Skip to main content
International Journal of Women's Dermatology logoLink to International Journal of Women's Dermatology
. 2025 Dec 11;11(4):e232. doi: 10.1097/JW9.0000000000000232

Cosmetic products and health concerns: insights from 1149 Saudi women

Mohammed Nasser Asiri a, Mohammed Yousof Bakhiet a, Haya Abdulaziz Kisan Alzahrani b,*, Sara Mahfoud Hassan Alghamdi b, Rania A Alghamdi b, Amirah Saleh Abdullah Alzubaidi c, Abdullah Faisal A Albukhari d
PMCID: PMC12700751  PMID: 41395208

Abstract

Background:

The cosmetics industry has grown significantly, driven by beauty standards and media influence. While cosmetics enhance appearance, many contain chemicals that may cause adverse effects. Understanding usage patterns and associated risks is essential for consumer safety.

Objective:

This study assessed cosmetic usage patterns and side effects among Saudi women, focusing on commonly used products, purchasing behaviors, and awareness.

Methods:

A cross-sectional survey was conducted from April 2024 to March 2025, involving 1,149 Saudi women. Data were collected via structured questionnaires on product usage, side effects, and purchasing habits. Statistical analysis examined associations between age and usage patterns.

Results:

The most used cosmetics were face creams (73.4%), makeup (70.2%), and hair care products (59.1%). Reported side effects included acne (76.1%), skin redness (74.3%), and hair loss (56.3%). Most participants (54.6%) bought cosmetics from supermarkets, and 72% did not read product leaflets. Younger participants (18–22 years) prioritized brand reputation and discontinued products upon experiencing side effects.

Limitations:

Self report, urban bias, and cross sectional design limit validity.

Conclusion:

The current study highlights age-related differences in cosmetic use and awareness, emphasizing the need for consumer education and stricter regulations to ensure product safety.

Keywords: adverse effects, awareness, beauty, cosmetics, Saudi women

Background

In today’s industrialized world, the cosmetics industry is one of the fastest-growing sectors. Cosmetics refer to products designed for application to the human body with the purpose of enhancing appearance without altering its structure or physiological functions.1 The global use of cosmetics has surged, largely driven by media-imposed beauty standards.2 Studies have detected preservatives such as parabens, carboxylic acids, alcohols, and their derivatives in various cosmetic products, including mascaras, body lotions, face creams, and leave-on formulations. These compounds have been linked to both local and systemic adverse effects, including skin irritation, rashes, blisters, and burning. Additionally, they may disrupt estrogen levels, potentially impairing female fertility, contributing to obesity, and causing hepatotoxicity and nephrotoxicity through inflammatory mechanisms.310 Furthermore, heavy metal nanoparticles—including zinc oxide (ZnO), titanium dioxide (TiO₂), aluminum oxide (Al₂O₃), and gold (Au) are widely used in cosmetics to protect the skin from ultraviolet radiation and microbial activity. However, these metals are recognized as systemic toxicants and have been associated with developmental abnormalities, cardiovascular diseases, neurological disorders, and various cancers.11,12

Notwithstanding these concerns, most consumers prioritize the immediate aesthetic benefits of cosmetic products over their potential long-term effects. These products are generally perceived as safe and well-tolerated.13

Given that Saudi women are known for their keen interest in fashion and beauty trends, numerous studies have been conducted to assess cosmetic usage patterns in this population. Most current research is constrained by limited scope or regional representation, indicating a necessity for more extensive studies throughout Saudi Arabia. Although there is an increasing occurrence of negative cosmetic effects, national-level cosmetovigilance systems are absent, emphasizing the need for assessments tailored to specific contexts.14 A study conducted in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia over 3 months found that 50.6% of the 425 respondents had experienced at least one adverse reaction in the 2 years preceding the study. The most commonly reported reactions included skin redness (19%), acne (15%), and itching (13%). Skincare (25%) and hair care (29%) products were associated with a significant proportion of these adverse effects. Notably, most affected individuals (n = 181 [84.2%]) managed their symptoms by discontinuing the use of the product.14 Another study found that 114 of 709 female participants (16.1%) experienced adverse effects from cosmetic use. Lotions were the most frequently reported culprit (51.2%). The recorded side effects included skin redness, itching, discomfort, hair loss, eye irritation, armpit darkening, and facial pigmentation.15

Recent studies indicate that consumers have limited awareness of the potential adverse effects of cosmetics. Despite varying education levels, most individuals lack expertise in cosmetic products and express concerns about their use.16 Aladwan et al.15 and Manoj et al.16 highlighted the need for further research to assess cosmetic usage patterns. Furthermore, it has been suggested that many harmful and serious effects of cosmetics remain unreported. In addition, there is an absence of public health initiatives specifically designed for cosmetic safety that are adapted to regional needs. Given Saudi Arabia’s distinct sociocultural context and market conditions, there is a pressing need for more relevant data to inform national awareness and regulatory measures.17 To bridge this knowledge gap, the present study explores the usage patterns and associated side effects of cosmetics among the Saudi female population.

Methods

Study design, setting, and period

This online, survey-based, descriptive cross-sectional study assessed cosmetic usage habits and reported adverse effects across the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia between April 2024 and March 2025. The target population was reached through a questionnaire distributed via various social media platforms. Participants were categorized based on geographic distribution, distinguishing between Saudi women living in urban and rural areas.

Participants

The study population consisted of adult Saudi females. Inclusion criteria required participants to be Saudi women aged 18 years or older and Arabic speakers. Non-Saudi individuals, non-Arabic speakers, and females below the specified age were excluded from the study.

Sample size

Sample size was estimated using the following formula:

n=P(1P)×Zα2/d2with a confidence level of95%.

n: Calculated sample size Z: The z-value for the selected level of confidence (1 − a) = 1.96

P: An estimated knowledge Q: (1 − 0.50) = 50%, that is, 0.50 D: The maximum acceptable error = 0.05 So, the calculated minimum sample size was: n = (1.96) 2 × 0.50 × 0.50 / (0.05) 2 = 385 consumers.

Data collection tool

The survey was developed based on existing literature13 and the expertise of plastic surgery professors from the Faculty of Medicine at Al-Baha University. The Arabic version was distributed to the target population, with translation performed by senior medical students and validated by 3 female graduates with bachelor’s degrees in Arabic Language and Literature. The questionnaire comprised 3 main sections: consumer demographics, reported side effects, and usage patterns. Participants provided informed consent before completing the survey. The demographics section collected information on age, social status, residence, educational level, and monthly income. Additionally, cosmetic consumption habits and potential side effects were assessed through a series of 10 structured questions.

Data analysis

Statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS version 26, with a significance level set at P < .05. Participant categorization was performed using descriptive statistical measures, including mean and standard deviation. Additionally, the Chi-square test was used to examine the correlation between age groups, reported adverse effects, and cosmetic consumption behavior.

Data assurance

A preliminary test was conducted with 31 Saudi females from different regions before the main study. This pilot study was excluded from the final analysis to evaluate the questionnaire’s clarity, suitability, and validity within the study context. Based on participant feedback, the authors included a section for suggestions regarding potential modifications to ensure the questionnaire accurately reflected the target population’s perspectives. Participants confirmed the questionnaire’s clarity by responding to an open-ended question, and no further modifications were necessary before data collection began.

Results

Sociodemographic characteristics

Of 1,506 participants, 1,149 met the inclusion criteria. All respondents were Saudi females aged 18 years or older, with a maximum age of 54 years. The mean age of the participants was 25.3 ± 5.8 years. The majority were single (89.8%), followed by married participants (9.5%). Most respondents (82.7%) resided in urban areas. In terms of education, 54.7% had completed secondary education, while 42.6% had attained higher education. Regarding monthly income, 49.3% earned between 5,000 and 10,000 SAR, while 43.3% earned less than 5,000 SAR (Table 1).

Table 1.

Sociodemographic characteristics of study participants

Sociodemographic characteristics N (%)
Age 18 or more N (%) 1149 (100%)
Mean and SD 25.3 ± 5.8
Minimum–maximum (years) 18–54
Marital status Single 1032 (89.8)
Married 109 (9.5)
Widowed 1 (0.1)
Divorced 7 (0.6)
Residency Town 199 (17.3)
City 950 (82.7)
Education Primary 1 (0.1)
Secondary 629 (54.7)
High level 490 (42.6)
Postgraduate 29 (2.6)
Income Less than 5k 498 (43.3)
5k–10k 567 (49.3)
More than 10 k 84 (7.3)

SD, standard deviation.

Cosmetic products use and side effects

As shown in Figure 1, face creams were the most commonly used cosmetic products (73.4%), followed by makeup (70.2%) and hair care products (59.1%). The primary reasons for using cosmetics included enhancing physical appearance (66.1%), reducing skin pigmentation (59.7%), and preventing hair loss and damage (56.6%). Figure 2 illustrates the most frequently reported side effects, including acne (76.1%), skin redness and itching (74.3%), and hair loss (56.3%). Additionally, the majority of participants purchased their cosmetics from supermarkets (54.6%) (Table 2).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

X-axis shows the different cosmetics used and y-axis shows the percentage of using these cosmetics and it shows face cream and makeup products are the most frequently used.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

X-axis shows the different cosmetic-related adverse effects, and y-axis shows the percentage and it shows acne and itching and redness of skin are the most frequent adverse effects.

Table 2.

Cosmetic product use and side effects

Product and side effects N (%)
Type of the cosmetic product that you used and caused side effects (you can choose more than one option) Face creams 841 (73.4)
Hair care products 677 (59.1)
Makeup products 804 (70.2)
Sunscreen 629 (55)
Deodorant 204 (17.8)
Nail polish 65 (5.7)
Body moisturizers 141 (12.3)
Why did you use the cosmetic (you can use more than one answer) Enhance physical appearance 757 (66.1)
Reduce hair loss and damage 648 (56.6)
Skin whitening 590 (51.5)
Reduce skin pigmentation 684 (59.7)
Follow beauty trends 122 (10.6)
Cover skin flaws 194 (17)
What side effects did you experience when you used this cosmetic? (you can choose more than one option) Hair loss 645 (56.3)
Acne 871 (76.1)
Itching and redness of the skin 851 (74.3)
Underarm darkening 144 (12.6)
Inflammation and infection 55 (4.8)
From where did you buy the cosmetic product that caused your side effects? Pharmacy 296 (25.8)
Supermarkets 627 (54.6)
Online stores 226 (19.6)

Utilization patterns of cosmetic use

In terms of utilization patterns among participants who experienced side effects, 62.6% reported using the product weekly. The primary factors influencing cosmetic product selection were seller promotions (45.6%), followed by recommendations from others (22.9%). Notably, most participants (72%) did not read the leaflet accompanying the product.

Upon experiencing side effects, 58.1% discontinued the product within 2 to 3 days. The majority (83%) did not reuse the product after adverse reactions, and 88.3% did not seek specific treatment for the side effects (Table 3).

Table 3.

Utilization patterns of cosmetic use

Utilization patterns N (%)
How many times did you use the product that caused the side effects? Daily 338 (29.4)
Weekly 719 (62.6)
Monthly 92 (8)
What are the criteria for choosing a cosmetic product? Trademark 171 (14.9)
Seller promotion 524 (45.6)
Experiences of others 263 (22.9)
Ingredients of the preparation 98 (8.5)
Social media advertising 93 (8.1)
Did you read the leaflet accompanying the product? Yes 322 (28)
No 827 (72)
When did you stop using the cosmetic when side effects appeared? Less than a day 145 (12.6)
A day 90 (7.8)
2–3 days 667 (58.1)
4 days or more 247 (21.5)
Did you reuse the product after emergence of side effects Yes 195 (17)
No 954 (83)
Did you use specific treatment after emergence of side effects Yes 134 (11.7)
No 1015 (88.3)

Association between cosmetic utilization and different age groups

A significant association was found between cosmetic utilization and different age groups (P < .05). Younger participants (18–22 years) were more likely to purchase cosmetics from pharmacies and use them daily. They preferred products based on brand reputation, read the accompanying leaflet, and discontinued use within a day if side effects appeared. They were also more likely to reuse the product and seek specific treatment for adverse reactions. Participants aged 23 to 30 years mostly bought cosmetics from supermarkets, used them monthly, and selected products based on seller promotions. They rarely read the leaflet and typically stopped using the product within 2 to 3 days when experiencing side effects. They were less likely to reuse the product or seek treatment. Participants over 30 years displayed distinct patterns of cosmetic utilization, as detailed in Table 4.

Table 4.

Association between cosmetic utilization and different age groups

Variable 18–22 years
N = 452
23–30 years
N = 610
More than 30 years
N = 83
P value
From where did you buy the cosmetic product that caused your side effects?
 Pharmacy 187 (41.4) 61 (10) 47 (56.6) .001
 Supermarkets 105 (23.2) 508 (83.3) 12 (14.5)
 Online stores 160 (35.4) 41 (6.7) 24 (28.9)
How many times did you use the product that caused the side effects?
 Daily 223 (49.3) 62 (10.2) 52 (62.7) .001
 Weekly 166 (36.8) 13 (2.1) 18 (21.6)
 Monthly 63 (13.9) 535 (87.7) 13 (15.7)
What are the criteria for choosing a cosmetic product?
 Trademark 108 (23.9) 34 (5.6) 28 (33.7) .001
 Seller promotion 22 (4.9) 496 (81.3) 4 (4.8)
 Experiences of others 195 (43.1) 42 (6.9) 25 (30.1)
 Ingredients of the preparation 67 (14.8) 19 (3.1) 12 (14.5)
 Social media advertising 60 (13.3) 19 (3.1) 14 (16.9)
Did you read the leaflet accompanying the product?
 Yes 203 (44.9) 58 (9.5) 58 (69.9) .001
 No 249 (55.1) 525 (90.5) 25 (30.1)
When did you stop using cosmetics when side effects appeared?
 Less than a day 104 (23) 22 (3.5) 18 (21.7) .001
 A day 62 (13.8) 9 (1.5) 19 (22.9)
 2–3 days 119 (26.3) 528 (86.6) 17 (20.5)
 4 days or more 167 (36.9) 51 (8.4) 29 (34.9)
Did you reuse the product after emergence of side effects
 Yes 141 (31.2) 38 (6.2) 15 (18.1) .001
 No 311 (68.8) 572 (93.8) 68 (81.9)
Did you use specific treatment after emergence of side effects
 Yes 85 (18.8) 25 (4.1) 23 (27.7) .001
 No 367 (81.2) 585 (95.9) 60 (72.3)
*

P value less than .05 is statistically significant.

Discussion

Participants sociodemographic

This study included 1,149 Saudi female respondents aged 18 years or older, with an average age of 25.3 ± 5.8 years. Understanding population characteristics is essential for assessing reported side effects and trends in cosmetic consumption. Our findings align with those of Shaaban et al., who reported higher cosmetic usage among younger females. This trend may be influenced by the younger generation’s increased engagement with social media platforms, which play a significant role in shaping beauty standards and consumer behavior.18 Additionally, the geographical distribution showed a higher population density in urban areas. This could be attributed to various factors, including the location of data collectors, which may have influenced participant recruitment.

Cosmetic product use and side effects

Our findings indicated that face creams were the cosmetic products most frequently associated with side effects, reported by 73.4% of users, followed by makeup products (70.2%) and hair care products (59.1%). These results contrast with a previous study conducted in Saudi Arabia, where lotions were the most commonly reported product causing side effects (51.2%), followed by face creams (27.1%).18 The discrepancy in findings may be attributed to differences in utilization frequency within similar populations, potentially influenced by variations in study periods and the methods used for data collection and survey distribution among Saudi women.

The study results revealed that acne was the most frequently reported side effect (76.1%), followed by skin redness and itching (74.3%) and hair loss (56.3%). The least reported side effects were underarm darkening (12.6%) and inflammation or infection (4.8%). In contrast, the incidence of acne as a cosmetic-related side effect was significantly lower in other studies, with Udayanga et al.2 in Sri Lanka reporting 21.0% and Bilal et al.1 in Eastern Ethiopia reporting 16%. Variations in reported side effects may be attributed to demographic, cultural, and environmental factors, as well as differences in product formulations and usage patterns. These findings emphasize the importance of considering local contexts and population characteristics when evaluating cosmetic-related adverse effects.16

The primary reason for cosmetic use among participants was to enhance physical appearance (66.1%), a trend consistent with a study in Sri Lanka, where 89.3% of respondents cited the same motivation.2 Additionally, the majority of participants (54.6%) purchased their cosmetics from supermarkets, closely aligning with findings from Ethiopia, where 50.89% of participants reported the same purchasing preference.3 However, studies from other countries have indicated that pharmacies are the preferred choice for purchasing cosmetics.19,20

Patterns of utilization

The frequency of cosmetic use significantly impacts the incidence of side effects. Previous research reported side effects in 42.3% of daily users and 8.8% of weekly users.2 Similarly, Getachew et al.21 found that 20% of daily cosmetic users experienced adverse reactions. In contrast, our study observed side effects in 29.4% of daily users, 62.6% of weekly users, and 8% of monthly users, suggesting a higher prevalence of irritants or increased sensitivity among weekly users. These findings emphasize the need for safer cosmetic formulations and greater consumer awareness regarding proper usage practices. The criteria for selecting cosmetic products also play a crucial role in consumer behavior and potential side effects. Our study found that 14.9% of participants based their choices on brand reputation, 45.6% on seller promotions, 22.9% on recommendations from others, 8.5% on ingredient composition, and 8.1% on social media advertising. These findings align with existing literature, which highlights the significant influence of marketing and peer recommendations on cosmetic product choices. Addis et al.3 reported that selecting products based on verified health claims was associated with a 97% lower likelihood of experiencing cosmetic-related adverse reactions. This underscores the importance of prioritizing ingredient transparency and certified health claims when choosing cosmetic products.

Additionally, Udayanga et al. found that 68.7% of consumers consider brand reputation a crucial factor in their purchasing decisions. In comparison, our study revealed that only 14.9% of participants selected products based on brand name, suggesting that brand reputation exerts a stronger influence in other markets.2 Reading the leaflet accompanying cosmetic products is essential for understanding proper usage and potential side effects. However, our study found that only 28% of participants read the leaflet, while 72% did not. This percentage is lower than that reported by Udayanga et al.,2 where 40.4% of consumers read ingredient labels and 45.4% reviewed labels for usage instructions. These findings highlight the need for increased consumer awareness regarding product information and safety. Several other studies have reported similar findings, indicating that reading user instructions, brand names, ingredient lists, expiration dates, and special remarks are common practices among cosmetic users.22 However, the low rate of leaflet reading in our study underscores the need for greater consumer education to promote informed usage and minimize the risk of adverse effects.

