Skip to main content
ACS Omega logoLink to ACS Omega
. 2025 Dec 2;10(49):60422–60434. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.5c07670

Synergistic Interfacial Engineering of Green TiO2@g‑C3N4 for Noble-Metal-Free Photocatalytic H2 Generation under Natural Sunlight

Samaha Said Abdallah †, Madappa C Maridevaru †, Faisal Al Marzouqi ‡, Bushra Al Wahaibi †, Munnelli Nagaveni §, Mamatha Kumari Murikinati §, Shankar Muthukonda Venkatakrishnan §, Majeda Khraisheh ∥, Rengaraj Selvaraj †,*
PMCID: PMC12713428  PMID: 41427186

Abstract

The plausible design for accurate, sunlight-responsive photocatalysts for feasible hydrogen generation remains a critical focus in solar energy conversion exploration. In this work, a green TiO2@g-C3N4 heterojunction was produced and systematically assessed for enhanced photocatalytic H2 evolution in an aqueous glycerol solution according to direct sunlight. Structural, morphological, and interfacial features were extensively determined utilizing TEM, XPS, and photoluminescence (PL) spectroscopy, verifying the accomplished generation of a robust heterojunction with strong Ti–N–C interfacial bonding. Gas chromatography confirmed the absence of H2 and O2 prior to irradiation, guaranteeing precise baseline assessments. Pristine g-C3N4 and green TiO2 displayed hydrogen generation rates of 3.75 and 44.5 μmolh–1, respectively, while green TiO2 most notably surpassed traditional white TiO2 (<40 μmolh–1) owing to oxygen vacancies boosting visible-light absorption. Interestingly, the designed green TiO2@g-C3N4 heterostructure attained a superior H2 evolution rate of 110.25 μmol h–1, a 29.4- and 2.4-fold improvement over g-C3N4 and green TiO2, respectively. This elevated photocatalytic achievement is credited to escalated interfacial charge movement, prolonged charge carrier lifetimes, and upgraded surface redox kinetics. This work offers beneficial insights into the rational design of g-C3N4-based heterostructures for highly effective, noble-metal-free, solar-driven hydrogen production.


graphic file with name ao5c07670_0010.jpg


graphic file with name ao5c07670_0008.jpg

1. Introduction

Rising environmental concerns and the depletion of fossil fuels have made the development of sustainable energy solutions a global necessity. , Researchers have been putting a lot of effort into creating a renewable, affordable, sustainable, and environmentally benign energy source substitute for fossil fuels. , Among the various alternatives, hydrogen (H2) has emerged as a promising clean fuel owing to its high energy density (120–142 MJ kg–1) and carbon-free nature. It is projected to meet nearly 90% of the world’s energy demand by 2080. At present, over 44.5 million tons of hydrogen are produced annually, mainly via steam reforming and water electrolysis. − However, these methods are costly and demand large amounts of external energy. Molecular H2 is speculated to be the most beneficial energy route for absorbing sunlight. Water splitting, an acknowledged chemical phenomenon that has sparked the creation of numerous innovations, including electrolyzers, photoelectrochemical (PEC) cells, and photocatalytic processors for particulate catalysts in an aqueous suspension, is a source of this substantial amount of energy. , Solar-driven photocatalytic water splitting offers a practical and eco-friendly strategy, using abundant sunlight and water to produce hydrogen without additional bias or corrosive electrolytes. Yet, the efficiency of this process is hindered by rapid charge recombination, suboptimal band edge alignment, and limited solar absorption. − Sunlight water splitting activities do not need a bias voltage or electrolytes, which are very alkaline/alkaline solutions, like PEC water splitting does. Thus, designing advanced semiconductor photocatalysts with improved light harvesting and charge separation is critical for green hydrogen production.

Since the first effort at water splitting using photocatalysis over Pt/TiO2 was attempted in 1972, scientists have been extensively at work trying to figure out photocatalytic ways to produce hydrogen from water sources. Several semiconductors, including TiO2, Cu2O, SrTiO3, ZnFe2O4, CdS, g-C3N4, WO3, BiVO4, MOF, and perovskite materials, have been noticed as photocatalysts for H2 generation. In recent decades, semiconductor-based photocatalysts have gained a lot of attention due to the fact that photocatalysis successfully handles the expanding worldwide ecological and energy emergencies. ,

In photocatalysis, titanium dioxide has emerged as the standard oxide semiconductor. , The conduction and valence band positions align with redox potentials, enabling eco-friendly reactions, supported by TiO2’s remarkable chemical stability, strong photocorrosion resistance, nontoxic character, and low cost, making it highly promising. Despite extensive efforts, TiO2 performance is limited by its ∼3.2 eV bandgap, restricting absorption to ∼4% UV light, and by rapid electron–hole recombination, which significantly reduces its photocatalytic efficiency. Designing diverse TiO2 nanostructures helps suppress charge recombination, while elemental doping effectively shifts its absorption edge from the ultraviolet to the visible region of sunlight, enhancing photocatalytic activity. ,, Creating a heterojunction an interface among two distinct semiconductors that have distinct band gaps with better electron–hole pair segregation is another method for achieving a visible photon responsiveness. The interface that exists between the semiconductor sensitizer and the TiO2 platform ought to be coordinated in an optimal heterojunction, and the locations of the corresponding VBs and CBs should facilitate it easier to separate the charge carriers generated by photosynthesis.

The unusual electronic composition and excellent thermal and chemical resilience of g-C3N4, a well-known 2D nonmetallic inorganic semiconductor exhibiting visible photon response, have garnered significant interest in the discipline of photocatalysis. , A polymeric semiconductor’s comparatively small bandgap (∼2.7 eV) allows for visible light absorption beyond 460 nm. Despite this, g-C3N4 has been shown to be capable of photocatalytic water splitting for the creation of H2. , Nevertheless, restricted electron accessibility and rapid charge recombination hinder its solar conversion effectiveness. Researchers have been actively working to rationally construct materials inspired by multiphase heterostructures over the past ten years to get beyond the drawbacks of using specific semiconductors for the generation of H2. An ideal photocatalytic heterojunction demands proper band alignment, sunlight utilization, stability, and efficient charge separation. ,

By employing these techniques, the collaborative effect involving TiO2 and g-C3N4 can be leveraged to increase the photocatalytic efficiency. , In addition to TiO2’s capacity to absorb UV light, g-C3N4 may also absorb the visible spectrum, increasing the effectiveness of photocatalytic processes. Additionally, g-C3N4 may establish a heterojunction with TiO2 to minimize the recombination of the photogenerated electron–hole pairs. Water splitting under both ultraviolet and visible light illumination is improved by the resultant nanoheterojunctions’ ability to use a wider spectrum of sunshine. , As documented by Yan and Yang, the productivity of photocatalytic hydrogen synthesis can be increased by employing g-C3N4/TiO2 photocatalysts made by ball-milling and then annealing g-C3N4 and TiO2. Since the CB edge of the TiO2 is lower than the position of the g-C3N4, they hypothesized that photogenerated electrons stimulated by visible photon illumination on the g-C3N4 CB would migrate to the location of TiO2. Wang et al. demonstrated that tailoring TiO2@g-C3N4 microstructures, including contact surfaces, defects, and nanosheets, enhanced photocatalytic efficiency. The optimized heterojunction achieved 436.3 μmol h–1 g–1 H2 production, attributed to favorable band alignment, intimate interfacial contact, and efficient charge carrier separation. Biswal et al. developed a Ti3C2/N,S-TiO2@g-C3N4 ternary heterojunction via annealing and ultrasonic impregnation. At 4 wt % Ti3C2, it achieved 495.06 μmol h–1 H2, enhanced by dual heterojunction formation, efficient carrier separation, and dual charge transfer pathways. Nevertheless, g-C3N4 and TiO2 do not form an intact and intimate interface with these particular heterojunction substances, which results in slow carrier exchange at the heterojunction interfaces. Therefore, relatively minimal enhancement in photoactivity in TiO2@g-C3N4 heterojunction materials. If g-C3N4 and TiO2 form an intimate interface, the movement of the photogenerated carriers across the heterojunction interface will be enhanced.

Moreover, the green template design strategy adopted for TiO2 preparation offers a sustainable and eco-friendly. Plant extracts act as natural reducing and stabilizing agents, eliminating the need for toxic reagents while simultaneously controlling particle size, morphology, and dispersion. Unlike conventional chemical methods, the green template strategy ensures an eco-friendly, cost-effective synthesis while maintaining precise control over TiO2 morphology and dispersion. Coupled with the rational design of the TiO2@g-C3N4 interface, this work introduces a sustainable pathway to produce a high-performance photocatalyst. The combination not only reduces the environmental footprint of catalyst preparation but also enhances hydrogen generation efficiency, thereby offering a practical model for merging environmental safety with energy conversion effectiveness.

In this study, two-dimensional g-C3N4 nanosheets were fabricated through a thermal polymerization strategy and subsequently integrated with TiO2 nanoparticles synthesized via a green template-assisted solvothermal approach, forming a TiO2@g-C3N4 heterojunction nanoheterojunction. The hybrid material was systematically explored for its photocatalytic efficiency in H2 generation under sunlight. The synergistic interaction between g-C3N4 and TiO2 was found to enhance charge carrier separation significantly, boosting the photocatalytic performance. Furthermore, a plausible photocatalytic mechanism was proposed to elucidate the charge transfer dynamics and active species generation within the TiO2@g-C3N4 heterostructure during H2 production. This study offers valuable insights into the design of efficient, environmentally benign photocatalysts for sustainable energy applications, emphasizing the potential of heterojunction engineering to optimize photocatalytic hydrogen evolution under ambient sunlight conditions.

2. Experimental Details

2.1. Materials

Melamine (C3H6N6, CAS No. 108–78–1, ≥99%) and titanium­(IV) butoxide (Ti­(OC4H9)4, CAS No. 5593–70–4, 97%) were used as precursors for the production of TiO2 and g-C3N4, accordingly. The solvents were Milli-Q water from a water purification system and absolute ethanol (C2H6O, CAS No. 64–17–5, 99.5%). Every chemical was acquired from Sigma-Aldrich and used without additional purification. The green template was prepared from a plant extract that utilized leaves from the Moringa plant (Moringa oleifera) from Wadi Kabir, Muscat, Sultanate of Oman.

2.2. Synthesis of Photocatalyst Materials

2.2.1. Synthesis of g-C3N4

Graphitic carbon nitride (g-C3N4) was obtained through a one-step thermal polymerization technique employing melamine as the starting material. A total of 1 g of melamine was transferred into a lidded crucible and subjected to thermal treatment in a muffle furnace. The system was heated from room temperature to 550 °C at a consistent rate of 10 °C per minute and held at the target temperature for 3 h to complete the polymerization process.

2.2.2. Synthesis of Green Template-Assisted TiO2

A green synthesis approach was employed for the preparation of titanium dioxide nanoparticles using Moringa leaves as a natural biotemplate. Initially, 10 g of cleaned, dried Moringa leaves were boiled in 150 mL of deionized water at 80 °C for 2 h. The extract was allowed to cool, filtered, and stored at 4 °C for later use. Separately, 2 mL of Titanium­(IV) butoxide was mixed with 20 mL of ethanol and vortexed to obtain a uniform solution. This mixture was then added dropwise to 50 mL of the prepared plant extract under constant stirring for 2 h. The resulting solution was transferred to a Teflon-lined autoclave and heated at 160 °C for 12 h. The formed precipitates were repeatedly washed with water and ethanol over 2 days, then dried at 80 °C for 12 h. Finally, the product was calcined at 450 °C for 3 h at a heating rate of 3 °C/min.

2.2.3. Synthesis of 1:1 Mass Ratio TiO2@g-C3N4 Nanoheterojunctions

To fabricate the nanoheterojunctions, synthesized TiO2 and graphitic carbon nitride (g-C3N4) were combined in equal mass ratios. Both materials were placed together into a conical flask (capacity 250 mL), followed by the addition of 50 mL of deionized water and 20 mL of ethanol. The suspension was stirred continuously for 2 h to ensure uniform dispersion of the components. After thorough mixing, the solution was transferred into a Teflon-lined autoclave (capacity: 150 mL) and subjected to solvothermal treatment at 160 °C for 12 h. Upon completion, the resulting mixture was carefully washed several times with deionized water and ethanol to eliminate residual impurities. Finally, the nanoheterojunction was dried in an oven at 80 °C for 12 h, yielding well-integrated TiO2/g-C3N4 nanostructures ready for further characterization and photocatalytic application.

2.3. Detailed Materials Characterization

The structural, optical, and compositional characteristics of TiO2, g-C3N4, and the green-synthesized TiO2@g-C3N4 nanoheterojunction were thoroughly investigated using a range of analytical techniques. The optical behavior of the materials was assessed by UV–Visible diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (UV–Vis DRS) using a SHIMADZU UV-2600i spectrophotometer. This instrument, capable of extending measurements into the near-infrared region up to 1400 nm, utilized BaSO4 as a baseline reference. To examine the surface morphology and elemental distribution, Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscopy (FESEM) was conducted with a JEOL JSM-7001F microscope, coupled with Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy (EDS) for elemental analysis. The chemical bonding and functional groups present in the samples were identified using Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy over a scanning range of 400–4000 cm–1, performed on an FTIR α (ECOART) spectrometer. The Particle structures of the synthesized materials were determined through X-ray diffraction (XRD) using an X’Pert Pro diffractometer, equipped with a Cu Kα radiation source (λ = 1.54056 Å). Diffraction patterns were recorded within a 2θ range from 10° to 90° to identify distinct crystal phases. Surface elemental states and chemical compositions were analyzed by X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS) using a multiprobe system from Omicron Nanotechnology (Germany), with data interpretation conducted through Casa XPS software. Additionally, the photoluminescence (PL) characteristics of the nanomaterials were examined using a Shimadzu RF-5301PC spectrophotometer, employing an excitation wavelength of 330 and 310 nm to evaluate their emission behavior, g-C3N4, TiO2@g-C3N4, and TiO2, respectively.

2.4. Photoelectrochemical Properties

Photoelectrochemical (PEC) measurements were performed using a conventional three-electrode system connected to a CHI 760D electrochemical workstation (CH Instruments). The working electrode was prepared by coating fluorine-doped tin oxide (FTO) glass (2 cm × 2 cm) with a suspension of the photocatalyst (TiO2, g-C3N4, or TiO2@g-C3N4), while a platinum wire and an Ag/AgCl electrode served as the counter and reference electrodes, respectively. To fabricate the working electrode, 200 μL of a 0.83 g/L photocatalyst suspension was drop-cast onto the FTO substrate and allowed to dry at room temperature for 12 h. The photocatalyst suspension was prepared by dispersing 3 mg of the material in 3 mL of ethanol and 500 μL of Nafion solution, followed by sonication for 30 min to achieve a uniform dispersion. A 500 W xenon lamp equipped with an AM 1.5 filter was used as the simulated solar light source. The transient photocurrent responses of the different photocatalysts were evaluated in a 0.5 M Na2SO4 electrolyte at an applied potential of 0.4 V versus Ag/AgCl under intermittent light irradiation. Additionally, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) measurements were carried out under the same conditions to assess the electrodes’ charge transfer resistance and interfacial properties. The EIS spectra were recorded at 0.4 V versus Ag/AgCl over a frequency range of 100 kHz to 0.1 Hz under illumination, providing insight into the photoelectrochemical performance of the synthesized materials.

2.5. Photocatalytic Experimental Setup for H2 Production

The hydrogen evolution performance of pristine TiO2, g-C3N4, and their TiO2@g-C3N4 nanoheterojunctions was systematically evaluated under natural sunlight, as demonstrated in Scheme . For each experiment, 10 mg of the photocatalyst powder was uniformly dispersed in 50 mL of an aqueous solution containing 10 vol.% glycerol, serving as a sacrificial electron donor. The suspension was prepared within a Kjeldahl-type quartz photoreactor (180 mL capacity), which was externally wrapped with aluminum foil to maintain dark conditions. The mixture was magnetically stirred at room temperature for 15 min to promote adsorption equilibrium between the photocatalyst surface and reactants. After sealing the reactor with a Suba-Seal rubber septum, it was evacuated for 15 min to remove trapped gases and subsequently purged with high-purity nitrogen gas to establish an oxygen-free environment. A Shimadzu GC-2014 gas chromatograph equipped with a molecular sieve (5 Å) column and a thermal conductivity detector (TCD) was used for hydrogen detection, with ultrahigh purity nitrogen as the carrier gas. A baseline (zero-hour) chromatogram was obtained prior to irradiation to confirm the absence of hydrogen and oxygen. After removing the aluminum covering, the photocatalytic hydrogen evolution experiments were conducted by exposing the reactor to direct sunlight on clear days, between 10 a.m. and 2 p.m. The system was irradiated continuously for 4 h, with gas sampling every 2 h using a gastight Hamilton micro syringe (250 μL). The solar irradiance was monitored hourly using a lux meter, recording an average intensity of 112,600 ± 4000 lx. This procedure was consistently applied to all photocatalysts for comparative evaluation.

1. Schematic Illustration of the Synthesis of g-C3N4, Green TiO2, and TiO2@g-C3N4 Nanoheterojunction Photocatalyst .

1

a [The Scheme is drawn using BioRender].

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Characterization of Nanoheterojunction Photocatalyst

To comprehensively uncover the microstructure, optical behavior, and chemical makeup of TiO2, g-C3N4, and their TiO2@g-C3N4 heterojunctions, a suite of advanced techniques including XRD, FT-IR, XPS, DRS, PL spectra, SEM, TEM, EDX, and elemental mapping were employed, offering deep insights into their structural and functional characteristics. The crystallographic properties and phase purity of TiO2, g-C3N4, and their TiO2@g-C3N4 nanoheterojunctions were thoroughly characterized by powder X-ray diffraction (XRD). The diffraction patterns, shown in Figure a, reveal that the prominent peaks of TiO2 correspond to the anatase phase, with diffraction peaks at 2θ values of 25.14°, 37.67°, 47.91°, 54.53°, 62.61°, 69.80°, and 79.90°, which are attributed to the (101), (004), (200), (211), (204), (116), and (215) planes, respectively. These peaks are in excellent agreement with the standard JCPDS card #21–1272, ,, confirming the Particle nature of TiO2. For g-C3N4, characteristic diffraction peaks at 2θ = 12.08° and 27.71° were observed, tris-s-triazine phase, corresponding to the (100) and (002) planes, respectively, in line with JCPDS card #87–1526. ,, The absence of additional diffraction peaks suggests that the materials are highly pure, with no detectable impurities or secondary phases. The diffraction patterns of the TiO2@g-C3N4 nanoheterojunctions show an influence of TiO2 on the peak intensities, with TiO2 dominating due to its sharper and more defined peaks. Notably, the (101) peak of TiO2 at 25.14° exhibits broadening and a shift to higher 2θ values (Figure b). The observed higher-angle shift in the XRD pattern of TiO2@g-C3N4 is attributed to lattice strain and slight contraction caused by strong interfacial interaction between TiO2 and g-C3N4. The formation of the heterojunction induces structural distortion and modifies the local electronic environment, leading to a decrease in interplanar spacing (d-spacing). Such shifts have been commonly reported in TiO2-based heterostructures and are consistent with the formation of a stable TiO2-g-C3N4 interface. The reduction in crystallite size, common in nanoheterojunctions, leads to broader XRD peaks due to the inverse relationship between peak width and particle size. Additionally, lattice strain may arise from the interaction between TiO2 and g-C3N4, as the materials may have mismatched lattice parameters or different thermal expansion properties. This strain disturbs the regular atomic arrangement in the crystal, causing both peak broadening and shifts to higher 2θ angles. In the case of g-C3N4, the sharp (100) peak originates from the in-plane arrangement of tri-s-triazine units, which are relatively well ordered, whereas the broad (002) reflection corresponds to interlayer stacking. The broadness of the (002) peak reflects poor crystallinity along the stacking direction because the layers are held together only by weak van der Waals forces, leading to structural disorder in that dimension. For the TiO2@g-C3N4 composite, there is the weak additional reflections around 2θ ≈ 19° and 30° which do not appear in either pure TiO2 or g-C3N4. Since they are absent in the green-synthesized TiO2, their origin is most likely associated with structural rearrangements that occur during the formation of the heterojunction. The intimate interfacial contact between TiO2 nanoparticles and g-C3N4 nanosheets can introduce local lattice strain, defect sites, or partial ordering of atoms at the interface, which can give rise to new diffraction features. As these peaks are very weak, they represent only minor structural modifications rather than significant impurities. Importantly, such interfacial distortions do not hinder the photocatalytic activity; in fact, they may provide additional defect states that promote charge separation and transport, thereby contributing positively to the overall performance.

1.

1

(a, b) Powder XRD patterns, (c) FT-IR analysis, (d) XPS survey spectra of pristine and nanoheterojunction photocatalyst, and XPS analysis of (e) Ti 2p, (f) O 1s, (g) C 1s, and (h) N 1s elements.

The crystallite sizes (D) were calculated using the Debye–Scherrer eq , providing insights into the average particle size of the synthesized materials.

Dhkl=Kλ/βcos⁡θ 1

In which K represents the shape factor (0.94), λ indicates the X-ray wavelength, β denotes the full width at half-maximum (fwhm) of the diffraction peak, and θ appears the Bragg angle, was adopted to derive the average dimensions of the grains of pure green TiO2, pristine g-C3N4, and the TiO2@g-C3N4 nanoheterojunction. According to Figure S2 in the Supporting Information, the predicted crystallitee sizes are 11.08 nm for TiO2, 19.44 nm for g-C3N4, and 18.83 nm for the TiO2@g-C3N4 nanoheterojunction. When TiO2 and g-C3N4 interact during formation, it may promote the proliferation of TiO2 crystallites and prevent their full dispersion, leading to greater particle sizes in the combined substance. This could explain the increase in particle size seen in the TiO2@g-C3N4 heterojunction when contrasted with pure TiO2.

Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy was employed to investigate the functional groups present in the synthesized TiO2 nanoparticles, g-C3N4, and their TiO2@g-C3N4 nanoheterojunctions. The recorded spectra, obtained in the wavenumber range of 400–4000 cm–1, are displayed in Figure c. A prominent absorption band observed around 436 cm–1 is attributed to the characteristic Ti–O–Ti stretching vibrations, which are indicative of the anatase phase of TiO2, typically appearing within the fingerprint region of 420–650 cm–1. ,, Additionally, a distinct peak at 803 cm–1 corresponds to the out-of-plane bending vibrations of C–H groups and the triazine ring units in the g-C3N4 framework. The absorption band near 1593 cm–1 is associated with N–H bending vibrations and contributions from –CC– stretching in aromatic structures. Moreover, a crest at 1618 cm–1 can be assigned to the stretching vibrations of CO groups and CN bonds within the tri-s-triazine rings of g-C3N4. A broad absorption band around 3120 cm–1 is attributed to N–H stretching vibrations, indicative of the amine functional group present in g-C3N4. , The FTIR spectra of the TiO2@g-C3N4 nanoheterojunctions exhibited all the major characteristic bands of both TiO2 and g-C3N4, though with reduced intensity as the TiO2 content increased. This attenuation suggests the formation of heterojunction interfaces between the two components. Additionally, a noticeable shift in the absorption bands toward higher wavenumbers was observed in the heterojunctions compared to pure g-C3N4, attributed to strong interfacial interactions and electronic coupling between TiO2 and g-C3N4. ,

X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was comprehensively employed to investigate the surface chemical composition, oxidation states, and interfacial interactions within the as-prepared TiO2, g-C3N4, and TiO2@g-C3N4 nanoheterojunctions. The wide-scan survey spectra obtained in the binding energy range of 0–1200 eV (Figure d) confirmed the presence of Ti, O, C, and N elements, consistent with the expected composition of the nanoheterojunction. The detection of these elements without any additional impurity signals suggests high purity and successful integration of TiO2 and g-C3N4 components within the heterojunction nanostructure. The high-resolution Ti 2p spectrum (Figure e) for both pure TiO2 and the nanoheterojunction revealed two characteristic peaks positioned at binding energies of approximately 458.8 and 464.1 eV, corresponding to Ti 2p3/2 and Ti 2p1/2, respectively. ,, The observed spin–orbit splitting of about 5.3 eV is in good agreement with the tetravalent Ti4+ state in the anatase phase, indicating the preservation of TiO2’s oxidation state upon heterojunction formation. The O 1s core-level spectrum (Figure f) exhibited a dominant peak near 529.7 eV, which can be assigned to lattice oxygen (Ti–O–Ti bonds) in the TiO2 framework. In the TiO2@g-C3N4 nanoheterojunction, a slight shift and broadening of this peak were observed, implying possible interaction or chemical bonding between TiO2 and the g-C3N4 matrix, likely through surface hydroxyl groups or interfacial oxygen linkages. ,, The C 1s spectrum for g-C3N4 (Figure g) presented three notable peaks at around 284.6, 286.9, and 288.1 eV. These peaks are attributed to graphitic carbon, sp2-bonded CN within the heptazine rings, and –N–CN aromatic structures. In the heterojunction, slight shifts in these peaks suggest electronic interactions and charge redistribution at the TiO2/g-C3N4 interface. Similarly, the N 1s spectrum in Figure h displayed peaks at 396.3, 398.9, and 401.7 eV, assigned to sp2-hybridized N in C–NC, tertiary nitrogen (N–(C)3), and amino-functionalized C–N–H groups, respectively. ,, In the XPS spectra, the C 1s and N 1s peaks of pristine g-C3N4 appear broader because of the coexistence of multiple bonding states (C–NC, C–(N)3, N–CN, and graphitic N) and the presence of structural defects, which lead to overlapping signals and peak broadening. Upon formation of the TiO2@g-C3N4 composite, these peaks become relatively narrower, reflecting a more uniform chemical environment. This change is due to interfacial interactions between TiO2 and g-C3N4, which reduce surface disorder and stabilize the bonding configuration of carbon and nitrogen atoms. The narrowing of the peaks thus indicates improved structural uniformity and stronger electronic coupling at the heterojunction interface, which is beneficial for charge separation and photocatalytic activity. In the heterojunction, changes in peak positions and intensities indicate chemical bonding and strong interfacial coupling between TiO2 nanoparticles and the g-C3N4 matrix, supporting the formation of a heterojunction structure that enhances charge transfer efficiency across the interface.

The optical properties of the synthesized nanomaterials were systematically investigated using UV–Vis diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (UV–Vis DRS) to evaluate their light absorption characteristics and band gap energies. The diffuse reflectance spectra of TiO2, g-C3N4, and the TiO2@g-C3N4 nanoheterojunction are presented in Figure a. Pure TiO2 exhibited strong absorption in the ultraviolet region, with an absorption edge at approximately 390 nm, which is characteristic of its wide band gap semiconductor nature. In comparison, g-C3N4 demonstrated a broader absorption profile extending well into the visible region due to its relatively narrower band gap. Interestingly, the introduction of g-C3N4 into TiO2 significantly modified the optical absorption behavior of the resulting nanoheterojunction. This coupling leads to the formation of a heterojunction interface, facilitating better electronic interactions between the two semiconductors. The optical band gap energies (Eg) of the materials were calculated from the diffuse reflectance data using the Kubelka–Munk function and Tauc plot method.

αhν=A(hν−Eg)n 2

where α is the absorption coefficient, h is Planck’s constant, ν is the frequency of light, A is a proportionality constant, and n depends on the type of electronic transition (n = 2 for direct transitions and n = 1/2 for indirect transitions).

2.

2

(a) UV–vis DRS absorption spectra, (b) Bandgap energies by Tauc plot, and (c) Photoluminescence spectra of pristine g-C3N4, green TiO2, and TiO2@g-C3N4 heterojunction photocatalysts.

The predicted band gap energies varied from 2.69 eV for g-C3N4 to 3.18 eV for TiO2, as seen in Figure b. This result confirms the successful formation of a heterojunction, enhancing visible light absorption and promoting efficient charge carrier separation, thereby improving photocatalytic performance. Moreover, an energy level diagram (ELD) was constructed to evaluate the relative positions of the conduction and valence band edges of the synthesized catalysts, based on the experimental data obtained from Mott–Schottky measurements. Furthermore, the potential barrier positions for both TiO2 and g-C3N4 nanomaterials were estimated using the following eqs and , enabling an approximate determination of the conduction band (E CB) and valence band (E VB) potentials ,,

EVB=χ−E0+(1/2Eg) 3
ECB=EVB−Eg 4

In these equations, χ represents the absolute electronegativity of the semiconductor, calculated as the geometric mean of the constituent atomic electronegativities (Ti: 3.51 eV, O: 7.54 eV, C: 6.27 eV, and N: 7.30 eV), sourced from Pearson’s Absolute Electronegativity values. E 0 corresponds to the energy of free electrons on the hydrogen scale (4.5 eV), while E g is the experimentally determined band gap energy of the material. The calculated ECB and EVB values provide insights into the charge transfer dynamics and photocatalytic activity of the materials.

Accordingly, the valence and conduction band positions for pure TiO2 were estimated to be +2.92 eV and −0.26 eV, respectively. In comparison, the band edge potentials for pristine g-C3N4 were predicted to be +1.57 eV for the valence band and −1.12 eV for the conduction band (detailed in Supporting Information Table S1). ,, The results offer valuable theoretical support for understanding the enhanced photocatalytic efficiency of the heterojunction material, correlating with its band structure alignment and charge separation behavior.

To further examine the separation efficiency of photogenerated charge carriers, photoluminescence (PL) spectra of all the produced nanoheterojunctions were acquired by employing an excitation wavelength of 330 and 310 nm to evaluate their emission behavior, g-C3N4, TiO2@g-C3N4, and TiO2, respectively. (Figure c). The PL emission of TiO2 in the broad band around 350–500 nm region. , This broad emission was found to be caused by band-to-band transitions and excitonic emission associated with interfacial oxygen vacancies and structural imperfections. , A significant rate of photoinduced electron–hole pair recombination was indicated by the broad and strong emission peak of g-C3N4, which was centered at roughly 460 nm. It is interesting to note that the TiO2@g-C3N4 heterojunction displayed a PL profile that was considerably less intense than that of pristine g-C3N4 and TiO2. This quenching of PL intensity demonstrates that the formation of the heterojunction effectively prevents charge carrier recombination. Figure c PL observations provided additional evidence for agreement.

The morphological features, particle size distribution, elemental composition, and elemental spatial distribution of the synthesized green TiO2, g-C3N4, and their nanoheterojunctions were comprehensively characterized using FE-SEM coupled with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS). As depicted in Figure a, high-magnification SEM images (ranging from 1 μm to 100 nm) revealed that the green-synthesized TiO2 nanoparticles exhibited predominantly spherical morphologies, with some variation in particle sizes indicative of polydispersity. In contrast, the SEM micrographs of g-C3N4, presented in Figure b, confirmed the presence of stacked, flat, two-dimensional sheet-like structures, consistent with its layered graphitic-like morphology. The microstructural examination of the TiO2@g-C3N4 nanoheterojunction, shown in Figure c, demonstrated a hybrid architecture wherein spherical TiO2 nanoparticles were uniformly anchored onto the surface of g-C3N4 nanosheets. The morphological features seen in the SEM examination were further validated by HR-TEM pictures, as demonstrated in Figure d–f. The TiO2 nanoparticles that were green-synthesized showed up as distinct, sphere-shaped particles with a modest size dispersion (Figure d). On the other hand, g-C3N4 showed smooth surfaces and thin, translucent, sheet-like nanostructures (Figure e). A well-dispersed hybrid framework with close contact among the nanoparticles and the 2D nanosheet matrix was confirmed by the TEM analysis of the TiO2@g-C3N4 nanoheterojunction, which showed TiO2 nanoparticles effectively attached onto the surface of the g-C3N4 nanosheets (Figure f). This configuration suggests the formation of intimate interfacial contact between the two phases, facilitating efficient heterojunction formation. The adoption of plant extract in the green synthesis route offered significant advantages in terms of environmental safety and process feasibility. Acting as a natural reducing and stabilizing agent, the plant extract enabled the formation of well-dispersed TiO2 nanoparticles without altering the intrinsic morphology of the g-C3N4 sheets in the resulting nanoheterojunction.

3.

3

(a–c) SEM, and (d-f) TEM images of green TiO2, g-C3N4 nanosheets, TiO2@g-C3N4 nanoheterojunction, (g) EDS analysis, and (h) Bright-field mapping images of as-synthesized TiO2@g-C3N4 nanoheterojunction, (i) Ti, (j) O, (k) C, and (l) N elements.

EDS elemental mapping and analysis, as shown in Figure g, confirmed the presence of Ti, O, C, and N elements within the nanostructures, consistent with the expected composition of the heterojunction materials. Additionally, traces of Mg, Cl, K, and Al detected in TiO2 samples were attributed to residual components from the plant-based green template. The homogeneous distribution of the principal elements throughout the TiO2@g-C3N4 heterojunction, verified by bright and well-defined color mapping images in Figure h–l, provided further confirmation of the successful synthesis and effective integration of the two phases.

The microstructural characterization of green-synthesized TiO2, g-C3N4, and their nanoheterojunction (Figure ) provides crucial insights into their structure–activity relationship. The spherical morphology and nanoscale dimensions of TiO2 offer a high surface-to-volume ratio, enabling efficient photon absorption and rapid surface reaction kinetics. Meanwhile, the stacked, layered morphology of g-C3N4 facilitates extended light harvesting in the visible region and provides a large platform for anchoring TiO2 nanoparticles. In the TiO2@g-C3N4 heterojunction, the uniform dispersion and intimate interfacial contact between TiO2 nanoparticles and g-C3N4 sheets promote effective charge separation and shorten the transport pathways of photoinduced carriers, thereby suppressing electron–hole recombination. The homogeneous elemental distribution confirmed by EDS mapping further supports this synergistic integration, which is essential for maintaining consistent charge flow across the heterointerface. Collectively, the structural features of nanoscale particle size, sheet-like morphology, and robust heterojunction interface directly contribute to enhanced charge transport and improved light absorption, ultimately accounting for the superior photocatalytic hydrogen generation observed under sunlight irradiation.

3.2. Photocatalytic Ability of TiO2@g-C3N4 in H2 Generation

The optical performance of TiO2, g-C3N4, and their TiO2/g-C3N4 nanoheterojunction was explored via diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (DRS). Pure TiO2 showed strong UV absorption around 390 nm, while g-C3N4 captured light well into the visible region. Remarkably, the TiO2/g-C3N4 heterojunction exhibited even stronger visible-light absorption. This unexpected enhancement, diverging slightly from earlier findings, is likely driven by the formation of unique (Ti)–N–C bonds at the interface. These bonds not only strengthen the interaction between components but also improve charge separation and extend light absorption, making the heterojunction a promising candidate for visible-light-driven applications. ,

The photocatalytic hydrogen production efficiency of green TiO2, g-C3N4, and their green TiO2/g-C3N4 nanoheterojunction was systematically investigated in an aqueous solution containing 10 vol.% glycerol under sunlight irradiation. Gas analysis conducted before illumination confirmed the absence of hydrogen and oxygen, ensuring accurate baseline measurements. Upon exposure to sunlight, pristine g-C3N4 and green TiO2 exhibited hydrogen evolution rates of 3.75 and 44.5 μmol.h–1, respectively. Notably, the H2 production rate of green TiO2 significantly surpasses that of conventional white TiO2, which typically produces less than 40 μmol h–1 under similar conditions, as reported in earlier studies. ,,, This enhancement can be attributed to the presence of oxygen vacancies, which narrow its effective bandgap, thereby extending light absorption into the visible range and improving charge carrier separation. ,

Despite these improvements, both pristine materials exhibited limited activity due to residual recombination of photogenerated carriers and the absence of a cocatalyst such as platinum. In contrast, the green TiO2/g-C3N4 nanoheterojunction displayed a remarkable photocatalytic enhancement, achieving a hydrogen production rate of 110.25 μmol.h–1 under optimal green TiO2 loading. This represents an approximate 29.4- and 2.4-fold increase compared to pristine g-C3N4 and green TiO2, respectively, as depicted in Figure a,b. The superior activity stems from the formation of a heterojunction between green TiO2 and g-C3N4, promoting efficient separation and transfer of photogenerated electrons and holes. Favorable band alignment allows electrons to migrate from the conduction band of g-C3N4 to green TiO2, while holes remain in the valence band of g-C3N4, effectively suppressing recombination. ,, Additionally, the defect-rich structure, enhanced sunlight absorption, and efficient charge migration in green TiO2 further contribute to the boosted hydrogen evolution performance of the heterojunction system. , The photocatalytic H2 generation performance of the as-synthesized TiO2@g-C3N4 nanocomposite was compared with previously reported photocatalyst systems under various sources of irradiations in Supporting Information Table S2. The results indicate that our green-synthesized heterojunction demonstrates competitive or superior activity, attributed to its uniform morphology, strong interfacial interaction, and efficient charge separation. This comparison highlights the effectiveness of the biotemplated synthesis strategy in enhancing photocatalytic hydrogen evolution.

4.

4

Photocatalytic efficiency of pristine and nanoheterojunctions for H2 production. (a) Accumulated H2 production under natural sunlight irradiation (b) rate of hydrogen production (c), recyclability test, (d) transient photocurrent properties, and (e) electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) plots (inset is the equivalent circuit).

Furthermore, the TiO2/g-C3N4 heterojunction exhibits relatively stable behavior during photocatalytic generation of hydrogen during sunlight irradiation, in addition to its good photocatalytic performance, as shown in Figure c. Nonetheless, the third cycle shows a visible drop in H2 generation. The visible drop-in activity is explained by a decrease in the concentration of sacrificial hole scavenger glycerol with irradiation, and not due to deactivation of the catalyst. Lakshmana Reddy et al. observed a gradual decrease in the total volume of H2 production from one cycle to another with the TiO2-based heterojunction photocatalyst. They explained that during prolonged recyclability studies, regain in photocatalytic activity was achieved by adding a small amount of glycerol to the reaction mixture. ,

Moreover, photogenerated charge carrier separation and transfer, specific surface area, surface imperfections, and light absorption capacity are all intimately related to the photocatalytic performance of semiconductor materials. Photocurrent response and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) Nyquist plots were employed to assess the separation and transportation of charge carriers across the heterojunction interface, given the critical role that charge carriers play in photocatalysis. Photocurrent sensitivity evaluations were performed for the produced photocatalysts in order to examine the behavior of photogenerated charge carriers. Under solar-light irradiation, the TiO2/g-C3N4 heterojunction exhibits a significantly increased photocurrent density, roughly twice that of pure g-C3N4 and almost 10 times greater than TiO2, displayed in Figure d. This notable improvement suggests that TiO2 and g-C3N4 heterojunction creation efficiently encourages the separation of photoinduced electron–hole pairs and speeds up charge carrier transmission. The heterojunction’s high interfacial contact significantly reduces recombination, which enhances charge transfer and photocatalytic performance in general. , Although TiO2 shows higher charge transfer resistance (calculate and provide the values 2 or 3 folds) and lower photocurrent response than g-C3N4, its superior photocatalytic activity can be explained by its favorable band structure, stability, and stronger oxidative potential. TiO2 possesses a wider band gap, which generates highly reactive photogenerated holes with strong oxidizing power, enabling more efficient surface redox reactions despite slower charge transport. In contrast, g-C3N4, while showing higher photocurrent and lower resistance, suffers from rapid charge recombination and weaker oxidation ability of its photogenerated holes. Thus, the intrinsic surface reactivity of TiO2 dominates over its charge transport limitations, allowing it to achieve higher overall photocatalytic activity compared to g-C3N4 under similar conditions. On the other hand, lower photocurrent generation at the TiO2 surface is ascribed to the lower light intensity available from sunlight than the C3N4 material, which absorbs the visible spectrum of sunlight.

The interfacial transfer of charge resistance across the electrolyte–electrode interface for g-C3N4, TiO2, and TiO2/g-C3N4 photocatalysts was investigated using electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS). The Nyquist plots, illustrated in Figure e, with the charge transfer resistance, are correlated with the arc diameter. ,, A smaller radius indicates more effective interfacial charge transmission. Out of all the samples evaluated, the TiO2/g-C3N4 heterojunction showed the shortest semicircle, demonstrating its more effective charge separation and transfer capabilities at the heterojunction interface. These findings demonstrate the TiO2/g-C3N4 structure’s increased potential for effective solar-driven water splitting and boosted hydrogen production capabilities.

Based on the previously reported empirical findings, we could recommend the photocatalytic H2 production mechanism over the TiO2@g-C3N4 heterojunction (Scheme ). In the TiO2@g-C3N4 heterojunction, the photocatalytic H2 generation follows an S-scheme charge transfer mechanism. Upon solar irradiation, both TiO2 and g-C3N4 absorb photons, generating electron–hole pairs. In g-C3N4, electrons are excited to its conduction band (−1.12 eV), leaving holes in the valence band (+1.57 eV), while TiO2 generates electrons in its conduction band (−0.26 eV) and holes in its valence band (+2.92 eV). At the interface, the less energetic electrons in the CB of TiO2 recombine with the less oxidative holes in the VB of g-C3N4, a defining step of the S-scheme mechanism. , As a result, the highly reductive electrons in the CB of g-C3N4 and the strongly oxidative holes in the VB of TiO2 are preserved. The electrons in g-C3N4 efficiently reduce protons to generate H2, while the holes in TiO2 oxidize sacrificial agents such as glycerol, sustaining proton supply. This selective recombination and retention of strong redox carriers suppresses electron–hole recombination, prolongs carrier lifetime, and ultimately enhances photocatalytic hydrogen evolution efficiency. , In accordance with FE-SEM and XPS studies of the produced heterojunction materials, g-C3N4 and TiO2 form a strong interaction ((Ti)2–N–C), which effectively enhances the splitting and transmission of the charge carriers formed by photons across the TiO2@g-C3N4 hybrid interface. Consequently, as demonstrated in the previous discussion, g-C3N4 and TiO2 can be closely coupled to confine an abundance of −OH groups across the TiO2@g-C3N4 catalytic interface. This significantly improves the adsorbed H2O’s interaction with g-C3N4 and speeds up with photogenerated holes in g-C3N4. Photogenerated holes are retained in the valence band (VB) of TiO2, where they promote the oxidation of sacrificial agents, such as aqueous glycerol mixtures, leading to the formation of protons (H+) along with reactive oxidation intermediates. , Simultaneously, photogenerated electrons are predominantly accumulated in the conduction band (CB) of g-C3N4, where they efficiently participate in the reduction of protons (H+) to generate molecular hydrogen (H2). Moreover, the TiO2@g-C3N4 heterojunction’s advantageous band orientation allows for the spatial separation of photogenerated charge carriers, which successfully hinders electron and hole recombination, extending their lifetime and improving photocatalytic effectiveness. The cumulative hydrogen evolution capacity under solar irradiation is greatly enhanced by the directed movement of electrons and holes, which expedite the corresponding redox processes within the active sites of TiO2 and g-C3N4. The heterojunction’s potential for long-term photocatalytic applications is highlighted by this mechanism and eqs 5–10.

3.2. 10

2. Sunlight-Driven S-Scheme Photocatalytic H2 Production Mechanism over the As-Prepared Green TiO2@g-C3N4 Heterojunction .

2

a [The Scheme is drawn using BioRender].

4. Conclusion

The present study explores a novel green TiO2@g-C3N4 heterojunction as a highly capable, noble-metal-free photocatalyst for solar-driven hydrogen production. A comprehensive analysis of structural, morphological, and optical properties affirmed the formation of a sustainable interfacial interaction between green TiO2 and g-C3N4, driven by Ti–N–C bonding. The defect-rich structure of green TiO2, featuring abundant oxygen vacancies, plays a critical role in enhancing visible-light absorption and improving the charge separation efficiency, marking a significant advancement over conventional TiO2 photocatalysts. Photocatalytic activity during sunlight exhibited a remarkable 110.25 μmol h–1 hydrogen generation rate for the heterojunction, achieving 29.4- and 2.4-fold enhancements over pristine g-C3N4 and green TiO2, respectively. The TiO2@g-C3N4 interface’s effective S-scheme charge migration and strategic band orientation are responsible for the previously unheard-of increase in photocatalytic function. The prolonged carrier lifetimes and lower recombination losses due to the heterojunction architecture are major elements behind its improved effectiveness. These results highlight the significance of band structure stimulation, interface engineering, and defect engineering in the development of high-performance photocatalysts. This work lays a solid basis for future integration with environmentally friendly technologies by proposing an affordable, scalable approach for successful solar-driven hydrogen generation.

Supplementary Material

ao5c07670_si_001.pdf (382.5KB, pdf)

Acknowledgments

One of the Authors S.S.A. gratefully acknowledges Sultan Qaboos University for providing an opportunity to study her Ph.D degree program. Also, all authors gratefully acknowledge the Sultan Qaboos University and Qatar University for providing financial support to conduct this research work under the joint collaborative project [CL/SQU-QU/SCI/23/01]. M.N. gratefully acknowledges DST-INSPIRE for providing a doctoral fellowship [IF190302].

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.5c07670.

  • Photographic images of experimental set up for the sunlight driven H2 production, change in crystallite size among the as-synthesized g-C3N4, green TiO2, and TiO2@g-C3N4 photocatalyst nanosamples, the potential edges of conduction and valence band of g-C3N4 and TiO2, comparison study of photocatalytic H2 generation over the as-synthesized TiO2@g-C3N4 nanocomposite structures and the previously documented literature, and references (PDF)

⊥.

S.S.A and M.C.M contributed equally to this work.

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

References

  1. Wang J., Li L., Ye X., Yang Y., Ren W., Ge J., Zhang S., Zheng X., Chen S.. Dual-Defect Modified 2 D/2D TiO2/g-C3N4 Heterojunction for Photocatalytic H2 Production. Cryst. Growth Des. 2024;24(18):7605–7616. doi: 10.1021/acs.cgd.4c00826. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  2. Shoaib M., Naz M. Y., Shukrullah S., Munir M. A., Irfan M., Rahman S., Ghanim A. A. J.. Dual S-Scheme Heterojunction CdS/TiO2/g-C3N4 Photocatalyst for Hydrogen Production and Dye Degradation Applications. ACS Omega. 2023;8(45):43139–43150. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.3c06759. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chiarello G. L., Zuliani A., Ceresoli D., Martinazzo R., Selli E.. Exploiting the Photonic Crystal Properties of TiO2 Nanotube Arrays to Enhance Photocatalytic Hydrogen Production. Acs Catal. 2016;6(2):1345–1353. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.5b02817. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  4. Rafique M., Hajra S., Irshad M., Usman M., Imran M., Assiri M. A., Ashraf W. M.. Hydrogen Production Using TiO2-Based Photocatalysts: A Comprehensive Review. ACS Omega. 2023;8(29):25640–25648. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.3c00963. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chiarello G. L., Dozzi M. V., Selli E.. TiO2-Based Materials for Photocatalytic Hydrogen Production. J. Energy Chem. 2017;26(2):250–258. doi: 10.1016/j.jechem.2017.02.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  6. Biswal L., Nayak S., Parida K.. Rationally Designed Ti3C2/N, S-TiO2/g-C3N4 Ternary Heterostructure with Spatial Charge Separation for Enhanced Photocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2022;621:254–266. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2022.04.071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Naseri A., Samadi M., Pourjavadi A., Moshfegh A. Z., Ramakrishna S.. Graphitic Carbon Nitride (GC 3 N 4)-Based Photocatalysts for Solar Hydrogen Generation: Recent Advances and Future Development Directions. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2017;5(45):23406–23433. doi: 10.1039/C7TA05131J. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  8. da Silva Veras T., Mozer T. S., da Costa Rubim Messeder dos Santos D., da Silva César A.. Hydrogen: Trends, Production and Characterization of the Main Process Worldwide. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 2017;42(4):2018–2033. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.08.219. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  9. Maridevaru M. C., Al F., Nagaveni M., Mamatha M., Venkatakrishnan M., Selvaraj R.. Sunlight Driven Eu 2 O 3/CoNiZn-LDH @ g-C 3 N 4 Ternary Heterojunction Nanocomposite Photocatalyst for Hydrogen Generation. Renewable Energy. 2025;246:122917. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2025.122917. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  10. Megía P. J., Vizca\’\ino A. J., Calles J. A., Carrero A.. Hydrogen Production Technologies: From Fossil Fuels toward Renewable Sources. A Mini Review. Energy Fuels. 2021;35(20):16403–16415. doi: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.1c02501. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hisatomi T., Kubota J., Domen K.. Recent Advances in Semiconductors for Photocatalytic and Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014;43(22):7520–7535. doi: 10.1039/C3CS60378D. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Naldoni A., Altomare M., Zoppellaro G., Liu N., Kment S., Zboril R., Schmuki P.. Photocatalysis with Reduced TiO2: From Black TiO2 to Cocatalyst-Free Hydrogen Production. ACS Catal. 2019;9(1):345–364. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.8b04068. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Qin C., Chen X., Jiang N., Liang R., Li Z., Zheng Z., Wu J., Chi H., Ye Z., Zhu L.. Surface Densification Strategy Assisted Efficient Cu2O Heterojunction Photocathode for Solar Water Splitting. Mater. Today Nano. 2023;21:100294. doi: 10.1016/j.mtnano.2022.100294. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  14. Tasleem S., Tahir M.. Constructing Exfoliated, Ti3C2T X MXene-Dispersed, LaCoo3 and PC3n4-Based Nanocomposites with in Situ Grown Titania Through Etching/Oxidation for Stimulating Solar H2 Production. Energy Fuels. 2023;37(2):1421–1440. doi: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.2c03339. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  15. AliAkbari R., Ghasemi M. H., Neekzad N., Kowsari E., Ramakrishna S., Mehrali M., Marfavi Y.. High Value Add Bio-Based Low-Carbon Materials: Conversion Processes and Circular Economy. J. Cleaner Prod. 2021;293:126101. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126101. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  16. Sahar K. U., Rafiq K., Abid M. Z., Rehman U. U., Althomali R. H., Rauf A., Hussain E.. Sensitization of TiO2/g-C3N4 Heterostructures via Pd--Au Cocatalysts: A Rational Design of Water Splitting System for Green Fuel Production. Energy Fuels. 2024;38(18):17995–18009. doi: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.4c01320. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  17. Zhou P., Navid I. A., Ma Y., Xiao Y., Wang P., Ye Z., Zhou B., Sun K., Mi Z.. Solar-to-Hydrogen Efficiency of More than 9\% in Photocatalytic Water Splitting. Nature. 2023;613(7942):66–70. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-05399-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Tran P. D., Batabyal S. K., Pramana S. S., Barber J., Wong L. H., Loo S. C. J.. A Cuprous Oxide--Reduced Graphene Oxide (Cu 2 O--RGO) Composite Photocatalyst for Hydrogen Generation: Employing RGO as an Electron Acceptor to Enhance the Photocatalytic Activity and Stability of Cu 2 O. Nanoscale. 2012;4(13):3875–3878. doi: 10.1039/c2nr30881a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Ouyang S., Tong H., Umezawa N., Cao J., Li P., Bi Y., Zhang Y., Ye J.. Surface-Alkalinization-Induced Enhancement of Photocatalytic H2 Evolution over SrTiO3-Based Photocatalysts. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012;134(4):1974–1977. doi: 10.1021/ja210610h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Lv J., Li B., Luo T., Nie C., Pan W., Ge X., Zheng J., Rui Y., Zheng L.. Selective Photothermal Therapy Based on Lipopolysaccharide Aptamer Functionalized MoS2 Nanosheet-Coated Gold Nanorods for Multidrug-Resistant Pseudomonas Aeruginosa Infection. Adv. Healthcare Mater. 2023;12(15):2202794. doi: 10.1002/adhm.202202794. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Girginer B., Galli G., Chiellini E., Bicak N.. Preparation of Stable CdS Nanoparticles in Aqueous Medium and Their Hydrogen Generation Efficiencies in Photolysis of Water. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 2009;34(3):1176–1184. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.10.086. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  22. Maridevaru M. C., Nagaveni M., Kumari M. M., Shankar M. V., Khraisheh M., Selvaraj R.. Unravelling the Efficiency of CoAl-LDH/g-C3N4 Nanosheets: Type-II Heterojunction for Photocatalytic Hydrogen Production and Dye Degradation under Solar Light Irradiation. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 2024;89:1112–1125. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.09.286. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  23. Su, J. ; Wang, Z. . Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting. In Water Photo- and Electro-Catalysis: Mechanisms, Materials, Devices, and Systems; Wiley, 2024; pp 143–206. [Google Scholar]
  24. Mia N., Singh K., Polson J., Lisi L., Willemsen E., Hu Y.. A Review of Znln2S4-Based Photocatalysts for Producing Hydrogen by Water Splitting under Visible Light: Fundamentals and Recent Advancements. Can. J. Chem. Eng. 2024;102(2):585–606. doi: 10.1002/cjce.25078. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  25. Reddy D. A., Kim Y., Gopannagari M., Kumar D. P., Kim T. K.. Recent Advances in Metal--Organic Framework-Based Photocatalysts for Hydrogen Production. Sustainable Energy Fuels. 2021;5(6):1597–1618. doi: 10.1039/C9SE00749K. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  26. Nguyen V.-H., Do H. H., Van Nguyen T., Singh P., Raizada P., Sharma A., Sana S. S., Grace A. N., Shokouhimehr M., Ahn S. H.. et al. Perovskite Oxide-Based Photocatalysts for Solar-Driven Hydrogen Production: Progress and Perspectives. Sol. Energy. 2020;211:584–599. doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2020.09.078. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  27. White J. L., Baruch M. F., Pander J. E. III, Hu Y., Fortmeyer I. C., Park J. E., Zhang T., Liao K., Gu J., Yan Y.. et al. Light-Driven Heterogeneous Reduction of Carbon Dioxide: Photocatalysts and Photoelectrodes. Chem. Rev. 2015;115(23):12888–12935. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Rathi A. K., Kmentová H., Naldoni A., Goswami A., Gawande M. B., Varma R. S., Kment S., Zbořil R.. Significant Enhancement of Photoactivity in Hybrid TiO2/g-C3N4 Nanorod Catalysts Modified with Cu--Ni-Based Nanostructures. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2018;1(6):2526–2535. doi: 10.1021/acsanm.8b00078. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  29. Fujishima A., Zhang X., Tryk D. A.. TiO2 Photocatalysis and Related Surface Phenomena. Surf. Sci. Rep. 2008;63(12):515–582. doi: 10.1016/j.surfrep.2008.10.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  30. Schneider J., Matsuoka M., Takeuchi M., Zhang J., Horiuchi Y., Anpo M., Bahnemann D. W.. Understanding TiO2 Photocatalysis: Mechanisms and Materials. Chem. Rev. 2014;114(19):9919–9986. doi: 10.1021/cr5001892. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Wei H., McMaster W. A., Tan J. Z. Y., Cao L., Chen D., Caruso R. A.. Mesoporous TiO2/g-C3N4Microspheres with Enhanced Visible-Light Photocatalytic Activity. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2017;121(40):22114–22122. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b06493. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  32. Liu G., Zhao Y., Sun C., Li F., Lu G. Q., Cheng H.-M.. Synergistic Effects of B/N Doping on the Visible-Light Photocatalytic Activity of Mesoporous TiO2. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008;47(24):4516–4520. doi: 10.1002/anie.200705633. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Wang P., Li X., Fang J., Li D., Chen J., Zhang X., Shao Y., He Y.. A Facile Synthesis of CdSe Quantum Dots-Decorated Anatase TiO2 with Exposed $\{$0 0 1$\}$ Facets and Its Superior Photocatalytic Activity. Appl. Catal., B. 2016;181:838–847. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2015.08.046. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  34. Yang J., Wang D., Han H., Li C. A. N.. Roles of Cocatalysts in Photocatalysis and Photoelectrocatalysis. Acc. Chem. Res. 2013;46(8):1900–1909. doi: 10.1021/ar300227e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Su N., Zhu D., Zhang P., Fang Y., Chen Y., Fang Z., Zhou X., Li C., Dong H.. 3D/2D Heterojunction Fabricated from RuS2 Nanospheres Encapsulated in Polymeric Carbon Nitride Nanosheets for Selective Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction to CO. Inorg. Chem. 2022;61(39):15600–15606. doi: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.2c02421. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Feng N., Lin H., Deng F., Ye J.. Interfacial-Bonding Ti--N--C Boosts Efficient Photocatalytic H2 Evolution in Close Coupling g-C3N4/TiO2. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2021;125(22):12012–12018. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.1c02606. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  37. Lin L., Yu Z., Wang X.. Crystalline Carbon Nitride Semiconductors for Photocatalytic Water Splitting. Angew. Chem. 2019;131(19):6225–6236. doi: 10.1002/ange.201809897. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Tahir M.. Binary Ni2P/Ti3C2Multilayer Cocatalyst Anchored TiO2 Nanocomposite with Etchant/Oxidation Grown TiO2 NPs for Enhancing Photocatalytic H2 Production. Energy Fuels. 2021;35(17):14197–14211. doi: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.1c01340. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  39. Tahir M.. Nanoconfined Ti3C2@ In-Situ-Grown TiO2 and Ruthenium Triphenylphosphine (Ru-II) Coupled g-C3N4 to Construct RuP-Ti3C2@ TiO2/EC3N4 Dual Function Nanocomposite for Enhancing Photocatalytic Green Hydrogen Production. Chem. Eng. J. 2023;476:146680. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2023.146680. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  40. Li K., Gao S., Wang Q., Xu H., Wang Z., Huang B., Dai Y., Lu J.. In-Situ-Reduced Synthesis of Ti3+ Self-Doped TiO2/g-C3N4 Heterojunctions with High Photocatalytic Performance under LED Light Irradiation. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2015;7(17):9023–9030. doi: 10.1021/am508505n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Abdallah S. S., Maridevaru M. C., Marzouqi F. Al., Selvaraj R.. Green Synthesis of TiO2@g-C3N4 Nanocomposites for the Photocatalytic Degradation of Pesticides and Toxic Organics Present in Water and Wastewater. J. Photochem. Photobiol., A. 2024;459:116015. doi: 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2024.116015. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  42. Wang J., Lu Z., Gao K., Kang X., Zhu C., Qiao F., Chen H., Li Z., Huang W., Lu G.. Photocatalytic Reforming of Ethanol in the Liquid Phase Using a Ternary Composite of Rh/TiO2/g-C3N4 as a Catalyst. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2024;16(37):49371–49379. doi: 10.1021/acsami.4c09188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Yan H., Yang H.. TiO2--g-C3N4 Composite Materials for Photocatalytic H2 Evolution under Visible Light Irradiation. J. Alloys Compd. 2011;509(4):L26–L29. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2010.09.201. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  44. Abaee M., Moraveji M. K.. Evaluation of Eco-Friendly Bio-Resources for Green Synthesis of TiO2 and Comparative Analysis with ZnO in Photocatalytic Degradation of Amoxicillin: A Case Study Using Vinegar and Natural Fatty Acids. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 2025;221:200–212. doi: 10.1016/j.cherd.2025.07.028. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  45. Ghareeb A., Fouda A., Kishk R. M., El Kazzaz W. M.. Unlocking the Potential of Titanium Dioxide Nanoparticles: An Insight into Green Synthesis, Optimizations, Characterizations, and Multifunctional Applications. Microb. Cell Fact. 2024;23(1):341. doi: 10.1186/s12934-024-02609-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Maridevaru M. C., Naceruddin A. H., Aljafari B., Anandan S.. Low-Frequency Acoustic Irradiation Coupled Photocatalytic Degradation of Dye Pollutant Using LaNi0. 5Co0. 5O3/g-C3N4 Nanocatalyst. J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 2022;140:104570. doi: 10.1016/j.jtice.2022.104570. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  47. Li J., Liu Y., Li H., Chen C.. Fabrication of G-C3N4/TiO2 Composite Photocatalyst with Extended Absorption Wavelength Range and Enhanced Photocatalytic Performance. J. Photochem. Photobiol., A. 2016;317:151–160. doi: 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2015.11.008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  48. Al Mamari S., Al Marzouqi F., Al Nabhani A., Kim Y., Selvaraj R.. Hollow TiO2/g-C3N4 Nanocomposite for Photodegradation of Volatile Organic Carbons under Visible-Light. Toxicol. Environ. Chem. 2022;104(2):211–231. doi: 10.1080/02772248.2022.2134387. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  49. Lu L., Wang G., Zou M., Wang J., Li J.. Effects of Calcining Temperature on Formation of Hierarchical TiO2/g-C3N4 Hybrids as an Effective Z-Scheme Heterojunction Photocatalyst. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018;441:1012–1023. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.02.080. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  50. Biswal L., Nayak S., Parida K.. Rationally Designed Ti3C2/N, S-TiO2/g-C3N4 Ternary Heterostructure with Spatial Charge Separation for Enhanced Photocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2022;621:254–266. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2022.04.071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Tong Z., Yang D., Xiao T., Tian Y., Jiang Z.. Biomimetic Fabrication of G-C3N4/TiO2 Nanosheets with Enhanced Photocatalytic Activity toward Organic Pollutant Degradation. Chem. Eng. J. 2015;260:117–125. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2014.08.072. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  52. Rathi A. K., Kmentová H., Naldoni A., Goswami A., Gawande M. B., Varma R. S., Kment S., Zboril R.. Significant Enhancement of Photoactivity in Hybrid TiO2/g-C3N4 Nanorod Catalysts Modified with Cu-Ni-Based Nanostructures. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2018;1(6):2526–2535. doi: 10.1021/acsanm.8b00078. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  53. Abdallah S. S., Maridevaru M. C., Marzouqi F. Al., Selvaraj R.. Green Synthesis of TiO2@g-C3N4 Nanocomposites for the Photocatalytic Degradation of Pesticides and Toxic Organics Present in Water and Wastewater. J. Photochem. Photobiol., A. 2024;459:116015. doi: 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2024.116015. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  54. Maridevaru M. C., Anandan S., Aljafari B., Wu J. J.. LaCoxFe1-XO3 (0≤ X≤ 1) Spherical Nanostructures Prepared via Ultrasonic Approach as Photocatalysts. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2021;80:105824. doi: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2021.105824. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Pearson R. G.. Absolute Electronegativity and Hardness: Application to Inorganic Chemistry. Inorg. Chem. 1988;27(4):734–740. doi: 10.1021/ic00277a030. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  56. Mei P., Wang H., Guo H., Zhang N., Ji S., Ma Y., Xu J., Li Y., Alsulami H., Alhodaly M. S., Hayat T., Sun Y.. The Enhanced Photodegradation of Bisphenol A by TiO2/C3N4 Composites. Environ. Res. 2020;182:109090. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2019.109090. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Yu Y., Wen W., Qian X.-Y., Liu J.-B., Wu J.-M.. UV and Visible Light Photocatalytic Activity of Au/TiO2 Nanoforests with Anatase/Rutile Phase Junctions and Controlled Au Locations. Sci. Rep. 2017;7(1):41253. doi: 10.1038/srep41253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Yang S., Wang B., Zhao R., Wei L., Su J.. Enhanced Photoelectrochemical Performance of NiS-Modified TiO 2 Nanorods with a Surface Charge Accumulation Facet. Dalton Trans. 2023;52(44):16442–16450. doi: 10.1039/D3DT02698A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Han C., Wang Y., Lei Y., Wang B., Wu N., Shi Q., Li Q.. In Situ Synthesis of Graphitic-C 3 N 4 Nanosheet Hybridized N-Doped TiO 2 Nanofibers for Efficient Photocatalytic H 2 Production and Degradation. Nano Res. 2015;8:1199–1209. doi: 10.1007/s12274-014-0600-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  60. Obregón S., Colón G.. Improved H2 Production of Pt-TiO2/g-C3N4-MnOx Composites by an Efficient Handling of Photogenerated Charge Pairs. Appl. Catal., B. 2014;144:775–782. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2013.07.034. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  61. Yu J., Wang S., Low J., Xiao W.. Enhanced Photocatalytic Performance of Direct Z-Scheme GC 3 N 4--TiO 2 Photocatalysts for the Decomposition of Formaldehyde in Air. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2013;15(39):16883–16890. doi: 10.1039/c3cp53131g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Dong G., Zhang Y., Wang Y., Deng Q., Qin C., Hu Y., Zhou Y., Tian G.. Ti3C2 Quantum Dots Modified 3D/2D TiO2/g-C3N4 S-Scheme Heterostructures for Highly Efficient Photocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2021;4(12):14342–14351. doi: 10.1021/acsaem.1c03019. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  63. Mousa S. A., Abdallah H., Khairy S. A.. The Use of Green Synthesized TiO2/MnO2 Nanoparticles in Solar Power Membranes for Pulp and Paper Industry Wastewater Treatment. Sci. Rep. 2025;15(1):2102. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-85075-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Miranda C., Mansilla H., Yáñez J., Obregón S., Colón G.. Improved Photocatalytic Activity of G-C3N4/TiO2 Composites Prepared by a Simple Impregnation Method. J. Photochem. Photobiol., A. 2013;253:16–21. doi: 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2012.12.014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  65. Reddy N. L., Emin S., Kumari V. D., Muthukonda Venkatakrishnan S.. CuO Quantum Dots Decorated TiO2 Nanocomposite Photocatalyst for Stable Hydrogen Generation. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2018;57(2):568–577. doi: 10.1021/acs.iecr.7b03785. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  66. Reddy N. L., Kumar S., Krishnan V., Sathish M., Shankar M. V.. Multifunctional Cu/Ag Quantum Dots on TiO2 Nanotubes as Highly Efficient Photocatalysts for Enhanced Solar Hydrogen Evolution. J. Catal. 2017;350:226–239. doi: 10.1016/j.jcat.2017.02.032. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  67. Liu X., Chen N., Li Y., Deng D., Xing X., Wang Y.. A General Nonaqueous Sol-Gel Route to g-C3N4-Coupling Photocatalysts: The Case of Z-Scheme g-C3N4/TiO2 with Enhanced Photodegradation toward RhB under Visible-Light. Sci. Rep. 2016;6(1):39531. doi: 10.1038/srep39531. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Yingsu J., Sun J., Yang L., Liang J., Bao H., Han L., Qian Y., Liu H., Fu X.. In Situ Generation of Anatase-Rutile TiO2/g-C3N4 Composite Catalyst in High-Temperature Molten Salt. Langmuir. 2025;41(5):3654–3661. doi: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.4c04971. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Li T.-T., Xie M.-M., Wang H.-Y., Wang J.-S., Lin J.-H., Lou C.-W.. An S-Scheme TiO2/g-C3N4 Nanocomposite Effectively Degrades Phenanthrene under Visible Light. Colloids Surf., A. 2025;705:135554. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2024.135554. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

ao5c07670_si_001.pdf (382.5KB, pdf)

Articles from ACS Omega are provided here courtesy of American Chemical Society

RESOURCES