ABSTRACT
In well‐perfused tissues, interstitial composition resembles capillary plasma. Solid tumors break this norm because cancer cell proliferation outpaces vascular expansion, leading to a diffusion‐limited tumor microenvironment (TME) that is notably depleted of oxygen and enriched in acids. The magnitude of tumor acidosis; its chemical composition in terms of [CO2] and [HCO3 −] (components of the major extracellular buffer); and its relationship with hypoxia are not intuitive to predict but important to know for designing experiments and contextualising results. We address these timely questions using mathematical models of a monolayer, spheroid, and poorly‐perfused tissue. Our simulations suggest a physiologically realistic TME pH range of 6.7–7.4, reveal a prominence of hypercapnia, and indicate varying levels of HCO3 − depletion or accumulation arising from fermentation and respiration, respectively. The trajectories of tumor hypoxia and acidosis depend on the balance between aerobic and anaerobic pathways, with important consequences on hypoxic signaling where many responses are pH‐sensitive.
Mathematical model of a perfused cylindrical tumor predicts venous‐end extracellular [O2], pH, [CO2], and [HCO3 −] in the case of either fermentative or respiratory metabolism, illustrating the relationship between hypoxia and acidosis and the chemical composition of acidosis in the tumor microenvironment.

1. Introduction
In healthy tissues, short diffusion distances between cells and capillaries collapse solute gradients and stabilize interstitial composition. In contrast, solid tumors are prone to solute heterogeneity because cancer cells divide faster than capillary growth. As a result, the tumor microenvironment (TME) can diverge from plasma composition [1, 2, 3, 4]. Distinct TME features can drive oncogenesis, underscoring the need to elucidate underlying mechanisms and define physiologically realistic solute ranges [5, 6, 7, 8]. A helpful framework for analyzing solute gradients is the diffusion‐reaction model, in which molecules are produced or consumed by chemical reactions, dispersed through the interstitial space by diffusion [9, 10].
The diffusion‐reaction formalism can accurately describe pH and oxygen gradients, two important selection pressures in cancer somatic evolution [11, 12, 13]. The partial pressure of oxygen (pO2) spans a range defined by the lower limit of anoxia and the upper limit of arterial normoxia. Within this range, interstitial pO2 is set by the balance between vascular supply and mitochondrial consumption. TME pH invariably falls below arterial pH because of metabolic acid production [14, 15, 16], but in the absence of an absolute lower limit for pH, the extent of acidification is difficult to predict and can lead to arbitrary decisions on what pH range to study and attribute to oncogenically significant events. Hence, our first question: “How low can TME pH realistically fall?” To answer this, we present a quantitative framework that delineates a realistic range for TME pH, and advocate for considering this information in studies of tumor acidosis. This recommendation leads to the second question: “How should TME pH be modeled experimentally?” H+ ions are in dynamic equilibrium with buffers, notably carbonic (CO2/HCO3 −). According to acid–base equilibria, pH is determined by the [HCO3 −] to [CO2] ratio, so the same pH can arise from many different CO2‐HCO3 − combinations, but not all are physiological. This highlights the importance of constraining [HCO3 −] and [CO2] within limits set by tumor metabolism and geometry. CO2‐producing respiration also depletes oxygen and establishes a mechanistic coupling between pH and O2 gradients over which hypoxic signaling may be influenced by acidosis. This leads to our final question: “What is a realistic relationship between O2 levels and pH in the TME?”
2. Closed‐Compartment Model
A starting point is to consider a block of tumor tissue that is abruptly uncoupled from blood flow, allowing metabolic products to accumulate and substrates to deplete. This setting may mimic cultured cancer cells without medium replacement, and is useful for appreciating the extent of pH changes when substrate is allowed to deplete. At 5 mM, the most abundant metabolic substrate is glucose, which can maximally yield 30 mM CO2 by respiration or 10 mM lactic acid by fermentation (Figure 1A). Neutralization of lactic acid depletes HCO3 − and produces an equimolar amount of CO2. Reasonably assuming that carbonic buffer is the dominant TME buffer and catalyzed by exofacial carbonic anhydrases [9, 10], equilibrium is estimated by solving the quadratic equation:
FIGURE 1.

Simple compartment model of the TME. (A) Fermentation in a closed system (e.g., sealed culture dish) results in lactic acid being neutralized by HCO3 −, and conversion to CO2 that is retained. Total inorganic carbon (TIC) is constant, but pH decreases significantly. If the system is open for gases (e.g., culture dish in an incubator), excess CO2 escapes, but TIC decrease because HCO3 − was depleted, and pH falls but by less than in a closed system. (B) Respiration in a closed system results in CO2 production and a rise in TIC. pH is expected to fall but only marginally because the limiting factor is O2 availability. If the system is open for gases, respiration is greatly increased by improved oxygen availability and generated CO2 escapes to keep TIC constant. pH is not expected to change.
Thus, pH, [HCO3 −] and [CO2] could maximally change from the initial 7.4, 24 mM, and 1.2 mM, to 6.2, 14 mM, and 11.2 mM, respectively. The proportionately larger rise in [CO2] is because [HCO3 −] depletion is transferred stoichiometrically to a [CO2] rise from a lower baseline. The sum of [CO2] and [HCO3 −], called total inorganic carbon (TIC), remains constant.
Unlike fermentation, the extent of glucose respiration is limited by oxygen availability (Figure 1B). In the closed‐compartment model, initial pO2 would equal arterial 13 kPa, which translates to 130 µM free [O2], assuming the hemoglobin‐bound reservoir of ∼9 mM is no longer accessible. At most, this yields 130 µM CO2 from 5 mM glucose, a substrate of respiratory quotient (RQ) equal to 1. Thus, TME [CO2] is expected to rise from 1.2 to 1.33 mM, a modest 10% increase. Solving the equilibrium equation predicts a 4 nM rise in [H+], equivalent to reducing pH from 7.4 to 7.35.
Whilst didactic, this closed‐compartment model is inadequate because no tumor is entirely hermetic. The model can be modified to allow gas exchange, a scenario resembling cell culture with access to a constant atmosphere (i.e., incubator). CO2 produced in excess of 1.2 mM can escape, reducing acidification (Figure 1A,B), and with access to atmospheric oxygen, all glucose could be respired (Figure 1B). This ‘open’ model explains why respiring cells do not acidify media, whereas fermentation leads to progressive acidification and inevitable loss of HCO3 −, and hence of TIC, that must be corrected with medium replacement.
3. Toward a Diffusion Model
In a mathematical sense, adding a source of substrate and sink for waste products introduces a boundary condition from which solute gradients emerge. Unlike the closed‐compartment model, a system featuring a constant source of metabolic substrate can attain steady‐state, which can be explored by considering the case of complete glucose consumption. The largest possible [glucose] gradient between blood and cells is 5 mM and generates a flux equal to 5 × D, where D is glucose diffusivity. At steady‐state, glucose influx is balanced by an efflux of its products, after considering stoichiometry. For fermentation, lactate efflux is 10 × D, which is expected to erect a 10 mM [lactate] gradient, if lactate and glucose have equal diffusivity (Figure 2A). H+ ions, co‐produced with lactate, must have an equal efflux, which takes the form of HCO3 − exchanging for CO2. The molecular components of carbonic buffer are significantly smaller than glucose, therefore their gradients will be significantly smaller than 10 mM. Additionally, CO2 is a gas that freely penetrates the entire tumor volume, whereas HCO3 − diffusion is restricted to the extracellular space. Using a reasonable estimate of the extracellular volume fraction (ve) in tumors of 0.25 [17, 18], CO2 diffusivity would be ∼4‐fold faster than HCO3 − (NB: this difference is likely closer to 5:1 because CO2 is a smaller molecule than HCO3 −). Taken together, if HCO3 − diffuses twice as fast as lactate and CO2 diffuses another 4‐fold faster, the predicted radial gradients of [HCO3 −] and [CO2] are 5 mM and 1.25 mM, respectively (Figure 2A; shaded). Solving the equilibrium equation:
estimates steady‐state pH, HCO3 −, and CO2 to be 7.0, 19 mM, and 2.45 mM, respectively, i.e., an acidotic state characterized by reduced [HCO3 −] and raised [CO2].
FIGURE 2.

Toward a diffusion model of extracellular solute fluxes in the TME. (A) Cells, separated from a capillary, consuming glucose by fermentation at a rate that produces a maximal gradient. This generates an inverse lactate gradient of double the magnitude, assuming lactate and glucose diffuse at the same rate. To balance fluxes, H+ ions produced alongside lactate must be removed by means of a CO2/HCO3 − buffer shuttle, involving HCO3 − flux toward cells in exchange for a CO2 counter‐flux. These CO2 and HCO3 − gradients would be equal to the lactate gradient, if diffusion coefficients were equivalent. However, CO2 and HCO3 − diffuse significantly faster than lactate due to their smaller size, and additionally, CO2 can also diffuse through the intracellular compartment, which results in smaller gradients, shown by the shaded area. (B) Consumption of glucose by respiring cells is limited by oxygen availability. This results in smaller CO2 and HCO3 − gradients, both directed toward the capillary.
Similar reasoning can be applied to understand how respiration affects pH (Figure 2B). The largest possible O2 gradient across the TME is 0.13 mM, and assuming a RQ of 1 and equal O2 and CO2 diffusivities, the maximal [CO2] gradient arising from respiration would be 0.13 mM. This represents a modest respiratory acidosis, when referenced to the CO2 baseline of 1.2 mM. There are noteworthy assumptions and limitations. First, the model assumes no O2 buffering in the interstitial fluid. Although the most substantive O2 buffer, hemoglobin, is confined to blood, leakage from ruptured red cells could increase oxygen flux. Similarly, oxygen binders inside cells could facilitate radial oxygen transfer. These factors could increase the magnitude of respiratory acidosis. Conversely, substrates of lower RQ, such as fatty acids or amino acids, would release less CO2. A limitation that applies to both respiratory and fermentative models presented thus far is the lack of spatial considerations, reaction kinetics, or precisely defined diffusion processes. To that end, a more formal diffusion‐reaction model is warranted, and a suitable starting point is a 3‐D spheroid.
4. Diffusion‐Reaction Model: Spheroid
A diffusion‐reaction model was solved over the radial symmetry of a sphere, representing a spheroid of radius 500 µm, of which the extracellular volume fraction (ve) was set to 0.25 [17, 18]. The model consisted of 10 solutes in total: four solutes that permeate membranes, either passively (O2, CO2) or facilitated by transporters (glucose on GLUT or SGLT or lactic acid as H+‐lactate on monocarboxylate transporters), and three solutes that partition between intra‐ and extracellular compartments (HCO3 −, H+, lactate). For membrane permeable and extracellular solutes, the boundary condition at the surface was that of a constant source of solutes, equivalent to arterial plasma. For intracellular solutes, the boundary condition was zero‐flux, or reflection, meaning that solutes cannot exchange with the surroundings unless they pass through the extracellular space. The components of the model are illustrated in Figure 3A and in the Supplement. To prevent glucose from being depleted (i.e., erroneously attain negative values), fermentative rate was modeled as a Hill‐type equation that is half‐maximal at ∼1 mM [19, 20]. Additionally, an inhibitory effect of intracellular acidosis was modeled with a half‐maximal pKa of 7.1 and cooperativity of 2.25, as determined in a panel of pancreatic cancer cell lines [21].
FIGURE 3.

Diffusion‐reaction modeled in spherical geometry. (A) Spheroid of 500 µm radius surrounded by the equivalent of well‐stirred arterial blood. The model consists of solutes, including gases O2 and CO2 that penetrate intra‐ and extracellular spaces, solutes that permeate membranes by facilitated transport (glucose, lactic acid), and solutes restricted to intra‐ and extracellular spaces (H+, HCO3 −, lactate). Reaction terms describe fermentation, respiration, and buffering. CA, carbonic anhydrase; Resp, respiration; Ferm, fermentation. (B) Modeling solute levels at the core of spheroids over a range of maximal fermentative (cyan background) or respiratory (magenta background) rates (Jferm max, Jresp max). (C) Simulated radial profiles of solutes at steady state for a fermentative spheroid (Jferm max = 10 mM/min; cyan background), respiratory spheroid (Jresp max = 0.67 mM/min; magenta background), and a mixed phenotype (Jferm max = 5 mM/min and Jresp max = 0.33 mM/min; purple background). Dashed lines denote intracellular concentrations; solid lines denote extracellular concentrations, or in the case of permeant species, tissue‐pooled concentrations.
Respiratory rate also factored a [glucose] dependence, in addition to an oxygen‐dependence characterized by half‐maximal activity at 1 µM [22, 23]:
The first set of simulations varied maximal fermentative rate (Jferm max) or respiratory rate (Jresp max) up to 100 mM/min to investigate predictions for pure metabolic phenotypes (Figure 3B). For the fermentative phenotype, these simulations predicted TME pH reaching ∼6.9 at the spheroid core, with ∼5:1 [HCO3 −] depletion and [CO2] accumulation, consistent with the ratio of their diffusivities. In the case of respiration, simulations predicted rapid O2 depletion, which limits acidification to ∼0.05 units, and restricts metabolism to the oxygenated outer ring. Radial gradients of solutes were solved for Jferm max of 10 mM/min, which produces a near saturating effect on TME pH (Figure 3C). As expected, pHe progressively acidifies with depth, drawing intracellular pH to lower levels. Neutralization of lactic acid by HCO3 − explains CO2 build‐up and HCO3 − depletion. To model radial gradients of respiring spheroids, Jresp max was set to 0.67 mM/min, i.e., 15‐fold less than fermentation to account for the ∼15‐fold higher per‐glucose yield of ATP of respiration. The model predicted anoxia beyond a depth of ∼200 µm, hence the rise in CO2 remains constant beyond this depth. Since HCO3 − is not chemically consumed, levels do not fall, unlike the case for fermentation. Since only a fraction of the spheroid can metabolize glucose, overall consumption is small and explains the modest respiratory acidosis of pH 7.35. A third simulation of radial gradients assumed a mixed metabolic phenotype with Jferm max of 5 mM/min and Jresp max of 0.33 mM/min. As expected, intermediate radial gradients were observed, with a deeper oxygenated outer ring, smaller CO2 build‐up, and small HCO3 − depletion.
These simulations are useful for understanding solute gradients in spheroids bathed in the relative constancy of culture medium [24]. The extent of acidification attained by lactic fermentation is maximally pH 6.9, which approaches the prediction of the simplified model shown in Figure 2. Significantly greater acid‐loads could be generated with higher [glucose], as is the case for high‐glucose (25 mM) media. A second significant observation is that restricted oxygen penetration limits respiratory capacity. Indeed, a limitation of the spheroid model is that oxygen supply relies on inward diffusion of dissolved gas. A greater degree of respiratory acidosis could be attained by facilitating O2 diffusion using a carrier, such as hemoglobin, but this would require a means of perfusing the spheroid with blood, which is not expected in these non‐vascularized structures. Critically, the carrier would have to selectively bind O2 over CO2 because a non‐specific facilitation of gas transport would also dissipate CO2 (hence pH) gradients. A limitation of the spheroid model is that the surface represents a constant supply/sink for solutes, which effectively clamps concentrations and does not accurately replicate a perfused tissue, where solutes are delivered and removed convectively with the blood flow. A poorly‐perfused tumor is better described as a cylinder of tissue surrounding a capillary with blood flow. To that end, a convection–diffusion‐reaction model is necessary [25].
