Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Biochemical Journal logoLink to Biochemical Journal
. 1967 Aug;104(2):503–509. doi: 10.1042/bj1040503

pH-dependence of carnitine acetyltransferase activity

J F A Chase 1
PMCID: PMC1270612  PMID: 6048792

Abstract

1. The pH-dependence of the kinetic constants of the carnitine acetyltransferase reaction has been investigated with the enzyme from pigeon breast muscle. 2. Michaelis constants for (−)-carnitine and acetyl-(−)-carnitine vary in a similar fashion in the pH range 6·0–9·0. A single ionizing group on the enzyme with an apparent pK7·2 is required in the basic form for binding of these substrates. 3. Binding of CoASH or acetyl-CoA raises the apparent pK of an ionizing group on the enzyme from 7·85 to 8·25. This group is probably not directly involved in forming the enzyme–substrate complex, but its microscopic environment is presumably altered. Another group in either the substrate or the free enzyme, with an apparent pK6·4, is needed in the basic form for optimum binding of CoA substrates. 4. This last group has been unequivocally identified as the 3′-phosphate of CoA, by showing that the Km of carnitine acetyltransferase for the substrate acetyl-3′-dephospho-CoA is independent of pH in the range 6·0–7·8. 5. V′max., the maximum velocity of the catalysed reaction between acetyl-CoA and (−)-carnitine, is constant between pH6·0 and 8·8. 6. The significance of these results in terms of a previously postulated reaction scheme for this enzyme is discussed.

Full text

PDF
503

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BEINERT H., VON KORFF R. W., GREEN D. E., BUYSKE D. A., HANDSCHUMACHER R. E., HIGGINS H., STRONG F. M. A method for the purification of coenzyme A from yeast. J Biol Chem. 1953 Jan;200(1):385–400. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. CHASE J. F., PEARSON D. J., TUBBS P. K. THE PREPARATION OF CRYSTALLIN CARNITINE ACETYLTRANSFERASE. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1965 Jan;96:162–165. doi: 10.1016/0005-2787(65)90622-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chase J. F. The substrate specificity of carnitine acetyltransferase. Biochem J. 1967 Aug;104(2):510–518. doi: 10.1042/bj1040510. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chase J. F., Tubbs P. K. Some kinetic studies on the mechanism of action of carnitine acetyltransferase. Biochem J. 1966 Apr;99(1):32–40. doi: 10.1042/bj0990032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. DIXON M. The effect of pH on the affinities of enzymes for substrates and inhibitors. Biochem J. 1953 Aug;55(1):161–170. doi: 10.1042/bj0550161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. ELLMAN G. L. Tissue sulfhydryl groups. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1959 May;82(1):70–77. doi: 10.1016/0003-9861(59)90090-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. FLORINI J. R., VESTLING C. S. Graphical determination of the dissociation constants for two-substrate enzyme systems. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1957 Sep;25(3):575–578. doi: 10.1016/0006-3002(57)90529-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. FRAENKEL G., FRIEDMAN S. Carnitine. Vitam Horm. 1957;15:73–118. doi: 10.1016/s0083-6729(08)60508-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. FRITZ I. B., SCHULTZ S. K., SRERE P. A. Properties of partially purified carnitine acetyltransferase. J Biol Chem. 1963 Jul;238:2509–2517. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. JENCKS W. P. Non-enzymic reactions of acyl adenylate and imidazole. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1957 Apr;24(1):227–228. doi: 10.1016/0006-3002(57)90185-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. SRERE P. A., KOSICKI G. W. The purification of citrate-condensing enzyme. J Biol Chem. 1961 Oct;236:2557–2559. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Biochemical Journal are provided here courtesy of The Biochemical Society

RESOURCES