Skip to main content
Eurosurveillance logoLink to Eurosurveillance
. 2025 Dec 18;30(50):2500450. doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2025.30.50.2500450

Maternal and infant immunity against Bordetella pertussis, Norway, 2020 to 2023

Margrethe Greve-Isdahl 1,2, Thea Kristine Rogne Møller 1, Terese Bekkevold 1, Marta Natalia Baranowska-Hustad 1,3, Cathinka Halle Julin 1,4, Ida Laake 1, Are Stuwitz Berg 1, Preben Aavitsland 1,5, Per Kristian Knudsen 6, Audun Aase 1,*, Ketil Størdal 2,6,*
PMCID: PMC12719935  PMID: 41414933

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pertussis remains a serious threat to young infants. In Norway, infants receive an acellular pertussis vaccine (aP) according to a 2 + 1 schedule at 3, 5 and 12 months of age, delivered as a hexavalent vaccine.

AIM

We aimed to study susceptibility to pertussis in mothers and infants to guide decisions regarding vaccination in pregnancy.

METHODS

In this prospective observational study, we included 366 mother/infant pairs during 2020–2023, collecting blood samples from mothers in late pregnancy, cord blood at delivery and from infants before their first and after their third vaccine dose. We retrieved health registry data on vaccination and pregnancy-related information. IgG antibody levels against pertussis-antigens, diphtheria and tetanus were measured using a multiplex immunoassay.

RESULTS

Of the pregnant women, 48% (174/366) had low levels of antibodies against pertussis toxin (PT) defined as below 5 IU/mL. Maternal antibodies declined in infants from birth until first vaccination, leaving 72% (154/215) of infants with anti-PT IgG levels below 5 IU/mL. All infants responded well to vaccination and we found no evidence of blunting from high levels (> 40 IU/mL) of maternal antibodies against PT. Infants of mothers who received an aP-containing booster vaccine within 2 years before pregnancy displayed low anti-PT IgG levels, with 58% (15/26) having levels below 5 IU/mL.

CONCLUSION

A high proportion of pregnant women and their infants under 3 months of age had low anti-PT antibody levels, indicating high susceptibility to pertussis. The results support the introduction of vaccination against pertussis during pregnancy in Norway.

Keywords: Whooping cough, antibodies, maternal vaccination, childhood immunisation programme


Key public health message.

What did you want to address in this study and why?

Whooping cough is a vaccine-preventable disease, caused by the bacterium Bordetella pertussis, and can cause severe respiratory disease and even death in infants. We wanted to investigate the protection against whooping cough in pregnant women and their infants in Norway and measured antibodies to evaluate their susceptibility towards this infection.

What have we learnt from this study?

Forty-eight percent (174/366) of pregnant women and 72% (154/215) of their infants 2–3 months of age had low antibody levels against whooping cough and are considered highly susceptible to the infection. This was true even for women who had received booster doses within 2 years before pregnancy start and had received childhood vaccines recommended at the time.

What are the implications of your findings for public health?

Booster vaccines before pregnancy start will not provide sufficient antibody levels in infants to protect them against whooping cough. The results demonstrate the necessity of efficient vaccination programmes against whooping cough during pregnancy.

Introduction

Pertussis (whooping cough), caused by the bacterium Bordetella pertussis, remains a health threat for infants despite widespread vaccination, causing an estimated 160,700 annual deaths globally in 2014 among children below the age of 5 years [1]. Over the last decades, there has been a concerning resurgence of pertussis in high-income countries, marked by hospitalisations and even deaths in infants [2-4]. Greater awareness and more sensitive diagnostic methods may partly explain this trend, but the switch from whole cell pertussis vaccines (wP) to acellular pertussis vaccines (aP) is considered a main contributor [2]. Therefore, emphasis on implementing additional strategies using the currently available aP vaccines to prevent pertussis, particularly among infants, is essential.

The national childhood immunisation programme in Norway is voluntary, government-funded and provided by public health nurses in municipal child health clinics. In Norway, wP was used in the infant immunisation schedule from 1952 until it was replaced by aP in 1998. The current infant schedule consists of a two-dose primary series at 3 and 5 months with a booster at 12 months (2 + 1 schedule), given as a hexavalent vaccine against diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, poliovirus, Haemophilus influenzae type b and hepatitis B (DTaP/IPV/Hib/HepB). The vaccination coverage is consistently higher than 95% for three doses among infants [5]. In addition, school-age boosters are offered at age 7 and 15 years. Adults are likewise recommended boosters every 10 years, although the awareness of this recommendation is low and adherence is assumed to be variable [6].

Despite the high childhood vaccination coverage at all measured time points (2, 9 and 16 years of age), the registered incidence of pertussis in Norway is among the highest in Europe [7], with a reported incidence of 37–48 cases per 100,000 population annually in 2015–2019 (see Supplementary Figure S1 for incidence rates for reported cases of pertussis). An unusually low incidence of pertussis was observed in all European Union/European Economic Area countries during the COVID-19 pandemic [5], and Norway recorded merely 0.7–0.8 cases per 100,000 population in 2021 and 2022. The low incidence raised concerns of a potential outbreak, including severe disease among infants due to immunity debt resulting from reduced pathogen circulation and infections. This accelerated the review of vaccination policies in several European countries, including Norway, experiencing large pertussis outbreaks in 2024 [5].

Vaccination in pregnancy, inducing maternal antibody transfer to the foetus, is a feasible approach to protect the neonate [8,9]. While maternal pertussis vaccination raises infants' antibody levels, there are concerns that blunting (negative interference with vaccine immune responses) could increase the risk of pertussis in infants and children at a later age [10-13]. The risk of blunted infant vaccine responses should therefore be considered when planning maternal vaccination programmes. Prior to May 2024, maternal vaccination against pertussis was not offered in the national immunisation programme in Norway.

The aim of this study is to investigate susceptibility to pertussis among Norwegian mothers and infants by measuring antibody levels in serum samples from pregnant women and their offspring and study potential blunting of infant vaccine responses from pre-existing maternal antibodies. The results intended to guide decisions on maternal vaccination against pertussis.

Material and methods

In this single centre observational prospective study, we collected blood samples and data from a cohort of women, recruited in late pregnancy, and their infants. The mother/infant pairs were followed until blood samples were collected after the infants’ received their first aP-containing hexavalent booster dose at 12 months of age (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Study outline, Norway, February 2020–October 2023

CB: cord blood; S1: Study visit 1 maternal visit in late pregnancy; S2: Study visit 2 infant age 2–3 months, pre-vaccination with first acellular pertussis vaccine (aP); S3: Study visit 3 infant age 13–15 months, post 12-month booster with aP.

a Excluded due to delivery before Study visit 1 or missing consent from the other parent.

b Withdrawn before Study visit 1.

c One infant died at 6 months of age from causes unrelated to pertussis. The other two withdrew.

d Hexavalent vaccine (diphtheria, tetanus, acellular pertussis, polio, Haemophilus influenzae type b, hepatitis B (DTaP/IPV/Hib/HepB), provided at municipal child health clinic.

{ALT text: Study flowchart showing inclusion of 398 pregnant women. Before Study visit 1, 11 were excluded and 21 withdrew from further participation. Study visit 1 was the maternal visit in gestational week 35-37, where 366 pregnant women attended and 363 blood samples were collected. At birth, 196 cord blood samples were collected. At Study visit 2, the infant visit pre-dose 1 at 3 months of age, 17 had withdrawn, 343 attended the visit and 215 blood samples collected. Between Study visit 2 and 3, all infant vaccines were administered at municipal child health clinics. At Study visit 3, the toddler visit post-dose 3 at 12 months of age, 3 had withdrawn, 323 toddlers attended and 240 blood samples were collected.}

Population

Between February 2020 and March 2022, we recruited a total of 398 pregnant women from the catchment area of Oslo University Hospital who attended the routine ultrasound examination in their second trimester. Participants were eligible if they were born before 1998, had a singleton pregnancy, were considered healthy and stated that they had received childhood vaccines according to the national immunisation programme in Norway at the time. Participants with severe complications during pregnancy and conditions or treatment compromising immunity were not eligible. Eleven women were excluded after recruitment due to delivery before the first study visit or missing consent from the other parent and 21 withdrew before the first study visit, leaving 366 pregnant women and their infants in the study (Figure 1). The final study visit took place in October 2023.

Data collection

Participants were invited to three study visits at Oslo University Hospital. The first study visit (S1) was in late pregnancy (from gestational week (GW) 35 to 37), the second visit (S2) was before the infant received the first hexavalent vaccine dose at 3 months of age (pre-vaccination), and the last visit (S3) was at 1 to 3 months after the 12-month booster. The hexavalent vaccine administered during the study period was Infanrix Hexa (GlaxoSmithKline, Rixenart, Belgium). Blood samples were collected from the mother during the first study visit, and from the infant at birth (cord blood) and at Study visits 2 and 3 (Figure 1). Questionnaire information was collected during study visits or shortly after and used to collect baseline characteristics, information on the mother’s and infant’s health and identify possible exposure to pertussis. All vaccines were delivered at municipal child health clinics at routine consultations.

We calculated a sample size of 320 mother/infant pairs to have power to estimate vaccine responses in infants with a 95% precision and identify any blunting effect of pre-existing high antibody levels in the mothers on their infants’ vaccine responses. Accounting for a 20% drop-out proportion, the aim was to include 400 pregnant women.

Health registry data

Using the national personal identity number unique for each participant, data from health registries were linked to laboratory and questionnaire results.

Vaccination data for mothers and children were retrieved from the Norwegian Immunisation Registry (SYSVAK), which was established for five regions in Norway in 1976 and nationally in 1995 [14]. Registration of childhood vaccines is mandatory by law. Registration of adult vaccines may be less complete but became mandatory in 2011.

Information regarding pregnancy, birth and the newborn was retrieved from The Medical Birth Registry of Norway (MBRN). The MBRN receives mandatory notifications for all births from GW 22 or with infant birth weight of at least 500 g [15].

Laboratory methods

IgG antibody levels against the vaccine components from participants’ serum were analysed by an in-house multiplex immunoassay (MIA) adopted from van Gageldonk et al. [16,17]. Pertussis toxin (PT), pertactin (PRN) and tetanus toxin (TT) (all from List Biological laboratories, Campbell, United States (US)), filamentous haemagglutinin (FHA) (Sigma-Aldrich, Merck Life Science, Darmstadt, Germany), and diphtheria toxoid (DT) (Statens Serum Institute, Copenhagen, Denmark) were coupled to carboxylated microspheres (MagPlex, Bio-Rad, Hercules, US). The antigen-coupled beads were mixed with diluted serum (1:200 and 1:1,000), fourfold dilution of standard serum, three positive controls and one negative control, all in duplicate. After incubation and washing procedures, secondary antibody goat anti-human IgG PE (P8047, Sigma-Aldrich, Merck Life Science) was added. Analyses were conducted on a BioPlexTM System 200 instrument and the BioPlex manager software version 6.2 (Bio-Rad). At these assay conditions, the lower limit of quantification for anti-PT IgG is less than 0.1 IU/mL.

Pertussis toxin is the only B. pertussis specific antigen included in all available aP vaccines. There is no established correlate for protection against pertussis, but individuals with antibody levels against pertussis toxin (anti-PT IgG) below 5 IU/mL are considered to have low levels of protection and to be susceptible to infection [18,19]. Anti-PT IgG above 40 IU/mL was used to indicate high levels of antibodies against pertussis, comparable to maternal antibody levels in studies where mothers were vaccinated in pregnancy [12,20]. For IgG against PRN and FHA, which are not specific to B. pertussis, no cut-off levels have been suggested. Antibody levels against DT and TT were included in the multiplex immunoassay and analysed for a more comprehensive understanding of vaccine immunity as pertussis vaccines are always combined with vaccines against diphtheria and tetanus. For IgG antibodies against DT and TT, levels above 1.0 IU/mL are considered highly protective, while values below 0.015 IU/mL for anti-DT IgG and 0.1 IU/mL for anti-TT IgG are considered below the protective level [19].

For the blunting analysis, only results from children sampled from 10 to 90 days after their hexavalent booster were included. Using the categorisation for antibody levels described above, we compared antibody levels against PT, DT and TT in infants after the 12-month booster by exposure to low, medium or high maternal antibody levels in late pregnancy.

Statistical analyses

We compared antibody levels between groups of infants or groups of mothers using a Mann–Whitney U test. To compare antibody levels at Study visit 3 (after the 12-month booster) to antibody levels at Study visit 2 (pre-vaccination), we applied a Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank test. Non-parametric tests were used since antibody levels were not normally distributed. A two-tailed p value < 0.05 was considered significant in all analyses.

All analyses were done using Stata version 17 (StataCorp, College Station, US). Figures were created using Stata or GraphPad Prism version 9.0.0 (GraphPad Software, Boston, US, www.graphpad.com).

Results

The 366 mother/infant pairs attended a total of 1,032 study visits, producing 1,014 blood samples (Figure 1).

Median maternal age was 33.2 years, and 56.8% (208/366) of the women were nulliparous (Table 1). All included mothers stated that they had received all vaccines according to the Norwegian childhood immunisation programme at the time, and vaccination data were available in SYSVAK for 344 of the women (92.4%); at least one dose of wP was recorded in the first year of life for all 344. The majority of mothers had a registered adult booster vaccine with aP (n = 212, 58%), ranging 15 days to 18.5 years (median 5.5 years) before the start of pregnancy. Four women had received a booster vaccine against diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis and polio (Tdap-IPV) booster during the current pregnancy for unknown reasons.

Table 1. Baseline characteristics of the study population, Norway, February 2020–October 2023 (n = 366).

Characteristics n %
Mothers (total: n = 366)
Study visit 1 attended (late pregnancy) 366 100
Mothers with blood sample from Study visit 1 363 99.2
Age at delivery in years, median (IQR) 33.2 (30.7–36.0) NA
Parity
Nulliparous 208 56.8
Para 1 126 34.4
Para 2 + 32 8.7
Mothers’ childhood wP vaccinationa status in SYSVAK
≥ 1 dose (range of registration period in years 1976–1997) 344 92.4
≥ 3 doses (range of registration period in years 1976–1997) 332 90.7
Mothers’ aP vaccinea status in SYSVAK
Mothers with aP vaccine before pregnancy start 212 57.9
Mothers with no recorded aP vaccine 154 42.1
Time before pregnancy start for aP vaccinea
< 2 years 34 9.3
2–5 years 62 16.9
5–10 years 99 27.0
> 10 years 17 4.6
Vaccination during pregnancy
Influenzab vaccinationa during pregnancy 210 57.4
COVID-19b vaccinationa during pregnancy 130 35.5
Pertussis (aP) vaccinationa during pregnancy 4 1.1
Infants (total: n = 366)
Male 165 45.1
Female 201 54.9
Total infants providing blood samples 325 88.8
Total infants attending study visits 355 97.0
Cord blood samples collected 196 53.6
Study visit 2 attended 343 NA
Study visit 2 blood sample collected (total: n = 343) 215 62.7
Study visit 3 attended 323 NA
Study visit 3 blood sample collected (total: n = 323) 240 74.3
Infants with complete sample sets from all time points 99 27.0
Gestational age at birth
Median (IQR) weeks+days 40+1 (39+0–41+0) NA
< 37 weeks 6 1.6
37–41 weeks 264 72.1
> 41 weeks 96 26.2
Birth weight
Median (IQR) grams 3,560 (3,240–3,900) NA
< 3,000 36 9.8
3,000–3,999 263 71.9
≥ 4,000 67 18.3
Age (days) Median IQR
At Study visit 2 74 72–78
At Study visit 3 413 401–430
At first hexavalent vaccine dose with aPa 93 90–96
At 12-month booster (third hexavalent vaccine) dose with aPa 370 362–381

aP: acellular pertussis vaccine (aP-containing hexavalent vaccine also including vaccines against diphtheria, tetanus, poliovirus, Haemophilus influenzae type b and hepatitis B (DTaP/IPV/Hib/HepB)); IQR: interquartile range; SYSVAK: Norwegian Immunisation Registry; wP: whole cell pertussis vaccine.

Study visit 1: maternal visit in late pregnancy; Study visit 2: infant age 2–3 months, pre-vaccination with first aP; Study visit 3: infant age 13–15 months, post 12-month booster with aP.

a Vaccination data from Norwegian Immunisation Registry SYSVAK.

b Not all participants may have been recommended an influenza and/or COVID-19 vaccines, as influenza vaccination is recommended only during the influenza season for pregnant women in the second and third trimester, or first trimester if in a risk group or healthcare worker. A recommendation for COVID-19 vaccination in pregnancy (all trimesters) was issued in midst of the study on August 18, 2021.

The infants in the study were born between 24 June 2020 and 4 September 2022. Most infants were born at term (GW 37–41, 72.1%) or post term (GW > 41, 26.2%). Six infants were born as late preterm infants (35–36 weeks). No known exposure to pertussis or reported cough of long duration was declared by parents or legal guardians in the questionnaires. All children received their first hexavalent vaccine after Study visit 2 and their 12-month booster before Study visit 3 (Table 1).

Maternal antibodies in mothers and infants before first vaccine dose

In late pregnancy, mothers had low levels of anti-PT IgG (Figure 2), with a median value of 5.3 IU/mL (Table 2), and 48% (174/366) had values below 5 IU/mL. Only 18 mothers (5%, 18/366) had anti-PT IgG above 40 IU/mL, including two of the four mothers who had received a booster vaccine in pregnancy. Two mothers had anti-PT IgG levels above 100 IU/mL, neither of them were vaccinated during pregnancy. Anti-PT IgG was moderately correlated with antibody levels towards the other pertussis antigens (see Supplementary Table S1 for antibody levels in maternal pregnancy samples and Supplementary Figure S2A, 2B for anti-PT IgG in mothers with corresponding IgG-levels against other antigens). For DT and TT, most mothers had protective antibody levels (Table 2). Thirteen mothers with anti-DT IgG below 0.015 IU/mL and nine mothers with anti-TT IgG below 0.1 IU/mL also had anti-PT IgG below 5 IU/mL (see Supplementary Figure S2C, 2D for anti-PT IgG in mothers with corresponding IgG-levels against other antigens). Further analysis did not indicate any association with maternal age, parity or infant birth weight (see Supplementary Figure S3 for median anti-PT IgG-levels by maternal age, parity and infant birth weight).

Figure 2.

Median IgG antibody levels (IU/mL) for pertussis toxin, pertactin, filamentous haemagglutinin, diphtheria toxin and tetanus toxin obtained from mother or infant by sampling time point, Norway, February 2020–October 2023

CB: cord blood; S1: Study visit 1 (maternal visit in late pregnancy); S2: Study visit 2 (infant age 2–3 months, pre-vaccination with first acellular pertussis vaccine (aP)); S3: Study visit 3 (infant age 13–15 months, post 12-month booster with aP).

Red dashed line at anti-PT IgG = 5 IU/mL (Panel A); blue dashed line indicates anti-DT IgG = 0.015 IU/mL (Panel D); light blue dashed line indicates anti-TT IgG = 0.1 IU/mL (Panel E).

a Indicates statistical significance.

{ALT text: Panel A shows median IgG-levels against pertussis toxin, Panel B against pertactin, Panel C against filamentous haemagglutinin, Panel D against diphtheria toxin and Panel E against tetanus toxin. All median levels are listed in Table 2.}

Table 2. Median IgG antibody levels (IU/mL) for pertussis toxin, diphtheria toxin, tetanus toxin, pertactin and filamentous haemagglutinin at each of the four sampling time points, Norway, February 2020–October 2023.

Study visit Mother Child
Pregnancy Birth cord blood Pre-vaccination Post 12-month booster Post 12-month booster
Grouped according to time after hexavalent booster
(DTaP/IPV/Hib/HepB)
S1 CB S2 S3 (All) S3a
IgG antibodies (IU/mL) Median IQR Median IQR Median IQR Median IQR 10–90 days 10–29 days 30–90 days  > 90 days
Median IQR Median IQR Median IQR Median IQR
Pertussis toxin 5.3 1.4–12.1 10.0 2.7–21.9 2.4 0.6–5.7 52.2 29.3–95.5 55.5 31.6–97.9 75.7 36.3–103.2 53.4 31.5–96.9 24.9 10.4–42.6
Diphtheria toxin, 0.15 0.07–0.38 0.25 0.09–0.64 0.05 0.02–0.12 2.41 1.39–3.87 2.60 1.55–3.96 3.54 2.34–4.68 2.51 1.46–3.79 0.55 0.37–1.02
Tetanus toxin 1.12 0.62–1.92 1.89 1.12–2.97 0.42 0.24–0.72 2.23 1.17–4.29 2.36 1.36–4.45 2.31 1.33–4.70 2.36 1.36–4.30 0.85 0.64–2.14
Pertactin 58.2 13.3–165.2 98.9 19.5–268.7 23.9 4.9–59.7 192.0 92.6–385.7 NA NA NA NA
Filamentous haemagglutinin 23.7 10.9–48.7 41.6 17.7–84.7 10.1 4.6–22.6 211.3 118.7–341.6 NA NA NA NA
Total samples (n) 363 196 215 240 215 32 183 22

CB: cord blood; DTaP/IPV/Hib/HepB: acellular pertussis-containing hexavalent vaccine includes vaccines against diphtheria, tetanus, poliovirus, Haemophilus influenzae type b and hepatitis B; IQR: interquartile range; S1: Study visit 1 (maternal visit in late pregnancy); S2: Study visit 2 (infant age 2–3 months, pre-vaccination with first acellular pertussis vaccine (aP)); S3: Study visit 3 (infant age 13–15 months, post 12-month booster with aP).

a Three infants were sampled less than 10 days after the 12-month booster and were excluded in the blunting analysis.

The transplacental IgG transfer from mothers to neonates was high for all studied antibodies (Table 2, Figure 2), with median ratios ranging between 1.5 and 1.8, thus providing the neonates with higher antibody levels than their mothers (see Supplementary Table S2 for placental antibody transfer ratios). Still, 36% (70/196) of neonates had anti-PT IgG below 5 IU/mL in cord blood.

The antibody levels declined in infant sera from birth to pre-vaccination at 2 to 3 months of age (Table 2, Figure 2), and a high proportion of infants (72%, 154/215) had anti-PT IgG below 5 IU/mL indicating low protection. Levels of anti-PT correlated moderately with PRN and FHA antibodies in infants at 2 to 3 months of age (see Supplementary Figure S4 for anti-PT IgG in infants at Study visit 2 with corresponding IgG-levels against other antigens), which was also demonstrated in late pregnancy.

Vaccine responses in infants and blunting

After the 12-month booster, all but three children achieved anti-PT IgG levels above 5 IU/mL, with a median level of 52.2 IU/mL (Table 2) and a significant increase compared with pre-vaccination levels (p < 0.001) (Figure 2). However, not all blood samples were collected at the recommended interval after the 12-month booster: three children were sampled fewer than 10 days after the booster, not leaving enough time to generate a detectable vaccine response. In addition, 22 children were sampled more than 90 days after, and these displayed significantly lower IgG levels for PT than in sera collected 10 to 90 days after vaccination (p < 0.01, Supplementary Figure S5: median anti-PT IgG at Study visit 3 grouped by days after 12-month aP-booster). Children with samples collected outside the 10–90-day window, including all three with anti-PT below 5 IU/mL, were excluded from the blunting analysis (see Supplementary Figure S6 for individual anti-PT IgG at Study visit 3 by days after 12-month aP-booster).

In the blunting analysis, we included the 215 mother-infant pairs where the final blood sample was collected between 10 and 90 days after the 12-month booster. The median child antibody levels for anti-PT IgG were not significantly different when comparing children of mothers with maternal anti-PT IgG levels below 5 IU/mL (median 52.3 IU/mL) with children of mothers with intermediate maternal levels (median 63.2 IU/mL, p = 0.66) or with high maternal anti-PT IgG levels higher than 40 IU/mL (median 49.3 IU/mL, p = 0.76) (Figure 3). We also found no blunting effect of anti-DT IgG or anti-TT IgG (see Supplementary Table S3 for information on blunting analysis).

Figure 3.

Anti-pertussis toxin levels, log transformed, in mothers in late pregnancy at Study visit 1 and in their children after receipt of 12-month booster (Study visit 3), Norway, February 2020–October 2023

Dotted red lines indicate anti-pertussis toxin (PT) IgG = 5 IU/mL, log transformed and anti-PT IgG = 40 IU/mL, log transformed.

{ALT text: Spaghetti-plot showing anti-PT IgG in mother-infant pairs. Panel A includes mothers with IgG below 5 IU/ml and the corresponding level in their infants. Panel B includes mothers with IgG 5-40 IU/ml and the corresponding level in their infants. Panel C includes mothers with IgG above 40 IU/ml and the corresponding level in their infants. The numbers in Figure 3 correspond to numbers provided in Supplementary Table S3.}

Mothers’ prior acellular pertussis vaccination and antibody levels

Among the 212 mothers who received an adult aP-containing vaccine before pregnancy start (mainly TdaP-IPV), antibody levels for PT and TT were lower in mothers vaccinated 5–10 years and more than 10 years before pregnancy compared with mothers who had received a vaccine within the 2 years before pregnancy (p < 0.05 for both PT and TT), but not for DT (p ≥ 0.24) (Figure 4). For DT and TT, observed median antibody levels in late pregnancy were considered protective. The median PT-level was at 5.3 IU/mL and below if more than 5 years had elapsed since last aP. Maternal anti-PT levels declined with time since last aP before pregnancy, but not according to calendar time (Supplementary Figure S7: mothers’ anti-PT IgG by time since last aP and calendar date for sampling). Among infants at pre-vaccination, we found a median anti-PT IgG below 5 IU/mL in all groups, i.e. even when mothers had received an aP-vaccine within the 2 years before pregnancy, 15 of 26 infants had anti-PT IgG levels below 5 IU/mL (Figure 4). The anti-PT IgG-levels declined significantly in infants with time since their mothers’ last registered aP (p < 0.01).

Figure 4.

Median IgG antibody levels (IU/mL) for pertussis toxin, diphtheria toxin and tetanus toxin in mothers in late pregnancy and infants pre-vaccination at 2–3 months of age according to time since mothers’ last registered acellular pertussis vaccine, Norway, February 2020–October 2023

DT: diphtheria toxin; PT: pertussis toxin; TT: tetanus toxin.

a Indicates statistical significance

b indicates not significant.

Red indicates mothers’ last acellular pertussis vaccine (aP) less than 2 years before pregnancy start. Green indicates mothers’ last aP 2–5 years before pregnancy start. Black indicates mothers’ last aP 5–10 years before pregnancy start. Blue indicates mothers’ last aP more than 10 years before pregnancy start.

Red dashed line at anti-PT IgG = 5 IU/mL (Panel A); blue dashed line indicates anti-DT IgG = 0.015 IU/mL (Panel B); light blue dashed line indicates anti-TT IgG = 0.1 IU/mL (Panel C).

{ALT text: All panels show mother and infant IgG in pairs according to time since mothers’ last acellular pertussis vaccine. Panel A is for pertussis toxin, Panel B for diphtheria toxin and Panel C for tetanus toxin.}

Discussion

In this prospective cohort study, we demonstrate that a significant proportion of pregnant women had low levels of antibodies against pertussis in late pregnancy, despite adherence to recommended childhood vaccinations and receipt of adult booster doses, in contrast to protection against diphtheria and tetanus. This leaves both mothers and their infants susceptible to pertussis, with 72% of infants having low anti-PT IgG levels below 5 IU/mL pre-vaccination. Our study did not reveal blunting of the infant immune response following the booster dose when comparing antibody levels in infants of mothers with high antibody levels to those in infants of mothers with low antibody levels.

Pertussis toxin is included in all aP vaccines and is considered the most important antigen for which vaccines can induce protection against severe pertussis [21]. Antibodies against other pertussis antigens may also contribute to protection, especially against PRN [18]. However, with the evolution of PRN-deficient B. pertussis strains without corresponding loss of vaccine effectiveness, new questions arise regarding the role of antibodies against PRN in the protection against pertussis [22]. Although it is not established what level of antibodies provide protection against pertussis, previous studies have indicated that anti-PT IgG levels below 5 IU/mL are likely non-protective [18,19,23]. A European serosurvey in adults aged 40 to 59 years revealed that when using a cut-off of 0.85 IU/mL, 2% of the Norwegians in this age group had undetectable levels of anti-PT [24]. The corresponding proportion among the pregnant women in our study using this low cut-off is 16% (data not shown), indicating that pregnant women may be more susceptible to infection than middle-aged adults. This is concerning, given that mothers are among the main sources of infection for pertussis in infants [25,26]. Thus, limiting maternal susceptibility to pertussis is of considerable significance.

As newborn infants are protected mainly by transferred maternal antibodies, they may need higher levels of antibodies to prevent infection than vaccinated individuals where protection may also be conferred by cellular responses and immunological memory. The first infant vaccine dose given at 6 to 12 weeks of age world-wide provides partial protection against hospitalisation due to pertussis, although at least two vaccine doses are needed to develop protection in the first year of life [27]. Vaccinating pregnant women against pertussis to protect their infants has proven to be a safe, feasible and effective strategy and demonstrates that transferred maternal antibodies can prevent infection in infants during their first months of life [28]. The estimated effectiveness of maternal vaccination during the second or third trimester is between 69% and 93% against laboratory-confirmed infant pertussis during the first 2 to 3 months of life, and even higher against hospitalisation (91–94%) and mortality (95%) in high-income countries [8]. Our study indicates a low level of protection and high susceptibility for pertussis in infants even when mothers had adhered to adult booster vaccine recommendations. This highlights the importance of vaccination against pertussis during pregnancy to achieve protection in infants, as antibodies wane rapidly in mothers [29].

Vaccinating pregnant women against pertussis has been implemented in an increasing number of countries [5,30]. However, obtaining a high vaccination coverage among pregnant women remains a challenge, with countries such as Czechia, Slovenia and Romania reporting coverage rates below 10% while others struggle to achieve even 50% [5]. High coverage is crucial to obtain the desired effect on disease prevention and public health goals. Research demonstrating that recent pre-pregnancy vaccines may not provide sufficient protection against pertussis in infants as suggested by this study, can be used in maternal vaccine communication to underscore the importance of vaccination in pregnancy and strengthen recommendations.

Vaccine acceptance in pregnancy may be influenced by sociodemographic factors, as a recent Norwegian study has demonstrated [31]. Although our study was conducted at a single centre in Oslo, Oslo University hospital is a public hospital with the highest number of annual births in Norway and the socioeconomic situation of mothers in the catchment area is diverse and includes mothers across the entire socioeconomic range. The mothers in our study had higher vaccination rates for influenza and COVID-19 vaccines than that demonstrated by Hansen et. al. [31], suggesting inclusion of mothers with higher socioeconomic status, but we did not collect socioeconomic data to confirm this. However, data from the literature do not suggest any major impact of socioeconomic factors on antibody levels in vaccinated individuals [32].

Interference of infant vaccine responses from high levels of maternal antibodies, called blunting, has raised concern that maternal vaccination may postpone the disease from early infancy to later in childhood. The focus has been mainly on vaccine responses to pertussis, but also polio, diphtheria and conjugate vaccine antigens using diphtheria carrier proteins, such as pneumococcal vaccines [10-12,33-35]. However, the clinical relevance remains unclear, and the blunting effect seems to be more evident after the primary series [13]. We did not demonstrate any blunted immune responses among the available 14 infant blood samples born by the 18 mothers with high anti-PT above 40 IU/mL, although the number of samples to identify such an effect were limited. This may also be attributed to the fact that we collected samples solely after the 12-month booster, rather than following the primary vaccination series. However, our results are in line with other studies demonstrating that any blunting effect is less pronounced after the first booster [13].

Strengths of our study include a large sample size for a serologic study in pregnant women and their infants, several sampling time points in the same dyads, and an extended follow-up period including samples after the 12-month booster in a 2 + 1 infant vaccination schedule. Health registry data for vaccination in mothers from infancy to adulthood is also unique and provides high quality data on vaccine type and timing of vaccination. With accurate vaccination data from the immunisation registry, we demonstrate that despite high adherence to childhood immunisation and receipt of adult boosters, pertussis antibody levels in mothers are low. Infants alike had high adherence to the infant immunisation schedule and received their hexavalent vaccines in a timely manner, even during the COVID-19 pandemic, and at routine consultations in municipal child health.

Limitations include that data were collected during the COVID-19 pandemic, when infection prevention measures limited the spread of communicable diseases, including pertussis [5]. This may have contributed to the high proportion of mothers with low anti-PT IgG levels. However, the proportion is similar to that found in other studies [29,36,37]. In addition, Norway has a high notified incidence of pertussis, ranging between 37 and 48 cases per 100,000 population in the 5 years before the COVID-19 pandemic, which indicates that although pertussis numbers were low during the pandemic, exposure in pre-pandemic years was common. Moreover, our study was underpowered to identify blunting of the children’s vaccine response after the booster dose at 12 months of age as the number of mothers with anti-PT > 40 IU/mL was only 18, and we did not collect blood samples after the primary vaccination series where blunting has been observed in other studies. We cannot rule out a temporal blunting effect from 3 to 12 months and having additional samples from mothers at delivery and infants after the primary series could have added value to the study. However, additional sample collection was not prioritised due to limited resources. Despite numerous reminders and several meetings with the maternity department, cord blood samples were often forgotten, and therefore only obtained from 53.6% of participants. Conducting the study during the COVID-19 pandemic also complicated compliance to the planned study visits and we achieved full sample sets from only 27% of mother-infant pairs. The completeness of our data would also have improved if all final study visits occurred within the recommended time frame after the 12-month booster, as a higher number of samples would likely have strengthened the blunting analysis. Nevertheless, our study is still large compared with others exploring the susceptibility for pertussis in maternal-infant pairs. Mothers in our study demonstrated high vaccine willingness, many having received influenza and COVID-vaccines as well as adult Tdap-IPV boosters. These mothers are most likely familiar and more up to date with current vaccine recommendations and thus may not be representative for the pregnant population in Norway. However, we still report low levels of antibodies against pertussis in the women included in our study. This may indicate that the susceptibility to pertussis is even higher in the general pregnant population than our results suggest.

Conclusion

Our study highlights the shortcomings of a childhood immunisation programme in protecting infants in the most vulnerable age against pertussis. We demonstrate a large proportion of women in late pregnancy with low levels of antibodies against pertussis, particularly against PT, thus leaving infants at high risk of severe pertussis disease should they be infected. The results from this study support maternal pertussis vaccination as means to close the susceptibility gap in infants too young to vaccinate and were significant to underpin the recommended introduction of maternal pertussis vaccination in Norway in 2024.

Ethical approval

Ethical approval was granted by Regional Committees for Medical Research Ethics Southeast Norway (reference 2019/296/REK Sør-Øst C). We obtained informed consent from all participant mothers and guardians of participating infants.

Use of artificial intelligence tools

During the preparation of this work the authors used the GPT-tool at the University of Oslo (Open AI GPT-4, adapted to fit within the University’s privacy requirements) to find adequate synonyms to improve clarity and readability. After using this tool, the authors reviewed and edited the content as needed and take full responsibility for the content of the publication.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank all mothers and children participating in the study, the study nurses at Oslo University hospital skilfully conducting study visits and making sure participants were well taken care of. We would also like to thank colleagues facilitating the study and ensuring financial support, especially Didrik Frimann Vestrheim and Ingeborg Aaberge, as well as Jesper Dahl for his input on the statistical analyses and interpretation and Elina Seppälä for the pertussis incidence figure in the Supplementary material.

Sadly, our colleague Are S. Berg passed away before submitting the final version of this manuscript. We would like to recognise his contributions in setting up this study and to this manuscript, and for his enthusiasm and support throughout this project. He was a beloved friend and colleague, and is dearly missed.

Supplementary Data

Supplementary Material

Authors’ contributions: Margrethe Greve-Isdahl: conceptualisation, data curation, formal analysis, funding acquisition, investigation, methodology, project administration, writing – original draft, writing – review and editing. Thea Kristine Rogne Møller: investigation, methodology, project administration, writing – review and editing. Terese Bekkevold: conceptualisation, project administration, writing – review and editing. Marta Natalia Baranowska-Hustad: investigation, methodology, writing – review and editing. Cathinka Halle Julin: conceptualisation, writing – review & editing. Ida Laake: methodology, writing – review and editing. Are Stuwitz Berg: conceptualisation, funding acquisition, project administration, writing – review and editing. Preben Aavitsland: conceptualisation, writing – review and editing. Per Kristian Knudsen: project administration, writing – review and editing. Audun Aase: conceptualisation, investigation, methodology, supervision, visualisation, writing – review and editing. Ketil Størdal: methodology, supervision, visualisation, writing – review and editing.

Conflict of interest: Per Kristian Knudsen has been on an advisory board for Sanofi Pasteur regarding a product with no relation to this study. The remaining authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Funding statement: This study was funded by the Norwegian Institute of Public Health.

Data availability

Data are not publicly available due to legal constraints but may be shared anonymised as baseline dataset upon reasonable request to the authors.

References

  • 1.Yeung KHT, Duclos P, Nelson EAS, Hutubessy RCW. An update of the global burden of pertussis in children younger than 5 years: a modelling study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2017;17(9):974-80. 10.1016/S1473-3099(17)30390-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Saadatian-Elahi M, Plotkin S, Mills KHG, Halperin SA, McIntyre PB, Picot V, et al. Pertussis: Biology, epidemiology and prevention. Vaccine. 2016;34(48):5819-26. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.10.029 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Skoff TH, Hadler S, Hariri S. The Epidemiology of Nationally Reported Pertussis in the United States, 2000-2016. Clin Infect Dis. 2018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Amirthalingam G, Gupta S, Campbell H. Pertussis immunisation and control in England and Wales, 1957 to 2012: a historical review. Euro Surveill. 2013;18(38):20587. 10.2807/1560-7917.ES2013.18.38.20587 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC). Increase in pertussis cases in the EU/EEA. Stockholm: ECDC; 8 May 2024. Available from: https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/sites/default/files/documents/Increase%20in%20pertussis%20cases%20in%20the%20EU-EEA%20-%20May%202024%20FINAL.pdf
  • 6.Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NIPH). Which vaccines do adults need? Oslo: NIPH. [Accessed: 30 Nov 2024]. Available from: https://www.fhi.no/en/va/vaccines-for-adults/booster-vaccines/#vaccine-against-diphtheria-whooping-cough-tetanus-and-polio
  • 7.European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC). Surveillance Atlas of Infectious Diseases. Stockholm: ECDC. [Accessed: 30 Nov 2024]. Available from: https://atlas.ecdc.europa.eu/public/index.aspx
  • 8.Abu-Raya B, Forsyth K, Halperin SA, Maertens K, Jones CE, Heininger U, et al. Vaccination in Pregnancy against Pertussis: A Consensus Statement on Behalf of the Global Pertussis Initiative. Vaccines (Basel). 2022;10(12):1990. 10.3390/vaccines10121990 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Perrett KP, Nolan TM. Immunization During Pregnancy: Impact on the Infant. Paediatr Drugs. 2017;19(4):313-24. 10.1007/s40272-017-0231-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Perrett KP, Halperin SA, Nolan T, Carmona Martínez A, Martinón-Torres F, García-Sicilia J, et al. Impact of tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis immunization during pregnancy on subsequent infant immunization seroresponses: follow-up from a large randomized placebo-controlled trial. Vaccine. 2020;38(8):2105-14. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.10.104 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Zimmermann P, Perrett KP, Messina NL, Donath S, Ritz N, van der Klis FRM, et al. The Effect of Maternal Immunisation During Pregnancy on Infant Vaccine Responses. EClinicalMedicine. 2019;13:21-30. 10.1016/j.eclinm.2019.06.010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Maertens K, Caboré RN, Huygen K, Hens N, Van Damme P, Leuridan E. Pertussis vaccination during pregnancy in Belgium: Results of a prospective controlled cohort study. Vaccine. 2016;34(1):142-50. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.10.100 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kandeil W, Savic M, Ceregido MA, Guignard A, Kuznetsova A, Mukherjee P. Immune interference (blunting) in the context of maternal immunization with Tdap-containing vaccines: is it a class effect? Expert Rev Vaccines. 2020;19(4):341-52. 10.1080/14760584.2020.1749597 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Trogstad L, Ung G, Hagerup-Jenssen M, Cappelen I, Haugen IL, Feiring B. The Norwegian immunisation register--SYSVAK. Euro Surveill. 2012;17(16):20147. 10.2807/ese.17.16.20147-en [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Irgens LM. Medisinsk fødselsregister – et sentralt utgangspunkt for perinatalmedisinsk forskning. [Medical birth registry--an essential resource in perinatal medical research]. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2002;122(26):2546-9. 10.2807/ese.17.16.20147-en [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.van Gageldonk PG, von Hunolstein C, van der Klis FR, Berbers GA. Improved specificity of a multiplex immunoassay for quantitation of anti-diphtheria toxin antibodies with the use of diphtheria toxoid. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2011;18(7):1183-6. 10.1128/CVI.05081-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.van Gageldonk PG, van Schaijk FG, van der Klis FR, Berbers GA. Development and validation of a multiplex immunoassay for the simultaneous determination of serum antibodies to Bordetella pertussis, diphtheria and tetanus. J Immunol Methods. 2008;335(1-2):79-89. 10.1016/j.jim.2008.02.018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Storsaeter J, Hallander HO, Gustafsson L, Olin P. Levels of anti-pertussis antibodies related to protection after household exposure to Bordetella pertussis. Vaccine. 1998;16(20):1907-16. 10.1016/S0264-410X(98)00227-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Plotkin SA. Correlates of protection induced by vaccination. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2010;17(7):1055-65. 10.1128/CVI.00131-10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Barug D, Pronk I, van Houten MA, Versteegh FGA, Knol MJ, van de Kassteele J, et al. Maternal pertussis vaccination and its effects on the immune response of infants aged up to 12 months in the Netherlands: an open-label, parallel, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Infect Dis. 2019;19(4):392-401. 10.1016/S1473-3099(18)30717-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Cherry JD, Paddock CD. Pathogenesis and histopathology of pertussis: implications for immunization. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2014;13(9):1115-23. 10.1586/14760584.2014.935766 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Breakwell L, Kelso P, Finley C, Schoenfeld S, Goode B, Misegades LK, et al. Pertussis Vaccine Effectiveness in the Setting of Pertactin-Deficient Pertussis. Pediatrics. 2016;137(5):e20153973. 10.1542/peds.2015-3973 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Taranger J, Trollfors B, Lagergård T, Sundh V, Bryla DA, Schneerson R, et al. Correlation between pertussis toxin IgG antibodies in postvaccination sera and subsequent protection against pertussis. J Infect Dis. 2000;181(3):1010-3. 10.1086/315318 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Berbers G, van Gageldonk P, Kassteele JV, Wiedermann U, Desombere I, Dalby T, et al. Circulation of pertussis and poor protection against diphtheria among middle-aged adults in 18 European countries. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):2871. 10.1038/s41467-021-23114-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Skoff TH, Kenyon C, Cocoros N, Liko J, Miller L, Kudish K, et al. Sources of Infant Pertussis Infection in the United States. Pediatrics. 2015;136(4):635-41. 10.1542/peds.2015-1120 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Merdrignac L, Aït El Belghiti F, Pandolfi E, Jané M, Murphy J, Fabiánová K, et al. Incidence and severity of pertussis hospitalisations in infants aged less than 1 year in 37 hospitals of six EU/EEA countries, results of PERTINENT sentinel pilot surveillance system, December 2015 to December 2018. Euro Surveill. 2021;26(4):1900762. 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2021.26.4.1900762 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Quinn HE, Snelling TL, Macartney KK, McIntyre PB. Duration of protection after first dose of acellular pertussis vaccine in infants. Pediatrics. 2014;133(3):e513-9. 10.1542/peds.2013-3181 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Campbell H, Gupta S, Dolan GP, Kapadia SJ, Kumar Singh A, Andrews N, et al. Review of vaccination in pregnancy to prevent pertussis in early infancy. J Med Microbiol. 2018;67(10):1426-56. 10.1099/jmm.0.000829 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Maertens K, Tran TMP, Hens N, Van Damme P, Leuridan E. Effect of Prepregnancy Pertussis Vaccination in Young Infants. J Infect Dis. 2017;215(12):1855-61. 10.1093/infdis/jix176 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.De Weerdt L, Herzog SA, Van Damme P, Maertens K. Timing of pertussis vaccination during pregnancy: Evidence and implementation - A systematic review. Vaccine. 2024;42(21):126152. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.07.053 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Hansen BT, Dahl J, Greve-Isdahl M, Winje BA, Rydland KM, Campbell S, et al. Low and inequitable influenza and COVID-19 vaccination coverage among pregnant women in Norway: Nationwide population-based cohort study. Vaccine. 2025;61:127386. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2025.127386 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.van den Boogaard J, Rots NY, van der Klis F, de Melker HE, Knol MJ. Is there an association between socioeconomic status and immune response to infant and childhood vaccination in the Netherlands? Vaccine. 2020;38(18):3480-8. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.01.071 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Maertens K, Burbidge P, Van Damme P, Goldblatt D, Leuridan E. Pneumococcal Immune Response in Infants Whose Mothers Received Tetanus, Diphtheria and Acellular Pertussis Vaccination During Pregnancy. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2017;36(12):1186-92. 10.1097/INF.0000000000001601 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Grassly NC, Andrews N, Cooper G, Stephens L, Waight P, Jones CE, et al. Effect of maternal immunisation with multivalent vaccines containing inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV) on infant IPV immune response: A phase 4, multi-centre randomised trial. Vaccine. 2023;41(7):1299-302. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.01.035 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Voysey M, Kelly DF, Fanshawe TR, Sadarangani M, O’Brien KL, Perera R, et al. The Influence of Maternally Derived Antibody and Infant Age at Vaccination on Infant Vaccine Responses : An Individual Participant Meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatr. 2017;171(7):637-46. 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.0638 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Gonik B, Puder KS, Gonik N, Kruger M. Seroprevalence of Bordetella pertussis antibodies in mothers and their newborn infants. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol. 2005;13(2):59-61. 10.1080/10647440500068289 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Wanlapakorn N, Ngaovithunvong V, Thongmee T, Vichaiwattana P, Vongpunsawad S, Poovorawan Y. Seroprevalence of Antibodies to Pertussis Toxin among Different Age Groups in Thailand after 37 Years of Universal Whole-Cell Pertussis Vaccination. PLoS One. 2016;11(2):e0148338. 10.1371/journal.pone.0148338 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Material

Data Availability Statement

Data are not publicly available due to legal constraints but may be shared anonymised as baseline dataset upon reasonable request to the authors.


Articles from Eurosurveillance are provided here courtesy of European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control

RESOURCES