Skip to main content
Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences logoLink to Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences
. 2025 Dec 2;34:e58. doi: 10.1017/S2045796025100346

Comorbidity of undiagnosed mood symptoms with dementia risk in multi-regional multi-ethnic adults: evidence from epidemiological findings and plasma metabolites

Haoran Zhang 1,2, Yingqi Liao 3, Zhiying Lin 1, Haoxuan Wen 1, Ting Pang 1, Xuhao Zhao 1, Wanheng Zhang 1, Xiaowen Lou 1, Christopher Chen 3, Shaohua Hu 2,4,5,6, Zuyun Liu 1, Xin Xu 1,2,6,7,✉
PMCID: PMC12721985  PMID: 41328607

Abstract

Aims

To investigate the association of midlife and late-life undiagnosed mood symptoms, especially their comorbidity, with long-term dementia risk among multi-regional and ethnic adults.

Methods

The prospective study used data from the UK Biobank (N = 142,670; mean follow-up 11.0 years) and three Asian studies (N = 1,610; mean follow-up 4.4 years). Undiagnosed mood symptoms (manic symptoms, depressive symptoms and comorbidity of depressive and manic symptoms) and diagnosed mood disorders (depression, mania and bipolar disorders) were classified. Plasma levels of 168 metabolites were measured. The association between undiagnosed mood symptoms and 12-year dementia (including subtypes) risk and domain-specific cognitive function was examined. The contribution of metabolites in explaining the association between symptom comorbidity and dementia risk was estimated.

Results

Undiagnosed mood symptoms were prevalent (11.4% in the UK cohort and 31.2% in Asian cohorts) among 1,462 (1.0%) and 74 (19.4%) participants who developed dementia. Comorbidity of undiagnosed mood symptoms was associated with higher dementia risk (sub-distribution hazard ratios = 9.46; 95% confidence interval = 4.07–21.97), especially Alzheimer’s disease, and with worse reasoning ability, poorer numeric memory and metabolic dysfunction. Glucose and total Esterified Cholesterol explained 9.1% of the association between symptom comorbidity and dementia, with most of the contribution being from glucose (6.8%).

Conclusions

Comorbidity of undiagnosed mood symptoms was associated with a higher cumulative risk of dementia in the long term. Glucose metabolism could be implicated in the development of mood disorders and dementia. The distinctive pathophysiological mechanism between psychiatric and neurodegenerative disorders warrants further exploration.

Keywords: bipolar disorders, dementia, depression, mania, undiagnosed mood symptoms

Introduction

Dementia is a major global health challenge. Mental health conditions play a critical role in the development of dementia (Nielsen et al., 2024). Research found that 28.2% of patients with neurodegenerative diseases had a clinically diagnosed psychiatric disorder, of which depression was the most common (Woolley et al., 2011). Evidence strongly suggested that mood disorders including depressive disorder (Fernández Fernández et al., 2024), mania (Stevenson-Hoare et al., 2024) and bipolar disorder (Liou et al., 2023) can increase the risk of dementia in middle-aged and elderly adults, both in the short-term (prior to the onset of dementia) and long-term (decades after the first episode of psychiatric disorder) (Liu et al., 2024). Furthermore, it was reported that bipolar disorder posed a higher risk than depressive disorder (Stevenson-Hoare et al., 2024). However, there is an overlap between psychiatric disorders and dementia, due to similar clinical manifestations of behavioural and psychological symptoms (Liu et al., 2024). Patients may hence receive delayed, inappropriate treatment and suffer greater distress (Woolley et al., 2011).

Studies have found that, prior to mood disorders diagnosis, early-onset depressive symptoms were associated with the development of dementia (Kaup et al., 2016). Emerging evidence also demonstrated the association between manic symptoms and disease progression in dementia patients (Elefante et al., 2023). However, there is a clear overlap between depressive and manic symptoms, as it was reported that manic and depressive symptoms are not bipolar opposites, but rather complementary in exacerbating presence and severity (Born et al., 2021). Presently, depressive symptoms are easily recognized in clinical practice (Born et al., 2021), as a large proportion of patients with bipolar disorder seek medical assistance during the depressive episodes (Young and Grunze, 2013). Nevertheless, manic symptoms are easily overlooked due to patients’ poor compliance in self-reporting (Benacek et al., 2024), making the diagnosis and treatment of bipolar disorder more challenging. Neglecting early manic symptoms could be associated with an overestimation of the depression burden, as well as the misdiagnosis and mistreatment of the bipolar disorder spectrum.

Previous dementia research mainly focused on specific mood symptoms, overlooking symptom co-occurrence (Petkus et al., 2024). Compared to single mood symptoms, studies showed that the comorbidity of mood symptoms was associated with disrupted structure and functioning of the brain (Pinto et al., 2018) and caused cumulative damage to higher levels of physical disease comorbidities (metabolic or cardiovascular disease) (Rise et al., 2016). Therefore, early recognition of concomitant mood symptoms could facilitate the integrated management of potential mood disorders and dementia at an earlier stage. However, there is limited evidence regarding the effect of midlife and late-life mood symptoms, especially their comorbidity, on the risk of long-term dementia. Moreover, previous research mainly targeted a single population, and evidence from multiregional and ethnic populations, particularly in Asia, is limited (Kaup et al., 2016; Liou et al., 2023; Liu et al., 2024).

The objective of the present study was to explore the associations of midlife and late-life undiagnosed mood symptoms and their comorbidity with cognitive impairment and long-term dementia risk, and to further investigate the potential role of metabolites in these associations. The present study used the UK Biobank (UKB) as a discovery dataset and validated the major findings in Asian cohorts of both clinical and community settings. We hypothesized that mood symptoms were prevalent among incident dementia patients. Individuals with comorbidity of mood symptoms had a higher cumulative risk of earlier-onset dementia, compared to those with single or no mood symptoms. Furthermore, we aimed to examine whether the comorbidity of mood symptoms had distinctive domain-specific cognitive impairment patterns compared with single or no symptoms. Plasma metabolomics provides a way to assess genetic, environmental and pathological changes during disease development (Zhang et al., 2022), and hence offers insights into disease aetiology. Previous studies have found that metabolic profile was independently associated with mood disorders (Godin et al., 2014; Saunders et al., 2016) and dementia (Zhang et al., 2022; Zhao et al., 2024). However, the mechanisms underlying the associations between mood symptoms and dementia are unclear. Hence, it remains necessary to further investigate the potential contribution of metabolites in explaining the association between mood symptoms and dementia risk.

Method

Participants

The overall study design was a prospective cohort study with a 12-year duration in the discovery dataset and a 6-year duration in the validation dataset. In the discovery dataset, 502,461 participants completed the baseline assessment from 2006 to 2010, followed by three follow-up visits (2012–2013, 2014+ and 2019+). In the validation dataset, 2175 participants completed the baseline assessment with annual follow-up across 6 years of visits. There were no overlapping participants between datasets.

Discovery dataset

The UKB is a population-based cohort from the United Kingdom (Biobank UK, 2007). Participants who completed mood symptoms assessments at least once in three visits were included for subsample analysis.

Validation dataset

Three multi-ethnic Asian studies were included. The Singapore memory clinic cohort is a 6-year cohort (Zhang et al., 2024c) and was used to examine the longitudinal association between undiagnosed mood symptoms and incident dementia. The Epidemiology of Dementia in Singapore (EDIS) (Zhang et al., 2024b) and Hangzhou (Zhang et al., 2024a) studies are community-based cross-sectional studies from Singapore and China, respectively. All three studies were used to examine the cross-sectional association of undiagnosed mood symptoms with cognitive impairment.

With dementia in older adults garnering much attention, the impact of early-onset dementia has been relatively understudied (Feng et al., 2025). Thus, the target population comprised both midlife and older people aged >35 years old. To identify our targeted participants with undiagnosed mood symptoms and to examine the longitudinal incidence of mood disorders, we excluded participants who were diagnosed with mood disorders at baseline.

In both datasets, we included participants who: (1) were aged >35; (2) completed mood symptoms assessments. Participants were excluded if they (1) were diagnosed with dementia at baseline; (2) were diagnosed with mood disorders, including depression, mania and bipolar disorder at baseline; (3) had malignant neoplasm; or (4) had significant auditory and visual impairments. Metabolomic analysis was performed in the subset of participants from UKB who underwent metabolomics measurement and across the full dementia risk gradient.

All study participants signed informed consent before the study. The UKB study was approved by the North West Multi-Centre Research Ethics Committee as a Research Tissue Bank. EDIS and Singapore memory clinic cohort studies were approved by both the Singapore Eye Research Institute and the National Healthcare Group Domain-Specific Review Board. The Hangzhou study was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee in Zhejiang University School of Public Health. All included studies were approved by the institutional review board.

Undiagnosed mood symptoms assessments

Undiagnosed mood symptoms were defined as the presence of mood symptoms based on established questionnaires and cutoffs, but without valid clinical diagnoses of any mood disorders according to the DSM-IV and ICD-10. Standardized cutoffs for respective questionnaires were applied to define mood symptoms based on established literature. Detailed questionnaires and definitions can be found in Table S1.

For the discovery dataset, mood symptoms, including depressive and manic symptoms, were assessed using the Patient Health Questionnaire-2 (Gao et al., 2023) and a previously established definition (Zhang et al., 2024c). For the validation datasets, manic symptoms were defined using agitation, disinhibition, irritability, elation or aberrant motor behaviours items in the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (Zhang et al., 2024b). Depressive symptoms were identified using the Geriatric Depression Scale (Zhang et al., 2024a).

Baseline occurrence of mood symptoms was categorized into one of four symptom groups: (1) Euthymic, (2) Manic, (3) Depressive, (4) Comorbidity of depressive and manic.

Dementia and mood disorders diagnosis

In UKB, the diagnosis of dementia and mood disorders, including their respective subtypes, was based on the ICD-10 (Table S2) (Zhang et al., 2024c).

Incident dementia and mood disorders were recorded. All-cause dementia was further categorized into three subtypes: AD, vascular dementia and other dementia. To compare the differential progression between undiagnosed mood symptoms and dementia, and diagnosed mood disorders and dementia, and consider the influence of mood disorder diagnosis before dementia. All-cause dementia was further categorized into two types. MD-Dementia was defined as having been diagnosed with at least one mood disorder prior to dementia. MS-Dementia was defined as the presence of undiagnosed mood symptom(s) without being diagnosed with any mood disorder prior to dementia.

In EDIS and the memory clinic cohort, the diagnosis of dementia was made by the DSM-IV (Zhang et al., 2024b, 2024c). In the Hangzhou study, the diagnosis of dementia was made by Clinical Dementia Rating scale (global score ≥1) and the 5-min Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA, global score ≤4) according to previous research (Zhang et al., 2024c).

Cognitive assessments

Baseline cognitive functions were assessed. In UKB, touchscreen tests were administered, including reasoning, numeric memory, pairs matching and reaction time (Cornelis et al., 2022). In the validation datasets, full MoCA (5-min MoCA in Hangzhou) and a standardized neuropsychological test battery were used to assess cognitive functioning (Table S3) (Zhang et al., 2024c).

Metabolomics measurement

In UKB, biological samples were collected from participants during their baseline visit between 2006 and 2010 (Biobank UK, 2025). Metabolomic profiling was performed using a high-throughput nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) metabolomics platform, which provides absolute quantification of metabolites directly from serum with high reproducibility and considering batch effects. Quality control was applied during measurement and pre-processing, such as removal of values affected by interfering substances. Detailed protocols for sample collection and methodology for the NMR pipeline were described elsewhere (Soininen et al., 2015; Würtz et al., 2017). We included 168 available metabolic biomarkers that were directly measured (Table S4). The values of each metabolic biomarker were transformed using natural logarithmic transformation (ln[x + 1]) followed by Z normalization prior to analysis (Jia et al., 2024).

A multi-nominal model with least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) penalization was employed for feature selection, and then multivariable linear regression models were used for effects estimation by regressing undiagnosed mood symptoms on differential metabolites and considering all demographic variables (Jia et al., 2024; Pirruccello et al., 2022). An optimal λ was selected via tenfold cross-validation.

Covariates

Covariates included baseline age, sex, ethnicity, Townsend deprivation index in quintiles, education level, smoking status, drinking status and body mass index status (normal [<25 kg/m2], overweight [25–30 kg/m2] and obese [≥30 kg/m2]). In the validation dataset, available data, including age, sex, education level and smoking status, were included as covariates.

Statistical analysis

The characteristics of participants were summarized according to depressive and manic symptoms groups. Categorical variables were expressed as frequencies and percentages, and continuous variables were expressed as mean and standard deviation (SD). Chi-square test and analysis of variance (ANOVA) were used for categorical and continuous variables, respectively.

First, we explored the association of early depressive and manic symptoms with the incidence of dementia and its different types. Competing risk analysis was performed using the Fine-Gray sub-distribution hazard models, and death before dementia was set as a competing event. Participants were followed up until the date of first diagnosis of dementia, death, loss to follow-up or 13 March 2021 (last date of all-cause dementia reported), whichever came first. Cumulative incidence function curves were constructed to compare the dementia risks over time across different depressive and manic symptoms groups. Time-dependent explanatory variables were constructed to test time-dependent sHRs and proportional hazards assumption (Cornelis et al., 2022). If the proportional hazards assumption was not fulfilled, time-dependent hazards models were constructed by introducing time interactions and time-varying effects were reported. Subgroup analyses were performed by age (midlife adults: <60, older adults: ≥60) and sex.

Multivariable linear regression models were used to analyse the association of mood symptoms with global and domain-specific cognitive Z-scores, and selected metabolites. Models were adjusted for all covariates. The contribution of metabolites in explaining the association between symptom comorbidity and dementia incidence was also estimated (Xu et al., 2023). In the validation dataset, two-step individual participant data meta-analyses with random effects were employed to pool effects across studies. I2 and τ2 statistics were reported to reflect heterogeneity between studies (Zhang et al., 2024c).

A series of sensitivity analyses was conducted. Firstly, to address the violation of the proportional hazards assumption and investigate potential reverse causation due to preclinical dementia affecting exposure status prior to a dementia diagnosis, restricting to two separate follow-up periods: ≤6 years, and >6 years; Secondly, to verify the independent association between undiagnosed mood symptoms and dementia, setting mood disorders as a competing event; Thirdly, additionally adjusting for diabetes, stroke and heart diseases; Fourthly, additionally adjusting for baseline global cognitive scores; Fifthly, additionally adjusting for regular physical activity and the number of people living together in the household; Sixthly, using multiple imputation by chained equation to impute the missing data of covariates, and comparing the main results between imputed and complete datasets.

All analyses were conducted using R version 4.4.1 (R Project for Statistical Computing). Statistical significance was defined as a 2-sided p < 0.05.

Results

Demographic characteristics of participants

The study schematic is shown in Figure 1, and the flowchart is shown in Figure S1. In UKB, 146,270 participants were included, of whom 3,766 (2.6%) had manic symptoms, 7,868 (5.4%) had depressive symptoms and 764 (0.5%) had comorbidity of depressive and manic symptoms. The Asian sample comprised 1,610 participants, of whom 207 (12.9%) had manic symptoms, 105 (6.5%) had depressive symptoms and 34 (2.1%) had symptom comorbidity (Table 1). In UKB, participants with comorbidity of undiagnosed mood symptoms had a higher prevalence of undiagnosed mood symptoms at follow-ups, with 47.4% of them still maintaining at least one symptom (Figure S2).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Study schematic.

Study schematic showing the study design and major findings. Four undiagnosed mood symptom categories were generated: (1) euthymic, (2) manic symptoms, (3) depressive symptoms, (4) comorbidity of depressive and manic symptoms. Incident mood disorders (depression, mania and bipolar) and dementia were diagnosed and recorded. Primary outcome was dementia risk. Secondary outcomes were domain-specific cognitive function and metabolic dysfunction.

Table 1.

Sample characteristics of the discovery and validation datasets

UKB

Memory clinic cohort

EDIS

Hangzhou

Euthymic

Manic

Depressive

Depressive and manic

Euthymic

Manic

Depressive

Depressive and manic

Euthymic

Manic

Depressive

Depressive and manic

Euthymic

Manic

Depressive

Depressive and manic

N, %

133,872 (91.5)

3,766 (2.6)

7,868 (5.4)

764 (0.5)

286 (75.1)

59 (15.5)

29 (7.6)

7 (1.8)

701 (83.9)

66 (7.9)

53 (6.3)

16 (1.6)

277 (70.8)

82 (20.9)

23 (5.9)

11 (2.8)

Location

United Kingdom

Singapore

Singapore

Hangzhou, China

Period of data collection

2006−2021

2010−2022

2009−2015

2021−2023

Ethnicity, %

White (92.0)

Chinese (86.6), Indian (6.3), Malayan (6.3)

Chinese (34.4), Indian (30.6), Malayan (34.9)

Chinese (100)

Age, mean (SD), y

57.4 (8.1)

54.6 (8.3)

54.8 (8.0)

52.4 (7.7)a

71.7 (8.0)

72.4 (6.6)

71.3 (7.4)

65.3 (8.8)

69.7 (6.5)

69.1 (5.8)

71.8 (6.1)

71.6 (5.9)

70.7 (8.7)

70.5 (7.9)

72.3 (8.8)

70.4 (7.7)

Sex, male, %

61,641 (46.0)

1,988 (52.8)

3,335 (42.4)

372 (48.7)a

124(43.4)

28 (47.5)

17 (58.6)

4 (57.1)

335 (47.8)

35 (53.0)

26 (49.1)

7 (43.8)

100 (36.1)

27 (32.9)

6 (26.1)

5 (45.5)

TDI, %

1 (least deprived)

23,103 (17.3)

503 (13.4)

799 (10.2)

64 (8.4)

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

5 (Most deprived)

25,047 (18.7)

1,008 (26.8)

2,829 (36.0)

319 (41.8)a

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Education, %

None

18,546 (13.9)

401 (10.6)

1,706 (21.7)

149 (19.5)

33 (11.5)

6 (10.2)

5 (17.2)

0 (0.0)

135 (19.3)

10 (15.2)

11 (20.8)

6 (37.5)

40 (14.7)

12 (14.8)

5 (22.7)

3 (30.0)

Primary

70,740 (52.8)

2,097 (55.7)

3,510 (44.6)

360 (47.1)

95 (33.2)

18 (30.5)

8 (27.6)

3 (42.9)

294 (41.9)

30 (45.5)

28 (52.8)

7 (43.8)

120 (44.1)

38 (46.9)

9 (40.9)

1 (10.0)

Secondary and above

43,555 (32.5)

1,245 (33.1)

2,519 (32.0)

243 (31.8)a

158 (55.2)

35 (59.3)

16 (55.2)

4 (57.1)

272 (38.8)

26 (39.4)

14 (26.4)

3 (18.8)

112 (41.2)

31 (38.3)

8 (36.4)

6 (60.0)

Smoking status, %

Never

74,744 (55.8)

1,674 (44.5)

4,262 (54.2)

336 (44.0)

220 (76.9)

42 (71.2)

20 (69.0)

4 (57.1)

510 (72.9)

50 (75.8)

35 (66.0)

10 (62.5)

224 (80.9)

66 (80.5)

16 (69.6)

9 (81.8)

Previous

46,671 (34.9)

1,415 (37.6)

2,238 (28.4)

214 (28.0)

43 (15.0)

13 (22.0)

6 (20.7)

2 (28.6)

123 (17.6)

8 (12.1)

11 (20.8)

3 (18.8)

27 (9.7)

7 (8.5)

5 (21.7)

1 (9.1)

Current

12,066 (9.0)

670 (17.8)

1,341 (17.0)

212 (27.7)a

23 (8.0)

4 (6.8)

3 (10.3)

1 (14.3)

67 (9.6)

8 (12.1)

7 (13.2)

3 (18.8)

26 (9.4)

9 (11.0)

2 (8.7)

1 (9.1)

Drinking status, %

Never

5,588 (4.2)

158 (4.2)

841 (10.7)

59 (7.7)

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Previous

4,361 (3.3)

200 (5.3)

522 (6.6)

63 (8.2)

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Current

123,848 (92.5)

3,405 (90.4)

6,489 (82.5)

640 (83.8)a

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

BMI, %

Normal

45,238 (33.8)

1,096 (29.1)

2,232 (28.4)

204 (26.7)

NA

NA

NA

NA

641 (91.7)

58 (87.9)

47 (88.7)

14 (87.5)

NA

NA

NA

NA

Overweight

56,769 (42.4)

1,570 (41.7)

2,912 (37.0)

277 (36.3)

NA

NA

NA

NA

50 (7.2)

6 (9.1)

6 (11.3)

2 (12.5)

NA

NA

NA

NA

Obese

31,074 (23.2)

1,061 (28.2)

2,599 (33.0)

267 (34.9)a

NA

NA

NA

NA

8 (1.1)

2 (3.0)

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

NA

NA

NA

NA

Diabetes, %

6,978 (5.2)

244 (6.5)

799 (10.2)

86 (11.3)a

71 (24.8)

20 (33.9)

10 (34.5)

5 (71.4)a

247 (35.2)

23 (34.8)

22 (41.5)

5 (31.2)

44 (16.4)

17 (20.7)

9 (39.1)

2 (18.2)

Stroke, %

1,927 (1.4)

75 (2.0)

202 (2.6)

29 (3.8)a

54 (18.9)

14 (23.7)

8 (27.6)

3 (42.9)

32 (4.6)

4 (6.1)

4 (7.5)

0 (0.0)

23 (12.0)

9 (12.7)

1 (5.9)

1 (11.1)

Heart diseases, %

5,233 (3.9)

158 (4.2)

462 (5.9)

46 (6.0)a

36 (12.6)

7 (11.9)

7 (24.1)

2 (28.6)

66 (9.4)

7 (10.6)

7 (13.2)

2 (12.5)

58 (21.6)

14 (17.1)

5 (21.7)

2 (18.2)

Global cognitive score

0.02 (0.92)

0.04 (0.92)

−0.30 (1.05)

−0.32 (1.02)a

0.03 (0.63)

−0.07 (0.60)

−0.10 (0.62)

−0.25 (0.64)

0.03 (0.59)

−0.06 (0.67)

−0.21 (0.52)

−0.43 (0.47)a

NA

NA

NA

NA

MoCA, mean (SD)

NA

NA

NA

NA

21.71 (4.98)

20.44 (4.76)

21.28 (5.28)

21.86 (4.74)

19.58 (4.97)

18.29 (5.79)

18.02 (4.78)

16.00 (4.50)a

8.22 (2.16)

8.28 (2.51)

7.30 (2.79)

8.44 (2.19)

a

p < 0.05 for group comparison.

BMI, body mass index; EDIS, Epidemiology of Dementia in Singapore; MoCA, Montreal Cognitive Assessment; NA, not applicable; SD, standard deviation; TDI, Townsend deprivation index; UKB, UK Biobank.

Association of undiagnosed mood symptoms with incident dementia

During a mean (SD) follow-up of 11.0 (1.3) and 4.4 (1.3) years in the UKB and Singapore memory clinic cohort, 1,462 (1.0%) and 74 (19.4%) participants developed incident dementia, among whom 167 (11.4%) and 23 (31.2%) had baseline undiagnosed mood symptoms. In UKB, 445 (0.3%) developed Alzheimer’s disease (AD). The accumulative average time (SD) to onset of dementia was 7.7 (2.7), 7.0 (2.9) and 6.1 (3.1) years in the euthymic, single symptom and symptom comorbidity groups, respectively.

In UKB, among those with single or comorbid symptoms, 118 (70.7%) experienced MS-Dementia, with an average duration (SD) between the presence of undiagnosed mood symptoms and dementia onset being 7.5 (2.7) years. Among 49 (33.3%) participants who experienced MD-Dementia, the average duration (SD) between the presence of mood disorders and dementia onset was 1.7 (2.2) years (Figure 2a and Table S5).

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

(a) The time duration and percentage of MS-Dementia and MD-Dementia. (b, c) The association of undiagnosed mood symptoms with global and domain-specific scores. Figure b shows the average cognitive scores. Figure c shows coefficients and 95% CI of multivariable linear regression. Models were adjusted for age, sex, ethnicity, quintiles of TDI, education levels, smoking status, drinking status and BMI status. BMI, body mass index; CI, confidence interval; TDI, Townsend deprivation index; MD-Dementia, mood disorder to dementia; MS-Dementia, mood symptom to dementia.

Individuals with undiagnosed mood symptoms comorbidity had a higher cumulative risk of developing dementia compared to euthymic individuals (sub-distribution hazard ratios [sHR], 9.46; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.07–21.97), those with manic symptoms (sHR, 6.14; 95% CI, 2.84–13.29) and those with depressive symptoms (sHR, 2.59; 95% CI, 1.44–4.66) (Table 2, Figure S3A). A stronger association was observed between symptom comorbidity and AD (Table S6). Participants with symptom comorbidity presented higher risk of both MD-Dementia and MS-Dementia (Table S7, Figure S3B and C). A time-attenuated effect was found in the association between undiagnosed mood symptoms and the risk of dementia, AD, and MS-Dementia (time interaction p < 0.05, Table 2, Tables S6 and S7).

Table 2.

Association between undiagnosed mood symptoms and incident all-cause dementia

Discovery in UKBa

Validation in Singapore memory clinic cohortb

Cases/total no.

sHR (95% CI)

p value

Cases/total no.

sHR (95% CI)

p value

Group

Euthymic

1,295/133,872 (1.0%)

Reference

51/286 (17.8%)

Reference

Manic

30/3,766 (0.8%)

1.54 (1.02, 2.34)

0.042

17/59 (28.8%)

1.71 (0.99, 2.94)

0.055

Depressive

122/7,868 (1.6%)

3.66 (2.25, 5.94)

<0.001

3/29 (10.3%)

0.66 (0.21, 2.09)

0.480

Depressive and manic

15/764 (2.0%)

9.46 (4.07, 21.97)

<0.001

3/7 (42.9%)

4.32 (2.10, 8.88)

<0.001

Group*time

NA

0.96 (0.93, 0.99)

0.006

NA

NA

Group

Manic

30/3,766 (0.8%)

Reference

17/59 (28.8%)

Reference

Depressive

122/7,868 (1.6%)

2.37 (1.49, 3.78)

<0.001

3/29 (10.3%)

0.39 (0.11, 1.31)

0.130

Depressive and manic

15/764 (2.0%)

6.14 (2.84, 13.29)

<0.001

3/7 (42.9%)

2.53 (1.09, 5.85)

0.030

Group

Depressive

122/7,868 (1.6%)

Reference

3/29 (10.3%)

Reference

Depressive and manic

15/764 (2.0%)

2.59 (1.44, 4.66)

0.002

3/7 (42.9%)

6.53 (1.80, 23.70)

0.004

a

Models were adjusted for age, sex, ethnicity, quintiles of TDI, education levels, smoking status, drinking status and BMI status.

b

Models were adjusted for age, sex, education levels and smoking status.

BMI, body mass index; CI, confidence interval; sHR, sub-distribution hazard ratio; NA, not applicable; TDI, Townsend deprivation index; UKB, UK Biobank.

Individuals with undiagnosed mood symptoms comorbidity in the Asian memory-clinic cohort also conferred a greater risk of developing dementia (Table 2).

Association of undiagnosed mood symptoms with cognitive function

Comorbidity of undiagnosed mood symptoms was associated with worse overall cognitive function, compared with euthymic (B, −0.32; 95% CI, −0.38 to 0.25) and manic symptoms (B, −0.25; 95% CI, −0.32 to 0.18). Compared to those with depressive symptom, participants with comorbidity of undiagnosed mood symptoms still had poor cognitive performance (B, −0.09; 95% CI, −0.15 to 0.03), especially in reasoning (B, −0.08; 95% CI, −0.15 to 0.01) and numeric memory (B, −0.27; 95% CI, −0.41 to 0.12) (Figure 2b and c). In the validation datasets, we also observed a progressive cognitive impairment in participants with euthymic, single symptom and symptom comorbidity (Reference: Euthymic; B, − 0.27; 95% CI, −0.45 to 0.09; I2 = 0%; Figure S4).

Metabolomics analysis of undiagnosed mood symptoms

A total of 71,464 participants were included in the metabolic analysis. Using LASSO regression, 116 metabolites were identified, and the associations between undiagnosed mood symptoms and the selected metabolites are shown in Figure 3a and b. Furthermore, the individuals with undiagnosed mood symptoms comorbidity had lower levels of degree of unsaturation of fatty acids, and higher levels of glucose, compared to those with manic symptoms (Figure 3b). Glucose and total Esterified Cholesterol explained 9.1% of the association between undiagnosed mood symptoms comorbidity and dementia, with most of the contribution being from glucose (6.8%) (Table S8). There was a progressive change in metabolite levels from euthymic to single symptom to symptom comorbidity (Figure 3c).

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Associations of undiagnosed mood symptoms with selected differential metabolic biomarkers. (a, b) Coefficients of multivariable linear regression. (a) Reference group was euthymic group. (b) Reference group was manic or depressive symptoms. Coefficients were expressed using colours, with red for positive and blue for inverse associations. The darker colour represented stronger magnitude. Models were adjusted for age, sex, ethnicity, quintiles of TDI, education levels, smoking status, drinking status and BMI status. Figure c shows the mean values of 33 metabolites remained significant after Bonferroni-corrected multivariable linear regression analysis across the four groups. BMI, body mass index; Ref; reference; TDI, Townsend deprivation index.

Stratified and sensitivity analysis

In the older adults’ group, 1,274 (1.9%) participants developed dementia. Stratified analysis showed that the comorbidity of undiagnosed mood symptoms was associated with a higher risk of dementia in both midlife and older adults, and in both male and female (Table S9). The results were consistent when restricting to two separate follow-up periods (Table S10). When considering mood disorders as a competing event, compared to depressive symptoms, mood symptoms comorbidity was not only associated with a higher risk of developing mental disorders (sHR, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.52–2.17), but also with a higher risk of developing dementia (sHR, 2.69; 95% CI, 1.37–5.29) (Table S11). The results remained robust after additionally controlling for diabetes, stroke, heart diseases, global cognitive score, regular physical activity and the number of people living together in the household (Table S12), as well as in the imputed dataset (Table S13).

Discussion

The present study found that undiagnosed comorbid mood symptoms were prevalent among incident dementia patients. Comorbidity of mid- and late-life undiagnosed mood symptoms was independently associated with an earlier onset and a higher risk of dementia, especially AD, in both European and Asian people. Furthermore, participants with undiagnosed mood symptoms comorbidity had worse cognitive function and metabolic dysfunction. Glucose metabolism could be implicated in the development of mood disorders and dementia.

First of all, undiagnosed mood symptoms were prevalent among incident dementia patients. The results showed that prevalence of manic symptoms in the Asian sample (12.9%) was higher than in the UKB sample (2.6%). Our findings were comparable with previous studies (Elefante et al., 2023; Smith et al., 2013; Xu et al., 2022; Zhang et al., 2024c). The difference between the Asian sample and the UKB sample could possibly be due to the older mean age in the Asian sample, as compared to the UKB sample (70.5 vs 57.2 years of age). The use of different questionnaires could also contribute to the different prevalence. The average durations from undiagnosed mood symptoms and disorders to dementia onset were 7.5 and 1.7 years, respectively. Previous studies also found that there was a short interval from the first diagnosis of psychiatric disorder to onset of dementia, and the incidence of all psychiatric diagnoses reached a peak in the year prior to dementia diagnosis (Stevenson-Hoare et al., 2024). In concordance with previous findings, our results highlighted the importance of identifying undiagnosed mood symptoms and their comorbidity, which could aid identification of more individuals at a higher risk of neurodegeneration and advance the management window for both mood and cognitive disorders by a long shot.

We observed that participants with undiagnosed mood symptoms comorbidity had an earlier onset and a higher risk of dementia, especially AD, than those with single symptom or euthymic. Our results were consistent with previous findings showing that bipolar disorder was associated with a higher risk of dementia than unipolar depressive disorder across studies conducted around the world (Liou et al., 2023; Liu et al., 2024; Stevenson-Hoare et al., 2024). In addition, depressive or manic symptoms were associated with higher risk of dementia compared to euthymic individual, which was in line with previous studies (Elefante et al., 2023; Kaup et al., 2016; Koga et al., 2022). The results further validate that undiagnosed mood symptoms comorbidity could be an independent risk factor for incident dementia.

When assessing global and individual cognitive functioning, participants with undiagnosed mood symptoms comorbidity also showed the worst cognitive function. Previous studies found that patients with bipolar disorder have worse cognitive function than those with major depressive disorder (Bo et al., 2019). Moreover, compared to those with depressive symptoms, participants with undiagnosed mood symptoms comorbidity exhibited a similar pattern but worse cognitive impairment, especially in reasoning and numeric memory domains, which align with previous findings of impaired cognitive domains in bipolar disorder (Liu et al., 2024; Montejo et al., 2022). As reasoning and memory are important domains in cognitive reserve (Aichele, 2024), previous studies found that participants with higher level of cognitive reserve could be more resilient to both cognitive impairment and mood symptoms (Camprodon-Boadas et al., 2024; Marselli et al., 2024). Future studies should investigate the role of cognitive reserve in the association between mood symptoms and cognitive impairment.

The results from metabolomics confirm and complement the epidemiological results, showing that there was an increased metabolic dysfunction ranging from euthymic to single symptom to symptom comorbidity. Although depression and mania share abnormalities in neurobiological pathways, such as neuroinflammation (Poletti et al., 2024; Sălcudean et al., 2025), there could be unique neurobiological underpinnings between depression and mania, resulting in cumulative damage to the brain structure and functioning (Pinto et al., 2018). Previous studies suggested that glucose and cholesterol metabolic abnormalities could underlie the association between mood symptoms and dementia (Steardo et al., 2019; Yang et al., 2024). Impaired glucose metabolism in individuals with mood symptoms could damage neuronal function, causing neuroinflammation and oxidative stress, which contribute to neurodegeneration (Campbell and Campbell, 2024; Łojko et al., 2019). In addition, altered cholesterol metabolism could disrupt membrane integrity and synaptic function, and contribute to the development of neuritic plaque and neurofibrillary pathology (He et al., 2024; Varma et al., 2021). We also observed a higher prevalence of cardiovascular diseases in participants with comorbidity of mood symptoms, which could be supported by vascular depression hypothesis. Vascular disease not only influences neural connectivity, but also promotes inflammatory process (Chen et al., 2021; Taylor et al., 2013). Furthermore, chronic neuroinflammation could cause a decline in homeostatic functions of microglia, disrupting synaptic and neuronal function, eventually contributing to the development of both neurodegenerative and neuropsychiatric disorders (Lecca et al., 2022; Sălcudean et al., 2025; Sobue et al., 2023).

Although our results illustrate a single risk trajectory from mood symptoms to dementia, the ‘mood-dementia’ pathway could be bidirectional, sharing common underlying drivers such as neuroinflammation and hypothalamus–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis. Neuroinflammation process could mutually reinforce both dementia and mood symptoms (Lecca et al., 2022; Sălcudean et al., 2025). Under chronic inflammation, the HPA axis dysfunction and glucocorticoid changes could link mood disorders and dementia through shared cerebrovascular impairment in addition to alterations in oxidant stress and kynurenine metabolism (Sapsford et al., 2022).

The study has strengths and limitations. Firstly, to our knowledge, this is the first study to explore the association of early undiagnosed mood symptoms comorbidity with long-term dementia risk in midlife and older adults, providing insight for identifying an earlier management window for both mood and cognitive disorders. Secondly, the study included cohorts from different regions and ethnic groups, covering both community and clinical settings, thus demonstrating the generalizability of study results to other populations. The limitations included a possible reverse causation bias, although a longitudinal study design and sensitivity analysis restricting follow-up periods were applied. Secondly, the prevalence of mood symptoms differed between the Asian and UKB samples, possibly due to differences in participants’ mean age (70.5 vs 57.2 years of age) and the use of different questionnaires. Future studies with more consistent sampling and measurements are warranted to enhance the generalizability of the results. Thirdly, the potential imbalance between exposure groups may introduce confounding bias, although potential covariates were controlled and several sensitivity analyses were conducted. Fourthly, the study lacks evaluation of symptom severity for a more in-depth dose-response relationship exploration. Lastly, as our metabolomics analysis was cross-sectional, further longitudinal studies and validation in multi-regional populations are needed.

The present study highlighted the high prevalence of undiagnosed comorbid mood symptoms among incident dementia patients from multi-regional and multi-ethnic settings. Comorbidity of mid- and late-life undiagnosed mood symptoms was associated with long-term higher cumulative risk of dementia, especially AD. Furthermore, glucose metabolism could be implicated in the development of mood disorders to dementia. The distinctive pathophysiological mechanism between psychiatric and neurodegenerative disorders warrants further exploration.

Supporting information

Zhang et al. supplementary material

Zhang et al. supplementary material

DOI: 10.1017/S2045796025100346.sm001

Acknowledgements

We thank all participants for their involvement and the staff of UK Biobank for data collection and participant follow-up.

Supplementary material

The supplementary material for this article can be found at https://doi.org/10.1017/S2045796025100346.

Availability of data and materials

The data used during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. The data from UK Biobank are openly available at [https://www.ukbiobank.ac.uk/], reference number [61856].

Author contributions

Study design and concept: X.X., H.Z., S.H. and Z. Liu. Data acquisition, analysis and interpretation: H.Z., X.X., Y. L. and Z. Lin. Drafting of the manuscript: H.Z., Y.L., Z. Lin, H.W. and X.X. Critical revision of the manuscript for intellectual content: All authors. Statistical analysis: H.Z., Y.L. and Z. Lin. Obtained funding: X.X., S.H. and C.C. Study supervision: X.X., S.H. and Z. Liu. S.H. and Z. Liu can also be contacted for correspondence, email dorhushaohua@zju.edu.cn and zuyunliu@zju.edu.cn.

Financial support

This study was funded by the Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC/72274170, NSFC/82201733), Zhejiang Provincial Key R&D program (2025C02108), the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2023YFC2506200) and the Center Grant from the Singapore National Medical Research Council (NMRC/CG/NUHS/2010 and NMRC/CG/013/2013). The funders had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Competing interests

The authors report no financial relationships with commercial interests.

Ethical standards

The authors assert that all procedures contributing to this work comply with the ethical standards of the relevant national and institutional committees on human experimentation and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000. All study participants signed informed consent before the study. The UKB study was approved by the North West Multi-Centre Research Ethics Committee as a Research Tissue Bank. EDIS and Singapore memory clinic cohort studies were approved by both the Singapore Eye Research Institute and the National Healthcare Group Domain-Specific Review Board. The Hangzhou study was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee in Zhejiang University School of Public Health.

References

  1. Aichele SR (2024) Cognitive reserve as residual variance in cognitive performance: latent dimensionality, correlates, and dementia prediction. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 30(8), 746–754. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Benacek J, Lawal N, Ong T, Tomasik J, Martin-Key NA, Funnell EL, Barton-Owen G, Olmert T, Cowell D and Bahn S (2024) Identification of predictors of mood disorder misdiagnosis and subsequent help-seeking behavior in individuals with depressive symptoms: gradient-boosted tree machine learning approach. JMIR Mental Health 11, e50738. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Biobank UK (2007) UK Biobank: protocol for a Large-Scale Prospective Epidemiological Resource. Available online: https://www.ukbiobank.ac.uk/media/gnkeyh2q/study-rationale.pdf (Accessed on 12 November 2024).
  4. Biobank UK (2025) Biological samples. Available online: https://www.ukbiobank.ac.uk/about-our-data/biological-samples/ (Accessed on 3 November 2025).
  5. Bo Q, Dong F, Li X, Li F, Li P, Yu H, He F, Zhang G, Wang Z, Ma X and Wang C (2019) Comparison of cognitive performance in bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, unaffected first‐degree relatives, and healthy controls. Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences 73(2), 70–76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Born C, Grunze H, Post RM, Altshuler LL, Kupka R, McElroy SL, Frye MA, Suppes T, Keck PE, Nolen WA and Schaerer L (2021) Mania and bipolar depression: Complementing not opposing Poles—a post-hoc analysis of mixed features in manic and hypomanic episodes. International Journal of Bipolar Disorders 9(1), 36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Chen Y, Qin Z, Wang Y, Li X, Zheng Y and Liu Y (2021) Role of inflammation in vascular disease-related perivascular adipose tissue dysfunction. Frontiers in Endocrinology 12, 710842. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Campbell IH and Campbell H (2024) The metabolic overdrive hypothesis: Hyperglycolysis and glutaminolysis in bipolar mania. Molecular Psychiatry 29(5), 1521–1527. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Camprodon-Boadas P, De Prisco M, Rabelo-da-ponte FD, Sugranyes G, Clougher D, Baeza I, Torrent C, Castro-Fornieles J, Tosetti Y, Vieta E, de la Serna E and Amoretti S (2024) Cognitive reserve and cognition in mood disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychiatry Research 339, 116083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Cornelis MC, Agarwal P, Holland TM and van Dam RM (2022) MIND dietary pattern and its association with cognition and incident dementia in the UK biobank. Nutrients 15(1), 32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Elefante C, Brancati GE, Torrigiani S, Amadori S, Ricciardulli S, Pistolesi G, Lattanzi L and Perugi G (2023) Bipolar disorder and manic-like symptoms in Alzheimer’s, vascular and frontotemporal dementia: a systematic review. Current Neuropharmacology 21(12), 2516. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Feng S, Wang T, Su Y, Yan J, Wang Y, Zhang Z, Yin C and Zhai H (2025) Global burden, risk factors, and projections of early-onset dementia: insights from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. Ageing Research Reviews 104, 102644. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Fernández Fernández R, Martín JI and M A M A (2024) Depression as a Risk factor for dementia: A meta-analysis. The Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences 36(2), 101–109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Gao X, Geng T, Jiang M, Huang N, Zheng Y, Belsky DW and Huang T (2023) Accelerated biological aging and risk of depression and anxiety: evidence from 424,299 UK Biobank participants. Nature Communications 14(1), 2277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Godin O, Etain B, Henry C, Bougerol T, Courtet P, Mayliss L, Passerieux C, Azorin J-M, Kahn J-P, Gard S, Costagliola D and Leboyer M, FondaMental Advanced Centers of Expertise in Bipolar Disorders (FACE-BD) Collaborators (2014) Metabolic syndrome in a French cohort of patients with bipolar disorder: results from the FACE-BD cohort. The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 75(10), 1078–1085. quiz 1085. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. He K, Zhao Z, Zhang J, Li D, Wang S and Liu Q (2024) Cholesterol metabolism in neurodegenerative diseases. Antioxidants & Redox Signaling 41(16–18), 1051–1072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Jia X, Fan J, Wu X, Cao X, Ma L, Abdelrahman Z, Zhao F, Zhu H, Bizzarri D, van den Akker EB, Slagboom PE, Deelen J, Zhou D and Liu Z (2024) A novel metabolomic aging clock predicting health outcomes and its genetic and modifiable factors. Advanced Science 11(43), 2406670. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kaup AR, Byers AL, Falvey C, Simonsick EM, Satterfield S, Ayonayon HN, Smagula SF, Rubin SM and Yaffe K (2016) Trajectories of depressive symptoms in older adults and risk of dementia. JAMA Psychiatry 73(5), 525. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Koga S, Sekiya H, Martin NB and Dickson DW (2022) Late-onset mania in autopsy-confirmed Lewy body disease: a rare symptom of prodromal dementia with Lewy bodies? Bipolar Disorders 24(6), 683–684. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Łojko D, Owecki M and Suwalska A (2019) Impaired glucose metabolism in bipolar patients: the role of psychiatrists in its detection and management. International Journal of Environmental Research & Public Health 16(7), 1132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Lecca D, Jung YJ, Scerba MT, Hwang I, Kim YK, Kim S, Modrow S, Tweedie D, Hsueh S-C, Liu D, Luo W, Glotfelty E, Li Y, Wang J-Y, Luo Y, Hoffer BJ, Kim DS, McDevitt RA and Greig NH (2022) Role of chronic neuroinflammation in neuroplasticity and cognitive function: a hypothesis. Alzheimer’s & Dementia 18(11), 2327–2340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Liou Y-J, Tsai S-J, Bai Y-M, Chen T-J and Chen M-H (2023) Dementia risk in middle-aged patients with schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and major depressive disorder: a cohort study of 84,824 subjects. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience 273(1), 219–227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Liu Y, Xiao X, Yang Y, Yao R, Yang Q, Zhu Y, Yang X, Zhang S, Shen L and Jiao B (2024) The risk of AlzheimerAlzheimer’s disease and cognitive impairment characteristics in eight mental disorders: a UK Biobank observational study and Mendelian randomization analysis. Alzheimer’s & Dementia 20(7), 4841. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Marselli G, Favieri F, Forte G, Corbo I, Agostini F, Guarino A and Casagrande M (2024) The protective role of cognitive reserve: an empirical study in mild cognitive impairment. BMC Psychology 12(1), 334. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Montejo L, Torrent C, Jiménez E, Martínez‐Arán A, Blumberg HP, Burdick KE, Chen P, Dols A, Eyler LT, Forester BP, Gatchel JR, Gildengers A, Kessing LV, Miskowiak KW, Olagunju AT, Patrick RE, Schouws S, Radua J, Bonnín Del M C and Vieta E and Force I S for B D (ISBD) O A with B D (OABD) T (2022) Cognition in older adults with bipolar disorder: an ISBD task force systematic review and meta-analysis based on a comprehensive neuropsychological assessment. Bipolar Disorders 24(2), 115–136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Nielsen JL, Kaltoft K, Wium-Andersen IK, Wium-Andersen MK and Osler M (2024) Association of early- and late-life bipolar disorder with incident dementia. A Danish cohort study. Journal of Affective Disorders 367, 367–373. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Petkus AJ, Wang X, Younan D, Salminen LE, Resnick SM, Rapp SR, Espeland MA, Gatz M, Widaman KF, Casanova R, Chui H, Barnard RT, Gaussoin SA, Goveas JS, Hayden KM, Henderson VW, Sachs BC, Saldana S, Shadyab AH, Shumaker SA and Chen J-C (2024) 20-year depressive symptoms, dementia, and structural neuropathology in older women. Alzheimer’s & Dementia: The Journal of the Alzheimer’s Association 20(5), 3472–3484. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Pinto JV, Passos IC, Librenza-Garcia D, Marcon G, Schneider MA, Conte JH, da Silva JPA, Lima LP, Quincozes-Santos A, Kauer-Sant Anna M and Kapczinski F (2018) Neuron-glia interaction as a possible pathophysiological mechanism of bipolar disorder. Current Neuropharmacology 16(5), 519–532. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Pirruccello JP, Lin H, Khurshid S, Nekoui M, Weng L-C, Vasan RS, Isselbacher EM, Benjamin EJ, Lubitz SA, Lindsay ME and Ellinor PT (2022) Development of a prediction model for ascending aortic diameter among asymptomatic individuals. JAMA 328(19), 1935. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Poletti S, Mazza MG and Benedetti F (2024) Inflammatory mediators in major depression and bipolar disorder. Translational Psychiatry 14(1), 247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Rise IV, Haro JM and Gjervan B (2016) Clinical features, comorbidity, and cognitive impairment in elderly bipolar patients. Neuropsychiatric Disease & Treatment 12, 1203–1213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Sălcudean A, Popovici R-A, Pitic DE, Sârbu D, Boroghina A, Jomaa M, Salehi MA, Kher AAM, Lica MM, Bodo CR and Enatescu VR (2025) Unraveling the complex interplay between neuroinflammation and depression: a comprehensive review. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 26(4), 1645. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Sapsford TP, Johnson SR, Headrick JP, Branjerdporn G, Adhikary S, Sarfaraz M and Stapelberg NJC (2022) Forgetful, sad and old: do vascular cognitive impairment and depression share a common pre-disease network and how is it impacted by ageing? Journal of Psychiatric Research 156, 611–627. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Saunders EFH, Ramsden CE, Sherazy MS, Gelenberg AJ, Davis JM and Rapoport SI (2016) Omega-3 and omega-6 polyunsaturated fatty acids in bipolar disorder. The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 77(10), e1301–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Smith DJ, Nicholl BI, Cullen B, Martin D, Ul-Haq Z, Evans J, Gill JMR, Roberts B, Gallacher J, Mackay D, Hotopf M, Deary I, Craddock N and Pell JP (2013) Prevalence and characteristics of probable major depression and bipolar disorder within UK biobank: Cross-sectional study of 172,751 participants. PloS One 8(11), e75362. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Sobue A, Komine O and Yamanaka K (2023) Neuroinflammation in Alzheimer’s disease: Microglial signature and their relevance to disease. Inflammation and Regeneration 43(1), 26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Soininen P, Kangas AJ, Würtz P, Suna T and Ala-Korpela M (2015) Quantitative serum nuclear magnetic resonance metabolomics in cardiovascular epidemiology and genetics. Circulation: Cardiovascular Genetics 8(1), 192–206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Steardo L, Fabrazzo M, Sampogna G, Monteleone AM, D’Agostino G, Monteleone P and Maj M (2019) Impaired glucose metabolism in bipolar patients and response to mood stabilizer treatments. Journal of Affective Disorders 245, 174–179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Stevenson-Hoare J, Legge SE, Simmonds E, Han J, Owen MJ, O’Donovan M, Kirov G and Escott-Price V (2024) Severe psychiatric disorders are associated with increased risk of dementia. BMJ Mental Health 27(1), e301097. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Taylor WD, Aizenstein HJ and Alexopoulos GS (2013) The vascular depression hypothesis: Mechanisms linking vascular disease with depression. Molecular Psychiatry 18(9), 963–974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Varma VR, Büşra Lüleci H, Oommen AM, Varma S, Blackshear CT, Griswold ME, An Y, Roberts JA, O’Brien R, Pletnikova O, Troncoso JC, Bennett DA, Çakır T, Legido-Quigley C and Thambisetty M (2021) Abnormal brain cholesterol homeostasis in Alzheimer’s disease—a targeted metabolomic and transcriptomic study. Npj Aging and Mechanisms of Disease 7(1), 11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Woolley JD, Khan BK, Murthy NK, Miller BL and Rankin KP (2011) The diagnostic challenge of psychiatric symptoms in neurodegenerative disease: Rates of and risk factors for prior psychiatric diagnosis in patients with early neurodegenerative disease. The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 72(2), 126–133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Würtz P, Kangas AJ, Soininen P, Lawlor DA, Davey Smith G and Ala-Korpela M (2017) Quantitative serum nuclear magnetic resonance metabolomics in large-scale epidemiology: A primer on -omic technologies. American Journal of Epidemiology 186(9), 1084–1096. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Xu X, Mishra GD, Holt-Lunstad J and Jones M (2023) Social relationship satisfaction and accumulation of chronic conditions and multimorbidity: A national cohort of Australian women. General Psychiatry 36(1), e100925. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Xu X, Ni Kan C, Li-Hsian Chen C and Hilal S (2022) Long-term neurobehavioral correlates of brain cortical microinfarcts in a memory clinic cohort in Singapore. International Journal of Stroke 17(2), 218–225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Yang S, Li Y, Tang Q, Zhang Y and Shao T (2024) Glucose metabolic abnormality: A crosstalk between depression and alzheimer’s disease. Current Neuropharmacology 23(7), 757. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Young AH and Grunze H (2013) Physical health of patients with bipolar disorder. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 127(s442), 3–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Zhang H, Chen R, Ma A, Li W, Zhao X, Pang T, Wen H, Qu H and Xu X (2024c) The association between abdominal obesity and depressive symptoms among Chinese adults: Evidence from national and regional communities. Journal of Affective Disorders 365, 49–55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Zhang H, Wang Y, Zhang Y, Hilal S, Cheng C-Y, Wong TY, Chen C, Venketasubramanian N and Xu X (2024a) Housing status is protective of neuropsychiatric symptoms among dementia-free multi-ethnic Asian elderly. BMC Geriatrics 24(1), 698. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Zhang H, Wen H, Zhao X, Huang H, Ge Q, Chen C, Xiao S, Liu Z and Xu X (2024b) Cardiometabolic multimorbidity and neuropsychiatric disturbances in multiregional older adults. Alzheimer’s & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring 16(4), e70007. [Google Scholar]
  51. Zhang X, Hu W, Wang Y, Wang W, Liao H, Zhang X, Kiburg KV, Shang X, Bulloch G, Huang Y, Zhang X, Tang S, Hu Y, Yu H, Yang X, He M and Zhu Z (2022) Plasma metabolomic profiles of dementia: A prospective study of 110,655 participants in the UK Biobank. BMC Medicine 20(1), 252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Zhao X, Xu X, Yan Y, Lipnicki DM, Pang T, Crawford JD, Chen C, Cheng C-Y, Venketasubramanian N, Chong E, Blay SL, Lima-Costa MF, Castro-Costa E, Lipton RB, Katz MJ, Ritchie K, Scarmeas N, Yannakoulia M, Kosmidis MH, Gureje O, Ojagbemi A, Bello T, Hendrie HC, Gao S, Guerra RO, Auais M, Gomez JF, Rolandi E, Davin A, Rossi M, Riedel-Heller SG, Löbner M, Roehr S, Ganguli M, Jacobsen EP, H C-C-C, Aiello AE, Ho R, Sanchez-Juan P, Valentí-Soler M, Del Ser T, Lobo A, De-la-cámara C, Lobo E, Sachdev PS and Xu X (2024) Independent and joint associations of cardiometabolic multimorbidity and depression on cognitive function: Findings from multi-regional cohorts and generalisation from community to clinic. The Lancet Regional Health –Western Pacific 51, 101198. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Zhang et al. supplementary material

Zhang et al. supplementary material

DOI: 10.1017/S2045796025100346.sm001

Data Availability Statement

The data used during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. The data from UK Biobank are openly available at [https://www.ukbiobank.ac.uk/], reference number [61856].


Articles from Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences are provided here courtesy of Cambridge University Press

RESOURCES