ABSTRACT
Fetal movements exert mechanical forces that shape the developing skeleton. Conditions that impair fetal movement can cause skeletal defects, but interventions are limited. Here, we show that maternal wheel running exercise regulates fetal skeletal development in mice. In wild‐type fetuses, maternal exercise stimulated joint morphogenesis and bone development. These changes could not be fully explained by altered placental transport. Therefore, we next evaluated the effects of maternal exercise in the Splotch‐delayed (Spd) mouse model of fetal akinesia, which features intact maternofetal communication, but homozygous mutants lack contractile limb skeletal muscle. Maternal exercise substantially rescued fetal akinesia‐impaired joint and bone development and prevented disuse‐induced resorption of the deltoid tuberosity. Further, bioreactor mechanical stimulation of explanted Spd limbs, which remove systemic factors, similarly stimulated joint morphogenesis. Together, these findings identify maternal exercise as a regulator of fetal skeletal development, provide a platform for studying skeletal developmental mechanobiology, and suggest potential therapeutic implications for maternal exercise in skeletal conditions caused by impaired fetal movement.
Keywords: bioreactor, bone, development, fetal akinesia, joints, maternal exercise, mechanobiology, placenta, splotch‐delayed mice
Spontaneous fetal movements exert mechanical forces that shape the developing skeleton. Clinically, conditions that impair fetal movements (i.e., fetal akinesia) can cause defects in skeletal development. The Splotch‐delayed (Spd) mouse model, which features limited skeletal muscle development, recapitulates this fetal akinesia phenotype. We found that maternal exercise during gestation can stimulate wild‐type (WT) limb development and rescue Spd limb development. Our data suggest that these benefits are mediated by passive movements imparted on the developing skeleton by maternal exercise.

1. Introduction
Spontaneous fetal movements exert mechanical forces that shape the developing skeleton. The first fetal movements begin with the initiation of muscle formation and coincide with joint and bone development [1, 2]. Reduced fetal movements (i.e., fetal hypokinesia) can cause congenital defects in skeletal development, including hip dysplasia, congenital scoliosis, joint contractures, and delayed bone formation [3, 4]. Etiologically, fetal hypokinesia‐associated syndromes exist on a broad phenotypic spectrum from mild to perinatal lethal, with fetal akinesia (i.e., no movements) being the most severe [5]. Fetal hypokinesia can be associated with intrauterine environmental conditions, such as breech fetal position [6, 7] and insufficient amniotic fluid (i.e., oligohydramnios) [8], genetic mutations that affect neuromuscular development (e.g., genetic forms of arthrogryposis) [9], or non‐genetic conditions with abnormal movements in utero (e.g., amyoplasia) [10, 11]. While fetal hypokinesia‐causing conditions can sometimes be detected by prenatal imaging and/or genetic screening, treatment of skeletal abnormalities is currently limited to postnatal interventions, including surgeries, bracing, and physical therapy [12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17]. This treatment gap stems both from limited mechanistic understanding of how fetal movements direct skeletal development and limited means for prenatal intervention. Here, using mouse models, we demonstrate that maternal exercise during fetal gestation can alter fetal joint and bone morphogenesis and can substantially rescue both joint and bone formation in a preclinical model of fetal akinesia.
Animal models of limited fetal movement recapitulate the skeletal defects observed in fetal akinesia patients. Early experiments used transplanted embryonic chick limb buds, which lack innervation, to infer that disrupted muscle development causes defects in joint cavitation and shape, and bone formation [18, 19]. Subsequent studies used pharmacological agents and motor neuron resection to paralyze chick embryos, and observed similar defects in both joint and long bone development [20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28]. Mouse models of fetal akinesia have further enabled mechanistic insights into how muscle contractions guide mammalian skeletal development. The muscular dysgenesis (mdg/mdg) and Splotch‐delayed (Spd) mouse models are products of spontaneous mutations. Mdg/mdg mice harbor a mutation in the DHPɑR1 receptor that prevents excitation‐contraction coupling [29, 30, 31] and Spd mice feature a point mutation at the Pax3 gene that abrogates muscle progenitor cell migration and limits skeletal muscle development [32, 33, 34]. Additional models have been genetically engineered to disrupt fetal muscle development, including the Myf5 −/−:MyoD −/− amyogenic mouse, which lacks striated muscle due to deletion of the myogenic regulatory factors Myf5 and MyoD [35]. Skeletal development studies using these models consistently show that in utero muscle function is required for proper fetal joint morphogenesis and bone formation [36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43]. Additionally, fetal muscle contraction regulates the growth and maturation of bony eminences at tendon insertion sites, such as the deltoid tuberosity of the humerus, which initiates via a cartilaginous rudiment that resorbs in the absence of fetal movements [44]. The coherence of these findings across human patients and animal models implicates the loss of muscle‐generated mechanical forces in fetal akinesia‐associated defects in skeletal development.
Ex vivo bioreactor cultures complement in vivo animal models of fetal akinesia by allowing the application of mechanical stimulation during fetal skeletal development [45, 46, 47, 48]. Previously, using bioreactor culture of embryonic chick limb explants, we showed that the amplitude, frequency, and duration of joint flexion regulate joint morphogenesis ex vivo [49, 50]. We further used mouse limb explant culture to demonstrate the roles of specific molecular mechanosensors and mechanotransducers in the mechanoregulation of skeletal morphogenesis. Using pharmacologic inhibition and conditional genetic ablation approaches, we showed that the mechanosensitive ion channel, Transient receptor potential cation channel subfamily V member 4 (TRPV4), mediates joint morphogenesis in response to applied limb movement [51, 52], and the mechanoresponsive transcriptional regulators, Yes‐associated protein (YAP) and Transcriptional co‐activator with PDZ‐binding motif (TAZ), mediate load‐induced fetal bone formation [53]. Developmentally, we found that YAP/TAZ mechanosignaling in vessel‐associated osteoblast precursor cells coordinates blood vessel invasion and growth plate remodeling at the chondro‐osseous junction during fetal bone development [53]. These findings suggest that both cartilaginous joint morphogenesis and endochondral ossification are mechanically regulated. In the context of fetal akinesia, we found that ex utero dynamic mechanical stimulation rescues collagen extracellular matrix deposition and organization in Spd mice [54]. These bioreactor studies have enabled interrogation of the molecular basis by which absent and restored mechanical signals regulate skeletal morphogenesis, but are limited by extraction from the fetal vascular system and from systemic factors provided by the gestational environment. Thus, explants can only be cultured for a limited duration in an environment that cannot perfectly mimic in utero conditions.
In addition to active movements exerted by the fetus, passive movements imparted on the fetal skeleton by maternal activity may also guide development. Motivated by the observation that Spd and mdg/mdg mice exhibit greater defects in the forelimb than hindlimb [38, 55, 56], we reasoned that passive mechanical stimuli from maternal movements may produce distinct mechanical environments in forelimbs and hindlimbs. By applying displacement boundary conditions, such as could be brought about by maternal activity, to finite element models of the forelimb and hindlimb, we observed greater stresses and strains in the developing femur compared with the humerus [57]. This is plausible since, in the developing fetus, the shape and mostly planar alignment of the forelimb positions the elbow joint closer to the central axis of the fetus. The hindlimb knee joint is angled away from the body, potentially increasing the lever arm effect of loads applied externally to the limb. Thus, passive movements on the fetus may impart greater stresses and strains on fetal hindlimbs than forelimbs, which correlates with the in vivo findings that Spd mice show less severe defects in knee morphogenesis than elbow and shoulder [38, 55, 56]. Based on this reasoning, we hypothesized that passive fetal movements induced by maternal exercise could provide formative mechanical signals to the developing fetus. Here, we test this hypothesis through the application of maternal exercise in wild‐type and Spd mice, with a focus on morphogenesis of the humerus.
Current guidelines recommend maternal exercise for healthy pregnancies. Regular moderate‐intensity exercise during pregnancy reduces maternal risk of gestational disorders (e.g., gestational diabetes, gestational hypertension) [58, 59, 60], enhances birth outcomes (e.g., reduced preterm birth rate, increased vaginal birth rate) [61, 62, 63], and improves offspring health (e.g., cardiac function, cerebral maturation) [64, 65]. Though clinical evidence suggests multifaceted benefits of maternal exercise, we do not fully understand how maternal exercise affects fetal development. Maternal blood and fetal blood are separated by the placenta; thus, all nutrients needed by the fetus are transported across the placenta. Prior studies suggest that maternal exercise may increase nutrient transport to the developing fetus via the placenta and/or upregulate specific humoral signaling molecules that are transferred to the developing fetus (e.g., insulin‐like growth factor 1 (IGF‐1)) [66, 67, 68]. Common metrics used to assess placental transport efficiency include the fetal weight to placental weight ratio (FW:PW), placental histomorphometry, and nutrient transporter expression [69]. Currently, experimental evidence is limited in understanding how maternal exercise affects fetal skeletal development, and continued research is required.
Here, we show that maternal exercise regulates fetal skeletal development in mice. We find that maternal exercise stimulates joint morphogenesis, deltoid tuberosity formation, and bone growth in wild‐type fetuses and largely rescues fetal akinesia‐impaired skeletal abnormalities in Spd mice. Our data suggest that these benefits are mediated by passive movements imparted on the developing skeleton by maternal exercise, but do not rule out contributions from altered maternofetal signaling. These findings identify maternal exercise as a regulator of fetal skeletal development, implicate maternal exercise as a putative platform for studying skeletal developmental mechanobiology in vivo, and motivate further investigation of maternal exercise as a potential in utero intervention for fetal hypokinesia‐associated skeletal syndromes.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Animal Husbandry and Care
C57BL/6J male and female mice were purchased from the Jackson Laboratory (Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME, USA). Mice were housed and bred for experiments at the University of Pennsylvania. Heterozygous Splotch‐delayed (Pax3spd/+) male and female mice were also purchased from the Jackson Laboratory. These mice were housed and bred at Imperial College London. Spd embryos were genotyped using PCR on DNA derived from embryonic head tissue. DNA underwent 30 30 s reaction cycles at 94°C, 60°C, and 74°C. For controls, the following primers were used: 5′ AGGGCCGAGTCAACCAGCACG 3′ and 3′ CACGCGAAGCTGGCGAGAAATG 5′. For mutants, the following primers were used: 5′ AGTGTCCACCCCTCTTGGCCTCGGCCGAGTCAACCAGGTCC 3′ and 3′ CACGCGAAGCTGGCGAGAAATG 5′.
