Skip to main content
Microbiology Resource Announcements logoLink to Microbiology Resource Announcements
. 2025 Nov 12;14(12):e00849-25. doi: 10.1128/mra.00849-25

Complete genome sequence of Pediococcus pentosaceus 5.5 8-1 isolated from a pasture-kept Holstein Friesian cattle

Fritz Titgemeyer 1, Nadine Mariani Corea 1, Frank Meyer 1, Sebastian W Fischer 1,2,
Editor: Daria Van Tyne3
PMCID: PMC12697178  PMID: 41222173

ABSTRACT

A Pediococcus pentosaceus strain was isolated from a Holstein Friesian milk cow on an organic farm. The complete genome sequence of 1.73 Mbp and 1,671 predicted genes of P. pentosaceus 5.5 8-1 (5_5_8_1 at NCBI databases) was determined for further investigation of environmental biodiversity and application in food fermentation.

KEYWORDS: lactic acid bacteria, probiotics, protective cultures, nanopore, postbiotics, food safety, food fermentation

ANNOUNCEMENT

Pediococci are lactic acid bacteria used for food fermentation and food preservation (13). They exert numerous probiotic effects and produce small beneficial molecules, so-called postbiotics (36). Strain 05.5 8-1 was isolated on an organic dairy farm from foremilk from one udder quarter of a Holstein Friesian cow. Foremilk was diluted in NaCl–Tween solution (9 g/L NaCl; 20 ml/L Tween 80). Dilutions were plated onto de Man, Rogosa, and Sharpe (MRS)-Bouillon-agar plates (0.5 g/L cysteine; 10 mg/L bromophenol blue) and incubated in an anaerobic jar (30°C; 48 h) (7). DNA from single colonies was subjected to polymerase chain reactions of the rrnA gene encoding 16S rRNA with primers 27f (5′-AGAGTTTGATCCTGGCTCAG-3′) and N1492r (5′-TACGGYTACCTTGTTAYGACTT-3′) (8). The Sanger sequenced DNA of a 1,067 bp was identical to rrnA of Pediococcus pentosaceus ATCC 25745 (NC_008525.1).

The strain was cultured on MRS agar with 0.5 g/L cysteine for 48 h at 30°C. Genomic DNA was isolated using the Wizard HMW DNA Extraction Kit (Promega, USA) and quantified with a DeNovix QFX fluorometer (DeNovix, USA). A rapid sequencing library was prepared with the Oxford Nanopore SQK-RAD004 kit and loaded (30 µL) onto a Flongle Flow Cell R9.4.1 (FLO-FLG001) mounted on a MinION Mk1B device running MinKNOW v22.08.9 (9). Raw reads for assembling were basecalled with Guppy v6.3.8 (high-accuracy model dna_r9.4.1_450bps_hac.cfg) and re-basecalled for additional polishing steps with Dorado v0.9.6 (model dna_r9.4.1_e8_sup@v3.6 with foundation) (10, 11). Reads with a mean Phred quality ≥Q9 were retained. Adapter trimming was performed with Porechop v0.2.4 (12). Reads were filtered (Filtlong v0.2.1) to discard the worst 10% by quality and all reads <1 kb (13). The final data set comprised 20,519 reads (71.62 Mbp; read N50 = 4,949 bp; median/mean read length = 2,236/3,490 bp; longest read = 140,560 bp; mean read Q = 11; 43.6 %/10.7% of bases reached ≥Q20/≥Q30, respectively). Quality metrics were obtained with Nanoq v0.1.0 and SeqKit v2.9.0 (14, 15). Assembling was done by Trycycler v0.5.4. Sub‑assemblies were generated with Flye v2.9.2, Raven v1.8.2, and Miniasm v0.3 (1620). The draft consensus was polished with Medaka v1.8.0. Circularity and correctness were verified with Bandage v0.9.0 (21). For additional polishing, re-basecalled reads were aligned via Dorado Aligner against the assembly and filtered (Samtools v1.22.1; MAPQ ≥20; flags QC-failed 0x200, secondary 0x100, and supplementary 0x800 excluded); ≥1 kb) (11, 22). One Medaka v2.1.0 round and two Homopolish v0.4.1 rounds (polish, modpolish) were then applied. The final circular chromosome was oriented to dnaA as the starting point (Dnaapler v1.2.0) (2325).

FastANI and QUAST v5.3.0, using P. pentosaceus ATCC 25745 (NC_008525.1) as reference, yielded the metrics in Table 1; BUSCO v5.8.3 (data set pediococcus_odb12) reported 98.9% completeness (2628). CheckM2 (specific neural-network model) confirmed 99.98% completeness and 0.13% contamination (29). Read depth, obtained by remapping the filtered reads with minimap2 v2.30 and samtools v1.22.1, showed a mean coverage of 27× across the chromosome (22, 30, 31). Genome features were predicted with Bakta v1.8.2 (database v5.0 light), identifying 1,671 protein-coding sequences, 15 rRNA genes, 56 tRNA genes, 1 tmRNA, and 3 ncRNAs (total features = 1,769) (32).

TABLE 1.

Assembly and quality metrics for the complete chromosome of P. pentosaceus 5.5 8-1

Replicon Length (bp) GC (%) BUSCO completeness (%) CheckM2 completeness/contamination (%) Genome fraction (%) Average nucleotide identity
Chromosome 1,731,209 37.4 98.9 99.98/0.13 86.66 98.61

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This publication was supported by the Open Access Publication Fund of the University of Bonn.

S.W.F., F.M., and N.M.C.: Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, and Methodology. S.W.F.: Genome assembly and quality control. S.W.F., N.M.C., and F.T.: Writing—original draft, review, and editing.

Contributor Information

Sebastian W. Fischer, Email: sebastian.fischer@fh-muenster.de.

Daria Van Tyne, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.

DATA AVAILABILITY

The whole-genome sequencing data for Pediococcus pentosaceus isolate 5.5 8-1 (5_5_8_1) have been deposited in the NCBI databases under BioSample (SAMN50255360) in BioProject (PRJNA1297324). The raw sequencing reads are available under SRA entries (SRX29883225) and (SRX29883226). The assembled and annotated genome is available under GenBank accession numbers (CP197206) and (GCF_052059785.1).

REFERENCES

  • 1. Mgomi FC, Yuan L, Wang Y, Rao S, Yang Z. 2022. Physiological properties, survivability and genomic characteristics of Pediococcus pentosaceus for application as a starter culture . Int J of Dairy Tech 75:588–602. doi: 10.1111/1471-0307.12864 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Fischer SW, Titgemeyer F. 2023. Protective cultures in food products: from science to market. Foods 12:1541. doi: 10.3390/foods12071541 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Qi Y, Huang L, Zeng Y, Li W, Zhou D, Xie J, Xie J, Tu Q, Deng D, Yin J. 2021. Pediococcus pentosaceus: screening and application as probiotics in food processing. Front Microbiol 12. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.762467 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Ahn SB, Jun DW, Kang B-K, Lim JH, Lim S, Chung M-J. 2019. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of a multispecies probiotic mixture in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Sci Rep 9:5688. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-42059-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Olaoye OA, Dodd CER. 2010. Evaluation of bacteriocinogenic Pediococcus acidilactici as protective culture in the preservation of Tsire, a traditional nigerian stick meat. J Food Saf 30:867–888. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-4565.2010.00247.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Tomičić Z, Šarić L, Tomičić R. 2025. Potential future applications of postbiotics in the context of ensuring food safety and human health improvement. Antibiotics (Basel) 14:674. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics14070674 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Lee HM, Lee Y. 2008. A differential medium for lactic acid-producing bacteria in a mixed culture. Lett Appl Microbiol 46:676–681. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-765X.2008.02371.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Mariani Corea N, Titgemeyer F, Wachtarczyk J, Meyer F, Fischer SW. 2025. Complete genome sequence of Pediococcus pentosaceus 13.7 2A-1 isolated from a Holstein Friesian dairy cattle. Microbiol Resour Announc:e0084825. doi: 10.1128/mra.00848-25 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Oxford Nanopore Technologies . 2022. MinKNOW (version 22.08.9). Oxford Nanopore Technologies. https://nanoporetech.com/software/. [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Oxford Nanopore Technologies . 2022. Guppy (version 6.3.8). Oxford Nanopore Technologies. https://nanoporetech.com/software/other/guppy. [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Oxford Nanopore Technologies . 2025. Dorado (version 0.9.6). Oxford Nanopore Technologies. https://nanoporetech.com/software/other/dorado. [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Wick R, Volkening J. 2018. Porechop (version 0.2.4). GitHub. https://github.com/rrwick/Porechop. [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Wick R. 2021. Filtlong (version 0.2.1). GitHub. https://github.com/rrwick/Filtlong. [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Shen W, Sipos B, Zhao L. 2024. SeqKit2: a Swiss army knife for sequence and alignment processing. iMeta 3:e191. doi: 10.1002/imt2.191 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Steinig E, Coin L. 2022. Nanoq: ultra-fast quality control for nanopore reads. JOSS 7:2991. doi: 10.21105/joss.02991 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Wick RR, Judd LM, Cerdeira LT, Hawkey J, Méric G, Vezina B, Wyres KL, Holt KE. 2021. Trycycler: consensus long-read assemblies for bacterial genomes. Genome Biol 22:266. doi: 10.1186/s13059-021-02483-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Kolmogorov M, Yuan J, Lin Y, Pevzner PA. 2019. Assembly of long, error-prone reads using repeat graphs. Nat Biotechnol 37:540–546. doi: 10.1038/s41587-019-0072-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Vaser R, Šikić M. 2024. Time- and memory-efficient genome assembly with Raven. Nat Comput Sci 1:332–336. doi: 10.1038/s43588021-00073-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Li H. 2016. Minimap and miniasm: fast mapping and de novo assembly for noisy long sequences. Bioinformatics 32:2103–2110. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw152 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Wick RR, Holt KE. 2021. Benchmarking of long-read assemblers for prokaryote whole genome sequencing. F1000Res 8:2138. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.21782.4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Wick RR, Schultz MB, Zobel J, Holt KE. 2015. Bandage: interactive visualization of de novo genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 31:3350–3352. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv383 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Danecek P, Bonfield JK, Liddle J, Marshall J, Ohan V, Pollard MO, Whitwham A, Keane T, McCarthy SA, Davies RM, Li H. 2021. Twelve years of SAMtools and BCFtools. Gigascience 10:giab008. doi: 10.1093/gigascience/giab008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Oxford Nanopore Technologies . 2024. Medaka (versions 1.8 and 2.1). GitHub. https://github.com/nanoporetech/medaka. [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Bouras G, Grigson SR, Papudeshi B, Mallawaarachchi V, Roach MJ. 2024. Dnaapler: a tool to reorient circular microbial genomes. JOSS 9:5968. doi: 10.21105/joss.05968 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Huang Y-T, Liu P-Y, Shih P-W. 2021. Homopolish: a method for the removal of systematic errors in nanopore sequencing by homologous polishing. Genome Biol 22:95. doi: 10.1186/s13059-021-02282-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Jain C, Rodriguez-R LM, Phillippy AM, Konstantinidis KT, Aluru S. 2018. High throughput ANI analysis of 90K prokaryotic genomes reveals clear species boundaries. Nat Commun 9:5114. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-07641-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Gurevich A, Saveliev V, Vyahhi N, Tesler G. 2013. QUAST: quality assessment tool for genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 29:1072–1075. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt086 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Manni M, Berkeley MR, Seppey M, Simão FA, Zdobnov EM. 2021. BUSCO update: novel and streamlined workflows along with broader and deeper phylogenetic coverage for scoring of eukaryotic, prokaryotic, and viral genomes. arXiv. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2106.11799 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 29. Chklovski A, Parks DH, Woodcroft BJ, Tyson GW. 2023. CheckM2: a rapid, scalable and accurate tool for assessing microbial genome quality using machine learning. Nat Methods 20:1203–1212. doi: 10.1038/s41592-023-01940-w [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Li H. 2018. Minimap2: pairwise alignment for nucleotide sequences. Bioinformatics 34:3094–3100. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty191 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Li H. 2021. New strategies to improve minimap2 alignment accuracy. Bioinformatics 37:4572–4574. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btab705 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Schwengers O, Jelonek L, Dieckmann MA, Beyvers S, Blom J, Goesmann A. 2021. Bakta: rapid and standardized annotation of bacterial genomes via alignment-free sequence identification: find out more about Bakta, the motivation, challenges and applications, here. Microb Genom 7. doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.000685 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The whole-genome sequencing data for Pediococcus pentosaceus isolate 5.5 8-1 (5_5_8_1) have been deposited in the NCBI databases under BioSample (SAMN50255360) in BioProject (PRJNA1297324). The raw sequencing reads are available under SRA entries (SRX29883225) and (SRX29883226). The assembled and annotated genome is available under GenBank accession numbers (CP197206) and (GCF_052059785.1).


Articles from Microbiology Resource Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES