ABSTRACT
Starmerella bacillaris is a non-Saccharomyces yeast associated with enological niches. We present whole-genome sequences of strains FC54 and MUT5705, previously isolated from grapes and extensively characterized for their enological traits. Given the limited genomic resources, these data provide valuable insights into the genetic diversity and heterogeneity within this species.
KEYWORDS: Starmerella bacillaris, wine, WGS, non-Saccharomyces, yeast
ANNOUNCEMENT
Starmerella bacillaris (formerly Candida zemplinina) has gained interest for its unique enological properties (1). It is commonly found on grapes and during wine fermentation worldwide (2). Its use in mixed fermentations with Saccharomyces cerevisiae has been widely studied for its impact on wine composition and quality (3). This fructophilic, acidogenic, psychrotolerant, and osmotolerant yeast is well suited for sweet wine fermentations (2) and can act as a biocontrol agent against undesirable microbes (4, 5) and pests (6). During wine fermentation, most Starm. bacillaris strains produce less ethanol and more glycerol than S. cerevisiae (7–9). They can increase total acidity, while acetaldehyde, acetic acid, and pyruvic acid production is strain dependent (2, 10). This species also tolerates high ethanol levels (1).
Starm. bacillaris is a haploid species with no evidence of sporulation (11). Genome sequencing and karyotypic analyses demonstrated three chromosomes, an approximately 9 Mb genome (12, 13), and high genetic diversity among isolates (12). Here, we present the draft genome sequences of two Starm. bacillaris strains, FC54 and MUT5705, isolated from Vitis vinifera L. cv. Picolit grapes in the Friuli Venezia Giulia region, Italy (14). Both strains were phenotypically characterized and selected for their enological attitude in mixed fermentation with S. cerevisiae. MUT5705 belongs to the Mycotheca Universitatis Taurinensis MUT (Dipartimento di Scienze della Vita e Biologia dei Sistemi, University of Torino, Italy).
For whole-genome sequencing, Starm. bacillaris strains were grown on YPD agar medium (10 g/L yeast extract, 20 g/L peptone, and 20 g/L dextrose, and 15 g/L agar) for 3 days at 25°C, then inoculated in YPD broth and incubated at 25°C for 24 hours. High-quality genomic DNA was extracted using the Epicenter Masterpure DNA purification kit (Epicenter, Madison, WI, USA). Libraries were prepared using the Illumina DNA Prep (M) Tagmentation kit and sequenced on a NovaSeq 600 S4 flow cell (Illumina) at the University of Trento, Trento, Italy.
The Starm. bacillaris strains present a 99.59% similarity between the two genomes as measured by average nucleotide identity (15). The de novo assembly was performed using SPAdes v.4.2.0 with default parameters (16). FC54 presented a nuclear genome sequence of 9.5 Mb, while the draft genome of MUT5705 was of 9.5 Mb. FastQC v.0.11.9 was used to assess read quality. A total of 24,182,418 raw reads were generated for strain FC54. The genome assembly achieved an average depth of coverage of 371×, corresponding to a total genome coverage of 381×. For strain MUT5705, 14,992,784 reads were obtained, yielding an average depth of coverage of 235× and a genome coverage of 230×. The GC contents were 39.5% and 39.5% for FC54 and MUT5707, respectively. The high quality of the FC54 assembly was indicated by the presence of 837 scaffolds (N50 length of 769.9 kb and L50 of 6), while MUT5707 had 589 scaffolds (N50 length of 601.6 kb and L50 of 6). The completeness of the assembly was assessed using BUSCO v.5.8.2 (17), which estimated the genome sequence to be 75.4% complete for both assemblies based on full and partial targets of the Saccharomycetes_odb10 database.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Part of this work was developed within the framework of the DOMINO project, which has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon Europe research and innovation program under grant agreement no. 101060218. MM and AQ acknowledge the award of the Spanish government MCIN/AEI to the IATA-CSIC as Center of Excellence Accreditation Severo Ochoa (CEX2021-001189-S/MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033)
Contributor Information
Vasileios Englezos, Email: vasileios.englezos@unito.it.
Jason E. Stajich, University of California Riverside, Riverside, California, USA
DATA AVAILABILITY
These Whole Genome Shotgun projects have been deposited at DDBJ/ENA/GenBank under accession number JBQWLV000000000 for MUT5705 and JBQWLW000000000 for FC54 strains, respectively. The versions described in this paper are version JBQWLV010000000 and JBQWLW010000000. The associated BioProject for both strains is PRJNA1298759, while the BioSample accession numbers are SAMN50284507 for strain FC54 and SAMN50284508 for strain MUT5705.
REFERENCES
- 1. Englezos V, Jolly NP, Di Gianvito P, Rantsiou K, Cocolin L. 2022. Microbial interactions in winemaking: Ecological aspects and effect on wine quality. Trends in Food Science & Technology 127:99–113. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2022.06.015 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Englezos V, Giacosa S, Rantsiou K, Rolle L, Cocolin L. 2017. Starmerella bacillaris in winemaking: opportunities and risks. Curr Opin Food Sci 17:30–35. doi: 10.1016/j.cofs.2017.08.007 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Tofalo R, Patrignani F, Lanciotti R, Perpetuini G, Schirone M, Di Gianvito P, Pizzoni D, Arfelli G, Suzzi G. 2016. Aroma profile of montepulciano d'Abruzzo wine fermented by single and co-culture starters of autochthonous Saccharomyces and non-Saccharomyces yeasts. Front Microbiol 7:610. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00610 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Di Gianvito P, Englezos V, Rantsiou K, Cocolin L. 2022. Bioprotection strategies in winemaking. Int J Food Microbiol 364:109532. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2022.109532 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Lemos Junior WJF, Bovo B, Nadai C, Crosato G, Carlot M, Favaron F, Giacomini A, Corich V. 2016. Biocontrol ability and action mechanism of Starmerella bacillaris (synonym Candida zemplinina) isolated from wine musts against gray mold disease agent Botrytis cinerea on grape and their effects on alcoholic fermentation. Front Microbiol 7:1499. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01499 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Arpellino A, Englezos V, Giacosa S, Di Gianvito P, Ferrero L, Rantsiou K, Cocolin LS, Spadaro D, Gonella E, Alma A. 2025. Use of antagonistic yeasts for multi-purpose grape and wine protection: attraction for Drosophila suzukii in pre-harvest and bioprotection during red winemaking. Journal of Agriculture and Food Research 22:102067. doi: 10.1016/j.jafr.2025.102067 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Binati RL, Lemos Junior WJF, Luzzini G, Slaghenaufi D, Ugliano M, Torriani S. 2020. Contribution of non-Saccharomyces yeasts to wine volatile and sensory diversity: a study on Lachancea thermotolerans, Metschnikowia spp. and Starmerella bacillaris strains isolated in Italy. Int J Food Microbiol 318:108470. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2019.108470 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Li R, Liu Y, Zheng J, Xu M, Wang H, Sun C, Cai S, Guo X, Wu X, Chen Y. 2023. Oenological characteristics of two indigenous Starmerella bacillaris strains isolated from Chinese wine regions. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 107:3717–3727. doi: 10.1007/s00253-023-12502-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Rantsiou K, Englezos V, Torchio F, Risse PA, Cravero F, Gerbi V, Rolle L, Cocolin L. 2017. Modeling of the fermentation behavior of Starmerella bacillaris. Am J Enol Vitic 68:378–385. doi: 10.5344/ajev.2017.16108 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Englezos V, Cocolin L, Rantsiou K, Ortiz-Julien A, Bloem A, Dequin S, Camarasa C. 2018. Specific phenotypic traits of Starmerella bacillaris related to nitrogen source consumption and central carbon metabolite production during wine Fermentation.. Appl Environ Microbiol 84:e00797-18. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00797-18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Sipiczki M. 2003. Candida zemplinina sp. nov., an osmotolerant and psychrotolerant yeast that ferments sweet botrytized wines. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 53:2079–2083. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.02649-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Lemos Junior WJF, da Silva Duarte V, Treu L, Campanaro S, Nadai C, Giacomini A, Corich V. 2018. Whole genome comparison of two Starmerella bacillaris strains with other wine yeasts uncovers genes involved in modulating important winemaking traits. FEMS Yeast Res 18. doi: 10.1093/femsyr/foy069 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Raymond Eder ML, Rosa AL. 2021. Genetic, physiological, and industrial aspects of the fructophilic non-Saccharomyces yeast species, Starmerella bacillaris. Fermentation 7:87. doi: 10.3390/fermentation7020087 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Urso R, Rantsiou K, Dolci P, Rolle L, Comi G, Cocolin L. 2008. Yeast biodiversity and dynamics during sweet wine production as determined by molecular methods. FEMS Yeast Res 8:1053–1062. doi: 10.1111/j.1567-1364.2008.00364.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R. 2009. Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:19126–19131. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0906412106 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Prjibelski A, Antipov D, Meleshko D, Lapidus A, Korobeynikov A. 2020. Using SPAdes de novo assembler. Curr Protoc Bioinformatics 70:e102. doi: 10.1002/cpbi.102 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Manni M, Berkeley MR, Seppey M, Simão FA, Zdobnov EM. 2021. BUSCO update: novel and streamlined workflows along with broader and deeper phylogenetic coverage for scoring of eukaryotic, prokaryotic, and viral genomes. Mol Biol Evol 38:4647–4654. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msab199 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
These Whole Genome Shotgun projects have been deposited at DDBJ/ENA/GenBank under accession number JBQWLV000000000 for MUT5705 and JBQWLW000000000 for FC54 strains, respectively. The versions described in this paper are version JBQWLV010000000 and JBQWLW010000000. The associated BioProject for both strains is PRJNA1298759, while the BioSample accession numbers are SAMN50284507 for strain FC54 and SAMN50284508 for strain MUT5705.
