Skip to main content
NCBI home page
CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal logoLink to CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal
. 1989 Mar 15;140(6):637–643.

Relation of family physician or specialist care to obstetric interventions and outcomes in patients at low risk: a western Canadian cohort study.

E H Krikke 1, N R Bell 1
PMCID: PMC1268753  PMID: 2920337

Abstract

To determine the relation of family physician or specialist care to intrapartum interventions and outcomes, we carried out a historical cohort study of 1456 obstetric patients at low risk admitted between Nov. 15, 1984, and Mar. 15, 1986, to a western Canadian teaching hospital. The patients were classified as being at low risk on admission by means of chart review. Family physicians and specialists were found to have similar rates for most of the interventions measured, although the interventions for which significantly different rates were found suggest a less interventionist style of intrapartum care by family physicians. There were no significant differences in maternal or neonatal outcomes except for a higher proportion of infants weighing less than 2500 g among primigravid women cared for by family physicians compared with those under the care of specialists. Self-selection of physician specialty by patients resulted in differences in the demographic characteristics of the two patient populations. The findings support the continued involvement of family physicians in the provision of obstetric care.

Full text

PDF
637

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Beck R. P. Proceedings: Obstetrics and family practice--conflict in medical education. A Canadian perspective. J Reprod Med. 1974 Feb;12(2):51–53. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Black D. P., Fyfe I. M. The safety of obstetric services in small communities in northern Ontario. Can Med Assoc J. 1984 Mar 1;130(5):571–576. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Black N. Do general practitioner deliveries constitute a perinatal mortality risk? Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1982 Feb 13;284(6314):488–490. doi: 10.1136/bmj.284.6314.488. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Brody H., Thompson J. R. The maximin strategy in modern obstetrics. J Fam Pract. 1981 Jun;12(6):977–986. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bull M. J. The general practitioner accoucheur in the 1980s. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1981 Jun;31(227):357–367. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cox C. A., Fox S. S., Zinkin P. M., Matthews A. E. Critical appraisal of domiciliary obstetric and neonatal practice. Br Med J. 1976 Jan 10;1(6001):84–86. doi: 10.1136/bmj.1.6001.84. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Curzen P., Mountrose U. M. The general practitioner's role in the management of labour. Br Med J. 1976 Dec 11;2(6049):1433–1434. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.6049.1433. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Ely J. W., Ueland K., Gordon M. J. An audit of obstetric care in a university family medicine department and an obstetrics-gynecology department. J Fam Pract. 1976 Aug;3(4):397–401. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Franks P., Eisinger S. Adverse perinatal outcomes: is physician specialty a risk factor? J Fam Pract. 1987 Feb;24(2):152–156. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Fry J. Obstetrics and the family physician: changing situations. J Fam Pract. 1979 Apr;8(4):873–874. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Garrett T., House W., Lowe S. W. Outcome of women booked into an isolated general practice maternity unit over eight years. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1987 Nov;37(304):488–490. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hein H. A. Evaluation of a rural perinatal care system. Pediatrics. 1980 Oct;66(4):540–546. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hemminki E. Perinatal mortality distributed by type of hospital in the Central Hospital District of Helsinki, Finland. Scand J Soc Med. 1985;13(3):113–118. doi: 10.1177/140349488501300308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Koning J. H. The obstetrical experience of 20 years in one family practice. J Fam Pract. 1982 Jan;14(1):163–166. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Leveno K. J., Cunningham F. G., Nelson S., Roark M., Williams M. L., Guzick D., Dowling S., Rosenfeld C. R., Buckley A. A prospective comparison of selective and universal electronic fetal monitoring in 34,995 pregnancies. N Engl J Med. 1986 Sep 4;315(10):615–619. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198609043151004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Lloyd G. The general practitioner and changes in obstetric practice. Br Med J. 1975 Jan 11;1(5949):79–82. doi: 10.1136/bmj.1.5949.79. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Lowe S. W., House W., Garrett T. Comparison of outcome of low-risk labour in an isolated general practice maternity unit and a specialist maternity hospital. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1987 Nov;37(304):484–487. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Marsh G. N. Obstetric audit in general practice. Br Med J. 1977 Oct 15;2(6093):1004–1006. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.6093.1004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Marsh G. N. The "specialty" of general practitioner obstetrics. Lancet. 1982 Mar 20;1(8273):669–672. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Mehl L. E., Bruce C., Renner J. H. Importance of obstetrics in a comprehensive family practice. J Fam Pract. 1976 Aug;3(4):385–389. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Mengel M. B., Phillips W. R. The quality of obstetric care in family practice: are family physicians as safe as obstetricians? J Fam Pract. 1987 Feb;24(2):159–164. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Mold J. W., Stein H. F. The cascade effect in the clinical care of patients. N Engl J Med. 1986 Feb 20;314(8):512–514. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198602203140809. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Owen J. D. A review of the general practitioner obstetric service in Colchester 1970-1979. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1981 Feb;31(223):92–96. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Phillips W. R., Rice G. A., Layton R. H. Audit of obstetrical care and outcome in family medicine, obstetrics, and general practice. J Fam Pract. 1978 Jun;6(6):1209–1216. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Phillips W. R., Sevens G. S. Obstetrics in family practice: competence, continuity, and caring. J Fam Pract. 1985 Jun;20(6):595–596. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Richmond G. A. An analysis of 3,199 patients booked for delivery in general-practitioner obstetric units. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1977 Jul;27(180):406–413. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Rosenberg E. E., Klein M. Is maternity care different in family practice? A pilot matched pair study. J Fam Pract. 1987 Sep;25(3):237–242. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Rosenblatt R. A., Reinken J., Shoemack P. Is obstetrics safe in small hospitals? Evidence from New Zealand's regionalised perinatal system. Lancet. 1985 Aug 24;2(8452):429–432. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(85)92747-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Stern T. L., Schmittling G., Clinton C., Black R. R. Hospital privileges for graduates of family practice residency programs. J Fam Pract. 1981 Dec;13(7):1013–1020. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Taylor G. W., Edgar W., Taylor B. A., Neal D. G. How safe is general practitioner obstetrics? Lancet. 1980 Dec 13;2(8207):1287–1289. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(80)92348-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Wanderer M. J., Suyehira J. G. Obstetrical care in a prepaid cooperative: a comparison between family practice residents, family physicians, and obstetricians. J Fam Pract. 1980 Oct;11(4):601–606. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Wilson R. W., Schifrin B. S. Is any pregnancy low risk? Obstet Gynecol. 1980 May;55(5):653–656. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Wood L. A. Obstetric retrospect. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1981 Feb;31(223):80–90. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from CMAJ: Canadian Medical Association Journal are provided here courtesy of Canadian Medical Association

RESOURCES