Skip to main content
Microbiology Resource Announcements logoLink to Microbiology Resource Announcements
. 2025 Oct 29;14(12):e00718-25. doi: 10.1128/mra.00718-25

Genome sequence of the novel Cystobasidiomycetes fungal isolate EMM_F5

Sachida Pokhrel 1, Zachary A Noel 1,
Editor: Jason E Stajich2
PMCID: PMC12697161  PMID: 41159974

ABSTRACT

The whole genome of fungal isolate EMM_F5, isolated from the phyllosphere of Magnolia grandiflora, was sequenced, assembled, and annotated. Preliminary phylogenomic analysis places EMM_F5 in the Cystobasidiomycetes class within Basidiomycota fungi, with multigene phylogenies placing it in Microsporomycetaceae family.

KEYWORDS: fungi, genome, Cystobasidiomycetes

ANNOUNCEMENT

Yeasts are known colonizers of the phyllosphere habitat (1, 2), though many remain unclassified (3).

We isolated a yeast, EMM_F5, from the phyllosphere of Magnolia grandiflora in the Donald E. Davis Arboretum at Auburn University (32.5959° N, 85.4828° W) on 21 January 2021. Leaf strips approximately 4 cm by 10 cm long were cut with flame-sterilized scissors into a sterile 50 mL tube. Strips were vortexed in 1× phosphate-buffered saline for 1 min, 100 μL was spread onto Petri dishes containing Difco malt extract agar (BD Biosciences, NJ, USA) amended with 1 g yeast extract (ME+) (MP Biomedicals, OH, USA), supplemented with rifampicin (0.01 mg/mL) and chloramphenicol (0.1 mg/mL). Individual colonies were subcultured onto new ME+ agar to represent an isolate. EMM_F5 had yellow-orange colonies with butyrous texture (Fig. 1a and b). Dalmau’s technique on cornmeal agar confirmed yeast-like morphology. The ITS region (PV764649) showed 82.24% sequence identity (100% query coverage) with Erythrobasidium hasegawianum CBS 10217 (EU002885.1).

Fig 1.

Colony images of the novel yellow-orange pigmented yeast; EMM_F5 on Malt Extract Agar and two phylogenetic trees comparing yeasts within Cystobasidiomycetes and EMM_F5, based on sequence clustering and taxonomic relationships to place the novel yeast.

(a) EMM_F5 on malt extract agar amended with yeast extract. (b) Close-up colonies of EMM_F5. (c) Maximum likelihood tree generated using IQ-TREE (4) through Phyling v2.2.0 based on 1708 BUSCO orthologs aligned against basidiomycota Hidden Markov Model (HMM) marker set from the predicted protein sequences (5) and visualized using iTOL (6). Repeat masking of the NCBI genomes and EMM_F5 was conducted using tantan (7) via the “mask” function in funannotate v1.8.13 (8) before protein prediction. Agaricostilbum hyphaenes, a taxon belonging to Agaricostilbomycetes, was used as an outgroup. The number at the branches designates the percent bootstrap value out of 1,000 iterations. (d) Maximum likelihood tree generated using IQ-TREE (4) using seven genetic markers; ITS, SSU, LSU, RPB1, RPB2, TEF1a, and CYTb partitioned to use their own models for sequence evolution and visualized using iTOL (6). Agaricostilbomycetes was used as an outgroup for the phylogenetic placement of EMM_F5. The number at the branches designates the percent bootstrap value out of 1,000 iterations.

For genomic DNA isolation, a single colony of EMM_F5, grown on ME+ agar, was inoculated into 5 mL of ME+ broth and grown for 3 days at 28°C. The cells were collected via centrifugation, and the pellet was processed using the E.Z.N.A. Plant DNA DS Kit (Norcross, GA). A library was prepared using the Illumina DNA Prep kit and IDT 10 bp UDI indices and sequenced on the Illumina NovaSeq 6000, generating 2 × 151 bp paired-end reads. Quality filtering and adapter removal were done with Trimmomatic v0.39 (9). De novo genome assembly used SPAdes v3.15.5 (10) followed by decontamination with FCS-GX v0.5.0 (11). Assembly quality was evaluated using QUAST v5.2.0 (12), and completeness was assessed using BUSCO v5.4.3 (13) using the basidiomycota_odb10 data set.

Sequencing yielded a total of 2,630,670,570 bp with a Q-score >30 for 93.53% of reads. The final assembled genome was 18,587,251 bp in length (coverage = 142×), comprising 253 contigs ≥ 500 bp, with a GC content of 52% and an N50 of 529,534 bp. Funannotate v1.8.13 (8) was used for the prediction of protein sequences from the genome using the “predict” function and annotation of protein sequences using output data from eggnog/2.1.7 (14) and InterProScan/5.66 (15) using the “annotate” function. Coding sequence (CDS) regions accounted for 10,719,149 bp, and 6,580 protein-coding genes were predicted using Funannotate v1.8.13. Gene prediction using BUSCO training identified 1,524 complete genes (86.4%).

A phylogenomic analysis with 27 Cystobasidiomycetes genomes and one Agaricostilbomycetes outgroup (from JGI MycoCosm and NCBI) placed EMM_F5 within Cystobasidiomycetes, lacking a sister taxon (Fig. 1c). As no genome data exist for Microsporomycetaceae and Sakaguchiales, we collated sequences from (16) and Microsporomyces follicola YN35N5T (17), comparing seven EMM_F5 genes (ITS, SSU, LSU, TEF1α, RPB1, RPB2, Cytb) using IQ-TREE (Fig. 1d). EMM_F5 clustered with Microsporomyces follicola YN35N5T.

We hypothesize that EMM_F5 belongs to Microsporomycetaceae, potentially representing the first genomic resource for this family and highlighting a gap in fungal genomics.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Emily Munroe for her efforts in isolating yeasts. This work is/was supported by the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture, Hatch project 1025628, and USDA grant number 2023-67014-39903.

Footnotes

Writing - original draft

Contributor Information

Zachary A. Noel, Email: zan0002@auburn.edu.

Jason E. Stajich, University of California Riverside, Riverside, California, USA

DATA AVAILABILITY

The raw forward and reverse sequences for EMM_F5 are available on the Sequence Read Archive accession number SRR30574311 under BioProject PRJNA1153973. This Whole Genome Shotgun project has been deposited at DDBJ/ENA/GenBank under the accession JBPGPT000000000. The ITS sequence accession number for EMM_F5 is PV764649. Default parameters were used for all software except where otherwise noted. The strain can be obtained by contacting the Noel lab at Auburn University while in the process of being deposited to a culture collection.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Lindow SE, Brandl MT. 2003. Microbiology of the phyllosphere. Appl Environ Microbiol 69:1875–1883. doi: 10.1128/AEM.69.4.1875-1883.2003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Inácio J, Pereira P, de Carvalho M, Fonseca A, Amaral-Collaço MT, Spencer-Martins I. 2002. Estimation and diversity of phylloplane mycobiota on selected plants in a mediterranean-type ecosystem in Portugal. Microb Ecol 44:344–353. doi: 10.1007/s00248-002-2022-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Li AH, Yuan FX, Groenewald M, Bensch K, Yurkov AM, Li K, Han PJ, Guo LD, Aime MC, Sampaio JP, Jindamorakot S, Turchetti B, Inacio J, Fungsin B, Wang QM, Bai FY. 2020. Diversity and phylogeny of basidiomycetous yeasts from plant leaves and soil: proposal of two new orders, three new families, eight new genera and one hundred and seven new species. Stud Mycol 96:17–140. doi: 10.1016/j.simyco.2020.01.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Minh BQ, Schmidt HA, Chernomor O, Schrempf D, Woodhams MD, von Haeseler A, Lanfear R. 2020. IQ-TREE 2: new models and efficient methods for phylogenetic inference in the genomic era. Mol Biol Evol 37:1530–1534. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msaa015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Stajich JE, Tsai C-H. 2023. PHYling for Phylogenomic reconstruction from genomes (Version 2.0). Zenodo. Available from: 10.5281/zenodo.4054262 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Letunic I, Bork P. 2024. Interactive Tree of Life (iTOL) v6: recent updates to the phylogenetic tree display and annotation tool. Nucleic Acids Res 52:W78–W82. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkae268 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Frith MC. 2011. A new repeat-masking method enables specific detection of homologous sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 39:e23–e23. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkq1212 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Palmer JM, Stajich JE. 2020. Funannotate v1.8.1: Eukaryotic genome annotation (v1.8.1). Zenodo. Available from: 10.5281/zenodo.4054262 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. 2014. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30:2114–2120. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M, Kulikov AS, Lesin VM, Nikolenko SI, Pham S, Prjibelski AD, Pyshkin AV, Sirotkin AV, Vyahhi N, Tesler G, Alekseyev MA, Pevzner PA. 2012. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol 19:455–477. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2012.0021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Astashyn A, Tvedte ES, Sweeney D, Sapojnikov V, Bouk N, Joukov V, Mozes E, Strope PK, Sylla PM, Wagner L, Bidwell SL, Brown LC, Clark K, Davis EW, Smith-White B, Hlavina W, Pruitt KD, Schneider VA, Murphy TD. 2024. Rapid and sensitive detection of genome contamination at scale with FCS-GX. Genome Biol 25:60. doi: 10.1186/s13059-024-03198-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Gurevich A, Saveliev V, Vyahhi N, Tesler G. 2013. QUAST: quality assessment tool for genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 29:1072–1075. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt086 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Simão FA, Waterhouse RM, Ioannidis P, Kriventseva EV, Zdobnov EM. 2015. BUSCO: assessing genome assembly and annotation completeness with single-copy orthologs. Bioinformatics 31:3210–3212. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv351 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Cantalapiedra CP, Hernández-Plaza A, Letunic I, Bork P, Huerta-Cepas J. 2021. eggNOG-mapper v2: functional annotation, orthology assignments, and domain prediction at the metagenomic scale. Mol Biol Evol 38:5825–5829. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msab293 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Jones P, Binns D, Chang H-Y, Fraser M, Li W, McAnulla C, McWilliam H, Maslen J, Mitchell A, Nuka G, Pesseat S, Quinn AF, Sangrador-Vegas A, Scheremetjew M, Yong S-Y, Lopez R, Hunter S. 2014. InterProScan 5: genome-scale protein function classification. Bioinformatics 30:1236–1240. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu031 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Schoutteten N, Yurkov A, Spirin V, Savchenko A, Aime M, Begerow D, Verbeken M. 2024. Examination of mycoparasites reveals a new type of host-parasite interface and rearranges the taxonomy of Occultifur and Microsporomyces (Cystobasidiomycetes, Basidiomycota). Stud Mycol 109. doi: 10.3114/sim.2024.109.07 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Jiang YL, Bao WJ, Liu F, Wang GS, Yurkov AM, Ma Q, Hu ZD, Chen XH, Zhao WN, Li AH, Wang QM. 2024. Proposal of one new family, seven new genera and seventy new basidiomycetous yeast species mostly isolated from Tibet and Yunnan provinces, China. Stud Mycol 109:57–153. doi: 10.3114/sim.2024.109.02 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The raw forward and reverse sequences for EMM_F5 are available on the Sequence Read Archive accession number SRR30574311 under BioProject PRJNA1153973. This Whole Genome Shotgun project has been deposited at DDBJ/ENA/GenBank under the accession JBPGPT000000000. The ITS sequence accession number for EMM_F5 is PV764649. Default parameters were used for all software except where otherwise noted. The strain can be obtained by contacting the Noel lab at Auburn University while in the process of being deposited to a culture collection.


Articles from Microbiology Resource Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES