Skip to main content
Microbial Genomics logoLink to Microbial Genomics
. 2025 Dec 23;11(12):001548. doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.001548

Diversity and functional characterization of HNH endonucleases encoded by lactococcal Skunavirus phages

Jun-Hyeok Yu 1,†, Christian Cambillau 1,2, Gabriele Andrea Lugli 3,4, Marco Ventura 3,4, Arjen Nauta 5,‡, Jennifer Mahony 1,*, Douwe van Sinderen 1,*
PMCID: PMC12724721  PMID: 41432540

Abstract

Homing, a biological phenomenon involving enzyme-mediated genetic exchange by homologous recombination, has been highlighted as a potential driver of phage genome evolution. In the current study, 18 lactococcal phages, belonging to the Skunavirus genus, were isolated from Dutch dairy facilities, and their genomes were sequenced. Together with 71 phages from previous studies involving Dutch dairy fermentation facilities, a total of 89 Skunavirus genomes were analysed, revealing a strong correlation between phage diversity and the applied starter culture. These analysed Skunavirus genomes were predicted to encode a total of 212 intact HNH endonucleases (HNHEs), which were classified into families based on structural homology and their insertion locations on the genome. Members of the I-HmuI-like HNHE family were observed to be present among most analysed genomes, though they varied in individual Skunavirus phages in both their number and genomic locations. Phylogenetic analysis revealed that these I-HmuI-like HNHEs cluster together according to their insertion locations and the corresponding starter cultures. Furthermore, the so-called genetic marker exclusion activity of particular expressed HNHEs against Skunavirus sk1 infection was observed, indicative of their role in phage genome evolution and associated adaptation processes.

Keywords: bacteriophage, comparative genomic analysis, evolution, homing endonuclease, Lactococcus, HNH endonuclease


Impact Statement.

Bacteriophages (or phages), viruses that infect bacteria, are regarded as a major risk factor in the dairy industry, as they may delay or completely disrupt milk fermentations. Although various strategies have been implemented to reduce the impact of phage infections, the genomic diversity and virulence of these phages continue to challenge the complete prevention of their propagation during fermentation. However, our understanding of the underlying factors driving this variability remains limited. In this study, we examined the genomic diversity of phages isolated from dairy samples collected from various environments and under different conditions (i.e. location of isolates, used starter culture and year of isolation). Furthermore, we explored the role of homing, a process that facilitates genetic exchange between phages, in contributing to this diversity. Focusing on phage-encoded HNH endonucleases as potential homing vehicles, we characterized their prevalence, genomic locations and protein sequence similarities. Our findings support the notion that HNH endonucleases instigate diversification and evolutionary adaptation of bacteriophages in dairy environments.

Data Summary

The genome sequences of the phages used in this study are available in the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) database under accession numbers listed in Table S3.

Introduction

Bacteriophages (or phages) play a crucial role in the biosphere, shaping the functional and taxonomic composition and the dynamics of microbial communities [1,2]. In response to the selective pressure of phage predation, bacteria have evolved numerous defence strategies, which act at different stages of the phage life cycle [3,5]. However, phages in turn adapt and evolve to overcome these bacterial anti-phage systems, thereby facilitating co-evolution of both bacterial and associated phage communities [6,8]. The genetic adaptations of phages infecting bacteria that make up starter cultures used in dairy fermentation may not only result in increased lytic virulence with a broader host range, shorter latency time and/or higher burst size, but also in enhanced resistance against thermal/biocidal treatments, posing significant challenges for the dairy fermentation industry [9,13]. Owing to the economic importance of fermented foods and their associated starter cultures, various studies related to phage diversity in fermentation facilities and associated foods have been conducted to identify factors that underpin phage genetic variation [14,17].

Recently, the genetic phenomenon designated as ‘homing’ has been proposed as a driver of genetic exchange between phages [18]. Homing, first observed in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and involving unidirectional inheritance of the mitochondrial ω allele, was originally described as a phenomenon in which a so-called homing endonuclease-encoding gene (HEG) is transferred along with an insertion sequence (self-splicing intron or intein) to a cognate allele lacking the sequence [19,20]. However, instances of homing, in which the transfer of the HEG is not associated with an intron sequence, have also been described (Fig. 1) [21]. Consequently, homing is classified as follows: (i) intron homing, in which the HEG is located within an intron and transferred along with the intron; (ii) intronless homing, in which the HEG exists as a ‘free-standing’ gene (i.e. not subject to mRNA splicing) and (iii) collaborative homing, in which the HEG is a free-standing gene yet transferred along with a separate intron [22].

Fig. 1. Schematic overview of homing mechanisms mediated by endonucleases. *Exon with pattern fills indicates DNA sequence polymorphism.

Fig. 1.

Homing is facilitated by so-called homing endonucleases, which are encoded by the donor DNA molecules and which generate a sequence-specific, double-stranded DNA break in the homologous allele of the recipient DNA molecule, typically within an essential host gene [23]. Transfer of the HEG from the donor to the recipient is then accomplished through repair of the cleaved recipient DNA strand through homologous recombination with the donor strand [24]. In the case of homing where the HEG is not encoded within an intron, a free-standing HEG is inserted into a location unconnected to the gene containing the target cleavage sequence [21,25]. Also, the recipient DNA molecule, which acquires the HEG, is assumed to become resistant to the corresponding homing endonuclease because the cleavage sequence of the recipient is replaced by an alternative sequence originating from the donor allele (Fig. 1) [21].

HEGs are frequently present in phage genomes, and several studies have explored their roles [18,26, 27]. Notably, the free-standing HEGs in phage T4 have been studied extensively [21,28,30]. In mixed infections of T4 and T2, the homing endonuclease encoded by T4 can selectively exclude genetic markers of T2 that lack the corresponding HEG, in a process referred to as ‘marker exclusion’, facilitating the generation of a T2-derived progeny that contain certain T4 genetic markers [30]. Furthermore, frequent transfer of genes adjacent to the homing endonuclease cleavage site was observed, likely due to the physical distance between the HEG insertion site and the cleavage site. This suggests that while homing is involved in HEG transfer, it may also facilitate the transfer of flanking genetic material, thus serving as a driver of genetic exchange.

Members of the HNH endonuclease (HNHE) family, deriving their name from the H-N-H/N amino acid (AA) motif that constitutes their active site, are known to function as restriction enzymes, bacterial toxins or phage DNA-packaging aides [31,33]. The homing HNHE is recognized to constitute the largest group of the HNHE family [24]. The structural and enzymatic features have been extensively investigated among various HNHEs (i.e. ColE7, I-HmuI, PacI, Hpy99I, Geobacter metallireducens GS-15 HNHE and GVE2) [31,32, 34,37]. In the genome of lactococcal phages, particularly among members of the Skunavirus genus, genes predicted to encode homing endonucleases of the HNHE family are commonly identified [26,38, 39]. Members of the Skunavirus genus in lactococcal phages are particularly problematic in the dairy industry due to their adaptability and virulence [11,40]. Despite the common presence of HNHE-encoding genes in the genomes of the Skunavirus members, their precise activity and genetic consequences remain unexplored [26,38, 39].

