Skip to main content
Microbiology Resource Announcements logoLink to Microbiology Resource Announcements
. 2025 Nov 10;14(12):e01029-25. doi: 10.1128/mra.01029-25

Draft genome sequence of multidrug-resistant Enterobacter hormaechei F10K from a captive common peafowl (Pavo cristatus) with respiratory illness and enteritis

Abu Nasar Md Aminoor Rahman 1,✉,#, Khaled Hassan Shuvo 1,#, Tima Tisa Mallick 1, Naim Siddique 1, Md Arman Sharif 2, M Nazmul Hoque 1,✉
Editor: David Rasko3
PMCID: PMC12697160  PMID: 41211821

ABSTRACT

We report the draft genome sequence of Enterobacter hormaechei strain F10K, a multidrug-resistant bacterium isolated from the feces of a captive common peafowl. The assembled genome is approximately 4.63 Mbp in size, with a guanine–cytosine (GC) content of 55.5% and an estimated completeness of 99.27%.

KEYWORDS: draft genome, E. hormaechei, multidrug resistance, virulence factors, peafowl

ANNOUNCEMENT

Enterobacter hormaechei, a gram-negative bacterium of the Enterobacter cloacae complex (ECC) (1). It is an opportunistic pathogen that affects immunocompromised hosts (2, 3). Although uncommon in animals (4), E. hormaechei has recently been identified as a multidrug-resistant ECC species causing various infections in pigs, cattle, sheep, and fox (5–9).

Freshly voided fecal samples were aseptically collected from a 2-year-old common peafowl diagnosed to show respiratory distress with open-mouth breathing and whitish diarrhea before death. The bird was housed at the Wildlife Reproduction and Conservation Field Laboratory, Gazipur Agricultural University (24.09° N, 90.41° E), Bangladesh. Samples were collected using sterile stool tubes, kept at 4°C in an icebox, and transported to the lab for processing within 24 h. Feces samples were diluted with sterile distilled water, vortexed, and preserved for further analysis. For E. hormaechei isolation, samples were enriched overnight in nutrient broth (Oxoid, UK) at 37°C under aerobic conditions, serially diluted (10⁻³), and streaked onto MacConkey agar (Oxoid). After 24  h of incubation, distinct colonies were subcultured to obtain pure isolates. The bacterium was identified as E. hormaechei based on colony morphology, Gram staining (gram-negative rods, pink colonies), and biochemical tests, including the Methyl Red-Voges-Proskauer (MR-VP) test (10, 11). Species-level identification of E. hormaechei was confirmed using the VITEK-2 system v.9.01 (12). The F10K isolate showed resistance to ampicillin, aztreonam, cefoxitin, chloramphenicol, ciprofloxacin, nalidixic acid, nitrofurantoin, oxacillin, and tetracycline, as determined by Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion following Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute M100 (2023) guidelines (13). For DNA extraction, strain F10K was grown in nutrient broth at 37°C for 18–24 h under aerobic conditions. Genomic DNA was extracted with the QIAamp DNA Mini Kit (QIAGEN, Germany) and quantified using NanoDrop 2000 (Thermo Fisher, USA) (14, 15). Whole genome sequencing libraries were constructed from 1 ng of DNA using the Nextera DNA Flex Kit (Illumina, USA) following the manufacturer’s instructions. The process involved enzymatic fragmentation and size selection, and sequencing was performed on an Illumina MiSeq platform using a 2 × 250 bp paired-end protocol. Raw reads (n = 4,244,402) were trimmed with Trimmomatic v.0.39 (16) and assessed with FastQC v.0.12.1 (17).

Genome assembly was performed with SPAdes v.4.2.0 (18) and annotated using the National Center for Biotechnology Information Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline v.6.10 (19). Genome completeness, virulence factor genes (VFGs), antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs), metabolic pathways, and pathogenic potential were evaluated using CheckM v.1.2.3 (20), VFDB v.6.0 (21), ResFinder 4.0 (22), RAST server (23), and PathogenFinder2 v.0.5.0 (24), respectively, with default parameters for all software unless otherwise specified.

The key genomic features of E. hormaechei F10K are shown in Table 1. We identified 22 ARGs, 21 VFGs, and 372 functional subsystems. The strain was associated with 105 pathogenic families by yielding a pathogenicity score of 0.966. These findings highlight E. hormaechei F10K as a potential pathogen associated with respiratory illness and enteritis in peafowls, emphasizing its relevance for veterinary and public health research.

TABLE 1.

Genomic features of the E. hormaechei F10K isolated from the feces of a captive common peafowl with respiratory illness and enteritisa

Genomic features E. hormaechei strain F10K
Genome size (bp) 4,632,952
Genome coverage (×) 112
Genome completeness (%) 99.27
CheckM contamination (%) 0.62
No. of contigs 50
Contig N50 (bp) 312,937
GC content (%) 55.5
Coding sequences (CDSs) 4,402
Protein-coding genes 4,358
No. of SEED subsystems 372
No. of VFGs 21
No. of ARGs 22
PathogenFinder2 score 0.966
Genome accessions JBOEQC000000000
Sequence Read Archive accessions SRR33697069
a

SEED, Subsystems Enabling the Effective Determination of function.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by research grants from the Ministry of Science and Technology, Government of Bangladesh (grant no. SRG-131044).

Contributor Information

Abu Nasar Md. Aminoor Rahman, Email: aminoor69@gau.edu.bd.

M. Nazmul Hoque, Email: nazmul90@gau.edu.bd.

David Rasko, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

DATA AVAILABILITY

The whole-genome shotgun sequencing project of Enterobacter hormaechei strain F10K has been deposited in GenBank and the National Center for Biotechnology Information Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under BioProject accession number PRJNA1267841. The SRA accession is listed in Table 1. The version described in this paper is version JBOEQC000000000.1.

ETHICS APPROVAL

The Animal Research Ethics Committee (AREC) of Gazipur Agricultural University (Gazipur, Bangladesh) reviewed and approved the experimental procedures of this study (reference number FVMAS/AREC/2023/55 [9 March 2025]).

REFERENCES

  • 1. Qiu X, Ye K, Ma Y, Zhao Q, Wang L, Yang J. 2024. Genome sequence-based species classification of Enterobacter cloacae complex: a study among clinical isolates. Microbiol Spectr 12:e0431223. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.04312-23 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Sinha R, Ottosen EN, Ngwaga T, Shames SR, DiRita VJ. 2025. Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacter hormaechei uses mucus metabolism to facilitate gastrointestinal colonization. mBio 16:e0288424. doi: 10.1128/mbio.02884-24 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Paauw A, Caspers MPM, Leverstein-van Hall MA, Schuren FHJ, Montijn RC, Verhoef J, Fluit AC. 2009. Identification of resistance and virulence factors in an epidemic Enterobacter hormaechei outbreak strain. Microbiology (Reading) 155:1478–1488. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.024828-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Wang Z, Duan L, Liu F, Hu Y, Leng C, Kan Y, Yao L, Shi H. 2020. First report of Enterobacter hormaechei with respiratory disease in calves. BMC Vet Res 16:1. doi: 10.1186/s12917-019-2207-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Chen C-W, Yuan L, Zhang Y-S, Mgomi FC, Wang Y, Yang Z-Q, Jiao X-A. 2022. Comparision of biological and genomic characteristics of five virulent bacteriophages against Enterobacter hormaechei. Microb Pathog 162:105375. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2021.105375 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Gharban HA. 2024. Molecular detection of Enterobacter hormaechei in bovine respiratory disease. Vet Med 69:403–412. doi: 10.17221/54/2024-VETMED [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Zaitsev SS, Khizhnyakova MA, Feodorova VA. 2022. First case report of detection of multidrug-resistant Enterobacter hormaechei in clinical sample from an aborted ruminant. Microorganisms 10:1036. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10051036 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Shi H, Wang K, Wang L, Sun S, Li B, Yao L. 2022. Case report of Enterobacter hormaechei in sheep with respiratory disease and death. BMC Vet Res 18:57. doi: 10.1186/s12917-022-03157-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Dubey SK, Kumar P, Kumari N, Rajak SK. 2025. Enterobacter hormaechie: an etiological agent for bovine mastitis identified through PCR and sequencing. UPJOZ 46:87–95. doi: 10.56557/upjoz/2025/v46i64847 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Rahman MM, Siddique N, Akter S, Das ZC, Hoque MN. 2024. Draft genome sequencing of Pediococcus pentosaceus strains isolated from cow milk. Microbiol Resour Announc 13:e0023824. doi: 10.1128/mra.00238-24 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Al-Saadi AGM, Abbas AF. 2020. Molecular, biochemical, and phenotypic characterization of a newly isolated Enterobacter hormaechei subsp. xiangfangensis strain associated with diarrhea cases in Iraq. Malays J Microbiol 16:462–468. doi: 10.21161/mjm.200699 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Pérez-Vázquez M, Oliver A, Sánchez del Saz B, Loza E, Baquero F, Cantón R. 2001. Performance of the VITEK2 system for identification and susceptibility testing of routine Enterobacteriaceae clinical isolates. Int J Antimicrob Agents 17:371–376. doi: 10.1016/s0924-8579(01)00318-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Rai S, Dash D, Agarwal N. 2023. Introducing the new face of CLSI M100 in 2023: an explanatory review. Indian J Med Microbiol 46:100432. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmmb.2023.100432 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Siddique N, Rahman MM, Hasnat S, Arafat KY, Rahman A, Talukder AK, Karim MR, Das ZC, Islam T, Hoque MN. 2025. Probiotic potential and antimicrobial efficacy of a dairy isolate, Enterococcus faecium MBBL3. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 109:176. doi: 10.1007/s00253-025-13558-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Arafat KY, Hasnat S, Siddique N, Rahman MM, Homa SF, Hoque MN. 2025. Draft genome sequencing of a multidrug-resistant and virulent Escherichia coli strain isolated from milk of a cow with clinical mastitis. Microbiol Resour Announc 14:e0126024. doi: 10.1128/mra.01260-24 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. 2014. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30:2114–2120. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Lo C-C, Chain PSG. 2014. Rapid evaluation and quality control of next generation sequencing data with FaQCs. BMC Bioinformatics 15:366. doi: 10.1186/s12859-014-0366-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M, Kulikov AS, Lesin VM, Nikolenko SI, Pham S, Prjibelski AD, Pyshkin AV, Sirotkin AV, Vyahhi N, Tesler G, Alekseyev MA, Pevzner PA. 2012. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol 19:455–477. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2012.0021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Tatusova T, DiCuccio M, Badretdin A, Chetvernin V, Nawrocki EP, Zaslavsky L, Lomsadze A, Pruitt KD, Borodovsky M, Ostell J. 2016. NCBI prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res 44:6614–6624. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw569 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Parks DH, Imelfort M, Skennerton CT, Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW. 2015. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res 25:1043–1055. doi: 10.1101/gr.186072.114 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Zhou S, Liu B, Zheng D, Chen L, Yang J. 2025. VFDB 2025: an integrated resource for exploring anti-virulence compounds. Nucleic Acids Res 53:D871–D877. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkae968 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Alcock BP, Huynh W, Chalil R, Smith KW, Raphenya AR, Wlodarski MA, Edalatmand A, Petkau A, Syed SA, Tsang KK, et al. 2023. CARD 2023: expanded curation, support for machine learning, and resistome prediction at the Comprehensive Antibiotic Resistance Database. Nucleic Acids Res 51:D690–D699. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkac920 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Overbeek R, Olson R, Pusch GD, Olsen GJ, Davis JJ, Disz T, Edwards RA, Gerdes S, Parrello B, Shukla M, Vonstein V, Wattam AR, Xia F, Stevens R. 2014. The SEED and the Rapid Annotation of microbial genomes using Subsystems Technology (RAST). Nucleic Acids Res 42:D206–D214. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt1226 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Cosentino S, Voldby Larsen M, Møller Aarestrup F, Lund O. 2013. PathogenFinder - distinguishing friend from foe using bacterial whole genome sequence data. PLoS One 8:e77302. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0077302 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The whole-genome shotgun sequencing project of Enterobacter hormaechei strain F10K has been deposited in GenBank and the National Center for Biotechnology Information Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under BioProject accession number PRJNA1267841. The SRA accession is listed in Table 1. The version described in this paper is version JBOEQC000000000.1.


Articles from Microbiology Resource Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES