Abstract
Background
Peripheral consequences following traumatic brain injury (TBI) are characterized by both systemic inflammatory responses and autonomic dysregulation. One of the main immune regulatory organs, the spleen, shows high interaction with the brain which is controlled by both circulating mediators as well as autonomic fibers targeting splenic immune cells. The brain-spleen axis does not function as a one-way street, it also shows reciprocal effects where the spleen affects neuroinflammatory and cognitive functions post injury. To date, systemic and splenic inflammatory responses are measured by cells or mediators located in circulation. Nevertheless, most of the signaling and inflammation post injury takes place in the organs.
Methods
We set out to investigate the early (3 h) signaling landscape in the spleen following a moderate severity closed head injury model to wild-type animals aged p60-90. Using phospho-proteomic signaling approaches, immunofluorescence stainings, Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA), super-resolution microscopy and single mRNA in situ hybridization we investigated novel molecular and cellular players in the spleen involved in immune modulation after a head injury.
Results
Based on the signaling signature, we found a rapid influx of basophil granulocytes towards the spleen, via a recruitment mechanism that includes CXCL1 expressed by B-cells and dendritic cells (DCs). The basophils in turn seem to activate B cells and dendritic cells via the IL-13/IL-13Ra1 signaling pathway and enhance protein translation through the long non-coding RNA NORAD. The early recruitment of basophils and subsequent activation of B cells and DCs, is short lived and sets at 3dpi. Interestingly, the rapid recruitment of basophils is inhibited by ethanol intoxication in TBI, with a subsequent prevention of IL-13Ra phosphorylation and NORAD increase in B-cells and DCs.
Conclusion
Basophils recruitment to the spleen may serve as an early mediator of systemic inflammatory responses to TBI with potential implications for research on biomarkers and therapeutic targets.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12974-025-03621-1.
Keywords: Basophil, B-cell, Dendritic cell, Spleen, Traumatic brain injury, IL-13
Introduction
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) has reported peripheral disturbances, characterised by both a systemic inflammatory response as well as an autonomic dysregulation in many distal organs [1, 2]. TBI is associated with large scale immune modulatory effects showing both an increased systemic inflammation, by release of inflammatory cytokines and mediators [3–5], as well as suppression of immune responses, with a reduction in circulating immune cells, like lymphocytes and natural killer cells [6–9]. Interestingly, the TBI induced systemic inflammatory responses have been reported to last up to 60 days post injury [10], suggesting not only acute, but also long-term systemic inflammatory consequences. Therefore, the general systemic inflammatory response post TBI is highly relevant, since it may contribute to an enhanced vulnerability towards infections post injury.
One of the main immune regulatory organs, the spleen, is involved in primary innate immune responses such as antigen presentation followed by secondary adaptive immune response including the activation of lymphocytes and production of antibodies, as well as filtering of red blood cells [11]. Neurological conditions have been shown to modulate splenic immune functions, through a pathway known as the “brain-spleen axis” [12–14]. This interaction is modulated by both circulating mediators [15], as well as autonomic fibres targeting splenic immune cells [16, 17]. In fact, stimulation of sympathetic and parasympathetic nerve fibers have been reported to inhibit inflammatory mediators, such as IL-6, IFN-y and TNF-a [18, 19]. Interestingly, TBI has been associated with a reduction of adrenergic receptors in dendritic cells, which is associated with their increased maturation and TNF-a response [20]. Nevertheless, the brain-spleen axis upon TBI does not function as a one-way street; rather, it exhibits reciprocal effects as evidenced by alterations in the cognitive and neuroinflammatory responses following splenectomy post injury [21, 22].
To date, most reports on the systemic, and in particular splenic, immune function upon injury have focused primarily on cellular effects and cytokines located in the systemic circulation, with less focus on in depth splenic molecular and cellular mechanisms. However, pharmacological interventions for systemic immune disturbances are largely targeting either molecular signaling pathways or specific cells within the inflamed tissue [23]. Together with the fact that immune responses occur within tissues rather than in the blood, we aimed at disentangling the early signaling responses in the spleen upon TBI.
In the present study we employed a phospho-proteomic signaling approach to identify a novel immunomodulatory mechanism in the acute phase upon TBI, involving the fast recruitment of basophils towards the spleen. Investigation of these basophils revealed a basophil to B-cell and Dendritic cell interaction, via IL-13 signaling. Followed by an enhanced protein translation, through a lncRNA NORAD fashion, in B-cells and DCs.
Material and Methods
Tissue isolation
Three hours or three days post TBI, mice were sacrificed by cervical dislocation, followed by organ and blood harvesting for further processing. The spleen was dissected and snap frozen on dry ice. Tissue was either used for protein isolation for western blot or protein arrays, RNA isolation for RT-qPCR or tissue sectioning for immunofluorescence staining or RNAscope in situ hybridisation. Spleen samples from MCPT8-cre mice were extracted and incubated in 4% PFA for 2 h followed by cryoprotection in 30% sucrose and embedding in OCT. Brain tissue from IL-13−/− mice were obtained by perfusion of the mouse. Briefly, mice were euthanized with a lethal dose of ketamine (100 mg/kg) and xylazine (16 mg/kg) in PBS, followed by transcardial perfusion with 4% PFA in PBS. The brains were dissected, post-fixed in 4% PFA overnight, washed, and cryoprotected in 30% sucrose for 2 days before being embedded in OCT (Tissue-Tek). Blood samples were collected in EDTA tubes and centrifuged at 5000 g, 4 °C, for 5 min, plasma was collected and frozen at −80 °C for further use.
Protein isolation and determination
Proteins were isolated from the spleen by adding RIPA buffer (150 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris pH 7.6, 0.1% SDS, 1% Triton X-100, 1 mM EDTA), in a volume 4x the weight of the spleen (weight: volume), protease and phosphatase inhibitors (Roche tablets) were added in excess, followed by homogenization of the tissue using a tissue grinder. The homogenate was sonicated for 2 × 2 s at 65%, followed by incubation at 4 °C for 30 min. The homogenate was centrifuged for 20 min at 10.000 g, the supernatant was moved to another tube and the pellet was discarded. The protein concentration was determined using the BCA assay (Thermo Fischer) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, the homogenate was diluted 20x in RIPA buffer and added to the wells together with the standard in duplicate, 200ul of working reagent (50:1, reagent A: B) was added to each well and incubated at 37 °C for 30 min. The absorbance was measured at 562 nm with a plate reader. Sample concentration was determined by calculation from the standard curve.
SDS-page and western blot
50 µg of protein with 1x loading buffer and 5% beta-mercaptoethanol was heated to 95 °C for 5 min, after which it was loaded and run on 8–12% SDS-PAGE gel at 100 V until separation of the proteins (1–2 h approx.). Then proteins were transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane at 100 V for 1.5–2.5 h, followed by blocking (5% BSA, 1% TBS-T) for 1 h at RT while shaking. Membranes were incubated with primary antibodies (supplementary Table 1), diluted in blocking buffer, at 4 °C overnight while shaking. The membranes were washed with TBS-T 3 × 10 min at RT while shaking, followed by incubation of the HRP secondary antibodies, diluted in blocking buffer, for 1 h at RT on the shaker. A last wash was performed with TBS-T 3 × 10 min at RT while shaking, followed by detection by adding enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) on the membrane and imaging using a Las4000 ImageQuant (GE healthcare). Analysis was performed with ImageJ, measuring the mean gray value of each band and normalised to the loading control.
Antibody array assay
AKT signaling antibody array kit was performed according to manufacturer’s instructions (Pathscan AKT signaling antibody array kit; CST). Briefly, slides were blocked by adding 75 µl of blocking buffer to each well for 15 min at RT, followed by 100 µl, 1 mg/ml lysate incubation at 4 °C overnight while shaking. Slides were washed 4 × 5 min using washing buffer, followed by an incubation of 150 µl detection antibody cocktail to each well for 1 h at RT while shaking. Slides were washed 4 × 5 min with washing buffer, followed by an incubation with Cy5-streptavidin (Thermo Fischer; 1:1000) for 20 min at RT, protected from light. Slides were washed a final time 4 × 5 min with washing buffer and air dried. The slides were scanned using a GenePix 4000B array scanner (Molecular Devices, LLC). Spotting of the arrays was performed semi-automatically with manual correction of each spot, followed by extraction of the data using the GenePix pro 6.1 software.
Cytokine and vascular factors (angiogenesis) antibody array kits were performed according to manufacturer’s instructions (Proteome Profiler Mouse XL Cytokine Array and Proteome Profiler Mouse Angiogenesis Array Kit; R&D systems). Briefly, membranes were blocked for 1 h at RT in buffer 6 while shaking, followed by an overnight incubation at 4 °C of 200ug proteins (diluted in buffer 4 to a total volume of 1.5 ml). Membranes were washed 3 × 10 min in 1x wash buffer at RT while shaking, followed by an incubation of detection antibody (diluted in buffer 4 to a total volume of 1.5 ml) at RT for 1 h while shaking. The membranes were washed 3 × 10 min in 1x wash buffer at RT while shaking, followed by incubation of streptavidin-HRP for 30 min at RT while shaking. The membranes were washed a final time 3 × 10 min in 1x wash buffer at RT while shaking, followed by incubation of chemi reagent mixture for 1 min. Detection was performed using a chemidoc system (BioRad). Analysis was performed with ImageJ, measuring the mean gray value of each spot, background subtracted and normalised to the positive control.
Phospho-explorer antibody array was performed according to manufacturer’s instructions (Phospho Explorer Antibody Array; Fullmoon bio). Briefly, 100ug of Protein samples, diluted with labeling buffer to a total volume of 75ul, were biotinylated by adding 3ul of a biotin/DMF solution and incubated for 2 h at RT, with vortexing every 10 min. Biotinylation was stopped by adding 35ul of stopping reagent and incubated for 30 min at RT, with vortexing every 10 min. Glass arrays were taken from 4 °C, left in the package, and allowed to warm up to RT for 1 h. The arrays were removed from the package and left at RT for another 30 min. The arrays were blocked for 45 min at RT on the shaker at 55 rpm. After blocking, the arrays were washed with Milli-Q grade water ten times. The biotinylated sample was combined with 6 ml Coupling Solution. The arrays were incubated with protein coupling mix on the orbital shaker rotating at 35 rpm for 2 h at RT. After coupling, the arrays were washed with 1x Washing Solution on the shaker rotating at 55 rpm for 3 × 10 min. The arrays were extensively rinsed with Milli-Q water as before. The arrays were submerged in the Detection Buffer with 0.5 mg/ml Cy5-streptavidin on the shaker rotating at 35 rpm for 20 min at RT in the dark. The arrays were washed by Washing Solution and rinsed with Milli-Q water as before. After drying with compressed nitrogen, the slides were scanned using a GenePix 4000B array scanner (Molecular Devices, LLC). Spotting of the arrays was performed semi-automatically with manual correction of each spot, followed by extraction of the data using the GenePix pro 6.1 software.
ELISA assay
The ELISA assays for CXCL1, CXCL13, CCL6 and IL-5 on spleen and plasma were performed according to manufacturer’s instructions (mouse DuoSet ELISA; R&D systems). Briefly, the plate was incubated overnight at RT with 100 µl of capture antibody solution, followed by 3 x washing step with wash buffer. The plate was blocked for 1 h at RT with 300 µl of reagent diluent, followed by 3 x washing step with wash buffer. 100 µl of standards and samples were added in various dilutions in reagent diluent (standards undiluted; CCL6: spleen 1:100, plasma 1:2; CXCL1 spleen 1:20, plasma 1:2; CXCL13 spleen 1:100, plasma undiluted; IL-5: spleen 1:25, plasma undiluted) and incubated for 2 h at RT, followed by 3 x washing step with wash buffer. 100 µl of detection antibody was added and incubated for 2 h at RT, followed by 3 x washing step with wash buffer. 100 µl of streptavidin-HRP was added and incubated for 20 min at RT, followed by 3 x washing step with wash buffer. 100 µl of substrate solution was added and incubated for 20 min at RT (covered from light), followed by 50 µl of stop solution to each well. The optical density was determined using a microplate reader at 450 nm (with a wavelength correction at 540 nm). Data was extracted and concentrations were calculated against a 4-PL curve (4-parameter logistics curve), followed by corrections of dilutions.
RNA isolation and quantitative RT-PCR
RNA was isolated from the spleen using QIAzol (Qiagen, Germany) by disrupting and homogenizing the tissue in 1 ml QIAzol, 250 µl of chloroform was added and vortexed for 15 s. The samples were placed at RT for 10 min and centrifuged for 10 min 12,000×g at 4 °C to achieve phase separation. The top layer (containing RNA) was moved to another tube and precipitated with a similar amount of isopropanol. The samples were placed at RT for 10 min and centrifuged for 10 min 12,000×g at 4 °C, with visible pellet formation. Isopropanol was discarded and 1 ml of 75% ethanol was added and mixed, to wash the pellet. The samples were centrifuged for 10 min 8,000×g at 4 °C, ethanol was discarded, and the samples were air dried. The RNA pellet was redissolved in 20 µl RNAse-free dH2O. RNA concentration was determined by NanoDrop. Reverse transcription was performed by adding 5 µl random hexamers (Biomers, Germany) to 1 µg RNA (total volume 40 µl diluted in dH2O) and incubated for 10 min at 70 °C. The samples were placed on ice and a master mix of 0.5 µl reverse transcriptase (Promega, Germany), 0.5 µl RNase Inhibitor (RiboLock, Thermo Scientific, Germany), 2 µl dNTPs (Genaxxon, Germany), and 12 µl reverse transcriptase buffer (Promega, Germany). The samples were incubated for 10 min at RT and placed in a water bath for 45 min at 42 °C. The samples were incubated for 3 min at 99 °C, placed on ice, and frozen until further use.
qPCR was performed on the Quantstudio 1 real-time PCR machine (Thermo fischer) with the Power SYBR-green PCR master mix (Applied biosystems). Two microliters of sample cDNA were used in a total volume of 10 µl (3 µl primer mix and 5 µl of Sybr-green) in a 96-well plate, all samples were duplicated, and the housekeeping gene Actin was used as a control. The Ct values obtained from the lightcycler were normalized according to the following equation: 2 − ΔΔCt to obtain the fold change.
Tissue sectioning and immunofluorescence staining
Frozen spleen tissue was embedded in OCT (Tissue-Tek, The Netherlands), 10 μm sections were cut using the cryostat and mounted on superfrost plus glass slides. The slides were stored for at least 24 h at − 80 °C and washed for 5 min in 1 × PBS, followed by a 15-min fixation step of the sections in 4% PFA at 4 °C. blocking of the sections was done in blocking buffer (3% BSA, 0.3% Triton X-100, PBS) for 2 h at RT. The primary antibodies (supplementary Table 1) were diluted in blocking buffer and incubated overnight at 4 °C, followed by 3 × 30 min washes in PBS at RT. The secondary antibodies were diluted in blocking buffer and incubated for 2 h at RT, followed by 3 × 30 min washes in PBS. The sections were mounted using Fluorogold prolong antifade mounting medium (Invitrogen, Germany). To test for unspecific antibody binding, the same immunostaining procedure but excluding the primary antibody was performed on spleen sections (Suppl. Figure 2 A-C).
Fig. 2.
TBI induces chemoattraction of basophils in splenic follicles. A, B Immunofluorescence staining of spleen sections with CD19 and MCPT8 show a significant increase in MCPT8+ cells (depicted by white dotted outline) in the germinal center (Sham vs TBI: 7±2.8% vs 11.6±2.8%; p = 0.0451; t = 2436) and marginal zone (Sham vs TBI:9.7±4.5% vs 16.9±3.8%; p = 0.0361; t = 2.8586) of splenic follicles. N = 4, scale bar overview: 100 µm; scale bar insert: 20 µm. C, D Immunofluorescent staining of spleen sections with CD19, pS6-RP and MCPT8 show a significant increase in pS6+/MCPT8+ cells (depicted by white dotted outline; sham vs TBI: 14.7±1.5% vs 19.7±2.0%; p = 0.002; t = 4.520) in splenic follicles. N = 5, scale bar overview: 50 µm; scale bar insert: 10 µm. Data is shown as mean±SD. *: p < 0.05,**: p <0.01.
To test for the specificity of the anti-IL13 antibody, brain tissue staining (IL-13 antibody validation) was performed on 40 μm pre-cut sections stored in cryoprotectant (50% PBS, 30% ethylene glycol, 20% glycerol). The sections were washed for 2 h in PBS, followed by blocking of the sections in blocking buffer for 2 h at RT. The primary antibodies were diluted in blocking buffer and incubated for 48 h at 4 °C, followed by 3 × 30 min washed in PBS at RT. The secondary antibodies were diluted in blocking buffer and incubated for 2 h at RT, followed by 3 × 30 min washed in PBS. The sections were placed on glass slides, dried and mounted using Fluorogold prolong antifade mounting medium.
Single mRNA in situ hybridisation
mRNA in situ hybridisation was performed according to manufacturer’s instructions (ACDBio, RNAscope, Newark, CA, USA fluorescence in-situ hybridization for fresh frozen tissue, all reagents and buffers were provided by ACDBio [32]. Briefly, frozen spleen tissue was embedded in OCT (Tissue-Tek, The Netherlands), 10 μm sections were cut using the cryostat and mounted on superfrost plus glass slides. The slides were stored for at least 24 h at −80 °C and washed for 5 min in 1 x PBS, followed by a 15 min fixation step in 4% PFA at 4 °C. The sections were dehydrated in a series of ascending ethanol concentrations (50% − 70% − 100%) for 5 min each, followed by a last time in 100% ethanol for 5 min. Sections were air dried and covered in 30% hydrogen peroxide for 10 min at RT, followed by 2x wash in PBS by moving the sections up and down 5x. Sections were covered in protease IV and incubated at 40 °C for 30 min, followed by 2 × 2 min washing in PBS. The probes (CXCL1, CXCR2 and NORAD) were added and incubated at 40 °C for 2 h, followed by 2 × 2 min washing in wash buffer. Then, amplification 1 was added to the sections and incubated at 40 °C for 30 min followed by 2 × 2 min washing step with wash buffer. Next, amplification 2 was added to the sections and incubated at 40 °C for 30 min followed by 2 × 2 min washing step with wash buffer. As a final amplification step, amplification 3 was added and incubated at 40 °C for 15 min, followed by 2 × 2 min washing step with wash buffer. HRP corresponding to the channel was added to the sections and incubated at 40 °C for 15 min, followed by 2 × 2 min washing step with wash buffer. The diluted fluorophore (1:1500 for CXCL1, 1:5000 for CXCR2 and 1:1000 for NORAD; in TSA buffer) was added to the sections and incubated at 40 °C for 30 min, followed by 2 × 2 min washing step with wash buffer. The remaining HRP was blocked by adding HRP-blocker to the sections and incubated at 40 °C for 15 min, followed by 2 × 2 min washing step with wash buffer. Sections were blocked using blocking buffer (3% BSA, 0.3% Triton X-100, PBS) at RT for 1 h, followed by primary antibody, diluted in blocking buffer, incubation at 40 °C overnight. The sections were washed 3 x with PBS-T (1% triton-x100) at RT for 20 min each, followed by secondary antibody incubation (diluted in blocking buffer) at RT for 2 h. The sections were washed 3 x with PBS-T at RT for 20 min each and mounted using Fluorogold prolong antifade mounting medium (Invitrogen, Germany).
Image acquisition
Confocal images were acquired with a laser-scanning confocal microscope (LSM Leica DMi8), with a 20x oil (NA 0.75) and 40x oil (NA 1.3) objective in a 1024 × 1024 pixel resolution and a 12-bit format. A z-stack of 7–8 optical sections spanning 14–16 μm (step size of 2 μm) and 1.5 optical zoom was made. A tilescan of 2 × 2 was made spanning the entire follicle (with 20x objective), or a part of the follicle (with the 40x objective). Imaging parameters were set to obtain signals from the stained antibody/probe while avoiding saturation. All fluorescent channels were acquired independently to avoid fluorescence cross-bleed. For each treatment, three spleen sections per animal were randomly selected and imaged.
Super-resolution STED imaging
Super-resolution STED imaging was performed on a Stedycon module (Abberior instruments, Germany) fixed to a Zeiss microscope fitted with a 100× (NA 1.4) oil objective. Images were acquired in both confocal and STED modes; imaging parameters were set to obtain signals from the staining while avoiding saturation. For the imaging, Abberior Star 580 and Abberior Star 635 dyes were used, with an excitation laser of 561 nm for the Star 580 and 640 nm for the Star 635 and a STED laser of 775 nm for both channels. The pixel size was set to 25 nm, with a pixel dwell time of 10 µs and line accumulation of 6 µs. 4 independent animals were used for each group, with 10–12 cells per animal per group. Spleen sections were stained with the two markers for STED analysis (IL-13 to IL-13Ra1 and beta-Actin to IL-13Ra1), together with the basophil marker MCPT8 and DAPI for architectural and cellular localization of the follicles. A positive basophil, based on MCPT8 positivity, was selected in the follicles, and a single optical section was acquired in correspondence with the optical plane.
Image analysis
Image analysis was performed using the ImageJ software. Images were background subtracted and smoothed. For the immunofluorescent staining, images were contrasted to assess positive and negative cells, positive cells were counted manually using the cell counter plugin and cells were depicted as either absolute number per area or as percentage of cell type. For the in-situ hybridisation, images were contrasted to assess positive and negative cells, cells positive for the mRNA marker and cellular marker were counted manually using the cell counter plugin and values were depicted as percentage of cell type. For the proximity analysis of pIL-13ra1 + close to IL-13 + cells, 4 fixed size circles (40, 60, 80 and 100 micron) were placed around the IL-13 + cell and the amount of pIL-13Ra1 + cells were manually counted in each circle using the cell counter plugin. For the proximity analysis of NORAD + cells close to MCPT8 + cells, a fixed size circle (40 micron) was placed around the MCPT8 + cell and the ratio of NORAD + and either CD19 + or CD11c + were manually counted using the cell counter plugin. For the Super-resolution STED images, 10–12 cells were imaged per animal in 4 separate animals per group (N). Deconvolution of all images was performed using the web based TRUESHARP image boosting tool from Abberior star [33], with following parameters; Number of iterations: 5, PSF size: 2, background size: 16 px, background weight: 1. For the IL-13/pIL-13ra1 analysis, an intensity plot was traced along an IL-13 cluster (in positive basophils) towards the pIL-13Ra1 cluster; the distance from IL-13 to pIL13-Ra1 was computed. For the Actin/pIL-13Ra1 analysis an intensity plot was traced over the actin of basophil towards the pIL-13ra1 positive cell, the distance from the actin to the pIL-13ra1 was computed. For the NORAD + colocalization with CD4 + T cells or CD19 + B cells, the area of both markers was assessed by thresholding both intensities and computing the percentage of colocalization for NORAD over the total positive area of either CD4 or CD19.
Antibody array analysis and bio-informatics
Antibody array analysis was performed using the R-studio version 4.3.1, using the limma package, utilizing linear models to model for experimental designs. Normalization within and between arrays was done using the cyclicloess method, to remove intensity-dependent biases between different samples and thereby making them more comparable. Then the arrays were corrected for any batch effects using the ComBat function, which estimates the mean and variance for each batch and adjusts the data accordingly. Then we proceeded towards differential expression, employing empirical Bayes methods that samples information across all proteins on the array, moderating the standard errors and improving the power to detect differential expression. The output was obtained using the topTable function to extract lists of differentially expressed proteins and their associated statistics like log fold-change, p-values, adjusted p-values, etc. as in Supplementary file 1.
Bio-informatic analysis was performed using the online “Immgen MyGeneset” database (Immunological Genome project; https://www.immgen.org/) [34]. The significant targets were imported into the database, the cell type selection was performed on cell types present in spleen and blood, and the analysis run using the Immgen ULI RNA-seq database. The relative enrichment of each population is deconvolved using the cellular subtypes defined using the Immgen database, which is a large-scale database of transcriptomic analysis of immunocyte populations or populations representing every lineage (ImmGen ULI RNA-seq data); Immgen Consortium 2019; [34, 35]). The preselection of immune cells is based on the populations used in the RNA-seq data, which is grouped into overall groups. The deconvolution has been performed using the immunological genome project web interface (https://rstats.immgen.org/MyGeneSet_New/index.html). The heatmap and W-plot were extracted with the median normalised function showing the involvement of immune cell types dependent on the significant targets. Granulocyte specific markers (Suppl. Figure 2 H) and chemokine receptor analysis (Suppl. Figure 4D) were performed with predefining targets, based on literature and database analysis, with preselected immune cell types, present in spleen or blood, from the Immgen database, followed by exporting the expression levels and plotting the values as a heatmap.
Fig. 4.
Basophils activate B-cells and DCs via IL-13 signaling post TBI. A-C Immunofluorescence staining of spleen sections with MCPT8 and IL-13 revealed the significant increase in MCPT8+ cells per area (Sham vs TBI: 5±1 vs 9±2; p = 0.0129; t = 3.495) and the significant increase of MCPT8+/IL-13+ (white dotted outline) cells post TBI (Sham vs TBI: 50.8±21.7% vs 84.7±7.6%; p = 0.0256; t = 2.949). N = 4, scale bar overview: 100 µm; scale bar insert: 20 µm. D, E Immunofluorescence staining of spleen sections with CD19, CD11c, MCPT8 and pIL-13Ra1 showed the significant increase in pIL-13Ra1+/CD19+ (white dotted outline; Sham vs TBI: 22±4% vs 32±6%; p = 0.0305; t = 2.817), pIL-13Ra1+/CD11c+ (white dotted outline; Sham vs TBI: 17±4% vs 31±10%; p = 0.0465; t = 2.501) and pIL-13Ra1+/MCPT8+ (white dotted outline; Sham vs TBI: 13±2% vs 18±2%; p = 0.0176; t = 3.244) cells post TBI. N = 4, scale bar overview: 50 µm; scale bar insert: 20 µm. F, G Immunofluorescence staining of spleen sections with IL-13 and pIL-13Ra1 revealed a significant increase of pIL-13Ra1+ cells in close proximity to IL-13+ cells as compared to a random location (IL-13+ vs random; 40 µm: 3±2 vs 13±4; 60 µm: 7±5 vs 30±8; 80 µm: 12±8 vs 50±13; 100 µm: 19±13 vs 73±18; p = 0.0029; p < 0.0001; p < 0.0001; p< 0.0001; F(7,192) = 138.1). N = 4, scale bar overview: 100 µm; scale bar insert: 50 µm. Data is shown as pie-charts or mean±SD. *: p < 0.05, **: p <0.01, ***:p <0.001.
The KEGG pathway analysis was performed using the online ShinyGo database [36], using a FDR of 0,05 with a min and max pathway size of 2 and 5000 respectively. The significant KEGG pathways were extracted and preselected based on immunological function.
Statistical analysis
Data analysis was performed using the Graphpad prism version 8 software or R software suite Version 4.3.1. Statistical analysis was performed using animals as a biological unit; whenever appropriate, single data points and averages per animal are depicted in the graphs. All datasets were tested for normality using the Shapiro-Wilks test. When comparing two groups, an unpaired t-test or Mann-Whitney test was used. When comparing multiple groups, ANOVA with Sidak’s multiple correction or Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s multiple correction were used, depending on normality. The descriptive statistical analysis has been reported in the supplementary file descriptive statistics.
Animals, traumatic brain injury model and ethanol treatment
This study is a post-hoc analysis of the spleen obtained from mice in previous studies [24–27]. This study was undertaken in accordance with the 3R principle, to reduce the number of animals in experimentation and increase the scientific output from sacrifice of animals. The experiments have been approved by the animal oversight committee at Ulm University and by the Regierungspräsidium in Tübingen (Reg. 1222). Wild-type (B6-SJL) male mice were bred locally, under standard housing conditions (24 °C, 60%–80% humidity, 12/12 light/dark cycle, with ad libitum access to food and water). TBI was performed on mice p60-90, as previously reported [24–27]. Briefly, mice were administered buprenorphine (0.1 mg/kg, subcutaneously) followed by sevoflurane anaesthesia (2.5% in 97.5% O2). The skin was shaved and incised on the midline, after which the mice were positioned in the apparatus. The closed head weight drop was delivered by a weight of 333 g falling from a height of 2 cm, on the parietal bone. Mice were administered 100% O2, directly after the TBI, with monitoring of apnoea time. Control mice (sham) had the same treatments (analgesia, anaesthesia, skin incision and handling), without the TBI being administered. The neurological severity score (NSS) as reported previously [27] shows a score of 5 ± 1.5 3 h post injury, with a decline over time being back at baseline at 3dpi. Therefore, this TBI model can be classified as a moderate severity brain injury model.
Ethanol treatment was performed as previously described [28]. Briefly, 100% synthesis grade ethanol was diluted in 0.9% NaCl to a final dilution of 32% volume/volume. Mice (20–25 g) were administered a volume of 400–500 µl of diluted ethanol (to obtain a concentration of 5 g/kg) by oral gavage 30 min before TBI. Four experimental groups were considered: saline administered, subjected to sham surgery (saline-sham, SS); saline administered, subjected to TBI (saline-TBI, ST); ethanol administered, subjected to sham surgery (ethanol-sham, ES); and ethanol administered, subjected to TBI (ethanol-TBI, ET).
For antibody characterization, tissue samples from two mouse lines were used: basophil deficient MCPT8-Cre BAC transgenic mice were generated as previously described [29] and backcrossed to a C57BL/6 background, these mice show constitutive and specific deletion of basophils resulting from Cre toxicity. IL-13−/− mice were previously reported [30] and have been bred for more than 10 generations on a C57/BL6J genetic background [31]. Samples from both mouse lines were kindly provided by Prof. David Voehringer and Prof. Caitlin C O’Maera respectively.
Results
Splenic large-scale signaling landscape following TBI points toward basophil influx
Since immune reactions largely take place within tissues rather than blood, we set out to investigate the early immunoregulatory events taking place after TBI by focusing on the spleen. As a first step, we verified that TBI induced acute changes (3 h post injury) in the splenic signaling landscape. We probed spleen extracts obtained 3 h after TBI (or sham surgery) with a 16-target glass based fluorescent antibody array, focused on Erk/AKT/mTOR signaling. We identified significant differences in 7 out of 16 targets (Fig. 1A), including increased phosphorylation of ERK1/2 (thr202/204), Bad (ser112) and GSK-30 (ser21), as well as decreased phosphorylation of Akt (ser473; thr308), RSK1 (ser380) and PDK1 (ser241). The upregulation of ERK phosphorylation (Fig. 1B, C) and of S6-RP phosphorylation (pS6, S235/236 - a marker for increased translation; Fig. 1B, D) was confirmed by WB, which demonstrated the significant activation of early signaling and cellular responses in the spleen upon TBI (pS6: p = 0.0367; pERK1/2: p = 0.0282; Fig. 1B-D). Notably, when the degree of kinase phosphorylation was correlated to the markers of brain injury NSE and NFL (values obtained from previously published data [37], an overall positive correlation within pErk and NSE, but not with NFL, emerged (Suppl. Figure 1A-C), indicating that the extent of splenic response is proportional to the severity of the injury.
Fig. 1.
TBI results in large-scale signaling resulting in a basophils influx to the spleen. A The heatmap shows significantly altered phosphorylation targets (down: RSK1, AKT and PDK1; up: GSK-30, ERK1/2 and BAD) from the AKT signaling pathway in mouse spleen 3 h post sham or TBI treatment. N = 8. B-D Western blot analysis in spleen samples reveals increased phosphorylation of S6 ribosomal protein (Sham vs. TBI: 1.0 ± 0.2 vs. 1.3 ± 0.4; p = 0.0367; t = 2.279) and ERK1/2 (Sham vs. TBI: 1.0 ± 0.2 vs. 1.2 ± 0.2; p = 0.0282; t = 2.428) 3 h post TBI. N = 4–13. E-F Heatmap and volcanoplot, from a large scale phospho-signaling array revealed 135 (out of 1184) targets altered in the spleen post TBI. Red = up-phosphorylated, blue = down-phosphorylated, several targets marked in the volcanoplot. N = 5. G KEGG (Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes) analysis of phospho-proteomic targets linked to immune related function and biological processes. H W-plot, extracted from the ImmGen My Geneset database, showing selected immune cells on the x-axis and the log2 expression of the significant targets from the phospho-proteomic dataset. The analysis shows a strong involvement of a basophil group (consisting of mast cells, basophils and eosinophils separately; red arrow) in the spleen post TBI. Data is shown as mean ± SD, z-scores for the heatmaps or fold enrichment with log10(FDR) for the KEGG analysis. *: p < 0.05. A complete list of altered phosphorylated targets can be found in supplementary information 1.
Next, we characterized in depth the signaling events unfolding in the spleen upon TBI. We performed a broad phospho-proteomic analysis using phospho-explorer arrays with 1318 targets from over 30 signaling pathways. We identified 135 significant differential phosphorylation events occurring upon TBI (Fig. 1E-F), with several notable targets having increased phosphorylation involved in an inflammatory response including STAT2, MAP3K7 and SLP76 [38–40] or a decreased phosphorylation of targets involved in depression or homeostasis of inflammation, such as; IL-10Ra1, P53 and SMAD1 [41–43]. Interestingly, several targets related to increased metabolic signaling, like 4E-BP1 and ERK showed an increase in phosphorylation, as well as mTOR that revealed a decreased phosphorylation at site Thr2446, which has been associated with decrease in nutrients and is inversely related to S6 phosphorylation [44]. Highlighting the multifaceted splenic signaling architecture triggered by TBI, KEGG pathway analysis revealed a significant enrichment of pathways involved in an increased inflammatory response like; T-cell receptor signaling, TNF signaling, JAK-STAT signaling, B-cell receptor and Toll-like receptor signaling, as well as an involvement of chemotaxis and cell-to-cell contact like; focal adhesion, adherens junctions, chemokine signaling and gap junctions (Fig. 1G).
To identify the immune cells subpopulations involved in the signaling events, we exploited the deconvolution algorithm provided by the Immunological Genome Project (available at: https://rstats.immgen.org/MyGeneSet_New/index.htm; [34]). When provided with the 135 proteins displaying altered phosphorylation, the algorithm indicated the ongoing regulation of DCs, macrophages and granulocytes groups, with a specifically strong involvement of a so-called basophil group compatible with mast cells, basophils and eosinophils (Fig. 1H, arrow).
Taken together, the phosphoproteomic data reveals a rapid and sustained activation of signaling in the spleen upon TBI, in particular involving DCs, granulocytes and, surprisingly, a substantial involvement of basophils or eosinophils in the spleen.
TBI results in an increased representation of basophils in splenic follicles
Our initial screenings indicated a possible involvement of a specific subset of granulocytes in the early systemic inflammatory response to TBI. We sought direct, spatial confirmation of increased granulocyte representation by immunofluorescent staining of spleen Sect. 3 h post injury with markers expressed on neutrophils (CD15 and CD16; [45–47]), eosinophils (SiglecF; [48]) and basophils (MCPT8; [29, 49, 50]) to identify whether there is an involvement of one specific granulocyte subtype, together with CD19 as a B-cell marker (to provide architectural context for germinal center and marginal zone of follicles; Fig. 2A).
The validation of the anti-MCPT8 antibody was performed on spleen samples from the basophil deficient MCPT8-cre BAC mouse line, which shows a loss of MCPT8 + cells due to Cre toxicity [29]; immunolabelling was strongly reduced (with no loss of the eosinophils marker SiglecF; Suppl. Figure 2 C-E). Furthermore, MCPT8 immunolabelling colocalized with the basophil markers CD203c ([51, 52]; Suppl. Figure 2 F, G) and Fcer1a ([53]; Suppl. Figure 2 F, H), validating the use of anti-MCPT8 antibody to identify basophils.
TBI caused a significant increase in the number of MCPT8 + cells in both the germinal center as well as the marginal zone (Germinal center: p = 0.0451; marginal zone: p = 0.036; Fig. 2A-B, with inserts showing MCPT8 + cells). On the other hand, the number of SiglecF+/MCPT8- cells (bona fide eosinophil marker) and CD15+/CD16 + cells (neutrophils) was unchanged between sham and TBI (Suppl. Figure 3 A-D; with inserts for SiglecF+/MCPT8-; CD15+/CD16 + cells respectively).
Fig. 3.
Chemoattraction of basophils upon TBI occurs through CXCL1 expression in B-cells and DCs. A Principal component analysis (PCA) of the cytokine array revealed distinct clustering of the sham and TBI treatment groups. N = 5. B The heatmap of the cytokine array showed the significantly altered cytokines/chemokines in the spleen 3 h after TBI. N = 5. C Principal component analysis (PCA) of the vascular factors array revealed distinct clustering of the sham and TBI treatment groups. N = 6. D The heatmap of the vascular factors array showed the significantly altered cytokines/chemokines in the spleen 3 h after TBI. N = 6. E-H ELISA assays verification, in a larger subset of samples, showed the significant upregulation of CXCL1 (Sham vs TBI: 2642±1403 pg/ml vs 4439±1451 pg/ml; p = 0.0090; t = 2.893) and CCL6 (Sham vs TBI: 19466±3209 pg/ml vs 26175±6681 pg/ml;p = 0.0083; t = 2.916), a significant downregulation of IL-5 (Sham vs TBI: 1146±637 pg/ml vs 654±337 pg/ml; p = 0.0331; t = 2.298) and no difference in CXCL13 in the spleen. Plasma samples showed the significant upregulation only in CXCL1 (Sham vs TBI: 116±92 pg/ml vs 408±264 pg/ml; p = 0.0018; t = 3.387), with no differences observed in CXCL13, CCL6 and IL-5. Sham N = 10; TBI N = 13. I-L Single mRNA RNAscope revealed the significant increase of CXCL1 mRNA puncta in the whole spleen (Sham vs TBI: 47±7 vs 59±9; p = 0.0377; t = 2.488), as well as an increase of CXCL1+/CD19+ (magenta dotted outline; sham vs TBI: 11±4% vs 23±6%; p = 0.0033; t = 4.125) and CXCL1+/CD11c+ (yellow dotted outline; sham vs TBI: 15±4% vs 28±3%; p = 0.0006; t = 5.484) cells after TBI. N = 5. scale bar overview: 50 µm; scale bar insert: 10 µm. Data is shown as mean±SD. *: p < 0.05, **: p <0.01, ***: p <0.001.
Finally, we verified the reactivity state of basophils in spleen by investigating their rate of protein synthesis (assessed by the phospho-S6 level). We immunolabelled spleen sections with antibodies against ribosomal pS6, together with MCPT8 and CD19 for cell-type identification. TBI resulted in a significant increase in the ratio of pS6+/MCPT8 + cells in splenic follicles (p = 0.002; Fig. 2C-D), suggesting an increase in protein synthesis rates of basophils upon TBI.
This data indicated not only an increased recruitment of basophils into the spleen post injury, but also their enhanced translational activity in splenic follicles.
CXCL1 from Splenic B-cells and dendritic cells contribute to basophil recruitment upon TBI through CXCR2
Several cytokines, chemokines and immune mediators have been found to regulate basophil chemotaxis and activation [54–58]. To identify immune mediators involved in TBI-induced recruitment of basophils in the spleen, we employed two distinct cytokine antibody arrays, one focused on chemokines and immune mediators (111 targets) and a second one focused on vascular activation factors (40 targets).
Principal component analysis (PCA) shows distinct clustering of the sham and TBI groups (Fig. 3A, C). The differential expression analysis revealed the upregulation of 14 proteins and downregulation of 10 proteins, upon TBI. Several of upregulated proteins were chemokines or mediators involved in chemotaxis, such as CXCL1, CXCL13, CCL6, MCP-1 (CCL2), fractalkine (CX3CL1) and GM-CSF (Fig. 3B, D; red arrows; upregulation of CXCL1 was reproduced by both assays). Notably, both CXCL1 and CCL6 are basophils chemoattractants [59–61]. Interestingly, IL-5, a critical regulator of the activation of basophils [62], was downregulated (Fig. 3D; blue arrow).
We quantified CXCL1, CXCL13, CCL6 and IL-5 levels by ELISA in both spleen protein extracts and plasma in a larger cohort of TBI samples, to eventually demonstrate a blood-spleen concentration gradient. The assay independently verified the significant increase of CXCL1 (p = 0.0090; Fig. 3E), CCL6 (p = 0.0083; Fig. 3G) and decrease of CCL5 (p = 0.0331; Fig. 3H) in the spleen of TBI animals (but not of CXCL13; Fig. 3F). Interestingly, only CXCL1 displayed a significant upregulation in serum of TBI animals (p = 0.0018; Fig. 3E); notably, CXCL1 levels were significantly lower in the plasma than in the spleen, indicating a gradient leading migration from the blood to the spleen. Both CCL6 and CXCL1 may contribute to basophil chemotaxis (their receptors, CCR1 and CXCR2 are expressed on basophils; Suppl. Figure 4D). Since absolute values of CXCL1 are higher than CCL6, the elevation of CXCL1 is higher than CCL6 after injury (68% vs. 34%; Fig. 3E), and CXCR2 is more expressed on basophils compared to CCR1 (Suppl. Figure 4 A), suggesting that CXCL1 is the most prominent chemokine in this process, although a contribution from CCL6 cannot be excluded.
Interestingly, spleen CXCL1 levels significantly correlate with the neuronal and axonal damage markers NSE and NFL (CXCL1 vs. NSE: p = 0.0170; CXCL1 vs. NFL: p = 0.0232; Suppl. Figure 4B, C).
Since B-cells, dendritic cells and CD4 + T cells have been reported to express CXCL1 in various disease settings [63–65], we performed single mRNA in situ hybridisation with a co-immunostaining for CD19, CD11c and CD4, to identify the cellular source responsible of CXCL1 upregulation. Analysis of in situ hybridisation experiments revealed an overall significant increase of CXCL1 mRNA in the spleen upon TBI (p = 0.0377; Fig. 3I, J), predominantly localized to CD19 + and CD11c + cells (Fig. 3I) and almost absent expression in CD4 + cells (Suppl. Figure 4D). Indeed, TBI resulted in a significant increase in the fraction of double-positive CXCL1+/CD19 + cells and CXCL1+/CD11c + cells (CD19: p = 0.0033; CD11c: p = 0.0006; Fig. 3I, K, L; magenta and yellow dotted outline for CD19 + and CD11c + respectively) but no change in CD4+/CXCL1 + cells (Suppl. Figure 4 C). Furthermore, we validated the expression of CXCR2 on basophils with single mRNA in situ hybridization, showing a stronger expression of CXCR2 on MCPT8 + basophils compared to CD15 + neutrophils (Suppl. Figure 4E).
These data suggest that TBI induces the expression of chemoattractant CXCL1 in CD19 + B cells as well as CD11c + DCs, but not CD4 + T cells, which attracts basophils, via the CXCR2 receptor, towards the spleen.
Basophils may contribute to B-cells and DCs activation via IL-13/IL-13Ra1 signaling upon TBI
Basophils are known to contribute to immunomodulation through their high level of IL-13 expression, which in turn promotes a Th2 adaptive immunity response [66, 67]. Thus, we hypothesized that the basophils influx in the spleen may strongly affect the local IL-13 signaling. We performed an immunofluorescence staining with MCPT8 and IL-13 in spleen sections of sham and TBI treated mice. The IL-13 antibody used in this study has been validated using IL-13−/− brain samples (Suppl. Figure 5 A). We showed a significant increase of MCPT8 + cells (p = 0.0256; Fig. 4A, B) as well as a significant increase of IL-13+/MCPT8 + cells upon TBI (from 50% to 80%; p < 0.05; Fig. 4A, C). However, no differences were found in the overall IL-13 + cells upon TBI (Suppl. Figure 5B).
Fig. 5.
STED imaging reveals IL-13 + Immune synapses between basophils and nearby immune cells. A, B Immunofluorescence staining and confocal imaging showed a significant increase of MCPT8+/IL-13+ cells in close contact with pIL-13Ra+ cells (white dotted outline; Sham vs TBI: 31±4% vs 47±6%; p = 0.0035; t = 4.654) post TBI. N = 4, scale bar overview: 100 µm; scale bar insert: 20 µm and 10 µm. C-G STED imaging and intensity plot profiles of spleen sections with MCPT8, IL-13 and pIL-13Ra1 revealed a smaller spread and a closer contact between IL-13 and pIL-13Ra1 clusters post TBI compared to sham. N = 4 (10–12 cells per mouse), scale bar overview: 2 µm; scale bar insert: 1 µm. H-L STED imaging and intensity plot profiles of spleen sections with MCPT8, 𝛽-actin and pIL-13Ra1 revealed a smaller spread and a closer contact between 𝛽-actin and pIL-13Ra1+ cells post TBI compared to sham. N = 4 (10–12 cells per mouse), scale bar: 2 µm. Data is shown as histogram on frequency distribution to distance and intensity plot profile of representative cell or cluster.
IL-13 signals through the type 1 receptor, consisting of IL-13Ra1 subunit and IL-4Ra, located mainly on B cells, monocytes and dendritic cells [68, 69]. Immunofluorescence staining of spleen sections with phosphorylated IL-13Ra1 co-stained with CD19, CD11c and MCPT8 revealed a significant increase of the ratio of pIL-13Ra1+/CD19 + and pIL-13Ra1+/CD11c + cells upon TBI (CD19: p = 0.0305; CD11c: p = 0.0465; Fig. 4D, E and suppl. Figure 5 C, D). Interestingly, MCPT8 + basophils also show a significant increase of pIl13-Ra1 positivity (p = 0.0176, Fig. 4D, E and suppl. Figure 5E), suggesting a paracrine effect toward B cells and DC but also an autocrine effect.
In fact, the spatial distribution of pIL-13Ra1 + cells in proximity of IL-13 + basophils was assessed, revealing an increased number of pIL-13Ra1 + cells in the vicinity of IL-13 + cells after TBI compared to randomly located coordinates (40 μm: p = 0.0029; 60 μm: p < 0.0001; 80 μm: p < 0.0001; 100 μm: p < 0.0001; Fig. 4F, G).
This data suggests that basophils trigger IL-13 signaling in adjacent B cells and DCs (as well as on themselves).
IL-13 + immune synapses between basophils and nearby immune cells revealed by super-resolution microscopy
Besides paracrine effects, immune cells [70, 71] including basophils [72, 73] are known to engage in direct physical interaction at so-called immune synapses. Close inspection of confocal immunofluorescence stacks displayed several instances of apparent contact between IL-13 + cells and pIL-13Ra1 + cells, with a significant increase in TBI vs. sham controls (p = 0.0035; Fig. 5A, B). We sought to elucidate the possibility of IL-13 + immune synapses between basophils and DC or B cells using super-resolution STED microscopy to resolve the IL-13 and pIL-13Ra1 clusters as belonging to distinct cells (in contrast to the hypothesis of them belonging to the same cell, thus being dependent on autocrine signaling). STED imaging was performed using IL-13 and pIL-13Ra1 for the two STED channel and MCPT8 as a basophil marker in the confocal channel; STED imaging revealed the close apposition of one or multiple pIL-13Ra1 clusters with IL-13 + cellular protrusions To ensure that the pIL-13Ra1 clusters belonged to a distinct cell, we plotted the distribution of distance peaks between IL-13 and pIL-13Ra1 clusters; quantification of the distance revealed a larger spread, spanning between 0.5 and 3 μm in the sham samples. Interestingly, for the TBI sections, we observed a large peak at around 500 nm, with an overall spread not superior than 1.5 μm (Fig. 5C-G). Cellular migration and motility have been linked to an increase of actin protrusion in the cytoplasm towards the direction of movement [74, 75]. We sought to confirm the involvement of actin dynamics in basophils post TBI, by super-resolution STED microscopy. STED imaging was performed using 𝛽-actin and pIL-13Ra1 in the two STED channel and MCPT8 + as a basophil marker in the confocal channel. STED imaging revealed increased actin protrusions, in MCPT8 + basophils, towards pIL-13Ra1 + cells in TBI sections compared to sham; quantification of the distance revealed a larger spread, spanning between 0 and 14 micrometers between the two cells in the sham samples. Interestingly, for the TBI sections, we observed a large peak at around 2 micrometres, with an overall spread not superior than 12 micrometers (Fig. 5H-L).
The super-resolution evidence implies an increase in direct contact between basophils and other immune cells upon TBI and the establishment of immune synapses enabling close-range IL-mediated signaling.
Basophils appear to participate in protein-synthesis upregulation in B-cells and DC through IL-13 and long-non-coding RNA NORAD
IL-13 signaling has been reported to be a regulator or mTOR dependent protein synthesis [76–78] and upregulation of metabolic rates and protein synthesis is an early marker of immune cells reactivity [79, 80]. Thus, we hypothesized that B-cells and DC receiving basophil-derived IL-13 may respond by upregulating their protein synthesis rate. In fact, we investigated this effect using the phosphorylation of the S6 ribosomal protein as proxy for mTOR activation. Furthermore, we exploited the phosphorylation of 4E-BP1 as a proxy for the enhancement of cap-dependent mRNA translation (by dissociation of eIF4E; [81]). Spleen sections were therefore immunostained for pS6 or, in independent experiments, for p-4E-BP1 together with CD19, CD11c and MCPT8. Confirming our hypothesis (and coherent with the phospho-proteomics array, Fig. 1E, F), we detected a significant increase in CD19 and CD11c immunofluorescence for either pS6 or p4E-BP1 immuno-positive cells, after TBI (pS6+/CD19+: p = 0.0210; pS6+/CD11c+: p = 0.0003; p4E-BP1+/CD19+: p = 0.0024; p4E-BP1+/CD11c+: p = 0.0007; Fig. 6A-D and suppl. Figure 6A-D). Interestingly, MCPT8 + cells (basophils) displayed only an increased colocalization with pS6, but not with p4E-BP1 immunolabelled cells (Figs. 2F-G and 6A and B and suppl. Figure 6E).
Fig. 6.
Basophil induces rapid translation response, via IL-13 and NORAD, in B-cells and DCs. A, B Immunofluorescence staining of spleen sections with pS6-RP, CD19 and CD11c showed a significant increase of pS6+/CD19+ (magenta dotted outline; Sham vs TBI: 12±2% vs 18±4%; p = 0.0210; t = 2.864) and pS6+/CD11c+ (yellow dotted outline; Sham vs TBI: 11±2% vs 22±4%; p = 0.0003; t = 6.012) cells post TBI. N = 5, scale bar overview: 50 µm; scale bar insert: 20 µm. C, D Immunofluorescence staining of spleen sections with p4E-BP1, CD19, CD11c and MCPT8 shows a significant increase of p4E-BP1+/CD19+ (magenta dotted outline; Sham vs TBI: 20±5% vs 34±4%; p = 0.0024; t = 4.357) and p4E-BP1+/CD11c+ (yellow dotted outline; Sham vs TBI: 18±4% vs 29±2%; p = 0.0007; t = 5.345) cells post TBI, but no difference in p4E-BP1+/MCPT8+ cells. N = 5, scale bar overview: 50 µm; scale bar insert: 20 µm. E-H Qualitative RT-PCR in spleen samples revealed no differences in lncRNA MALAT1, HOTAIR and CYRANO, but a significant increase in NORAD (Sham vs TBI: 1±0.3 vs 1.4±0.5; p = 0.0484; t = 2.127) post TBI. Sham N = 9; TBI N = 10. I-J Single lncRNA RNAscope in spleen sections with the probe NORAD and a co-staining with CD19, CD11c and MCPT8 revealed a significant increase in NORAD+/CD19+ (magenta dotted outline; Sham vs TBI: 26±12% vs 54±4%; p = 0.0074; t = 4.341) and NORAD+/CD11c+ (blue dotted outline; Sham vs TBI: 22±5% vs 55±9%; p = 0.0023; t = 5.701) in close proximity (40 µm) to MCPT8+ cells. Sham N = 3; TBI N = 4, scale bar overview: 50 µm; scale bar insert: 20 µm. Data is shown as pie-charts or mean±SD. *: p < 0.05, **: p <0.01, ***: p <0.001.
Protein synthesis upregulation is not only dependent on phosphorylation cascades, but it is also regulated by a number of RNA-dependent mechanisms [82, 83]. Among these, the long-non-coding RNA NORAD has been reported to enhance mRNA stability by sequestering PUMILIO proteins, which normally decrease mRNA stability [84, 85]. We preliminary screened the possible involvement of NORAD-mediated mechanisms in spleen upon TBI by assessing the overall NORAD expression in whole-spleen extracts, along with 3 lncRNA also involved in immune regulation (namely MALAT1, HOTAIR, CYRANO). Quantitative RT-PCR showed a significant NORAD upregulation in the spleen post TBI (p = 0.0484; Fig. 6H) but no difference in the expression of MALAT1, HOTAIR and CYRANO (Fig. 6E-G), indicating the specificity of the lcnRNA response.
To provide cellular context to NORAD upregulation, and to verify that NORAD upregulation takes place in B-cells and DCs proximal to basophils, we performed a single-molecule in situ hybridisation for NORAD RNA together with immunohistochemistry for the cell markers CD19, CD11c and MCPT8. The overall density (cells/mm2) of NORAD + cells in the spleen was significantly increased in TBI, with the majority of NORAD + cells located in the marginal zone of the follicles.
MCPT8 + basophils displayed a strong NORAD signal already in sham samples, which is not changed upon TBI (Suppl. Figure 6 F, G). On the other hand, NORAD positivity was assessed by counting the ratio of NORAD + and either CD19 + or CD11c + cells in a proximity of 40 micron to an MCPT8 + cell. We showed an increased number of NORAD+/CD19 + and NORAD+/CD11c + cells in close proximity to MCPT8 + cells compared to their density in proximity of randomly located spleen cells (CD19: p = 0.0074; CD11c: p = 0.0023; Fig. 6I, J).
Overall, this data suggests that direct cell-to-cell signaling from basophils to B-cells and DCs results in a rapid protein synthesis and mRNA stability upregulation, through mechanisms involving protein phosphorylation as well as lncNORAD induction.
TBI induced increase of basophils in the follicles returns back to baseline 3 d post injury
To investigate if the basophil recruitment to the splenic follicles persisted beyond the 3 h timepoint considered so far, an immunofluorescent staining on sections with MCPT8 coimmunostained for CD19 was carried out for spleen samples from mice 3 days post TBI (as in Fig. 2A). Interestingly, we detected no differences in the number of MCPT8 + cells post TBI (Fig. 7A, B). In line with the number of basophils in the splenic follicles, the expression of CXCL1 mRNA, shown by single molecule in situ hybridisation, was reduced to baseline 3 days post TBI (Fig. 7C, D). This suggests that the basophils’ chemoattraction and homing in the spleen persisted for a period of time shorter than 3 days. Thus, immunomodulatory effects of basophils in TBI are short-lived. Pointing towards a reduced chemoattraction of basophils towards the spleen in the subacute phase of TBI.
Fig. 7.
TBI induced increase of basophils returns to baseline 3 days post TBI. A, B Immunofluorescence staining of spleen sections with CD19 and MCPT8 showed no differences in MCPT8+ cells (white dotted outline) 3 days post TBI. N = 4, scale bar overview: 100 µm; scale bar insert: 20 µm. C, D Single mRNA RNAscope revealed no difference in CXCL1 mRNA puncta in the spleen 3 days post TBI (cells depicted in magenta or yellow dotted outline, for B cells and DCs respectively). Sham N = 4; TBI N = 6. scale bar overview: 50 µm; scale bar insert: 10 µm. Data is shown as mean±SD.
Ethanol intoxication prevents the chemotaxis of basophils to the spleen
Ethanol intoxication is a frequent co-morbidity in TBI patients, with 40% of patients showing a positive blood alcohol level upon admission [86] with possible outcome relevance [87–89]. The immunomodulatory effects of ethanol in TBI inflammatory response have been previously investigated in the brain [24, 25, 90] as well as in the spleen [20, 91, 92]. Having characterized the basophil recruitment to the spleen as an early event in TBI-associated immune response, here we set out to investigate the effect of ethanol on the basophil phenotype reported. We treated the mice with a single high dose of ethanol (5 g/kg) 30 min before the TBI was administered. Spleen were dissected 3 h after the injury and sections were immunostained with two sets of staining, on the one hand MCPT8 and CD19, and on the other hand pIL-13RA1, CD19, CD11c and MCPT8. Interestingly, in the case of the number of MCPT8 + cells, ethanol pretreatment prevented the TBI induced upregulation of basophils in the spleen in both the germinal center as well as the marginal zone (Germinal center: p = 0.0032; marginal zone: p = 0.0002; Fig. 8A, B). In line with the basophil numbers post TBI with and without ethanol pretreatment, the pIl-13RA1 staining revealed that ethanol prevented the TBI induced pIL-13Ra1 signaling in CD19+, CD11c + and MCPT8 + cells (CD19: p = 0.0146; CD11c: p = 0.0119; MCPT8; p = 0.0176; Fig. 8C, D). Additionally, to verify if the reduced basophil numbers upon ethanol pretreatment is caused by a decreased amount of CXCL1, we performed an CXCL1 ELISA in spleen protein samples. We found a significant downregulation of CXCL1 in the ethanol pretreated samples compared to TBI alone (p = 0.0303; Fig. 8E). Furthermore, to verify that the hypothesised pIL-13Ra1 induced NORAD increase is prevented upon ethanol pretreatment, we performed quantitative RT-PCR for lncRNA NORAD on sham and TBI mice pretreated with ethanol. Interestingly, the qPCR revealed a significant increase of NORAD in ethanol pretreated samples compared to TBI alone (p = 0.0002; suppl. Figure 7D). Since ethanol treated mice already significantly increased NORAD levels in the sham group (p = 0.0261; Suppl. Figure 7D), where we did not observe any differences at basophil or pIL13Ra1 levels, we hypothesised that ethanol pretreatment might increase NORAD levels in a different cell type. In fact, in situ hybridization of NORAD co-stained with CD19 and CD4 revealed that the ratio of CD4+/NORAD + colocalization increases with ethanol pretreatment, with a significance between sham and ethanol treated TBI (p = 0.0437; suppl. Figure 7E, F), for the ratio of CD19+/NORAD + colocalization, a significant reduction in the ethanol pretreated TBI mice was observed (p = 0.0353; Supple Fig. 7E, G).
Fig. 8.
Ethanol pretreatment prevents the chemotaxis of basophils to the spleen. A, B Immunofluorescence staining of spleen sections with CD19 and MCPT8 show a significant increase in MCPT8+ cells (white dotted outline) post TBI in the germinal center (SS vs ST: 8±1 vs 18±4; p = 0.0047) and marginal zone (SS vs ST: 11±1 vs 27±4; p < 0.0001) of splenic follicles. With a significant decrease in MCPT8+ cells with ethanol pretreatment, in both the germinal center (ST vs ET: 18±4 vs 8±3; p = 0.0032) as well as the marginal zone (ST vs ET: 27±4 vs 14±4; p = 0.0002). N = 4, scale bar overview: 100 µm; scale bar insert: 20 µm. C, D Immunofluorescence staining of spleen sections with CD19, CD11c, MCPT8 and pIL-13Ra1 showed the significant increase post TBI in pIL-13Ra1+/CD19+ (magenta dotted outline; SS vs ST: 22±4% vs 36±8%; p = 0.0328), pIL-13Ra1+/CD11c+ (yellow dotted outline; SS vs ST: 18±3% vs 27±5%; p = 0.0043) and pIL-13Ra1+/MCPT8+ (green dotted outline; SS vs ST: 11±3% vs 18±3%; p = 0.0154). With a significant decrease with ethanol pretreatment, in pIL-13Ra1+/CD19+ (ST vs ET: 36±8% vs 21±7%; p = 0.0146), pIL-13Ra1+/CD11c+ (ST vs ET: 27±5% vs 19±4%; p = 0.0119) and pIL-13Ra1+/MCPT8+ (ST vs ET: 18±3% vs 11±3%; p = 0.0176). N = 4, scale bar overview: 50 µm; scale bar insert: 20 µm. E. ELISA assay in a larger cohort of the 4 treatment groups (SS; ES; ST and ET) revealed a significant upregulation of CXCL1 post TBI (SS vs ST: 642±1403 pg/ml vs 4439±1451 pg/ml; p= 0.0066), with a significant decrease with ethanol pretreatment (ST vs ET: 4439±1451 pg/ml vs 2987±1145 pg/ml; p = 0.0303). SS N = 10; ES N = 7; ST N = 13; ET N = 9. Data is shown as mean±SD. *: p < 0.05, **: p <0.01.
These data suggest that recruitment of basophils to the spleen and the subsequent upregulation of IL-13 and NORAD is prevented by ethanol. However, ethanol pretreatment increases NORAD in CD4 + T-cells, further expanding the mechanistic understanding of ethanol immunomodulation.
Discussion
In the present work we provide evidence for a previously unappreciated mechanism responsible for rapid immunomodulatory response following TBI, namely the rapid recruitment of basophils to spleen lymphoid follicles. Basophils are recruited through chemotactic cues that include CXCL1, deliver an IL-13-mediated signal to B-cells and dendritic cells and contribute to their activation by triggering a protein synthesis response that involve phosphorylation cascades as well as the induction of lncRNA NORAD. The basophils recruitment appears to be transient, possibly because of the downregulation of IL-5 simultaneous to their recruitment and disappears by 3 dpi. Thus, upon TBI, spleen cells recruit an additional source of IL-13 in the form of the peripheral pool of basophils and this IL13 is delivered to B-cells and DC to shape their early response. Interestingly, this early recruitment of basophils is among the processes altered by ethanol intoxication in TBI (Fig. 9).
Fig. 9.
Graphical Abstract. Here we report a TBI induced basophil to adaptive immunity crosstalk. With an enhanced production of CXCL1 by DCs and B cells, followed by chemoattraction of basophils, via CXCR2 receptor, towards the splenic follicle. Basophils show direct cellular interaction via IL-13 and IL-Ra1 signaling resulting in enhanced translational response in B-cells and DCs driven by phosphorylation of S6 and 4E-BP1, and an increase in mRNA stability by transcription of lncRNA NORAD. Prior ethanol intoxication inhibits CXCL1 increase, basophil chemotaxis and IL-13Ra1 phosphorylation and lncRNA induction in DCs and B cells (Illustration from NIAID NIH BioArt Source (bioart.niaid.nih.gov/bioart/###)
TBI is marked by systemic immune effects [93], with both a diminished immune response, revealed by reduced levels of monocytes, lymphocytes and natural killer cells [6–8], as well as an increased inflammation, shown by enhanced inflammatory markers in the blood [3, 94] and an increase in neutrophils and eosinophils post injury [10, 95, 96]. Interestingly, in contrast to neutrophils and eosinophils, an increase in basophils post TBI was not found [97]. Which might be due to the overall low numbers (< 1%) and short lifespan (2–3 days) of basophils, compared to other granulocytes or leukocytes in general [98, 99].
We have shown a significant involvement of basophils in splenic follicles, interacting with B-cells and DCs, using both paracrine mediators as well as cell-to-cell contacts. Basophils have previously been reported to act as very potent antigen presenting cells, inducing both a Th2 response in CD4 + T-cells [72, 73, 100, 101], as well as an CD8 + T-cell response [102], via direct cellular contact or by means of soluble mediators [103]. The interaction and activation of B-lymphocytes by basophils has been reviewed extensively by Merluzzi et al., in 2015 [104], focussing on both soluble mediator dependent interaction, as well as cell-to-cell contact between basophils and B-cells. Earlier studies have reported basophils expressing IL-13 to activate B-cells, leading to maturation and induction of IgE [105, 106]. More recent reports have also reported the interaction of B-cells with basophils, leading to survival, differentiation and maturation of B-cells into plasma cells in mice [107] and humans [108]. Direct cellular interaction, by immunological synapse, of basophils with dendritic cells has not been reported previously. However, a close cooperation between the two cells, by soluble mediator expression of basophils that activate DCs (e.g. IL-4 and IL-13; [109]) or ROS mediated signaling between basophils and DCs to elicit a Th2 response has been reported [110]. Our data is largely in agreement with previous findings, showing basophils activating B-cells and dendritic cells, with two distinct mechanisms of interaction (paracrine and cell-to-cell contact) as shown by the literature. However, further investigations are needed to disentangle if one cell type is preferred for a specific type of interaction in this context.
What is causing the TBI induced increase of CXCL1 in splenic B-cells and DCs, and what could be the consequences? CXCL1, also known as GRO-a or KC, has been reported as a granulocyte chemoattractant and plays a key role in cancer, by recruiting neutrophils to the tumor environment [111, 112]. It has also been reported to play a role in neurological disorders [113, 114]. Recent studies identified CXCL1 as a chemoattractant for basophils, by acting on the CXCR2 receptor located on basophils [61]. In addition, several other receptors for CXCL1 have been reported to be expressed on basophils [54], pointing towards the involvement of multiple chemokine receptors for CXCL1 signaling in basophils. The expression of CXCL1 in immune cells is largely induced by an inflammatory insult, either by mediators (cytokines/chemokines; [115, 116]), pathogen associated molecular patterns or damage associated molecular patterns (PAMPs and DAMPs; [117, 118]). In fact, Burke et al., showed that NF-kB and STAT1 pathways are directly involved in the expression of CXCL1 [119]). Furthermore, Hu et al., reported the expression of CXCL1 upon LPS stimulation, and thereby TLR4 signaling, in murine B cells [120]. These reports point towards a TBI induced damage response or inflammatory insult in the spleen, which induces CXCL1 expression in B-cells and DCs. In fact, damage markers are already elevated in the plasma 3 h post TBI [37]. Nevertheless, recent studies have shown strong involvement of autonomic innervation in controlling splenic responses via adrenergic and cholinergic signaling [13, 17, 121]. Furthermore, adrenergic receptor expression in DCs has been reported to be decreased 3 h post TBI, which is associated with increased maturation [20]. In fact, electrical induction of sympathetic neurotransmitters decreases expression of CXCL1, IFN-y and IL-6 in the spleen [18]. Thus, a role for the autonomic innervation in contributing to TBI-induced CXCL1 expression may take place along with the effect of systemic damage induced mediators.
IL-13, expressed largely by mast cells, basophils and eosinophils [122], is best known for its T helper 2 (Th2) cell-mediated Type 2 inflammation, resulting in an humoral immune response, promotion of B cell proliferation and induction of antibody production [123–125]. IL-13 has been reported to induce B-cell proliferation and inducing antibody class switching to IgG4 and IgE [104–106]. More recent studies have shown differentiation, maturation and survival of B-cells in response to IL-13, expressed by basophils [107, 108]. In fact, when B cells are depleted of the IL-13 Co-receptor, IL-4Ra, a decrease of B-cell responsiveness and IgE expression upon an allergic insult was observed [126]. Furthermore, IL-4Ra has been shown to regulate IgE response in B cells in acute and chronic atopic dermatitis [127]. In the case of dendritic cells, early studies have reported the maturation of DCs upon IL-13, with increased MHC-II and costimulatory factors, like CD40 and CD86 [128, 129]. With more recent studies showing the Th2 directed immune phenotype of DCs in an IL-13 dependent fashion [130–133]. In fact, inhibition of STAT6, the main transcription factor of IL-13 signaling, was reported to reduce the induction of the Th2 adaptive immunity by reduction of DCs migration [134]. In addition to the IL-13 driven enhanced Th2 response by DCs, mast cell derived IL-13 has been reported to downregulate IL-12 expression in DCs, which in turn inhibits the Th1 cell response [135]. Interestingly, we observed a downregulation of IL-5 following injury, an important activator of basophils [136, 137]. Suggesting not only a rapid initial activation of basophils but also a subsequent suppression of their response, as indicated by the decrease in basophil numbers and the concurrent activation of B cells and DCs at 3 dpi. Suggesting a short-lived interaction of basophils with B cells and DCs after TBI. Thus, the rapid activation of B cells and DCs, by basophil derived IL-13, found here may point towards both a differentiation and maturation of follicular B-cells as well as a maturation of DCs in the spleen upon TBI, followed by a potential Th2 adaptive immune response.
This study revealed a TBI induced basophil to adaptive immunity crosstalk, with an enhanced translational response in B-cells and DCs driven by phosphorylation of S6 and 4E-BP1 and an increase transcription of the lncRNA NORAD, which has been reported to induce a rapid translation by enhancing mRNA stability [84, 85]. The enhanced translational response was driven by IL-13 signaling, which has been reported to induce mTOR dependent protein synthesis [76–78]. The enhanced metabolic activity of B cells and DCs, induced by basophils, may point toward an increase in Th2 cell development, as described previously [101, 123, 138, 139]. In fact, the systemic consequences post TBI has been associated with a shift in Th polarization, showing a decrease in Th1 response and an increase in Th2 response [140–143], which may be a further risk for sepsis, multi-organ failure and systemic inflammatory response syndrome following injury [144]. In contrast, an increase in the proinflammatory cytokine TNF-α upon DC maturation post TBI has been reported [20], which might point to an increase of the Th1 response [145, 146]. However, the involvement of specific DC subsets might reveal the Th directed reactivity in the spleen post TBI. In fact, CD8a + and CD8a- DC subsets have been reported to induce a Th1 and Th2 response respectively [147–149]. The involvement of a specific Th response in the spleen post TBI remains elusive and requires further in-depth investigations.
The present work displays a few limitations. First, the phosphoproteomic screening reveals multiple signaling cascades, only some of which are traced to basophils, because of their broad expression across multiple immune cells subpopulations (e.g., interferon response, tnf signaling). Thus, additional processes are unfolding in the splenic lymphoid tissue for which it is not possible to provide a precise cellular deconvolution. Second, the identification of the subpopulations responding to the basophil-derived IL-13 is influenced by the sensitivity of the immunofluorescence assay; it is conceivable that once released in the extracellular milieu, more populations (including T-cells) may respond to this cytokine, but their protein-synthesis induction is not detectable with current methods. Thus, the impact of basophils recruitment may extend beyond B-cells and DC. Third, the focus on early events occurring within the preserved architecture of the splenic lymphoid tissue interfered with the follow-up of the same cells at later stages. As such, the ultimate outcome of IL-13 signaling can only be speculated, based on the known effects of IL-13 on antigen presentation of DC [128, 129] and on B-cells proliferation [104–106].
In conclusion, here we have demonstrated that TBI results in a coordinated immunomodulatory effort in the lymphoid tissue of the spleen, which involve the active recruitment of granulocyte subpopulations, such as basophils, to deliver critical cytokine signaling to DC and B cells, possibly shaping immune responses to the brain injury. Thus, the basophil-IL-13 axis in TBI provides a new window of opportunity to manipulate acute and long-term immune reactions to TBI for therapeutic purposes.
Supplementary Information
Supplementary Material 1: Supplementary Table 1: List of antibodies and lncRNA sequences.
Supplementary Material 2: Supplementary Figure 1: Splenic signaling correlates with neuronal damage, but not axonal damage. A. The correlation matrix reveals high R values between the signaling targets and NSE plasma values, with a significance in pERK. R values close to 0 were observed between signaling targets and NFL plasma values. B-C. Single target correlation shows the significant correlation between NSE and pERK, and poor correlation between NFL and pERK. N = 9. Data is shown as Spearman R correlation matrix, R value as color coded and p value depicted in the graph. *: p<0.05.
Supplementary Material 3: Supplementary Figure 2: Overview images and validation of antibodies. A. Immunofluorescence staining and imaging of CD19, MCPT8 and DAPI in spleen sections showed the dishomogeneous distribution of CD19 and MCPT8. With a main localization in the white pulp, marginal zone and follicles. Scale bar 500 µm. B. Immunofluorescence staining and imaging of DAPI, a-rat AF-488, a-mouse AF-568 and a-rabbit AF 647 in spleen sections showed little to no unspecific binding of secondary antibodies to spleen tissue sections. Scale bar 500 µm. C-E. Immunofluorescence staining and imaging of in one set DAPI and MCPT8 and another set CD19, SiglecF and MCPT8 in WT and MCPT8-cresamples show a strong decrease of MCPT8+ cells in the cre samples with no differences in eosinophil marker SiglecF compared to WT control samples. Scale bar overview: 50 µm; scale bar insert: 20 µm. WT N = 2; Cre N = 3. Data is shown as mean±SD F. Heatmap with data extracted from the Immgen database, showing a selection of immune cells and expression of several granulocyte, eosinophil and basophil markers with levels of expression depicted in red. H, I. Immunostaining of spleen sections with a subset of markers with high and intermediate expression on basophils reveal a colocalization of known highly expressed basophil markers CD203c and Fcer1a with MCPT8. Scale bar overview: 50 µm; scale bar insert: 20 µm.
Supplementary Material 4: Supplementary Figure 3: Eosinophils and Neutrophils show no difference post TBI.A-B. Immunofluorescence staining of spleen sections with CD19, SiglecF and MCPT8 show no differences in SiglecF+/MCPT8- cells3 h post TBI. Sham N = 3; TBI N = 5, scale bar overview: 100 µm; scale bar insert: 20 µm. C-D. Immunofluorescence staining of spleen sections with CD19, CD15 and CD16 show no differences in CD15+/CD16+ cells3 h post TBI. Sham N = 4; TBI N = 5, scale bar overview: 100 µm; scale bar insert: 20 µm.
Supplementary Material 5: Supplementary Figure 4: CXCL1 chemoattracts basophils via its cognate receptor CXCR2.A. Heatmap with data extracted from the Immgen database, showing a selection of immune cells and expression of most common chemokine receptors reveal a high expression of CXCR2on both basophils and neutrophils. B-C. Pearson R correlation analysis reveals a significant positive correlation between splenic CXCL1 protein levels with both NSEand NFLplasma levels. D. Single mRNA in situ hybridization of CXCL1 co-stained with CD4 showed no expression of CXCL1 in CD4+ cells in either sham nor TBI. N = 5. scale bar: 10 µm. E. Single mRNA in situ hybridization of CXCR2 co-stained with MCPT8 and CD15 showed high expression of CXCR2 in MCPT8+ cellsand lower expression in CD15+ cellsN = 3. Scale bar overview: 50 µm; scale bar insert: 10 µm.
Supplementary Material 6: Supplementary Figure 5: Basophils activate B-cells and DCs via IL-13Ra1 phosphorylation.A. Immunofluorescence staining of brain tissue with MAP2 and IL-13 in WT and IL-13-/- samples reveal IL-13 antibody specificity. N = 3. Scale bar: 10 µm. B. Analysis of immunofluorescence staining of spleen sections with IL-13 shows no difference in the number of IL-13+ cells post TBI. Sham N = 4; TBI N = 5. C-E. Analysis of the immunofluorescence staining of spleen sections with CD19, CD11c, MCPT8 and pIL-13Ra1, depicted in barplots. Corresponding to Figure 4D. N = 4. Data is shown as mean±SD. *: p < 0.05.
Supplementary Material 7: Supplementary Figure 6: Basophils induce fast translational response in B-cells and DCs post TBI.A, B. Analysis of the immunofluorescence staining of spleen sections with CD19, CD11c and pS6-RP, depicted in barplots. Corresponding to the representative images in Figure 6A. N = 5. C-E. Analysis of the immunofluorescence staining of spleen sections with CD19, CD11c, MCPT8 and p4E-BP1, depicted in barplots. Corresponding to the representative images in Figure 6C. N = 5. F, G. Single lncRNA RNAscope in spleen sections with the probe NORAD and a co-staining with MCPT8 revealed a high amount of NORAD in MCPT8+ cells, with no significant differences between sham and TBI. Sham N = 3; TBI N = 4; scale bar insert: 20 µm. Data is shown as mean±SD. *: p < 0.05, **: p<0.01.
Supplementary Material 8: Supplementary Figure 7: Ethanol pretreatment prevents basophil induced IL-13Ra1 phosphorylation and NORAD expression, B-cells and DCs.A-C. Analysis of the immunofluorescence staining of spleen sections with CD19, CD11c, MCPT8 and pIL-13Ra1, depicted in barplots. Corresponding to the representative images in Figure 8D. N = 4. D. Qualitative RT-PCR in spleen samples revealed a significant increase in NORAD upon ethanol pretreatmentpost TBI. SS N = 8; ES N = 6; ST N = 8; ET N = 10. E-G. Single lncRNA RNAscope in spleen sections with the probe NORAD and a co-staining with CD19 and CD4 revealed a significant increase in CD19+/NORAD+ upon TBI, with a decrease upon ethanol pretreatment. CD4+ cells show a steady increase in NORAD+ with a significant increase between sham and ethanol pretreated TBI. SS N = 4; ES N = 4; ST N = 4; ET N = 4, scale bar overview: 50 µm; scale bar insert: 20 µm. Data is shown as mean±SD. *: p < 0.05, **: p<0.01, ***: p<0.001.
Acknowledgements
We thank all the members of the CRC 1149 for their scientific input and discussion. We would like to thank Prof. Anita Ignatius for the access to the histology facility. Technical support by Thomas Lenk was highly appreciated.
Authors’ contributions
FoH and FR designed and conceived the study. FoH, JZ and FS performed antibody array assays and ELISA assays. SSK and BÖ performed bioinformatic analysis of the arrays. FoH and GY performed Immunofluorescence staining and single mRNA in situ hybridisation. FoH performed qPCR, confocal, super-resolution imaging and image analysis. DV and CCO contributed tissue samples and data of the knockout mice. FR, MH-L, MP and FoH cooperated in the critical analysis of the data and the preparation of the initial draft. FR, MH-L, MS and FoH contributed to the final version of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. The present work is supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) with the grant. No. 251293561 in the context of the SFB1149/3 (“Danger Response, disturbance Factors and Regenerative Potential after Acute Trauma”). F.R. is also supported by the German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE)-Ulm and by the DFG with grant. No. 545426613 and by the Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF) with the grant no. 01ED2302. FoH is also supported by the ZNS Hannelore Kohl Stiftung.
Data availability
Original data will be provided upon request.
Declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.McDonald SJ, Sharkey JM, Sun M, Kaukas LM, Shultz SR, Turner RJ, et al. Beyond the brain: peripheral interactions after traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma. 2020;37:770–81. 10.1089/neu.2019.6885. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Rachfalska N, Putowski Z, Krzych ŁJ. Distant organ damage in acute brain injury. Brain Sci. 2020;10:1–18. 10.3390/brainsci10121019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Sun Y, Bai L, Niu X, Wang Z, Yin B, Bai G, et al. Elevated serum levels of inflammation-related cytokines in mild traumatic brain injury are associated with cognitive performance. Front Neurol. 2019. 10.3389/FNEUR.2019.01120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Rael LT, Bar-Or R, Mains CW, Slone DS, Levy AS, Bar-Or D. Plasma oxidation-reduction potential and protein oxidation in traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma. 2009;26:1203–11. 10.1089/neu.2008.0816. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Xu B, Chandrasekar A, Heuvel FO, Powerski M, Nowak A, Noack L, et al. Ethanol intoxication alleviates the inflammatory response of remote organs to experimental traumatic brain injury. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21:1–15. 10.3390/ijms21218181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kong XD, Bai S, Chen X, Wei HJ, Jin WN, Li MS, et al. Alterations of natural killer cells in traumatic brain injury. Neurosci Bull. 2014;30:903–12. 10.1007/s12264-014-1481-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Mrakovcic-Sutic I, Tokmadzic VS, Laskarin G, Mahmutefendic H, Lucin P, Zupan Z, et al. Early changes in frequency of peripheral blood lymphocyte subpopulations in severe traumatic brain-injured patients. Scand J Immunol. 2010;72:57–65. 10.1111/j.1365-3083.2010.02407.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Schwulst SJ, Trahanas DM, Saber R, Perlman H. Traumatic brain injury-induced alterations in peripheral immunity. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013;75:780–8. 10.1097/ta.0b013e318299616a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Vermeij JD, Aslami H, Fluiter K, Roelofs JJ, Van Den Bergh WM, Juffermans NP, et al. Traumatic brain injury in rats induces lung injury and systemic immune suppression. J Neurotrauma. 2013;30:2073–9. 10.1089/neu.2013.3060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Ritzel RM, Doran SJ, Barrett JP, Henry RJ, Ma EL, Faden AI, et al. Chronic alterations in systemic immune function after traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma. 2018;35:1419–36. 10.1089/NEU.2017.5399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Lewis SM, Williams A, Eisenbarth SC. Structure and function of the immune system in the spleen. Sci Immunol. 2019. 10.1126/sciimmunol.aau6085. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Zhang B, Zhong J, Gao ZA, Brain-Spleen. Axis regulates humoral immunity. Neurosci Bull. 2021;37:427–9. 10.1007/S12264-020-00610-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Zhang X, Lei B, Yuan Y, Zhang L, Hu L, Jin S, et al. Brain control of humoral immune responses amenable to behavioural modulation. Nature. 2020;581:204–8. 10.1038/s41586-020-2235-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Wei Y, Chang L, Hashimoto K. Molecular mechanisms underlying the antidepressant actions of arketamine: beyond the NMDA receptor. Mol Psychiatry. 2021. 10.1038/s41380-021-01121-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ajmo CT, Collier LA, Leonardo CC, Hall AA, Green SM, Womble TA, et al. Blockade of adrenoreceptors inhibits the splenic response to stroke. Exp Neurol. 2009;218:47–55. 10.1016/j.expneurol.2009.03.044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Hu D, Al-Shalan HAM, Shi Z, Wang P, Wu Y, Nicholls PK, et al. Distribution of nerve fibers and nerve-immune cell association in mouse spleen revealed by immunofluorescent staining. Sci Rep. 2020. 10.1038/s41598-020-66619-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Takenaka MC, Guereschi MG, Basso AS. Neuroimmune interactions: dendritic cell modulation by the sympathetic nervous system. Semin Immunopathol. 2017;39:165–76. 10.1007/s00281-016-0590-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Straub RH, Rauch L, Rauh L, Pongratz G. Sympathetic inhibition of IL-6, IFN-γ, and KC/CXCL1 and sympathetic stimulation of TGF-β in spleen of early arthritic mice. Brain Behav Immun. 2011;25:1708–15. 10.1016/J.BBI.2011.07.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Wang H, Yu M, Ochani M, Amelia CA, Tanovic M, Susarla S, et al. Nicotinic acetylcholine receptor α7 subunit is an essential regulator of inflammation. Nature. 2003;421:384–8. 10.1038/nature01339. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Zhang J, Li Z, Chandrasekar A, Li S, Ludolph A, Boeckers TM, et al. Fast maturation of splenic dendritic cells upon TBI is associated with FLT3/FLT3L signaling. Front Immunol. 2022. 10.3389/fimmu.2022.824459. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Li M, Li F, Luo C, Shan Y, Zhang L, Qian Z, et al. Immediate splenectomy decreases mortality and improves cognitive function of rats after severe traumatic brain injury. Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection & Critical Care. 2011;71(1):141–7. 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181f30fc9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Chu W, Li M, Li F, Hu R, Chen Z, Lin J, et al. Immediate splenectomy down-regulates the MAPKYNF-JB signaling pathway in rat brain after severe traumatic brain injury. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013;74:1446–53. 10.1097/TA.0b013e31829246ad. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Strzelec M, Detka J, Mieszczak P, Sobocińska MK, Majka M. Immunomodulation-a general review of the current state-of-the-art and new therapeutic strategies for targeting the immune system. Front Immunol. 2023. 10.3389/FIMMU.2023.1127704. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Olde Heuvel F, Holl S, Chandrasekar A, Li Z, Wang Y, Rehman R, et al. STAT6 mediates the effect of ethanol on neuroinflammatory response in TBI. Brain Behav Immun. 2019;81:228–46. 10.1016/j.bbi.2019.06.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Chandrasekar A, Heuvel F, olde, Palmer A, Linkus B, Ludolph AC, Boeckers TM, et al. Acute ethanol administration results in a protective cytokine and neuroinflammatory profile in traumatic brain injury. Int Immunopharmacol. 2017;51:66–75. 10.1016/j.intimp.2017.08.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Chandrasekar A, Aksan B, Heuvel F, olde, Förstner P, Sinske D, Rehman R, et al. Neuroprotective effect of acute ethanol intoxication in TBI is associated to the hierarchical modulation of early transcriptional responses. Exp Neurol. 2018;302:34–45. 10.1016/j.expneurol.2017.12.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Chandrasekar A, Olde Heuvel F, Wepler M, Rehman R, Palmer A, Catanese A, et al. The neuroprotective effect of ethanol intoxication in traumatic brain injury is associated with the suppression of ERBB signaling in Parvalbumin-positive interneurons. J Neurotrauma. 2018;35:2718–35. 10.1089/neu.2017.5270. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Franz N, Dieteren S, Köhler K, Mörs K, Sturm R, Marzi I, et al. Alcohol binge reduces systemic leukocyte activation and pulmonary PMN infiltration after blunt chest trauma and hemorrhagic shock. Inflammation. 2019;42:690–701. 10.1007/s10753-018-0927-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Ohnmacht C, Schwartz C, Panzer M, Schiedewitz I, Naumann R, Voehringer D. Basophils orchestrate chronic allergic dermatitis and protective immunity against helminths. Immunity. 2010;33:364–74. 10.1016/J.IMMUNI.2010.08.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.McKenzie GJ, Emson CL, Bell SE, Anderson S, Fallon P, Zurawski G, et al. Impaired development of Th2 cells in IL-13-deficient mice. Immunity. 1998;9:423–32. 10.1016/S1074-7613(00)80625-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Wodsedalek DJ, Paddock SJ, Wan TC, Auchampach JA, Kenarsary A, Tsaih SW, et al. IL-13 promotes in vivo neonatal cardiomyocyte cell cycle activity and heart regeneration. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2019;316:H24–34. 10.1152/AJPHEART.00521.2018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Wang F, Flanagan J, Su N, Wang LC, Bui S, Nielson A, et al. RNAscope: A novel in situ RNA analysis platform for formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues. J Mol Diagnostics. 2012;14:22–9. 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2011.08.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.TRUESHARP online deconvolution. Abberior instruments gmb H. (Version 1.0). https://app.truesharp.rocks/
- 34.Heng TSP, Painter MW, Elpek K, Lukacs-Kornek V, Mauermann N, Turley SJ, et al. The immunological genome project: networks of gene expression in immune cells. Nat Immunol. 2008;9:1091–4. 10.1038/NI1008-1091. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Yoshida H, Lareau CA, Ramirez RN, Rose SA, Maier B, Wroblewska A, et al. The cis-Regulatory atlas of the mouse immune system. Cell. 2019;176:897–e91220. 10.1016/J.CELL.2018.12.036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Ge SX, Jung D, Jung D, Yao R. ShinyGO: a graphical gene-set enrichment tool for animals and plants. Bioinformatics. 2020;36:2628–9. 10.1093/BIOINFORMATICS/BTZ931. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Li Z, Zhang J, Halbgebauer S, Chandrasekar A, Rehman R, Ludolph A, et al. Differential effect of ethanol intoxication on peripheral markers of cerebral injury in murine blunt traumatic brain injury. Burns Trauma. 2021. 10.1093/BURNST/TKAB027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Duodu P, Sosa G, Canar J, Chhugani O, Gamero AM. Exposing the two contrasting faces of STAT2 in inflammation. J Interferon Cytokine Res. 2022;42:467–81. 10.1089/JIR.2022.0117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Wang W, Gao W, Zhu Q, Alasbahi A, Seki E, Yang L. TAK1: a molecular link between liver inflammation, fibrosis, steatosis, and carcinogenesis. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021. 10.3389/FCELL.2021.734749. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Yan Z, Luo H, Xie B, Tian T, Li S, Chen Z, et al. Targeting adaptor protein SLP76 of RAGE as a therapeutic approach for lethal sepsis. Nat Commun. 2021. 10.1038/S41467-020-20577-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Akdis CA, Blaser K. Mechanisms of interleukin-10-mediated immune suppression. Immunology. 2001;103:131–6. 10.1046/J.1365-2567.2001.01235.X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Gudkov AV, Gurova KV, Komarova EA. Inflammation and p53: a tale of two stresses. Genes Cancer. 2011;2:503–16. 10.1177/1947601911409747. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Malhotra N, Kang J. SMAD regulatory networks construct a balanced immune system. Immunology. 2013;139:1–10. 10.1111/IMM.12076. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Cheng SWY, Fryer LGD, Carling D, Shepherd PR. Thr2446 is a novel mammalian target of Rapamycin (mTOR) phosphorylation site regulated by nutrient status. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:15719–22. 10.1074/JBC.C300534200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Zhang R, Zhao Y, Chai X, Wang Y, Zhao M, Guo S, et al. Modified CD15/CD16-CLL1 inhibitory CAR-T cells for mitigating granulocytopenia toxicities in the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia. Transl Oncol. 2025. 10.1016/J.TRANON.2024.102225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Ganesh K, Joshi MB. Neutrophil sub-types in maintaining immune homeostasis during steady state, infections and sterile inflammation. Inflamm Res. 2023;72:1175–92. 10.1007/S00011-023-01737-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Dumitru CA, Moses K, Trellakis S, Lang S, Brandau S. Neutrophils and granulocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cells: immunophenotyping, cell biology and clinical relevance in human oncology. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2012;61:1155–67. 10.1007/S00262-012-1294-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Kiwamoto T, Katoh T, Evans CM, Janssen WJ, Brummet ME, Hudson SA, et al. Endogenous airway mucins carry glycans that bind Siglec-F and induce eosinophil apoptosis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2015;135:1329–e13409. 10.1016/J.JACI.2014.10.027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Miyake K, Ito J, Nakabayashi J, Shichino S, Ishiwata K, Karasuyama H. Single cell transcriptomics clarifies the basophil differentiation trajectory and identifies pre-basophils upstream of mature basophils. Nat Commun 2023. 2023;141:14:1–15. 10.1038/s41467-023-38356-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Schwartz C, Voehringer D. Identification of murine basophils by flow cytometry and histology. Methods Mol Biol. 2020;2163:367–75. 10.1007/978-1-0716-0696-4_29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Ono E, Taniguchi M, Higashi N, Mita H, Kajiwara K, Yamaguchi H, et al. CD203c expression on human basophils is associated with asthma exacerbation. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2010. 10.1016/J.JACI.2009.10.074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Hauswirth AW, Natter S, Ghannadan M, Majlesi Y, Schernthaner GH, Sperr WR, et al. Recombinant allergens promote expression of CD203c on basophils in sensitized individuals. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2002;110:102–9. 10.1067/mai.2002.125257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Worrall WPM, Kamphuis JBJ, Stackowicz J, Mougel A, Mauré E, Pecalvel C, et al. The anti-FcεRI antibody MAR-1 depletes basophils and cross-reacts with myeloid cells through its Fc portion. Allergy. 2022;77:1903–6. 10.1111/ALL.15269. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Hughes CE, Nibbs RJB. A guide to chemokines and their receptors. FEBS J. 2018;285:2944–71. 10.1111/febs.14466. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Kohli K, Pillarisetty VG, Kim TS. Key chemokines direct migration of immune cells in solid tumors. Cancer Gene Ther. 2022;29:10–21. 10.1038/S41417-021-00303-X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Siracusa MC, Comeau MR, Artis D. New insights into basophil biology: initiators, regulators, and effectors of type 2 inflammation. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2011;1217:166–77. 10.1111/J.1749-6632.2010.05918.X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Mommert S, Kleiner S, Gehring M, Eiz-Vesper B, Stark H, Gutzmer R, et al. Human basophil chemotaxis and activation are regulated via the Histamine H4 receptor. Allergy. 2016;71:1264–73. 10.1111/ALL.12875. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Leyva-Castillo JM, Sun L, Wu SY, Rockowitz S, Sliz P, Geha RS. Single-cell transcriptome profile of mouse skin undergoing antigen-driven allergic inflammation recapitulates findings in atopic dermatitis skin lesions. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2022;150:373–84. 10.1016/J.JACI.2022.03.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Ma B, Zhu Z, Homer RJ, Gerard C, Strieter R, Elias JA. The C10/CCL6 chemokine and CCR1 play critical roles in the pathogenesis of IL-13-induced inflammation and remodeling. J Immunol. 2004;172:1872–81. 10.4049/JIMMUNOL.172.3.1872. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Korbecki J, Gassowska-Dobrowolskaą M, Wójcik J, Szatkowska I, Barczak K, Chlubek M, et al. The importance of CXCL1 in physiology and noncancerous diseases of bone, bone Marrow, muscle and the nervous system. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23. 10.3390/IJMS23084205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 61.Doke T, Abedini A, Aldridge DL, Yang YW, Park J, Hernandez CM, et al. Single-cell analysis identifies the interaction of altered renal tubules with basophils orchestrating kidney fibrosis. Nat Immunol. 2022;23:947–59. 10.1038/S41590-022-01200-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Jorssen J, Van Hulst G, Mollers K, Pujol J, Petrellis G, Baptista AP, et al. Single-cell proteomics and transcriptomics capture eosinophil development and identify the role of IL-5 in their lineage transit amplification. Immunity. 2024;57:1549–e15668. 10.1016/J.IMMUNI.2024.04.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Lo LW, Chang CW, Chiang MF, Lin IY, Lin KI. Marginal zone B cells assist with neutrophil accumulation to fight against systemic Staphylococcus aureus infection. Front Immunol. 2021. 10.3389/FIMMU.2021.636818. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Hsu YL, Chen YJ, Chang WA, Jian SF, Fan HL, Wang JY, et al. Interaction between tumor-associated dendritic cells and colon cancer cells contributes to tumor progression via CXCL1. Int J Mol Sci. 2018. 10.3390/IJMS19082427. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Zheng C, Cao T, Ye C, Zou Y. Neutrophil recruitment by CD4 tissue-resident memory T cells induces chronic recurrent inflammation in atopic dermatitis. Clin Immunol. 2023. 10.1016/J.CLIM.2023.109805. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Schuijs MJ, Brenis Gomez CM, Bick F, Van Moorleghem J, Vanheerswynghels M, van Loo G, et al. Interleukin-33-activated basophils promote asthma by regulating Th2 cell entry into lung tissue. J Exp Med. 2024. 10.1084/JEM.20240103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Sicklinger F, Meyer IS, Li X, Radtke D, Dicks S, Kornadt MP, et al. Basophils balance healing after myocardial infarction via IL-4/IL-13. J Clin Invest. 2021. 10.1172/JCI136778. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Graber P, Gretener D, Herren S, Aubry J-P, Elson G, Poudrier J, et al. The distribution of IL-13 receptor >1 expression on B cells, T cells and monocytes and its regulation by IL-13 and IL-4. Eur J Immunol. 1998. 10.1002/(SICI)1521-4141(199812)28:12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Barik S, Miller M, Cattin-Roy A, Ukah T, Zaghouani H. A distinct dendritic cell population arises in the thymus of IL-13Rα1-sufficient but not IL-13Rα1-deficient mice. Cell Immunol. 2018;331:130–6. 10.1016/J.CELLIMM.2018.06.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Grakoui A, Bromley SK, Sumen C, Davis MM, Shaw AS, Allen PM, et al. The immunological synapse: a molecular machine controlling T cell activation. Science. 1999;285:221–7. 10.1126/SCIENCE.285.5425.221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Huppa JB, Davis MM. T-cell-antigen recognition and the immunological synapse. Nat Rev Immunol. 2003;3:973–83. 10.1038/NRI1245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Sokol CL, Chu NQ, Yu S, Nish SA, Laufer TM, Medzhitov R. Basophils function as antigen-presenting cells for an allergen-induced T helper type 2 response. Nat Immunol. 2009;10:713–20. 10.1038/NI.1738. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Perrigoue JG, Saenz SA, Siracusa MC, Allenspach EJ, Taylor BC, Giacomin PR, et al. MHC class II-dependent basophil-CD4 + T cell interactions promote T(H)2 cytokine-dependent immunity. Nat Immunol. 2009;10:697–705. 10.1038/NI.1740. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Bunnell TM, Burbach BJ, Shimizu Y, Ervasti JM. Β-actin specifically controls cell growth, migration, and the G-actin pool. Mol Biol Cell. 2011;22:4047–58. 10.1091/MBC.E11-06-0582. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Fritz-Laylin LK, Titus MA. The evolution and diversity of actin-dependent cell migration. Mol Biol Cell. 2023. 10.1091/MBC.E22-08-0358. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Jia QN, Zeng YP. Rapamycin blocks the IL-13-induced deficiency of epidermal barrier related proteins via upregulation of miR-143 in HaCaT keratinocytes. Int J Med Sci. 2020;17:2087–94. 10.7150/IJMS.45765. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Kudrna K, Staab EB, Eilers E, Thomes P, Maurya S, Brody SL, et al. mTOR signaling regulates aberrant epithelial cell proliferative and migratory behaviors characteristic of airway mucous metaplasia in asthma. BioRxiv Prepr Serv Biol. 2024. 10.1101/2024.02.12.579905. [Google Scholar]
- 78.Maher P, Conti B. Deciphering the pathways that protect from IL-13-mediated potentiation of oxidative stress-induced dopaminergic nerve cell death. Cytokine. 2018;103:114–20. 10.1016/J.CYTO.2017.09.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Lelouard H, Schmidt EK, Camosseto V, Clavarino G, Ceppi M, Hsu HT, et al. Regulation of translation is required for dendritic cell function and survival during activation. J Cell Biol. 2007;179:1427–39. 10.1083/JCB.200707166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Cho SH, Raybuck AL, Stengel K, Wei M, Beck TC, Volanakis E, et al. Germinal centre hypoxia and regulation of antibody qualities by a hypoxia response system. Nature. 2016;537:234–8. 10.1038/NATURE19334. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Spriggs KA, Bushell M, Willis AE. Translational regulation of gene expression during conditions of cell stress. Mol Cell. 2010;40:228–37. 10.1016/J.MOLCEL.2010.09.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Yao RW, Wang Y, Chen LL. Cellular functions of long noncoding RNAs. Nat Cell Biol. 2019;21:542–51. 10.1038/S41556-019-0311-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Herman AB, Tsitsipatis D, Gorospe M. Integrated lncRNA function upon genomic and epigenomic regulation. Mol Cell. 2022;82:2252–66. 10.1016/J.MOLCEL.2022.05.027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Lee S, Kopp F, Chang TC, Sataluri A, Chen B, Sivakumar S, et al. Noncoding RNA NORAD regulates genomic stability by sequestering PUMILIO proteins. Cell. 2016;164:69–80. 10.1016/J.CELL.2015.12.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Kopp F, Elguindy MM, Yalvac ME, Zhang H, Chen B, Gillett FA, et al. PUMILIO hyperactivity drives premature aging of Norad-deficient mice. Elife. 2019. 10.7554/ELIFE.42650. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Bjarkø VV, Skandsen T, Moen KG, Gulati S, Helseth E, Nilsen TIL, et al. Time of injury and relation to alcohol intoxication in Moderate-to-Severe traumatic brain injury: A Decade-Long prospective study. World Neurosurg. 2019;122:e684–9. 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.10.122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Raj R, Mikkonen ED, Siironen J, Hernesniemi J, Lappalainen J, Skrifvars MB. Alcohol and mortality after moderate to severe traumatic brain injury: a meta-analysis of observational studies. J Neurosurg. 2016;124:1684–92. 10.3171/2015.4.JNS141746. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Brennan JH, Bernard S, Cameron PA, Rosenfeld JV, Mitra B. Ethanol and isolated traumatic brain injury. J Clin Neurosci. 2015;22:1375–81. 10.1016/j.jocn.2015.02.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Brigode W, Cohan C, Beattie G, Victorino G. Alcohol in traumatic brain injury: toxic or therapeutic? J Surg Res. 2019;244:196–204. 10.1016/j.jss.2019.06.043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Goodman MD, Makley AT, Campion EM, Friend LAW, Lentsch AB, Pritts TA. Preinjury alcohol exposure attenuates the neuroinflammatory response to traumatic brain injury. J Surg Res. 2013;184:1053–8. 10.1016/j.jss.2013.04.058. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Liu X, Mao X, Chang SL. Altered gene expression in the spleen of adolescent rats following high ethanol concentration binge drinking. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2011;4:252–7. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Eken A, Ortiz V, Wands JR. Ethanol inhibits antigen presentation by dendritic cells. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2011;18:1157–66. 10.1128/CVI.05029-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Magatti M, Pischiutta F, Ortolano F, Pasotti A, Caruso E, Cargnoni A, et al. Systemic immune response in young and elderly patients after traumatic brain injury. Immun Ageing. 2023. 10.1186/S12979-023-00369-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Di Battista AP, Rhind SG, Hutchison MG, Hassan S, Shiu MY, Inaba K, et al. Inflammatory cytokine and chemokine profiles are associated with patient outcome and the hyperadrenergic state following acute brain injury. J Neuroinflammation. 2016. 10.1186/s12974-016-0500-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Liao Y, Liu P, Guo F, Zhang ZY, Zhang Z. Oxidative burst of circulating neutrophils following traumatic brain injury in human. PLoS One. 2013. 10.1371/journal.pone.0068963. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Gonzalez Gomez H, Savarraj JPJ, Paz AS, Ren X, Chen H, McCullough LD, et al. Peripheral eosinophil trends and clinical outcomes after non-traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage. Front Neurol. 2023. 10.3389/FNEUR.2023.1051732. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Wang R, Xu J, He M. Blood leukocyte-based clusters in patients with traumatic brain injury. Front Immunol. 2025. 10.3389/FIMMU.2024.1504668. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Falcone FH, Haas H, Gibbs BF. The human basophil: a new appreciation of its role in immune responses. Blood. 2000;96:4028–38. 10.1182/BLOOD.V96.13.4028. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Schwartz C, Eberle JU, Voehringer D. Basophils in inflammation. Eur J Pharmacol. 2016;778:90–5. 10.1016/J.EJPHAR.2015.04.049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Nakanishi K. Basophils are potent antigen-presenting cells that selectively induce Th2 cells. Eur J Immunol. 2010;40:1836–42. 10.1002/EJI.201040588. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Wynn TA. Basophils trump dendritic cells as APCs for TH2 responses. Nat Immunol. 2009;10:679–81. 10.1038/NI0709-679. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Kim S, Shen T, Min B. Basophils can directly present or cross-present antigen to CD8 lymphocytes and alter CD8 T cell differentiation into IL-10-producing phenotypes. J Immunol. 2009;183:3033–9. 10.4049/JIMMUNOL.0900332. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Sokol CL, Medzhitov R. Role of basophils in the initiation of Th2 responses. Curr Opin Immunol. 2010;22:73–7. 10.1016/J.COI.2010.01.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Merluzzi S, Betto E, Ceccaroni A, Magris R, Giunta M, Mion F. Mast cells, basophils and B cell connection network. Mol Immunol. 2015;63:94–103. 10.1016/J.MOLIMM.2014.02.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Yanagihara Y, Kajiwara K, Basaki Y, Ikizawa K, Ebisawa M, Ra C, et al. Cultured basophils but not cultured mast cells induce human IgE synthesis in B cells after immunologic stimulation. Clin Exp Immunol. 1998;111:136–43. 10.1046/J.1365-2249.1998.00474.X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Gauchat JF, Henchoz S, Mazzei G, Aubry JP, Brunner T, Blasey H, et al. Induction of human IgE synthesis in B cells by mast cells and basophils. Nature. 1993;365:340–3. 10.1038/365340A0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Gomez MR, Talke Y, Goebel N, Hermann F, Reich B, Mack M. Basophils support the survival of plasma cells in mice. J Immunol. 2010;185:7180–5. 10.4049/JIMMUNOL.1002319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Dijkstra D, Meyer-Bahlburg A. Human basophils modulate plasma cell differentiation and maturation. J Immunol. 2017;198:229–38. 10.4049/JIMMUNOL.1601144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Möbs C, Salheiser M, Bleise F, Witt M, Mayer JU. Basophils control T cell priming through soluble mediators rather than antigen presentation. Front Immunol. 2023. 10.3389/FIMMU.2022.1032379. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Tang H, Cao W, Kasturi SP, Ravindran R, Nakaya HI, Kundu K, et al. The T helper type 2 response to cysteine proteases requires dendritic cell-basophil cooperation via ROS-mediated signaling. Nat Immunol. 2010;11:608–17. 10.1038/NI.1883. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Vries MHM, Wagenaar A, Verbruggen SEL, Molin DGM, Post MJ. CXCL1 promotes arteriogenesis through enhanced monocyte recruitment into the peri-collateral space. Angiogenesis. 2015;18:163–71. 10.1007/S10456-014-9454-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Chen X, Jin R, Chen R, Huang Z. Complementary action of CXCL1 and CXCL8 in pathogenesis of gastric carcinoma. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2018;11:1036. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Omari KM, Lutz SE, Santambrogio L, Lira SA, Raine CS. Neuroprotection and remyelination after autoimmune demyelination in mice that inducibly overexpress CXCL1. Am J Pathol. 2009;174:164–76. 10.2353/AJPATH.2009.080350. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Silva RL, Lopes AH, Guimarães RM, Cunha TM. CXCL1/CXCR2 signaling in pathological pain: role in peripheral and central sensitization. Neurobiol Dis. 2017;105:109–16. 10.1016/J.NBD.2017.06.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Slowikowski K, Nguyen HN, Noss EH, Simmons DP, Mizoguchi F, Watts GFM, et al. CUX1 and IκBζ (NFKBIZ) mediate the synergistic inflammatory response to TNF and IL-17A in stromal fibroblasts. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020;117:5532–41. 10.1073/PNAS.1912702117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Catar RA, Chen L, Cuff SM, Kift-Morgan A, Eberl M, Kettritz R, et al. Control of neutrophil influx during peritonitis by transcriptional cross-regulation of chemokine CXCL1 by IL-17 and IFN-γ. J Pathol. 2020;251:175–86. 10.1002/PATH.5438. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Su L, Li N, Tang H, Lou Z, Chong X, Zhang C, et al. Kupffer cell-derived TNF-α promotes hepatocytes to produce CXCL1 and mobilize neutrophils in response to necrotic cells. Cell Death Dis. 2018. 10.1038/S41419-018-0377-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Yamaguchi A, Jitsuishi T, Hozumi T, Iwanami J, Kitajo K, Yamaguchi H, et al. Temporal expression profiling of DAMPs-related genes revealed the biphasic post-ischemic inflammation in the experimental stroke model. Mol Brain. 2020. 10.1186/S13041-020-00598-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Burke SJ, Lu D, Sparer TE, Masi T, Goff MR, Karlstad MD, et al. NF-κB and STAT1 control CXCL1 and CXCL2 gene transcription. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2014. 10.1152/AJPENDO.00347.2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Hu L, Dixit VD, de Mello-Coelho V, Taub DD. Age-associated alterations in CXCL1 chemokine expression by murine B cells. BMC Immunol. 2004. 10.1186/1471-2172-5-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Takenaka MC, Araujo LP, Maricato JT, Nascimento VM, Guereschi MG, Rezende RM, et al. Norepinephrine controls effector T cell differentiation through β 2 -adrenergic receptor–mediated inhibition of NF-κB and AP-1 in dendritic cells. J Immunol. 2016;196:637–44. 10.4049/jimmunol.1501206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Junttila IS. Tuning the cytokine responses: an update on Interleukin (IL)-4 and IL-13 receptor complexes. Front Immunol. 2018. 10.3389/FIMMU.2018.00888. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Walker JA, McKenzie ANJ. Th2 cell development and function. Nat Rev Immunol. 2018;18:121–33. 10.1038/NRI.2017.118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Yoshimoto T, Yasuda K, Tanaka H, Nakahira M, Imai Y, Fujimori Y. Basophils contribute to TH2-IgE responses in vivo via IL-4 production and presentation of peptide–MHC class II complexes to CD4+ T cells. Nat Immunol. 2009;10:706–12. 10.1038/NI.1737. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Tolomeo M, Cascio A. STAT4 and STAT6, their role in cellular and humoral immunity and in diverse human diseases. Int Rev Immunol. 2024. 10.1080/08830185.2024.2395274. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Hadebe S, Khumalo J, Mangali S, Mthembu N, Ndlovu H, Scibiorek M, et al. Deletion of IL-4Rα signaling on B cells limits hyperresponsiveness depending on antigen load. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2021;148:99–e1095. 10.1016/J.JACI.2020.12.635. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Scibiorek M, Mthembu N, Mangali S, Ngomti A, Ikwegbue P, Brombacher F, et al. IL-4Rα signalling in B cells and T cells play differential roles in acute and chronic atopic dermatitis. Sci Rep. 2023. 10.1038/S41598-022-26637-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Padilla J, Daley E, Chow A, Robinson K, Parthasarathi K, McKenzie ANJ, et al. IL-13 regulates the immune response to inhaled antigens. J Immunol. 2005;174:8097–105. 10.4049/JIMMUNOL.174.12.8097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Webb DC, Cai Y, Matthaei KI, Foster PS. Comparative roles of IL-4, IL-13, and IL-4Ralpha in dendritic cell maturation and CD4 + Th2 cell function. J Immunol. 2007;178:219–27. 10.4049/JIMMUNOL.178.1.219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.Mayer JU, Hilligan KL, Chandler JS, Eccles DA, Old SI, Domingues RG, et al. Homeostatic IL-13 in healthy skin directs dendritic cell differentiation to promote TH2 and inhibit TH17 cell polarization. Nat Immunol. 2021;22:1538–50. 10.1038/S41590-021-01067-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.Halim TYF, Steer CA, Mathä L, Gold MJ, Martinez-Gonzalez I, McNagny KM, et al. Group 2 innate lymphoid cells are critical for the initiation of adaptive T helper 2 cell-mediated allergic lung inflammation. Immunity. 2014;40:425–35. 10.1016/J.IMMUNI.2014.01.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Halim TYF, Hwang YY, Scanlon ST, Zaghouani H, Garbi N, Fallon PG, et al. Group 2 innate lymphoid cells license dendritic cells to potentiate memory TH2 cell responses. Nat Immunol. 2016;17:57–64. 10.1038/NI.3294. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Lamiable O, Brewerton M, Ronchese F. IL-13 in dermal type-2 dendritic cell specialization: from function to therapeutic targeting. Eur J Immunol. 2022;52:1047–57. 10.1002/EJI.202149677. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Lee S, Shan J, Aldossary H, Gaudreault V, Bazett M, Fixman ED. STAT6 inhibitory peptide reduces dendritic cell migration to the lymph nodes to control Th2 adaptive immunity in the mouse lung. Eur J Immunol. 2019;49:157–69. 10.1002/EJI.201847534. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135.Leyva-Castillo JM, Das M, Artru E, Yoon J, Galand C, Geha RS. Mast cell-derived IL-13 downregulates IL-12 production by skin dendritic cells to inhibit the TH1 cell response to cutaneous antigen exposure. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2021;147:2305–e23153. 10.1016/J.JACI.2020.11.036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136.Buchheit KM, Shaw D, Chupp G, Lehtimaki L, Heffler E, Finney-Hayward T, et al. Interleukin-5 as a pleiotropic cytokine orchestrating airway type 2 inflammation: effects on and beyond eosinophils. Allergy. 2024;79:2662–79. 10.1111/ALL.16303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137.Caruso C, Colantuono S, Tolusso B, Di Mario C, Pentassuglia A, Rumi G, et al. Basophil activation and serum IL-5 levels as possible monitor biomarkers in severe eosinophilic asthma patients treated with anti-IL-5 drugs. Allergy. 2021;76:1569–71. 10.1111/ALL.14643. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138.Barrett NA, Austen KF. Innate cells and T helper 2 cell immunity in airway inflammation. Immunity. 2009;31:425–37. 10.1016/J.IMMUNI.2009.08.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139.Voehringer D. Regulation of type 2 immunity by basophils. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2013;785:37–41. 10.1007/978-1-4614-6217-0_4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140.Bao W, Lin Y, Chen Z. The peripheral immune system and traumatic brain injury: insight into the role of T-helper cells. Int J Med Sci. 2021;18:3644–51. 10.7150/IJMS.46834. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141.Decker D, Schondorf M, Bidlingmaier F, Hirner A, Von Ruecker AA. Surgical stress induces a shift in the type-1/type-2 T-helper cell balance, suggesting down-regulation of cell-mediated and up-regulation of antibody-mediated immunity commensurate to the trauma. Surgery. 1996;119:316–25. 10.1016/S0039-6060(96)80118-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142.De AK, Kodys KM, Pellegrini J, Yeh B, Furse RK, Bankey P, et al. Induction of global anergy rather than inhibitory Th2 lymphokines mediates posttrauma T cell immunodepression. Clin Immunol. 2000;96:52–66. 10.1006/CLIM.2000.4879. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143.Miller AC, Rashid RM, Elamin EM. The T in trauma: the helper T-cell response and the role of immunomodulation in trauma and burn patients. J Trauma. 2007;63:1407–17. 10.1097/TA.0B013E31815B839E. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144.Huber-Lang M, Lambris JD, Ward PA. Innate immune responses to trauma review-article. Nat Immunol. 2018;19:327–41. 10.1038/s41590-018-0064-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145.Psarras A, Antanaviciute A, Alase A, Carr I, Wittmann M, Emery P, et al. TNF-α regulates human plasmacytoid dendritic cells by suppressing IFN-α production and enhancing T cell activation. J Immunol. 2021;206:785–96. 10.4049/JIMMUNOL.1901358. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146.Iwamoto S, Iwai S, Tsujiyama K, Kurahashi C, Takeshita K, Naoe M, et al. TNF-alpha drives human CD14 + monocytes to differentiate into CD70 + dendritic cells evoking Th1 and Th17 responses. J Immunol. 2007;179:1449–57. 10.4049/JIMMUNOL.179.3.1449. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147.Maldonado-López R, De Smedt T, Michel P, Godfroid J, Pajak B, Heirman C, et al. CD8alpha+ and CD8alpha- subclasses of dendritic cells direct the development of distinct T helper cells in vivo. J Exp Med 1999;189:587–92. 10.1084/JEM.189.3.587. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 148.Maldonado-López R, Maliszewski C, Urbain J, Moser M. Cytokines regulate the capacity of CD8alpha(+) and CD8alpha(-) dendritic cells to prime Th1/Th2 cells in vivo. J Immunol 2001;167:4345–50. 10.4049/JIMMUNOL.167.8.4345. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 149.Schlecht G, Leclerc C, Dadaglio G. Induction of CTL and nonpolarized Th cell responses by CD8alpha(+) and CD8alpha(-) dendritic cells. J Immunol 2001;167:4215–21. 10.4049/JIMMUNOL.167.8.4215. [DOI] [PubMed]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Supplementary Material 1: Supplementary Table 1: List of antibodies and lncRNA sequences.
Supplementary Material 2: Supplementary Figure 1: Splenic signaling correlates with neuronal damage, but not axonal damage. A. The correlation matrix reveals high R values between the signaling targets and NSE plasma values, with a significance in pERK. R values close to 0 were observed between signaling targets and NFL plasma values. B-C. Single target correlation shows the significant correlation between NSE and pERK, and poor correlation between NFL and pERK. N = 9. Data is shown as Spearman R correlation matrix, R value as color coded and p value depicted in the graph. *: p<0.05.
Supplementary Material 3: Supplementary Figure 2: Overview images and validation of antibodies. A. Immunofluorescence staining and imaging of CD19, MCPT8 and DAPI in spleen sections showed the dishomogeneous distribution of CD19 and MCPT8. With a main localization in the white pulp, marginal zone and follicles. Scale bar 500 µm. B. Immunofluorescence staining and imaging of DAPI, a-rat AF-488, a-mouse AF-568 and a-rabbit AF 647 in spleen sections showed little to no unspecific binding of secondary antibodies to spleen tissue sections. Scale bar 500 µm. C-E. Immunofluorescence staining and imaging of in one set DAPI and MCPT8 and another set CD19, SiglecF and MCPT8 in WT and MCPT8-cresamples show a strong decrease of MCPT8+ cells in the cre samples with no differences in eosinophil marker SiglecF compared to WT control samples. Scale bar overview: 50 µm; scale bar insert: 20 µm. WT N = 2; Cre N = 3. Data is shown as mean±SD F. Heatmap with data extracted from the Immgen database, showing a selection of immune cells and expression of several granulocyte, eosinophil and basophil markers with levels of expression depicted in red. H, I. Immunostaining of spleen sections with a subset of markers with high and intermediate expression on basophils reveal a colocalization of known highly expressed basophil markers CD203c and Fcer1a with MCPT8. Scale bar overview: 50 µm; scale bar insert: 20 µm.
Supplementary Material 4: Supplementary Figure 3: Eosinophils and Neutrophils show no difference post TBI.A-B. Immunofluorescence staining of spleen sections with CD19, SiglecF and MCPT8 show no differences in SiglecF+/MCPT8- cells3 h post TBI. Sham N = 3; TBI N = 5, scale bar overview: 100 µm; scale bar insert: 20 µm. C-D. Immunofluorescence staining of spleen sections with CD19, CD15 and CD16 show no differences in CD15+/CD16+ cells3 h post TBI. Sham N = 4; TBI N = 5, scale bar overview: 100 µm; scale bar insert: 20 µm.
Supplementary Material 5: Supplementary Figure 4: CXCL1 chemoattracts basophils via its cognate receptor CXCR2.A. Heatmap with data extracted from the Immgen database, showing a selection of immune cells and expression of most common chemokine receptors reveal a high expression of CXCR2on both basophils and neutrophils. B-C. Pearson R correlation analysis reveals a significant positive correlation between splenic CXCL1 protein levels with both NSEand NFLplasma levels. D. Single mRNA in situ hybridization of CXCL1 co-stained with CD4 showed no expression of CXCL1 in CD4+ cells in either sham nor TBI. N = 5. scale bar: 10 µm. E. Single mRNA in situ hybridization of CXCR2 co-stained with MCPT8 and CD15 showed high expression of CXCR2 in MCPT8+ cellsand lower expression in CD15+ cellsN = 3. Scale bar overview: 50 µm; scale bar insert: 10 µm.
Supplementary Material 6: Supplementary Figure 5: Basophils activate B-cells and DCs via IL-13Ra1 phosphorylation.A. Immunofluorescence staining of brain tissue with MAP2 and IL-13 in WT and IL-13-/- samples reveal IL-13 antibody specificity. N = 3. Scale bar: 10 µm. B. Analysis of immunofluorescence staining of spleen sections with IL-13 shows no difference in the number of IL-13+ cells post TBI. Sham N = 4; TBI N = 5. C-E. Analysis of the immunofluorescence staining of spleen sections with CD19, CD11c, MCPT8 and pIL-13Ra1, depicted in barplots. Corresponding to Figure 4D. N = 4. Data is shown as mean±SD. *: p < 0.05.
Supplementary Material 7: Supplementary Figure 6: Basophils induce fast translational response in B-cells and DCs post TBI.A, B. Analysis of the immunofluorescence staining of spleen sections with CD19, CD11c and pS6-RP, depicted in barplots. Corresponding to the representative images in Figure 6A. N = 5. C-E. Analysis of the immunofluorescence staining of spleen sections with CD19, CD11c, MCPT8 and p4E-BP1, depicted in barplots. Corresponding to the representative images in Figure 6C. N = 5. F, G. Single lncRNA RNAscope in spleen sections with the probe NORAD and a co-staining with MCPT8 revealed a high amount of NORAD in MCPT8+ cells, with no significant differences between sham and TBI. Sham N = 3; TBI N = 4; scale bar insert: 20 µm. Data is shown as mean±SD. *: p < 0.05, **: p<0.01.
Supplementary Material 8: Supplementary Figure 7: Ethanol pretreatment prevents basophil induced IL-13Ra1 phosphorylation and NORAD expression, B-cells and DCs.A-C. Analysis of the immunofluorescence staining of spleen sections with CD19, CD11c, MCPT8 and pIL-13Ra1, depicted in barplots. Corresponding to the representative images in Figure 8D. N = 4. D. Qualitative RT-PCR in spleen samples revealed a significant increase in NORAD upon ethanol pretreatmentpost TBI. SS N = 8; ES N = 6; ST N = 8; ET N = 10. E-G. Single lncRNA RNAscope in spleen sections with the probe NORAD and a co-staining with CD19 and CD4 revealed a significant increase in CD19+/NORAD+ upon TBI, with a decrease upon ethanol pretreatment. CD4+ cells show a steady increase in NORAD+ with a significant increase between sham and ethanol pretreated TBI. SS N = 4; ES N = 4; ST N = 4; ET N = 4, scale bar overview: 50 µm; scale bar insert: 20 µm. Data is shown as mean±SD. *: p < 0.05, **: p<0.01, ***: p<0.001.
Data Availability Statement
Original data will be provided upon request.









