Abstract
Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) is known for good sealing and also for its biocompatibility. However, limitations such as extended setting time and potential leakage persist. Therefore, it is of interest to compare the sealing efficacy of titanium-doped MTA and conventional MTA in the repair of access perforations using in vitro dye penetration model fourty extracted human mandibular premolars were used. Titanium-doped MTA showed significantly less dye penetration (mean 0.92 mm) compared to conventional MTA (mean 1.46 mm) (p = 0.001), indicating superior sealing efficacy. Thus, Titanium-doped MTA demonstrates better sealing capability than conventional MTA and may serve as an improved material for perforation repair.
Keywords: Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA), titanium-doped MTA, access perforation, microleakage, endodontic repair
Background:
Access perforations during endodontic procedures remain a significant clinical challenge, as they compromise the structural integrity of the tooth and can lead to microbial contamination, ultimately affecting the prognosis of the treatment. Successful management of perforations depends largely on the choice of repair material, which must provide an effective seal, be biocompatible and withstand functional stresses [1]. Among various biomaterials developed for this purpose, MTA has gained wide acceptance due to its superior sealing ability, biocompatibility and regenerative potential [2- 3]. Despite its favorable properties, conventional MTA has several drawbacks, including long setting time, difficult handling, potential for discoloration and questionable mechanical resistance under load [4- 5]. To overcome these limitations, modifications to MTA formulations have been explored. One such promising advancement is titanium-doped MTA, which involves the incorporation of titanium oxide nanoparticles into the MTA matrix [6]. Titanium compounds are known to enhance physical and biological properties due to their chemical stability, high biocompatibility and ability to promote bio mineralization [7]. in vitro studies have suggested that doping MTA with titanium can improve its compressive strength, accelerate setting time and increase resistance to microleakage [8]. This modification also aims to reduce the incidence of material washout and improve sealing ability in the presence of moisture-an essential requirement in perforation repair scenarios [9]. Given that microleakage at the perforation site is a critical determinant of long-term clinical success, evaluating the sealing efficacy of these materials becomes imperative [10]. Therefore, it is of interest to comparatively assess the sealing ability of titanium-doped MTA versus conventional MTA when used in repairing simulated access perforations in extracted human teeth.
Methodology:
Research design:
This in vitro experiment research was conducted to compare the sealing efficacy of "titanium-doped mineral trioxide aggregate (Ti-MTA)" and "conventional mineral trioxide aggregate (C-MTA)" in access perforation repair. Forty freshly extracted human single-rooted mandibular premolars were considered for the research based on standardized inclusion and exclusion criteria. Teeth with cracks, caries, restorations, or resorptive defects were excluded.
Specimen preparation:
All teeth crowns were removed at the "cementoenamel junction CEJ" to obtain a standardized root length of 15mm. Root canals were prepared using ProTaper rotary files up to size F3 and irrigated with 2.5% sodium hypochlorite followed by 17% EDTA to clear the smear layer. Canals were dried with paper-point and access perforations were made in the coronal third of the buccal root surface using a round bur (ISO size 0.8 mm) under water coolant to simulate clinical iatrogenic perforations.
Grouping and repair material placement:
The 40 specimens were randomly divided into 2 equal sets (n=20):
[1] Group A (Control): Access perforations repaired with conventional MTA
[2] Group B (Experimental): Access perforations repaired with titanium-doped MTA
Both materials were mixed as per manufacturer instructions and placed into the perforation site with a microcarrier. A wet cotton pellet was placed in the canal and all specimens were stored at 37°C in 100% humidity for 48 hours to ensure ample setting.
Dye penetration and evaluation:
After setting, the external root surfaces were coated with two layers of nail varnish but around the perforation site. The samples were submerged in 2% methylene blue dye for 48 hours, then rinsed and sectioned longitudinally. Dye penetration was assessed under a stereomicroscope at 20x magnification. Linear dye penetration (in mm) from the external surface toward the canal space was measured using Image J software.
Statistical analysis:
Mean dye penetration values were compared between sets using the independent t-test. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant using SPSS version 25.0.
Results:
The mean dye penetration depth in Group A (Conventional MTA) was greater compared to Group B (Titanium-Doped MTA), indicating superior sealing ability in the latter. The variance between the two sets was statistically significant. Table 1 (see PDF) presents the mean and standard deviation of dye penetration values in millimeters for both groups. Titanium-doped MTA exhibited a mean leakage of 0.92 ± 0.31 mm, while conventional MTA showed higher leakage at 1.46 ± 0.42 mm. In addition, the frequency distribution of specimens by leakage severity (mild: <1 mm, moderate: 1-2 mm, severe: >2 mm) revealed that 75% of specimens in the titanium-MTA group had mild leakage, while only 30% of the conventional MTA group achieved the same. This pattern further supports the improved sealing efficacy of titanium-doped MTA (Table 2 - see PDF). These results demonstrate that titanium doping in MTA significantly enhances sealing capacity in access perforation repair, likely due to improved material adaptation and reduced porosity.
Discussion:
The management of access perforations is a critical aspect of endodontic therapy and the material used for repair plays a significant role in determining the clinical outcome. This research aimed to compare the sealing efficacy of titanium-doped MTA with that of conventional MTA, using dye penetration as an indicator of microleakage. The results demonstrated that titanium-doped MTA showed significantly reduced dye penetration compared to conventional MTA, indicating superior sealing ability. The enhanced performance of titanium-doped MTA can be attributed to several material properties. Titanium oxide, when incorporated into MTA, is known to improve the crystalline structure, leading to reduced porosity and better marginal adaptation. This contributes to decreased pathways for microleakage and improves the integrity of the seal in moist environments, which is crucial in clinical scenarios involving perforations [11]. Moreover, titanium-doped formulations are reported to have faster setting times and improved handling characteristics, both of which can influence the clinical success of perforation repair [12]. Previous studies evaluating modifications of MTA with different nanoparticles have demonstrated similar improvements in sealing efficacy and physical properties. The biocompatibility of titanium-containing compounds also makes them suitable for endodontic applications, as they support favorable tissue responses without inducing inflammation or cytotoxic effects [13]. This is essential for achieving long-term healing and maintaining the integrity of periradicular tissues. Additionally, the reduction in severe leakage in the titanium-MTA group in this research suggests better adaptation and material stability over time. The absence of specimens with dye penetration greater than 2 mm in the titanium-MTA group may imply a more predictable sealing outcome, which is particularly valuable in perforation management cases that are otherwise at higher risk for failure [14]. It is important to note that while in vitro studies like this one provide controlled comparisons, they may not fully replicate clinical conditions such as blood contamination, functional stresses and host immune responses. Therefore, further in vivo studies and clinical trials are necessary to confirm these findings and establish long-term outcomes [15, 16, 17, 18, 19-20].
Conclusion:
Titanium-doped MTA exhibited significantly better sealing efficacy than conventional MTA in access perforation repair. Its reduced microleakage, likely due to enhanced physical and structural properties, positions it as a promising material for clinical use. Further research is needed to validate these results in clinical scenarios and explore long-term biocompatibility and success rates.
Edited by Akshaya Ojha
Citation: Patil et al. Bioinformation 21(8):2481-2484(2025)
Declaration on Publication Ethics: The author's state that they adhere with COPE guidelines on publishing ethics as described elsewhere at https://publicationethics.org/. The authors also undertake that they are not associated with any other third party (governmental or non-governmental agencies) linking with any form of unethical issues connecting to this publication. The authors also declare that they are not withholding any information that is misleading to the publisher in regard to this article.
Declaration on official E-mail: The corresponding author declares that official e-mail from their institution is not available for all authors.
License statement: This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. This is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License
Comments from readers: Articles published in BIOINFORMATION are open for relevant post publication comments and criticisms, which will be published immediately linking to the original article without open access charges. Comments should be concise, coherent and critical in less than 1000 words.
Bioinformation Impact Factor:Impact Factor (Clarivate Inc 2023 release) for BIOINFORMATION is 1.9 with 2,198 citations from 2020 to 2022 taken for IF calculations.
Disclaimer:The views and opinions expressed are those of the author(s) and do not reflect the views or opinions of Bioinformation and (or) its publisher Biomedical Informatics. Biomedical Informatics remains neutral and allows authors to specify their address and affiliation details including territory where required. Bioinformation provides a platform for scholarly communication of data and information to create knowledge in the Biological/Biomedical domain.
References
- 1.Makhlouf M, et al. J Contemp Dent Pract. . 2020;21:1091. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Abdelmotelb MA, et al. Clin Oral Investig. . 2021;25:4915. doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-03800-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Das M, et al. J Contemp Dent Pract. . 2022;23:1136. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Mohan D, et al. J Contemp Dent Pract. . 2021;22:80. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Shah S, et al. Indian J Dent Res. . 2019;30:573. doi: 10.4103/ijdr.IJDR_788_16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Aladimi AA, et al. Eur Endod J. . 2020;5:138. doi: 10.14744/eej.2020.44127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Mohamed DA, et al. Clin Oral Investig. . 2023;27:5103. doi: 10.1007/s00784-023-05131-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Clauder T. Int Endod J. . 2022;55:872. doi: 10.1111/iej.13748. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Abboud KM, et al. BMC Oral Health. . 2021;21:192. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-01552-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.de Sousa Reis M, et al. Clin Oral Investig. . 2019;23:4019. doi: 10.1007/s00784-019-02833-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Gorni FG, et al. J Endod. . 2022;48:1092. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2022.06.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Pinheiro LS, et al. Int Endod J. . 2021;54:2195. doi: 10.1111/iej.13617. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Övsay E, et al. Biomed Res Int. . 2018;2018:5478796. doi: 10.1155/2018/5478796. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Nagmode P, et al. J Clin Exp Dent. . 2023;15:e32.. doi: 10.4317/jced.59755. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Koç C, et al. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. . 2021;15:183. doi: 10.34172/joddd.2021.031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Izaz S, et al. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. . 2021;13:S952.. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_392_21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Izaz S, et al. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. . 2021;13:S43.. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.JPBS_810_20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Mall A, et al. IP Indian J Conserv Endod. . 2025;10:48. doi: 10.18231/j.ijce.2025.008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Shaik I, et al. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. . 2024;16:S613.. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_891_23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Bichile ML, et al. J Conserv Dent. . 2022;25:541. doi: 10.4103/jcd.jcd_248_22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
