Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of Anatomy logoLink to Journal of Anatomy
. 1973 Jul;115(Pt 2):237–253.

Mesothelial cells in peritoneal fluid.

A T Raftery
PMCID: PMC1271510  PMID: 4756248

Full text

PDF
237

Images in this article

238Fig. 1
on p.238
238Fig. 2
on p.238
238Fig. 3
on p.238
238Fig. 4
on p.238
238Fig. 5
on p.238
238Fig. 6
on p.238
238Fig. 7
on p.238
238Fig. 8
on p.238
240Fig. 9
on p.240
240Fig. 10
on p.240
242Fig. 11
on p.242
242Fig. 12
on p.242
242Fig. 13
on p.242
244Fig. 14
on p.244
244Fig. 15
on p.244
246Fig. 16
on p.246
246Fig. 17
on p.246
246Fig. 18
on p.246
246Fig. 19
on p.246
248Fig. 20
on p.248
248Fig. 21
on p.248
248Fig. 22
on p.248
248Fig. 23
on p.248
248Fig. 24
on p.248
248Fig. 25
on p.248
248Fig. 26
on p.248

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BARADI A. F., HOPE J. OBSERVATIONS ON ULTRASTRUCTURE OF RABBIT MESOTHELIUM. Exp Cell Res. 1964 Mar;34:33–44. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(64)90180-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. BRIDGES J. B., WHITTING H. W. PARIETAL PERITONEAL HEALING IN THE RAT. J Pathol Bacteriol. 1964 Jan;87:123–130. doi: 10.1002/path.1700870117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Carr I. The cellular basis of reticulo-endothelial stimulation. J Pathol Bacteriol. 1967 Oct;94(2):323–330. doi: 10.1002/path.1700940209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. DALTON A. J., FELIX M. D. A comparison of mesothelial cells and macrophages in mice after the intraperitoneal inoculation of melanin granules. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1956 Jul 25;2(4 Suppl):109–114. doi: 10.1083/jcb.2.4.109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Davis R. H., McGowan L. Comparative peritoneal cellular content as related to species and sex. Anat Rec. 1968 Nov;162(3):357–361. doi: 10.1002/ar.1091620310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Eskeland G., Kjaerheim A. Regeneration of parietal peritoneum in rats. 2. An electron microscopical study. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand. 1966;68(3):379–395. doi: 10.1111/apm.1966.68.3.379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Eskeland G. Regeneration of parietal peritoneum in rats. 1. A light microscopical study. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand. 1966;68(3):355–378. doi: 10.1111/apm.1966.68.3.355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. FELIX M. D., DALTON A. J. A phase-contrast microscope study of free cells native to the peritoneal fluid of DBA/2 mice. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1955 Oct;16(2):415–446. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. FELIX M. D. Observations on the surface cells of the mouse omentum as studied with the phase-contrast and electron microscopes. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1961 Oct;27:713–745. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. HIGGINS G. M. Hormonally induced eosinopenia of peritoneal fluid of white rats. Am J Clin Pathol. 1953 Aug;23(8):775–783. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/23.8.775. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hoff H. F., Gottlob R. A fine structure study of injury to the endothelial cells of the rabbit abdominal aorta by various stimuli. Angiology. 1967 Jul;18(7):440–451. doi: 10.1177/000331976701800704. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. JOHNSON F. R., WHITTING H. W. Repair of parietal peritoneum. Br J Surg. 1962 May;49:653–660. doi: 10.1002/bjs.18004921819. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kluge T., Hovig T. The ultrastructure of human and rat pericardium. I. Parietal and visceral mesothelium. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand. 1967;71(4):529–546. doi: 10.1111/j.1699-0463.1967.tb05175.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kluge T., Hovig T. The ultrastructure of human and rat pericardium. II. Intercellular spaces and junctions. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand. 1967;71(4):547–563. doi: 10.1111/j.1699-0463.1967.tb05176.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. McGowan L., Davis R. H., Stein D. B., Bebon S., Vaskelis P. The cytology of the pelvic peritoneal cavity in normal women. Am J Clin Pathol. 1968 Apr;49(4):506–511. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/49.4.506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. McGowan L., Stein D. B., Miller W. Cul-de-sac aspiration for diagnostic cytologic study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1966 Oct 1;96(3):413–417. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(66)90245-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. ODOR D. L. Observations of the rat mesothelium with the electron and phase microscopes. Am J Anat. 1954 Nov;95(3):433–465. doi: 10.1002/aja.1000950304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. PADAWER J., GORDON A. S. Cellular elements in the peritoneal fluid of some mammals. Anat Rec. 1956 Feb;124(2):209–222. doi: 10.1002/ar.1091240206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. RICHARDSON K. C., JARETT L., FINKE E. H. Embedding in epoxy resins for ultrathin sectioning in electron microscopy. Stain Technol. 1960 Nov;35:313–323. doi: 10.3109/10520296009114754. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Raftery A. T. Regeneration of parietal and visceral peritoneum. A light microscopical study. Br J Surg. 1973 Apr;60(4):293–299. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800600412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. SHELTON E., RICE M. E. Growth of normal peritoneal cells in diffusion chambers: a study in cell modulation. Am J Anat. 1959 Nov;105:281–341. doi: 10.1002/aja.1001050302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Warren B. A. The platelet pseudopodium and its involvement in aggregation and adhesion to vessel walls. Br J Exp Pathol. 1971 Aug;52(4):378–387. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Warren B. A. The ultrastructure of platelet pseudopodia and the adhesion of homologous platelets to tumour cells. Br J Exp Pathol. 1970 Dec;51(6):570–580. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Anatomy are provided here courtesy of Anatomical Society of Great Britain and Ireland

RESOURCES