Association between cosmetic utilization and different age groups

The association between cosmetic utilization and different age groups revealed significant differences across all variables (P < .05). Specifically, participants aged 18 to 22 demonstrated a greater tendency to purchase cosmetics from pharmacies (187; 41.4%) and use them daily (223; 49.3%). Brand reputation influenced their product selection (108; 23.9%), and when side effects occurred, they discontinued use within a day. However, they were more likely to resume using the product and seek specific treatment for adverse reactions. In contrast, a study examining cosmetic use and associated side effects among female university graduates reported that approximately half (172; 50.89%) purchased cosmetics from large supermarkets, while 61 (18.05%) preferred drug retail outlets. The study also found that 185 (54.73%) selected products based on brand name, aligning with our findings.3

Among participants aged 23 to 30, the majority purchased cosmetics from supermarkets (508; 83.3%), used them on a monthly basis (535; 87.7%), and primarily based their choices on seller promotions (496; 81.3%). When side effects emerged, they typically discontinued use within 2 to 3 days (528; 86.6%) and were less likely to reuse the product or seek specific treatment (572; 93.8%). The statistical differences in consumption habits across age groups suggest that younger women may be more aware of potential cosmetic-related side effects, even though they exhibit a higher tendency to resume product use after experiencing adverse reactions.

Study limitations and future suggestions

Our study had several limitations. First, no objective clinical evaluation was conducted to confirm the reported adverse events. Participants provided responses based on their past experiences, making the study susceptible to recall bias. The findings may not be applicable to rural populations, as a significant portion of participants (82.7%) originated from urban settings. Additionally, the cross-sectional design prevented us from establishing a causal relationship between cosmetic use and adverse outcomes. It is crucial to carry out prospective cohort studies that observe the long-term impacts of cosmetic components, especially parabens and metal oxides, on both skin and overall health.10 Future research should incorporate clinical assessments to validate reported side effects, evaluate the effectiveness of specific treatments, and assess the impact of local campaigns and workshops in raising public awareness about cosmetic safety.

Conclusion

This study highlighted the widespread use of cosmetics among Saudi women and identified significant side effects, including acne, redness, and hair loss. Most participants based their product choices on marketing rather than ingredient awareness, and a considerable number did not read product brochures, limiting informed decision-making. Younger women exhibited distinct purchasing and usage patterns, underscoring the need for targeted education on cosmetic safety. To enhance the safety of cosmetics, public health initiatives ought to concentrate on informing consumers about how to interpret labels, identify harmful substances, and report negative reactions. Awareness campaigns should prioritize younger audiences through social media platforms and university workshops to encourage informed choices and promote safer usage of cosmetic products.19 Despite these valuable insights, limitations such as recall bias and the absence of clinical evaluations suggest that further research is needed to investigate the long-term effects of cosmetic use.

Recommendations for consumer education

To lessen the negative impacts of cosmetics, it is essential to implement focused educational strategies. Possible approaches include:

Initiating awareness campaigns via pharmacies and social media platforms.

Encouraging consumers to read product labels and ingredient lists carefully.

Organizing workshops at universities that address safe cosmetic practices.

Collaborating with dermatologists and influencers to disseminate reliable safety information.

These initiatives can enable women, particularly younger individuals, to make informed decisions and minimize preventable health risks.16

Conflicts of interest

None.

Funding

None.

Study approval

The ethical approval (REC/SUR/BU-FM/2024/50) was obtained from Faculty of Medicine, Al-Baha University.

Author contributions

All authors provide cooperations in the article production.

