Abstract
In January 1986 two brief power failures occurring within an hour of each other affected the operation of visual display terminals in a section of the Manitoba Telephone System. After the power failures three operators reported an alarming tingling sensation in their arms and one side of their body, which they called "shocks". Other operators then began to report incidents of numbness and tingling in their limbs, face or head as well as other, diffuse symptoms. During the next 2 weeks 92 such incidents were reported by 55 operators. The media carried alarming headlines, and medical practitioners perpetuated the label of "electric shock". Despite extensive investigation, which revealed no electrical fault, the section was closed by the regulatory authority, and an independent medical panel was convened to review the findings. The panel concluded that there was no immediate hazard to life or health and recommended continued workplace assessment and follow-up of affected operators; however, because the panel lacked electrical engineering expertise, uncertainty persisted as to the cause of the events. The reports of incidents persisted, peaking in association with continued rumours of diagnoses of "nerve damage". In the fall of 1987 a multidisciplinary committee ruled out as causative factors all known hazards other than electrostatic shock and occupational stress. This costly and lengthy investigation underlines the danger in regarding collective stress reaction as a diagnosis of exclusion. It highlights the need to scrutinize objective evidence before validating potentially unfounded concerns and underlines the desirability of considering the psychosocial effects of technology and regimented tasks.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Billette A., Piché J. Health problems of data entry clerks and related job stressors. J Occup Med. 1987 Dec;29(12):942–948. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Boxer P. A. Occupational mass psychogenic illness. History, prevention, and management. J Occup Med. 1985 Dec;27(12):867–872. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brodsky C. M. Psychological factors contributing to somatoform diseases attributed to the workplace. The case of intoxication. J Occup Med. 1983 Jun;25(6):459–464. doi: 10.1097/00043764-198306000-00011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Colligan M. J. Mass psychogenic illness: some clarification and perspectives. J Occup Med. 1981 Sep;23(9):635–638. doi: 10.1097/00043764-198109000-00013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Faust H. S., Brilliant L. B. Is the diagnosis of "mass hysteria" an excuse for incomplete investigation of low-level environmental contamination? J Occup Med. 1981 Jan;23(1):22–26. doi: 10.1097/00043764-198101000-00013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Frankenhaeuser M., Gardell B. Underload and overload in working life: outline of a multidisciplinary approach. J Human Stress. 1976 Sep;2(3):35–46. doi: 10.1080/0097840X.1976.9936068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Guidotti T. L. The general internist and occupational medicine. J Gen Intern Med. 1986 May-Jun;1(3):201–202. doi: 10.1007/BF02602340. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sirois F. Epidemic hysteria. Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl. 1974;252:1–46. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Smith M. J., Cohen B. G., Stammerjohn L. W., Jr An investigation of health complaints and job stress in video display operations. Hum Factors. 1981 Aug;23(4):387–400. doi: 10.1177/001872088102300402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]