Skip to main content
Revista Brasileira de Medicina do Trabalho logoLink to Revista Brasileira de Medicina do Trabalho
. 2025 Dec 9;23(4):e20251485. doi: 10.47626/1679-4435-2025-1485

Epidemiology of occupational accidents involving exposure to biological material in Goiânia, Goiás, from 2014 to 2024

Epidemiologia dos acidentes de trabalho com exposição a material biológico em Goiânia, Goiás, entre 2014 e 2024

Vítor Gonzaga Chaves 1,✉, Eduardo William Farinha Carvalho 1, Gustavo Peres Pelegrine 1, Stefan Vilges de Oliveira 2
PMCID: PMC12713554  PMID: 41425304

Abstract

Introduction

Occupational accidents involving exposure to biological material occur when workers come into contact with blood or other bodily fluids. The literature indicates that most of these events affect health professionals and could be prevented.

Objectives

To describe the epidemiological profile of occupational accidents involving exposure to biological material reported to the Notifiable Diseases Information System in the city of Goiânia, state of Goiás, Brazil.

Methods

This descriptive, cross-sectional study analyzed epidemiological aspects of occupational accidents with exposure to biological material using data from the Notifiable Diseases Information System for Goiânia between 2014 and 2024.

Results

Most reported accidents involved nurses, nursing technicians, or nursing assistants (49.90%), women (76.75%), and individuals aged 20-29 years (37.44%). Among the victims, 580 were not vaccinated against hepatitis B, and 1,004 had unknown or unrecorded vaccination status. Blood was the most frequent biological material involved (75.47%). Loss to clinical follow-up occurred in 17.41% of cases. Two deaths directly related to the accidents were recorded.

Conclusions

There is a need to expand continuing education programs in biosafety for health professionals and to promote large-scale hepatitis B vaccination campaigns. Improving the completeness and quality of reporting is also essential to reduce underreporting of these events.

Keywords: public health surveillance, occupational accidents registry, occupational exposure.

INTRODUCTION

Occupational accidents involving exposure to biological material refer to situations in which workers from different sectors come into contact with organic materials capable of transmitting pathogens.1 Among the most relevant occupational infections are those caused by HIV and the hepatitis B and C viruses.2,3 Human blood, for example, can be a source of 20 different diseases.3

Health professionals are particularly vulnerable to this type of accident.4,5 This increased susceptibility results from performing activities that favor accidental contact with potentially contaminated materials, combined with factors such as long working hours, occupational stress, and, in many cases, insufficient training and inadequate resources.4-6

A large proportion of these accidents could be prevented through the adoption of simple biosafety measures.7 In addition, even after the event occurs, appropriate clinical follow-up of the victim is essential to prevent infections and late complications.8

Although complete elimination of occupational risks is not feasible, occupational medicine seeks to promote workplaces that adopt a culture of prevention, grounded in awareness and good safety practices.9 In this context, reporting of accidents is essential, as it enables health authorities to assess and improve mitigation strategies, particularly those related to potentially pathogenic biological agents.10

Despite being a legal requirement,11 reporting of occupational accidents involving exposure to biological material remains insufficient. Underreporting is influenced by factors such as lack of knowledge among professionals responsible for recording cases, underestimation of severity and infection risk,12 and limited understanding of the legal importance of these notifications.10

Therefore, this study aimed to identify and describe the epidemiological profile of occupational accidents involving exposure to biological material reported to the Notifiable Diseases Information System (Sistema de Informação de Agravos de Notificação, SINAN) in the city of Goiânia, state of Goiás, Brazil, between 2014 and 2024.

METHODS

This study is a descriptive, cross-sectional analysis of the epidemiological aspects of occupational accidents involving exposure to biological material in Goiânia.

Data were obtained from SINAN, which is publicly available through the Department of Informatics of the Brazilian Unified Health System. All events reported in Goiânia between 2014 and 2024 were included. Data collection was conducted in February 2025.

The following variables were accessed: number of cases per year, age group, sex, race/skin color, number of pregnant women, educational level, occupation, employment status, outsourced or non-outsourced employment bond, type of exposure, biological material involved, circumstances of the accident, causal agent, use of personal protective equipment (PPE), hepatitis B vaccination status, case outcome, and issuance of a work accident report, which is the official record of an occupational accident or work-related disease. Data were presented in tables as absolute and relative frequencies.

