Skip to main content
Aging and Disease logoLink to Aging and Disease
. 2025 Feb 10;17(1):159–184. doi: 10.14336/AD.2024.1438

Interconnected Pathways of Alzheimer's Disease and Osteoporosis: A Review of Genetic, Hormonal, and Environmental Influences

Yu-Xin Li 1, Kun Liu 1, Qin Zeng 1, Wei-Hong Zeng 1, Jia-Li Li 1, Qian-Qian Zhang 1, Xuan Lu 1, Hong-Wen Deng 2,*, Li-Jun Tan 1,*
PMCID: PMC12727082  PMID: 40153577

Abstract

Alzheimer's disease (AD) and osteoporosis (OP) are both age-related multifactorial degenerative diseases that share overlapping pathogenic mechanisms. While genetic factors contribute significantly to their onset and progression, environmental influences also play a crucial role. However, identifying the shared environmental factors and genetic architecture underlying the co-pathogenesis of AD and OP remains a significant challenge. This review highlights the common hormonal imbalances, environmental factors, genetic factors, and similar signaling pathways involved in both diseases. Furthermore, it explores the role of bone-secreted proteins and extracellular vesicles (EVs) in AD, as well as the effects of brain-derived proteins and EVs on bone homeostasis. By shedding light on the interconnected molecular and pathological mechanisms of AD and OP, this review aims to enhance our understanding of the underlying pathological molecular mechanisms of AD and OP, promote early diagnosis, and support the development of innovative therapeutic strategies for AD and OP patients.

Keywords: Alzheimer's disease, osteoporosis, hormones, genetic factors, environmental impact factors

1. Introduction

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is one of the most prevalent neurodegenerative disorders, with a high degree of heritability. Twin studies estimate the heritability of AD to range between 60% and 80% [1]. Clinically, AD is characterized by a progressive cognitive decline, behavioral abnormalities, and reduced ability to perform daily activities. Its histopathology hallmarks include the accumulation of extracellular amyloid beta (Aβ) plaques and intracellular neuronal (tau) tangles in the brain, which result in neuronal death, brain atrophy, and memory loss [2]. As the global population ages, the prevalence of AD continues to rise, with projections estimating 152.8 million cases worldwide by 2050 [3]. Despite extensive research, no curative treatments or effective therapies are currently available. The increasing incidence of AD poses a significant public health challenge, contributing to a substantial social and economic burden.

Osteoporosis (OP), the most common metabolic bone disease [4], is characterized by low bone mineral density (BMD), deterioration of the bone tissue microarchitecture [5], and reduced bone mass, which leads to an increased risk of fracture, particularly in elderly and post-menopausal females [6]. The clinical diagnosis and evaluation of OP primarily rely on the measurement of BMD. Similar to AD, BMD is a highly heritable trait, with heritability estimates ranging between 60% and 80% [7]. This indicates that genetic factors play a predominant role, while environmental factors also significantly influence bone density. Osteoporotic fractures have severe consequences, serving as a leading cause of mortality and disability in elderly patients, leading to a heavy burden on the healthcare system and society as a whole.

Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified hundreds of susceptibility loci associated with OP and AD. However, the shared causal variants, genes, and molecular mechanisms underlying these two diseases remain largely unknown. To date, the genetic loci identified through GWAS account for only a fraction of the heritability of AD and OP, leaving a significant portion unexplained. While genetic factors play a critical role in the development of these conditions, environmental factors are equally important and contribute substantially to their onset and progression.

This review explores the interconnected pathways between AD and OP by examining genetic and environmental factors. It emphasizes the shared significance of these factors in the pathophysiology of AD and OP, focusing on their implications for prevention, early intervention, and the development of novel therapeutic strategies. Understanding these interconnections will provide valuable insights into the co-pathogenesis of AD and OP, paving the way for improved management of these age-related disorders.

Specifically, we conducted a systematic search of PubMed using the following keywords: “Alzheimer's disease”, “osteoporosis”, “brain”, “bone”, “osteocyte”, “estrogen”, “thyroid hormone”, “follicle-stimulating hormone”, “insulin”, “glucocorticoids ”, “melatonin”, “metal ions”, “sleep”, “diet ”, “exercise”, “smoking”, “inflammation”, “education level”, “air pollution”, “gut microflora”, “alcohol consumption”, “extracellular vesicles” This search focused on English-language studies up to November 2024, addressing genetic and environmental factors in AD and OP. All articles were screened for relevance based on their titles and abstracts. In addition, the reference lists of identified articles were reviewed to ensure the inclusion of pertinent studies not captured by the initial search. As a result, a total of 264 relevant articles in English were included in the review.

2. The complex relationship between AD and OP

Several studies suggest a potential association between AD and OP, but the evidence is inconsistent. Epidemiological research indicates that OP is a prevalent comorbidity in patients with AD, with individuals affected by AD frequently exhibiting OP and an increased incidence of hip fractures. Notably, femoral neck BMD has been associated with a twofold higher risk of developing AD and dementia in women [8]. Furthermore, clinical studies have demonstrated a strong correlation between bone metabolism biomarkers and early-stage AD [9]. Some studies have found that bone loss and OP are associated with the progression from mild cognitive impairment to AD [10]. A prospective cohort study reported that bone loss predicted subsequent cognitive decline in older women [11]. Recent studies involving large populations have also observed a significant bidirectional relationship between the rate of cognitive decline and bone loss, particularly in women [12].

Furthermore, reduced BMD has been linked to reduced left precuneus gray matter volume in memory-impaired older adults, suggesting that bone loss may influence cognition [13]. Conversely, a recent meta-analysis indicated a higher risk rate of cognitive impairment in patients with OP [14]. At the same time, a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) study found no bidirectional causal relationship between AD and OP [15]. These findings collectively indicate an association between AD and OP, but the supporting evidence remains somewhat conflicting and warrants further investigation.

3. Effects of hormones alteration on AD and OP

3.1. Estrogen

Estrogen, a type of steroid hormone, consists primarily of estrone, 17-beta estradiol, and estriol, with estradiol being the most biologically active form. Estrogen receptors are widely distributed throughout the body, including in the skeleton and brain [24]. Estrogen functions as an essential neurotrophic factor, playing a critical role in neurogenesis and maintaining the balance of brain function [25]. There is growing evidence that estrogen influences cognitive function through its interactions with various neurotransmitters, including brain-derived neurotrophic factor [26] (BDNF), acetylcholine [27], and dopamine [28]. Estrogen also exerts neuroprotective effects by inhibiting tau hyperphosphorylation and reducing Aβ deposition [29].

Furthermore, estrogen is essential for regulating glucose metabolism in the brain. Estrogen deficiency in postmenopausal women has been shown to elevate nitric oxide (NO) levels, leading to the production of s-nitrosylated complement factor C3 (SNO-C3), which activates microglia and ultimately contributes to cognitive decline in female patients [30]. The relationship between estrogen and AD has driven interest in hormone replacement therapy (HRT), which is associated with improved cognition in APOE4-positive women [31]. However, controversy exists regarding the safety and efficacy of HRT. For instance, a Finnish study found that long-term oral hormone (e.g., estrogen-only or estrogen-progestin combination tablets) therapy in postmenopausal women was associated with a slight increase in the risk of AD [32]. These contradictory findings underscore the need for more rigorous and comprehensive studies to clarify the role of HRT in AD prevention and management (Table 1).

Table 1.

Correlation Study of AD and OP

Years Study Population Findings Refs.
1999 8333 Elderly community-dwelling women enrolled For every 1 SD decline in baseline hip BMD or calf bone BMD, the risk of cognitive decline increased by 32% (95% CI, 19-47%) or 33% (95% CI, 20-48%). [16]
2001 4,304 elderly subjects BMD in older adults was associated with verbal memory impairment. [17]
2003 4462 women aged 70 and above Women with more rapid hip bone loss are more likely to experience cognitive decline than women with lower rates of hip bone loss. [11]
2005 987 subjects (610 female) Reduced femoral neck BMD was associated with a twofold increased risk of AD in women. [8]
2010 55 non-dementia participants and 63 early AD participants Whole-body BMD was positively correlated with total hypothalamic volume in the early AD group (b0 = -1.93, b1 = 3.4, p = 0.007). [18]
2014 946 men and women aged 60-75 years Subjects with the lowest quartile BMD had a 2-fold increased risk of AD compared with controls. [10]
2018 71 older adults with early AD and 69 non-dementia controls Bone loss in AD may be related to neurodegenerative changes in the hypothalamus. [19]
2018 29,983 OP patients and 29,983 controls OP leads to a 1.2-fold increased risk of dementia in women and a 1.3-fold increased risk of dementia in men. [20]
2020 42 male patients with early AD and 40 age-matched healthy older volunteers Bone metabolism biomarkers and BMD are strongly associated with early AD patients. [9]
2020 149 patients with memory disorders Multiple regression analysis showed a significant positive correlation between BMD and rGMV in the left precuneus (adjusted P = 0.046 after SVC). [13]
2020 1508 participants aged ≥60 years in the Bushehr Elderly Health (BEH) program in Iran In women, bone loss and cognitive impairment may be risk factors for each other, but not in men. [21]
2021 150 diagnosed AD patients, 150 sex- and age-matched healthy controls 86.7% of the AD patients showed low BMD. [22]
2021 2361 participants ≥ 65 years of age The rate of cognitive decline in women was significantly associated with bone loss, and the relationship was bidirectional. [12]
2021 78,994 OP patients and 2015 controls OP patients showed high risk of suffering AD (males HR=1.15; 95% CI = 1.04-1.28; P = 0.008; females HR=1.28; 95% CI = 1.22-1.34; P < 0.001). [23]
2023 8 studies (136,222 subjects) OP patients have a higher risk of cognitive impairment (OR=2.01, 95% CI=1.63-2.48, P<0.01). [14]
2023 GWAS data for AD and BMD at different sites There is no bi-directional causality between AD and OP. [15]

AD, Alzheimer's disease; OP, osteoporosis; BMD, bone mineral density; rGMV, regional gray matter volume; SVC, small volume correction; HR, hazard ratios; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval

In addition to its effects on the brain, estrogen plays a critical role in bone metabolism. A significant decline in estrogen levels in postmenopausal women leads to postmenopausal osteoporosis (PMO), a condition characterized by decreased bone mass and an elevated risk of fractures [33]. Estrogen deficiency accelerates bone resorption and impairs new bone formation, resulting in a marked reduction in BMD [34]. Estrogen promotes bone health by inducing osteoblast (OB) differentiation and reducing osteoclast (OC) activity. Moreover, it inhibits bone resorption by stimulating calcitonin production [35]. In the absence of adequate estrogen, calcitonin production decreases, leading to enhanced bone resorption and the development of OP.

Estrogen also interacts with the immune system, influencing the activity of various immune cells. For instance, during postmenopausal osteoporosis, estrogen deficiency activates B cells, which secrete higher levels of cytokines such as granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-Β ligand (RANKL) [33]. To counteract these effects, selective estrogen receptor modulators, such as raloxifene, are commonly used for OP treatment and prevention. Ultra-low doses of estrogen (0.014 mg/day), approved by the FDA, have been shown to prevent BMD reduction in postmenopausal women, though its adverse effects require further investigation [36].

3.2. Thyroid hormone

Thyroid hormone (TH) exists in two primary active forms: tetraiodothyronine (T4) and triiodothyronine (T3) [37]. T4 is the predominant circulating form of TH, while T3 the biologically active form, is derived from the conversion of T4 within the body. TH is essential for normal growth and development, particularly in the brain and bones.

TH receptors are abundantly expressed in the brain [38]. Studies have demonstrated that thyroidectomy leads to hippocampus-dependent spatial learning and memory deficits in rats [39]. TH can also influence glucose metabolism and insulin signaling [37], both of which are critical for neural function and memory. Specifically, T3 signaling has been shown to inhibit amyloid-β precursor protein (APP) gene expression, thereby reducing Aβ formation through the modulation of histone H3 acetylation and methylation [40]. Consequently, low TH levels may accelerate AD progression by increasing APP expression, leading to elevated Aβ accumulation. Additionally, TH deficiency exacerbates AD pathology by influencing the immune response of microglia [41].

However, the relationship between TSH, TH, and cognitive performance remains controversial. For example, a population-based cohort study found no association between TSH or TH and the risk of AD, nor between TSH or T3 and brain atrophy [42]. In contrast, other studies have suggested that AD may develop in individuals with normal to high TSH levels [43]. While the exact mechanisms remain unclear, the potential influence of TH on the progression of AD cannot be overlooked. Understanding the alterations in TH metabolism within the AD brain may provide valuable insights into novel treatment approaches, including the use of TH replacement therapy.

In addition to its effects on the brain, TH plays a critical role in bone development and metabolism. TH binds to TH receptors on osteoblasts and osteoclasts in bone tissue, ensuring proper bone remodeling and bone metabolism. However, excessive TH reduces both the degree of mineralization of bone and the quantity of mineralized tissue, reflecting an acceleration in skeletal renewal [44]. Hyperthyroidism is a well-established trigger for high bone turnover, as excess TH enhances the activity of both osteoblasts and osteoclasts, ultimately leading to bone loss and increased fracture risk [45]. Conversely, hypothyroidism impairs bone remodeling by decreasing osteoblasts and osteoclasts activity, resulting in lower bone turnover, a prolonged bone remodeling cycle, and increased bone loss [4].

Understanding the dual effects of TH dysregulation on the brain and bones could pave the way for therapeutic strategies targeting both AD and OP. Future research should explore how optimizing TH levels through replacement therapy or other interventions could mitigate the pathology of these diseases.

3.3. Follicle-stimulating hormone

Follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), a gonadotropin produced and secreted by the anterior pituitary gland, plays a critical role in regulating reproductive processes [46]. During menopause, women experience a sharp increase in FSH levels, often exceeding ten times their previous levels. A recent study published in Nature has revealed that elevated perimenopausal FSH levels are associated with the risk of AD, as higher FSH levels accelerate the deposition of Aβ peptides and tau protein in the brain [47]. This finding offers important insights into why women are more susceptible to developing AD compared to men.

In addition to its effects on the brain, FSH is increasingly recognized as a regulator of bone resorption, acting independently of estrogen [48]. Notably, selective FSH blockade stimulates new bone formation [47]. Clinical evidence suggests that serum FSH levels negatively correlate with BMD and positively correlate with bone turnover markers [49]. Elevated FSH levels are strongly linked to menopausal bone loss. Experimental studies, both in vitro and in vivo, have demonstrated that FSH directly or indirectly impacts bone health [50]. FSH binds to its receptor (FSHR) on osteoclasts, promoting osteoclastogenesis and enhancing bone resorption [51]. Additionally, FSH stimulates the production of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNFα), which stimulates osteoclast precursor expansion and osteoblast differentiation [52]. The dual role of FSH in regulating bone mass and modulating cognitive function underscores its significance in the interconnected pathways of AD and OP. While these findings highlight the importance of FSH and its receptor (FSHR) in bone and brain health, there remains uncertainty regarding whether elevated FSH levels or decreased estrogen levels are the primary drivers of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Further research is required to elucidate the relative contributions of these hormonal changes to the pathogenesis of both AD and OP.

3.4. Insulin

Insulin, a peptide hormone secreted by the pancreas, plays a critical role in regulating glucose metabolism in peripheral tissues [53]. Insulin receptors are abundantly expressed in key brain regions, including the hippocampus, mesencephalon, and temporal lobe, which are particularly vulnerable to neurodegeneration [54]. This suggests that altered glucose metabolism in the brain may contribute to the pathogenesis of AD [55]. Insulin has a role in maintaining protein homeostasis by influencing the clearance of Aβ peptide and the phosphorylation of tau, two hallmarks of AD [56]. A study showed that peripheral insulin resistance in AD patients positively correlates with increased brain Aβ deposition, particularly in frontal and temporal lobe regions [57]. There is growing evidence that insulin dysregulation exacerbates Aβ deposition and hyperphosphorylation of Tau proteins, significantly increasing the risk of AD.

Insulin dysregulation also impacts bone health. Abnormal glucose and lipid metabolism associated with insulin dysfunction in the AD brain can lead to secondary bone deterioration. Glucose is an essential nutrient for osteoblasts [58], and bone relies heavily on glucose metabolism. Insulin acts as a crucial regulator of bone growth, influencing calcium resorption and bone mineralization. Insulin signaling is vital for osteoblast differentiation and proliferation, as it promotes Runx2 expression, a key transcription factor that facilitates bone formation [59]. Additionally, insulin stimulates osteoblast differentiation, enhances intracellular amino acid accumulation, and supports the synthesis and secretion of bone collagen and bone matrix while promoting the production of osteocalcin [60].

On the other hand, insulin also modulates osteoclast activity. Elevated insulin levels affect osteoclast recruitment and differentiation by impairing the RANKL signaling pathway [61]. Conversely, insufficient insulin secretion compromises osteoblast-mediated bone regeneration while increasing osteoclast-driven bone resorption. This imbalance leads to a higher rate of bone resorption compared to bone formation, which ultimately accelerates the development of OP.

The intricate interplay between insulin, glucose metabolism, and bone homeostasis underscores the significance of insulin dysregulation in the interconnected pathways of AD and OP. Further research is needed to understand these mechanisms better and explore insulin-targeted interventions for the prevention and management of both AD and OP.

3.5. Glucocorticosteroids

Glucocorticosteroids (GC) are steroid hormones capable of freely crossing the blood-brain barrier, where they bind to a high-affinity mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) and low-affinity glucocorticoid receptor (GR). Numerous animal studies have demonstrated that elevated GC levels contribute to the pathophysiology of AD through several mechanisms, including increased Aβ deposition and tau protein hyperphosphorylation, chronic inflammation, and impairment of synaptic plasticity. Transgenic mouse experiments have provided further insights into the role of GCs in AD, revealing that elevated GC levels exacerbate tau hyperphosphorylation and amyloid accumulation [62]. Additionally, abnormally elevated GC levels affect the structure and function of the hippocampal synapses [63], which can result in cognitive and memory impairment. Elevated GC levels, coupled with microglia abnormalities, also induce chronic brain inflammation [64] and neurotoxicity, ultimately contributing to AD progression.

Glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis (GIOP) is the most common form of secondary osteoporosis [65]. GCs directly influence the function of osteoblasts, osteoclasts, and osteocytes [66]. Specifically, GCs inhibit osteoblast differentiation and maturation [67], leading to decreased bone formation. Moreover, GCs directly prolong osteoclast longevity [68], resulting in decreased BMD. They also increase the ratio of RANKL to osteoprotegerin, promoting osteoclast differentiation and maturation, which further accelerates bone resorption. [69]. Paradoxically, long-term GC therapy inhibits osteoclasts, thereby impairing bone remodeling [70]. Beyond their direct effects, GCs reduce intestinal absorption of calcium [71], suppress estrogen and testosterone synthesis [65], and decrease muscle mass, all indirectly contributing to bone loss.

While GCs are essential for the treatment of numerous conditions due to their potent anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive effects, their overuse poses significant risks for OP. Thus, careful control of GC dosage is critical to minimizing adverse effects. Bisphosphonates, such as alendronate [76]), have demonstrated efficacy in treating GIOP, postmenopausal OP, and male OP. Notably, recent studies have found that alendronate may also inhibit Aβ deposition and memory loss in AD transgenic mice [77]. A population-based analysis found that OP patients treated with bisphosphonates exhibited a significantly lower risk of developing dementia compared to untreated patients [78].

3.6. Melatonin

Melatonin is an amine hormone synthesized by the pineal gland, with its production initiated from the amino acid tryptophan [72]. Melatonin, an essential hormone that affects the As a critical regulator of circadian rhythm, melatonin has been shown to exert significant neuroprotective effects, including attenuation of Aβ-induced intracerebral neurotoxicity [73] and may prevent or slow the progression of AD. Experimental evidence demonstrates that melatonin can improve cognitive deficits in AD mouse models by promoting mitochondrial autophagy [74]. Increasing studies highlight the potential of melatonin in AD treatment. For instance, scientists discovered that melatonin and its metabolites may preserve memory by protecting against cognitive decline in mice and humans [75]. Mechanistic studies further revealed that melatonin mediates the degradation of death-associated protein kinase 1 (DAPK1) and enhances the activity of Pin1, a prolyl isomerase with a protective role against tau hyperphosphorylation and tau-related pathology in AD [76]. These findings position melatonin as a promising candidate for AD treatment and as a potential anti-aging agent, providing new options for AD therapy.

Melatonin also plays an integral role in maintaining bone metabolism by regulating the balance between bone resorption and bone formation. As early as 1999, ROTH et al. [77] reported that melatonin increases the expression of bone sialoprotein (BSP) as well as several key bone marker proteins (e.g., ALP), thereby promoting osteoblast differentiation. Recent studies have demonstrated that melatonin counteracts glucocorticoid-induced inhibition of osteoblast differentiation via the PI3K/AKT and bone morphogenetic protein/Smad signaling pathways [78]. Animal studies corroborate these findings, showing that melatonin facilitates osteoblast differentiation while suppressing osteoclast formation through mechanisms such as reducing oxidative stress and inhibiting peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ) [79]. Moreover, melatonin inhibits bone resorption by downregulating RANKL-mediated osteoclast activation [80].

Emerging evidence suggests that oxidative stress is a major pathogenic mechanism factor in OP. Melatonin enhances cellular antioxidant capacity by activating multiple signaling pathways, maintaining mitochondrial stability [81], and inhibiting apoptosis. These processes mitigate cytotoxic damage, promote cellular osteogenic differentiation and mineralization [82], and suppress osteoclast differentiation [83]. Recently, mutations in the melatonin receptor 1A (MTNR1A) have been identified as a genetic cause of idiopathic osteoporosis (IOP) [84], providing further evidence for the repurposing of melatonin as a potential therapy for OP. Collectively, these findings highlight the dual roles of melatonin in neuroprotection and bone health, underscoring its potential as a novel therapeutic strategy for AD and OP (Table 2).

Table 2.

The effects of different hormones on AD and OP.

Hormones Association mechanism Refs.
Estrogen Affects cognitive function;
Promote bone formation and inhibit bone resorption
[29, 35, 85]
Thyroid hormone (TH) Affects glucose metabolism and APP expression;
Affects bone resorption and bone formation
[4, 37, 40, 45]
Follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) Affects the deposition of Aβ peptide and tau protein;
Increases osteoclastogenesis and resorption
[47, 48]
Insulin Affects the clearance of Aβ peptide and phosphorylation of tau;
Affects calcium absorption and bone formation
[56, 59]
Glucocorticoids (GC) Affects Aβ deposition, tau protein hyperphosphorylation, and brain inflammation; Affects bone formation [62, 68, 86]
Melatonin Affects sleep and cognitive function;
Promote bone formation and inhibit bone resorption
[74, 78, 79]

AD, Alzheimer's disease; OP, osteoporosis; Aβ, amyloid beta

4. The impact of environmental factors on AD and OP

4.1. Metal ion

The appropriate balance of metal elements, such as zinc, iron, and copper, is essential for regulating human growth, brain development, and metabolism. Increasing evidence suggests that abnormalities in metal ion metabolism in the brain are a significant risk factor in the pathogenesis of AD [87]. Metal ions play a critical role in the APP hydrolysis process [88]. Research has revealed that the balance of metal ions in AD patients is disrupted, with iron, zinc, and copper levels in the brain being 3-7 times higher than those in healthy individuals [89]. Notably, iron levels in the brain increase with age, and iron accumulation is directly related to the number of Aβ plaques, particularly in plaques and microglia in the frontal cortex of AD patients [90]. A recent study has identified that the multitarget iron chelating and propargylamine drug M30 has neuroprotective effects in AD models [91]. Similar to iron, copper is involved in cellular oxidative stress and Aβ production [92]. These findings suggest that the dysregulation of metal ion homeostasis significantly impacts APP processing and A β generation, playing an important role in the pathological changes of AD. Therefore, metal ions may be a plausible therapeutic target for AD, with potential treatments focusing on modulating metal ion levels to restore balance.

In recent years, the role of metallic elements in the pathogenesis of OP has also attracted considerable attention. Metallic trace elements, such as manganese, iron, zinc, and copper, are integral components of various catalytic enzymes or coenzymes, regulating bone formation and bone turnover processes. Imbalances in these elements can disrupt bone mineral formation and bone matrix synthesis, ultimately contributing to the development of OP [93]. For instance, iron overload and iron deficiency have been linked to increased risk of OP. Iron overload inhibits osteoblast activity [94], suppressing bone formation and causing bone damage. In contrast, mild iron deficiency may stimulate osteoblast activity, whereas severe iron deficiency inhibits osteoblast function [95], leading to an imbalance in bone metabolism and a heightened risk of OP.

4.2. Sleep

Sleep is a fundamental physiological activity intricately related to circadian rhythms and is considered an essential process for the brain to repair and store information. Normal sleep facilitates the clearance of metabolites and harmful proteins, including Aβ, from the brain. Sleep disorders are a risk factor for AD, with affected individuals experiencing a more significant accumulation of neurotoxic substances due to impaired metabolite clearance [96]. Notably, there appears to be a bidirectional relationship between sleep disorders and AD pathology. Sleep disorders promote the accumulation of Aβ and tau proteins, while increased Aβ and tau aggregation may, in turn, exacerbate the progression of sleep disorders [97]. Chronic sleep deprivation plays a key role in regulating microglia inflammatory and metabolic responses and contributes to increased Aβ plaque deposition in the brain. Early-life chronic sleep deprivation has been linked to AD-related impairments in glycolysis, disrupting metabolic balance, resulting in aberrant protein deposition, and ultimately impairing cognitive function [98]. These findings underscore the importance of adequate and high-quality sleep in reducing Aβ accumulation and mitigating AD risk. Addressing sleep disorders is crucial for AD prevention and treatment. Slow wave activity (SWA) during non-rapid eye movement sleep (NREM) has shown the potential to mitigate memory loss in individuals with significant AD pathology [99].

Sleep disturbances have also been implicated as risk factors for OP. Experimental studies in rats [100] and healthy men [101] have shown that sleep and circadian rhythm disturbances impair bone formation. Both sleep deprivation and excessive sleep are associated with decreased bone density and an elevated risk of developing OP. Animal experiments have found that chronic sleep deprivation during growth phases negatively affects skeletal development, specifically by inhibiting bone formation [102]. Furthermore, several studies have identified chronic sleep disorders as significant risk factors for OP [103]. Poor sleep quality and excessive or insufficient sleep adversely impact bone density, underscoring the necessity of maintaining an optimal sleep duration for bone health.

4.3. Lifestyle

4.3.1. Diet

The relationship between diet, bone health, and brain health has received a lot of attention in recent years. Unhealthy dietary patterns, including high-fat and high-salt diets, have been shown to affect various physiological processes adversely. Long-term consumption of a high-fat diet (HFD) not only increases the risk of obesity but also induces chronic brain inflammation, which can impair cognitive function. High-fat diets are directly implicated in the pathogenesis of AD through mechanisms such as enhanced Aβ accumulation, tau protein hyper-phosphorylation, and exacerbation of neuroinflammation [104]. Moreover, HFD consumption has been shown to alter gut microbial composition [105], triggering systemic inflammation. Inflammation, an important regulator of bone remodeling, can impede bone formation and increase the risk of OP [106]. Additionally, HFDs reduce calcium absorption in the intestines and kidneys, leading to diminished bone minerals (calcium and phosphorus) [107] and subsequent bone loss, thereby increasing susceptibility to OP.

A high-salt diet (HSD) poses similar risks to both cognitive and skeletal health. HSDs have been identified as risk factors for dementia, as they promote tau protein phosphorylation in the brain, leading to cognitive impairment [108]. Elevated sodium intake has been shown to increase blood levels of interleukin 17 (IL-17), which reduces nitric oxide (NO) bioavailability, resulting in imbalanced vasoregulation [109]. This imbalance restricts the oxygen and glucose supply to brain regions critical for cognitive function. Additionally, NO depletion exacerbates hyperphosphorylation of tau proteins [110], further contributing to cognitive deficits in mice.

Excessive salt intake also negatively affects bone health. In addition, HSDs increase calcium loss from the human endoskeleton by promoting urinary calcium excretion, which can accelerate bone demineralization and heighten the risk of OP. [111]. A recent study based on the Korean population data revealed a negative correlation between urinary sodium excretion and bone health, indicating that high salt intake is a significant risk factor for OP [112].

The Mediterranean diet, characterized by a high intake of vegetables, fruits, legumes, fish, and olive oil, promotes brain and bone health [113, 114]. Studies have linked this diet to increased lumbar spine BMD in postmenopausal women [115] and a reduced risk of cognitive decline and AD [116, 117].

4.3.2. Exercise

An accessible and efficient method to slow brain aging is to increase physical activity. Studies have shown that regular exercise improves brain health and is associated with increased brain volume [118]. Recent research indicates that exercise can alleviate the pathological features of AD and improve cognitive dysfunction by modulating the morphology and function of astrocytes. Clinical studies have demonstrated that regular physical activity significantly improves mental health and cognitive performance in healthy older adults and AD patients. For instance, a prospective cohort study conducted on the Japanese general population revealed that higher participation in daily physical activity was associated with nearly a 50% reduction in AD risk [119]. Moreover, recent findings suggest that moderate physical activity (MPA) is particularly effective in lowering the risk of developing AD [120]. Additionally, long-term exercise has been shown to enhance sleep quality, which indirectly contributes to improved brain health.

Regular exercise also plays a pivotal role in maintaining bone health during aging and is widely recognized as an effective intervention for promoting bone formation in OP patients. Mechanically induced forces from physical activity are essential for maintaining bone homeostasis, as the absence of exercise deteriorates bone strength and structure and accelerates bone loss [121]. Exercise increases lumbar spine and femur BMD in menopausal women and older adults [122, 123].

4.4. Smoking

The dangers of smoking extend far beyond its well-documented effects on lung health, posing a serious threat to brain health and increasing the risk of AD. Research has shown that middle-aged smokers are more likely to experience memory loss, cognitive impairment, and AD compared to non-smokers [124]. A study reported that smoking is associated with accelerated degradation of gray and white matter [125]. Furthermore, smoking has been shown to shrink the brain and accelerate brain aging; notably, this reduction in brain volume appears to be irreversible [125]. Smoking also has a profound impact on the cerebral cortex, which is significantly thinner in smokers compared to ex-smokers and non-smokers [126]. This cortical thinning is a key marker of neurodegeneration and may signal an increased dementia risk 5-10 years before the onset of clinical symptoms [127].

In addition to its detrimental effects on brain health, smoking compromises bone health significantly by reducing bone strength and BMD. A previous study found that active smokers have lower BMD compared to non-smokers, putting them at a higher risk for OP and fracture [128]. GWAS analysis reveals a significant genetic correlation between smoking status and BMD, indicating that smoking behavior and BMD are influenced by shared genetic factors [129]. Cigarette smoke contains a variety of toxic and hazardous substances such as nicotine, heavy metals (arsenic, cadmium, and lead), and tar, which collectively harm the skeletal system and reduce BMD. Cadmium, in particular, is a major contributor to smoking-induced bone damage, as the element accumulates in the body over time, with bone being a primary target of cadmium toxicity [130].

Nicotine, another key component of cigarette smoke, exhibits dose-dependent effects on bone metabolism. Low nicotine concentrations promote osteoblast-like cell proliferation and the expression of genes involved in bone metabolism, while high nicotine concentrations exert the opposite effect [131]. Additionally, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH), such as benzo [a]pyrene (BaP), a carcinogenic compound found in cigarette smoke, have been shown to inhibit osteoclast differentiation and bone resorption through crosstalk between RANKL and NF-κB [132]. Smoking has also been linked to an increased risk of insulin resistance, which may further contribute to compromised bone health [133]. Smoking also disrupts hormonal balance, reducing estrogen production and metabolism [134], thereby diminishing the protective effects of estrogen on bone health in premenopausal women.

Notably, passive smoking has been shown to produce effects comparable to those of active smoking, suggesting that both are significant risk factors for OP. The Bone Health and Osteoporosis Foundation (BHOF) strongly advocates for smoking cessation as a preventive measure against OP.

4.5. Inflammation

Inflammation is the body's immune response to injury, infection, or other stimuli. The brain is particularly vulnerable to inflammation, and neuroinflammation is prominently observed in pathologically affected regions in AD [135]. While the exact etiology of AD remains elusive, neuroinflammation is increasingly recognized as a crucial contributor to its development and progression. Microglia, the primary immune cells in the central nervous system (CNS), play a central role in neuroinflammation. Upon activation, microglia release proinflammatory cytokines, such as TNF, which have been shown to induce tau accumulation in neurons [136]. Persistent neuroimmune inflammation is now considered the third hallmark of AD, alongside Aβ plaques and neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs) [137].

The role of inflammation in AD is complex, as it exhibits both protective and detrimental effects depending on the stage of the disease. While attenuation of pro-inflammatory phagocytosis during the early stage of Aβ plaque accumulation can have harmful effects, chronic activation of pro-inflammatory signaling exacerbates tau pathology, synaptic loss, and neuronal damage [138].In addition, chronic inflammation is a key factor in blood-brain barrier (BBB) dysfunction, which further impairs Aβ metabolism and accelerates its deposition [139, 140]. These findings underscore the central role of neuroinflammation not only as a response to the pathological process of AD but also as a driving force in the progression of AD. Consequently, numerous therapeutic strategies targeting neuroinflammation have been developed and are currently undergoing clinical trials.

Inflammation also exerts a profound impact on bone metabolism, disrupting the delicate balance between bone resorption and bone formation [141]. Chronic inflammation promotes pathological bone loss by increasing osteoclastic activity while inhibiting osteoblastic function [142]. Inflammatory states are characterized by elevated levels of pro-inflammatory factors such as TNF-α and interleukin-6 (IL-6), which are major regulators of dysregulated bone remodeling [143]. TNF-α activates the NF-κB pathway in osteocytes, upregulates RANKL, and stimulates osteoclastogenesis and bone resorption [144]. Simultaneously, TNF-α suppresses osteoblast activity, further reducing bone formation and increasing the risk of OP. IL6 also promotes osteoclastogenesis [145] and is an important biomarker for postmenopausal osteoporosis and a predictor of osteoporotic fractures [146].

The interplay between inflammation, AD, and OP highlights a shared pathogenic mechanism that involves dysregulated immune responses. Chronic inflammation not only accelerates the progression of AD but also contributes to abnormal bone metabolism, emphasizing the need for therapeutic interventions that target inflammatory pathways to mitigate the effects of these interconnected diseases.

4.6. Educational level

Higher levels of education are widely believed to enhance an individual's cognitive reserve, defined as the brain's capacity to maintain cognitive function as long as possible under any damaging conditions [147]. A study by Larsson [148] et al. identified a significant association between higher educational attainment and a reduced risk of AD, emphasizing the protective role of education in cognitive health. Recent research also demonstrates a significant correlation between years of education and a reduced risk of AD [149]. However, once AD symptoms manifest, a study has also noted that individuals with high cognitive reserve showed a faster rate of cognitive decline compared to those with lower cognitive reserve [150]. This accelerated decline may reflect the ability of cognitive reserve to mask early symptoms, delaying diagnosis until the pathology has advanced significantly. These findings highlight the need to increase access to education and promote cognitive activities that stimulate the population across all ages as a preventive strategy for AD.

Educational attainment also plays a crucial role in the prevention and management of OP. Lower levels of education have been identified as an independent risk factor for OP [151]. Conversely, higher levels of education are positively associated with OP prevention, as they are linked to broader perspectives, greater access to knowledge, and more proactive attitudes toward bone health [152]. Educated individuals are more likely to engage in health-promoting behaviors, access high-quality healthcare, and exhibit higher health literacy [153]. These advantages contribute to a healthier lifestyle, including balanced nutrition, regular physical activity, and reduced exposure to environmental toxins, which collectively lower the risk of developing AD and OP.

The interplay between education, AD, and OP underscores the importance of societal efforts to enhance educational opportunities and health literacy. By promoting lifelong learning and awareness, it may be possible to mitigate the risks of these interconnected diseases through improved cognitive reserve and healthier lifestyles.

4.7. Air pollution

Air pollution is the fourth leading cause of illness and mortality globally [154]. Long-term exposure to air pollution, particularly fine particulate matter (PM2.5), has been implicated in the pathophysiology of AD [155]. In 2018, The Lancet Pollution Commission identified a strong association between atmospheric particulate matter and the development of dementia in the elderly population [156]. PM2.5 has been shown to alter the permeability of the BBB and thus enter the brain. In addition, PM2.5 can also enter the brain by traveling along the olfactory nerve via the nasal mucosa. Emerging evidence suggests that interactions between PM2.5 and genetic factors, such as APOE, may hasten brain aging, offering novel insights into the pathogenesis of AD [157]. A recent study analyzed postmortem brain tissue from 224 individuals and revealed that those exposed to elevated PM2.5 levels for at least one year before death exhibited higher levels of amyloid plaques [158]. Remarkably, even PM2.5 concentrations below the air quality standards set by the US EPA, the UK, and the EU were found to significantly increase dementia risk [159]. These findings indicate that prolonged exposure to low concentrations of PM2.5 is sufficient to elevate the risk of developing AD, highlighting the urgent need for stricter air quality regulations and public health interventions.

In addition to its impact on cognitive health, poor air quality is emerging as a significant risk factor for bone health. A prospective observational study explored the relationship between air pollution and bone health and identified nitrogen oxides as key contributors to bone loss, particularly in the lumbar spine, the most susceptible site. [160]. Recent experimental evidence from in vitro and in vivo models further supports these findings, showing that PM2.5 exposure may increase the risk of OP by promoting osteoclastogenesis through the TNF-α-mediated Traf6/c-Fos pathway [161].

The dual impact of air pollution on both AD and OP underscores its far-reaching consequences on public health. Efforts to mitigate air pollution could significantly reduce the prevalence of these interconnected diseases.

4.8. Gut microbiota

The gut microbiota refers to the diverse community of microorganisms residing in the intestinal tract, which interacts with the CNS in a bidirectional manner, forming the gut-brain axis. This interaction is primarily mediated through the production of microbial metabolites, as well as the modulation of the nervous, immune, and endocrine systems [162].

Recent studies have highlighted the significant role of gut microbiota in the pathogenesis of AD. Gut microbiota-derived metabolites can enhance inflammatory response in the CNS, leading to pathologic microglial function, increased neurotoxicity, and impaired amyloid clearance, collectively heightening AD risk [163]. A recent amplicon sequencing technology study identified the gut as a potential source of Aβ production. Gut microbiota can upregulate gut-derived Aβ, contributing to the pathogenesis of AD [164]. Studies of the gut microbiota in AD patients have revealed an increased abundance of pro-inflammatory microorganisms and a reduced population of beneficial metabolite-producing microorganisms, establishing a causal relationship between AD and gut microbiota dysbiosis [165].

The intimate relationship between intestinal flora and AD development is now well-documented, with gut microbiota and their metabolites playing pivotal roles in neuroinflammation and amyloid pathology. These findings suggest that interventions to regulate intestinal flora may represent a novel strategy for combating AD by mitigating neuroinflammation via the brain-gut axis. Novel therapies targeting the brain-gut axis show promise. For example, chiral Au nanoparticles and sodium Oligomannate (GV-971) have been shown to modulate gut flora, reduce neuroinflammation, and improve cognitive function in AD models [172-174].

The gut microbiota also plays a crucial role in regulating bone metabolism by modulating intestinal function, immune system, and endocrine system [166, 167]. Healthy gut microbiota can reduce intestinal inflammation and improve bone metabolic function [168]. Recent studies have revealed a possible mechanism linking gut bacteria to bone health. For example, Bacteroides vulgaris has been shown to negatively impact bone structure in mice by inhibiting the production of valeric acid, thereby promoting bone absorption [169]. In contrast, short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs (, produced by the gut microbiota, exhibit anti-inflammatory effects by inhibiting the activation of nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells (NF-κB ( activation [170]. SCFAs also regulate osteocyte metabolism and bone mass by regulating osteoclast differentiation and inhibiting excessive bone resorption without impairing bone formation [171].

Furthermore, the gut microbiota promotes insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) production via SCFA-mediated pathway. IGF-1 stimulates osteoblast, osteoclast, and chondrocyte differentiation, which are vital for bone remodeling [172]. The gut microbiota also synthesizes key vitamins, such as vitamin B [173] and vitamin K [174], which are crucial for maintaining bone health. In addition, the gut microbiota influences the nervous system by regulating the synthesis of hormones and neurotransmitters such as serotonin (5-HT) [175, 176]. Serotonin signaling, in particular, plays a crucial role in bone development and maintenance [177].

The evidence suggests that the gut microbiota may form an "axis" connecting the gut to bone metabolism, influencing bone health through intricate pathways involving inflammation, endocrine signaling, and vitamin synthesis. Therefore, maintaining the homeostatic balance of gut microbiota holds significant potential for promoting cognitive and skeletal health.

4.9. Alcohol consumption

Alcohol and its metabolite acetaldehyde exert direct neurotoxic effects, causing permanent structural and functional damage to the brain [178]. Evidence suggests that alcohol consumption accelerates the pathological cascade of AD, particularly in its early stages. Even moderate alcohol consumption has been associated with accelerated brain atrophy and increased amyloid plaque deposition [179]. Animal studies have shown that chronic alcohol consumption leads to neuronal tau protein phosphorylation in the hippocampus, resulting in impaired memory and cognitive deficits [180]. Furthermore, a large-scale study analyzing data from over 36,000 adults in the UK Biobank found that alcohol consumption is associated with reduced brain volume. Strikingly, even light to moderate alcohol consumption was found to have detrimental effects on brain health, with an average of one beer per day associated with brain aging comparable to two additional years of natural aging [181]. These findings challenge earlier perceptions of moderate alcohol use being relatively harmless, highlighting that even low levels of alcohol consumption can significantly compromise brain health and contribute to AD risk.

In addition to its effects on cognitive health, chronic alcohol consumption is a major risk factor for alcohol-induced osteoporosis (AOP), a secondary form of osteoporosis. Research demonstrated that long-term alcohol consumption leads to heightened secretion of TNF-a from peripheral monocytes and tissue-resident macrophages in rhesus monkeys, accompanied by upregulated expression of genes linked to oxidative stress and inflammation/cellular activation [182]. Alcohol disrupts bone cell activity by inhibiting the proliferation and differentiation of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) into osteoblasts [183]. Chronic and excessive alcohol consumption interferes with bone remodeling, leading to significant bone loss [184, 185]. Recent studies have further shown that excessive alcohol consumption decreases trabecular bone area ratio and osteoblast numbers, while increasing osteoclast numbers, resulting in an overall imbalance in bone remodeling [186]. Alcohol consumption alters gut microbiota composition, causing intestinal calcium malabsorption, elevated parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels, reduced production of the active form of vitamin D, and disrupted the production of sex hormones, all of which exacerbate bone loss [187].

Interestingly, some research suggests that the detrimental effects of alcohol on the bone are partially reversible. Abstinence from alcohol has been associated with increased BMD; however, it remains unclear whether BMD will return to normal levels in long-term abstainers [184].

The dual role of alcohol in exacerbating both AD pathology and OP highlights the necessity of addressing alcohol consumption as a modifiable risk factor for these interconnected diseases. Reducing alcohol intake or achieving abstinence may offer significant benefits for both cognitive and skeletal health (Fig. 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

The impact of environmental factors on AD and OP. AD, Alzheimer's disease; OP, osteoporosis; Aβ, amyloid beta; BMD, bone mineral density (Created with BioRender.com)

5. Potential common genetic factors

5.1. TREM2

Trigger receptor expressed on myeloid cells 2 (TREM2) is an innate immune receptor expressed on the cell surface of myeloid cells, including preosteoclasts, microglia, dendritic cells, and macrophages. TREM2 has emerged as a key genetic risk factor for AD and plays a pivotal role in both neuroinflammation and bone metabolism [188].

In the CNS, TREM2 is critical for maintaining immune homeostasis and preventing neurodegeneration. It achieves this by promoting phagocytosis, regulating microglia proliferation and survival, controlling cytokine release, and mediating accumulation around Aβ plaques [189, 190]. In addition, TREM2 activation in microglia also attenuates harmful inflammatory responses, which are central to AD pathology [191]. These functions make TREM2 an essential modulator of the neuroimmune response in AD, linking its activity to the regulation of Aβ pathology and neuroprotection.

Beyond its role in CNS, TREM2 is also a key regulator of bone metabolism, functioning as a crucial factor in osteoclast differentiation and activity. TREM2 is implicated in the activation of the classical Wnt/β-catenin pathway, which serves as a critical molecular link between bone and brain health [192]. Experiments evidence from mouse models have shown that TREM2 and β-catenin jointly regulate bone resorption by modulating the rate of osteoclastogenesis [193]. Furthermore, TREM2 blockade prevents functional resorption of OCs and regulates OC migration [194]. TREM2 is emerging as a potential therapeutic target for AD and OP. Monoclonal antibodies or small molecules could modulate TREM2 signaling to mitigate disease progression [189].

5.2. BMAL1

Brain and muscle arnt-like protein 1 (Bmal1) is a central component of the mammalian biological clock [195], essential for the regulation of circadian rhythms and the maintenance of cellular and organ physiological functions. Bmal1 expression decreases with aging [196], significantly influencing the aging process and modulating the progression of age-related diseases, including AD and OP [197].

Dysfunction of circadian rhythm has long been associated with AD-related neurodegeneration. Experimental studies demonstrate that mice with circadian rhythm disturbances exhibit loss of dendritic length, reduced neuronal complexity in the limbic prefrontal cortex, and impaired cognitive flexibility [198]. Peripheral Bmal1 deficiency in the brain parenchyma has been shown to upregulate ApoE expression and promote deposition of fibrous plaques [199]. Interestingly, Aβ pathology may exacerbate circadian rhythm disruption by degrading BMAL1, creating a vicious cycle that accelerates neurodegeneration [200]. Moreover, deletion of BMAL1 has been linked to a protective activation state in astrocytes and a reduction in tau pathology levels in vivo [201]. Therefore, strategies aimed at restoring BMAL1 levels to induce protective activation of astrocytes early in the disease process or by counteracting Aβ-induced degradation of BMAL1 may represent promising avenues for AD prevention and treatment.

In bone biology, Bmal1 plays an essential role in regulating mesenchymal cell differentiation and bone metabolism. Bmal1 deficiency inhibits osteoblast and chondrocyte differentiation, while promoting osteoclast differentiation and bone resorption [202]. Bmal1 is also involved in rhythmic oscillations of bone formation, where it promotes osteogenesis and inhibits adipogenesis. Bmal1 enhances the differentiation of BMSCs and increases the number of functional osteoblasts through the Wnt signaling pathway while suppressing adipocyte differentiation. Furthermore, Bmal1 supports osteoblast maturation and mineralization during the later stages of bone formation [203]. Recent studies have found that overexpression of Bmal1 enhances the osteogenic capacity of BMSC [204]. This highlights its therapeutic potential for the treatment of bone loss and suggests that Bmal1 could be a novel target for the treatment of bone diseases.

The dual roles of Bmal1 in circadian regulation, AD pathogenesis, and bone metabolism underscore its importance as a potential therapeutic target. Restoring Bmal1 expression may provide benefits for both neurodegenerative and skeletal disorders. Continued exploration of its mechanisms in aging and disease progression is essential for developing targeted interventions aimed at improving cognitive and skeletal health.

5.3. PYK 2

Proline-rich tyrosine kinase 2 (PYK2) is an adhesion patch kinase localized to postsynaptic sites in the brain and expressed abundantly both in the CNS and hematopoietic system. In neurons, PYK2 plays a critical role as a mediator of Aβ toxicity, interacting with Fyn kinase to link Aβ effects to aberrant phosphorylation of Tau [205]. PYK2 can influence both extracellular amyloid plaque and intracellular NFT formation. Specifically, PYK2 directly phosphorylates tau and is an important component of NFT, thereby enhancing tau pathology [206]. These findings highlight the potential of PYK2 as a molecular target in mitigating the downstream effects of Aβ toxicity and tau-mediated neurodegeneration in AD. In addition to its role in CNS, PYK2 is a critical regulator of bone metabolism, particularly in osteoclast and osteoblast function. PYK2 is one of the few genes known to regulate adult bone mass predominantly through its effects on bone formation [207]. PYK2 mediates osteoclast-bone interactions by serving as a major adhesion-inducing tyrosine kinase in osteoclasts. The adhesion of PYK2 to bone matrix induces osteoclast differentiation [208]. In vitro studies further confirm that PYK2 plays an active role in osteoclast maturation and bone resorption [207]. Interestingly, PYK2 deficiency has been found to promote bone formation and enhance the effects of estrogen on the formation and mineralization of the OB matrix, suggesting a dual regulatory role for PYK2 in both osteoclast and osteoblast activity [209]. Recent studies have also identified novel therapeutic approaches targeting PYK2-related pathways. For example, puerarin has been shown to inhibit the integrin-β3-mediated Pyk2-Src-Cbl pathway, thereby interfering with f-actin formation in osteoclasts and suppressing bone resorption [210]. These findings provide promising new perspectives for the treatment of OP.

5.4. MARK3

Microtubule affinity-regulated kinase 3 (MARK3) is a conserved serine/threonine kinase that regulates cell polarity and the cell cycle. MARK3 has been identified in a subset of the granulovacuolar neurodegeneration (GVD) -containing neurons and is strongly associated with the phosphorylation of tau at Ser 262 [211]. This suggests that MARK3 contributes to early tau phosphorylation, a hallmark of AD.

In bone metabolism, MARK3 significantly influences bone mass by disrupting cellular signals in osteoblasts. Both human and mouse studies have revealed that MARK3 transcript levels are negatively correlated with BMD [212]. Functional assessment in mice has shown that loss of function of MARK3, whether globally or specifically in osteoblasts, results in increased bone mass. MARK3-deficient osteoblasts exhibit enhanced matrix mineralization compared to controls, indicating that MARK3 negatively regulates osteoblast activity [213]. Additionally, alterations in MARK3 expression disrupt osteoblast signaling and affect osteoclast differentiation and bone mass [214] (Table 3).

Table 3.

Potential shared genetic factors between AD and OP

Genes Association mechanism Refs
TREM2 Regulates bone resorption and neuroinflammation [34, 35]
BMAL1 Regulates circadian rhythm, bone formation, and cognitive function [36, 37]
PYK 2 Affects the formation of amyloid plaques and NFTs, and affects bone formation [38, 39]
MARK3 Affects early tau phosphorylation in AD;
Disrupts osteoblast signaling transduction
[40, 41]
APOE Affects the clearance of Aβ;
Promotes OB differentiation and inhibits OC formation
[42-44]
VPS35 Affects neuronal function and bone formation [45-47]
DKK1 Regulates tau phosphorylation and bone homeostasis through the Wnt signaling pathway [48-50]

AD, Alzheimer's disease; OP, osteoporosis; NFTs, neurofibrillary tangles; Aβ, amyloid beta; OB, Osteoblast; OC, osteoclas

6. Potential common signaling pathways

6.1. Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway

An increasing amount of research underscores the critical role of the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway in AD and OP. Dysregulation of this pathway is closely linked to Aβ formation, Tau protein phosphorylation, and synaptic dysfunction [225]. Synapse loss is a prominent early feature of AD and is closely associated with cognitive deficits in AD [226]. The Wnt/β-Catenin signaling pathway promotes neuronal survival and neurogenesis and enhances synaptic plasticity. Recent studies have found that Aβ oligomers directly inhibit the Wnt/β-catenin signaling in endothelial cells, leading to BBB dysfunction and further accelerating AD progression [227].

In the skeletal system, the Wnt/β-catenin pathway is a crucial regulator of BMSC proliferation and differentiation into osteoblasts [228]. β-catenin plays a pivotal role in osteoblast proliferation, differentiation, and activity. Degradation of β-catenin results in impaired osteoblast function, increased serum ALP activity, and reduced BMD, all contributing to OP [229]. Genetic studies have further highlighted the role of this pathway in bone health. For instance, mutations in LRP5, a gene associated with Wnt/β-catenin signaling, have been linked to an increased incidence of osteoporosis or osteomalacia [230].

Animal studies also show that activation of the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway significantly increased osteoblast activation and bone matrix mineralization in ovariectomized mouse models [231]. The Wnt signaling pathway has led to the development of romosozumab for OP treatment [232]. Additionally, DKK1, a key antagonist of the Wnt signaling pathway, links brain and bone health and may serve as a therapeutic target for AD and OP [232-236].

6.2. TGF-β signaling pathway

Transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β), a multifunctional cytokine belonging to the transforming growth factor superfamily, has an important regulatory role in cell growth, differentiation, and immune function. Humans have three TGF-β isoforms: TGF-β1, TGF-β2 and TGF-β3. Aging is associated with a suppression of TGF-β1 expression and inhibition of the TGF-β/Smad signaling pathway, which leads to cytotoxic activation of microglia and mediates neurodegeneration [232]. These changes suggest that age-related declines in TGF-β signaling may be an early indicator of AD.

TGF-β is involved in multiple pathways influencing AD pathogenesis. For instance, the microglia APOE4-ITGB8-TGF-β pathway has been identified as a negative regulator of microglia's pathological response to AD [233]. Additionally, TGF-β1 exerts neuroprotective effects by activating the PI3K/Akt/Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway [234]. However, disruption of the BBB triggers hyperactivation of the TGF-β signaling pathway in astrocytes, contributing to cognitive deficits in both animal models and humans [235].

In bone biology, TGF-β plays a dual regulatory role in the activity of osteoblasts and osteoclasts [236], essential for embryonic skeletal development and postnatal bone homeostasis [237]. During bone remodeling, TGF-β can promote the proliferation and early differentiation of bone progenitor cells via the MAPK-Smad2/3 pathway [238]. TGF-β exhibits both promotive and inhibitory effects on osteoclasts and is involved in bone extracellular matrix metabolism and chondrocyte production [239]. These findings indicate that the TGF-β signaling pathway influences both AD pathology and bone metabolism by crosstalking with other pathways, such as Wnt/β-catenin and MAPK.

6.3. NF-κB signaling pathway

NF-κB is a transcription factor central to the regulation of neuroinflammation and glial activation in the CNS. NF-κB can be activated by Aβ, which further promotes the production of Aβ [240], creating a vicious cycle that accelerates AD progression. Tau proteins also activate the NF-κB signaling pathway, driving microglia into an inflammatory state [241]. Inhibition of the microglia NF-κB signaling pathway in a tau protein-triggered mouse model of AD has been shown to reverse cognitive deficits, restoring the learning and memory abilities of the animals [241]. Additionally, microRNA-22-3p has been identified as a potential therapeutic agent for AD [242] by acting on Sox9 through the NF-κB signaling pathway. Given its central role in neuroinflammation and its regulation of senescence, NF-κB is a promising target for the treatment of AD.

The NF-κB signaling pathway also plays a pivotal role in regulating the differentiation and proliferation of osteoblasts and osteoclasts. Activation of the NF-κB pathway inhibits osteoblast proliferation and differentiation, while its blockade reduces inflammation-induced damage to osteoblasts [243]. The RANKL/RANK/OPG axis is a key regulator of osteoclastogenesis and bone resorption, operating through the NF-κB signaling pathway [244].RANKL binding to its receptor RANK activates NF-κB, as well as three mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathways, which subsequently NF-κB interact with nuclear factor of activated T-cells cytoplasmic 1 (NFATc1) and c-fos transcription factors to drive osteoclast formation [245]. In contrast, osteoprotectin (OPG), a decoy receptor for RANKL, inhibits RANK signaling and protects against bone resorption [246]. Mice lacking OPG exhibit increased osteoclast activity, leading to severe bone loss and OP [247].

From a therapeutic perspective, the RANKL/RANK/OPG pathway is an important target for anti-OP drug development. Denosumab, a monoclonal antibody against RANKL, has been approved for the treatment of postmenopausal OP, male OP, and GIOP [248]. These findings underline the critical role of the NF-κB signaling pathway in bone metabolism and its potential as a therapeutic target for OP and AD (Fig 2).

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Potential shared signaling pathways between AD and OP. AD, Alzheimer's disease; OP, osteoporosis; Aβ, amyloid beta; BMD, bone mineral density; ALP, Alkaline phosphatase; RANK, the receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa B; RANKL, receptor activator of NF-kappaB ligand (Created with BioRender.com).

7. Effects of Bone-derived proteins and extracellular vesicles (EVs) on AD

EVs are a collective term for membrane-bound vesicles released by cells into the extracellular environment, serving as carriers of biologically active molecules such as proteins, lipids, and nucleic acids. Based on their size and release mechanism, EVs are classified into three types: apoptotic vesicles (1000-5000 nm), microvesicles (100-1000 nm), and exosomes (30-100 nm) [249]. EVs are widely distributed in cell culture supernatants as well as in various bodily fluids, including blood, saliva, and urine, and play a crucial role in intercellular communication, enabling long-distance transfer of biomolecules via body fluids [250].

Bone-derived EVs, including osteocyte-derived Evs (OCY-Evs) and BMSC-derived EVs (BMSC-EVs), contribute to the crosstalk between bone and brain, particularly in AD and OP [251]. These EVs can cross the BBB and participate in Aβ metabolism. For instance, BMSC-EVs have been shown to reduce Aβ plaque deposition in the cortex and hippocampus, demonstrating potential therapeutic effects in the early stages of AD [252]. Additionally, BMSC-EVs improve cognitive function in AD rats by activating the miR-29c-3p/BACE1 axis and Wnt/β-catenin pathway activation [253].

Notably, younger OCY-EVs exhibit a greater ability to cross the BBB compared to older OCY-EVs, highlighting the age-dependent decline in the protective effect of OCY-EVs against AD [254]. Moreover, intranasal (IN) delivery of MSC-EVs in 3xTg mouse models has been shown to modulate microglia phenotypes safely and effectively, suggesting a minimally invasive therapeutic route for AD [255]. However, despite these promising findings, most studies using EV-based therapies for AD remain preclinical, necessitating further exploration for clinical translation.

Bone-derived proteins transported via EVs also play important roles in AD pathogenesis. Sclerostin, secreted by osteocytes, inhibits the Wnt/β-catenin pathway in neurons, thereby increasing the expression of BACE1 and accelerating Aβ deposition [256]. Elevated serum sclerostin levels have been identified as a potential risk factor for cognitive decline [256]. Conversely, osteocalcin (OCN), another bone-derived protein, reduces Aβ deposition in the hippocampus and cortex and improves cognitive dysfunction in AD mouse models [257]. These findings suggest that targeting bone-derived proteins and EVs could provide novel therapeutic strategies for AD by modulating the bone-brain axis.

8. Effects of brain-derived proteins and EVs on bone homeostasis

Brain-derived proteins and EVs also play critical roles in bone metabolism, further highlighting the bidirectional nature of the bone-brain axis. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF (, a key member of the neurotrophic factors family, has been implicated in both cognitive function and bone formation. Intranasal administration of miR-206-3p antagomir-loaded MSC-EVs has been shown to target the brain, upregulate the level of BDNF, reduce Aβ deposition, and improve learning and memory in AD model mice [258]. BDNF and its receptor TrkB are expressed at various stages of bone formation and are upregulated in human osteoblasts. BDNF contributes to osteogenesis, promotes fracture healing [259], and stimulates cell differentiation for new bone formation [260].

Another brain-derived factor, cellular communication network factor 3 (CCN3), secreted by arcuate nucleus KISS1 neurons (ARCKISS1) in the maternal brain, has been shown to promote osteogenesis, bone formation, and fracture repair [261]. Similarly, brain-derived EVs influence bone metabolism by transporting microRNAs (miRNAs) that regulate osteogenic differentiation. For example, miRNA-483-5p in brain-derived EVs inhibits osteogenic differentiation and promotes adipogenesis of BMSCs, contributing to bone loss in AD [262]. On the other hand, plasma-derived small EVs (sEVs) from damaged neurons carrying microRNA-328a-3p and miR-150-5p have been shown to promote osteogenesis and bone repair by targeting osteogenic progenitor cells [263]. The application of MSC-EVs in OP therapy is still in its early stages [264]. Further clinical trials are needed to advance non-coding RNA-based therapeutics utilizing EVs as drug delivery systems for OP.

EVs act as critical mediators of communication between the brain and bone, supporting cognitive function and maintaining bone homeostasis within the bone-brain axis. However, while preclinical studies offer promising insights into the therapeutic potential of EVs in both AD and OP, their clinical applications remain to be fully explored. Future research targeting EV-mediated pathways and bone-derived proteins may open new avenues for treating these interconnected diseases (Fig 3).

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

The effect of extracellular vesicles on AD and OP. AD, Alzheimer's disease; OP, osteoporosis; BMSC, bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell; BMSC-EVs, bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell-derived EVs; Aβ, amyloid beta; OCY-EVs, osteocyte-derived Evs; AD-B-EVs, AD brain-derived EVs; BBB,the blood-brain barrier (Created with BioRender.com)

9. Practical and clinical implications

The current treatments for AD and OP are primarily limited to symptomatic relief, with no curative therapies available. The complexity of AD and OP comorbidity highlights the necessity of developing novel therapeutic approaches that not only target neurodegeneration but also address bone loss and dysregulated bone metabolism in AD patients. Targeting AD-related pathways may provide new avenues for OP treatment, while targeting OP-related pathways could provide insights into AD therapies. However, the efficacy and safety of anti-osteoporotic drugs in AD patients and anti-AD drugs in OP patients remain largely unexplored, underscoring the urgent need for research focused on managing neurodegeneration and bone loss in this population.

Preventive strategies targeting modifiable risk factors, such as diet, exercise, sleep, smoking, and alcohol consumption, are critical for reducing the incidence of both AD and OP. The lack of systematic studies on AD and OP comorbidity highlights the need for new animal models and well-designed clinical trials to evaluate the efficacy and safety of anti-osteoporotic drugs in AD patients.

10. Summary

The interplay between genetic and environmental factors plays a crucial role in developing complex diseases such as AD and OP. AD and OP have multifaceted etiologies involving multiple susceptibility genes and diverse environmental factors. Environmental factors often exacerbate the risk of AD and OP by promoting stress hormone signaling, oxidative stress, and chronic inflammation. This review summarizes the current understanding of how environmental factors influence the onset and progression of AD and OP and highlights the genetic mechanisms underlying these conditions. However, the intricate interactions between environmental and genetic predispositions remain insufficiently explored. Notably, gene-gene and gene-environment interactions may also vary significantly across populations, particularly in polygenic diseases like AD and OP.

The correlation between AD and OP remains incompletely understood, and the shared factors and mechanisms driving their co-pathogenesis require further investigation. Although several common genetic factors contributing to both AD and OP have been identified, additional research is needed to elucidate the interconnections between the two diseases. Future studies should investigate how specific environmental factors (e.g., metal ions and unhealthy lifestyles) interact with genetic backgrounds to influence the development and progression of AD and OP. The shared pathologic features of AD and OP present an opportunity for developing common therapeutic strategies. For example, drugs targeting the Wnt/β-catenin or TGF-βsignaling pathways could potentially enhance cognitive function and BMD. Additionally, future research should prioritize the exploration of novel cell-based therapeutic approaches, particularly those involving bone-secreted proteins and brain-derived proteins, given the intricate interactions between bone and brain.

Understanding the complex link between AD and OP holds promise not only for improving early diagnosis and treatment but also for discovering innovative therapeutic strategies that benefit both diseases. Furthermore, the application of advanced techniques such as big data and artificial intelligence could aid in identifying novel biomarkers and developing targeted treatments for AD and OP. This integration of interdisciplinary approaches is critical for bridging existing knowledge gaps and advancing therapeutic development.

Future studies should integrate GWAS data with environmental data and apply machine learning methods to predict the risk of AD and OP under specific environmental exposures. Additionally, integrating genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics could help identify shared molecular pathways and mechanisms underlying AD and OP. Advanced techniques such as single-cell sequencing and spatial transcriptomics could refine our understanding of pathological changes at the cellular level. The development of dual-purpose drugs and therapeutic strategies that target both AD and OP should be pursued, with their efficacy and safety rigorously tested in clinical trials.

References

  • [1].Gatz M, Reynolds CA, Fratiglioni L, Johansson B, Mortimer JA, Berg S, et al. (2006). Role of Genes and Environments for Explaining Alzheimer Disease. Arch Gen Psychiatry, 63:168-174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [2].Querfurth HW, LaFerla FM (2010). Alzheimer’s disease. N Engl J Med, 362:329-344. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [3].Nichols E, Steinmetz JD, Vollset SE, Fukutaki K, Chalek J, Abd-Allah F, et al. (2022). Estimation of the global prevalence of dementia in 2019 and forecasted prevalence in 2050: an analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet Public Health, 7:e105-e125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [4].Delitala AP, Scuteri A, Doria C (2020). Thyroid Hormone Diseases and Osteoporosis. J Clin Med, 9:1034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [5].Lorentzon M, Cummings SR (2015). Osteoporosis: the evolution of a diagnosis. J Intern Med, 277:650-661. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [6].Coughlan T, Dockery F (2014). Osteoporosis and fracture risk in older people. Clin Med, 14:187-191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [7].Sigurdsson G, Halldorsson BV, Styrkarsdottir U, Kristjansson K, Stefansson K (2008). Impact of Genetics on Low Bone Mass in Adults. J Bone Miner Res, 23:1584-1590. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [8].Tan ZS, Seshadri S, Beiser A, Zhang Y, Felson D, Hannan MT, et al. (2005). Bone Mineral Density and the Risk of Alzheimer Disease. Arch Neurol, 62:107-111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [9].Pu Z, Tang X, Fei Y, Hou Q, Lin Y, Zha X (2020). Bone metabolic biomarkers and bone mineral density in male patients with early-stage Alzheimer’s disease. Eur Geriatr Med, 11:403-408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [10].Zhou R, Zhou H, Rui L, Xu J (2014). Bone loss and osteoporosis are associated with conversion from mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer’s disease. Curr Alzheimer Res, 11:706-713. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [11].Lui L-Y, Stone K, Cauley JA, Hillier T, Yaffe K (2003). Bone loss predicts subsequent cognitive decline in older women: the study of osteoporotic fractures. J Am Geriatr Soc, 51:38-43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [12].Bliuc D, Tran T, Adachi JD, Atkins GJ, Berger C, van den Bergh J, et al. (2021). Cognitive decline is associated with an accelerated rate of bone loss and increased fracture risk in women: a prospective study from the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study. J Bone Miner Res Off J Am Soc Bone Miner Res, 36:2106-2115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [13].Takano Y, Tatewaki Y, Mutoh T, Morota N, Matsudaira I, Thyreau B, et al. (2020). Voxel-Based Morphometry Reveals a Correlation Between Bone Mineral Density Loss and Reduced Cortical Gray Matter Volume in Alzheimer’s Disease. Front Aging Neurosci, 12:178. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [14].Zhao Y, Chen H, Qiu F, He J, Chen J (2023). Cognitive impairment and risks of osteoporosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Gerontol Geriatr, 106:104879. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [15].Hu H, Mei J, Cai Y, Ding H, Niu S, Zhang W, et al. (2023). No genetic causal association between Alzheimer’s disease and osteoporosis: A bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization study. Front Aging Neurosci, 15:1090223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [16].Yaffe K, Browner W, Cauley J, Launer L, Harris T (1999). Association between bone mineral density and cognitive decline in older women. J Am Geriatr Soc, 47:1176-1182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [17].Zhang Y, Seshadri S, Ellison RC, Heeren T, Felson DT (2001). Bone mineral density and verbal memory impairment: Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Am J Epidemiol, 154:795-802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [18].Loskutova N, Honea RA, Brooks WM, Burns JM (2010). Reduced limbic and hypothalamic volumes correlate with bone density in early alzheimer’s disease. J Alzheimers Dis JAD, 20:313-322. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [19].Loskutova N, Watts AS, Burns JM (2019). The cause-effect relationship between bone loss and Alzheimer’s disease using statistical modeling. Med Hypotheses, 122:92-97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [20].Kostev K, Hadji P, Jacob L (2018). Impact of osteoporosis on the risk of dementia in almost 60,000 patients followed in general practices in Germany. J Alzheimers Dis JAD, 65:401-407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [21].Ebrahimpur M, Sharifi F, Shadman Z, Payab M, Mehraban S, Shafiee G, et al. (2020). Osteoporosis and cognitive impairment interwoven warning signs: community-based study on older adults-Bushehr Elderly Health (BEH) Program. Arch Osteoporos, 15:140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [22].Kumar S, Chandnani A, Aung NH, Shahid S, Bukhari D, Shahzad S, et al. (2021). Alzheimer’s Disease and Its Association With Bone Health: A Case-Control Study. Cureus, 13:e13772. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [23].Kwon MJ, Kim J-H, Kim JH, Cho SJ, Nam ES, Choi HG (2021). The Occurrence of Alzheimer’s Disease and Parkinson’s Disease in Individuals With Osteoporosis: A Longitudinal Follow-Up Study Using a National Health Screening Database in Korea. Front Aging Neurosci, 13:786337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [24].Xu W, Jiang Y, Wang N, Bai H, Xu S, Xia T, et al. (2022). Traditional Chinese Medicine as a Promising Strategy for the Treatment of Alzheimer’s Disease Complicated With Osteoporosis. Front. Pharmacol. 13:. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [25].Spencer JL, Waters EM, Romeo RD, Wood GE, Milner TA, McEwen BS (2008). Uncovering the mechanisms of estrogen effects on hippocampal function. Front Neuroendocrinol, 29:219-237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [26].Hwang WJ, Lee TY, Kim NS, Kwon JS (2020). The Role of Estrogen Receptors and Their Signaling across Psychiatric Disorders. Int J Mol Sci, 22:373. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [27].Matsuda Y, Hirano H, Watanabe Y (2002). Effects of estrogen on acetylcholine release in frontal cortex of female rats: involvement of serotonergic neuronal systems. Brain Res, 937:58-65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [28].Almey A, Milner TA, Brake WG (2015). Estrogen receptors in the central nervous system and their implication for dopamine-dependent cognition in females. Horm Behav, 74:125-138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [29].Sato K, Takayama K-I, Inoue S (2023). Expression and function of estrogen receptors and estrogen-related receptors in the brain and their association with Alzheimer’s disease. Front Endocrinol, 14:1220150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [30].Yang H, Oh C-K, Amal H, Wishnok JS, Lewis S, Schahrer E, et al. (2022). Mechanistic insight into female predominance in Alzheimer’s disease based on aberrant protein S-nitrosylation of C3. Sci Adv, 8:eade0764. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [31].Saleh RNM, Hornberger M, Ritchie CW, Minihane AM (2023). Hormone replacement therapy is associated with improved cognition and larger brain volumes in at-risk APOE4 women: results from the European Prevention of Alzheimer’s Disease (EPAD) cohort. Alzheimers Res Ther, 15:10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [32].Savolainen-Peltonen H, Rahkola-Soisalo P, Hoti F, Vattulainen P, Gissler M, Ylikorkala O, et al. (2019). Use of postmenopausal hormone therapy and risk of alzheimer’s disease in Finland: nationwide case-control study. BMJ, 364:l665. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [33].Fischer V, Haffner-Luntzer M (2022). Interaction between bone and immune cells: Implications for postmenopausal osteoporosis. Semin Cell Dev Biol, 123:14-21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [34].Krassas GE, Papadopoulou P (2001). Oestrogen action on bone cells. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact, 2:143-151. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [35].Agnusdei D, Civitelli R, Camporeale A, Gennari C (1990). Calcitonin and estrogens. J Endocrinol Invest, 13:625-630. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [36].Ettinger B, Ensrud KE, Wallace R, Johnson KC, Cummings SR, Yankov V, et al. (2004). Effects of ultralow-dose transdermal estradiol on bone mineral density: a randomized clinical trial. Obstet Gynecol, 104:443-451. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [37].Salehipour A, Dolatshahi M, Haghshomar M, Amin J (2023). The Role of Thyroid Dysfunction in Alzheimer’s Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Prev Alzheimers Dis, 10:276-286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [38].AlAnazi FH, Al-kuraishy HM, Alexiou A, Papadakis M, Ashour MHM, Alnaaim SA, et al. (2023). Primary Hypothyroidism and Alzheimer’s Disease: A Tale of Two. Cell Mol Neurobiol, 43:3405-3416. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [39].Torres-Manzo AP, Franco-Colín M, Blas-Valdivia V, Pineda-Reynoso M, Cano-Europa E (2018). Hypothyroidism Causes Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress in Adult Rat Hippocampus: A Mechanism Associated with Hippocampal Damage. Oxid Med Cell Longev, 2018:e2089404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [40].Belakavadi M, Dell J, Grover GJ, Fondell JD (2011). Thyroid hormone suppression of β-amyloid precursor protein gene expression in the brain involves multiple epigenetic regulatory events. Mol Cell Endocrinol, 339:72-80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [41].Kim DK, Choi H, Lee W, Choi H, Hong SB, Jeong J-H, et al. (2024). Brain hypothyroidism silences the immune response of microglia in alzheimer’s disease animal model. Sci Adv, 10:eadi1863. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [42].de Jong FJ, den Heijer T, Visser TJ, de Rijke YB, Drexhage HA, Hofman A, et al. (2006). Thyroid hormones, dementia, and atrophy of the medial temporal lobe. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 91:2569-2573. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [43].Choi BW, Kim S, Kang S, Won KS, Yi H-A, Kim HW (2020). Relationship between thyroid hormone levels and the pathology of alzheimer’s disease in euthyroid subjects. Thyroid Off J Am Thyroid Assoc, 30:1547-1555. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [44].Monfoulet L-E, Rabier B, Dacquin R, Anginot A, Photsavang J, Jurdic P, et al. (2011). Thyroid hormone receptor β mediates thyroid hormone effects on bone remodeling and bone mass. J Bone Miner Res Off J Am Soc Bone Miner Res, 26:2036-2044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [45].Tsourdi E, Rijntjes E, Köhrle J, Hofbauer LC, Rauner M (2015). Hyperthyroidism and Hypothyroidism in Male Mice and Their Effects on Bone Mass, Bone Turnover, and the Wnt Inhibitors Sclerostin and Dickkopf-1. Endocrinology, 156:3517-3527. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [46].Das N, Kumar TR (2018). Molecular regulation of follicle-stimulating hormone synthesis, secretion and action. J Mol Endocrinol, 60:R131-R155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [47].Xiong J, Kang SS, Wang Z, Liu X, Kuo T-C, Korkmaz F, et al. (2022). FSH blockade improves cognition in mice with Alzheimer’s disease. Nature, 603:470-476. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [48].Sun L, Peng Y, Sharrow AC, Iqbal J, Zhang Z, Papachristou DJ, et al. (2006). FSH directly regulates bone mass. Cell, 125:247-260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [49].Desai Meena P, Khatkhatay MI, Bhanu Prakash KV, Savardekar LS, Shah RS, Ansari Z (2007). Hormonal profiles and biochemical indices of bone turnover in Indian women. Osteoporos Int, 18:923-929. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [50].Xiong J, Zhang Z, Ye K (2023). C/EBPβ/AEP Signaling Drives Alzheimer’s Disease Pathogenesis. Neurosci Bull, 39:1173-1185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [51].Sun L, Zhang Z, Zhu L-L, Peng Y, Liu X, Li J, et al. (2010). Further evidence for direct pro-resorptive actions of FSH. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 394:6-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [52].Iqbal J, Sun L, Kumar TR, Blair HC, Zaidi M (2006). Follicle-stimulating hormone stimulates TNF production from immune cells to enhance osteoblast and osteoclast formation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 103:14925-14930. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [53].Sędzikowska A, Szablewski L (2021). Insulin and Insulin Resistance in Alzheimer’s Disease. Int J Mol Sci, 22:9987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [54].Figueroa PBS, Ferreira AFF, Britto LR, Doussoulin AP, Torrão A da S (2021). Association between thyroid function and Alzheimer’s disease: A systematic review. Metab Brain Dis, 36:1523-1543. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [55].Mergenthaler P, Lindauer U, Dienel GA, Meisel A (2013). Sugar for the brain: the role of glucose in physiological and pathological brain function. Trends Neurosci, 36:587-597. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [56].Kellar D, Craft S (2020). Brain insulin resistance in Alzheimer’s disease and related disorders: mechanisms and therapeutic approaches. Lancet Neurol, 19:758-766. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [57].Willette AA, Johnson SC, Birdsill A, Sager MA, Christian B, Baker LD, et al. (2015). Insulin resistance predicts brain amyloid deposition in late middle-aged adults. Alzheimers Dement J Alzheimers Assoc, 11:504-510.e1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [58].Wei J, Shimazu J, Makinistoglu MP, Maurizi A, Kajimura D, Zong H, et al. (2015). Glucose uptake and Runx2 synergize to orchestrate osteoblast differentiation and bone formation. Cell, 161:1576-1591. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [59].Karsenty G, Khosla S (2022). The crosstalk between bone remodeling and energy metabolism: A translational perspective. Cell Metab, 34:805-817. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [60].Klein GL (2014). Insulin and bone: Recent developments. World J Diabetes, 5:14-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [61].Krishnan A, Muthusami S (2017). Hormonal alterations in PCOS and its influence on bone metabolism. J Endocrinol, 232:R99-R113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [62].TATOMIR A, MICU C, CRIVII C (2014). The impact of stress and glucocorticoids on memory. Clujul Med, 87:3-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [63].Gulyaeva NV (2023). Glucocorticoids Orchestrate Adult Hippocampal Plasticity: Growth Points and Translational Aspects. Biochem Biokhimiia, 88:565-589. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [64].Duque E de A, Munhoz CD (2016). The Pro-inflammatory Effects of Glucocorticoids in the Brain. Front Endocrinol. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2016.00078. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [65].Compston J (2018). Glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis: an update. Endocrine, 61:7-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [66].Chotiyarnwong P, McCloskey EV (2020). Pathogenesis of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis and options for treatment. Nat Rev Endocrinol, 16:437-447. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [67].Canalis E (2005). Mechanisms of glucocorticoid action in bone. Curr Osteoporos Rep, 3:98-102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [68].Jia D, O’Brien CA, Stewart SA, Manolagas SC, Weinstein RS (2006). Glucocorticoids act directly on osteoclasts to increase their life span and reduce bone density. Endocrinology, 147:5592-5599. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [69].Chen M, Fu W, Xu H, Liu C (2023). Pathogenic mechanisms of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev, 70:54-66. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [70].Teitelbaum SL (2015). Glucocorticoids and the osteoclast. Clin Exp Rheumatol, 33:S37-39. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [71].Huybers S, Naber THJ, Bindels RJM, Hoenderop JGJ (2007). Prednisolone-induced Ca2+ malabsorption is caused by diminished expression of the epithelial Ca2+ channel TRPV6. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, 292:G92-97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [72].do Amaral FG, Cipolla-Neto J (2018). A brief review about melatonin, a pineal hormone. Arch Endocrinol Metab, 62:472-479. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [73].Li Y, Zhang J, Wan J, Liu A, Sun J (2020). Melatonin regulates Aβ production/clearance balance and Aβ neurotoxicity: A potential therapeutic molecule for Alzheimer’s disease. Biomed Pharmacother Biomedecine Pharmacother, 132:110887. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [74].Chen C, Yang C, Wang J, Huang X, Yu H, Li S, et al. (2021). Melatonin ameliorates cognitive deficits through improving mitophagy in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. J Pineal Res, 71:e12774. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [75].Iwashita H, Matsumoto Y, Maruyama Y, Watanabe K, Chiba A, Hattori A (2021). The melatonin metabolite N1-acetyl-5-methoxykynuramine facilitates long-term object memory in young and aging mice. J Pineal Res, 70:e12703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [76].Chen D, Mei Y, Kim N, Lan G, Gan C-L, Fan F, et al. (2020). Melatonin directly binds and inhibits death-associated protein kinase 1 function in Alzheimer’s disease. J Pineal Res, 69:e12665. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [77].Roth JA, Kim B-G, Lin W-L, Cho M-I (1999). Melatonin Promotes Osteoblast Differentiation and Bone Formation*. J Biol Chem, 274:22041-22047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [78].Zhao R, Tao L, Qiu S, Shen L, Tian Y, Gong Z, et al. (2020). Melatonin rescues glucocorticoid-induced inhibition of osteoblast differentiation in MC3T3-E1 cells via the PI3K/AKT and BMP/Smad signalling pathways. Life Sci, 257:118044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [79].Zhang L, Su P, Xu C, Chen C, Liang A, Du K, et al. (2010). Melatonin inhibits adipogenesis and enhances osteogenesis of human mesenchymal stem cells by suppressing PPARγ expression and enhancing Runx2 expression. J Pineal Res, 49:364-372. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [80].Histing T, Anton C, Scheuer C, Garcia P, Holstein JH, Klein M, et al. (2012). Melatonin Impairs Fracture Healing by Suppressing RANKL-Mediated Bone Remodeling. J Surg Res, 173:83-90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [81].Tan D-X, Manchester LC, Qin L, Reiter RJ (2016). Melatonin: A Mitochondrial Targeting Molecule Involving Mitochondrial Protection and Dynamics. Int J Mol Sci, 17:2124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [82].Xiong X-C, Zhu Y, Ge R, Liu L-F, Yuan W (2015). Effect of Melatonin on the Extracellular-Regulated Kinase Signal Pathway Activation and Human Osteoblastic Cell Line hFOB 1.19 Proliferation. Int J Mol Sci, 16:10337-10353. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [83].Ping Z, Wang Z, Shi J, Wang L, Guo X, Zhou W, et al. (2017). Inhibitory effects of melatonin on titanium particle-induced inflammatory bone resorption and osteoclastogenesis via suppression of NF-κB signaling. Acta Biomater, 62:362-371. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [84].Bisikirska B, Labella R, Cuesta-Dominguez A, Luo N, De Angelis J, Mosialou I, et al. (2024). Melatonin receptor 1A variants as genetic cause of idiopathic osteoporosis. Sci Transl Med, 16:eadj0085. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [85].Krassas GE, Papadopoulou P Oestrogen action on bone cells. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [86].Pathogenesis of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis and options for treatment. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41574-020-0341-0. Accessed 8 Jan 2024. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • [87].Wang T, Xu S-F, Fan Y-G, Li L-B, Guo C (2019). Iron Pathophysiology in Alzheimer’s Diseases. Adv Exp Med Biol, 1173:67-104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [88].Syed RA, Hayat M, Qaiser H, Uzair M, Al-Regaiey K, Khallaf R, et al. (2024). Aging-Related Protein Alterations in the Brain. J Alzheimers Dis JAD, 99:S5-S22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [89].Zatta P, Drago D, Bolognin S, Sensi SL (2009). Alzheimer’s disease, metal ions and metal homeostatic therapy. Trends Pharmacol Sci, 30:346-355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [90].van Duijn S, Bulk M, van Duinen SG, Nabuurs RJA, van Buchem MA, van der Weerd L, et al. Cortical Iron Reflects Severity of Alzheimer’s Disease. J Alzheimers Dis, 60:1533-1545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [91].Amit T, Bar-Am O, Mechlovich D, Kupershmidt L, Youdim MBH, Weinreb O (2017). The novel multitarget iron chelating and propargylamine drug M30 affects APP regulation and processing activities in alzheimer’s disease models. Neuropharmacology, 123:359-367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [92].Roberts BR, Ryan TM, Bush AI, Masters CL, Duce JA (2012). The role of metallobiology and amyloid-β peptides in Alzheimer’s disease. J Neurochem, 120 Suppl 1:149-166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [93].Zofková I, Nemcikova P, Matucha P (2013). Trace elements and bone health. Clin Chem Lab Med CCLM, 51:1555-1561. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [94].He Y-F, Ma Y, Gao C, Zhao G-Y, Zhang L-L, Li G-F, et al. (2013). Iron overload inhibits osteoblast biological activity through oxidative stress. Biol Trace Elem Res, 152:292-296. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [95].Zhao G-Y, Zhao L-P, He Y-F, Li G-F, Gao C, Li K, et al. (2012). A comparison of the biological activities of human osteoblast hFOB1.19 between iron excess and iron deficiency. Biol Trace Elem Res, 150:487-495. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [96].Shi L, Chen S-J, Ma M-Y, Bao Y-P, Han Y, Wang Y-M, et al. (2018). Sleep disturbances increase the risk of dementia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Sleep Med Rev, 40:4-16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [97].Wang C, Holtzman DM (2020). Bidirectional relationship between sleep and Alzheimer’s disease: role of amyloid, tau, and other factors. Neuropsychopharmacology, 45:104-120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [98].Parhizkar S, Gent G, Chen Y, Rensing N, Gratuze M, Strout G, et al. (2023). Sleep deprivation exacerbates microglial reactivity and Aβ deposition in a TREM2-dependent manner in mice. Sci Transl Med, 15:eade6285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [99].Zavecz Z, Shah VD, Murillo OG, Vallat R, Mander BA, Winer JR, et al. (2023). NREM sleep as a novel protective cognitive reserve factor in the face of alzheimer’s disease pathology. BMC Med, 21:156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [100].Everson CA, Folley AE, Toth JM (2012). Chronically inadequate sleep results in abnormal bone formation and abnormal bone marrow in rats. Exp Biol Med, 237:1101-1109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [101].Swanson CM, Shea SA, Wolfe P, Cain SW, Munch M, Vujovic N, et al. (2017). Bone Turnover Markers After Sleep Restriction and Circadian Disruption: A Mechanism for Sleep-Related Bone Loss in Humans. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 102:3722-3730. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [102].Duan X, Pan Q, Guo L (2022). Chronic Sleep Deprivation Impaired Bone Formation in Growing Rats and Down-Regulated PI3K/AKT Signaling in Bone Tissues. Nat Sci Sleep, 14:697-710. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [103].Cauley JA, Hovey KM, Stone KL, Andrews CA, Barbour KE, Hale L, et al. (2019). Characteristics of Self-Reported Sleep and the Risk of Falls and Fractures: The Women’s Health Initiative (WHI). J Bone Miner Res, 34:464-474. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [104].Guo T, Zhang D, Zeng Y, Huang TY, Xu H, Zhao Y (2020). Molecular and cellular mechanisms underlying the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease. Mol Neurodegener, 15:40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [105].Clemente JC, Ursell LK, Parfrey LW, Knight R (2012). The Impact of the Gut Microbiota on Human Health: An Integrative View. Cell, 148:1258-1270. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [106].Torres HM, Arnold KM, Oviedo M, Westendorf JJ, Weaver SR (2023). Inflammatory Processes Affecting Bone Health and Repair. Curr Osteoporos Rep, 21:842-853. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [107].Song Q, Sergeev IN (2015). High vitamin D and calcium intakes increase bone mineral (Ca and P) content in high-fat diet-induced obese mice. Nutr Res N Y N, 35:146-154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [108].Faraco G, Hochrainer K, Segarra SG, Schaeffer S, Santisteban MM, Menon A, et al. (2019). Dietary salt promotes cognitive impairment through tau phosphorylation. Nature, 574:686-690. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [109].Faraco G, Brea D, Garcia-Bonilla L, Wang G, Racchumi G, Chang H, et al. (2018). Dietary salt promotes neurovascular and cognitive dysfunction through a gut-initiated TH17 response. Nat Neurosci, 21:240-249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [110].Patrick GN, Zukerberg L, Nikolic M, de la Monte S, Dikkes P, Tsai L-H (1999). Conversion of p35 to p25 deregulates Cdk5 activity and promotes neurodegeneration. Nature, 402:615-622. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [111].Goulding A, Campbell D (1983). Dietary NaCl Loads Promote Calciuria and Bone Loss in Adult Oophorectomized Rats Consuming a Low Calcium Diet. J Nutr, 113:1409-1414. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [112].Park Y, Kwon SJ, Ha YC (2016). Association between Urinary Sodium Excretion and Bone Health in Male and Female Adults. Ann Nutr Metab, 68:189-196. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [113].Quattrini S, Pampaloni B, Gronchi G, Giusti F, Brandi ML (2021). The Mediterranean diet in osteoporosis prevention: an insight in a peri- and post-menopausal population. Nutrients, 13:531. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [114].Rivas A, Romero A, Mariscal-Arcas M, Monteagudo C, Feriche B, Lorenzo ML, et al. (2013). Mediterranean diet and bone mineral density in two age groups of women. Int J Food Sci Nutr, 64:155-161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [115].Silva TR da, Martins CC, Ferreira LL, Spritzer PM (2019). Mediterranean diet is associated with bone mineral density and muscle mass in postmenopausal women. Climacteric J Int Menopause Soc, 22:162-168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [116].Moustafa B, Trifan G, Isasi CR, Lipton RB, Sotres-Alvarez D, Cai J, et al. (2022). Association of Mediterranean diet with cognitive decline among diverse hispanic or latino adults from the hispanic community health study/study of latinos. JAMA Netw Open, 5:e2221982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [117].Shannon OM, Ranson JM, Gregory S, Macpherson H, Milte C, Lentjes M, et al. (2023). Mediterranean diet adherence is associated with lower dementia risk, independent of genetic predisposition: findings from the UK Biobank prospective cohort study. BMC Med, 21:81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [118].Raji CA, Meysami S, Hashemi S, Garg S, Akbari N, Ahmed G, et al. (2024). Exercise-Related Physical Activity Relates to Brain Volumes in 10,125 Individuals. J Alzheimers Dis JAD, 97:829-839. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [119].Kishimoto H, Ohara T, Hata J, Ninomiya T, Yoshida D, Mukai N, et al. (2016). The long-term association between physical activity and risk of dementia in the community: the Hisayama Study. Eur J Epidemiol, 31:267-274. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [120].Hu M, Zhang K, Su K-J, Qin T, Shen H, Deng H-W (2024). Unveiling the link between physical activity levels and dementia risk: Insights from the UK Biobank study. Psychiatry Res, 336:115875. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [121].Huang X, Zhu Y, Sun S, Gao X, Yang Y, Xu H, et al. (2023). Exercise maintains bone homeostasis by promoting osteogenesis through STAT3. Int J Biol Sci, 19:2021-2033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [122].Benedetti MG, Furlini G, Zati A, Letizia Mauro G (2018). The Effectiveness of Physical Exercise on Bone Density in Osteoporotic Patients. BioMed Res Int, 2018:4840531. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [123].Gómez-Cabello A, Ara I, González-Agüero A, Casajús JA, Vicente-Rodríguez G (2012). Effects of Training on Bone Mass in Older Adults. Sports Med, 42:301-325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [124].Rajczyk JI, Ferketich A, Wing JJ (2023). Relation Between Smoking Status and Subjective Cognitive Decline in Middle Age and Older Adults: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of 2019 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Data. J Alzheimers Dis JAD, 91:215-223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [125].Chang Y, Thornton V, Chaloemtoem A, Anokhin AP, Bijsterbosch J, Bogdan R, et al. (2024). Investigating the Relationship Between Smoking Behavior and Global Brain Volume. Biol Psychiatry Glob Open Sci, 4:74-82. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [126].Karama S, Ducharme S, Corley J, Chouinard-Decorte F, Starr JM, Wardlaw JM, et al. (2015). Cigarette smoking and thinning of the brain’s cortex. Mol Psychiatry, 20:778-785. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [127].Satizabal CL, Beiser AS, Fletcher E, Seshadri S, DeCarli C (2024). A novel neuroimaging signature for ADRD risk stratification in the community. Alzheimers Dement, 20:1881-1893. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [128].(2015). Cigarette smoking and risk of hip fracture in women: A meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Injury, 46:1333-1340. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [129].Qin C, Zhang W, Xiao C, Qu Y, Xiao J, Wu X, et al. (2024). Shared genetic basis connects smoking behaviors and bone health: insights from a genome-wide cross-trait analysis. J Bone Miner Res Off J Am Soc Bone Miner Res, 39:918-928. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [130].Li H, Wallin M, Barregard L, Sallsten G, Lundh T, Ohlsson C, et al. (2020). Smoking-Induced Risk of Osteoporosis Is Partly Mediated by Cadmium From Tobacco Smoke: The MrOS Sweden Study. J Bone Miner Res, 35:1424-1429. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [131].Rothem DE, Rothem L, Soudry M, Dahan A, Eliakim R (2009). Nicotine modulates bone metabolism-associated gene expression in osteoblast cells. J Bone Miner Metab, 27:555-561. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [132].Yan C, Avadhani NG, Iqbal J (2011). The effects of smoke carcinogens on bone. Curr Osteoporos Rep, 9:202-209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [133].Bergman BC, Perreault L, Hunerdosse D, Kerege A, Playdon M, Samek AM, et al. (2012). Novel and reversible mechanisms of smoking-induced insulin resistance in humans. Diabetes, 61:3156-3166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [134].Pacifici R (1996). Estrogen, cytokines, and pathogenesis of postmenopausal osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res Off J Am Soc Bone Miner Res, 11:1043-1051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [135].Akiyama H, Barger S, Barnum S, Bradt B, Bauer J, Cole GM, et al. (2000). Inflammation and Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol Aging, 21:383-421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [136].Gorlovoy P, Larionov S, Pham TTH, Neumann H (2009). Accumulation of tau induced in neurites by microglial proinflammatory mediators. FASEB J Off Publ Fed Am Soc Exp Biol, 23:2502-2513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [137].Kinney JW, Bemiller SM, Murtishaw AS, Leisgang AM, Salazar AM, Lamb BT (2018). Inflammation as a central mechanism in Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement N Y N, 4:575-590. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [138].Newcombe EA, Camats-Perna J, Silva ML, Valmas N, Huat TJ, Medeiros R (2018). Inflammation: the link between comorbidities, genetics, and Alzheimer’s disease. J Neuroinflammation, 15:276. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [139].Wang D, Chen F, Han Z, Yin Z, Ge X, Lei P (2021). Relationship Between Amyloid-β Deposition and Blood-Brain Barrier Dysfunction in Alzheimer’s Disease. Front Cell Neurosci, 15:695479. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [140].Jha NK, Kumar Nelson V, Nuli MV, Kanna S, Gahtani RM, Hani U, et al. (2024). Unveiling the impact of Aging on BBB and Alzheimer’s disease: Factors and Therapeutic implications. Ageing Res Rev, 102224. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [141].Buenzli PR, Pivonka P, Smith DW (2011). Spatio-temporal structure of cell distribution in cortical Bone Multicellular Units: A mathematical model. Bone, 48:918-926. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [142].Redlich K, Smolen JS (2012). Inflammatory bone loss: pathogenesis and therapeutic intervention. Nat Rev Drug Discov, 11:234-250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [143].Loi F, Córdova LA, Pajarinen J, Lin T, Yao Z, Goodman SB (2016). Inflammation, fracture and bone repair. Bone, 86:119-130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [144].Marahleh A, Kitaura H, Ohori F, Kishikawa A, Ogawa S, Shen W-R, et al. (2019). TNF-α Directly Enhances Osteocyte RANKL Expression and Promotes Osteoclast Formation. Front Immunol. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.02925. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [145].Tamura T, Udagawa N, Takahashi N, Miyaura C, Tanaka S, Yamada Y, et al. (1993). Soluble interleukin-6 receptor triggers osteoclast formation by interleukin 6. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 90:11924-11928. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [146].Shi X, Jiang J, Hong R, Xu F, Dai S (2023). Circulating IGFBP-3 and Interleukin 6 as Predictors of Osteoporosis in Postmenopausal Women: A Cross-Sectional Study. Mediators Inflamm, 2023:2613766. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [147].Seyedsalehi A, Warrier V, Bethlehem RAI, Perry BI, Burgess S, Murray GK (2023). Educational attainment, structural brain reserve and Alzheimer’s disease: a Mendelian randomization analysis. Brain, 146:2059-2074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [148].Larsson SC, Traylor M, Malik R, Dichgans M, Burgess S, Markus HS (2017). Modifiable pathways in Alzheimer’s disease: Mendelian randomisation analysis. BMJ, 359:j5375. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [149].Zhang Q, Xu F, Wang L, Zhang W-D, Sun C-Q, Deng H-W (2020). Detecting potential causal relationship between multiple risk factors and Alzheimer’s disease using multivariable Mendelian randomization. Aging, 12:21747. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [150].Stern Y, Tang MX, Denaro J, Mayeux R (1995). Increased risk of mortality in alzheimer’s disease patients with more advanced educational and occupational attainment. Ann Neurol, 37:590-595. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [151].Wang J, Kong C, Pan F, Lu S (2023). Construction and Validation of a Nomogram Clinical Prediction Model for Predicting Osteoporosis in an Asymptomatic Elderly Population in Beijing. J Clin Med, 12:1292. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [152].Puttapitakpong P, Chaikittisilpa S, Panyakhamlerd K, Nimnuan C, Jaisamrarn U, Taechakraichana N (2014). Inter-correlation of knowledge, attitude, and osteoporosis preventive behaviors in women around the age of peak bone mass. BMC Womens Health, 14:35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [153].IHME-CHAIN Collaborators (2024). Effects of education on adult mortality: a global systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Public Health, 9:e155-e165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [154].Rajagopalan S, Landrigan PJ (2021). Pollution and the Heart. N Engl J Med, 385:1881-1892. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [155].Shi L, Steenland K, Li H, Liu P, Zhang Y, Lyles RH, et al. (2021). A national cohort study (2000-2018) of long-term air pollution exposure and incident dementia in older adults in the United States. Nat Commun, 12:6754. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [156].Landrigan PJ, Fuller R, Acosta NJR, Adeyi O, Arnold R, Basu NN, et al. (2018). The Lancet Commission on pollution and health. Lancet Lond Engl, 391:462-512. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [157].(2017). Air pollution may lead to dementia in older women. In: News Events. https://dornsife.usc.edu/news/stories/air-pollution-may-lead-to-dementia-in-older-women/. Accessed 21 Feb 2024.
  • [158].Christensen GM, Li Z, Liang D, Ebelt S, Gearing M, Levey AI, et al. (2024). Association of PM2.5 Exposure and Alzheimer Disease Pathology in Brain Bank Donors-Effect Modification by APOE Genotype. Neurology, 102:e209162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [159].Wilker EH, Osman M, Weisskopf MG (2023). Ambient air pollution and clinical dementia: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ, 381:e071620. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [160].Prada D, Crandall CJ, Kupsco A, Kioumourtzoglou M-A, Stewart JD, Liao D, et al. (2023). Air pollution and decreased bone mineral density among Women’s Health Initiative participants. EClinicalMedicine, 57:101864. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [161].Ge Q, Yang S, Qian Y, Chen J, Yuan W, Li S, et al. (2023). Ambient PM2.5 Exposure and Bone Homeostasis: Analysis of UK Biobank Data and Experimental Studies in Mice and in Vitro. Environ Health Perspect, 131:107002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [162].Megur A, Baltriukienė D, Bukelskienė V, Burokas A (2020). The Microbiota-Gut-Brain Axis and Alzheimer’s Disease: Neuroinflammation Is to Blame? Nutrients, 13:37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [163].Kowalski K, Mulak A (2019). Brain-Gut-Microbiota Axis in Alzheimer’s Disease. J Neurogastroenterol Motil, 25:48-60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [164].Jin J, Xu Z, Zhang L, Zhang C, Zhao X, Mao Y, et al. (2023). Gut-derived β-amyloid: Likely a centerpiece of the gut-brain axis contributing to Alzheimer’s pathogenesis. Gut Microbes, 15:2167172. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [165].Grabrucker S, Marizzoni M, Silajdžić E, Lopizzo N, Mombelli E, Nicolas S, et al. (2023). Microbiota from Alzheimer’s patients induce deficits in cognition and hippocampal neurogenesis. Brain J Neurol, 146:4916-4934. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [166].Duffuler P, Bhullar KS, Wu J (2024). Targeting gut microbiota in osteoporosis: impact of the microbial-based functional food ingredients. Food Sci Hum Wellness, 13:1-15. [Google Scholar]
  • [167].Chen Y-C, Greenbaum J, Shen H, Deng H-W (2017). Association Between Gut Microbiota and Bone Health: Potential Mechanisms and Prospective. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 102:3635-3646. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [168].McCabe L, Britton RA, Parameswaran N (2015). Prebiotic and Probiotic Regulation of Bone Health: Role of the Intestine and its Microbiome. Curr Osteoporos Rep, 13:363-371. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [169].Lin X, Xiao H-M, Liu H-M, Lv W-Q, Greenbaum J, Gong R, et al. (2023). Gut microbiota impacts bone via Bacteroides vulgatus-valeric acid-related pathways. Nat Commun, 14:6853. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [170].Park J-S, Lee E-J, Lee J-C, Kim W-K, Kim H-S (2007). Anti-inflammatory effects of short chain fatty acids in IFN-γ-stimulated RAW 264.7 murine macrophage cells: Involvement of NF-κB and ERK signaling pathways. Int Immunopharmacol, 7:70-77. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [171].Ding K, Hua F, Ding W (2020). Gut Microbiome and Osteoporosis. Aging Dis, 11:438-447. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [172].Seely KD, Kotelko CA, Douglas H, Bealer B, Brooks AE (2021). The Human Gut Microbiota: A Key Mediator of Osteoporosis and Osteogenesis. Int J Mol Sci, 22:9452. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [173].van Wijngaarden JP, Doets EL, Szczecińska A, Souverein OW, Duffy ME, Dullemeijer C, et al. (2013). Vitamin B12, folate, homocysteine, and bone health in adults and elderly people: a systematic review with meta-analyses. J Nutr Metab, 2013:486186. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [174].Villa JKD, Diaz MAN, Pizziolo VR, Martino HSD (2017). Effect of vitamin K in bone metabolism and vascular calcification: A review of mechanisms of action and evidences. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr, 57:3959-3970. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [175].Stasi C, Sadalla S, Milani S (2019). The Relationship Between the Serotonin Metabolism, Gut-Microbiota and the Gut-Brain Axis. Curr Drug Metab, 20:646-655. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [176].Kennedy PJ, Cryan JF, Dinan TG, Clarke G (2017). Kynurenine pathway metabolism and the microbiota-gut-brain axis. Neuropharmacology, 112:399-412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [177].Park K-R, Kim E-C, Hong JT, Yun H-M (2018). Dysregulation of 5-hydroxytryptamine 6 receptor accelerates maturation of bone-resorbing osteoclasts and induces bone loss. Theranostics, 8:3087-3098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [178].Kruman II, Henderson GI, Bergeson SE (2012). DNA damage and neurotoxicity of chronic alcohol abuse. Exp Biol Med, 237:740-747. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [179].Day SM, Gironda SC, Clarke CW, Snipes JA, Nicol NI, Kamran H, et al. (2023). Ethanol exposure alters Alzheimer’s-related pathology, behavior, and metabolism in APP/PS1 mice. Neurobiol Dis, 177:105967. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [180].Hoffman JL, Faccidomo S, Kim M, Taylor SM, Agoglia AE, May AM, et al. (2019). Alcohol drinking exacerbates neural and behavioral pathology in the 3xTg-AD mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Int Rev Neurobiol, 148:169-230. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [181].Daviet R, Aydogan G, Jagannathan K, Spilka N, Koellinger PD, Kranzler HR, et al. (2022). Associations between alcohol consumption and gray and white matter volumes in the UK Biobank. Nat Commun, 13:1175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [182].Lewis SA, Doratt BM, Qiao Q, Blanton M, Grant KA, Messaoudi I (2023). Integrated single cell analysis shows chronic alcohol drinking disrupts monocyte differentiation in the bone marrow. Stem Cell Rep, 18:1884-1897. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [183].Suh KT, Kim SW, Roh HL, Youn MS, Jung JS (2005). Decreased Osteogenic Differentiation of Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Alcohol-induced Osteonecrosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 431:220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [184].Gaddini GW, Turner RT, Grant KA, Iwaniec UT (2016). Alcohol: A Simple Nutrient with Complex Actions on Bone in the Adult Skeleton. Alcohol Clin Exp Res, 40:657-671. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [185].Luo Z, Liu Y, Liu Y, Chen H, Shi S, Liu Y (2017). Cellular and molecular mechanisms of alcohol-induced osteopenia. Cell Mol Life Sci, 74:4443-4453. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [186].Cheng M, Tan B, Wu X, Liao F, Wang F, Huang Z (2021). Gut Microbiota Is Involved in Alcohol-Induced Osteoporosis in Young and Old Rats Through Immune Regulation. Front Cell Infect Microbiol, 11:636231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [187].Maurel DB, Boisseau N, Benhamou CL, Jaffre C (2012). Alcohol and bone: review of dose effects and mechanisms. Osteoporos Int, 23:1-16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [188].Guerreiro R, Wojtas A, Bras J, Carrasquillo M, Rogaeva E, Majounie E, et al. (2013). TREM2 variants in Alzheimer’s disease. N Engl J Med, 368:117-127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [189].Deczkowska A, Weiner A, Amit I (2020). The Physiology, Pathology, and Potential Therapeutic Applications of the TREM2 Signaling Pathway. Cell, 181:1207-1217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [190].Ulland TK, Song WM, Huang SC-C, Ulrich JD, Sergushichev A, Beatty WL, et al. (2017). TREM2 Maintains Microglial Metabolic Fitness in Alzheimer’s Disease. Cell, 170:649-663.e13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [191].Ji K-Y, Kim S-M, Yee S-M, Kim M-J, Ban Y-J, Kim E-M, et al. (2021). Cyclophilin A is an endogenous ligand for the triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells-2 (TREM2). FASEB J, 35:e21479. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [192].Kelly RR, Sidles SJ, LaRue AC (2020). Effects of Neurological Disorders on Bone Health. Front Psychol, 11:612366. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [193].Otero K, Shinohara M, Zhao H, Cella M, Gilfillan S, Colucci A, et al. (2012). TREM2 and β-catenin regulate bone homeostasis by controlling the rate of osteoclastogenesis. J Immunol Baltim Md 1950, 188:2612-2621. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [194].Humphrey MB, Daws MR, Spusta SC, Niemi EC, Torchia JA, Lanier LL, et al. (2006). TREM2, a DAP12-Associated Receptor, Regulates Osteoclast Differentiation and Function. J Bone Miner Res, 21:237-245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [195].Ray S, Valekunja UK, Stangherlin A, Howell SA, Snijders AP, Damodaran G, et al. (2020). Circadian rhythms in the absence of the clock gene Bmal1. Science, 367:800-806. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [196].Duncan MJ, Prochot JR, Cook DH, Tyler Smith J, Franklin KM (2013). Influence of aging on Bmal1 and Per2 expression in extra-SCN oscillators in hamster brain. Brain Res, 1491:44-53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [197].Zhang W, Xiong Y, Tao R, Panayi AC, Mi B, Liu G (2022). Emerging Insight Into the Role of Circadian Clock Gene BMAL1 in Cellular Senescence. Front Endocrinol. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.915139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [198].Karatsoreos IN, Bhagat S, Bloss EB, Morrison JH, McEwen BS (2011). Disruption of circadian clocks has ramifications for metabolism, brain, and behavior. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 108:1657-1662. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [199].Kress GJ, Liao F, Dimitry J, Cedeno MR, FitzGerald GA, Holtzman DM, et al. (2018). Regulation of amyloid-β dynamics and pathology by the circadian clock. J Exp Med, 215:1059-1068. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [200].Song H, Moon M, Choe HK, Han D-H, Jang C, Kim A, et al. (2015). Aβ-induced degradation of BMAL1 and CBP leads to circadian rhythm disruption in Alzheimer’s disease. Mol Neurodegener, 10:13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [201].Sheehan PW, Nadarajah CJ, Kanan MF, Patterson JN, Novotny B, Lawrence JH, et al. (2023). An astrocyte BMAL1-BAG3 axis protects against alpha-synuclein and tau pathology. Neuron, 111:2383-2398.e7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [202].Chen G, Tang Q, Yu S, Xie Y, Sun J, Li S, et al. (2020). The biological function of BMAL1 in skeleton development and disorders. Life Sci, 253:117636. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [203].Chen Y, Xu X, Tan Z, Ye C, Zhao Q, Chen Y (2012). Age-related BMAL1 change affects mouse bone marrow stromal cell proliferation and osteo-differentiation potential. Arch Med Sci AMS, 8:30-38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [204].Cha S, Wang J, Lee SM, Tan Z, Zhao Q, Bai D (2022). Clock-modified mesenchymal stromal cells therapy rescues molecular circadian oscillation and age-related bone loss via miR142-3p/Bmal1/YAP signaling axis. Cell Death Discov, 8:111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [205].de Pins B, Mendes T, Giralt A, Girault J-A (2021). The Non-receptor Tyrosine Kinase Pyk2 in Brain Function and Neurological and Psychiatric Diseases. Front Synaptic Neurosci, 13:749001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [206].Kumar R, Tiwari V, Dey S (2022). Role of proline-rich tyrosine kinase 2 (Pyk2) in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease. Eur J Neurosci, 56:5442-5452. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [207].Buckbinder L, Crawford DT, Qi H, Ke HZ, Olson LM, Long KR, et al. (2007). Proline-rich tyrosine kinase 2 regulates osteoprogenitor cells and bone formation, and offers an anabolic treatment approach for osteoporosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 104:10619-10624. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [208].Lakkakorpi PT, Bett AJ, Lipfert L, Rodan GA, Duong LT (2003). PYK2 Autophosphorylation, but Not Kinase Activity, Is Necessary for Adhesion-induced Association with c-Src, Osteoclast Spreading, and Bone Resorption *. J Biol Chem, 278:11502-11512. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [209].Posritong S, Hong JM, Eleniste PP, McIntyre PW, Wu JL, Himes ER, et al. (2018). Pyk2-deficiency Potentiates Osteoblast Differentiation and Mineralizing Activity in Response to Estrogen and Raloxifene. Mol Cell Endocrinol, 474:35-47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [210].Qiu Z, Li L, Huang Y, Shi K, Zhang L, Huang C, et al. (2022). Puerarin specifically disrupts osteoclast activation via blocking integrin-β3 Pyk2/src/cbl signaling pathway. J Orthop Transl, 33:55-69. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [211].Lund H, Gustafsson E, Svensson A, Nilsson M, Berg M, Sunnemark D, et al. (2014). MARK4 and MARK3 associate with early tau phosphorylation in Alzheimer’s disease granulovacuolar degeneration bodies. Acta Neuropathol Commun, 2:22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [212].Calabrese GM, Mesner LD, Stains JP, Tommasini SM, Horowitz MC, Rosen CJ, et al. (2017). Integrating GWAS and Co-expression Network Data Identifies Causal Bone Mineral Density Genes SPTBN1 and MARK3 and an Osteoblast Functional Module. Cell Syst, 4:46-59.e4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [213].Zhang Q, Mesner LD, Calabrese GM, Dirckx N, Li Z, Verardo A, et al.Genomic variants within chromosome 14q32.32 regulate bone mass through MARK3 signaling in osteoblasts. J Clin Invest, 131:e142580. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [214].Yang J, Niu H, Pang S, Liu M, Chen F, Li Z, et al. (2023). MARK3 kinase: Regulation and physiologic roles. Cell Signal, 103:110578. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [215].Chen G, Tang Q, Yu S, Xie Y, Sun J, Li S, et al. (2020). The biological function of BMAL1 in skeleton development and disorders. Life Sci, 253:117636. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [216].Noguchi T, Ebina K, Hirao M, Otsuru S, Guess AJ, Kawase R, et al. (2018). Apolipoprotein E plays crucial roles in maintaining bone mass by promoting osteoblast differentiation via ERK1/2 pathway and by suppressing osteoclast differentiation via c-Fos, NFATc1, and NF-κB pathway. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 503:644-650. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [217].Uddin MS, Kabir MT, Al Mamun A, Abdel-Daim MM, Barreto GE, Ashraf GM (2019). APOE and alzheimer’s disease: evidence mounts that targeting APOE4 may combat alzheimer’s pathogenesis. Mol Neurobiol, 56:2450-2465. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [218].Xia Z, Prescott EE, Urbanek A, Wareing HE, King MC, Olerinyova A, et al. (2024). Co-aggregation with apolipoprotein E modulates the function of amyloid-β in alzheimer’s disease. Nat Commun, 15:4695. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [219].Xia W-F, Tang F-L, Xiong L, Xiong S, Jung J-U, Lee D-H, et al. (2013). Vps35 loss promotes hyperresorptive osteoclastogenesis and osteoporosis via sustained RANKL signaling. J Cell Biol, 200:821-837. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [220].Qiu Z, Deng X, Fu Y, Jiang M, Cui X (2024). Exploring the triad: VPS35, neurogenesis, and neurodegenerative diseases. J Neurochem, 168:2363-2378. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [221].Wen L, Tang F-L, Hong Y, Luo S-W, Wang C-L, He W, et al. (2011). VPS35 haploinsufficiency increases alzheimer’s disease neuropathology. J Cell Biol, 195:765-779. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [222].Pinzone JJ, Hall BM, Thudi NK, Vonau M, Qiang Y-W, Rosol TJ, et al. (2009). The role of Dickkopf-1 in bone development, homeostasis, and disease. Blood, 113:517-525. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [223].Scali C, Caraci F, Gianfriddo M, Diodato E, Roncarati R, Pollio G, et al. (2006). Inhibition of Wnt signaling, modulation of Tau phosphorylation and induction of neuronal cell death by DKK1. Neurobiol Dis, 24:254-265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [224].Martínez-Gil N, Roca-Ayats N, Atalay N, Pineda-Moncusí M, Garcia-Giralt N, Van Hul W, et al. (2020). Functional Assessment of Coding and Regulatory Variants From the DKK1 Locus. JBMR Plus, 4:e10423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [225].Zhang C, Wang J, Wang W (2023). Wnt signaling in synaptogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease. Ibrain, 9:316-325. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [226].Forner S, Baglietto-Vargas D, Martini AC, Trujillo-Estrada L, LaFerla FM (2017). Synaptic Impairment in Alzheimer’s Disease: A Dysregulated Symphony. Trends Neurosci, 40:347-357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [227].Wang Q, Huang X, Su Y, Yin G, Wang S, Yu B, et al. (2022). Activation of Wnt/β-catenin pathway mitigates blood-brain barrier dysfunction in Alzheimer’s disease. Brain, 145:4474-4488. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [228].Jiang T, Zhou B, Huang L, Wu H, Huang J, Liang T, et al. (2015). Andrographolide Exerts Pro-Osteogenic Effect by Activation of Wnt/β-Catenin Signaling Pathway in Vitro. Cell Physiol Biochem Int J Exp Cell Physiol Biochem Pharmacol, 36:2327-2339. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [229].Liu Y, Huang L, Hao B, Li H, Zhu S, Wang Q, et al. (2017). Use of an Osteoblast Overload Damage Model to Probe the Effect of Icariin on the Proliferation, Differentiation and Mineralization of MC3T3-E1 Cells through the Wnt/β-Catenin Signalling Pathway. Cell Physiol Biochem Int J Exp Cell Physiol Biochem Pharmacol, 41:1605-1615. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [230].Gong Y, Slee RB, Fukai N, Rawadi G, Roman-Roman S, Reginato AM, et al. (2001). LDL receptor-related protein 5 (LRP5) affects bone accrual and eye development. Cell, 107:513-523. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [231].Tian Y, Xu Y, Fu Q, He M (2011). Parathyroid hormone regulates osteoblast differentiation in a Wnt/β-catenin-dependent manner. Mol Cell Biochem, 355:211-216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [232].Estrada LD, Oliveira-Cruz L, Cabrera D (2018). Transforming Growth Factor Beta Type I Role in Neurodegeneration: Implications for Alzheimer´s Disease. Curr Protein Pept Sci, 19:1180-1188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [233].Yin Z, Rosenzweig N, Kleemann KL, Zhang X, Brandão W, Margeta MA, et al. (2023). APOE4 impairs the microglial response in Alzheimer’s disease by inducing TGFβ-mediated checkpoints. Nat Immunol, 24:1839-1853. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [234].Hu Y, Chen W, Wu L, Jiang L, Liang N, Tan L, et al. (2019). TGF-β1 Restores Hippocampal Synaptic Plasticity and Memory in Alzheimer Model via the PI3K/Akt/Wnt/β-Catenin Signaling Pathway. J Mol Neurosci, 67:142-149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [235].Senatorov VV, Friedman AR, Milikovsky DZ, Ofer J, Saar-Ashkenazy R, Charbash A, et al. (2019). Blood-brain barrier dysfunction in aging induces hyperactivation of TGFβ signaling and chronic yet reversible neural dysfunction. Sci Transl Med, 11:eaaw8283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [236].Filvaroff E, Erlebacher A, Ye J, Gitelman SE, Lotz J, Heillman M, et al. (1999). Inhibition of TGF-beta receptor signaling in osteoblasts leads to decreased bone remodeling and increased trabecular bone mass. Dev Camb Engl, 126:4267-4279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [237].Wu M, Chen G, Li Y-P (2016). TGF-β and BMP signaling in osteoblast, skeletal development, and bone formation, homeostasis and disease. Bone Res, 4:16009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [238].Chen G, Deng C, Li Y-P (2012). TGF-β and BMP signaling in osteoblast differentiation and bone formation. Int J Biol Sci, 8:272-288. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [239].Janssens K, ten Dijke P, Janssens S, Van Hul W (2005). Transforming growth factor-beta1 to the bone. Endocr Rev, 26:743-774. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [240].Kaltschmidt B, Uherek M, Volk B, Baeuerle PA, Kaltschmidt C (1997). Transcription factor NF-kappaB is activated in primary neurons by amyloid beta peptides and in neurons surrounding early plaques from patients with Alzheimer disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 94:2642-2647. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [241].Wang C, Fan L, Khawaja RR, Liu B, Zhan L, Kodama L, et al. (2022). Microglial NF-κB drives tau spreading and toxicity in a mouse model of tauopathy. Nat Commun, 13:1969. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [242].Xia P, Chen J, Liu Y, Cui X, Wang C, Zong S, et al. (2022). MicroRNA-22-3p ameliorates alzheimer’s disease by targeting SOX9 through the NF-κB signaling pathway in the hippocampus. J Neuroinflammation, 19:180. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [243].He Y-Q, Yang H, Shen Y, Zhang J-H, Zhang Z-G, Liu L-L, et al. (2018). Monotropein attenuates ovariectomy and LPS-induced bone loss in mice and decreases inflammatory impairment on osteoblast through blocking activation of NF-κB pathway. Chem Biol Interact, 291:128-136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [244].Sun Y, Li J, Xie X, Gu F, Sui Z, Zhang K, et al. (2021). Recent Advances in Osteoclast Biological Behavior. Front Cell Dev Biol, 9:788680. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [245].M A, Bl I-O, Mc K (2021). Potential modulatory mechanisms of action by long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids on bone cell and chondrocyte metabolism. Prog Lipid Res. doi: 10.1016/j.plipres.2021.101113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [246].Ming J, Cronin SJF, Penninger JM (2020). Targeting the RANKL/RANK/OPG Axis for Cancer Therapy. Front Oncol, 10:1283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [247].Mizuno A, Amizuka N, Irie K, Murakami A, Fujise N, Kanno T, et al. (1998). Severe osteoporosis in mice lacking osteoclastogenesis inhibitory factor/osteoprotegerin. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 247:610-615. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [248].Polyzos SA, Makras P, Tournis S, Anastasilakis AD (2019). Off-label uses of denosumab in metabolic bone diseases. Bone, 129:115048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [249].György B, Szabó TG, Pásztói M, Pál Z, Misják P, Aradi B, et al. (2011). Membrane vesicles, current state-of-the-art: emerging role of extracellular vesicles. Cell Mol Life Sci CMLS, 68:2667-2688. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [250].Konoshenko MY, Lekchnov EA, Vlassov AV, Laktionov PP (2018). Isolation of Extracellular Vesicles: General Methodologies and Latest Trends. BioMed Res Int, 2018:8545347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [251].Liu Z-T, Liu M-H, Xiong Y, Wang Y-J, Bu X-L (2024). Crosstalk between bone and brain in Alzheimer’s disease: Mechanisms, applications, and perspectives. Alzheimers Dement[J] Alzheimers Assoc. doi: 10.1002/alz.13864. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [252].Elia CA, Tamborini M, Rasile M, Desiato G, Marchetti S, Swuec P, et al. (2019). Intracerebral Injection of Extracellular Vesicles from Mesenchymal Stem Cells Exerts Reduced Aβ Plaque Burden in Early Stages of a Preclinical Model of Alzheimer’s Disease. Cells, 8:1059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [253].Sha S, Shen X, Cao Y, Qu L (2021). Mesenchymal stem cells-derived extracellular vesicles ameliorate Alzheimer’s disease in rat models via the microRNA-29c-3p/BACE1 axis and the Wnt/β-catenin pathway. Aging, 13:15285-15306. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [254].Jiang Y-L, Wang Z-X, Liu X-X, Wan M-D, Liu Y-W, Jiao B, et al. (2022). The Protective Effects of Osteocyte-Derived Extracellular Vesicles Against Alzheimer’s Disease Diminished with Aging. Adv Sci Weinh Baden-Wurtt Ger, 9:e2105316. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [255].Losurdo M, Pedrazzoli M, D’Agostino C, Elia CA, Massenzio F, Lonati E, et al. (2020). Intranasal delivery of mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles exerts immunomodulatory and neuroprotective effects in a 3xTg model of alzheimer’s disease. Stem Cells Transl Med, 9:1068-1084. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [256].Shi T, Shen S, Shi Y, Wang Q, Zhang G, Lin J, et al. (2024). Osteocyte-derived sclerostin impairs cognitive function during ageing and Alzheimer’s disease progression. Nat Metab, 6:531-549. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [257].Shan C, Zhang D, Ma D-N, Hou Y-F, Zhuang Q-Q, Gong Y-L, et al. (2023). Osteocalcin ameliorates cognitive dysfunctions in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s Disease by reducing amyloid β burden and upregulating glycolysis in neuroglia. Cell Death Discov, 9:46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [258].Peng D, Liu T, Lu H, Zhang L, Chen H, Huang Y, et al. (2024). Intranasal delivery of engineered extracellular vesicles loaded with miR-206-3p antagomir ameliorates alzheimer’s disease phenotypes. Theranostics, 14:7623-7644. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [259].Kilian O, Hartmann S, Dongowski N, Karnati S, Baumgart-Vogt E, Härtel FV, et al. (2014). BDNF and its TrkB receptor in human fracture healing. Ann Anat Anat Anz Off Organ Anat Ges, 196:286-295. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [260].Ida-Yonemochi H, Yamada Y, Yoshikawa H, Seo K (2017). Locally Produced BDNF Promotes Sclerotic Change in Alveolar Bone after Nerve Injury. PloS One, 12:e0169201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [261].Babey ME, Krause WC, Chen K, Herber CB, Torok Z, Nikkanen J, et al. (2024). A maternal brain hormone that builds bone. Nature. doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-07634-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [262].Liu X, Chen C, Jiang Y, Wan M, Jiao B, Liao X, et al. (2023). Brain-derived extracellular vesicles promote bone-fat imbalance in Alzheimer’s disease. Int J Biol Sci, 19:2409-2427. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [263].Xia W, Xie J, Cai Z, Liu X, Wen J, Cui Z-K, et al. (2021). Damaged brain accelerates bone healing by releasing small extracellular vesicles that target osteoprogenitors. Nat Commun, 12:6043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [264].Lu C-H, Chen Y-A, Ke C-C, Liu R-S (2021). Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Derived Extracellular Vesicle: A Promising Alternative Therapy for Osteoporosis. Int J Mol Sci, 22:12750. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Aging and Disease are provided here courtesy of JKL International LLC

RESOURCES