Prior to maternal exercise experiments, all mice were fed regular chow (Purina LabDiet, St. Louis, MO, USA) ad libitum and housed in cages containing 2–4 animals each. Mice were maintained at constant 25°C on a 12 h light/dark cycle. Protocols were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees at the University of Pennsylvania for experiments conducted in the United States (Protocol no: 806482) and United Kingdom experiments were conducted under the UK Home Office Project License number PPL P39D18B9C. All US‐based animal procedures were performed in adherence to United States federal guidelines of animal care. All UK‐based procedures were performed in accordance with the UK Animals Scientific Procedures Act of 1986 and were approved by the institutional Animal Welfare and Ethical Review Body (AWERB). Additionally, experiments were conducted in accordance with the 3R principles in animal research [70, 71, 72].
2.2. Maternal Exercise
Virgin female C57BL/6J mice were housed individually with the Mouse Home Cage Running Wheel system (Columbus Instruments, Columbus, OH) for at least 2 weeks prior to timed matings. This free‐spinning wheel running system allowed us to measure voluntary running activity during the acclimation period. After timed pregnancies, mice were individually housed, without running wheels, from E0 to E13.5. Mated females were weighed at E0 and E12.5 to confirm pregnancy by weight gain. For ad libitum wheel running experiments, dams pregnant with E13.5 embryos were re‐housed with their running wheels and allowed to run freely from E13.5 through E17.5, with harvest at E17.5. For supervised wheel running experiments, mice were individually housed without running wheels from E13.5 through E17.5, but exercised daily from E13.5 to E16.5, inclusive (Figure S1A). Each day, the pregnant dam was transferred back to her cage with the running wheel and placed onto the wheel. To encourage running, the wheel was lifted slightly off the ground for each bout of exercise. Mice exercised for 15 min, then rested for 15 min with the wheel back in the cage. This process was repeated four times, so that dams received 1 h of encouraged wheel running exercise per day. At the end of this exercise regimen, pregnant dams were returned to their cages without wheels. Sham mice were included in ad libitum and supervised wheel running experiments, which received the same access to wheels, but the wheels were locked to prevent running.
Humane endpoints were predefined, including criteria such as poor grooming, sunken eyes, hunched posture, severe axial deviation, lack of food and water intake, significant weight loss, bloody feces, severe respiratory issues, debilitating diarrhea, seizures, paresis, and abscesses. No adverse effects of exercise were observed in any of the mice, and no humane endpoints were reached during the study. Pregnant dams were monitored closely until euthanasia, when embryos reached E17.5.
Ad libitum wheel access during the maternal exercise period yielded highly variable running distances and low running distances at later timepoints that are important for joint and bone development (Figure S1B–D). Thus, Spd mice were only exercised using supervised wheel running. Spd mice underwent the same procedures described above, except embryos were harvested at E16.5.
2.3. Microcomputed Tomography (μCT)
The Microct45 system (SCANCO Medical Ag, Brüttisellen, Switzerland) was used to capture high‐resolution three‐dimensional (3D) microcomputed tomography (MicroCT) images of fixed E17.5 forelimbs from C57BL/6J embryos. E17.5 forelimbs were submerged in phosphate‐buffered saline (PBS, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) for image capture. The following imaging parameters were applied: isotropic voxel size of 3 μm, integration time of 300 ms, x‐ray intensity of 114 μA, and peak tube voltage of 70 kVp. A three‐dimensional Gaussian filter of 1.2 with a filter support of 2 was used for noise suppression, and mineralized tissue was segmented from the PBS or soft tissue using a threshold of 140 mgHA/cm [3]. The acquired images were analyzed using the manufacturer‐provided software.
2.4. Optical Projection Tomography (OPT)
Right forelimbs from E17.5 C57BL/6J embryos and E16.5 Spd embryos were harvested for skeletal preparations with Alcian blue (MilliporeSigma, Billerica, MA, USA) and Alizarin red (MilliporeSigma) [73]. Harvested forelimbs were frozen at −20°C prior to preparation. Upon thawing, samples were dissected to remove the outer epidermal layer, which improves stain penetration, then incubated in 95% (v/v) ethanol (Decon Laboratories Inc., Swedeland, PA, USA) overnight. The next day, samples were washed with acetone (MilliporeSigma) for 1–2 h, then incubated with acetone overnight. After acetone incubation, samples were rinsed with deionized water (ddH2O) for 1–2 h, then incubated for 24 h in a 150 mg/L Alcian blue solution (80% ethanol (v/v), 20% acetic acid (v/v) (Thermo Fisher Scientific)). The following day, samples were washed with 70% ethanol (v/v) four times for 1 h each, washed for 1 h with 1% potassium hydroxide (KOH, w/v) (VWR International, Radnor, PA, USA), then incubated overnight in a 50 mg/L Alizarin red solution (1% KOH (w/v), ddH2O). After Alizarin red incubation, the stain was gently poured off and samples were placed in a storage mixture (50% ethanol (v/v), 50% glycerol (v/v) (MilliporeSigma)) and stored at 4°C until embedding for optical projection tomography (OPT). All washes and incubations prior to the KOH wash were carried out at room temperature (RT) with rocking. Since KOH causes the skeletal preparations to be fragile, the KOH wash and Alizarin red incubation were conducted at RT without rocking.
Forelimbs stained with Alizarin red and Alcian blue were embedded in 1% agarose (w/v) (MilliporeSigma) hydrogels for OPT imaging (Figure S2) [74, 75]. To prepare the 1% agarose hydrogels, agarose powder was dissolved into boiling ddH2O, then sterile filtered using the Steriflip (MilliporeSigma). The sterilized 1% agarose solution was poured into 35 mm petri dishes and samples were carefully placed into the polymer solutions at medium depth. Embedded samples were allowed to solidify on ice. Excess agarose was removed for all samples, then samples were dehydrated for 24 h in methanol (Thermo Fisher Scientific). To ensure full dehydration, the methanol solution was replaced 2–3 times during the 24‐h incubation. The following day, samples were cleared for 24 h using a solution of 50% benzoic acid (v/v) (MilliporeSigma) and 50% benzyl benzoate (v/v) (MilliporeSigma). For OPT imaging, samples were staged using a custom OPT imaging apparatus [76], which captures 400 images of each forelimb as it is rotated 360°. Image sets were reconstructed into two‐dimensional (2D) sections using NRecon software (Micro Photonics Inc., Allentown, PA, USA), cropped using ImageJ/Fiji software (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA), then segmented using ITK SNAP (Penn Image Computing and Science Laboratory, Philadelphia, PA USA) [77]. Measurements of rudiment lengths, mineral lengths, and joint shape features were quantified from 3D reconstructions using Blender (Blender Foundation, Amsterdam, NL) and 3D Slicer [78].
2.5. Cryohistology and Immunofluorescence Staining
C57BL/6J embryos harvested at E17.5 were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA, Electron Microscopy Sciences, Hartfield, PA, USA) at 4°C overnight, then transferred to 30% sucrose (w/v) (Thermo Fisher Scientific) in PBS for 24 h. After sucrose infiltration, embryonic forelimbs were isolated and embedded in optical cutting temperature (OCT) compound (Tissue‐Tek, Torrance, CA, USA) for cryosectioning with an Epredia CryoStar NX70 Cryostat (Thermo Fisher Scientific). 10‐μm thick tissue sections were obtained on cryotape (Section Lab Co, Hiroshima, Japan), as described in detail in a previously published protocol [79]. Tape sections were glued to microscope slides with Norland Optical Adhesive 81 (Norland Products Inc., Jamesburg, NJ, USA), then processed using standard kits and immunofluorescent protocols. For all protocols, samples were mounted using Fluoromount‐GT (Thermo Fisher Scientific), imaged using the ZEISS AxioScan.Z1 Slide Scanner (ZEISS, Oberkochen, Germany), and analyzed using ImageJ/Fiji.
Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) staining was conducted using the Vector blue Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP) substrate kit (SK‐5300, Vector Laboratories, Newark, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions.
Phalloidin staining with Hoechst counterstain (Thermo Fisher Scientific) was conducted using Alexa Fluor 647 Phalloidin (A22287, Thermo Fisher Scientific) according to the manufacturer's instructions.
Immunofluorescent imaging of Collagen 10, Endomucin, Yes‐associated protein (YAP), and Connective tissue growth factor‐like protein 1 (Cyr61/CCN1) was conducted using standard immunofluorescent protocols. Briefly, glued tissue sections were rehydrated in PBS, then blocked with 5% goat serum (MilliporeSigma) in 0.3% Triton‐X‐100 (MilliporeSigma) for 30 min. The following primary antibodies were applied overnight at 4°C (dilutions and catalog numbers provided): rabbit polyclonal anti‐Collagen 10 (ab182563, Abcam, Cambridge, UK), rat monoclonal anti‐Endomucin (1:100, sc‐65 495, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX, USA), rabbit monoclonal anti‐YAP (1:100, 14 074, Cell Signaling Technologies, Danvers, MA, USA), rat monoclonal anti‐Cyr61 (1:20, MAB4864, R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA). After primary antibody incubation, samples were washed thrice with PBS, then incubated with the following secondary antibodies for 2 h at RT: goat anti‐rat 647 (1:1000, A‐21247, Thermo Fisher Scientific), goat anti‐rat 488 (1:1000, A‐11006, Thermo Fisher Scientific), goat anti‐rabbit A647 (1:1000, A‐27040, Thermo Fisher Scientific), and goat anti‐rabbit A488 (1:1000, A11034, Thermo Fisher Scientific). Hoechst counterstain (1:2000, Thermo Fisher Scientific) was added during the secondary antibody incubation. Samples were then washed thrice with PBS prior to mounting.
2.6. Paraffin Histology and Tinctorial Staining
Placentas were isolated during embryo harvests, flash frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at −80°C until paraffin histology. Half of each placenta was thawed and processed for paraffin histology using a Thermo Scientific Excelsior AS Tissue Processor (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Processed samples were paraffin‐embedded and sectioned to 10 μm using a Leica RM 2030 Microtome (Leica, Bala Cynwyd, PA, USA). Sections were stained for hematoxylin and eosin using standard protocols. Stained sections were imaged using a ZEISS Axio Scan.Z1 Slide Scanner and analyzed using ImageJ/Fiji.
2.7. Protein Lysis, Enzyme‐Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA), and Western Blot
The remaining half of each placenta was processed for enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and western blot. Approximately 20 mg of placental tissue was placed in 550 μL of 1× Cell Lysis Buffer (R&D Systems) and homogenized for 5 min at max speed using the Bullet Blender Storm Tissue Homogenizer (Next Advance, Troy, NY, USA). Homogenized lysates were incubated on ice for 15 min, transferred to a clean 1.5 mL centrifuge tube, and centrifuged at 13000 g for 10 min at 4°C using a Sorvall Legend Micro 17R centrifuge (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Protein levels were quantified using a Pierce BCA Protein Assay Kit (23 227, Thermo Fisher Scientific) according to the manufacturer's instructions.
Placental levels of Insulin‐like growth factor‐1 (IGF‐1) were quantified using the Mouse IGF‐1 ELISA Kit (RAB0229, Thermo Fisher Scientific) according to the manufacturer's instructions.
Placental levels of glucose transporter 1 (GLUT1), Sodium‐coupled neutral amino acid transporter 4 (SNAT4), and fatty acid transporter 4 (FATP4) were quantified using standard western blot protocols. Briefly, protein solutions were diluted to 20 μg of protein in 20 μL of RNAse‐free H2O (Thermo Fisher Scientific), then mixed in a 1:1 ratio with a solution of 95% 2× Laemmli Buffer (v/v) (Bio‐Rad, Philadelphia, PA, USA) and 5% mercaptoethanol (v/v) (Bio‐Rad). Samples were loaded onto 4%–15% Mini‐PROTEAN TGX Precast Protein Gels (Bio‐Rad) with the Precision Plus Kaleidoscope ladder (Bio‐Rad) and run using the Mini‐PROTEAN Tetra System (Bio‐Rad). Bands were transferred to Immun‐Blot PVDF Membranes (Bio‐Rad) using the Trans Blot Turbo Transfer System (Bio‐Rad). Membranes were washed thrice in tris‐buffered saline with Tween 20 (TBST, Bio‐Rad), then blocked using Blotting‐Grade blocker (Bio‐Rad) 1.5 h on a rocker at RT. The following primary antibodies were applied overnight at 4°C with rocking (dilutions and catalog numbers provided): rabbit monoclonal anti‐GLUT1 (1:1000, 12 939, Cell Signaling Technologies), rabbit polyclonal anti‐SLC38A4/SNAT4 (1:1000, 20 857–1‐AP, Proteintech, Rosemont, IL, USA), rabbit monoclonal anti‐SLC27A4/FATP4 (1:1000, ab200353, Abcam), rabbit polyclonal anti–actin (1:1000, Cell Signaling Technologies), rabbit polyclonal anti‐histone H3 (1:5000, Thermo Fisher Scientific). After primary antibody incubation, samples were washed thrice with TBST, then incubated with anti‐rabbit IgG, HRP‐linked antibody (1:1000, 7074P2, Cell Signaling Technologies) for 1.5 h at RT on a rocker. Bands were detected using the Amersham ECL Prime Western Blotting Detection Reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific) according to the manufacturer's instructions, then imaged using the Bio‐Rad ChemiDoc MP Imaging System (Bio‐Rad). Band intensities were quantified using ImageJ/Fiji.
2.8. Ex Vivo Bioreactor Culture
Histological images generated by Ahmed et al. [54] were reanalyzed using quantitative histomorphometry to determine the effects of ex vivo mechanical loading on embryonic limb development. Full materials and methods for generating these samples are provided in Ahmed et al. [54] Briefly, E15.5 forelimbs were harvested from WT and Spd embryos, then cultured using the Ebers TC‐3 bioreactor system (Don Whitley Scientific, Bingley, UK). Contralateral limbs were randomly assigned to either Static or Dynamic culture conditions. Static forelimbs were placed within the bioreactor foam supports without any loading. Dynamic forelimb explants were loaded at 0.67 Hz to a displacement of 2 mm for 2 h, 3 times per day. In previous studies, we demonstrated that this compression produces a cyclic flexion angle of approximately 14°, which led to the most physiological growth of tissues [49]. All explanted limbs were cultured at air‐liquid interface with osteogenic media (ɑ‐MEM GlutaMAX supplemented with 1% penicillin–streptomycin with amphotericin B, 100 μM ascorbic acid, 2 mM‐glycerophosphate, and 100 nM dexamethasone) for 7 days at 37°C in normoxic conditions. Media was changed daily.
Cultured forelimbs were prepared for cryohistology. Full materials and methods for staining and imaging are provided in Ahmed et al. [54] The following antibodies were used (dilutions and catalog numbers provided): mouse monoclonal anti‐collagen type II (1:50, MAB8887, MilliporeSigma) and rabbit anti‐mouse (Alexa Fluor 488) (1:200, ab150125, Abcam). Samples were imaged using either the ZEISS LSM 510 (ZEISS) or the Leica CF6 (Leica) confocal laser scanning microscope. Images were analyzed using ImageJ/Fiji.
2.9. Statistical Analysis and Regression
The “pwr2” package in R (Indianapolis, IN, USA) was used to conduct power analysis for large effect sizes (α = 0.05, = 0.20, f = 0.4–0.6). GraphPad Prism software Version 10.4.1 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA) was used to conduct all statistical analyses. Student's t‐test was used to determine significant differences for all continuous outcome measurements in the C57BL/6J experiments. Significant differences in litter size were determined using a chi‐squared test. A two‐way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Bonferroni correction was used as a conservative test to determine significant differences for all outcome measurements in the in vivo Spd experiments. A repeated measures two‐way ANOVA with Bonferroni correction was used to determine significant differences for all outcome measurements in the ex utero Spd experiments.
Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with linear regression was performed using R. Individual linear models were generated using predictors of interest for bone length. Significant predictors were input into an exhaustive best‐subsets algorithm to determine the best multivariate predictive model of bone length based on Akaike's information criteria (AIC) [80, 81, 82, 83]. In short, optimizing for the lowest AIC selects the model that explains the highest level of variability, while prioritizing models with the fewest predictors. Resultant linear models were graphed using Prism.
3. Results
3.1. Effects of Maternal Exercise on Pregnancy Outcomes
We first assessed the effects of maternal exercise on embryonic day 17.5 (E17.5) C57BL/6J mice. Pregnant female dams received daily supervised exercise, 1 h per day, starting at E13.5, which coincides with the onset of fetal limb movements and the initiation of endochondral development [1, 2]. Sham controls received equivalent wheel exposure, but their wheels were locked to prevent running (Figures 1A and S1A). Pregnant dams were selected between 20 and 24 weeks of age, with no significant differences in maternal age between Sham and Exercise groups (Figure S1F). Dams in the Exercise group consistently ran an average of 0.71 km/day throughout the exercise period (Figure S1D). These exercise conditions did not significantly alter either the mass of the pregnant dams at E17.5 or their litter size (Figure S1G,H). Fetuses from these litters were harvested for downstream analyses, and the datapoint color in subsequent graphs corresponds to the pregnant dam. For example, a dark red dot would indicate that the fetus came from Exercise Litter #1 (Figure 1).
FIGURE 1.

Maternal exercise stimulates fetal joint morphogenesis. (A) Schematic representation of Sham and exercise pregnant dams. (B) Optical projection tomography (OPT) reconstructions of alizarin red and alcian blue‐stained forelimbs at E17.5. Cartilaginous regions of the scapula, humerus, radius, and ulna are marked in green, purple, orange, and yellow, respectively. Ossified regions are marked in gray. Scale bar = 1 mm. (C) Zoomed projections of the cartilaginous distal humerus. The width, depth, and height of the lateral condyle and medial condyle are marked in the frontal, sagittal, and coronal planes. Scale bar = 500 μm. (D) Medial condyle width, (E) medial condyle height, (F) medial condyle depth, (G) lateral condyle width, (H) lateral condyle height, and (I) lateral condyle depth. Fetuses from the same litter are marked by the same color datapoint. *p < 0.05 using Student's t‐test.
3.2. Effects of Maternal Exercise on Joint and Bone Morphogenesis
To assess the effects of maternal exercise on fetal skeletal development, we first assessed the morphogenesis of the E17.5 mouse elbow joint using OPT (Figure 1B,C). Maternal exercise increased humeral medial condyle width, height, and depth (Figure 1D–F), lateral condyle width, height, and depth (Figure 1G–I).
To assess the effects of maternal exercise on bone development, we performed OPT and microcomputed tomography (μCT) imaging (Figure 2A,G). Maternal exercise significantly increased humerus rudiment length and mineralized length of the bony primary ossification center, but did not affect the mineralization ratio (i.e., the ratio of mineralized length to rudiment length) (Figure 2B–D). This indicates that maternal exercise proportionally stimulated rudiment growth and mineralization. The development of the deltoid tuberosity has been shown to be particularly sensitive to absent muscle stimulation [44]. Maternal exercise significantly increased deltoid tuberosity volume (Figure 2E), even after normalization by the rudiment length (Figure 2F). Using μCT, we confirmed that maternal exercise increased humeral bone volume and bone length (Figure 2G–I), and further showed that maternal exercise significantly increased bone tissue mineral density (TMD) (Figure 2J).
FIGURE 2.

Maternal exercise stimulates fetal bone development. (A) Optical projection tomography (OPT) reconstructions of embryonic day 17.5 (E17.5) humeri. The rudiment length and mineralized length are marked with white arrows. The deltoid tuberosity is contoured in black. Scale bar = 500 μm. (B) Rudiment length, (C) mineralized length, and (D) mineralized ratio (i.e., the ratio of mineralized length to rudiment length). (E) Deltoid tuberosity volume and (F) deltoid tuberosity volume normalized by rudiment length. (G) Three‐dimensional microcomputed tomography (μCT) reconstructions of the E17.5 humeri. Scale bar = 500 μm. (H) Bone volume, (I) bone length, and (J) tissue mineral density (TMD). Fetuses from the same litter are marked by the same color datapoint. *p < 0.05 using Student's t‐test.
3.3. Effects of Maternal Exercise on Placental Transport
Maternal exercise may regulate fetal development by altering the transport of factors or nutrients across the placenta. Maternal exercise significantly increased fetal weight, suggesting that maternal exercise may affect overall fetal development (Figure 3A). Based on this finding, we performed an ANCOVA to control for the contributions of fetal weight change to maternal exercise‐induced variation in fetal bone length. If bone length is best predicted by separate regression lines for each exercise condition, this would indicate that there is an effect of exercise on bone length that cannot be explained by fetal weight. In contrast, a best fit by a single regression line for both exercise conditions would indicate that variation in bone length can be explained by changes in fetal weight. We found that separate regression lines for each exercise condition best predicted bone length, with a persistently significant effect of maternal exercise after controlling for variation in fetal weight (p < 0.001, Figures 3B and S3). Thus, the increase in bone length induced by maternal exercise cannot be fully explained by differences in fetal weight.
FIGURE 3.

Placental transport cannot fully explain how maternal exercise regulates limb development. (A) Fetal weight (FW). (B) Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) for the effect of maternal exercise on humerus bone length, accounting for variation in fetal weight. Bands indicate the 95% confidence interval for each curve. Goodness of fit (R2) and linear equation are reported for each linear regression. (C) Placental weight (PW), and (D) FW:PW ratio. (E) Hematoxylin and eosin micrographs of embryonic day 17.5 (E17.5) placentas. Scale bar = 1 mm. (F) Labyrinth zone (LZ) area to junctional zone (JZ) area ratio (LZ:JZ). (G) Placental levels of insulin‐like growth factor‐1 (IGF‐1) and (H) fetal plasma levels of IGF‐1, pooled by litter. (I) Western blots for glucose transporter 1 (GLUT1, molecular weight (MW) = 54 kDa), sodium‐coupled neutral amino acid transporter 4 (SNAT4, MW = 60 kDa), and fatty acid transporter 4 (FATP4, MW = 72 kDa). Histone H3 (MW = 15 kDa) and ‐Actin (MW = 42 kDa) were used as loading controls. (J) Relative GLUT1 intensity, (K) relative SNAT4 intensity, and (L) relative FATP4 intensity. Fetuses from the same litter are marked by the same color datapoint. *p < 0.05 using Student's t‐test.
We next evaluated hierarchical measures of placental. The fetal weight to placental weight (FW:PW) ratio reflects the capacity of the placenta to support a fetus of a given weight, and can be altered by changes in fetal weight, placental weight, or both [84, 85]. Maternal exercise was associated with significantly increased fetal weight and decreased placental weight, resulting in a significantly increased FW:PW ratio (Figure 3A,C,D). To more directly measure placental transport capacity, we measured the area ratio between the labyrinth zone (LZ) and junctional zone (JZ) of the placenta. The higher the value of the LZ:JZ ratio, the greater the assumed placental transport efficiency [84, 85]. Maternal exercise did not significantly alter the LZ:JZ ratio (Figure 3E,F). Finally, we evaluated the expression of proteins known to regulate fetal growth through regulation of placental transport. Insulin‐like growth factor‐1 (IGF‐1) is a major upstream regulator of placental nutrient transporter expression and IGF‐1 levels are strongly correlated with fetal growth outcomes [69, 86]. Maternal exercise did not significantly alter placental levels of IGF‐1, but significantly decreased the concentration of IGF‐1 in fetal plasma, which was pooled for all fetuses within a litter (Figure 3G,H). To ensure that similar placental IGF‐1 levels were consistent with similar placental nutrient transport, we measured the expression of the major nutrient transporters involved in placental‐fetal glucose, amino acid, and fatty acid transport: glucose transporter 1 (GLUT1), sodium‐coupled neutral amino acid transporter 4 (SNAT4), and fatty acid transporter 4 (FATP4), respectively [69]. Consistent with our LZ:JZ and placental IGF‐1 findings, maternal exercise did not alter placental levels of GLUT1, SNAT4, or FATP4 (Figure 5E–H). Together, these findings do not constitute compelling evidence for a critical role of altered placental transport in maternal exercise‐induced fetal skeletal development; however, they do not preclude the potential contributions of transplacental humoral factors.
FIGURE 5.

Maternal exercise alters growth plate morphometry and bone neovascularization. (A) Fluorescent staining for collagen type 10 alpha 1 chain (Col10a1) in the proximal hypertrophic zone (HZ) of embryonic day 17.5 (E17.5) humeri. Scale bar = 500 μm. (B) HZ length. (C) Fluorescent staining for alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity in E17.5 humeri. Scale bar = 250 μm. (D) Primary ossification center (POC) ALP activity and (E) bone collar (BC) ALP activity. (F) Fluorescent staining for blood vessels (endomucin) in E17.5 humeri. Scale bar = 250 μm. (G) Medullary vessel area, (H) Medullary vessel density, (I) BC vessel area, (J) BC vessel density, (K) metaphyseal vessel area, and (L) metaphyseal vessel density. Fetuses from the same litter are marked by the same color datapoint. *p < 0.05 using a Student's t‐test.
3.4. Mechanoregulation of Endochondral Ossification via Maternal Exercise
Beyond placental transport, maternal exercise may also stimulate skeletal development through passive movement‐induced mechanical stimulation. Based on our prior studies on the mechanotransductive roles of the transcriptional regulators Yes‐associated protein (YAP) and Transcriptional co‐activator with PDZ‐binding motif (TAZ) in skeletal development [53, 80, 87, 88], we evaluated YAP/TAZ expression and the abundance of the canonical YAP target gene, Cysteine‐rich angiogenic inducer 61 (Cyr61), in the developing bone. YAP is transcriptionally active in the nucleus, and its cytoplasmic‐nuclear transport can be induced by a variety of signals, including mechanical cues and morphogen signaling [88]. We observed robust YAP expression in the developing skeleton, including in the bone collar (BC) and the primary ossification center (POC) of both groups (Figure 4A). We found that maternal exercise significantly increased Cyr61 abundance in the bone collar (Figure 4B). The increase in Cyr61 abundance in the primary ossification center was not statistically significant (p = 0.058) (Figure 4C).
FIGURE 4.

Maternal exercise upregulates YAP signaling in fetal bone. (A) Fluorescent staining for nuclei (DAPI), Yes‐associated protein (YAP), and Cysteine‐rich angiogenic inducer 61 (Cyr61) in embryonic day 17.5 (E17.5) humeri. Scale bar = 250 μm. (B) Bone collar (BC) Cyr61‐positive area, and (C) primary ossification center (POC) Cyr61‐positive area. Fetuses from the same litter are marked by the same color datapoint. *p < 0.05 using a Student's t‐test.
Next, we evaluated the effects of maternal exercise on growth plate morphometry, alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity, and neovascular morphometry in the developing humerus. These analyses were prioritized based on our findings that osteoprogenitor cell YAP/TAZ signaling regulates fetal bone development by coupling osteoprogenitor mobilization to blood vessel invasion for chondro‐osseous junction remodeling and bone formation [53]. Maternal exercise significantly reduced hypertrophic zone length (Figure 5A,B), consistent with increased chondro‐osseous junction remodeling [53]. Maternal exercise did not alter ALP activity, which marks osteogenic cell activity, in either the endochondral primary ossification center or the intramembranous bone collar (Figure 5C–E). Maternal exercise did not significantly alter medullary vessel area or density (Figure 5F–H), but significantly increased bone collar vessel area and density (Figure 5I,J). Maternal exercise also significantly increased vessel area and density in the metaphyseal region, which captures the looping vessels along the chondro‐osseous junction (Figure 5K,L). Together, these data suggest that maternal exercise enhanced growth plate remodeling and neovascularization, but did not directly stimulate osteogenesis, per se.
3.5. Effects of Maternal Exercise on Fetal Akinesia‐Impaired Limb Development
We next tested whether maternal exercise would influence joint and bone formation in the Splotch‐delayed (Spd) model of fetal akinesia [3]. The Spd homozygous fetus exhibits limited muscle development and lacks spontaneous limb movements [32, 33, 34]; thus, this model has intact maternofetal transport, but dramatically altered mechanical loading in the limbs. In these experiments, female dams pregnant with wild‐type and Spd embryos were exercised from E13.5 to E15.5, inclusive, with harvest at E16.5. Like previous experiments, dams in the Sham group had access to locked wheels to prevent running.
Maternal exercise stimulated elbow joint morphogenesis in both wild‐type and Spd fetuses, rescuing fetal akinesia‐impaired joint parameters (Figure 6A,B). Specifically, fetal akinesia significantly reduced humeral medial condyle width and height (Figure 6C,D) and lateral condyle width and height (Figure 6F,G), but these defects were rescued in Spd embryos exposed to maternal exercise. Medial and lateral condyle depth were not significantly reduced by fetal akinesia, but were significantly increased by maternal exercise in Spd fetuses (Figure 6E,H).
FIGURE 6.

Maternal exercise rescues fetal akinesia‐impaired joint morphogenesis. (A) Optical projection tomography (OPT) reconstructions of embryonic day 16.5 (E16.5) forelimbs in wild‐type (WT) and Splotch‐delayed (Spd) mice. Cartilaginous regions of the scapula, humerus, radius, and ulna are marked in green, purple, orange, and yellow, respectively. Ossified regions are marked in gray. (B) Zoomed projections of the cartilaginous distal humerus. (C) Medial condyle width, (D) medial condyle height, (E) medial condyle depth, (F) lateral condyle width, (G) lateral condyle height, and (H) lateral condyle depth. Fetuses from the same litter are marked by the same color datapoint. *p < 0.05 using a two‐way ANOVA with Bonferroni correction.
Fetal akinesia significantly reduced humerus rudiment length, mineralized length, and mineralization ratio, but these defects were also rescued by maternal exercise (Figure 7A–D). Similar to joint morphogenesis, maternal exercise rescued these key bone development outcomes. Lastly, we measured the effects of fetal akinesia and maternal exercise on the morphogenesis of the deltoid tuberosity. Previous studies showed that the cartilaginous rudiment of the deltoid tuberosity forms in Spd mice at E14.5, but resorbs by E18.5 due to the absence of stimulatory mechanical cues [44]. Consistently, we observed significantly reduced deltoid tuberosity volume in Spd fetuses at E16.5 (Figure 7E). However, maternal exercise rescued deltoid tuberosity volume to the level of wild‐type fetuses. Importantly, the maternal exercise‐induced rescue of deltoid tuberosity morphogenesis was preserved after controlling for overall rudiment growth (i.e., after normalizing by rudiment length) (Figure 7F).
FIGURE 7.

Maternal exercise rescues fetal akinesia‐impaired bone development. (A) Optical projection tomography (OPT) reconstructions of embryonic day 16.5 (E16.5) humeri in wild‐type (WT) and Splotch‐delayed (Spd) mice. The rudiment length and mineralized length are marked with white arrows. The deltoid tuberosity is contoured in black. Scale bar = 500 μm. (B) Rudiment length, (C) mineralized length, (D) mineralization ratio, (E) deltoid tuberosity volume, and (F) rudiment length‐normalized deltoid tuberosity volume. Fetuses from the same litter are marked by the same color datapoint. *p < 0.05 using a two‐way ANOVA with Bonferroni correction.
