Abstract
Peritoneal dialysis (PD)-related peritonitis remains a major cause of morbidity, technique failure, and hospitalization in patients receiving renal replacement therapy. While Staphylococcus species and Enterobacterales represent the predominant etiologies, emerging reports have described rare infections caused by environmental or zoonotic organisms. Streptococcus uberis, a bovine mastitis pathogen and ubiquitous environmental microorganism, has been only exceptionally associated with human disease.
We report a case of peritonitis due to S. uberis in a 66-year-old male receiving automated peritoneal dialysis (APD; HomeChoice™ Pro Cycler, Baxter Healthcare, Deerfield, IL). The diagnosis was established using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS; Bruker Biotyper®, Bruker Daltonics, Bremen, Germany) and confirmed by sequencing of the sodA gene. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing (Etest®, bioMérieux, Marcy-l’Étoile, France) demonstrated susceptibility to β-lactams and glycopeptides.
The patient was successfully treated with a 21-day course of intraperitoneal vancomycin and ceftazidime, with complete clinical resolution and no relapse at 18-month follow-up. This case expands the spectrum of pathogens implicated in PD-associated infections and highlights the role of advanced microbiological diagnostics in identifying uncommon organisms. Environmental exposure should be considered in PD patients presenting with atypical or culture-negative peritonitis.
Keywords: antimicrobial resistance, automated peritoneal dialysis, maldi-tof, peritoneal dialysis, peritonitis, soda gene, streptococcus uberis, zoonosis
Introduction
Peritonitis remains one of the most significant complications in patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis (PD), contributing to catheter loss, transition to hemodialysis, hospitalization, and mortality. Despite improvements in connection systems, patient training, and aseptic technique, PD-related infections persist as a major barrier to long-term technique survival. The microbiological spectrum is dominated by Gram-positive organisms, particularly Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus aureus, and other coagulase-negative staphylococci, which account for approximately 60-70% of cases. Gram-negative organisms and fungi are less common but frequently associated with adverse outcomes.
Increasingly sensitive diagnostic technologies, including matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS; Bruker Biotyper®, Bruker Daltonics, Bremen, Germany), broad-range 16S rRNA gene polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and housekeeping-gene sequencing (e.g., sodA and rpoB), have expanded the ability to detect unusual organisms that were previously misidentified by conventional microbiology.
Streptococcus uberis is an environmental and bovine mastitis pathogen, commonly isolated from soil, livestock bedding, and water. Human infections are extremely rare and typically limited to case reports, most involving ocular, urinary, or soft-tissue infections. Its identification can be challenging, as phenotypic methods may misclassify it as other viridans-group streptococci. Additionally, antimicrobial susceptibility patterns may differ from related species, and evidence-based interpretive breakpoints remain limited.
We present a case of peritonitis due to S. uberis in a patient treated with automated peritoneal dialysis (APD; HomeChoice™ Pro Cycler, Baxter Healthcare, Deerfield, IL). This case adds to the limited body of literature on human infections caused by this organism and emphasizes the critical role of advanced diagnostics and environmental exposure assessment in PD-related infections.
Case presentation
A 66-year-old Caucasian male with end-stage renal disease secondary to hypertensive nephrosclerosis had been on continuous cycling peritoneal dialysis (CCPD) for 24 months using a HomeChoice™ Pro Cycler (Baxter Healthcare, Deerfield, IL, USA). His regimen consisted of four overnight exchanges with 2.0 L of 1.36% glucose-based dialysate and a daytime dwell, with no prior episodes of peritonitis.
His medical history included hypertension and hyperuricemia, treated with amlodipine, irbesartan, and allopurinol. He denied recent antibiotic use, abdominal procedures, or catheter malfunction. He reported a recent rural trip to Campania, Italy, where he had indirect exposure to livestock barns housing cattle and water buffalo.
He presented with cloudy peritoneal effluent, mild abdominal pain, and low-grade fever (38.5°C). Examination revealed mild diffuse abdominal tenderness without guarding, and a clean exit site without erythema or drainage. Laboratory results are shown in Table 1. Peritoneal fluid contained 4,370 white blood cells (WBC)/mm³ (80% polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMN)), fulfilling the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis (ISPD) 2022 criteria for peritonitis.
Table 1. Baseline laboratory parameters.
| Parameter | Value | Reference range |
| White blood cells | 13,410/mm³ (90.7% neutrophils) | 4,000–10,000/mm³ |
| C-reactive protein | 6.3 mg/dL | <0.5 mg/dL |
| Procalcitonin | 0.77 ng/mL | <0.05 ng/mL |
| Serum creatinine | 5.4 mg/dL | 0.6–1.3 mg/dL |
| Blood urea nitrogen | 72 mg/dL | 7–20 mg/dL |
| Total protein | 6.7 g/dL | 6.0–8.0 g/dL |
| Fasting glucose | 94 mg/dL | 70–110 mg/dL |
| Total cholesterol | 182 mg/dL | <200 mg/dL |
| High-density lipoprotein cholesterol | 48 mg/dL | >40 mg/dL |
| Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol | 112 mg/dL | <130 mg/dL |
| Triglycerides | 124 mg/dL | <150 mg/dL |
Empirical intraperitoneal vancomycin (30 mg/kg, full-dwell intermittent dosing) and ceftazidime (250 mg/L) were started. Dialysate samples were inoculated into aerobic and anaerobic blood culture bottles (BACTEC™, Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ). Within 48 hours, aerobic cultures were positive. Colonies were catalase-negative and α-hemolytic. MALDI-TOF MS (Bruker Biotyper®, Bruker Daltonics) identified Streptococcus uberis with a high-confidence score. Species confirmation was achieved by sodA gene sequencing (430 bp amplicon, 100% identity to reference genome). Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed using Etest® (bioMérieux, Marcy-l’Étoile, France). The clinical course and therapeutic steps are shown in Table 2, while the detailed antimicrobial susceptibility profile of the isolate is reported in Table 3. The patient became afebrile within 72 hours, and dialysate clarity normalized by day five. All subsequent peritoneal cultures remained sterile. Therapy was continued for 21 days. The patient remained free of recurrence at 18-month follow-up.
Table 2. Therapeutic timeline and clinical course.
Therapeutic timeline summarizing the patient’s clinical course, microbiological milestones, and response to intraperitoneal therapy.
AST: antimicrobial susceptibility testing; IE: insufficient evidence (EUCAST v.13.0); IP: intraperitoneal; PD: peritoneal dialysis; PMN: polymorphonuclear neutrophils; WBC: white blood cells; MALDI-TOF MS: matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry.
| Day | Clinical/laboratory findings | Intervention/remarks |
| 0 | Onset of cloudy effluent, mild abdominal pain, and fever of 38.5°C. Effluent WBC 4,370/mm³ (80% PMN). | Empirical IP antibiotics started: vancomycin 30 mg/kg (all bags; trough 15–20 µg/mL) + ceftazidime 250 mg/L of dialysate. |
| 2 | Cultures were positive (aerobic bottles). Catalase-negative α-hemolytic colonies. | MALDI-TOF MS identification: Streptococcus uberis (log > 2.2). |
| 3 | sodA gene PCR/sequencing confirms 100% identity (CP009999). | AST (Etest, EUCAST v.13.0): susceptible to β-lactams, vancomycin; linezolid: resistant; macrolides/aminoglycosides: IE. |
| 3–5 | Rapid clinical improvement: afebrile by 72 hours, pain resolution, effluent clearing. | Continuation of the same regimen; no adverse effects. |
| 5–14 | Effluent WBC < 100/mm³; culture-negative. | Therapy continued to complete a full 21-day course (both agents) to ensure Gram-negative coverage and prevent relapse. |
| 7–21 | Repeated effluent cultures were sterile. | Full recovery; no catheter malfunction or exit-site infection. |
| >18 months follow-up | No recurrence; stable PD technique and peritoneal function. | - |
Table 3. Antimicrobial susceptibility profile of Streptococcus uberis isolate (Etest, EUCAST v.13.0).
AST by Etest (bioMérieux®). Interpretation per EUCAST v.13.0 for viridans-group streptococci.
QC strain: Streptococcus pneumoniae ATCC 49619. IE: insufficient evidence to establish species-specific clinical breakpoints. S/I/R categories apply where EUCAST provides breakpoints for related viridans-group streptococci. MIC: minimum inhibitory concentration.
| Antibiotic | MIC (mg/L) | Category (EUCAST v.13.0) |
| β-lactams | ||
| Ampicillin | ≤0.25 | S |
| Benzylpenicillin | 0.25 | S |
| Cefotaxime | ≤0.12 | S |
| Ceftriaxone | 0.5 | S |
| Macrolide/lincosamide | ||
| Erythromycin | >4 | IE |
| Clindamycin | >0.5 | R |
| Fluoroquinolones | ||
| Levofloxacin | 0.5 | IE |
| Moxifloxacin | 0.12 | IE |
| Oxazolidinone | ||
| Linezolid | 2 | IE |
| Glycopeptides | ||
| Teicoplanin | ≤0.12 | S |
| Vancomycin | 0.5 | S |
Discussion
PD-related peritonitis has been extensively described in the literature, with Gram-positive organisms representing the majority of episodes [1-6], a significant contribution of Gram-negative bacteria to severe clinical outcomes [3], and a broader microbiological spectrum that includes emerging environmental or veterinary-associated pathogens [7-9]. This case highlights an uncommon etiology of PD-related peritonitis caused by Streptococcus uberis, traditionally regarded as a bovine mastitis pathogen and environmental microorganism.
Microbiological and taxonomic considerations
Streptococcus uberis belongs to the viridans-like streptococci group, a heterogeneous cluster frequently misidentified by conventional microbiology [6,10]. In this case, initial cultures showed catalase-negative, α-hemolytic colonies. MALDI-TOF MS (Bruker Biotyper®, Bruker Daltonics) enabled high-confidence identification of S. uberis, later confirmed by sequencing of the sodA gene [6]. The complementary use of proteomic and molecular methods reflects best practice for accurate species-level identification of viridans-group streptococci [5,6].
Clinical course and therapeutic implications
The clinical presentation, i.e., cloudy effluent, abdominal discomfort, and elevated peritoneal white blood cell (WBC) count, was typical of PD-related peritonitis. Empirical intraperitoneal vancomycin and ceftazidime were started according to the ISPD guidelines [1]. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing demonstrated susceptibility to β-lactams and glycopeptides, consistent with patterns described in veterinary isolates [9] and in rare reported human infections. The patient experienced rapid improvement and remained recurrence-free at 18-month follow-up. The therapeutic timeline is shown in Table 2, and antimicrobial susceptibility in Table 3.
Previously reported human infections due to Streptococcus uberis
Human infections caused by S. uberis remain rare and have included intraocular endophthalmitis, urinary tract infections [11,12], community-acquired pneumonia [13], and a soft-tissue infection with bloodstream involvement in a hemodialysis patient [14]. These reports are summarized in Table 4 and classified by infection type and diagnostic method in Table 5.
Table 4. Summary of published human cases of S. uberis infection.
This table includes only documented human cases with published data and confirmed bacterial identification. Animal studies and unverified or suspected reports were excluded.
MALDI-TOF MS: matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry.
| Year | Author (reference) | Clinical presentation | Host factors/comorbidities | Isolation site | Identification method | Outcome |
| 2010 | Velez-Montoya et al. [12] | Endophthalmitis (intra-ocular) | Postoperative ocular surgery | Vitreous humor | Culture + unspecified antibiotic-resistance study | Recovery after intravitreal ampicillin + other therapy |
| 2013 | Gülen et al. [11] | Urinary tract infections | Various patients (agricultural/rural exposure) | Urine | Biochemical phenotypic identification | Resolution after therapy in most cases |
| 2015 | Valentiny et al. [14] | Soft tissue infection + bacteremia | Hemodialysis; diabetic foot | Wound, blood | MALDI-TOF MS (molecular) | Recovery after combined therapy |
Table 5. Classification of reported Streptococcus uberis human infections by type, year, and clinical context.
This table was derived strictly from the currently cited references in the manuscript [11-14] plus the present case. Categories unsupported by these references were not included. Animal studies and unverified reports were excluded.
CAP: community-acquired pneumonia; ESRD: end-stage renal disease; PD: peritoneal dialysis; MALDI-TOF MS: matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry.
| Infection type | Number of cases | Year range | Main clinical contexts | Predisposing factors | Typical diagnostic approach |
| Ocular – endophthalmitis [12] | 1 | 2010 | Postoperative intra-ocular infection | Ocular surgery (post-op) | Culture (vitreous); targeted intravitreal therapy reported |
| Soft tissue + bacteremia [14] | 1 | 2015 | Diabetic foot; hemodialysis patient | Diabetes; hemodialysis | MALDI-TOF MS (species ID); wound/blood culture |
| Urinary tract infection [11] | 7 | 2013 | Community-acquired UTIs | Various; several with probable environmental exposure | Urine culture; phenotypic/biochemical identification |
| Community-acquired pneumonia (conference abstract) [13] | 1 | 2012 | CAP (meeting abstract) | Not reported | Reported in abstract; limited diagnostic detail |
| Peritonitis – current case | 1 | 2025 | Peritoneal dialysis | ESRD; PD catheter exposure | Culture + MALDI-TOF + sodA gene sequencing (as performed) |
A chronological overview of confirmed human infections, including the present case, is illustrated in Figure 1, highlighting the progressive expansion of clinical presentations and the increasing adoption of advanced microbial diagnostics [11-14].