5. Convection–Diffusion‐Reaction Model: Krogh Cylinder
Perfused tumors can be described as a Krogh cylinder [25] of large radius (Figure 4A). Simulations used a cylinder length of 2 mm, a capillary radius of 5 µm, and a surrounding layer of tissue of thickness 250 µm, which captures the oxygenated rim, as predicted by the spheroid model. Further details are provided in the Supplement. Blood velocity was 1 mm/s, i.e., a transit time of 2 s [26], during which solutes equilibrate between plasma and the TME. Simulations were run for a range of maximal fermentative and respiratory rates (Figure 4B) to interrogate the range of TME pH. When averaged across the length and radius of the tissue, a fermentative Krogh cylinder acidified to pH 6.6, whereas a respiratory phenotype saturated at pH ∼7. Modeling of solute profiles along the length of the tissue was performed for Jresp max of 0.067 mM/min, i.e., near the saturation point, and a Jferm max of 1 mM/min, i.e., 15‐fold higher to account for a ∼15‐fold lower ATP yield per glucose (Figure 4C). Compared to the spheroid model, saturating outcomes were attained at lower metabolic rates because the cylindrical tissue relies on a much smaller capillary volume to supply substrates and remove wastes. At the venous end of a fermentative tissue, blood pH reached ∼6.7, carrying with it ∼9 mM of lactate and ∼4 mM CO2, consistent with a near‐complete depletion of glucose (Figure 4B). The model predicts ∼3 mM HCO3 − depletion and ∼3 mM CO2 accumulation, constrained by the constancy of TIC during capillary transit, a transiently closed system. At the venous end of a respiring tissue, glucose consumption is smaller (<1 mM), consistent with rate‐limiting O2 penetration. Nonetheless, the Krogh model allows more glucose respiration than the spheroid model because of access to additional O2 held on hemoglobin. Still, the entire oxygen content of blood is not sufficient to deplete glucose. Since the Krogh cylinder is a net‐producer of CO2, TIC must increase. Metabolism of 1 mM glucose is expected to yield ∼6 mM TIC, split between a ∼2.5 mM rise in [CO2] and ∼3.5 mM rise in [HCO3 −], generating an acidification to pH ∼7 (Figure 4C). To model a mixed metabolic phenotype, Jferm max and Jresp max were set to 0.5 mM/min and 0.033 mM/min; this resulted in intermediate spatial profiles and an overall acidification to pH 6.7, significant hypercapnia, and near‐constant [HCO3 −]. The results of these models indicate that a reasonable lower range for TME pHe is ∼6.7, readily explainable by constraints placed on metabolism.
FIGURE 4.

Convection‐diffusion‐reaction modeled in Krogh's cylindrical geometry. (A) Perfused capillary surrounded by a layer of tissue. Blood flow is described by convection of nine solutes, of which seven exchange freely with the tissue and two (pH buffer and O2‐Hb) remain confined to blood. In the tissue, the model consists of gases O2 and CO2 that penetrate intra‐ and extracellular spaces, solutes that exchange between intra‐ and extracellular spaces by facilitated transport (glucose, lactic acid), and solutes restricted to intra‐ and extracellular compartments (H+, HCO3 −, lactate). Reaction terms describe fermentation, respiration, and buffering. (B) Modeling solute concentrations over a range of maximal fermentative (cyan background) or respiratory (magenta background) rates (Jferm max, Jresp max). Tissue concentrations are averaged over the radial distance. Red: blood, blue: tissue. Dashed lines indicate intracellular solutes; solid lines denote extracellular or tissue‐pooled concentrations for permeant solutes. (C) Simulating solute concentration profile along the capillary (red) and tissue (blue) for a fermentative spheroid (Jferm max = 10 mM/min; cyan background), respiratory spheroid (Jresp max = 0.67 mM/min; magenta background), and a mixed phenotype (Jferm max = 5 mM/min and Jresp max = 0.33 mM/min; purple background). Red dashed lines denote intracellular concentrations; solid lines denote extracellular or tissue‐pooled concentrations for permeant solutes.
6. What Do Simulations Tell us About Tumor Acidosis?
Our simulations span scenarios that differ in their physiological relevance and resemblance to experimental conditions. Their predictions can be summarized on a series of Davenport‐like diagrams [27] that plot [CO2] against [HCO3 −] over a range of pH (Figure 5A–C). Regular monolayer culture can be modeled as a compartment that is open to gas exchange but closed for non‐volatile solutes. Openness to a normal atmosphere unleashes the full potential of respiration, albeit some pericellular hypoxia may arise in unstirred flasks [28, 29]. This setting may artefactually over‐stimulate respiration beyond the constraints of oxygen delivery in under‐perfused tumors. An open atmosphere also masks respiratory acidosis by allowing CO2 to escape. Acidification in such culture systems is driven by fermentation and takes the form of a metabolic acidosis, wherein HCO3 − is depleted at constant CO2 (Figure 5A). At most, pH is expected to fall to ∼7.2 because no more than 10 mM lactic acid could be generated from 5 mM glucose, although a more profound acidosis is possible with supra‐physiological substrate levels, such as 25 mM glucose used in so‐called high‐glucose media.
FIGURE 5.

Summary of modeling results. (A–C) Davenport‐like diagrams summarising simulation outcomes. Colored lines (red to blue) denote equilibrium pH for a given CO2/HCO3 − combination. (A). Trajectory of CO2/HCO3 − changes in response to fermentation in a fully closed compartment or a compartment that remains open to gases only. (B) Trajectory of CO2/HCO3 − changes in fermentative or respiratory spheroid. The Shaded area refers to the range defined in (A). (C) Trajectory of CO2/HCO3 − changes at the venous end of the fermentative or respiratory Krogh cylinder of thickness 250 µm or 50 µm (dashed line). (D) Simulated relationship between spheroid radius and pHe for a fermentative or respiratory model (Jferm max = 10 mM/min; Jresp max = 0.67 mM/min). (E) Simulated relationship between Krogh cylinder radius at 2 mm length. (F) Krogh cylinder length at radius 250 µm and pHe for a fermentative or respiratory model (Jferm max = 1 mM/min; Jresp max = 0.067 mM/min). (G) Simulated relationship between extracellular pH (pHe) and intracellular pH (pHi) for models without pH regulation (−Reg) and with pH regulation (+Reg) in a spheroid. (H) Krogh cylinder of radius 50 µm (Jferm max = 1 mM/min; Jresp max = 0.067 mM/min). (I) Krogh cylinder of radius 250 µm (Jferm max = 1 mM/min; Jresp max = 0.067 mM/min). Magenta‐respiration; cyan‐fermentation. (J) Simulated relationship between O2 and pHe for fermentative or respiratory spheroids (Jferm max = 10 mM/min; Jresp max = 0.67 mM/min). (K) Krogh cylinder of radius 50 µm (Jferm max = 1 mM/min; Jresp max = 0.067 mM/min). (L) Krogh cylinder of radius 250 µm (Jferm max = 1 mM/min; Jresp max = 0.067 mM/min). Magenta‐respiration; cyan‐fermentation.
Good oxygenation and the absence of hypercapnia may resemble cells juxtaposed to capillaries, but this is unlikely to reflect solid tumors because of diffusion barriers. Physiologically, the barriers to oxygen permeation are similar to those obstructing CO2 egress; therefore, experimentally replicating the TME ex vivo requires a means of hindering both gases. This condition is not met by hypoxic incubation―a routine effort to mimic hypoxia in cultured cells―because O2 depletion arises without CO2 build‐up. The option of reducing O2 and raising CO2 in the incubator's atmosphere is challenging to implement because the exact coupling is difficult to predict because it depends on metabolic profile. A practical way of imposing a barrier to gas exchange is to apply a layer of mineral oil atop of the medium [30]. This partial closure allows cells to titrate the degree of hypoxia and hypercapnia as appropriate for their metabolic phenotype. As the barrier increases, the system tends toward a closed state, with two consequences: (i) respiratory suppression from oxygen shortage and (ii) hypercapnia caused by the neutralization of lactic acid with HCO3 −. Depending on the magnitude of the barrier to gas exchange, medium CO2, HCO3 −, and pH in most 2‐D culture systems will follow a trajectory nested between the two lines plotted in Figure 5A.
Unlike stirred monolayers, spheroids harbor diffusion distances that can stabilize solute gradients, resembling those of the TME. Spheroids in an open culture system maintain constant [O2] and [CO2] at their surface, which limits the extent of radial gradients. For a fermentative phenotype, acidosis near the surface will resemble metabolic acidosis, but tends to retain CO2 nearer the core. Consequently, the radial profiles of CO2, HCO3 −, and pH in the extracellular space of a fermentative spheroid will be nested between a fully‐closed and gas‐open 2‐D culture (gray region in Figure 5B). The metabolism of a purely respiring spheroid is rate‐limited by oxygen penetration, which results in limited CO2 build‐up and a resemblance to a fully‐closed system. Since respiration generates TIC, [HCO3 −] increases in tandem with CO2, and explains the clockwise deviation from the closed‐compartment (Figure 5B).
In contrast to spheroids, cells in poorly‐perfused tissues exchange solutes with capillary blood, a fluid that is in motion and chemically modified by upstream tissue metabolism. For example, capillary [CO2] progressively increases, causing greater CO2 retention in downstream tissue. Moreover, blood in a capillary has its TIC trapped during transit, which forces the CO2‐HCO3 − trajectory for fermentative tissues to track closed monolayers, and that of a respiratory phenotype to be further rotated clockwise (Figure 5C). Indeed, an intriguing feature of the visualization shown in Figure 5A–C is that with increasing complexity (monolayer to spheroid to poorly‐perfused tissue), CO2/HCO3 − trajectories rotate clockwise. This transition reflects the retention of CO2, hence the emergence of respiratory acidosis. Since respiration (unlike fermentation) always increases TIC, acidosis in respiring tissues is associated with higher [HCO3 −]: not a response that is intuitively linked to acidosis.
The cases modeled in Figure 5A–C had specific geometries, and to investigate a wider range of sizes, simulations were performed for spheroids of radius up to 0.5 mm, Krogh cylinders of radius up to 0.5 mm and length up to 5 mm. For respiratory spheroids, acidification saturation was attained for radius ∼200 µm, which is consistent with the size of the oxygenated outer rim. Acidification in fermentative spheroids saturated at a larger radius of ∼600 µm, which reflects the combination of glucose depletion and glycolytic inhibition at low pH (Figure 5D). For Krogh cylinders, the greatest degree of acidification was attained with radius ∼150–200 µm with both fermentative and respiratory phenotypes and likely reflects an optimal size of the oxygenated rim and acid‐inhibition of glycolysis with greater depth (Figure 5E). Interestingly, tissue length also had an effect on acidification, although the effect was more pronounced with fermentative phenotypes, reaching a pH nadir of 6.7 at a length of ∼1 mm. This effect is likely due to glucose depletion beyond ∼2 mm, which means that downstream tissue is not metabolizing and dilutes the outflow with physiological interstitium (Figure 5F).
Extracellular acidification is ultimately driven by acid‐equivalent fluxes generated by cells. In the models presented thus far, these fluxes represented the metabolic production of CO2 by respiration and lactic acid by fermentation. An additional source of acid‐equivalent flux is membrane transport of H+ or its chemical equivalents (OH−, HCO3 −, and CO3 2−). These fluxes can be readily implemented by coupling equations for intracellular H+ and extracellular H+ with a Hill‐type equation, such as a representation of Na+/H+ exchanger (NHE):
Simulations were repeated for NHE featuring KNHE of 10−6.7 and JNHE max of 10 mM/min, fluxes that are representative of many cancer cells [31]. The effect of implementing a powerful acid‐extruder was visualized in plots of extracellular (pHe) versus intracellular pH (pHi). Without pHi‐regulation, pHi decreased as pHe acidified in spheroids (radius 250 µm) and Krogh cylinders (radii 50 or 250 µm; length 2 mm), with respiration following the same trajectory as fermentation (Figure 5G–I). In the case of Krogh cylinders, the pHi/pHe relationships approach the line of identity and then reverse. The reversal of trajectory is due to depletion of glucose during capillary transit, which means that tissue and blood pH gradually recover as they are diluted by downstream, non‐metabolising tissues. Significantly, the apex of this curve defines the maximal extent of pHe/pHi. When NHE activity is implemented, pHi is homeostatically regulated to the set‐point, here defined as 7.2. Strikingly, the maximal extent of pHe acidification in models with pHi regulation was not substantially affected. This is because regulators like NHE produce a corrective flux only when pHi is acidic; once this is normalized, net flux returns to zero and will not contribute to the steady‐state. Near set‐point pH, the dominant acid‐equivalent flux emitted from cells is carried by CO2 and/or lactic acid thus pHi regulators are not expected to make a large contribution. In fact, a significant flux by NHE would cause the cytoplasm to alkalinize to infinity. The reason for the modestly greater pHe drop with NHE for Krogh cylinders of radius 250 µm relates to stimulation of glycolysis at the more alkaline pHi. We conclude that at the steady‐state, pHi regulatory flux will not meaningfully contribute to pHe acidification once pHi is returned to its set‐point.
7. Relationship Between Acidosis and Hypoxia
Results of our simulations can be used to explore relationships between oxygen and pH (Figure 5J–L). For purely fermentative phenotypes, acidification is not accompanied by oxygen consumption, irrespective of model complexity. A respiratory phenotype, in contrast, will deplete oxygen and produce acid as CO2. For spheroid models, hypoxia is associated with modest acidification because CO2 production is limited by O2 availability. Total depletion of oxygen is equivalent to a 0.13 mM reduction in [O2] and a mere 10% increase in CO2 (at least for substrates of RQ of 1), which translates to a ∼0.1 pH unit acidification. A more profound acidification is attainable in the Krogh cylinder model because hemoglobin increases oxygen availability to 9 mM, and capillary CO2 can build up in the direction of blood flow. For a respiring Krogh cylinder, CO2 production and hence acidification are greater at a radius of 50 µm compared to 250 µm, reflecting the size of the oxygenated outer rim. These O2‐pH trajectories demarcate extreme circumstances of a pure fermentative or respiratory phenotype. Since solid tumors are metabolically heterogeneous, any combination of O2 and pH lying between the lines marked in Figure 5J–L is plausible. Moreover, changes in oxygen can feedback on metabolism through hypoxic signaling, introducing a dynamic aspect to metabolic heterogeneity. A key transcriptional response to hypoxia is a switch from respiration to fermentation orchestrated by hypoxia inducible factors, most notably HIF1α [32, 33, 34, 35].
Compared to alkalotic hypoxia, acidotic hypoxia produces a more transient stabilization of HIF1α, arising from enhanced lysosomal degradation [36] or reduced translation of its mRNA [37, 38]. Consequently, combining hypoxia with acidosis reduces the transcriptional response of at least some hypoxia‐responsive genes [36, 37, 38]. The extent of this interaction can be inferred from a proteomic analysis of cells exposed to acidosis (pH 6.4), hypoxia (1% O2), or their combination. SW1222 colorectal cancer cells were selected for this experiment because of their acid resistance, conducive to surviving low pH [36]. After 48 h of treatment, protein abundance was measured and compared across the conditions. If the effects of acidosis and hypoxia were additive, then protein responses determined experimentally under acidotic hypoxia should be equal to the sum of the responses to acidosis and hypoxia presented separately (Figure 6A). However, a difference between the measured and expected response to acidotic hypoxia would signify an interaction which may be synergistic (acidotic hypoxia response greater than the sum of acidic and hypoxia responses) or antagonistic (acidotic hypoxia response smaller than the sum of acidic and hypoxia responses). The distribution of these differences across the proteome is shown in Figure 6A. For log2‐transformed abundance, a cut‐off of ±0.5 was used to define the three classes of responses: 2608 additive responses, 822 antagonistic responses, and 569 synergistic responses, alongside 5355 non‐significant responses. Thus, a third of significant responses were not additive, indicating a meaningful interaction between acidosis and hypoxia.
FIGURE 6.

Effect of pH on hypoxic responses. Proteomic analysis (published in White et al) of SW1222 cells after 48 h culture under acidic (pH 6.4), hypoxic (1% O2), or their combination. (A) Illustration of the method for quantifying interaction between acidosis and hypoxia. If protein abundance responses to acidosis and hypoxia are additive, then the response to acidotic hypoxia should equal to the sum of its parts. Synergy between hypoxia and acidosis is inferred if the measured response is 0.5 units greater than the expected response. Antagonism is inferred if the measured response is 0.5 units smaller than the expected response. The histogram shows the distribution of this difference across the SW1222 proteome. The pie chart shows the fraction of additive, synergistic, and antagonistic responses. (B) Heatmap of responses in the three groups. (C). Enrichment analysis (ClusterProfiler) for biological pathway and cell compartment of the three groups of proteins, showing the two 10 pathways only.
Additive responses to acidosis and hypoxia were broadly associated with protein synthesis and turnover processes—including ribosome and RNP biogenesis, rRNA/tRNA processing, RNA splicing, and vesicle/Golgi trafficking—as well as with macroautophagy and small‐molecule catabolism. Examples of relevant responses are the downregulation of proteins involved in rRNA processing (DDX family, KNOP1, NOPCHAP1, NOP14/16/53, and EXOSC1/8), ribosomal components and maturation factors (RPL members, RIOK1/2/3, BRIX1, and RPF1/2). Altered tRNA metabolism was indicated by changes in aminoacyl‐tRNA synthetases (IARS1/2, LARS1, and MARS2) and TRMT methyltransferases (TRMT61B, 13, 112). RNA splicing was modulated through spliceosomal components (U2AF1/2, SRSF2/10, and PRPF8/40A). Golgi, anterograde and retrograde vesicle trafficking showed upregulation of COPI (COPA/B1/B2/Z1) and COPII (SEC23A/24C/23IP) components, Golgi structural proteins (GOLGA1/5), and regulators of endosomal transport and exocytosis. Metabolic reprogramming encompassed amino acid (GLUD1, GOT2, BCAT2, SHMT2), fatty acid (ACAD8/M/S/VL, ACOT9, ACSL1/4), and carbohydrate (HK1, ENO2, SDHA, SUCLG2) metabolism. The macroautophagy machinery exhibited increased levels of ATG2A/2B/5/7/16L, ULK1/3, and Beclin1, indicating enhanced autophagic flux. These outcomes are expected, as cells must adapt to survive under challenging conditions.
The synergistic effects of acidosis and hypoxia manifested in the induction of stress‐related programs, including ER stress/UPR, responses to misfolded proteins, cytosolic translation, extrinsic apoptosis, and adhesion remodeling. Examples of responses included activation of ER stress and UPR pathways (ATF3, ATF6/6B, ATF7/7B, ERN2, HSPA13, HSP90B1, HSP90AB2B/4B, DNAJA1/C15/C25, and PDI5/6), ribosomal stress (RPS27A/L, EEF2KMT), and extrinsic apoptosis (CASP2, BID, TNFRSF19, TNFAIP8, TP53I11, TP53BP2, TP73, and BCL2L15/L13). Concurrently, protein signatures indicated extracellular matrix remodeling (COL6A1/A3, COL2A1, and ITGB5/6), altered cell adhesion (CEACAM1/5), and epidermal differentiation (multiple KRTs). These patterns align with the cooperative effects of lactic acidosis and hypoxia in the tumor microenvironment and the protective ATF4‐mediated response [37].
In contrast, antagonistic effects of acidosis and hypoxia primarily affected cell‐cycle and mitotic programs, including cyclin‐dependent kinases (CDK1/4/6) and division regulators (CDC20/CDC25B/CDC6/7), as well as DNA replication and repair proteins (MCM2–10, ORC6, CDT2/DTL, BRCA1/2, and RAD51 family), and components of the mitotic spindle and kinetochore machinery (CENP‐E/F, BUB1/BUB1B, KIF15/18B/20A/B/21A/22). This finding indicates that acidotic hypoxia attenuates proliferative programs that are less strongly repressed by either stress alone, and explains the growth arrest and quiescence under acidic hypoxia.
8. Conclusions, Recommendations and Limitations
8.1. How Low Can TME pH Realistically Fall?
The range of models presented herein—from simple quadratic equations to convection–diffusion‐reaction models of perfused tissue—provide a framework for appreciating the extent of acidification possible in the TME under the constraints of chemistry and physics, but subject to certain assumptions. Although the extreme case of total glucose consumption by fermentation in a closed compartment predicts pH falling to 6.2, this is unlikely to reflect the TME because no tumor is a hermetically closed compartment. This is illustrated by the more modest acidification predicted by the spheroid (“3‐D culture”) and Krogh cylinder (“poorly‐perfused tissue”) models. In the case of total glucose consumption, fermentation is predicted to decrease pH to ∼7, which can be explained in terms of flux‐balance as follows. Complete fermentation drives glucose influx equal to the maximal blood‐tissue difference (5 mM) multiplied by glucose diffusivity. This is counterbalanced by a two‐fold greater lactate flux, reflecting 2:1 stoichiometry, alongside H⁺ ions shuttled by HCO3 −/CO2 exchange. Since CO2/HCO3 − diffuses more rapidly than lactate or glucose, the [HCO3 −] gradient and even more so the [CO2] gradient are smaller. For a reasonable estimate of CO2:HCO3 −:lactate diffusivity of 10:2:1, the Henderson–Hasselbalch equation predicts a pH of ∼7:
This prediction is supported by simulations of spheroids based on a diffusion‐reaction framework. According to the Krogh cylinder model, however, even greater acidifications―down to pH 6.7―are possible, reflecting a more complex relationship between CO2/HCO3 −, lactic acid, and lactate once advection is also added to the modeling. Although glucose respiration yields three times as many acid‐equivalents compared to fermentation (6 × CO2 versus 2 × lactic acid), the actual yield of acid is restricted by oxygen availability, which is in the sub‐micromolar range, despite high total O2 availability in blood (∼9 mM) and rapid gas diffusivity. Consequently, the maximal [O2] gradient across the TME is ∼0.13 mM, which is rate‐limiting for respiratory rate. Even if this O2 were consumed entirely to produce CO2, the effect on pH would be modest on top of the baseline of 1.2 mM [CO2].
8.2. Limitations of Our Models
Taken together, we propose that the most likely range of TME pH is 6.7–7.4. This range overlaps with measurements of extracellular pH in tumors in vivo [39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49] with a median of ∼6.8 [50]. Of note, some measurements of TME pH were substantially lower than 6.7, which may suggest additional sources of acidity that our models fail to capture. Indeed, a notable limitation of our simulations is that only glucose metabolism is considered a source of acid. Tumors have access to additional substrates, including blood‐borne non‐esterified fatty acids (NEFA; ∼0.2 mM) [51], lactate (∼1 mM), ketone bodies (<1 mM), or cell‐stored glycogen [52]. Plasma‐borne substrates other than glucose can be metabolized oxidatively and contribute toward hypercapnia and hypoxia. With an average of 17 carbon atoms per molecule, NEFA are the most significant substrates after glucose, but their overall carbon content (17 × 0.2 = 3.4 mM) is ∼10% of the carbon content of glucose (6 × 5 = 30 mM). Thus, a more complete model with all respiratory substrates would have only a small effect on the overall outcomes. We therefore opted for a simplified model featuring glucose metabolism in the interest of didactic accessibility of our models. Unlike plasma‐delivered substrates that are in continuous arterial supply, glycogen is a finite store. At steady‐state, glycogen breakdown must equal production from plasma glucose, which—for the sake of simplicity—could be pooled with the direct route of glucose metabolism via glycolysis. A further source of acidity is the secretion of acid by cancer cells through active transport processes [53], including Na+/H+ exchangers (NHEs) or V‐type H+ ATPases. These fluxes can be substantial but cannot continue perpetually as they are limited by their effect on intracellular alkalinization and inhibition by the ensuing extracellular acidity [31]. Our modeling shows that once pHi is restored, fluxes carried by pHi‐regulators collapse to zero (the definition of attaining a set‐point), which means they cannot meaningfully contribute to extracellular acidification. A perpetual flux by transporters such as NHE would lead to infinite alkalinization of cells, which is not feasible. Expunging cellular content, including acidic organelles, from ruptured cells may lower TME pH instantaneously but this event does not represent a continuous supply of acid, as the case for metabolism. Finally, our models are notable for lacking electrostatic interactions, which may impact the pH distribution [54]. This, however, is poorly defined and therefore difficult to model, but unlikely to be a major contributor to acidification due to short‐circuiting due to abundant ions such as Na+ and Cl−.
8.3. How Should TME pH Be Modeled Experimentally?
Our literature survey of in vitro experiments [37, 51, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72] suggests pH 6.5 as a mean value [50], with some studies–including our own work [73, 74]–investigating responses to pH as low as 6. We advocate for assessing pH‐sensitivity across a broad range, ensuring that the pH range of 6.7–7.4 is adequately interrogated. Experimental control of pH is best exercised by exploiting the prominence of CO2/HCO3 − as the major extracellular buffer, rather than attempting to overcome it using excessive concentrations of exogenous buffers (e.g., HEPES) or entirely replacing this physiological system [75]. In regular monolayer culture, acidosis is most likely attained by fermentation that depletes HCO3 − whilst [CO2] is clamped by the incubator atmosphere. However, pure metabolic acidosis is unlikely in the TME because some retention of CO2 is inevitable, as illustrated by the spheroid and Krogh cylinder models. Somewhat surprisingly, [HCO3 −] can fall or rise during acidosis, depending on the modeled geometry and metabolism. For instance, fermentative spheroids tend to deplete [HCO3 −] because TIC cannot increase, whereas respirating Krogh cylinders accumulate [HCO3 −] in tandem with CO2 because their TIC must rise. This latter response arises because respiration adds CO2 to TIC, which then becomes trapped during capillary transit; consequently, [HCO3 −] increased, but relatively less than the [CO2]‐rise, i.e., a net acidosis. We conclude that HCO3 − depletion is not a universal feature of acidotic TME, even though it is a preferred method for attaining acidosis in cultured media [75]. Pragmatically, it would be impossible to set medium [CO2] and [HCO3 −] independently and with adequate precision because metabolic phenotypes are challenging to measure and anticipate. For high‐throughput assays using 96‐well (or similar) plates, and in the interest of batching experiments for better statistical power, it is not practical to vary [CO2] for individual experimental conditions. Instead, pH can be controlled robustly by modifying [HCO3 −] through appropriate (osmotically‐compensated) adjustments to medium composition, and we continue to recommend this approach because the alternative of varying [CO2] is technologically inaccessible. This recommendation acknowledges that replicating TME acidosis as a metabolic acidosis carries the risk of masking responses to hypercapnia, such as carboxylation [76] or carbamylation [77, 78] which may be particularly important in very acidotic cancers, such as gastric or pancreatic.
8.4. What Is a Realistic Relationship Between O2 Levels and pH in the TME?
Intuitively, a barrier to oxygen is also a barrier to acid (e.g., CO2), therefore, a hypoxic tumor region is also expected to be acidotic. Since the balance between fermentation and respiration can be tuned dynamically through HIF, almost any combination of pH (∼6.7–7.4) and O2 (0%–21%) is plausible for the TME in situ. When studying hypoxic signaling, we recommend the inclusion of interactions with acidosis because as many as a third of hypoxic responses can show a synergistic or antagonistic interaction with pH.
Author Contributions
PS developed, analysed and interpreted the mathematical models. AH analyzed proteomic data and interpreted the hypoxia‐acidosis interactions. PS and AH wrote the manuscript.
Funding
This work is supported by Bowel Research UK (SG‐24003) and the Medical Research Council (MR/Z506163/1).
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Supporting information
Supporting Information File 1: bies70101‐sup‐0001‐Appendix.docx.
Hulikova A. and Swietach P., “Using Mathematical Modeling of Tumor Metabolism to Predict the Magnitude, Composition, and Hypoxic Interactions of Microenvironment Acidosis.” BioEssays 48, no. 1 (2026): e70101. 10.1002/bies.70101
Data Availability Statement
Equations for the spheroid and Krogh cylinder models are shown in the Supplement (Appendix). Models presented herein are available for download as stand‐alone executable files at: https://github.com/pawelswietach/Tumour‐pH‐simulations/releases/tag/v1.0.0.
References
- 1. De Visser K. E. and Joyce J. A., “The Evolving Tumor Microenvironment: From Cancer Initiation to Metastatic Outgrowth,” Cancer Cell 41 (2023): 374–403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Wagner M. and Wiig H., “Tumor Interstitial Fluid Formation, Characterization, and Clinical Implications,” Frontiers in Oncology 5 (2015): 115, 10.3389/fonc.2015.00115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Vaupel P., Kallinowski F., and Okunieff P., “Blood Flow, Oxygen and Nutrient Supply, and Metabolic Microenvironment of Human Tumors: A Review,” Cancer Research 49 (1989): 6449–6465. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Vaupel P., Kallinowski F., and Okunieff P., “Blood Flow, Oxygen Consumption and Tissue Oxygenation of Human Tumors,” Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology 277 (1990): 895–905. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Sullivan M. R., Danai L. V., Lewis C. A., et al., “Quantification of Microenvironmental Metabolites in Murine Cancers Reveals Determinants of Tumor Nutrient Availability,” eLife 8 (2019): 44235, 10.7554/eLife.44235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Elia I. and Haigis M. C., “Metabolites and the Tumour Microenvironment: From Cellular Mechanisms to Systemic Metabolism,” Nature Metabolism 3 (2021): 21–32, 10.1038/s42255-020-00317-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Suvac A., Ashton J., and Bristow R. G., “Tumour Hypoxia in Driving Genomic Instability and Tumour Evolution,” Nature Reviews Cancer 25 (2025): 167–188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Carmona‐Fontaine C., Deforet M., and Akkari L., “Metabolic Origins of Spatial Organization in the Tumor Microenvironment,” PNAS 114 (2017): 2934–2939, 10.1073/pnas.1700600114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Swietach P., Patiar S., and Supuran C. T., “The Role of Carbonic Anhydrase 9 in Regulating Extracellular and Intracellular Ph in Three‐Dimensional Tumor Cell Growths,” Journal of Biological Chemistry 284 (2009): 20299–20310, 10.1074/jbc.M109.006478. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Swietach P., Wigfield S., Cobden P., et al., “Tumor‐Associated Carbonic Anhydrase 9 Spatially Coordinates Intracellular pH in Three‐Dimensional Multicellular Growths,” Journal of Biological Chemistry 283 (2008): 20473–20483, 10.1074/jbc.M801330200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Gatenby R. A. and Gillies R. J., “Why Do Cancers Have High Aerobic Glycolysis?” Nature Reviews Cancer 4 (2004): 891–899, 10.1038/nrc1478. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Gatenby R. A. and Gillies R. J., “A Microenvironmental Model of Carcinogenesis,” Nature Reviews Cancer 8 (2008): 56–61, 10.1038/nrc2255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Gatenby R. A., Smallbone K., Maini P. K., et al., “Cellular Adaptations to Hypoxia and Acidosis During Somatic Evolution of Breast Cancer,” British Journal of Cancer 97 (2007): 646–653, 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603922. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. McCoy C. L., Parkins C. S., Chaplin D. J., et al., “The Effect of Blood Flow Modification on Intra‐ and Extracellular pH Measured by 31P Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy in Murine Tumours,” British Journal of Cancer 72 (1995): 905–911, 10.1038/bjc.1995.431. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Estrella V., Chen T., Lloyd M., et al., “Acidity Generated by the Tumor Microenvironment Drives Local Invasion,” Cancer Research 73 (2013): 1524–1535, 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-12-2796. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Jo J., Lee C. H., Kopelman R., and Wang X., “In Vivo Quantitative Imaging of Tumor pH by Nanosonophore Assisted Multispectral Photoacoustic Imaging,” Nature Communications 8 (2017): 471, 10.1038/s41467-017-00598-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Baxter L. T. and Jain R. K., “Transport of Fluid and Macromolecules in Tumors. I. Role of Interstitial Pressure and Convection,” Microvascular Research 37 (1989): 77–104, 10.1016/0026-2862(89)90074-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Majumder S., Islam M. T., and Righetti R., “Non‐Invasive Imaging of Interstitial Fluid Transport Parameters in Solid Tumors in Vivo,” Scientific Reports 13 (2023): 7132, 10.1038/s41598-023-33651-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Cognet G. and Muir A., “Identifying Metabolic Limitations in the Tumor Microenvironment,” Science Advances 10 (2024): adq7305, 10.1126/sciadv.adq7305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Hirayama A., Kami K., Sugimoto M., et al., “Quantitative Metabolome Profiling of Colon and Stomach Cancer Microenvironment by Capillary Electrophoresis Time‐of‐Flight Mass Spectrometry,” Cancer Research 69 (2009): 4918–4925, 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-4806. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Blaszczak W., Williams H., and Swietach P., “Autoregulation of H+/Lactate Efflux Prevents Monocarboxylate Transport (MCT) Inhibitors From Reducing Glycolytic Lactic Acid Production,” British Journal of Cancer 127 (2022): 1365–1377, 10.1038/s41416-022-01910-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Grimes D. R., Fletcher A. G., and Partridge M., “Oxygen Consumption Dynamics in Steady‐State Tumour Models,” Royal Society Open Science 1 (2014): 140080, 10.1098/rsos.140080. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. McKeown S. R., “Defining Normoxia, Physoxia and Hypoxia in Tumours—Implications for Treatment Response,” British Journal of Radiology 87 (2014): 20130676, 10.1259/bjr.20130676. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Bull J. A., Mech F., Quaiser T., et al., “Mathematical Modelling Reveals Cellular Dynamics Within Tumour Spheroids,” PLOS Computational Biology 16 (2020): 1007961, 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007961. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Goldman D., “Theoretical Models of Microvascular Oxygen Transport to Tissue,” Microcirculation 15 (2008): 795–811, 10.1080/10739680801938289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Marchand P. J., Lu X., Zhang C., and Lesage F., “Validation of Red Blood Cell Flux and Velocity Estimations Based on Optical Coherence Tomography Intensity Fluctuations,” Scientific Reports 10 (2020): 19584, 10.1038/s41598-020-76774-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Berend K., “Diagnostic Use of Base Excess in Acid–Base Disorders,” New England Journal of Medicine 378 (2018): 1419–1428, 10.1056/NEJMra1711860. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Al‐Ani A., Toms D., Kondro D., et al., “Oxygenation in Cell Culture: Critical Parameters for Reproducibility Are Routinely Not Reported,” PLoS ONE 13 (2018): 0204269, 10.1371/journal.pone.0204269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Place T. L., Domann F. E., and Case A. J., “Limitations of Oxygen Delivery to Cells in Culture: An Underappreciated Problem in Basic and Translational Research,” Free Radical Biology and Medicine 113 (2017): 311–322, 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2017.10.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Li C., Humayun M., Walker G. M., et al., “Under‐Oil Autonomously Regulated Oxygen Microenvironments: A Goldilocks Principle‐Based Approach for Microscale Cell Culture,” Advanced Science 9 (2022): 2104510, 10.1002/advs.202104510. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Hulikova A., Harris A. L., Vaughan‐Jones R. D., and Swietach P., “Regulation of Intracellular pH in Cancer Cell Lines under Normoxia and Hypoxia,” Journal of Cellular Physiology 228 (2013): 743–752, 10.1002/jcp.24221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Schito L. and Semenza G. L., “Hypoxia‐Inducible Factors: Master Regulators of Cancer Progression,” Trends in Cancer 2 (2016): 758–770, 10.1016/j.trecan.2016.10.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Wicks E. E. and Semenza G. L., “Hypoxia‐Inducible Factors: Cancer Progression and Clinical Translation,” Journal of Clinical Investigation 132 (2022), 10.1172/JCI159839. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Arias C. F., Acosta F. J., Bertocchini F., and Fernandez‐Arias C., “Redefining the Role of Hypoxia‐Inducible Factors (HIFs) in Oxygen Homeostasis,” Communications Biology 8 (2025): 446, 10.1038/s42003-025-07896-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Semenza G. L., “Regulation of Metabolism by Hypoxia‐Inducible Factor 1,” Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology 76 (2011): 347–353, 10.1101/sqb.2011.76.010678. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. White B., Wang Z., Dean M., et al., “Acidosis Attenuates the Hypoxic Stabilization of HIF‐1α by Activating Lysosomal Degradation,” Journal of Cell Biology 224 (2025): 202409103, 10.1083/jcb.202409103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Tang X., Lucas J. E., Chen J. L., et al., “Functional Interaction Between Responses to Lactic Acidosis and Hypoxia Regulates Genomic Transcriptional Outputs,” Cancer Research 72 (2012): 491–502, 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-2076. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Prado‐Garcia H., Campa‐Higareda A., and Romero‐Garcia S., “Lactic Acidosis in the Presence of Glucose Diminishes Warburg Effect in Lung Adenocarcinoma Cells,” Frontiers in Oncology 10 (2020): 807, 10.3389/fonc.2020.00807. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Chen M. M., Chen C. Y., Shen Z. W., et al., “Extracellular pH Is a Biomarker Enabling Detection of Breast Cancer and Liver Cancer Using CEST MRI,” Oncotarget 8 (2017): 45759–45767, 10.18632/oncotarget.17404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Coman D., Huang Y., Rao J. U., et al., “Imaging the Intratumoral–Peritumoral Extracellular pH Gradient of Gliomas,” NMR in Biomedicine 29 (2016): 309–319, 10.1002/nbm.3466. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Murdter T. E., Friedel G., Backman J. T., et al., “Dose Optimization of a Doxorubicin Prodrug (HMR 1826) in Isolated Perfused Human Lungs: Low Tumor pH Promotes Prodrug Activation by β‐Glucuronidase,” Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics 301 (2002): 223–228, 10.1124/jpet.301.1.223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Anemone A., Consolino L., Conti L., et al., “Tumour Acidosis Evaluated in Vivo by MRI‐CEST pH Imaging Reveals Breast Cancer Metastatic Potential,” British Journal of Cancer 124 (2021): 207–216, 10.1038/s41416-020-01173-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Tang Y. Y., Xiao G., Shen Z. W., et al., “Noninvasive Detection of Extracellular pH in Human Benign and Malignant Liver Tumors Using CEST MRI,” Frontiers in Oncology 10 (2020): 578985, 10.3389/fonc.2020.578985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Ferrauto G., Di Gregorio E., Auboiroux V., et al., “CEST‐MRI for Glioma pH Quantification in Mouse Model: Validation by Immunohistochemistry,” NMR in Biomedicine 31 (2018): 4005, 10.1002/nbm.4005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Liu G., Li Y., Sheth V. R., and Pagel M. D., “Imaging in Vivo Extracellular pH With a Single Paramagnetic Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer Magnetic Resonance Imaging Contrast Agent,” Molecular Imaging 11 (2012): 47–57, 10.2310/7290.2011.00026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Duwel S., Hundshammer C., Gersch M., et al., “Imaging of pH in Vivo Using Hyperpolarized 13C‐Labelled Zymonic Acid,” Nature Communications 8 (2017): 15126, 10.1038/ncomms15126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Samouilov A., Efimova O. V., Bobko A. A., et al., “In Vivo Proton–Electron Double‐Resonance Imaging of Extracellular Tumor pH Using an Advanced Nitroxide Probe,” Analytical Chemistry 86 (2014): 1045–1052, 10.1021/ac402230h. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Komarov D. A., Ichikawa Y., Yamamoto K., et al., “In Vivo Extracellular pH Mapping of Tumors Using Electron Paramagnetic Resonance,” Analytical Chemistry 90 (2018): 13938–13945, 10.1021/acs.analchem.8b03328. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Chen L. Q. and Pagel M. D., “Evaluating pH in the Extracellular Tumor Microenvironment Using CEST MRI and Other Imaging Methods,” Advanced Radiology 2015 (2015): 206405, 10.1155/2015/206405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Blaszczak W. and Swietach P., “What Do Cellular Responses to Acidity Tell Us about Cancer?” Cancer and Metastasis Reviews 40 (2021): 1159–1176, 10.1007/s10555-021-10005-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Corbet C., Pinto A., Martherus R., et al., “Acidosis Drives the Reprogramming of Fatty Acid Metabolism in Cancer Cells Through Changes in Mitochondrial and Histone Acetylation,” Cell Metabolism 24 (2016): 311–323, 10.1016/j.cmet.2016.07.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Pelletier J., Bellot G., Gounon P., et al., “Glycogen Synthesis Is Induced in Hypoxia by the Hypoxia‐Inducible Factor and Promotes Cancer Cell Survival,” Frontiers in Oncology 2 (2012): 18, 10.3389/fonc.2012.00018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Swietach P., Boedtkjer E., and Pedersen S. F., “How Protons Pave the Way to Aggressive Cancers,” Nature Reviews Cancer 23 (2023): 825–841, 10.1038/s41568-023-00628-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Aydogan Gokturk P., Sujanani R., Qian J., et al., “The Donnan Potential Revealed,” Nature Communications 13 (2022): 5880, 10.1038/s41467-022-33592-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Damaghi M., Mori H., Byrne S., et al., “Collagen Production and Niche Engineering: A Novel Strategy for Cancer Cells to Survive Acidosis in DCIS and Evolve,” Evolutionary Applications 13 (2020): 2689–2703, 10.1111/eva.13075. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Zhou Z. H., Song J. W., Li W., et al., “The Acid‐Sensing Ion Channel, ASIC2, Promotes Invasion and Metastasis of Colorectal Cancer Under Acidosis by Activating the Calcineurin/NFAT1 Axis,” Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research 36 (2017): 130, 10.1186/s13046-017-0599-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Hu P., Li S., Tian N., et al., “Acidosis Enhances the Self‐Renewal and Mitochondrial Respiration of Stem Cell‐Like Glioma Cells Through CYP24A1‐Mediated Reduction of Vitamin D,” Cell Death & Disease 10 (2019): 25, 10.1038/s41419-018-1242-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Lamonte G., Tang X., Chen J. L., et al., “Acidosis Induces Reprogramming of Cellular Metabolism to Mitigate Oxidative Stress,” Cancer & Metabolism 1 (2013): 23, 10.1186/2049-3002-1-23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Kondo A., Yamamoto S., Nakaki R., et al., “Extracellular Acidic pH Activates the Sterol Regulatory Element‐Binding Protein 2 to Promote Tumor Progression,” Cell Reports 18 (2017): 2228–2242, 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.02.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Peppicelli S., Bianchini F., Toti A., et al., “Extracellular Acidity Strengthens Mesenchymal Stem Cells to Promote Melanoma Progression,” Cell Cycle 14 (2015): 3088–3100, 10.1080/15384101.2015.1078032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Hofschroer V., Koch K. A., Ludwig F. T., et al., “Extracellular Protonation Modulates Cell‐Cell Interaction Mechanics and Tissue Invasion in Human Melanoma Cells,” Scientific Reports 7 (2017): 42369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Menard J. A., Christianson H. C., Kucharzewska P., et al., “Metastasis Stimulation by Hypoxia and Acidosis‐Induced Extracellular Lipid Uptake Is Mediated by Proteoglycan‐Dependent Endocytosis,” Cancer Research 76 (2016): 4828–4840, 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-15-2831. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. John S., Sivakumar K. C., and Mishra R., “Extracellular Proton Concentrations Impacts LN229 Glioblastoma Tumor Cell Fate via Differential Modulation of Surface Lipids,” Frontiers in Oncology 7 (2017): 20, 10.3389/fonc.2017.00020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Gao J., Guo Z., Cheng J., et al., “Differential Metabolic Responses in Breast Cancer Cell Lines to Acidosis and Lactic Acidosis Revealed by Stable Isotope Assisted Metabolomics,” Scientific Reports 10 (2020): 21967, 10.1038/s41598-020-78955-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Marino M. L., Pellegrini P., Di Lernia G., et al., “Autophagy Is a Protective Mechanism for Human Melanoma Cells Under Acidic Stress,” Journal of Biological Chemistry 287 (2012): 30664–30676, 10.1074/jbc.M112.339127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Yao J., Czaplinska D., Ialchina R., et al., “Cancer Cell Acid Adaptation Gene Expression Response Is Correlated to Tumor‐Specific Tissue Expression Profiles and Patient Survival,” Cancers 12 (2020): 2183, 10.3390/cancers12082183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Moellering R. E., Black K. C., Krishnamurty C., et al., “Acid Treatment of Melanoma Cells Selects for Invasive Phenotypes,” Clinical & Experimental Metastasis 25 (2008): 411–425, 10.1007/s10585-008-9145-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Sutoo S., Maeda T., Suzuki A., and Kato Y., “Adaptation to Chronic Acidic Extracellular pH Elicits a Sustained Increase in Lung Cancer Cell Invasion and Metastasis,” Clinical & Experimental Metastasis 37 (2020): 133–144, 10.1007/s10585-019-09990-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Zhou Z. H., Wang Q. L., Mao L. H., et al., “Chromatin Accessibility Changes Are Associated With Enhanced Growth and Liver Metastasis Capacity of Acid‐Adapted Colorectal Cancer Cells,” Cell Cycle 18 (2019): 511–522, 10.1080/15384101.2019.1578145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Wojtkowiak J. W., Rothberg J. M., Kumar V., et al., “Chronic Autophagy Is a Cellular Adaptation to Tumor Acidic pH Microenvironments,” Cancer Research 72 (2012): 3938–3947, 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-3881. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Urbanelli L., Buratta S., Logozzi M., et al., “Lipidomic Analysis of Cancer Cells Cultivated at Acidic pH Reveals Phospholipid Fatty Acids Remodelling Associated With Transcriptional Reprogramming,” Journal of Enzyme Inhibition and Medicinal Chemistry 35 (2020): 963–973, 10.1080/14756366.2020.1748025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Logozzi M., Mizzoni D., Angelini D. F., et al., “Microenvironmental pH and Exosome Levels Interplay in Human Cancer Cell Lines of Different Histotypes,” Cancers 10 (2018): 370, 10.3390/cancers10100370. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73. Michl J., Wang Y., Monterisi S., et al., “CRISPR‐Cas9 Screen Identifies Oxidative Phosphorylation as Essential for Cancer Cell Survival at Low Extracellular pH,” Cell Reports 38 (2022): 110493, 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.110493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74. Michl J., White B., Monterisi S., et al., “Phenotypic Screen of Sixty‐Eight Colorectal Cancer Cell Lines Identifies CEACAM6 and CEACAM5 as Markers of Acid Resistance,” PNAS 121 (2024): 2319055121, 10.1073/pnas.2319055121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75. Michl J., Park K. C., and Swietach P., “Evidence‐Based Guidelines for Controlling pH in Mammalian Live‐Cell Culture Systems,” Communications Biology 2 (2019): 144, 10.1038/s42003-019-0393-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76. Tanaka M. and Siemann D. W., “Therapeutic Targeting of the Gas6/Axl Signaling Pathway in Cancer,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences 22 (2021): 9953, 10.3390/ijms22189953. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77. Cook K. W., Xue W., Symonds P., et al., “Homocitrullination of Lysine Residues Mediated by Myeloid‐Derived Suppressor Cells in the Tumor Environment Is a Target for Cancer Immunotherapy,” Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer 9 (2021): 001910, 10.1136/jitc-2020-001910. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78. Shah S., Cook K. W., Symonds P., et al., “Vaccination With Post‐Translational Modified, Homocitrullinated Peptides Induces CD8 T‐Cell Responses That Mediate Antitumor Immunity,” Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer 11 (2023): 006966, 10.1136/jitc-2023-006966. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Supporting Information File 1: bies70101‐sup‐0001‐Appendix.docx.
Data Availability Statement
Equations for the spheroid and Krogh cylinder models are shown in the Supplement (Appendix). Models presented herein are available for download as stand‐alone executable files at: https://github.com/pawelswietach/Tumour‐pH‐simulations/releases/tag/v1.0.0.