Footnotes

Published online 11 December 2025

References

  • 1.Bilal AI, Tilahun Z, Osman ED, Mulugeta A, Shekabdulahi M, Berhe DF. Cosmetics use-related adverse events and determinants among Jigjiga Town Residents, Eastern Ethiopia. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb) 2017;7:143–53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Udayanga L, Subashini N, Udugama M, Silva P, Ranathunge T. Knowledge, perceptions, and consumption behaviour of cosmetics among undergraduates of Sri Lanka: a descriptive cross-sectional study. Front Public Heal 2023;11:1–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Addis GT, Yimer YS, Dagnew SB, et al. Cosmetic use and related negative effects among graduate university female students in Ethiopia: a multicenter cross-sectional study. J Public Heal 2024;32:237–45. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Panico A, Serio F, Bagordo F, et al. Skin safety and health prevention: an overview of chemicals in cosmetic products. J Prev Med Hyg 2019;60:E50–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS). Opinion on fragrance allergens in cosmetic products. SCCS/1459/11. The SCCS adopted this opinion at its 15th plenary meeting of 26-27 June 2012. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Regulation (EC) no. 1272/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 on classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures, amending and repealing Di-rectives 67/548/EEC and 1999/45/EC, and amending Regulation (EC) no. 1907/2006. Official Journal of the European Union. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ara C, Asmatullah ZR, Memoona AC, Andleeb S. Turmeric plays protective role against paraben induced hepatic and renal lesions in Albino Mice. Punjab Univ J Zool 2020;35:07–12. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Vo TT, Yoo YM, Choi KC, Jeung EB. Potential estrogenic effect (s) of parabens at the prepubertal stage of a postnatal female rat model. Reprod Toxicol 2010;29:306–16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Quirós-Alcalá L, Buckley JP, Boyle M. Parabens and measures of adiposity among adults and children from the US general population: NHANES 2007–2014. Int J Hyg Environ Health 2018;221:652–60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Matwiejczuk N, Galicka A, Zaręba I, Brzóska MM. The protective effect of rosmarinic acid against unfavorable influence of methylparaben and propylparaben on collagen in human skin fibroblasts. Nutrients 2020. b;12:1282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Jaishankar M, Tseten T, Anbalagan N, Mathew BB, Beeregowda KN. Toxicity, mechanism and health effects of some heavy metals. Interdiscip Toxicol 2014;7:60–72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ullah H, Aslam S, Mustafa G, et al. Potential toxicity of heavy metals in cosmetics: fake or fact: a review. Int J Environ Anal Chem 2024;104:8878–909. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ekonomicznego Katowicach, U. & Ekonomiczny Poznaniu Wydział Gospodarki Międzynarodowej Katedra Zarządzania Międzynarodowego, U. The middle eastern market of cosmetics and toiletries: characteristics underlying demand and potential for growth. Stud Ekon Zesz Nauk 2016;303:114–33. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Lucca JM, Joseph R, Hussain Al Kubaish Z, Mohammad Al-Maskeen S, Ali Alokaili Z. An observational study on adverse reactions of cosmetics: the need of practice the Cosmetovigilance system. Saudi Pharm J 2020;28:746–53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Aladwan SM, Shakya AK, Naik RR, Afrashtehfar KI. Awareness of cosmetic procedures among adults seeking to enhance their physical appearance: a cross-sectional pilot study in Central Jordan. Cosmetics 2023;10:19. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Manoj SD, Venkatesan S, Ramalingam S. Awareness on cosmetic-related health hazards and measures to address them among service providers of beauty salons. J Family Med Prim Care 2024;13:713–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Almousa A, AlKhamees S, Aldusaymani S, et al. Cosmetics use, purchasing behaviors, and risks among women in Saudi Arabia. Int J Med Dev Ctries 2024;8:612–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Shaaban H, Alhajri W. Usage patterns of cosmetic and personal care products among female population in Saudi Arabia: important factors for exposure and risk assessment. J Environ Public Health 2020;2020:8434508. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Alanzi ME, Alghamdi RA, Alsharif OM, Alghamdi KS, El Sayed SM. Health knowledge, cosmetic interests, attitude, and the need for health education regarding the use of topical bleaching agents among women in west Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional study. J Cosmet Sci 2018;69:101–20. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Rybowska A. Consumers attitudes with respect to ecological cosmetic products. Sci J Gdynia Marit Univ. 2014:158–164. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Getachew M, Tewelde T. Cosmetic use and its adverse events among female employees of Jimma University, Southwest Ethiopia. Ethiop J Health Sci 2018;28:717–24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Shrestha R, Shakya J. Knowledge regarding adverse effects of selected cosmetic products among higher secondary level girl students, Chitwan. J Chitwan Med Coll 2017;6:27–32. [Google Scholar]

Articles from International Journal of Women's Dermatology are provided here courtesy of Wolters Kluwer Health

RESOURCES