Figure 1. Chronological trend of reported human Streptococcus uberis infections (2010–2025).
Cumulative number of microbiologically confirmed human infections due to Streptococcus uberis reported in the literature from 2010 to 2025, derived from published cases [11-14] and the present report. Each point represents the cumulative number of documented cases up to that year: intraocular infection (endophthalmitis, 2010) [12], community-acquired pneumonia (2012) [13], seven urinary tract infections (2013) [11], a soft-tissue and bloodstream infection in a hemodialysis patient (2015) [14], and peritoneal dialysis–related peritonitis (2025, current case).
Environmental exposure and One Health considerations
S. uberis is a major cause of environmental mastitis in cattle, commonly associated with soil, bedding, and animal housing [9]. The patient’s recent indirect exposure to livestock barns in southern Italy suggests possible environmental acquisition, consistent with previous reports involving agricultural or environmental contact [11-13]. This aligns with the One Health framework, emphasizing the interconnectedness of human, animal, and environmental health domains [15]. PD patients with rural or agricultural exposure may benefit from targeted hygiene and catheter care counseling to reduce the risk of environmental peritonitis [14,15].
Diagnostic and laboratory considerations
Key priorities for PD programs and microbiology laboratories include the following: routine use of MALDI-TOF MS to enhance detection of uncommon pathogens [5,10]; molecular confirmation (e.g., sodA and rpoB) when MALDI-TOF identifies atypical species [6]; standardized antimicrobial susceptibility reporting, including EUCAST version, method, and quality control (QC) strain, to improve comparability [9]; comprehensive reporting of diagnostic methods to support recognition of rare pathogens.
Alignment with the ISPD recommendations and clinical practice
Management in this case followed the ISPD guidance, emphasizing rapid empirical treatment, culture-directed adjustments, and appropriate treatment duration [1]. The absence of recurrence over long-term follow-up supports the adequacy of this approach. This case underscores the need for broad differential diagnosis and early use of advanced microbiological tools in PD-related peritonitis, particularly in patients with environmental exposure.
Conclusions
PD-related peritonitis is most commonly caused by skin or enteric flora, but this case demonstrates that environmental streptococci such as Streptococcus uberis can also act as opportunistic pathogens in selected patients. Advanced microbiological techniques, including MALDI-TOF MS and housekeeping-gene sequencing, were crucial for accurate species-level identification in this setting and allowed effective, targeted intraperitoneal therapy with vancomycin and ceftazidime, resulting in sustained clinical cure. Clinicians should remain alert to atypical organisms in PD effluent, particularly in the presence of environmental exposures or unexpected susceptibility patterns.
This case also highlights the relevance of the One Health concept in the care of PD patients, emphasizing the interplay between human, animal, and environmental health in the emergence of rare infections. Detailed environmental histories, appropriate counseling regarding rural and agricultural exposures, and close collaboration between nephrologists, microbiologists, and public health professionals can enhance prevention, early recognition, and optimal management of uncommon PD-related infections.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank the nursing staff of the Peritoneal Dialysis Unit of Ospedale del Mare for their assistance in patient care.
Disclosures
Human subjects: Informed consent for treatment and open access publication was obtained or waived by all participants in this study.
Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following:
Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work.
Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work.
Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.
