Skip to main content
PhytoKeys logoLink to PhytoKeys
. 2025 Dec 15;268:45–58. doi: 10.3897/phytokeys.268.174287

Sedum qingyuanense (Crassulaceae), a new species from Qingyuan, Guangdong, China

Xiao-Wei Yi 1, Zhi-Yi Xie 2, Xue-Gui Shen 3, Wei Xu 2, Qiu-Gen Zeng 3, Ke Tang 1, Yan-Shuang Huang 1, Qiang Fan 1,
PMCID: PMC12723398  PMID: 41445970

Abstract

This study describes a new species of Sedum (Crassulaceae), Sedum qingyuanensesp. nov. discovered in Qingyuan City, Guangdong Province, China. Morphologically, S. qingyuanense resembles S. alfredii and S. emarginatum. The new species may have previously been misidentified as S. alfredii. However, the new species can be readily distinguished from S. alfredii by its creeping sterile stems, opposite leaves, emarginate leaf apices, and smaller sepals. Compared to S. emarginatum, it is differentiated by its creeping sterile stems, smaller sepals, and conspicuous pseudopetioles. Phylogenetic analysis based on the nuclear ribosomal DNA internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region revealed that the new species forms a sister clade to S. emarginatum within Sedum sect. Sedum, supported by moderate to strong bootstrap support (> 80%). Integrating both morphological evidence and the phylogenetic tree, we establish it as an independent lineage.

Key words: New species, nrITS, phylogeny, Sedum

Introduction

The genus Sedum L. (Crassulaceae), comprising approximately 474 accepted species (WFO 2025), represents the most species-rich genus within the family. It has a broad distribution across temperate and subtropical regions of the Northern Hemisphere, with biodiversity hotspots concentrated in the Mediterranean Basin, Central America, the Himalayas, and East Asia (Stephenson 1994; Thiede and Eggli 2007). A few species extend into the Southern Hemisphere, particularly in Africa and South America. Sedum species typically exhibit herbaceous to subshrubby growth forms with succulent leaves and stems, an adaptation to xeric habitats such as deserts, cliffs, rock crevices, and sandy slopes (Thiede and Eggli 2007). Certain taxa, including Sedum lineare Thunb. and S. sarmentosum Bunge, are widely used in urban green roofing due to their compact growth habit, shallow root systems, stress tolerance, low maintenance requirements, and ornamental value (Schindler et al. 2019).

East Asia constitutes one of the major centers of Sedum diversity (Thiede and Eggli 2007; Ito et al. 2017a). According to the Flora of China (Fu and Ohba 2001), 121 Sedum species occur in China, of which 91 are endemic. These species are classified into three sections: sect. Oreades Fröd., sect. Sedum, and sect. Filipes Fröd., with the majority primarily distributed in southwestern China. Among them, Sect. Sedum represents the most species-rich group (Zou et al. 2025). It is characterized by convex ventral surfaces of carpels and follicles.

From 2005 to 2024, 18 new species of the genus Sedum have been described from China (Dai et al. 2025). Between 2024 and October 2025, an additional five species—S. orientalichinense Q. Fan & P. Li (Dai et al. 2025), S. guangxiense Yan Liu & C.Y.Zou (Zou et al. 2025), S. simingshanense Y.L.Xu (She et al. 2025a), S. yongkangense Y.L.Xu et Z.H.Chen (She et al. 2025b), and S. shunhuangense L.Wu & Z.L.Feng (Feng et al. 2025) —were published. As of 2025, the genus Sedum comprises 144 species in China, including 114 endemic species. During field surveys in Guangdong Province, southern China, this species was discovered growing on rocky slopes in Qingyuan City. The species morphologically resembles S. alfredii Hance and S. emarginatum Migo but is distinguished by its smaller sepals, creeping sterile stems, and conspicuous pseudopetioles. Phylogenetic analysis based on nrITS sequencing supports its status as an independent lineage. Morphological comparisons and molecular evidence confirm that S. qingyuanense represents a previously undescribed species within Sedum sect. Sedum. This paper provides a comprehensive morphological description, taxonomic discussion, and ecological illustrations of the new species.

Methods

Morphological study

To obtain fresh material for morphological analysis, detailed field investigations were conducted during the flowering period of the new species and its close relatives: S. emarginatum (Hangzhou), S. alfredii (Hangzhou and Guangzhou), S. jinglanii (ShaoGuan). Collected 4 specimens were thoroughly examined, dissected, and photographed. Living specimens of this new species were collected from TaiHe Grotto, Qingyuan City, Guangdong Province, China.

Digital specimens of related species were examined via the Chinese Virtual Herbarium (https://www.cvh.ac.cn/); and the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (https://www.gbif.org/) to obtain comparative morphological data. The holotype was collected from TaiHe Grotto, Qingyuan City, and is deposited in the Herbarium of Sun Yat-sen University (SYS!).

Molecular study

Fresh leaves from two individuals of S. qingyuanense were collected at TaiHe Grotto, Qingyuan City, and dried in silica gel. Total DNA was extracted using a modified CTAB method (Doyle and Doyle 1987). The partial internal transcribed spacer 1 (ITS1), the 5.8S ribosomal RNA gene, and the partial internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS2) region were amplified using the primers ITS1 and ITS4 (White et al. 1990), following PCR protocols from Huang et al. (2021).

We downloaded 74 ITS sequences from GenBank, representing 53 Sedum species (including subspecies and variants) and 3 outgroups (Table 1). Greenovia aizoon, Aeonium viscatum and A. lancerottense were selected as outgroups (Huang et al. 2023). Ultimately, a total of 79 sequences were used to construct the phylogenetic tree, including the sequence of S. qingyuanense and our newly sequenced S. alfredii and S. emarginatum sequences.

Table 1.

Taxa, voucher information, GenBank accession numbers and references for ITS sequences of Sedum (S.) species and three outgroups used for phylogenetic analyses in this study.

Taxon Voucher Accession number Reference
S. actinocarpum Ito 1749 LC229265 Ito et al. 2017a
S. alfredii IBK194564 FJ919949 Wang and Shu unpublished
IBK114924 FJ919951 Wang and Shu unpublished
PX560094 Present Study
S. arisanense Ito 1842 LC229273 Ito et al. 2017a
Ito 1836 LC229272 Ito et al. 2017a
S. baileyi LBG0064555 FJ919935 Wang and Shu unpublished
S. bergeri AY352897 Ni et al. unpublished
S. boninense Ito 2371 LC229242 Ito et al. 2017a
S. bulbiferum Ito 416 LC229234 Ito et al. 2017a
130514hs41 KM111166 Xie et al. 2014
130524qz09 KM111165 Xie et al. 2014
S. brachyrinchum var. brachyrinchum Ito 1359 LC229274 Ito et al. 2017a
S. danjoense Ito 3658 LC260127 Ito et al. 2017b
S. emarginatum 130512hs27 KM111145 Xie et al. 2014
130529hz03 KM111146 Xie et al. 2014
130503jz21 KM111147 Xie et al. 2014
24041001 PP981038 Dai et al. 2025
24052201 PP981037 Dai et al. 2025
AYJT-Nanjing-0308-08 EU592006
PX560095 Present Study
PX560096 Present Study
S. erici-magnusii Ito 2077 LC229235 Ito et al. 2017a
S. erythrospermum Tsutsumi 1504 AB906473 Ito et al. 2014b
S. formosanum Ito1115 LC530813 Ito et al. 2020
Ito2296 LC260124 Ito et al. 2017b
S. hakonense Mayuzumi C00005 AB088625 Mayuzumi and Ohba 2004
S. hangzhouense Ito 2604 LC260130 Ito et al. 2017b
S. japonicum Kokubugata 16749 AB906475 Ito et al. 2014b
S. japonicum var. oryzifolium Ito 2285 LC229239 Ito et al. 2017a
S. japonicum var. pumilum Ito 2287 LC229240 Ito et al. 2017a
S. japonicum var. senanense Ito 2200 LC229238 Ito et al. 2017a
S. jinglanii Y. S. Huang 21040301 OP288035 Huang et al. 2023
DNPC 2873 OQ162326 Huang et al. 2023
S. jiulungshanense Ito 76 LC229243 Ito et al. 2017a
S. kiangnanense CMQ1030 LC229244 Ito et al. 2017a
S. lineare Mayuzumi C00120 AB088623 Mayuzumi and Ohba 2004
S. lipingense ZRB1479 MN150061 Zhang et al. 2019
S. lungtsuanense Ito 3563 LC260131 Ito et al. 2017b
S. makinoi Kokubugata 16730 AB906476 Ito et al. 2014b
S. mexicanum Ito 647 LC229247 Ito et al. 2017a
S. microsepalum Ito 2771 LC229282 Ito et al. 2017a
Ito 1965 LC229281 Ito et al. 2017a
S. morrisonense Ito 2765 LC229290 Ito et al. 2017a
Hornat S1 LM993281 Nikulin et al. 2016
S. multicaule Miyamoto et al. TI9596136 AB088631 Mayuzumi and Ohba 2004
S. nagasakianum Ito 2064 LC229249 Ito et al. 2017a
S. nokoense Kokubugata 10426 AB906478 Ito et al. 2014b
S. oligospermum Ito 74 LC229250 Ito et al. 2017a
S. oreades Rao 090803-03 KF113733 Zhang et al. 2014
S. polytrichoides subsp. polytrichoides CMQ1057 LC229251 Ito et al. 2017a
S. polytrichoides var. setouchiense Ito 2298 LC229253 Ito et al. 2017a
S. qingyuanense TH1001 PX560092 Present Study
TH1002 PX560093 Present Study
S. rupifragum Ito2070 LC229254 Ito et al. 2017a
S. sarmentosum Ito 978 LC229255 Ito et al. 2017a
S. satumense Ito 2295 LC229256 Ito et al. 2017a
S. sekiteiense Ito 1456 LC229295 Ito et al. 2017a
S. simingshanense - PP464049 She et al. 2025
- PP464048 She et al. 2025
S. subtile Ito 624 AB930277 Ito et al. 2014a
Shimizu 1999 AB088622 Mayuzumi and Ohba 2004
S. taiwanianum Ito 2770 LC229297 Ito et al. 2017a
Ito 2770 LC229296 Ito et al. 2017a
S. tetractinum Ito 3623 LC260135 Ito et al. 2017b
S. tianmushanense Ito 355 LC229261 Ito et al. 2017a
S. tosaense Kokubugata 16726 AB906483 Ito et al. 2014b
S. triactina 9596091 AB088629 Mayuzumi and Ohba 2004
S. tricarpum Ito 2269 LC229259 Ito et al. 2017a
- PP989617 -
S. trullipetalum Miyamoto et al. 9420132 AB088630 Mayuzumi and Ohba 2004
S. truncatistigmum Ito 3254 LC229306 Ito et al. 2017a
S. xunvense - PV101948 Chai et al. 2024
- PV101947 Chai et al. 2024
S. yabeanum Ito 396 AB906490 Ito et al. 2014b
S. zentaro-tashiroi Ohba 1998 AB088619 Mayuzumi and Ohba 2004
Outgroups
Aeonium lancerottense Mort 1518 AY082143 Mort et al. 2002
Aeonium viscatum Mort 1432 AY082154 Mort et al. 2002
Greenovia aizoon Mort 1425 AY082112 Mort et al. 2002

Sequence alignment was performed using MAFFT v7.505 (Katoh and Standley 2013) with the ‘--auto’ strategy. The initial alignment was manually inspected and refined in BioEdit v7.2.5 to correct misalignments in hypervariable regions. Maximum Likelihood (ML) phylogenetic inference was conducted using IQ-TREE 2.1.4 (Minh et al. 2020). The best-fit nucleotide substitution model was determined through the built-in ModelFinder utility, which selected the SYM+I+G4 model under the Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC). Branch support was assessed through standard non-parametric bootstrap analysis with 3,000 replicates. Bayesian inference (BI) analysis was conducted with MrBayes v.3.2.1 (nruns = 2, nchains = 4, mcmc = 30,000,000). The consensus tree was visualized and annotated in FigTree v1.4.4, with branches scaled by the expected number of substitutions per site and bootstrap support values (BS) displayed at the nodes.

Results and discussion

The final length of the aligned ITS sequences was 659 bp. Using these ITS data, we successfully constructed a Maximum Likelihood (ML) tree (Fig. 1). In the ML tree, Sedum qingyuanense was clearly distinguishable from its morphologically similar relatives, S. alfredii and S. emarginatum. It formed a distinct clade, positioned as a sister group to S. emarginatum, while S. alfredii was located on a separate branch of the tree. Notably, although S. qingyuanense appeared phylogenetically close to S. jinglanii in the ML tree, it can be unequivocally distinguished from this species morphologically. Moreover, their habitats are markedly distinct: S. jinglanii is endemic to the Danxia landscape of Danxiashan Mountain in Shaoguan City, whereas S. qingyuanense is restricted to the granite cliffs in TaiHe Grotto of Qingyuan City.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Maximum Likelihood phylogenetic tree constructed based on ITS sequences of S. qingyuanense and closely related species with Bayesian posterior probabilities mapped onto the branches. Node support values are given as bootstrap support value (BS) and Bayesian posterior probabilities (PP). S. qingyuanense is highlighted in yellow and bolded. The newly sequenced S. alfredii and S. emarginatum from this study are marked in blue.

This new species closely resembles S. alfredii morphologically and may have previously been misidentified as such. However, it can be differentiated by its smaller sepals, creeping sterile stems, opposite leaves, emarginate leaf apices, conspicuously pseudopetiolate, and consistently spatulate leaf shape. Because of its emarginate leaves and opposite phyllotaxy, S. qingyuanense may also be confused with S. emarginatum. However, the two species are readily distinguishable by differences in sepal size, leaf shape and size, presence of creeping sterile stems, and conspicuous pseudopetiolate. Morphological analyses of the putative new species and its relatives reveal that, despite some shared characteristics, they can be clearly distinguished by several diagnostic traits.

Based on our measurements and previous studies (Fu and Ohba 2001; Wu et al. 2012; Huang et al. 2023; Dai et al. 2025), we summarize and detail the morphological distinctions among these three species in Table 2.

Table 2.

Morphological comparisons of S. qingyuanense, S. alfredii, S. emarginatum, S. jinglanii.

Character Species
S. qingyuanense S. alfredii S. emarginatum S. jinglanii
Fertile stems 4–15 cm 10–20 cm 10–27 cm 10–15 cm
Phyllotaxy opposite,
sometimes alternate
alternate Opposite opposite
Leaf apex emarginate obtuse sometimes emarginate Emarginate obtuse sometimes emarginate
Leaf blade spatulate to broadly obovate linear-cuneate, spatulate, or obovate spatulate-obovate to broadly obovate spatulate or obovate
Leaf size 1.1–5.9 × 0.5–1.4 cm 1.2–3 × 0.2–0.6 cm 1–2 × 0.5–1 cm 0.8–2.9 × 0.4–1.2 cm
Pseudopetiolate conspicuously 8–24 mm inconspicuously Inconspicuously inconspicuously
Sterile stem creeping ascending absent ascending
Sepal shape linear-spatulate linear-spatulate lanceolate to narrowly oblong linear-spatulate
Sepal size 1.8–3.2 × 0.5–1.5 mm 3–5 × 1–1.5 mm 2–5 × 0.7–2 mm 2–3.1 × 0.7–1.4 mm
Flowering March–April April–May May–June April–May

Taxonomic treatment

. Sedum qingyuanense

X.W.Yi, Z.Y.Xie & Q.Fan sp. nov.

CAD17E2F-C962-523D-AF55-E9EA300D0A35

urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:77373284-1

Figs 2, 3, 4, 5

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Sedum qingyuanense. A. Flower; B. Petals and epipetalous stamens; C. Episepalous stamens; D. Back view of flower (with sepals); E. Sepals; F. Frontal and lateral aspects of carpels; G. Unripe follicles; H. Opened follicles; I. Unripe seeds; J. Flower compared with S. alfredii (left: S. alfredii; right: S. qingyuanense); K. Sepals compared with S. alfredii (upper: S. alfredii; lower: S. qingyuanense). Photos: XiaoWei Yi.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Sedum qingyuanense. A–B. Habitat; C. Leaves of a single S. qingyuanense; D. Immature cyme; E–G. Mature cyme. Photos: XiaoWei Yi & Ke Tang.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Sedum qingyuanense. A–B. Flowers; C. Follicles; D. Petal with stamen; E. Seed; F. Sepals; G. Leave; H. Bract; I. Basal leaf; J. Fertile stems; K. Sterile stems. Drawing by RongEn Wu.

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Holotype of Sedum qingyuanense.

Chinese name.

清远景天 (Qīng yuăn JĬng tiān).

Type.

China • Guangdong Province, Qingyuan City, TaiHe Grotto; on rocky cliff; 23.7553°N, 112.9807°E; 238 m a.s.l.; 18 April 2025; X.W.Yi & K.Tang QY-1001 (holotype: SYS00237022).

Diagnosis.

The new species is distinguished from its congeners by the combination of creeping sterile stems, conspicuous pseudopetiolate, and small linear-spatulate sepals (1.8–3.2 × 0.5–1.5 mm). It differs from close species, S. jinglanii, S. alfredii and S. emarginatum in having creeping sterile stems (vs. ascending sterile stems), smaller sepals and more distinctly pseudopetiolate. In addition, we have also provided photographs of S. emarginatum and S. alfredii (Fig. 6).

Figure 6.

Figure 6.

A–D.Sedum emarginatum from its type locality (LingYin Temple, HangZhou, ZheJiang, China); E, F.S. alfredii. Photos: YueLiang Xu.

Description.

Perennial herb, entirely glabrous. Stems succulent; fertile stems suberect 5–20 cm long, apex erect, usually 3-branched above; sterile stems present, creeping, rooting at nodes and producing new rosettes. Leaves opposite, conspicuously pseudopetiolate; leaf blades spatulate to broadly obovate, margin entire, apex emarginate, base attenuate with a spur, 1.1–5.9 × 0.5–1.4 cm. Cymes 3–8 cm in diameter, usually 3-branched, multiflowered; bracts obovate with an obtuse apex. Flowers sessile, 7–10 mm long, pentamerous, actinomorphic. Sepals 5, linear-spatulate, 1.8–3.2 × 0.5–1.5 mm, base spurred. Petals 5, yellow, lanceolate to lanceolate-oblong, 4–6 × 1.1–1.7 mm, apex acuminate, base connate ca. 0.3 mm. Stamens 10 antepetalous stamens ca. 3 mm long, adnate to petals for ca. 0.3 mm; antesepalous stamens ca. 4.5 mm long. Carpels 5, lanceolate, erect, connate at base, 3–4 mm long. Follicles obliquely divergent, many-seeded; placentation marginal. Seeds ovoid, brown at maturity, 0.6–0.8 mm long.

Phenology.

Flowering from March–April; fruiting in May.

Etymology.

The specific epithet refers to the distribution of this species in Qingyuan City.

Distribution and habitat.

The new species is endemic to Qingyuan City, Guangdong Province, southern China, growing on rocky cliffs at 200–300 m a.s.l.

Conservation status.

The Extent of Occurrence (EOO) and Area of Occupancy (AOO) were calculated following the guidelines of the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN 2024). All known occurrences of Sedum qingyuanense are currently restricted to a single locality—TaiHe Grotto, Qingxin District, Qingyuan City, Guangdong Province, China. The EOO was estimated using the minimum convex polygon method based on this single site, resulting in an EOO < 2 km2. The AOO was assessed using a standard 2 km × 2 km grid system, and as all individuals fall within one grid cell, the AOO is inferred to be ≤ 4 km2. Given that the entire population occurs in a heavily visited tourist area along roadsides and is subject to ongoing anthropogenic threats (e.g., trampling, habitat disturbance), and considering its extremely limited distribution, Sedum qingyuanense meets the criteria for Critically Endangered (CR) under B1ab(iii)+2ab(iii).

Supplementary Material

XML Treatment for Sedum qingyuanense

Acknowledgements

We are deeply grateful to the Qingyuan Forestry Bureau for their invaluable support throughout this research and extend our thanks to the Biological Museum of Sun Yat-sen University for their expert assistance in specimen preparation and conservation. Special acknowledgment goes to Yueliang Xu of the Zhejiang Museum of Natural History for providing high-quality samples and photographs of Sedum alfredii. We also extend our sincere thanks to Rong-En Wu for her skillful artwork in preparing the illustrations for this manuscript.

Additional information

Conflict of interest

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Ethical statement

No ethical statement was reported.

Use of AI

No use of AI was reported.

Funding

This work was supported by the 2024 Guangdong Province Ecological Quality Index (EQI) Monitoring Project(GPCGD241115FG155F)and the Foundation of Qingyuan Forestry Bureau (HT-99982024-0030).

Author contributions

Data curation: XWY. Funding acquisition: QF. Investigation: XGS, QGZ, XWY, WX, ZYX, KT. Project administration: QF. Resources: QF. Supervision: QF. Visualization: XWY, KT. Writing – original draft: XWY. Writing – review and editing: YSH.

Author ORCIDs

Xiao-Wei Yi https://orcid.org/0009-0004-8867-7418

Zhi-Yi Xie https://orcid.org/0009-0004-4443-4502

Xue-Gui Shen https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5619-7784

Wei Xu https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2907-0478

Qiu-Gen Zeng https://orcid.org/0009-0003-2250-4648

Ke Tang https://orcid.org/0009-0009-9108-5145

Qiang Fan https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4254-6936

Data availability

All of the data that support the findings of this study are available in the main text.

Supplementary materials

Supplementary material 1

Sedum qingyuanense paratype

This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.

Xiao-Wei Yi, Zhi-Yi Xie, Xue-Gui Shen, Wei Xu, Qiu-Gen Zeng, Ke Tang, Yan-Shuang Huang, Qiang Fan

Data type

jpg

References

  1. Chai M-L, Wu Y-M, Zhang Y, Pu J-B, Chen B, Xu Y-L, Li P. (2024) Sedum xunvense, a new species from Southeast China. Phytotaxa 644: 258–270. 10.11646/phytotaxa.644.4.2 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  2. Dai J-M, Xiong Y, Li P, Xu Y-L, Fan Q. (2025) A new species of Sedum (Crassulaceae) from eastern China based on morphological and molecular evidence. PhytoKeys 253: 271–285. 10.3897/phytokeys.253.119922 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Doyle JJ, Doyle JL. (1987) A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochemical Bulletin 19: 11–15. [Google Scholar]
  4. Feng Z-L, Liao X-W, Deng D, Tang L-P, Meng S-Y, Wu L. (2025) Sedum shunhuangense (Crassulaceae), a new species from Hunan, China. PhytoKeys 262: 305–320. 10.3897/phytokeys.262.159097 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Fu KT, Ohba H. (2001) Crassulaceae. In: Wu ZY, Raven PH. (Eds) Flora of China (Vol.8). Science Press, Beijing, China and Missouri Botanical Garden Press, St. Louis, USA, 202–268.
  6. Huang Y-S, Kang N, Zhong X-J, Liao W-B, Fan Q. (2021) A new species of Viola (Violaceae) from Guangdong Province, China. PhytoKeys 176: 67–76. 10.3897/phytokeys.176.65443 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Huang Y-S, Meng K-K, Sun Y-Y, Chen Z-X, Fan Q. (2023) A new species of Sedum (Crassulaceae) from Mount Danxia in Guangdong, China. PhytoKeys 221: 117–129. 10.3897/phytokeys.221.97495 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Ito T, Chen R, Yang Q-e, Saito Y, Yokota M, Kokubugata G. (2014a) Taxonomic reexamination of Sedum formosanum (Crassulaceae) in Japan, Taiwan, and the Philippines based on molecular data. The Journal of Phytogeography and Taxonomy 62: 1–9. 10.24517/00053566 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  9. Ito T, Nakamura K, Park C-H, Song G-P, Maeda A, Tanabe Y, Kokubugata G. (2014b) Nuclear and plastid DNA data confirm that Sedum tosaense (Crassulaceae) has a disjunct distribution between Pacific mainland Japan and Jeju Island, Korea. Phytotaxa 177: 221–230. 10.11646/phytotaxa.177.4.3 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  10. Ito T, Yu C-C, Nakamura K, Chung K-F, Yang Q, Fu C-X, Qi Z-C, Kokubugata G. (2017a) Unique parallel radiations of high-mountainous species of the genus Sedum (Crassulaceae) on the continental island of Taiwan. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 113: 9–22. 10.1016/j.ympev.2017.03.028 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Ito T, Nakanishi H, Chichibu Y, Minoda K, Kokubugata G. (2017b) Sedum danjoense (Crassulaceae), a new species of succulent plants from the Danjo Islands in Japan. Phytotaxa 309: 23–34. 10.11646/phytotaxa.309.1.2 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  12. Ito T, Yu C-C, Yokota M, Kokubugata G. (2020) Sedum formosanum subsp. miyakojimense (Crassulaceae), a new subspecies from Miyako-jima Island of the Ryukyu Islands, Japan. PhytoKeys 148: 51–70. 10.3897/phytokeys.148.48957 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. IUCN Standards and Petitions Committee (2024) Guidelines for Using the IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria. Version 16. Prepared by the Standards and Petitions Committee. https://www.iucnredlist.org/documents/RedListGuidelines.pdf [Accessed 25.03.2024]
  14. Katoh K, Standley DM. (2013) MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: Improvements in performance and usability. Molecular Biology and Evolution 30(4): 772–780. 10.1093/molbev/mst010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Mayuzumi S, Ohba H. (2004) The phylogenetic position of eastern Asian Sedoideae (Crassulaceae) inferred from chloroplast and nuclear DNA sequences. Systematic Botany 29: 587–598. 10.1600/0363644041744329 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  16. Minh BQ, Schmidt HA, Chernomor O, Schrempf D, Woodhams MD, von Haeseler A, Lanfear R. (2020) IQ-TREE 2: New models and efficient methods for phylogenetic inference in the genomic era. Molecular Biology and Evolution 37(5): 1530–1534. 10.1093/molbev/msaa015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Mort ME, Soltis DE, Soltis PS, Francisco-Ortega J, Santos-Guerra A. (2002) Phylogenetics and evolution of the Macaronesian clade of Crassulaceae inferred from nuclear and chloroplast sequence data. Systematic Botany 27: 271–288. [Google Scholar]
  18. Nikulin VY, Gontcharova SB, Stephenson R, Gontcharov AA. (2016) Phylogenetic relationships between Sedum L. and related genera (Crassulaceae) based on ITS rDNA sequence comparisons. Flora 224: 218–229. 10.1016/j.flora.2016.08.003 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  19. Schindler BY, Blaustein L, Vasl A, Kadas GJ, Seifan M. (2019) Cooling effect of Sedum sediforme and annual plants on green roofs in a Mediterranean climate. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 38: 392–396. 10.1016/j.ufug.2019.01.020 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  20. She S-Q, Li J-P, Xie W-Y, Yao S-H, Chen Z-H, Zhou X, Xu Y-L. (2025b) Sedum yongkangense (Crassulaceae), a New Species from Zhejiang, East China. Taxonomy 5: 15. 10.3390/taxonomy5010015 [DOI]
  21. She S-Q, Zhang Y, Zhou X, Peng Y-J, Yao S-H, Zhao X-X, Yang J, Xu Y-L. (2025a) Sedum simingshanense (Crassulaceae), a new species from Zhejiang, East China. PhytoKeys 251: 23–35. 10.3897/phytokeys.251.125595 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Stephenson R. (1994) Sedum: Cultivated Stonecrops. Timber Press, Portland, 355 pp. [Google Scholar]
  23. Thiede J, Eggli U. (2007) Crassulaceae. In: Kubitzki K. (Ed.) Flowering Plants Eudicots.The Families and Genera of Vascular Plants (Vol. 9). Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, 83–118. 10.1007/978-3-540-32219-1_12 [DOI]
  24. WFO (2025) World Flora Online. http://www.worldfloraonline.org
  25. White TJ, Bruns T, Lee S, Taylor J. (1990) Amplification and Direct Sequencing of Fungal Ribosomal RNA Genes for Phylogenetics. Academic Press, San Diego, 315–322. 10.1016/B978-0-12-372180-8.50042-1 [DOI]
  26. Wu L, Liu Y, Zhou S, Guo F, Bi D, Guo X, Baker A, Smith JAC, Luo Y. (2012) Sedum plumbizincicola X.H. Guo et S.B. Zhou ex L.H. Wu (Crassulaceae): A new species from Zhejiang Province, China. Plant Systematics and Evolution 299: 487–498. 10.1007/s00606-012-0738-x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  27. Xie D-M, Peng D-Y, Fang C-W, Qin M-J, Wang D-Q, Huang L-Q. (2014) Sedum spiralifolium (Crassulaceae): A new species from Anhui Province, China. Phytotaxa 183: 171–182. 10.11646/phytotaxa.183.3.4 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  28. Zhang J-Q, Meng S-Y, Wen J, Rao G-Y. (2014) Phylogenetic relationships and character evolution of Rhodiola (Crassulaceae) based on nuclear ribosomal ITS and plastid trnL-F and psbA-trnH Sequences. Systematic Botany 39: 441–451. 10.1600/036364414X680753 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  29. Zhang R-B, Deng T, Dou Q-L, He L, Lv X-Y, Jiang H. (2019) Sedum lipingense (Crassulaceae) identifying a new stonecrop species in SE Guizhou, China, based on morphological and molecular evidence. PhytoKeys 134: 125–133. 10.3897/phytokeys.134.38287 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Zou C-Y, Meng T, Meng S-Y, Liu Y. (2025) A new species of Sedum (Crassulaceae, Saxifragineae) from Guangxi, China. PhytoKeys 252: 287–299. 10.3897/phytokeys.252.128011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

XML Treatment for Sedum qingyuanense
Supplementary material 1

Sedum qingyuanense paratype

This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.

Xiao-Wei Yi, Zhi-Yi Xie, Xue-Gui Shen, Wei Xu, Qiu-Gen Zeng, Ke Tang, Yan-Shuang Huang, Qiang Fan

Data type

jpg

Data Availability Statement

All of the data that support the findings of this study are available in the main text.


Articles from PhytoKeys are provided here courtesy of Pensoft Publishers

RESOURCES