Skip to main content
Journal of Anatomy logoLink to Journal of Anatomy
. 1973 Oct;116(Pt 1):1–24.

Varieties of fast and slow extrafusal muscle fibres in amphibian hind limb muscles.

R S Smith, W K Ovalle Jr
PMCID: PMC1271546  PMID: 4273105

Full text

PDF
1

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Asmussen G., Kiessling A. Die Muskelfasersorten des Frosches: Ihre Identifikation und die Gesetzmässigkeiten ihrer Anordnung in der Skelettmuskulatur. Acta Biol Med Ger. 1970;24(6):871–889. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Barker D. L'innervation motrice du muscle strié des vertébrés. Actual Neurophysiol (Paris) 1968;8:23–71. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Burke R. E., Levine D. N., Zajac F. E., 3rd Mammalian motor units: physiological-histochemical correlation in three types in cat gastrocnemius. Science. 1971 Nov 12;174(4010):709–712. doi: 10.1126/science.174.4010.709. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Edström L., Kugelberg E. Histochemical composition, distribution of fibres and fatiguability of single motor units. Anterior tibial muscle of the rat. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1968 Oct;31(5):424–433. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.31.5.424. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Engel W. K., Irwin R. L. A histochemical-physiological correlation of frog skeletal muscle fibers. Am J Physiol. 1967 Aug;213(2):511–518. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1967.213.2.511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Gauthier G. F. On the relationship of ultrastructural and cytochemical features of color in mammalian skeletal muscle. Z Zellforsch Mikrosk Anat. 1969;95(3):462–482. doi: 10.1007/BF00995217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Guth L., Samaha F. J. Procedure for the histochemical demonstration of actomyosin ATPase. Exp Neurol. 1970 Aug;28(2):365–367. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. HENNEMAN E., OLSON C. B. RELATIONS BETWEEN STRUCTURE AND FUNCTION IN THE DESIGN OF SKELETAL MUSCLES. J Neurophysiol. 1965 May;28:581–598. doi: 10.1152/jn.1965.28.3.581. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. HUXLEY A. F. MUSCLE. Annu Rev Physiol. 1964;26:131–152. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ph.26.030164.001023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hess A. Vertebrate slow muscle fibers. Physiol Rev. 1970 Jan;50(1):40–62. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1970.50.1.40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. KNAPPEIS G. G., CARLSEN F. The ultrastructure of the Z disc in skeletal muscle. J Cell Biol. 1962 May;13:323–335. doi: 10.1083/jcb.13.2.323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. KUFFLER S. W., VAUGHAN WILLIAMS E. M. Small-nerve junctional potentials; the distribution of small motor nerves to frog skeletal muscle, and the membrane characteristics of the fibres they innervate. J Physiol. 1953 Aug;121(2):289–317. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1953.sp004948. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kelly D. E., Cahill M. A. Filamentous and matrix components of skeletal muscle Z-disks. Anat Rec. 1972 Apr;172(4):623–642. doi: 10.1002/ar.1091720403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Korneliussen H. Identification of muscle fiber types in "semithin" sections stained with p-phenylene-diamine. Histochemie. 1972;32(1):95–98. doi: 10.1007/BF00277476. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kugelberg E., Edström L. Differential histochemical effects of muscle contractions on phosphorylase and glycogen in various types of fibres: relation to fatigue. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1968 Oct;31(5):415–423. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.31.5.415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. NACHLAS M. M., TSOU K. C., DE SOUZA E., CHENG C. S., SELIGMAN A. M. Cytochemical demonstration of succinic dehydrogenase by the use of a new p-nitrophenyl substituted ditetrazole. J Histochem Cytochem. 1957 Jul;5(4):420–436. doi: 10.1177/5.4.420. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. ORKAND R. K. A further study of electrical responses in slow and twitch muscle fibres of the frog. J Physiol. 1963 Jun;167:181–191. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1963.sp007140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. PADYKULA H. A., HERMAN E. Factors affecting the activity of adenosine triphosphatase and other phosphatases as measured by histochemical techniques. J Histochem Cytochem. 1955 May;3(3):161–169. doi: 10.1177/3.3.161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. PEACHEY L. D., HUXLEY A. F. Structural identification of twitch and slow striated muscle fibers of the frog. J Cell Biol. 1962 Apr;13:177–180. doi: 10.1083/jcb.13.1.177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Page S. G. A comparison of the fine structures of frog slow and twitch muscle fibers. J Cell Biol. 1965 Aug;26(2):477–497. doi: 10.1083/jcb.26.2.477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Rowe R. W. Ultrastructure of the Z line of skeletal muscle fibers. J Cell Biol. 1971 Dec;51(3):674–685. doi: 10.1083/jcb.51.3.674. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. SHAMARINA N. M. Electric response of 'tonic' muscle fibres of the frog skeletal musculature. Nature. 1962 Feb 24;193:783–784. doi: 10.1038/193783a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Sandow A. Skeletal muscle. Annu Rev Physiol. 1970;32:87–138. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ph.32.030170.000511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Smith R. S., Lännergren J. Types of motor units in the skeletal muscle of Xenopus laevis. Nature. 1968 Jan 20;217(5125):281–283. doi: 10.1038/217281a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Weibel E. R. Stereological principles for morphometry in electron microscopic cytology. Int Rev Cytol. 1969;26:235–302. doi: 10.1016/s0074-7696(08)61637-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Anatomy are provided here courtesy of Anatomical Society of Great Britain and Ireland

RESOURCES