Abstract
Background
The terrestrial ribbon worm Geonemertes pelaensis Semper, 1863 (phylum Nemertea) is widely reported from tropical regions worldwide. In Japan, this species has been recorded from subtropical islands including the Ogasawara Islands, a UNESCO World Heritage Site south of Tokyo recognized for its unique biodiversity, where it has been implicated in the decline of native soil invertebrates. Here, we demonstrate that the nemerteans in the Ogasawara Islands are genetically and morphologically distinct from those found on Yonaguni Island (Okinawa, Japan), indicating the presence of at least two separate species in Japan.
Results
We sequenced the complete mitochondrial genomes of both populations (18,755 bp for Ogasawara; 31,745 bp for Yonaguni), revealing substantial differences in genome size and gene arrangement. The mitochondrial genome of the Yonaguni population is unusually large, exceeding typical sizes reported for metazoans. Uncorrected p-distances in cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COX1) sequences between the two populations ranged from 6.75 to 8.59%, which is above the widely used threshold for intraspecific variation in nemerteans. Morphological comparisons also support species-level distinction: live specimens from Yonaguni have a pale body with a prominent mid-dorsal stripe (body width-to-stripe ratio: 1:0.078–0.110), whereas individuals from Ogasawara are pale to light brown with a narrower and fading stripe (ratio: 1:0.042–0.050). Moreover, accessory-stylet pouches differ between populations: Yonaguni specimens possess four to five pouches, each containing 3–5 stylets, while Ogasawara specimens have two pouches, each with two stylets. Examination of museum specimens collected in the 1980s from Chichijima showed the extremely similar external morphology as our recent Ogasawara specimens, indicating that this form has been the only Geonemertes species in the Ogasawara Islands for nearly half a century.
Conclusions
Our results indicate the presence of species-level diversity in Japanese terrestrial nemerteans and demonstrate that accurate species identification using molecular barcodes is essential in insular ecosystems. Recognizing cryptic or pseudocryptic lineages is critical for effective biodiversity monitoring and for preventing mismanagement in ecologically sensitive regions such as the Ogasawara Islands.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12862-025-02468-7.
Keywords: Geonemertes pelaensis, Alien species, Pseudocryptic, Conservation, Endemic
Background
Oceanic islands are globally recognized for their high levels of endemism and evolutionary distinctiveness, yet they are particularly vulnerable to biological invasions [1]. The Ogasawara Islands or the Bonin Islands, a group of more than 30 oceanic islands located approximately 1,000 km south of mainland Japan, were designated a UNESCO World Heritage Site in 2011 due to unique ecosystems and its evolutionary processes including biogeographic isolation [2, 3]. Prolonged spatial isolation has led to high endemism, particularly among land snails, where adaptive radiation has resulted in remarkable species diversification within the islands. However, like other oceanic islands such as the Galápagos, Aldabra, and Lord Howe, the Ogasawara Islands have experienced severe ecological disruptions caused by invasive species [3]. Introduced species—including goats, rats, cats, green anoles, and terrestrial flatworms—have driven the decline or extinction of many native organisms (i.e. plants, birds, bees, and land snails) and have disrupted a delicate ecosystem in the Ogasawara Islands [4–7]. These impacts are exacerbated by the inherent fragility of insular ecosystems and the frequent difficulty in distinguishing native from introduced species [8]. In particular, cryptic or morphologically similar species can obscure biogeographic origins, potentially leading to inappropriate conservation measures, such as the inadvertent protection of invasive species or the failure to safeguard endangered endemics [9].
Nemerteans (phylum Nemertea) are mostly marine predators, with approximately 1,350 described species [10]. They are characterized by an eversible proboscis used to capture prey and occasionally to escape predators [11, 12]. While predominantly benthic marine animals, a few nemertean species inhabit freshwater or terrestrial environments [13]. Although often small, cryptic, and not abundant, nemerteans play important ecological roles as predators [14–16]. At both species and higher taxonomic levels, the necessity of molecular approaches (e.g., DNA barcoding) to reveal cryptic diversity in nemerteans has become increasingly evident over the past decade [17–24]. Many nemertean taxa once thought to be cosmopolitan have turned out to be complexes of cryptic or pseudocryptic species.
The genus Geonemertes Semper, 1863 once encompassed all known terrestrial nemerteans [11]. Subsequent taxonomic revisions based on external/internal morphology have narrowed the genus to include G. pelaensis Semper, 1863 (the type species), G. rodericana (Gulliver, 1879), and G. philippinensis Gibson & Moore, 1998. Geonemertes arboricola Punnett, 1907, described from the Seychelles, is now regarded as a junior synonym of G. pelaensis [25]. These species can be grouped into two general forms based on body coloration: those with a dark background (G. rodericana, G. philippinensis) and those with a pale background (G. pelaensis, G. arboricola). While G. rodericana is characterized by a white mid-dorsal stripe on dark green, and G. philippinensis by a cream stripe on dark brown, G. pelaensis and G. arboricola exhibit a pale background with a mid-dorsal brown stripe [26]. In G. pelaensis occasional faint lateral stripes have been reported [26]. Specimens of G. pelaensis from Papua New Guinea deviate from this typical pattern, showing four dark stripes, with lateral stripes joining anteriorly [26, 27]. Despite such morphological variation, no prior study has rigorously examined the color pattern diversity of G. pelaensis-like forms using molecular methods. This raises the possibility that what has been referred to as “G. pelaensis” may in fact represent a complex of multiple distinct species.
Geographic distributions of Geonemertes species are typically limited to small areas on remote oceanic islands [26, 28]. An exception is G. pelaensis, which was originally described from Palau (Pelew Islands) [29] and has since been reported—based on morphology—across the Indian, Pacific, and Atlantic Oceans. Recent DNA barcoding using cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COX1) sequences has confirmed the wide distribution of G. pelaensis-like forms, with identical haplotypes detected in Cuba, Bermuda, and tropical islands in Japan (Minamidaito and Okinawa islands; [30]). One possible explanation for this broad distribution is the species’ reproductive strategy: G. pelaensis is a cyclic hermaphrodite, a trait associated with high fecundity and dispersal potential [31, 32]. By contrast, its congeners G. rodericana and G. philippinensis are dioecious, possibly limiting their ability to spread [26, 33].
In Japan, G. pelaensis is the only reported land nemertean, with morphological records from subtropical islands such as Okinawa and the Ogasawara archipelago [13, 34–37]. While G. pelaensis has been reported to feed on terrestrial snails in the Seychelles Islands [38], recent observations from the Ogasawara Islands show that the local population is a voracious predator of isopods and other soil invertebrates [39, 40]. These differences in feeding ecology may reflect species-level divergence among geographically separated populations. Indeed, some reports have already questioned the identification of the Ogasawara nemerteans as G. pelaensis, and have described new ecological characteristics, although these are not based on molecular data [40–42]. In this study, we investigate the taxonomic identity of Geonemertes specimens collected from the Ogasawara Islands and compare them with specimens from other localities in Pacific and western Atlantic regions. We also examined Geonemertes specimens collected in the 1980s, deposited in museum collections by Prof. Dr. Masanori Kawakatsu, which provide the earliest evidence of the occurrence of G. pelaensis in the Ogasawara Islands (e.g. [39]). Using an integrative approach—combining COX1-based phylogenetic analysis, complete mitochondrial genome sequencing, and morphological examination for fresh and museum specimens—we assess whether the Ogasawara species represents a distinct lineage.
Materials and methods
Fieldwork, specimen collection, and morphological observation
Geonemertes specimens were collected from the Ogasawara Islands (Chichijima and Hahajima), Tokyo, and Yonaguni Island, Okinawa, Japan, between 2022 and 2025. Living specimens were photographed using digital cameras (Nikon D5600 and Z50II, Japan). For anesthetization, specimens were placed on a piece of paper towel moistened with a few drops of bittern (Tenpi Nigari, Amashio, Japan) and observed under a light microscope by gently squeezing them between a glass slide and a cover slip. Following internal morphological observation, relaxed specimens were cut into two fragments using a razor blade: the proboscis or posterior portion (approximately 3 mm in length) was preserved in 99% ethanol for DNA extraction, while the remaining part was fixed in formalin or preserved whole in 99% ethanol. In addition, we examined archival specimens deposited at the Naturalis Biodiversity Center (formerly Rijksmuseum van Natuurlijke Historie, RMNH), Leiden, the Netherlands, originally collected by Prof. Dr. Masanori Kawakatsu in the 1980s from Chichijima, Ogasawara Island. A specimen of Malacobdella japonica Takakura, 1897 was collected from inside the mantle cavity of Pseudocardium sachalinense (Schrenck, 1862), which were obtained at the local market in Kashima, Ibaraki, Japan. The sucker tissue was preserved in 99% ethanol for DNA extraction.
DNA extraction, PCR amplification, and electrophoresis
Total DNA was extracted from body wall or proboscis muscle tissues to avoid contamination from gut contents, using the DNeasy Blood & Tissue Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification was performed using TaKaRa Ex Taq (Takara Bio, Japan) on a Thermo Fisher Veriti 96-Well Thermal Cycler (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) under the following conditions: initial denaturation at 94 °C for 2 min; followed by 37 cycles of 94 °C for 40 s, 52 °C for 60 s, and 72 °C for 60 s; with a final extension at 72 °C for 7 min. The “Folmer region” in the cytochrome c oxidase subunit I gene (COX1)—the universal DNA barcoding region for metazoan [43]—was amplified using the primer pair LCO1490/HCO2198 [43]. PCR products were checked by electrophoresis on E-Gel EX Double Comb 2% Agarose Gels (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). COX1 amplification was successful for the Yonaguni specimens, but all PCRs failed for specimens from the Ogasawara Islands.
Shotgun sequencing and mitochondrial genome assembly
To obtain the complete mitochondrial genome and design specific COX1 primers for the Ogasawara specimens, total DNA from one individual from Chichijima (Ogasawara) and one from Yonaguni was subjected to shotgun sequencing using next-generation sequencing (NGS). The protocol largely followed Hiruta et al. (2022) [44]. DNA concentration was quantified using Qubit 4 Fluorometer with a dsDNA HS Assay Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). Since the EDTA in AE buffer (Qiagen, Germany) can inhibit enzymatic reactions during library preparation, the buffer was replaced with EB buffer using SeraPure beads [45]. Library preparation was performed using the Collibri ES DNA Library Prep Kit for Illumina Systems with UD Indexes (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA), using 20 ng of input DNA. DNA fragmentation was conducted at 37 °C for 10 min to obtain fragments ranging from 300 to 800 bp. The library was amplified for 12 cycles. Quantification and quality assessment were conducted using Qubit 4 and a TapeStation 4200 (Agilent Technologies, USA) with a D1000 DNA Assay Kit. Libraries were pooled and sent to Macrogen Japan for sequencing on an Illumina HiSeq X system to generate 150 bp paired-end reads.
In addition, the complete mitochondrial genome of M. japonica was determined for a mitogenome-based phylogenetic analysis. The total genomic DNA solution was sent to Macrogen Japan for shotgun library preparation and sequencing. The final libraries were sequenced on an Illumina NovaSeq 6000 system to generate 150 bp paired-end reads. Acquired fastq files were divided into tenths using SeqKit v2.10.0 [46], and only one pair of reads was used for subsequent analyses.
Complete mitochondrial genomes were assembled using GetOrganelle v1.7.5.2 [47]. Annotation was performed with the MITOS2 web server (RefSeq 81 Metazoa; Genetic Code 5) [48], followed by manual curation using Geneious Prime [49]. GenBank accession numbers of the newly obtained mitochondrial genomes are provided in Tables 1 and 2. Genome maps were visualized using Organellar Genome DRAW [50].
Table 1.
GenBank accession numbers of Geonemertes spp. and the related species used for phylogenetic analyses in this study
| Species | Collection localities | Accession No. | References |
|---|---|---|---|
| Geonemertes sp. Ogasawara CMH01 | Miyanohamamichi, Chichijima, Ogasawara | PX290021 | Present study |
| Geonemertes sp. Ogasawara CMH02 | Miyanohamamichi, Chichijima, Ogasawara | PX290018 | Present study |
| Geonemertes sp. Ogasawara CMK01 | Mt. Mikazuki, Chichijima, Ogasawara | PX290022 | Present study |
| Geonemertes sp. Ogasawara CMK02 | Mt. Mikazuki, Chichijima, Ogasawara | PX290023 | Present study |
| Geonemertes sp. Ogasawara CMK03 | Mt. Mikazuki, Chichijima, Ogasawara | PX290017 | Present study |
| Geonemertes sp. Ogasawara CMK04 | Mt. Mikazuki, Chichijima, Ogasawara | PX290019 | Present study |
| Geonemertes sp. Ogasawara MI | Higashimachi, Chichijima, Ogasawara | PX392562 | Present study |
| Geonemertes sp. Ogasawara MNK01 | Nakanotaira, Hahajima, Ogasawara | PX290020 | Present study |
| Geonemertes sp. MCZ IZ-132,534 | Bocas del Toro, Panama | KF935548 | Kvist et al. (2014) [87] |
| Geonemertes “pelaensis” CZACC_18_007 | Cuba | MN653922 | Morffe et al. (2020) [30] |
| Geonemertes “pelaensis” CZACC_18_008 | Cuba | MN653923 | Morffe et al. (2020) [30] |
| Geonemertes “pelaensis” CZACC_18_010 | Cuba | MN653924 | Morffe et al. (2020) [30] |
| Geonemertes “pelaensis” CZACC_18_011 | Cuba | MN653925 | Morffe et al. (2020) [30] |
| Geonemertes “pelaensis” CZACC_18_012 | Cuba | MN653926 | Morffe et al. (2020) [30] |
| Geonemertes “pelaensis” CZACC_18_014 | Cuba | MN653927 | Morffe et al. (2020) [30] |
| Geonemertes “pelaensis” CZACC_18_015 | Cuba | MN653928 | Morffe et al. (2020) [30] |
| Geonemertes “pelaensis” CZACC_18_016 | Cuba | MN653929 | Morffe et al. (2020) [30] |
| Geonemertes “pelaensis” | Bermuda | EU255602 | Mateos and Giribet (2008) [88] |
| Geonemertes “pelaensis” | Minamidaito Island, Okinawa | LC412491 | Unpublished |
| Geonemertes “pelaensis” | Minamidaito Island, Okinawa | LC412492 | Unpublished |
| Geonemertes “pelaensis” | Minamidaito Island, Okinawa | LC412493 | Unpublished |
| Geonemertes “pelaensis” | Minamidaito Island, Okinawa | LC412494 | Unpublished |
| Geonemertes “pelaensis” | Minamidaito Island, Okinawa | LC412495 | Unpublished |
| Geonemertes “pelaensis” | Minamidaito Island, Okinawa | LC412496 | Unpublished |
| Geonemertes “pelaensis” | Minamidaito Island, Okinawa | LC412497 | Unpublished |
| Geonemertes “pelaensis” | Minamidaito Island, Okinawa | LC412496 | Unpublished |
| Geonemertes “pelaensis” | Minamidaito Island, Okinawa | LC412497 | Unpublished |
| Geonemertes “pelaensis” | Minamidaito Island, Okinawa | LC412498 | Unpublished |
| Geonemertes “pelaensis” | Minamidaito Island, Okinawa | LC412499 | Unpublished |
| Geonemertes “pelaensis” | Minamidaito Island, Okinawa | LC412500 | Unpublished |
| Geonemertes “pelaensis” | Okinawa Main Island, Okinawa | LC412501 | Unpublished |
| Geonemertes “pelaensis” | Okinawa Main Island, Okinawa | LC412502 | Unpublished |
| Geonemertes “pelaensis” | Yonaguni Island, Okinawa | PX392564 | Present study |
| Prosadenoporus floridensis | Link Port, Florida, USA | EF157596 | Maslakova and Norenburg (2008) [12] |
| Prosadenoporus mooreae | Magnetic Island, Australia | EF157595 | Maslakova and Norenburg (2008) [12] |
| Prosadenoporus winsori | Banks of Ross River, Townsville, Australia | EF157594 | Maslakova and Norenburg (2008) [12] |
Table 2.