In the current work, the presence, diversity and activity of homing endonucleases in lactococcal Skunavirus phages were investigated. A total of 89 Skunavirus genomes isolated from several Dutch dairy facilities, including 18 newly isolated phages, were analysed. A number of HNHEs encoded in Skunavirus genomes were discovered, and their insertion locations within the genome and structural characteristics were assessed. As previously described, genetic variability of Skunavirus genomes was highly associated with their bacterial host rather than the location of isolation or sampling time. Also, the phylogenetic clustering of these HNHEs was specific to their genomic insertion locations as well as the corresponding starter cultures used for fermentation. Additionally, genetic marker exclusion activity of HNHEs against Skunavirus sk1 infection was examined in vivo, in some cases supporting their presumed role in driving genetic exchange between phages via homing during coinfection.

Methods

Sample pretreatment and bacteriophage screening

A total of 103 samples from several dairy fermentation facilities in the Netherlands (Table S1, available in the online Supplementary Material) were subjected to pretreatment prior to phage isolation as described previously [41], and briefly outlined as follows. After thawing frozen samples at room temperature, samples were diluted with cold trisodium citrate (2% w/v) and homogenized using a stomacher (Lab-Blender 400; Gemini, the Netherlands) for 5 min. Large solid particles were removed by centrifugation at 300g for 10 min at 4 °C, followed by a second centrifugation of the supernatant at 4,500g for 50 min at 4 °C. The resulting solution was sequentially filtered through 0.45 and 0.2 µM pore-sized syringe filters. The filtered liquid was diluted five-fold with cold salt magnesuim (SM) buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl [hydrochloride], pH 7.5, 200 mM NaCl [sodium chloride], 10 mM MgSO4 [magnesium sulfate]). From the processed samples, bacteriophages were isolated using Lactococcus cremoris or Lactococcus lactis strains from undefined starter cultures SM1 (strains A–T), SM2 (strains 1–20) [42] and SM3 (strains L1, L2, L6, etc.) [43], as well as lactococcal strains NZ9000 and 3107 as indicators [44,45]. Bacterial cultures were prepared in M17 (Millipore, USA) medium supplemented with 0.5% lactose (LM17) at 30 °C. The presence of phages in a given sample was screened using the double-agar (LM17) method supplemented with CaCl2 (calcium chloride; final concentration 10 mM), as described previously [46]. After overnight incubation at 30 °C, if plaques were observed, some of these were used for propagation purposes with the corresponding bacterial host (1% inoculation from an overnight culture) for 3 h at 30 °C in LM17 broth supplemented with 10 mM CaCl2.

Phage DNA preparation and genome sequencing

Phage genomic DNA was extracted from lysates of individually propagated phage (10 ml lysate with a phage titre ranging between 108 and 1010 PFU [plaque-forming unit] ml−1). Phage particles were first precipitated overnight at 4 °C following the addition of 10% polyethylene glycol (final concentration; PEG8000; Sigma Aldrich, USA). Following phage particle collection by centrifugation at 15,000g for 15 min at 4 °C, the pellet was resuspended in 1 ml of SM buffer. The recovered virion concentrate was treated with DNase (final concentration: 10 U ml−1) for 30 min at room temperature, and the reaction was halted by adding 0.5 M EDTA. After proteinase K treatment (final concentration: 250 µg ml−1) for 15 min at 55 °C, phage DNA was extracted using the Phage DNA Isolation Kit (Norgen Biotek, Canada) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

The extracted phage DNA was subjected to phage genotyping using multiplex PCR with primer pairs specific for each of the two major lactococcal phage genera, Skunavirus and Ceduovirus, as well as for representatives of the P335 phage group (Table S2), as described previously [47]. Subsequently, whole-genome sequencing was performed by GenProbio srl (Parma, Italy) using a MiSeq platform (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). The libraries of phage DNA were prepared using an Illumina Nextera XT DNA Library Preparation Kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA), and the paired-end reads (250 bp) were assembled using the SPAdes program v3.14. ORFs were predicted using Prodigal [44], and ORFs were annotated against the National Centre for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) RefSeq database and INTERPRO and against the protein families (Pfam) database [48]. tRNA genes were identified using tRNAscan-SE version 2.0 [49]. Genome assembly and annotation were performed sequentially on all phage genomes using the MEGAnnotator2 pipeline [50].

Comparative genomic analysis of Skunavirus members

All bioinformatic analyses were performed using the MobaXterm server (https://mobaxterm.mobatek.net/). Genome sequences of Skunavirus members from Dutch dairy factories were retrieved from the NCBI database and included phages isolated in this study as well as those previously described (Table S3) [10,39, 42, 43, 51]. For protein-level comparisons, the markov clustering (MCL) algorithm was performed in the mclblastline pipeline v12-0678 with cut-off values of 50% AA identity across 50% coverage using an all-against-all bi-directional blast alignment, as described previously [13]. The produced MCL matrix was visualized and analysed using a two-way hierarchical clustering (HCL) in Orange v3.37 [52]. Different phage groups were identified based on MCL clusters.

Classification of HNHE

The annotated 268 HNHEs from the assessed Skunavirus phages were subjected to HHPred (hidden markov model to hidden markov model prediction) analysis (https://toolkit.tuebingen.mpg.de/tools/hhpred), and the protein with the highest probability match to the subject was identified. The identified HNHEs were then classified as HmuI-like, PacI-like, GVE2-like or truncated.

To determine approximate insertion locations of each HNHE-encoding gene in a given Skunavirus genome, we first identified the genes encoding fully conserved or core proteins of lactococcal Skunavirus phages based on the orthologous clusters in the MCL analysis. The approximate insertion location of each HNHE-encoding gene was then derived based on the position of the nearest core protein-encoding genes (i.e. located either immediately upstream or downstream of each HNHE-encoding gene). Their nucleotide sequence identity to corresponding genes in the Skunavirus sk1 genome [53] was assessed by blastn search using the NCBI blast tool (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/).

AA sequences of all 121 I-HmuI-like HNHEs were aligned using MAFFT v.7 (https://mafft.cbrc.jp/alignment/server/index.html). Phylogenetic analysis was performed by the neighbour-joining method in Mega (v.12) [54], and the unrooted phylogenetic tree was visualized using ITOL v7 (https://itol.embl.de/).

Protein sequence alignments

AA sequences of representative I-HmuI-like HNHEs from each identified insertion location (H1 and H3–H11) were aligned using clustalw [55] in Mega (v11) and imaged with ALIGNMENTVIEWER (https://alignmentviewer.org/), i.e. protein identifiers (IDs; if applicable) or gene locus tags: ALM64117.1 (from phage 4.2), ALM63048.1 (from phage 4), A.1_22 (from phage A.1), ALM64149.1 (from phage 4.2), ALM64155.1 (from phage 4.2), ALM64160.1 (from phage 4.2), ALM64165.1 (from phage 4.2), ALM64616.1 (from phage E1127), M19_49 (from phage M19) and 7.1 n_24 (from phage 7.1 n).

Computational structure prediction and analysis of HNHEs

Protein structures of selected I-HmuI-like HNHEs were predicted using AlphaFold3 [56] on a Google server (https://golgi.sandbox.google.com) by introducing the sequence of the HNHE protein, a Zn2+ ion, and a random dsDNA with a length between 26 and 32 bp. The associated images were created employing ChimeraX [57]. Coordinates of the predicted structures are accessible on Zenodo (https://zenodo.org/records/13767314).

In vivo genetic exclusion activity assay

To test the exclusion activity of HNHEs against Skunavirus genomic DNA, seven HNHE-encoding genes (six I-HmuI-like and one PacI-like HNHEs) associated with different insertion locations or HNHE families were cloned into the nisin-inducible expression plasmid pPTPi [58], i.e. genes with locus tags: Phi42_02 (from phage 4.2), Phi93_03 (from phage 93), Phi4_09 (from phage 4), M51_28 and M51_51 (from phage M51), 7 .p3_37 (from phage 7 .p3) and PhiE1127_59 (from phage E1127). DNA of each phage was prepared, and HNHE-encoding genes were amplified by PCR using gene-specific primers (Table S2), containing restriction enzyme recognition sequences (SalI or BglII). PCR amplifications were performed using a 2720 Thermal Cycler (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA) employing the following conditions: 5 min at 94 °C followed by 40 cycles (30 s at 94 °C, 30 s at 55 °C, 30 s at 72 °C) followed by a final extension step at 72 °C for 7 min. Following restriction enzyme treatment, the individual PCR products were ligated with plasmid pPTPi, which had been treated with the corresponding restriction enzymes, using T4 DNA ligase (Fisher Scientific, USA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The ligation mixture was introduced into competent L. cremoris NZ9000 by electroporation (20 µF, 200 Ω, 2.5 KV) followed by recovery for 2.5 h at 30 °C in GM17 (M17 supplemented with 0.5% glucose) with 20 mM MgCl2 and 2 mM CaCl2. Transformants were selected on GM17 agar plates supplemented with 10 µg ml−1 tetracycline (final concentration) and incubated overnight at 30 °C. The integrity of the generated constructs was confirmed by Sanger Sequencing by Azenta/GENEWIZ (Leipzig, Germany).

For culture preparations of host bacteria harbouring the nisin-inducible plasmid pPTPi or its derivatives, a fresh overnight culture with 10 µg ml−1 tetracycline was used to inoculate (1%) fresh growth medium (without tetracycline) and incubated until the optical density at 620 nm reached 0.2, followed by nisin (Sigma, USA) induction (through the addition of nisin at a final concentration of 20 ng ml−1) for 3 h at 30 °C. A 300 µl aliquot of the prepared bacterial culture was inoculated into 5 ml of GM17 semi-agar supplemented with CaCl2 (10 mM final concentration) and 100 µl of serial dilutions (100–10−7) of phage sk1 (Skunavirus) [53]. The mixture was then plated onto GM17 agar, which was similarly supplemented with CaCl2, to perform a standard plaque assay procedure using the double-agar overlay approach [46]. Plaque formation was observed, following overnight incubation at 30 °C. The efficiency of plaquing (EOP) was calculated using NZ9000/pPTPi as a positive control. To assess the specificity of HNHE against Skunavirus, phage c2 (Ceduovirus) was included as a comparator [59]. Three biological repeats of each assay were performed.

Results

Bacteriophage isolation and identification

Previously, a large collection of Skunavirus members had been isolated from samples associated with Dutch dairy facilities. In order to expand this phage collection, a total of 103 dairy fermentation-derived samples were screened for bacteriophages (Table S1) using strains isolated from the corresponding starter culture, for example, 34 samples obtained when the cheese factory used starter culture SM1 were screened against lactococcal host strains named A through to T [42]. For samples without information regarding the corresponding starter culture, a range of L. cremoris/L. lactis strains representing different cell wall polysaccharide (CWPS) types (from SM1, SM2 and SM3 – A, B, C1, C2, C4 and unknown types) and reference strains (NZ9000 and 3107) were used for phage identification (Table S4). The CWPS of Lactococcus strains is known to serve as the primary receptor for specific binding of Skunavirus phage receptor-binding proteins (RBPs), thus determining the host range of a given phage [39,60]. To avoid isolating identical phages, a single representative phage infecting a distinct host strain was selected from individual samples of each production date or sample type (Table S1). Among the SM1-associated samples, 15 out of 34 tested positive for phage infection against at least one strain, and 14 phages were successfully isolated and propagated to high titres (~107 PFU ml−1). For SM2, 18 out of the 19 assessed samples were phage-positive, resulting in the isolation of eight phages. For samples where information regarding the employed starter culture was unavailable, it was shown that all tested positive for phage infection, yielding 34 phage isolates. Multiplex PCR genotyping analysis of the isolated lactococcal phages revealed that all identified phages are members of the genus Skunavirus (data not shown). Based on host range analysis and other sample information, presumed identical phage isolates from each starter culture sample were excluded. In this manner, a total of 18 apparently distinct phage isolates were selected from screened dairy samples associated with fermentations employing starter cultures SM1 (n=9), SM2 (n=2) or an unknown starter culture (n=7) (Table 1).

Table 1. Bacteriophage isolated from dairy samples in this study.

Starter originally used to obtain sample Bacteriophage Host strain used for isolation CWPS type of host
SM1 A.1 A C1
L.1 L Unknown
D.1 D C1
B.1 B A
A.2 A C1
D.2 D C1
I.2 I C*
B.2 B A
N.2 N C*
SM2 7.1 7 C1
19.2 n 19 C1
Unknown 2 .p9 2 B
7 .p3 7 C1
L.l25 L Unknown
R.l24 R C*
L1.p3 L1 A
Mm14.p9 Mm14 C2
SB31.p3 SB31 C4

*Indicates the strains for which the C subtype was not determined.

Diversity of isolated Skunavirus members and correlation to starter, geographical location, or other sample/isolation characteristics

The genomes of the 18 newly isolated phages were sequenced, revealing that, as expected, all represent genetically distinct phages (Table S5). These 18 newly isolated and sequenced phages were categorized together with 71 previously sequenced Skunavirus phages (derived from Dutch cheese whey), retrieved from the NCBI database (Table S3), based on their corresponding starter cultures (SM1, SM2, SM3 and unknown), associations with specific factories (F1, F2, F3, F4 and unknown) and year of isolation (2009, 2013, 2015, 2021 and 2024), if applicable. Genome sizes ranged from 27,529 to 34,004 bp, encompassing 48–63 ORFs and possessing a G+C content ranging between 34.43 and 35.52 mol% (Table 2). Notably, phages isolated from F3, which used starter culture SM3, encoded an average of 3 or 4 additional ORFs and demonstrated a larger genome size (of ~1,000 bp), with the lowest G+C content (34.81 mol%), compared with phages associated with other starter cultures or factories.

Table 2. Genetic features of Skunavirus phages isolated from dairy factory in the Netherlands.

Factor No. of phage No. of ORF Genome size (bp) G+C (mol%)
Avg. Max. Min. Avg. Max. Min. Avg. Max. Min.
Starter SM1 29 54 59 49 30,262 34,004 28,349 35.03 35.31 34.58
SM2 41 57 63 52 31,302 33,017 28,811 34.81 35.21 34.43
SM3 3 53 55 49 30,039 31,359 28,027 35.18 35.52 34.86
Unknown 16 54 60 48 30,250 32,900 27,529 35.04 35.46 34.62
Factory F1 16 54 58 49 30,154 32,855 28,349 34.96 35.31 34.58
F2 4 53 55 49 30,509 31,841 28,983 35.02 35.14 34.92
F3 41 57 63 52 31,302 33,017 28,811 34.81 35.21 34.43
F4 12 53 55 49 30,269 34,004 28,027 35.17 35.52 34.86
Unknown 16 54 60 48 30,250 32,900 27,529 35.04 35.46 34.62
Year 2009 17 54 58 49 30,686 32,150 28,437 34.88 35.25 34.58
2013 22 55 63 49 30,371 32,682 28,349 34.91 35.46 34.49
2015 29 57 61 51 31,432 33,017 28,732 34.87 35.3 34.43
2021 19 53 57 48 30,192 34,004 27,529 35.13 35.52 34.82
2024 2 53 54 52 30,041 30,065 30,017 34.84 34.90 34.78

Avg, average; Max, maximum; Min, minimum.

HCL of phage-derived proteomes was performed using the genome sequences of the 89 assessed Dutch Skunavirus members, based on the absence or presence of orthologous protein clusters (applied criteria: at least 50% AA identity with at least 50% protein coverage) (Fig. 2). This analysis identified eight distinct phage clusters (designated here as clusters A through to H). No clear cluster correlations were observed between phage clusters and the collection factors (starter cultures, factories and years). Nevertheless, phages isolated from samples using the same starter culture tended to cluster closely together, while phages isolated from the same factory or sampling year were scattered across different clusters. For example, cluster D is composed of starter culture SM1-associated phages, but these were isolated from various factories and across different years. Similarly, phage clusters A and C, which also contain SM1-derived phages, exhibit relatedness between gene content and the associated starter culture rather than factory origin or sample collection year.

Fig. 2. HCL of gene content variation among 89 Skunavirus phages isolated from Dutch dairy factories. The colour intensity of the bar at the bottom right indicates the number of genes encoding the corresponding proteins.

Fig. 2.

Classification of HNHE in Skunavirus

HNHE-encoding genes are frequently predicted to be present within Skunavirus genomes, and most have been presumed to represent homing endonucleases, potentially facilitating phage genetic exchanges [21,26]. To understand their prevalence and relationship to phage genomic diversity, HNHE-encoding genes were identified by blast-based alignments (Fig. 2). This analysis identified a total of 268 predicted HNHE-encoding genes spread across 89 assessed phage genomes. Based on the lack of intervening sequences between a given HNHE-encoding gene and its adjacent gene, it appeared that none of the HNHE-encoding genes is encoded within a self-splicing intron (as shown in Fig. 1) [20,61]. The number of HNHEs encoded by a given Skunavirus genome ranged from 1 to 8 (Fig. 3). Further AA sequence-based analysis using HHPred indicated that 212 of these HNHEs had significant similarity with one of three reference HNHEs, i.e. PacI [32], GVE2 [35] or I-HmuI [23]. In the current study, these identified Skunavirus-derived HNHEs were therefore classified into three distinct groups, i.e. I-HmuI-, PacI- or GVE2-like groups. Each examined Skunavirus phage was shown to encode a single GVE2-like HNHE (thus representing 89 HNHEs of the total 268 HNHEs identified), all positioned in the same relative genomic location. In contrast, the presence and number of I-HmuI- and PacI-like HNHE-encoding genes varied among the assessed phages. Especially, I-HmuI-like HNHE-encoding genes were most abundant, accounting for ~45% of all identified HNHE-encoding genes (121/268), whereas PacI-like HNHEs were seemingly rare, appearing only twice among all 89 assessed genomes (2/268). The remaining 56 genes, identified as HNHEs by BLASTP, appeared to represent incomplete HNHE proteins, suggesting they are partially deleted remnants of formerly complete HNHE-encoding genes. These presumably truncated HNHE-encoding genes were also shown to be variable in both presence and number across the assessed phage genomes (56/268).

Fig. 3. Identified HNHE-encoding genes from 89 Skunavirus genomes.

Fig. 3.

To identify the approximate insertion location of HNHE-encoding genes within Skunavirus genomes, core proteins were determined based on the orthologous clusters (Fig. 2). Among them, their encoding genes located adjacent to each HNHE-encoding gene were identified. Most of these genes showed high nucleotide sequence similarities (>75%) to the corresponding genes of sk1, with at least 59% coverage (Table S6). The genes specifying the suppressor of AbiK (SAK)-like ssDNA annealing protein (encoded by sk1p37), hypothetical protein (encoded by sk1p27) and DNA polymerase (encoded by sk1p45) showed high sequence similarities (>75%), yet with limited coverages (26%, 37% and 15%, respectively).

Based on these core protein-encoding genes, the approximate insertion locations of HNHE-encoding genes within Skunavirus genomes were mapped (Fig. 4) to a total of 11 genomic positions (termed H1 through to H11) across the 89 genomes. The I-HmuI-like HNHE-encoding genes were dispersed across ten of these identified insertion locations (the exception being H2) in these Skunavirus genomes, spanning the three functional modules of their genomes (these are related to the late-, early- and middle-expressed transcriptional units associated with morphogenesis, replication and regulation, respectively). Conversely, PacI- and GVE2-like HNHE-encoding genes were each found at a specific insertion location (H1 and H2, respectively) in the morphogenesis module. All 89 GVE2-like HNHEs were encoded between the terminase large subunit (TerL)- and portal protein-encoding genes, which are involved in phage DNA packaging, indicating that this HNHE (inserted at H2) plays a role in DNA packaging that may be unrelated to homing [26], and we named this HNHE ‘HNHE related to DNA Packaging’ (HrdP). Most of the I-HmuI-like HNHE-encoding genes (97 out of 121) were identified in the replication module, distributed across seven locations (H4–H9 and H11) (Fig. 4). Notably, insertion locations H6, H7 and H9 harboured 70 out of the 97 I-HmuI-like HNHE-encoding genes. Furthermore, most of the truncated HNHE-encoding genes were found at location H7 (39/56).

Fig. 4. Schematic overview showing approximate insertion locations (H1–H11) of HNHE-encoding genes across Skunavirus genomes. *Denotes the number of genes between the HNHE-encoding gene and its core protein-encoding genes (black coloured). The number above the bar indicates the count of HNHE-encoding genes in each homology group (red: I-HmuI-like; green: GVE2-like; blue: PacI-like) or the number of truncated genes (grey).

Fig. 4.

Relationship between HNHE and phage diversity

To elucidate the relationship between phage diversity and homing endonucleases, a phylogenetic comparison of Skunavirus-associated I-HmuI-like HNHEs, which represent the most abundant and variable HNHEs among the three HNHE groups (i.e. I-HmuI-, PacI- and GVE2-like) identified in this study, was performed (Fig. 5). In total, 15 (designated here as clusters I through to XV) distinct phylogenetic clusters were identified. Interestingly, the insertion locations of HNHE-encoding genes were associated with these clusters, with each cluster representing a single insertion location, except for cluster III. Notably, insertion locations H4, H6, H9 and H10 were observed in multiple clusters, suggesting that distinct HNHEs can be inserted at the same insertion location within a Skunavirus genome.

Fig. 5. Phylogenetic comparison of I-HmuI-like HNHEs identified from Dutch Skunavirus genomes, with bootstrap values from 1,000 replicates.

Fig. 5.

Furthermore, members of a given phylogenetic cluster were shown to be frequently associated with the starter culture used for production. For example, clusters II, IV, V, VI, VIII, IX and XII were predominantly derived from phage isolates from a single, specific starter culture, indicative of a correlation between a given HNHE and its associated host strain. Conversely, HNHEs encoded by phages belonging to cluster XV are not specifically associated with a particular starter culture, as they were found in Skunavirus genomes derived from both starter SM1 and SM2 samples [17].

Sequence alignment and structure prediction of HNHEs

To explore the diversity of HNHE-encoding genes based on their insertion locations, the deduced protein sequences and predicted structures of representative I-HmuI-like HNHE-encoding genes from each insertion location (H1-4.2, H3-4, H4-A.1, H5-4.2, H6-4.2, H7-4.2, H8-4.2, H9-E1127, H10-M19 and H11-7.1n) were analysed. For this comparative analysis, PacI- and GVE2-like HNHEs were excluded, as all members of these families are encoded at the same insertion locations (H1 and H2, respectively) (Fig. 4). Sequence alignment revealed that the catalytic domains, known as the HN(H/N) motif, exhibited high similarity with conserved catalytic residues (D74, H75 and N96 of I-HmuI) (Fig. 6a) [23]. The C-terminal region of HNHEs was relatively variable, compared with the N-terminal region, including the active site.

Fig. 6. The structure of I-HmuI-like HNHEs from Skunavirus. (a) AA sequence alignment of I-HmuI-like HNHEs at each insertion location (H1, H3, H4, H5, H6, H7, H8, H9, H10 and H11) with I-HmuI. The HN(H/N) catalytic domains are boxed in green, and catalysis associated residues are marked with asterisks. (b) Predicted protein structures of I-HmuI-like HNHEs. The Zn2+-binding residues are displayed as sticks, and the Zn2+ ion is represented as a red sphere and is indicated by red arrows. The dsDNA is coloured yellow and orange. The origin phage of each HNHE is indicated in parentheses. Nt, N-terminal; Ct, C-terminal.

Fig. 6.

Protein structure predictions using AlphaFold3 showed that all I-HmuI-like HNHEs are represented by two β-sheets and a single α-helix, with a Zn2+ ion-binding site in the N-terminal region, referred to as the ββα-metal active site, which is typically found in HNHEs (Fig. 6b) [62]. The predicted models reported interactions between two residues of each HNHE and the catalytic Zn2+ ion, as well as with dsDNA (Table S7). The N-terminal domain of all analysed HNHEs was shown to consist of a globular domain and to fit into the large groove of a dsDNA molecule, bringing the Zn2+ ion into the vicinity of the dsDNA backbone upper lip of the small groove. However, consistent with the sequence alignment, the C-terminal region of the HNHE protein structures exhibited variability, compared with the N-terminal region, indicative of (variable) DNA-binding specificity. Except for HNHE-encoding genes located at H9 and H10, the C-terminal domains of the other HNHEs were also shown to encompass a globular domain.

Marker exclusion activity of HNHE

Homing endonucleases are known to act as sequence-specific endonucleases to the homologous allele lacking their encoding genes [21]. The presumed specific endonucleolytic activities of HNHEs encoded by Dutch Skunavirus genomes were examined in vivo against Skunavirus sk1, which lacks these HNHE-encoding genes. Host bacteria (L. cremoris NZ9000) harbouring a particular HNHE-encoding gene (I-HmuI-like: H1-4.2, H3-4, H5-M51, H7-7.p3, H9-M51 or H10-E1127; PacI-like: H1-93) within a nisin-inducible plasmid (pPTPi) were induced with nisin and subsequently subjected to phage infection with Skunavirus sk1 or Ceduovirus c2, after which the (reduction of) EOP was calculated (Fig. 7) [53]. Compared with the control (NZ9000/pPTPi), which was shown to exhibit a titre of ~109 PFU ml–1 of Skunavirus sk1, both HNH7 and HNH9 demonstrated ~103-fold reduction in plaque numbers (EOP=0.0079 and 0.0014, respectively). The EOPs of Ceduovirus c2 on HNH7- and HNH9-expressing hosts were 0.12 and 0.10, respectively, suggesting that both HNHEs specifically target the Skunavirus genome. The other five HNHEs did not display significant activity against either sk1 or c2 (data not shown).

Fig. 7. In vivo marker exclusion activity of HNHEs (H7 from phage 7 .p3 and H9 from phage M51) against Skunavirus and Ceduovirus.

Fig. 7.

Discussion

In this study, HNHEs encoded by 89 different genomes from Skunavirus members isolated from Dutch dairy fermentation facilities were identified and characterized. Among the 268 identified, apparently ‘free-standing’ HNHE-encoding genes (Fig. 3), 89 HNHEs presented homology with GVE2 HNHE [35]. These latter HNHEs, named HrdP, were encoded by all analysed Skunavirus genomes, and their corresponding gene was shown to be located between the terminase large subunit- and portal protein-encoding genes, indicating that they play a critical role in phage DNA packaging, as has been described for other phages [26,33, 62].

The remaining 179 HNHEs (i.e. I-HmuI-like, PacI-like and truncated) were shown to exhibit variable presence and frequency across different Skunavirus genomes, suggesting that these HNHEs play non-essential roles in phage fitness, likely functioning as homing endonucleases, as described previously [26]. Interestingly, the majority of these presumptive HNH homing endonucleases are encoded by genes present in the early-expressed region (126/179) (Fig. 4), an area known for its high genetic diversity in Skunavirus genomes [14,16]. Especially, these HNHE-encoding genes were the most frequently observed at insertion locations H6, H7 and H9, and the number of flanking genes between their insertion locations and the nearest core protein-encoding genes was shown to be more variable compared with others. This suggests that homing events may occur frequently near these insertion locations. Additionally, their core protein-encoding genes showed lower sequence coverage/identity levels compared with corresponding genes from Skunavirus sk1, compared with other core proteins. These DNA polymorphisms may result from homing events, which influence the sensitivity of DNA against the corresponding homing endonuclease.

The phylogenetic comparison of I-HmuI-like HNHEs demonstrates the significant association between HNHE phylogeny position and their corresponding insertion location. As shown in Fig. 6, the HNHEs associated with each insertion location exhibit sequence and structural diversity in their C-terminal region, which is presumed to function as the DNA-binding domain. While sharing a conserved N-terminal HNH-motif, the structural diversity at the C-terminal region likely contributes to their functional differences in recognizing and cleaving specific phage genome sequences, which in turn is indirectly responsible for distinct insertion locations [23]. Furthermore, the apparent marker exclusion activities of particular HNHEs in nisin-induced host bacteria against Skunavirus infection are a clear indication of their sequence-specific endonucleolytic activities. These results suggest that HNHEs at each insertion location possess distinct target sequences and may drive genomic recombination within only specific parts of the genome among phages of the same genus.

Correlations between phage diversity and their host range have been elucidated in previous studies [17,63]. Our findings are consistent with these observations, as presented by certain MCL groups showing an association with the specific starter cultures used in the dairy samples. Similarly, most of the phylogenetic clusters of I-HmuI-like HNHEs show associations with starter cultures (Fig. 5). Since the inheritance of a HEG is known to occur during co-infection of host bacteria, these observations might be attributed to the strain-level host range of Skunavirus. Possibly, a particular host strain composition (e.g. containing strains with specific CWPS types) of a given starter culture may create different phage populations possessing particular HEGs. This may result in the inheritance or distribution of specific HEGs among phages associated with particular starter cultures, potentially influencing phage diversity. On the other hand, as shown by phylogenetic clustering, cluster XV, which is specific to the insertion location (H7), did not show a significant association with the starter culture. This lack of association may be attributed to the presence of host strains in both starter cultures (SM1 and SM2), which could be susceptible to homologous phages.

In conclusion, we identified and characterized HNHE-encoding genes in various Skunavirus genomes, which may be linked with Skunavirus genome diversity. Our work provides a valuable ‘roadmap’ for further investigation into the role HNHEs may play in Skunavirus genetic exchanges. For future research, a detailed investigation of individual HNHE insertion locations will be required to better understand this process. Through screening of mutant phages that have become insensitive to HNHE activity, escape mechanisms from this endonuclease activity, possibly through mutations in the target sequence, can be elucidated. This will provide a clearer understanding of the specific target sequences for each HNHE. Furthermore, experimental studies are necessary to confirm whether these HNHEs actively promote homing events in Skunavirus phages, thereby enhancing their genetic diversity. These insights will improve our understanding of their role in genome evolution.

Supplementary material

Uncited Fig. S1.
mgen-11-01548-s001.pdf (267.8KB, pdf)
DOI: 10.1099/mgen.0.001548

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the members of our lab in University College Cork (UCC) for their valuable help and insightful discussions.

Abbreviations

AA

amino acid

CWPS

cell wall polysaccharide

EOP

efficiency of plaquing

HCL

hierarchical clustering

HEG

homing endonuclease-encoding gene

HNHE

HNH endonuclease

HrdP

HNHE related to DNA Packaging

MCL

Markov clustering

NCBI

National Center for Biotechnology Information

RBP

receptor-binnding protein

Footnotes

Funding: This work was supported by grants from Irish Research Council (https://research.ie/) and FrieslandCampina (https://www.frieslandcampina.com/) under award no. EPSPG/2020/42 to J.-H.Y. Science Foundation Ireland (https://www.sfi.ie/) 12/RC/2273-P2 to D.v.S. Science Foundation Ireland (https://www.sfi.ie/) 20/FFP-P/8664 to J.M.

Author contributions: Conceptualization: J.-H.Y., J.M. and D.v.S. Funding acquisition: J.-H.Y., A.N., J.M. and D.v.S. Investigation: J.-H.Y., C.C., G.A.L. and M.V. Resources: A.N. and D.v.S. Supervision: A.N., J.M. and D.v.S. Visualization: J.-H.Y. and C.C. Writing – original draft: J.-H.Y. Writing – review and editing: J.-H.Y., C.C., G.A.L., M.V., A.N., J.M. and D.v.S.

Contributor Information

Jun-Hyeok Yu, Email: junhyeok.yu@smart.mit.edu.

Christian Cambillau, Email: ccambillau@gmail.com.

Gabriele Andrea Lugli, Email: gabrieleandrea.lugli@unipr.it.

Marco Ventura, Email: marco.ventura@unipr.it.

Arjen Nauta, Email: arjen.nauta@dsm-firmenich.com.

Jennifer Mahony, Email: j.mahony@ucc.ie.

Douwe van Sinderen, Email: d.vansinderen@ucc.ie.

References

  • 1.Blazanin M, Turner PE. Community context matters for bacteria-phage ecology and evolution. ISME J. 2021;15:3119–3128. doi: 10.1038/s41396-021-01012-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Alseth EO, Custodio R, Sundius SA, Kuske RA, Brown SP, et al. The impact of phage and phage resistance on microbial community dynamics. PLoS Biol. 2024;22:e3002346. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3002346. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Hampton HG, Watson BNJ, Fineran PC. The arms race between bacteria and their phage foes. Nature. 2020;577:327–336. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1894-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Patel PH, Taylor VL, Zhang C, Getz LJ, Fitzpatrick AD, et al. Anti-phage defence through inhibition of virion assembly. Nat Commun. 2024;15:1644. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-45892-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Georjon H, Bernheim A. The highly diverse antiphage defence systems of bacteria. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2023;21:686–700. doi: 10.1038/s41579-023-00934-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Paez-Espino D, Sharon I, Morovic W, Stahl B, Thomas BC, et al. CRISPR immunity drives rapid phage genome evolution in Streptococcus thermophilus. mBio. 2015;6:e00262-15. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00262-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Pleška M, Guet CC. Effects of mutations in phage restriction sites during escape from restriction-modification. Biol Lett. 2017;13:20170646. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2017.0646. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Otsuka Y, Yonesaki T. Dmd of bacteriophage T4 functions as an antitoxin against Escherichia coli LsoA and RnlA toxins. Mol Microbiol. 2012;83:669–681. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2012.07975.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Josephsen J, Petersen A, Neve H, Nielsen EW. Development of lytic Lactococcus lactis bacteriophages in a Cheddar cheese plant. Int J Food Microbiol. 1999;50:163–171. doi: 10.1016/S0168-1605(99)00098-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hayes S, Murphy J, Mahony J, Lugli GA, Ventura M, et al. Biocidal inactivation of Lactococcus lactis bacteriophages: efficacy and targets of commonly used sanitizers. Front Microbiol. 2017;8:107. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Murphy J, Mahony J, Bonestroo M, Nauta A, van Sinderen D. Impact of thermal and biocidal treatments on lactococcal 936-type phages. Int Dairy J. 2014;34:56–61. doi: 10.1016/j.idairyj.2013.06.011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Atamer Z, Dietrich J, Müller-Merbach M, Neve H, Heller KJ, et al. Screening for and characterization of Lactococcus lactis bacteriophages with high thermal resistance. Int Dairy J. 2009;19:228–235. doi: 10.1016/j.idairyj.2008.10.012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Mahony J, Moscarelli A, Kelleher P, Lugli GA, Ventura M, et al. Phage biodiversity in artisanal cheese wheys reflects the complexity of the fermentation process. Viruses. 2017;9:45. doi: 10.3390/v9030045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kupczok A, Neve H, Huang KD, Hoeppner MP, Heller KJ, et al. Rates of mutation and recombination in siphoviridae phage genome evolution over three decades. Mol Biol Evol. 2018;35:1147–1159. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msy027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Lavelle K, Murphy J, Fitzgerald B, Lugli GA, Zomer A, et al. A decade of Streptococcus thermophilus phage evolution in an Irish dairy plant. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2018;84:e02855-17. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02855-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Castro-Nallar E, Chen H, Gladman S, Moore SC, Seemann T, et al. Population genomics and phylogeography of an Australian dairy factory derived lytic bacteriophage. Genome Biol Evol. 2012;4:382–393. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evs017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Jolicoeur AP, Lemay M-L, Beaubien E, Bélanger J, Bergeron C, et al. Longitudinal study of Lactococcus phages in a Canadian cheese factory. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2023;89:e0042123. doi: 10.1128/aem.00421-23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Barth ZK, Dunham DT, Seed KD. Nuclease genes occupy boundaries of genetic exchange between bacteriophages. NAR Genom Bioinform . 2023;5:lqad076. doi: 10.1093/nargab/lqad076. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Jacquier A, Dujon B. An intron-encoded protein is active in a gene conversion process that spreads an intron into a mitochondrial gene. Cell. 1985;41:383–394. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(85)80011-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Dujon B. Group I introns as mobile genetic elements: facts and mechanistic speculations — a review. Gene. 1989;82:91–114. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(89)90034-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Belle A, Landthaler M, Shub DA. Intronless homing: site-specific endonuclease SegF of bacteriophage T4 mediates localized marker exclusion analogous to homing endonucleases of group I introns. Genes Dev. 2002;16:351–362. doi: 10.1101/gad.960302. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Edgell DR. Selfish DNA: homing endonucleases find a home. Curr Biol. 2009;19:R115–7. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2008.12.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Shen BW, Landthaler M, Shub DA, Stoddard BL. DNA binding and cleavage by the HNH homing endonuclease I-HmuI. J Mol Biol. 2004;342:43–56. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2004.07.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Stoddard BL. Homing endonuclease structure and function. Q Rev Biophys. 2005;38:49–95. doi: 10.1017/S0033583505004063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Zeng Q, Bonocora RP, Shub DA. A free-standing homing endonuclease targets an intron insertion site in the psbA gene of cyanophages. Curr Biol. 2009;19:218–222. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2008.11.069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Coq A, Ne! Dicte Cesselin B, Commissaire J, Anba J. Sequence analysis of the lactococcal bacteriophage bil170: insights into structural proteins and HNH endonucleases in dairy phages. Microbiology. 2002;148:985–1001. doi: 10.1099/00221287-148-4-985. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Birkholz EA, Morgan CJ, Laughlin TG, Lau RK, Prichard A, et al. An intron endonuclease facilitates interference competition between coinfecting viruses. Science. 2024;385:105–112. doi: 10.1126/science.adl1356. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Brok-Volchanskaya VS, Kadyrov FA, Sivogrivov DE, Kolosov PM, Sokolov AS, et al. Phage T4 SegB protein is a homing endonuclease required for the preferred inheritance of T4 tRNA gene region occurring in co-infection with a related phage. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008;36:2094–2105. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkn053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Sandegren L, Nord D, Sjöberg BM. SegH and Hef: two novel homing endonucleases whose genes replace the mobC and mobE genes in several T4-related phages. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005;33:6203–6213. doi: 10.1093/nar/gki932. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Liu Q, Belle A, Shub DA, Belfort M, Edgell DR. SegG endonuclease promotes marker exclusion and mediates co-conversion from a distant cleavage site. J Mol Biol. 2003;334:13–23. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2003.09.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Ko TP, Liao CC, Ku WY, Chak KF, Yuan HS. The crystal structure of the DNase domain of colicin E7 in complex with its inhibitor Im7 protein. Structure. 1999;7:91–102. doi: 10.1016/s0969-2126(99)80012-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Shen BW, Heiter DF, Chan S-H, Wang H, Xu S-Y, et al. Unusual target site disruption by the rare-cutting HNH restriction endonuclease PacI. Structure. 2010;18:734–743. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2010.03.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Quiles-Puchalt N, Carpena N, Alonso JC, Novick RP, Marina A, et al. Staphylococcal pathogenicity island DNA packaging system involving cos-site packaging and phage-encoded HNH endonucleases. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111:6016–6021. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1320538111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Sokolowska M, Czapinska H, Bochtler M. Crystal structure of the beta beta alpha-Me type II restriction endonuclease Hpy99I with target DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37:3799–3810. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkp228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Zhang L, Xu D, Huang Y, Zhu X, Rui M, et al. Structural and functional characterization of deep-sea thermophilic bacteriophage GVE2 HNH endonuclease. Sci Rep. 2017;7 doi: 10.1038/srep42542. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Xu S, Kuzin AP, Seetharaman J, Gutjahr A, Chan S-H, et al. Structure determination and biochemical characterization of a putative HNH endonuclease from Geobacter metallireducens GS-15. PLoS One. 2013;8:e72114. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0072114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Cheng YS, Hsia KC, Doudeva LG, Chak KF, Yuan HS. The crystal structure of the nuclease domain of colicin E7 suggests a mechanism for binding to double-stranded DNA by the H-N-H endonucleases. J Mol Biol. 2002;324:227–236. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(02)01092-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Chmielewska-Jeznach M, Bardowski JK, Szczepankowska AK. Molecular, physiological and phylogenetic traits of Lactococcus 936-type phages from distinct dairy environments. Sci Rep. 2018;8:12540. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-30371-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Murphy J, Bottacini F, Mahony J, Kelleher P, Neve H, et al. Comparative genomics and functional analysis of the 936 group of lactococcal Siphoviridae phages. Sci Rep. 2016;6:21345. doi: 10.1038/srep21345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Mahony J, Murphy J, van Sinderen D. Lactococcal 936-type phages and dairy fermentation problems: from detection to evolution and prevention. Front Microbiol. 2012;3:335. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2012.00335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Dugat-Bony E, Lossouarn J, De Paepe M, Sarthou A-S, Fedala Y, et al. Viral metagenomic analysis of the cheese surface: a comparative study of rapid procedures for extracting viral particles. Food Microbiol. 2020;85:103278. doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2019.103278. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Murphy J, Royer B, Mahony J, Hoyles L, Heller K, et al. Biodiversity of lactococcal bacteriophages isolated from 3 Gouda-type cheese-producing plants. Journal of Dairy Science. 2013;96:4945–4957. doi: 10.3168/jds.2013-6748. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Yu J-H, Lugli GA, Ventura M, van der Vaart R, Nauta A, et al. Distinct shifts in bacteriophage diversity and abundance during various stages of Gouda-type cheese production. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2025;91 doi: 10.1128/aem.00651-25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Erazo Garzon A, Mahony J, Bottacini F, Kelleher P, van Sinderen D. Complete genome sequence of Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris 3107, host for the model lactococcal P335 bacteriophage TP901-1. Microbiol Resour Announc. 2019;8:e01635-18. doi: 10.1128/MRA.01635-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Linares DM, Geertsma ER, Poolman B. Evolved Lactococcus lactis strains for enhanced expression of recombinant membrane proteins. J Mol Biol. 2010;401:45–55. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2010.06.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Lillehaug D. An improved plaque assay for poor plaque-producing temperate lactococcal bacteriophages. J Appl Microbiol. 1997;83:85–90. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2672.1997.00193.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Labrie S, Moineau S. Multiplex PCR for detection and identification of lactococcal bacteriophages. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2000;66:987–994. doi: 10.1128/AEM.66.3.987-994.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Dai C, Qu Y, Wu W, Li S, Chen Z, et al. QSP: an open sequence database for quorum sensing related gene analysis with an automatic annotation pipeline. Water Res. 2023;235:119814. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2023.119814. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Chan PP, Lin BY, Mak AJ, Lowe TM. tRNAscan-SE 2.0: improved detection and functional classification of transfer RNA genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021;49:9077–9096. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab688. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Lugli GA, Fontana F, Tarracchini C, Milani C, Mancabelli L, et al. MEGAnnotator2: a pipeline for the assembly and annotation of microbial genomes. Microbiome Res Rep . 2023;2:15. doi: 10.20517/mrr.2022.21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Hayes S, Vincentelli R, Mahony J, Nauta A, Ramond L, et al. Functional carbohydrate binding modules identified in evolved dits from siphophages infecting various Gram-positive bacteria. Mol Microbiol. 2018;110:777–795. doi: 10.1111/mmi.14124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Demšar J, Erjavec A, Hočevar T, Milutinovič M, Možina M, et al. Orange: data mining toolbox in python. J Mach Learn Res. 2013;14:2349–2353. [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Chandry PS, Moore SC, Boyce JD, Davidson BE, Hillier AJ. Analysis of the DNA sequence, gene expression, origin of replication and modular structure of the Lactococcus lactis lytic bacteriophage sk1. Mol Microbiol. 1997;26:49–64. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1997.5491926.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Kumar S, Nei M, Dudley J, Tamura K. MEGA: a biologist-centric software for evolutionary analysis of DNA and protein sequences. Brief Bioinform . 2008;9:299–306. doi: 10.1093/bib/bbn017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Thompson JD, Gibson TobyJ, Higgins DG. Multiple sequence alignment using ClustalW and ClustalX. Curr Protoc Bioinforma. 2003;00 doi: 10.1002/0471250953.bi0203s00. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Abramson J, Adler J, Dunger J, Evans R, Green T, et al. Accurate structure prediction of biomolecular interactions with AlphaFold 3. Nature. 2024;630:493–500. doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-07487-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Pettersen EF, Goddard TD, Huang CC, Meng EC, Couch GS, et al. UCSF ChimeraX: structure visualization for researchers, educators, and developers. Protein Sci. 2021;30:70–82. doi: 10.1002/pro.3943. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.O’Driscoll J, Glynn F, Cahalane O, O’Connell-Motherway M, Fitzgerald GF, et al. Lactococcal plasmid pNP40 encodes a novel, temperature-sensitive restriction-modification system. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004;70:5546–5556. doi: 10.1128/AEM.70.9.5546-5556.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Valyasevi R, Sandine WE, Geller BL. A membrane protein is required for bacteriophage C2 infection of Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis C2. J Bacteriol. 1991;173:6095–6100. doi: 10.1128/jb.173.19.6095-6100.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Mahony J, Frantzen C, Vinogradov E, Sadovskaya I, Theodorou I, et al. The CWPS Rubik’s cube: Linking diversity of cell wall polysaccharide structures with the encoded biosynthetic machinery of selected Lactococcus lactis strains. Mol Microbiol. 2020;114:582–596. doi: 10.1111/mmi.14561. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Goodrich-Blair H, Shub DA. Beyond homing: competition between intron endonucleases confers a selective advantage on flanking genetic markers. Cell. 1996;84:211–221. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80976-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Kala S, Cumby N, Sadowski PD, Hyder BZ, Kanelis V, et al. HNH proteins are a widespread component of phage DNA packaging machines. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111:6022–6027. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1320952111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Szczepańska AK, Hejnowicz MS, Kołakowski P, Bardowski J. Biodiversity of Lactococcus lactis bacteriophages in Polish dairy environment. Acta Biochim Pol. 2007;54:151–158. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Uncited Fig. S1.
mgen-11-01548-s001.pdf (267.8KB, pdf)
DOI: 10.1099/mgen.0.001548

Articles from Microbial Genomics are provided here courtesy of Microbiology Society

RESOURCES