Abstract
Fischer carbenes have recently found great utility in the construction of degradable metathesis materials, but investigations have been limited to oxygen-containing enol ether monomers. Here, the ring-opening metathesis polymerization of 1,2-dihydroazetes is reported. The polymerization proceeds regioselectivity, and the resulting molecular weights are targetable by adjusting the Grubbs initiator loading. Under acidic conditions, the resulting polymers degrade into 3-aminopropanal derivatives through hydrolysis of the recurring enamide motifs in the polymer backbone. Additionally, the underlying kinetics and thermodynamics of the polymerization were studied through DFT calculations to elucidate the origins of metathesis regioselectivity. This work further expands the suite of monomers available to generate degradable metathesis materials and provides a flexible platform for target applications.
Keywords: ROMP; 1,2-Dihydroazete; Degradation; Regio-selectivity
Graphical Abstract

An exploration of 1,2-dihydroazetes in ring-opening metathesis polymerization (ROMP) is reported. The 4-membered rings readily polymerized using the Hoveyda-Grubbs 2nd generation initiator and maintained living chain-ends for block polymer synthesis. This study gives new insights into the reactivity and limitations of enamine derivatives in metathesis processes, while also offering a new approach to degradable metathesis materials with tunable properties.
Introduction
Ring-opening metathesis polymerization (ROMP) with heteroatom-substituted cycloalkenes has seen a renaissance in recent years. While these systems were previously considered to be incompatible with metathesis polymerization due to the limited reactivity of the Fischer carbene generated upon ring-opening[1], Xia’s landmark homopolymerization of dihydrofuran (DHF) demonstrated its viability and revitalized interest in this area[2]. Ensuing studies demonstrated the ability of DHF to readily copolymerize in an alternating fashion with enyne[3], ynyne[4], cyclobutenes[5], and norbornene[6] comonomers. In addition to revealing unexpected metathesis competence, these systems introduced labile enol ether motifs into the polymer backbone. Plastic waste that persists in the environment is an urgent challenge to modern society, and this provided a facile strategy to introduce degradability into metathesis-derived materials which historically contain all-carbon backbones.
While DHF has received increasing attention in the literature, very little has been explored to evaluate other heteroatom-substituted cyclic alkenes in ROMP. Extension to enamine derivatives would offer an increased valency to the heteroatom, thereby permitting incorporation of functional sidechains to tune material properties, while still retaining the same capability for degradation[7]. Grubbs and coworkers reported the viability of metathesis between nitrogen and sulfur-substituted alkenes, but this chemistry was not further translated into a polymerization manifold[1a]. In this work, the ring-opening metathesis polymerization (ROMP) of strained 1,2-dihydroazete (DHA) monomers that contain an embedded enamine motif is reported that produces functional and degradable materials.
Results and Discussion
To evaluate the potential of enamine derivatives in ROMP, the 1,2-dihydroazete (DHA) scaffold was selected for initial studies (Scheme 1). As conventional wisdom in ROMP dictates the need for ring strain, the four-membered heterocycle was selected based on the richness of metathesis literature on cyclobutene derivatives[8]. The DHA derivatives were synthesized starting from inexpensive N-Boc-azetidin-3-one in 3–4 steps in 31–70% overall yields (Scheme S1) through modification of literature procedures.[9] Boc, benzoyl, pivaloyl, or tosyl groups were readily appended to the nitrogen atom to evaluate the steric and electronic impacts on polymerization. The 5-membered dihydropyrrole derivative NBoc-DHP was also prepared to evaluate the role of ring-strain in the system following analogous procedures (Figure S1–9 and Scheme S2).
Scheme 1.

(A) Homopolymerization of DHF. (B) Alternating copolymerization of DHF with alkyne derivatives, cyclobutenes, and norbornenes. (C) Design and synthesis of enamine-containing polymers via ROMP of 1,2-dihydroazete derivatives (NR-DHA).
NBz-DHA was selected as the model monomer to evaluate competence in ROMP using ruthenium-based initiators. Grubbs 1 (G1), Grubbs 2 (G2), Grubbs 3 (G3), and Hoveyda Grubbs (HG2) were all examined in THF with a monomer/initiator ratio ([M]0/[I]0) of 100/1 (Table 1)[10]. Ethyl vinyl ether (EVE) was selected as the terminating agent to remove the ruthenium chain end and produce a methylene end group. While 25 % conversion of NBz-DHA was observed with G1 over 48 hours (Table 1, entry 1), no conversion was observed with G3 (Table 1, entry 3). Conversion of NBz-DHA was improved with G2, giving the desired polymer PNBz-DHA with a slightly lower than theoretical number average molecular weight (Mn) and moderate dispersity (Table 1, entry 2; Mnexp. = 11.4kg/mol, Mncal. = 15.9 kg/mol, Ð = 1.63). Interestingly, ROMP of NBz-DHA initiated by HG2 gave a near theoretical molecular weight value and lower dispersity (Table 1, entry 4; Mn = 13.3 kg/mol, Ð = 1.43). While HG2 is usually ineffective at controlling polymerization due to slow rates of initiation, Choi has shown the efficient ROMP of cyclobutene derivatives with HG2 due to coordination of the ruthenium center to backbone alkenes during propagation (vide infra)[11].
Table 1.
Ring-opening metathesis polymerization of NR-DHAs
| Entry | Monomer | [M]0/[I]0d | Initiator | Time (h) | Mn,cal.(g/mol) | Mn,exp.(g/mol)e | Ð f | Conversion (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1a | NBz-DHA | 100/1 | G1 | 48 | 15900 | - | - | 25 |
| 2a | NBz-DHA | 100/1 | G2 | 48 | 15900 | 11350 | 1.63 | >95 |
| 3a | NBz-DHA | 100/1 | G3 | 48 | 15900 | - | - | <5 |
| 4a | NBz-DHA | 100/1 | HG2 | 42 | 15900 | 13290 | 1.43 | >95 |
| 5 | NBz-DHA | 100/1 | HG2 | 42 | 15900 | 13170 | 1.41 | >95 |
| 6b | NBz-DHA | 100/1 | HG2 | 48 | 15900 | 7010 | 1.75 | 68 |
| 7 | NBz-DHA | 50/1 | HG2 | 18 | 8000 | 8161 | 1.36 | >95 |
| 8 | NBz-DHA | 25/1 | HG2 | 6 | 4000 | 5770 | 1.29 | >95 |
| 9 | NBz-DHA | 150/1 | HG2 | 67 | 23900 | 19480 | 1.47 | >95 |
| 10 | NBz-DHA | 200/1 | HG2 | 93 | 31800 | 28660 | 1.44 | >95 |
| 11 | NBz-DHA | 250/1 | HG2 | 93 | 39800 | 33550 | 1.55 | >95 |
| 12 | NBz-DHA | 1000/1 | HG2 | 95 | 159100 | 48300 | 1.72 | 43 |
| 13 | NBoc-DHA | 100/1 | HG2 | 2 | 15500 | 18450 | 1.51 | >95 |
| 14 | NPiv-DHA | 100/1 | HG2 | 63 | 13900 | 11370 | 1.63 | >95 |
| 15c | NTs-DHA | 50/1 | HG2 | 65 | 10500 | 4370 | 1.79 | 62 |
| 16 | NBoc-DHA/NBz-DHA | 100/25/1 | HG2 | 0.5/40 | 19800 | 15900 | 1.32 | >95/>95 |
| 17 | NBoc-DHP | 50/1 | HG2 | 32 | 8450 | - | - | <5 |
ROMP was performed under a N2 atmosphere.
The solvent was DCM.
The concentration was set as 0.7M for the lower solubility of NTs-DHA.
Initial equivalents of NR-DHAs/Grubbs catalyst.
Determined by SEC analysis in chloroform.
Mw/Mn.
Notably, polymerization performed under a nitrogen atmosphere (Table 1, entry 4) and an air atmosphere (Table 1, entry 5) showed similar performance, possibly attributed to the pendant coordination of the olefin moiety, coupled with the reduced reactivity of the Fischer-type carbene. For convenience, all future polymerizations were performed under air atmosphere without degassing protocols. Dichloromethane (DCM) was also examined as a polymerization solvent for NBz-DHA (Table 1, entry 6)[12]. This led to a slower rate of polymerization with 68 % conversion of NBz-DHA after 48 h. The higher polymerization rate in THF may be attributed to coordination of the Lewis basic oxygen to the ruthenium center, thereby facilitating dissociation of the pendant alkene in the propagating chain.
The HG2-initiated ROMP of NBz-DHA demonstrated some features of controlled polymerization, such as the linear increase in molecular weight with feed ratio and a first order kinetic profile (Figure 1 and S14). Polymerization of NBz-DHA at [M]0/[I]0 ratios of 25/1 and 50/1 displayed Mn of 5.8 and 8.2 kg/mol and Ð of 1.29 and 1.36, respectively (Table 1, entries 7–8). Changing the [M]0/[I]0 ratio to 150/1, 200/1 and 250/1 linearly increased the Mn to 19.5, 28.7 and 33.6 kg/mol, respectively, while maintaining a Ð of ~1.50 (Table 1, entries 9–11). The modest dispersity values of the polymerization suggest a relatively slow initiation with HG2. The polymerization begins to fail at higher molecular weights, with an [M]0/[I]0 ratio of 1000/1 resulting in incomplete conversion and a broader molecular weight distribution (Table 1, entry 12). Next, a polymer with a degree of polymerization of 30 was characterized via matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry after quenching with EVE (Figure 1D). The resulting spectrum predominantly displayed peaks corresponding to the matrix and proton adducts (Figure S15). Notably, the consistent mass interval of 159.1 Da between the major peaks is indicative of the molar mass of the NBz-DHA repeat unit. Furthermore, the detected ions exclusively contained the iPrO−PhCH− and CH2− end groups, thereby confirming the chain end control and the high efficacy of the polymerization.
Figure 1.

HG2-Catalyzed ROMP of NBz-DHA (A) Overlay of SEC curves at different [M]0/[I]0 ratios. (B) Plots of Mn and Ð as a function of the [M]0/[I]0 ratio. (C) Overlay of SEC curves of the precursor polymer P(NBoc-DHA)25 and the copolymer P(NBoc-DHA)25-b-P(NBz-DHA)100. (D) MALDI-TOF mass spectrum of PNBz-DHA, quenched by EVE.
Changing the nitrogen substituent of the DHA monomer to Boc (NBoc-DHA) or pivalate (NPiv-DHA) led to similar performance under the standard conditions to that of NBz-DHA (Table 1, entries 13–14, and Figure S10–11). Examination of tosylated NTs-DHA, however, only reached 62% conversion after ~65 hours, suggesting diminished reactivity compared to the acylated DHA derivatives (Table 1, entry 15). To further verify the retention of the ruthenium chain-end after polymerization, a diblock polymer was prepared by polymerizing NBoc-DHA followed by addition of NBz-DHA (Table 1, entry 16). As can be seen by SEC analysis, the monomodal peak of the first block completely shifts to an earlier elution time after chain extension, supporting diblock formation (Figure 1C and Figure S13). Since ring strain presumably plays a critical role in this polymerization, the five-membered dihydropyrrole derivative NBoc-DHP was investigated (Figure S9)[13]. As anticipated, only trace conversion of NBoc-DHP was observed at [M]0/[I]0 ratio of 50/1 under the standard reaction conditions (Table 1, entry 17).
The thermal behavior of the PNR-DHAs were investigated via thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). PNBoc-DHA showed a decomposition temperature (Td5%) of ~ 202 °C due to the thermal decomposition of Boc group (Figure S16). The other PNR-DHAs all displayed good thermal stability with a Td5% over ~270 °C. The Tg of the polymers were tunable over a range of ~51−105 °C by altering side group structure, which provided a broad window for material processing (Figure S17–21).
The protons resonances observed in the PNBz-DHA 1H NMR spectrum is broad and complex (Figure 2 and Figure S12). Likewise, the protons present in the NBz-DHA monomer also exhibit significant broadening (a, b, and c). This suggests the coexistence and rapid interconversion of the four possible rotamers on the NMR timescale (Figure 2A, I-1, I-2, I-3 and I-4). Density functional theory (DFT) calculations on the B3LYP/6–31G* level of theory supported the similar energy of the four possible isomers (free energy differences less than ~0.1 kcal/mol) and relatively low energy barriers for both rotation (17.4 and 12.1 kcal/mol for I-TS2 and I-TS4, respectively) and flipping (1.9 and 2.9 kcal/mol for I-TS1 and I-TS3, respectively) processes (Figure 2A). When a CDCl3 solution of NBz-DHA was cooled to ~-2 °C, the proton peaks resolved, due to the inhibition of amide bond rotation with higher energy barriers (Figure 2C).
Figure 2.

(A) Rapid interconversion of four NBz-DHA isomers via rotation and flipping processes. 1H NMR spectra of NBz-DHA at room temperature (B) and at −2 °C (C) and PNBz-DHA (D) in CDCl3.
The abundant enamide motifs decorating the PNR-DHAs backbone present the potential for backbone cleavage under acidic conditions. To investigate degradation, PNBoc-DHA was dissolved in anhydrous MeOH containing 10 eq of HCl. According to 1H NMR, PNBoc-DHA can be completely degraded (>95%) into small molecules within minutes to give 3,3-dimethoxypropan-1-amine as the major product (Figure S22B, bottom), which supported by a sharp decrease in molecular weight by SEC (Figure S22A). The same product is generated upon methanolysis of the NBoc-DHA monomer under the identical conditions (Figure S22B, middle). Similarly, PNBz-DHA featuring a more acid stable benzoate substituents also undergoes facile degradation into small molecules under acidic aqueous conditions. As illustrated in Figures 3A and 3B, a gradual decrease in molecular weight of PNBz-DHA observed upon stirring in a TFA/H₂O/DCM solvent mixture over 48 hours. A more rapid degradation of PNBz-DHA can be accomplished within ~5 minutes in a homogeneous HCl/MeOH solution, with NBz-DMA (N-(3,3-dimethoxypropyl)benzamide) identified as the predominant degradation product (Figure 3C).
Figure 3.

Acid-Catalyzed degradation of PNBz-DHA. (A) Overlay of SEC curves at various time points during the degradation process in TFA/H₂O/DCM. (B) Plots of Mn as a function of degradation time. (C) Overlay of the 1H NMR spectra in MeOD of PNBz-DHA (top), the degraded PNBz-DHA (bottom), and NBz-DHA after hydrolysis (middle)as a reference.
The degradation experiments also gave insights into the polymer regiochemistry, as a minor product (<10%) was identified as N,N’-(but-2-ene-1,4-diyl)dibenzamide via LC-MS analysis (Figure S23). This degradation product corresponds to the hydrolysis of small quantities of head-to-head (H–H) linkages with a measured regioselectivity of approximately 90%. This result aligns with the high regioselectivity of metathesis for the nitrogen-substituted alkenes N-vinyl carbazole and N-vinyl(pyrrolidinone) previously studied by Grubbs[1a].
To better understand the nature of polymerization, a mechanistic study of the NR-DHA ROMP was performed through DFT calculations[14]. To simplify the calculations, NMeCO-DHA was used as a model monomer and G2 as initiator. The free energies of key intermediates (INTs) and transition states (TSs) for both the initiation and chain propagation steps are summarized in Figure 4 and Figure S25, respectively. To elucidate the origin of head-to-tail regioselectivity of the unsymmetrical NR-DHA monomers, two possible orientations of the monomer-ruthenium carbenoid were considered. The orientation which results in a nitrogen-substituted ruthenium carbenoid was designated pathway H (head), and the orientation resulting in a carbon-substituted ruthenium carbenoid was termed the pathway T (tail). The DFT calculations start with the dissociation of tricyclohexylphosphine (PCy3) from G2 (1 → 2, Figure 4). Next, the coordination and cycloaddition of the 14-electron complex was calculated in the H and T orientations. The resulting energy barriers for the metallacyclobutane formation are highest in both H and T pathways (17.3 and 16.0 kcal/mol, respectively), indicating that cycloaddition is the rate-determining step of initiation. The 1.27 kcal/mol higher energy of H-TS1 compared to T-TS1 implies the pathway T is kinetically favored over pathway H.
Figure 4.

Mechanistic Investigation of the ROMP by DFT Calculation. Free energy profile of ROMP of NMeCO-DHA initiated by G2.
The ring-opening product could be stabilized by intramolecular olefin or carbonyl coordination to ruthenium center[15]. Therefore, both coordination modes (5 and 6) were considered for the NMeCO-DHA monomer in both H and T pathways. Consistent with prior experimental work by Choi[11], the free energy of olefin-coordinated complexes 5 were found to be lower in energy than ester-coordinated complexes 6 (−25.8 kcal/mol vs −22.5 kcal/mol for pathway H). Furthermore, the ~15.4 kcal/mol higher free energy of T-5 compared to H-5 correlates with the observed regioselectivity from the viewpoint of thermodynamics. This regioselectivity was also validated experimentally by the sole existence of alkylidene signals at the ~12.0 – 15.0 ppm range in 1H NMR spectrum of the mixture of HG2/NR-DHAs, corresponding to the Fischer-type H carbene proton signals of the propagating species (Figure S24)[1a].
Since the observed regioselectivity does not fully account for the kinetically favored T pathway for initiation, the ensuing propagation step was also investigated via DFT starting from intermediate H-5. Similar with the case of initiation, both carbene-monomer orientations were evaluated for coordination/cycloaddition and labeled as pathway H-H and pathway H-T, respectively. As shown in Figure S25, the energy barrier calculated for pathway H-T (14.3 kcal/mol) is 3.3 kcal/mol higher than that for pathway H-H (11.0 kcal/mol). Similarly, pathway H-H demonstrated a 14.7 kcal/mol lower overall free energy difference for ring-opening compared to pathway H-T. This suggests that the initiation event has reduced regioselectivity, which then becomes primarily head-to-head (pathway H) in ensuing propagation events.
To gain further insight into the origins of the cycloaddition regioselectivity, energy decomposition analysis (EDA) was performed on the activation energy difference (ΔΔE‡) between the H-TS1 and T-TS1. ΔΔE‡ can be decomposed to the contribution from steric interactions (ΔΔEsteric), orbital interactions (ΔΔEorb), and electrostatic interactions (ΔΔEele), allowing each of the individual factors impacting regioselectivity to be compared (Table S2–S4; see the Computational Details in SI for more information)[16]. As shown in Figure 5, the EDA results indicated that steric effects (ΔΔEsteric = −68.2 kcal/mol) positively contribute to H regioselectivity. However, orbital and electrostatic interactions (ΔΔEorb = 38.0 kcal/mol and ΔΔEele = 27.7 kcal/mol) are unfavorable factors for H regioselectivity due to the higher orbital matching (Figure S26) and stronger coulombic attraction (Table S5) between the ruthenium complex and DHA fragments in T-TS1. These findings were surprising since it was presumed electronic factors would guide the cycloaddition to pathway H. This could be impacted by the electron-withdrawing groups on the DHA monomers, and further investigation of the relative impacts of ΔΔEsteric, ΔΔEorb, and ΔΔEele in the cycloaddition reactions of other electron-rich olefins is underway.
Figure 5.

Energy decomposition analysis of the energy difference between transition states H-TS1 and T-TS1.
Conclusion
In summary, the ROMP of 1,2-dihydroazetes under ambient conditions to afford degradable materials has been developed. In the presence of HG2 as the initiator, polymerization can rationally target different molecular weights and proceeds with high regioselectivity. The effects of substituents on the 1,2-dihydroazete scaffold were investigated to show broad tolerance of acyl derivatives, while reduced rates of metathesis were observed with a sulfonyl 1,2-dihydroazete. The overall polymerization was studied via DFT calculations to demonstrate the relative roles of initiation and propagation to give rise to an overall regio-controlled polymerization. The resulting materials were readily degraded into small molecule fragments under acidic conditions via cleavage of the enamide linkages, further expanding the suite of monomers to generate degradable metathesis materials.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health under Award Number R35GM133784. We acknowledge support from the Organic Materials Characterization Laboratory (OMCL) at GT for use of the shared characterization facility.
References:
- [1].a) Louie J, Grubbs RH, Organometallics 2002, 21 (11), 2153–2164; [Google Scholar]; b) Schwab P, Grubbs RH, Ziller JW, J. Am. Chem. Soc 1996, 118 (1), 100–110; [Google Scholar]; c) Owen RM, Gestwicki JE, Young T, Kiessling LL, Org. Lett 2002, 4 (14), 2293–2296; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d) Hilf S, Grubbs RH, Kilbinger AFM, J. Am. Chem. Soc 2008, 130 (33), 11040–11048; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e) Katayama H, Urushima H, Nishioka T, Wada C, Nagao M, Ozawa F, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2000, 39 (24), 4513–4515. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; f). Liu P, Yasir M, Kurzen H, Hanik N, Schäfer M, and Kilbinger AFM, J. Polym. Sci. Part A: Polym. Chem 2017, 55 (18), 2983–2990. [Google Scholar]
- [2].Feist JD, Xia Y, J. Am. Chem. Soc 2020, 142 (3), 1186–1189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [3].Sui XL, Zhang TQ, Pabarue AB, Fu LB, Gutekunst WR, J. Am. Chem. Soc 2020, 142 (30), 12942–12947. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [4].Sui XL, Gutekunst WR, ACS Macro Lett. 2022, 11 (5), 630–635. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [5].An TY, Ryu H, Choi TL, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2023, 62 (47), e202309632. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [6].a) Feist JD, Lee DC, Xia Y, Nat. Chem 2022, 14 (1), 53–58; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Mandal A, Mandal I, Kilbinger AFM, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2023, 62 (4), e202211842; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Mandal A, Mandal I, Kilbinger AFM, Macromolecules 2022, 55, 7827–7833; [Google Scholar]; d) Tashiro K, Akiyama M, Kashiwagi K, Okazoe T, J. Am. Chem. Soc 2023, 145 (5), 2941–2950. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [7].a) Demarteau J, Cousineau B, Wang Z, Bose B, Cheong S, Lan G, Baral NR, Teat SJ, Scown CD, Keasling JD, Helms BA, Nat. Sustain 2023, 6, 1426–1435; [Google Scholar]; b) Christensen P, Scheuermann A, Loeffler K, Helms B, Nat. Chem 2019, 11, 1–7; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) DeBlase CR, Silberstein KE, Truong TT, Abruña HD, Dichtel WR, J. Am. Chem. Soc 2013, 135 (45), 16821–16824; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d) Wang LJ, Dong PY, Zhang GL, Zhang FM, Energy & Fuels 2023, 37 (9), 6323–6347; [Google Scholar]; e) Koner K, Mohata S, Ogaeri Y, Nishiyama Y, Addicoat MA, Banerjee R, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2024, 63, e202316873. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [8].a) Schleyer P. v. R., Williams JE, Blanchard KR, J. Am. Chem. Soc 1970, 92 (8), 2377–2386; [Google Scholar]; b) Dall’Asta G, Motroni G, Motta L, Polym J. Sci. A1 1972, 10 (6), 1601–1608; [Google Scholar]; c) Wu Z, Grubbs RH, Macromolecules 1995, 28 (10), 3502–3508; [Google Scholar]; d) Wu Z, Wheeler DR, Grubbs RH, J. Am. Chem. Soc 1992, 114 (1), 146–151; [Google Scholar]; e) Wu Z, Grubbs RH, Macromolecules 1994, 27 (23), 6700–6703; [Google Scholar]; f) Perrott MG, Novak BM, Macromolecules 1995, 28 (9), 3492–3494; [Google Scholar]; g) Leroux F, Pascual S, Montembault V, Fontaine L, Macromolecules 2015, 48 (12), 3843–3852; [Google Scholar]; h) Song A, Parker KA, Sampson NS, J. Am. Chem. Soc 2009, 131 (10), 3444–3445; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; i) Song A, Lee JC, Parker KA, Sampson NS, J. Am. Chem. Soc 2010, 132 (30), 10513–10520; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; j) Boadi FO, Zhang JL, Yu XX, Bhatia SR, Sampson NS, Macromolecules 2020, 53 (14), 5857–5868; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; k) Limanto J, Snapper M, J. Am. Chem. Soc 2000, 122 (33), 8071–8072; [Google Scholar]; l) Edel K, Yang X, Ishibashi J, Lamm A, Maichle-Mössmer C, Giustra Z, Liu S, Bettinger H, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2018, 57, 5296–5300; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; m) Ozaki T, Bentley S, Rybansky N, Li B, Liu SY, J. Am. Chem. Soc 2024, DOI: 10.1021/jacs.4c08088; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; n) Adamo M, Disetti P, Piras L, Tetrahedron Lett. 2009, 50 (26), 3580–3584. [Google Scholar]
- [9].Dejaegher Y, Kuz’menok NM, Zvonok AM, De Kimpe N, Chem. Rev 2002, 102 (1), 29–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [10].Nascimento D, Gawin A, Gawin R, Guńka P, Zachara J, Skowerski K, Fogg D, J. Am. Chem. Soc 2019, 141 (27), 10626–10631. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [11].Song JA, Park B, Kim S, Kang C, Lee D, Baik MH, Grubbs RH, J. Am. Chem. Soc 2019, 141 (25), 10039–10047 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [12].Blosch S, Alaboalirat M, Eades C, Scannelli S, Matson J, Macromolecules 2022, 55 (9), 3522–3532. [Google Scholar]
- [13].Yu J, Truc V, Riebel P, Hierl E, Mudryk B, Tetrahedron Lett. 2005, 46 (23), 4011–4013. [Google Scholar]
- [14].Sanford MS, Love JA, Grubbs RH, J. Am. Chem. Soc 2001, 123 (27), 6543–6554. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [15].a) Anderson DR, Hickstein DD, O’Leary DJ, Grubbs RH, J. Am. Chem. Soc 2006, 128 (26), 8386–8387; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Wolf WJ, Lin TP, Grubbs RH, J. Am. Chem. Soc 2019, 141 (44), 17796–17808. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [16].a) Lu T, Chen Q, J. Phys. Chem. A 2023, 127 (33), 7023–7035; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Lu T, Chen F, J. Comput. Chem 2012, 33 (5), 580–592; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Qi X, Kohler DG, Hull KL, Liu P, J. Am. Chem. Soc 2019, 141 (30), 11892–11904. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