GenBank accession numbers of the mitochondrial genome of the selected hoplonemerteans used for phylogenetic analyses in this study
| Species | Accession No. | References |
|---|---|---|
| Amphiporus formidabilis | KC710979 | Sun and Sun (2014) [89] |
| Amphiporus lactifloreus | OR387313 | Dodt et al. (unpublished) |
| Geonemertes “pelaensis” Yonaguni Island | PX392564 | Present study |
| Geonemertes “pelaensis” New Caledonia | PX238424 | Gastineau (unpublished) |
| Geonemertes “pelaensis” Martinique | PQ336987 | Gastineau (unpublished) |
| Geonemertes sp. Ogasawara | PX392562 | Present study |
| Gononemertes parasita | KF572481 | Sun et al. (2014) [90] |
| Emplectonema gracile | JF727825 | Unpublished |
| Malacobdella japonica | PX392563 | Present study |
| Nectonemertes cf. mirabilis | HQ997772 | Chen et al. (2012) [65] |
| Nemertopsis tetraclitophila | KF572482 | Sun et al. (2014) [90] |
| Nipponnemertes punctatula | KC710980 | Sun and Sun (2014) [89] |
| Paranemertes cf. peregrina | GU564481 | Chen et al. (2011) [91] |
| Prosadenoporus spectaculum | KC710981 | Sun and Sun (2014) [89] |
| Prosorhochmus claparedii | OR397959 | Dodt et al. (unpublished) |
COX1 primer design and sanger sequencing
Based on the complete mitochondrial genome obtained above, specific primers targeting the Folmer region of COX1 for the Ogasawara specimens were designed using Geneious Prime. PCR products were purified using ExoSAP-IT PCR Product Cleanup Reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Sanger sequencing was performed with the same primer pairs used in PCR and outsourced to FASMAC (Kanagawa, Japan). Shotgun sequencing of the mitochondrial genome revealed that the forward primer for the Folmer COX1 region in the Geonemertes specimens collected from Ogasawara Islands (referred to as Geonemertes sp. Ogasawara in Fig. 1A, E) showed mismatches at three positions in each primer region: the 1st, 2nd, and 8th positions for the forward primer (LCO1490), and the 3rd, 12th, and 18th positions for the reverse primer (HCO2198). Based on these results, specific primers were designed for PCR amplification: GeoG_98F (TTTGGTCTGGGCTTGTTGGT) / GeoG_1348R (AATAACGACGAGGCATCCCA) for amplification, and GeoG_interval_917F (TGGATGTTGATACTCGGGCT) / GeoG_interval_498R (AGAAGAAACACCAGCAAGATGA) for sequencing. The same PCR conditions as in other PCR reactions were used, allowing for successful COX1 sequencing of Geonemertes sp. Ogasawara.
Fig. 1.
Genetic and geographic differentiation between Geonemertes species in the Pacific and western Atlantic regions. (A) Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree based on COX1 sequences (573 bp) showing the genetic divergence between Geonemertes sp. Ogasawara (orange) and the broadly distributed Geonemertes “pelaensis” clade (blue), including specimens from Bermuda, Cuba, Martinique, New Caledonia, and the Okinawa Islands. Bootstrap values ≥ 70 are shown at nodes. (B) Global map showing sampling localities. Blue circles indicate records of G. “pelaensis”, orange circles indicate Geonemertes sp. Ogasawara. (C) Regional map of the northwestern Pacific showing localities in Japan where Geonemertes specimens were collected. (D–E) Live specimens: (D) G. “pelaensis” from Yonaguni Island (blue frame); (E) Geonemertes sp. Ogasawara from Chichijima Island, Ogasawara (orange frame)
Phylogenetic analyses based on COX1
Sequence alignments were performed in Geneious Prime using Clustal Omega v1.2.3 [51]. Ambiguous regions were trimmed using Gblocks v0.91b [52] under less stringent parameters. From the original 658-bp COX1 alignment, 573 bp (87%) remained after trimming.
Maximum-likelihood (ML) analyses were conducted using IQ-TREE [53] based on the best-fit substitution model identified by the IQ-TREE web server [54]. Node support was evaluated using 1,000 ultrafast bootstrap (UFboot) replicates. Clades with UFboot support values ≥ 95% were considered strongly supported, following the guidelines provided by IQ-TREE. Three species of Prosadenoporus Bürger, 1890 were used as outgroup taxa. COX1 sequences determined in the present study were deposited in GenBank, with accession numbers listed in Table 1.
Uncorrected pairwise genetic distances were calculated based on the 658-bp COX1 in Geneious Prime.
Phylogenetic analyses based on protein coding genes (PCGs) in mitochondrial DNA
To infer phylogenetic position of Geonemertes in Amphiporiina (Monostilifera), a ML analysis was performed using concatenated sequences of mitochondrial 13 PCGs and two ribosomal RNA genes, ATP synthase subunits (ATP6 and ATP8), cytochrome c oxidase subunits (COX1–3), NADH dehydrogenase subunits (ND1–6 and ND4L), and cytochrome b (CYTB) and 16S rRNA (16S) and 12S rRNA (12S) from 16 operational taxonomic units (OTUs) of hoplonemerteans. A single species of polystiliferan, Nectonemertes cf. mirabilis, was used as an outgroup taxon. Sequence alignment, ambiguous site trimming, model selection, and phylogenetic analyses follow the methods above.
Results
Sequencing and mitochondrial genome assembly
For Geonemertes “pelaensis”, a total of 94.6 Gbp, corresponding to approximately 626.9 million raw reads, was generated. Assembly of a 10% subset of these reads yielded a complete mitochondrial genome of 31,745 bp with an average coverage of 650×. The assembled mitochondrial genome showed no evidence of nuclear mitochondrial pseudogene contamination, as indicated by continuous read mapping across the genome without gaps or excessive coverage variation. The overall read coverage was uniform across both coding and non-coding regions (Supplementary Fig. 1, Supplementary Table 2).
Sequencing of Geonemertes sp. Ogasawara produced 2.5 Gbp of data, comprising approximately 16.6 million raw reads. The subsequent assembly resulted in a mitochondrial sequence of 18,755 bp with an average coverage of 177.7×.
For Malacobdella japonica, we obtained 3.8 Gbp of data, consisting of approximately 25.7 million raw reads. The assembly of these reads produced a 14,917 bp mitochondrial genome with an average coverage of 697.39×.
Phylogeny based on COX1
Phylogenetic analyses based on COX1 sequences (573 bp) revealed that Geonemertes sp. Ogasawara formed a distinct clade, separate from those identified as G. pelaensis based on body coloration (referred to as Geonemertes “pelaensis” in Fig. 1A, D), including specimens from Okinawa (main island), Minamidaito Island, Yonaguni Island (this study), Bermuda, Cuba, Martinique, and New Caledonia (Fig. 1A, B). All Ogasawara specimens from both Chichijima and Hahajima clustered together with 100% ultrafast bootstrap support (UFboot) and were consistently recovered as sister to a clade comprising G. “pelaensis” and Geonemertes sp. from Bocas del Toro, Panama (Fig. 1A).
Uncorrected pairwise COX1 sequence divergence between Geonemertes sp. Ogasawara and G. “pelaensis” plus Geonemertes sp. Bocas del Toro ranged from 6.75% to 8.59%. These inter-clade divergences far exceed the typical intraspecific variation in nemerteans; for reference, most species show less than 4–5% COX1 divergence between geographically distant populations, although cryptic species complexes may exhibit higher values (e.g. [55]). In contrast, within-clade divergences were very low: 0.00–0.16% within the Ogasawara clade and 0.00–0.26% within the G. pelaensis clade (Supplementary Table 1).
Alignment of the COX1 sequences also revealed consistent synonymous substitutions distinguishing Geonemertes sp. Ogasawara population, further supporting their genetic separation.
Characterization and interspecific comparison of mitochondrial genome
We obtained the complete mitochondrial genomes of Geonemertes sp. Ogasawara, G. “pelaensis” from Yonaguni Island, and the relatively close taxon with Geonemertes (e.g. [56]), Malacobdella japonica from Kashima-nada, Japan (Fig. 2). The mitogenome of G. pelaensis from Yonaguni Island was substantially larger at 31,745 bp in total, with a GC content of 22.3% (Fig. 2A). The mitogenome of Geonemertes sp. Ogasawara was reconstructed as 18,755 bp, with a GC content of 24.3% (Fig. 2D). The mitogenome of M. japonica was reconstructed as 14,917 bp, with a GC content of 30.4% (Fig. 2G). The mitogenome of G. “pelaensis” from Yonaguni Island was comparable in length to the deposited sequence of G. pelaensis from Martinique and New Caledonia (Fig. 3C), which shares an identical COX1 sequence with our Yonaguni specimen.
Fig. 2.
Mitochondrial genome organization, codon usage, and relative synonymous codon usage (RSCU) of three nemertean species. (A–C) Geonemertes “pelaensis” from Yonaguni Island, (D–F) Geonemertes sp. Ogasawara, and (G–I) Malacobdella japonica. (A, D, G) Circular maps of the mitochondrial genomes showing gene organization and strand orientation. Protein-coding genes are indicated by standard gene abbreviations (e.g., COX1, ND2, ATP6), ribosomal RNA genes are labeled as 12S rRNA and 16S rRNA, and tRNA genes are denoted by their corresponding amino acid codes. The innermost ring plot represents the GC content along the genome, with peaks indicating regions of higher GC composition. Central photographs show the corresponding specimens. (B, E, H) RSCU for each species. Colored bars represent the RSCU values of individual codons grouped by amino acid. RSCU values > 1 indicate preferential usage of that codon relative to others encoding the same amino acid. (C, F, I) Codon usage bias across protein-coding genes, showing the deviation in codon usage frequency
Fig. 3.
Mitochondrial phylogeny, gene order, and genome size of Geonemertes species and other hoplonemerteans. (A) Maximum likelihood phylogeny of selected hoplonemerteans based on concatenated mitochondrial protein-coding genes (PCGs), and two rRNA genes (12S, 16S). (B) Mitochondrial gene order of 13 protein-coding genes and 2 rRNA genes for each species. (C) Comparison of total mitochondrial genome sizes; Geonemertes sp. Ogasawara has a larger genome (18,755 bp) than other hoplonemerteans, while G. “pelaensis” from Yonaguni Island shows an exceptionally large genome (31,745 bp), more than twice the typical size observed in Nemertea
The 13 PCGs of Geonemertes “pelaensis”, Geonemertes sp. Ogasawara, and M. japonica encode a total of 3,698 (Fig. 2A), 3,627 (Fig. 2D), and 3,699 amino acids (Fig. 2G), respectively. Among the amino acids, phenylalanine (Phe) is the most frequently used in M. japonica and Geonemertes sp. Ogasawara, whereas proline (Pro) is the most common in G. “pelaensis” (Fig. 2C, F, H). Relative synonymous codon usage (RSCU) analysis indicates a strong preference for codons ending with thymine (T) at the third codon position (Fig. 2B, E, H). This pattern is consistent with the general AT-bias commonly observed in mitochondrial genomes of metazoans [57–59]. In particular, the preferred codon for arginine (Arg) differs between lineages: M. japonica shows a bias toward GGA (Fig. 2H), whereas both Geonemertes species preferentially use GGT (Fig. 2B, E). Moreover, striking differences were observed in leucine (Leu, CUN) codon usage; G. “pelaensis” predominantly employed CTT for Leu (CUN) codon but Geonemertes sp. Ogasawara displayed a more balanced distribution of Leu (CUN) codon, closely resembling the pattern in M. japonica (Fig. 2B, E, H).
To evaluate sequencing quality of G. “pelaensis” from Yonaguni Island, we analyzed coverage depth based on Phred quality scores ≥ 30. The Yonaguni specimen exhibited high-quality sequencing across the genome, with an average per-site coverage of 22,574 reads (median: 23,528; minimum: 881; maximum: 29,187) and a mean base quality score of 37. A small number of sites showed minor alternative bases (Supplementary Fig. 1, Supplementary Table 2), likely reflecting sequencing artifacts or low-level heteroplasmy, though their frequencies were low and did not affect the consensus sequence.
All three mitochondrial genomes were circular and contained the full complement of 13 PCGs and two ribosomal RNA genes (12S and 16S). The inferred gene order of Geonemertes sp. Ogasawara oriented clockwise, was as follows: ND6, ND4, ND5, CYTB, ND4L, ND2, ATP8, 16S, ND1, COX3, ND3, COX1, COX2, ATP6, 12S (Figs. 2D, 3B and 4). This arrangement differs markedly from that of G. “pelaensis”, which has the following gene order: ND6, ND4L, ND4, COX3, ATP8, ND1, CYTB, ND5, ND3, COX1, ND2, COX2, ATP6, 12S, 16S (Figs. 2A and 4); the gene arrangement was identical with sequences from the Martinique and New Caledonia specimens (Fig. 3B). Despite the substantially larger genome size (Fig. 3C), we detected no gene duplications in the mitogenome of G. “pelaensis”. Expanded non-coding regions were observed between ND4 and COX3, and COX3 and ATP8, which likely contributed to the overall mitochondrial genome size (Fig. 2A).
Fig. 4.
Comparisons of mitochondrial gene arrangements in Geonemertes. Gene translocations are illustrated by comparing the ancestral hoplonemertean mitochondrial gene arrangement with those of Geonemertes “pelaensis” and Geonemertes sp. Ogasawara. Arrows indicate inferred hypothetical translocation events. Single-letter abbreviations denote tRNA genes: A = tRNA-Ala, C = tRNA-Cys, D = tRNA-Asp, E = tRNA-Glu, F = tRNA-Phe, G = tRNA-Gly, H = tRNA-His, I = tRNA-Ile, K = tRNA-Lys, L1 = tRNA-Leu (UUR), L2 = tRNA-Leu (CUN), M = tRNA-Met, N = tRNA-Asn, P = tRNA-Pro, Q = tRNA-Gln, R = tRNA-Arg, S1 = tRNA-Ser (AGN), S2 = tRNA-Ser (UCN), T = tRNA-Thr, V = tRNA-Val, W = tRNA-Trp, Y = tRNA-Tyr
Interspecific comparisons of PCGs order with marine species of Hoplonemertea, revealed that these taxa share a conserved ancestral gene order typical of Nemertea: ND6, CYTB, ND4L, ND4, ND5, COX3, ND3, COX1, ND2, COX2, ATP8, ATP6, 12S, 16S, ND1 (Fig. 4) (e.g., Chen et al. 2012). Relative to the ancestral hoplonemertean gene order, both Geonemertes species exhibit multiple rearrangements; in G. “pelaensis”, CYTB, ND1, ND5, and ATP8 are translocated, whereas in Geonemertes sp. Ogasawara, translocations involve ND4–ND5, ND2, ATP8, and the 16S–ND1 blocks (Figs. 3B and 4).
Phylogeny based on mitochondrial PCGs, 12S, and 16S
In the resulting tree (Fig. 3A), the two terrestrial nemerteans, G. “pelaensis” and Geonemertes sp. Ogasawara, formed a clade; the clade was sister to M. japonica with 94% of UFboot. The clade constituted by the two Geonemertes species and M. japonica was sister to Prosadenoporus spectaculum (Yamaoka, 1940) with a full support value (Fig. 3A).
Systematics
Family Prosorhochmidae Bürger, 1895.
Genus Geonemertes Semper, 1863.
Type species: Geonemertes pelaensis Semper, 1863.
Diagnosis based on Gibson & Moore (1998) [26]: Terrestrial eumonostiliferous nemertean with 2–8 eyes. Rhynchocoel nearly full body length; rhynchocoel wall with two-separated muscular layers, outer circular and inner longitudinal muscle layers. Mid-dorsal vascular vessels with a single vascular plug. Frontal organ massively developed. Cephalic glands extensively developed. Submuscular glands present. Lateral nerve with accessory nerves. Excretory system well developed, consisting of enormous numbers of separate protonephridia distributed throughout body and opening by large numbers of pores; the binucleate flame cells, with both transverse and longitudinal support bars.
Geonemertes pelaensis Semper, 1863.
(Fig. 5A–E)
Fig. 5.
Geonemertes spp. herein reported. (A) Geonemertes “pelaensis”, whole body; (B) magnification of head, anterodorsal; (C) ventral; (D) squeezed specimen; (E) stylet apparatus; (F) Geonemertes sp. Ogasawara, specimens photographed in-situ; (G) whole body; (H) magnification of head, dorsal; (I) stylet apparatus. Abbreviations: cf, cephalic furrow; fo, frontal organ; pp, proboscis pore. Scale bars: 1 mm (A, G); 500 μm (B, C, H); 100 μm (D, E, I)
Material examined:
NSMT-Ne 22, a complete body except for a posterior tip used for DNA extraction, preserved in 70% ethanol, collected near Tabaru River, Yonaguni Island, Okinawa, Japan (24°27′38.7′′N, 123°00′15.3′′E), by Naoto Sawada, on April 16 2022.
Habitat and geographic distribution:
The specimens collected from Yonaguni were found under stones and among litter layers in the natural forest seemingly remoted from human activities. In other localities, the species was also found from habitats likely affected from human activities such as in botanical gardens and under plant pots or soil sacks, and beneath moist cement blocks and bricks [60]. Currently reported from tropical/subtropical areas in the Atlantic, Caribbean, Indian, and Pacific Oceans.
Description:
Body 23.0–120.0 mm in length and 0.7–4.0 mm in maximum width; body ground color uniformly pale to light brown; a single longitudinal dark brown stripe faintly appearing at posterior region of head and extending to posterior end of body (Fig. 5A). A single longitudinal lateral stripe very faintly present on both sides of a mid-dorsal stripe (Fig. 5A). Cerebral ganglia invisible through body wall. Cephalic furrows transversely extending on ventral surface and meeting at mid-line (Fig. 5B, C). Eyes arranged in four groups; anterior eyes typically larger than posterior ones; posterior groups containing 2–4 eyes (Fig. 5D). Large frontal organ visible in squeezed specimens (Fig. 5D). Proboscis pore terminal (Fig. 5D). Proboscis white (Fig. 5D). In the Yonaguni specimens, proboscis middle chamber with 4 or 5 accessory-stylet pouches, each containing 3–5 accessory stylets (Fig. 5E). Central stylet smooth; stylet 80–92 μm in length and 16–20 μm in width; basis cylindrical, 100–125 μm in length and 30 μm in width (Fig. 5E).
Remarks:
The external features of the Yonaguni specimens including the body coloration and the number of eyes agree with G. pelaensis previously reported worldwide [26, 30, 61]. A wide distribution of the present species was genetically confirmed by 0.00–0.16% of COX1 genetic distances between the specimens from Yonaguni and the specimens from Bermuda, Cuba, Martinique, and New Caledonia, much lower than interspecific divergences (approx. 4–5%) observed among monostiliferans (e.g. [55]).
Geonemertes sp. Ogasawara.
(Fig. 5F–I)
Material examined:
NSMT-Ne 23, a complete body except for a posterior tip used for DNA extraction, preserved in 70% ethanol, collected in a private garden in Higashimachi, Chichijima Island, Ogasawara, Tokyo, Japan by Natsumi Hookabe, on December 12, 2020. RMNH.VER.22254 (referred to as “KAWAKATSU’s Specimen Lot No. 1899” in Oki et al. (1987) [34]), seven specimens preserved in 70% ethanol, collected under a flowerpot placed in a garden at Nishi-machi, Chichijima Island; altitude, ca. 10 m by Kitagawa Ken’ichi on July 18, 1987; RMNH.VER.22258 (referred to as “KAWAKATSU’s Specimen Lot No. 1882” in Oki et al. (1987) [34], five specimens, collected at a roadside bush at Miyanohamamichi, Chichjima Island; altitude, ca. 25 m by Kitagawa Ken’ichi, the specimen label indicating the collection date as August 22, 1986, whereas Oki et al. (1987) [34] reported it as 1981.
Habitat and geographic distribution:
This species was found under bricks in backyard gardens and roadsides. It is likely to prefer moist substrates like most land snails and terrestrial flatworms. The similar forms with a lighter brown mid-dorsal single stripe than G. pelaensis were reported from southern part of Hahajima Island [39].
Description:
Body 21.0–40.0 mm in length and 1.7–2.0 mm in maximum width; body ground color uniformly pale; a single longitudinal narrow pale-brown stripe faintly appearing at posterior region of head; a stripe becoming faded at posterior end of body (Figs. 5F, G and 6). A single longitudinal lateral stripe not well distinguished. Cerebral ganglia invisible through body wall. Eyes arranged in four groups; anterior eyes typically larger than posterior ones; posterior groups containing 2 or 3 eyes (Fig. 5H). Testes visible through body wall as a milk-yellow colored region (Fig. 5G).
Fig. 6.
Museum specimens identified as Geonemertes pelaensis in the 1980s from Chichijima Island, Ogasawara. (A) RMNH.VER.22,254 collected in 1987 from Chichijima Island; (B) RMNH.VER.22,258 collected from Miyanohamamichi (misspelled on label as “Miyano-hama, Nichi”), Chichijima Island; the specimen label indicates the collection date as August 22, 1986, whereas Oki et al. (1987) reported it as 1981. Scale bars: 5 mm
Proboscis pore terminal (Fig. 5H). In the specimen examined in this study, proboscis middle chamber with 2 accessory-stylet pouches, each containing 2 accessory stylets. Central stylet smooth; stylet 82 μm in length and 16 μm in width; basis cylindrical with a constricted middle region, 100 μm in length and 27 μm in width (Fig. 5I).
Ecology:
Hahajima Island population has been observed preying on a wider range of invertebrates, such as spiders, cicadas (e.g., Orosanga), Drosophila, Gryllodes sigillatus, lepidopteran larvae, amphipods (Talitridae), and isopods (Burmoniscus kathmandius and Venezillo parvus) [39, 40, 62].
Remarks:
The present species most resembles G. pelaensis in having a pale body with a dark mid-dorsal longitudinal stripe (Figs. 5G and 6). However, the mid-dorsal stripe is paler and narrower than G. “pelaensis” from Yonaguni Island (Fig. 5A, G) and these characters seem consistent with Kawakatsu Collection collected in 1980s from Chichijima Island (Fig. 6). Apart from the external features, there is the other morphological difference between the two—the number of accessory-stylet pouches and accessory stylets (each 2 in 2 pouches in Geonemertes sp. Ogasawara vs. each 3–5 in 4 or 5 pouches in G. “pelaensis”).
The present study provides clear molecular and morphological evidence that Geonemertes sp. Ogasawara and G. “pelaensis” represent distinct species (Table 3).
Table 3.
Summary of diagnostic morphological and distributional differences between the Yonaguni (G. “pelaensis”) and Ogasawara (Geonemertes sp. Ogasawara) specimens.
| Geonemertes “pelaensis” (based on Yonaguni specimens) | Geonemertes sp. Ogasawara | |
|---|---|---|
| Body length (mm) | 23–120 | 21–40 |
| Body width (mm) | 0.7–4.0 | 1.7–2.0 |
| Body color | Pale to light brown | Uniformly pale |
| Mid-dorsal stripe | Dark brown, distinct and broad; extending to posterior end | Pale brown, narrow and faint; fading posteriorly |
| Lateral stripes | Faintly visible on both sides of mid-dorsal stripe | Poorly defined or absent |
| Eyes | Four groups; anterior eyes larger; posterior groups with 2–4 eyes | Four groups; anterior eyes larger; posterior groups with 2–3 eyes |
| Proboscis pore | Terminal | Terminal |
| Accessory-stylet pouches (no.) | 4–5 | 2 |
| Accessory stylets per pouch | 3–5 | 2 |
| Stylet basis (µm) | Cylindrical, 100–125 × 30 | Cylindrical, constricted medially, 100 × 27 |
| Geographic distribution | Widespread in tropical/subtropical Atlantic, Caribbean, Indian, and Pacific; originally described from Palau | Known only from Chichijima and Hahajima, Ogasawara (Japan) |
| Remarks | COX1 identical to specimens from Bermuda, Cuba, Martinique, and New Caledonia; considered a widespread cosmopolitan species | Distinct molecular and morphological lineage |
The Ogasawara specimen is potentially undescribed; however, because topotypic DNA sequences for G. pelaensis from Palau are currently unavailable, we refrain from describing it formally in this study.
Discussion
Unrecognized species diversity in Japanese terrestrial Geonemertes
Our mitochondrial genome and COX1 analyses revealed the presence of at least two distinct Geonemertes lineages in Japan (Fig. 1A). The Ogasawara population—previously identified as G. pelaensis—is genetically and morphologically distinct from the widely distributed G. “pelaensis” found in Yonaguni and other tropical/subtropical regions. Given its unique ecological characteristics and potential impact on native soil fauna, further taxonomic and ecological investigation, particularly regarding its biogeographic origin and pathways of dispersal are required for the Ogasawara population.
Morphological differentiation of the Ogasawara population
Our morphological examination revealed differentiations between Geonemertes sp. Ogasawara and G. “pelaensis” from Yonaguni Island (Fig. 5). Live specimens of G. “pelaensis” possess a pale body with a solid dark mid-dorsal stripe; (body width): (width of mid-dorsal stripe) = 1: 0.078–0.110 (Figs. 1D and 5A–F). In contrast, Geonemertes sp. Ogasawara exhibit a uniformly pale to light brown coloration, with a narrow, posteriorly becoming faint or indistinct (body width): (width of mid-dorsal stripe) = 1: 0.042–0.050, mostly half ratio than G. pelaensis (Figs. 1E and 5G–F). In addition, G. “pelaensis” from Yonaguni Island possess four or five accessory-stylet pouches, each containing 3–5 accessory stylets (Fig. 5E), while Ogasawara specimens consistently had only two pouches, each with two accessory stylets (Fig. 5I). These differences, coupled with 6.75 to 8.59% COX1 genetic divergence observed in our analyses, support the hypothesis that the Ogasawara population represents a distinct species as suggested in Yoshino (2025) [40].
Examination of specimens collected in the 1980s by Prof. Dr. Kawakatsu, which were later used in Oki et al. (1987) [34] and are now deposited in the museum collections of the Naturalis Biodiversity Center, revealed external morphologies identical to those of our recent Ogasawara specimens (Figs. 5G and H and 6). To the best of our knowledge, Geonemertes sp. Ogasawara has been the only Geonemertes species present in the Ogasawara Islands for nearly half a century. These findings suggest the crucial role of museum collections in documenting biodiversity through time as mentioned in many previous studies (e.g. [63]). The preservation and accessibility of historical specimens not only allowed us to confirm species identification in Ogasawara Islands over several decades but also highlight the importance of systematic deposition for future taxonomic and conservation studies.
Mitogenomic variation and its evolutionary implications
In addition to COX1 divergence, our study revealed striking differences in mitochondrial genome size and arrangement among Geonemertes sp. Ogasawara, G. “pelaensis”, and other monostiliferans (Figs. 3B, C and 4). The mitogenome of the Ogasawara species, at 18,755 bp, is larger than those reported for other hoplonemerteans (e.g. [64, 65]). Further, the mitogenome of G. “pelaensis” from Yonaguni Island was 31,745 bp—1.89–2.18 times larger than those of other nemerteans—despite consistently encoding the 13 PCGs and two rRNA genes [64, 66]. The large genome of G. “pelaensis” seems due to the long intergenic non-coding regions, particularly between ND4–COX3 and COX3–ATP8 (Fig. 2A). These features are also confirmed in G. “pelaensis” from Martinique and New Caledonia (Fig. 3A), indicating that this expansion pattern is species-specific and conserved across geographically distant populations.
Although both Geonemertes species exhibit extensive rearrangements in gene order, their overall architectures retain partial similarity to the ancestral hoplonemertean pattern (Fig. 4). The two Geonemertes species nevertheless differ markedly: in G. “pelaensis”, the translocations of CYTB, ND1, ND5, and ATP8 have occurred, whereas in Geonemertes sp. Ogasawara, rearrangements involve the ND4–ND5 block, ND2, ATP8, and the 16S–ND1 block. ATP8, ND1, and ND5 are translocated in both the Geonemertes species (Fig. 4), suggesting that these loci may represent hotspots of rearrangement in Geonemertes. The relative position of ATP8 is similar in both species, suggesting that its translocation may have occurred once in their common ancestor, while the remaining rearrangements likely arose independently after divergence.
Despite these dynamic mitochondrial gene rearrangements, several elements remain conserved; for example, the ND3–12S block is conserved across both Geonemertes species as well as in the inferred ancestral pattern (Fig. 4). It suggests that this segment possibly represents relatively conserved gene arrangement in hoplonemertean mitogenomes.
Such mitochondrial plasticity has not been previously reported in Nemertea [64], but well documented in other invertebrate phyla, including Mollusca, Bryozoa, Tunicata, and Acari (e.g. [67–75]). Gene rearrangements and expansions in mitogenomes have been reported in gastropods, bivalves, and isopods (e.g. [76–78]). Several studies hypothesized to be driven by ecological factors such as parasitism, hypoxia, oxidative stress, and short generation times [72, 79, 80]. In addition, striking accelerations of mitochondrial substitution rates have been linked to cytoplasmic male sterility (CMS) in freshwater snails, where genomic conflict between mitochondria and nuclear genes suppresses male function [81]. However, large-scale analyses in annelids found no correlation between gene rearrangements and ecological traits. Instead, substitution rates and nucleotide composition were identified as the main predictors of gene order variability [82].
In annelids and mollusks, mitochondrial gene rearrangements are often associated with molecular mechanisms such as tandem duplication–random loss (TDRL) and slipped-strand mispairing [74, 83]. The relatively simple regulatory system of mitochondrial genomes—typically limited to the recognition of start and stop codons and lacking complex interactions with distant regulatory elements—may facilitate structural changes with minimal functional disruption [84–86]. Flexibility of mitogenome may help explain the frequency of gene translocations, although the evolutionary mechanisms underlying this plasticity appear to vary among taxa and remain incompletely understood.
Although Geonemertes lacks gene duplications in mitogenome, the gene rearrangements and size expansions—especially in G. “pelaensis”—might represent lineage-specific responses to terrestrial stressors such as desiccation or hypoxia. These findings possibly raise important questions about the evolutionary pressures shaping mitochondrial architecture in terrestrial nemerteans. Future studies incorporating transcriptional profiling, regulatory element mapping, and replication dynamics will be essential to determine whether these changes reflect adaptive evolution or neutral processes. Comparative analyses across subtidal, intertidal, and terrestrial nemerteans may further clarify whether mitogenomic reorganization is driven by ecological transitions or phylogenetic constraints.
Conservation implications
The discovery of previously unrecognized biodiversity within the terrestrial nemertean Geonemertes provides important insights into biodiversity and ecological risks in island ecosystems. Misidentification of invasive species can lead to underestimation of their ecological impact and delay appropriate management responses [9]. In the case of Geonemertes, previous assumptions regarding its limited predatory role may have obscured the true extent of its ecological impact on native soil fauna in Ogasawara [40]. If the Ogasawara population indeed represents a different species with a distinct ecological niche or predatory behavior, its influence on native ecosystems may differ from that of G. pelaensis elsewhere.
While our results clearly support the genetic and morphological distinctiveness of the Ogasawara population, its biogeographic origin remains uncertain. Similarly, the population in Okinawa—although genetically distinct from the Ogasawara lineage—also lacks historical records or biogeographic data. As both Ogasawara and Okinawa Islands are partially designated as World Natural Heritage Sites—with the latter inscribed in 2021 and notable for its insect diversity—the potential ecological role and interactions of terrestrial nemerteans within these ecosystems warrant careful investigation. At present, it is premature to definitively conclude the native or non-native status of either population. A comprehensive investigation involving population genetics, ecological field surveys, and historical reconstruction is essential to determine the evolutionary origin, native range, and ecological significance of previously unrecognized Geonemertes lineages.
Conclusion
Our study demonstrates that the terrestrial nemertean population in the Ogasawara Islands—long assumed to be Geonemertes pelaensis—constitutes a genetically and morphologically distinct lineage from the widely distributed G. “pelaensis” found in other parts of the Pacific and western Atlantic. This finding suggests the importance of integrating molecular and morphological data to previously overlooked species-level diversity, particularly in ecologically sensitive island systems.
In addition to morphology and COX1 divergence, mitogenomic traits—including genome size expansion and gene order rearrangement—further distinguish these lineages. Although we refrain from definitive conclusions about the population’s origin, the evidence strongly supports the recognition of at least two species-level lineages of Geonemertes in Japan.
The species-level divergence between the two Japanese Geonemertes species implies the need for accurate species identification in biodiversity monitoring and invasive-species management on oceanic islands such as Ogasawara, a UNESCO World Heritage Site. More broadly, our findings strengthen the importance of accurate species identification not only for taxonomic studies, but also for understanding ecological dynamics, informing conservation strategies, and protecting native biodiversity.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Acknowledgements
We thank Ms. Arike Gill, Ms. Sytske de Waart, and Dr. Ronald Sluys for providing access to Prof. Kawakatsu’s nemertean collection at the Naturalis Biodiversity Center. We are also grateful to Dr. Takafumi Nakano (Kyoto University) for sharing valuable information on Geonemertes from Yonaguni Island.
Abbreviations
- AT
Adenine–thymine
- bp
Base pairs
- CMS
Cytoplasmic male sterility
- COX1
Cytochrome c oxidase subunit I
- CYTB
Cytochrome b
- ML
Maximum likelihood
- NGS
Next-generation sequencing
- OTU
Operational taxonomic unit
- PCG
Protein-coding gene
- PCR
Polymerase chain reaction
- RSCU
Relative synonymous codon usage
- rRNA
Ribosomal RNA
- tRNA
Transfer RNA
- UFboot
Ultrafast bootstrap
Author contributions
NH conceived and designed the study, conducted fieldwork, morphological observations, and molecular analyses, and drafted the manuscript. SFH and AY contributed to mitogenome sequencing and assembly. YH and NS conducted field sampling and ecological observations in Ogasawara. RU contributed to phylogenetic interpretation and manuscript revision. HK supervised the project and contributed to manuscript writing and editing. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Funding
This work was supported by a Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) Postdoctoral Research Fellowship for Young Scientists (23KJ2222) to NH, and by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number 25K09751 to HK.
Data availability
The mitochondrial genome sequences generated in this study have been deposited in GenBank under accession numbers [PX290017–PX290023, PX392562–PX392564] (see Table 1 and 2).
Declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable. This study did not involve humans or vertebrate animals.
Consent for publication
Not applicable. This manuscript does not contain data from any individual person.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Paulay G. Biodiversity on oceanic islands: its origin and extinction. Am Zool. 1994;34:134–44. [Google Scholar]
- 2.International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN). IUCN evaluations of nominations of natural and mixed properties to the world heritage list. Gland (Switzerland): IUCN; 2011. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Yoshida M. Values and challenges of the Ogasawara Islands in comparison with other Island world heritages. Glob Environ Res. 2020;23:3–8. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Kawakami K. Threats to Indigenous biota from introduced species on the Bonin Islands, Southern Japan. J Disaster Res. 2008;3:174–86. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Abe T, Wada K, Kato Y, Makino S, Okochi I. Alien pollinator promotes invasive mutualism in an insular pollination system. Biol Invasions. 2011;13:957–67. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Chiba S, Cowie RH. Evolution and extinction of land snails on oceanic Islands. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 2016;47:123–41. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Sato N. Recent control of invasive alien animals in the Bonin Islands. Glob Environ Res. 2019;23:9–19. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Altaba CR. Extinction resilience of island species: an amphibian case and a predictive model. Diversity. 2014;6:43–71. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Bickford D, Lohman DJ, Sodhi NS, Ng PK, Meier R, Winker K, et al. Cryptic species as a window on diversity and conservation. Trends Ecol Evol. 2007;22:148–55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Norenburg JL, Chernyshev A, Kajihara H, Maslakova S. World Nemertea Database. World Register of Marine Species. 2025. https://www.marinespecies.org Accessed 8 Jul 2025.
- 11.Moore J, Gibson R. The Geonemertes problem (Nemertea). J Zool. 1981;194:175–201. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Maslakova SA, Norenburg JL. Revision of the smiling worm, genera Prosadenoporus Bürger, 1890 and Pantinonemertes Moore and Gibson, 1981 and description of a new species Prosadenoporus floridensis sp. nov. (Prosorhochmidae; Hoplonemertea; Nemertea) from Florida and Belize. J Nat Hist. 2008;42:1689–1727.
- 13.Kajihara H. Species diversity of Japanese ribbon worms (Nemertea). In: Motokawa M, Kajihara H, editors. Species diversity of animals in Japan. Tokyo: Springer Japan; 2017. pp. 419–44. [Google Scholar]
- 14.McDermott JJ, Roe P. Food, feeding behavior and feeding ecology of nemerteans. Am Zool. 1985;25:113–25. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Thiel M, Kruse I. Status of the Nemertea as predators in marine ecosystems. Hydrobiologia. 2001;456:21–32. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Maslakova S, Cherneva I, Kahn E, Wong A, Paulay G. A hundred species, mostly new—first assessment of ribbon worm diversity and distribution in Oman. PeerJ. 2025;13:e19438. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Chen H, Strand M, Norenburg JL, Sun S, Kajihara H, Chernyshev AV, et al. Statistical parsimony networks and species assemblages in cephalotrichid nemerteans (Nemertea). PLoS ONE. 2010;5:e12885. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Fernández-Álvarez FA, Machordom A. DNA barcoding reveals a cryptic nemertean invasion in Atlantic and mediterranean waters. Helgol Mar Res. 2013;67:599–605. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Leasi F, Norenburg JL. The necessity of DNA taxonomy to reveal cryptic diversity and spatial distribution of meiofauna, with a focus on Nemertea. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e104385. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Hiebert TC, Maslakova S. Integrative taxonomy of the Micrura alaskensis Coe, 1901 species complex (Nemertea: Heteronemertea), with descriptions of a new genus Maculaura gen. nov. And four new species from the NE Pacific. Zool Sci. 2015;32:615–37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Krämer D, Schmidt C, Podsiadlowski L, Beckers P, Horn L. Von Döhren J. Unravelling the Lineus ruber/viridis species complex (Nemertea, Heteronemertea). Zool Scr. 2017;46:111–26. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Chernyshev AV, Polyakova NE, Turanov SV, Kajihara H. Taxonomy and phylogeny of Lineus torquatus and allies (Nemertea, Lineidae) with descriptions of a new genus and a new cryptic species. Syst Biodivers. 2018;16:55–68. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Sagorny C, Wesseler C, Krämer D, von Döhren J. Assessing the diversity and distribution of Cephalothrix species (Nemertea: Palaeonemertea) in European waters by comparing different species delimitation methods. J Zool Syst Evol Res. 2019;57:497–519. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Verdes A, Arias MB, Junoy J, Schwartz ML, Kajihara H. Species delimitation and phylogenetic analyses reveal cryptic diversity within Cerebratulus marginatus (Nemertea: Pilidiophora). Syst Biodivers. 2021;19:895–905. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Moore J, Moore NW. Land nemertines in Dominica. W Indies Caribb J Sci. 1982;18:43–7. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Gibson R, Moore J. Further observations on the genus Geonemertes with a description of a new species from the Philippine Islands. Hydrobiologia. 1998;365:157–71. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Bürger O. Meeres- und Land-Nemertinen, gesammelt von den Herren Dr. Plate und Micholitz. Zool Jb Syst. 1896;9:271–6. [Google Scholar]
- 28.Pantin CFA. Geonemertes: a study in island life. Proc Linn Soc Lond. 1961;172:137–52. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Semper C. Reisebericht. Z Wiss Zool. 1863;13:558–70. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Morffe J, Garcia N, Breugelmans K. First record of the terrestrial nemertean Geonemertes pelaensis Semper, 1863 (Hoplonemertea: Prosorhochmidae) for Cuba. BioInvasions Rec. 2020;9:399–407. [Google Scholar]
- 31.Coe WR. Sexual phases in terrestrial nemerteans. Biol Bull. 1939;76:416–27. [Google Scholar]
- 32.Coe WR. Notes on the morphology and sexuality of the terrestrial nemertean, Geonemertes palaensis. Occas Pap Bernice Pauahi Bish Mus. 1940;15:205–11. [Google Scholar]
- 33.Gulliver G, Turbellaria. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1879;168:557–63.
- 34.Oki I, Tamura S, Ogren RE, Kitagawa K, Kawakatsu M. The karyotype and a new locality for the land nemertine Geonemertes pelaensis Semper, 1863. Bull Fuji Womens Coll Ser 2. 1987;25:66–77. [Google Scholar]
- 35.Kawakatsu M. Nemertinea. In: Aoki J, editor. Pictorial keys to soil animals of Japan. Tokyo: Tôkaidaigaku Shuppan Kai; 1991. p. 2. [in Japanese]. [Google Scholar]
- 36.Kawakatsu M. Nemertinea. In: Aoki J, editor. Pictorial keys to soil animals of Japan. Tokyo: Tôkaidaigaku Shuppan Kai; 1999. p. 11. [in Japanese]. [Google Scholar]
- 37.Kajihara H. A taxonomic catalogue of Japanese nemerteans (phylum Nemertea). Zool Sci. 2007;24:287–326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Gerlach J. The behaviour and captive maintenance of the terrestrial nemertine (Geonemertes pelaensis). J Zool. 1998;246:233–7. [Google Scholar]
- 39.Shinobe S, Uchida S, Mori H, Okochi I, Chiba S. Declining soil Crustacea in a world heritage site caused by land nemertean. Sci Rep. 2017;7:12400. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Yoshino H. Current distribution and field observations of the invasive land nemertean, Geonemertes sp., and some isopods in the Bonin (Ogasawara) Islands. Ogasawara Res. 2025;51:45–56. [Google Scholar]
- 41.Kishimoto T. Crisis for soil animals in the Ogasawara islands: the impact of invasive alien terrestrial nemertean. Nat Insects (Tokyo). 2022;57:31–4. [in Japanese]. [Google Scholar]
- 42.Karube H. Insects in Ogasawara. Nat Insects (Tokyo). 2024;59:15–8. [in Japanese]. [Google Scholar]
- 43.Folmer O, Black M, Hoeh W, Lutz R, Vrijenhoek R. DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Mol Mar Biol Biotechnol. 1994;3:294–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Hiruta SF, Waki T, Shimano S. Complete mitochondrial genomes of two snail mite: Riccardoella tokyoensis and R. reaumuri (Acariformes, Prostigmata, Ereynetidae). Mitochondrial DNA B Resour. 2022;7:345–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Rohland N, Reich D. Cost-effective, high-throughput DNA sequencing libraries for multiplexed target capture. Genome Res. 2012;22:939–46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Shen W, Sipos B, Zhao L. SeqKit2: a Swiss army knife for sequence and alignment processing. iMeta. 2024;3:e191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Jin JJ, Yu WB, Yang JB, Song Y, DePamphilis CW, Yi TS, et al. GetOrganelle: a fast and versatile toolkit for accurate de novo assembly of organelle genomes. Genome Biol. 2020;21:241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Donath A, Jühling F, Al-Arab M, Bernhart SH, Reinhardt F, Stadler PF, et al. Improved annotation of protein-coding genes boundaries in metazoan mitochondrial genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47:10543–52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Kearse M, Moir R, Wilson A, Stones-Havas S, Cheung M, Sturrock S, et al. Geneious basic: an integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bioinformatics. 2012;28:1647–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Lohse M, Drechsel O, Bock R. OrganellarGenomeDRAW (OGDRAW): a tool for the easy generation of high-quality custom graphical maps of plastid and mitochondrial genomes. Curr Genet. 2007;52:267–74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Sievers F, Wilm A, Dineen D, Gibson TJ, Karplus K, Li W, et al. Fast, scalable generation of high-quality protein MSAs using clustal Omega. Mol Syst Biol. 2011;7:539. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Castresana J. Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis. Mol Biol Evol. 2000;17:540–52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Minh BQ, Nguyen MAT, von Haeseler A. Ultrafast approximation for phylogenetic bootstrap. Mol Biol Evol. 2013;30:1188–95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Nguyen LT, Schmidt HA, von Haeseler A, Minh BQ. IQ-TREE: a fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Mol Biol Evol. 2015;32:268–74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Sundberg P, Kvist S, Strand M. Evaluating the utility of single-locus DNA barcoding for the identification of ribbon worms (phylum Nemertea). PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0155541. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Kvist S, Chernyshev AV, Giribet G. Phylogeny of Nemertea with special interest in the placement of diversity from Far East Russia and northeast Asia. Hydrobiologia. 2015;760:105–19. [Google Scholar]
