Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2025 Dec 12.
Published in final edited form as: Vasc Med. 2023 Aug 28;28(6):564–570. doi: 10.1177/1358863X231191822

Longitudinal outcomes following peripheral vascular intervention among older persons living with HIV

Katherine Kentoffio 1,2, Tianyu Sun 3, Jiaman Xu 3, Rushi V Parikh 4, Priscilla Y Hsue 5, Eric A Secemsky 2,3,6
PMCID: PMC12697259  NIHMSID: NIHMS2128122  PMID: 37638877

Abstract

Background:

Persons living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV, PLWH) have an increased risk of peripheral artery disease (PAD) in comparison to the general population. However, a gap remains in understanding optimal management for this condition. This study assesses longitudinal outcomes associated with peripheral endovascular intervention (PVI) for PAD among PLWH.

Methods:

All Medicare fee-for-service patients undergoing femoropopliteal artery PVI between April 1, 2015 and December 31, 2018 were identified and stratified by HIV serostatus. The primary outcome was major adverse limb events (MALE), defined as major amputation or arterial embolism/thrombosis following an index procedure. The subdistribution hazard was used to evaluate the association between HIV serostatus and MALE, accounting for the competing risk of death. Results were adjusted for sociodemographics and major comorbidities.

Results:

Of 168,553 patients who underwent PVI, 357 (0.21%) were PLWH. The average age was 77.0 ± 7.6 years; 80.3% had hypertension, 70.3% had hyperlipidemia, and 24.6% had tobacco use disorder. Compared to those without HIV, PLWH were younger and had a higher burden of cardiovascular risk factors. MALE were substantially more frequent among PLWH, with a cumulative incidence of 24.6%, compared to 14.5% among those without HIV. The adjusted subdistribution hazard ratio was 1.26 (95% CI 1.00–1.58, p = 0.05). The use of guideline-directed statin therapy was low in both groups in the 90 days following revascularization (57.9% in PLWH vs 58.1% in those without HIV, p = 0.95).

Conclusion:

Among US Medicare beneficiaries, PLWH had poorer long-term outcomes following PVI. Greater attention to the management of symptomatic PAD is warranted for the HIV population, particularly following revascularization.

Keywords: human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), peripheral artery disease (PAD), revascularization

Background

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection is associated with an increased risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, including stroke, myocardial infarction,1,2 and peripheral vascular disorders.3,4 Appropriate management of these conditions is essential to minimize excess morbidity and mortality as the population of persons living with HIV (PLWH) ages in the United States.5 Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is of particular concern, due to its strong association with impaired physical function, loss of independence, and poor overall prognosis in older adults.6–9 PAD is a common condition in the general US population and continues to increase in prevalence worldwide.10 The pathophysiology overlaps that for HIV-associated atherosclerosis and includes lifestyle exposures such as smoking, chronic arterial inflammation and, in PLWH, metabolic dysregulation associated with antiretroviral therapy.11–13 Consequently, PLWH have an increased risk of both asymptomatic14 and symptomatic15 PAD in comparison to the general population.

There is a growing interest in understanding both the epidemiology of PAD among PLWH and the optimal approach to treatment in this unique patient population. However, there is currently limited evidence on response to PAD therapy specifically among PLWH. In particular, outcomes following the invasive management of symptomatic PAD among PLWH remain poorly described. The present study seeks to address this evidence gap by utilizing longitudinal Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services (CMS) data to better understand whether HIV serostatus is associated with adverse long-term outcomes among older adults with femoropopliteal artery disease referred for peripheral vascular intervention (PVI).

Methods

Data source and study population

This was a retrospective cohort study using all available samples of inpatient and outpatient CMS data to identify all femoropopliteal PVIs performed between April 1, 2015 and December 31, 2018 among Medicare fee-for-service (FFS) beneficiaries in the US. Individuals were eligible for inclusion if they were aged 66 or older, were enrolled in Medicare FFS for at least 1 year prior to their index procedure (to allow for ascertainment of comorbidities), and underwent a femoropopliteal PVI either during a hospital admission or as an outpatient. Only the first procedure for each participant was included.

PVIs were identified using the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision (ICD-10) Procedural Coding System (PCS) and Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes (online supplemental Table 1). PVI could include balloon angioplasty alone or with stent implantation. The study was conducted in compliance with the data use agreement in place between CMS and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center. The study was approved by the institutional review board of the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, with a waiver of informed consent for retrospective data analysis.

Exposure classification and covariates

The primary exposure of interest was HIV serostatus as defined by the CMS Chronic Conditions Ware house (CCW) Other Conditions algorithm for HIV.16 Demographic data were obtained from Medicare enrollment records to determine participant age, self-reported sex, and race/ethnicity. Other baseline comorbidities were assessed using the CCW Chronic Conditions coding algorithm. Critical limb ischemia (CLI) and prior amputation were defined by ICD 9th and 10th Revisions Clinical Modification claims codes ascertained via a 1-year look-back period (online supplemental Table 2). Hospital characteristics were retrieved from the 2016 Hospital Association Annual Survey File, including teaching status, region, and bed capacity. The use of cardiovascular medications was assessed by querying prescription claims in the 90-day period postprocedure. Prescription analysis was restricted to participants enrolled in Medicare Part D at the time of PVI.

Outcomes

The primary outcome for this study was the cumulative incidence of major adverse limb events (MALE) through December 31, 2019. As in prior studies, MALE were defined as arterial thrombosis/embolism or major lower-extremity amputation.17 The ICD 9th and 10th Revisions Clinical Modification claims codes were used to identify MALE following an index procedure (online supplemental Table 2). Secondary endpoints included all-cause mortality and any lower-extremity amputation through study follow up.

Statistical analysis

Sociodemographics and comorbidities were compared between groups with t-tests for continuous variables and chi-squared tests for categorical variables. To assess the risk of MALE and major amputation alone following index PVI, survival methods accounting for the competing risk of death were used. Cumulative incidence functions were estimated using Fine–Gray methods and differences were compared using the Fine–Gray test. The subdistribution hazard ratio (HR) was also estimated with and without adjustment for relevant covariates.18 Covariates included age, sex, race, diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, ischemic heart disease, heart failure, and CLI.

The cumulative incidence of death and the combination endpoint of death plus MALE were estimated using Kaplan–Meier methods. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to calculate the HR for each outcome, adjusted for the covariates listed above. However, due to violation of the proportional hazards assumption for death plus MALE over the total follow-up period, the results for the combined endpoint are not reported.

Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05 for all analyses and no adjustments were made for multiple comparisons. Data linkage and analyses were performed using SAS software, version 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA).

Results

Study cohort

Of 287,866 PVIs performed during the study period, 168,553 met criteria and were included in the analysis. A total of 70,677 procedures were excluded due to age < 66 years, or < 1 year of Medicare FFS coverage; 48,265 procedures were excluded as they were repeat interventions in the same individual; and 371 procedures were excluded due to missing age or insurance coverage (Figure 1). Of the 168,553 participants included in the final analysis, 357 (0.21%) were PLWH.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Patient flow diagram for establishment of the final cohort. Procedures were initially identified based on claims codes. After exclusion criteria were applied, repeat procedures were then removed to allow for analysis of individual beneficiaries.

Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics of the study population are presented in Table 1. The average age of the total population was 77.0 ± 7.6 years; 80.3% had hypertension, 70.3% had hyperlipidemia, and 24.6% had tobacco use disorder. A large proportion (46.6%) had CLI and 7.9% had undergone a prior amputation. Among the study cohort, 130,919 participants (77.7%) had pharmacy coverage through Medicare.

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics of study participants.

Non-HIV PLWH p-value
(n = 168,196) (n = 357)
Age (mean ± SD) 77.0 ± 7.6 72.1 ± 5.6 < 0.001
Women (%) 44.98 26.89 < 0.001
Race/ethnicity (%)
 White 81.96 47.89 < 0.001
 Black 12.85 42.25 < 0.001
 Asian 0.89 0.85 0.93
 Hispanic 2.42 5.35 < 0.001
 North American Native 0.66 1.13 0.28
 Other 1.22 2.54 0.02
Tobacco use disorder (%) 24.59 40.34 < 0.001
Substance use disorder (%) 3.78 14.29 < 0.001
Baseline amputation (%) 7.88 13.45 < 0.001
Critical limb ischemia (%) 46.67 46.22 0.86
Diabetes (%) 50.94 56.02 0.06
Hyperlipidemia (%) 70.33 75.91 0.02
Hypertension (%) 80.24 88.80 < 0.001
Obesity (%) 20.45 15.97 0.04
Chronic kidney disease (%) 50.11 64.71 < 0.001
Ischemic heart disease (%) 65.31 70.31 0.05
Heart failure (%) 37.84 43.14 0.04
Stroke/transient ischemic attack (%) 9.32 10.08 0.62
Hospital characteristics
Region (%) < 0.001
 Northeast 17.80 29.86
 South 42.19 43.10
 West 14.79 14.65
 Midwest 25.22 12.39
Bed size (%)
 6–24 0.09 0.29 0.21
 25–49 0.84 0.00 0.09
 50–99 4.22 1.44 0.01
 100–199 16.12 11.78 0.03
 200–299 20.39 14.37 0.01
 300–399 18.68 14.94 0.07
 400–499 11.42 13.22 0.29
 ≥500 28.24 43.97 < 0.001
Procedural characteristics
Adjunctive atherectomy (%) 35.14 32.49 0.30
Inpatient procedure (%) 47.60 47.34 0.92
Any stent placement (%) 41.00 43.70 0.30
Drug-coated stent (%) 17.43 22.13 0.02

HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; PLWH, persons living with HIV.

Baseline characteristics between groups

Compared to those without HIV, PLWH were younger, less likely to identify as White or women, and more likely to smoke or have a history of substance use disorder. PLWH also exhibited an increased risk of multiple baseline cardiovascular comorbidities, including hypertension, hyperlipidemia, heart failure, ischemic heart disease, and chronic kidney disease. There was no difference in baseline rates of CLI between the two groups, but PLWH had nearly twice the prevalence of prior amputation (13.5% vs 7.9%, p < 0.001). PLWH were also more likely to undergo PVI at a teaching hospital and at hospitals with greater than 500 beds compared to persons without HIV (Table 1).

Procedural characteristics, including the use of atherectomy, stent placement, and patient location at the time of procedure (inpatient vs outpatient) did not differ by HIV serostatus. Notably, there was no difference in the rate of any stent placement between the two groups, but PLWH were more likely to receive a drug-eluting stent compared to those without HIV (22.1% vs 17.4%, p = 0.02).

The use of cardiovascular medications was similar by HIV serostatus (Table 2), including use of statins and antiplatelet agents. Among PLWH, 57.9% received a prescription for a statin, 42.4% received a prescription for non-aspirin antiplatelet agent, and 73.4% received a prescription for any antiretroviral therapy within 90 days following PVI.

Table 2.

Medication prescription fills to 90 days postprocedure among Medicare Part D beneficiaries.

Non-HIV PLWH p-value
(n = 130,596) (n = 323)
ACE inhibitor/ARB (%) 45.41 47.37 0.48
Statins (%) 58.08 57.89 0.95
Beta-blocker (%) 52.39 52.94 0.84
Antiplatelet* (%) 41.96 42.41 0.87
Anticoagulant (%) 16.65 14.55 0.31
Insulin (%) 19.27 20.43 0.60
GLP-1 agonists (%) 1.05 1.24 0.74

ACE, angiotensin-converting enzyme; ARB, angiotensin receptor blocker; GLP, glucagon-like peptide; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; PLWH, persons living with HIV.

*

Antiplatelet category does not include aspirin

Primary outcome

The median study follow-up time was 2.4 years in both groups, with a maximum follow up of 4.8 years. PLWH had a higher risk of MALE following PVI over the study follow up. The rate of MALE was 9.4 events per 100 person-years among PLWH and 5.8 events per 100 person-years in the non-HIV group (Table 3). The cumulative incidence of MALE at the end of follow up was 24.6% for PLWH and 14.5% among those without HIV (Figure 2). The unadjusted HR for MALE was 1.56 (95% CI 1.23–1.97, p < 0.01). This association persisted after multivariable adjustment (HR 1.26, 95% CI 1.00–1.58, p = 0.05).

Table 3.

Risk of adverse events following peripheral vascular intervention by HIV serostatus.

Event rate per 100 person-years Cumulative incidence (%) Hazard ratio (95% CI)
PLWH Control PLWH Control Unadjusted p-value Adjusted p-value
MALE 9.36 5.79 24.55 14.49 1.56 (1.23–1.97) < 0.01 1.26 (1.00–1.58) 0.05
 Major amputation 6.23 4.06 18.87 10.52 1.50 (1.14–1.99) < 0.01 1.12 (0.85–1.47) 0.42
 Arterial thrombosis or embolism 2.95 2.04 7.45 5.47 1.41 (0.94–2.12) 0.10 1.42 (0.94–2.14) 0.10
All-cause mortality 15.25 16.44 55.92 51.39 0.93 (0.78–1.10) 0.36 1.09 (0.91–1.30) 0.34
Any amputation 9.24 6.71 23.60 16.42 1.33 (1.06–1.69) 0.02 1.07 (0.85–1.34) 0.56

Estimates for all outcomes other than all-cause mortality via subdistribution hazard ratio.

HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; MALE, major adverse limb events; PLWH, persons living with HIV.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Cumulative incidence of MALE and mortality, stratified by HIV serostatus. Displayed are the cumulative incidence functions for study endpoints among persons living with HIV (PLWH, red) compared to HIV-negative controls (blue). (A) Unadjusted cumulative incidence of MALE is increased over 4.8 years of follow up among PLWH compared to HIV-negative controls (p < 0.01). (B) Unadjusted cumulative incidence of mortality is similar between study groups (p = 0.36).

HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; HR, hazard ratio; MALE, major adverse limb events; PLWH, persons living with HIV.

Secondary outcomes

Among the individual endpoints, the unadjusted HR for major amputation was 1.50 (95% CI 1.14–1.99, p < 0.01) and for arterial thrombosis or embolism was 1.41 (95% CI 0.94–2.12, p = 0.10, Table 3). After multivariable adjustment, the HR for major amputation was attenuated (1.12, 95% CI 0.85–1.47, p = 0.42).

The all-cause mortality rate was 15.3 deaths per 100 person-years in the HIV group and 16.4 deaths per 100 person-years in the non-HIV group. There was no statistically significant difference in the risk of death over the study follow up (adjusted HR 1.09, 95% CI 0.91–1.30, p = 0.34).

Discussion

In this study of older adults undergoing PVI for PAD, HIV was associated with a nearly twofold increase in risk of MALE over 4.8 years of follow up. PLWH had an increased burden of cardiovascular comorbidities at baseline and were more likely to have had a prior amputation. Notably, pharmacotherapy for atherosclerotic disease was underutilized for both study cohorts. Fifty-eight percent of analyzed subjects were provided with a statin prescription in the 90-day post-PVI, despite prior evidence demonstrating improved outcomes for PAD with statin therapy.19

The current study is novel as it investigates long-term outcomes following endovascular intervention for PAD among PLWH, and includes procedures performed both in inpatient and outpatient settings. Previous work has demonstrated that PLWH with PAD have an increased risk of perioperative mortality following open surgical revascularization, as well as a higher risk of subsequent amputation,20 but have not investigated longitudinal outcomes following a percutaneous approach. Data on in-hospital outcomes immediately following PVI among PLWH in the National Inpatient Sample did not demonstrate increased rates of in-hospital amputation or mortality, but did not explore events after discharge.21,22

Multiple factors likely contribute to the increased risk of MALE observed among PLWH in our population. Our data are consistent with prior studies which have reported a high prevalence of traditional cardiac risk factors among PLWH with suboptimal control of modifiable contributors to disease, such as smoking.23 Similar to previous analyses using CMS claims data, our study demonstrated high rates of tobacco and substance use among PLWH undergoing treatment for PAD in comparison to those without HIV in the general Medicare population.24 Our study also demonstrated notable differences in the baseline health status of Medicare beneficiaries living with HIV as a cohort, including higher rates of hypertension, hyperlipidemia, kidney disease, and heart failure. Prior work has demonstrated that these comorbidities contribute to an increased risk of adverse events following PVI among older adults in the general population.25 The increased risk of MALE among PLWH was attenuated in the current study after adjustment for medical comorbidities, supporting the hypothesis that poor overall health status in these individuals is a major contributor to subsequent risk of adverse events.

Our findings are also consistent with recent work by Parikh et al. demonstrating an increased risk in 5-year mortality following percutaneous intervention for coronary artery disease among US veterans aging with HIV. This increased risk was observed despite well-controlled HIV infection and a similar procedural approach to HIV-negative controls.26 As in our study, the authors report significantly higher rates of tobacco and substance use disorder among PLWH, suggesting the critical importance of addressing these modifiable risk factors among PLWH with advanced atherosclerosis requiring intervention.

Whether HIV itself is a direct causative factor in adverse arterial events is a subject of ongoing investigation. The overall physiologic links between HIV and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease are complex, with immune dysregulation and chronic inflammation contributing to accelerated arterial dysfunction over time, even in individuals with well-controlled infection.27–29 Various studies have assessed the association between HIV and subclinical atherosclerosis and have demonstrated independent increases in coronary artery calcium,30 noncalcified coronary plaque,31 and carotid intima–media thickness.32 These changes contribute to the increased burden of overt cardiovascular disease among PLWH, and may extend to the increased risk of PAD that has been observed in multiple HIV populations.3,14,15 It remains plausible that these same changes may contribute to adverse events following PVI, though a complete causal analysis of the direct effects of the virus on MALE risk is outside the scope of this study.

One additional major contributing factor may be the under-utilization of guideline-based medical therapy. Several large studies have reported that individuals with HIV are less likely be prescribed statins despite meeting criteria for lipid-lowering therapy.33,34 Statins also continue to be woefully under-prescribed for PAD in the general population.35–37 This includes cohorts undergoing peripheral vascular intervention, despite data demonstrating an increased risk of MALE in individuals who have not been prescribed statin and antiplatelet therapy following revascularization.25 Although no differences in cardiovascular medication use were observed between groups in our current study, the overall low frequency of key medications including statin and antiplatelet agents is concerning and may disproportionately affect PLWH due to their higher burden of cardiovascular comorbidities. Further attention is needed to maximize optimal medical therapy, treat uncontrolled comorbidities, and intervene on tobacco utilization if long-term PVI outcomes are going to be comparable to the general population. A team-based model, including representation from vascular medicine, vascular surgery, and providers experienced in management of HIV, may offer opportunities for improved quality for this patient group.

Study limitations

The current study has several limitations. First, because these data are derived from Medicare FFS records, younger patients and those with alternative insurance (e.g., Medicare Advantage) are not represented. The prescription medication utilization results were further restricted to patients who enrolled in both Medicare FFS and Medicare Part D in order to obtain complete prescription claims, and do not include aspirin for this reason. Second, residual confounding cannot be excluded in this non-randomized sample – we conclude that PLWH as a group have an overall increased risk of MALE, but we are not able to define the HIV-specific attributable risk as compared to the risk accrued from underlying differences in baseline health and socioeconomic status. Third, claims data do not allow for evaluation of detailed clinical, anatomical, and procedural information, including the presence of multilevel arterial disease, laterality of procedures, and duration/control of HIV infection. Finally, although this was one of the largest samples of PAD patients above the age of 65 with long-term limb data, the proportion of PLWH overall was small and no data were included on surgical revascularization for either group.

Conclusions

PLWH enrolled in Medicare FFS who are referred for endovascular treatment of symptomatic PAD are younger overall but have a high rate of comorbidities in comparison to HIV-negative controls. Following PVI, these patients are at an increased risk of long-term MALE and are under prescribed goal-directed medical therapy. Additional studies investigating the etiology behind adverse outcomes and optimization of high-quality, guideline-based medical treatment for PAD are warranted.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental material

The supplementary material is available online with the article.

Funding

Priscilla Y Hsue is supported by NIH grant K24AI112393; Eric A Secemsky is supported by NIH/NHLBI grant K23HL150290.

Declaration of conflicting interests

Rushi V Parikh receives research support from the American Heart Association, Janssen, Infraredx, Abbott Vascular, and Bayer, and consulting fees from Abbott Vascular. Priscilla Y Hsue reports honoraria from Gilead and Merck. Eric A Secemsky receives research support from the US Food & Drug Administration, Harvard Medical School’s Shore Faculty Development Award, Becton Dickinson, Boston Scientific, Cook, Cardiovascular Systems, Inc., Laminate Medical, Medtronic, and Philips, and reports consulting and speaking fees from Abbott, Bayer, Becton Dickinson, Boston Scientific, Cook, Cardiovascular Systems Inc., Janssen, Medtronic, Philips, and VentureMed. The remaining authors report no other relevant disclosures.

Data availability

The data underlying this article were provided by the Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services under a license. Data will be shared on request to the corresponding author with permission of the Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services.

References

  • 1.Chow FC, Regan S, Feske S, et al. Comparison of ischemic stroke incidence in HIV-infected and non-HIV-infected patients in a U.S. health care system. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2012; 60: 351–358. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Freiberg MS, Chang CCH, Kuller LH, et al. HIV infection and the risk of acute myocardial infarction. JAMA Intern Med 2013; 173: 614–622. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Rerkasem A, Sripan P, Pongtam S, et al. The prevalence and risk factors for peripheral arterial disease in adults living with human immunodeficiency virus. Int J Low Extrem Wounds 2023; 22: 332–338. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Shah ASV, Stelzle D, Lee KK, et al. Global burden of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in people living with HIV: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Circulation 2018; 138: 1100–1112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Feinstein MJ, Bahiru E, Achenbach C, et al. Patterns of cardiovascular mortality for HIV-infected adults in the United States: 1999 to 2013. Am J Cardiol 2016; 117: 214–220. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Smolderen KG, Heath K, Scherr T, et al. The Nevada peripheral artery disease screening effort in a Medicare Advantage population and subsequent mortality and major adverse cardiovascular event risk. J Vasc Surg 2022; 75: 2054–2064.e3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.McDermott MM, Liu K, Ferrucci L, et al. Decline in functional performance predicts later increased mobility loss and mortality in peripheral arterial disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011; 57: 962–970. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Arya S, Khakharia A, Rothenberg KA, et al. Association of peripheral artery disease with life-space mobility restriction and mortality in community-dwelling older adults. J Vasc Surg 2020; 71: 2098–2106.e1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Alberts MJ, Bhatt DL, Mas JL, et al. Three-year follow-up and event rates in the international REduction of Atherothrombosis for Continued Health Registry. Eur Heart J 2009; 30: 2318–2326. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Fowkes FGR, Rudan D, Rudan I, et al. Comparison of global estimates of prevalence and risk factors for peripheral artery disease in 2000 and 2010: A systematic review and analysis. Lancet 2013; 382: 1329–1340. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Hsue PY, Waters DD. HIV infection and coronary heart disease: Mechanisms and management. Nat Rev Cardiol 2019; 16: 745–759. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Peñín-Grandes S, Martín-Hernández J, Valenzuela PL, et al. Exercise and the hallmarks of peripheral arterial disease. Atherosclerosis 2022; 350: 41–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Gerhard-Herman MD, Gornik HL, Barrett C, et al. 2016 AHA/ACC guideline on the management of patients with lower extremity peripheral artery disease: Executive summary: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 2017; 69: 1465–1508. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Knudsen AD, Gelpi M, Afzal S, et al. Brief report: Prevalence of peripheral artery disease is higher in persons living with HIV compared with uninfected controls. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2018; 79: 381–385. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Beckman JA, Duncan MS, Alcorn CW, et al. Association of human immunodeficiency virus infection and risk of peripheral artery disease. Circulation 2018; 138: 255–265. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Chronic Conditions Data Warehouse. Updated February 2021. https://www2.ccwdata.org/condition-categories-other (accessed Jun 11, 2022).
  • 17.Anand SS, Bosch J, Eikelboom JW, et al. Rivaroxaban with or without aspirin in patients with stable peripheral or carotid artery disease: An international, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2018; 391: 219–229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Austin PC, Fine JP. Practical recommendations for reporting Fine–Gray model analyses for competing risk data. Stat Med 2017; 36: 4391–4400. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Arya S, Khakharia A, Binney ZO, et al. Association of statin dose with amputation and survival in patients with peripheral artery disease. Circulation 2018; 137: 1435–1446. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Tran LM, Cong G, Eslami MH, et al. Symptomatic human immunodeficiency virus infection is associated with advanced presentation and perioperative mortality in patients undergoing surgery for peripheral arterial disease. J Vasc Surg 2022; 75: 1403–1412.e2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Kim TI, Brahmandam A, Sarac TP, Orion KC. Trends and perioperative outcomes of patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) undergoing lower extremity revascularization. Vasc Med 2020; 25: 527–533. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Teng AE, Kennedy KF, Parikh RV, et al. Temporal trends and outcomes of peripheral artery disease revascularization and amputation among the HIV population. AIDS 2022; 36: 1717–1724. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Paisible AL, Chang CCH, So-Armah KA, et al. HIV infection, cardiovascular disease risk factor profile, and risk for acute myocardial infarction. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2015; 68: 209–216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Friedman EE, Duffus WA. Chronic health conditions in Medicare beneficiaries 65 years and older with HIV infection. AIDS 2016; 30: 2529–2536. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Weissler EH, Wang Y, Gales JM, et al. Cardiovascular and limb events following endovascular revascularization among patients ≥65 years old: An American College of Cardiology PVI Registry Analysis. J Am Heart Assoc 2022; 11: e024279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Parikh RV, Hebbe A, Barón AE, et al. Clinical characteristics and outcomes among people living with HIV undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: Insights from the Veterans Affairs Clinical Assessment, Reporting, and Tracking Program. J Am Heart Assoc 2023; 12: e028082. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Sinha A, Ma Y, Scherzer R, et al. Role of T-cell dysfunction, inflammation, and coagulation in microvascular disease in HIV. J Am Heart Assoc 2016; 5: e004243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Hoffmann U, Lu MT, Foldyna B, et al. Assessment of coronary artery disease with computed tomography angiography and inflammatory and immune activation biomarkers among adults with HIV eligible for primary cardiovascular prevention. JAMA Netw Open 2021; 4: e2114923. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Hsue PY, Scherzer R, Hunt PW, et al. Carotid intima-media thickness progression in HIV-infected adults occurs preferentially at the carotid bifurcation and is predicted by inflammation. J Am Heart Assoc 2012; 1: jah3-e000422. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Kingsley LA, Deal J, Jacobson L, et al. Incidence and progression of coronary artery calcium in HIV-infected and HIV-uninfected men. AIDS 2015; 29: 2427–2434. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.D’Ascenzo F, Cerrato E, Calcagno A, et al. High prevalence at computed coronary tomography of non-calcified plaques in asymptomatic HIV patients treated with HAART: A meta-analysis. Atherosclerosis 2015; 240: 197–204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Hanna DB, Post WS, Deal JA, et al. HIV infection is associated with progression of subclinical carotid atherosclerosis. Clin Infect Dis 2015; 61: 640–650. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Freiberg MS, Leaf DA, Goulet JL, et al. The association between the receipt of lipid lowering therapy and HIV status among veterans who met NCEP/ATP III criteria for the receipt of lipid lowering medication. J Gen Intern Med 2009; 24: 334–340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Ladapo JA, Richards AK, DeWitt CM, et al. Disparities in the quality of cardiovascular care between HIV-infected versus HIV-uninfected adults in the United States: A cross-sectional study. J Am Heart Assoc 2017; 6: e007107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Hess CN, Cannon CP, Beckman JA, et al. Effectiveness of blood lipid management in patients with peripheral artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2021; 77: 3016–3027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Colantonio LD, Hubbard D, Monda KL, et al. Atherosclerotic risk and statin use among patients with peripheral artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2020; 76: 251–264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Berger JS, Ladapo JA. Underuse of prevention and lifestyle counseling in patients with peripheral artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2017; 69: 2293–2300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental material

Data Availability Statement

The data underlying this article were provided by the Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services under a license. Data will be shared on request to the corresponding author with permission of the Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services.

RESOURCES