Author Contributions
Concept and design: Gennaro Argentino, Maria Luisa Sirico, Alessandra Antonia Mele, Lucia Di Micco, Mario Iorio, Andrea Pota, Vita Dora Iula, Andrea Camocardi
Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: Gennaro Argentino, Maria Luisa Sirico, Alessandra Antonia Mele, Lucia Di Micco, Mario Iorio, Andrea Pota, Vita Dora Iula, Andrea Camocardi
Drafting of the manuscript: Gennaro Argentino, Maria Luisa Sirico, Alessandra Antonia Mele, Lucia Di Micco, Mario Iorio, Andrea Pota, Vita Dora Iula, Andrea Camocardi
Critical review of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Gennaro Argentino, Maria Luisa Sirico, Alessandra Antonia Mele, Lucia Di Micco, Mario Iorio, Andrea Pota, Vita Dora Iula, Andrea Camocardi
Supervision: Gennaro Argentino, Maria Luisa Sirico, Alessandra Antonia Mele, Lucia Di Micco, Mario Iorio, Andrea Pota, Vita Dora Iula, Andrea Camocardi
References
- 1.ISPD peritonitis recommendations: 2016 update on prevention and treatment. Li PK, Szeto CC, Piraino B, et al. Perit Dial Int. 2016;36:481–508. doi: 10.3747/pdi.2016.00078. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Coagulase negative staphylococcal peritonitis in peritoneal dialysis patients: review of 232 consecutive cases. Szeto CC, Kwan BC, Chow KM, et al. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2008;3:91–97. doi: 10.2215/CJN.03070707. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Peritoneal dialysis-related peritonitis caused by gram-negative organisms: ten-years experience in a single center. Zeng Y, Jiang L, Lu Y, Wang Z, Song K, Shen H, Feng S. Ren Fail. 2021;43:993–1003. doi: 10.1080/0886022X.2021.1939050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Key factors for a high-quality peritoneal dialysis program — the role of the PD team and continuous quality improvement. Fang W, Ni Z, Qian J. Perit Dial Int. 2014;34:0–42. doi: 10.3747/pdi.2013.00120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Utility of matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry following introduction for routine laboratory bacterial identification. Neville SA, Lecordier A, Ziochos H, Chater MJ, Gosbell IB, Maley MW, van Hal SJ. J Clin Microbiol. 2011;49:2980–2984. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00431-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Taxonomic dissection of the Streptococcus bovis group by analysis of manganese-dependent superoxide dismutase gene (sodA) sequences: reclassification of 'Streptococcus infantarius subsp. coli' as Streptococcus lutetiensis sp. nov. and of Streptococcus bovis biotype 11.2 as Streptococcus pasteurianus sp. nov. Poyart C, Quesne G, Trieu-Cuot P. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2002;52:1247–1255. doi: 10.1099/00207713-52-4-1247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Unusual presentation of Streptococcus uberis bacteremia in a complex patient: a case report. Chaudhari J, Nand P. Cureus. 2025;17:0. doi: 10.7759/cureus.82157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Population-based study of invasive disease due to beta-hemolytic streptococci of groups other than A and B. Broyles LN, Van Beneden C, Beall B, et al. Clin Infect Dis. 2009;48:706–712. doi: 10.1086/597035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Whole-genome sequencing reveals high genetic diversity of Streptococcus uberis isolated from cows with mastitis. Silva NCC, Yang Y, Rodrigues MX, Tomazi T, Bicalho RC. BMC Vet Res. 2021;17:321. doi: 10.1186/s12917-021-03031-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.A rarely isolated bacterium in microbiology laboratories: Streptococcus uberis. (Article in Turkish) Eryıldız C, Bukavaz Ş, Gürcan Ş, Hatipoğlu O. Mikrobiyol Bul. 2017;51:171–176. doi: 10.5578/mb.40378. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Urinary tract infections caused by Streptococcus uberis: a pathogen of bovine mastitis-report of seven cases. Gülen D, Kaya AD, Aydin M, Tanriverdi Y. https://academicjournals.org/journal/AJMR/article-abstract/E85AE8112738 Afr J Microbiol Res. 2013;7:3908–3912. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Intravitreal ampicillin sodium for antibiotic-resistant endophthalmitis: Streptococcus uberis first human intraocular infection report. Velez-Montoya R, Rascón-Vargas D, Mieler WF, Fromow-Guerra J, Morales-Cantón V. J Ophthalmol. 2010;2010:169739. doi: 10.1155/2010/169739. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Streptococcus uberis, an unusual cause of community acquired pneumonia. Upadhyay S, Pesola GR. https://www.atsjournals.org/doi/abs/10.1164/ajrccm-conference.2012.185.1_MeetingAbstracts.A6119 Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012;185:0. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Streptococcus uberis and Staphylococcus aureus forefoot and blood stream co-infection in a haemodialysis patient: a case report. Valentiny C, Dirschmid H, Lhotta K. BMC Nephrol. 2015;16:73. doi: 10.1186/s12882-015-0069-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.The One Health approach—why is it so important? Mackenzie JS, Jeggo M. Trop Med Infect Dis. 2019;4:88. doi: 10.3390/tropicalmed4020088. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

