Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2026 Sep 20.
Published in final edited form as: Aquat Toxicol. 2025 Sep 20;289:107583. doi: 10.1016/j.aquatox.2025.107583

Impacts of PCBs on grey seal pup immunity and influenza A infection vary across biological scales

Christina M McCosker a,*, Milton Levin b, Wendy B Puryear c, Jonathan A Runstadler c, Christopher Perkins d, Ebru Unal e,f, Kimberly T Murray g, Kristina M Cammen a
PMCID: PMC12709521  NIHMSID: NIHMS2113996  PMID: 41014917

Abstract

Disease outbreaks in marine species have increased, prompting concern regarding the health of coastal ecosystems. Environmental contaminants are hypothesized to contribute to disease outbreaks, as many contaminants have documented immunosuppressive effects in a variety of marine organisms. Of particular concern are marine mammals that have long life-spans, live in coastal waters, and have thick blubber, all of which leads to greater contaminant exposure and accumulation. In the Northwest Atlantic Ocean, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) have been detected in grey seals (Halichoerus grypus), yet research on impacts of PCBs in this species is limited or yields contradictory results. We first validated the use of dried blood spot cards (DBS) to measure contaminants in wild grey seal pups using a paired analysis to whole blood samples (N = 30). Then, DBS was used to measure PCBs in pup blood (N = 127) and we assessed the impact of PCBs on gene expression (N = 23), cytokines (N = 87), and influenza A virus (IAV) infection status (N = 127). We found a significant correlation between the concentrations of PCBs detected by DBS and whole blood. PCBs were found to down-regulate adaptive immunity genes, but up-regulate innate immunity and defense response genes. Despite the apparent effects of PCBs at the molecular level, we observed no difference in cytokine profiles nor IAV infection status across pups with and without measurable PCBs. Our research highlights the intricacies of contaminant-induced effects on immune function and sheds light on how grey seals survive ongoing threats in their environment.

Keywords: Gray seal, PCB, gene expression, cytokine, influenza, immunotoxicology

1. Introduction

Over the past several decades, an increasing number of reported disease outbreaks in coastal species have prompted concern that coastal ecosystem health may be declining (Desforges et al., 2016; Gulland & Hall, 2007), with high levels of environmental contaminants cited as one contributing factor (de Swart, Harder, et al., 1995; Ross, 2002; Ross et al., 1996). From marine mammals to humans, exposure to environmental contaminants has been associated with immunosuppression, reproductive impairment, population declines, among other health effects (I. Ahmad et al., 2023; Desforges et al., 2018; Sonne et al., 2020). Of particular concern are a group of persistent organic pollutants, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), of which there are 209 different congeners, or unique chemical compounds. Their long half-lives and stability have allowed PCBs to persist in environments despite their use and production being banned or severely restricted. In addition to environmental persistence, these pollutants threaten marine wildlife due to their lipophilic nature, which allows them to bioaccumulate in organisms and biomagnify up the food chain (Faroon & Ruiz, 2016; Levin et al., 2016; O’Shea & Tanabe, 2003).

The health impacts of these contaminants are of particular concern for marine mammals, which are known to bioaccumulate some of the highest levels of contaminants due to their long life-spans, coastal residency, high trophic level, and thick blubber that acts as a repository for contaminants (Bossart, 2011; Desforges et al., 2016; Reddy et al., 2001). Over the past several decades, PCBs have been detected in global pinniped populations, including in the North Atlantic Ocean (Hobbs et al., 2002; Rigét et al., 2020; Shaw et al., 2005; Vanden Berghe et al., 2012), Baltic Sea (Nyman et al., 2002), North Pacific Ocean (Peterson et al., 2014), Arctic Ocean (Facciola et al., 2022), and Antarctic Ocean (Khairy et al., 2021). Across these bodies of water, PCBs have been found to adversely affect marine mammal immune function (e.g., de Swart et al. 1995; Desforges et al. 2016; Levin et al. 2005, 2007, 2016; Schwacke et al. 2011; Sørmo et al. 2009), the endocrine system (Bennett et al., 2021; Schwacke et al., 2011; Troisi et al., 2020; Villanger et al., 2013), and other critical biological functions (e.g., Nyman et al. 2003; Mos et al. 2007; Vanden Berghe et al. 2010). In addition, PCBs have been found to disrupt the expression of genes related to T-cell activity, cytokines, metabolism, growth and development, immune function, and more (Brown et al., 2014, 2017; Neale et al., 2005; Noël et al., 2017; Soulen et al., 2022). These prior findings set the stage for analyses of PCB-associated health effects and disease susceptibility in wild pinniped populations.

In the Northwest Atlantic, PCBs have been detected in the blubber of grey (Halichoerus grypus) and harbor seals (Phoca vitulina) (Hobbs et al., 2002; Shaw et al., 2005), two sympatric species of pinnipeds that have experienced numerous large-scale mortality events associated with infectious disease in recent years. One infectious disease, influenza A virus (IAV), was first isolated in Northwest Atlantic pinnipeds during an epidemic in 1979–1980 that resulted in the death of ~20% of the local harbor seal population (Geraci et al., 1982; Runstadler & Puryear, 2020). Since then, IAV has been implicated as the cause of disease outbreaks of varying magnitude in the Northwest Atlantic in 1982, 1991, 2011, and 2022 (Fereidouni et al., 2014; Puryear et al., 2016, 2023). The recurring nature of IAV epidemics is suggestive of the presence of a reservoir host, in which the virus can evolve prior to spilling over into susceptible populations. In the North Atlantic, grey seals are thought to fill this role as they are permissive to IAV infections without associated morbidity and mortality (Puryear et al., 2016). Grey seal populations were nearly extirpated in the mid-1900s due to intense hunting pressure and bounty programs (Wood et al., 2011), but since receiving federal protection, the population has rebounded to an estimated 27,000 animals in the Northeast US (Hayes et al., 2024). As grey seal numbers increase, so too does the potential for intra- and inter-species interactions that foster pathogen transmission in coastal waters and at shared haul out sites.

It is uncontested that PCBs can be found in Northwest Atlantic grey seals (Hobbs et al., 2002; Nyman et al., 2002), but research on the impacts of PCBs in this population is limited to sex hormones (Troisi et al., 2020) or association with exposure biomarkers (Nyman et al., 2003). Across the Atlantic, research on grey seals in Scotland suggests there is no effect of PCBs on immune-related processes such as phagocytosis or the respiratory burst, infection prevalence, or hematology and biochemical blood parameters (A. Hall et al., 1997; Hammond et al., 2005), which contrasts with studies on other pinniped species (see references above). The aim of our study was to investigate the impact of PCBs across biological scales in Northwest Atlantic grey seal pups within the context of IAV. To do so, we first validated the use of dried blood spot (DBS) cards for contaminant analysis in grey seal pups. DBS cards offer a cost-effective approach to sampling that minimizes the amount of whole blood that needs to be collected from a wild animal (Jobst et al., 2020). We then measured PCBs in grey seal pup blood and tested for associations between PCBs and gene expression, cytokine production, and IAV infection status. Due to their documented immunosuppressive properties, we hypothesized that the presence and concentration of PCBs would alter the expression of immune genes, alter the production of cytokines, and be associated with a greater probability of IAV infection status. Our findings advance our understanding of human-made contaminants and their impacts on the health of a coastal sentinel species and mechanisms that underlie environmentally modulated disease susceptibility in a proposed wild disease reservoir.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sample collection

Blood samples and swabs (nasal, conjunctival, and rectal) were collected and archived during annual grey seal health assessments carried out at South Monomoy Island (Monomoy National Wildlife Refuge), Muskeget Island, and Great Point, Nantucket in Massachusetts (MA), United States between 2014 and 2020. Sampling was authorized under National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) research permits #10080–95 and 17670–01 and National Wildlife Refuge (NWR) System Research and Monitoring Special Use Permits 16-MNY-01 and 53514. Animal handling, biological sampling, and disease testing were conducted as previously described (Puryear et al., 2016). For this study, ~50–200ul of blood per individual was collected onto Whatman 903 protein saver cards (Cytiva, Marlborough, MA, USA) and archived at 4°C for contaminant analysis (Batterman & Chernyak, 2014). For a subset of pups, ~5–10 ml of whole blood was also collected and archived at 4°C to validate the use of DBS cards for contaminant analysis (40 CFR Part 136). Previously published serum cytokine profiles (N = 87; McCosker et al. 2025) and blood transcriptomes (N = 23; McCosker et al. 2025) from a subset of the grey seal pups used in this study enabled comparisons of measured PCBs to cytokine concentrations and gene expression.

Sex and molt stage of all pups were recorded in the field, with molt stage serving as a proxy for age in wild grey seal pups. Molt stages II (full lanugo), III (molted around face and flippers), IV (molting on body), and V (completed molting) are associated with pups that are on average 3–7 days old, 7–18 days old, 18–25 days old, and 25–40 days old, respectively (Bowen et al., 2003; Noren et al., 2008).

2.2. Dried blood spot card validation

To validate DBS cards as a sampling method for contaminant analysis, paired whole blood and DBS cards from a subset of pups were analyzed for a suite of 21 PCB congeners (IUPAC #s: 18, 28, 44, 49, 52, 66, 87, 101, 105, 118, 128, 138, 153, 170, 180, 183, 184, 187, 195, 206, 209) using the Agilent 6890 GC with a Waters Tandem Mass Spectrometer (GC/MS/MS) platform. For validation purposes, the detection (or lack thereof) of each individual PCB congener was analyzed across samples and methods. A Shapiro-Wilk test was used to determine if the number of detections per PCB congener were normally distributed, and a paired Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test was used to determine if the number of detections per PCB congener were different between whole blood and DBS cards. For detections of PCB congeners that were above the limit of detection (LOD) using both methods, a Pearson correlation test was used to assess the relationship between the concentration of each PCB congener in each sample measured via blood spot cards and whole blood. All statistical tests described here and below were performed in R v. 4.3.1 (R Core Team, 2024) with α = 0.05.

2.3. PCB measurement

A subset of 16 PCB congeners (IUPAC #s: 18, 44, 66, 87, 105, 118, 128, 138, 153, 180, 183, 184, 187, 195, 206, 209) were measured in the full set of DBS cards (n = 127) using the Agilent GC/MS/MS in multiple reaction monitoring mode and methods optimized by the University of Connecticut’s Center for Environmental Sciences and Engineering (Provatas et al., 2019). The samples were analyzed in five batches across which the reported LOD, or lowest concentration that can be detected by the instrument, differed due to variable signal to noise ratios during each round of measurements. For analyses of the complete dataset, we conservatively applied the maximum LOD for each of the 16 PCB congeners that were measured in all datasets and considered all measured PCB concentrations below that value as not detected (assigned a zero for further analysis). When sample size allowed, we also analyzed the batches that shared LODs separately to explore potential batch effects and report on the findings from some additional PCB congeners that were only analyzed in a subset of samples. Unless otherwise noted, the results in the main manuscript are from the analysis of the complete dataset and results from the batch-specific analyses are presented in the Supplementary Materials for comparison. Given that congeners of PCBs are typically correlated with one another and there was an excess of zero detections, we implemented a hurdle model framework, in which we evaluated the presence and concentration of ΣPCBs, as described below. The concentration of non-zero ΣPCBs were log-transformed to approximate a normal distribution.

To identify environmental and biological factors that may influence the presence and/or concentration of PCBs in the full set of DBS cards, we evaluated how ΣPCBs vary across years, sampling location, sex, and molt stage. A logistic regression was used to test for an association between the presence/absence of PCBs across years. A Pearson’s Chi-squared test, or Fisher’s Exact Test when expected counts in more than 20% of cells fell below five, was used to test for associations between PCB presence/absence and location, sex, and molt stage. Significant associations were further examined with a post-hoc pairwise Fisher’s Exact Test to test for significant differences across each pairwise comparison using the holm p-adjustment method in the R package rstatix v. 0.7.2 (Kassambara, 2023). For pups with measurable PCBs, an ANOVA with Tukey’s HSD (package rstatix) was used to test for differences in ΣPCBs across molt stages, t-tests were used to test for differences in log ΣPCBs between location and sex, and a Pearson’s correlation was used to determine if there was an association between year and ΣPCBs.

2.4. Gene expression

Blood transcriptomes from a subset of the female pups included in this study (N = 23) had been previously generated via RNA sequencing following hemolysis and removal of red blood cells, as described in McCosker et al. (2025). This subset of female samples was collected between 2016–2019, predominately from Monomoy Island (n = 21), and predominantly classified as molt stage V (n = 22). For the present study, these data were used to measure mRNA transcript abundance and test for differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between pups with (n = 3) and without (n = 20) PCBs, as conservatively assessed using the maximum study-wide LOD. Though we acknowledge that true gene expression involves several processes from genotype to phenotype (Buccitelli & Selbach, 2020), here and throughout the manuscript the term gene expression is used synonymously with mRNA transcript abundance, as is common in the field and analytical tools used for these analyses.

Analyses of gene expression were conducted using the R package edgeR (v. 4.0.12; Robinson et al. 2009). Genes that did not have read counts in at least three samples (the minimum group size) were filtered out, and counts for remaining genes were normalized based on library size. A Fisher’s exact test was used to test for DEGs between pups with and without PCBs, and genes were considered to be differentially expressed if they exhibited an uncorrected p-value <0.05 and absolute log2 fold change > 1. Using a combination of thresholds for p-value and fold change takes into account both statistical and biological significance to identify biologically meaningful genes for further investigation (McCarthy & Smyth, 2009; Xiao et al., 2014). The R package rbioapi v. 0.8.2 (Rezwani et al., 2022) was used to access the Protein Analysis Through Evolutionary Relationships (PANTHER) Classification System (Mi et al., 2019) to determine which Gene Ontology (GO) terms were significantly over-represented (Fisher’s exact test FDR < 0.05) among DEGs compared to the background list of genes that were expressed in grey seal pup blood, as described in McCosker et al. (2025). The R package WebGestaltR v. 0.4.4 (Wang et al., 2020) was used to determine if there were any significantly enriched Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways among differentially expressed genes.

2.5. Cytokines

Concentrations of 13 serum cytokines (GM-CSF, IFNg, IL-2, IL-6, IL-7, IL-8, IL-15, IP-10, KC-like, IL-10, IL-18, MCP-1, TNFa) had been previously quantified (pg/mL) in a subset of the grey seal pups included in this study (N = 87), as described in McCosker et al. (2025). Cytokines were quantified using the commercially available Millipore MILLIPLEX® Canine Cytokine Magnetic Bead Panel kit according to the manufacturers’ instructions, validated for use in pinnipeds by Levin et al. (2014). Samples were diluted 1:3 and standards were prepared using a 1/4 serial dilution to generate a standard curve. If the reported cytokine concentration was extrapolated outside of the standard curve calculated by the software (19% of measurements), the value was accepted as the calculated concentration and values reported as “out of range – below asymptote of equation” (71% of measurements) were assigned a zero, following Levin et al. (2014). For the present study, cytokines that were either not detected or only detected in a single pup from this subset were removed from further analyses (GM-CSF, IP-10, MCP-1, and TNFα), and associations between the profile of the nine remaining cytokines with PCB presence and concentration were tested. Cytokines operate within complex biological networks, often influencing the production of one another. Therefore, we used multivariate statistics to (1) determine if the presence and/or concentration of cytokines differed across pups with and without measurable PCBs and (2) visualize differences among multivariate cytokine distributions between groups. To do so, we constructed dissimilarity matrices using 1 - Sørensen’s index (Sørensen, 1948) and the Bray-Curtis index to quantify dissimilarity between groups (i.e., pups with and without measurable PCBs) in cytokine presence/absence and concentrations, respectively, using the function betadiver from R package vegan v. 2.6–8 (Oksanen et al., 2024). Permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) was used to compare the dissimilarity of cytokine presence/absence and concentration between pups with and without measurable PCBs using adonis2 in vegan. The function betadisper from vegan was used to model group dispersions, and the assumption of homogeneity of dispersions under adonis2 was tested using an ANOVA.

Partial-least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) was used to visualize differences in cytokine profiles between groups using the R package mixOmics v. 6.26.0 (Rohart et al., 2017). PLS-DA is a multivariate supervised dimensionality-reduction technique that is aware of group identities and attempts to create latent variables that separate groups as best as possible, with each latent variable explaining some proportion of variation in cytokine profiles among pups (Barker & Rayens, 2003; Ruiz-Perez et al., 2020). PLS-DA is useful for datasets with correlated independent variables, as is the case in cytokine measurements.

2.6. IAV status

Three swabs (nasal, conjunctival, and rectal) were collected from most grey seal pups in this study (N = 124) and the remaining three pups were sampled using a subset of swabs (i.e., rectal, conjunctival and rectal, or nasal). All swabs were tested for the presence of influenza viral RNA using RT-PCR following methods previously described by Puryear et al. (2016). Briefly, swabs were stored in viral transport media (VTM), kept chilled during collection, and frozen in a liquid nitrogen dry shipper before being stored at −80°C. RNA was extracted (using Omega Mag-Bead Viral DNA/RNA Kit, Omega Bio-Tek, Norcross, GA, USA) and tested for the presence of viral RNA (using qScript XLT One-Step RT-qPCR ToughMix, Quanta Biosciences, Gaithersburg, MD, USA) using primers directed against a conserved region of the influenza A matrix gene (Spackman et al., 2002). Pups were classified as IAV+ if at least one swab was avian influenza (AI) matrix positive, using a cycle threshold (Ct) of < 45. In the Northwest Atlantic, grey seals are exposed to a variety of influenza subtypes (Puryear et al. 2016), across which immune responses may vary (Sládková & Kostolanský, 2006), but this mode of viral screening cannot distinguish between subtypes. Therefore, observations likely reflect associations with the dominant IAV subtype present in pups, or those shared across multiple subtypes. A Pearson’s Chi-squared test was used to determine if the presence of PCBs was associated with IAV status. For pups with measurable levels of PCBs, a logistic regression was used to assess the relationship between ΣPCB concentration and IAV status.

3. Results

3.1. Sample collection

PCBs were measured in 127 DBS cards and 30 whole blood samples from wild grey seal pups. Across all 127 samples that were collected between 2014 and 2020, most (64%) originated from pups born on Monomoy Island, followed by Muskeget Island (31%) and Great Point (5%). Samples were approximately balanced across sexes (55% female, 39% male, 6% unknown) and were predominately molt stages IV (18%) and V (53%), with some molt stage III (12%), one molt stage II, and 21 (17%) pups for which molt stage was not recorded. In the subset of pups born on Monomoy Island in 2017 from which whole blood was collected for contaminant analysis, samples were distributed approximately evenly across sexes (40% female, 50% male, 10% unknown) and molt stage (37% V, 27% IV, 30% III, 3% II, and 3% unknown). For a full list of grey seal pup samples and attributes, see Supplemental Table S1.

3.1. Dried blood spot card validation

In the subset of wild grey seal pups for which paired whole blood and DBS cards were collected (N = 30) and 21 PCB congeners were measured, 70% and 67%, respectively, of grey seal pups had measurable PCBs, many with detections for only one or a few congeners. Across the 21 PCB congeners measured, 13 were detected through whole blood and 10 were detected DBS cards, and there was no significant difference in the number of detections per congener between methods (Z = −1.16, p = 0.25) (Figure 1). For instances in which a PCB congener was detected in a sample through both DBS and whole blood (n = 15), there was a significant correlation (r = 0.75, df = 13, p < 0.01) in the concentrations measured between both collection methods (Figure 1, Supplemental Figure S1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Validation of dried blood spot (DBS) cards for use in measuring polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in wild grey seal pups, including the proportion of samples (out of N = 30) in which each congener was measured above the limit of detection (LOD) through DBS cards and whole blood (WB; left). For instances in which a PCB congener was detected in a sample through both DBS and whole blood (n = 15), the concentration measured was significantly correlated (r = 0.75) between whole blood and DBS cards, depicted by a line with shaded 95% confidence intervals (right). Data originated from wild grey seal pups sampled on Monomoy Island, Massachusetts, USA in 2017.

3.2. PCB measurement

Using the conservative study-wide LOD across 16 PCB congeners measured in all samples, PCBs were detected in 26% (n = 33) of 127 sampled grey seal pups, including 13 of the 16 measured PCB congeners (Table 1). Individual PCB congeners were detected in 1–12 pups, with PCB 44 (9.45%) and PCB 66 (5.51%) detected the most frequently. Across all samples, PCB 87 had the greatest mean concentration (231.55 ng/g wet weight ± 23.16 SE), when considering only detections that were above LOD (Table 1). Within a single sample, total PCB concentrations within pups ranged from 27.9 to 445 ng/g wet weight.

Table 1.

Summary of 16 polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) congener detections in wild grey seal (Halichoerus grypus) pups (N = 127). Metrics reported include the maximum limit of detection (LOD) across batches, the number of samples in which a given PCB congener was detected above the LOD, and the mean ± standard error (SE), median, and range of non-zero concentrations for each PCB congener measured. Data originate from pups sampled on Monomoy Island, Muskeget Island, and Great Point, Nantucket, Massachusetts, USA between 2014 and 2020. Batch-specific summaries can be found in Supplemental Tables S3 – S5.

Congener LOD (ng/g wet weight) # Samples > LOD Mean ± SE (ng/g wet weight) Median (Range) (ng/g wet weight)
PCB 18 25 1 (0.79%) 129.5 129.5
PCB 44 26.7 12 (9.45%) 62.15 ± 5.57 54.7 (27.9 – 102.5)
PCB 66 50 7 (5.51%) 124.14 ± 15.92 72.1 (50.8 – 445)
PCB 87 75 2 (1.57%) 231.55 ± 23.16 231.55 (109.8 – 353.3)
PCB 105 26.7 4 (3.15%) 48.15 ± 4.4 51.45 (27.9 – 61.8)
PCB 118 75 2 (1.57%) 102.75 ± 9.22 102.75 (84.7 – 120.8)
PCB 128 75 1 (0.79%) 81.2 81.2
PCB 138 100 2 (1.57%) 117.3 ± 10.46 117.3 (102 – 132.6)
PCB 153 50 4 (3.15%) 77.03 ± 7.06 70.15 (54.2 – 113.6)
PCB 180 266.7 0 NA NA
PCB 183 266.7 0 NA NA
PCB 184 133.3 1 (0.79%) 135.4 135.4
PCB 187 266.7 0 NA NA
PCB 195 66.7 2 (1.57%) 76.25 ± 6.74 76.25 (75.2 – 77.3)
PCB 206 26.7 1 (0.79%) 46.7 46.7
PCB 209 66.7 3 (2.36%) 118.23 ± 10.82 131.7 (72.7 – 150.3)
ΣPCBs - 33 (25.98%) 118.75 ± 17.67 81.2 (27.9 – 445)

Within and across PCB batches, we detected little to no significant differences in the proportion of pups with PCBs or the non-zero ΣPCBs across location, sex, and molt stage (Supplemental Table S2). Across the complete dataset, the proportion of pups with PCBs significantly declined in more recent years (X2 = 11.77, df = 1, p < 0.01), although the concentration of non-zero ΣPCBs remained variable and was not significantly correlated with year (r = −0.05, df = 30, p = 0.77; Figure 2).

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Proportion of wild grey seal pup DBS cards with measurable levels of PCBs above the study-wide maximum limit of detection (LOD) across years (left) and the log-transformed concentration of non-zero ΣPCBs across years (right), with sample sizes noted below. For the concentration of PCBs, there was no significant correlation (r = −0.05) with year, depicted by a line with 95% confidence intervals. Data originate from pups sampled between 2014 and 2023 in Massachusetts, USA.

3.3. Gene expression

Among a subset of 23 female grey seal pups from 2016–2019 for which RNA sequencing data were previously generated, 574 genes (out of 12,067 expressed genes following removal of genes with low read counts) were found to be differentially expressed between grey seal pups with (N = 3) and without (N = 20) PCBs in the complete PCB dataset. This analysis was not re-run on PCB batch-specific datasets due to sample size limitations.

Among 318 genes that were up-regulated in pups with PCBs, there were 35 over-represented Biological Process (BP) terms, including terms related to host immune & defense processes (e.g., “innate immune response,” “defense response,” “regulation of viral genome replication”), red blood cells (e.g., “erythrocyte differentiation”), metabolic and biosynthetic processes (e.g., “tetrapyrrole biosynthetic process”), transport mechanisms (e.g., “gas transport”), among others (Figure 3). Additionally, 6 GO Cellular Component (CC) terms were over-represented among up-regulated genes that were predominately related to the cytoskeleton and plasma membrane (e.g., “cortical cytoskeleton,” “plasma membrane”). Among 256 down-regulated genes, there was one over-represented GO BP term, “adaptive immune response” and 6 over-represented GO CC terms including those related to immune activity (e.g., “immunological synapse” and “cytolytic granule”) and protein complexes (e.g., “T cell receptor complex” and “FANCM-MHF complex”; Figure 3). There were no GO Molecular Function terms found to be over-represented among either up- or down- regulated genes, nor any significantly over-represented KEGG pathways among DEGs.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Significantly (FDR < 0.05) over-represented GO Biological Process and Cellular Component terms among genes that were up- (+ Fold Enrichment) or down-regulated (− Fold Enrichment) in blood samples from wild grey seal pups with measurable levels of PCBs in blood compared to pups with no measurable levels of PCBs. Data originate from pups sampled between 2014 and 2023 in Massachusetts, USA.

3.4. Cytokines

Among a subset of 87 grey seal pups in which cytokines were previously measured (McCosker et al. 2025), we found no significant difference in the multivariate distributions of cytokine profiles between pups with (n = 18) and without (n = 69) PCBs using either presence/absence (F[1,85] = 2.70, p = 0.06) or concentration (F[1,85] =1.23, p = 0.29) data from the complete dataset. Neither cytokine presence/absence nor concentration exhibited significantly different group dispersions (F[1,85] = 2.74 and 1.07, p = 0.10 and 0.30, respectively). The PLS-DA was unable to discriminate between groups, as pups with and without PCBs overlapped in multivariate space, despite the first two latent variables explaining 15.7% and 14.7%, respectively, of variation in cytokine profiles (Figure 4). Five cytokines (IL-2, IL-7, IL-8, IL-15, and IL-10) were detected more frequently in pups with PCBs, three were detected less frequently in pups with PCBs (IFNg, IL-6, and KC-like), and one was detected in all pups (IL-18), despite all cytokines exhibiting roughly equal concentrations across groups (Supplemental Figures S2 – S3). Analyses of PCB batch-specific analyses yielded similar results (Supplemental Figures S7 – S9 and Figures S12 – S14).

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) visualization depicting variation in cytokine profiles between wild grey seal pups with (n = 18) and without (n = 69) measurable levels of PCBs in blood. The two axes represent the first two latent variables (LV) created to reduce the number of dimensions while maximizing discrimination between groups using cytokine profiles. The proportion of variation in cytokine profiles among pups explained by each LV is indicated, and ellipses depict 95% confidence intervals. Data originate from pups sampled between 2014 and 2023 in Massachusetts, USA.

3.5. IAV status

Across all 127 grey seal pups, we found no significant difference in the proportion of animals with PCBs detected above the study-wide maximum LOD in wild grey seal pup blood (X2 = 0.25, df = 1, p = 0.62), nor the concentration of ΣPCBs (X2 = 0.03, df = 1, p = 0.86) between pups with (n = 41) and without (n = 86) IAV (Figure 5). Among the PCB batch-specific analyses (Supplemental Figures S5, S10, S15), only one batch exhibited a significant relationship with IAV status; ΣPCBs were higher in pups with IAV (n = 5) than pups without IAV (n = 14) in the first batch of PCB data (Supplemental Figure S5). This different result may be due to differences in the samples and/or PCB congeners included in each batch.

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

The proportion of wild grey seal pups with (n = 41) and without (n = 86) influenza A virus (IAV) that had measurable levels of PCBs in blood (left) and log-transformed ΣPCB concentrations for pups with measurable levels (right). Data originate from pups sampled between 2014 and 2023 in Massachusetts, USA..

4. Discussion

Despite the fact that their production ceased in the 1970s, PCBs persist in the environment as a result of their chemical stability and continue to bioaccumulate in higher trophic level species, such as marine mammals, due to their lipophilic nature (Faroon & Ruiz, 2016; Levin et al., 2016). We quantified PCBs in grey seal pup blood, validated the use of DBS cards for PCB analysis in pups, and assessed the relationship between PCB load and pup health across multiple biological scales: gene expression, cytokine production, and IAV infection status. We found that PCBs are associated with dysregulation of immune and defense genes, but there was little to no evidence of an association between PCBs and cytokine profiles or IAV infection status. Our findings highlight potential mechanisms that may be related to the grey seal’s ability to function as a wild disease reservoir host.

In our paired samples, the profiles and concentrations of PCBs were not significantly different between whole blood and DBS cards, validating the use of DBS for PCB analysis in grey seal pups. DBS cards were originally developed for medical applications in humans but have since been used for various applications in the wildlife health field (Hansen et al., 2014; Lehner et al., 2013; McHuron et al., 2019; Provatas et al., 2017, 2019; Shlosberg et al., 2011). The use of DBS cards requires a smaller volume of blood, thus minimizing negative impacts on live animals, and is generally simpler and cheaper to collect, store, and transport than larger volumes of blood (Jobst et al., 2020; Lehner et al., 2013). Our validation of this tool for measuring PCBs in grey seal pups can guide future wildlife pinniped health assessment work, thereby increasing the wealth of information that can be obtained with a limited amount of blood.

Using DBS cards to measure 16 PCB congeners, our study detected PCBs in 26% (n = 33) of wild grey seal pups sampled between 2014 and 2020, providing evidence that PCBs persist in Northwest Atlantic food webs. Across our study period we also detected a declining trend in the presence of PCBs, but not in the concentration of PCBs. These observations mirror those elsewhere across the globe where PCBs continue to be detected in pinnipeds, but in declining numbers. Within the past two decades, PCB detections and declining trends have been reported among Scottish and Baltic grey seals (Bennett et al., 2021; K. J. Robinson et al., 2019; Schmidt et al., 2020), in ringed seals (Pusa hispida) across the Arctic and Baltic Sea (Bjurlid et al., 2018; Facciola et al., 2022; Rigét et al., 2020), and in Weddell seals in Antarctica (Khairy et al., 2021).

Though relative changes reported within studies can be compared globally, it is more challenging to compare absolute values of PCB load between studies. Studies vary among the congeners that are measured (209 total PCB congeners exist, but many studies only measure a fraction of these), the tissue type within which PCBs are measured (e.g., blubber, liver, blood), the age class of pinniped studied (e.g., pups, juveniles, adults), and the way in which PCB data are presented in publications (e.g., individual congeners, grouped congeners, or sum PCBs). These confounding factors may in part explain differences that were observed between the PCB profiles that were reported among grey seal pup blood in the Northwest Atlantic in this study and the dominant patterns in PCB profiles reported previously among pinnipeds. Across many previous studies, PCBs 153, 138, and 180 have been reported as the most abundant congeners detected in pinnipeds (Bernt et al., 1999; Debier et al., 2003a; Khairy et al., 2021; Koistinen et al., 1997; K. J. Robinson et al., 2019; Vanden Berghe et al., 2012), similar to other wildlife species (Megson et al., 2022). In contrast, the most frequently detected congeners in grey seal pups in the present study were PCBs 44 and 66, while the greatest mean concentration of PCBs was observed in PCB 87 (Table 1). This inter-study difference may be due to differences between studies in the tissue in which PCBs were measured. PCBs with lower chlorine content (denoted by lower numbers on the scale from 1–209) are more frequently detected in serum and they are more susceptible to biotransformation whereas PCBs with higher chlorine content have greater lipophilicity and are more likely to be found in fatty tissues ((Grimm et al., 2015). Congruently, most (though not all; see Debier et al. 2003a and 2003b; Vanden Berghe et al. 2012) of the prior studies that report high concentrations of PCBs 153, 138, and 180 in pinnipeds have analyzed blubber samples.

In this study, PCBs were measured in grey seal pup blood, which represents the congeners and concentrations of PCBs that are actively circulating throughout the body and can have immediate physiological impacts (Beckmen et al., 2016). Fat stores, as well as PCBs that have been sequestered there, tend to mobilize during periods of fasting in pinnipeds that can lead to greater bioavailability of PCBs (Debier et al., 2003b). Grey seal pups undergo a period of fasting for about 10–28 days post-weaning (A. J. Hall, 1998). As the samples for this study were collected during this post-weaning period, this timing might have led to observed differences in the amount and type of PCBs detected in blood. Though the concentration of ΣPCBs measured within pups in our study varied greatly, ranging from 0 – 445 ng/g wet weight, we observed no detectable trends across molt stages (a proxy for pup age), suggesting that individual variation in PCB profiles may largely be due to the source of PCBs (their mother), rather than physiological processes within the pup.

During the post-weaning fast, grey seal pups are not yet foraging on their own, which means pup PCB profiles directly reflect maternal PCB load. Small quantities of PCBs are transferred in utero, and then greater quantities of PCBs are transferred during lactation as PCBs are mobilized in the dam during milk production (Debier et al., 2003a; Wolkers et al., 2004). The quantity of PCBs transferred can vary based on birth order, with first time mothers offloading greater concentrations than multiparous dams (Beckmen et al., 1999). There is no way of knowing if grey seal pups in the present study were born to primiparous or multiparous dams, but incorporating PCB measurements in studies of grey seal populations where mark-recapture methods are used, such as on Sable Island in Canada (den Heyer et al., 2021), may illuminate patterns in grey seal pup PCB profiles relative to birth order.

To further understand the impacts of PCBs in wild grey seal pups across biological scales, we investigated changes in gene expression, cytokine profiles, and IAV infection associated with PCBs. We found that pups with PCBs exhibited dysregulation of the immune system, and defense mechanisms more broadly. GO terms related to adaptive immune function (e.g., adaptive immune response, T-cell receptor complex) were associated with down-regulated genes, while those related to innate immuntiy (e.g., cytolytic granule, antiviral innate immune response) were associated with up-regulated genes in pups with PCBs. These findings are generally consistent with a large body of literature that documents PCB-mediated dysregulation of immune gene expression across pinnipeds (Castelli et al., 2014; Neale et al., 2005; Noël et al., 2017; Routti et al., 2010; Soulen et al., 2022) and other marine mammals (Buckman et al., 2011; Fossi et al., 2010; Mancia et al., 2014; Noël et al., 2014). Many genes associated with down-regulated immune GO terms were involved in T-cell function (e.g., CD6, CD7, IL2RB, PDCD1, TRAV genes), which has been shown to be impaired in captive harbor seals fed contaminated Baltic Sea fish (de Swart et al., 1994; de Swart, Ross, et al., 1995) and wild grey seal pups inhabiting the contaminated Baltic Sea (Sørmo et al., 2009). Further, the contaminant mixtures reflective of those found in wild killer whale (Orcinus orca) and polar bear (Ursus maritimus) blood has been found to decrease T and B cell proliferation in killer whales, bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus), harp seals (Pagophilus groenlandicus), hooded seals (Cystophora cristata), and polar bears (Desforges et al., 2016, 2017). Together, these results illustrate a general pattern of impaired cell-mediated immunity in marine mammals exposed to environmental contaminants. The present study suggests these effects can be seen in wild grey seals as early as post-weaning following exposure through colostrum.

Despite the apparent down-regulation of cell-mediated immunity, grey seal pups with PCBs exhibited an up-regulation of genes related to defense response, innate immune response, and regulation of viral replication. In addition, some cytokines (e.g., IL-2, IL-7, IL-8, IL-10, and IL-15) were detected more frequently in pups with PCBs compared to pups without PCBs. Though in contrast to several other studies (see Desforges et al., 2016 for a review), the up-regulation of immune and defense genes and cytokines could be due to PCB-stimulation of the immune system, which has been documented via increased natural killer activity across marine mammal species and via increased respiratory burst activity in harbor seals (Desforges et al., 2017; Hammond et al., 2005). These results could also be a by-product of increased infection rates in pups exposed to PCBs (Buckman et al., 2011). Among the subset of samples with gene expression and PCB data from the present study, 33.3% (5/20) of grey seal pups without PCBs were IAV+ while 66.7% (2/3) of grey seal pups with PCBs were IAV+. Prior work with these RNA sequence data has documented IAV-induced dysregulation of immune genes (McCosker et al. 2025), which could be confounding results in the present study. Interestingly, IAV is known to inhibit host protein production to redirect cellular machinery towards increasing viral replication during a process termed host shut-off (Rivas et al., 2016). It is possible that genes associated with regulation of viral replication and response to virus is an artifact of the grey seal immune response intercepting interactions between IAV and host cells, a mechanism that may contribute towards their ability to resist IAV-induced morbidity and mortality and serve as a wild disease reservoir. Future research using in vitro methods to experimentally expose grey seal blood to pathogens and/or to PCBs would be useful in disentangling molecular processes underlying grey seal response to health challenges (e.g., Bogomolni et al. 2016).

Beyond noting that several cytokines were detected more frequently in pups with PCBs, there was little to no significant evidence of an association of PCBs with cytokine profiles, the concentration or presence of individual cytokines, or IAV infection status. Cytokines are a part of both the innate and adaptive immune system, both of which exhibited evidence for dysregulated gene expression. In one case, the gene (CXCL8) coding for interleukin-8 (IL-8) showed evidence of up-regulation in pups with PCBs without resulting in an increase in IL-8 levels in the cytokine dataset. It is possible that grey seal pups are able to compensate for PCB-induced effects at the molecular level with post-translational processes, or that different immune cells have different levels of sensitivity to contaminants (Desforges et al., 2017). Timing may also play a role, as protein levels often peak later than mRNA transcript levels (Lee et al., 2011), and our RNA and cytokine samples were collected at the same time. This discrepancy could also be a result of the study design as the pups used for RNA sequencing were a subset of the pups for which cytokines were measured. Additionally, this study primarily focused only on 16 PCB congeners that were quantified across all batches in grey seal pup blood. Studies that have previously documented correlations between PCBs and specific cytokines (e.g., IL-1B in ringed seals (Brown et al., 2014; Routti et al., 2010), IL-10 in killer whales (Buckman et al., 2011)) measured 43 – 206 PCB congeners in either liver or blubber. The limited number of congeners measured in blood for this study along with the snapshot of PCB profiles obtained might also have hindered the ability to detect associations between PCBs and cytokine production.

Despite these methodological limitations, the lack of association detected between PCBs and IAV infection status could be a true biological signal. Brown et al. (2014) noted a “hockey stick” curve – PCBs had to reach a certain threshold before an effect was observed. The maximum ∑PCBs detected in a sample across the complete dataset in our study was 445 ng/g wet weight, which equals 0.05 ng/g lipid weight (ng/g wet weight / (lipid content % / 100) = ng/g lipid weight) assuming approximately 90% lipid content in gray seal blubber (Addison & Stobo, 1993). The most conservative threshold for PCBs in ringed seal (Pusa hispida) blubber was 1,370 ng/g lipid weight, far exceeding the greatest concentrations detected in our study. It is possible that the combination of decreased PCBs in the environment over time and the growth stage of grey seal pups (not yet foraging and accumulating PCBs on their own) could have resulted in a level of PCBs that has not yet reached a threshold whereby physiological effects can be seen across biological scales. This may also explain why no changes were observed in the expression of genes previously identified as biomarkers or associated with metabolism of PCBs (e.g., AHR, CYP1A1, ARNT), which is in contrast to many studies across marine mammals (Brown et al., 2014, 2017; Buckman et al., 2011; Castelli et al., 2014; Fossi et al., 2010; Kim et al., 2005; Noël et al., 2014; Routti et al., 2016; Soulen et al., 2022). Future studies that quantify PCB loads in adult grey seals in the Northwest Atlantic, although difficult logistically, would help elucidate patterns of PCB accumulation over time and potential physiological impacts.

As a wild reservoir species, grey seals have exhibited a remarkable ability to recover from near-extirpation in the Northeast USA and withstand infectious disease during outbreaks. This research suggests that while PCBs may disrupt immune and defense responses in weaned grey seal pups at the molecular level, the physiological responses at higher biological levels, including IAV infection, are less impacted. While this finding may suggest that PCBs are of minimal concern to the Northwest Atlantic pinniped population, it is also possible that PCBs might affect other components of the immune system (e.g., other cytokines (Brown et al., 2014; Neale et al., 2005), lymphocyte proliferation (Levin et al., 2005; Sørmo et al., 2009), phagocytosis (Hammond et al., 2005; Mos et al., 2006)) or other biological systems (e.g., the endocrine system (Bennett et al., 2021; Troisi et al., 2020)) that were not measured in the present study. Further, there are other contaminants of concern that could be impacting this population that should be investigated in future research, such as per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs), and pesticides (Li et al., 2024). Understanding the mechanisms by which grey seals survive current threats in their environment will help us understand how marine mammal populations might be affected by the ongoing and emerging threats.

Supplementary Material

1

Highlights.

  • This study validates the use of dried blood spot cards for PCB analysis in grey seal pups.

  • Results suggest PCBs dysregulate immune and defense response genes.

  • PCBs were not associated with changes in cytokine concentrations or influenza A infection.

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Alexa Simulynas for logistical support and sample processing, Alayna Gigliotti for building RNA sequence libraries, and two anonymous reviewers for their comments on previous drafts of this manuscript. We thank Gordon Waring, Elizabeth Josephson, Frederick Wenzel and the rest of the team at National Marine Fisheries Service’s Northeast Fisheries Science Center who provided expertise, permitting and logistical support for these studies, as well as the many members of the field teams who have made it possible to obtain samples from the rookeries. We thank Monomoy National Wildlife Refuge, the US National Park Service, US Fish and Wildlife Service, and The Trustees of Reservations, Marine Mammals Nantucket, and Crocker Snow for access or critical assistance in field operations. All grey seal rookery sampling was conducted under National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) permits 17670 and 21719. Work on Monomoy Island was performed under National Wildlife Refuge (NWR) Special Use Permits 16-MNY-01 and 53514. This research was supported by two American Association of Zoo Veterinarians’ Wild Animal Health Fund research grants to Milton Levin (2017) and Christina McCosker (2022), the University of Maine Office of the Vice President for Research, Bioscience Association of Maine, the Centers of Excellence for Influenza Research and Response (funded by the National Institutes of Health’s National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease; grant nos. HHSN272201400008C, HHSN266200700010C, and 75N93021C00014), and the US National Science Foundation One Health and the Environment (OH&E): Convergence of Social and Biological Sciences NRT program grant DGE-1922560, and a NOAA Special Project titled Strengthening Local and Regional Seafood Systems grant number NOAA-NMFS-GARFO-2022-2007390. This research constitutes scientific contribution #382 from the Sea Research Foundation, Inc. This research was supported in part through computational resources provided by The University of Maine System Advanced Computing Group, Orono, Maine.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

Declaration of interests

The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests:

Milton Levin reports financial support was provided by American Association of Zoo Veterinarians. Christina McCosker reports financial support was provided by American Association of Zoo Veterinarians. Christina McCosker reports financial support was provided by Bioscience Association of Maine. If there are other authors, they declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Data availability

Data and code will be made available at https://github.com/christinamccosker/hg-pcb and https://christinamccosker.github.io/hg-pcb/.

References

  1. Addison RF, Stobo WT, 1993. Organochlorine residue concentrations and burdens in grey seal (Halichoerus grypus) blubber during the first year of life. J. Zool 230 (3), 443–450. 10.1111/j.1469-7998.1993.tb02696.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ahmad I, Mahamood M, Javed M, & Alhewairini SS (2023). Toxicology and Human Health (Ahmad Md. I., Mahamood M, Javed M, & Alhewairini SS, Eds.). Springer. 10.1007/978-981-99-2193-5 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  3. Barker M, & Rayens W (2003). Partial least squares for discrimination. Journal of Chemometrics, 17(3), 166–173. 10.1002/cem.785 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  4. Batterman S, & Chernyak S (2014). Performance and storage integrity of dried blood spots for PCB, BFR and pesticide measurements. Science of the Total Environment, 494–495, 252–260. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.06.142 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Beckmen KB, Keogh MJ, Burek-Huntington KA, Ylitalo GM, Fadely BS, & Pitcher KW (2016). Organochlorine contaminant concentrations in multiple tissues of free-ranging Steller sea lions (Eumetopias jubatus) in Alaska. Science of the Total Environment, 542, 441–452. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.10.119 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Beckmen KB, Ylitalo GM, Towell RG, Krahn MM, O’Hara TM, & Blake JE (1999). Factors affecting organochlorine contaminant concentrations in milk and blood of northern fur seal (Callorhinus ursinus) dams and pups from St. George Island, Alaska. Science of The Total Environment, 231(2–3), 183–200. 10.1016/S0048-9697(99)00094-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bennett KA, Robinson KJ, Armstrong HC, Moss SEW, Scholl G, Tranganida A, Eppe G, Thomé JP, Debier C, & Hall AJ (2021). Predicting consequences of POP-induced disruption of blubber glucose uptake, mass gain rate and thyroid hormone levels for weaning mass in grey seal pups. Environment International, 152. 10.1016/j.envint.2021.106506 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bernt KE, Hammill MO, Lebeuf M, & Kovacs KM (1999). Levels and patterns of PCBs and OC pesticides in harbour and grey seals from the St Lawrence Estuary, Canada. Science of The Total Environment, 243–244, 243–262. 10.1016/S0048-9697(99)00400-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Bjurlid F, Roos A, Ericson Jogsten I, & Hagberg J (2018). Temporal trends of PBDD/Fs, PCDD/Fs, PBDEs and PCBs in ringed seals from the Baltic Sea (Pusa hispida botnica) between 1974 and 2015. Science of the Total Environment, 616–617, 1374–1383. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.10.178 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Bogomolni A, Frasca S, Levin M, Matassa K, Nielsen O, Waring G, & De Guise S (2016). In Vitro Exposure of Harbor Seal Immune Cells to Aroclor 1260 Alters Phocine Distemper Virus Replication. Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 70(1), 121–132. 10.1007/s00244-015-0178-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Bossart GD (2011). Marine mammals as sentinel species for oceans and human health. Veterinary Pathology, 48(3), 676–690. 10.1177/0300985810388525 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Bowen WD, Ellis SL, Iverson SJ, & Boness DJ (2003). Maternal and newborn life-history traits during periods of contrasting population trends: Implications for explaining the decline of harbour seals (Phoca vitulina), on Sable Island. Journal of Zoology, 261(2), 155–163. 10.1017/S0952836903004047 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  13. Brown TM, Hammond SA, Behsaz B, Veldhoen N, Birol I, & Helbing CC (2017). De novo assembly of the ringed seal (Pusa hispida) blubber transcriptome: A tool that enables identification of molecular health indicators associated with PCB exposure. Aquatic Toxicology, 185, 48–57. 10.1016/j.aquatox.2017.02.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Brown TM, Ross PS, Reimer KJ, Veldhoen N, Dangerfield NJ, Fisk AT, & Helbing CC (2014). PCB related effects thresholds as derived through gene transcript profiles in locally contaminated ringed seals (Pusa hispida). Environmental Science and Technology, 48(21), 12952–12961. 10.1021/es5032294 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Buccitelli C, Selbach M, 2020. mRNAs, proteins and the emerging principles of gene expression control. Nat. Rev. Genet 21 (10), 630–644. 10.1038/s41576-020-0258-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Buckman AH, Veldhoen N, Ellis G, Ford JKB, Helbing CC, & Ross PS (2011). PCB-associated changes in mRNA expression in killer whales (Orcinus orca) from the NE pacific ocean. Environmental Science and Technology, 45(23), 10194–10202. 10.1021/es201541j [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Castelli MG, Rusten M, Goksøyr A, & Routti H (2014). MRNA expression of genes regulating lipid metabolism in ringed seals (Pusa hispida) from differently polluted areas. Aquatic Toxicology, 146, 239–246. 10.1016/j.aquatox.2013.11.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. de Swart RL, Harder TC, Ross PS, Vos HW, & Osterhaus AD (1995). Morbilliviruses and morbillivirus diseases of marine mammals. Infectious Agents and Disease, 4, 125–130. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. de Swart RL, Ross PS, Timmerman HH, Vos HW, Reijnders PJH, Vos JG, & Osterhaus ADME (1995). Impaired cellular immune response in harbour seals (Phoca vitulina) feeding on environmentally contaminated herring. Clin Exp Immunol, 101, 480–486. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. de Swart RL, Ross PS, Vedder LJ, Timmerman HH, Heisterkamp S, Van Loveren H, Vos JG, Reijnders PJH, & Osterhaus ADME (1994). Impairment of immune function in harbor seals (Phoca vitulina) feeding on fish from polluted waters. Ambio, 23(2), 155–159. [Google Scholar]
  21. Debier C, Pomeroy P, Dupont C, Joiris C, Comblin V, Le Boulengé E, Larondelle Y, & Thomé J (2003a). Dynamics of PCB transfer from mother to pup during lactation in UK grey seals Halichoerus grypus: differences in PCB profile between compartments of transfer and changes during the lactation period. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 247, 249–256. 10.3354/meps247249 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  22. Debier C, Pomeroy P, Dupont C, Joiris C, Comblin V, Le Boulengé E, Larondelle Y, & Thomé J (2003b). Quantitative dynamics of PCB transfer from mother to pup during lactation in UK grey seals Halichoerus grypus. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 247, 237–248. 10.3354/meps247237 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  23. den Heyer CE, Bowen WD, Dale J, Gosselin JF, Hammill MO, Johnston DW, Lang SLC, Murray KT, Stenson GB, & Wood SA (2021). Contrasting trends in gray seal (Halichoerus grypus) pup production throughout the increasing northwest Atlantic metapopulation. Marine Mammal Science, 37(2), 611–630. 10.1111/mms.12773 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  24. Desforges J-P, Hall A, McConnell B, Rosing-Asvid A, Barber JL, Brownlow A, De Guise S, Eulaers I, Jepson PD, Letcher RJ, Levin M, Ross PS, Samarra F, Víkingson G, Sonne C, & Dietz R (2018). Predicting global killer whale population collapse from PCB pollution. Science, 361(6409), 1373–1376. 10.1126/science.aat1953 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Desforges J-P, Levin M, Jasperse L, De Guise S, Eulaers I, Letcher RJ, Acquarone M, Nordøy E, Folkow LP, Hammer Jensen T, Grøndahl C, Bertelsen MF, St Leger J, Almunia J, Sonne C, & Dietz R (2017). Effects of Polar Bear and Killer Whale Derived Contaminant Cocktails on Marine Mammal Immunity. Environmental Science and Technology, 51(19), 11431–11439. 10.1021/acs.est.7b03532 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Desforges J-P, Sonne C, Levin M, Siebert U, De Guise S, & Dietz R (2016). Immunotoxic effects of environmental pollutants in marine mammals. In Environment International (Vol. 86, pp. 126–139). Elsevier Ltd. 10.1016/j.envint.2015.10.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Facciola N, Houde M, Muir DCG, Ferguson SH, & McKinney MA (2022). Feeding and contaminant patterns of sub-arctic and arctic ringed seals: Potential insight into climate change-contaminant interactions. Environmental Pollution, 313. 10.1016/j.envpol.2022.120108 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Faroon O, & Ruiz P (2016). Polychlorinated biphenyls: New evidence from the last decade. In Toxicology and Industrial Health (Vol. 32, Issue 11, pp. 1825–1847). SAGE Publications Ltd. 10.1177/0748233715587849 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Fereidouni S, Munoz O, Von Dobschuetz S, & De Nardi M (2014). Influenza virus infection of marine mammals. EcoHealth, 13(1), 161–170. 10.1007/s10393-014-0968-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Fossi MC, Urban J, Casini S, Maltese S, Spinsanti G, Panti C, Porcelloni S, Panigada S, Lauriano G, Niño-Torres C, Rojas-Bracho L, Jimenez B, Muñoz-Arnanz J, & Marsili L (2010). A multi-trial diagnostic tool in fin whale (Balaenoptera physalus) skin biopsies of the Pelagos Sanctuary (Mediterranean Sea) and the Gulf of California (Mexico). Marine Environmental Research, 69. 10.1016/j.marenvres.2009.10.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Geraci JR, St Aubin DJ, Barker IK, Webster RG, Hinshaw VS, Bean WJ, Ruhnke HL, Prescott JH, Early G, Baker AS, Madoff S, & Schooley RT (1982). Mass Mortality of Harbor Seals: Pneumonia Associated with Influenza A Virus. Science, 215(4536), 1129–1131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Grimm FA, Hu D, Kania-Korwel I, Lehmler HJ, Ludewig G, Hornbuckle KC, Duffel MW, Bergman Å, & Robertson LW (2015). Metabolism and metabolites of polychlorinated biphenyls. Critical Reviews in Toxicology, 45(3), 245–272. 10.3109/10408444.2014.999365 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Gulland FMD, & Hall AJ (2007). Is marine mammal health deteriorating? Trends in the global reporting of marine mammal disease. EcoHealth, 4(2), 135–150. 10.1007/s10393-007-0097-1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  34. Hall AJ (1998). Blood Chemistry and Hematology of Gray Seal (Halichoerus grypus) Pups from Birth to Postweaning. Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine, 29(4), 401–407. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Hall A, Pomeroy P, Greeqb N, Jonesb K, & Harwood J (1997). Infection, Haematology and Biochemistry in Grey Seal Pups Exposed to Chlorinated Biphenyls. Marine Environmental Research, 43(2), 81–98. [Google Scholar]
  36. Hammond JA, Hall AJ, & Dyrynda EA (2005). Comparison of polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) induced effects on innate immune functions in harbour and grey seals. Aquatic Toxicology, 74(2), 126–138. 10.1016/j.aquatox.2005.05.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Hansen CM, Hueffer K, Gulland F, Wells RS, Balmer BC, Margaret Castellini J, & O’Hara T (2014). Use of cellulose filter paper to quantify whole-blood mercury in two marine mammals: Validation study. Journal of Wildlife Diseases, 50(2), 271–278. 10.7589/2013-08-214 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Hayes SA, Josephson E, Maze-Foley K, Rosel PE, & Mccordic J (2024). U.S. Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico Marine Mammal Stock Assessments 2023. [Google Scholar]
  39. Hobbs KE, Lebeuf M, & Hammill, M. O (2002). PCBs and OCPs in male harbour, grey, harp and hooded seals from the Estuary and Gulf of St Lawrence, Canada. Science of The Total Environment, 296(1–3), 1–18. 10.1016/S0048-9697(01)01074-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Jobst KJ, Arora A, Pollitt KG, & Sled JG (2020). Dried blood spots for the identification of bioaccumulating organic compounds: Current challenges and future perspectives. Current Opinion in Environmental Science and Health, 15, 66–73. 10.1016/j.coesh.2020.07.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Kassambara A (2023). rstatix: Pipe-friendly framework for basic statistical tests (0.7.2). https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=rstatix. [Google Scholar]
  42. Khairy M, Brault E, Dickhut R, Harding KC, Harkonen T, Karlsson O, Lehnert K, Teilmann J, & Lohmann R (2021). Bioaccumulation of PCBs, OCPs and PBDEs in Marine Mammals From West Antarctica. Frontiers in Marine Science, 8. 10.3389/fmars.2021.768715 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  43. Kim EY, Iwata H, Suda T, Tanabe S, Amano M, Miyazaki N, Petrov EA, 2005. Aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) and AHR nuclear translocator (ARNT) expression in Baikal seal (Pusa sibirica) and association with 2,3,7,8-TCDD toxic equivalents and CYP1 expression levels. Compar. Bioche. Physicol. - C Toxicol. Pharmac 141 (3), 281–291. 10.1016/j.cca.2005.07.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Koistinen J, Stenmanb O, Haahti’ H, Suonper$ M, & Paasivirta J (1997). Polychlorinated diphenyl ethers, dibenzo-p-dioxins, dibenzofurans and biphenyls in seals and sediment from the Gulf of Finland. Chemosphere, 35(6), 1249–1269. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Lee MV, Topper SE, Hubler SL, Hose J, Wenger CD, Coon JJ, Gasch AP, 2011. A dynamic model of proteome changes reveals new roles for transcript alteration in yeast. Molecul. Sys. Biol 7. 10.1038/msb.2011.48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Lehner AF, Rumbeiha W, Shlosberg A, Stuart K, Johnson M, Domenech R, & Langner H (2013). Diagnostic analysis of veterinary dried blood spots for toxic heavy metals exposure. Journal of Analytical Toxicology, 37(7), 406–422. 10.1093/jat/bkt048 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Levin M, De Guise S, & Ross PS (2005). Association between lymphocyte proliferation and polychlorinated biphenyls in free-ranging harbor seal (Phoca vitulina) pups from British Columbia, Canada. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24(5), 1247–1252. 10.1897/04-206R.1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Levin M, Gebhard E, Jasperse L, Desforges J-P, Dietz R, Sonne C, Eulaers I, Covaci A, Bossi R, & De Guise S (2016). Immunomodulatory effects of exposure to polychlorinated biphenyls and perfluoroalkyl acids in East Greenland ringed seals (Pusa hispida). Environmental Research, 151, 244–250. 10.1016/j.envres.2016.07.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Levin M, Morsey B, & De Guise S (2007). Modulation of the respiratory burst by organochlorine mixtures in marine mammals, humans, and mice. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health - Part A: Current Issues, 70(1), 73–83. 10.1080/15287390600754979 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Levin M, Romano T, Matassa K, & De Guise S (2014). Validation of a commercial canine assay kit to measure pinniped cytokines. Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology, 160(1–2), 90–96. 10.1016/j.vetimm.2014.04.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Li X, Shen X, Jiang W, Xi Y, Li S, 2024. Comprehensive review of emerging contaminants: Detection technologies, environmental impact, and management strategies. In: Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 278. Academic Press. 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2024.116420. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Mancia A, Ryan JC, Van Dolah FM, Kucklick JR, Rowles TK, Wells RS, Rosel PE, Hohn AA, & Schwacke LH (2014). Machine learning approaches to investigate the impact of PCBs on the transcriptome of the common bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus). Marine Environmental Research, 100, 57–67. 10.1016/j.marenvres.2014.03.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. McCarthy DJ, Smyth GK, 2009. Testing significance relative to a fold-change threshold is a TREAT. Bioinformatics 25 (6), 765–771. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. McCosker CM, Levin M, Puryear WB, Runstadler JA, Murray KT, & Cammen KM (2025). Gray Seal (Halichoerus grypus) Pups Fail to Mount an Inflammatory Cytokine Response to Influenza A Virus. 10.7589/JWD-D-24-00166 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. McCosker CM, Unal E, Gigliotti A, Puryear WB, Runstadler JA, Murray KT, King BL, Cammen KM (2025). Molecular mechanisms underlying response to influenza in grey seals (Halichoerus grypus), a potential wild reservoir. Molecular Ecology. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. McHuron EA, Castellini JM, Rios CA, Berner J, Gulland FMD, Greig DJ, & O’hara TM (2019). Hair, whole blood, and blood-soaked cellulose paper-based risk assessment of mercury concentrations in stranded California pinnipeds. Journal of Wildlife Diseases, 55(4), 823–833. 10.7589/2018-11-276 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Megson D, Brown T, Jones GR, Robson M, Johnson GW, Tiktak GP, Sandau CD, & Reiner EJ (2022). Polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) concentrations and profiles in marine mammals from the North Atlantic Ocean. Chemosphere, 288. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.132639 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Mi H, Muruganujan A, Huang X, Ebert D, Mills C, Guo X, & Thomas PD (2019). Protocol Update for large-scale genome and gene function analysis with the PANTHER classification system (v.14.0). Nature Protocols, 14(3), 703–721. 10.1038/s41596-019-0128-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Mos L, Morsey B, Jeffries SJ, Yunker MB, Raverty S, de Guise S, Ross PS, 2006. Chemical and biological pollution contribute to the immunological profiles of free-ranging harbor seals. Envi. Toxico. Chem 25 (12), 3110–3117. 10.1897/06-027R.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Mos L, Tabuchi M, Dangerfield N, Jeffries SJ, Koop BF, & Ross PS (2007). Contaminant-associated disruption of vitamin A and its receptor (retinoic acid receptor α) in free-ranging harbour seals (Phoca vitulina). Aquatic Toxicology, 81(3), 319–328. 10.1016/j.aquatox.2006.12.017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Neale JCC, Kenny TP, Tjeerdema RS, & Gershwin ME (2005). PAH- and PCB-induced alterations of protein tyrosine kinase and cytokine gene transcription in harbor seal (Phoca vitulina) PBMC. Clinical and Developmental Immunology, 12(2), 91–97. 10.1080/17402520500116624 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Noël M, Dangerfield N, Jeffries S, Lambourn D, Lance M, Helbing C, Lebeuf M, & Ross PS (2017). Polychlorinated Biphenyl-Related Alterations of the Expression of Essential Genes in Harbour Seals (Phoca vitulina) from Coastal Sites in Canada and the United States. Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 73(2), 310–321. 10.1007/s00244-016-0362-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Noël M, Loseto LL, Helbing CC, Veldhoen N, Dangerfield NJ, & Ross PS (2014). PCBs are associated with altered gene transcript profiles in arctic beluga whales (Delphinapterus leucas). Environmental Science and Technology, 48(5), 2942–2951. 10.1021/es403217r [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Noren SR, Boness DJ, Iverson SJ, McMillan J, & Bowen WD (2008). Body condition at weaning affects the duration of the postweaning fast in gray seal pups (Halichoerus grypus). Physiological and Biochemical Zoology, 81(3), 269–277. 10.1086/528777 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Nyman M, Bergknut M, Fant ML, Raunio H, Jestoi M, Bengs C, Murk A, Koistinen J, Bäckman C, Pelkonen O, Tysklind M, Hirvi T, & Helle E (2003). Contaminant exposure and effects in Baltic ringed and grey seals as assessed by biomarkers. Marine Environmental Research, 55(1), 73–99. 10.1016/S0141-1136(02)00218-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Nyman M, Koistinen J, Fant ML, Vartiainen T, & Helle E (2002). Current levels of DDT, PCB and trace elements in the Baltic ringed seals (Phoca hispida baltica) and grey seals (Halichoerus grypus). Environmental Pollution, 119(3), 399–412. 10.1016/S0269-7491(01)00339-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Oksanen J, Simpson G, Blanchet F, Kindt R, Legendre P, Minchin P, O’Hara R, Solymos P, Stevens M, Szoecs E, Wagner H, Barbour M, Bedward M, Bolker B, Borcard D, Carvalho G, Chirico M, DeCaceres M, Durand S, … Weedon J (2024). vegan: Community Ecology Package (R package version 2.6.8). [Google Scholar]
  68. O’Shea TJ, & Tanabe S (2003). Persistent ocean contaminants and marine mammals: A retrospective overview. In Vos JG, Bossart GD, Fournier M, & O’Shea TJ (Eds.), Toxicology of Marine Mammals (pp. 99–134). CRC Press. [Google Scholar]
  69. Peterson SH, Hassrick JL, Lafontaine A, Thomé JP, Crocker DE, Debier C, & Costa DP (2014). Effects of age, adipose percent, and reproduction on PCB concentrations and profiles in an extreme fasting north pacific marine mammal. PLoS ONE, 9(4). 10.1371/journal.pone.0096191 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Protection of the Environment, Title 40, C.F.R. Part 136: Guidelines for establishing test procedures for the analysis of pollutants. https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-40/chapter-I/subchapter-D/part-136
  71. Provatas AA, King CA, Kolakowski SL, Stuart JD, & Perkins CR (2017). Quantification of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Avian Dried Blood Spots by Ultra-performance Liquid Chromatography with Simple Liquid Extraction and Phospholipid Solid-phase Extraction Preparation. Analytical Letters, 50(16), 2649–2660. 10.1080/00032719.2017.1302461 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  72. Provatas AA, Kolakowski SL, Sternberg FH, Stuart JD, & Perkins CR (2019). Analysis of Dried Blood Spots for Polychlorinated Biphenyls and Organochlorine Pesticides by Gas Chromatography Coupled with Tandem Mass Spectrometry. Analytical Letters, 52(9), 1379–1395. 10.1080/00032719.2018.1541994 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  73. Puryear WB, Keogh M, Hill N, Moxley J, Josephson E, Davis KR, Bandoro C, Lidgard D, Bogomolni A, Levin M, Lang S, Hammill M, Bowen D, Johnston DW, Romano T, Waring G, & Runstadler J (2016). Prevalence of influenza A virus in live-captured North Atlantic gray seals: A possible wild reservoir. Emerging Microbes and Infections, 5(8). 10.1038/emi.2016.77 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Puryear WB, Sawatzki K, Hill N, Foss A, Stone JJ, Doughty L, Walk D, Gilbert K, Murray M, Cox E, Patel P, Mertz Z, Ellis S, Taylor J, Fauquier D, Smith A, DiGiovanni RA, van de Guchte A, Gonzalez-Reiche AS, … Runstadler J (2023). Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza A(H5N1) Virus Outbreak in New England Seals, United States. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 29(4), 786–791. 10.3201/eid2904.221538 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. R Core Team. (2024). R: A language and environmental for statistical computing. (4.4.2). R Foundation for Statistical Computing. [Google Scholar]
  76. Reddy ML, Dierauf LA, & Gulland FMD (2001). Marine Mammals as Sentinels of Ocean Health. In Dierauf LA & Gulland FMD (Eds.), CRC Handbook of Marine Mammal Medicine (2nd ed.). CRC Press. [Google Scholar]
  77. Rezwani M, Pourfathollah AA, & Noorbakhsh F (2022). rbioapi: User-friendly R interface to biologic web services’ API. Bioinformatics, 38(10), 2952–2953. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btac172 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Rigét F, Vorkamp K, Eulaers I, & Dietz R (2020). Influence of climate and biological variables on temporal trends of persistent organic pollutants in Arctic char and ringed seals from Greenland. Environmental Science: Processes and Impacts, 22(4), 993–1005. 10.1039/c9em00561g [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Rivas HG, Schmaling SK, & Gaglia MM (2016). Shutoff of host gene expression in influenza A virus and herpesviruses: Similar mechanisms and common themes. Viruses, 8(4). 10.3390/v8040102 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Robinson KJ, Hall AJ, Scholl G, Debier C, Thomé JP, Eppe G, Adam C, & Bennett KA (2019). Investigating decadal changes in persistent organic pollutants in Scottish grey seal pups. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 29(S1), 86–100. 10.1002/aqc.3137 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  81. Robinson MD, McCarthy DJ, & Smyth GK (2009). edgeR: A Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics, 26(1), 139–140. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp616 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Rohart F, Gautier B, Singh A, & Lê Cao KA (2017). mixOmics: An R package for ‘omics feature selection and multiple data integration. PLoS Computational Biology, 13(11). 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005752 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Ross PS (2002). The role of immunotoxic environmental contaminants in facilitating the emergence of infectious diseases in marine mammals. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment, 8(2), 277–292. 10.1080/20028091056917 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  84. Ross PS, De Swart R, Addison’ R, Loverend H. Van, Vosd J, & Osterhausasb A (1996). Contaminant-induced immunotoxicity in harbour seals: wildlife at risk? Toxicology, 112(1), 6807. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Routti H, Arukwe A, Jenssen BM, Letcher RJ, Nyman M, Bäckman C, & Gabrielsen GW (2010). Comparative endocrine disruptive effects of contaminants in ringed seals (Phoca hispida) from Svalbard and the Baltic Sea. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology - C Toxicology and Pharmacology, 152(3), 306–312. 10.1016/j.cbpc.2010.05.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Routti H, Lille-Langoy R, Berg MK, Fink T, Harju M, Kristiansen K, Rostkowski P, Rusten M, Sylte I, Øygarden L, & Goksoyr A (2016). Environmental Chemicals Modulate Polar Bear (Ursus maritimus) Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor Gamma (PPARG) and Adipogenesis in Vitro. Environmental Science and Technology, 50(19), 10708–10720. 10.1021/acs.est.6b03020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Ruiz-Perez D, Guan H, Madhivanan P, Mathee K, & Narasimhan G (2020). So you think you can PLS-DA? BMC Bioinformatics, 21. 10.1186/s12859-019-3310-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Runstadler JA, & Puryear W (2020). A Brief Introduction to Influenza A Virus in Marine Mammals (Spackman E, Ed.; 3rd Ed., pp. 429–450). Humana Press. 10.1007/978-1-0716-0346-8_33 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Schmidt B, Sonne C, Nachtsheim D, Wohlsein P, Persson S, Dietz R, & Siebert U (2020). Liver histopathology of Baltic grey seals (Halichoerus grypus) over three decades. Environment International, 145. 10.1016/j.envint.2020.106110 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Schwacke LH, Zolman ES, Balmer BC, de Guise S, Clay George R, Hoguet J, Hohn AA, Kucklick JR, Lamb S, Levin M, Litz JA, Mcfee WE, Place NJ, Townsend FI, Wells RS, & Rowles TK (2011). Anaemia, hypothyroidism and immune suppression associated with polychlorinated biphenyl exposure in bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus). Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 279(1726), 48–57. 10.1098/rspb.2011.0665 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Shaw SD, Brenner D, Bourakovsky A, Mahaffey CA, & Perkins CR (2005). Polychlorinated biphenyls and chlorinated pesticides in harbor seals (Phoca vitulina concolor) from the northwestern Atlantic coast. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 50(10), 1069–1084. 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2005.04.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Shlosberg A, Rumbeiha WK, Lublin A, & Kannan K (2011). A database of avian blood spot examinations for exposure of wild birds to environmental toxicants: The DABSE biomonitoring project. Journal of Environmental Monitoring, 13(6), 1547–1558. 10.1039/c0em00754d [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Sládková T, & Kostolanský F (2006). The role of cytokines in the immune response to Influenza A virus infection. Acta Virologica, 50, 151–162. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/6666557 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Sonne C, Siebert U, Gonnsen K, Desforges J-P, Eulaers I, Persson S, Roos A, Bäcklin BM, Kauhala K, Tange Olsen M, Harding KC, Treu G, Galatius A, Andersen-Ranberg E, Gross S, Lakemeyer J, Lehnert K, Lam SS, Peng W, & Dietz R (2020). Health effects from contaminant exposure in Baltic Sea birds and marine mammals: A review. Environment International, 139. 10.1016/j.envint.2020.105725 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. Sørensen TA (1948). A method of establishing groups of equal amplitude in plant sociology based on similarity of species content, and its application to analyses of the vegetation on Danish commons. Kongelige Danske Videnskabernes Selskabs Biologiske Skrifter, 5, 1–34. [Google Scholar]
  96. Sørmo EG, Larsen HJS, Johansen GM, Skaare JU, & Jenssen BM (2009). Immunotoxicity of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB) in free-ranging gray seal pups with special emphasis on dioxin-like congeners. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health - Part A: Current Issues, 72(3–4), 266–276. 10.1080/15287390802539251 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. Soulen BK, Divine LM, Venables BJ, & Roberts AP (2022). Persistent organic pollutant exposure and associations with gene expression in northern fur seals (Callorhinus ursinus) from St. Paul Island, Alaska. Marine Environmental Research, 182. 10.1016/j.marenvres.2022.105789 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. Spackman E, Senne DA, Myers TJ, Bulaga LL, Garber LP, Perdue ML, Lohman K, Daum LT, & Suarez DL (2002). Development of a real-time reverse transcriptase PCR assay for type A influenza virus and the avian H5 and H7 hemagglutinin subtypes. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 40(9), 3256–3260. 10.1128/JCM.40.9.3256-3260.2002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  99. Troisi GM, Barton SJ, Liori O, & Nyman M (2020). Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) and Sex Hormone Concentrations in Ringed and Grey Seals: A Possible Link to Endocrine Disruption? Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 78(4), 513–524. 10.1007/s00244-020-00716-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  100. Vanden Berghe M, Mat A, Arriola A, Polain S, Stekke V, Thomé JP, Gaspart F, Pomeroy P, Larondelle Y, & Debier C (2010). Relationships between vitamin A and PCBs in grey seal mothers and pups during lactation. Environmental Pollution, 158(5), 1570–1575. 10.1016/j.envpol.2009.12.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  101. Vanden Berghe M, Weijs L, Habran S, Das K, Bugli C, Rees JF, Pomeroy P, Covaci A, & Debier C (2012). Selective transfer of persistent organic pollutants and their metabolites in grey seals during lactation. Environment International, 46, 6–15. 10.1016/j.envint.2012.04.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  102. Villanger GD, Gabrielsen KM, Kovacs KM, Lydersen C, Lie E, Karimi M, Sørmo EG, & Jenssen BM (2013). Effects of complex organohalogen contaminant mixtures on thyroid homeostasis in hooded seal (Cystophora cristata) mother-pup pairs. Chemosphere, 92(7), 828–842. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.04.036 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  103. Wang J, Liao Y, Jaehnig E, Shi Z, & Sheng Q (2020). WebGestaltR: Gene Set Analysis Toolkit WebGestaltR (R package version 0.4.4). [Google Scholar]
  104. Wolkers H, Lydersen C, & Kovacs KM (2004). Accumulation and lactational transfer of PCBs and pesticides in harbor seals (Phoca vitulina) from Svalbard, Norway. Science of the Total Environment, 319(1–3), 137–146. 10.1016/S0048-9697(03)00449-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  105. Wood SA, Frasier TR, McLeod BA, Gilbert JR, White BN, Bowen WD, Hammill MO, Waring GT, & Brault S (2011). The genetics of recolonization: an analysis of the stock structure of grey seals (Halichoerus grypus) in the northwest Atlantic. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 89(6), 490–497. 10.1139/z11-012 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  106. Xiao Y, Hsiao TH, Suresh U, Chen HIH, Wu X, Wolf SE, Chen Y, 2014. A novel significance score for gene selection and ranking. Bioinformatics 30 (6), 801–807. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr671. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

1

Data Availability Statement

Data and code will be made available at https://github.com/christinamccosker/hg-pcb and https://christinamccosker.github.io/hg-pcb/.

RESOURCES