This study relied exclusively on secondary data, without any identification of workers involved in occupational accidents with exposure to biological material, the companies to which they were linked, or the professionals responsible for managing the cases. Therefore, in accordance with National Health Council Resolution no. 510 of April 7, 2016,13 submission of the project to a Research Ethics Committee was not required.

RESULTS

Between 2014 and 2024, 12,490 occupational accidents involving exposure to biological material were reported in Goiânia. The annual number of notifications remained relatively stable over the period, with a mean of 1,135.45 cases per year. Table 1 shows the distribution of cases according to year of notification, sex, and age group of the victims.

Table 1.

Occupational accidents involving exposure to biological material in Goiânia between 2014 and 2024, according to year of notification, sex, and age group of the victim

Variable/category Absolute frequency Relative frequency (%)
Year of notification
2014 1,174 9.40
2015 1,180 9.45
2016 1,322 10.58
2017 1,231 9.86
2018 1,036 8.30
2019 1,189 9.52
2020 806 6.45
2021 1,090 8.73
2022 1,275 10.21
2023 1,286 10.29
2024 901 7.21
Total 12,490 100.00
Sex
Male 2,904 23.25
Female 9,586 76.75
Total 12,490 100.00
Age group (years)
<19 315 2.52
20-29 4,676 37.44
30-39 4,095 32.78
40-49 2,383 19.08
50-59 831 6.66
60-69 171 1.37
70-79 9 0.07
> 80 10 0.08
Total 12,490 100.00

Source: Notifiable Diseases Information System (2025).

The sociodemographic profile of the victims shows a higher incidence of these events among women (Table 1). Among the reported cases, 172 occurred in pregnant women. The 20-29-year age group was the most affected (Table 1). Regarding educational level, most events involved individuals with completed high school (44.51%), followed by those with completed higher education (27.30%) and incomplete higher education (9.63%) (Table 2).

Table 2.

Occupational accidents involving exposure to biological material in Goiânia between 2014 and 2024, according to victims’ educational level

Educational level Absolute frequency Relative frequency (%)
Illiterate 9 0.07
Incomplete 1st to 4th grade of elementary school 110 0.88
Completed 4th grade of elementary school 85 0.68
Incomplete 5th to 8th grade of elementary school 235 1.88
Completed elementary school 254 2.04
Incomplete high school 395 3.16
Completed high school 5,559 44.51
Incomplete higher education 1,203 9.63
Completed higher education 3,403 27.25
Not applicable 120 0.96
Unknown/blank 1,117 8.94
Total 12,490 100.00

Source: Notifiable Diseases Information System (2025).

A higher concentration of cases was observed among health professionals, with accidents involving nurses, nursing technicians, and nursing assistants accounting for approximately 49.90% of all notifications (Table 3).

Table 3.

Occupational accidents involving exposure to biological material in Goiânia between 2014 and 2024, according to victims’ occupation and employment status

Variable/category Absolute frequency Relative frequency (%)
Occupation
Physicians 1,100 8.81
Students 760 6.08
Nurses 810 6.49
Nursing technicians and assistants 5,422 43.41
Dentists 472 3.78
Pharmacists 211 1.69
Waste collectors 322 2.58
Beauty and aesthetics professionals* 123 0.98
Cleaning and maintenance workers† 865 6.93
Physical therapists 123 0.98
Laboratory technicians, assistants, and aides 412 3.30
Other 1,679 13.44
Unknown/blank 191 1.53
Total 12,490 100.00
Employment status
Registered employee 7,382 59.10
Unregistered employee 360 2.88
Self-employed worker 639 5.12
Statutory public servant 1,226 9.82
Public servant under Consolidation of Labor Laws contract 320 2.56
Retiree 3 0.02
Unemployed 15 0.12
Temporary worker 178 1.43
Cooperative worker 126 1.01
Casual worker 29 0.23
Employer 26 0.21
Other 1,257 10.06
Unknown/blank 929 7.44
Total 12,490 100.00

*Including esthetician, manicurist, makeup artist, barber, hairdresser, and podiatrist.

†

Including janitor, domestic worker, laundry worker, and housekeeper.

Source: Notifiable Diseases Information System (2025).

Among the victims, 59.10% held registered employment positions (Table 3). Regarding the employment bond of the companies to which the victims were linked, 2,903 workers were outsourced and 7,354 were non-outsourced, while the combined total of the “not applicable” and “unknown/blank” categories in this field of the notification forms corresponded to 2,233 events.

In the analysis of the type of exposure, percutaneous exposure was the most frequent, with 9,962 cases, followed by exposure involving non-intact skin (317 cases), intact skin (1,399 cases), and mucous membranes (1,686 cases). Importantly, the notification forms allow more than one response for this item.

Blood and blood-containing fluids were the organic materials most frequently involved in the incidents (Table 4). The most prevalent circumstances associated with the accidents were intravenous medication administration (9.89%) and the performance of surgical procedures (9.30%) (Table 4).

Table 4.

Occupational accidents involving exposure to biological material in Goiânia between 2014 and 2024, according to organic material and accident circumstances

Variable/category Absolute frequency Relative frequency (%)
Organic material
Blood 9,426 75.47
Cerebrospinal fluid 121 0.97
Pleural fluid 20 0.16
Ascitic fluid 14 0.11
Amniotic fluid 25 0.20
Blood-containing fluid 584 4.67
Serum/plasma 82 0.66
Other 1,231 9.86
Unknown/blank 987 7.90
Total 12,490 100.00
Accident circumstances
Intravenous medication administration 1,235 9.89
Intramuscular medication administration 462 3.70
Subcutaneous medication administration 517 4.14
Intradermal medication administration 78 0.62
Blood collection puncture 626 5.01
Unspecified puncture 781 6.25
Improper waste disposal 1,057 8.46
Improper disposal on the floor 1,092 8.74
Laundry activities 105 0.84
Instrument cleaning 472 3.78
Handling of sharps containers 534 4.28
Surgical procedure 1,161 9.30
Dental procedure 693 5.55
Laboratory procedure 364 2.92
Destro 124 0.99
Needle recapping 226 1.81
Other 2,664 21.33
Unknown/blank 299 2.39
Total 12,490 100.00

Source: Notifiable Diseases Information System (2025).

The analysis of the agents involved in the accidents indicates that hollow-bore needles were the main devices associated with the notifications, accounting for 54.91% of the cases.

Among the PPE items, facial protection was the least used, with only 1,324 recorded instances. In contrast, glove use during the event was the most frequently reported, totaling 10,066 notifications. Additionally, 10,906 victims were vaccinated against hepatitis B, 580 were not vaccinated, and in 1,004 forms this information was recorded as unknown or left blank.

Regarding case outcomes, 30 notifications (0.24%) reported discharge with seroconversion and 2,585 (20.70%) reported discharge without seroconversion. In 5,089 notifications (40.74%), this item was marked as unknown or left blank. In 2,606 cases (20.87%), discharge occurred because the source patient tested negative for the biological agent. Loss to clinical follow-up was recorded in 2,175 cases (17.41%). A total of five deaths were reported, two directly related to the accident and three due to other causes.

Concerning the issuance of the work accident report, 7,443 notifications (59.59%) indicated that the document had been issued, while 2,524 (20.21%) reported that it had not. In 2,064 forms (16.53%), this information was recorded as unknown or left blank, and in 459 notifications (3.67%), issuance of the report was marked as not applicable to the case.

DISCUSSION

The findings of this study showed that health professionals were the main group affected by occupational accidents involving exposure to biological material in Goiânia, a result consistent with previous research.14,15 Since health care teams are predominantly composed of women,15-17 most victims are expected to be female. Additionally, Vieira et al. reported that male workers tend to underreport accidents involving themselves when compared with women,10 which may contribute to the difference observed between sexes.

The high number of notifications involving nursing staff, both technicians and nurses, may be related to the vulnerability of this group, which maintains direct and frequent contact with patients and is responsible for a large portion of routine care procedures.6,18 Despite this, evidence indicates that many nursing professionals do not adequately adhere to standard occupational safety measures.19

The higher occurrence of accidents among individuals aged 20-59 years, with a progressive decrease in older age groups, as well as the predominance of victims with completed high school education, suggests that professional experience may act as a protective factor. Younger workers with less practical experience may feel less confident when performing high-risk activities,17 making them more susceptible to such events.

Routine health care procedures, such as medication administration and surgical interventions, were among the most frequent circumstances associated with the accidents. In this context, the World Health Organization recommends occupational health programs provide continuing education and promote the adoption of safe practices in the workplace.20 Training focused on correct handling of sharp instruments is essential in the process,7,21 although research still requires methodological refinement in studies evaluating the effectiveness of such interventions.21

Proper use of PPE helps reduce exposure to biological agents, protecting both the worker and other staff and patients.22 Factors influencing PPE use include availability, the worker’s perception of risk, and the type of employment bond.23 In the present study, gloves were the most commonly used PPE, whereas others, such as facial protection and goggles, showed low adherence.

Vaccination against hepatitis B is recommended for susceptible individuals who do not have proof of a complete vaccination schedule or who, even when properly vaccinated, present a non-reactive anti-HBs serology.24 Immunization is available free of charge both for health professionals25 and for the general population through the Brazilian National Immunization Program.26 Since vaccination is not yet universal among Brazilian workers, including those in Goiânia, making it mandatory for higher-risk occupations has been suggested as a relevant strategy.27

In the context of labor rights, current legislation establishes that employers are responsible for reporting occupational accidents involving their employees to Social Security; in the absence of this procedure, the report may be filed by the victim or by the attending physician.28 It is therefore concerning that a large portion of the notifications analyzed indicated that the work accident report had not been issued. It is important to note that the victim is entitled to an official copy of this document, which carries legal validity to safeguard labor rights.28

Finally, a limitation of this study is its reliance on the accuracy of the notifications recorded in the system, which may be affected by human and logistical errors. For example, 105 notifications involved victims reported as younger than 1 year old, an age at which engagement in any form of labor activity is impossible. This highlights the importance of immediate and precise reporting of these events to support timely and effective preventive actions,29 and reinforces the need to train health professionals to perform this process properly.

CONCLUSIONS

The epidemiological profile of occupational accidents involving exposure to biological material in Goiânia highlights the need for a prevention plan tailored to local specificities and to the challenges encountered within the municipal health care network. The findings confirm that health professionals constitute the most vulnerable group due to their continuous exposure to occupational risks. In this context, the implementation of permanent continuing education programs is recommended, with emphasis on biosafety practices, post-exposure management, and the updating of care protocols directed at this population.

The findings concerning the victims’ vaccination status are also concerning, given the substantial number of individuals who were either not vaccinated against hepatitis B or had unknown vaccination status. Thus, the need to intensify hepatitis B vaccination as an essential protective measure is reinforced as well as the importance of ensuring both clinical and occupational follow-up for affected workers.

Finally, the importance of strengthening reporting systems and ensuring transparency of epidemiological data related to these events is underscored, as this supports social oversight and the collaborative development of prevention policies. With the integration of these measures, a significant reduction in accident incidence is expected, along with the consolidation of an institutional culture of occupational safety in health care, in alignment with the organizational principles of the Brazilian Unified Health System.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors thank the teams from the Department of Strategic Health Information Assessment and Dissemination, part of the Secretariat of Information and Digital Health, and from SINAN, under the responsibility of the General Coordination for Epidemiological Information and Analysis of the Department of Epidemiological Analysis and Surveillance of Noncommunicable Diseases, within the Secretariat of Health Surveillance and Environment of the Ministry of Health, whose technical support was fundamental to the development of this article.

Footnotes

Conflicts of interest: None

Funding: None

Handling editor: Sergio de Lucca

REFERENCES

  • 1.Brasil, Ministério da Saúde . Nota informativa nº 90, de 25 de julho de 2019: orientações sobre as novas definições dos agravos e doenças relacionadas ao trabalho do Sistema de Informações de Agravos de Notificação (SINAN) Brasília: Ministério da Saúde;; 2019. [acesso 20 mar 2025]. [Internet] Disponível: https://saude.es.gov.br/Media/sesa/CEREST/NOTA-INFORMATIVA-N-90-2019-DSASTE-SVS-MS.pdf . [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Carneiro P, Braga AC, Cabuço R. Professionals working in operating rooms: a characterization of biological and chemical risks. Work. 2019;64(4):869–876. doi: 10.3233/WOR-193027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Denault D, Gardner H. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing;; 2023. Jul. [cited 2025 jan 19]. OSHA bloodborne pathogen standards. [Internet] Available: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK555922/ [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Frison FS, Alonzo HGA. Acidente de trabalho com exposição a material biológico: percepções dos residentes de medicina. Saude Debate. 2022;46(134):832–841. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ribeiro AF, Monteiro MVB, Silva-Júnior REC, Silva RR. Assessment of biological hazards in a laboratory in Boa Vista, Roraima. Rev Bras Med Trab. 2023;21(1):e2023818. doi: 10.47626/1679-4435-2023-818. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Vieira KMR, Vieira FU, Bittencourt ZZLC. Occupational accidents with biological material in a school hospital. Rev Bras Enferm. 2019;72(3):737–743. doi: 10.1590/0034-7167-2018-0630. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Basso TV, Martin Chaves EB, Joveleviths D, Knijnik GJ, Rodrigues SR. Effectiveness of a prevention and training program to reduce work accidents involving exposure to biological materials. Rev Bras Med Trab. 2020;17(3):387–393. doi: 10.5327/Z1679443520190411. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Sardeiro TL, Souza CL, Salgado TA, Galdino H, Júnior, Neves ZCP, Tipple AFV. Work accidents with biological material: factors associated with abandoning clinical and laboratory follow-up. Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2019;53:e03516. doi: 10.1590/S1980-220X2018029703516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Colin J, Elias L, Muller M, Poncin M, Rusu D. Rôle de la médecine du travail dans la prévention des maladies et des accidents [role of the occupational medicine in the prevention of diseases and accidents] Rev Med Liege. 2024;79(5-6):285–290. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Vieira C, Góis J, Laranjeira P, Pinho P, Norton P. Underreporting of work accidents associated with blood-borne risk factors. La Med Lav. 2022;113(3):e2022028. doi: 10.23749/mdl.v113i3.13257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Brasil, Ministério da Saúde . Define a Lista Nacional de Notificação Compulsória de doenças, agravos e eventos de saúde pública nos serviços de saúde públicos e privados em todo o território nacional, nos termos do anexo, para fins de vigilância em saúde. Vol. 1. Diario Oficial da Uniao; 2016. Portaria nº 204, de 17 fev 2016; p. 23. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Mizoguti NN, Hirota MM, Ito FY, Gonçalves MR, Gonçalves MR, Hayashida MR, et al. Occupational accidents involving exposure to biological material reported at a worker’s health sentinel unit: 11,645 cases. Rev Bras Med Trab. 2023;20(3):362–368. doi: 10.47626/1679-4435-2022-699. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Brasil, Conselho Nacional de Saúde . Dispõe sobre as normas aplicáveis a pesquisas em Ciências Humanas e Sociais. Vol. 1. Diario Oficial da Uniao; 2016. Resolução nº 510, de 7 abr 2016; pp. 44–46. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Gomes MR, Araújo TM, Soares JFS, Sousa CC, Lua I. Occupational stressors and work accidents among health workers. Rev Saude Publica. 2021;55:98. doi: 10.11606/s1518-8787.2021055002938. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Mangueira LA, Guedes MO, Guntzel CR, Vasconcelos MS, Neves TV. Profile of victims of occupational accidents involving exposure to biological material notified in the city of Palmas, state of Tocantins, Brazil. Rev Bras Med Trab. 2023;21(2):e2022869. doi: 10.47626/1679-4435-2022-869. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ribeiro LCM, Munari DB, Souza ACS, Mendonça KM, Chaves LDP, Neves ZCP. Planned organizational change to transform care to workers exposed to biological material. Rev Bras Enferm. 2020;73(5):e20190314. doi: 10.1590/0034-7167-2019-0314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Soares RZ, Schoen AS, da Rocha Gomes Benelli K, Araújo MS, Neves M. Analysis of reported work accidents involving healthcare workers and exposure to biological materials. Rev Bras Med Trab. 2020;17(2):201–208. doi: 10.5327/Z1679443520190341. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Freitas PH, Silva RMD, Camponogara S, Beck CLC, Zeitoune RCG, Trindade LDL, et al. Software development for the assistance to be provided to workers after accidents involving biological material. Texto Contexto Enferm. 2024;33:e20230308. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Medeiros LP, Miranda KS, Gonçalves TM, Rodrigues DDM, Hiraki KRN, Valim MD, et al. Knowledge of and adherence to standard precautions in a haemodialysis unit: a cross-sectional study. Sao Paulo Med J. 2022;140(2):297–304. doi: 10.1590/1516-3180.2021.0288.23072021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.World Health Organization . Caring for those who care: guide for the development and implementation of occupational health and safety programmes for health workers. Geneva: World Health Organization;; 2022. [cited 2025 mar 18]. Available: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240040779 . [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Cheetham S, Ngo HT, Liira J, Liira H. Education and training for preventing sharps injuries and splash exposures in healthcare workers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021;4(4):CD012060. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012060.pub2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Reddy SC, Valderrama AL, Kuhar DT. Improving the use of personal protective equipment: applying lessons learned. Clin Infect Dis. 2019;69(Suppl 3):S165–70. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciz619. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Bertelli C, Martins BR, Reuter CP, Krug SBF. Acidentes com material biológico: fatores associados ao não uso de equipamentos de proteção individual no Sul do Brasil. Cienc Saude Coletiva. 2023;28(3):789–801. doi: 10.1590/1413-81232023283.08222022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Brasil, Ministério da Saúde . Protocolo clínico e diretrizes terapêuticas para profilaxia pós-exposição (PEP) de risco à infecção pelo HIV, IST e hepatites virais. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde;; 2021. [acesso 20 jun 2025]. Secretaria de Vigilância em Saúde. Departamento de Vigilância, Prevenção e Controle das Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis, do HIV/AIDS e das Hepatites Virais. [Internet] Disponível: https://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/publicacoes/protocolo_clinico_diretrizes_terapeuticas_prevencao_transmissao_vertical_hiv_sifilis_hepatites_virais.pdf . [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Brasil, Ministério do Trabalho e Emprego Norma Regulamentadora NR-32 - Segurança e Saúde no Trabalho em Serviços de Saúde. Portaria MTE nº 485. nov. 2005. [acesso 20 mar 2025]. [Internet] Disponível: https://www.gov.br/trabalho-e-emprego/pt-br/acesso-a-informacao/participacao-social/conselhos-e-orgaos-colegiados/comissao-tripartite-partitaria-permanente/normas-regulamentadora/normas-regulamentadoras-vigentes/nr-32-atualizada-2023-1.pdf .
  • 26.Ministério da Saúde, Ministério da Saúde . Protocolo Clínico e Diretrizes Terapêuticas de Hepatite B e Coinfecções. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde;; 2023. [acesso 21 mar 2025]. [Internet] Disponível: https://www.gov.br/aids/pt-br/central-de-conteudo/publicacoes/2023/protocolo-clinico-e-diretrizes-terapeuticas-de-hepatite-b-e-coinfeccoes-2023.pdf . [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Cordeiro TMSC, Ferreira RP, Filho, Júnior AD’O. Factors associated with occupational and non-occupational viral hepatitis infections in Brazil between 2007-2014. Ann Hepatol. 2019;18(5):751–756. doi: 10.1016/j.aohep.2019.03.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Brasil . Dispõe sobre os Planos de Benefícios da Previdência Social e dá outras providências. Vol. 1. Diário Oficial da União; 1991. Lei nº 8.213, de 24 de julho de 1991; p. 14554. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Kyung M, Lee SJ, Dancu C, Hong OS. Underreporting of workers’ injuries or illnesses and contributing factors: a systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2023;23(1):558. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15487-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Revista Brasileira de Medicina do Trabalho are provided here courtesy of Associação Nacional de Medicina do Trabalho

RESOURCES