Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2026 Jun 11.
Published in final edited form as: J Gen Intern Med. 2025 Jun 2;40(16):4086–4089. doi: 10.1007/s11606-025-09623-2

Patient Assistance Programs for High-Cost Diabetes Medications: What Is Available for Uninsured Immigrants?

Constantinos P Karakousis 1,2, Francesca Polito 1,3, Kathleen R Page 1, Mariana Socal 4
PMCID: PMC12686247  NIHMSID: NIHMS2183232  PMID: 40457114

INTRODUCTION

Newer type 2 diabetes medications, such as GLP-1 and dual GLP-1/GIP receptor agonists (RAs), SGLT-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2is), and DPP-4 inhibitors (DPP-4is), offer significant clinical benefits over older therapies, including reduced risks of hypoglycemia, cardiovascular events, and kidney complications.1 Despite these benefits, the high cost of these medications may limit patient access. Racial and ethnic minority populations are disproportionately impacted by diabetes and more likely to have difficulty affording their treatments.2–4 These challenges are greater for uninsured populations, such as immigrants ineligible for public programs or subsidized insurance. Uninsured immigrants have high rates of diabetes and experience poor clinical outcomes.5

Manufacturers often offer financial assistance to help patients afford necessary medications.6 Copay cards and savings programs help reduce the amount that patients pay out-of-pocket, while patient assistance programs (PAPs) provide medications at no cost for eligible patients.6 The availability of manufacturer-sponsored PAPs to uninsured immigrants remains poorly understood. Key concerns include whether these programs present language barriers or require patients to share sensitive personal information to determine eligibility, potentially limiting access to this population. This study examined manufacturer-sponsored PAPs for high-cost type 2 diabetes medications, assessing their coverage of uninsured immigrants, available language options, and personal information requirements for eligibility.

METHODS

We reviewed the public-facing websites of all GLP-1 RAs, dual GLP-1/GIP RAs, SGLT-2is, and DPP-4is drugs approved and available in the USA.1 We assessed the availability and type of PAPs, eligibility criteria, website language options, and personal information requirements for eligibility. Generic medications such as metformin, sulfonylureas, and pioglitazone were excluded due to their low out-of-pocket cost, even for individuals without insurance. Two team members (CPK and FP) independently evaluated each product’s website and recorded their observations in a standardized data table, and discrepancies were resolved by a third reviewer (KRP).

RESULTS

We identified 15 approved and available medications (7 GLP-1RAs, 1 dual GLP-1/GIP RAs, 5 SGLT-2is, and 4 DPP-4is). Among the 13 medications with public-facing websites, 6 were available only in English, 7 in English and Spanish, and none in other languages (Table 1). While every website offered savings cards for patients with commercial insurance (but not for uninsured or those with government insurance), none of the main websites had information on PAPs; information for these programs required separate searches. PAPs were available for 4/7 GLP1-RAs, 3/5 SGLT-2is, and 2/4 DPP-4is. All the PAP websites had information in Spanish and English, but not in other languages. PAPs for GLP-1RAs required applicants to be US citizens or permanent residents, but did not request social security numbers (SSN) (Table 2). Two PAPs (one SGLT2-I, one DPP-4i) did not explicitly restrict eligibility based on immigration status but requested the last four digits of the SSN. All PAPs required personal identifiers such as name, date of birth, and address. All PAPs also required patient authorization to release their medical information and share protected health information (PHI) with the pharmaceutical company and affiliates. PAPs disclosed that federal privacy laws, such as HIPAA, do not protect this information, and that it could be shared with third parties.

Table 1.

Assistance and Accessibility for GLP-1 and Dual GLP-1/GIP Receptor Agonists, SGLT-2 Inhibitors, and DPP-4 Inhibitors

Product Brand name Type of assistance Assistance for uninsured Website language access PAP information language access PAP information on product website
GLP-1 agonists
 Dulaglutide Trulicity1 Patient assistance program** Yes English
Spanish
English
Spanish
(Application only)
No
 Exenetide Byetta2 None* No English N/A N/A
Bydureon BCise2 None* No English N/A N/A
 Liraglutide Victoza3 Patient assistance program* Yes English English
Spanish
No
Lixisenatide Adlyxin4 None N/A N/A*** N/A N/A
 Semaglutide Ozempic3 Patient assistance program* Yes English
Spanish
English
Spanish
No
Rybelsus3 Patient assistance program** Yes English
Spanish
English
Spanish
No
GLP-1/GIP RA
 Tirzetapide Mounjaro1 None* No English
Spanish
N/A N/A
SGLT-2 inhibitors
 Bexagliflozin Brenzavvy5 None N/A English N/A N/A
 Canaglifozin Invokana6 Patient assistance program** Yes English English
Spanish
(Application not in Spanish)
No
 Dapaglifozin Farxiga2 Patient assistance** Yes English
Spanish
English
Spanish (Application only)
No
 Empaglifozin Jardiance7 Patient assistance** Yes English
Spanish
English
Spanish
(Application only)
No
 Ertugliflozin Steglatro8 None N/A N/A*** N/A N/A
DPP-4 inhibitors
 Alogliptin Nesina9 None N/A N/A*** N/A N/A
 Linagliptin Tradjenta7 Patient assistance** Yes English English
Spanish
(Application only)
No
 Saxagliptin Onglysa2 None N/A N/A*** N/A N/A
 Sitagliptin Januvia8 Patient assistance** Yes English Spanish English
Spanish
No
1

Eli Lilly

2

Astra Zeneca

3

Novo Nordisk

4

Sanofi

5

TheracosBio

6

Janssen

7

Boehringer Ingelheim

8

Merck

9

Takeda

*

Savings card program for patients with commercial insurance, but not for uninsured or those with government insurance. No immigration or social security requirement

**

In addition to PAP, also has savings card program for patients with commercial insurance

Acronyms: GLP, glucose-like peptide; SGLT, sodium-glucose linked transporter; DPP-4, dipeptidyl peptidase-4; PAP, patient assistance program; FPL, federal poverty level

***

No patient-facing website

Table 2.

Eligibility Requirements for Available GLP-1 and Dual GLP-1/GIP Receptor Agonists, SGLT-2 Inhibitors, and DPP-4 Inhibitor PAPs

Product Brand name Immigration status requirement Health insurance requirement Income requirement PAP application requests social security Authorization to share PHI required
GLP-1 agonists
 Dulaglutide Trulicity1 US citizen or permanent resident Medicare or uninsured < 300% FPL No* Yes**
 Liraglutide Victoza2 US citizen or legal resident Medicare or uninsured < 400% FPL No* Yes**
 Semaglutide Ozempic2 US citizen or legal resident Medicare or uninsured < 400% FPL No* Yes**
Rybelsus2 US citizen or legal resident Medicare or uninsured < 400% FPL No* Yes**
SGLT-2 inhibitors
 Canaglifozin Invokana3 No Medicare or uninsured < 300% FPL No Yes**
 Dapaglifozin Farxiga4 No Medicare or uninsured < 300% FPL No Yes**
 Empaglifozin Jardiance5 No Medicare or underinsured < 250% FPL Last 4 digits Yes**
DPP-4 inhibitors
 Linagliptin Tradjenta5 No Medicare or underinsured < 250% FPL Last 4 digits Yes**
 Sitagliptin Januvia6 No Medicare or uninsured < 400% FPL No Yes**
1

Eli Lilly

2

Novo Nordisk

3

Janssen

4

Astra Zeneca

5

Boehringer Ingelheim

6

Merck

*

Requires signed certification that the applicant is a legal/permanent resident or US citizen

**

All PAPs require name, date of birth, address, contact information (telephone, email), release of medical information, and authorization to share PHI with the pharmaceutical company and affiliates. All PAPs include a disclosure that federal privacy laws do not protect this information, which may be lawfully shared to other parties by recipients

DISCUSSION

This study highlights several barriers to accessing PAPs for uninsured immigrants. First, navigating PAPs is challenging as information is not prominently featured on product websites, requiring users to conduct additional searches. Second, language access is limited to English and Spanish. Third, eligibility criteria for GLP-1 RAs restrict access to US citizens or legal residents. Privacy concerns further compound these barriers. All PAPs require applicants to provide sensitive personal information and authorize its release to pharmaceutical companies and affiliates. Critically, PAPs state that this information is not protected under federal privacy laws, potentially deterring immigrants from applying due to fears of misuse or disclosure.

The primary limitation of this study is that information on the actual access to these medications through PAPs was not available beyond the information available on the companies’ websites. Further research should examine actual rates of successful access to treatments through PAPs, identifying differences across facilities with and without dedicated staff such as medication access coordinators.

These findings underscore the need for reforms to improve access to PAPs. Simplifying application processes, expanding language access, removing immigration status requirements, and strengthening data privacy protections are essential steps to address structural inequities in diabetes care.

Funding

This work was funded by Arnold Ventures and NIH Grant K24 NR020508. The funding sources had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the article; and decision to submit the article for publication.

Footnotes

Prior presentations None.

Conflict of Interest: None.

Disclaimer: This article reflects the views of the authors and should not be construed to represent the views or policies of the US Food and Drug Administration, the Department of Health and Human Services, or the US Government.

Data Availability:

The data examined in this study is publicly available through pharmaceutical websites.

REFERENCES

  • 1.American Diabetes Association Professional Practice C. 9. Pharmacologic Approaches to Glycemic Treatment: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2024. Diabetes Care. 2024;47(Suppl 1):S158–S178. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Cheng YJ, Kanaya AM, Araneta MRG, et al. Prevalence of Diabetes by Race and Ethnicity in the United States, 2011–2016. JAMA. 2019;322(24):2389–2398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Eberly LA, Yang L, Essien UR, et al. Racial, Ethnic, and Socioeconomic Inequities in Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonist Use Among Patients With Diabetes in the US. JAMA Health Forum. 2021;2(12):e214182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Rodriguez LA, Finertie H, Neugebauer RS, et al. Race and ethnicity and pharmacy dispensing of SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists in type 2 diabetes. Lancet Reg Health Am. 2024;34:100759. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Chasens ER, Dinardo M, Imes CC, Morris JL, Braxter B, Yang K. Citizenship and health insurance status predict glycemic management: NHANES data 2007–2016. Prev Med. 2020;139:106180. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Fraker JH, Socal MP. Manufacturer-Sponsored Cost-Sharing Programs for Insulin: Are Patients Getting the Help They Need? J Gen Intern Med. 2022;37(6):1561–1564. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The data examined in this study is publicly available through pharmaceutical websites.

RESOURCES