Skip to main content
Aging and Disease logoLink to Aging and Disease
. 2025 Feb 19;17(1):91–113. doi: 10.14336/AD.2024.1629

Decoding Microglial Polarization and Metabolic Reprogramming in Neurodegenerative Diseases: Implications for Disease Progression and Therapy

Ran Gao 1,2, Ya Gao 3, Wenting Su 1,2, Renxi Wang 1,2,*
PMCID: PMC12730189  PMID: 40072374

Abstract

As the resident macrophages of the brain, microglia are crucial immune cells specific to the central nervous system (CNS). They constantly surveil their surroundings and trigger immunological reactions, playing a key role in various neurodegenerative diseases (ND). As illnesses progress, microglia exhibit multiple phenotypes. Traditionally, microglia have been classified into two main phenotypes upon activation: the pro-inflammatory M1 polarization and the anti-inflammatory M2 polarization. However, this classification is now considered overly simplistic, as it is unable to fully convey the intricacy and diversity of the inflammatory response. Immune regulatory factors, such as chemokines secreted by microglia, are essential for modulating brain development, maintaining the neural milieu, and orchestrating responses to injury, along with the subsequent repair processes. However, in recent years, the significance of metabolic reprogramming in both physiological microglial activity and ND has also become increasingly recognized. Upon activation—triggered by brain injury, infection, or ND—microglia typically modify their metabolic processes by transitioning from oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) phosphorylation to glycolysis. This shift facilitates rapid energy production but may also enhance pro-inflammatory responses. This review seeks to summarize metabolic reprogramming and polarization in the function of microglia and their involvement in ND.

Keywords: microglia, microglial polarization, inflammation, metabolic reprogramming, neurodegenerative diseases

INTRODUCTION

Within the CNS, microglia serve as the principal immune cells, consisting of roughly 10-15% of brain cells [1]. They are vital for sustaining neural equilibrium and facilitating immune monitoring. Originating from the yolk sac during embryonic development, microglia migrate to the CNS, where they are essential in early developmental processes [2]. Resident microglia in the brain act as the primary defense against disturbances in physiological balance. These cells uniquely oversee the microenvironment and dynamically survey the entire brain by continuously extending and withdrawing their branched projections [3]. In neurodegenerative diseases, microglia undertake multiple immune roles, such as phagocytosis, cytokine secretion, and the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), altering their phenotype in response to shifts in the surrounding environment [3-5]. These different phenotypes help the immune system in the nervous system to control and maintain tissue homeostasis [6]. In the context of chronic neuro-inflammation, microglial metabolic profile also undergoes significant changes.

ND, including Parkinson's disease (PD), Alzheimer's disease (AD), and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), are chronic conditions that lead to neuronal degeneration in the peripheral and central nervous systems [7,8]. The global socio-economic impact of these diseases is increasing rapidly. In ND, microglia become overactivated and release large amounts of inflammatory mediators, creating an inflammatory microenvironment [9,10]. Upon activation, microglia change their phenotype and continuously assess and clear brain tissue metabolites and debris. They actively participate in synaptic remodeling, neuronal damage, and repair, all of which have high energy demands [11,12]. Metabolic reprogramming refers to the method by which cells adapt their metabolic profiles to meet the energy and biomolecular requirements of their surrounding microenvironment. Recent research has emphasized the critical function of microglial metabolic reprogramming in immune metabolism and neurodegenerative disorders, particularly in relation to amino acid, glucose, and fatty acid metabolism.

Like other cells, microglia primarily use glucose as an energy source. Their functional changes are closely linked to the advancement of ND, but whether microglial activity exacerbates, or limits neurodegeneration remains a subject of ongoing investigation. Researchers consider neuroinflammation and its associated metabolic changes to be key factors in the beginning and development of these conditions. Recent studies have underscored the significance of metabolic reprogramming in microglia for regulating their polarization and functionality, particularly in relation to neuroinflammatory responses and neurodegeneration [13-15]. However, the specific changes and metabolic pathways involved in microglial glucose metabolism during ND, as well as their mechanisms of interaction with neuroinflammation remain incompletely understood.

This article offers a thorough and up-to-date review of the evolving roles of microglial activity and key polarization processes in the development of ND. Finally, we will address the existing challenges and potential future avenues for exploring the complex interaction between microglial metabolism and polarization within the framework of ND.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Search strategy

As in previous studies [16], the analysis began with a preprocessing step to clean and prepare the downloaded data for subsequent analysis. We removed articles without summaries to ensure a comprehensive, complete data set. We sourced the data for this analysis from the Web of Science Core Collection (WOSCC), which provides the most comprehensive bibliographic data available. The time frame of the search spans from 2004 to 2023, with the search restricted to English-language reviews and articles. The search was completed on November 24, 2024, as outlined in Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Literature search and selection.

Data collection and methods

As described in previous studies [17,18], VOSviewer (1.6.18, Leiden University) and CiteSpace (5.8) were used to conduct bibliometric analysis, focusing on temporal trends and keyword visualization. CiteSpace analyzed and visualized keyword bursts, with nodes representing keywords and their associated timelines. VOSviewer performed keyword clustering. After importing the downloaded data, we selected options such as "co-authorship," "co-occurrence," and "author" to achieve our research goals and set a threshold of 190-200 documents to filter the data.

In the visual output from VOSviewer, node size reflects the frequency, quantity, and citation count of keywords, while link thickness indicates the strength of relationships such as collaboration or co-occurrence. VOSviewer automatically clusters data based on keyword frequency and assigns distinct colors to each cluster.

CiteSpace was used to analyze and visualize keyword bursts; nodes represent keywords and their associated timelines. CiteSpace is similar to VOSviewer in terms of data processing. When using CiteSpace for time trend analysis, the source selects all items, including article, and other keywords selected for nodes. By setting a time slice for one year to check the changing trend of some key terms or concepts in different periods, retrospective analysis, and summary of the literature in microglia and neurodegenerative diseases in the past 20 years, the development vein and emerging hot topics in the research field can be revealed and predict its research frontier. Figure 1 displays a flow diagram of this search method and selection procedure.

Microglial Functions

Microglia are the brain's local macrophages, cultivated during the development of the embryo and maintained through self-renewal without external input [19,20]. Under physiological conditions, microglia play a crucial role in preserving brain balance by monitoring the brain's microenvironment. Neurons in the CNS rely on a stable microenvironment for survival, and their maintenance largely depends on innate immune cells, specifically microglia [1,21-23]. During development, microglia regulate brain function by modulating programmed cell death and synaptic maturation [2]. As the main immune cells in the brain, microglia capture pathogens and remove cellular debris to restore CNS homeostasis.

Several investigations have shown that microglia serve as neuroprotective agents in various mechanisms. For example, in a neural injury model, researchers studied the contribution of microglia to nerve injury repair by isolating nuclei associated with cell types to label microglia for polarization analysis and functional assessment. These processes revealed that microglia contribute to nerve damage repair by promoting neurogenesis, synaptic pruning, and inhibiting harmful inflammation through the secretion of anti-inflammatory factors [24-27].

However, during disease progression, microglia can adopt dysfunctional phenotypes and produce cytotoxic effects, which have been shown to negatively impact conditions such as ND [28,29]. For example, researchers linked microglial polarization to changes seen in severe neurodegenerative conditions, including AD, PD, HD, MS, and ALS [30-32]. Some theories suggest that microglia-driven neuroinflammation and metabolic changes could contribute to the neurodegeneration, though the precise underlying processes remain unclear.

Polarization process

Microglia undergo complex, long-term changes during polarization in response to neuroinflammatory conditions. A defining feature of microglia is their ability to undergo transformation in response to pathology within the CNS. Researchers now understand this transformation as a continuum, encompassing intermediate stages that involved alterations in gene expression, migration, metabolism, sensory functions, secretion, phagocytosis, and cell death [33,34].

Neuroinflammation is characterized by microglial polarization, which refers to the process by which microglia, the resident immune cells of the CNS, adopt distinct functional states in response to various stimuli, such as injury or environmental factors [35-37]. These polarized states are commonly categorized into the M1 pro-inflammatory or M2 anti-inflammatory phenotypes to respond to the disturbances in the microenvironment [38,39].

M1 polarization usually refers to microglial activation of surface receptors such as TLRs upon exposure to bacteria-derived products or infection-related signals, as shown in Table 1. Pro-inflammatory molecules produced by pathogens or injured cells stimulate resting microglia to produce pro-inflammatory substances like IL-1β, TNF-α, and proteases that affect neurons and surrounding immune cells during neuroinflammation [40-42]. By promoting local inflammatory responses, microglia effectively remove foreign pathogens or damaged cells and initiate nerve repair processes. Additionally, M1 microglia are continuously activated, and an excessive pro-inflammatory response causes persistent inflammation inside the neurological system, promoting neurodegeneration and accelerating disease progression.

Table 1.

Surface reactive receptors of microglia: functional characteristics and associated pathways.

Receptor Recognized structure/ligand Associated pathway Functional characteristics Ref.
Toll-like receptors (TLRs) Pathogen-associated molecular patterns (e.g., LPS, dsRNA, CpG DNA) NF-κB, MAPK Detects microbial pathogens, initiating pro-inflammatory cascades and inducing cytokine release [59]
NOD-like receptors (NLRs) DAMPs (e.g., ATP, uric acid) NF-κB, Caspase-1 Senses cellular injury, activates inflammasome complexes, and mediates the regulates of IL-18 and IL-1β [60,61]
RAGE HMGB1, S100 proteins NF-κB, MAPK Drives chronic inflammation, promoting the generation of ROS and the release of inflammatory substances [62,63]
CD36 Oxidized low-density lipoprotein (oxLDL) Src, MAPK, PI3K-Akt Recognizes modified lipids, participates in the removal of apoptotic cells, and regulates metabolic homeostasis [64,65]
Dectin-1 β-glucan (component of fungal cell wall) Syk, CARD9, NF-κB Recognizes fungal infection, induces pro-inflammatory response and antimicrobial immunity [66,67]
P2X7 ATP MAPK, NF-κB, Caspase-1 Induces inflammasome activation via ATP signaling, promotes IL-1β release [68]
TREM2 Phospholipids, apoptotic cells PI3K-Akt, NF-κB Promotes microglial proliferation, phagocytosis, and anti-inflammatory response [69]
Fc Receptors Antibody-antigen complexes Src, Syk, NF-κB Mediates antibody-dependent phagocytosis, regulates adaptive immunity [70]
CR3 (Complement receptor 3) C3b, iC3b PI3K-Akt, NF-κB Recognizes complement-tagged pathogens, promotes phagocytosis and inflammatory response [71,72]
CX3CR1 CX3CL1 (ligand from neurons) PI3K-Akt, ERK Regulates neuron-microglia interaction, primarily exhibits anti-inflammatory effects [73]
Scavenger Receptors Modified proteins, apoptotic cell debris, oxidized lipids MAPK, NF-κB Clears cellular debris and pathogens, regulates tissue homeostasis and inflammation [59,74]

Conversely, mediators like IL-4, IL-10, and IL-13 are mainly secreted by M2 microglia. These stimulate neuroprotective responses in microglia, prompting the secretion of cytokines such as FIZZ1, IL-4, arginase 1, Ym1, CD206. These factors may be involved in neuroprotection and tissue repair; researchers demonstrated that IL-4, for instance, suppressed the secretion of pro-inflammatory factors [43].

Recently, studies demonstrated that M2-type microglia play a harmful role in some cases. For example, the immune response may be excessively suppressed in some ND, leading to a reduced ability to clear pathological proteins. As a result, these pathological changes are not effectively eliminated, which in turn exacerbates disease progression [43-45]. Therefore, understanding the balance between M1 and M2 microglia and their dual roles in ND is important for the clinical development of more precise treatment strategies (Fig. 2).

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

The regulatory role of M1/M2 microglial polarization in CNS. Microglia in their resting state secrete IL-4, IL-13, or IL-10, inducing M2 polarization while suppressing M1 activity. By discharging neurotrophic substances and anti-inflammatory cytokines, the M2 phenotype offers neuroprotection and mitigates neuronal damage. By contrast, under stimulation by LPS and IFN-γ, microglia adopt an M1 phenotype. This shift leads to the generation of pro-inflammatory mediators including IL-1β, IL-6, CCL2, NO, and ROS. These factors collectively establish a toxic inflammatory milieu, impairing neuronal function and ultimately precipitating neuronal death.

However, recent research has shown that the traditional M1/M2 dichotomy is overly simplistic and unable to capture the complexity of microglia [46]. Microglial phenotypes are more intricate than what is represented in in vitro models, and they are highly plastic and diverse. Some microglia neither distinctly express markers of the M1 or M2 phenotypes nor display bio-homogeneity when expressing similar polarizing markers [47,48]. Microglia exhibit distinct phenotypes in homeostasis and can shift into different activation states in response to stimulation [49]. These phenotypic states are not static but exist along a continuum, reflecting the dynamic processes within microglia [48].

Likewise, microglia activation might show up as either pro- or anti-inflammatory; yet this transformation is a transitional, constant change impacted by elements including injury and inflammation [50]. The phenotype of microglia is not only shaped by the external environment but is also closely linked to their intrinsic characteristics and the maturation process of the CNS, which endows microglia with a high degree of phenotypic plasticity and diversity [48]. These phenotypes fall on a dynamic continuum and exhibit varying immune characteristics based on the severity and phase of the illness [51].

Applying single-cell technologies has revealed significant differences in microglial response patterns, particularly their more complex behaviors under different stimulus. Some studies have even shown that individual microglial cells express both M1 and M2 markers, as well as a range of M2 phenotypic subsets, including M2a, M2b, and M2c, each possessing distinct physical characteristics and biological features [52]. As a result, these phenotypic states have distinct physiological and pathological effects.

The functional state of microglia varies greatly in different environments, and this phenotypic transformation, intricately linked to their function, plays a significant role in the development of ND [53]. In AD, microglia typically display a pro-inflammatory M1 phenotype, particularly around Aβ plaques. Recent studies suggest that in the AD environment, microglia are prone to polarization toward the damaging M1 phenotype [54,55]. Additionally, new research employing clinical techniques like spatial transcriptomics and single-cell RNA sequencing provides deeper insights into microglia's gene expression profiles in different environments [56,57].

Although the classical categorization of microglia into M1 and M2 is overly simplistic, it remains a useful starting point for understanding the complex microglial phenotypes observed in neurodegenerative diseases. This understanding could enhance our comprehension of microglial function throughout disease progression and may help guide the creation of new treatment strategies. Multiple investigations have demonstrated that controlling microglial polarization is crucial for alleviating central nervous system diseases [35,58].

Microglial metabolic reprogramming

Metabolic reprogramming, a concept initially introduced by Warburg to describe the unique energy metabolism of tumor cells, has also been observed in microglia [75]. These immune cells of the CNS exhibit similar shifts in metabolic pathways, closely tied to their activation states [76]. The energy demands of microglia primarily arise from the breakdown and metabolism of various nutrients, including glucose, lipids, and proteins [15,77]. Molecules associated with glucose metabolism, such as glucose transporters (GLUTs), are pivotal in the metabolic reprogramming of neurodegenerative diseases mediated by microglia. Table 2 summarizes the key molecules that regulate changes in microglial glucose metabolism under inflammatory conditions, detailing their respective functions and related findings.

Table 2.

Key molecules involved in glucose metabolism changes in microglia and their correlation.

Molecule Function Effects under inflammation Reference
GLUTs Facilitate glucose uptake, regulate microglial metabolism Inflammatory stimuli increase GLUT1 expression, enhancing glycolysis and lactate release; GLUT1 inhibitors reduce the release of inflammatory mediators (IL-1β, TNFα, and IL-6 etc) [96,97]
Hexokinase II (HK2) Catalyzes the initial step of glucose metabolism, regulates glycolysis and mitochondrial activity HK2 deficiency promotes M1 polarization, enhancing phagocytosis and inflammatory responses [98,99]
Phosphofructokinase 1 (PFK1) Regulates the rate of glycolysis, modulated by the PFKFB3 isoform PFKFB3 is upregulated under pro-inflammatory conditions, promoting glycolysis, restoring oxidative metabolism, and reducing inflammation [100]
Monocarboxylate Transporters (MCTs) Transport pyruvate, lactate, and other monocarboxylates Expression of MCT1, MCT2, and MCT4 is elevated upon M1 polarization; MCT1 inhibition reduces glycolysis and inflammatory cytokine expression [101-103]
Pyruvate Kinase M2 (PKM2) and Pyruvate Dehydrogenase (PDH) End enzymes of glycolysis and acetyl-CoA production PKM2 levels are elevated in AD samples, influencing M1 polarization; PDH is linked to the balance of oxidative metabolism [104-106]
Lactate Dehydrogenase (LDH) Facilitates the conversion of pyruvate to lactate, maintaining glycolytic flux LDH is highly expressed in microglia, and lactate production is enhanced during pro-inflammatory responses [107,108]

Depending on the energy sources it uses, each type of cell displays distinct metabolic traits under physiological conditions. However, alterations in cellular activity within the surrounding microenvironment can induce transformations in these metabolic profiles. For instance, in response to different inflammatory signals, microglia can alter their intracellular metabolic pathways, as illustrated in Table 3. The investigation of these molecules offers valuable insights into the intricate relationship between microglial metabolic reprogramming and neurodegenerative diseases while also providing a path for the creation of alternative treatments.

Table 3.

Key metabolic pathways of microglia.

Target/pathway Composition/activation mechanism Function Mechanism Disease relevance Inhibition/activation effect Reference
mTOR Composed of mTORC1 and mTORC2; activated by PAMPs (LPS) and DAMPs (ATP) Regulates GLUTs, glycolytic enzymes, and transcription factors Promotes glucose utilization, modulates inflammation, increases glycolysis Associated with aging and neurodegenerative diseases Inhibition reduces glycolysis, ROS, and pro-inflammatory factors [109,110]
HIF-1α Composed of HIF-α and HIF-β; upregulated under hypoxic conditions, downstream of mTOR Controls metabolic reprogramming, promotes glycolysis, inhibits TCA cycle Increases GLUT1, HK2 activity, reduces OXPHOS, stabilizes pro-inflammatory state Linked to Aβ toxicity and neurodegeneration Inhibition reduces pro-inflammatory cytokine expression, alleviates neurodamage [111,112]
PI3K-AKT-mTOR Composed of PI3K, AKT, mTOR; activated by LPS stimulation Regulates glycolysis and pro-inflammatory gene transcription Upregulates PDK1, enhances glucose uptake, promotes glycolysis, reduces OXPHOS Promotes inflammation in neurodegenerative diseases Inhibition decreases STAT3 phosphorylation, reduces inflammation [113]
AMPK Composed of AMPKα, AMPKβ, AMPKγ; activated during energy stress Regulates OXPHOS, glucose and lipid metabolism, maintains metabolic balance Increases GLUT1 and GLUT4 translocation, enhances glycolysis, supports anti-inflammatory state Involved in metabolic dysregulation and chronic inflammation Activation inhibits glycolysis, NLRP3, and pro-inflammatory gene expression [114,115]

Increased glycolytic flux, accumulation of specific TCA cycle metabolites, decreased mitochondrial respiration, and improved transcriptional control of HIF-1α and mTOR are characteristics of metabolic reprogramming [78,79]. Recent studies show that iron deposition in microglia induces inflammation and glycolytic phenotypes, increases ferritin expression, and raises TNF-α and IL-6 secretion [45]. It also impairs glycolysis and microglial function, reducing phagocytosis and chemotaxis [80,81]. These changes modulate the microglial immune functions, such as cytokine synthesis, ultimately contributing to ND [82].

When faced with metabolic stressors, cultured microglia can activate alternative glycolytic pathways or expand mitochondrial respiratory capacity, positioning them as universal sensors of physiological changes in the CNS [83,84]. These cells combine multiple cellular signals and conduct extensive phenotypic changes to adjust to inflammatory events. However, direct data on the metabolism of microglia within brain tissue remains limited [85-87]. Recent studies using fluorescent lifetime imaging of acute brain sections, which represent the backbone paradigm for researching the CNS from circuitry to nanoscale occurrences, have revealed time-dependent phenotypic changes in microglia impacted by intricate extracellular ATP dynamics via P2Y12R and CX3CR1 signaling [88]. In vitro, the signal persisted in mouse brain slices for several hours, and the results showed that while microglia are more glycolytic than other cells in the neocortex, they exhibit significant metabolic flexibility and can participate in glutamyl amylolysis, enabling them to actively survey the brain parenchyma [88-90].

These findings imply that microglial functions are sustained by intricate metabolic networks within the brain, potentially involving the dynamic exchange of energy substrates between different cell types. At the same time, this phenomenon highlights the critical reliance of microglia on glycolysis and oxidative energy metabolism, with this metabolic balance closely tied to their activation states and shifts under various pathological or physiological conditions. This underscores the intimate link between microglia and metabolic reprogramming, offering insights into their adaptive response mechanisms and presenting a fresh perspective for understanding their role in ND.

Comparative transcriptomic analyses of energy metabolism-related genes in neurons, astrocytes, and mouse microglia reveal that microglia uniquely express a repertoire of genes essential for both glycolysis and oxidative phosphorylation [91-93]. This metabolic trait suggests that metabolic imbalance within microglia may be a key pathophysiological basis for a number of brain illnesses in addition to the crucial function that microglia play in preserving brain homeostasis.

Recently, the link between microglial metabolism and its functions, particularly in ND, has gained increased attention. The results from mouse models provide useful preliminary data but cannot fully replicate the complex metabolic and immune responses seen in human disease. Studies have shown that iPSC-derived microglia, brain organoids, and transplantation into humanized mice can simulate inflammation and metabolism in vivo [94,95]. However, despite the vast therapeutic potential of this area, our understanding of the metabolic alterations in microglia under disease conditions remains significantly limited.

Using hippocampal slice cultures, researchers found that the increase in glucose consumption and lactate secretion depended on microglial activity in inflammatory cortical tissue. This suggests that microglia not only regulate their own metabolism in inflammatory environments but may also influence other brain cells through the secretion of metabolites [85]. Future studies will aim to further elucidate the key interactions between microglial metabolism and their communication with other brain cells. This will help reveal how these dynamic metabolic processes influence the course of neuroinflammatory diseases and pave the way for novel approaches targeting microglial metabolism.

Microglia and ND

Using existing data, we conducted a comprehensive keyword analysis of research trends in microglia and neurodegenerative diseases from 2004 to 2023, based on the WOSCC. The keyword analysis reveals core research areas and emerging hotspots. From 7166 articles, we identified 197 keywords, 126 of which appeared more than 100 times. Figure 3A displays a network grouping keywords into color-coded clusters. Figure 3B shows an overlaid visualization map based on their temporal patterns. Figure 3C highlights the top 25 keywords with the greatest citation bursts, with red lines indicating the outbreak periods, including start and end years (Fig. 3).

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

The keyword distribution map provides a visual representation of research topics and their evolutionary trends, with each node representing a keyword. (A) Clustering map of keywords: This map categorizes keywords based on co-occurrence, with different colors representing distinct clusters. These clusters highlight the connections and distinctions between various research topics, offering insight into the thematic structure of the field. (B) Temporal clustering map: This map is based on the average appearance time of keywords, where gradient colors represent the temporal distribution. Darker colors correspond to keywords with earlier average appearance times, while lighter colors indicate keywords that have appeared more recently. This visualization reveals the chronological development and trajectory of the research field. (C) Keyword burst map: Highlighting keywords with high-frequency occurrences within specific timeframes, this map identifies research hotspots and trends. It provides valuable references for understanding emerging focus areas and shifts in research priorities.

We identified four clusters for keyword co-occurrence analysis (Fig. 3A). A red cluster primarily focuses on the pathological and physiological mechanisms of microglia and neurodegenerative diseases, with key terms such as "neurodegeneration," "neuroinflammation," "oxidative stress," and "activation." The strong correlation between "neuroinflammation" and "oxidative stress" highlights their continued importance as critical research areas, with "biomarkers" emerging prominently since 2018, indicating their status as a recent research hotspot. Green and blue clusters mainly encompass keywords related to specific ND, particularly PD, emphasizing their position as mainstream research topics. These clusters include terms like "neuroprotection," "apoptosis," and "cognition," underscoring their close association with microglial function. A yellow cluster focuses on research models and phenotype analysis, particularly in the context of cognitive decline, reflecting a core interest in neurodegenerative disease research.

Figure 3B reveals a notable shift in research focus over time. Early studies centered on classical mechanisms such as inflammatory factors and oxidative stress in ND, but recent trends have moved toward exploring metabolic reprogramming, autophagy, and polarization signaling pathways, suggesting a transition towards more precise therapeutic approaches for neurodegenerative diseases. These findings align with the sudden emergence of keywords in Figure 3C, indicating a shift from classical mechanisms to precision medicine. The transition highlights the importance of understanding molecular mechanisms, particularly the polarization and metabolic reprogramming of microglia. The deeper exploration of these processes could provide critical insights for developing effective treatment plans for ND, emphasizing the potential of precision medicine in addressing these complex conditions (Fig 4).

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Microglial polarization and metabolic reprogramming. In a healthy state, microglia predominantly utilize OXPHOS to produce energy, supporting brain repair, enhancing phagocytosis, and releasing neurotrophic factors. During inflammation, they undergo a metabolic shift toward glycolysis, marked by increased glucose absorption, lactate generation, succinic acid accumulation, lipid synthesis, and upregulation of glycolytic enzymes. This metabolic reprogramming amplifies inflammatory responses while impairing phagocytic functions. The distinct phenotypes of microglia are closely associated with specific metabolic pathways, with activation inducing changes in mitochondrial dynamics and enabling transitions between glycolysis and OXPHOS to meet functional demands.

Polarization and metabolic processes of microglia

Today, the effects of the microglial polarization process on the metabolism of cellular energy are well established. In the classically M1 type, metabolic reprogramming shifts toward glycolysis, accompanied by the generation of nitric oxide (NO) and citrulline [116,117]. This metabolic switch enhances glucose uptake, lactate production, and PPP activation while reducing the consumption of mitochondrial oxygen.

In microglia, the common inflammatory stimulus like LPS can quickly induce aerobic glycolysis [118,119]. Recent findings show that the extracellular acidification rate (ECAR), a gauge of glycolysis, significantly increases within 150 minutes of LPS treatment [116], along with a significant increase in the expression levels of important glycolytic enzymes, including GLUT1 and HK2 [120]. These results underscore the ability of LPS to rapidly trigger glycolytic reprogramming in microglia.

Another characteristic of M1 is the generation of NOS, with NO produced via the oxidation of L-arginine, utilizing electrons provided by NADPH to power nitric oxide synthase (NOS), specifically inducible NOS (iNOS). When present in high amounts, NO reversibly impedes mitochondrial respiration by competing with oxygen for binding sites on cytochrome c oxidase. Consequently, as mitochondrial respiration diminishes, superoxide radicals (O2-) are produced, which are then enzymatically transformed by superoxide dismutase 3 (SOD3) into hydrogen peroxide (H2O2). Hydrogen peroxide diffuses into the cytoplasm, where prolonged NO production can lead to its reaction with O2-, forming peroxynitrite (ONOO-), an agent that irreversibly inhibits the electron transport chain [97,121,122]. In addition, NO suppresses the action of pyruvate dehydrogenase, a critical enzyme accountable for catalyzing the transition of pyruvate into acetyl-CoA [117,123].

Monitoring microglial polarization under these conditions suggests that while glycolysis increases, OXPHOS may still play a vital part in sustaining cellular energy metabolism. This highlights the significant impact of the polarization process on cellular energy regulation. Different polarization states may control energy supply and cellular function through distinct metabolic pathways. This metabolic regulation not only influences microglial polarization but also plays an important part in the initiation and advancement of neuroinflammation and ND.

We are only now starting to understand how energy metabolism influences microglial inflammation. One study shows that the glycolysis rate, independent of glucose levels, influences the formation of inflammasomes such as NLRP1 and NLRP3 [124], suggesting that the metabolic state of cells may partially regulate their inflammatory response. For example, the researchers restricted dietary energy through daily calorie reduction or intermittent fasting to examines the effects on the role of microglia in illness models. They found that microglia possess the capability to metabolize ketone bodies, such as acetic acid and β-hydroxybutyric acid, produced during ketogenic or fasting diets, and react to such metabolites as signaling molecules [125,126].

β-Hydroxybutyric acid triggers GRP109A receptors and prevents histone deacetylase in microglia, thereby suppressing their activation following brain injury and promoting their transformation into a neuroprotective phenotype [4,127]. This mechanism suggests that metabolites are essential for regulating microglia's inflammatory response and driving their transformation into protective phenotypes. In addition, studies used LPS as an inflammatory stimulus and the glycolytic inhibitor 2-deoxy-D-glucose to simulate the reduction in glycolytic flux induced by caloric restriction, suppressing the production of TNF-α and IL-6 via the nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) signaling pathway [97]. This discovery emphasizes the critical function of energy metabolism in regulating microglia's inflammatory response.

The precise regulation and disruption of energy metabolism may serve as a fundamental patho-physiological mechanism underlying various brain diseases [93,128,129]. In the context of ND, growing evidence suggests a strong relationship between the energy metabolism of microglia and their polarization state. As the metabolic pathways of microglia become better understood, future research is likely to uncover additional molecular mechanisms that regulate these processes, offering new therapeutic targets for interventions in neuroinflammation and ND (Fig. 4).

Polarization of microglia and changes in energy metabolism programming in ND

ND are widespread disorders that primarily impact the CNS, and they are distinguished by gradual structural changes, neuronal degeneration, loss of function, and eventual cell death [3]. At present, there are no definitive cures for these illnesses, and the clinical efficacy of available drugs is either limited or difficult to detect. Typical ND include AD, HD, PD, multiple sclerosis (MS), and ALS. These conditions exhibit several shared subcellular pathological characteristics, such as aberrant protein accumulation, malfunctioning protein degradation mechanisms, disrupted axonal circulation, and pervasive bioenergetic and mitochondrial impairments [130-132]. Considerable evidence highlights the importance of microglial polarization within the brain in the beginning and course of ND. Similarly, disturbances in energy metabolism, particularly mitochondrial dysfunction, and glucose hypometabolism, have emerged as crucial early hallmarks of ND [133,134].

In ND, the interaction between microglial polarization and metabolic changes is particularly crucial. According to our investigation and research, microglia contribute to ND not only through immune responses but also by regulating the brain environment through their metabolic characteristics. The following section summarizes the changes in microglial polarization and metabolic reprogramming observed in major neurodegenerative diseases, offering insights into their potential roles in disease mechanisms and progression.

AD

AD accounts for 60-70% of dementia cases and is defined by its hallmark amyloid-beta (Aβ) plaques and hyperphosphorylated tau protein tangles [59,135,136]. These pathological features contribute to synaptic loss, neuronal death, and cognitive decline. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) highlight microglia as central players in AD development, and numerous AD risk factors are mostly or exclusively produced by these cells [137,138].

Neuroinflammation has a major impact on AD pathogenesis. Pro-inflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6 increase progressively from early disease stages, while others, including IL-18 and MCP-1, peak at specific points. Additionally, changes in TDP-43, progranulin, and TREM2, among other genes, impair defense mechanisms, intensify inflammation, and accelerate neurodegeneration [139-141].

A recent study analyzed 194,000 mononuclear microglial transcripts and epigenomes from 443 individuals with various AD pathologies [142]. The researchers identified 12 microglial transcriptional stages, including those related to AD-dysregulated homeostasis, inflammation, and lipid metabolism. These conditions show specific microglial roles linked to inflammation and lipid activity [142]. The study also examined the production of AD risk genes in conditions like microglial polarization. Unlike in mouse brains, microglial features were minimally enhanced over all conditions in this human dataset, suggesting species-specific differences in disease features [142]. Taken together, however, the data support the close link between microglial polarization and lipid metabolism in AD pathogenesis.

Emerging research highlights metabolic features of AD pathology, particularly in microglia [143]. In AD, M1 microglia undergo metabolic reprogramming, shifting from OXPHOS to aerobic glycolysis, a process referred to as the Warburg effect [144]. This shift increases glucose metabolism, promoting microglial functions like migration, proliferation, and phagocytosis in reaction to injury and other pathological stimuli [145]. Mitochondria are reprogrammed to meet the energy demands of these processes, but chronic inflammation produced by tau and Aβ disrupts the cellular TCA cycle, resulting in the buildup of metabolites such as citric acid, succinic acid, and cis-caprylic acid [146]. This exacerbates inflammation, inhibits OXPHOS, reduces ATP synthesis, and increases the production of saturated fatty acids [147]. These fatty acids can integrate into membrane phospholipids, making cells more vulnerable to inflammatory signals and lipid peroxidation, ultimately contributing to neuroinflammation and AD progression [147].

In AD patients, glycolytic activity of enzymes, including phosphofructokinase, aldolase, G6P isomerase, and LDH, is significantly reduced [148]. Additionally, mitochondrial defects, such as reduced activity of the pyruvate dehydrogenase complex and cytochrome oxidase, further indicate that metabolic abnormalities are a key feature of AD [148,149]. In APP/PS1 and 5xFAD mouse models, microglial metabolic changes are characterized by increased glycolysis and decreased oxidative phosphorylation [150,151]. These features support microglial immune and inflammatory responses in AD but may also exacerbate neurodegeneration.

While these models are valuable for studying AD mechanisms and drug screening, they have limitations in replicating the genetic diversity of clinical AD, as they only include APP and PS1 mutations [152]. To better simulate human AD, researchers have developed more complex double or multiple transgenic mouse models, incorporating mutations in tau, TREM2, APOE4, and other related genes [153,154]. For example, the APOE4 transgenic APP/PS1 mice showed earlier cognitive decline and were able to better mimic the early clinical manifestations of human AD patients [155,156].

PD

PD is the most common movement disorder and the second most prevalent ND condition, trailing AD [157]. It is distinguished by the slow deterioration of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra that project to the basal ganglia and are crucial for motor control [157].

Notably, the stimulation of glial cells, including microglia, and astrocytes, significantly contributes to PD pathogenesis. Research has shown that M1 polarization markers such as iNOS and COX2, along with pro-inflammatory enzymes and phagocytic markers like CD68, are elevated in PD patients [158]. PET scans of PD patients have shown extensive M1 polarization, with the level of activation correlating with dopaminergic terminal loss, especially in the early stages of the disease [159,160].

Microglia typically adopt the pro-inflammatory phenotype upon activation, and the release of aggregated alpha-synuclein from dead dopaminergic neurons can trigger this transformation. Overexpression of alpha-synuclein drives microglia into a reactive pre-inflammatory state, where inflammatory factors such as TNF-α, NO, and IL-1β further modulate neuro-inflammation in PD [158]. Additionally, signaling pathways like PPARγ are necessary for microglia to polarize. Activating PPARγ enhances the anti-inflammatory response and promotes the transition of microglia to the M2 type by inhibiting pro-inflammatory factors like STAT and NF-κB [76]. Anti-inflammatory cytokines, including TGF-β and IL-10 are released as a result, supporting tissue healing and lowering neuroinflammation. In summary, microglial polarization is a complex process influenced by various cytokines and signaling pathways, significantly impacting neuro-inflammation and ND.

According to recent research, the 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA) rat model effectively replicates key characteristics of PD, including dopaminergic neuron loss and a classic Parkinsonian motor phenotype [161]. In this model, microglia rely on OXPHOS to produce ATP, which is essential for the proper functioning of neurons, particularly dopaminergic ones [162]. Glycolysis may also help neurons compensate for impaired OXPHOS, especially in energy-demanding neurons [163]. However, exposure to inflammatory triggers, including excessive alpha-synuclein PFF and neurotoxins, triggers metabolic reprogramming through the AKT-mTOR-HIF-1α pathway, shifting metabolism from OXPHOS to aerobic glycolysis [164,165], which results in M1 polarization and significant deficits in energy metabolism, phagocytosis, and immune function, ultimately leading to dopaminergic neuron loss.

The roles of OXPHOS and glycolysis in PD are complex and depend on the balance between the two pathways and their ability to adapt to pathological conditions. Research in both humans and PD animal models has shown increased G6PD expression, elevated PPP activity, and enhanced NADPH metabolism in microglia lead to excessive NOX2 activation [165]. This produces ROS, contributing to neuronal degeneration and dopaminergic neuron dysfunction. Additionally, the interaction between NOX2 and NO generates peroxynitrite, further exacerbating neuronal death [166].

Although the 6-OHDA model effectively replicates many of the features of PD, it still has limitations; its local lesions do not fully mimic the global brain degeneration of PD [167,168]. To overcome these challenges, researchers employ genetic modifications, induced iPSC technology, organoid models, and advanced small animal models to create more accurate and multidimensional PD research tools [147,169,170]. We expect these innovations to improve early diagnosis, mechanistic understanding, and drug development for PD.

ALS

ALS, commonly mentioned as Lou Gehrig's disease, characterized by progressive neurodegeneration, stands as the most prevalent motor neuron disorder affecting adults. During this process, microglia undergo alterations in cell count, morphology, and the release of growth factors [171]. This leads to phenotypic changes, such as the alternating M2 phenotype or the classical M1 activation [172,173].

Different cytokines and signaling pathways regulate the activation of these phenotypes. In the M2 phenotype, IL-10 induces microglial inactivation and promotes their transformation into the M2 polarized state, while IL-4 supports the alternative M2 activation [174-176]. M2 microglia exert anti-inflammatory effects by clearing pro-inflammatory cytokines, regulating endothelial function, promoting tissue repair, and secreting elevated IGF-1 and IL-4 levels. By contrast, M1 microglia, typically activated by IFN-γ or LPS, secrete cytokines that promote inflammation, such as TNF-α and IL-1β, while inhibiting the release of nutritional factors, resulting in neuronal damage [177,178].

The transgenic mouse model expressing mutant human SOD1 (mSOD1) is the primary model of ALS. Studies have shown that microglia isolated from mSOD1 transgenic mice exhibit neuroprotective effects [179]. However, the neurotoxicity exhibited by microglia containing mSOD1 is dependent on NF-κB signaling and partly facilitated by IL-1β, further suggesting the pivotal role of microglia in ALS pathogenesis [180].

A previous study used human iPSC-derived microglia to examine the impact on microglial function, which closely resemble true human microglia [181]. This study provided a thorough phenotypic investigation of human C9orf72 variant iPSC microglia through RNA sequencing to identify a multitude of mechanisms linked to chemokines and immune cell activation in both C9orf72 hexanucleotide repeat expansion (HRE) mutant microglia and healthy controls. Most notably, after LPS initiation, pathways related to immune cell activation and cytokines were enriched [181]. This finding was consistent with the widespread M1 polarization clinically observed in patients with HRE, the most prevalent hereditary cause of ALS, which is linked to disease progression [182,183].

Disturbance of neuronal metabolic supply, particularly decreased glucose absorption and utilization, is thought to result from changed microglial types in ALS [184,185]. Bioenergetic flux analysis in the ALS mouse model SOD1-G93A revealed increased mitochondrial respiration and aerobic glycolysis via the activation of GLUTs, pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase 1, and MCT-1 in primary microglia [186-188]. Pro-inflammatory signals from microglia can disrupt mitochondrial dynamics, impair energy production, and increase oxidative stress, which contributes to the metabolic abnormality seen in ALS [189].

Additionally, microglia can respond quickly to inflammation by enhancing glycolysis to provide a rapid energy supply, which also leads to lactic acid accumulation. This accumulation can destabilize the intracellular environment, potentially triggering cell damage and creating a vicious cycle [190]. Although the SOD1-G93A mouse model is widely used and represents familial ALS, it does not fully capture the pathology of sporadic ALS, limiting the translation potential of research findings into treatments for this form of disease [191-193]. To address these challenges, clinical studies are incorporating other ALS models, such as the TDP-43 and C9orf72 mouse models, to obtain a more thorough comprehension of ALS pathology and processes [194,195].

These findings highlight the complex connection between neuroinflammation and metabolic diseases in ALS, underscoring the need for metabolic therapies to manage the disease. Ongoing investigation into ALS's metabolic pathways may result in new treatments that preserve neurons and improve patient states.

HD

HD is a genetic ND marked by uncontrollable movements, cognitive impairment, and behavioral disturbances, all linked to the increase of trinucleotide (CAG) repeats in the Huntington gene [196]. In addition, a hallmark of HD pathology is reactive gliosis, primarily manifested as reactive fibroastrocytosis and M1 polarization in the striatum [197]. PET imaging studies have revealed notable microglial polarization in the HD brain's impacted areas, often detectable even before clinical symptoms emerge, with this activation becoming more pronounced in the disease's later stages [198-200].

The expression of mutant Huntington protein (mHTT) in neurons triggers M1 polarization through excitotoxicity or direct mHTT expression within microglia [199]. This polarization of microglia alters their functions and promotes neuroinflammation, a key factor in the progression of HD [201,202]. Researchers are exploring therapeutic approaches that aim to reduce mutant Huntington protein RNA (HtRNA) expression, alter microglial polarization, reduce inflammation, and provide neuroprotection.

Previous studies suggest that increased glycolysis in microglia can rapidly generate ATP, supporting migration, phagocytosis, and inflammatory responses in HD models [203]. This metabolic phenomenon helps clear mHTT aggregates and damaged cells, providing some neuroprotection [204,205].

In HD, primary microglia from adult R6/2 mice show impaired energy metabolism, leading to an accumulation of mHTT and enhanced glycolysis [206,207]. This, coupled with M1 microglial polarization, leads to the release of pro-inflammatory factors such as IL-1β [208]. The accumulation of mHTT may also impair oxidative phosphorylation by interacting with mitochondrial proteins, disrupting mitochondrial function, and producing excessive ROS [209,210]. These ROS further drive neuroinflammation and neuronal apoptosis. However, when oxidative phosphorylation is balanced, microglia can clear ROS and mitigate the toxic effects of mHTT on neurons.

PET imaging of HD patients shows increased microglial activity in regions like the striatum and frontal lobes correlates with areas of neurodegeneration [200,211,212]. Increased levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines, including IL-6 and IL-1β, have been detected in the cerebrospinal fluid and blood of HD patients, reflecting M1 polarization and metabolic reprogramming [200]. Animal models and clinical imaging and biomarkers support these findings. However, in animal models, microglial M1 polarization is often premature and rapid, whereas in patients, neuroinflammation generally progresses more gradually with disease progression [200,213]. Therefore, it is crucial to develop animal models that more closely mimic human HD pathology. This includes using transgenic models with moderate CAG repeats and applying single-cell transcriptomics to analyze microglial dynamics in both HD patients and animal models [214,215]. These approaches could help refine anti-inflammatory therapeutic strategies (Fig. 5).

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

The role of microglial polarization and metabolic reprogramming in ND. An extensive synopsis of the functional alterations in microglial polarization and metabolic processes observed in ND such as AD, PD, ALS, and HD.

Current Therapeutic Strategies for ND

Currently, the treatment strategies for ND prioritize symptom alleviation and halting illness progression. While no cures exist, various drugs have been created to target the fundamental processes of ND to help manage clinical symptoms. Below are some of the existing treatment approaches for major neurodegenerative diseases (Table 4).

Table 4.

Current treatment strategies for four major neurodegenerative diseases.

Disease Therapeutic goal Drugs/researchers References
AD Modulate neuroinflammation, enhance microglial phagocytosis of Aβ NLRP3 inhibitors (OLT1177),N,N′diacetyl-p-phenylenediamine; Min Hee Park et al. [10,216-218]
Activation of TREM2, altering microglial phenotypes, boosting Aβ clearance TREM2 antibodies (4D9, AL002c), bispecific antibodies, TREM2 plasmid; Pengzhen Wang et al. [219,220]
Inhibit exosome synthesis to limit pathological tau propagation nSMase2 inhibitors, P2X7 receptor blockers; Asai H et al. [82,121,220]
Promote microglial metabolic shifts to decrease amyloid burden NaR to stimulate OXPHOS; Rui-Yuan Pan et al. [221-223]
Reprogram microglia, ensuring protective phenotypes for improved cognitive outcomes ROS-responsive polymeric micelles in AD models; Yifei Lu et al. [224,225]
PD Prevent M1 polarization, alleviating neuroinflammation Naloxone, Xilei san; Liu B et al. [226,227]
Phenotypic targeting of microglia for dopaminergic neuron protection PPAR-γ agonists (rosiglitazone), vitamin D; Pisanu A et al. [228]
Microglial therapies under clinical investigation NLY01, AZD3241, MCC950; Jucaite A et al. [229]
ALS Reduce neuroinflammation, improve motor functions through microglial targeting Riluzole, minocycline, stem cell therapies, SOD1 gene editing; Luo et al. [230-232]
HD Alleviate neuroinflammation, enhance motor performance by modulating microglia Anti-inflammatory agents (minocycline, levetiracetam), HD-specific drugs (creatine, coenzyme Q10), HTT gene therapies [233-235]

Conclusion and Future Directions

In recent years, microglial polarization and neuroinflammation have become important contributors to the development of numerous ND. Microglia are essential to the development of ND through mechanisms including early activation, migration to injury sites, phagocytosis, and the release of proteases, cytokines, and ROS. While these responses are initially protective, clearing damaged cells and pathological deposits to maintain neural stability can become detrimental in chronic pathological states. In such conditions, prolonged activation leads to sustained phagocytosis, diffusion of pathological deposits, chronic neuroinflammation, and impaired phenotype transformation, thereby accelerating disease progression and neuronal degeneration.

Emerging evidence indicates that microglial metabolic dysfunction may act as an early trigger for ND, underscoring the significance of metabolic reprogramming and bioenergy regulation in maintaining neurological function. The dual role of microglia as both protectors and contributors to neurodegeneration underscores their transition from a protective to a pro-inflammatory or cytotoxic phenotype, which plays a critical role in the progression of disease.

Future research should prioritize the precise regulation of microglial functions by exploring the mechanisms of metabolism and phenotype transition. Efforts to enhance their protective phenotype, reduce neuroinflammation, and slow disease progression offer promising avenues for new therapeutic strategies in ND. Although the existing research has made substantial advancements in elucidating the role of microglia in cellular inflammation, how metabolic reprogramming influences microglial function, neuroinflammation, and brain health remains unknown. This is particularly important as many ND involve brain energy metabolism and inflammation disruptions.

This review emphasizes the interaction between metabolic reprogramming, microglial polarization, and their contributions to several ND. However, critical gaps remain. Most current insights into the metabolic regulation of microglia come from simplified in vitro models, such as cultured microglia, which lack the complexity of in vivo systems. Validation in sophisticated models, including the actual trigger of microglial metabolic breakdown in inflammatory diseases, is essential. Moreover, the causes of lipid metabolism dysregulation in microglia during ND remain poorly understood.

Research into the roles of metabolic reprogramming and inflammation in microglial biology is still in its infancy; deeper exploration is needed to clarify how these pathways interact within microglia and the broader brain environment. Therefore, understanding the integration of metabolism and polarization in microglia, along with strategies for regulating immune pathways, holds great promise for discovering new therapies for neuroinflammatory diseases.

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by grants from National Natural Science Foundation of China (32270933), R&D Program of Beijing Municipal Education Commission (KZ2022 10025035), and Chinese Institutes for Medical Research, Beijing (grants no. CX24PY07). These funding bodies have no role in the design of the study, collection, analysis, and interpretation of data, or in writing the manuscript. We sincerely thank the Figdraw website (www.figdraw.com/static/index.html#/paint_index_v2) used to provide a platform for drawing.

Funding Statement

This study was supported by grants from National Natural Science Foundation of China (32270933), R&D Program of Beijing Municipal Education Commission (KZ2022 10025035), and Chinese Institutes for Medical Research, Beijing (grants no. CX24PY07). These funding bodies have no role in the design of the study, collection, analysis, and interpretation of data, or in writing the manuscript. We sincerely thank the Figdraw website (www.figdraw.com/static/index.html#/paint_index_v2) used to provide a platform for drawing.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study has been approved by the Ethics Committee of Beijing Institute of Brain Disorders in Capital Medical University. This article contains Web of Science Core Collection database. All participants in all relevant original research gave informed consent.

Data availability statement

Bibliometric data statistics can be found on the Web of Science.

Statements and Declarations

Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Authors' contributions:

Ran gao and Renxi wang conceived and initiated the project and wrote the manuscript. Ya gao analyzed the data. Wenting Su revised the manuscript. All authors contributed to the interpretation of the results, critical revision of the manuscript, and approved the final version of the manuscript. All authors read and approved of the final manuscript.

References

  • [1].Garaschuk O & Verkhratsky A (2019). Physiology of Microglia. Methods Mol Biol, 2034:27-40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [2].Hughes V (2012). Microglia: The constant gardeners. Nature, 485:570-572. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [3].Derecki NC, Katzmarski N, Kipnis J & Meyer-Luehmann M (2014). Microglia as a critical player in both developmental and late-life CNS pathologies. Acta Neuropathol, 128:333-345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [4].Dienel GA (2012). Brain lactate metabolism: the discoveries and the controversies. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab, 32:1107-1138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [5].Ghosh S & Geahlen RL (2015). Stress Granules Modulate SYK to Cause Microglial Cell Dysfunction in Alzheimer's Disease. EBioMedicine, 2:1785-1798. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [6].Kann O (2016). The interneuron energy hypothesis: Implications for brain disease. Neurobiol Dis, 90:75-85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [7].Masdeu JC, Pascual B & Fujita M (2022). Imaging Neuroinflammation in Neurodegenerative Disorders. J Nucl Med, 63:45s-52s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [8].Gilhus NE & Deuschl G (2019). Neuroinflammation - a common thread in neurological disorders. Nat Rev Neurol, 15:429-430. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [9].Li Q & Barres BA (2018). Microglia and macrophages in brain homeostasis and disease. Nat Rev Immunol, 18:225-242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [10].Leng F & Edison P (2021). Neuroinflammation and microglial activation in Alzheimer disease: where do we go from here? Nat Rev Neurol, 17:157-172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [11].Attwell D, Buchan AM, Charpak S, Lauritzen M, Macvicar BA & Newman EA (2010). Glial and neuronal control of brain blood flow. Nature, 468:232-243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [12].Schneider J, Berndt N, Papageorgiou IE, Maurer J, Bulik S, Both M et al. (2019). Local oxygen homeostasis during various neuronal network activity states in the mouse hippocampus. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab, 39:859-873. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [13].Bielanin JP & Sun D (2023). Significance of Microglial Energy Metabolism in Maintaining Brain Homeostasis. Transl Stroke Res, 14:435-437. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [14].Yang S, Qin C, Hu ZW, Zhou LQ, Yu HH, Chen M et al. (2021). Microglia reprogram metabolic profiles for phenotype and function changes in central nervous system. Neurobiol Dis, 152:105290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [15].Mergenthaler P, Lindauer U, Dienel GA & Meisel A (2013). Sugar for the brain: the role of glucose in physiological and pathological brain function. Trends Neurosci, 36:587-597. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [16].Karabacak M, Jagtiani P, Jain A, Panov F & Margetis K (2024). Tracing topics and trends in drug-resistant epilepsy research using a natural language processing-based topic modeling approach. Epilepsia, 65:861-872. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [17].Poncela-Casasnovas J, Gerlach M, Aguirre N & Amaral LAN (2019). Large-scale analysis of micro-level citation patterns reveals nuanced selection criteria. Nat Hum Behav, 3:568-575. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [18].Caywood K & Darmstadt GL (2024). Gender mainstreaming at 25 years: Toward an inclusive, collaborative, and structured research agenda. J Glob Health, 14:04011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [19].Nimmerjahn A, Kirchhoff F & Helmchen F (2005). Resting microglial cells are highly dynamic surveillants of brain parenchyma in vivo. Science, 308:1314-1318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [20].Fu R, Shen Q, Xu P, Luo JJ & Tang Y (2014). Phagocytosis of microglia in the central nervous system diseases. Mol Neurobiol, 49:1422-1434. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [21].Lauro C & Limatola C (2020). Metabolic Reprograming of Microglia in the Regulation of the Innate Inflammatory Response. Front Immunol, 11:493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [22].Hanisch UK & Kettenmann H (2007). Microglia: active sensor and versatile effector cells in the normal and pathologic brain. Nat Neurosci, 10:1387-1394. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [23].Ransohoff RM & Perry VH (2009). Microglial physiology: unique stimuli, specialized responses. Annu Rev Immunol, 27:119-145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [24].Cunningham C (2013). Microglia and neurodegeneration: the role of systemic inflammation. Glia, 61:71-90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [25].Schmid CD, Melchior B, Masek K, Puntambekar SS, Danielson PE, Lo DD et al. (2009). Differential gene expression in LPS/IFNgamma activated microglia and macrophages: in vitro versus in vivo. J Neurochem, 109 Suppl 1:117-125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [26].Shi F, Yang L, Kouadir M, Yang Y, Wang J, Zhou X et al. (2012). The NALP3 inflammasome is involved in neurotoxic prion peptide-induced microglial activation. J Neuroinflammation, 9:73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [27].Zhou X, Wahane S, Friedl MS, Kluge M, Friedel CC, Avrampou K et al. (2020). Microglia and macrophages promote corralling, wound compaction and recovery after spinal cord injury via Plexin-B2. Nat Neurosci, 23:337-350. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [28].Tan J, Town T, Mori T, Wu Y, Saxe M, Crawford F et al. (2000). CD45 opposes beta-amyloid peptide-induced microglial activation via inhibition of p44/42 mitogen-activated protein kinase. J Neurosci, 20:7587-7594. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [29].Tang Y & Le W (2016). Differential Roles of M1 and M2 Microglia in Neurodegenerative Diseases. Mol Neurobiol, 53:1181-1194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [30].Karve IP, Taylor JM & Crack PJ (2016). The contribution of astrocytes and microglia to traumatic brain injury. Br J Pharmacol, 173:692-702. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [31].Sun XY, Li LJ, Dong QX, Zhu J, Huang YR, Hou SJ et al. (2021). Rutin prevents tau pathology and neuroinflammation in a mouse model of Alzheimer's disease. J Neuroinflammation, 18:131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [32].Du L, Zhang Y, Chen Y, Zhu J, Yang Y & Zhang HL (2017). Role of Microglia in Neurological Disorders and Their Potentials as a Therapeutic Target. Mol Neurobiol, 54:7567-7584. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [33].Yao Y, Li J, Zhou Y, Wang S, Zhang Z, Jiang Q et al. (2023). Macrophage/microglia polarization for the treatment of diabetic retinopathy. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne), 14:1276225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [34].Xian X, Cai LL, Li Y, Wang RC, Xu YH, Chen YJ et al. (2022). Neuron secrete exosomes containing miR-9-5p to promote polarization of M1 microglia in depression. J Nanobiotechnology, 20:122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [35].Sanjay, Shin JH, Park M & Lee HJ (2022). Cyanidin-3-O-Glucoside Regulates the M1/M2 Polarization of Microglia via PPARγ and Aβ42 Phagocytosis Through TREM2 in an Alzheimer's Disease Model. Mol Neurobiol, 59:5135-5148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [36].Xue Y, Nie D, Wang LJ, Qiu HC, Ma L, Dong MX et al. (2021). Microglial Polarization: Novel Therapeutic Strategy against Ischemic Stroke. Aging Dis, 12:466-479. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [37].Xie L, Wu Q, Li K, Khan MAS, Zhang A, Sinha B et al. (2024). Tryptophan Metabolism in Alzheimer's Disease with the Involvement of Microglia and Astrocyte Crosstalk and Gut-Brain Axis. Aging Dis, 15:2168-2190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [38].Michels M, Sonai B & Dal-Pizzol F (2017). Polarization of microglia and its role in bacterial sepsis. J Neuroimmunol, 303:90-98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [39].Hernandez Baltazar D, Nadella R, Barrientos Bonilla A, Flores Martínez Y, Olguín A, Heman Bozadas P et al. (2020). Does lipopolysaccharide-based neuroinflammation induce microglia polarization? Folia Neuropathol, 58:113-122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [40].Orihuela R, McPherson CA & Harry GJ (2016). Microglial M1/M2 polarization and metabolic states. Br J Pharmacol, 173:649-665. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [41].Hu X (2020). Microglia/macrophage polarization: Fantasy or evidence of functional diversity? J Cereb Blood Flow Metab, 40:S134-s136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [42].Wang B & Jin K (2015). Current perspectives on the link between neuroinflammation and neurogenesis. Metab Brain Dis, 30:355-365. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [43].Voet S, Prinz M & van Loo G (2019). Microglia in Central Nervous System Inflammation and Multiple Sclerosis Pathology. Trends Mol Med, 25:112-123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [44].Tay TL, Savage JC, Hui CW, Bisht K & Tremblay M (2017). Microglia across the lifespan: from origin to function in brain development, plasticity and cognition. J Physiol, 595:1929-1945. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [45].Yu H, Chang Q, Sun T, He X, Wen L, An J et al. (2023). Metabolic reprogramming and polarization of microglia in Parkinson's disease: Role of inflammasome and iron. Ageing Res Rev, 90:102032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [46].Hu X, Leak RK, Shi Y, Suenaga J, Gao Y, Zheng P et al. (2015). Microglial and macrophage polarization—new prospects for brain repair. Nat Rev Neurol, 11:56-64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [47].Crain JM, Nikodemova M & Watters JJ (2013). Microglia express distinct M1 and M2 phenotypic markers in the postnatal and adult central nervous system in male and female mice. J Neurosci Res, 91:1143-1151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [48].Salter MW & Stevens B (2017). Microglia emerge as central players in brain disease. Nat Med, 23:1018-1027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [49].Kobayashi K, Imagama S, Ohgomori T, Hirano K, Uchimura K, Sakamoto K et al. (2013). Minocycline selectively inhibits M1 polarization of microglia. Cell Death Dis, 4:e525. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [50].Miron VE & Franklin RJ (2014). Macrophages and CNS remyelination. J Neurochem, 130:165-171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [51].Town T, Nikolic V & Tan J (2005). The microglial "activation" continuum: from innate to adaptive responses. J Neuroinflammation, 2:24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [52].Ma H, Li H, Zhang Y, Zhou Y, Liu H, Xu H et al. (2023). Microglia Exhibit Distinct Heterogeneity Rather than M1/M2 Polarization within the Early Stage of Acute Ischemic Stroke. Aging Dis, 14:2284-2302. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [53].vonderEmbse AN, Hu Q & DeWitt JC (2019). Dysfunctional microglia:neuron interactions with significant female bias in a developmental gene x environment rodent model of Alzheimer's disease. Int Immunopharmacol, 71:241-250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [54].Peruzzotti-Jametti L, Willis CM, Krzak G, Hamel R, Pirvan L, Ionescu RB et al. (2024). Mitochondrial complex I activity in microglia sustains neuroinflammation. Nature, 628:195-203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [55].Li Y, Xia X, Wang Y & Zheng JC (2022). Mitochondrial dysfunction in microglia: a novel perspective for pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease. J Neuroinflammation, 19:248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [56].Hammond TR, Dufort C, Dissing-Olesen L, Giera S, Young A, Wysoker A et al. (2019). Single-Cell RNA Sequencing of Microglia throughout the Mouse Lifespan and in the Injured Brain Reveals Complex Cell-State Changes. Immunity, 50:253-271.e256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [57].Zheng J, Ru W, Adolacion JR, Spurgat MS, Liu X, Yuan S et al. (2021). Single-cell RNA-seq analysis reveals compartment-specific heterogeneity and plasticity of microglia. iScience, 24:102186. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [58].Yang X, Xu S, Qian Y & Xiao Q (2017). Resveratrol regulates microglia M1/M2 polarization via PGC-1α in conditions of neuroinflammatory injury. Brain Behav Immun, 64:162-172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [59].Merighi S, Nigro M, Travagli A & Gessi S (2022). Microglia and Alzheimer's Disease. Int J Mol Sci, 23: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [60].Yao J, Wang Z, Song W & Zhang Y (2023). Targeting NLRP3 inflammasome for neurodegenerative disorders. Mol Psychiatry, 28:4512-4527. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [61].Singh S & Jha S (2018). NLRs as Helpline in the Brain: Mechanisms and Therapeutic Implications. Mol Neurobiol, 55:8154-8178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [62].Fan H, Tang HB, Chen Z, Wang HQ, Zhang L, Jiang Y et al. (2020). Inhibiting HMGB1-RAGE axis prevents pro-inflammatory macrophages/microglia polarization and affords neuroprotection after spinal cord injury. J Neuroinflammation, 17:295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [63].Zhang S, Hu L, Jiang J, Li H, Wu Q, Ooi K et al. (2020). HMGB1/RAGE axis mediates stress-induced RVLM neuroinflammation in mice via impairing mitophagy flux in microglia. J Neuroinflammation, 17:15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [64].Li Q, Lan X, Han X, Durham F, Wan J, Weiland A et al. (2021). Microglia-derived interleukin-10 accelerates post-intracerebral hemorrhage hematoma clearance by regulating CD36. Brain Behav Immun, 94:437-457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [65].Feng M, Zhou Q, Xie H, Liu C, Zheng M, Zhang S et al. (2024). Role of CD36 in central nervous system diseases. Neural Regen Res, 19:512-518. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [66].Ulland TK, Song WM, Huang SC, Ulrich JD, Sergushichev A, Beatty WL et al. (2017). TREM2 Maintains Microglial Metabolic Fitness in Alzheimer's Disease. Cell, 170:649-663.e613. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [67].Zhang D, Jia Y, Sun X, Li H, Yin M, Li H et al. (2022). The Dectin-1 Receptor Signaling Pathway Mediates the Remyelination Effect of Lentinan through Suppression of Neuroinflammation and Conversion of Microglia. J Immunol Res, 2022:3002304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [68].Kan LK, Williams D, Drummond K, O'Brien T & Monif M (2019). The role of microglia and P2X7 receptors in gliomas. J Neuroimmunol, 332:138-146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [69].Wang S, Sudan R, Peng V, Zhou Y, Du S, Yuede CM et al. (2022). TREM2 drives microglia response to amyloid-β via SYK-dependent and -independent pathways. Cell, 185:4153-4169.e4119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [70].Fuller JP, Stavenhagen JB & Teeling JL (2014). New roles for Fc receptors in neurodegeneration-the impact on Immunotherapy for Alzheimer's Disease. Front Neurosci, 8:235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [71].Hong S, Beja-Glasser VF, Nfonoyim BM, Frouin A, Li S, Ramakrishnan S et al. (2016). Complement and microglia mediate early synapse loss in Alzheimer mouse models. Science, 352:712-716. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [72].Cornell J, Salinas S, Huang HY & Zhou M (2022). Microglia regulation of synaptic plasticity and learning and memory. Neural Regen Res, 17:705-716. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [73].Mecca C, Giambanco I, Donato R & Arcuri C (2018). Microglia and Aging: The Role of the TREM2-DAP12 and CX3CL1-CX3CR1 Axes. Int J Mol Sci, 19: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [74].El Khoury J, Hickman SE, Thomas CA, Loike JD & Silverstein SC (1998). Microglia, scavenger receptors, and the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease. Neurobiol Aging, 19:S81-84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [75].Bovio F, Perciballi E, Melchioretto P, Ferrari D, Forcella M, Fusi P et al. (2024). Morphological and metabolic changes in microglia exposed to cadmium: Cues on neurotoxic mechanisms. Environ Res, 240:117470. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [76].Huang ZP, Liu SF, Zhuang JL, Li LY, Li MM, Huang YL et al. (2023). Role of microglial metabolic reprogramming in Parkinson's disease. Biochem Pharmacol, 213:115619. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [77].Jurcovicova J (2014). Glucose transport in brain - effect of inflammation. Endocr Regul, 48:35-48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [78].O'Neill LA & Pearce EJ (2016). Immunometabolism governs dendritic cell and macrophage function. J Exp Med, 213:15-23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [79].Andreone BJ, Przybyla L, Llapashtica C, Rana A, Davis SS, van Lengerich B et al. (2020). Alzheimer's-associated PLCγ2 is a signaling node required for both TREM2 function and the inflammatory response in human microglia. Nat Neurosci, 23:927-938. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [80].Li H, Cao Z, Liu C, Wang Y, Wang L, Tang Y et al. (2024). Quercetin Inhibits Neuronal Pyroptosis and Ferroptosis by Modulating Microglial M1/M2 Polarization in Atherosclerosis. J Agric Food Chem, 72:12156-12170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [81].Wang Q, Liu J, Zhang Y, Li Z, Zhao Z, Jiang W et al. (2024). Microglial CR3 promotes neuron ferroptosis via NOX2-mediated iron deposition in rotenone-induced experimental models of Parkinson's disease. Redox Biol, 77:103369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [82].Baik SH, Kang S, Lee W, Choi H, Chung S, Kim JI et al. (2019). A Breakdown in Metabolic Reprogramming Causes Microglia Dysfunction in Alzheimer's Disease. Cell Metab, 30:493-507.e496. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [83].Mattson MP & Arumugam TV (2018). Hallmarks of Brain Aging: Adaptive and Pathological Modification by Metabolic States. Cell Metab, 27:1176-1199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [84].Prinz M, Jung S & Priller J (2019). Microglia Biology: One Century of Evolving Concepts. Cell, 179:292-311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [85].Chausse B, Kakimoto PA & Kann O (2021). Microglia and lipids: how metabolism controls brain innate immunity. Semin Cell Dev Biol, 112:137-144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [86].Sabogal-Guáqueta AM, Marmolejo-Garza A, Trombetta-Lima M, Oun A, Hunneman J, Chen T et al. (2023). Species-specific metabolic reprogramming in human and mouse microglia during inflammatory pathway induction. Nat Commun, 14:6454. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [87].García-Cáceres C, Balland E, Prevot V, Luquet S, Woods SC, Koch M et al. (2019). Role of astrocytes, microglia, and tanycytes in brain control of systemic metabolism. Nat Neurosci, 22:7-14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [88].Berki P, Cserép C, Környei Z, Pósfai B, Szabadits E, Domonkos A et al. (2024). Microglia contribute to neuronal synchrony despite endogenous ATP-related phenotypic transformation in acute mouse brain slices. Nat Commun, 15:5402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [89].Bernier LP, York EM, Kamyabi A, Choi HB, Weilinger NL & MacVicar BA (2020). Microglial metabolic flexibility supports immune surveillance of the brain parenchyma. Nat Commun, 11:1559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [90].Mosconi L, Pupi A & De Leon MJ (2008). Brain glucose hypometabolism and oxidative stress in preclinical Alzheimer's disease. Ann N Y Acad Sci, 1147:180-195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [91].Van Hove I, De Groef L, Boeckx B, Modave E, Hu TT, Beets K et al. (2020). Single-cell transcriptome analysis of the Akimba mouse retina reveals cell-type-specific insights into the pathobiology of diabetic retinopathy. Diabetologia, 63:2235-2248. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [92].Li H, Liu P, Zhang B, Yuan Z, Guo M, Zou X et al. (2023). Acute ischemia induces spatially and transcriptionally distinct microglial subclusters. Genome Med, 15:109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [93].Ghosh S, Castillo E, Frias ES & Swanson RA (2018). Bioenergetic regulation of microglia. Glia, 66:1200-1212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [94].Han CZ, Li RZ, Hansen E, Trescott S, Fixsen BR, Nguyen CT et al. (2023). Human microglia maturation is underpinned by specific gene regulatory networks. Immunity, 56:2152-2171.e2113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [95].Clayton K, Delpech JC, Herron S, Iwahara N, Ericsson M, Saito T et al. (2021). Plaque associated microglia hyper-secrete extracellular vesicles and accelerate tau propagation in a humanized APP mouse model. Mol Neurodegener, 16:18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [96].Xiang X, Wind K, Wiedemann T, Blume T, Shi Y, Briel N et al. (2021). Microglial activation states drive glucose uptake and FDG-PET alterations in neurodegenerative diseases. Sci Transl Med, 13:eabe5640. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [97].Cheng J, Zhang R, Xu Z, Ke Y, Sun R, Yang H et al. (2021). Early glycolytic reprogramming controls microglial inflammatory activation. J Neuroinflammation, 18:129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [98].Guo D, Meng Y, Jiang X & Lu Z (2023). Hexokinases in cancer and other pathologies. Cell Insight, 2:100077. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [99].Fang J, Luo S & Lu Z (2023). HK2: Gatekeeping microglial activity by tuning glucose metabolism and mitochondrial functions. Mol Cell, 83:829-831. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [100].Lv Y, Zhang B, Zhai C, Qiu J, Zhang Y, Yao W et al. (2015). PFKFB3-mediated glycolysis is involved in reactive astrocyte proliferation after oxygen-glucose deprivation/reperfusion and is regulated by Cdh1. Neurochem Int, 91:26-33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [101].Pierre K & Pellerin L (2005). Monocarboxylate transporters in the central nervous system: distribution, regulation and function. J Neurochem, 94:1-14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [102].Pellerin L, Bergersen LH, Halestrap AP & Pierre K (2005). Cellular and subcellular distribution of monocarboxylate transporters in cultured brain cells and in the adult brain. J Neurosci Res, 79:55-64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [103].Moreira TJ, Pierre K, Maekawa F, Repond C, Cebere A, Liljequist S et al. (2009). Enhanced cerebral expression of MCT1 and MCT2 in a rat ischemia model occurs in activated microglial cells. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab, 29:1273-1283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [104].Leng L, Yuan Z, Pan R, Su X, Wang H, Xue J et al. (2022). Microglial hexokinase 2 deficiency increases ATP generation through lipid metabolism leading to β-amyloid clearance. Nat Metab, 4:1287-1305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [105].Pan RY, He L, Zhang J, Liu X, Liao Y, Gao J et al. (2022). Positive feedback regulation of microglial glucose metabolism by histone H4 lysine 12 lactylation in Alzheimer's disease. Cell Metab, 34:634-648.e636. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [106].Johnson ECB, Dammer EB, Duong DM, Ping L, Zhou M, Yin L et al. (2020). Large-scale proteomic analysis of Alzheimer's disease brain and cerebrospinal fluid reveals early changes in energy metabolism associated with microglia and astrocyte activation. Nat Med, 26:769-780. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [107].Zaib S, Hayyat A, Ali N, Gul A, Naveed M & Khan I (2022). Role of Mitochondrial Membrane Potential and Lactate Dehydrogenase A in Apoptosis. Anticancer Agents Med Chem, 22:2048-2062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [108].Rogatzki MJ, Ferguson BS, Goodwin ML & Gladden LB (2015). Lactate is always the end product of glycolysis. Front Neurosci, 9:22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [109].Vander Heiden MG, Cantley LC & Thompson CB (2009). Understanding the Warburg effect: the metabolic requirements of cell proliferation. Science, 324:1029-1033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [110].Shimobayashi M & Hall MN (2014). Making new contacts: the mTOR network in metabolism and signalling crosstalk. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 15:155-162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [111].Chen R, Lai UH, Zhu L, Singh A, Ahmed M & Forsyth NR (2018). Reactive Oxygen Species Formation in the Brain at Different Oxygen Levels: The Role of Hypoxia Inducible Factors. Front Cell Dev Biol, 6:132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [112].Wei Y, Chen J, Cai GE, Lu W, Xu W, Wang R et al. (2021). Rosmarinic Acid Regulates Microglial M1/M2 Polarization via the PDPK1/Akt/HIF Pathway Under Conditions of Neuroinflammation. Inflammation, 44:129-147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [113].Li J, Cheng X, Fu D, Liang Y, Chen C, Deng W et al. (2022). Autophagy of Spinal Microglia Affects the Activation of Microglia through the PI3K/AKT/mTOR Signaling Pathway. Neuroscience, 482:77-86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [114].Jian M, Kwan JS, Bunting M, Ng RC & Chan KH (2019). Adiponectin suppresses amyloid-β oligomer (AβO)-induced inflammatory response of microglia via AdipoR1-AMPK-NF-κB signaling pathway. J Neuroinflammation, 16:110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [115].Xu N, Li X, Weng J, Wei C, He Z, Doycheva DM et al. (2022). Adiponectin Ameliorates GMH-Induced Brain Injury by Regulating Microglia M1/M2 Polarization Via AdipoR1/APPL1/AMPK/PPARγ Signaling Pathway in Neonatal Rats. Front Immunol, 13:873382. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [116].Wang L, Pavlou S, Du X, Bhuckory M, Xu H & Chen M (2019). Glucose transporter 1 critically controls microglial activation through facilitating glycolysis. Mol Neurodegener, 14:2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [117].Li Y, Lu B, Sheng L, Zhu Z, Sun H, Zhou Y et al. (2018). Hexokinase 2-dependent hyperglycolysis driving microglial activation contributes to ischemic brain injury. J Neurochem, 144:186-200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [118].Rubio-Araiz A, Finucane OM, Keogh S & Lynch MA (2018). Anti-TLR2 antibody triggers oxidative phosphorylation in microglia and increases phagocytosis of β-amyloid. J Neuroinflammation, 15:247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [119].Vilalta A & Brown GC (2014). Deoxyglucose prevents neurodegeneration in culture by eliminating microglia. J Neuroinflammation, 11:58. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [120].Gimeno-Bayón J, López-López A, Rodríguez MJ & Mahy N (2014). Glucose pathways adaptation supports acquisition of activated microglia phenotype. J Neurosci Res, 92:723-731. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [121].Hu Y, Mai W, Chen L, Cao K, Zhang B, Zhang Z et al. (2020). mTOR-mediated metabolic reprogramming shapes distinct microglia functions in response to lipopolysaccharide and ATP. Glia, 68:1031-1045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [122].Fodelianaki G, Lansing F, Bhattarai P, Troullinaki M, Zeballos MA, Charalampopoulos I et al. (2019). Nerve Growth Factor modulates LPS - induced microglial glycolysis and inflammatory responses. Exp Cell Res, 377:10-16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [123].Kang S, Ko EY, Andrews AE, Shin JE, Nance KJ, Barman PK et al. (2024). Microglia undergo sex-dimorphic transcriptional and metabolic rewiring during aging. J Neuroinflammation, 21:150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [124].Meyers AK, Wang Z, Han W, Zhao Q, Zabalawi M, Duan L et al. (2023). Pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase supports macrophage NLRP3 inflammasome activation during acute inflammation. Cell Rep, 42:111941. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [125].Gasior M, Rogawski MA & Hartman AL (2006). Neuroprotective and disease-modifying effects of the ketogenic diet. Behav Pharmacol, 17:431-439. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [126].González Ibáñez F, Halvorson T, Sharma K, McKee CG, Carrier M, Picard K et al. (2023). Ketogenic diet changes microglial morphology and the hippocampal lipidomic profile differently in stress susceptible versus resistant male mice upon repeated social defeat. Brain Behav Immun, 114:383-406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [127].Bianchi R, Giambanco I & Donato R (2010). S100B/RAGE-dependent activation of microglia via NF-kappaB and AP-1 Co-regulation of COX-2 expression by S100B, IL-1beta and TNF-alpha. Neurobiol Aging, 31:665-677. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [128].Wang Q, Zhao Y, Sun M, Liu S, Li B, Zhang L et al. (2014). 2-Deoxy-d-glucose attenuates sevoflurane-induced neuroinflammation through nuclear factor-kappa B pathway in vitro. Toxicol In Vitro, 28:1183-1189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [129].Chen CC, Lin JT, Cheng YF, Kuo CY, Huang CF, Kao SH et al. (2014). Amelioration of LPS-induced inflammation response in microglia by AMPK activation. Biomed Res Int, 2014:692061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [130].Voet S, Srinivasan S, Lamkanfi M & van Loo G (2019). Inflammasomes in neuroinflammatory and neurodegenerative diseases. EMBO Mol Med, 11: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [131].Franklin H, Clarke BE & Patani R (2021). Astrocytes and microglia in neurodegenerative diseases: Lessons from human in vitro models. Prog Neurobiol, 200:101973. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [132].Ahn K, Lee SJ & Mook-Jung I (2022). White matter-associated microglia: New players in brain aging and neurodegenerative diseases. Ageing Res Rev, 75:101574. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [133].Umpierre AD & Wu LJ (2021). How microglia sense and regulate neuronal activity. Glia, 69:1637-1653. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [134].Kim JD, Copperi F & Diano S (2024). Microglia in Central Control of Metabolism. Physiology (Bethesda), 39:0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [135].Hansen DV, Hanson JE & Sheng M (2018). Microglia in Alzheimer's disease. J Cell Biol, 217:459-472. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [136].Li A, Cao S, Jin K & Su H (2023). Mitochondria and Neurodegenerative Diseases: A New Hotspot. Aging Dis, 14:1031-1034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [137].Cai Y, Liu J, Wang B, Sun M & Yang H (2022). Microglia in the Neuroinflammatory Pathogenesis of Alzheimer's Disease and Related Therapeutic Targets. Front Immunol, 13:856376. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [138].Jorfi M, Maaser-Hecker A & Tanzi RE (2023). The neuroimmune axis of Alzheimer's disease. Genome Med, 15:6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [139].Fujikawa R & Tsuda M (2023). The Functions and Phenotypes of Microglia in Alzheimer's Disease. Cells, 12: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [140].Zhang PF, Hu H, Tan L & Yu JT (2021). Microglia Biomarkers in Alzheimer's Disease. Mol Neurobiol, 58:3388-3404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [141].Al-Ghraiybah NF, Wang J, Alkhalifa AE, Roberts AB, Raj R, Yang E et al. (2022). Glial Cell-Mediated Neuroinflammation in Alzheimer's Disease. Int J Mol Sci, 23: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [142].Sun N, Victor MB, Park YP, Xiong X, Scannail AN, Leary N et al. (2023). Human microglial state dynamics in Alzheimer's disease progression. Cell, 186:4386-4403.e4329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [143].Huang Z, Shi B, Mu X, Qiao S, Xiao G, Wang Y et al. (2024). Construction of a Dataset for All Expressed Transcripts for Alzheimer's Disease Research. Brain Sci, 14: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [144].Shang C, Su Y, Ma J, Li Z, Wang P, Ma H et al. (2024). Huanshaodan regulates microglial glucose metabolism reprogramming to alleviate neuroinflammation in AD mice through mTOR/HIF-1α signaling pathway. Front Pharmacol, 15:1434568. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [145].Fairley LH, Wong JH & Barron AM (2021). Mitochondrial Regulation of Microglial Immunometabolism in Alzheimer's Disease. Front Immunol, 12:624538. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [146].Dewanjee S, Chakraborty P, Bhattacharya H, Chacko L, Singh B, Chaudhary A et al. (2022). Altered glucose metabolism in Alzheimer's disease: Role of mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative stress. Free Radic Biol Med, 193:134-157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [147].Chen H, Guo Z, Sun Y & Dai X (2023). The immunometabolic reprogramming of microglia in Alzheimer's disease. Neurochem Int, 171:105614. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [148].Kalsbeek MJ, Mulder L & Yi CX (2016). Microglia energy metabolism in metabolic disorder. Mol Cell Endocrinol, 438:27-35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [149].Winkler EA, Nishida Y, Sagare AP, Rege SV, Bell RD, Perlmutter D et al. (2015). GLUT1 reductions exacerbate Alzheimer's disease vasculo-neuronal dysfunction and degeneration. Nat Neurosci, 18:521-530. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [150].Zhang SS, Zhu L, Peng Y, Zhang L, Chao FL, Jiang L et al. (2022). Long-term running exercise improves cognitive function and promotes microglial glucose metabolism and morphological plasticity in the hippocampus of APP/PS1 mice. J Neuroinflammation, 19:34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [151].Shi Q, Chowdhury S, Ma R, Le KX, Hong S, Caldarone BJ et al. (2017). Complement C3 deficiency protects against neurodegeneration in aged plaque-rich APP/PS1 mice. Sci Transl Med, 9: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [152].Unger MS, Schernthaner P, Marschallinger J, Mrowetz H & Aigner L (2018). Microglia prevent peripheral immune cell invasion and promote an anti-inflammatory environment in the brain of APP-PS1 transgenic mice. J Neuroinflammation, 15:274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [153].Keren-Shaul H, Spinrad A, Weiner A, Matcovitch-Natan O, Dvir-Szternfeld R, Ulland TK et al. (2017). A Unique Microglia Type Associated with Restricting Development of Alzheimer's Disease. Cell, 169:1276-1290.e1217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [154].Rosenzweig N, Kleemann KL, Rust T, Carpenter M, Grucci M, Aronchik M et al. (2024). Sex-dependent APOE4 neutrophil-microglia interactions drive cognitive impairment in Alzheimer's disease. Nat Med, 30:2990-3003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [155].Gratuze M, Schlachetzki JCM, D'Oliveira Albanus R, Jain N, Novotny B, Brase L et al. (2023). TREM2-independent microgliosis promotes tau-mediated neurodegeneration in the presence of ApoE4. Neuron, 111:202-219.e207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [156].Yin Z, Rosenzweig N, Kleemann KL, Zhang X, Brandão W, Margeta MA et al. (2023). APOE4 impairs the microglial response in Alzheimer's disease by inducing TGFβ-mediated checkpoints. Nat Immunol, 24:1839-1853. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [157].Glass CK, Saijo K, Winner B, Marchetto MC & Gage FH (2010). Mechanisms underlying inflammation in neurodegeneration. Cell, 140:918-934. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [158].Tu D, Gao Y, Yang R, Guan T, Hong JS & Gao HM (2019). The pentose phosphate pathway regulates chronic neuroinflammation and dopaminergic neurodegeneration. J Neuroinflammation, 16:255. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [159].Gerhard A, Pavese N, Hotton G, Turkheimer F, Es M, Hammers A et al. (2006). In vivo imaging of microglial activation with [11C](R)-PK11195 PET in idiopathic Parkinson's disease. Neurobiol Dis, 21:404-412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [160].Reynolds AD, Kadiu I, Garg SK, Glanzer JG, Nordgren T, Ciborowski P et al. (2008). Nitrated alpha-synuclein and microglial neuroregulatory activities. J Neuroimmune Pharmacol, 3:59-74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [161].Pott Godoy MC, Tarelli R, Ferrari CC, Sarchi MI & Pitossi FJ (2008). Central and systemic IL-1 exacerbates neurodegeneration and motor symptoms in a model of Parkinson's disease. Brain, 131:1880-1894. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [162].Iravanpour F, Dargahi L, Rezaei M, Haghani M, Heidari R, Valian N et al. (2021). Intranasal insulin improves mitochondrial function and attenuates motor deficits in a rat 6-OHDA model of Parkinson's disease. CNS Neurosci Ther, 27:308-319. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [163].Kuter K, Olech Ł & Głowacka U (2018). Prolonged Dysfunction of Astrocytes and Activation of Microglia Accelerate Degeneration of Dopaminergic Neurons in the Rat Substantia Nigra and Block Compensation of Early Motor Dysfunction Induced by 6-OHDA. Mol Neurobiol, 55:3049-3066. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [164].Yu L, Hu X, Xu R, Zhao Y, Xiong L, Ai J et al. (2024). Piperine promotes PI3K/AKT/mTOR-mediated gut-brain autophagy to degrade α-Synuclein in Parkinson's disease rats. J Ethnopharmacol, 322:117628. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [165].Yang L, Zhang X, Li S, Wang H, Zhang X, Liu L et al. (2020). Intranasal insulin ameliorates cognitive impairment in a rat model of Parkinson's disease through Akt/GSK3β signaling pathway. Life Sci, 259:118159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [166].Tseng WT, Hsu YW & Pan TM (2016). The ameliorative effect of Monascus purpureus NTU 568-fermented rice extracts on 6-hydroxydopamine-induced neurotoxicity in SH-SY5Y cells and the rat model of Parkinson's disease. Food Funct, 7:752-762. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [167].Agrawal S, Kumari R, Sophronea T, Kumari N & Luthra PM (2022). Design and synthesis of benzo[d]thiazol-2-yl-methyl-4-(substituted)-piperazine-1-carbothioamide as novel neuronal nitric oxide inhibitors and evaluation of their neuroprotecting effect in 6-OHDA-induced unilateral lesioned rat model of Parkinson's disease. Biomed Pharmacother, 156:113838. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [168].Blandini F & Armentero MT (2012). Animal models of Parkinson's disease. Febs j, 279:1156-1166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [169].Doi D, Magotani H, Kikuchi T, Ikeda M, Hiramatsu S, Yoshida K et al. (2020). Pre-clinical study of induced pluripotent stem cell-derived dopaminergic progenitor cells for Parkinson's disease. Nat Commun, 11:3369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [170].Lal R, Singh A, Watts S & Chopra K (2024). Experimental models of Parkinson's disease: Challenges and Opportunities. Eur J Pharmacol, 980:176819. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [171].Hardiman O, Al-Chalabi A, Chio A, Corr EM, Logroscino G, Robberecht W et al. (2017). Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Nat Rev Dis Primers, 3:17071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [172].McGeer PL & cGeer EG (2002). Inflammatory processes in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Muscle Nerve, 26:459-470. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [173].Turner MR, Cagnin A, Turkheimer FE, Miller CC, Shaw CE, Brooks DJ et al. (2004). Evidence of widespread cerebral microglial activation in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: an [11C](R)-PK11195 positron emission tomography study. Neurobiol Dis, 15:601-609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [174].Pradat PF, Bruneteau G, Gordon PH, Dupuis L, Bonnefont-Rousselot D, Simon D et al. (2010). Impaired glucose tolerance in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Amyotroph Lateral Scler, 11:166-171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [175].Reyes ET, Perurena OH, Festoff BW, Jorgensen R & Moore WV (1984). Insulin resistance in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J Neurol Sci, 63:317-324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [176].Tondo G, Iaccarino L, Cerami C, Vanoli GE, Presotto L, Masiello V et al. (2020). (11) C-PK11195 PET-based molecular study of microglia activation in SOD1 amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Ann Clin Transl Neurol, 7:1513-1523. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [177].Mitchell RM, Freeman WM, Randazzo WT, Stephens HE, Beard JL, Simmons Z et al. (2009). A CSF biomarker panel for identification of patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Neurology, 72:14-19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [178].Moisse K & Strong MJ (2006). Innate immunity in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Biochim Biophys Acta, 1762:1083-1093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [179].Apolloni S, Fabbrizio P, Amadio S, Napoli G, Verdile V, Morello G et al. (2017). Histamine Regulates the Inflammatory Profile of SOD1-G93A Microglia and the Histaminergic System Is Dysregulated in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. Front Immunol, 8:1689. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [180].Apolloni S, Parisi C, Pesaresi MG, Rossi S, Carrì MT, Cozzolino M et al. (2013). The NADPH oxidase pathway is dysregulated by the P2X7 receptor in the SOD1-G93A microglia model of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J Immunol, 190:5187-5195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [181].Vahsen BF, Gray E, Candalija A, Cramb KML, Scaber J, Dafinca R et al. (2022). Human iPSC co-culture model to investigate the interaction between microglia and motor neurons. Sci Rep, 12:12606. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [182].Talbot K, Feneberg E, Scaber J, Thompson AG & Turner MR (2018). Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: the complex path to precision medicine. J Neurol, 265:2454-2462. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [183].Brettschneider J, Libon DJ, Toledo JB, Xie SX, McCluskey L, Elman L et al. (2012). Microglial activation and TDP-43 pathology correlate with executive dysfunction in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Acta Neuropathol, 123:395-407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [184].Huang Q, Wang Y, Chen S & Liang F (2024). Glycometabolic Reprogramming of Microglia in Neurodegenerative Diseases: Insights from Neuroinflammation. Aging Dis, 15:1155-1175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [185].Ahsan A, Liu M, Zheng Y, Yan W, Pan L, Li Y et al. (2021). Natural compounds modulate the autophagy with potential implication of stroke. Acta Pharm Sin B, 11:1708-1720. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [186].Vallée A, Lecarpentier Y, Guillevin R & Vallée JN (2018). Aerobic glycolysis in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and Huntington's disease. Rev Neurosci, 29:547-555. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [187].Apolloni S, Fabbrizio P, Amadio S & Volonté C (2016). Actions of the antihistaminergic clemastine on presymptomatic SOD1-G93A mice ameliorate ALS disease progression. J Neuroinflammation, 13:191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [188].Vallarola A, Sironi F, Tortarolo M, Gatto N, De Gioia R, Pasetto L et al. (2018). RNS60 exerts therapeutic effects in the SOD1 ALS mouse model through protective glia and peripheral nerve rescue. J Neuroinflammation, 15:65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [189].Chen H, Kankel MW, Su SC, Han SWS & Ofengeim D (2018). Exploring the genetics and non-cell autonomous mechanisms underlying ALS/FTLD. Cell Death Differ, 25:648-662. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [190].Wang H, Liu S, Sun Y, Chen C, Hu Z, Li Q et al. (2024). Target modulation of glycolytic pathways as a new strategy for the treatment of neuroinflammatory diseases. Ageing Res Rev, 101:102472. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [191].Wang T, Tomas D, Perera ND, Cuic B, Luikinga S, Viden A et al. (2022). Ferroptosis mediates selective motor neuron death in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Cell Death Differ, 29:1187-1198. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [192].Filipi T, Matusova Z, Abaffy P, Vanatko O, Tureckova J, Benesova S et al. (2023). Cortical glia in SOD1(G93A) mice are subtly affected by ALS-like pathology. Sci Rep, 13:6538. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [193].Scaricamazza S, Salvatori I, Giacovazzo G, Loeffler JP, Renè F, Rosina M et al. (2020). Skeletal-Muscle Metabolic Reprogramming in ALS-SOD1(G93A) Mice Predates Disease Onset and Is A Promising Therapeutic Target. iScience, 23:101087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [194].Walker AK, Spiller KJ, Ge G, Zheng A, Xu Y, Zhou M et al. (2015). Functional recovery in new mouse models of ALS/FTLD after clearance of pathological cytoplasmic TDP-43. Acta Neuropathol, 130:643-660. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [195].Balendra R & Isaacs AM (2018). C9orf72-mediated ALS and FTD: multiple pathways to disease. Nat Rev Neurol, 14:544-558. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [196].Ross CA & Tabrizi SJ (2011). Huntington's disease: from molecular pathogenesis to clinical treatment. Lancet Neurol, 10:83-98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [197].Henkel JS, Beers DR, Zhao W & Appel SH (2009). Microglia in ALS: the good, the bad, and the resting. J Neuroimmune Pharmacol, 4:389-398. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [198].Cybulska K, Perk L, Booij J, Laverman P & Rijpkema M (2020). Huntington's Disease: A Review of the Known PET Imaging Biomarkers and Targeting Radiotracers. Molecules, 25: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [199].Field SE, Curle AJ & Barker RA (2024). Inflammation and Huntington's disease - a neglected therapeutic target? Expert Opin Investig Drugs, 33:451-467. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [200].Tai YF, Pavese N, Gerhard A, Tabrizi SJ, Barker RA, Brooks DJ et al. (2007). Imaging microglial activation in Huntington's disease. Brain Res Bull, 72:148-151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [201].Rocha NP, Charron O, Latham LB, Colpo GD, Zanotti-Fregonara P, Yu M et al. (2021). Microglia Activation in Basal Ganglia Is a Late Event in Huntington Disease Pathophysiology. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm, 8: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [202].Pavese N, Gerhard A, Tai YF, Ho AK, Turkheimer F, Barker RA et al. (2006). Microglial activation correlates with severity in Huntington disease: a clinical and PET study. Neurology, 66:1638-1643. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [203].Rae CD, Baur JA, Borges K, Dienel G, Díaz-García CM, Douglass SR et al. (2024). Brain energy metabolism: A roadmap for future research. J Neurochem, 168:910-954. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [204].Zhang B, Li F, Shi Y, Ji C, Kong Q, Sun K et al. (2024). Single-cell RNA sequencing integrated with bulk RNA sequencing analysis reveals the protective effects of lactate-mediated lactylation of microglia-related proteins on spinal cord injury. CNS Neurosci Ther, 30:e70028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [205].Moidunny S, Matos M, Wesseling E, Banerjee S, Volsky DJ, Cunha RA et al. (2016). Oncostatin M promotes excitotoxicity by inhibiting glutamate uptake in astrocytes: implications in HIV-associated neurotoxicity. J Neuroinflammation, 13:144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [206].Paldino E, Migliorato G & Fusco FR (2024). Neuroimmune pathways involvement in neurodegeneration of R6/2 mouse model of Huntington's disease. Front Cell Neurosci, 18:1360066. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [207].Gasser J, Gillet G, Valadas JS, Rouvière L, Kotian A, Fan W et al. (2023). Innate immune activation and aberrant function in the R6/2 mouse model and Huntington's disease iPSC-derived microglia. Front Mol Neurosci, 16:1191324. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [208].Etxeberria-Rekalde E, Alzola-Aldamizetxebarria S, Flunkert S, Hable I, Daurer M, Neddens J et al. (2020). Quantification of Huntington's Disease Related Markers in the R6/2 Mouse Model. Front Mol Neurosci, 13:617229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [209].Villegas L, Nørremølle A, Freude K & Vilhardt F (2021). Nicotinamide Adenine Dinucleotide Phosphate Oxidases Are Everywhere in Brain Disease, but Not in Huntington's Disease? Front Aging Neurosci, 13:736734. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [210].Wu AG, Zhou XG, Qiao G, Yu L, Tang Y, Yan L et al. (2021). Targeting microglial autophagic degradation in NLRP3 inflammasome-mediated neurodegenerative diseases. Ageing Res Rev, 65:101202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [211].Roussakis AA & Piccini P (2015). PET Imaging in Huntington's Disease. J Huntingtons Dis, 4:287-296. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [212].Delva A, Michiels L, Koole M, Van Laere K & Vandenberghe W (2022). Synaptic Damage and Its Clinical Correlates in People With Early Huntington Disease: A PET Study. Neurology, 98:e83-e94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [213].Kachemov M, Vaibhav V, Smith C, Sundararaman N, Heath M, Pendlebury DF et al. (2024). Dysregulation of protein SUMOylation networks in Huntington's disease R6/2 mouse striatum. Brain [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [214].Pozojevic J & Spielmann M (2023). Single-Cell Sequencing in Neurodegenerative Disorders. Mol Diagn Ther, 27:553-561. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [215].Sun Y, Zhang H, Zhang X, Wang W, Chen Y, Cai Z et al. (2023). Promotion of astrocyte-neuron glutamate-glutamine shuttle by SCFA contributes to the alleviation of Alzheimer's disease. Redox Biol, 62:102690. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [216].Park MH, Lee M, Nam G, Kim M, Kang J, Choi BJ et al. (2019). N,N'-Diacetyl-p-phenylenediamine restores microglial phagocytosis and improves cognitive defects in Alzheimer's disease transgenic mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 116:23426-23436. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [217].Lonnemann N, Hosseini S, Marchetti C, Skouras DB, Stefanoni D, D'Alessandro A et al. (2020). The NLRP3 inflammasome inhibitor OLT1177 rescues cognitive impairment in a mouse model of Alzheimer's disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 117:32145-32154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [218].Lu J, Zhang C, Lv J, Zhu X, Jiang X, Lu W et al. (2021). Antiallergic drug desloratadine as a selective antagonist of 5HT(2A) receptor ameliorates pathology of Alzheimer's disease model mice by improving microglial dysfunction. Aging Cell, 20:e13286. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [219].Wang P, Yang P, Qian K, Li Y, Xu S, Meng R et al. (2022). Precise gene delivery systems with detachable albumin shell remodeling dysfunctional microglia by TREM2 for treatment of Alzheimer's disease. Biomaterials, 281:121360. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [220].Xu Q, Xu W, Cheng H, Yuan H & Tan X (2019). Efficacy and mechanism of cGAMP to suppress Alzheimer's disease by elevating TREM2. Brain Behav Immun, 81:495-508. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [221].Daria A, Colombo A, Llovera G, Hampel H, Willem M, Liesz A et al. (2017). Young microglia restore amyloid plaque clearance of aged microglia. Embo j, 36:583-603. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [222].Lu Y, Guo Z, Zhang Y, Li C, Zhang Y, Guo Q et al. (2019). Microenvironment Remodeling Micelles for Alzheimer's Disease Therapy by Early Modulation of Activated Microglia. Adv Sci (Weinh), 6:1801586. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [223].Ofengeim D, Mazzitelli S, Ito Y, DeWitt JP, Mifflin L, Zou C et al. (2017). RIPK1 mediates a disease-associated microglial response in Alzheimer's disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 114:E8788-e8797. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [224].Iaccarino HF, Singer AC, Martorell AJ, Rudenko A, Gao F, Gillingham TZ et al. (2016). Gamma frequency entrainment attenuates amyloid load and modifies microglia. Nature, 540:230-235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [225].Tao L, Liu Q, Zhang F, Fu Y, Zhu X, Weng X et al. (2021). Microglia modulation with 1070-nm light attenuates Aβ burden and cognitive impairment in Alzheimer's disease mouse model. Light Sci Appl, 10:179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [226].Cassano T, Calcagnini S, Pace L, De Marco F, Romano A & Gaetani S (2017). Cannabinoid Receptor 2 Signaling in Neurodegenerative Disorders: From Pathogenesis to a Promising Therapeutic Target. Front Neurosci, 11:30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [227].Fiebich BL, Batista CRA, Saliba SW, Yousif NM & de Oliveira ACP (2018). Role of Microglia TLRs in Neurodegeneration. Front Cell Neurosci, 12:329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [228].Pisanu A, Lecca D, Mulas G, Wardas J, Simbula G, Spiga S et al. (2014). Dynamic changes in pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines in microglia after PPAR-γ agonist neuroprotective treatment in the MPTPp mouse model of progressive Parkinson's disease. Neurobiol Dis, 71:280-291. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [229].Aratani Y (2018). Myeloperoxidase: Its role for host defense, inflammation, and neutrophil function. Arch Biochem Biophys, 640:47-52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [230].Zhang C, Wang H, Liang W, Yang Y, Cong C, Wang Y et al. (2021). Diphenyl diselenide protects motor neurons through inhibition of microglia-mediated inflammatory injury in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Pharmacol Res, 165:105457. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [231].Ibarburu S, Kovacs M, Varela V, Rodríguez-Duarte J, Ingold M, Invernizzi P et al. (2021). A Nitroalkene Benzoic Acid Derivative Targets Reactive Microglia and Prolongs Survival in an Inherited Model of ALS via NF-κB Inhibition. Neurotherapeutics, 18:309-325. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [232].Deora V, Lee JD, Albornoz EA, McAlary L, Jagaraj CJ, Robertson AAB et al. (2020). The microglial NLRP3 inflammasome is activated by amyotrophic lateral sclerosis proteins. Glia, 68:407-421. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [233].Sagredo O, González S, Aroyo I, Pazos MR, Benito C, Lastres-Becker I et al. (2009). Cannabinoid CB2 receptor agonists protect the striatum against malonate toxicity: relevance for Huntington's disease. Glia, 57:1154-1167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [234].Siew JJ, Chen HM, Chen HY, Chen HL, Chen CM, Soong BW et al. (2019). Galectin-3 is required for the microglia-mediated brain inflammation in a model of Huntington's disease. Nat Commun, 10:3473. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [235].Kauppinen TM, Higashi Y, Suh SW, Escartin C, Nagasawa K & Swanson RA (2008). Zinc triggers microglial activation. J Neurosci, 28:5827-5835. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Bibliometric data statistics can be found on the Web of Science.


Articles from Aging and Disease are provided here courtesy of JKL International LLC

RESOURCES