Skip to main content
Microbiology Resource Announcements logoLink to Microbiology Resource Announcements
. 2025 Nov 18;14(12):e00768-25. doi: 10.1128/mra.00768-25

Isolation and genomic analysis of seven phages active against carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae

Luz Cuello 1,, Krupa Parmar 2, Adeline Supandy 3, Daria Van Tyne 3,4, Robin Patel 2,5,
Editor: Catherine Putonti6
PMCID: PMC12697139  PMID: 41251356

ABSTRACT

The genomic sequences of seven phages isolated from municipal sewage in Rochester, Minnesota, USA, using Klebsiella pneumoniae strains (blaKPC carriers) as hosts are reported. These phages are lytic and belong to the Ackermannviridae, Drexlerviridae, and Zobellviridae families. No known antimicrobial resistance or virulence genes were found within their genomes.

KEYWORDS: bacteriophages, Klebsiella, phylogenetic analysis, isolation, genome analysis

ANNOUNCEMENT

Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) are Gram-negative pathogens, which can cause difficult-to-treat infections, especially in hospitalized and immunocompromised patients (1). CRKP poses a threat to public health due to increasing global antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and a stagnating pipeline for novel antibiotic discovery (2). Phages could provide an alternative option against these multidrug-resistant infections. Here, the isolation and characterization of seven lytic phages active against CRKP are reported; all phages were sourced from one public sewage sample (collected 22 November 2022, in Rochester, Minnesota, USA [44.06377, −92.46758], transported in a 2 L sterile glass bottle, and stored at 4°C).

Sewage was enriched as described (3) in tryptic soy broth (overnight incubation, 37°C), using individual K. pneumoniae clinical isolates (all blaKPC carriers; n = 24 from the Antibacterial Resistance Leadership Group (ARLG) (4, 5), and n = 4 from the Clinical Microbiology Laboratory at Mayo Clinic). Single plaques were picked and passaged at least thrice using the double-agar overlay method (6, 7). Plaque-purified phage lysates (800 µL–1600 µL) were treated with DNAse I (2 U/µL) and RNAse A (10 mg/mL), and DNA was isolated using the Quick-DNA Viral Kit (Zymo Research), or the Maxwell® RSC Blood DNA Kit (Promega), following manufacturers’ instructions.

Sequencing libraries were prepared using the Illumina DNA Prep tagmentation kit and Illumina Unique Dual Indexes and sequenced on an Illumina NextSeq2000 platform using a 300-cycle flow cell kit to produce 2 × 150 bp paired-end reads. Raw reads were trimmed with Trimmomatic (8) (v. 0.39 + galaxy2) and quality-checked with FastQC (9) (v. 0.74 + galaxy1). Genomes were assembled using metaviralSPAdes (10) (v. 3.15.5 + galaxy2). Assemblies were quality-checked using Quast (11) (v. 5.2.0 + galaxy1) and annotated with Pharokka (12) (v. 1.3.2 + galaxy0). Genomes were screened for AMR and virulence genes using ABRicate (13) (v. 1.0.1). When possible, genome ends were determined with PhageTerm (14) (v. 1.0.12). Software tools were run in Galaxy (15, 16) with default parameters. Genome lengths and assembly statistics are reported in Table 1. Phage lifestyle predictions were determined using PhageAI (17). Phylogeny was established through NCBI Nucleotide BLAST searches and taxMyPhage (18). For each phage, the top 10 most similar complete phage sequences in NCBI (maximum score parameter) were used as input for construction of a phylogenetic tree using VICTOR (19). Phage morphology was assessed by negative staining transmission electron microscopy.

TABLE 1.

Genetic characterization of the isolated phagesa,b

Phage Family Genus CRKP isolation host Genome size (bp) GC- content (%) Raw reads (n) Trimmed reads (n) Coverage (×) Contig (n) N50 Genome termini type and position
(+/−)
Closest NCBI hit (accession number) Similarity to closest NCBI hit (%)
vB_KpnM-Zahir Ackermannviridae Taipeivirus ARLG-3318 160,669 46.52 1,391,799 21,152 291.0 1 160,669 Redundant, (150,944/60,802) UPM 2146
(https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/NC_049472.1/https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/NC_049472.1/NC_049472.1)
97.92
vB_KpnM-Bestiario Ackermannviridae Taipeivirus ARLG-4653 157,565 47.43 1,793,429 23,322 386.0 2 157,565 Redundant, (14,945/30,939) vB_KpnM_Trex_ER12
(PP738761.1)
98.31
vB_KpnS-Cronopio Drexlerviridae Webervirus ARLG-3529 46,531 50.63 1,133,541 21,272 810.0 1 46,531 Redundant, multiple vB_KpnD_ghw
(PP374644.1)
94.47
vB_KpnS-Fama Drexlerviridae Webervirus ARLG-3529 45,921 50.61 1,539,163 22,593 1127.4 1 45,921 Redundant, multiple vB_KpnS_2811
(LR757892.1)
94.51
vB_KpnS-Tlon Drexlerviridae Webervirus IDRL-10368 49,297 50.83 1,384,776 22,706 973.4 1 49,297 Redundant, multiple Sin4
(NC_049847.1)
93.64
vB_KpnS-Uqbar Drexlerviridae Webervirus IDRL-10368 49,542 50.77 1,169,891 20,051 823.1 1 49,542 Redundant, multiple RCIP0056
(OR532850.1)
91.96
vB_KpnP-Asterion Zobellviridae Not established. Closest related genus is Citrovirus ARLG-4382 48,578 45.80 1,107,662 26,996 790.5 1 48,578 Redundant, multiple vB_KpnP_Klyazma
(OP125547.1)https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/OP125547.1/https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/OP125547.1/
93.46
a

The 28 Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates used for phage isolation included 24 isolates from the Antibacterial Resistance Leadership Group (ARLG-3415-P, ARLG-4501, ARLG-4653, ARLG-4888, ARLG-4496, ARLG-4429-P, ARLG-3623-P, ARLG-4428-P, ARLG-3245, ARLG-3594-P, ARLG-3529, ARLG-3614-P, ARLG-4212, ARLG-4425-P, ARLG-4674, ARLG-4380, ARLG-7547-P, ARLG-4190, ARLG-3328, ARLG-3321, ARLG-3318-P, ARLG-4382, ARLG-4490-P, and ARLG-3375), and 4 from the Mayo Clinic Clinical Microbiology Laboratory (IDRL-10368, IDRL-10370, IDRL-10373, and IDRL-10376). All isolates except for IDRL-10373 were resistant to meropenem (minimum inhibitory concentration, ≥4µg/mL) by broth microdilution.

b

NCBI database accessed 7 May 2025.

The seven isolated phages showed myo-, sipho-, and podophage morphotypes (n = 2, n = 4, and n = 1, respectively) (Fig. 1). Phylogenetic analysis results suggest clustering into the Caudovirales order, Ackermannviridae (vB_KpnM-Zahir and vB_KpnM-Bestiario), Drexlerviridae (vB_KpnS-Cronopio, vB_KpnS-Fama, vB_KpnS-Tlon, and vB_KpnS-Uqbar), and Zobellviridae families (vB_KpnP-Asterion) (Fig. 1, Table 1). Genus identification was possible for 6/7 phages, which clustered into the Taipeivirus and Webervirus genera (Table 1). taxMyPhage analysis suggested that vB_KpnP-Asterion may represent a new species and genus. PhageTerm analysis showed redundant termini for all phage genomes; determination of genome termini position was only possible for vB_KpnM-Zahir and vB_KpnM-Bestiario (Table 1). All phages were scored ≥99.7% for a virulent lifestyle, with no known AMR or virulence genes. Thus, these newly isolated phages appear to be strictly lytic and show activity in CRKP strains, meriting further investigation as therapeutic alternatives.

Fig 1.

Phylogenetic tree depicting relationship among Klebsiella phages from Drexlerviridae, Ackermannviridae, and Zobellviridae families and electron micrographs showing structural diversity of siphophage, myophage, and podophage morphotypes.

Morphologic and phylogenetic characterization of the isolated phages. (A) Phylogenetic tree showing the arrangement of taxa according to D0 equation (created using VICTOR). Isolated phages are highlighted. At the family level, squares indicate Drexlerviridae (dark orange), Ackermannviridae (dark green), and Zobellviridae (purple) clustering. At the genus level, squares indicate Webervirus (light green), Taipeivirus (blue), and Citrovirus (green) clustering. (B) Negative stain transmission electron micrographs of the isolated phages showing distinct morphologies. Colors correspond to phylogeny.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank the ARLG for granting access to 24 “ARLG” K. pneumoniae isolates. The ARLG Laboratory Center is supported by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number UM1AI104681. The content of this announcement is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. We thank the Clinical Microbiology Laboratory at Mayo Clinic for providing access to four additional “IDRL” K. pneumoniae isolates (Institutional Review Board 1777-00). All bacterial isolates were de-identified. Sequencing was completed by SeqCoast Genomics (New Hampshire, USA). We thank Trace Christensen, M.B.A., at Mayo Clinic’s Microscopy and Cell Analysis Core for help acquiring the TEM images. Figures were created using BioRender. Phage names were inspired by works of the authors Julio Cortázar and Jorge Luis Borges.

Contributor Information

Luz Cuello, Email: cuellopagnone.luz@mayo.edu.

Robin Patel, Email: patel.robin@mayo.edu.