Finally, we used mechanostimulation bioreactor culture of explanted embryonic limbs to test the effects of mechanical loading on joint morphogenesis, in the absence of systemic maternal factors, by using ex utero mechanical stimulation bioreactor culture. Briefly, E15.5 embryonic forelimbs from wild‐type and Spd fetuses were explanted and cultured for 7 days in a dynamic loading bioreactor. The implemented dynamic loading protocol was previously optimized by our group to promote proper limb morphogenesis in vitro [49, 50]. Contralateral static control limbs from each genotype were cultured in the bioreactor without cyclic loading (Figure 8A). Under static conditions, wild‐type and Spd joints were not significantly different in condyle height or condyle area (Figure 8B–D). This suggests that unloaded WT limbs exhibited similarly impaired joint morphogenesis as Spd limbs due to explantation‐induced arrest of active movement. However, dynamic loading significantly increased condyle height and condyle area in both wild‐type and Spd limbs. Together, these data demonstrate that morphogenesis of both WT and Spd limbs is responsive to mechanical stimuli.
FIGURE 8.

Mechanical loading, in the absence of systemic maternal factors, rescues joint morphogenesis impaired by lack of movement. (A) Schematic representation of ex utero mechanostimulation bioreactor culture of embryonic forelimbs from wild‐type (WT) and Splotch‐delayed (Spd) mice. (B) Fluorescent staining for collagen type 2 alpha 1 chain (Col2a1) in the proximal joint of ex utero forelimbs. Scale bar = 200 μm. (C) Condyle height and (D) condyle area. Limbs from the same fetus are marked by the same shape and connecting line. *p < 0.05 using a two‐way ANOVA with Bonferroni correction.
4. Discussion
Here, we describe the effects of maternal wheel running exercise on fetal skeletal development in mice. In wild‐type fetuses, maternal exercise stimulated joint morphogenesis, bone growth, deltoid tuberosity formation, chondro‐osseous junction remodeling, and blood vessel invasion. These changes could not be fully explained by altered placental transport; however, our data strongly support a role of mechanical stimulation by maternal exercise in fetal limb development. Using the Spd mouse model of fetal akinesia, which features normal maternofetal communication but lacks fetal movement, we found that maternal exercise rescued fetal akinesia‐impaired joint morphogenesis, bone growth, and deltoid tuberosity formation. Further, the application of passive limb movement in explanted limbs, removed from maternal systemic factors, similarly stimulated joint morphogenesis. Taken together, our data suggest that maternal exercise promotes fetal skeletal development, likely via both systemic maternofetal communication and physical stimulation of the developing limbs. These findings demonstrate that maternal exercise regulates fetal skeletal development, implicate maternal exercise as a platform for studying developmental mechanobiology of the skeleton in vivo, and motivate continued study into maternal exercise as a potential in utero intervention for fetal hypokinesia.
Maternal exercise can benefit offspring development. Controlled trials in humans showed that moderate maternal exercise (40%–60% of maximum oxygen consumption (VO2 max), up to 50 min/day, 3 days/week) significantly increased fetal cardiac function at 36 weeks gestation [64] and increased offspring brain maturity at 15 days old [65]. Corroborating enhanced cognitive function outcomes, a preclinical rat study found that moderate‐intensity maternal treadmill exercise (up to 8 m/min, 30 min/day, 5 days/week) significantly increased spatial learning memory in offspring [89]. Preclinical models have also demonstrated the benefits of maternal exercise on offspring liver function. Specifically, moderate‐intensity maternal treadmill exercise (up to 21 m/min, up to 60 min/day, 6 days/week) protected rat offspring from liver dysfunction associated with maternal high‐fat/high‐sugar diet [90] and voluntary maternal wheel running exercise protected mouse offspring from developing non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease associated with maternal high‐fat diet [91]. Voluntary maternal wheel running exercise in mice also protects offspring from developing mammary tumors after carcinogen challenge [92]. Some studies have also described that maternal exercise prior to conception may benefit pregnancy and offspring [93]. In our study, all mice, including sham and exercise groups, received the same ad libitum wheel acclimation prior to pregnancy. We used a targeted exercise approach, in which we exposed pregnant dams to 1 h of supervised wheel running each day (broken into four 15‐min bouts), for up to 4 days during the key window of fetal joint and bone development. We selected this limited regimen to mimic an achievable exercise program and because we observed that pregnant dams progressively diminish their running distances as pregnancy progresses when provided wheels ad libitum. Our findings contribute to a growing body of maternal exercise literature and pose new questions about how maternal exercise affects orthopedic tissues.
We do not yet understand how maternal exercise affects offspring skeletal development. To date, only three preclinical studies have measured the effects of maternal exercise on offspring skeletal development, but all focused on postnatal skeletal outcomes. One study found that voluntary wheel running exercise by pregnant mice, throughout gestation, increased osteogenic gene expression in the offspring femora, measured at 2 months old [94]. Conversely, another study found that subjecting pregnant rats to regular squat exercise throughout pregnancy (i.e., food and water were raised so pregnant rats needed to stand on fully extended hindlimbs to eat and drink) significantly reduced tibial bone mineral density in the offspring, measured at 4 months old [95]. The final study found that mild maternal treadmill exercise (30% VO2 max, unspecified exercise frequency) did not significantly alter femur length or bone mineral content in rat offspring at 3 months old [96]. In synthesis, these findings suggest that the intensity and frequency of maternal exercise can regulate offspring skeletal health: too little exercise may not provide adequate stimuli, but too much may be detrimental. A recent systematic review and meta‐analysis reported no significant difference in birthweight of babies born from mothers who completed vigorous intensity exercise in the third trimester compared with controls, but observed a small but significant increase in gestational age at delivery and a decrease in the risk of prematurity [97]. Our findings, using preclinical mouse models, suggest that moderate exercise during late gestation stimulates fetal skeletal development, but further studies are required to assay long‐term benefits.
Synthesizing our findings, we posit that maternal exercise promotes fetal skeletal development, in part through passive physical stimulation of the fetal limb. We observed effects of maternal exercise on YAP/TAZ‐target gene expression, growth plate remodeling, and vascular morphogenesis at the chondro‐osseous junction, which are consistent with our prior findings that YAP and TAZ mediate mechanical control of limb development and regulate neovascular invasion‐mediated growth plate remodeling [53]. However, it is important to note that YAP/TAZ activity per se, particularly in vivo, is not a univariate indicator of mechanotransduction. Further work will be needed to test for a mechanistic role of YAP/TAZ mechanotransduction in maternal exercise‐induced limb morphogenesis. Second, maternal exercise substantially rescued joint and bone morphogenesis in the Spd model of fetal akinesia, which disrupts fetal movement without altering maternofetal communication. Notably, maternal exercise prevented akinesia‐induced resorption of the deltoid tuberosity, an established hallmark of mechanoregulated morphogenesis [35, 56]. Normalizing deltoid tuberosity volume by rudiment length, to control for overall rudiment growth induced by maternal exercise, did not abrogate the rescue, further suggesting a local mechanical response. Lastly, we used an orthogonal ex utero approach for mechanical stimulation of explanted limbs, removed from systemic factors [49, 50, 51, 53, 54]. These data show that mechanical cues are sufficient to stimulate joint morphogenesis in both wild‐type and Spd mice.
In addition to mechanical stimulation, our data support a contribution of maternal‐derived signals on fetal skeletal development. Maternal exercise increased fetal weight and FW:PW ratio, an approximate measure of placental transport efficiency, but we found no significant changes in more direct measurements of placental transport capacity (i.e., LZ/JZ ratio, nutrient transporter expression). These findings are consistent with previous studies that found FW:PW ratio changes without significantly altered downstream measurements of placental transport [98, 99]. A previous study in rats found that moderate maternal treadmill exercise (up to 17 m/min, up to 50 min/day, 7 days/week) increased fetal weight and placental transport efficiency via increased IGF signaling [66]. In addition, dysregulation of the IGF system has been implicated in the pathogenesis of fetal growth restriction in mice [100, 101, 102], rats [103, 104], rabbits [105], sheep [106, 107, 108], and humans [109, 110]. However, we did not observe changes in placental zone morphometry [84, 85], placental IGF‐1 levels [69, 86], or nutrient transporter expression [84, 85]. Compared with these prior studies, our experimental design featured different intensity, modality (i.e., wheel running vs. treadmill) and duration (i.e., 3–4 days vs. 20 days). Although we do not observe evidence of increased IGF signaling in our exercise model, it is possible that other maternally secreted humoral signals are involved. For example, a mouse study found that moderate maternal treadmill exercise (up to 40%–65% VO2, up to 60 min/day, 7 days/week) enhanced fetal muscle development via elevated apelin signaling, which demethylated the promoter region of Ppargc1a and promoted mitochondriogenesis [67]. Future studies will be required to determine these additional putative contributions.
This study has limitations. First, our study did not vary exercise duration or intensity. Human pregnancy guidelines recommend that maternal exercise can be beneficial through means that depend on the intensity, duration, and exercise modality [61]. Although the mice in our study ran consistent distances, our supervised wheel running approach could not modulate exercise intensity. Future studies using controlled treadmill running and longitudinal endpoint assessments of maternal exercise physiology will be required. Second, we utilize the Spd mouse model of fetal akinesia, which produces fetuses that lack mature skeletal muscle. Though this mouse represents an extreme case of absent fetal movements, the Spd model prevented us from studying possible influences of trophic factors from fetal muscle in the response to maternal exercise. In future studies, we aim to use the mdg/mdg mouse as a more clinically relevant model of amyoplasia that may preserve bone‐muscle crosstalk. Lastly, though our evidence suggests that maternal exercise regulates fetal skeletal development in part through passive restoration of mechanical signals, our data also support contributions of altered maternofetal communication. This study was not designed to define the underlying mechanotransductive mechanisms, and further research will be necessary to identify putative humoral signals that may mediate maternofetal crosstalk. Likewise, we do not yet know whether the developing cell populations affected by fetal akinesia are directly stimulated by maternal exercise or whether the observed rescue effects are mediated by indirect cellular mechanisms.
Taken together, these findings identify maternal exercise as a regulator of fetal skeletal development, providing a platform for studying skeletal developmental mechanobiology and suggesting potential therapeutic applications for fetuses with impaired movement.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization: C.J.P., Y.H., N.K., J.D.B., N.C.N. Methodology: C.J.P., Y.H., N.K., D.C.G., M.E., S.A. Investigation: C.J.P., Y.H., N.K., D.C.G., S.A., M.E. Visualization: C.J.P., Y.H., N.K., D.C.G., M.E., S.A., J.D.B., N.C.N. Supervision: N.A.D., R.A.S., J.D.B., N.C.N. Writing – original draft: C.J.P., J.D.B., N.C.N. Writing – review and editing: C.J.P., Y.H., N.K., D.C.G., M.E., S.A., N.A.D., R.A.S., J.D.B., N.C.N.
Funding
This work was supported by EC European Research Council (ERC), 336306, the EC ERC HORIZON EUROPE European Research Council (ERC), 101124603, Research Ireland, 23/US/3923, HHS NIH Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD), R01‐HD113596, HHS NIH National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS), P30‐AR069619, National Science Foundation (NSF), 15‐48571, and HHS NIH National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS), K12GM081259.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Supporting information
Figure S1: Wheel acclimation and maternal exercise regimen. (A) Schematic representation of maternal exercise modalities. Female mice were acclimated to running wheels with ad libitum access for 2 weeks prior to timed pregnancies. After timed pregnancies, pregnant dams had no wheel access until embryonic day 13.5 (E13.5). At E13.5, pregnant dams were assigned to one of two exercise modalities: (1) Ad libitum wheel access until harvest at E17.5 or (2) supervised wheel running daily until harvest at E17.5. Each exercise modality included Sham mice, which had the same wheel exposure, but wheels were locked so that the pregnant dams could not use them to exercise. Embryos were harvested at E17.5 for downstream analyses. (B) Daily running distance throughout the 2‐week acclimation period. (C) Daily running distance for pregnant dams using the ad libitum exercise modality. (D) Daily running distance for pregnant dams using the supervised running exercise modality. Each line represents one pregnant dam. (E) Schematic and legend for pregnant C57BL/6J dams used in this study. Each pregnant dam is noted by a different shade of blue for Sham animals and red for exercise animals. (F) Maternal age, (G) maternal mass at E17.5, and (H) litter size.
Figure S2: Optical projection tomography (OPT) imaging of fetal forelimbs. (A) OPT apparatus with a high‐solution camera, a rotating stage, and a magnetic sample holder marked by yellow arrows. (B) Example process for how a series of 400 brightfield images captured at 360° was reconstructed and converted into a 3D model.
Figure S3: Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) for effect of maternal exercise on humerus bone length, accounting for variation in fetal weight. (A) Single linear regression fitting humerus length vs. fetal weight for Sham and exercise fetuses. (B) Separate linear regressions fitting humerus length vs. fetal weight for Sham and exercise fetuses. Bands indicate 95% confidence interval for each curve. Goodness of fit (R2) and linear equation are reported for each linear regression.
Acknowledgments
European Research Council (ERC)—European Union's Seventh Framework Programme grant agreement number 336306 (N.C.N.). ERC—Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme grant agreement number 101124603 (N.C.N.). Research Ireland grant 23/US/3923 (N.C.N.). NIH/NICHD grant R01‐HD113596 (J.D.B., N.D.). NIH/NIAMS grant P30‐AR069619 (J.D.B., N.D.). NIH/NIGMS grant K12GM081259 (C.J.P.). NSF CMMI grant 15–48 571 (J.D.B.). University of Pennsylvania Center for Undergraduate Research and Fellowships (CURF) (C.J.P., D.C.G., M.E., J.D.B.).
The graphical abstract and schematics in Figures 1, 8, and S1 were generated using BioRender.com.
Joel D. Boerckel and Niamh C. Nowlan contributed equally to this work.
Contributor Information
Joel D. Boerckel, Email: boerckel@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.
Niamh C. Nowlan, Email: niamh.nowlan@ucd.ie.
Data Availability Statement
All data needed to evaluate the conclusions in the paper are present in the paper and/or the Supporting Information.
References
- 1. Suzue T., “Movements of Mouse Fetuses in Early Stages of Neural Development Studied In Vitro,” Neuroscience Letters 218 (1996): 131–134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Kozhemyakina E., Lassar A. B., and Zelzer E., “A Pathway to Bone: Signaling Molecules and Transcription Factors Involved in Chondrocyte Development and Maturation,” Development 142 (2015): 817–831. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Nowlan N., “Biomechanics of Foetal Movement,” European Cells and Materials 29 (2015): 1–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Verbruggen S. W., Kainz B., Shelmerdine S. C., et al., “Stresses and Strains on the Human Fetal Skeleton During Development,” Journal of the Royal Society Interface 15 (2018): 20170593. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Wang Y., Wang D., Zhang G., et al., “Effects of Spinal Deformities on Lung Development in Children: A Review,” Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research 18 (2023): 246. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Fong B. F., Savelsbergh G. J. P., Leijsen M. R., and de Vries J. I. P., “The Influence of Prenatal Breech Presentation on Neonatal Leg Posture,” Early Human Development 85 (2009): 201–206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Sekulić S., Žarkov M., Slankamenac P., Božić K., Vejnović T., and Novakov‐Mikić A., “Decreased Expression of the Righting Reflex and Locomotor Movements in Breech‐Presenting Newborns in the First Days of Life,” Early Human Development 85 (2009): 263–266. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Moh W., Graham J. M., Wadhawan I., and Sanchez‐Lara P. A., “Extrinsic Factors Influencing Fetal Deformations and Intrauterine Growth Restriction,” Journal of Pregnancy 2012 (2012): 1–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Filges I. and Hall J. G., “Failure to Identify Antenatal Multiple Congenital Contractures and Fetal Akinesia – Proposal of Guidelines to Improve Diagnosis,” Prenatal Diagnosis 33 (2013): 61–74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Bamshad M., Van Heest A. E., and Pleasure D., “Arthrogryposis: A Review and Update,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 91 (2009): 40–46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Hall J. G., Aldinger K. A., and Tanaka K. I., “Amyoplasia Revisited,” American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part A 164 (2014): 700–730. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Rodríguez J. I., Palacios J., García‐Alix A., Pastor I., and Paniagua R., “Effects of Immobilization on Fetal Bone Development. A Morphometric Study in Newborns With Congenital Neuromuscular Diseases With Intrauterine Onset,” Calcified Tissue International 43 (1988): 335–339. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Palacios J. and Rodriguez J. I., “Extrinsic Fetal Akinesia and Skeletal Development: A Study in Oligohydramnios Sequence,” Teratology 42 (1990): 1–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Rodríguez J. I., Palacios J., Ruiz A., Sanchez M., Alvarez I., and Demiguel E., “Morphological Changes in Long Bone Development in Fetal Akinesia Deformation Sequence: An Experimental Study in Curarized Rat Fetuses,” Teratology 45 (1992): 213–221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Palacios J., Rodríguez J. I., Ruiz A., Sanchez M., Alvarez I., and Demiguel E., “Long Bone Development in Extrinsic Fetal Akinesia: An Experimental Study in Rat Fetuses Subjected to Oligohydramnios,” Teratology 46 (1992): 79–84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Niles K. M., Blaser S., Shannon P., and Chitayat D., “Fetal Arthrogryposis Multiplex Congenita/Fetal Akinesia Deformation Sequence (FADS)‐Aetiology, Diagnosis, and Management,” Prenatal Diagnosis 39 (2019): 720–731. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Hall J. G., “Deformations Associated With Arthrogryposis,” American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part A 185 (2021): 2676–2682. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Hamburger V. and Waugh M., “The Primary Development of the Skeleton in Nerveless and Poorly Innervated Limb Transplants of Chick Embryos,” Physiological Zoology 13 (1940): 367–382. [Google Scholar]
- 19. Murray P. D. F. and Huxley J. S., “The Development of Grafted Embryonic Fragments of the Chick,” Journal of Experimental Biology 3 (1925): 9–34. [Google Scholar]
- 20. Drachman D. B. and Sokoloff L., “The Role of Movement in Embryonic Joint Development,” Developmental Biology 14 (1966): 401–420. [Google Scholar]
- 21. Hall B. K. and Herring S. W., “Paralysis and Growth of the Musculoskeletal System in the Embryonic Chick,” Journal of Morphology 206 (1990): 45–56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Hogg D. A. and Hosseini A., “The Effects of Paralysis on Skeletal Development in the Chick Embryo,” Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology. Comparative Physiology 103 (1992): 25–28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Hosseini A. and Hogg D. A., “The Effects of Paralysis on Skeletal Development in the Chick Embryo. I. General Effects,” Journal of Anatomy 177 (1991): 159–168. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Hosseini A. and Hogg D. A., “The Effects of Paralysis on Skeletal Development in the Chick Embryo. II. Effects on Histogenesis of the Tibia,” Journal of Anatomy 177 (1991): 169–178. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Rolfe R. A., Scanlon O'Callaghan D., and Murphy P., “Joint Development Recovery on Resumption of Embryonic Movement Following Paralysis,” Disease Models & Mechanisms 14 (2021): dmm048913. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Roddy K. A., Prendergast P. J., and Murphy P., “Mechanical Influences on Morphogenesis of the Knee Joint Revealed Through Morphological, Molecular and Computational Analysis of Immobilised Embryos,” PLoS One 6 (2011): e17526. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Mitrovic D., “Development of the Articular Cavity in Paralyzed Chick Embryos and in Chick Embryo Limb Buds Cultured on Chorioallantoic Membranes,” Cells, Tissues, Organs 113 (1982): 313–324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Mikic B., Johnson T. L., Chhabra A. B., et al., “Differential Effects of Embryonic Immobilization on the Development of Fibrocartilaginous Skeletal Elements,” Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development 37 (2000): 127–133. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Pai A. C., “Developmental Genetics of A Lethal Mutation, Muscular Dysgenesis (MDG), in the Mouse. I. Genetic Analysis and Gross Morphology,” Developmental Biology 11 (1965): 82–92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Pai A. C., “Developmental Genetics of A Lethal Mutation, Muscular Dysgenesis (MDG), in the Mouse. II. Developmental Analysis,” Developmental Biology 11 (1965): 93–109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Powell J. A., Petherbridge L., and Flucher B. E., “Formation of Triads Without the Dihydropyridine Receptor Alpha Subunits in Cell Lines From Dysgenic Skeletal Muscle,” Journal of Cell Biology 134 (1996): 375–387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Franz T., Kothary R., Surani M. A., Halata Z., and Grim M., “The Splotch Mutation Interferes With Muscle Development in the Limbs,” Anatomy and Embryology 187 (1993): 153–160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Bober E., Franz T., Arnold H. H., Gruss P., and Tremblay P., “Pax‐3 Is Required for the Development of Limb Muscles: A Possible Role for the Migration of Dermomyotomal Muscle Progenitor Cells,” Development 120 (1994): 603–612. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Tajbakhsh S., Rocancourt D., Cossu G., and Buckingham M., “Redefining the Genetic Hierarchies Controlling Skeletal Myogenesis: Pax‐3 and Myf‐5 Act Upstream of MyoD,” Cell 89 (1997): 127–138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Rot‐Nikcevic I., Reddy T., Downing K. J., et al., “Myf5−/−:MyoD−/− Amyogenic Fetuses Reveal the Importance of Early Contraction and Static Loading by Striated Muscle in Mouse Skeletogenesis,” Development Genes and Evolution 216 (2006): 1–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Nowlan N. C., Sharpe J., Roddy K. A., Prendergast P. J., and Murphy P., “Mechanobiology of Embryonic Skeletal Development: Insights From Animal Models,” Birth Defects Research. Part C, Embryo Today 90 (2010): 203–213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Roddy K. A., Kelly G. M., van Es M. H., Murphy P., and Prendergast P. J., “Dynamic Patterns of Mechanical Stimulation Co‐Localise With Growth and Cell Proliferation During Morphogenesis in the Avian Embryonic Knee Joint,” Journal of Biomechanics 44 (2011): 143–149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Nowlan N. C., Bourdon C., Dumas G., Tajbakhsh S., Prendergast P. J., and Murphy P., “Developing Bones Are Differentially Affected by Compromised Skeletal Muscle Formation,” Bone 46 (2010): 1275–1285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Rolfe R. A., Nowlan N. C., Kenny E. M., et al., “Identification of Mechanosensitive Genes During Skeletal Development: Alteration of Genes Associated With Cytoskeletal Rearrangement and Cell Signalling Pathways,” BMC Genomics 15 (2014): 48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Murphy P. and Rolfe R. A., “Building a Co‐Ordinated Musculoskeletal System: The Plasticity of the Developing Skeleton in Response to Muscle Contractions,” Advances in Anatomy, Embryology, and Cell Biology 236 (2023): 81–110, 10.1007/978-3-031-38215-4_4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Shwartz Y., Farkas Z., Stern T., Aszódi A., and Zelzer E., “Muscle Contraction Controls Skeletal Morphogenesis Through Regulation of Chondrocyte Convergent Extension,” Developmental Biology 370 (2012): 154–163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Sharir A., Stern T., Rot C., Shahar R., and Zelzer E., “Muscle Force Regulates Bone Shaping for Optimal Load‐Bearing Capacity During Embryogenesis,” Development 138 (2011): 3247–3259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Pierantoni M., le Cann S., Sotiriou V., et al., “Muscular Loading Affects the 3D Structure of Both the Mineralized Rudiment and Growth Plate at Early Stages of Bone Formation,” Bone 145 (2021): 115849. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Blitz E., Viukov S., Sharir A., et al., “Bone Ridge Patterning During Musculoskeletal Assembly Is Mediated Through SCX Regulation of Bmp4 at the Tendon‐Skeleton Junction,” Developmental Cell 17 (2009): 861–873. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Davies C., Jones D. B., Stoddart M. J., et al., “Mechanically Loaded Ex Vivo Bone Culture System ‘Zetos’: Systems and Culture Preparation,” European Cells and Materials 11 (2006): 57–75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Rodriguez E. K. and Munasinghe J., “A Chick Embryo In‐Vitro Model of Knee Morphogenesis,” Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery 4 (2016): 109–115. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Henstock J. R., Rotherham M., Rose J. B., and El Haj A. J., “Cyclic Hydrostatic Pressure Stimulates Enhanced Bone Development in the Foetal Chick Femur In Vitro,” Bone 53 (2013): 468–477. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Smith E., Kanczler J., and Oreffo R., “A New Take on an Old Story: Chick Limb Organ Culture for Skeletal Niche Development and Regenerative Medicine Evaluation,” European Cells and Materials 26 (2013): 91–106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Chandaria V. V., McGinty J., and Nowlan N. C., “Characterising the Effects of In Vitro Mechanical Stimulation on Morphogenesis of Developing Limb Explants,” Journal of Biomechanics 49 (2016): 3635–3642. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Khatib N., Parisi C., and Nowlan N., “Differential Effect of Frequency and Duration of Mechanical Loading on Fetal Chick Cartilage and Bone Development,” European Cells and Materials 41 (2021): 531–545. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Khatib N. S., Monsen J., Ahmed S., Huang Y., Hoey D. A., and Nowlan N. C., “Mechanoregulatory Role of TRPV4 in Prenatal Skeletal Development,” Science Advances 9 (2023): eade2155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Parisi C., Chandaria V. V., and Nowlan N. C., “Blocking Mechanosensitive Ion Channels Eliminates the Effects of Applied Mechanical Loading on Chick Joint Morphogenesis,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, B: Biological Sciences 373 (2018): 20170317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Collins J. M., Lang A., Parisi C., et al., “YAP and TAZ Couple Osteoblast Precursor Mobilization to Angiogenesis and Mechanoregulation in Murine Bone Development,” Developmental Cell 59 (2024): 211–227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Ahmed S., Rogers A. V., and Nowlan N. C., “Mechanical Loading due to Muscle Movement Regulates Establishment of the Collagen Network in the Developing Murine Skeleton,” Royal Society Open Science 10 (2023): 231023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Sotiriou V., Huang Y., Ahmed S., Isaksson H., and Nowlan N. C., “Prenatal Murine Skeletogenesis Partially Recovers From Absent Skeletal Muscle as Development Progresses,” European Cells and Materials 44 (2022): 115–132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Kahn J., Shwartz Y., Blitz E., et al., “Muscle Contraction Is Necessary to Maintain Joint Progenitor Cell Fate,” Developmental Cell 16 (2009): 734–743. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Nowlan N. C., Dumas G., Tajbakhsh S., Prendergast P. J., and Murphy P., “Biophysical Stimuli Induced by Passive Movements Compensate for Lack of Skeletal Muscle During Embryonic Skeletogenesis,” Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology 11 (2012): 207–219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Cordero Y., Mottola M. F., Vargas J., Blanco M., and Barakat R., “Exercise Is Associated With a Reduction in Gestational Diabetes Mellitus,” Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 47 (2015): 1328–1333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Magro‐Malosso E. R., Saccone G., Di Tommaso M., Roman A., and Berghella V., “Exercise During Pregnancy and Risk of Gestational Hypertensive Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis,” Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 96 (2017): 921–931. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Magro‐Malosso E. R., Saccone G., Di Mascio D., Di Tommaso M., and Berghella V., “Exercise During Pregnancy and Risk of Preterm Birth in Overweight and Obese Women: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials,” Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 96 (2017): 263–273. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.“Physical Activity and Exercise During Pregnancy and the Postpartum Period,” Obstetrics & Gynecology 135 (2020): e178–e188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Dye T. D., Knox K. L., Artal R., Aubry R. H., and Wojtowycz M. A., “Physical Activity, Obesity, and Diabetes in Pregnancy,” American Journal of Epidemiology 146 (1997): 961–965. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Berghella V. and Saccone G., “Exercise in Pregnancy!,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 216 (2017): 335–337. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. May L. E., McDonald S., Forbes L., et al., “Influence of Maternal Aerobic Exercise During Pregnancy on Fetal Cardiac Function and Outflow,” American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology MFM 2 (2020): 100095. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Labonte‐Lemoyne E., Curnier D., and Ellemberg D., “Exercise During Pregnancy Enhances Cerebral Maturation in the Newborn: A Randomized Controlled Trial,” Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 39 (2017): 347–354. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Mangwiro Y. T. M., Cuffe J. S. M., Briffa J. F., et al., “Maternal Exercise in Rats Upregulates the Placental Insulin‐Like Growth Factor System With Diet‐ and Sex‐Specific Responses: Minimal Effects in Mothers Born Growth Restricted,” Journal of Physiology 596 (2018): 5947–5964. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Son J. S., Chae S. A., Wang H., et al., “Maternal Inactivity Programs Skeletal Muscle Dysfunction in Offspring Mice by Attenuating Apelin Signaling and Mitochondrial Biogenesis,” Cell Reports 33 (2020): 108461. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Lovell E. A. K., Hosking S. L., Groome H. M., et al., “Effects of Exercise on Vascular Remodelling and Fetal Growth in Uncomplicated and Abortion‐Prone Mouse Pregnancies,” Scientific Reports 14 (2024): 31841. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Brett K. E., Ferraro Z. M., Yockell‐Lelievre J., Gruslin A., and Adamo K. B., “Maternal‐Fetal Nutrient Transport in Pregnancy Pathologies: The Role of the Placenta,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences 15 (2014): 16153–16185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Hubrecht R. C. and Carter E., “The 3rs and Humane Experimental Technique: Implementing Change,” Animals (Basel) 9 (2019): 754. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Tannenbaum J. and Bennett B. T., “Russell and Burch's 3Rs Then and Now: The Need for Clarity in Definition and Purpose,” Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science 54 (2015): 120–132. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Allen M. J., Hankenson K. D., Goodrich L., Boivin G. P., and von Rechenberg B., “Ethical Use of Animal Models in Musculoskeletal Research,” Journal of Orthopaedic Research 35 (2017): 740–751. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73. McLeod M. J., “Differential Staining of Cartilage and Bone in Whole Mouse Fetuses by Alcian Blue and Alizarin Red S,” Teratology 22 (1980): 299–301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74. Quintana L. and Sharpe J., “Preparation of Mouse Embryos for Optical Projection Tomography Imaging,” Cold Spring Harbor Protocols 2011 (2011): 664–669. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75. Sharpe J., Ahlgren U., Perry P., et al., “Optical Projection Tomography as a Tool for 3D Microscopy and Gene Expression Studies,” Science 296 (2002): 541–545. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76. Nowlan N. C., Murphy P., and Prendergast P. J., “A Dynamic Pattern of Mechanical Stimulation Promotes Ossification in Avian Embryonic Long Bones,” Journal of Biomechanics 41 (2008): 249–258. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77. Yushkevich P. A., Piven J., Hazlett H. C., et al., “User‐Guided 3D Active Contour Segmentation of Anatomical Structures: Significantly Improved Efficiency and Reliability,” NeuroImage 31 (2006): 1116–1128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78. Fedorov A., Beichel R., Kalpathy‐Cramer J., et al., “3D Slicer as an Image Computing Platform for the Quantitative Imaging Network,” Magnetic Resonance Imaging 30 (2012): 1323–1341. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79. M. Zlotnick H., Jiang X., L. Mauck R., and A. Dyment N., “Multiplexed Tape‐Stabilized Cryohistology of Mineralized Large Animal Specimens,” Journal of Biological Methods 9 (2022): 1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80. Kegelman C. D., Mason D. E., Dawahare J. H., et al., “Skeletal Cell YAP and TAZ Combinatorially Promote Bone Development,” FASEB Journal 32 (2018): 2706–2721. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81. Schneider P., Voide R., Stampanoni M., Donahue L. R., and Müller R., “The Importance of the Intracortical Canal Network for Murine Bone Mechanics,” Bone 53 (2013): 120–128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82. Akaike H., “A New Look at the Statistical Model Identification,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 19 (1974): 716–723. [Google Scholar]
- 83. Guss J. D., Horsfield M. W., Fontenele F. F., et al., “Alterations to the Gut Microbiome Impair Bone Strength and Tissue Material Properties,” Journal of Bone and Mineral Research 32 (2017): 1343–1353. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84. Bobek G., Stait‐Gardner T., Price W., Makris A., and Hennessy A., “Quantification of Placental Change in Mouse Models of Preeclampsia Using Magnetic Resonance Microscopy,” European Journal of Histochemistry: EJH 62 (2018): 2868. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85. De Clercq K., Persoons E., Napso T., et al., “High‐Resolution Contrast‐Enhanced microCT Reveals the True Three‐Dimensional Morphology of the Murine Placenta,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 116 (2019): 13927–13936. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86. Rashid C. S., Lien Y. C., Bansal A., et al., “Transcriptomic Analysis Reveals Novel Mechanisms Mediating Islet Dysfunction in the Intrauterine Growth‐Restricted Rat,” Endocrinology 159 (2018): 1035–1049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87. Kegelman C. D., Nijsure M. P., Moharrer Y., et al., “YAP and TAZ Promote Periosteal Osteoblast Precursor Expansion and Differentiation for Fracture Repair,” Journal of Bone and Mineral Research 36 (2020): 143–157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88. Kegelman C. D., Collins J. M., Nijsure M. P., Eastburn E. A., and Boerckel J. D., “Gone Caving: Roles of the Transcriptional Regulators YAP and TAZ in Skeletal Development,” Current Osteoporosis Reports 18 (2020): 526–540, 10.1007/s11914-020-00605-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89. Ko Y. J., Kim B.‐K., and Ji E.‐S., “Treadmill Exercise in Obese Maternal Rats During Pregnancy Improves Spatial Memory Through Activation of Phosphatidylinositol 3‐Kinase Pathway in the Hippocampus of Rat Pups,” Journal of Exercise Rehabilitation 16 (2020): 483–488. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90. Stevanović‐Silva J., Beleza J., Coxito P., et al., “Maternal High‐Fat High‐Sucrose Diet and Gestational Exercise Modulate Hepatic Fat Accumulation and Liver Mitochondrial Respiratory Capacity in Mothers and Male Offspring,” Metabolism 116 (2021): 154704. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91. Bae‐Gartz I., Kasper P., Großmann N., et al., “Maternal Exercise Conveys Protection Against NAFLD in the Offspring via Hepatic Metabolic Programming,” Scientific Reports 10 (2020): 15424. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92. Camarillo I. G., Clah L., Zheng W., et al., “Maternal Exercise During Pregnancy Reduces Risk of Mammary Tumorigenesis in Rat Offspring,” European Journal of Cancer Prevention 23 (2014): 502–505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93. Harrison C. L., Brown W. J., Hayman M., Moran L. J., and Redman L. M., “The Role of Physical Activity in Preconception, Pregnancy and Postpartum Health,” Seminars in Reproductive Medicine 34 (2016): e28–e37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94. Gaeini A. A., Shafiei Neek L., Choobineh S., et al., “Preconception Endurance Training With Voluntary Exercise During Pregnancy Positively Influences on Remodeling Markers in Female Offspring Bone,” Journal of Maternal‐Fetal and Neonatal Medicine 29 (2016): 3634–3640. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95. Rosa B. V., Blair H. T., Vickers M. H., et al., “Moderate Exercise During Pregnancy in Wistar Rats Alters Bone and Body Composition of the Adult Offspring in a Sex‐Dependent Manner,” PLoS One 8 (2013): e82378. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96. Monteiro A. C. T., Paes S. T., Dos Santos J. A., De Lira K. D. S., and De Moraes S. R. A., “Effects of Physical Exercise During Pregnancy and Protein Malnutrition During Pregnancy and Lactation on the Development and Growth of the Offspring's Femur,” Jornal de Pediatria 86 (2010): 233–238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97. Beetham K. S., Giles C., Noetel M., Clifton V., Jones J. C., and Naughton G., “The Effects of Vigorous Intensity Exercise in the Third Trimester of Pregnancy: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis,” BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 19 (2019): 281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98. Coan P. M., Angiolini E., Sandovici I., Burton G. J., Constância M., and Fowden A. L., “Adaptations in Placental Nutrient Transfer Capacity to Meet Fetal Growth Demands Depend on Placental Size in Mice,” Journal of Physiology 586 (2008): 4567–4576. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99. McIntyre K. R., Hayward C. E., Sibley C. P., Greenwood S. L., and Dilworth M. R., “Evidence of Adaptation of Maternofetal Transport of Glutamine Relative to Placental Size in Normal Mice, and in Those With Fetal Growth Restriction,” Journal of Physiology 597 (2019): 4975–4990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100. Claycombe‐Larson K., Singh B., Bundy A. N., Brunelle D., Bukowski M. R., and Roemmich J. N., “Effects of Maternal HF Diet and Absence of TRPC1 Gene on Mouse Placental Growth and Fetal Intrauterine Growth Retardation (IUGR),” Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry 114 (2023): 109162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101. Wilson R. L., Troja W., Sumser E. K., Maupin A., Lampe K., and Jones H. N., “Insulin‐Like Growth Factor 1 Signaling in the Placenta Requires Endothelial Nitric Oxide Synthase to Support Trophoblast Function and Normal Fetal Growth,” American Journal of Physiology. Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology 320 (2021): R653–R662. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102. McKnight R. A., Yost C. C., Yu X., et al., “Intrauterine Growth Restriction Perturbs Nucleosome Depletion at a Growth Hormone‐Responsive Element in the Mouse IGF‐1 Gene,” Physiological Genomics 47 (2015): 634–643. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103. Reid G. J., Flozak A. S., and Simmons R. A., “Placental Expression of Insulin‐Like Growth Factor Receptor‐1 and Insulin Receptor in the Growth‐Restricted Fetal Rat,” Journal of the Society for Gynecologic Investigation 9 (2002): 210–214. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104. Simmons R. A., Flozak A. S., and Ogata E. S., “The Effect of Insulin and Insulin‐Like Growth Factor‐I on Glucose Transport in Normal and Small for Gestational Age Fetal Rats,” Endocrinology 133 (1993): 1361–1368. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105. Thakur A., Sase M., Lee J. J., Thakur V., and Buchmiller T. L., “Ontogeny of Insulin‐Like Growth Factor 1 in a Rabbit Model of Growth Retardation,” Journal of Surgical Research 91 (2000): 135–140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106. Gentili S., Morrison J. L., and McMillen I. C., “Intrauterine Growth Restriction and Differential Patterns of Hepatic Growth and Expression of IGF1, PCK2, and HSDL1 mRNA in the Sheep Fetus in Late Gestation1,” Biology of Reproduction 80 (2009): 1121–1127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107. Kind K. L., Owens J. A., Robinson J. S., et al., “Effect of Restriction of Placental Growth on Expression of IGFs in Fetal Sheep: Relationship to Fetal Growth, Circulating IGFs and Binding Proteins,” Journal of Endocrinology 146 (1995): 23–34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108. Bauer M. K., Breier B. H., Harding J. E., Veldhuis J. D., and Gluckman P. D., “The Fetal Somatotropic Axis During Long Term Maternal Undernutrition in Sheep: Evidence for Nutritional Regulation In Utero,” Endocrinology 136 (1995): 1250–1257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109. Spencer J. A., Chang T. C., Jones J., Robson S. C., and Preece M. A., “Third Trimester Fetal Growth and Umbilical Venous Blood Concentrations of IGF‐1, IGFBP‐1, and Growth Hormone at Term,” Archives of Disease in Childhood. Fetal and Neonatal Edition 73 (1995): F87–F90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110. Langford K., Blum W., Nicolaides K., Jones J., McGregor A., and Miell J., “The Pathophysiology of the Insulin‐Like Growth Factor Axis in Fetal Growth Failure: A Basis for Programming by Undernutrition?,” European Journal of Clinical Investigation 24 (1994): 851–856. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Figure S1: Wheel acclimation and maternal exercise regimen. (A) Schematic representation of maternal exercise modalities. Female mice were acclimated to running wheels with ad libitum access for 2 weeks prior to timed pregnancies. After timed pregnancies, pregnant dams had no wheel access until embryonic day 13.5 (E13.5). At E13.5, pregnant dams were assigned to one of two exercise modalities: (1) Ad libitum wheel access until harvest at E17.5 or (2) supervised wheel running daily until harvest at E17.5. Each exercise modality included Sham mice, which had the same wheel exposure, but wheels were locked so that the pregnant dams could not use them to exercise. Embryos were harvested at E17.5 for downstream analyses. (B) Daily running distance throughout the 2‐week acclimation period. (C) Daily running distance for pregnant dams using the ad libitum exercise modality. (D) Daily running distance for pregnant dams using the supervised running exercise modality. Each line represents one pregnant dam. (E) Schematic and legend for pregnant C57BL/6J dams used in this study. Each pregnant dam is noted by a different shade of blue for Sham animals and red for exercise animals. (F) Maternal age, (G) maternal mass at E17.5, and (H) litter size.
Figure S2: Optical projection tomography (OPT) imaging of fetal forelimbs. (A) OPT apparatus with a high‐solution camera, a rotating stage, and a magnetic sample holder marked by yellow arrows. (B) Example process for how a series of 400 brightfield images captured at 360° was reconstructed and converted into a 3D model.
Figure S3: Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) for effect of maternal exercise on humerus bone length, accounting for variation in fetal weight. (A) Single linear regression fitting humerus length vs. fetal weight for Sham and exercise fetuses. (B) Separate linear regressions fitting humerus length vs. fetal weight for Sham and exercise fetuses. Bands indicate 95% confidence interval for each curve. Goodness of fit (R2) and linear equation are reported for each linear regression.
Data Availability Statement
All data needed to evaluate the conclusions in the paper are present in the paper and/or the Supporting Information.