- 57.Chen HX, Sundberg P, Norenburg JL, Sun SC. The complete mitochondrial genome of Cephalothrix simula (Iwata) (Nemertea: Palaeonemertea). Gene. 2009;442:8–17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Zhang B, Zhang YH, Wang X, Zhang HX, Lin Q. The mitochondrial genome of a sea anemone Bolocera sp. exhibits novel genetic structures potentially involved in adaptation to the deep-sea environment. Ecol Evol. 2017;7:4951–62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Yang M, Gong L, Sui J, Li X. The complete mitochondrial genome of Calyptogena marissinica (Heterodonta: Veneroida: Vesicomyidae): insight into the deep-sea adaptive evolution of vesicomyids. PLoS ONE. 2019;14:e0217952. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Jones HD, Sterrer W. Terrestrial planarians (Platyhelminthes, with three new species) and nemertines of Bermuda. Zootaxa. 2005;1001:31–58. [Google Scholar]
- 61.Ali H, Deo RN, Rutherford MG. First records of the terrestrial nemertean Geonemertes pelaensis (Hoplonemertea; Prosorhochmidae) in Trinidad, WI. Living World J Trinidad Tobago Field Nat Club. 2021;2021:117–8. [Google Scholar]
- 62.Ohbayashi T. Predation on Gryllodes sigillatus by Geonemertes pelaensis. Annu Rep Ogasawara Stud. 2021;44:51–3. [Google Scholar]
- 63.Ponder WF, Carter GA, Flemons P, Chapman RR. Evaluation of museum collection data for use in biodiversity assessment. Conserv Biol. 2001;15:648–57. [Google Scholar]
- 64.Podsiadlowski L, Braband A, Struck TH, von Döhren J, Bartolomaeus T. Phylogeny and mitochondrial gene order variation in Lophotrochozoa in the light of new mitogenomic data from Nemertea. BMC Genomics. 2009;10:364. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Chen HX, Sun SC, Sundberg P, Ren WC, Norenburg JL. A comparative study of nemertean complete mitochondrial genomes, including two new ones for Nectonemertes cf. mirabilis and Zygeupolia rubens, may elucidate the fundamental pattern for the phylum Nemertea. BMC Genomics. 2012;13:1–18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Shen C, Sun SC. Mitochondrial genome of Micrura bella (Nemertea: Heteronemertea), the largest mitochondrial genome known to phylum Nemertea. Mitochondrial DNA DNA Mapp Seq Anal. 2016;27:2899–900. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Boore JL, Medina M, Rosenberg LA. Complete sequences of the highly rearranged molluscan mitochondrial genomes of the scaphopod Graptacme eborea and the bivalve Mytilus edulis. Mol Biol Evol. 2004;21:1492–503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Shao R, Barker SC, Mitani H, Takahashi M, Fukunaga M. Molecular mechanisms for the variation of mitochondrial gene content and gene arrangement among chigger mites of the genus Leptotrombidium (Acari: Acariformes). J Mol Evol. 2006;63:251–61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Waeschenbach A, Telford MJ, Porter JS, Littlewood DTJ. The complete mitochondrial genome of Flustrellidra hispida and the phylogenetic position of Bryozoa among the Metazoa. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2006;40:195–207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Gissi C, Pesole G, Mastrototaro F, Iannelli F, Guida V, Griggio F, et al. Hypervariability of ascidian mitochondrial gene order: exposing the myth of deuterostome organelle genome stability. Mol Biol Evol. 2010;27:211–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Stach T, Braband A, Podsiadlowski L. Erosion of phylogenetic signal in tunicate mitochondrial genomes on different levels of analysis. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2010;55:860–71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Bernt M, Bleidorn C, Braband A, Dambach J, Donath A, Fritzsch G, et al. A comprehensive analysis of bilaterian mitochondrial genomes and phylogeny. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2013;69:352–64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Sun S, Li Q, Kong L, Yu H. Evolution of mitochondrial gene arrangements in Arcidae (Bivalvia: Arcida) and their phylogenetic implications. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2020;150:106879. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Ghiselli F, Gomes-dos-Santos A, Adema CM, Lopes-Lima M, Sharbrough J, Boore JL. Molluscan mitochondrial genomes break the rules. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021;376:20200159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Varney RM, Brenzinger B, Malaquias MAE, Meyer CP, Schrödl M, Kocot KM. Assessment of mitochondrial genomes for heterobranch gastropod phylogenetics. BMC Ecol Evol. 2021;21:6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Cunha RL, Grande C, Zardoya R. Neogastropod phylogenetic relationships based on entire mitochondrial genomes. BMC Evol Biol. 2009;9:210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Kilpert F, Held C, Podsiadlowski L. Multiple rearrangements in mitochondrial genomes of Isopoda and phylogenetic implications. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2012;64:106–17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Kong L, Li Y, Kocot KM, Yang Y, Qi L, Li Q, et al. Mitogenomics reveals phylogenetic relationships of Arcoida (Mollusca, Bivalvia) and multiple independent expansions and contractions in mitochondrial genome size. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2020;150:106857. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Kajander OA, Rovio AT, Majamaa K, Poulton J, Spelbrink JN, Holt IJ, et al. Human mtDNA sublimons resemble rearranged mitochondrial genomes found in pathological states. Hum Mol Genet. 2000;9:2821–35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Dowton M, Campbell NJH. Intramitochondrial recombination—Is it why some mitochondrial genes sleep around? Trends Ecol Evol. 2001;16:269–71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.David P, Degletagne C, Saclier N, Jennan A, Jarne P, Plénet S, et al. Extreme mitochondrial DNA divergence underlies genetic conflict over sex determination. Curr Biol. 2022;32:2325–33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Struck TH, Golombek A, Hoesel C, Dimitrov D, Elgetany AH. Mitochondrial genome evolution in Annelida—a systematic study on conservative and variable gene orders and the factors influencing its evolution. Syst Biol. 2023;72:925–45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Weigert A, Golombek A, Gerth M, Schwarz F, Struck TH, Bleidorn C. Evolution of mitochondrial gene order in Annelida. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2016;94:196–206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Wolstenholme DR. Genetic novelties in mitochondrial genomes of multicellular animals. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 1992;2:918–25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Boore JL. Animal mitochondrial genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 1999;27:1767–80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Gissi C, Iannelli F, Pesole G. Evolution of the mitochondrial genome of Metazoa as exemplified by comparison of congeneric species. Heredity. 2008;101:301–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Kvist S, Laumer CE, Junoy J, Giribet G. New insights into the phylogeny, systematics and DNA barcoding of Nemertea. Invert Syst. 2014;28:287–308. [Google Scholar]
- 88.Mateos E, Giribet G. Exploring the molecular diversity of terrestrial nemerteans (Hoplonemertea, Monostilifera, Acteonemertidae) in a continental landmass. Zool Scr. 2008;37:235–43. [Google Scholar]
- 89.Sun WY, Sun SC. A description of the complete mitochondrial genomes of Amphiporus formidabilis, Prosadenoporus spectaculum and Nipponnemertes punctatula (Nemertea: Hoplonemertea: Monostilifera). Mol Biol Rep. 2014;41:5681–92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Sun WY, Xu DL, Chen HX, Shi W, Sundberg P, Strand M, Sun SC. Complete mitochondrial genome sequences of two parasitic/commensal nemerteans, Gononemertes parasita and Nemertopsis tetraclitophila (Nemertea: Hoplonemertea). Parasites Vectors. 2014;7:273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Chen HX, Sundberg P, Wu HY, Sun SC. The mitochondrial genomes of two nemerteans, Cephalothrix sp. (Nemertea: Palaeonemertea) and Paranemertes cf. peregrina (Nemertea: Hoplonemertea). Mol Biol Rep. 2011;38:4509–25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The mitochondrial genome sequences generated in this study have been deposited in GenBank under accession numbers [PX290017–PX290023, PX392562–PX392564] (see Table 1 and 2).






