Skip to main content
CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal logoLink to CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal
. 1989 Apr 1;140(7):806–809.

Physicians' participation in establishing criteria for hypertension management in the office: will patient outcomes be improved?

R W Putnam 1, L Curry 1
PMCID: PMC1268807  PMID: 2924230

Abstract

We designed this study to determine whether an intensive 1-day educational workshop involving family physicians in establishing essential criteria for hypertension management would significantly affect the short-term outcomes of hypertensive patients in their practices. Forty randomly selected physicians were separated into three groups: those who would be involved in establishing the criteria (15), those who would receive the criteria by mail (15) and those who would act as controls and not be aware of the criteria (10). We found no significant difference between the three groups in the number of hypertensive patients whose condition remained uncontrolled after the intervention. We conclude that physicians' participation in the establishment of standards of care for conditions such as hypertension or their awareness of such standards does not independently result in significantly better patient outcomes. Consequently, we recommend that physicians and health care planners concerned with improving outcomes not rely on any single intervention strategy when planning change.

Full text

PDF

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bertram D. A., Brooks-Bertram P. A. The evaluation of continuing medical education: a literature review. Health Educ Monogr. 1977 Winter;5(4):330–362. doi: 10.1177/109019817700500404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Evans C. E., Haynes R. B., Birkett N. J., Gilbert J. R., Taylor D. W., Sackett D. L., Johnston M. E., Hewson S. A. Does a mailed continuing education program improve physician performance? Results of a randomized trial in antihypertensive care. JAMA. 1986 Jan 24;255(4):501–504. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Evans C. E., Haynes R. B., Gilbert J. R., Taylor D. W., Sackett D. L., Johnston M. Educational package on hypertension for primary care physicians. Can Med Assoc J. 1984 Mar 15;130(6):719–722. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Gullion D. S., Adamson T. E. A practice-based CME program in hypertension using a medication and behavioral treatment approach. Res Med Educ. 1985;24:207–212. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Gullion D. S., Tschann J. M., Adamson T. E. Physicians' management of hypertension: a randomized controlled CME trial. Res Med Educ. 1987;26:115–120. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Haynes R. B., Davis D. A., McKibbon A., Tugwell P. A critical appraisal of the efficacy of continuing medical education. JAMA. 1984 Jan 6;251(1):61–64. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Lloyd J. S., Abrahamson S. Effectiveness of continuing medical education: a review of the evidence. Eval Health Prof. 1979 Sep;2(3):251–280. doi: 10.1177/016327877900200301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Mushlin A. I., Appel F. A. Testing an outcome-based quality assurance strategy in primary care. Med Care. 1980 May;18(5 Suppl):1–100. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Putnam R. W., Curry L. Impact of patient care appraisal on physician behaviour in the office setting. Can Med Assoc J. 1985 May 1;132(9):1025–1029. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Sanazaro P. J., Worth R. M. Concurrent quality assurance in hospital care. Report of a study by Private Initiative in PSRO. N Engl J Med. 1978 May 25;298(21):1171–1177. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197805252982104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Winickoff R. N., Coltin K. L., Morgan M. M., Buxbaum R. C., Barnett G. O. Improving physician performance through peer comparison feedback. Med Care. 1984 Jun;22(6):527–534. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198406000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from CMAJ: Canadian Medical Association Journal are provided here courtesy of Canadian Medical Association

RESOURCES