Abstract
The use of organic active materials in redox flow batteries (RFBs) presents a promising approach to sustainable large-scale energy storage. However, the stability of nonaqueous organic RFB electrolytes is generally limited by degradation reactions that cause capacity fade. These reactions are commonly thought to convert redox-active organics to products that are no longer electrochemically active. Here we uncover an additional pathway leading to capacity fade that involves the supporting electrolyte salt. Capacity fade in nonaqueous RFBs is studied in detail for the 1,2,4-benzotriazin-4-yl radical (1) as a model compound and extended to several other classes of representative redox-active organics. By using symmetrical batteries (1 0/– ∥1 0/+ ), we delineate that capacity fade occurs in a nonlinear (autocatalytic) fashion via acid-induced decomposition of the supporting salt anion PF6 – in the posolyte solution. This is shown to be a universal degradation reaction in the posolyte of nonaqueous RFBs. Although the acidic degradation products are not detrimental to the posolyte, the crossover of acid to the opposite compartment leads to capacity-limiting protonation of the negolyte active material. Replacement of PF6 – with other anions substantially improves the stability of these nonaqueous electrolytes, as demonstrated with a symmetrical RFB based on 0.38 M active material 1 that can be cycled for >69 days with very high capacity retention (fade rate of ≤0.1% per day). The improved understanding of factors determining the lifetime of nonaqueous electrolytes unlocks rational strategies to develop more durable electrochemical energy storage systems.
Keywords: redox flow batteries, bipolar radicals, nonaqueous electrolytes, hexafluorophosphate degradation, electrolyte lifetime


Introduction
The intermittent nature of renewable energy from wind and solar requires large-scale energy storage to regulate the stability of the grid. , Redox flow batteries (RFBs) are a promising technology in this regard, but the most mature RFBs use vanadium-based electrolytes that are expensive and cause environmental concern. Organic molecules are promising candidates to replace the critical active material in vanadium RFBs, as they do not contain scarce elements and can potentially be produced in a more cost-effective and sustainable manner. − In recent years, both posolyte and negolyte chemistries have been developed for nonaqueous electrolyte solutions that result in high cell voltages and thus high (theoretical) energy densities. − However, a major challenge is that the lifetime of organic redox-active materials (RAMs) is generally limited due to decomposition reactions that convert the active materials to degraded products that can no longer be charged/discharged. While active material degradation pathways have been established for select RFB chemistries, , it is difficult to generalize this knowledge to newly developed active materials. The complexity of interactions within the electrolyte solution (e.g., solvation, ion pairing, and reactions with cell materials such as membrane, electrode, etc.) may obscure the origin of the capacity fade, and nonaqueous RFB electrolyte stability remains poorly understood at a molecular level.
Nonaqueous RFBs often use tetraalkylammonium salts with noncoordinating anions to facilitate cell depolarization. In particular, the use of hexafluorophosphate (PF6 –) is widespread due to the superior conductivity and wide electrochemical stability window of R4NPF6 salts in organic solvents. While several groups have reported that the stability of (charged) RAMs is markedly dependent on the nature of the supporting electrolyte salt, the reasons for these differences and the implications for battery durability are not well understood. − In this work, we study the lifetime of nonaqueous RFB electrolytes and reveal how the supporting electrolyte salt plays a major role in capacity fade. Our group previously reported that organic radical 1 is a promising candidate for symmetrical RFBs due to its reversible bipolar electrochemistry (Scheme ). Such bipolar materials provide the opportunity to construct symmetrical batteries with an identical posolyte and negolyte (in the discharged state), which mitigates crossover-induced capacity fade. , Here we exploit the bipolar character of 1 as a “reporter” for battery stability via the sensitivity of the 1 0/– redox couple to electrolyte degradation, providing new insight into the molecular processes underlying capacity fade. We demonstrate that decomposition of PF6 –, a widely used supporting anion, is a critical contributor to electrolyte instability across various organic RFB chemistries and show how electrolyte design can extend the lifetime of symmetrical RFBs based on 1. These findings point to the broader relevance of electrolyte salt stability across nonaqueous electrochemistry, from energy storage to organic electrosynthesis and electrocatalysis.
1. Structure of Bipolar Radical 1 and Its Charged States (1+ and 1– ), with Redox Potentials (vs Fc0/+) of Both Half-Reactions Used in the Symmetrical Battery.
Results and Discussion
Long-Term Cycling Stability of Bipolar Radical 1
To investigate the long-term cycling stability of radical 1, we ran H-cell cycling experiments in MeCN using 6 mM 1 with 0.3 M Bu4NPF6 as the supporting salt. In agreement with our previous data, such a battery shows excellent capacity retention for at least 3 weeks. However, prolonged battery cycling results in the onset of capacity fade after ca. 25 days, which then rapidly increases in rate (Figure A). Analysis of these electrolyte solutions by cyclic voltammetry (CV) showed the disappearance of the redox wave at −1.03 vs Fc/Fc+, and new peaks appear at ∼0 V (Figure B). From this, we infer that loss of the negolyte half-reaction is responsible for the capacity fade. We attempted to identify the chemical decomposition products of 1 by mass spectrometry, but the only peaks detected in the positive ion mode were at m/z = 276 and 277, which are due to the ions 1 + and [1 + H] + that are also observed in the mass spectrum of pristine 1 (Figures S1 and S2). Similar results were obtained when using KPF6 as the electrolyte salt, albeit the onset of capacity fade occurred already after a lag phase of ca. 4 days with full degradation after ca. 14 days (Figure A). The increasingly rapid capacity fade suggests that (auto)catalysis may take place in both systems, but the onset is dependent on the nature of the cation of the supporting salt (K+ vs Bu4N+; vide infra).
1.

(A) Capacity as a function of time for the H-cell cycling experiment in MeCN using 6 mM 1 with 0.3 M Bu4NPF6 or 0.3 M KPF6 as the supporting salt. (B) CV of postcycling electrolyte solutions (Bu4NPF6 supporting salt). (C and D) CV of 6 mM 1 in 0.3 M Bu4NPF6/MeCN with added formic acid (FA) and p-toluenesulfonic acid (pTsOH), respectively.
The disappearance of the negolyte (1 0/– ) redox couple (E2) in the CV of the degraded battery electrolytes was accompanied by an increase in the current for the posolyte half-reaction (E1). This resembles the sequential one-electron electrochemistry of quinones (Q2–/Q•–/Q) in nonaqueous solvents: hydrogen bonding with protic additives results in a gradual shift of the negative redox wave, ultimately merging into a single [2e/2H+] process (H2Q/Q). − Similarly, our postcycling CVs indicate that the formation of protic compounds affects the negative half-reaction of 1, resulting in the loss of its bipolar character and thus capacity fade. As shown in Figure C,D, control experiments with 1 in the presence of protic additives confirm the sensitivity of the 1 0/– couple, the extent of which depends on the pK a of the additive. While a relatively weak acid (formic acid; pK a ≈ 20.9 in MeCN) shifts and broadens the negative redox wave, the strong acid pTsOH (pK a = 8.5 in MeCN) effectively eliminates the 1 0/– couple when the concentrations of pTsOH and 1 are identical, at which point a single two-electron [2e/H+] process is obtained.
In contrast to quinones (Q2–/Q•–/Q), the Blatter radical is positively charged in its most oxidized state (1 + ), and protonation to 1H 2+ does not occur as shown by the invariance of the posolyte redox reaction (E1) with added acid. Thus, the electrochemistry of 1 is best described by the wedge scheme shown in Scheme . Deviations from the purely electron-transfer steps (black arrows) by hydrogen bonding (green) and/or protonation (red) will result in a loss of battery performance even when the active material remains otherwise intact, as demonstrated below.
2. Proposed Electrochemical Pathways for 1 in MeCN (Black; Redox Potentials E1 and E2), in the presence of Hydrogen Bond Donors (Green; E1 and E3), and with Strong Acids (Red; [2e/H+] Redox Reaction with E4 ≈ E1).
The formation of acid in the degraded electrolytes was also indicated by the appearance of a hydrogen evolution wave in the CV at potentials below −1.3 V (Figures S3 and S4) and confirmed by measuring the pH after dilution of an aliquot with deionized water. While a pristine electrolyte solution resulted in a pH of 8 using this procedure, the postcycling posolyte and negolyte from the cell with Bu4NPF6 have a pH of around 2. Moreover, the shift in E2 due to the presence of acid is reversible, as shown with the addition of a stoichiometric amount of strong base (Bu4NOH) to a solution of 1 with formic acid (Figure S5).
Further evidence for the formation of acid was obtained by NMR analysis of the electrolytes using 19F NMR spectroscopy. The spectra of a fully faded H-cell battery with Bu4NPF6 as the supporting salt showed new fluorine-containing compounds in both the posolyte and the negolyte (Figure ). In addition to the PF6 – signal, the 19F NMR spectrum shows an additional doublet at around δ −83 ppm with a coupling constant (J PF) of ∼950 Hz attributed to the fluorophosphate anion PO2F2 – , and a signal at δ −151.7 ppm due to BF4 –. The assignment of these species was confirmed by 31P and 11B NMR spectroscopy, respectively (Figure S6). Both postcycling electrolytes also show resonances attributed to fluorosilicate (SiF6 2–; δ −138 ppm), and HF (∼δ −180 ppm). Finally, the negolyte solution contains the leuco-form of the Blatter radical (1H; CF3 group at δ −72.1 ppm), which is formed by protonation of the negolyte charged state, 1 – (Scheme ). From this, it is clear that decomposition of the supporting salt is involved in the capacity fade of 1. The same decomposition products were observed in the 19F NMR spectra of H-cell batteries with KPF6 as the supporting salt (Figure S7). The only exception is SiF6 2–, as its K+ salt is insoluble in organic solvents. , The KPF6 electrolyte solution contains PO3F2– as a further degradation product.
2.

19F NMR spectra of negolyte (top) and posolyte (bottom) solutions taken from a fully faded H-cell battery of 6 mM 1 in 0.3 M Bu4NPF6/MeCN.
Decomposition of PF6 – has been extensively investigated in the context of Li-ion battery electrolytes (i.e., LiPF6 in organic carbonate solvents) and is thought to involve PF5 generated in the equilibrium LiPF6 ⇌ LiF + PF5. While our work was in progress, Marbella et. al reported that PF6 – stability in organic carbonates is correlated to the Lewis acidity of the cation. Based on this, it is expected that KPF6 and Bu4NPF6 are stable due to the weak or nonacidic nature of K+ and Bu4N+, respectively. This is in line with the fact that Bu4NPF6 is a common salt for nonaqueous electrochemistry and RFB research, and its role in electrolyte degradation and capacity fade has, to the best of our knowledge, not been previously considered. Despite its perceived innocence, our data indicate that acidic compounds are formed due to decomposition of the supporting electrolyte anion (PF6 –) and that the negolyte becomes capacity-limiting due to protonation of 1 – . The appearance of boron- and silicon-fluorides further suggests that reactions with SiO x and BO x groups at the surface of the cell material (e.g., borosilicate) are involved in capacity fade.
Investigation of Cycling Stability for Each Half-Reaction
The stability of each half-reaction was investigated to identify on which battery side PF6 – degradation originates. A solution containing a 1:1 mixture of 1 – and 1 (the negolyte half-reaction) was electrochemically generated as described in the Supporting Information and divided between the two compartments of an H-cell. Battery charge/discharge with this electrolyte composition allows the molecular stability of the 1 0/– couple to be studied. , H-cell cycling of this half-reaction in 0.3 M Bu4NPF6/MeCN showed a stable capacity for >140 days, and no electrolyte decomposition is observed by NMR spectroscopy. Also, the postcycling CV shows that the bipolar properties of 1 are retained (Figure S9). Similar stability was observed for 1 – in the KPF6 electrolyte (Figure S10).
In stark contrast, a similar H-cell cycling experiment with only the posolyte half-reaction (i.e., a 1:1 mixture of 1 and 1 + ) in KPF6 electrolyte was stable during the first 30 days, but after that, the capacity started to increase (Figure A, black line). We attribute the capacity increase to the contribution of a [2e/H+] redox reaction due to the presence of a strong acid (vide supra). A CV taken after 33 days indeed confirms that acid is present in the solution: the 1 0/– couple is completely absent, and the 1 0/+ peak current has increased (Figure S11). 19F NMR spectra of the electrolyte solution after 43 days of cycling contain substantial amounts of PF6 – decomposition products (fluorophosphates, fluoroborates, and HF). The subsequent rapid drop in capacity is due to a larger cell resistance of the H-cell (see the discharge voltage trace in Figure S11C), which we tentatively attribute to the precipitation of K2SiF6 onto the separator and/or the RVC electrode. As a control experiment, we deliberately added 1 mM pTsOH to a 1 0/+ half-cell that had been cycled stably for 15 days. This resulted in an instantaneous capacity increase due to the [2e/H+] process between 1 + and 1H (Figure A, red line). The lag phase observed previously, and its absence when substoichiometric pTsOH is added, together with the sigmoidal shape of the capacity profile, is consistent with an autocatalytic process.
3.

(A) Capacity changes for a 6 mM positive half-cell (1/1 + ) in 0.3 M KPF6/MeCN, with and without the addition of pTsOH. (B) Plot of battery capacity and ratio of negolyte (1/1 – , i P1) and posolyte (1/1 + , i P2) peak currents (blue) from an in situ CV experiment monitoring both electrolyte solutions.
Next, we carried out in situ CV measurements during battery cycling to verify a direct link between acid concentration and overall battery capacity via the 1 0/– “reporter” unit. Charge/discharge cycling of a full battery (1 0/– ∥1 0/+ ), i.e., utilizing both half-reactions, showed that the peak current of the 1 0/– couple in the negolyte compartment remains constant during 25 days of cycling, in which time the capacity also does not appreciably change (Figure B; see Figures S12 and S13 for CV data). Conversely, the peak current of the 1 0/– couple on the posolyte side starts to drop already after ca. 10 days, i.e., it precedes the occurrence of battery capacity fade. This demonstrates that acidic compounds originate from PF6 – decomposition in the posolyte, but this leads to capacity fade only upon crossover to the negolyte compartment. An observation that supports this notion is that the onset of capacity fade is dependent on the Coulombic efficiency of the H-cell used (Figure S14), which is determined by the properties (porosity and area) of the frit that separates both sides. Moreover, an experiment where the effect of pTsOH during H-cell cycling was investigated also showed that capacity fade is instantaneous when added to the negative side, but addition to the positive side is gradual due to the transfer of acid across the separator (Figure S15).
Cycling Stability in Redox Flow Battery Setup
The cycling studies were extended from H-cells to a small-scale flow battery to investigate the electrolyte stability in a glass-free setup. The electrolyte solutions were pumped from polypropylene containers by using a peristaltic pump via chemically resistant tubing (Masterflex Tygon A-60-G and Swagelok PFA) into a flow cell containing a polyethylene porous separator (Daramic 175). Achieving stable long-term cycling is more difficult in such a flow setup due to the gradual buildup of volumetric imbalances, as well as evaporation of the volatile MeCN solvent. In our symmetrical batteries, this can be mitigated by mixing and redistributing the solutions across both sides and/or adding fresh solvent. Long-term flow cycling with the same electrolyte composition (i.e., 6 mM 1 in 0.3 M Bu4NPF6 or KPF6) showed a similar trend as in the H-cell experiments, with an induction period followed by rapid capacity fade, which happens earlier for KPF6-containing electrolytes than with Bu4NPF6 (Figures , S16, and S17). Postcycling analysis of the solutions by CV and NMR spectroscopy indicated that the negolyte redox process is absent and similar PF6 – degradation products are formed as before (PO3F–, PO2F2 –, and HF). Importantly, a significant amount of fluorosilicate (SiF6 2–) is also observed, but fluoroborates are absent. Thus, PF6 – degradation is not limited to glass cells, and it appears that silicon (SiO x ) materials in the pump tubing, separator, or other cell components contribute to the observed electrolyte instability.
4.

Flow cell cycling of 6 mM compound 1 in 0.3 M Bu4NPF6/MeCN at a current of 2 mA/cm2. (A) Plot of capacity change as a function of cycle time; arrow indicates mixing of both electrolyte solutions to rebalance the cell. (B) 19F NMR analysis of postcycling electrolyte (mixed).
Chemical Stability of PF6 – Salts
The role of electrolyte degradation products on battery performance and longevity has been well-recognized for the solid/solution interphases in Li-ion batteries, − but their influence on electrolyte stability in nonaqueous RFBs remains virtually unexplored. To shed light on the chemical stability of PF6 – in MeCN solution, we prepared 0.3 M solutions of PF6 – with Li+, Na+, K+, and Bu4N+ counterions in anhydrous MeCN in a glovebox and monitored the solution composition in the absence of an applied voltage by NMR spectroscopy. As expected, both Li+ and Na+ salts immediately contain PF6 – decomposition products, which increase upon standing at room temperature (PO2F2 –, HF, and BF4 –; see Figure S18). The corresponding salts with the less polarizing cations K+ and Bu4N+ are not prone to fluoride abstraction, , and we find no indication of PF6 – degradation even when 50 mM water is added and/or the solutions are heated to 70 °C for several days (Figure S19). Similarly, solutions containing 0.3 M KPF6 or Bu4NPF6 in MeCN with 6 mM solutions of either neutral 1 or anion 1 – kept at 70 °C did not show signs of decomposition by NMR spectroscopy (Figure S20). In marked contrast, when a 0.3 M Bu4NPF6 solution was monitored in an NMR tube at 70 °C in the presence of 6 mM 1 + (generated electrochemically), extensive PF6 – decomposition was observed with substantial amounts of PO2F2 – and HF formed already after 12 h. After 3 days, about half of the PF6 – was converted to PO2F2 – (∼145 mM) as the major P-containing product, and other products in solution are fluorosilicates (71 mM) and fluoroborates (27 mM). The extent of decomposition in the corresponding KPF6 solution is more difficult to quantify due to the formation of insoluble K2SiF6, but it is clear that also in this case, the cation 1 + (but not 1 or 1 – ) induces PF6 – degradation after 12 h at 70 °C, with concentrations of PO2F2 – and HF that are in the same range as that found for Bu4NPF6. Moreover, both solutions contain 1H NMR resonances indicative of acidic groups (broad resonance at δ > 8 ppm; Figure S22).
To evaluate the role of silicon-containing materials, we performed a similar electrolyte stability study using 1 + /Bu4NPF6/MeCN that was stored at 70 °C in a Teflon-lined NMR tube (no contact with the SiO x surface) or an identical sample to which a small amount of powdered borosilicate (ground P5 frit) was added. Whereas the sample without SiO x shows only a trace of degradation products (HF and fluorophosphates), the PF6 – in the sample that is exposed to a SiO x surface is extensively decomposed based on NMR analysis, including the formation of acidic groups (14.2 ppm in the 1H NMR spectrum; see Figure S23). The phosphate products of PF6 – decomposition incorporate O atoms that could originate from H2O (i.e., hydrolysis, overall reaction (4) in Scheme ). , This appears unlikely, however, since the residual water content in our Bu4NPF6 and KPF6 electrolyte solutions was determined by Karl Fischer titration to be <10 ppm. Instead, it seems that HF-initiated etching of borosilicate glass (SiO2/B2O3) or other SiO x -containing cell materials is the source of O atoms (reactions (5)–(8), Scheme ), ,, accounting also for the formation of SiF6 2– and BF4 –. It should be noted that complete removal of water from SiO x surfaces is challenging, and it is likely that our drying procedures (e.g., glassware is placed in a 150 °C oven overnight) will retain at least some of these reactive O-groups.
3. Overview of Reactions That Could Contribute to PF6 – Decomposition through Hydrolysis (1)–(4); Reactions with Cell Materials (SiO x or B2O3) That Generate H2O (5)–(8).
PF6 – Degradation in RFB Electrolytes Is Universal
Having established that 1 + is involved in the decomposition of PF6 –, we investigated whether other common organic posolyte RAMs would behave similarly. As a starting point, we cycled a ferrocene (Fc) half-cell, i.e., with both compartments containing a 6 mM 1:1 mixture of Fc and Fc+, , for ca. 30 days in an H-cell with 0.3 M KPF6/MeCN. While the capacity remains constant and the CV of the solution does not change (Figure S24), the NMR spectra clearly show that PF6 – decomposition occurs with the formation of acidic products as indicated by broad signals in the 1H NMR spectrum at >8 ppm. Similar results were obtained for an H-cell cycling experiment using the phenothiazine 2 (Figure S25). Thus, both of these RAMs, previously reported to be highly stable in nonaqueous electrolytes, initiate PF6 – decomposition during battery cycling. It appears that this pathway has previously escaped detection because their redox chemistry and UV–vis spectroscopic signature are insensitive to acidic degradation products from supporting salt breakdown. Additionally, nonaqueous battery cycling is rarely carried out for periods longer than a week, − and these studies may have been stopped before the onset of (autocatalytic) PF6 – degradation was noticeable.
The generality of these results was extended to a series of representative RFB chemistries shown in Scheme . To rapidly evaluate the stability of electrolytes with these active materials, we prepared solutions (ca. 40 mM RAM) in anhydrous MeCN with ∼0.1 M Bu4NPF6, which were monitored by 19F NMR spectroscopy. As expected, solutions of the parent compounds remain unchanged after several days at temperatures of up to 70 °C. However, when the same solutions were chemically oxidized by the addition of 0.8 equiv of [NO][PF6], i.e., to 80% state-of-charge, in all cases the formation of PO2F2 –, SiF6 2–, BF4 –, and HF was clear from the NMR spectra (Figures S26–S30). Prolonged heating to 70 °C caused the appearance of additional PF-containing compounds, which could be di- or triphosphate condensation products, but these were not further characterized. Thus, PF6 – degradation is a general phenomenon for the oxidized (charged) state of typical nonaqueous RFB posolytes. Importantly, this decomposition reaction is observed regardless of whether the electrolyte solutions are prepared chemically, via bulk electrolysis, or during battery charge/discharge cycling.
4. Posolyte RAMs Tested to Establish Generality of PF6 – Degradation.
Early work in the literature that examined the oxidative stability of PF6 – salts in organic solvents reported the onset of anodic oxidation at >3 V vs Ag/Ag+, − well beyond the potentials accessed in our work; this was confirmed computationally. − These data rule out direct (electro)chemical oxidation of PF6 – as the cause of its degradation. Although our current data do not allow detailed mechanistic interpretation, it seems plausible that the oxidized (charged) state of RAMs undergoes electron transfer with SiO x -adsorbed H2O molecules or surface Si–OH groups to generate H+: this initiates fluoride abstraction from PF6 – to produce HF and PF5, the latter of which reacts with trace water to the PO2F2 – ion. Once the formation of HF and other acidic products is initiated, it leads to PF6 – degradation via an autocatalytic pathway. This reactivity is not limited to MeCN solvent, as an H-cell cycling experiment carried out in DME showed similar PF6 – degradation products (Figure S31). To what extent the acid-induced decomposition of PF6 – will limit cycling stability in scaled-up (technical) RFB systems remains to be evaluated, but it is clear that materials selection for cell components such as pumps, tubing, and membranes will have an important influence on PF6 – electrolyte stability. In this context, it should be noted that chemical compatibility of cell materials (including toward HF) is also crucial for the cycle life of Li-ion batteries. ,
Cycling Stability with Other Supporting Electrolyte Anions
To improve the long-term cycling stability of 1 in lab-scale experiments, we replaced PF6 – with other anions that are known to provide good electrochemical stability and conductivity. H-cell batteries were constructed with 6 mM 1 in MeCN and tetrabutylammonium salts of tetrafluoroborate (BF4 –), trifluoromethanesulfonate (OTf–), and bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide (TFSI–) anions. , Gratifyingly, all these electrolyte compositions indeed performed much better (Figure A), without indication of the “catastrophic” capacity fade observed with PF6 –. Although the initial fade rate for an H-cell of 1 with BF4 – is higher than that with PF6 –, it does not show autocatalytic degradation and thus has an improved overall lifetime. The most stable electrolyte was that using Bu4NTFSI as the supporting salt, which retained 87.5% of its initial capacity after 220 days (3500 cycles). Although solvent evaporation/replenishment and mass transfer limitations (variable efficiency of magnetic stirring) cause fluctuations in the discharge capacity during long-term cycling, CV analysis indicated minimal changes to the electrolyte composition (Figure S32). The fade rate is only 0.044% per day based on a linear fit of capacity vs time data, which testifies to the remarkable stability of this nonaqueous RFB electrolyte.
5.

(A) Comparison of capacity fade for H-cell cycling experiments with different supporting salt anions (6 mM 1 in MeCN, 0.3 M Bu4NX; X = PF6 –, BF4 –, TfO–, and TFSI–). (B) Discharge capacity and Coulombic efficiency of a high-concentration flow cell (0.38 M 1 in MeCN, 1.0 M Bu4NTFSI, 60 mA/cm2); data are shown for each battery polarity separately, and theoretical capacity (10.2 Ah/L) is shown as a dashed line. Between days 16 and 18 (yellow), the cell was cycled at different current densities. Inset shows representative voltage traces highlighting the inversion of polarity after every cycle. Discontinuities in the CE are due to the addition of MeCN (at 0% SOC) to compensate for solvent evaporation.
Finally, we used this insight to construct a high-concentration symmetric RFB with an electrolyte composed of 0.38 M 1 in 1.0 M Bu4NTFSI/MeCN with a theoretical capacity of 10.2 Ah/L. To minimize the buildup of volumetric imbalances, the battery was run with polarity inversion after every charge/discharge cycle (i.e., with cutoff voltages of +1.9 and −1.9 V; current density of 60 mA/cm2). This allowed stable cycling for over 2750 cycles (69 days) with the periodic addition of fresh MeCN in both electrolyte reservoirs to counteract solvent evaporation. After 16 days of cycling, we ran the battery at different current densities (20–80 mA/cm2) which all showed high material utilization (>85%). The use of a porous Daramic membrane results in low ohmic resistance (1.5 Ω from PEIS) but also relatively rapid active material crossover, which manifests as poor Coulombic efficiency at lower current densities (CE = 79% at 20 mA/cm2; energy efficiency (EE) = 65%). Importantly, the cycling stability of this symmetrical RFB is not negatively affected by crossover, and prolonged cycling at 60 mA/cm2 (days 20–69) shows that the discharge capacity is very stable with a fade rate of 0.0025% per cycle or 0.1% per day (averaged over both cycling polarities). These performance metrics compare favorably to current state-of-the-art nonaqueous RFB electrolytes and even approach the stability of well-established aqueous systems. Thus, to the best of our knowledge, the electrolyte based on 1/Bu4NTFSI provides the first symmetrical RFB that demonstrates excellent battery longevity at high active material concentration. Whether the stability gain obtained with Bu4NTFSI outweighs its additional cost requires further technoeconomic evaluation. Nevertheless, it is clear that “electrolyte engineering” holds considerable promise to improve the lifetime of nonaqueous RFB electrolytes.
Conclusion
Our results show that the long-term cycling stability of nonaqueous RFBs is influenced by decomposition of the commonly used supporting salt anion, PF6 –. By using the 1 0/– redox couple of bipolar radical 1 as a “reporter” of the formation of protic degradation products, we were able to delineate that PF6 – is decomposed in the posolyte solution via an autocatalytic pathway, which is induced by the oxidized (charged) state 1 + . Capacity limitation is only incurred upon the crossover of these products to the negative side of the battery. These findings are general for a range of representative nonaqueous posolyte chemistries based on organic/organometallic active materials. This has important implications for the interpretation of stability studies that focus only on a single half-reaction because degradation on one side can have a major capacity-limiting effect on the opposing battery side. Among the several lifetime extension strategies that these findings enable, we show here that replacement of PF6 – with alternative supporting anions significantly increases the stability of nonaqueous electrolytes. This enables long-term cycling of a high-capacity symmetrical flow battery by using Bu4NTFSI as the supporting salt. With this optimized electrolyte, we achieved a capacity fade rate of ≤0.1% per day in both H-cell and flow battery cycling studies. The insights gained highlight the necessity of considering the reactivity of organic RFB electrolytes as a whole, i.e., beyond the active material, thereby establishing a pathway for the development of robust nonaqueous RFBs.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We thank Fionn Ferreira and Ferit Begar (University of Groningen) for the synthesis of compounds 1 and 4, respectively. Financial support from The Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO) (VIDI and VICI grants to E.O.) and the China Scholarship Council (grant to W.T.) is gratefully acknowledged.
The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsaem.5c03070.
Experimental details, characterization data, and supplementary figures, including a schematic of the H-cell cycling test setup, MS and NMR spectra, and additional electrochemical data for H-cells and flow cells (PDF)
The manuscript was written through contributions of all authors. All authors have given approval to the final version of the manuscript.
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
References
- Dunn B., Kamath H., Tarascon J.-M.. Electrical Energy Storage for the Grid: A Battery of Choices. Science. 2011;334:928. doi: 10.1126/science.1212741. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhu Z., Jiang T., Ali M., Meng Y., Jin Y., Cui Y., Chen W.. Rechargeable Batteries for Grid Scale Energy Storage. Chem. Rev. 2022;122:16610. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.2c00289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shoaib M., Vallayil P., Jaiswal N., Iyapazham Vaigunda Suba P., Sankararaman S., Ramanujam K., Thangadurai V.. Advances in Redox Flow Batteries - A Comprehensive Review on Inorganic and Organic Electrolytes and Engineering Perspectives. Adv. Energy Mater. 2024;14:2400721. doi: 10.1002/aenm.202400721. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Ding Y., Zhang C., Zhang L., Zhou Y., Yu G.. Molecular engineering of organic electroactive materials for redox flow batteries. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2018;47:69. doi: 10.1039/C7CS00569E. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Luo J., Hu B., Hu M., Zhao Y., Liu T. L.. Status and Prospects of Organic Redox Flow Batteries toward Sustainable Energy Storage. ACS Energy Lett. 2019;4:2220. doi: 10.1021/acsenergylett.9b01332. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang L., Feng R., Wang W., Yu G.. Emerging chemistries and molecular designs for flow batteries. Nat. Rev. Chem. 2022;6:524. doi: 10.1038/s41570-022-00394-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kortekaas L., Fricke S., Korshunov A., Cekic-Laskovic I., Winter M., Grünebaum M.. Building Bridges: Unifying Design and Development Aspects for Advancing Non-Aqueous Redox-Flow Batteries. Batteries. 2023;9:4. doi: 10.3390/batteries9010004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Mansha M., Anam A., Akram Khan S., Saeed Alzahrani A., Khan M., Ahmad A., Arshad M., Ali S.. Recent Developments on Electroactive Organic Electrolytes for Non-Aqueous Redox Flow Batteries: Current Status, Challenges, and Prospects. Chem. Rec. 2024;24:e202300233. doi: 10.1002/tcr.202300233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ahn S., Yun A., Ko D., Singh V., Joo J. M., Byon H. R.. Organic redox flow batteries in non-aqueous electrolyte solutions. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2025;54:742. doi: 10.1039/D4CS00585F. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kwabi D. G., Ji Y., Aziz M. J.. Electrolyte Lifetime in Aqueous Organic Redox Flow Batteries: A Critical Review. Chem. Rev. 2020;120:6467. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00599. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Armstrong C. G., Toghill K. E.. Stability of molecular radicals in organic non-aqueous redox flow batteries: A mini review. Electrochem. Commun. 2018;91:19. doi: 10.1016/j.elecom.2018.04.017. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Gong K., Fang Q., Gu S., Li S. F. Y., Yan Y.. Nonaqueous redox-flow batteries: organic solvents, supporting electrolytes, and redox pairs. Energy Environ. Sci. 2015;8:3515. doi: 10.1039/C5EE02341F. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Wei X., Xu W., Huang J., Zhang L., Walter E., Lawrence C., Vijayakumar M., Henderson W. A., Liu T., Cosimbescu L., Li B., Sprenkle V., Wang W.. Radical Compatibility with Nonaqueous Electrolytes and Its Impact on an All-Organic Redox Flow Battery. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2015;54:8684. doi: 10.1002/anie.201501443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang J., Shkrob I. A., Assary R. S., Tung S. o., Silcox B., Curtiss L. A., Thompson L., Zhang L.. Toward Improved Catholyte Materials for Redox Flow Batteries: What Controls Chemical Stability of Persistent Radical Cations? J. Phys. Chem. C. 2017;121:23347. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b08281. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Hendriks K. H., Sevov C. S., Cook M. E., Sanford M. S.. Multielectron Cycling of a Low-Potential Anolyte in Alkali Metal Electrolytes for Nonaqueous Redox Flow Batteries. ACS Energy Lett. 2017;2:2430. doi: 10.1021/acsenergylett.7b00559. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Zhao Y., Yu Z., Robertson L. A., Zhang J., Shi Z., Bheemireddy S. R., Shkrob I. A., Y Z, Li T., Zhang Z., Cheng L., Zhang L.. Unexpected electrochemical behavior of an anolyte redoxmer in flow battery electrolytes: solvating cations help to fight against the thermodynamic-kinetic dilemma. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2020;8:13470. doi: 10.1039/D0TA02214D. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Mitchell N. H., Elgrishi N.. Investigation of Iron(III) Tetraphenylporphyrin as a Redox Flow Battery Anolyte: Unexpected Side Reactivity with the Electrolyte. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2023;127:10938. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.3c01763. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Steen J. S., Nuismer J. L., Eiva V., Wiglema A. E. T., Daub N., Hjelm J., Otten E.. Blatter Radicals as Bipolar Materials for Symmetrical Redox-Flow Batteries. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2022;144:5051. doi: 10.1021/jacs.1c13543. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li M., Case J., Minteer S. D.. Bipolar Redox-Active Molecules in Non-Aqueous Organic Redox Flow Batteries: Status and Challenges. ChemElectroChem. 2021;8:1215. doi: 10.1002/celc.202001584. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Raihan M. A., Dyker C. A.. Status and prospects for symmetric organic redox flow batteries. J. Energy Chem. 2025;100:125. doi: 10.1016/j.jechem.2024.08.016. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Gupta N., Linschitz H.. Hydrogen-Bonding and Protonation Effects in Electrochemistry of Quinones in Aprotic Solvents. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997;119:6384. doi: 10.1021/ja970028j. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Quan M., Sanchez D., Wasylkiw M. F., Smith D. K.. Voltammetry of Quinones in Unbuffered Aqueous Solution: Reassessing the Roles of Proton Transfer and Hydrogen Bonding in the Aqueous Electrochemistry of Quinones. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007;129:12847. doi: 10.1021/ja0743083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gamboa-Valero N., Astudillo P. D., González-Fuentes M. A., Leyva M. A., Rosales-Hoz M. d. J., González F. J.. Hydrogen bonding complexes in the quinone-hydroquinone system and the transition to a reversible two-electron transfer mechanism. Electrochim. Acta. 2016;188:602. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2015.12.060. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Smith D. K.. Exploring the Role of H-Bonding in Organic Electrochemistry - From Supramolecular Applications to Mechanistic Investigations. Chem. Rec. 2021;21:2488. doi: 10.1002/tcr.202100186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stirling M. J., Sweeney G., MacRory K., Blacker A. J., Page M. I.. The kinetics and mechanism of the organo-iridium-catalysed enantioselective reduction of imines. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2016;14:3614. doi: 10.1039/C6OB00245E. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kütt A., Leito I., Kaljurand I., Sooväli L., Vlasov V. M., Yagupolskii L. M., Koppel I. A.. A Comprehensive Self-Consistent Spectrophotometric Acidity Scale of Neutral Brønsted Acids in Acetonitrile. J. Org. Chem. 2006;71:2829. doi: 10.1021/jo060031y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Clare L. A., Pham A. T., Magdaleno F., Acosta J., Woods J. E., Cooksy A. L., Smith D. K.. Electrochemical Evidence for Intermolecular Proton-Coupled Electron Transfer through a Hydrogen Bond Complex in a p-Phenylenediamine-Based Urea. Introduction of the “Wedge Scheme” as a Useful Means To Describe Reactions of This Type. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013;135:18930. doi: 10.1021/ja410061x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Guillot S. L., Peña-Hueso A., Usrey M. L., Hamers R. J.. Thermal and Hydrolytic Decomposition Mechanisms of Organosilicon Electrolytes with Enhanced Thermal Stability for Lithium-Ion Batteries. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2017;164:A1907. doi: 10.1149/2.0671709jes. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Keyzer E. N., Matthews P. D., Liu Z., Bond A. D., Grey C. P., Wright D. S.. Synthesis of Ca(PF6)2, formed via nitrosonium oxidation of calcium. Chem. Commun. 2017;53:4573. doi: 10.1039/C7CC01938F. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Marat R. K., Janzen A. F.. Fluorine exchange between four-, five-, and six-coordinate silicon compounds. Can. J. Chem. 1977;55:3845. doi: 10.1139/v77-543. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Frayret J., Castetbon A., Trouve G., Potin-Gautier M.. Solubility of (NH4)2SiF6, K2SiF6 and Na2SiF6 in acidic solutions. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2006;427:356. doi: 10.1016/j.cplett.2006.06.044. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Physical Constants of Organic Compounds. In CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 104th ed.; Rumble, J. R. , Ed.; CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2023. [Google Scholar]
- Rinkel B. L. D., Hall D. S., Temprano I., Grey C. P.. Electrolyte Oxidation Pathways in Lithium-Ion Batteries. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020;142:15058. doi: 10.1021/jacs.0c06363. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Buitrago Botero P. J., Ells A. W., Svirinovsky-Arbeli A., Juelsholt M., Marbella L. E.. Counterion Lewis Acidity Determines the Rate of Hexafluorophosphate Hydrolysis in Nonaqueous Battery Electrolytes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2025;147:9159. doi: 10.1021/jacs.4c12469. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Deliberate addition of 1 mM pTsOH to an H-cell battery of 6 mM 1 in 0.3 M Bu4NPF6/MeCN shows an instantaneous decrease in capacity when the acid is added to the negolyte side. Addition to the posolyte side retains the same capacity initially, but the fade rate is increased due to the crossover of acid to the negolyte side (Figure S15).
- Goulet M.-A., Aziz M. J.. Flow Battery Molecular Reactant Stability Determined by Symmetric Cell Cycling Methods. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2018;165:A1466. doi: 10.1149/2.0891807jes. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Li M., Odom S. A., Pancoast A. R., Robertson L. A., Vaid T. P., Agarwal G., Doan H. A., Wang Y., Suduwella T. M., Bheemireddy S. R., Ewoldt R. H., Assary R. S., Zhang L., Sigman M. S., Minteer S. D.. Experimental Protocols for Studying Organic Non-aqueous Redox Flow Batteries. ACS Energy Lett. 2021;6:3932. doi: 10.1021/acsenergylett.1c01675. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Hanopolskyi A. I., Smaliak V. A., Novichkov A. I., Semenov S. N.. Autocatalysis: Kinetics, Mechanisms and Design. ChemSystemsChem. 2021;3:e2000026. doi: 10.1002/syst.202000026. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang J., Huang J., Robertson L. A., Shkrob I. A., Zhang L.. Comparing calendar and cycle life stability of redox active organic molecules for nonaqueous redox flow batteries. J. Power Sources. 2018;397:214. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.07.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Heiskanen S. K., Kim J., Lucht B. L.. Generation and Evolution of the Solid Electrolyte Interphase of Lithium-Ion Batteries. Joule. 2019;3:2322. doi: 10.1016/j.joule.2019.08.018. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Meng Y. S., Srinivasan V., Xu K.. Designing better electrolytes. Science. 2022;378:eabq3750. doi: 10.1126/science.abq3750. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liao Y., Zhang H., Peng Y., Hu Y., Liang J., Gong Z., Wei Y., Yang Y.. Electrolyte Degradation During Aging Process of Lithium-Ion Batteries: Mechanisms, Characterization, and Quantitative Analysis. Adv. Energy Mater. 2024;14:2304295. doi: 10.1002/aenm.202304295. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Navalpotro P., Mavrantonakis A., Marcilla R.. Unraveling the role of supporting electrolytes in organic redox flow battery performance. Journal of Energy Storage. 2025;131:117570. doi: 10.1016/j.est.2025.117570. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Plakhotnyk A. V., Ernst L., Schmutzler R.. Hydrolysis in the system LiPF6propylene carbonatedimethyl carbonateH2O. J. Fluorine Chem. 2005;126:27. doi: 10.1016/j.jfluchem.2004.09.027. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Barnes P., Smith K., Parrish R., Jones C., Skinner P., Storch E., White Q., Deng C., Karsann D., Lau M. L., Dumais J. J., Dufek E. J., Xiong H.. A non-aqueous sodium hexafluorophosphate-based electrolyte degradation study: Formation and mitigation of hydrofluoric acid. J. Power Sources. 2020;447:227363. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.227363. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Lux S. F., Lucas I. T., Pollak E., Passerini S., Winter M., Kostecki R.. The mechanism of HF formation in LiPF6 based organic carbonate electrolytes. Electrochem. Commun. 2012;14:47. doi: 10.1016/j.elecom.2011.10.026. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Ono Y., Nagai S., Hayashi Y., Urashima S.-h., Yui H.. The role of silanol groups on the reaction of SiO2 and anhydrous hydrogen fluoride gas. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2023;106:4052. doi: 10.1111/jace.19082. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Banerjee J., Bojan V., Pantano C. G., Kim S. H.. Effect of heat treatment on the surface chemical structure of glass: Oxygen speciation from in situ XPS analysis. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2018;101:644. doi: 10.1111/jace.15245. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Hwang B., Park M.-S., Kim K.. Ferrocene and Cobaltocene Derivatives for Non-Aqueous Redox Flow Batteries. ChemSusChem. 2015;8:310. doi: 10.1002/cssc.201403021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Armstrong C. G., Hogue R. W., Toghill K. E.. Characterisation of the ferrocene/ferrocenium ion redox couple as a model chemistry for non-aqueous redox flow battery research. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2020;872:114241. doi: 10.1016/j.jelechem.2020.114241. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Milshtein J. D., Kaur A. P., Casselman M. D., Kowalski J. A., Modekrutti S., Zhang P. L., Harsha Attanayake N., Elliott C. F., Parkin S. R., Risko C., Brushett F. R., Odom S. A.. High current density, long duration cycling of soluble organic active species for non-aqueous redox flow batteries. Energy Environ. Sci. 2016;9:3531. doi: 10.1039/C6EE02027E. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Kaur A. P., Harris K. C., Attanayake N. H., Liang Z., Parkin S. R., Tang M. H., Odom S. A.. Quantifying Environmental Effects on the Solution and Solid-State Stability of a Phenothiazine Radical Cation. Chem. Mater. 2020;32:3007. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.9b05345. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Milton M., Cheng Q., Yang Y., Nuckolls C., Hernández Sánchez R., Sisto T. J.. Molecular Materials for Nonaqueous Flow Batteries with a High Coulombic Efficiency and Stable Cycling. Nano Lett. 2017;17:7859. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b04131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ma T., Pan Z., Miao L., Chen C., Han M., Shang Z., Chen J.. Porphyrin-Based Symmetric Redox-Flow Batteries towards Cold-Climate Energy Storage. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2018;57:3158. doi: 10.1002/anie.201713423. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yan Y., Vogt D. B., Vaid T. P., Sigman M. S., Sanford M. S.. Development of High Energy Density Diaminocyclopropenium-Phenothiazine Hybrid Catholytes for Non-Aqueous Redox Flow Batteries. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2021;60:27039. doi: 10.1002/anie.202111939. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Etkind S. I., Lopez J., Zhu Y. G., Fang J.-H., Ong W. J., Shao-Horn Y., Swager T. M.. Thianthrene-Based Bipolar Redox-Active Molecules Toward Symmetric All-Organic Batteries. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2022;10:11739. doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.2c01717. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- A substoichiometric amount of [NO][PF6] was deliberately used to prevent the presence of excess NO+, which would react with trace water according to NO+ + H2O → HNO2 + H+.
- Wilken S., Treskow M., Scheers J., Johansson P., Jacobsson P.. Initial stages of thermal decomposition of LiPF6-based lithium ion battery electrolytes by detailed Raman and NMR spectroscopy. RSC Adv. 2013;3:16359. doi: 10.1039/c3ra42611d. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Fleischmann M., Pletcher D.. The electrochemical oxidation of some aliphatic hydrocarbons in acetonitrile. Tetrahedron Lett. 1968;9:6255. doi: 10.1016/S0040-4039(00)75447-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Portis L. C., Roberson J. C., Mann C. K.. Anodic background reaction in moist acetonitrile. Anal. Chem. 1972;44:294. doi: 10.1021/ac60310a018. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Ue M., Takeda M., Takehara M., Mori S.. Electrochemical Properties of Quaternary Ammonium Salts for Electrochemical Capacitors. J. Electrochem. Soc. 1997;144:2684. doi: 10.1149/1.1837882. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Liu M., Vatamanu J., Chen X., Xing L., Xu K., Li W.. Hydrolysis of LiPF6-Containing Electrolyte at High Voltage. ACS Energy Lett. 2021;6:2096. doi: 10.1021/acsenergylett.1c00707. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Delp S. A., Borodin O., Olguin M., Eisner C. G., Allen J. L., Jow T. R.. Importance of Reduction and Oxidation Stability of High Voltage Electrolytes and Additives. Electrochim. Acta. 2016;209:498. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2016.05.100. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Fadel E. R., Faglioni F., Samsonidze G., Molinari N., Merinov B. V., Goddard W. A. Iii, Grossman J. C., Mailoa J. P., Kozinsky B.. Role of solvent-anion charge transfer in oxidative degradation of battery electrolytes. Nat. Commun. 2019;10:3360. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-11317-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Borodin O.. Challenges with prediction of battery electrolyte electrochemical stability window and guiding the electrode - electrolyte stabilization. Curr. Opin. Electrochem. 2019;13:86. doi: 10.1016/j.coelec.2018.10.015. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- A similar lag phase was recently reported in PF6 –-triggered H/D exchange reactions. The mechanism is proposed to involve P–F bond cleavage induced by a microstructured H-bonding network around the PF6 – anion, which leads to the in situ formation of DPO2F2 as the deuterium source. See:; Ni Y., Lebelt J., Barp M., Kreuter F., Buttkus H., Jin J., Kretzschmar M., Tonner-Zech R., Asmis K. R., Gulder T.. Hexafluorophosphate-Triggered Hydrogen Isotope Exchange (HIE) in Fluorinated Environments: A Platform for the Deuteration of Aromatic Compounds via Strong Bond Activation. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2025;64:e202417889. doi: 10.1002/anie.202417889. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Strmcnik D., Castelli I. E., Connell J. G., Haering D., Zorko M., Martins P., Lopes P. P., Genorio B., Østergaard T., Gasteiger H. A., Maglia F., Antonopoulos B. K., Stamenkovic V. R., Rossmeisl J., Markovic N. M.. Electrocatalytic transformation of HF impurity to H2 and LiF in lithium-ion batteries. Nat. Catal. 2018;1:255. doi: 10.1038/s41929-018-0047-z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Jiang S., Li R., Chen L., Sun C., Wang J., Zheng J., Chen L., Deng T., Fan X.. Deciphering the Purification Additive Chemistries for Ultra-Stable High-Voltage Lithium-Ion Batteries. Adv. Mater. 2025;37:2417285. doi: 10.1002/adma.202417285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li Z., Wang L., Huang X., He X.. Lithium Bis(Trifluoromethanesulfonyl)Imide (LiTFSI): A Prominent Lithium Salt in Lithium-Ion Battery Electrolytes - Fundamentals, Progress, and Future Perspectives. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2024;34:2408319. doi: 10.1002/adfm.202408319. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.