Catherine Putonti, Loyola University Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

DATA AVAILABILITY

Phage genomic assemblies have been deposited in GenBank (accession numbers PV891800, PV891801, PV891802, PV891803, PV891804, PV891805, and PV891806). Raw sequencing reads are available under BioProject PRJNA1287990, Sequence Read Archive accessions SRR34427932, SRR34427931, SRR34427930, SRR34427929, SRR34427928, SRR34427927, and SRR34427926.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Karampatakis T, Tsergouli K, Behzadi P. 2023. Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae: virulence factors, molecular epidemiology and latest updates in treatment options.. Antibiotics (Basel) 12:234. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics12020234 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Sati H, Carrara E, Savoldi A, Hansen P, Garlasco J, Campagnaro E, Boccia S, Castillo-Polo JA, Magrini E, Garcia-Vello P, Wool E, Gigante V, Duffy E, Cassini A, Huttner B, Pardo PR, Naghavi M, Mirzayev F, Zignol M, Cameron A, Tacconelli E, WHO Bacterial Priority Pathogens List Advisory Group . 2025. The WHO bacterial priority pathogens list 2024: a prioritisation study to guide research, development, and public health strategies against antimicrobial resistance. Lancet Infect Dis 25:1033–1043. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(25)00118-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Sillankorva S. 2018. Isolation of bacteriophages for clinically relevant bacteria. Methods Mol Biol 1693:23–30. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-7395-8_3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. van Duin D, Arias CA, Komarow L, Chen L, Hanson BM, Weston G, Cober E, Garner OB, Jacob JT, Satlin MJ, et al. 2020. Molecular and clinical epidemiology of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales in the USA (CRACKLE-2): a prospective cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis 20:731–741. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(19)30755-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Wang M, Earley M, Chen L, Hanson BM, Yu Y, Liu Z, Salcedo S, Cober E, Li L, Kanj SS, et al. 2022. Clinical outcomes and bacterial characteristics of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae complex among patients from different global regions (CRACKLE-2): a prospective, multicentre, cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis 22:401–412. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00399-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Bonilla N, Rojas MI, Netto Flores Cruz G, Hung SH, Rohwer F, Barr JJ. 2016. Phage on tap-a quick and efficient protocol for the preparation of bacteriophage laboratory stocks. PeerJ 4:e2261. doi: 10.7717/peerj.2261 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Glonti T, Pirnay JP. 2022. In vitro techniques and measurements of phage characteristics that are important for phage therapy success. Viruses 14:1490. doi: 10.3390/v14071490 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. 2014. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30:2114–2120. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Andrews S. 2015. FastQC: a quality control tool for high throughput sequence data. Available from: http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc
  • 10. Antipov D, Raiko M, Lapidus A, Pevzner PA. 2020. Metaviral SPAdes: assembly of viruses from metagenomic data. Bioinformatics 36:4126–4129. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa490 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Gurevich A, Saveliev V, Vyahhi N, Tesler G. 2013. QUAST: quality assessment tool for genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 29:1072–1075. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt086 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Bouras G, Nepal R, Houtak G, Psaltis AJ, Wormald P-J, Vreugde S. 2023. Pharokka: a fast scalable bacteriophage annotation tool. Bioinformatics 39. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btac776 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Seeman T. 2016. ABRicate: mass screening of contigs for antiobiotic resistance genes. Available from: https://github.com/tseemann/abricate
  • 14. Garneau JR, Depardieu F, Fortier L-C, Bikard D, Monot M. 2017. PhageTerm: a tool for fast and accurate determination of phage termini and packaging mechanism using next-generation sequencing data. Sci Rep 7:8292. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-07910-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. The Galaxy Community . 2024. The Galaxy platform for accessible, reproducible, and collaborative data analyses: 2024 update. Nucleic Acids Res 52:W83–W94. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkae410 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Mareuil F, Doppelt-Azeroual O, Ménager H. 2017. A public Galaxy platform at Pasteur used as an execution engine for web services. F1000Res 6:1030. doi: 10.7490/f1000research.1114334.1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Tynecki P, Guziński A, Kazimierczak J, Jadczuk M, Dastych J, Onisko A. 2020. PhageAI - bacteriophage life cycle recognition with machine learning and natural language processing. bioRxiv. doi: 10.1101/2020.07.11.198606 [DOI]
  • 18. Millard A, Denise R, Lestido M, Thomas MT, Webster D, Turner D, Sicheritz-Pontén T. 2025. taxMyPhage: Automated Taxonomy of dsDNA phage genomes at the genus and species level. PHAGE (New Rochelle) 6:5–11. doi: 10.1089/phage.2024.0050 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Göker M. 2017. VICTOR: genome-based phylogeny and classification of prokaryotic viruses. Bioinformatics 33:3396–3404. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx440 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Phage genomic assemblies have been deposited in GenBank (accession numbers PV891800, PV891801, PV891802, PV891803, PV891804, PV891805, and PV891806). Raw sequencing reads are available under BioProject PRJNA1287990, Sequence Read Archive accessions SRR34427932, SRR34427931, SRR34427930, SRR34427929, SRR34427928, SRR34427927, and SRR34427926.


Articles from Microbiology Resource Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES