Skip to main content
JARO: Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology logoLink to JARO: Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology
. 2025 Dec 12;27(1):37–56. doi: 10.1007/s10162-025-01013-z

Aging in the Primary Auditory Cortex

Jonah K Mittelstadt 1,2,4, Kelson V Shilling-Scrivo 2,3, Patrick O Kanold 1,2,4,5,
PMCID: PMC12704821  NIHMSID: NIHMS2120491  PMID: 41388208

Abstract

Age-related auditory dysfunction affects half of all individuals 60 years and older, yet its causes are poorly understood. While commonly associated with cochlear dysfunction, a growing body of literature suggests that dysfunction originating in the auditory cortex itself is also a major contributor. Here, we review recent literature that describes the effects of aging on the primary auditory cortex in humans, non-human primates, rodents, and a variety of other species. During aging, individuals with auditory cortical dysfunction experience deficits in spectral and temporal processing of sounds, resulting not only from a loss of inhibition but also from an extensive restructuring of cortical circuits. Importantly, aging in the auditory cortex is sex-dependent, yet few studies account for this variable. A lack of comprehensive knowledge on aging in the auditory cortex hinders the path toward restoring cortical function through auditory training or broader cortical rehabilitation paradigms. Thus, we propose a cohesive mechanism of aging in the primary auditory cortex that involves a complex interaction between excitatory and inhibitory neurons, which several factors can modify. These factors include input from higher-order cortical areas, such as the orbitofrontal cortex, as well as the wide-ranging effects of neuromodulators and the external sensory environment, which must be accounted for in a sex-dependent manner.

Keywords: Auditory cortex, Training, Sex-effect, Neuroplasticity, Aging

Introduction

Approximately half of the people aged 60, and increasing in prevalence from age 60 onwards, will suffer from age-related auditory dysfunction, both when self-reported and measured audiologically [1]. Classically, patients present with two main symptoms of auditory dysfunction: either difficulty in detecting sounds or in perceiving sounds [2]. While sound detection often manifests as not being able to hear sounds of a low amplitude as a result of disrupted cochlear function, perceptually, patients frequently struggle with sound source localization, temporal perception, and gap detection even in older individuals with normal cochlear function, suggesting dysfunction in central components the auditory pathway, including the auditory cortex (ACtx), the auditory thalamus, and portions of the auditory brainstem and midbrain [310] (Fig. 1a). In day-to-day life, central auditory system dysfunction often affects older individuals, causing them to struggle to discriminate speech from a noisy background [7, 11].

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

The aged auditory cortex represents auditory stimuli with less specificity. a Schematic of the central auditory system necessary for proper auditory processing. Adapted from Fig. 2.2 of Goodrich & Kanold, [199]. The lemniscal auditory pathway is shown with the solid arrows, and the non-lemniscal pathway is shown with dotted arrows. b Adapted from Fig. 6 of Turner et al., [26]. Collapsed peristimulus time histogram from layer V primary ACtx neurons with complex response profiles from young and aging rats in response to a 200 ms current pulse ranging from 1 to 10 nA (represented by green bar). c Adapted from Fig. 2 of Ramamurthy & Recanzone, [20]. Exemplar ON and OFF intensity rate-level functions (top) and peristimulus time histograms (bottom) from both young and aging non-human primate neurons in response to a 200 ms unfrozen Gaussian noise stimulus (represented by green bar). d Schematic containing the main point made in this figure: as inhibition is lost in aging, the network becomes increasingly homogenous in its stimuli encoding. Circles represent neurons, and lines represent connections. Excitatory neurons are in blue and inhibitory neurons are in red

Cochlear dysfunction is exceedingly common in adult humans [12], likely due to exposure to harsh auditory environments, such as noise pollution, prolonged use of personal listening devices at high volumes, or loud environments. Additionally, independent dysfunction can also be observed throughout the remainder of the ascending auditory pathway in the majority of the aging population, contributing to this auditory dysfunction, although the prevalence of central auditory system dysfunction is difficult to measure in isolation from peripheral auditory system loss [4, 1316]. To disambiguate central auditory system dysfunction from peripheral hearing loss, carefully controlled animal studies have been used. To this effect, multiple studies have searched for and found independent effects of aging on ACtx in non-human primates, rats, and mice [1732]. Studies evaluating the effects of aging on single neurons in the ACtx of the macaque monkey suggest that aging increases both the spontaneous and sound-driven activity of these neurons [18, 19], increasing the effects of noise on auditory processing. These findings significantly advanced the field’s mechanistic understanding of the basis of age-related dysfunction in the ACtx and closely fit the human phenotype of decreased fidelity in auditory perception. To supplement this new knowledge, mouse models were used due to the wide availability of transgenic methods that enable the simultaneous recording of the activity of thousands of neurons in large cohorts of animals raised in controlled housing conditions designed to minimize variations in peripheral hearing experience not easily possible with non-human primates [2123]. Here, we attempt to synthesize literature obtained from humans, non-human primates, rodents, and a variety of other species about aging in the ACtx.

The ACtx is thought to represent sound stimuli using sparse neural networks of excitatory and inhibitory neurons that respond preferentially to specific stimuli composed of numerous variables, such as the frequency, intensity, or location of the sound [3335]. In aging, numerous changes occur in the ACtx, ranging from brain hemisphere-scale changes in the asymmetric processing of spatially distributed sounds [36] to smaller-scale, network-scale changes in the excitation-inhibition balance in local cortical circuits [25]. Over the past decade, a large body of literature has supported the idea that decreased inhibition is responsible for most dysfunctions observed in the aging ACtx [32, 3742] although changes can also be seen throughout the entire auditory pathway [42]. However, recent findings suggest that changes in the ACtx involve both decreased inhibition and altered excitation rather than decreased inhibition alone [21, 22, 24, 25]. Therefore, this review describes the recent advances in our understanding of aging in the ACtx.

Throughout the entire auditory system, auditory stimuli can be primarily characterized by their frequency spectrum, temporal envelope, and binaural differences [43]. Within the ACtx, neurons then integrate this information into complex readouts of multiple components of each auditory stimulus, including its spatial location, amplitude, spectral and temporal components, including as sound onset or offset leading to high stimulus selectivity [3335, 4347]. Furthermore, sound features are also encoded by neuronal ensembles in ACtx [21, 45, 46, 48, 49] and neuronal responses are modulated by arousal and behavioral state, such that neural and ensemble responses vary between passive tone presentation and during behavioral tasks [22, 4753]. Sex has also been shown to affect the activity of neural populations and circuits in the ACtx, especially during aging [21, 22, 24]. Given the processing complexity in the brain, even slight circuit and functional changes associated with aging can have a dramatic impact on cognitive abilities, including those in the sensory systems. However, the detailed circuit and processing changes in the ACtx with aging were not well-studied until recently. The cerebral cortex demonstrates a tremendous capacity for plasticity, and an expanding body of research highlights promising strategies, such as auditory training and vagal nerve stimulation, to restore or preserve auditory cortical function [23, 5458]. Thus, this review will focus on the changes in the primary ACtx that disrupt the spectral and temporal representations of sound before concentrating on the effects of sex and plasticity in the aging ACtx. While this work focuses on the primary ACtx, all ACtx references can be assumed to refer to the primary ACtx unless otherwise stated. Available research about the secondary ACtx is referenced when available, but differences in aging between primary and higher-order areas remain a central open question.

Decreased Functional Response Selectivity in the Aging Auditory Cortex

The aged ACtx fundamentally differs from the young ACtx in both structure and function. Thus, the aged ACtx represents stimuli differently and often with less fidelity than the young ACtx. Research conducted in humans has revealed distinct cortical activity patterns in young and older adults when listening to auditory stimuli. When an individual listens to auditory stimuli, the ACtx performs a type of pattern recognition, allowing for proper speech recognition [59, 60]. However, sustained neural activity resulting from this speech recognition pattern appears to be lost in the aged human ACtx when measured using magnetoencephalography (MEG) [61]. Accordingly, speech has been shown to recruit more neurons in the ACtx of older individuals as compared to young individuals [62, 63], suggesting that decreased auditory processing abilities, which limit speech comprehension, correlate with an overrepresentation in, and thus less specific, neural responses [64]. As such, older listeners often place excessive emphasis on the context of speech to aid in word recognition, which can lead to a misperception of the actual spoken word, a phenomenon termed false hearing [65]. This, too, has been hypothesized to be a result of decreased inhibition of high-probability responses, leading to the misperception of speech [66].

Moreover, multiple studies in humans have found that a decrease in inhibition, as measured by magnetic resonance (MR) spectroscopy, in the ACtx correlates with impaired speech-in-noise comprehension [38, 39, 67]. However, due to the inherent limitations of working with human subjects, these experiments lacked many finer observations made possible by invasive experiments in animal models. Thus, studies using non-human primates nicely complement human studies by allowing for direct, temporally precise measurements of neural activity in the ACtx. Such studies have revealed that auditory stimuli cause a higher spike rate of individual excitatory neurons in the aged ACtx, in addition to an increase in spontaneous activity present in aged neurons [1719], perhaps partially due to a compensatory loss of inhibition in the ACtx to make up for decreased peripheral excitation in the case of accompanying peripheral hearing loss [26, 68]. Thus, the increase in cortical activity, concomitant with a decrease in functional response specificity to any given sound, suggests a fundamental change in the underlying circuitry of the ACtx throughout one’s lifespan.

With the advances in transgenic models, the relative ease of controlled housing, and shorter lifespan, single-neuron recordings and circuit-level in vivo calcium imaging in rodents have proven invaluable for studies on the individual neuron and circuit levels. Early studies that recorded single-neuron activity in response to a GABAA receptor antagonist indicated that local inhibition plays a crucial role in maintaining sparse tuning in the ACtx [69, 70], and subsequent molecular and slice-physiology studies found that aging disrupts levels of inhibition, leading to broader tuning throughout the ACtx [40, 71]. In one such experiment, the intrinsic excitability of layer V rat auditory cortical neurons with complex receptive fields, namely those heavily shaped by inhibitory inputs, was recorded in young and aging animals in response to a 200-ms current pulse [26]. While neurons from young rats were difficult to excite, presumably due to the plentiful inhibitory influences (Fig. 1b, top), those from aging rats were easily excitable (Fig. 1b, bottom). Decreased inhibition is consistent with the observation that the aged ACtx employs less stable encoding, resulting in greater variability in single-neuron responses compared to its younger counterpart [28] and exhibits broader frequency tuning [27]. Despite this apparent lack of functional inhibition, in vitro studies in mice demonstrate that both the excitatory and inhibitory circuits in layer 2/3 of the ACtx change across age, likely by equivalent amounts [24, 25]. To complement this work, in vivo, 2-photon calcium imaging of excitatory neurons in the mouse ACtx allows imaging of many thousands of single neurons in awake animals. This technique, thus, enables the dissection of circuit dynamics at single-neuron resolution. Using mice of the CBA/CaJ strain, which have little early peripheral hearing loss and thus allowing for the study of central auditory system dysfunction in isolation [72], imaging studies showed that local inhibition might well play a role in the dysfunction of the ACtx seen in old age, but that widespread increases in correlated activity observed on the circuit level appear to also indicate a fundamental change in excitatory network structure [21, 22, 32]. Furthermore, these results demonstrate that while single-neuron tuning is largely unchanged with age, network-wide responses to auditory stimuli are more functionally homogeneous with age. Thus, aging seems to affect network responses more profoundly than responses of single neurons, likely due to the effects of aging on top-down or neuromodulatory inputs or due to remodeling of intrinsic ACtx circuits.

Decreased Temporal Selectivity and Response Diversity in the Aging Auditory Cortex: The Danger of Losing the Beat

In the ACtx, neural timing is crucial for ensuring that each discrete sound stimulus can be processed independently [73]. In the primary ACtx, neurons show a variety of temporal response shapes and primarily encode large changes in sound intensity, namely sound onset and offset [44, 7476]. These neural representations of stimulus timing correlate with behavioral readouts of auditory perception, resulting in the robust detection of stimulus onset and offset during a tone detection task [22]. Similarly, the ability of the human ACtx to encode the temporal envelope of speech is thought to underlie speech intelligibility [77, 78].

Aging degrades temporal processing in the ACtx, leading human listeners to considerable difficulty in using temporal cues to isolate components of the auditory scene, such as speech [61, 79, 80]. More specifically, aging causes a decrease in the ability of the ACtx to encode the envelope of speech and temporal fine structure [64, 81]. This loss in fidelity is likely due to prolonged neural responses in the ACtx causing discrete stimuli to bleed into one another [82] and a distinct rise in prestimulus energy, thought to represent background noise, that occurs with aging, which in turn distorts auditory perception [83]. As such, older listeners must rely on a reactive strategy, where the ACtx only transiently uses cues from the external auditory environment because of difficulty in maintaining a cognitive state focused solely on the auditory task at hand [84]. Younger individuals, in contrast, typically employ a proactive listening strategy. Work done in the aged ACtx of non-human primates has found that although an equal number of neurons responded to amplitude-modulated noise, a lesser proportion were able to synchronize their firing rate to the amplitude modulation of the stimulus [19], although the literature paints a more conflicting picture in rats [28, 68], perhaps due to their higher-shifted range of frequencies where phase-locked responses become far less feasible. Thus, at least in non-human primates, of the overall smaller proportion of neurons that phase-lock with the temporal envelope of a stimulus as compared to young, those neurons can only do so weakly instead, leaving the network with primarily a firing rate code where neurons simply spike more often during the stimulus to encode the timing of stimuli, rather than a more precise temporal code where neurons phase-lock with the temporal envelope of a stimulus. Phase-locking is essential to temporal encoding throughout the ascending auditory system [8587], likely contributing to the changes seen in the ACtx.

Aging disrupts even relatively basic temporal responses of neurons to sounds. Throughout aging, sound onset is overrepresented in the human ACtx by way of its response magnitude [82]. In non-human primates, the rate-level function differs between onset and offset responding neurons. This difference is influenced heavily by age [20] (Fig. 1c). Similar results are found in mice [21]. These disruptions that lead to an overrepresentation of sound onset are accompanied by a loss of sound offset representation [21], likely as a result of lessened inhibition in the ascending auditory pathway thought to give rise to sound offset encoding.

Sound offset representation is crucial for temporally precise stimulus representation [88]. Sound offsets are robustly encoded in the ACtx in many species [20, 44] and their encoding has been shown to decrease with age [2022]. Consequently, the disappearance of a tone offset response may underlie some of the auditory difficulties experienced by older listeners. In aged mice, the sound offset is no longer a viable cue for sound detection [22], effectively eliminating half of the temporal information of a sound. Given that sound offsets are thought to arise from inhibition in the ascending auditory pathway [44], a decrease in sound offset representation is consistent with a reduction in inhibitory influence in aging or selective degradation of ascending pathways mediating these signals (Fig. 1d).

Not only does the temporal response pattern of individual neurons change with aging, but the variety of unique temporal responses of neurons in response to a sound stimulus decreases with age [21], likely decreasing the coding diversity and perceptual accuracy of the sound stimulus as fewer neurons are encoding unique temporal aspects of the stimulus. One prime example of this change is a distinct rise in prestimulus activity, which robustly predicts a false perception of a sound stimulus found only in older animals [22]. In young animals, this likely representation of noise in the external environment is easily suppressed by complex inhibitory networks that work to create noise-invariant representations of the attended-to auditory stimulus [53, 89]. Instead, this neural distraction is present in the ACtx of older animals, leading to increased difficulties in auditory perception.

Decreased Behavioral Modulation of Responses in the Aging Auditory Cortex

The ACtx encodes stimuli in an environment- and task-dependent manner. For example, a listener can distinguish the speech of a single person from that of individuals not relevant to a conversation. As such, the ACtx preferentially encodes stimuli when presented in a behaviorally relevant context compared to passive exposure [22, 47, 5053]. This adaptive capability of the ACtx is thought to enable humans to understand speech in noisy environments, a process often disrupted in aging [7, 11]. In mice, a greater evoked neural response to an auditory stimulus is also observed in 87% of excitatory layer 2/3 neurons when presented as part of a behavior compared to passive exposure [48, 49]. Moreover, task engagement leads to a refinement of the excitatory layer 2/3 active functional circuits, reducing their size to nearly a quarter of that found during passive exposure, thereby enhancing the representation of the behaviorally relevant stimulus [48, 49]. In its most basic measurement, this enhancement can be observed in the modulation of single-neuron responses via task engagement, such as during a tone detection task (Fig. 2a). In a previous study using 2-photon imaging of excitatory layer 2/3 during behavior in aging animals [22], we found a gain enhancement in both young and aging animals (Fig. 2b). When we grouped neurons with an increase in calcium activity during tone presentation and those with a decrease (~ 20%) (Fig. 2c), we further found that the only difference between young and aging animals exists in the gain effect in those suppressed neurons (Fig. 2d). Circuit-scale observations showed that many effects observed in non-behaving animals, such as increased neural correlation, were similar to those in behaving animals [21]. In the ACtx, a population of neurons increases their correlated activity when a stimulus has behavioral relevance (36%), and another population of neurons becomes decorrelated by this behavioral relevance (64%) [22, 48]. However, only in the aging ACtx do the neurons that become more correlated in response to a behaviorally relevant stimulus have a larger increase in correlation from the passive condition than those in the young ACtx. Additionally, those neurons that became uncorrelated in response to a behavioral stimulus already had a higher baseline correlation level than young neurons [22]. This result suggests that, during behavior, neurons in the aging ACtx show a dramatic increase in attentional-driven correlated responses and a higher baseline of correlated activity found within the network. However, this difference in circuit dynamics was not largely driven by the outcome of the mouse’s behavior, as observed in the younger ACtx, but rather by a highly correlated network of neurons responding to the vast majority of stimuli, whether behaviorally relevant or not. Together, these results could explain why older listeners experience significant difficulty focusing on only salient aspects of the auditory environment (Fig. 2e).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Aging in the auditory cortex leads to a loss of differential suppressive responses during a behavioral task. Adapted from Figs. 1 and 3 of Shilling-Scrivo et al., [22] and Fig. 1 from Mittelstadt et al., [23]. a Neurons in the awake mouse primary ACtx were recorded during a tone detection task in both young and old mice. b Fluorescence traces of each neuron illustrating the basic gain calculation using fluorescence intensity in both the passive and active conditions. c Average suppressive and facilitative gain traces. d Average suppressive and facilitative gain as calculated by behavioral stimulus. e Schematic containing the main point made in this figure: in aging, the influence of the remaining inhibitory neurons in the auditory cortex decreases, leading to less differential responses to behaviorally relevant sounds. Circles represent neurons, and lines represent connections. Excitatory neurons are in blue and inhibitory neurons are in red. Dashed lines indicate loss of synaptic modulation

Sex Differences in the Aging Auditory Cortex

In the human brain, the expression of numerous genes, and thus their effects, differ between females and males [90]. These gene expression differences persist into old age [91], and it has been shown that both male and female brains age differently, dependent on a second X-chromosome [92]. Accordingly, both males and females have different baseline levels of auditory processing [93, 94], with females displaying better harmonic, speech onset, and even better hearing sensitivity, illustrating differences in structures throughout the auditory system from outer hair cells in the cochlea to centers of the brainstem. Across both humans and mice, females possess a larger ACtx than their male counterparts as measured either anatomically in post-mortem tissue or using neuroimaging [95, 96]. Functionally, some processes, such as representations of auditory stimuli derived from only silent lipreading, can only be observed in the left primary ACtx of females [97], but more often, there are slight changes in processing between the sexes as seen in a study comparing bilateral activation of the ACtx to noise or tones [98]. In earlier stages of the ascending auditory system, it has been demonstrated that there are differences between males and females, such as susceptibility to age and noise-induced hearing loss, a cochlear phenomenon primarily due to sex differences in noise exposure, preferentially affecting males and volume of the visual cortex correlating with hearing difficulty only in females [99102]. Furthermore, in both mice and humans, females show increased synchrony in spiral ganglion neuron activation, as evident in wave I of the auditory brainstem response [103105], at least partially due to the likely expression of glutamate subunits with faster kinetics [103], reflecting a fundamental difference in the auditory system between males and females that can be observed even further upstream in centers such as the cochlear nucleus and inferior colliculus [103, 106, 107].

However, until recent work in animal models [21, 22, 24], little research investigated any potential differences in the aging ACtx between males and females on a neural circuit level. This work found large changes in neuronal, temporal, and spectral encoding between the aging male and female ACtx. More specifically, only males exhibited increased amplitudes, lower bandwidths, greater spectral homogeneity, and the elimination of a tone offset response [21] (Fig. 3a), all previously considered universal hallmarks of the aging ACtx. Similar sex-specific effects were observed during behavioral task performance, where males exhibited a distinct rise in prestimulus neural activity that could reliably predict a wrong early response from the mouse, which was nearly absent in females [22]. These sex-dependent differences in auditory processing are likely due to sex-dependent changes in aging ACtx circuits as these mice had little peripheral hearing loss and thus likely equivalent peripheral inputs between males and females, a scenario not easily found in isolation in humans but likely playing a large, and previously undiscovered role, in sex-based differences in auditory processing abilities. Should there have been additional differences in peripheral input in addition to differences in cortical circuitry in aging, these findings would likely have been exacerbated.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Neural circuits in the male, aging auditory cortex are preferentially disrupted. a Adapted from Fig. 5 of Shilling-Scrivo et al., [21]. Stimulus-dependent correlations from young and aging animals split by sex. b Adapted from figure 8 of Xu et al., [24]. Correlation of excitatory and inhibitory circuits across all layers. c Schematic containing the main point made in this figure: with aging, the male auditory cortex is more disrupted as compared to the female and thus will have less unique stimulus encoding. Circles represent neurons, and lines represent connections. Excitatory neurons are in blue and inhibitory neurons are in red

In vitro studies have shown that compared to adult mice, the aging ACtx of male mice has altered interlaminar excitatory and inhibitory connectivity. In contrast, aged female mice do not appear to exhibit changes [24] (Fig. 3b), a finding that was once thought to be a universal hallmark of the aging ACtx. These latest data from animal models underscore the need for further research on the aging ACtx to be stratified by sex (Fig. 3c).

Preventing Age Changes in Neural Cortical Processing

The cortex, including the ACtx, has been shown to possess a remarkable ability to change in response to long-term alterations in the external environment [5557]. Both decreased and increased richness of auditory experience can change the ACtx. For example, in individuals with hearing impairment, the responses of ACtx neurons become less distinct, while parts of the visual cortex are recruited for auditory processing of the degraded signals [108, 109]. However, in individuals with hearing aids, and thus an increase in external signal availability, there is enhanced speech processing, and thus likely cortical plasticity [110112]. In contrast, musicians generally have more extensive and interconnected cortical areas devoted to auditory processing than average listeners [113115]. Importantly, these cortical changes persist into old age [116], and can have long-lasting functional consequences such as improvements in speech-in-noise perception [117]. There is also evidence suggesting that auditory training in older adults can improve auditory processing abilities [118], but there has been little work in humans looking at the effects of auditory training on cortical plasticity.

In rodent models, short-term auditory training (~ 2 months), even when attempted at old age, has been shown to forestall neural changes or even revert aged auditory cortical neurons to a more youthful state while also increasing the population of inhibitory neurons [2931]. This learning-induced rejuvenation was most strikingly shown in the increase in ACtx spectral organization of the rat, regardless of age [31] (Fig. 4). On a network scale, after a longer-term training experience (~ 6 months), a similar phenomenon is observed, but it is not as simple as the entire network being frozen in time and remaining similar to that of a younger one [23]. The mice trained on a tone detection task with a water reward exhibited a suppressed tone-onset response more in balance with the limited tone-offset response found in aging mice, and neuronal responses were less correlated during tone presentation as compared to responses in mice only passively exposed to the same set of tones. Additionally, the network seems to rebalance itself by introducing more heterogeneity in neurons tuned to tone onsets and more homogeneity in neurons likely influenced by inhibitory inputs, thus deemphasizing tone onset and amplifying the effect of inhibitory neurons in the network. However, for these effects, mice had to have nearly continuous access to auditory training for nearly six months, beginning around middle age, completing tens of thousands of correct tone-detection trials in exchange for their daily water. Thus, this strategy, although effective, is likely too intensive to apply proactively to humans, and the water-reward scenario cannot be directly replicated. However, one could envision that a purposefully designed auditory game or increased, focused auditory exposure may preserve ACtx function in old age, albeit likely with lower efficacy.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Auditory training in adulthood can improve auditory cortex spectral organization. Adapted from Fig. 1 of de Villers-Sidani et al., [31]. Exemplar characteristic frequency (top), tuning curve width (middle), and receptive field overlap relative to the respective recording sites identified on the maps by “*”

Long-term auditory training may not be efficient for people other than musicians who have lifelong high-engagement experience. In rodents, cross-modal plasticity induced by short-term visual deprivation has been shown to alter the ACtx, potentially providing a novel mechanism for recovering central auditory processing circuits lost during aging. The sensory cortices show a high degree of interconnectivity, and this is well demonstrated during periods of sensory deprivation when one or more of the non-deprived sensory cortices see heightened function [119, 120]. In mice with short-term (1–2 weeks) periods of visual deprivation, there are durable changes to the intracortical circuits of the ACtx, increasing the frequency tuning within the neurons of the ACtx [121123]. Functionally, a visual deprivation paradigm has been shown to most likely increase central auditory system function in mice using a tone-detection task [58]. Thus, temporary sensory deprivation may be a promising strategy for restoring some of the auditory function lost with aging, although this remains unexplored in the context of aging.

Another possible way to reorganize the ACtx and potentially revert age-dependent changes is the selective engagement of neuromodulatory systems, potentially paired with selective auditory stimulation. As such, stimulation of the vagus nerve, when paired with auditory stimuli, has been shown to cause reorganization of the ACtx, which is highly dependent on the nature of the auditory stimulus presented [54, 124], extends to the temporal domain [125], and impacts behavioral output in an auditory discrimination task in mice [124]. These phenomena are thought to occur from a release of numerous neurotransmitters such as acetylcholine and norepinephrine, which likely causes increased expression of NMDA and GABAA receptors, which dramatically change neural dynamics [124, 126, 127]. Although most vagus nerve stimulation studies currently focus on its application in tinnitus [128130], this could likely be applied to a variety of central auditory processing disorders [54, 131], including aging.

The Molecular Basis of Aging

Within the ACtx, and indeed the wider brain, circuit-level changes are preceded by those on a molecular level. Often, this is achieved via changes in neurotransmitter receptor expression levels, including NMDA and AMPA receptors for the excitatory neurotransmitter glutamate and GABA receptors for the inhibitory neurotransmitter GABA. In the rodent ACtx, all of these receptors are age and experience-dependent [132135], highlighting their role in ACtx dynamics. In more advanced age, the expression of both NMDA receptors and an enzyme responsible for the production of GABA have been shown to increase compared to young adult rats [136], and changes in NMDA receptor subunit expression have been shown to affect a type of neuroplasticity called long-term potentiation in the ACtx [137]. Although the work on NMDA receptor changes has thus far been limited, a much more extensive body of literature exists on the role of GABA in the aging auditory system. From post-mortem human tissue studies, it has long been established that aging is associated with a decrease in glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD), an enzyme that produces GABA, in the ACtx [138], and that GABA loss in the ACtx with aging has functional consequences [39, 67]. Further studies in rats demonstrated that GABA receptor subunit expression changes with age [71] and that GABA binds these receptors less efficiently [40, 139]. Together, these results indicate that the ACtx is more prone to hyperactivity with age due to a decrease in inhibitory weight on the networks of the ACtx. Thus, these networks would provide a less specific representation of sounds in the ACtx.

Although neurotransmitter receptor expression may be the most direct molecular mechanism capable of modifying neural circuits in aging throughout the brain, the actions of neuromodulators need to be considered as well. Indeed, neuromodulators, including acetylcholine, serotonin, norepinephrine, and dopamine, are thought to modulate the neural activity of the human ACtx, contributing to neuroplasticity [140], and their receptors can be found at synaptic terminals throughout the cortical layers [141]. At the level of the synapse, acetylcholine has been shown to modify a neuron’s response to the excitatory neurotransmitter glutamate, and the effects of acetylcholine can, in turn, be modulated by dopamine [142144]. Similarly, serotonin and norepinephrine have also been shown to affect auditory cortical neurons [145, 146]. In aging, levels of these neurotransmitters differ. For serotonin, the expression has been shown to decrease with age [136], but the functional effects are unclear. A bit more is known about changes in the cholinergic modulation in aging. There is an increase in the precursor enzyme, choline acetyltransferase, with age [147]. Functionally, acetylcholine yielded decreased post-synaptic responses in auditory cortical neurons in an in vitro patch clamp experiment from aged rats [148], likely as a result of altered acetylcholine receptor subunit expression. These results highlight the complexities of altered neuromodulation and neurotransmission in aging, underscoring the need for further research into the molecular underpinnings of the circuit changes described throughout this review.

Altered Inputs in Aging: Complex Interactions Throughout the Auditory Pathway

Although aging does independently affect the ACtx, as illustrated by the multitude of studies referenced above, the ACtx is far from the only component of the auditory system to be affected by aging. In the peripheral auditory system, specifically the cochlea and its output spiral ganglion neurons, the effects of aging can be observed in age-related hearing loss. Work dating back several decades used post-mortem human temporal bones to observe clear degradation in the cochlea as a result of aging, namely loss of the signal-transducing stereocilia that sit atop the hair cells, loss of the signal-amplifying outer hair cells, and even loss of cochlear supporting cells that are crucial to hair cell function [12, 149151]. Importantly, outer hair cell loss is often most prevalent in the basal turn of the cochlea, the region responsible for encoding high-frequency sounds, and leads to increased audiometric thresholds beginning in the higher frequencies before progressing down the frequency range with old age. There is also a loss of cochlear innervation as a result of the loss of spiral ganglion neurons [12, 149152]. These two forms of peripheral degeneration combine to decrease the encoding fidelity of auditory stimuli before they ever reach the central auditory system. With a weaker and altered signal, the central auditory system often struggles to distinguish similar sounds or perceive them at all.

Upstream from the peripheral auditory system, the lower-order auditory processing centers of the brainstem and thalamus also experience the effects of aging that can be demonstrated either independently of or in tandem with aging in the peripheral auditory system. In the first auditory relay, the cochlear nucleus, the sound is parsed primarily by its temporal aspects, leading to precise, phase-locked representations of sound in addition to frequency representation. There is conflicting literature about the effects of aging on measures such as cochlear nucleus volume and cell counts in humans [13, 153155], likely due to the morphological complexity found in the human cochlear nucleus, making its precise delineation challenging. However, the effects of cochlear synaptopathy are widely observed in animal models, resulting in deficits in tone-in-noise encoding and specific loss to certain types of cochlear nucleus neuron subtypes [156, 157]. In addition, there is a widespread loss of inhibition, primarily glycinergic, in the cochlear nucleus with age [158, 159]. This loss of inhibition likely contributes to a loss of temporal processing accuracy in the cochlear nucleus that is seen with age [160, 161]. Similar changes can also be seen in the next auditory processing center, the inferior colliculus in the midbrain [162166]. Less is known about aging in the auditory thalamus, the medial geniculate body, likely due to its small physical size and deep location within the brain. To date, rodent studies have not found any significant age-related changes [167], yet this may be caused by the relatively small proportion of inhibitory neurons found in the medial geniculate body in rodents as compared to other species [168]. Many of the above-referenced changes occur independently of peripheral hearing loss. When combined with peripheral hearing loss, the effects compound.

Within the auditory system, there are significant descending pathways that go through many of the same auditory processing centers as the ascending auditory pathway. While the communication between the bottom-up and top-down auditory systems is poorly understood, the descending auditory pathway is thought to play a crucial role in processing more complex auditory environments, enabling speech perception when presented in a high level of background noise [169171]. However, the descending system seems to be particularly responsive to peripheral hearing loss [172] and thus a good example of the close interplay between the peripheral and central auditory systems. When older individuals lose part of their peripheral auditory system function, they often show an overreliance on contextual clues to understand speech [65, 173, 174]. In animal models, deafness leads to anatomical and functional differences in the descending auditory system, both at the level of the central and the peripheral auditory systems [175177], and even auditory training has been shown to rely on cortical projections to the inferior colliculus [178]. Thus, although this review focuses on the ACtx, the entirety of the auditory system is closely interconnected, both in a top-down and bottom-up fashion, and future research should focus on changes in this interplay with aging, both with and without peripheral hearing loss.

Discussion

We are beginning to understand that auditory dysfunction in old age is not solely due to peripheral hearing loss but also largely due to changes within the ACtx. Moreover, the ACtx shows sex-specific circuit changes with aging, leading to sex-specific differences in hearing abilities. These circuit changes in aging lead to a loss of diversity in spectral and temporal selectivity, especially in males. While a lot of progress has been made, this review highlights the critical gaps in our knowledge, especially surrounding the sex differences in the aging ACtx, as these sex differences likely require different treatment approaches.

In aging, it seems that the proper excitatory/inhibitory balance is disrupted in the ACtx, which leads to a rise in background activity and decreased stimulus encoding fidelity for simple stimuli due to reduced temporal precision. For example, if there were a similar number of neurons remaining in the aging ACtx, a simple loss of inhibitory drive could be enough to account for the observed phenotype. Imagine three different networks of auditory cortical neurons: one with weak inhibition, one with moderate, and one with strong inhibition. In response to a simple, tonal stimulus, each network would encode the sound differently. In low background noise, neurons in the weakly inhibited network would display the largest response to tone-onset and the largest amplitude response overall. Such neurons would be critical for hearing sounds of low amplitude but would suffer from poor temporal precision, as the lack of inhibition would lead to a prolonged period of excitation following the stimulus. Instead, the moderately inhibited network has high temporal precision, as there is a balance of excitation and inhibition. Neurons in this network would have a tone-offset response as inhibition and excitation are in tight enough coordination to give the precise temporal offset cue. However, in the strongly inhibited network, neurons would likely be non-responsive, as the tone stimulus by itself is not strong enough to overcome the inhibition. Therefore, in an environment with low background noise, weak and moderately inhibited neurons would optimally encode the stimulus. In a noisy environment, however, these networks are no longer optimal. With increased background noise, there will be increased excitatory drive onto each network. The strongly inhibited network will now be the network that contains the most information about the tone. The strong inhibition of the network makes the neural responses largely invariant to noise and increases the threshold of the neurons themselves. In the weakly inhibited network, neurons will strongly respond to noise and will, therefore, have no more dynamic range to respond to the tone. The moderately inhibited network will have some tonal information but will not fully be able to suppress its response to noise.

During normal aging in the ACtx, inhibitory function decreases. As such, this creates an imbalance in which most neurons become weakly inhibited if inhibited at all, and the previously strongly inhibited neurons are now weakly inhibited (Fig. 5a). This would explain the increase in neural correlation seen in old animals, in addition to the reduction in response types found in old animals. This shift is inconsequential without background noise, as a wider range of neurons can detect the tone. However, in background noise, there are no longer strongly inhibited neurons, so fewer neurons optimally encode the tone in a noise-invariant manner. Therefore, old animals would likely have to rely on moderately inhibited neurons to detect tones in noise. As these neurons cannot fully suppress their responses to noise, they will often be active when no tone stimulus is present. As the animal has no way of knowing if the moderately inhibited neuron is active due to the tone or the noise, the animal will commonly respond to the background noise instead of the tone [22] (Fig. 5b). As such, a decrease in inhibition can explain many of the functional consequences of aging, but more complex explanations focused on a change in inhibition corresponding to a restructuring of the excitatory networks could also be true.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Aging disrupts the excitation-inhibition balance to negatively affect processing of complex auditory stimuli in the auditory cortex. Adapted from Fig. 5.1 of Shilling-Scrivo, [200]. a Model of inhibition in young and aging animals. b In a noisy environment, only the young neurons have sufficient inhibitory drive to properly encode the timing of a sound stimulus

Although the recent network-scale work supports much of the existing literature on the decline of inhibitory influence in aging, research directly linking it to network-scale loss of inhibition is lacking. Instead, most of the literature focuses on a single-neuron or whole-brain scale. Still, some research suggests that both the number and strength of inhibitory neurons decline with age [37, 41, 179]. However, emerging evidence indicates that altered inhibition may be one of many sex effects observed in aging [21, 24]. The lack of accounting for sex effects leaves only suppressed responses of excitatory neurons as indirect confirmation of network-wide loss of inhibition in male mice [21, 22] consistent with the existing aging literature, which shows an increase in response amplitude [180].

Although much debate surrounds whether the reduction of inhibition is due to a loss in inhibitory connections or simply a decrease in the strength of those connections, it appears that the inhibition loss is differentially affected by sex in that males lose inhibitory connections while females lose strength in their inhibitory connections [24]. What initiates this change remains unknown, but it appears that it can be altered via auditory training, suggesting that it is not a simple, irreversible rule of aging [23, 2931]. However, more finely sampled time points should be used to elucidate this process throughout the aging process.

The ACtx is the primary site of complex auditory processing required for processes such as speech comprehension, but it can only process the information it receives from the periphery. Likewise, auditory training has been shown to alter cortical activity [23, 2931], but this can only occur if the training paradigm itself is received by the peripheral auditory system. A primary method to ensure this is through the use of hearing aids, as they amplify all auditory stimuli in the environment to ensure they are received by the peripheral auditory system, even if they are degraded. The use of a hearing aid alone has been shown to induce cortical plasticity [110112], demonstrating the crucial link between both the peripheral and central auditory systems. This further compounds the problem of developing auditory training paradigms when males and females have been repeatedly shown to have differing levels of peripheral degeneration as a result of increased noise exposure in males [99, 100, 102]. Thus, combining auditory training paradigms with increased auditory input via hearing aids may be the most effective tool in increasing cortical plasticity for both males and females.

While so far discussion has focused on changes occurring on the local scale within one ACtx, the mammalian brain has two hemispheres that work together to represent stimuli, albeit in a lateralized fashion for speech stimuli in humans [181, 182], and this lateralization is disrupted, and typically decreased, in aging, likely due to a decline in the inhibitory force placed on one hemisphere by the other [36, 183, 184]. Lateralization of auditory processing is also found in animal models [185187] where the right hemisphere is thought to be more important for spectral processing, while the left is important for temporal processing, at least in rats [188, 189], or shows increased responses to vocalizations in mice [187]. In aging, the right hemisphere is preferentially affected via decreased neural firing synchronization with the amplitude modulation of a wide-band stimulus. However, neural synchronization increases in the left hemisphere [28], and leads to increases across both hemispheres in response to more narrow-band, tonal stimuli. This disparity between hemispheric responses to wide and narrow-band stimuli illustrates that aging involves a complex change in auditory processing and is not just a simple degradation of the respective networks. Given that the two hemispheres are coupled via inhibitory circuits [190] and show asymmetrical functional interactions [187], altered inhibition with aging could result in altered hemispheric interactions and lateralization. This small but illuminating body of work highlights the need for more cross-hemisphere studies on the effects of aging in the auditory cortices.

Although the scope of this review is the effect of aging on the ACtx, the ACtx receives numerous inputs from various regions in the frontal cortex, especially the orbitofrontal cortex [191195]. The orbitofrontal cortex is generally thought of as being the brain region responsible for encoding reward and error [196], but it has been shown to respond to sound and cause plasticity in the ACtx [191, 192, 194, 195]. Additionally, the projections from the orbitofrontal cortex to the ACtx respond specifically to sounds and encode task-relevant information such as outcomes [194]. However, the role of top-down neural inputs to the ACtx is largely unknown, yet they may play a large role in shaping the dynamics of the excitatory network in the ACtx during aging. Indeed, the orbitofrontal cortex mediates many attentional effects that are largely altered in the aging ACtx [84, 194, 197], and the link between the ACtx and the prefrontal cortex is diminished with age [198].

In summary, the ACtx is a crucial component of the aging auditory system. While some of the difficulties associated with hearing are caused by damage to the peripheral auditory system, many hearing difficulties in aging are due to central changes. The aging central auditory system has a decreased ability to remediate the degraded peripheral signal and is prone to counterproductive changes that make it decreasingly specific when it comes to encoding all aspects of auditory stimuli, but especially the spectral and temporal attributes of a sound. However, while aging in the ACtx was previously primarily viewed as an issue that affects males and females similarly, recent research has shown this to be an oversimplification of what appear to be somewhat distinct aging processes. This sex difference makes the path of restorative neuroplasticity difficult to overcome during the aging process in the ACtx. Still, recent approaches, such as training on auditory tasks, visual deprivation, and vagus nerve stimulation, show early signs of promise. Together, the recent work on aging sheds light on a complex degradation of network dynamics; however, as summarized in this review, there are still fundamental gaps in the literature surrounding the basic mechanisms.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Sandra Gordon-Salant, HiJee Kang, Didhiti Mukherjee, Hyun-Ji Shim, Yunru Chen, and Christopher Workman for their thoughtful comments on this manuscript. Artificial intelligence was not used in the preparation of this manuscript.

Author Contributions

All authors contributed to the writing of this manuscript (JKM, KVS-S, POK).

Funding

Funding was provided courtesy of National Institutes of Health grants T32NS091018 (JKM), T32DC000046 (KVS-S), RF1AG078378 (POK), P01AG055365 (POK), and R01DC017785 (POK).

Code Availability

No code was created for this manuscript.

Data Availability

No novel data were obtained for this manuscript.

Declarations

Artificial Intelligence

Artificial intelligence was not used in the preparation of this manuscript.

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Open Questions

1. To what degree does a decline in inhibition affect network properties in the aging auditory cortex and its associated functional relevance?

2. How does the timeline of cellular changes correlate with network changes in the auditory cortex?

3. Which known effects of aging in the auditory cortex are sex-specific?

4. Which known effects of aging in the auditory cortex are hemisphere-specific?

5. How does input on the auditory cortex from regions such as the orbitofrontal cortex change over age?

6. Are changes in top-down inputs and changes within the auditory cortex independent?

7. How does aging affect the secondary regions of the auditory cortex?

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Dillard LK, Matthews LJ, Dubno JR (2024) Prevalence of self-reported hearing difficulty on the revised hearing handicap inventory and associated factors. BMC Geriatr 24(1):510. 10.1186/s12877-024-04901-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Roth TN (2015) Aging of the auditory system. Handb Clin Neurol 129:357–373. 10.1016/B978-0-444-62630-1.00020-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Wambacq IJ, Koehnke J, Besing J, Romei LL, Depierro A, Cooper D (2009) Processing interaural cues in sound segregation by young and middle-aged brains. J Am Acad Audiol 20(7):453–458. 10.3766/jaaa.20.7.6 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Bao J et al (2020) Evidence for independent peripheral and central age-related hearing impairment. J Neurosci Res 98(9):1800–1814. 10.1002/jnr.24639 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Fitzgibbons PJ, Gordon-Salant S (1998) Auditory temporal order perception in younger and older adults. J Speech Lang Hear Res 41(5):1052–1060. 10.1044/jslhr.4105.1052 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Gordon-Salant S, Fitzgibbons PJ (1999) Profile of auditory temporal processing in older listeners. J Speech Lang Hear Res 42(2):300–311. 10.1044/jslhr.4202.300 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Füllgrabe C, Moore BCJ (2014) Effects of age and hearing loss on stream segregation based on interaural time differences. J Acoust Soc Am 136(2):EL185. 10.1121/1.4890201 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Freigang C, Schmiedchen K, Nitsche I et al (2014) Free-field study on auditory localization and discrimination performance in older adults. Exp Brain Res 232:1157–1172. 10.1007/s00221-014-3825-0
  • 9.Anderson S, Karawani H (2020) Objective evidence of temporal processing deficits in older adults. Hear Res 397:108053. 10.1016/j.heares.2020.108053 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.DeVries L, Anderson S, Goupell MJ, Smith E, Gordon-Salant S (2022) Effects of aging and hearing loss on perceptual and electrophysiological measures of pulse-rate discrimination. J Acoust Soc Am 151(3):1639–1650. 10.1121/10.0009399 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Snell KB, Mapes FM, Hickman ED, Frisina DR (2002) Word recognition in competing babble and the effects of age, temporal processing, and absolute sensitivity. J Acoust Soc Am 112(2):720–727. 10.1121/1.1487841 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Johnsson L-G, Hawkins JE (1972) Sensory and neural degeneration with aging, as seen in microdissections of the human inner ear. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 81(2):179–193. 10.1177/000348947208100203 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Hinojosa R, Nelson EG (2011) Cochlear nucleus neuron analysis in individuals with presbycusis. Laryngoscope 121(12):2641–2648. 10.1002/lary.22383 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Koops EA, Haykal S, van Dijk P (2021) Macrostructural changes of the acoustic radiation in humans with hearing loss and tinnitus revealed with fixel-based analysis. J Neurosci 41(18):3958–3965. 10.1523/jneurosci.2996-20.2021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Profant O, Tintěra J, Balogová Z, Ibrahim I, Jilek M, Syka J (2015) Functional changes in the human auditory cortex in ageing. PLoS ONE 10(3):e0116692. 10.1371/journal.pone.0116692
  • 16.Golding M, Carter N, Mitchell P, Hood LJ (2004) Prevalence of central auditory processing (CAP) abnormality in an older Australian population: the Blue Mountains hearing study. J Am Acad Audiol 15(9):633–642. 10.3766/jaaa.15.9.4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Juarez-Salinas DL, Engle JR, Navarro XO, Recanzone GH (2010) Hierarchical and serial processing in the spatial auditory cortical pathway is degraded by natural aging. J Neurosci 30(44):14795–14804. 10.1523/jneurosci.3393-10.2010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ng C-W, Recanzone GH (2017) Age-related changes in temporal processing of rapidly-presented sound sequences in the macaque auditory cortex. Cereb Cortex 28(11):3775–3796. 10.1093/cercor/bhx240 [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Overton JA, Recanzone GH (2016) Effects of aging on the response of single neurons to amplitude-modulated noise in primary auditory cortex of rhesus macaque. J Neurophysiol 115(6):2911–2923. 10.1152/jn.01098.2015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Ramamurthy DL, Recanzone GH (2020) Age-related changes in sound onset and offset intensity coding in auditory cortical fields A1 and CL of rhesus macaques. J Neurophysiol 123(3):1015–1025. 10.1152/jn.00373.2019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Shilling-Scrivo K, Mittelstadt J, Kanold PO (2021) Altered response dynamics and increased population correlation to tonal stimuli embedded in noise in aging auditory cortex. J Neurosci. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0839-21.2021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Shilling-Scrivo K, Mittelstadt J, Kanold PO (2022) Decreased modulation of population correlations in auditory cortex is associated with decreased auditory detection performance in old mice. J Neurosci. 10.1523/jneurosci.0955-22.2022 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Mittelstadt JK, Shilling-Scrivo KV, Kanold PO (2024) Long-term training alters response dynamics in the aging auditory cortex. Hear Res. 10.1016/j.heares.2024.108965 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Xu Z, Xue B, Kao JP-Y, Kanold PO (2024) Sex-specific age-related changes in excitatory and inhibitory intra-cortical circuits in mouse primary auditory cortex. eNeuro. 10.1523/eneuro.0378-24.2024 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Xue B, Meng X, Kao JPY, Kanold PO (2023) Age-related changes in excitatory and inhibitory intra-cortical circuits in auditory cortex of C57Bl/6 mice. Hear Res 429:108685. 10.1016/j.heares.2022.108685 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Turner JG, Hughes LF, Caspary DM (2005) Affects of aging on receptive fields in rat primary auditory cortex layer V neurons. J Neurophysiol 94(4):2738–2747. 10.1152/jn.00362.2005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Bishop R, Qureshi F, Yan J (2022) Age-related changes in neuronal receptive fields of primary auditory cortex in frequency, amplitude, and temporal domains. Hear Res 420:108504. 10.1016/j.heares.2022.108504 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Bureš Z, Pysanenko K, Syka J (2021) Age-related changes in the temporal processing of acoustical signals in the auditory cortex of rats. Hear Res 402:108025. 10.1016/j.heares.2020.108025 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Cheng Y et al (2017) Positive impacts of early auditory training on cortical processing at an older age. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 114(24):6364–6369. 10.1073/pnas.1707086114 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Cheng Y et al (2020) Reversal of age-related changes in cortical sound-azimuth selectivity with training. Cereb Cortex 30(3):1768–1778. 10.1093/cercor/bhz201 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.de Villers-Sidani E, Alzghoul L, Zhou X, Simpson KL, Lin RCS, Merzenich MM (2010) Recovery of functional and structural age-related changes in the rat primary auditory cortex with operant training. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107(31):13900–13905. 10.1073/pnas.1007885107 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Maximov K, Kanold PO (2025) Aging reduces excitatory bandwidth, alters spectral tuning curve diversity, and reduces sideband inhibition in L2/3 of primary auditory cortex. bioRxiv. 10.1101/2025.04.02.646797
  • 33.Hromadka T, Deweese MR, Zador AM (2008) Sparse representation of sounds in the unanesthetized auditory cortex. PLoS Biol 6(1):e16. 10.1371/journal.pbio.0060016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Willmore BDB, King AJ (2009) Auditory cortex: representation through sparsification? Curr Biol 19(24):R1123–R1125. 10.1016/j.cub.2009.11.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Chambers AR, Hancock KE, Sen K, Polley DB (2014) Online stimulus optimization rapidly reveals multidimensional selectivity in auditory cortical neurons. J Neurosci 34(27):8963–8975. 10.1523/jneurosci.0260-14.2014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Eddins AC, Ozmeral EJ, Eddins DA (2023) Aging alters across-hemisphere cortical dynamics during binaural temporal processing. Front Neurosci. 10.3389/fnins.2022.1060172 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Graïc J-M (2024) Age-related changes in the primary auditory cortex of newborn, adults and aging bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) are located in the upper cortical layers. Front Neuroanat. 10.3389/fnana.2023.1330384 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Dobri S, Chen JJ, Ross B (2022) Insights from auditory cortex for GABA+ magnetic resonance spectroscopy studies of aging. Eur J Neurosci 56(4):4425–4444. 10.1111/ejn.15755 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Dobri SGJ, Ross B (2021) Total GABA level in human auditory cortex is associated with speech-in-noise understanding in older age. Neuroimage 225:117474. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117474 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Stebbings KA, Choi HW, Ravindra A, Caspary DM, Turner JG, Llano DA (2016) Ageing-related changes in GABAergic inhibition in mouse auditory cortex, measured using in vitro flavoprotein autofluorescence imaging. J Physiol 594(1):207–221. 10.1113/JP271221 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Cisneros-Franco JM, Ouellet L, Kamal B, de Villers-Sidani E (2018) A brain without brakes: reduced inhibition is associated with enhanced but dysregulated plasticity in the aged rat auditory cortex. eNeuro 5(4):ENEURO.0051–18.2018. 10.1523/eneuro.0051-18.2018 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Caspary DM, Ling L, Turner JG, Hughes LF (2008) Inhibitory neurotransmission, plasticity and aging in the mammalian central auditory system. J Exp Biol 211(11):1781–1791. 10.1242/jeb.013581 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.King A, Teki S, Willmore B (2018) Recent advances in understanding the auditory cortex [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]. F1000Res 7(1555):10.12688/f1000research.15580.1 [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Liu J, Whiteway MR, Sheikhattar A, Butts DA, Babadi B, Kanold PO (2019) Parallel processing of sound dynamics across mouse auditory cortex via spatially patterned thalamic inputs and distinct areal intracortical circuits. Cell Rep 27(3):872–885 e7. 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.03.069 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Atencio CA, Sohal VS, Schreiner CE (2018) Coordinated neuronal ensembles in primary auditory cortical columns. Elife 7:e35587. 10.7554/eLife.35587 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.See JZ, Homma NY, Atencio CA, Sohal VS, Schreiner CE (2021) Information diversity in individual auditory cortical neurons is associated with functionally distinct coordinated neuronal ensembles. Sci Rep 11(1):4064. 10.1038/s41598-021-83565-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Fritz J, Shamma S, Elhilali M, Klein D (2003) Rapid task-related plasticity of spectrotemporal receptive fields in primary auditory cortex. Nat Neurosci 6(11):1216–1223. 10.1038/nn1141 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Francis NA, Winkowski DE, Sheikhattar A, Armengol K, Babadi B, Kanold PO (2018) Small networks encode decision-making in primary auditory cortex. Neuron 97(4):885–897 e6. 10.1016/j.neuron.2018.01.019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Francis NA, Mukherjee S, Kocillari L, Panzeri S, Babadi B, Kanold PO (2022) Sequential transmission of task-relevant information in cortical neuronal networks. Cell Rep 39(9):110878. 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.110878 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Atiani S, Elhilali M, David SV, Fritz JB, Shamma SA (2009) Task difficulty and performance induce diverse adaptive patterns in gain and shape of primary auditory cortical receptive fields. Neuron 61(3):467–480. 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.12.027 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.David SV, Fritz JB, Shamma SA (2012) Task reward structure shapes rapid receptive field plasticity in auditory cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109(6):2144–2149. 10.1073/pnas.1117717109 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Kato HK, Gillet SN, Isaacson JS (2015) Flexible sensory representations in auditory cortex driven by behavioral relevance. Neuron 88(5):1027–1039. 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.10.024 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Kuchibhotla K, Bathellier B (2018) Neural encoding of sensory and behavioral complexity in the auditory cortex. Curr Opin Neurobiol 52:65–71. 10.1016/j.conb.2018.04.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Engineer CT, Engineer ND, Riley JR, Seale JD, Kilgard MP (2015) Pairing speech sounds with vagus nerve stimulation drives stimulus-specific cortical plasticity. Brain Stimul 8(3):637–644. 10.1016/j.brs.2015.01.408 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Lambert K, Eisch AJ, Galea LAM, Kempermann G, Merzenich M (2019) Optimizing brain performance: Identifying mechanisms of adaptive neurobiological plasticity. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 105:60–71. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.06.033
  • 56.Nahum M, Lee H, Merzenich MM (2013) Principles of neuroplasticity-based rehabilitation. In: Merzenich MM et al (eds) Changing brains: applying brain plasticity to advance and recover human ability. Progress in Brain Research vol 207. Elsevier, pp 141–171
  • 57.HMahncke HW, Bronstone A, Merzenich MM (2006) Brain plasticity and functional losses in the aged: scientific bases for a novel intervention. In: Møller AR (ed) Reprogramming of the brain. Progress in Brain Research vol 157. Elsevier, pp 81–109
  • 58.Jendrichovsky P, Lee H-K, Kanold PO (2024) Brief periods of visual deprivation in adults increase performance on auditory tasks. iScience. 10.1016/j.isci.2024.110936 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Holmes E, Zeidman P, Friston KJ, Griffiths TD (2020) Difficulties with speech-in-noise perception related to fundamental grouping processes in auditory cortex. Cereb Cortex 31(3):1582–1596. 10.1093/cercor/bhaa311 [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Obleser J, Eisner F (2009) Pre-lexical abstraction of speech in the auditory cortex. Trends Cogn Sci 13(1):14–19. 10.1016/j.tics.2008.09.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Herrmann Br, Maess B, Johnsrude IS (2022) A neural signature of regularity in sound is reduced in older adults. Neurobiol Aging 109:1–10. 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2021.09.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Brodbeck C, Presacco A, Anderson S, Simon JZ (2018) Over-representation of speech in older adults originates from early response in higher order auditory cortex. Acta Acustica united with Acustica 104(5):774–777. 10.3813/AAA.919221 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Presacco A, Simon JZ, Anderson S (2016) Evidence of degraded representation of speech in noise, in the aging midbrain and cortex. J Neurophysiol 116(5):2346–2355. 10.1152/jn.00372.2016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Karunathilake IMD (2023) Effects of aging on cortical representations of continuous speech. J Neurophysiol 129(6):1359–1377. 10.1152/jn.00356.2022 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Rogers CS, Jacoby LL, Sommers MS (2012) Frequent false hearing by older adults: the role of age differences in metacognition. Psychol Aging 27(1):33–45. 10.1037/a0026231 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Gordon-Salant S, Shader MJ, Wingfield A (2020) Age-related changes in speech understanding: peripheral versus cognitive influences. In: Helfer KS, Bartlett EL, Popper AN, Fay RR (eds) Aging and hearing: causes and consequences. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 199–230
  • 67.Lalwani P et al (2019) Neural distinctiveness declines with age in auditory cortex and is associated with auditory GABA levels. Neuroimage. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116033 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Occelli F (2019) Age-related changes in auditory cortex without detectable peripheral alterations: a multi-level study in Sprague-Dawley rats. Neuroscience 404:184–204. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2019.02.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Wang J, Caspary D, Salvi RJ (2000) GABA-a antagonist causes dramatic expansion of tuning in primary auditory cortex. Neuroreport 11(5):1137–1140. 10.1097/00001756-200004070-00045 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Wang J, McFadden SL, Caspary D, Salvi R (2002) Gamma-aminobutyric acid circuits shape response properties of auditory cortex neurons. Brain Res 944(1):219–231. 10.1016/S0006-8993(02)02926-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Caspary DM, Hughes LF, Ling LL (2013) Age-related GABAA receptor changes in rat auditory cortex. Neurobiol Aging 34(5):1486–1496. 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2012.11.009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Bowen Z, Winkowski DE, Kanold PO (2020) Functional organization of mouse primary auditory cortex in adult C57BL/6 and F1 (CBAxC57) mice. Sci Rep 10(1):10905. 10.1038/s41598-020-67819-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Arnal LJ, Poeppel D, Giraud A-L (2015) Chapter 5: Temporal coding in the auditory cortex. In: Aminoff MJ et al (eds) The human auditory system: fundamental organization and clinical disorders. Handbook of Clinical Neurology, vol. 129. Elsevier, pp 85–98
  • 74.Zhou B, Tomioka R, Song W-J (2023) Temporal profiles of neuronal responses to repeated tone stimuli in the mouse primary auditory cortex. Hear Res 430:108710. 10.1016/j.heares.2023.108710 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Qin L, Chimoto S, Sakai M, Wang J, Sato Y (2007) Comparison between offset and onset responses of primary auditory cortex on–off neurons in awake cats. J Neurophysiol 97(5):3421–3431. 10.1152/jn.00184.2007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Fishman YI, Steinschneider M (2009) Temporally dynamic frequency tuning of population responses in monkey primary auditory cortex. Hear Res 254(1):64–76. 10.1016/j.heares.2009.04.010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Vanthornhout J, Decruy L, Wouters J, Simon JZ, Francart T (2018) Speech intelligibility predicted from neural entrainment of the speech envelope. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 19(2):181–191. 10.1007/s10162-018-0654-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Di Liberto GM, Crosse MJ, Lalor EC (2018) Cortical measures of phoneme-level speech encoding correlate with the perceived clarity of natural speech. eNeuro 5(2):ENEURO.0084-18.2018. 10.1523/eneuro.0084-18.2018 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Herrmann Br, Buckland C, Johnsrude IS (2019) Neural signatures of temporal regularity processing in sounds differ between younger and older adults. Neurobiol Aging 83:73–85. 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2019.08.028 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Gordon-Salant S, Yeni-Komshian GH, Fitzgibbons PJ, Barrett J (2006) Age-related differences in identification and discrimination of temporal cues in speech segments. J Acoust Soc Am 119(4):2455–2466. 10.1121/1.2171527 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Grose JH, Mamo SK (2010) Processing of temporal fine structure as a function of age. Ear Hear 31(6):755–760. 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181e627e7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Herrmann Br, Maess B, Johnsrude IS (2023) Sustained responses and neural synchronization to amplitude and frequency modulation in sound change with age. Hear Res 428:108677. 10.1016/j.heares.2022.108677 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.McNair SW, Kayser SJ, Kayser C (2019) Consistent pre-stimulus influences on auditory perception across the lifespan. Neuroimage 186:22–32. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.10.085 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Herrmann Br, Maess B, Henry MJ, Obleser J, Johnsrude IS (2023) Neural signatures of task-related fluctuations in auditory attention and age-related changes. Neuroimage 268:119883. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2023.119883 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Liu L-F, Palmer AR, Wallace MN (2006) Phase-locked responses to pure tones in the inferior colliculus. J Neurophysiol 95(3):1926–1935. 10.1152/jn.00497.2005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Rouiller E, de Ribaupierre Y, de Ribaupierre F (1979) Phase-locked responses to low frequency tones in the medial geniculate body. Hear Res 1(3):213–226. 10.1016/0378-5955(79)90015-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Kim DO, Sirianni JG, Chang SO (1990) Responses of DCN-PVCN neurons and auditory nerve fibers in unanesthetized decerebrate cats to AM and pure tones: analysis with autocorrelation/power-spectrum. Hear Res 45(1):95–113. 10.1016/0378-5955(90)90186-S [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Bregman AS (1990) Auditory scene analysis: the perceptual organization of sound. The MIT Press
  • 89.Cooke JE, King AJ, Willmore BDB, Schnupp JWH (2018) Contrast gain control in mouse auditory cortex. J Neurophysiol 120(4):1872–1884. 10.1152/jn.00847.2017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Kang HJ et al (2011) Spatio-temporal transcriptome of the human brain. Nature 478(7370):483–489. 10.1038/nature10523 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Buchpiguel M et al (2020) Differences in total brain volume between sexes in a cognitively unimpaired elderly population. Clinics 75:e2245. 10.6061/clinics/2020/e2245 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Marino F, Wang D, Merrihew GE, MacCoss MJ, Dubal D (2024) A second X chromosome improves cognition in aging male and female mice. bioRxiv. 10.1101/2024.07.26.605328
  • 93.Krizman J, Bonacina S, Colegrove D, Otto-Meyer R, Nicol T, Kraus N (2022) Athleticism and sex impact neural processing of sound. Sci Rep 12(1):15181. 10.1038/s41598-022-19216-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.McFadden D (1998) Sex differences in the auditory system. Developmental Neuropsychology 14(2-3):261–298, 1998/01/01 1998. 10.1080/87565649809540712
  • 95.Guma E et al (2024) Comparative neuroimaging of sex differences in human and mouse brain anatomy. Elife 13:RP92200. 10.7554/eLife.92200 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Rademacher J, Morosan P, Schleicher A, Freund H-J, Zilles K (2001) Human primary auditory cortex in women and men. Neuroreport 12(8):1561–1565. 10.1097/00001756-200106130-00010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Ruytjens L, Albers F, van Dijk P, Wit H, Willemsen A (2007) Activation in primary auditory cortex during silent lipreading is determined by sex. Audiol Neurotol 12(6):371–377. 10.1159/000106480 [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Ruytjens L, Georgiadis JR, Holstege G, Wit HP, Albers FWJ, Willemsen ATM (2007) Functional sex differences in human primary auditory cortex. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 34(12):2073–2081. 10.1007/s00259-007-0517-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Wang Q, Wang X, Yang L, Han K, Huang Z, Wu H (2021) Sex differences in noise-induced hearing loss: a cross-sectional study in China. Biol Sex Differ. 10.1186/s13293-021-00369-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Nolan LS (2020) Age-related hearing loss: why we need to think about sex as a biological variable. J Neurosci Res 98(9):1705–1720. 10.1002/jnr.24647 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.He J et al (2024) Sex differences in the pleiotropy of hearing difficulty with imaging-derived phenotypes: a brain-wide investigation. Brain. 10.1093/brain/awae077 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Dubno JR, Eckert MA, Lee F-S, Matthews LJ, Schmiedt RA (2013) Classifying human audiometric phenotypes of age-related hearing loss from animal models. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 14(5):687–701. 10.1007/s10162-013-0396-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Lozier NR, Muscio S, Pal I, Cai H-M, Rubio ME (2023) Sex differences in glutamate AMPA receptor subunits mRNA with fast gating kinetics in the mouse cochlea. Front Syst Neurosci. 10.3389/fnsys.2023.1100505 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Milon B et al (2018) The impact of biological sex on the response to noise and otoprotective therapies against acoustic injury in mice. Biol Sex Differ 9(1):12. 10.1186/s13293-018-0171-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Wharton JA, Church GT (1990) Influence of menopause on the auditory brainstem response. Audiology 29(4):196–201. 10.3109/00206099009072850 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Keesom SM, Morningstar MD, Sandlain R, Wise BM, Hurley LM (2018) Social isolation reduces serotonergic fiber density in the inferior colliculus of female, but not male, mice. Brain Res 1694:94–103. 10.1016/j.brainres.2018.05.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Willott JF, Bross L (2004) Effects of prolonged exposure to an augmented acoustic environment on the auditory system of middle-aged C57BL/6J mice: cochlear and central histology and sex differences. J Comp Neurol 472(3):358–370. 10.1002/cne.20065 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Guerreiro MJS, Puschmann S, Eck J, Rienäcker F, Van Gerven PWM, Thiel CM (2023) The effect of hearing loss on age-related differences in neural distinctiveness. Aging Neuropsychol Cogn 31(4):627–645. 10.1080/13825585.2023.2223904 [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Ponticorvo S et al (2022) Cross-modal connectivity effects in age-related hearing loss. Neurobiol Aging 111:1–13. 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2021.09.024 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Karawani H, Jenkins K, Anderson S (2022) Neural plasticity induced by hearing aid use. Front Aging Neurosci. 10.3389/fnagi.2022.884917 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Karawani H, Jenkins K, Anderson S (2018) Restoration of sensory input may improve cognitive and neural function. Neuropsychologia 114:203–213. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.04.041 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Karawani H, Jenkins KA, Anderson S (2018) Neural and behavioral changes after the use of hearing aids. Clin Neurophysiol 129(6):1254–1267. 10.1016/j.clinph.2018.03.024 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Papadaki E, Koustakas T, Werner A, Lindenberger U, Kühn S, Wenger E (2023) Resting-state functional connectivity in an auditory network differs between aspiring professional and amateur musicians and correlates with performance. Brain Struct Funct 228(9):2147–2163. 10.1007/s00429-023-02711-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Andrews E, Eierud C, Banks D, Harshbarger T, Michael A, Rammell C (2021) Effects of lifelong musicianship on white matter integrity and cognitive brain reserve. Brain Sci 11(1):67. 10.3390/brainsci11010067 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Worschech F et al (2022) Evidence of cortical thickness increases in bilateral auditory brain structures following piano learning in older adults. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1513(1):21–30. 10.1111/nyas.14762 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Rus-Oswald OG (2022) Musicianship-related structural and functional cortical features are preserved in elderly musicians. Front Aging Neurosci. 10.3389/fnagi.2022.807971 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Zhang L, Wang X, Alain C, Du Y (2023) Successful aging of musicians: preservation of sensorimotor regions aids audiovisual speech-in-noise perception. Sci Adv 9(17):eadg7056. 10.1126/sciadv.adg7056 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Anderson S, DeVries L, Smith E, Goupell MJ, Gordon-Salant S (2022) Rate discrimination training may partially restore temporal processing abilities from age-related deficits. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 23(6):771–786. 10.1007/s10162-022-00859-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Lee H-K, Whitt JL (2015) Cross-modal synaptic plasticity in adult primary sensory cortices. Curr Opin Neurobiol 35:119–126. 10.1016/j.conb.2015.08.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Röder B, Teder-Sälejärvi W, Sterr A, Rösler F, Hillyard SA, Neville HJ (1999) Improved auditory spatial tuning in blind humans. Nature 400(6740):162–166. 10.1038/22106 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Solarana K, Liu J, Bowen Z, Lee HK, Kanold PO (2019) Temporary visual deprivation causes decorrelation of spatiotemporal population responses in adult mouse auditory cortex. eNeuro. 10.1523/ENEURO.0269-19.2019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Meng X, Kao JPY, Lee H-K, Kanold PO (2015) Visual deprivation causes refinement of intracortical circuits in the auditory cortex. Cell Reports 12(6):955–964. 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.07.018
  • 123.Petrus E et al (2014) Crossmodal induction of thalamocortical potentiation leads to enhanced information processing in the auditory cortex. Neuron 81(3):664–673. 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.11.023 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Martin KA et al (2024) Vagus nerve stimulation recruits the central cholinergic system to enhance perceptual learning. Nat Neurosci. 10.1038/s41593-024-01767-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Shetake JA, Engineer ND, Vrana WA, Wolf JT, Kilgard MP (2012) Pairing tone trains with vagus nerve stimulation induces temporal plasticity in auditory cortex. Exp Neurol 233(1):342–349. 10.1016/j.expneurol.2011.10.026 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Hays SA, Rennaker RL, Kilgard MP (2013) Chapter 11: Targeting plasticity with vagus nerve stimulation to treat neurological disease. In: Merzenich M et al (eds) Changing brains: applying brain plasticity to advance and recover human ability. Progress in Brain Research vol 207. Elsevier, pp 275–299
  • 127.Nichols JA, Nichols AR, Smirnakis SM, Engineer ND, Kilgard MP, Atzori M (2011) Vagus nerve stimulation modulates cortical synchrony and excitability through the activation of muscarinic receptors. Neuroscience 189:207–214. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2011.05.024 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Vanneste S, Martin J, Rennaker RL, Kilgard MP (2017) Pairing sound with vagus nerve stimulation modulates cortical synchrony and phase coherence in tinnitus: an exploratory retrospective study. Sci Rep 7(1):17345. 10.1038/s41598-017-17750-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Kochilas HL, Cacace AT, Arnold A, Seidman MD, Tarver WB (2020) Vagus nerve stimulation paired with tones for tinnitus suppression: effects on voice and hearing. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol 5(2):286–296. 10.1002/lio2.364 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Hyvärinen P et al (2015) Transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation modulates tinnitus-related beta- and gamma-band activity. Ear Hear 36(3):e76–e85. 10.1097/aud.0000000000000123 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Adcock KS et al (2020) Vagus nerve stimulation paired with tones restores auditory processing in a rat model of Rett syndrome. Brain Stimul 13(6):1494–1503. 10.1016/j.brs.2020.08.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Kotak VC, Takesian AE, Sanes DH (2008) Hearing loss prevents the maturation of GABAergic transmission in the auditory cortex. Cereb Cortex 18(9):2098–2108. 10.1093/cercor/bhm233 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Bi C, Cui Y, Mao Y, Dong S, Zhang J, Sun X (2006) The effect of early auditory deprivation on the age-dependent expression pattern of NR2B mRNA in rat auditory cortex. Brain Res 1110(1):30–38. 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.06.056 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Hsieh CY, Chen Y, Leslie FM, Metherate R (2002) Postnatal development of NR2A and NR2B mRNA expression in rat auditory cortex and thalamus. JARO - Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology 3(4):479–487. 10.1007/s10162-002-2052-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Xu J, Yu L, Zhang J, Cai R, Sun X (2010) Early continuous white noise exposure alters l-α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole propionic acid receptor subunit glutamate receptor 2 and γ-aminobutyric acid type a receptor subunit β3 protein expression in rat auditory cortex. J Neurosci Res 88(3):614–619. 10.1002/jnr.22232 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Shim HJ, Lee LH, Huh Y, Lee SY, Yeo SG (2012) Age-related changes in the expression of NMDA, serotonin, and GAD in the central auditory system of the rat. Acta Otolaryngol 132(1):44–50. 10.3109/00016489.2011.622785 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Hogsden JL, Dringenberg HC (2009) Decline of long-term potentiation (LTP) in the rat auditory cortex in vivo during postnatal life: involvement of NR2B subunits. Brain Res 1283:25–33. 10.1016/j.brainres.2009.06.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.McGeer EG, McGeer PL (1980) Aging and neurotransmitter systems. Advances in biochemical psychopharmacology, Article 23:305–314. 10.1007/978-1-4684-8893-7_3 [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Kessler M (2020) GABAA receptors in the Mongolian gerbil: a PET study using [18F]flumazenil to determine receptor binding in young and old animals. Mol Imaging Biol 22(2):335–347. 10.1007/s11307-019-01371-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Thiel CM (2007) Pharmacological modulation of learning-induced plasticity in human auditory cortex. Restor Neurol Neurosci 25(3–4):435–443. 10.3233/rnn-2007-253426 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Campbell MJ, Lewis DA, Foote SL, Morrison JH (1987) Distribution of choline acetyltransferase-, serotonin-, dopamine-β-hydroxylase-, tyrosine hydroxylase-immunoreactive fibers in monkey primary auditory cortex. J Comp Neurol 261(2):209–220. 10.1002/cne.902610204 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Metherate R, Ashe JH (1991) Basal forebrain stimulation modifies auditory cortex responsiveness by an action at muscarinic receptors. Brain Res 559(1):163–167. 10.1016/0006-8993(91)90301-B [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Aramakis VB, Bandrowski AE, Ashe JH (1997) Activation of muscarinic receptors modulates NMDA receptor-mediated responses in auditory cortex. Exp Brain Res 113(3):484–496. 10.1007/PL00005601 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Atzori M, Kanold PO, Pineda JC, Flores-Hernandez J, Paz RD (2005) Dopamine prevents muscarinic-induced decrease of glutamate release in the auditory cortex. Neuroscience 134(4):1153–1165. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2005.05.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Manjarrez G, Hernandez E, Robles A, Hernández J (2005) N1/P2 component of auditory evoked potential reflect changes of the brain serotonin biosynthesis in rats. Nutr Neurosci 8(4):213–218. 10.1080/10284150500170971 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146.Manunta Y, Edeline JM (1998) Effects of noradrenaline on rate-level function of auditory cortex neurons: Is there a “gating” effect of noradrenaline? Exp Brain Res 118(3):361–372. 10.1007/s002210050290 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Godfrey DA, Chen K, O’Toole TR, Mustapha AIAA (2017) Amino acid and acetylcholine chemistry in the central auditory system of young, middle-aged and old rats. Hear Res 350:173–188. 10.1016/j.heares.2017.05.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148.Ghimire M, Cai R, Ling L, Hackett TA, Caspary DM (2020) Nicotinic receptor subunit distribution in auditory cortex: impact of aging on receptor number and function. J Neurosci 40(30):5724–5739. 10.1523/jneurosci.0093-20.2020 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149.Bredberg G, Engstrom H, Ades HW (1965) Cellular pattern and nerve supply of the human organ of Corti: a preliminary report. Arch Otolaryngol 82(5):462–469. 10.1001/archotol.1965.00760010464003 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150.Wu PZ, Liberman LD, Bennett K, de Gruttola V, O’Malley JT, Liberman MC (2019) Primary neural degeneration in the human cochlea: evidence for hidden hearing loss in the aging ear. Neuroscience 407:8–20. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2018.07.053 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151.Suga F, Lindsay JR (1976) Histopathological observations of presbycusis. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 85(2):169–184. 10.1177/000348947608500201 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152.Makary CA, Shin J, Kujawa SG, Liberman MC, Merchant SN (2011) Age-related primary cochlear neuronal degeneration in human temporal bones. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 12(6):711–717. 10.1007/s10162-011-0283-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153.Arnesen AR (1982) Presbyacusis—loss of neurons in the human cochlear nuclei. J Laryngol Otol 96(6):503–511. 10.1017/S002221510009277X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154.Konigsmark BW, Murphy EA (1972) Volume of the ventral cochlear nucleus in man: its relationship to neuronal population and age. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 31(2):304–316. 10.1097/00005072-197204000-00006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155.Gandolfi A, Horoupian DS, De Teresa RM (1981) Quantitative and cytometric analysis of the ventral cochlear nucleus in man. J Neurol Sci 50(3):443–455. 10.1016/0022-510X(81)90156-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156.Xie R, Wang M, Zhang C (2024) Mechanisms of age-related hearing loss at the auditory nerve central synapses and postsynaptic neurons in the cochlear nucleus. Hear Res 442:108935. 10.1016/j.heares.2023.108935 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157.Hockley A, Cassinotti LR, Selesko M, Corfas G, Shore SE (2023) Cochlear synaptopathy impairs suprathreshold tone-in-noise coding in the cochlear nucleus. J Physiol 601(14):2991–3006. 10.1113/JP284452 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158.Caspary DM, Hughes LF, Schatteman TA, Turner JG (2006) Age-related changes in the response properties of cartwheel cells in rat dorsal cochlear nucleus. Hear Res 216:207–215. 10.1016/j.heares.2006.03.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159.Caspary DM, Schatteman TA, Hughes LF (2005) Age-related changes in the inhibitory response properties of dorsal cochlear nucleus output neurons: role of inhibitory inputs. J Neurosci 25(47):10952–10959. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2451-05.2005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 160.Schatteman TA, Hughes LF, Caspary DM (2008) Aged-related loss of temporal processing: altered responses to amplitude modulated tones in rat dorsal cochlear nucleus. Neuroscience 154(1):329–337. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2008.02.025 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 161.Frisina RD, Walton JP (2006) Age-related structural and functional changes in the cochlear nucleus. Hear Res 216:216–223. 10.1016/j.heares.2006.02.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 162.Walton JP, Frisina RD, Ison JR, O’Neill WE (1997) Neural correlates of behavioral gap detection in the inferior colliculus of the young CBA mouse. Journal of Comparative Physiology - A Sensory, Neural, and Behavioral Physiology, Article 181(2):161–176. 10.1007/s003590050103 [Google Scholar]
  • 163.Walton JP, Frisina RD, O’Neill WE (1998) Age-related alteration in processing of temporal sound features in the auditory midbrain of the CBA mouse. J Neurosci 18(7):2764–2776. 10.1523/jneurosci.18-07-02764.1998 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 164.Allen PD, Burkard RF, Ison JR, Walton JP (2003) Impaired gap encoding in aged mouse inferior colliculus at moderate but not high stimulus levels. Hear Res 186(1):17–29. 10.1016/S0378-5955(03)00300-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 165.Khouri L, Lesica NA, Grothe B (2011) Impaired auditory temporal selectivity in the inferior colliculus of aged Mongolian gerbils. J Neurosci 31(27):9958–9970. 10.1523/jneurosci.4509-10.2011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 166.Finlayson PG (2002) Paired-tone stimuli reveal reductions and alterations in temporal processing in inferior colliculus neurons of aged animals. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 3(3):321–331. 10.1007/s101620020038 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 167.Mendelson JR, Lui B (2004) The effects of aging in the medial geniculate nucleus: a comparison with the inferior colliculus and auditory cortex. Hear Res 191(1):21–33. 10.1016/j.heares.2004.01.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 168.Winer JA, Larue DT (1996) Evolution of GABAergic circuitry in the mammalian medial geniculate body. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 93(7):3083–3087. 10.1073/pnas.93.7.3083 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 169.Obleser J (2014) Putting the listening brain in context. Lang Linguist Compass 8(12):646–658. 10.1111/lnc3.12098 [Google Scholar]
  • 170.Lauer AM, Jimenez SV, Delano PH (2022) Olivocochlear efferent effects on perception and behavior. Hear Res 419:108207. 10.1016/j.heares.2021.108207 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 171.Homma NY, Bajo VM (2021) Lemniscal corticothalamic feedback in auditory scene analysis. Front Neurosci. 10.3389/fnins.2021.723893 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 172.Lesicko AMH, Llano DA (2017) Impact of peripheral hearing loss on top-down auditory processing. Hear Res 343:4–13. 10.1016/j.heares.2016.05.018 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 173.Sommers MS, Danielson SM (1999) Inhibitory processes and spoken word recognition in young and older adults: the interaction of lexical competition and semantic context. Psychol Aging 14(3):458–472. 10.1037/0882-7974.14.3.458 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 174.Sheldon S, Pichora-Fuller MK, Schneider BA (2008) Priming and sentence context support listening to noise-vocoded speech by younger and older adults. J Acoust Soc Am 123(1):489–499. 10.1121/1.2783762 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 175.Illing R-B, Kraus KS, Meidinger MA (2005) Reconnecting neuronal networks in the auditory brainstem following unilateral deafening. Hear Res 206(1):185–199. 10.1016/j.heares.2005.01.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 176.Kral A, Hartmann R, Tillein J, Heid S, Klinke R (2000) Congenital auditory deprivation reduces synaptic activity within the auditory cortex in a layer-specific manner. Cereb Cortex 10(7):714–726. 10.1093/cercor/10.7.714 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 177.Asokan MM, Williamson RS, Hancock KE, Polley DB (2018) Sensory overamplification in layer 5 auditory corticofugal projection neurons following cochlear nerve synaptic damage. Nat Commun 9(1):2468. 10.1038/s41467-018-04852-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 178.Bajo VM, Nodal FR, Moore DR, King AJ (2010) The descending corticocollicular pathway mediates learning-induced auditory plasticity. Nat Neurosci 13(2):253–260. 10.1038/nn.2466 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 179.Llano DA, Turner J, Caspary DM (2012) Diminished cortical inhibition in an aging mouse model of chronic tinnitus. J Neurosci 32(46):16141–16148. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2499-12.2012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 180.Hughes LF, Turner JG, Parrish JL, Caspary DM (2010) Processing of broadband stimuli across A1 layers in young and aged rats. Hear Res 264(1–2):79–85. 10.1016/j.heares.2009.09.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 181.Belin P et al (1998) Lateralization of speech and auditory temporal processing. J Cogn Neurosci 10(4):536–540. 10.1162/089892998562834 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 182.Elmo T (1987) Hemispheric asymmetry of auditory evoked potentials to comparisons within and across phonetic categories. Scand J Psychol 28(4):251–266. 10.1111/j.1467-9450.1987.tb00763.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 183.Goosens T, Vercammen C, Wouters J, van Wieringen A (2016) Aging affects neural synchronization to speech-related acoustic modulations. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, Original Research 8. 10.3389/fnagi.2016.00133
  • 184.Bellis TJ, Nicol T, Kraus N (2000) Aging affects hemispheric asymmetry in the neural representation of speech sounds. J Neurosci 20(2):791–797. 10.1523/jneurosci.20-02-00791.2000 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 185.Levy RB, Marquarding T, Reid AP, Pun CM, Renier N, Oviedo HV (2019) Circuit asymmetries underlie functional lateralization in the mouse auditory cortex. Nat Commun 10(1):2783. 10.1038/s41467-019-10690-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 186.Wetzel W, Ohl FW, Scheich H (2008) Global versus local processing of frequency-modulated tones in gerbils: an animal model of lateralized auditory cortex functions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105(18):6753–6758. 10.1073/pnas.0707844105 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 187.Calhoun G, Chen C-T, Kanold PO (2023) Bilateral widefield calcium imaging reveals circuit asymmetries and lateralized functional activation of the mouse auditory cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 120(30):e2219340120. 10.1073/pnas.2219340120 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 188.Rybalko N, Šuta D, Nwabueze-Ogbo F, Syka J (2006) Effect of auditory cortex lesions on the discrimination of frequency-modulated tones in rats. Eur J Neurosci 23(6):1614–1622. 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2006.04688.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 189.Rybalko N, Šuta D, Popelář J, Syka J (2010) Inactivation of the left auditory cortex impairs temporal discrimination in the rat. Behav Brain Res 209(1):123–130. 10.1016/j.bbr.2010.01.028 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 190.Slater BJ, Isaacson JS (2020) Interhemispheric callosal projections sharpen frequency tuning and enforce response fidelity in primary auditory cortex. eNeuro 7(4):ENEURO.0256-20.2020. 10.1523/eneuro.0256-20.2020 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 191.Winkowski DE, Bandyopadhyay S, Shamma SA, Kanold PO (2013) Frontal cortex activation causes rapid plasticity of auditory cortical processing. J Neurosci 33(46):18134–18148. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0180-13.2013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 192.Winkowski DE et al (2017) Orbitofrontal cortex neurons respond to sound and activate primary auditory cortex neurons. Cereb Cortex 28(3):868–879. 10.1093/cercor/bhw409 [Google Scholar]
  • 193.Ying R, Hamlette L, Nikoobakht L, Balaji R, Miko N, Caras ML (2023) Organization of orbitofrontal-auditory pathways in the Mongolian gerbil. bioRxiv. 10.1101/2023.04.25.538296
  • 194.Mittelstadt JK, Kanold PO (2023) Orbitofrontal cortex conveys stimulus and task information to the auditory cortex. Curr Biol 33(19):4160–4173.e4. 10.1016/j.cub.2023.08.059 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 195.Macedo-Lima M, Hamlette LS, Caras ML (2024) Orbitofrontal cortex modulates auditory cortical sensitivity and sound perception in Mongolian gerbils. Curr Biol. 10.1016/j.cub.2024.06.036 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 196.Howard JD, Kahnt T (2021) To be specific: the role of orbitofrontal cortex in signaling reward identity. Behav Neurosci 135(2):210–217. 10.1037/bne0000455 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 197.Xie Y, Nie C, Yang T (2018) Covert shift of attention modulates the value encoding in the orbitofrontal cortex. Elife. 10.7554/eLife.31507 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 198.Belden A, Quinci MA, Geddes M, Donovan NJ, Hanser SB, Loui P (2023) Functional organization of auditory and reward systems in aging. J Cogn Neurosci 35(10):1570–1592. 10.1162/jocn_a_02028 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 199.Goodrich LV, Kanold PO (2020) Chapter 2 - Functional circuit development in the auditory system. In: Rubenstein J et al (eds) Neural circuit and cognitive development (second edition). Academic Press, pp 27–55
  • 200.Shilling-Scrivo K (2022) Can you hear me now? Towards a model of age-related difficulty in noisy environments. Ph.D. thesis, University of Maryland, Baltimore. Available: https://www.proquest.com/openview/d903c29e2699c27d526bf72b8639d619/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

No code was created for this manuscript.

No novel data were obtained for this manuscript.


Articles from JARO: Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES