Abstract
Background: Biopolymer-based active packaging has experienced significant growth in the food industry due to its capacity to enhance product stability and reduce reliance on synthetic preservatives. However, its application in cosmetics remains limited, despite increasing consumer demand for sustainable and preservative-free solutions. Objective: This review evaluates the feasibility of transferring biopolymer-based active packaging technologies from the food sector to cosmetic applications, identifying relevant materials, processing methods, and implementation challenges. Methodology: A bibliographic search was conducted across nine databases (2000–2025) using the keywords “active packaging,” “antioxidant,” “antimicrobial,” and “biopolymers.” Results: The most recurrent biopolymers identified were chitosan, fish gelatin, zein, and kafirin, all of which exhibit biodegradability, film-forming capacity, and compatibility with natural additives. Although their intrinsic antioxidant and antimicrobial properties are limited, these can be enhanced through the incorporation of bioactive compounds. Processing techniques such as casting, coating, dry forming, and electrospinning were found to be the most effective, enabling customized packaging designs. Key challenges include cost, sensory attributes, mechanical limitations, and regulatory compliance. Conclusion: Active packaging systems based on biopolymers—either alone or combined with natural bioactive ingredients—offer a viable innovation pathway for the cosmetics industry. These systems support clean-label claims and ecological positioning, representing a strategic opportunity to adapt validated technologies from the food sector to meet emerging cosmetic market demands.
Keywords: active packaging, biopolymers, chitosan, cosmetic sector, fish gelatin, kafirin, zein
1. Introduction
Between 2019 and 2024, the global cosmetic and personal care industry experienced a 20% increase in sales, reaching a value of USD 593 billion in 2024 [1]. This growth has underscored its consolidation and relevance in international markets. These products are primarily formulated to enhance physical appearance and promote aesthetic appeal [2], encompassing a wide range of items such as lipsticks, foundations, mascaras, eyeshadows, nail polishes, facial and hand creams, micellar water, sunscreens, serums, and shaving creams. In parallel, personal hygiene has remained a cornerstone of public health, contributing to the prevention of infectious diseases [3]. Daily routines—including bathing, facial cleansing, hair washing, and oral care—have relied on specialized products such as shampoo, conditioner, toothpaste, soap, and mouthwash.
Within the research, development, and innovation (RDI) landscape, cosmetic formulations are required to meet stringent quality and safety standards to ensure their commercial viability. Among these, product stability has been recognized as a critical criterion, as it guarantees the preservation of active ingredients throughout the intended shelf life [4]. To achieve this, preservatives are commonly incorporated—compounds capable of inhibiting microbial growth and mitigating oxidative degradation and the formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) [5,6]. Widely used preservatives include parabens [7,8], aldehydes and formaldehyde donors [9,10,11,12], organic acids [13,14], isothiazolinone [15,16], alcohols, and phenols [17,18]. In addition to preservatives, packaging materials play a pivotal role in maintaining product integrity. These are typically manufactured from synthetic polymers such as polyethylene, polypropylene, polymethylmethacrylate, nylon, silicon, terephthalate, and high- or low-density polyethylene [2,19,20,21].
However, both preservatives and conventional packaging materials have raised concerns regarding human health and environmental safety. Formaldehyde has been classified as carcinogenic by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) [22], while parabens are suspected endocrine disruptors [23,24]. Moreover, the environmental burden associated with non-biodegradable synthetic polymers has intensified the search for safer and more sustainable alternatives.
In response to growing consumer awareness of ingredient safety and environmental sustainability, the cosmetics industry has begun to explore innovative strategies for formulation preservation and packaging. Among these, active packaging has emerged as a promising alternative. Defined as systems that not only contain and protect a product but also interact with it or its environment in a controlled manner, active packaging aims to enhance product quality, stability, and shelf life [25,26,27]. Unlike conventional packaging, which serves a passive role, active packaging can release beneficial agents such as antioxidants or antimicrobials, or absorb undesirable compounds like oxygen, moisture, or free radicals [28,29,30].
Over the past decade, significant advances have been reported in the development of active packaging, particularly within the food sector. For instance, chitosan films incorporating calcium oxide have demonstrated antimicrobial activity against E. coli and S. aureus [31]; nanocellulose-based coatings with selenium nanoparticles have exhibited high antioxidant capacity [32]; and polyvinyl alcohol films embedded with carbon quantum dots from green tea extracts have provided UV protection and enhanced oxygen barrier properties [33]. These systems have proven effective in extending shelf life and preserving the quality of perishable foods, thereby consolidating the technological potential of active packaging.
Although its application in cosmetics remains limited, the transfer of active packaging technologies from food to cosmetic sectors has gained relevance. Many cosmetic formulations contain oxidation-sensitive compounds—such as oils, fats, and antioxidants—and are susceptible to microbial contamination [34,35,36]. Under these conditions, active packaging offers a viable strategy to reduce reliance on synthetic preservatives, improve physicochemical and microbiological stability, and meet consumer demand for safer, more sustainable, and skin-compatible products.
To support this perspective, a broad literature review was conducted across multiple databases (2000–2025), focusing on keywords such as “active packaging,” “antioxidant,” “antimicrobial,” and “biopolymers.” This exploratory search aimed to identify the most recurrent materials and processing techniques relevant to active packaging, without following a formal systematic review protocol. Chitosan, fish gelatin, zein, and kafirin emerged as key biopolymers with transferable potential from food to cosmetic applications. Their functional versatility, biodegradability, and compatibility with natural additives position them as strategic candidates for innovation in cosmetic packaging—a domain still underexplored in the current literature.
2. Biopolymers Frequently Used in the Development of Active Packaging
Active packaging materials often incorporate bioactive agents such as antimicrobials, antioxidants, and moisture absorbers, which may be embedded within the packaging matrix or contained in separate sachets, working synergistically to control microbial growth, oxidative processes, and environmental conditions [28]. Within this framework, several natural polymers have garnered particular attention due to their biocompatibility, biodegradability, and functional versatility. Notably, chitosan, fish gelatin, and vegetal proteins such as zein and kafirin have been extensively studied as matrix materials for active packaging applications. These biopolymers not only offer film-forming abilities and barrier properties but also serve as carriers for incorporating active compounds [37], thus contributing to the extended shelf life and improved safety of cosmetic products.
2.1. Chitosan
Chitin is recognized as one of the most abundant biopolymers in nature, second only to cellulose. It is present in the exoskeletons of crustaceans and insects, as well as in the cell walls of several fungi, where it fulfills a fundamental structural role [38,39,40,41]. Its wide availability and renewable nature have established chitin as a strategic resource for obtaining derivatives of interest in industrial fields. Among these derivatives, chitosan is the most notable, as it is produced through the deacetylation of chitin (Figure 1) and combines unique properties that position it as a highly versatile material [42,43,44,45,46,47,48].
Figure 1.
Schematic representation of the chemical conversion of chitin to chitosan by deacetylation. The acetyl moieties (–COCH3) highlight-ed in red on the chitin repeating units are cleaved during processing, resulting in the exposure and formation of free amino groups (–NH2), highlighted in red on the chitosan backbone. Chitin is sourced from animal exoskeletons and fungal cell walls, while chitosan is commonly processed into powders and films for diverse industrial applications.
The key step in the production of chitosan from chitin is the removal of acetyl groups from the polymeric chain, a process that significantly increases the number of free amino groups (-NH2) (Figure 1). This structural modification not only enhances the solubility of the polymer in acidic aqueous environments but also confers a polycationic nature, which is responsible for many of its biological and technological interactions [49]. The degree of deacetylation (DD) is considered a critical parameter, as it determines important physicochemical properties such as charge density [50], solubility [51], antimicrobial activity [52], and the ability to form interactions with metal ions [53]. However, achieving a high DD remains a major challenge in industrial-scale production, since it requires precise control of pH, temperature, and processing time. Strict conditions can lead to polymer degradation and the generation of undesirable byproducts, which reduce the overall yield and compromise product quality [54].
To overcome these limitations, several technological alternatives have been explored with the aim of achieving a balance between efficiency, sustainability, and product quality. Autoclave-assisted deacetylation has been reported to shorten reaction times and achieve DD values close to 83%, with high yields and reduced polymer degradation [54]. Microwave-assisted synthesis can increase DD values to more than 90%, producing chitosan with improved thermal stability, higher crystallinity, and reduced molecular weight [55], which are desirable characteristics for specific applications.
On the other hand, chitosan has been classified according to its molecular weight into low (below 150 kDa), medium (150–750 kDa), and high (above 750 kDa) ranges [56]. In particular, lower molecular weight confers markedly enhanced solubility and reduced solution viscosity, facilitating the fabrication of thin, uniform, and mechanically stable films [57,58]. Additionally, shorter chitosan chains diffuse more efficiently and interact more effectively with target surfaces, thereby strengthening antimicrobial performance and enabling the development of high-functionality coatings with superior protective properties [59,60]. Enzymatic methods are also emerging as promising eco-efficient alternatives, as they allow the production of chitosan of comparable quality to that obtained by conventional processes, while simultaneously optimizing upstream steps such as deproteinization and demineralization of crustacean shells [61]. These advances highlight the transition toward more sustainable and efficient production processes, in accordance with the current demands of biotechnology and material sciences.
The structural characteristics of chitosan give rise to a particular molecular behavior that supports its technological applications. The rigidity of its polymeric chains, which results from equatorial glycosidic linkages, is combined with the ability to extend under protonated conditions, driven by the repulsion between positively charged amino groups [62]. This structural dynamism allows chitosan to adapt to different environments and provides considerable versatility in its applications.
From a functional perspective, three key properties are especially relevant: the ability to form complexes with transition metals, pH-dependent solubility, and charge density. First, chitosan can interact with cations such as Cu2+, Zn2+, and Ni2+ [63,64,65], with copper binding being particularly significant in the context of active cosmetic packaging, where the controlled release of ions contributes to prolonged antimicrobial activity [66]. Second, its solubility manifests primarily in acidic environments with pH values below 6.0, where the protonation of amino groups facilitates polymer dispersion in solution [67]. Finally, the charge density, which is determined by the DD and influenced by factors such as pH and ionic strength [68], is directly associated with the antimicrobial potential of the material, since it regulates the interactions of chitosan with cell membranes and biomolecules [69].
Beyond its intrinsic properties, chitosan has emerged as a versatile matrix for the incorporation of natural bioactive compounds. This is particularly relevant for the development of active packaging in the cosmetic industry, where functional ingredients such as oils, lipids, and functional ingredients are highly susceptible to degradation processes induced by ROS, light, temperature fluctuations, and microbiological contamination [70]. The incorporation of flavonoids, phenolic acids, tannins, and terpenoid-rich plant extracts into chitosan-based matrices not only enhances the antioxidant and antimicrobial potential of the material but also contributes to preserving the physicochemical and microbiological stability of cosmetic formulations. Owing to these distinctive features, chitosan has attracted significant attention as a polymeric matrix for the development of functional films in cosmetic packaging. Its biodegradability, biocompatibility, and versatility make it a renewable alternative to conventional synthetic materials, while its intrinsic bioactivity provides added value for the preservation of functional cosmetic ingredients. Rather than serving solely as a passive barrier, chitosan-based packaging materials actively extend product shelf life and reduce the need for synthetic additives, positioning them as a highly promising strategy for next-generation active packaging systems [71,72].
2.2. Fish Gelatin
Gelatin is a natural biopolymer derived from collagen, a protein consisting of three chains with different molecular weights after hydrolysis, α-chain (80–125 kDa), β-chain (160–250 kDa), and γ-chain (240–375 kDa), along with low-molecular-weight substances such as mineral salts and water [73]. In relation to fish gelatin, it is worth highlighting that its use has increased significantly as an alternative to conventional gelatin of bovine or porcine origin, mainly due to the large quantities of skins and scales generated as by-products of the fishing and aquaculture industries, which makes this material more readily available and sustainable. In addition, the extraction and purification processes of fish gelatin are generally simpler and less costly than those required for traditional sources, favoring its application in the development of bioactive biopolymer-based packaging systems and contributing to the valorization of marine by-products, as widely documented in the literature [74]. Beyond its availability, fish gelatin exhibits distinctive physicochemical characteristics—including lower gelation and melting temperatures [75,76], higher solubility [77], and a unique amino acid profile [78,79]—that directly influence its rheological and mechanical behavior, making it particularly suitable for use in heat-sensitive pharmaceutical and cosmetic formulations.
Gelatin is commonly classified into two main types according to the pretreatment applied to collagen: type A (acid-processed) and type B (alkaline-processed). In addition, enzymatic technologies have been developed to hydrolyze collagen fibers with greater selectivity and control [80].
Fish gelatin is obtained by processing collagen extracted from fish by-products such as skin, scales, and bones through controlled hydrolysis (Figure 2). During this conversion, significant structural modifications occur, including the deamination of asparagine to aspartic acid in acid treatments and the deamination of glutamine to glutamic acid in alkaline treatments, resulting in a partially degraded structure compared to native collagen [81,82]. Among these materials, type A fish gelatin exhibits particularly advantageous structural and functional characteristics for the development of active bio-based packaging, especially for solid cosmetic products. The acid-induced conversion of asparagine to aspartic acid increases the density of carboxyl groups, enhancing hydrophilicity, solubility, and film-forming capacity [83,84]. These attributes enable the fabrication of homogeneous, flexible, and functional films capable of incorporating antioxidants, antimicrobials, or other active agents, making type A gelatin highly suitable for active packaging systems [85,86,87]. Nevertheless, its enhanced solubility and hygroscopicity impose limitations for liquid or high-moisture formulations, where premature dissolution and loss of mechanical integrity may occur. Considering both its functional advantages and application-specific constraints, type A fish gelatin provides a strategically valuable biomaterial for biodegradable, thermo-sensitive, and active biopackaging in solid cosmetic products. For these reasons, and due to its relevance to current technological demands, the present review focuses specifically on type A fish gelatin.
Figure 2.
Fish gelatin extraction: pretreatment technologies and collagen network structure. Gelatin is extracted from fish by-products such as bones, skin, and scales through three main pretreatment strategies: acidic, alkaline, and enzymatic processes. As highlighted in red, the acidic and alkaline treatments promote the deamidation of asparagine and glutamine residues into aspartic acid and glutamic acid, respectively, through hydrolytic reactions (H+/H2O and OH−/H2O). The molecular network structure obtained after extraction is highlighted, depicting the interconnected collagen-derived chains characteristic of gelatin.
Type A gelatin is characterized by an isoelectric point within the pH range of 6 to 9, a consequence of the applied acid treatment. These gelatins exhibit physicochemical properties advantageous for producing bio-based packaging materials, including gel strength, viscosity, melting temperature, and the α/β chain ratio. Specifically, fish gelatin has reported gel strengths between 70 and 270 bloom, with gelation and melting temperatures ranging from 8–25 °C and 11–28 °C, respectively [88,89,90]. Its notable hydrophilicity and high solubility in cold water facilitate processing in aqueous systems, which is favorable for developing environmentally friendly and sustainable polymeric materials.
Moreover, fish gelatin stands out due to its biodegradability and biocompatibility, positioning it as a promising alternative to synthetic polymers and traditional mammalian gelatins, particularly in the sector of biodegradable active packaging [76]. However, it displays lower mechanical properties and structural stability under usage conditions compared to mammalian gelatins, which poses challenges for commercial applications [91]. To overcome these limitations, composite films combining fish gelatin with other polymers, such as chitosan, have been explored to enhance mechanical strength and water vapor barrier properties [92,93], thereby improving their potential functionality in cosmetic packaging applications.
Gelation temperature, melting temperature, and gel strength are the most critical functional and technical properties of gelatin that determine its commercial utility. These properties are primarily influenced by gelatin molecular weight and its internal amino acid composition. Fish gelatin, in comparison to mammalian gelatin, contains lower levels of proline and hydroxyproline, key amino acids crucial for forming the collagen-like triple helix structure [93]. This deficiency accounts for the generally lower gel strength and melting temperature observed in fish gelatin. Moreover, gel strength correlates positively with the content of α-chains, while a lower α/β chain ratio negatively impacts its functional properties [94,95]. These inherent characteristics restrict the broad replacement of mammalian gelatin by fish gelatin in packaging technology applications, where mammalian gelatin typically exhibits superior thickening, stabilizing, and gelling capabilities [91]. Nevertheless, fish gelatin remains a promising alternative, provided that its structural and thermal particularities are addressed through tailored technological approaches to achieve functional equivalence—an effort that is further supported by its inherently favorable film-forming properties and high compatibility with natural bioactive compounds [96]. Recent studies have focused on the incorporation of plant- and biomass-derived additives into fish gelatin matrices to enhance their mechanical, barrier, and functional properties. The combination of gelatin with polyphenols, essential oils, polysaccharides, and nanostructured materials has demonstrated significant improvements in stability, antioxidant activity, and antimicrobial efficacy. These composite films have been successfully applied in food preservation, showing extended shelf life and protection against microbial contamination and lipid oxidation [97,98,99]. Such findings highlight the potential translation of fish gelatin-based films into the cosmetic sector, where they could serve as active or intelligent packaging materials to protect sensitive formulations, such as emulsions, creams, oils, and gels, from degradation and microbiological contamination.
2.3. Plant-Based Proteins (Zein and Kafirin)
Among the plant-based proteins with growing interest for active packaging in cosmetics, zein and kafirin stand out as emerging biopolymers with promising functional potential. Zein is the main storage protein of maize endosperm and a by-product of the bioethanol industry, which makes it an attractive, sustainable raw material [100]. Its extraction process from corn and the subsequent recovery of zein powder through ethanolic extraction, filtration, and drying are schematically illustrated in Figure 3. It belongs to the prolamin family and is characterized by its hydrophobic nature, being insoluble in water at pH < 12 due to its high content of non-polar amino acid residues. This protein is considered non-toxic and exhibits favorable properties such as low permeability, thermal resistance, and intrinsic antimicrobial activity, which have supported its use in edible coatings for food and pharmaceutical products. Laboratory-scale studies have demonstrated successful processing of zein films through casting, extrusion, and co-extrusion techniques [101,102]. From a compositional perspective, zein consists of four fractions (α, β, γ, and δ) with differences in molecular weight and amino acid polarity. The α (19–22 kDa), γ (27 kDa), and δ (10 kDa) fractions are predominantly apolar, while the β fraction contains a more balanced ratio of polar and apolar residues [103]. Glutamic acid is the most abundant amino acid (≈27.5%), followed by proline, alanine, aspartic acid, and phenylalanine [104]. Although largely hydrophobic, zein also contains polar and basic residues such as arginine and histidine, enabling electrostatic interactions with acidic groups and explaining its solubility in mixed solvents rather than in pure water or ethanol [103].
Figure 3.
Zein and Kafirin Extraction. Corn and sorghum grains are processed and extracted with ethanol. Filtration and drying yield protein powders. The α-helix-rich models of zein and kafirin were generated using Copilot for illustrative purposes.
Similarly, kafirin, the major storage protein of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor), accounts for 60–80% of the total grain protein and exhibits close structural similarity to zein, though with an even higher degree of hydrophobicity [105]. This property contributes to the formation of more stable films, making kafirin an equally interesting candidate for packaging applications. However, its extraction requires hydroalcoholic processes that yield precipitates containing residual triglycerides (≈8%) and free fatty acids (≈1%), which must be removed to obtain functional biopolymer matrices. The properties of kafirin-based films depend on multiple factors, including protein purity, solvent system, pH, plasticizers or additives, drying temperature, and ambient humidity [106]. Structural organization also plays a critical role: films dominated by α-helical conformations exhibit higher tensile strength, improved rupture resistance, and lower water vapor permeability (Figure 3), whereas those with a predominance of β-sheet structures display weaker mechanical and barrier performance [107,108]. At the molecular level, kafirin is classified into α-, β-, γ-, and δ-fractions according to amino acid composition, solubility, and electrophoretic mobility. These fractions differ in length and residue distribution: α-kafirin (240–250 mainly non-polar residues, including lysine and tryptophan), β-kafirin (172 residues, including Met, Cys, Trp), γ-kafirin (193 residues, including Pro, Cys, His, Lys, Asn, Trp), and δ-kafirin (114 residues, including Met, Lys, Trp) [106,109]. Due to its highly apolar nature, kafirin exhibits limited solubility in conventional solvents; nonetheless, aqueous ethanol and acetone, particularly under elevated temperatures, have proven effective for solubilization and film formation. Additionally, Oguntoyinbo, et. al. demonstrated that food-compatible solvents such as acetic and lactic acids at 70 °C efficiently dissolve kafirin, reflecting its amphoteric character [110]. Zein and kafirin illustrate the versatility of plant-derived prolamins as functional biopolymers for cosmetic packaging. Their intrinsic hydrophobicity, strong film-forming capacity, and adaptability to diverse processing techniques enable the development of biodegradable materials with tailored barriers, mechanical, and bioactive properties.
Taken together, the analysis of chitosan, fish gelatin, and plant-derived prolamins such as zein and kafirin highlights that each biopolymer presents a distinctive combination of functional, structural, and processing-related attributes that directly influence its suitability for cosmetic packaging applications. While some materials excel in film-forming capacity or intrinsic bioactivity, others offer superior hydrophobicity or barrier performance but face challenges related to mechanical stability, solubility, or scalability. Importantly, many of these limitations can be strategically mitigated through blending, plasticization, crosslinking, or incorporation of complementary polymers—such as starch—allowing the design of optimized composite systems tailored to specific cosmetic formulations. In this context, a comparative assessment becomes essential to rationally select materials according to the functional requirements of the final application. The main advantages and limitations of the biopolymers studied in this review—chitosan, fish gelatin, zein, kafirin, and starch—are therefore summarized in Table 1, highlighting their potential and constraints for cosmetic packaging applications.
Table 1.
Comparative analysis of biopolymers studied and their advantages/disadvantages for cosmetic packaging applications.
| Biopolymer | Advantages | Disadvantages |
|---|---|---|
| Chitosan | Biodegradable; antimicrobial and antioxidant activity; compatible with plant extracts; film-forming; supports natural claims | Higher cost than synthetics; limited solubility at neutral pH; may require plasticizers or blending |
| Fish Gelatin | Renewable origin; good film-forming ability; compatible with bioactives; biodegradable; supports clean-label claims | Odor and low thermal/mechanical stability; sensitive to humidity; may require composite reinforcement |
| Zein | Hydrophobic; good barrier properties; thermal stability; antioxidant potential; food-grade; supports UV protection claims | Brittle without plasticizers; yellow coloration; limited solubility; moderate cost |
| Kafirin | Strong hydrophobicity; stable films; antioxidant and antimicrobial potential; compatible with essential oils | Difficult extraction; low solubility; residual lipids; limited industrial availability |
| Starch (complementary) |
Abundant; biodegradable; low cost; compatible with essential oils and antioxidants; supports “natural origin” claims | Poor water resistance; low mechanical strength; requires crosslinking or reinforcement |
2.4. Moisture Sensitivity and Functional Suitability of Biopolymers for Cosmetic Packaging
Despite their widespread use as matrix materials for active packaging, the intrinsic interaction of biopolymers with water is a critical factor determining their suitability for different cosmetic formulations. Chitosan and fish gelatin, for example, exhibit pronounced water uptake and high moisture permeability due to their hydrophilic functional groups and the capacity of their polymer chains to swell, hydrate, and even undergo partial solubilization in aqueous environments [49,50,51,77]. When these materials encounter liquid formulations, such as emulsions, aqueous gels, tonics, or other high-moisture cosmetic systems, they may lose structural integrity through excessive swelling, hydrogel formation, or dissolution [111,112,113,114]. These limitations restrict their direct use as primary packaging for liquid cosmetics unless specific technological reinforcements—such as chemical or enzymatic crosslinking, hydrophobic polymer blending, lamination with water-resistant layers, or the application of surface coatings—are incorporated to enhance moisture resistance and stabilize the packaging matrix. For example, several studies have shown that blending gelatin with more water-resistant biopolymers can markedly improve its stability: chitosan incorporation strengthens the matrix, reduces solubility, and lowers water-vapor permeability by up to 50% [92], while hydrophobic zein increases crystallinity, raises contact-angle values, and decreases film solubility to about 40%, enhancing moisture tolerance [115]. These results demonstrate how polymer reinforcement strategies can effectively mitigate the inherent water sensitivity of gelatin-based materials.
In contrast, plant-derived prolamins such as kafirin and zein exhibit markedly lower affinity for water due to their hydrophobic and non-polar amino acid composition, making them considerably more stable in the presence of semi-solid or moderately hydrated cosmetic formulations, including sticks, balms, solid conditioners, dry masks, or anhydrous pastes [106,109]. Nonetheless, even these comparatively water-resistant biopolymers may require structural reinforcement, plasticization, or nanocomposite engineering to meet specific mechanical, permeability, and durability requirements. For example, tannin-modified kafirin films exhibit pronounced mechanical reinforcement—showing up to two- to four-fold increases in tensile strength and Young’s modulus, along with reduced water uptake—while LAPONITE®-based kafirin nanocomposites displayed enhanced rigidity and structural stability without detrimental changes in water-vapor permeability [116,117]. Likewise, the incorporation of TiO2 nanoparticles into zein matrices strengthens tensile performance, improves thermal stability, and decreases both oxygen and water-vapor permeability by reducing porosity and consolidating the internal microstructure [118]. Together, these considerations highlight the need to match the physicochemical profile of each biopolymer with the moisture content, rheological characteristics, and stability requirements of the targeted cosmetic product when designing bio-based packaging systems.
3. Methods for the Development of Active Packaging
Active packaging increasingly uses biopolymers with antioxidant or antimicrobial properties, alone or combined. Techniques like solution casting and surface coating are common for film and coating formation. Emerging methods such as dry forming and electrospinning enable tailored microstructures and enhanced performance. Figure 4 compares four approaches—casting, coating, dry forming, electrospinning—across preparation, application, and solidification.
Figure 4.
Biopolymer processing methods for active packaging—(A) casting, (B) coating, (C) dry forming, (D) electrospinning—each shown in preparation, application, and solidification steps.
3.1. Solvent Casting
Solvent casting is one of the most widely employed laboratory-scale techniques for the fabrication of biopolymer-based films, particularly for hydrophilic polymers such as gelatin, chitosan, starch and cellulose derivatives (Figure 4A). The process involves dissolving the biopolymer in a suitable solvent—typically water, dilute acetic acid (for chitosan), or hydroalcoholic mixtures—followed by the incorporation of plasticizers (e.g., glycerol, sorbitol) and optional additives or secondary polymers. The solution is then homogenized, degassed and cast onto leveled substrates (glass, Teflon or polyester plates), where solvent evaporation under controlled temperature (20–50 °C) and relative humidity (40–60%) yields a continuous film within 24–48 h [119].
Films produced by solvent casting typically exhibit thicknesses ranging is commonly reported in the range of tens to a few hundred micrometers. For chitosan, Eulalio et al. prepared films of about 100 µm thickness from chitosan solutions in different acids, while more recent work on chitosan packaging films reports thickness values around 0.05 mm (~50 µm) [120,121]. Fish-gelatin films obtained by casting skin-gelatin solutions usually show thicknesses between ~0.05 and 0.15 mm; for example, Avena-Bustillos et al. evaluated water-vapour permeability on 0.05-mm fish-gelatin films, and Pouralkhas et al. reported fish-gelatin/fucoidan films with average thicknesses ranging from 0.12 to 0.147 mm, while other studies describe ranges of 0.051–0.069 mm depending on formulation [122,123,124]. Zein films produced by ethanol-based solvent casting have also been measured in the ~0.06–0.22 mm range, with thin films of ~50 µm used in dynamic mechanical analysis and thicker films (0.14–0.22 mm) reported for plasticized zein formulations [125,126]. Kafirin films obtained by casting in organic acids are described as very thin (<50 µm) or prepared with a typical film thickness of about 100 µm in comparative studies of zein, kafirin and avenin films [127]. Overall, these data indicate that for chitosan, fish gelatin, zein and kafirin, solvent-cast films are commonly engineered with thicknesses in the ~50–150 µm range, which offers a practical compromise between mechanical integrity, flexibility and barrier performance for packaging applications.
Compared with conventional packaging materials, solvent-cast films often exhibit superior antioxidant and antimicrobial performance, chiefly due to their specific formulation (active compounds and biopolymer composition) rather than the casting technique itself, as shown by studies confirming their effectiveness in preserving product quality [128,129,130]. This technique is especially suitable for incorporating thermosensitive and volatile bioactive compounds, as it operates at low temperatures and under mild shear conditions, thereby minimizing chemical and structural degradation of both the polymer matrix and the active ingredients [131,132]. Nevertheless, important limitations such as poor scalability, prolonged drying times, potential solvent residues, and batch-to-batch variability remain critical challenges [133,134,135]. These drawbacks can be partially mitigated through the application of cross-linking strategies (chemical or enzymatic), polymer blending approaches (e.g., gelatin–chitosan or gelatin–zein systems), and the use of surface coatings or lamination with hydrophobic outer layers, which contribute to improved mechanical strength and enhanced moisture barrier properties [136,137,138,139].
3.2. Coating
Coating represents a versatile strategy to functionalize the surface of primary packaging materials by depositing a thin biopolymer layer onto a preformed substrate (Figure 4B). Typically, a polymer solution or dispersion containing the biopolymer (e.g., gelatin, chitosan), plasticizers, and functional additives is applied onto the surface by spraying, dipping, roll-to-roll or slot-die coating, followed by controlled drying to form a continuous film [140].
Unlike free-standing films, coated layers based on chitosan, fish gelatin, zein or kafirin are typically much thinner, with representative systems showing ultrathin chitosan layers of ~1–2 µm on eggshells and up to ~10 µm after multiple applications, chitosan– and fish-gelatin–based coatings on fresh-cut apples in the range of ~35–60 µm, and zein coatings on tomatoes with controlled thicknesses of approximately 5, 15 and 66 µm [141,142,143].
However, the same feature that makes these coatings attractive from a material- and functionality-efficiency perspective—their extremely reduced thickness—also becomes their main structural limitation, significantly increasing their susceptibility to cracking, delamination and moisture-induced degradation, as commonly observed in ultra-thin barrier layers and biopolymer coatings under humid conditions [144,145,146]. Key challenges include the low mechanical resistance of ultra-thin layers, the formation of cracks and defects, and the limited durability of hydrophilic matrices at high relative humidity [146,147]. These limitations can be mitigated or overcome by designing multilayer architectures, using compatibilizing blends and cross-linking agents, and incorporating hydrophobic components such as waxes or zein, which improve moisture barrier and structural integrity [148,149,150,151]. In addition, post-treatment strategies based on plasma activation or UV-curing have been shown to enhance coating adhesion, reduce delamination and extend the functional lifetime of thin chitosan- and protein-based layers on polymeric substrates [137,152,153].
3.3. Dry Forming (Extrusion and Thermo-Compression)
Dry-forming processes, including extrusion and thermo-compression, are solvent-free techniques that rely on polymer melting or thermal softening followed by shaping under pressure and subsequent cooling to obtain continuous films or sheets (Figure 4C). When applied to biopolymers such as zein and kafirin, which exhibit more hydrophobic and thermoplastic behavior [154,155], these methods can produce films with typical thicknesses ranging from 100 to 500 μm, and up to approximately 1 mm in more rigid structures [156,157]. In contrast, the use of chitosan and fish gelatin in these processes generally requires prior thermoplasticization and the incorporation of plasticizers (e.g., glycerol, sorbitol or polyethylene glycol) to enable adequate flow and prevent excessive brittleness [158,159,160].
Due to the high processing temperatures (approximately 80–200 °C) required in these techniques, their compatibility with volatile and thermosensitive active compounds is limited [159]. Moreover, in protein-based biopolymers such as fish gelatin and kafirin, excessive thermal exposure may lead to denaturation, chain scission, oxidation or loss of functional groups, resulting in reduced film flexibility and altered barrier properties [161,162,163,164]. Consequently, sensitive cosmetic actives (e.g., essential oils, vitamins, phenolic antioxidants) are preferably microencapsulated prior to processing or incorporated post-extrusion via surface coating or lamination [165,166,167,168,169,170].
Despite these limitations, hot-melt extrusion (HME) has gained increasing relevance in the development of bioactive protein-based packaging, particularly in thermoplastic zein systems, as it enables precise control over film thickness, density, mechanical strength and gas/moisture permeability [156,171,172,173,174]. Kafirin-based films similarly exhibit promising oxygen and water vapor barrier properties and can be formulated as bioactive matrices incorporating antimicrobial and antioxidant agents [175,176]. Furthermore, the integration of functional modifiers—such as enzymatic cross-linkers, hydrophobic additives and nanostructured reinforcements including cellulose nanocrystals or layered silicates—has been shown to improve flexibility, enhance antimicrobial performance and optimize the barrier properties of zein- and kafirin-based films [177,178,179,180,181,182].
3.4. Electrospinning
Electrospinning is a high-voltage technique that enables the production of ultrafine fibrous films and coatings with tunable morphology and porosity (Figure 4D). It involves the ejection of a charged polymer jet from a Taylor cone, followed by fiber stretching and solvent evaporation before deposition on a grounded collector [183,184,185].
This method typically produces nanofibrous mats with fiber diameters ranging from 50 nm to several micrometers and overall film thicknesses between 10 and 230 μm, depending on deposition time [186,187,188,189,190]. Electrospinning is highly compatible with thermosensitive, volatile and bioactive compounds, since it operates at ambient temperature and allows incorporation via blending, coaxial or emulsion electrospinning [191,192,193].
Biopolymers such as gelatin, chitosan, and zein have been successfully electrospun into highly porous, high-surface-area structures. Although this porosity precludes their use as stand-alone barrier films, it enables their application as functional layers in multilayer systems, where they regulate permeability and serve as efficient carriers for antioxidant and antimicrobial agents [194,195,196,197].
Limitations include low large-scale productivity, dependence on solvent systems and potential structural instability under high humidity [198,199,200,201,202]. These challenges can be addressed by crosslinking, multilayer electrospinning, blending with hydrophobic polymers or post-treatment (e.g., UV, thermal or chemical stabilization) [203,204,205,206].
Electrospun materials have also been explored as preservative-free cosmetic delivery systems, such as antioxidant-enriched dry facial masks activated by moisture, providing multifunctional performance (hydration, antioxidant and antimicrobial effects) [207].
3.5. Other Emerging Methodologies
Beyond conventional approaches, several emerging techniques have expanded the design space for functional biopolymer-based films. Layer-by-layer (LbL) assembly enables the sequential deposition of oppositely charged polymers such as chitosan or gelatin, forming nanostructured multilayered films with precisely controlled thickness (typically 10–500 nm per bilayer) and high functional tunability. These films are particularly attractive for applications requiring strong barrier, antioxidant or antimicrobial properties without bulk material modification [208,209,210].
3D printing (additive manufacturing) has also gained attention as it allows customized geometries, spatial distribution of active agents and real-time modulation of formulation architecture [211]. Meanwhile, blow-film extrusion remains the dominant industrial method for producing flexible biopolymer films with optimized mechanical and barrier properties [212,213,214].
These emerging approaches provide new opportunities to overcome limitations associated with traditional casting and coating methods, bridging laboratory-scale developments and industrial packaging solutions for cosmetic applications.
4. Fundamental Methodologies for Characterizing Active Packaging
The development of active packaging systems for cosmetic applications demands a rigorous and multidimensional characterization approach. This involves the systematic application of chemical, morphological, mechanical, thermal, barrier, bioactive, optical, and sensory analyses, each supported by well-established and mandatory techniques. These methodologies are essential not only for ensuring material performance and regulatory compliance, but also for guiding formulation compatibility, user experience, and environmental alignment. Figure 5 illustrates the principal analytical domains and core techniques most applied in the characterization of biomaterials for active cosmetic packaging.
Figure 5.
Overview of key analytical domains for the characterization of biomaterials in active cosmetic packaging. Each segment highlights the most common, essential, and mandatory techniques used to evaluate structural, functional, sensory, and environmental performance.
4.1. Chemical Structure Characterization
Chemical structure characterization is a fundamental step in the development of biopolymeric materials, as it provides insight into molecular architecture, functional group interactions, and compatibility between components. However, in the context of biopolymer-based active packaging, this characterization is not always explicitly reported. This omission often stems from the use of well-established materials—such as chitosan, gelatin, zein, kafirin and starch—whose chemical structures, degradation pathways, and biocompatibility profiles have been extensively studied and validated across multiple applications [2,100,102,108,215]. These polymers are frequently selected based on their known film-forming ability, biodegradability, and intrinsic bioactivity, which reduces the perceived need for repeated structural analysis. Nevertheless, when these matrices are functionalized with natural extracts, nanoparticles, or blended with other polymers, chemical characterization becomes essential to confirm molecular interactions, assess compatibility, and correlate structural modifications with performance attributes such as antioxidant capacity, antimicrobial efficacy, and barrier behavior [216,217,218]. Importantly, in cosmetic packaging applications, these interactions must be interpreted considering specific environmental and formulation-related stressors, including moderate temperatures (20–40 °C), fluctuating humidity (40–90% RH), variable pH (typically 4.5–7.5 for skin-compatible products), and prolonged exposure to aqueous, oily or emulsion-based matrices.
In this context, Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) remains one of the most extensively employed techniques due to its accessibility and high diagnostic value. This technique is based on the absorption of infrared radiation by molecular bonds, which induces vibrational transitions specific to functional groups [219]. FTIR enables the identification of chemical moieties and interaction patterns, making it indispensable for confirming the incorporation of bioactive and monitoring polymer modifications. Recent studies have demonstrated its value in detecting hydrogen bonding and esterification in chitosan–gelatin films functionalized with flavonoids, where spectral shifts in the O–H and C=O regions correlate with enhanced antioxidant activity and mechanical strength [220]. These interactions are particularly relevant for packaging of aqueous and emulsion-based cosmetics, where hydrogen-bond networks strongly influence moisture uptake and structural integrity.
Similarly, X-ray diffraction (XRD) is another widely used technique which is used to evaluate the crystallinity and behavior of various biomaterials in different matrix systems. This method is based on the constructive interference of monochromatic X-rays scattered by atoms in a crystalline lattice, producing a diffraction pattern that reveals the degree of order, interplanar spacing, and phase composition [221]. In cosmetic-packaging systems, crystallinity plays a decisive role in controlling permeability, mechanical strength and long-term dimensional stability, especially in high-humidity environments such as bathrooms or humid climates. For example, Sun et al. [222] reported that the incorporation of brassica-derived compounds into chitosan–gelatin films disrupted crystalline packing, increasing amorphous content and improving flexibility—an advantageous feature for packaging of squeezable creams, gels and lotions. In contrast, the addition of layered double hydroxides (LDHs) promoted semi-crystalline domains, enhancing tensile strength and reducing permeability [223], features that are particularly beneficial for protective packaging of volatile or oxidation-sensitive oily formulations. These findings underscore XRD’s relevance in tailoring packaging properties through structural modulation [224].
In contrast, nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy, although a powerful technique for structural elucidation, is less frequently used in this type of characterization studies. This technique is based on the magnetic properties of atomic nuclei—typically hydrogen (1H) or carbon (13C)—which resonate at characteristic frequencies when placed in a magnetic field and exposed to radiofrequency pulses [225]. The resulting spectra provides detailed information about the chemical environment, molecular dynamics, and structural conformation. In cosmetic-related applications, NMR has proven particularly valuable in confirming the chemical integrity of encapsulated bioactives and in elucidating interactions between polymers and hydrophobic or amphiphilic compounds commonly found in oil-based cosmetics [226,227]. Moreover, advanced solid-state NMR techniques have enabled the study of nano crystallization effects in cellulose-based films, revealing changes in mobility and segmental orientation that influence barrier performance [228]. Wang et al. [229] further emphasized the role of 2D NMR in resolving complex polysaccharide structures relevant to active packaging matrices.
On the other hand, Mass Spectrometry (MS), particularly when coupled with chromatographic separation and high-resolution tandem analysis (e.g., UHPLC-HRMS/MS), is increasingly used not only to quantify the migration of bioactive compounds from packaging films into cosmetic matrices, but also to monitor their structural integrity and possible transformation during release [230]. This technique, based on the ionization of chemical species and measurement of their mass-to-charge ratio (m/z), allows the detailed identification of low-molecular-weight compounds, characteristic fragmentation patterns, degradation products, and structural modifications. Recent studies employing UHPLC-HRMS/MS have demonstrated its capability to assess the preservation of phenolic and antioxidant compounds even under extreme conditions, confirming its robustness for tracking compound stability and transformation [230]. In cosmetic-packaging research, MS has been successfully applied to monitor the controlled release of antioxidants, preservatives or fragrances from biopolymer films into aqueous creams or lipid-rich matrices. For instance, Otero-Pazos et al. [231] demonstrated the application of MS to monitor the controlled release of tocopherol from chitosan-based films, highlighting its relevance for oxidative-stability preservation in oil-containing formulations such as serums and ointments.
Finally, Elemental Analysis [232], which consists of quantifying the elemental composition of a sample—typically carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen, and other relevant atoms—complements these techniques by confirming the presence of inorganic additives and assessing purity. This method is usually performed via combustion followed by detection of evolved gases, or through spectroscopic techniques such as atomic absorption or inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES). In the context of cosmetic-packaging systems, elemental analysis is particularly useful for confirming the incorporation of metal oxides (e.g., ZnO, TiO2, Ag or Cu nanoparticles) and for determining the degree of deacetylation in chitosan, a key parameter directly related to antimicrobial efficacy and pH-dependent solubility in water-rich formulations (such as toners, gels and hydrophilic creams) [233].
Altogether, these techniques provide a robust analytical framework for the development of next-generation active packaging materials. Their integration allows researchers to correlate chemical structure with macroscopic performance under conditions that simulate real cosmetic storage and use, including moderate heat, high humidity, repeated contact with water or oils, and exposure to active ingredients. As such, the results obtained from these characterization techniques can be considered highly transferable to packaging applications for aqueous and emulsified products (e.g., creams, lotions, serums, masks) as well as lipid-rich or anhydrous formulations (e.g., balms, oils, solid cosmetics), provided that environmental conditions are considered during experimental evaluation.
4.2. Morphological Characterization
Morphological characterization has been established as a critical analytical dimension in the development of biopolymer-based active packaging systems, as surface features such as fiber diameter, roughness, and porosity directly influence barrier performance, mechanical cohesion, and the release behavior of bioactive compounds [234,235]. These structural attributes are particularly relevant for cosmetic packaging, where materials are exposed to repeated mechanical stress, variable humidity, and continuous contact with chemically diverse formulations.
Depending on the processing technique, biopolymer-based materials can exhibit markedly different morphological features. Electrospun matrices typically exhibit high surface area and interconnected porosity, cast and thermo-compressed films tend to form smoother, denser structures. While high porosity may enhance diffusion and active release, denser morphologies tend to provide superior mechanical resistance and barrier properties—features that are critical in cosmetic containers, sachets, liners and biodegradable wraps exposed to aqueous, oily or emulsified products.
To assess these features, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) has been widely employed; this technique operates by scanning a focused beam of electrons across the sample surface, generating secondary electrons that are detected to form high-resolution images of topography and microstructure [236,237]. SEM analyses performed on protein- and polysaccharide-based systems have provided valuable insights under conditions relevant to cosmetic packaging. For example, SEM analysis of SF/PCL nanofibers revealed that fiber diameter and distribution were modulated by processing parameters, directly affecting wettability and biocompatibility [238]. In starch-chitosan films loaded with Gongju extract, SEM provided critical insight into the surface morphology of films, revealing smoother and more homogeneous structures compared to control films [239]. In zein-based bilayer films, SEM revealed improved interfacial compatibility and surface uniformity when PEG400 was incorporated, resulting in enhanced mechanical strength and reduced water vapor permeability [240], an advantageous property for packaging of hydrophilic creams, masks and gel-based formulations.
In contrast, atomic force microscopy (AFM) has enabled nanometric topographic analysis based on the interaction between a sharp probe and the sample surface; the probe, mounted on a cantilever, deflects in response to surface forces, and these deflections are recorded to reconstruct three-dimensional maps of roughness and texture [241,242]. In cosmetic-related applications, AFM has proven particularly useful in correlating nanoscale roughness with functional activity. Increased surface irregularity has been linked to improved antimicrobial performance in thyme oil-enriched films, where improved contact between microorganisms and active surfaces was observed [243]. In fish gelatin films enriched with Aloe vera, AFM and FTIR revealed structural rearrangements and increased hydrophilicity due to polysaccharide–protein interactions, which influenced both roughness and thermal stability [244]. These effects are critical in packaging systems intended for aqueous cosmetics, where hydrophilicity and interfacial stability govern moisture absorption and structural integrity. Furthermore, zein films plasticized with polyols such as sorbitol and glycerol showed distinct AFM topographies, where sorbitol improved surface smoothness and reduced oxygen permeability [245], relevant to oxidation-sensitive products such as facial oils and antioxidant-rich serums.
On the other hand, profilometry has complemented these techniques by providing precise measurements of film thickness and continuity. Optical profilometry operates by projecting light onto the surface and analyzing reflected patterns to determine height variations, while mechanical profilometry uses a stylus that physically traces the surface profile [246,247]. These measurements are particularly important when designing cosmetic packaging materials, as thickness homogeneity minimizes weak points that can lead to rupture, deformation or uncontrolled migration [248,249]. In chitosan-based systems, thickness uniformity has been correlated with reduced water vapor transmission rates (WVTR), suggesting that microstructural consistency enhances barrier function in humid environments [250,251,252]. Kafirin films plasticized with triacetin and PEG400 exhibited improved surface homogeneity and reduced microporosity, as confirmed by profilometry and SEM, contributing to enhanced mechanical and barrier properties [253]. Starch-based films modified with nano clays and crosslinkers have also shown improved surface continuity and reduced roughness, as revealed by profilometric and SEM analyses [254], supporting their suitability for semi-rigid cosmetic packaging and protective inner linings.
Although these techniques differ in resolution, operational context, and sample-preparation requirements, their integration with chemical, thermal, and functional analyses has proven essential for a comprehensive understanding of biopolymer-based packaging systems. SEM combined with FTIR has revealed that porosity often arises from underlying molecular interactions, while AFM-derived roughness parameters have been linked to antimicrobial efficacy, and profilometry has provided quantitative support for barrier performance models. Beyond offering purely descriptive information, these morphological characterization techniques enable the rational design of packaging systems tailored to the preservation, aesthetic, and functional demands of cosmetic formulations.
In the specific context of cosmetic packaging, such morphological evaluations are especially relevant under conditions of high relative humidity (60–90% RH), skin-contact temperature ranges (25–40 °C), and repeated exposure to aqueous or lipid-based products. Surface defects, microcracks, and interconnected porosity detected by SEM, AFM, and profilometry directly correlate with increased moisture uptake, higher migration risk, and compromised microbiological protection in creams, gels, serums, and emulsions [255,256,257,258,259]. Therefore, the morphological stability observed in these biopolymer films can be considered highly representative of the performance expected in real cosmetic packaging environments, strengthening the translational relevance of the reported analyses.
4.3. Determination of Barrier Properties
Barrier properties have been recognized as essential performance indicators in the design of active packaging systems, particularly those intended for cosmetic formulations sensitive to moisture, oxygen, and volatile compound loss [260]. These properties determine the material’s ability to regulate mass transfer phenomena, including water vapor transmission rate (WVTR) [261], oxygen permeability (OP) [262], and aroma retention [263], which directly affect product stability, shelf life, and sensory integrity. While conventional petroleum-based polymers exhibit low permeability and high sealing efficiency, biopolymer-based films often require structural and compositional optimization to achieve comparable barrier performance [264,265,266].
In cosmetic applications, where formulations are stored for extended periods in humid environments and frequently exposed to air, light and temperature fluctuations, these barrier parameters become critical for preventing oxidation, dehydration, phase separation and loss of fragrance. Consequently, the evaluation of barrier properties under controlled but realistic conditions is essential to determine the practical feasibility of biopolymer-based packaging in the cosmetic sector.
To evaluate WVTR, gravimetric methods are commonly employed, wherein the film is sealed over a desiccant-containing chamber and exposed to controlled humidity; the rate of water uptake is then measured over time. This approach, standardized by ASTM E96 [267], allows quantification of moisture diffusion through the film matrix. In chitosan composite films, WVTR has been shown to decrease with increasing polymer concentration and crosslinking density, indicating that molecular packing and hydrogen bonding restrict water migration [250]. In fish gelatin films layered with PLA and PBAT, water vapor permeability was significantly reduced due to the hydrophobic nature of the outer layers and the lamination strategy, which created tortuous diffusion paths and improved thermal stability [268]. Additionally, fish gelatin films enriched with Aloe vera demonstrated moderate oxygen and water vapor barrier properties, while FTIR analysis revealed increased hydrophilicity due to polysaccharide–protein interactions [244]. These characteristics are particularly relevant for packaging of aqueous and semi-solid cosmetic systems such as gels, toners, masks and hydrophilic creams, where controlled moisture exchange is necessary to prevent excessive dehydration or microbial contamination.
Similarly, oxygen permeability is typically assessed using coulometric or manometric techniques, which measure the rate of oxygen transmission across the film under defined partial pressures. These methods reveal that the incorporation of polyphenolic compounds or essential oils can either enhance or impair barrier function depending on their miscibility and distribution within the matrix [220]. Zein-based bilayer films incorporating PEG400, and chitosan have shown improved water vapor barrier performance and near-complete UV protection, with WVTR values as low as 6.60 × 10−11 g·m−2·s−1·Pa−1, attributed to enhanced interfacial compatibility and reduced porosity [240]. These properties are particularly advantageous for antioxidant-rich cosmetic systems, botanical extracts and photo-sensitive formulations such as facial serums and vitamin-enriched creams.
Correspondingly, kafirin films plasticized with triacetin and PEG400 exhibited reduced water permeability and increased contact angle values [253], indicating an enhanced resistance to moisture penetration and oxygen diffusion, making such films particularly suitable for lipid-rich, anhydrous or oil-dominant cosmetic formulations, including balms, facial oils, solid perfumes, and ointments that are highly susceptible to oxidative degradation.
In contrast, aroma retention and volatile compound migration are often evaluated using gas chromatography coupled with headspace analysis, allowing precise quantification of active compound loss over time. Films enriched with thyme essential oil demonstrated improved aroma retention when formulated as multilayer structures, suggesting that diffusion pathways can be modulated by architectural design [243]. Starch-based films modified with montmorillonite clays and polycaprolactone showed reduced WVTR and OP due to improved matrix cohesion and tortuous diffusion paths, making them suitable for active packaging applications [269]. Moreover, permeability data must be interpreted in conjunction with morphological and mechanical analyses, as surface defects, porosity, and film thickness significantly influence barrier behavior. SEM and profilometry have revealed that microcracks and uneven deposition correlate with elevated WVTR and OP values, underscoring the need for structural uniformity [238]. Although barrier performance is often compromised in pure biopolymer films due to their hydrophilic nature, recent advances in composite and multilayer strategies have enabled significant improvements. For example, zein films blended with anthocyanins not only improved antioxidant activity but also enhanced barrier properties and enabled intelligent spoilage detection through colorimetric response [270]. These enhancements are attributed to tortuous diffusion paths and interfacial interactions that hinder molecular transport. Finally, barrier characterization provides critical insight into the functional viability of packaging systems, guiding formulation decisions and enabling the rational design of materials that preserve cosmetic integrity under diverse environmental conditions.
From a cosmetic packaging perspective, WVTR, oxygen permeability and aroma retention are especially critical for emulsions, oil-rich formulations, natural extracts and volatile-active products, which are highly sensitive to oxidation and moisture exchange. Most of the reported measurements are performed at 25–38 °C and 50–90% RH, moisture ranges that directly mimic storage and bathroom conditions [271,272]. Consequently, the barrier results reported for chitosan-, fish gelatin-, zein- and kafirin-based films are fully applicable to cosmetic formulations in aqueous, semi-solid and oily matrices, particularly for products with high antioxidant sensitivity.
4.4. Evaluation of Mechanical Properties
Mechanical properties are fundamental to the structural integrity and functional viability of active packaging systems, particularly those intended for cosmetic applications where flexibility, tensile strength, and resistance to deformation are critical [273,274]. These attributes determine the material’s ability to withstand handling, sealing, and environmental stress without compromising barrier performance or aesthetic quality [275]. While synthetic polymers typically offer superior mechanical strength, biopolymer-based films require careful formulation and processing to achieve comparable performance. Tensile strength (TS), elongation at break (EAB), and Young’s modulus are commonly used to evaluate mechanical behavior, typically measured using universal testing machines under controlled humidity and temperature, following standards such as ASTM D882, where the tensile and deformation tests are performed at 23 °C and moderate relative humidity (50% RH) [276], which closely approximate common cosmetic-use and storage conditions, including those found in indoor environments, bathrooms and during skin contact.
In chitosan–gelatin films, TS has been shown to increase with crosslinking and incorporation of polyphenolic compounds, which enhance intermolecular interactions and reduce brittleness [220]; moreover, SEM and profilometry have revealed that smoother and more homogeneous surfaces correlate with improved mechanical resilience, while rough or cracked films tend to fail prematurely under tensile stress [238]. These results are especially relevant for packaging of aqueous and semi-solid cosmetics (e.g., creams, gels, masks and lotions) that require materials with sufficient mechanical stability to prevent rupture or deformation when exposed to moisture and physical pressure.
In a similar vein, fish gelatin films layered with PLA and PBAT exhibited improved tensile strength and flexibility, attributed to the lamination strategy and interfacial adhesion between hydrophilic and hydrophobic layers [268]. This mechanical reinforcement is highly advantageous for flexible cosmetic packaging formats such as sachets, sachet-like containers, biodegradable wraps and inserts, where repeated bending and compression are frequent. In contrast, films enriched with Aloe vera demonstrated increased EAB and reduced stiffness, indicating enhanced plasticity due to polysaccharide–protein interactions [244]. Such characteristics are particularly suitable for soft, conformable packaging used for dermal-contact products such as masks, under-eye patches and flexible liners.
In prolamin-based systems, zein films plasticized with glycerol or sorbitol showed distinct mechanical profiles, where sorbitol improved tensile strength and reduced brittleness, while glycerol enhanced flexibility but lowered TS values [245]. These tunable mechanical responses are valuable in the context of oil-rich or antioxidant-based cosmetic formulations, including facial oils, serums and lipid-rich creams, which require packaging systems that combine moderate rigidity with sufficient flexibility to prevent cracking.
By contrast, kafirin films plasticized with triacetin and PEG400 exhibited higher TS and lower EAB compared to zein, attributed to stronger hydrophobic interactions and disulfide cross-linking within the protein matrix [253]. These features make kafirin-based films particularly suitable for rigid or semi-rigid applications such as compact cases, protective layers for powdered cosmetics, and inner liners for dry formulations, where higher stiffness and compressive resistance are required.
Finally, starch-based films modified with montmorillonite clays and crosslinkers demonstrated enhanced tensile strength and reduced water sensitivity, as the nanofillers improved matrix cohesion and stress distribution [240]. These mechanical advantages are relevant for secondary cosmetic packaging and protective outer layers, especially when products are exposed to fluctuating humidity conditions during transport and storage.
From a cosmetic-packaging perspective, mechanical resistance is particularly critical for squeeze-based containers, soft tubes, sachets, wraps, liners and inserts that undergo repeated deformation, friction and environmental stress [277]. Furthermore, cosmetic formulations typically contain water, oils, alcohols, surfactants and bioactive ingredients, all of which can interact with packaging materials and influence their mechanical stability over time. For this reason, mechanical tests conducted under moderate humidity and near-ambient or skin-contact temperatures can be considered highly representative for predicting real-use performance in cosmetic packaging systems [278].
Taken together, these findings indicate that the improvements in tensile strength, elongation, flexibility, and mechanical endurance observed in chitosan-, fish gelatin-, zein-, and kafirin-based films under experimentally controlled conditions are directly transferable to cosmetic packaging applications. Accordingly, their mechanical performance must be evaluated in conjunction with morphological and barrier properties, since formulation parameters—such as polymer ratios, plasticizer type, and processing methods—can be deliberately modulated to achieve materials that satisfy the mechanical requirements of cosmetic packaging while preserving biodegradability and functional integrity.
4.5. Determination of Thermal Properties
Thermal properties are among the most widely applied analytical parameters in the characterization of biopolymer-based packaging systems, not only because they reflect the material’s behavior under heat stress, but also due to their ability to generate rapid and reproducible thermal profiles that serve as molecular “fingerprints” [279,280]. These thermal signatures allow differentiation between biomaterials and even between variants of the same polymer, revealing subtle differences in molecular weight, residual solvents, and impurities derived from extraction, purification, or manufacturing processes [281,282,283]. Moreover, thermal analysis offers critical advantages in compatibility studies, where transitions such as glass transition (Tg) or melting point (Tm) can indicate miscibility or phase separation, and in decomposition studies, where onset degradation temperatures and mass loss profiles inform formulation stability and shelf-life.
In the context of cosmetic packaging, thermal characterization is especially important because materials are routinely exposed to moderate heat, fluctuating environmental conditions and prolonged contact with complex formulations containing water, oils, surfactants, alcohols, antioxidants and fragrances. Therefore, the interpretation of thermal transitions in biopolymer films must be directly linked to realistic storage, processing and usage conditions.
Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) [284], it measures the heat flux required to increase the temperature of a sample relative to a reference, allowing for the detection of transitions such as Tg, Tm, and crystallization. In this way, DSC compares the energy absorbed or released during thermal events, which can be considerably improved through the modulation effect (modulated DSC) [285,286], significantly increasing resolution by superimposing sinusoidal temperatures to separate reversible from irreversible transitions. In contrast, thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) complements this characterization by measuring mass loss as a function of temperature, providing data on thermal degradation, moisture content, and compositional stability. When integrated, DSC–TGA offers a comprehensive view of both energetic and mass-related changes [287], which is particularly valuable for predicting material performance under cosmetic storage and handling conditions.
Less commonly, isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) [288] has been used to study binding interactions and enthalpic compatibility between biopolymers and active ingredients, although its application in packaging remains exploratory. Nonetheless, in cosmetic contexts, this technique may offer valuable insight into polymer–bioactive affinity, particularly for antioxidant, phenolic, and essential-oil components incorporated within active packaging matrices.
In chitosan-based films, thermal stability has been shown to improve upon incorporation of flavonoids and crosslinkers, which enhance molecular cohesion and reduce chain mobility; with respect to chitosan-based systems, TGA analyses revealed that chitosan–gelatin matrices loaded with flavonoids exhibited increased onset degradation temperatures and reduced decomposition rates [220], indicating enhanced thermal resistance suitable for cosmetic packaging cosmetic packaging exposed to moderate heat and long-term storage. These improvements are especially relevant for aqueous and semi-solid cosmetic products such as creams, gels and lotions, which require packaging stability under bathroom and transportation conditions.
In the case of fish gelatin films integrated with tara gum, thermal stability was significantly enhanced when the gum was pre-treated by ball milling, as revealed by TGA and DSC analyses; this modification increased the onset degradation temperature and reduced the enthalpy of transition, suggesting tighter polymer packing and reduced chain mobility [289]. Similarly, fish gelatin films blended with alginate dialdehyde and pomelo peel–derived carbon dots (PCDs) exhibited concentration-dependent thermal behavior: low PCD contents enhanced stability through hydrogen bonding interactions, whereas higher concentrations promoted accelerated thermal decomposition [290]. Both these results demonstrate the feasibility of fine-tuning thermal stability for the packaging of hydrated or water-rich cosmetic systems, including masks, serums and hydrogels.
On the other hand, Zein-based films have demonstrated excellent thermal resistance due to their high content of hydrophobic amino acids and compact molecular structure; when blended with PEG400 and cast as bilayer films with chitosan and PVA, zein exhibited a stable thermal profile with minimal mass loss below 200 °C, and the incorporation of anthocyanins further improved antioxidant activity and thermal resilience [240], while DSC and TGA analyses of zein films plasticized with oleic acid revealed a reduction in Tg, indicating enhanced flexibility and oxidative stability [291]. These characteristics are particularly advantageous for oil-rich and antioxidant-sensitive cosmetic formulations such as facial oils, vitamin-enriched serums and botanical extracts.
Kafirin-based films plasticized with triacetin and PEG400 showed a reduction in Tg and an increase in thermal degradation temperature, as confirmed by DSC and TGA; this behavior was attributed to enhanced chain flexibility and reduced crystallinity [253], making them suitable for heat-sealable and semi-rigid cosmetic packaging formats, including inner linings and protective layers. Additionally, kafirin–polycaprolactone blends exhibited dual-phase degradation profiles, with initial mass loss attributed to PCL and delayed decomposition of kafirin [292], indicating potential for thermally stratified, multilayer cosmetic packaging systems.
Furthermore, it is worth highlighting the starch-based films reinforced with micro cellulose fibers that showed improved thermal stability at low load levels (1 wt%), as the fibers enhanced interfacial interactions and delayed thermal decomposition; however, higher fiber content disrupted crystallinity and reduced degradation temperature, highlighting the importance of controlled reinforcement strategies [293], while starch–chitosan blends crosslinked with citric acid showed increased Tg and reduced mass loss in TGA, indicating improved thermal integrity and reduced plasticizer volatility [294]. These thermally enhanced systems are particularly relevant for dry or powdered cosmetic products, where dimensional stability under warm conditions is essential.
Overall, thermal characterization provides a multidimensional understanding of biopolymer behavior under heat stress, enabling rational design of packaging systems that maintain integrity during processing and storage, while supporting compatibility with active cosmetic ingredients and functional additives.
From a cosmetic perspective, thermal stability is a critical parameter not only for product storage, but also throughout processing, filling and distribution. Cosmetic packaging is typically exposed to temperatures of approximately 20–25 °C under standard storage conditions, increasing to 30–45 °C during transportation, warehousing and use in warm or tropical environments [295]. In addition, packages are frequently subjected to microclimatic conditions approaching skin surface temperatures (∼32–37 °C), as well as to highly humid environments (60–90% RH) commonly found in bathrooms and poorly ventilated spaces [296,297,298]. This combined thermal and hygrometric stress can significantly affect the structural integrity, barrier performance and overall functionality of biodegradable and biopolymer-based packaging materials. Consequently, the thermal behavior reported for these films provides a realistic and reliable prediction of their performance under cosmetic handling, logistics and shelf-life conditions, including formulations containing essential oils, antioxidants and vitamins.
4.6. Evaluation of Bioactive Functionality
Bioactive functionality has emerged as a defining attribute in the development of active packaging systems for cosmetic applications, as it enables the controlled release or sustained presence of compounds with antioxidant, antimicrobial, anti-age, or regenerative properties [299]. These functionalities are typically achieved through the incorporation of natural extracts, essential oils, polyphenols, peptides, or metallic nanoparticles into biopolymer matrices, which act not only as carriers but also as modulators of release kinetics and stability [300,301,302]. Depending on the formulation strategy, bioactive agents may be physically entrapped, chemically bonded, or dispersed as micro- or nano-sized inclusions, influencing their diffusion, interaction with the substrate, and long-term efficacy.
In the context of cosmetic applications, this functionality is especially relevant because packaging materials are in continuous or intermittent contact with water-rich, oil-rich or amphiphilic formulations, often at mildly acidic pH values (4.5–6.5) and under humid conditions (60–90% RH), which can both accelerate degradation processes and promote microbial growth [303,304,305]. Therefore, evaluating bioactive functionality under such conditions is fundamental in determining the real-world applicability of biopolymer-based active packaging systems in the cosmetic sector.
Chitosan-based films, their bioactivity has been extensively documented due to the intrinsic antimicrobial properties of chitosan and its ability to form electrostatic complexes with negatively charged microbial membranes. When combined with flavonoids or essential oils, chitosan matrices have demonstrated synergistic effects, enhancing both antioxidant capacity and microbial inhibition. For instance, chitosan–gelatin films loaded with flavonoids exhibited sustained antibacterial activity against Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli, while also protecting sensitive cosmetic ingredients from oxidative degradation [220]. These properties are directly relevant for packaging of aqueous and semi-solid cosmetic products—such as creams, gels, masks and toners—where high water activity favors microbial proliferation and oxidative degradation.
In contrast, fish gelatin systems, bioactivity has been imparted through the incorporation of Aloe vera, green tea extract, or silver nanoparticles, which interact with the protein matrix to modulate release and enhance stability. Fish gelatin films enriched with Aloe vera gel showed improved antioxidant activity and microbial inhibition, attributed to the synergistic interaction between polysaccharides and bioactive phytochemicals [244]. Additionally, chitosan blends containing green and black tea extracts demonstrated prolonged radical scavenging activity, making them suitable for cosmetic preservation and topical application [306]. These effects are particularly relevant for hydrophilic cosmetics and emulsified systems, where antioxidant and antimicrobial protection must be sustained over extended shelf-life periods under humid conditions.
In the case of zein-based films, these have been used as carriers for hydrophobic bioactives, including curcumin, anthocyanins, and essential oils, due to zein’s amphiphilic nature and film-forming capacity. Zein–anthocyanin bilayer films exhibited pH-sensitive color changes and antioxidant activity, enabling intelligent spoilage detection and active protection in cosmetic formulations [270]. Moreover, zein–gum Arabic–tannic acid nanoparticles loaded with curcumin showed enhanced photostability and controlled release, supporting their use in UV-protective and anti-inflammatory cosmetic systems [307]. These features are highly advantageous for oil-rich, antioxidant-based and UV-sensitive cosmetic systems such as facial serums, botanical oils and anti-aging formulations.
While kafirin films, although less explored, have demonstrated promising bioactive potential when combined with plant-derived antimicrobials or metallic agents. Chitosan–silver nanocomposite films exhibited broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity and maintained structural integrity under cosmetic pH conditions, suggesting their suitability for preservative-free packaging formats [308]. In addition, kafirin-based films incorporating citral and quercetin demonstrated notable antimicrobial activity, attributed to the synergistic effects of the essential oil and polyphenol within the protein matrix. Such multifunctional behavior highlights their potential as active packaging materials for cosmetic formulations containing natural oils or labile bioactives, where preservation and protection against microbial contamination are essential [110]. This multifunctionality is especially suitable for anhydrous or oil-dominant cosmetics—such as balms, ointments and solid perfumes—where oxidation control and microbial protection are critical.
In addition, starch-based films have been functionalized with phenolic compounds, essential oils, and antimicrobial peptides to enhance their bioactivity. Starch–chitosan films loaded with cinnamon essential oil demonstrated strong antibacterial and antifungal activities [309]. Furthermore, thermoplastic starch films containing nisin and lysozyme showed synergistic antimicrobial effects and maintained bioactivity over extended storage periods, supporting their use in cosmetic preservation and hygiene applications [310]. These properties are particularly relevant for secondary cosmetic packaging and hygiene-related applications, including dry products and powder-based formulations, where environmental moisture must be controlled, and microbial contamination avoided.
Beyond these material-specific examples, recent studies have emphasized the importance of understanding the molecular mechanisms underlying bioactive functionality. Silver nanoparticles and chitosan–Ag composites exert antimicrobial effects by generating reactive oxygen species (ROS), binding to thiol groups in microbial proteins, and disrupting cell wall integrity [311,312]. Essential oils such as citral and terpenes destabilize microbial lipid bilayers, increasing membrane permeability and causing leakage of intracellular contents [313]. Proteinaceous antimicrobials like nisin and lysozyme complement these effects by forming pores in bacterial membranes and hydrolyzing peptidoglycan [314]. In contrast, phytochemicals such as catechins (from green and black tea extracts), curcumin, anthocyanins, quercetin, and Aloe vera extracts exhibit antioxidant activity through proton or electron donation, resonance stabilization of phenoxyl radicals, and chelation of transition metals (Fe2+, Cu2+), thereby preventing oxidative chain reactions [315,316,317]. Importantly, biocompatibility analyses using keratinocytes and other skin-relevant cell models confirm that these bioactive compounds, when applied at concentrations suitable for cosmetic packaging, maintain cellular viability and do not induce significant cytotoxicity, supporting their safe use in topical applications [312,314].
Overall, the incorporation of bioactive compounds into biopolymer-based films enables the development of multifunctional packaging systems that not only protect the physical and chemical integrity of cosmetic products but also contribute actively to microbial control, oxidative stability and skin safety. In cosmetic applications, bioactive functionality is especially critical for anti-aging creams, antioxidant serums, botanical emulsions and preservative-free products, which are highly susceptible to degradation and microbial contamination [318,319].
4.7. Organoleptic and Optical Characterization
Organoleptic and optical characterization plays a critical role in evaluating biopolymer-based packaging systems for cosmetic applications, as these properties directly influence consumer perception, product acceptance, and functional integration with the final formulation [320,321]. Organoleptic attributes—such as visual appearance, surface texture, tactile response, odor, and transparency—are essential not only for aesthetic compatibility but also for usability, especially in dermal and facial applications [322]. These parameters are typically assessed through a combination of instrumental techniques (colorimetry, gloss meters, profilometry, opacity analysis) and descriptive sensory panels, which provide qualitative and quantitative feedback on material performance under realistic conditions.
In the case of chitosan-based films, organoleptic properties have been modulated through blending and plasticization strategies; for example, the incorporation of glycerol or sorbitol has improved flexibility and reduced brittleness, while the addition of essential oils has altered odor and surface gloss. Chitosan–gelatin films loaded with flavonoids showed increased yellowness and reduced transparency, as measured by CIE Lab parameters, which correlated with antioxidant content and UV-blocking capacity [220]. These features are especially relevant for cosmetic creams, anti-aging products and photoprotective formulations, where partial opacity and UV-shielding properties are often desirable.
In fish gelatin-based systems, visual and tactile properties have been influenced by protein concentration, drying conditions, and additive incorporation; films enriched with Aloe vera gel demonstrated enhanced smoothness and reduced surface irregularities, as confirmed by profilometry and sensory panel evaluation, while maintaining neutral odor and high transparency [244]. Similarly, fish gelatin/alginate blend exhibited improved mechanical properties (greater elongation and higher tensile strength) and good compatibility, suggesting a more homogeneous matrix [323].
Regarding zein-based films, their natural golden hue and hydrophobic surface have been modulated through pH adjustment and plasticizer selection; zein–anthocyanin bilayer films exhibited pH-responsive color shifts and reduced gloss, enabling intelligent packaging with visual spoilage indicators [270]. This property opens opportunities for intelligent cosmetic packaging capable of indicating product degradation, oxidation or contamination. Additionally, zein films plasticized with oleic acid showed increased surface smoothness and reduced opacity [324], enhancing their suitability for transparent or translucent packaging formats such as cosmetic wraps, sachets and inner liners. These characteristics are especially relevant for oil-based or antioxidant-rich formulations, where both visual clarity and protective function are required.
In addition, kafirin-based films exhibit matte finishes and neutral tones that can be tuned through extraction and processing conditions. Films cast from lyophilized kafirin extracted with NaOH demonstrated superior sensory attributes—showing greater clarity, lighter color, enhanced flexibility, and smoother surface texture—compared to those prepared from non-alkali-extracted kafirin dried at 40 °C, which appeared darker, less transparent, and markedly rougher to the touch [325]. These tunable aesthetic features support their potential application in both minimalist and natural-style cosmetic packaging, particularly for solid or semi-solid products such as compact powders, solid perfumes and botanical balms.
From a cosmetic-packaging perspective, organoleptic and optical characteristics are also strongly affected by the nature of the contained formulation. Aqueous and hydrogel-based cosmetics require packaging with high transparency, low haze and neutral odor to preserve clarity and consumer trust [326]. Emulsions and semi-solid products (e.g., creams and lotions) benefit from slightly opaque, UV-protective materials that minimize light-induced degradation [327]. Oil-rich and anhydrous formulations require stable surface properties and low opacity changes to prevent oxidation and fragrance alteration, whereas dry and powder-based cosmetics demand materials with matte finish, low tackiness and high mechanical integrity to avoid stickiness, caking and product contamination [328,329].
Furthermore, exposure to high humidity levels (60–90% RH), moderate temperatures (25–40 °C), skin-contact conditions (32–37 °C), and mildly acidic environments (pH 4.5–6.5) can alter optical clarity, color stability, surface gloss and odor adsorption of biopolymer films [330,331]. Consequently, the fact that most reported organoleptic and optical analyses are conducted under conditions comparable to cosmetic environments reinforces the high transferability and validity of these results for real cosmetic packaging systems.
Overall, organoleptic and optical characterization provides not only aesthetic and sensory validation, but also valuable functional information linked to photostability, surface interactions, consumer perception and overall product quality. Therefore, these analyses represent a crucial component in the design of next-generation sustainable packaging materials tailored specifically for the complex physicochemical and sensory demands of modern cosmetic formulations.
Accordingly, and building upon the preceding analysis, Table 2 presents a structured synthesis of representative systems categorized by based biomaterial, incorporated compounds, reported functional properties, and potential cosmetic packaging application. This comparative framework highlights the technological relevance of each material–compound combination, emphasizing attributes such as mechanical enhancement, antioxidant and antimicrobial activity, controlled release, and biodegradability. The table also identifies indexed references that consolidate and substantiate these findings, offering a concise yet comprehensive overview of the functional potential of biopolymer-based systems for active cosmetic packaging.
Table 2.
Representative biomaterial-based systems and incorporated compounds used in active cosmetic packaging. The table summarizes reported functional properties—including mechanical enhancement, antioxidant and antimicrobial activity, controlled release, and biodegradability—and outlines their potential applications in cosmetic formulations and packaging formats. References correspond to indexed studies supporting each material–compound combination.
| Based Biomaterial |
Functional Ingredient |
Preparation Method |
Reported Functional Properties |
Potential Cosmetic Packaging Application |
Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chitosan | Tea tree oil in modified palygorskite | Solvent casting method | Enhanced mechanical strength, fluid absorption, controlled release (10 h), antimicrobial activity (P. acnes, S. aureus), antioxidant activity (93% DPPH). | This composite film is suitable for solid or semi-solid cosmetic formats such as acne patches, solid bars, and therapeutic spot dressings, where its antimicrobial and antioxidant activities provide functional value. Due to the hydrophilic and swelling-prone nature of chitosan, direct long-term contact with aqueous emulsions or gels is not recommended. Instead, it can be incorporated as an antimicrobial liner or internal protective sheet within containers for natural or preservative-free formulations. | [332] |
| Chitosan | Naringenin, apigenin, luteolin | Solvent casting method | Improved strength, thermal stability, antioxidant activity (ABTS: luteolin > naringenin > apigenin), antibacterial activity (S. aureus). | The film is appropriate for dry or low-moisture cosmetics such as antioxidant facial patches, solid balms, and compact topical bars, where controlled release and phenolic bioactivity are advantageous. Its water sensitivity limits direct use with high-moisture emulsions, but it may act as an internal stabilizing insert to reduce oxidative degradation in natural creams or serums. This makes it particularly relevant for formulations requiring enhanced oxidative protection. | [220] |
| Chitosan/Zein | Zein/chitosan nanoparticles, tea polyphenols, cinnamaldehyde | Solvent casting method | Significant increase in antioxidant activity (57.6% DPPH), antibacterial activity (S. aureus, E. coli), improved structural stability. | Improved moisture tolerance due to zein incorporation enables application in semi-solid or moderately hydrated cosmetics, including balms, butters, or anhydrous creams. Its antimicrobial and antioxidant performance also supports use as an active inner coating for natural emulsions. While not optimal as primary packaging for water-rich systems, it provides functional stabilization and shelf-life extension as a barrier-enhancing internal layer. | [333] |
| Chitosan | Kaolin clay and biovanillin | Solvent casting method | Antioxidant activity (80% DPPH), antimicrobial activity (90% reduction of E. coli and S. aureus), antifungal activity (75% reduction), biodegradability (88% within 20 days). | This biodegradable film is suitable for solid cosmetic formats such as cleansing bars, dry masks, or pressed balms, where its antioxidant, antimicrobial, and antifungal effects enhance preservation. Its moisture sensitivity limits direct exposure to liquid formulations, but it can serve as an internal sachet or secondary liner to protect oxidation-prone creams. This makes it particularly useful for clean-label, low-preservative cosmetic systems. | [334] |
| Chitosan | Calcium oxide nanoparticles | Solvent casting method | Outstanding antimicrobial properties (>99.999% reduction of S. aureus and E. coli), improved thermal and mechanical resistance, reduced water vapor permeability. | The composite exhibits strong antimicrobial activity and enhanced barrier performance, making it suitable for solid or semi-solid cosmetics that require microbiological protection, such as deodorant bars or compact skincare sticks. It may be employed as an antimicrobial lid liner or insert for preservative-free creams. However, its hydrophilicity still restricts direct long-term contact with aqueous emulsions. | [31] |
| Chitosan | Cell-free supernatant (CFS) of Lacticaseibacillus paracasei ALAC-4 | Solvent casting method | Strong antifungal activity against molds and yeasts (notably Candida albicans); improved mechanical strength; formation of hydrogen bonds between CS and CFS (FTIR evidence); smooth and compact morphology (SEM). | This antifungal film is appropriate for dry facial masks, compressed mask sheets, or powder-to-gel systems where fungal contamination is a risk. In aqueous or emulsion-based cosmetics, it may act as an internal antifungal protective layer, reducing mold and yeast growth without functioning as the primary contact surface. Its bio-based origin aligns well with natural and probiotic-inspired cosmetic lines. | [335] |
| Chitosan/Guar gum composite | Watermelon rind extract (WRE) | Solvent casting method | Formation of hydrogen-bonded intermolecular network (FTIR, XRD, SEM evidence); improved mechanical strength and barrier properties (reduced WVTR and O2 permeability); enhanced antioxidant activity (83.24% DPPH) and antibacterial effect; sustainable bio-based additive from agro-waste. | The film is suitable for low-moisture and solid cosmetic applications such as bars, balms, and powder masks, benefiting from its antioxidant and antimicrobial activities. Although not ideal as primary packaging for liquid formulations, it may serve as an internal protective insert for natural emulsions susceptible to oxidation. Its sustainability profile makes it particularly attractive for eco-conscious brands. | [336] |
| Chitosan | Scallion flower extract (SFE) | Solvent casting method | Enhanced mechanical and oxygen-barrier properties due to hydrogen bonding and electrostatic interactions; improved antioxidant activity (DPPH 74.8%, ABTS 84.1%) and antibacterial performance (1.9x vs. control); reduced water solubility and moisture content; eco-friendly (no toxic reagents). | This bioactive film is well-suited for solid or semi-solid cosmetic formats requiring antioxidant and antimicrobial enhancement, such as cleansing bars or solid serums. For creams and gels, it functions best as an internal barrier layer that reduces microbial and oxidative degradation. Its reduced solubility improves performance but does not fully overcome limitations in high-moisture environments. | [337] |
| Chitosan | Zinc oxide nanoparticles loaded with gallic acid (ZnO@gal) | Solvent casting method | Improved mechanical strength and elongation; reduced oxygen and water vapor permeability; decreased water solubility and swelling; strong UV–VIS light barrier; enhanced antioxidant and antibacterial activity; homogeneous nanoparticle dispersion (SEM); hydrogen bonding interactions between CS and ZnO@gal (FTIR). | The composite’s UV-protective and antimicrobial properties make it valuable for solid or oil-based cosmetics sensitive to light or oxidation, including balms, sticks, and facial oils. In emulsions or serums, it can act as a UV-protective internal liner to mitigate photodegradation. Its reduced water solubility improves stability but still limits direct-intimate contact with high-moisture matrices. | [338] |
| Poly(ε-caprolactone)/Chitosan (PCL/CS) nanofiber composite | Urchin-like gold nanoparticles (UGNP) | Electrospinning | Enhanced antibacterial activity against S. aureus and E. coli (dependent on UGNP spine length and loading); good thermal stability, hydrophilicity, and mechanical strength; optimized water vapor permeability; improved surface interaction due to topographic nanostructure. | This nanofibrous system provides antimicrobial and barrier performance suitable for high-value semi-solid cosmetics such as gel patches, sheet masks, or serum-infused pads. Its structural robustness supports use as an inner functional layer in containers for natural emulsions, though chitosan restricts use as primary packaging for water-rich systems. Engineered nanofiber morphology enhances interfacial stability and protective functionality. | [339] |
| Chitosan | ɛ-Polylysine (ɛ-PL) | Solvent casting method | Improved thickness and tensile strength; reduced water vapor permeability (WVP); enhanced antioxidant and antimicrobial properties (synergistic effect between CS and ɛ-PL); significant inhibition of microbial growth (total viable count, coliforms, molds, yeasts) and oxidative degradation; non-toxic and biodegradable. | This composite film is suitable for solid and semi-solid cosmetic formats requiring enhanced antimicrobial protection, such as natural deodorant bars, cleansing sticks, or solid balms. In emulsions or gels, it performs best as an internal antimicrobial insert that suppresses bacterial, yeast, and mold proliferation without being in continuous direct contact with water phases. Its synergistic antimicrobial activity is particularly valuable for preservative-free cosmetic systems. | [340] |
| Chitosan | Eugenol nanoemulsion (EuNE), Aloe vera gel (AVG), Zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnONP) | Solvent casting method | Improved UV-barrier, antioxidant activity (up to 95% DPPH scavenging), antimicrobial activity (enhanced antibacterial performance), increased tensile strength, improved hydrophobicity, reduced solubility, maintained transparency, good component compatibility (XRD). | This multifunctional film is appropriate for solid or anhydrous cosmetic products, where its UV-protective, antioxidant, and antimicrobial performance benefits stability. In light-sensitive creams or serums, it can serve as an internal UV-shielding and antimicrobial liner, reducing degradation while avoiding direct immersion in aqueous matrices. Its enhanced hydrophobicity improves tolerance to moisture but still limits use as primary packaging for liquid formulations. | [341] |
| Chitosan | Luteolin | Solvent casting method | Improved microstructural compactness and homogeneity, enhanced water vapor and oxygen barrier, increased mechanical strength, controlled release of luteolin (up to 10 days), antioxidant and antimicrobial activity, high encapsulation efficiency (89.52%), zeta potential −39.8 mV. | This antioxidant and antimicrobial film is suitable for solid balms, solid serums, and pressed cosmetic formats where controlled release of luteolin enhances stability. For emulsions and serums, it functions effectively as an internal controlled-release antioxidant layer that delays oxidative deterioration. Its improved barrier properties offer added protection but do not fully overcome chitosan’s incompatibility with continuous water exposure. | [342] |
| Chitosan | Crude Brassica extract | Solvent casting method | Enhanced mechanical strength, light transmittance, and oxygen/water vapor barrier properties; improved antioxidant and antimicrobial activity due to Brassica extract; compatible and homogeneous chitosan/gelatin matrix confirmed by FTIR and SEM; overall active film performance superior to control formulations. | The composite film is ideal for solid and semi-solid cosmetics enriched with natural oils or botanical extracts, benefiting from its antioxidant and antimicrobial activity. In emulsions, it may be used as a secondary liner that enhances microbial and oxidative stability while minimizing direct contact with aqueous phases. Its structural integrity and bioactivity align well with eco-friendly and “clean beauty” packaging approaches. | [222] |
| Chitosan | Thyme essential oil (TEO) | Solution casting method | Enhanced mechanical strength (TS = 7.43 MPa), elongation at break (up to 28.22%), and barrier properties (improved WVP and OP); formation of hydrogen bonds between chitosan, pectin, and TEO confirmed by FTIR; significant antimicrobial activity (complete inhibition of S. typhimurium at 20% TEO); microstructural homogeneity improved by SEM and AFM analysis. | This antimicrobial active film is suitable for solid soaps, cleansing bars, and semisolid balms where fungal and bacterial contamination is a concern. It may be incorporated as an internal antimicrobial barrier in containers for natural creams or gels, providing surface protection without functioning as the primary moisture-exposed material. Its enhanced mechanical properties support usage in solid cosmetic applications. | [243] |
| Chitosan | Hydroxyapatite nanoparticles (HASP) derived from eggshell waste | Solvent casting method | Films with 3 wt% HANP showed 61.5% higher tensile strength and 1 wt% HANP film reduced WVP by 52%; improved thermal stability (higher Tg) and storage modulus; homogeneous nanoparticle dispersion confirmed by SEM/TEM/XRD; FTIR and XPS indicated strong Chitosan–HANP interactions. | The reinforced film is suitable for solid and semi-solid products that require strong barrier performance, such as facial bars, powdered cosmetics, and compact balms. In emulsions, it may serve as an internal oxygen- and moisture-reducing insert, extending stability without prolonged direct contact with the liquid phase. Its improved thermal and mechanical performance makes it an attractive biodegradable alternative to synthetic barrier materials. | [217] |
| Fish Gelatin | Ethanolic extract of Lepidium sativum seeds. | Solvent casting method | Preservation of thickness, tensile strength, and elongation, with slight alteration in color. High antioxidant capacity and reduction of bacterial growth. | This antioxidant and antimicrobial gelatin film is best suited for solid or oil-rich cosmetic formulations where its bioactivity enhances preservation. Due to its hydrophilicity, it is not ideal for direct contact with aqueous emulsions but may function as an internal protective liner that delays oxidation and microbial growth. Its biodegradability aligns well with sustainable cosmetic packaging initiatives. | [343] |
| Fish Gelatin | Pomegranate peel powder | Solvent casting method | Improvement in tensile strength and water vapor permeability. Enhanced antioxidant activity measured by DPPH and ABTS assays, with inhibition of S. aureus, L. monocytogenes, and E. coli. | This bioactive film is appropriate for solid cosmetics, makeup pans, and balm-based formulations that benefit from its antioxidant and antibacterial properties. In emulsions or creams, it can be used as an internal antioxidant layer enhancing shelf life while avoiding continuous water exposure. Its improved mechanical and barrier performance makes it suitable for eco-friendly packaging solutions. | [344] |
| Fish Gelatin | Artemisia sphaerocephala gum and bamboo flavonoids | Solvent casting method | Improvement in mechanical strength, barrier properties, and thermal stability, with reduction in elongation and permeability. Strong antioxidant and antimicrobial effects. | The mechanically reinforced and antioxidant-rich film is suitable for solid or semi-solid cosmetic formats, particularly those sensitive to oxidation or microbial contamination. As a liner for oil-based creams or anhydrous balms, it enhances stability while protecting bioactive compounds. Its limited water resistance still restricts direct contact with high-moisture emulsions. | [345] |
| Chitosan/Fish Gelatin | Chitosan and mango peel carbon dots | Solvent casting method | Improvement in mechanical strength, hydrophobicity, and UV barrier capacity, with additional luminescent properties. Outstanding antioxidant and antimicrobial effects. | This intelligent, luminescent, antimicrobial film is well-suited for solid cosmetics or semi-solid anhydrous formulations that benefit from visual detection and active protection. It can act as a UV-shielding and antioxidant liner inside packaging for serums or natural emulsions requiring enhanced stability. Due to hydrophilicity from both biopolymers, it should not be used as the primary packaging for liquid products. | [346] |
| Fish Gelatin | Essential oils (clove and oregano) | Extrusion method | Improvement in elasticity and elongation with a decrease in oxygen barrier properties. High antioxidant activity from clove and strong antimicrobial effects from oregano. | This active film provides strong antimicrobial and antioxidant protection, making it suitable for solid or oil-based cosmetics such as balms, makeup cakes, and solid perfumes. Its elasticity and bioactivity offer stabilization against microbial contamination in low-moisture formats. However, due to its high hydrophilicity, it is not recommended for direct-contact packaging of aqueous emulsions or gels but may be used as an internal antimicrobial liner. | [347] |
| Fish Gelatin | Liquid smoke (phenols and organic acids) | Solvent casting method | Improvement in water resistance and vapor barrier properties. Strong antimicrobial effect and inhibition of lipid oxidation. | Enhanced water resistance and vapor barrier properties allow this film to serve as protective packaging for semi-solid balms, ointments, or oil-based cosmetics. Its potent antimicrobial action makes it effective as an internal coating for containers storing natural emulsions, reducing lipid oxidation and surface contamination. Nonetheless, its limited moisture tolerance restricts use as direct-contact packaging for high-moisture formulations. | [348] |
| Fish Gelatin | Maillard reaction products (gelatin and fructose) | Solvent casting method | Improvement in mechanical strength, water vapor barrier properties, and reduction of light transmission. Strong antioxidant activity. | This thermally and mechanically improved film is suited for packaging oil-based cosmetics, facial oils, and solid balms that require antioxidant protection and reduced light-induced degradation. Its improved water vapor barrier enhances stability of oxidative-sensitive actives. Still, the hydrophilic nature of gelatin prevents safe direct use with aqueous formulations, making it more suitable as an inner liner rather than primary contact material. | [349] |
| Fish gelatin (from mackerel skin) | Ficus carica L. leaf extract (FLE) | Solvent casting method | Enhanced tensile strength (2.74 MPa), elongation at break (372.82%), reduced solubility (36.2%), low water vapor permeability (3.96 × 10−11 g/msPa), antioxidant activity (45.49%), antibacterial activity against S. aureus and E. coli. Biodegradable and eco-friendly | The enhanced tensile strength, reduced solubility, and strong antioxidant and antibacterial activities make this film suitable for solid cosmetics such as bars, sticks, and compact skincare formats. It may function as an internal antioxidant and antimicrobial liner for emulsions or serums, improving stability without continuous water exposure. Its biodegradability aligns well with sustainable packaging initiatives. | [350] |
| Fish scale gelatin (FSG) and sodium alginate (SA) | Carvacrol-loaded ZIF-8 nanoparticles (CV@ZIF-8) | Solvent casting method | Improved UV-light blocking, elongation at break (+20.86%), reduced water solubility (−1.85×), reduced WVP (−19%), enhanced thermal stability. Exhibited strong antioxidant activity (92.35% DPPH scavenging) and sustained antibacterial effect against E. coli and S. aureus due to slow release of carvacrol. Extended strawberry shelf life by 8 days. | With improved UV-blocking, reduced solubility, and sustained antimicrobial release, this film is suitable for solid or semi-solid cosmetics prone to oxidation or microbial spoilage. It can be used as a functional insert for natural emulsions requiring slow release of preservative agents. Its partial water sensitivity still limits direct use as a primary packaging layer for liquid formulations. | [351] |
| Fish gelatin and carrageenan | Turmeric essential oil (TEO) encapsulated in zein nanoparticles (ZNP) | Solvent casting method | Improved physicochemical and mechanical properties; sustained release of TEO; strong antimicrobial activity against Salmonella enterica; reduced bacterial load from 6.66 to 2.81 log CFU/g after 14 days; enhanced stability and bioactivity due to ZNP incorporation. | The composite film, featuring sustained release of turmeric essential oil and improved multidimensional stability, is suitable for solid and semi-solid cosmetics needing antimicrobial protection. It may serve as an internal antimicrobial and antioxidant layer for creams and emulsions. Water sensitivity still restricts its use as direct-contact packaging in fully aqueous formulations. | [352] |
| Fish gelatin and soluble soybean polysaccharide | Tea polyphenols | Solvent casting method | Enhanced antioxidant activity, UV protection, and lipid oxidation inhibition; modified flexibility and surface hydrophilicity; amorphous film structure improving mechanical and optical properties. | This UV-protective, antioxidant film is ideal for packaging light-sensitive solid or semi-solid cosmetics, including balms, makeup pans, and high-oil formulations. Its enhanced bioactivity supports use as an internal protective liner for oxidation-prone emulsions. Nonetheless, its hydrophilic character limits direct exposure to high-moisture cosmetics. | [98] |
| Fish scale gelatin/dialdehyde alginate | Carbon dots derived from grapefruit peel | Solvent casting method | Enhanced mechanical strength, UV-blocking, water vapor and moisture resistance, fluorescence, and thermal stability; strong antioxidant activity (91.7% DPPH, ~100% ABTS) and antimicrobial activity against bacteria and fungi; extended strawberry shelf life by 7 days. | The film’s enhanced mechanical strength, UV-blocking activity, and moisture resistance make it suitable for solid cosmetics and anhydrous skincare formulations. Its potent antioxidant and antimicrobial properties support use as an intelligent internal liner for natural emulsions vulnerable to microbial and oxidative degradation. However, gelatin-derived sensitivity to water limits primary-contact usage for liquid systems. | [290] |
| Fish gelatin | Cinnamaldehyde and sulfobutyl ether-β-cyclodextrin inclusion complex | Solvent casting method | Improved elongation at break and light barrier properties; strong antibacterial activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa (98.4% inhibition initially, 82.9% at 72 h); prolonged microbial inhibition and protein preservation during storage; environmentally friendly formulation. | This controlled-release antimicrobial film is appropriate for solid or semi-solid cosmetics requiring prolonged microbial protection, such as balms, sticks, or pressed skincare products. For creams and hydrous emulsions, it may serve as a long-acting antimicrobial insert that maintains formulation integrity. Its moderate water sensitivity limits use as direct-contact packaging material for aqueous products. | [353] |
| Fish skin gelatin | Mangrove leaf extracts from Bruguiera gymnorhiza and Sonneratia alba | Solvent casting method | Improved elongation (16.9–19.4%) and water vapor transmission (13.3–13.6 g/m2); strong antioxidant activity (12–61%, concentration-dependent); mild antibacterial effect; thickness and tensile strength not significantly affected. | This antioxidant film is suited for oil-based cosmetics, makeup pans, and solid formulations that benefit from protection against oxidative degradation. Although water vapor transmission is moderate, it can act as an internal antioxidant liner for natural emulsions. Direct-contact use with high-moisture products remains limited due to gelatin’s intrinsic hydrophilicity. | [354] |
| Fish gelatin | Aloe vera gel (AV) | Solvent casting | Addition of AV increased hydrophilicity and solubility; improved thermal and thermo-oxidative stability (higher onset degradation temperature); preserved transparency and homogeneity; showed antioxidant activity (high total phenolic content and radical scavenging activity); exhibited antimicrobial effect against S. aureus; FTIR confirmed intermolecular interactions and enhanced Tg due to hydrogen bonding. | Although this composite film offers strong antioxidant and antimicrobial properties suitable for stabilizing natural cosmetic actives, its markedly increased hydrophilicity and solubility restrict direct application to aqueous or gel-based formulations. It is best suited for solid cosmetics or as an internal bioactive liner providing antioxidant protection without prolonged water exposure. Transparency and biocompatibility also make it attractive for eco-friendly solid-product wraps. | [244] |
| Fish gelatin | Ball-milled tara gum (TG) | Solvent casting method | Film morphology and density influenced by TG particle size and glycerol content; ball-milled TG improved homogeneity, thermal stability, and mechanical strength; optimal plasticizer content (≤20 wt%) enhanced flexibility without compromising performance; SEM, AFM, and FTIR confirmed morphological and structural modifications linked to improved film performance. | This biodegradable film, with improved mechanical behavior and tunable flexibility, is suitable for solid cosmetics, facial mask matrices, or dehydrated skincare products requiring structural stability and controlled hydration. While hydrophilic, its enhanced density and compactness allow short-term contact with mildly hydrated formulations, but it remains unsuitable for direct packaging of liquid cosmetics. | [289] |
| Kafirin | Citral and quercetin | Solvent casting method | Increased flexibility, reduction in maximum stress and stiffness, increase in strain at break, development of yellow coloration. Antimicrobial activity against viable counts in chicken fillets; antioxidant activity through inhibition of lipid oxidation and reduction of TBARS. | The enhanced antioxidant and antimicrobial performance makes this hydrophobic prolamin-based film ideal for solid and semi-solid cosmetics susceptible to oxidation or microbial growth, such as solid creams, balms, and oil-rich formulations. Its low water sensitivity allows safer interaction with moderately hydrated systems compared to polysaccharide- or gelatin-based films. | [176] |
| Kafirin | Citral and quercetin | Solvent casting method | Decrease in tensile strength and increase in elongation at break with citral incorporation; reduction in oxygen permeability and water vapor transmission rate; yellow coloration of films. Strong antimicrobial activity against Campylobacter jejuni, Listeria monocytogenes and Pseudomonas fluorescens. | Reduced oxygen and water-vapor permeability, together with potent antimicrobial activity, support applications in semi-solid or oil-based cosmetics that require oxidative and microbial stabilization. Its hydrophobic nature provides better resistance to moisture than chitosan or gelatin films, enabling use as direct-contact packaging for moderately hydrated emulsions. | [110] |
| Kafirin and polyethylene oxide (PEO) nanocomposite | Red beet extract (natural pH-sensitive pigment) | Electrospinning method | High color stability and reversibility to pH changes (1–10), temperature, and environmental conditions; reversible color transitions; reusable without loss of efficiency; sensitive to aqueous environments due to PEO solubility. | This pH-sensitive, chromatically responsive film is suitable for smart cosmetic packaging aimed at detecting oxidation or pH changes in emulsions, serums, or natural creams. Due to PEO solubility, it should not serve as primary packaging for liquid cosmetics but is effective as an internal diagnostic layer or indicator strip within secondary packaging. | [355] |
| Kafirin | Quercetin | Solvent casting method (followed by electron beam (EB) irradiation curing) | EB irradiation enhanced mechanical and thermal stability; reduced water vapor permeability, solubility, and transparency; formation of dense crosslinked structure; inhibited microbial growth and oxidative degradation during storage. | Its enhanced mechanical and thermal stability, coupled with reduced solubility and permeability, make this crosslinked film suitable for solid and semi-solid cosmetics, especially those sensitive to oxidation. The hydrophobicity gained through EB irradiation allows limited contact with emulsions, although prolonged exposure to high-water systems should still be avoided. | [356] |
| Kafirin protein blended with polycaprolactone (PCL) | Carnosic acid (CA) | Electrospinning method | Formation of flexible, hydrophilic fibrous mats with tunable mechanical strength and swelling; hydrogen bonding between kafirin and PCL; controlled release of CA via diffusion; structural stability due to PCL crystalline domains. | This fibrous mat enables controlled antioxidant release and offers moderate water resistance, making it suitable for semi-solid cosmetics requiring slow diffusion of actives (e.g., antioxidant patches, solid balms, or topical delivery matrices). Its stability derives from PCL crystalline domains, supporting safe use near moderately hydrated formulations but not fully aqueous ones. | [357] |
| Kafirin protein | Glutaraldehyde | Solvent casting method | Microparticle-cast films (<50 μm) exhibited greater water stability than conventional kafirin films. Glutaraldehyde treatment increased tensile strength up to 43%, maintained structural integrity despite plasticizer loss, and enhanced covalent crosslinking between amino and carbonyl groups. | The high water stability achieved through covalent crosslinking renders this film suitable for direct packaging of semi-solid cosmetics or anhydrous pastes that require moisture resistance and mechanical robustness. Its enhanced integrity supports applications where controlled exposure to hydration occurs, though full immersion or high-water emulsions still require caution. | [127] |
| Kafirin and gelatin | None (focus on structural and barrier design) | Solvent casting method | Distinct multilayer morphology with defined interfaces; intermolecular interactions confirmed by FTIR; enhanced UV protection, mechanical strength, and transparency; asymmetric water vapor barrier—kafirin side more moisture-resistant while gelatin side retains humidity; surface hydrophilicity tunable by layer orientation. | This asymmetric multilayer structure is ideal for cosmetics requiring directional moisture control—such as solid skincare products, pressed powders, or semi-solid formulations that benefit from a hydrophobic external layer and a humidity-retaining internal surface. UV protection and mechanical strength make it useful for formulations containing photosensitive or oxidative-sensitive actives. | [358] |
| Wheat gluten/zein composite | Ferulic acid and TiO2 nanoparticles | Electrospinning method | Enhanced hydrophobicity, mechanical strength, and thermal stability; improved barrier performance; reduced water vapor transmission rate. Antimicrobial effect and ethylene scavenging capacity. | This hydrophobic, thermally stable composite is well suited for semi-solid and oil-based cosmetics that require strong oxidative and UV protection. Its low water vapor transmission rate allows safe contact with moderately hydrated formulations while offering a durable barrier against microbial and oxidative degradation in natural cosmetics. | [359] |
| Zein | Theaflavins. | Electrospinning method | Improved hydrophobicity and thermo-mechanical stability; alterations in secondary and crystalline structure. Antimicrobial activity against S. aureus and Salmonella paratyphi B; antioxidant effect with reduced TBARS in meat. | This hydrophobic zein-based film, reinforced with antioxidant theaflavins, is suitable for packaging solid or oil-rich cosmetics requiring oxidative protection and antimicrobial functionality. Its moisture resistance favors applications involving anhydrous balms, pigmented cosmetics, and solid skincare bars. Due to its limited water tolerance, it is better suited for products with low hydration rather than aqueous emulsions. | [360] |
| Zein | TiO2 nanotube arrays (700 nm–5.2 µm) | Solvent casting method | Increased mechanical strength and water resistance; intermolecular hydrogen bonding with zein matrix. Antimicrobial activity against E. coli under UV irradiation. | The increased mechanical strength and water resistance make this composite useful for semi-solid cosmetics that benefit from enhanced stability and UV protection. Its hydrophobic profile supports direct contact with moderately hydrated formulations, while the photoactive antimicrobial response offers added value for packaging of natural creams or gel-like products stored under ambient light. | [361] |
| Zein | Foeniculum vulgare and Carum carvi essential oils. | Electrospinning method | Mechanical strength in the range of 6–9 MPa; low water vapor permeability; molecular interactions confirmed by FTIR. Antimicrobial activity against S. aureus, L. monocytogenes, and Y. enterocolitica. | Low water-vapor permeability and strong antimicrobial activity make this system appropriate for solid and semi-solid cosmetics with microbial sensitivity, such as natural deodorants, balms, and essential oil–based formulations. Its hydrophobic matrix prevents excessive moisture absorption, supporting improved stability of moderately hydrated products but not fully aqueous systems. | [362] |
| Zein | Peppermint oil with methyltriethoxysilane coating | Electrospinning method | High hydrophobicity (water contact angle 138°); controlled release of peppermint oil; stable structural properties. Antimicrobial activity against S. aureus; antioxidant activity; extension of pork shelf-life by 100%. | This highly hydrophobic and structurally stable film is suitable for solid cosmetics requiring fragrance retention or controlled volatile release, such as solid perfumes or aromatherapeutic balms. Although it offers antimicrobial activity, its water-repellent nature limits use with aqueous emulsions, making it ideal primarily for anhydrous or low-moisture products. | [363] |
| Zein, polyvinyl alcohol and chitosan | Anthocyanin extract | Solvent casting method | Enhanced interfacial compatibility and flexibility; improved mechanical strength (elongation at break 68.7%, elastic modulus 187.2 MPa); excellent UV protection (200–350 nm) and reduced water vapor permeability (6.60 × 10−11 g·m·m−2·s−1·Pa−1); antioxidant activity (45.8%) and colorimetric response (ΔE = 20.2) to volatile amines. | This intelligent, UV-protective, antioxidant composite is well-suited for semi-solid or oil-containing cosmetic formulations that benefit from oxidation monitoring and barrier reinforcement. While the presence of PVA and chitosan introduces some hydrophilicity, the reduced WVP supports short-term contact with mildly hydrated products, though it remains unsuitable for high-water emulsions as primary packaging. | [240] |
| Zein and poly(lactic acid) (PLA) composite fibrous films | Carvacrol | Electrospinning method | Successful encapsulation of carvacrol; smooth bead-free fibers; enhanced antioxidant activity (62–75% for zein fibers, 53–65% for PLA fibers); sustained diffusion-controlled release; antimicrobial inhibition of mold and yeast (99.6% for zein, 91.3% for PLA); improved thermal stability in PLA fibers. | These fibrous mats are ideal for solid and semi-solid cosmetics requiring antimicrobial and antioxidant protection, such as masks, balms, or natural creams. The hydrophobicity of zein and PLA supports controlled release while maintaining structural integrity in moderately hydrated formulations. However, they are not recommended for direct packaging of high-moisture products. | [364] |
| Cassava starch and chitosan | Lemongrass essential oil (LEO) | Solution casting method | Optimal physical and mechanical properties at 20% glycerol; antimicrobial activity of LEO against E. coli, S. typhimurium, S. aureus, B. cereus, C. albicans, and A. niger; reduced water vapor permeability (WVP) and solubility; effective in reducing microbial growth and extending chili shelf life to 16 days. | Antimicrobial and antioxidant film suitable for solid or semi-solid cosmetic products (bars, balms, oil-based creams); may serve as an inner antimicrobial sachet within containers for natural emulsions, but not intended for direct long-term contact with high-moisture formulations. | [365] |
| Maize starch | Nisin and Natamycin | Solution casting method | Exhibited strong antimicrobial activity against Bacillus cereus and Aspergillus niger; synergistic effect with modified atmosphere packaging (MAP: N2/CO2 70:30) extended the shelf life of dairy-based confection from 21 to 42 days; maintained physicochemical, microbiological, and sensory quality. | Active antimicrobial coating or insert for protecting preservative-free cosmetic creams and emulsions from fungal or bacterial contamination; recommended as a secondary or internal element rather than a primary packaging layer in contact with liquid formulations due to the hydrophilic nature of starch. | [366] |
Abbreviations: DPPH: 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl; ABTS: 2,2′-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid); FTIR: Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy; SEM: Scanning Electron Microscopy; XRD: X-ray Diffraction; WVTR: Water Vapor Transmission Rate; OP: Oxygen Permeability; UV–VIS: Ultraviolet–Visible spectroscopy; CS: Chitosan; CFS: Cell-Free Supernatant; WRE: Watermelon Rind Extract; SFE: Scallion Flower Extract; ZnO@gal: Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles loaded with Gallic Acid; PCL: Poly(ε-caprolactone); UGNP: Urchin-like Gold Nanoparticles; ɛ-PL: ɛ-Polylysine; EuNE: Eugenol Nanoemulsion; AVG: Aloe vera Gel; ZnONP: Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles; HASP: Hydroxyapatite Nanoparticles; HANP: Hydroxyapatite Nanoparticles; Tg: Glass Transition Temperature; XPS: X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy; AFM: Atomic Force Microscopy; TS: Tensile Strength; WVP: Water Vapor Permeability; OP: Oxygen Permeability; TBARS: Thiobarbituric Acid Reactive Substances; ZIF-8: Zeolitic Imidazolate Framework-8; CV@ZIF-8: Carvacrol-loaded ZIF-8 Nanoparticles; ZNP: Zein Nanoparticles; CFU: Colony Forming Units; AV: Aloe vera; TG: Tara Gum; EB: Electron Beam; CA: Carnosic Acid; PEO: Polyethylene Oxide; PLA: Poly(lactic acid); LEO: Lemongrass Essential Oil; MAP: Modified Atmosphere Packaging; SA: Sodium Alginate; FSG: Fish Scale Gelatin; FLE: Ficus carica Leaf Extract; TE: Turmeric Essential Oil; TEO: Thyme Essential Oil; CA: Carnosic Acid; N2/CO2: Nitrogen/Carbon Dioxide mixture.
5. Challenges and Future Perspectives: Transferability to the Cosmetics Sector
The implementation of biopolymer-based active packaging in the cosmetics industry presents a promising yet complex opportunity. While the food sector has demonstrated the efficacy of these systems in preserving product quality and extending shelf life, their transfer to cosmetic applications requires careful consideration of formulation compatibility, regulatory frameworks, consumer expectations, and industrial scalability.
One of the main advantages of these biopolymers—such as chitosan, fish gelatin, zein, and kafirin—is their biodegradability, renewable origin, and ability to form packaging systems composed of 100% natural ingredients, which agrees with current consumer trends favoring clean-label and eco-conscious products. These materials also enable the use of functional claims such as “antioxidant protection,” “microbial safety,” or “natural preservation,” which can enhance product differentiation and marketing appeal.
Several challenges must be addressed to ensure the successful integration of biopolymer-based active packaging into the cosmetics sector. First, cost and scalability remain critical limitations, as these systems are generally more expensive than conventional synthetic materials due to the sourcing, purification, and processing of natural raw materials. Second, sensory attributes such as odor and coloration—particularly in fish gelatin and plant-derived proteins—may affect consumer acceptance; however, these effects can be mitigated through deodorization, masking agents, or composite formulations. Third, natural biopolymers often exhibit lower mechanical strength, higher water vapor permeability, and reduced thermal stability compared to synthetic polymers, necessitating reinforcement strategies such as blending or multilayer structuring. Fourth, although many biopolymers meet food-grade safety standards, their application in cosmetics may require additional toxicological validation, especially for direct-contact packaging. Finally, formulation compatibility must be carefully considered, as cosmetic products vary widely in pH, viscosity, and chemical composition, and packaging materials must be tailored to avoid adverse interactions that compromise product integrity or stability.
From an economic perspective, the development of biopolymer-based active packaging for cosmetics currently faces significant cost-related challenges compared to petroleum-derived materials such as polyethylene, polypropylene, or PET. The production of natural polymers involves higher raw material and processing costs due to factors such as limited supply chains, purification requirements, and less mature industrial infrastructure. Moreover, the incorporation of bioactive compounds, nanoparticles, or essential oils to confer functional properties further increases formulation and manufacturing expenses. In contrast, synthetic plastics benefit from decades of industrial optimization, large-scale petrochemical production, and lower per-unit costs. Nevertheless, when considering the full life-cycle costs—including waste management, recyclability, and environmental taxation—biopolymer systems may offer long-term economic advantages aligned with circular economy models. As regulatory and consumer pressures drive the cosmetic industry toward sustainable packaging, advances in biopolymer processing, valorization of agro-industrial byproducts, and economies of scale are expected to progressively reduce production costs, narrowing the gap with conventional petroleum-based materials.
Despite these challenges, the feasibility of transferring active packaging systems to the cosmetics sector is high, particularly for formulations vulnerable to oxidation, microbial contamination, or light-induced degradation. Advances in processing technologies, composite film design, and functionalization strategies continue to expand the applicability of these materials, offering a sustainable and innovative alternative to conventional packaging.
6. Conclusions
This review highlights the growing relevance of biopolymer-based active packaging systems as sustainable and functional alternatives for the cosmetics industry, drawing on technological advances and validated applications from the food sector. Materials such as chitosan, fish gelatin, zein, and kafirin exhibit biodegradability, compatibility with natural additives, and intrinsic but limited antioxidant and antimicrobial properties, which can be significantly enhanced through the incorporation of bioactive compounds. These systems enable the development of packaging composed entirely of renewable ingredients and support clean-label claims in line with current consumer trends. Despite challenges related to cost, mechanical performance, sensory attributes, and regulatory adaptation, these biopolymers offer feasible solutions for protecting oxidation-prone and microbiologically sensitive cosmetic formulations. The integration of tailored processing techniques and composite strategies further enhances their applicability, positioning active packaging as a viable innovation pathway toward safer, more stable, and environmentally responsible cosmetic products. While these technologies have gained substantial traction in the food industry over the past decade, their adoption in cosmetics remains limited. This gap represents a strategic opportunity to redirect attention toward food-derived systems and adapt them to the specific needs of cosmetic formulations, especially in light of emerging ecological values and consumer expectations that increasingly favor sustainable, preservative-free, and naturally packaged cosmetic products.
Acknowledgments
The authors gratefully acknowledge the institutional support received for the development of this proposal, including access to facilities, technical resources, and collaborative networks that enabled its execution. During the preparation of this manuscript the authors used Copilot AI, Copilot Pro 2025 for the purposes of facilitating the generation of accurate, didactic illustrations aligned with the structural and editorial requirements of the study. The authors have reviewed and edited the output and take fully responsible for the content of this publication.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, A.C.A.-L. and C.H.S.; methodology, A.C.A.-L., A.C.P. and C.H.S.; validation, A.C.A.-L., Y.C. and C.H.S.; formal analysis, A.C.A.-L.; A.B.-O., Y.C., A.C.P. and C.H.S.; resources, C.H.S. and Y.C.; writing—original draft preparation, A.C.A.-L. and C.H.S.; writing—review and editing, A.B.-O., Y.C., A.C.P. and C.H.S.; visualization, A.C.A.-L. and C.H.S.; supervision, C.H.S.; project administration, C.H.S.; funding acquisition, C.H.S., A.C.P. and Y.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Data Availability Statement
No new data were created in this study and therefore, data sharing is not applicable to this article.
Conflicts of Interest
Author Constain H. Salamanca was employed by the Grupo de Investigación Cecoltec, Cecoltec Services SAS. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Funding Statement
This research has been funded by the Dirección General de Investigaciones of Universidad Santiago de Cali under call No. DGI-01-2026 and grant number 939-621122-071.
Footnotes
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
References
- 1.Euromonitor Beauty and Personal Care: Euromonitor from Trade Sources/National Statistics. [(accessed on 15 September 2025)]. Available online: https://nebulosa.icesi.edu.co:3174/statisticsevolution/index.
- 2.Biyimba B.N., Ekaette I., Cobbinah-Sam E. Starch Functionality in Cosmetics and Personal Care Products. Carbohydr. Polym. 2025;364:123597. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2025.123597. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Nowak K., Jabłońska E., Ratajczak-Wrona W. Controversy around Parabens: Alternative Strategies for Preservative Use in Cosmetics and Personal Care Products. Environ. Res. 2021;198:110488. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2020.110488. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Guaratini T., Gianeti M.D., Campos P.M.B.G.M. Stability of Cosmetic Formulations Containing Esters of Vitamins E and A: Chemical and Physical Aspects. Int. J. Pharm. 2006;327:12–16. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2006.07.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Kočevar Glavač N., Lunder M. Preservative Efficacy of Selected Antimicrobials of Natural Origin in a Cosmetic Emulsion. Int. J. Cosmet. Sci. 2018;40:276–284. doi: 10.1111/ics.12461. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Ryu O., Park B.K., Bang M., Cho K.S., Lee S.H., Gonzales E.L.T., Yang S.M., Kim S., Eun P.H., Lee J.Y., et al. Effects of Several Cosmetic Preservatives on ROS-Dependent Apoptosis of Rat Neural Progenitor Cells. Biomol. Ther. 2018;26:608–615. doi: 10.4062/biomolther.2017.221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Alshehrei F.M. Microbiological Quality Assessment of Skin and Body Care Cosmetics by Using Challenge Test. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2024;31:103965. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2024.103965. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Dalmaz A., Sivrikaya Özak S. DES-Based Vortex-Assisted Liquid-Liquid Microextraction Procedure Developed for the Determination of Paraben Preservatives in Mouthwashes. Microchem. J. 2022;179:107445. doi: 10.1016/j.microc.2022.107445. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Chen X., Sullivan D.A., Sullivan A.G., Kam W.R., Liu Y. Toxicity of Cosmetic Preservatives on Human Ocular Surface and Adnexal Cells. Exp. Eye Res. 2018;170:188–197. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2018.02.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Lefebvre M.A., Meuling W.J.A., Engel R., Coroama M.C., Renner G., Pape W., Nohynek G.J. Consumer Inhalation Exposure to Formaldehyde from the Use of Personal Care Products/Cosmetics. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2012;63:171–176. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2012.02.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Lv C., Hou J., Xie W., Cheng H. Investigation on Formaldehyde Release from Preservatives in Cosmetics. Int. J. Cosmet. Sci. 2015;37:474–478. doi: 10.1111/ics.12212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Malinauskiene L., Blaziene A., Chomiciene A., Isaksson M. Formaldehyde May Be Found in Cosmetic Products Even When Unlabelled. Open Med. 2015;10:323–328. doi: 10.1515/med-2015-0047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Mikami E., Goto T., Ohno T., Matsumoto H., Nishida M. Simultaneous Analysis of Dehydroacetic Acid, Benzoic Acid, Sorbic Acid and Salicylic Acid in Cosmetic Products by Solid-Phase Extraction and High-Performance Liquid Chromatography. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2002;28:261–267. doi: 10.1016/S0731-7085(01)00564-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Johnson W., Bergfeld W.F., Belsito D.V., Hill R.A., Klaassen C.D., Liebler D.C., Marks J.G., Shank R.C., Slaga T.J., Snyder P.W., et al. Safety Assessment of Benzyl Alcohol, Benzoic Acid and Its Salts, and Benzyl Benzoate. Int. J. Toxicol. 2017;36:5S–30S. doi: 10.1177/1091581817728996. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Alanazi S., Tabassum H., Abudawood M., Alrashoudi R., Alrashed M., Alsheikh Y.A., Alkaff S., Alghamdi M., Alenzi N. Quantification of Methylisothiazolinone and Methylchloroisothiazolinone Preservatives by High-Performance Liquid Chromatography. Molecules. 2023;28:1760. doi: 10.3390/molecules28041760. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Higgins E., Kirby B., Rogers S., Collins P. Methylchloroisothiazolinone and Methylisothiazolinone Allergic Contact Dermatitis and the Effect of Patch Test Concentration. Dermatitis. 2013;24:73–76. doi: 10.1097/DER.0b013e3182811432. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Padilla M., Palma M., Barroso C.G. Determination of Phenolics in Cosmetic Creams and Similar Emulsions. J. Chromatogr. A. 2005;1091:83–88. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2005.07.041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Dréno B., Zuberbier T., Gelmetti C., Gontijo G., Marinovich M. Safety Review of Phenoxyethanol When Used as a Preservative in Cosmetics. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 2019;33:15–24. doi: 10.1111/jdv.15944. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Yaripour S., Bandekar M., Vihavainen J., More K., Eronen A., Durão M.F., Daneliya M., Houni T., Halonen T., Leskinen J.T.T., et al. Effects of Polymethylmethacrylate Nanoplastics on the Swimming Behaviour and Gut Microbiome of the Freshwater Amphipod Gammarus Pulex. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2025;289:117501. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2024.117501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Klaiber M., Moreno-Gordaliza E., Gómez-Gómez M.M., Marazuela M.D. Human Intake Assessment of Triclosan Associated with the Daily Use of Polypropylene-Made Antimicrobial Food Packaging. Food Chem. 2024;451:139475. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2024.139475. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Tacker M., Hafner-Kuhn T., Gstöhl A., Nduagu E., Vozzola E., Roux T.W., Auras R. Life Cycle Assessment of Polyethylene Packaging and Alternatives on the European Market. Clean. Environ. Syst. 2025;17:100270. doi: 10.1016/j.cesys.2025.100270. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Kim S.T., Shao K., Oleschkewitz C., Hamilton R. Margin of Exposure to Free Formaldehyde in Personal Care Products Containing Formaldehyde-Donor Preservatives: Evidence for Consumer Safety. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2023;145:105519. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2023.105519. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Lillo M.A., Nichols C., Perry C., Runke S., Krutilina R., Seagroves T.N., Miranda-Carboni G.A., Krum S.A. Methylparaben Stimulates Tumor Initiating Cells in ER+ Breast Cancer Models. J. Appl. Toxicol. 2017;37:417–425. doi: 10.1002/jat.3374. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Amin M.M., Tabatabaeian M., Chavoshani A., Amjadi E., Hashemi M., Ebrahimpour K., Klishadi R., Khazaei S., Mansourian M., Amin M.M., et al. Paraben Content in Adjacent Normal-Malignant Breast Tissues from Women with Breast Cancer. Biomed. Environ. Sci. 2019;32:893–904. doi: 10.3967/BES2019.112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Syed T.R., Sharaby M.R., Salmieri S., Lacroix M. Innovations in Active Food Packaging: Harnessing Waste Valorization and Irradiation-Assisted Functionalization for Sustainable Food Preservation. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2025;163:105183. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2025.105183. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Li S., Łopusiewicz Ł., Merino D., Sani M.A., Kalita P., Roy S., Yang T., Fei T., Zhang W. High-Performance Ethyl Cellulose Composite Films: Innovations in Functional Enhancement for Sustainable Food Packaging. Carbohydr. Polym. 2025;368:124154. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2025.124154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Karnwal A., Rauf A., Jassim A.Y., Selvaraj M., Al-Tawaha A.R.M.S., Kashyap P., Kumar D., Malik T. Advanced Starch-Based Films for Food Packaging: Innovations in Sustainability and Functional Properties. Food Chem. X. 2025;29:102662. doi: 10.1016/j.fochx.2025.102662. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Du H., Sun X., Chong X., Yang M., Zhu Z., Wen Y. A Review on Smart Active Packaging Systems for Food Preservation: Applications and Future Trends. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2023;141:104200. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2023.104200. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Li X., Zhang R., Hassan M.M., Cheng Z., Mills J., Hou C., Realini C.E., Chen L., Day L., Zheng X., et al. Active Packaging for the Extended Shelf-Life of Meat: Perspectives from Consumption Habits, Market Requirements and Packaging Practices in China and New Zealand. Foods. 2022;11:2903. doi: 10.3390/foods11182903. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Vasile C., Baican M. Progresses in Food Packaging, Food Quality, and Safety—Controlled-Release Antioxidant and/or Antimicrobial Packaging. Molecules. 2021;26:1263. doi: 10.3390/molecules26051263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Rachtanapun C., Rachtanapun P., Tantala J., Kasi G., Jantanasakulwong K., Halder J.N., Sringam K., Sommano S.R., Worajittiphon P., Seo J., et al. Synthesis of Calcium Oxide and Antimicrobial Activity Enhancement of Chitosan Bio-Composite Films: An Active Packaging Material. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2025;322:146971. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2025.146971. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Sam S., Aguado R.J., Fiol N., Bastida G., Delgado-Aguilar M., Tarrés Q. Antioxidant Coatings with Selenium Nanoparticles, Stabilized by Chitosan and Nanocellulose, for Active Paper Packaging. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2025;319:145721. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2025.145721. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Ansari J.R., Park K., Seo J. Improving the Oxygen Barrier Properties of Composite Films Using Green Tea Extracted CQDs and PVA for Active Packaging Applications. Food Packag. Shelf Life. 2025;48:101460. doi: 10.1016/j.fpsl.2025.101460. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Hrádková I., Kumherová M., Šmidrkal J. Preservatives in Cosmetics: Regulatory Aspects and Analytical Methods. Chem. Listy. 2018;115:175–224. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-63508-2.00009-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Campana R., Scesa C., Patrone V., Vittoria E., Baffone W. Microbiological Study of Cosmetic Products during Their Use by Consumers: Health Risk and Efficacy of Preservative Systems. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2006;43:301–306. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-765X.2006.01952.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Almukainzi M., Alotaibi L., Abdulwahab A., Albukhary N., El Mahdy A.M. Quality and Safety Investigation of Commonly Used Topical Cosmetic Preparations. Sci. Rep. 2022;12:18299. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-21771-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Bhatt P., Trehan S., Inamdar N., Mourya V.K., Misra A. Polymers in Drug Delivery: An Update. Appl. Polym. Drug Deliv. 2021:1–42. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-819659-5.00001-X. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Priyadarshi R., Rhim J.W. Chitosan-Based Biodegradable Functional Films for Food Packaging Applications. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2020;62:102346. doi: 10.1016/j.ifset.2020.102346. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Galani E., Ly I., Laurichesse E., Zoumpopoulou G., Tsakalidou E., Schmitt V., Xenakis A., Chatzidaki M.D. Fungi-Derived Chitosan as an Emulsion Stabilizer for the Encapsulation of Bioactives. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2024;683:133002. doi: 10.1016/J.COLSURFA.2023.133002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Felix-Sagaste K.G., García-Armenta E., Picos-Corrales L.A., Bastidas-Bastidas P., Clemente-Soto A.F., Licea-Claverie A., Torres-Iribe A.M. Insect Extract-Chitosan Microemulsions Stabilized by Alginate Hydrogels for Improved Wound Healing. Mater. Today Commun. 2025;47:113231. doi: 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2025.113231. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Remesh S.D., Sandrasaigaran P., Remesh S., Perumal V., Lip Vun J.Y., Gandhi S., Hasan H. Antimicrobial and Anti-Biofilm Activity of Crustacean-Derived Chitosan against Salmonella Typhimurium, Staphylococcus Aureus and Listeria Monocytogenes. Food Biosci. 2025;68:106697. doi: 10.1016/j.fbio.2025.106697. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Muhammed H., Faheema S., Thayyil M.S., Udayan G., Ramesan M.T. Multifunctional Chitosan/Chloro-Aspirin Composites for Energy Storage and Biomedical Applications. J. Indian Chem. Soc. 2025;102:101866. doi: 10.1016/j.jics.2025.101866. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Sun S., Wang C., Tang W., Cao Y., Zhang Y., Du C., Jiang W. From Preparation to Application: Mushroom-Derived Chitosan in Wine-Making Exerts Microbial Suppression and Triggers Transcriptomic Response of Saccharomyces Cerevisiae. Food Biosci. 2025;71:107291. doi: 10.1016/j.fbio.2025.107291. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Althagbi H.I., Alorfi H.S. Green Synthesis of Multifunctional Ag/SeO2 and Ag/SeO2-Chitosan Nanocomposites Derived from Matricaria Chamomilla (L.) Extract: A Promising Platform for Natural Product Delivery and Antimicrobial Applications. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2025;346:131402. doi: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2025.131402. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Olariu D.-I., Platon V.M., Ibanescu A., Vlad M.D., Zara-Danceanu C.M., Lutic D., Marin L., Dragoi B. LDH-Chitosan Bionanocomposites for Oncologic Applications: A Refreshing Perspective on the Mutual Influence through Intermolecular Forces toward Controlled Morphology and Dispersion. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2025;329:147495. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2025.147495. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Jeyanthi R., Praveen E., Mohan C.R. Boosting of Mechanical Sensitivity of ZnO through Imprinting on the Chitosan/PVDF Matrix for Vibration Sensor Applications. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2025;321:146257. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2025.146257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Lillo-Pérez S., Monsalve Y., Mesa M., Martínez R., Bernal C. Encapsulation of Glucose Oxidase and Asparaginase in Silica–Chitosan Hybrids: Stability and PH-Modulated Release for Potential Biomedical Applications. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2025;323:146890. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2025.146890. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Yi K., Miao S., Yang B., Li S., Hu Y., Lu Y. Application of Chitosan Extracted from Silkworm Pupae by Ultrasound-Assisted Enzymatic Method on Strawberry Preservation. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2025;327:147489. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2025.147489. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Sagar B.M., Islam M.M., Habib M.L., Ahmed S., Sahadat Hossain M. Utilization of Natural and Waste Sources for Synthesis of Cellulose, Chitin, and Chitosan for a Suitable Environment. RSC Adv. 2025;15:26276–26301. doi: 10.1039/D5RA02896E. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Bhutto R.A., Bhutto N.U.A.H., Wang M., Iqbal S., Yi J. Curcumin-Loaded Pickering Emulsion Stabilized by PH-Induced Self-Aggregated Chitosan Particles: Effects of Degree of Deacetylation and Molecular Weight. Food Hydrocoll. 2024;147:109422. doi: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2023.109422. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 51.de Alvarenga E.S., de Oliveira P.C., Bellato C.R. An Approach to Understanding the Deacetylation Degree of Chitosan. Carbohydr. Polym. 2010;80:1155–1160. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.01.037. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Ganesan T.L., Pitchai A., Ramasamy P. Antimicrobial Activity of Chitosan Phosphate Derived from Cuttlebone of Sepia Brevimana against Dental Pathogens. Next Res. 2025;2:100568. doi: 10.1016/j.nexres.2025.100568. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Manimohan M., Pugalmani S., Sithique M.A. Biologically Active Novel N, N, O Donor Tridentate Water Soluble Hydrazide Based O-Carboxymethyl Chitosan Schiff Base Cu (II) Metal Complexes: Synthesis and Characterisation. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019;136:738–754. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.06.115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Andoko A., Prasetya R., Cakra B.D., Syah M.Z., Santoso A. Autoclave-Assisted Multi-Objective Optimization of the Deacetylation Process in Chitosan Production from Shrimp Shell Waste via Response Surface Methodology. Results Eng. 2025;27:106353. doi: 10.1016/j.rineng.2025.106353. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Lertjindaporn M., Geng J.T., Keratimanoch S., Lee G.Y., Ryo K., Osako K. Chitin and Chitosan from North Pacific Krill (Euphausia Pacifica): Comparative Study of Conventional and Microwave-Assisted Extraction Methods and the Potential Use in Chitosan Film Production. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2025;296:139692. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2025.139692. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Román-Doval R., Torres-Arellanes S.P., Tenorio-Barajas A.Y., Gómez-Sánchez A., Valencia-Lazcano A.A. Chitosan: Properties and Its Application in Agriculture in Context of Molecular Weight. Polymers. 2023;15:2867. doi: 10.3390/polym15132867. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Khubiev O.M., Egorov A.R., Kirichuk A.A., Khrustalev V.N., Tskhovrebov A.G., Kritchenkov A.S. Chitosan-Based Antibacterial Films for Biomedical and Food Applications. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023;24:10738. doi: 10.3390/ijms241310738. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Zhang W., Cao J., Jiang W. Analysis of Film-Forming Properties of Chitosan with Different Molecular Weights and Its Adhesion Properties with Different Postharvest Fruit Surfaces. Food Chem. 2022;395:133605. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.133605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Wang M., Wang Y., Chen G., Gao H., Peng Q. Chitosan-Based Multifunctional Biomaterials as Active Agents or Delivery Systems for Antibacterial Therapy. Bioengineering. 2024;11:1278. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering11121278. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Fatmawati A., Suseno N., Savitri E., Masui G.T., Ivony F.A. Chitosan-Based Coating Application to Enhance Antimicrobial and Water Vapor Barrier Properties of Industry-Manufactured Paper. J. Kim. Sains Dan Apl. 2024;27:515–522. doi: 10.14710/jksa.27.11.515-522. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Vázquez-Aldana M., Sixto-Berrocal A.M., Arcos-Casarrubias J.A., Martínez-Trujillo M.A., Cruz-Díaz M.R. Biological and Chemical Synergy in Chitin and Chitosan Production: The Role of Process Sequencing in Shrimp Shell Waste Treatment. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2025;306:141247. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2025.141247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.No H.K., Meyers S.P. Preparation and Characterization of Chitin and Chitosan—A Review. J. Aquat. Food Prod. Technol. 1995;4:27–52. doi: 10.1300/J030v04n02_03. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Liu W., Qin Y., Liu S., Xing R., Yu H., Chen X., Li K., Li P. C-Coordinated O-Carboxymethyl Chitosan Metal Complexes: Synthesis, Characterization and Antifungal Efficacy. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018;106:68–77. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.07.176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Chen A.H., Yang C.Y., Chen C.Y., Chen C.Y., Chen C.W. The Chemically Crosslinked Metal-Complexed Chitosans for Comparative Adsorptions of Cu(II), Zn(II), Ni(II) and Pb(II) Ions in Aqueous Medium. J. Hazard Mater. 2009;163:1068–1075. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.07.073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Manimohan M., Paulpandiyan R., Pugalmani S., Sithique M.A. Biologically Active Co (II), Cu (II), Zn (II) Centered Water Soluble Novel Isoniazid Grafted O-Carboxymethyl Chitosan Schiff Base Ligand Metal Complexes: Synthesis, Spectral Characterisation and DNA Nuclease Activity. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020;163:801–816. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.06.278. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.El-Kattan N., Ibrahim M.A., Emam A.N., Metwally K., Youssef F.S., Nassar N.A., Mansour A.S. Evaluation of the Antimicrobial Activity of Chitosan- and Curcumin-Capped Copper Oxide Nanostructures against Multi-Drug-Resistant Microorganisms. Nanoscale Adv. 2025;7:2988–3007. doi: 10.1039/D4NA00955J. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Wang Q.Z., Chen X.G., Liu N., Wang S.X., Liu C.S., Meng X.H., Liu C.G. Protonation Constants of Chitosan with Different Molecular Weight and Degree of Deacetylation. Carbohydr. Polym. 2006;65:194–201. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2006.01.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Fabiano A., Beconcini D., Migone C., Piras A.M., Zambito Y. Quaternary Ammonium Chitosans: The Importance of the Positive Fixed Charge of the Drug Delivery Systems. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020;21:6617. doi: 10.3390/ijms21186617. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Davydova V.N., Komleva D.D., Volod’ko A.V., Sidorin E.V., Pimenova E.A., Kitan’ S.A., Shulgin A.A., Spirin P.V., Sidorin A.E., Prassolov V.S., et al. Comparative Analysis of Physicochemical Properties and Biological Activities of Chitosans from Squid Gladius and Crab Shell. Carbohydr. Polym. 2025;365:123812. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2025.123812. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Wu S., Wu S., Feng T., Shi X., Yan Y., Wang Y., Wang Q., Hu N., Wang L., Ding F. Development of Multifunctional Green Food Packaging Based on Chitosan and Quercetin for Visual Monitoring of Fish Spoilage. Food Packag. Shelf Life. 2025;52:101605. doi: 10.1016/j.fpsl.2025.101605. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Wang X., Guo J., Zhou H., Hou Y., Jin P., Zheng Y., Wu Z. Chitosan-Based Aerogel Food Active Packaging with Integrated Preservation and Buffering Functions. J. Adv. Res. 2025 doi: 10.1016/j.jare.2025.08.054. in press . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Yang A., Xu X., Deng S., Lee S.H., Lum W.C., Zhou X., Du G., Zhang J. Sustainable Bio-Based Film Based on Chitosan Resin Crosslinking with Tannin, Phytic Acid and Octadecylamine for Food Packaging Application. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2025;327:147446. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2025.147446. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Lv L.C., Huang Q.Y., Ding W., Xiao X.H., Zhang H.Y., Xiong L.X. Fish Gelatin: The Novel Potential Applications. J. Funct. Foods. 2019;63:103581. doi: 10.1016/j.jff.2019.103581. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Gomez-Guillen M.C., Gimenez B., Lopez-Caballero M.E., Montero M.P. Functional and Bioactive Properties of Collagen and Gelatin from Alternative Sources: A Review. Food Hydrocoll. 2011;25:1813–1827. doi: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2011.02.007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Haug I.J., Draget K.I., Smidsrød O. Physical and Rheological Properties of Fish Gelatin Compared to Mammalian Gelatin. Food Hydrocoll. 2004;18:203–213. doi: 10.1016/S0268-005X(03)00065-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Derkach S.R., Voron’ko N.G., Kuchina Y.A., Kolotova D.S. Modified Fish Gelatin as an Alternative to Mammalian Gelatin in Modern Food Technologies. Polymers. 2020;12:3051. doi: 10.3390/polym12123051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Rather J.A., Akhter N., Ashraf Q.S., Mir S.A., Makroo H.A., Majid D., Barba F.J., Khaneghah A.M., Dar B.N. A Comprehensive Review on Gelatin: Understanding Impact of the Sources, Extraction Methods, and Modifications on Potential Packaging Applications. Food Packag. Shelf Life. 2022;34:100945. doi: 10.1016/j.fpsl.2022.100945. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Usman M., Regenstein J.M., Rahman H.U.U., Sahar A., Aadil R.M., Tariq A., Fatima I., Bilal A., He L. Physicochemical and Functional Properties of Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus Mykiss) Skin Gelatin in Comparison to Commercial Bovine Gelatin. Food Chem. Adv. 2025;8:101088. doi: 10.1016/j.focha.2025.101088. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Wu J., Xiao J., Zhu M., Yang H., Liu J., Liu Y. Study of Physicochemical and Gelation Properties of Fish Gelatin from Different Sources. Appl. Sci. 2023;13:5337. doi: 10.3390/app13095337. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Staroszczyk H., Kusznierewicz B., Malinowska-Pańczyk E., Sinkiewicz I., Gottfried K., Kołodziejska I. Fish Gelatin Films Containing Aqueous Extracts from Phenolic-Rich Fruit Pomace. LWT. 2020;117:108613. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2019.108613. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Kato K., Nakayoshi T., Kurimoto E., Oda A. Mechanisms of Deamidation of Asparagine Residues and Effects of Main-Chain Conformation on Activation Energy. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020;21:7035. doi: 10.3390/ijms21197035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Catak S., Monard G., Aviyente V., Ruiz-López M.F. Deamidation of Asparagine Residues: Direct Hydrolysis versus Succinimide-Mediated Deamidation Mechanisms. J. Phys. Chem. A. 2009;113:1111–1120. doi: 10.1021/jp808597v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Ramsøe A., van Heekeren V., Ponce P., Fischer R., Barnes I., Speller C., Collins M.J. DeamiDATE 1.0: Site-Specific Deamidation as a Tool to Assess Authenticity of Members of Ancient Proteomes. J. Archaeol. Sci. 2020;115:105080. doi: 10.1016/J.JAS.2020.105080. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Shakeri F., Bahmani Z., Mirmoghtadaie L. Effect of Deamination and Agar Addition on Physical Properties of Gelatin Extracted from Thunnus Tonggol Skin. J. Food Qual. Hazards Control. 2025;12:183–191. doi: 10.18502/jfqhc.12.3.19782. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Jafari M., Afkhami R., Sedaghat N. Preparation and Characterization of Active Cirish Fructans–Fish Gelatin Film: Physicochemical, Antioxidant, and Antimicrobial Properties. Food Sci. Nutr. 2023;11:709–721. doi: 10.1002/FSN3.3106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.León-López A., Fuentes-Jiménez L., Hernández-Fuentes A.D., Campos-Montiel R.G., Aguirre-álvarez G. Hydrolysed Collagen from Sheepskins as a Source of Functional Peptides with Antioxidant Activity. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019;20:3931. doi: 10.3390/ijms20163931. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Murugan G., Nilsuwan K., Prodpran T., Ponnusamy A., Rhim J.W., Kim J.T., Benjakul S. Active Fish Gelatin/Chitosan Blend Film Incorporated with Guava Leaf Powder Carbon Dots: Properties, Release and Antioxidant Activity. Gels. 2024;10:281. doi: 10.3390/gels10040281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Huang T., Tu Z.-C., Shangguan X., Wang H., Sha X., Bansal N. Rheological Behavior, Emulsifying Properties and Structural Characterization of Phosphorylated Fish Gelatin. Food Chem. 2018;246:428–436. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.12.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Gómez-Estaca J., Bravo L., Gómez-Guillén M.C., Alemán A., Montero P. Antioxidant Properties of Tuna-Skin and Bovine-Hide Gelatin Films Induced by the Addition of Oregano and Rosemary Extracts. Food Chem. 2009;112:18–25. doi: 10.1016/J.FOODCHEM.2008.05.034. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Giménez B., López de Lacey A., Pérez-Santín E., López-Caballero M.E., Montero P. Release of Active Compounds from Agar and Agar–Gelatin Films with Green Tea Extract. Food Hydrocoll. 2013;30:264–271. doi: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2012.05.014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Derkach S.R., Voron’ko N.G., Kuchina Y.A., Kolotova D.S., Grokhovsky V.A., Nikiforova A.A., Sedov I.A., Faizullin D.A., Zuev Y.F. Rheological Properties of Fish and Mammalian Gelatin Hydrogels as Bases for Potential Practical Formulations. Gels. 2024;10:486. doi: 10.3390/gels10080486. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Fakhreddin Hosseini S., Rezaei M., Zandi M., Ghavi F.F. Preparation and Functional Properties of Fish Gelatin–Chitosan Blend Edible Films. Food Chem. 2013;136:1490–1495. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.09.081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Jeya Shakila R., Jeevithan E., Varatharajakumar A., Jeyasekaran G., Sukumar D. Comparison of the Properties of Multi-Composite Fish Gelatin Films with That of Mammalian Gelatin Films. Food Chem. 2012;135:2260–2267. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.07.069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.See S.F., Ghassem M., Mamot S., Babji A.S. Effect of Different Pretreatments on Functional Properties of African Catfish (Clarias Gariepinus) Skin Gelatin. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2015;52:753–762. doi: 10.1007/s13197-013-1043-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Joy J.M., Padmaprakashan A., Pradeep A., Paul P.T., Mannuthy R.J., Mathew S. A Review on Fish Skin-Derived Gelatin: Elucidating the Gelatin Peptides—Preparation, Bioactivity, Mechanistic Insights, and Strategies for Stability Improvement. Foods. 2024;13:2793. doi: 10.3390/foods13172793. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Nitsuwat S., Zhang P., Ng K., Fang Z. Fish Gelatin as an Alternative to Mammalian Gelatin for Food Industry: A Meta-Analysis. LWT. 2021;141:110899. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2021.110899. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Tongnuanchan P., Benjakul S., Prodpran T. Comparative Studies on Properties and Antioxidative Activity of Fish Skin Gelatin Films Incorporated with Essential Oils from Various Sources. Int. Aquat. Res. 2014;6:62. doi: 10.1007/s40071-014-0062-x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Liu J., Song Z., Wang Y., Pei Y., Tang K. Edible Films Based on Fish Gelatin and Soluble Soybean Polysaccharide Enriched with Tea Polyphenol for Active Food Packaging. Polymers. 2025;17:2174. doi: 10.3390/polym17162174. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Azizah F., Nursakti H., Ningrum A. Supriyadi Development of Edible Composite Film from Fish Gelatin–Pectin Incorporated with Lemongrass Essential Oil and Its Application in Chicken Meat. Polymers. 2023;15:2075. doi: 10.3390/polym15092075. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Shukla R., Cheryan M. Zein: The Industrial Protein from Corn. Ind. Crops Prod. 2001;13:171–192. doi: 10.1016/S0926-6690(00)00064-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Zhang S., Zhao H. Preparation and Properties of Zein–Rutin Composite Nanoparticle/Corn Starch Films. Carbohydr. Polym. 2017;169:385–392. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.04.044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Gaona-Sánchez V.A., Calderón-Domínguez G., Morales-Sánchez E., Chanona-Pérez J.J., Velázquez-de la Cruz G., Méndez-Méndez J.V., Terrés-Rojas E., Farrera-Rebollo R.R. Preparation and Characterisation of Zein Films Obtained by Electrospraying. Food Hydrocoll. 2015;49:1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2015.03.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 103.da Silva C.E.P., de Oliveira M.A.S., Simas F.F., Riegel-Vidotti I.C. Physical Chemical Study of Zein and Arabinogalactans or Glucuronomannans Polyelectrolyte Complexes and Their Film-Forming Properties. Food Hydrocoll. 2020;100:105394. doi: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2019.105394. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Liu Z., Cao X., Ren S., Wang J., Zhang H. Physicochemical Characterization of a Zein Prepared Using a Novel Aqueous Extraction Technology and Tensile Properties of the Zein Film. Ind. Crops Prod. 2019;130:57–62. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2018.12.071. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Kumar P., Lau P.W., Kale S., Johnson S., Pareek V., Utikar R., Lali A. Kafirin Adsorption on Ion-Exchange Resins: Isotherm and Kinetic Studies. J. Chromatogr. A. 2014;1356:105–116. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2014.06.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Taylor J., Taylor J.R.N., Dutton M.F., De Kock S. Identification of Kafirin Film Casting Solvents. Food Chem. 2005;90:401–408. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2004.03.055. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Oom A., Pettersson A., Taylor J.R.N., Stading M. Rheological Properties of Kafirin and Zein Prolamins. J. Cereal Sci. 2008;47:109–116. doi: 10.1016/j.jcs.2007.02.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Belton P.S., Delgadillo I., Halford N.G., Shewry P.R. Kafirin Structure and Functionality. J. Cereal Sci. 2006;44:272–286. doi: 10.1016/j.jcs.2006.05.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Oguntoyinbo S.I., Taylor J.R.N., Taylor J. Comparative Functional Properties of Kafirin and Zein Viscoelastic Masses Formed by Simple Coacervation at Different Acetic Acid and Protein Concentrations. J. Cereal Sci. 2018;83:16–24. doi: 10.1016/j.jcs.2018.07.008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Giteru S.G., Coorey R., Bertolatti D., Watkin E., Johnson S., Fang Z. Physicochemical and Antimicrobial Properties of Citral and Quercetin Incorporated Kafirin-Based Bioactive Films. Food Chem. 2015;168:341–347. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.07.077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Bhat R., Karim A.A. Towards Producing Novel Fish Gelatin Films by Combination Treatments of Ultraviolet Radiation and Sugars (Ribose and Lactose) as Cross-Linking Agents. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2012;51:1326–1333. doi: 10.1007/s13197-012-0652-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Kołodziejska I., Piotrowska B. The Water Vapour Permeability, Mechanical Properties and Solubility of Fish Gelatin–Chitosan Films Modified with Transglutaminase or 1-Ethyl-3-(3-Dimethylaminopropyl) Carbodiimide (EDC) and Plasticized with Glycerol. Food Chem. 2007;103:295–300. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2006.07.049. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Bajpai M., Bajpai S.K., Jyotishi P. Water Absorption and Moisture Permeation Properties of Chitosan/Poly(Acrylamide-Co-Itaconic Acid) IPC Films. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2016;84:1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2015.11.088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Remuñán-López C., Bodmeier R. Mechanical, Water Uptake and Permeability Properties of Crosslinked Chitosan Glutamate and Alginate Films. J. Control. Release. 1997;44:215–225. doi: 10.1016/S0168-3659(96)01525-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Ahammed S., Liu F., Khin M.N., Yokoyama W.H., Zhong F. Improvement of the Water Resistance and Ductility of Gelatin Film by Zein. Food Hydrocoll. 2020;105:105804. doi: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2020.105804. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Olivera N., Rouf T.B., Bonilla J.C., Carriazo J.G., Dianda N., Kokini J.L. Effect of LAPONITE® Addition on the Mechanical, Barrier and Surface Properties of Novel Biodegradable Kafirin Nanocomposite Films. J. Food Eng. 2019;245:24–32. doi: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2018.10.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Emmambux M.N., Stading M., Taylor J.R.N. Sorghum Kafirin Film Property Modification with Hydrolysable and Condensed Tannins. J. Cereal Sci. 2004;40:127–135. doi: 10.1016/j.jcs.2004.08.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Xiao F.H., Wang J., Wang D.G., Zhai J.Q., Lu G.X., Chen C.Z. Influence of TiO2 Nanoparticles on the Performance and Inner Structure of Zein/Eugenol Films. Food Packag. Shelf Life. 2022;31:100782. doi: 10.1016/j.fpsl.2021.100782. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Nicosia C., Pulvirenti A., Licciardello F. Development of Solvent-Cast Antimicrobial PHBV Films for the Inhibition of Spoilage Microflora. LWT. 2025;218:117486. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2025.117486. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Ponce P., Ávila E., Morales Z., Reinoso C., Díaz A., Loyo C., Saucedo-Vázquez J.P., Terencio T., Mora J., López F. Mechanical Parameters of Chitosan Film with Glycerol and Propylene Carbonate. Carbon Trends. 2025;21:100563. doi: 10.1016/j.cartre.2025.100563. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 121.C.-Eulalio H.Y., B.-Rodrigues J.F., O.-Santos K., Peniche C., V.-LiaFook M. Characterization and Thermal Properties of Chitosan Films Prepared with Different Acid Solvents. Rev. Cuba. de Química. 2019;31:309–323. [Google Scholar]
- 122.Theerawitayaart W., Prodpran T., Benjakul S., Sookchoo P. Properties of Films from Fish Gelatin Prepared by Molecular Modification and Direct Addition of Oxidized Linoleic Acid. Food Hydrocoll. 2019;88:291–300. doi: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2018.10.022. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Pouralkhas M., Kordjazi M., Ojagh S.M., Farsani O.A. Physicochemical and Functional Characterization of Gelatin Edible Film Incorporated with Fucoidan Isolated from Sargassum Tenerrimum. Food Sci. Nutr. 2023;11:4124–4135. doi: 10.1002/fsn3.3402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Avena-Bustillos R.J., Olsen C.W., Olson D.A., Chiou B., Yee E., Bechtel P.J., McHugh T.H. Water Vapor Permeability of Mammalian and Fish Gelatin Films. J. Food Sci. 2006;71:E202–E207. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2006.00016.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Ahammed S., Easdani M., Liu F., Zhong F. Encapsulation of Tea Polyphenol in Zein through Complex Coacervation Technique to Control the Release of the Phenolic Compound from Gelatin–Zein Composite Film. Polymers. 2023;15:2882. doi: 10.3390/polym15132882. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Gennadios A. Formation and Properties of Corn Zein Films and Coatings. In: Gennadios A., editor. Protein-Based Films and Coatings. CRC Press; Boca Raton, FL, USA: 2002. pp. 63–88. [Google Scholar]
- 127.Anyango J.O., Taylor J., Taylor J.R.N. Improvement in Water Stability and Other Related Functional Properties of Thin Cast Kafirin Protein Films. J. Agric Food Chem. 2011;59:12674–12682. doi: 10.1021/jf203273y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Hussain R., Batool S.A., Aizaz A., Abbas M., Ur Rehman M.A. Biodegradable Packaging Based on Poly(Vinyl Alcohol) and Carboxymethyl Cellulose Films Incorporated with Ascorbic Acid for Food Packaging Applications. ACS Omega. 2023;8:42301–42310. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.3c04397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Kanmani P., Rhim J.W. Antimicrobial and Physical-Mechanical Properties of Agar-Based Films Incorporated with Grapefruit Seed Extract. Carbohydr. Polym. 2014;102:708–716. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.10.099. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.Singh S., Gaikwad K.K., Lee Y.S. Antimicrobial and Antioxidant Properties of Polyvinyl Alcohol Bio Composite Films Containing Seaweed Extracted Cellulose Nano-Crystal and Basil Leaves Extract. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018;107:1879–1887. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.10.057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.Borbolla-Jiménez F.V., Peña-Corona S.I., Farah S.J., Jiménez-Valdés M.T., Pineda-Pérez E., Romero-Montero A., Del Prado-Audelo M.L., Bernal-Chávez S.A., Magaña J.J., Leyva-Gómez G. Films for Wound Healing Fabricated Using a Solvent Casting Technique. Pharmaceutics. 2023;15:1914. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15071914. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.de Carvalho A.C.W., Paiva N.F., Demonari I.K., Duarte M.P.F., do Couto R.O., de Freitas O., Vicentini F.T.M.d.C. The Potential of Films as Transmucosal Drug Delivery Systems. Pharmaceutics. 2023;15:2583. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15112583. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Ghosh M., Kshirsagar S.M., Kipping T., Banga A.K. Vacuum Compression-Molded Polyvinyl Alcohol Microneedles for Sustained Three-Day Transdermal Delivery of Palonosetron Hydrochloride. Drug Deliv. Transl. Res. 2025;2025:1–20. doi: 10.1007/s13346-025-01980-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Konopka T., Jurczyszyn K., Karolewicz B., Kida D., Konopka T., Jurczyszyn K., Zena Karolewicz B. Technological Aspects and Evaluation Methods for Polymer Matrices as Dental Drug Carriers. Biomedicines. 2023;11:1274. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines11051274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135.Di Muzio L., Simonetti P., Carriero V.C., Brandelli C., Trilli J., Sergi C., Tirillò J., Cairone F., Cesa S., Radocchia G., et al. Solvent Casting and UV Photocuring for Easy and Safe Fabrication of Nanocomposite Film Dressings. Molecules. 2022;27:2959. doi: 10.3390/molecules27092959. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136.Weng S., Marcet I., Rendueles M., Díaz M. Edible Films from the Laboratory to Industry: A Review of the Different Production Methods. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2024;18:3245–3271. doi: 10.1007/s11947-024-03641-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 137.Wang Q., Chen W., Zhu W., McClements D.J., Liu X., Liu F. A Review of Multilayer and Composite Films and Coatings for Active Biodegradable Packaging. npj Sci. Food. 2022;6:18. doi: 10.1038/s41538-022-00132-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138.Mihalca V., Kerezsi A.D., Weber A., Gruber-traub C., Schmucker J., Vodnar D.C., Dulf F.V., Socaci S.A., Fărcaș A., Mureșan C.I., et al. Protein-Based Films and Coatings for Food Industry Applications. Polymers. 2021;13:769. doi: 10.3390/polym13050769. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139.Chen H., Lan X., Zhang S., Zhang Q., Zhang X., Chi H., Meng Q., Fan F., Tang J. Properties of Gelatin-Zein Films Prepared by Blending Method and Layer-by-Layer Self-Assembly Method. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2025;292:139172. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.139172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140.Zhang Q., Sando D., Nagarajan V. Chemical Route Derived Bismuth Ferrite Thin Films and Nanomaterials. J. Mater. Chem. C Mater. 2016;4:4092–4124. doi: 10.1039/C6TC00243A. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 141.Park H.J., Chinnan M.S., Shewfelt R.L. Edible corn-zein film coatings to extend storage life of tomatoes. J. Food Process Preserv. 1994;18:317–331. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-4549.1994.tb00255.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 142.Suresh P.V., Raj K.R., Nidheesh T., Pal G.K., Sakhare P.Z. Application of Chitosan for Improvement of Quality and Shelf Life of Table Eggs under Tropical Room Conditions. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2015;52:6345–6354. doi: 10.1007/s13197-015-1721-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143.Xu D., Wang J., Ren D., Wu X. Effects of Chitosan Coating Structure and Changes during Storage on Their Egg Preservation Performance. Coatings. 2018;8:317. doi: 10.3390/coatings8090317. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 144.Baxamusa S.H., Stadermann M., Aracne-Ruddle C., Nelson A.J., Chea M., Li S., Youngblood K., Suratwala T.I. Enhanced Delamination of Ultrathin Free-Standing Polymer Films via Self-Limiting Surface Modification. Langmuir. 2014;30:5126–5132. doi: 10.1021/la5011665. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145.Nathanael A.J., Oh T.H. Biopolymer Coatings for Biomedical Applications. Polymers. 2020;12:3061. doi: 10.3390/polym12123061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146.Jahangiri F., Mohanty A.K., Misra M. Sustainable Biodegradable Coatings for Food Packaging: Challenges and Opportunities. Green Chem. 2024;26:4934–4974. doi: 10.1039/D3GC02647G. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 147.Vartiainen J., Vähä-Nissi M., Harlin A., Vartiainen J., Vähä-Nissi M., Harlin A. Biopolymer Films and Coatings in Packaging Applications—A Review of Recent Developments. Mater. Sci. Appl. 2014;5:708–718. doi: 10.4236/msa.2014.510072. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 148.Eranda D.H.U., Chaijan M., Panpipat W., Karnjanapratum S., Cerqueira M.A., Castro-Muñoz R. Gelatin-Chitosan Interactions in Edible Films and Coatings Doped with Plant Extracts for Biopreservation of Fresh Tuna Fish Products: A Review. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024;280:135661. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.135661. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149.Adhikari M., Koirala S., Anal A.K. Edible Multilayer Coating Using Electrostatic Layer-by-Layer Deposition of Chitosan and Pectin Enhances Shelf Life of Fresh Strawberries. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2023;58:871–879. doi: 10.1111/ijfs.15704. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 150.Rossi-Márquez G., Dávalos-Saucedo C.A., Farris S., Mayek-Pérez N., Di Pierro P. Multilayered Edible Coatings to Enhance Some Quality Attributes of Ready-to-Eat Cherimoya (Annona cherimola) Coatings. 2022;13:41. doi: 10.3390/coatings13010041. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 151.Wentz F., Olofsson S. Master’s Thesis. Lund University; Lund, Sweden: 2023. A Study on Lignin or Zein Based Hydrophobic Coatings. [Google Scholar]
- 152.Jose C., Thomas S., Ahmad I., Marin L., Vesel A. Deposition of Chitosan on Plasma-Treated Polymers—A Review. Polymers. 2023;15:1109. doi: 10.3390/POLYM15051109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 153.Theapsak S., Watthanaphanit A., Rujiravanit R. Preparation of Chitosan-Coated Polyethylene Packaging Films by DBD Plasma Treatment. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2012;4:2474–2482. doi: 10.1021/am300168a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 154.Oliviero M., Di Maio E., Iannace S. Effect of Molecular Structure on Film Blowing Ability of Thermoplastic Zein. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2010;115:277–287. doi: 10.1002/app.31116. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 155.Di Maio E., Mali R., Iannace S. Investigation of Thermoplasticity of Zein and Kafirin Proteins: Mixing Process and Mechanical Properties. J. Polym. Environ. 2010;18:626–633. doi: 10.1007/s10924-010-0224-x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 156.Rojas-Lema S., Gomez-Caturla J., Balart R., Arrieta M.P., Garcia-Sanoguera D. Development and Characterization of Thermoplastic Zein Biopolymers Plasticized with Glycerol Suitable for Injection Molding. Ind. Crops Prod. 2024;218:119035. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2024.119035. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 157.Long J., Qian M. Biodegradable Protein-Based Plastics with Improved Mechanical Strength and Water Resistance. US11739216B2. U.S. Patent. 2020 December 4;
- 158.Zhang Y., Liu B.L., Wang L.J., Deng Y.H., Zhou S.Y., Feng J.W. Preparation, Structure and Properties of Acid Aqueous Solution Plasticized Thermoplastic Chitosan. Polymers. 2019;11:818. doi: 10.3390/polym11050818. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 159.Krishna M., Nindo C.I., Min S.C. Development of Fish Gelatin Edible Films Using Extrusion and Compression Molding. J. Food Eng. 2012;108:337–344. doi: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2011.08.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 160.Matet M., Heuzey M.C., Pollet E., Ajji A., Avérous L. Innovative Thermoplastic Chitosan Obtained by Thermo-Mechanical Mixing with Polyol Plasticizers. Carbohydr. Polym. 2013;95:241–251. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.02.052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 161.Byaruhanga Y.B., Erasmus C., Emmambux M.N., Taylor J.R.N. Effect of Heating Cast Kafirin Films on Their Functional Properties. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2007;87:167–175. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.2700. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 162.Georget D.M.R., Elkhalifa A.E.O., Peter S.B. Structural Changes in Kafirin Extracted from a White Type II Tannin Sorghum during Germination. J. Cereal Sci. 2012;55:106–111. doi: 10.1016/j.jcs.2011.10.007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 163.Wang Y., Zhang L., Cao G., Li Z., Du M. Effect of Heat Treatment on Gelatin Properties and the Construction of High Internal Phase Emulsions for 3D Printing. Foods. 2024;13:4009. doi: 10.3390/foods13244009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 164.Hoque M.S., Benjakul S., Prodpran T. Effect of Heat Treatment of Film-Forming Solution on the Properties of Film from Cuttlefish (Sepia Pharaonis) Skin Gelatin. J. Food Eng. 2010;96:66–73. doi: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2009.06.046. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 165.Mahanta B.P., Bora P.K., Kemprai P., Borah G., Lal M., Haldar S. Thermolabile Essential Oils, Aromas and Flavours: Degradation Pathways, Effect of Thermal Processing and Alteration of Sensory Quality. Food Res. Int. 2021;145:110404. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2021.110404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 166.Yang H., Hou L., Sun H.M., Ye S.H. Degradation Kinetics of Vitamins in Different Enteral Feeding Formulas during Storage at Different Temperatures. Heliyon. 2024;10:e29653. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29653. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 167.de Vilela Silva E.T., de Queiroz A.J.M., de Figueirêdo R.M.F., Moura H.V., dos Santos F.S., de Franςa Silva A.P., Cavalcanti C.F., Gregório M.G., Galdino P.O., Gomes J.P. Dynamic Modelling of Degradation Kinetics of Phenolic Compounds, Phenolic Profiles, Mineral Content, and Overall Antioxidant Capacity of Germinated Peanut Flours. LWT. 2023;183:114927. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2023.114927. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 168.Gharsallaoui A., Roudaut G., Chambin O., Voilley A., Saurel R. Applications of Spray-Drying in Microencapsulation of Food Ingredients: An Overview. Food Res. Int. 2007;40:1107–1121. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2007.07.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 169.Zhang L., Kosaraju S.L. Biopolymeric Delivery System for Controlled Release of Polyphenolic Antioxidants. Eur Polym. J. 2007;43:2956–2966. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2007.04.033. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 170.da Rocha C.B., Noreña C.P.Z. Microencapsulation and Controlled Release of Bioactive Compounds from Grape Pomace. Dry. Technol. 2021;39:1018–1032. doi: 10.1080/07373937.2020.1741004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 171.Bisharat L., Alkhatib H.S., Abdelhafez A., Barqawi A., Aljaberi A., Qi S., Berardi A. Hot Melt Extruded Zein for Controlled Delivery of Diclofenac Sodium: Effect of Drug Loading and Medium Composition. Int. J. Pharm. 2020;585:119503. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2020.119503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 172.Bouman J., Belton P., Venema P., Van Der Linden E., De Vries R., Qi S. Controlled Release from Zein Matrices: Interplay of Drug Hydrophobicity and PH. Pharm. Res. 2015;33:673–685. doi: 10.1007/s11095-015-1818-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 173.Masanabo M.A., Ray S.S., Emmambux M.N. Properties of Thermoplastic Maize Starch-Zein Composite Films Prepared by Extrusion Process under Alkaline Conditions. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2022;208:443–452. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.03.060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 174.Chen Y., Ye R., Xu H. Physicochemical Properties of Zein-Based Films by Electrophoretic Deposition Using Indium Tin Oxide Electrodes: Vertical and Horizontal Electric Fields. Int. J. Food Prop. 2016;19:945–957. doi: 10.1080/10942912.2015.1041038. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 175.Taylor J.R.N., Taylor J. Do Kafirin Bioplastic Materials Have Unique Functional Characteristics? Cereal Chem. 2023;100:539–555. doi: 10.1002/cche.10648. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 176.Giteru S.G., Oey I., Ali M.A., Johnson S.K., Fang Z. Effect of Kafirin-Based Films Incorporating Citral and Quercetin on Storage of Fresh Chicken Fillets. Food Control. 2017;80:37–44. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2017.04.029. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 177.Pavlatkova L., Sogut E., Sedlarikova J., Pleva P., Petit L., Masar M., Peer P., Janalikova M., Uysal-Unalan I. Zein/Chitosan/Cellulose Nanocrystal Based Active Food Contact Layer: Unlocking the Interrelations between Release Behavior, Mechanical Stability, and Hydrolysis. Food Hydrocoll. 2025;166:111316. doi: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2025.111316. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 178.Velásquez E., Rojas A., Piña C., Galotto M.J., de Dicastillo C.L. Development of Bilayer Biodegradable Composites Containing Cellulose Nanocrystals with Antioxidant Properties. Polymers. 2019;11:1945. doi: 10.3390/polym11121945. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 179.De Almeida C.B., Corradini E., Forato L.A., Fujihara R., Filho J.F.L. Microstructure and Thermal and Functional Properties of Biodegradable Films Produced Using Zein. Polímeros. 2018;28:30–37. doi: 10.1590/0104-1428.11516. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 180.AL-Hassan A.A., Norziah M.H. Effect of Transglutaminase Induced Crosslinking on the Properties of Starch/Gelatin Films. Food Packag. Shelf Life. 2017;13:15–19. doi: 10.1016/j.fpsl.2017.04.006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 181.Hou B.Y., Wang B.J., Weng Y.M. Transglutaminase Cross-Linked and Lysozyme-Incorporated Antimicrobial Tilapia Collagen Edible Films: Development and Characterization. Foods. 2023;12:1475. doi: 10.3390/foods12071475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 182.Masamba K., Li Y., Hategekimana J., Zehadi M., Ma J., Zhong F. Evaluation of Mechanical and Water Barrier Properties of Transglutaminase Cross-Linked Zein Films Incorporated with Oleic Acid. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2016;51:1159–1167. doi: 10.1111/ijfs.13069. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 183.Westlake J.R., Tran M.W., Jiang Y., Zhang X., Burrows A.D., Xie M. Biodegradable Active Packaging with Controlled Release: Principles, Progress, and Prospects. ACS Food Sci. Technol. 2022;2:1166–1183. doi: 10.1021/acsfoodscitech.2c00070. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 184.Li Y., Zhu J., Cheng H., Li G., Cho H., Jiang M., Gao Q., Zhang X. Developments of Advanced Electrospinning Techniques: A Critical Review. Adv. Mater. Technol. 2021;6:2100410. doi: 10.1002/admt.202100410. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 185.Castillo-Henríquez L., Vargas-Zúñiga R., Pacheco-Molina J., Vega-Baudrit J. Electrospun Nanofibers: A Nanotechnological Approach for Drug Delivery and Dissolution Optimization in Poorly Water-Soluble Drugs. ADMET DMPK. 2020;8:325–353. doi: 10.5599/admet.844. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 186.Jahanbakhsh Oskouei M., Alizadeh Khaledabad M., Almasi H., Hamishekar H., Amiri S. Preparation and Characterization of Kafirin/PLA Electrospun Nanofibers Activated by Syzygium Aromaticum Essential Oil. Polym. Bull. 2024;81:10061–10079. doi: 10.1007/s00289-024-05179-z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 187.Moradinezhad F., Aliabadi M., Ansarifar E. Zein Multilayer Electrospun Nanofibers Contain Essential Oil: Release Kinetic, Functional Effectiveness, and Application to Fruit Preservation. Foods. 2024;13:700. doi: 10.3390/foods13050700. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 188.Wang H., Xia R., Zhou M., Williams G.R., Amler E., Zhou F.L., Tamaddon M., Liu C. The Development of a Coaxial Electrospinning Formula Using Fish Gelatin/PBS as the Core for Structurally Intact Liposome Loading and Release. Polymers. 2025;17:944. doi: 10.3390/polym17070944. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 189.Ali S.H., Mahammed M.A., Yasin S.A. Characterization of Electrospinning Chitosan Nanofibers Used for Wound Dressing. Polymers. 2024;16:1984. doi: 10.3390/polym16141984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 190.Songchotikunpan P., Tattiyakul J., Supaphol P. Extraction and Electrospinning of Gelatin from Fish Skin. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2008;42:247–255. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2007.11.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 191.Isik B.S., Bayram S., Altay F. Electrospinning Encapsulation of Chlorophylls Microwave-Extracted from Spinach Waste and Utilization as Coloring Agent in Yogurt. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2025;18:4684–4706. doi: 10.1007/s11947-024-03740-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 192.Yao Z.C., Chen S.C., Ahmad Z., Huang J., Chang M.W., Li J.S. Essential Oil Bioactive Fibrous Membranes Prepared via Coaxial Electrospinning. J. Food Sci. 2017;82:1412–1422. doi: 10.1111/1750-3841.13723. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 193.Camerlo A., Bühlmann-Popa A.M., Vebert-Nardin C., Rossi R.M., Fortunato G. Environmentally Controlled Emulsion Electrospinning for the Encapsulation of Temperature-Sensitive Compounds. J. Mater. Sci. 2014;49:8154–8162. doi: 10.1007/s10853-014-8524-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 194.Topuz F., Uyar T. Electrospinning of Sustainable Polymers from Biomass for Active Food Packaging. Sustain. Food Technol. 2024;2:1266–1296. doi: 10.1039/D4FB00147H. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 195.Amorim L.F.A., Mouro C., Gouveia I.C. Electrospun Fiber Materials Based on Polysaccharides and Natural Colorants for Food Packaging Applications. Cellulose. 2024;31:6043–6069. doi: 10.1007/s10570-024-05956-z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 196.Angel N., Li S., Yan F., Kong L. Recent Advances in Electrospinning of Nanofibers from Bio-Based Carbohydrate Polymers and Their Applications. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2022;120:308–324. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2022.01.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 197.Tan S.M., Teoh X.Y., Le Hwang J., Khong Z.P., Sejare R., Almashhadani A.Q., Assi R.A., Chan S.Y. Electrospinning and Its Potential in Fabricating Pharmaceutical Dosage Form. J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol. 2022;76:103761. doi: 10.1016/j.jddst.2022.103761. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 198.Peresin M.S., Habibi Y., Vesterinen A.H., Rojas O.J., Pawlak J.J., Seppälä J.V. Effect of Moisture on Electrospun Nanofiber Composites of Poly(Vinyl Alcohol) and Cellulose Nanocrystals. Biomacromolecules. 2010;11:2471–2477. doi: 10.1021/bm1006689. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 199.Jiang Q., Reddy N., Zhang S., Roscioli N., Yang Y. Water-Stable Electrospun Collagen Fibers from a Non-Toxic Solvent and Crosslinking System. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A. 2013;101A:1237–1247. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.34422. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 200.Khatri M., Khatri Z., El-Ghazali S., Hussain N., Qureshi U.A., Kobayashi S., Ahmed F., Kim I.S. Zein Nanofibers via Deep Eutectic Solvent Electrospinning: Tunable Morphology with Super Hydrophilic Properties. Sci. Rep. 2020;10:15307. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-72337-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 201.Uhljar L.É., Alshweiat A., Katona G., Chung M., Radacsi N., Kókai D., Burián K., Ambrus R. Comparison of Nozzle-Based and Nozzle-Free Electrospinning for Preparation of Fast-Dissolving Nanofibers Loaded with Ciprofloxacin. Pharmaceutics. 2022;14:1559. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14081559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 202.Rosenthal T., Weller J.M., Chan C.K. Needleless Electrospinning for High Throughput Production of Li7La3Zr2O12 Solid Electrolyte Nanofibers. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2019;58:17399–17405. doi: 10.1021/acs.iecr.9b03376. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 203.Kianfar P., Vitale A., Dalle Vacche S., Bongiovanni R. Enhancing Properties and Water Resistance of PEO-Based Electrospun Nanofibrous Membranes by Photo-Crosslinking. J. Mater. Sci. 2020;56:1879–1896. doi: 10.1007/s10853-020-05346-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 204.Mirzaei R., Tangestaninejad S., Marandi A., Moghadam M., Mohammadpoor-Baltork I., Kardanpour R., Abdolvand H. Innovative Cross-Linked Electrospun PVA/MOF Nanocomposites for Removal of Cefixime Antibiotic. Sci. Rep. 2025;15:83. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-84818-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 205.Li C., Wang C., Liu Y., Zhang Y., Wang S., Zhao R., Xu A. Electrospinning and Multilayer Modification to Construct NH2/EPSP-Modified Polyacrylonitrile Nanofiber Films for Humidity Regulation. Prog. Org. Coat. 2023;178:107485. doi: 10.1016/j.porgcoat.2023.107485. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 206.Aflaha R., Putri L.A., Maharani C.N., Rianjanu A., Roto R., Wasisto H.S., Triyana K. Tuning a Superhydrophobic Surface on an Electrospun Polyacrylonitrile Nanofiber Membrane by Polysulfone Blending. ACS Omega. 2024;9:29840–29847. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.4c03554. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 207.Sun W., Ren G., Li B., Li D., Hu S., Zhang Y., Cui Z., Yue W., Yu H., Lu D. Novel Dry Facial Mask Based on Emulsion Electrospinning. Surf. Interfaces. 2024;51:104823. doi: 10.1016/j.surfin.2024.104823. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 208.Vostrejs P., Kovalcik A., Schaubeder J.B., Spirk S., Hricovini M., Nypelö T., Kalina M., Cernekova N., Brezina M., Kargl R. Biobased Antimicrobial Coatings: Layer-by-Layer Assemblies Based on Natural Polyphenols. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. 2025;7:3601–3610. doi: 10.1021/acsapm.4c03681. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 209.dos Santos V.L.S., Araújo R.C., Lisboa E.S., Lopes A.M., de Albuquerque-Júnior R.L., Cardoso J.C., Blanco-Llamero C., Deshpande T.A., Anderson H.O.W., Priefer R., et al. Layer-by-Layer Assembly: A Versatile Approach for Tailored Biomedical Films and Drug Delivery. J. Drug Deliv Sci. Technol. 2024;91:105243. doi: 10.1016/j.jddst.2023.105243. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 210.Partheniadis I., Nikolakakis I., Laidmäe I., Heinämäki J. A Mini-Review: Needleless Electrospinning of Nanofibers for Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Applications. Processes. 2020;8:673. doi: 10.3390/pr8060673. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 211.Saleh-Bey-Kinj Z., Heller Y., Socratous G., Christodoulou P. 3D Printing in Oral Drug Delivery: Technologies, Clinical Applications and Future Perspectives in Precision Medicine. Pharmaceuticals. 2025;18:973. doi: 10.3390/ph18070973. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 212.Nath D., Pal A.K., Misra M., Mohanty A.K. Biodegradable Blown Film Composites from Bioplastic and Talc: Effect of Uniaxial Stretching on Mechanical and Barrier Properties. Macromol. Mater. Eng. 2023;308:2300214. doi: 10.1002/mame.202300214. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 213.Kim S.H., Kang S.E., Kim Y.D., Park M.K. Industrial-Scale Blown Active Packaging Film with Essential Oils: Properties, Dual-Functional Performance, and Box Packaging Application of Instant Noodles. Food Packag. Shelf Life. 2024;43:101276. doi: 10.1016/j.fpsl.2024.101276. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 214.Klinmalai P., Leelapatarapun J., Wongphan P., Harnkarnsujarit N. Antibacterial and Antifungal Activities of Protease Loaded Modified Thermoplastic Starch Blown PBAT Films for Active Packaging. Food Packag. Shelf Life. 2025;50:101541. doi: 10.1016/j.fpsl.2025.101541. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 215.Semenova M. Advances in Molecular Design of Biopolymer-Based Delivery Micro/Nanovehicles for Essential Fatty Acids. Food Hydrocoll. 2017;68:114–121. doi: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2016.09.019. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 216.Leyva-Porras C., Saavedra-Leos Z., Periyasamy T., Asrafali S.P., Lee J. Recent Advances in Functional Biopolymer Films with Antimicrobial and Antioxidant Properties for Enhanced Food Packaging. Polymers. 2025;17:1257. doi: 10.3390/polym17091257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 217.Upadhyay P., Ullah A. Enhancement of Mechanical and Barrier Properties of Chitosan-Based Bionanocomposites Films Reinforced with Eggshell-Derived Hydroxyapatite Nanoparticles. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024;261:129764. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.129764. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 218.Westlake J.R., Tran M.W., Jiang Y., Zhang X., Burrows A.D., Xie M. Biodegradable Biopolymers for Active Packaging: Demand, Development and Directions. Sustain. Food Technol. 2023;1:50–72. doi: 10.1039/D2FB00004K. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 219.Acosta-Humánez M.F., Arrieta A.A., Hernández J., Garay Y., Combatt E.M., Libreros-Castillo K.H., Afanasjeva N., Palencia M. An Overview of Basic Characterization Techniques for Natural-Originated Biopolymers: UV-Vis and FTIR Spectroscopy-A Review. J. Sci. Technol. Appl. 2025;18:1–9. doi: 10.34294/j.jsta.25.18.106. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 220.Chen H., Wang Q., Deng Y., Zhang J., Wang Y., Zhao H., Zhu Y., Zhang Y., Javed M., Zhuang L., et al. Experimental and Theoretical Studies on Antioxidant and Antibacterial Properties of Chitosan-Gelatin Functional Composite Films Loaded with Flavonoids. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024;282:137449. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.137449. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 221.Cullity B.D., Stock S.R. Elements of X-Ray Diffraction. Pearson New International Edition; Harlow, UK: 2014. [Google Scholar]
- 222.Sun Y., Wu S., Jiao Z., Liu D., Li X., Shang T., Tian Z. Preparation and Characterization of Active Packaging Film Containing Chitosan/Gelatin/Brassica Crude Extract. Sci. Rep. 2025;15:6729. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-90638-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 223.Mishra G., Praharaj P., Pandey S., Parida S. Biodegradable Layered Double Hydroxide Based Polymeric Films for Sustainable Food Packaging Applications. Appl. Clay Sci. 2023;240:106978. doi: 10.1016/j.clay.2023.106978. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 224.Kargupta T., Pooja N., Rahman M.H., Vij I., Biswas R., Roy S., Mazumder N. An Insight into Thermal, Chemical, and Structural Characterization of Biopolymers. Discov. Appl. Sci. 2025;7:865. doi: 10.1007/s42452-025-07549-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 225.Saalwächter K. Applications of NMR in Polymer Characterization—An Introduction. In: Zhang R., Miyoshi T., Sun P., editors. NMR Methods for Characterization of Synthetic and Natural Polymers. The Royal Society of Chemistry; London, UK: 2019. pp. 1–22. [Google Scholar]
- 226.Zhao R., Sandström C., Zhang H., Tan T. NMR Study on the Inclusion Complexes of β-Cyclodextrin with Isoflavones. Molecules. 2016;21:372. doi: 10.3390/molecules21040372. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 227.Kfoury M., Landy D., Ruellan S., Auezova L., Greige-Gerges H., Fourmentin S. Determination of Formation Constants and Structural Characterization of Cyclodextrin Inclusion Complexes with Two Phenolic Isomers: Carvacrol and Thymol. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2016;12:29. doi: 10.3762/bjoc.12.5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 228.Pradhan B.L., Sen P., Dey K.K., Ghosh M. Investigating Structural and Dynamic Changes in Cellulose Due to Nanocrystallization. J. Biomol. NMR. 2025;79:259–280. doi: 10.1007/s10858-025-00472-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 229.Wang W., Cai J., Xu Z., Zhang Y., Niu F., Gao M., Yang J. Structural Characteristics of Plant Cell Wall Elucidated by Solution-State 2D NMR Spectroscopy with an Optimized Procedure. Green Process. Synth. 2020;9:650–663. doi: 10.1515/gps-2020-0049. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 230.Aznar M., Rodriguez-Lafuente A., Alfaro P., Nerin C. UPLC-Q-TOF-MS Analysis of Non-Volatile Migrants from New Active Packaging Materials. Anal. Bioanal Chem. 2012;404:1945–1957. doi: 10.1007/s00216-012-6247-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 231.Otero-Pazos P., Sendón R., Blanco-Fernandez B., Blanco-Dorado S., Alvarez-Lorenzo C., Concheiro A., Angulo I., Paseiro-Losada P., Rodríguez-Bernaldo de Quirós A. Preparation of Antioxidant Active Films Based on Chitosan: Diffusivity Study of α-Tocopherol into Food Simulants. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2016;53:2817–2826. doi: 10.1007/s13197-016-2256-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 232.Kandioller W., Theiner J., Keppler B.K., Kowol C.R. Elemental Analysis: An Important Purity Control but Prone to Manipulations. Inorg. Chem. Front. 2022;9:412–416. doi: 10.1039/D1QI01379C. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 233.dos Santos Z.M., Caroni A.L.P.F., Pereira M.R., da Silva D.R., Fonseca J.L.C. Determination of Deacetylation Degree of Chitosan: A Comparison between Conductometric Titration and CHN Elemental Analysis. Carbohydr. Res. 2009;344:2591–2595. doi: 10.1016/j.carres.2009.08.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 234.Santos D.S., Matos R.S., Pinto E.P., Santos S.B., da Fonseca Filho H.D., Prioli R., Ferreira I.M., Souza T.M. Probing the Physicochemical, Nanomorphological, and Antimicrobial Attributes of Sustainable Silk Fibroin/Copaiba Oleoresin-Loaded PVA Films for Food Packaging Applications. Polymers. 2025;17:375. doi: 10.3390/polym17030375. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 235.Rizal S., Alfatah T., Abdul Khalil H.P.S., Yahya E.B., Abdullah C.K., Mistar E.M., Ikramullah I., Kurniawan R., Bairwan R.D. Enhanced Functional Properties of Bioplastic Films Using Lignin Nanoparticles from Oil Palm-Processing Residue. Polymers. 2022;14:5126. doi: 10.3390/polym14235126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 236.Cabrera-Barjas G., González M., Benavides-Valenzuela S., Preza X., Paredes-Padilla Y.A., Castaño-Rivera P., Segura R., Durán-Lara E.F., Nesic A. Active Packaging Based on Hydroxypropyl Methyl Cellulose/Fungal Chitin Nanofibers Films for Controlled Release of Ferulic Acid. Polymers. 2025;17:2113. doi: 10.3390/polym17152113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 237.Gautam S., Verma M., Lakhanpal T.S. Machine-Learning Driven Design of Bio-Based Active Food Packaging Films with Improved Mechanical Properties. Sustain. Food Technol. 2025;3:1705–1722. doi: 10.1039/D5FB00198F. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 238.Chen H.W., Lin M.F. Characterization, Biocompatibility, and Optimization of Electrospun SF/PCL/CS Composite Nanofibers. Polymers. 2020;12:1439. doi: 10.3390/polym12071439. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 239.Yang X., Ma Y., Huang T., Zhang K., Zhang Q., Huang J., Huang M. Optimization and Characterization of Modified Starch-Chitosan Composite Films Incorporated with Gongju Extract. LWT. 2025;226:117965. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2025.117965. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 240.Sun R., Li L., Zhou J., Zhang Y., Sun H., Zhang D., Wu Q. Development of Zein–PEG400/PVA–Chitosan Bilayer Films for Intelligent Packaging. Polymers. 2025;17:387. doi: 10.3390/polym17030387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 241.Lal R., Ramachandran S., Arnsdorf M.F. Multidimensional Atomic Force Microscopy: A Versatile Novel Technology for Nanopharmacology Research. AAPS J. 2010;12:716–728. doi: 10.1208/s12248-010-9232-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 242.Variola F. Atomic Force Microscopy in Biomaterials Surface Science. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2015;17:2950–2959. doi: 10.1039/C4CP04427D. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 243.Mulla M.F.Z., Ahmed J., Vahora A., Pathania S., Rashed M.S. Characterization of Biopolymers Based Antibacterial Films Enriched with Thyme Essential Oil and Their Application for Milk Cake Preservation. Front. Food Sci. Technol. 2024;4:1356582. doi: 10.3389/frfst.2024.1356582. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 244.Sánchez J.T., García A.V., Martínez-Abad A., Vilaplana F., Jiménez A., Garrigós M.C. Physicochemical and Functional Properties of Active Fish Gelatin-Based Edible Films Added with Aloe Vera Gel. Foods. 2020;9:1248. doi: 10.3390/foods9091248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 245.Ghanbarzodeh B., Oromiehie A.R., Musavi M., Falcone P.M., D-Jomeh Z.E., Rad E.R. Study of Mechanical Properties, Oxygen Permeability and AFM Topography of Zein Films Plasticized by Polyols. Packag. Technol. Sci. 2007;20:155–163. doi: 10.1002/pts.750. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 246.Juarez-Salazar R., Esquivel-Hernandez S., Diaz-Ramirez V.H. Optical Fringe Projection: A Straightforward Approach to 3D Metrology. Metrology. 2025;5:47. doi: 10.3390/metrology5030047. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 247.Chen L.C., Duong D.H., Chen C.S. Optical 3-D Profilometry for Measuring Semiconductor Wafer Surfaces with Extremely Variant Reflectivities. Appl. Sci. 2019;9:2060. doi: 10.3390/app9102060. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 248.Kaewprachu P., Jaisan C. Physicochemical Properties of Chitosan from Green Mussel Shells (Perna Viridis): A Comparative Study. Polymers. 2023;15:2816. doi: 10.3390/polym15132816. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 249.Türksever C., Koç B., Esmer O.K. Sustainable Alternatives in Multilayer Packaging: Storage Stability of Pudding Powder Under Accelerated Storage Conditions. Foods. 2025;14:3806. doi: 10.3390/foods14223806. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 250.Miranda S.P., Garnica O., Lara-Sagahon V., Cárdenas G. Water Vapor Permeability and Mechanical Properties of Chitosan Composite Films. J. Chil. Chem. Soc. 2004;49:173–178. doi: 10.4067/s0717-97072004000200013. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 251.Liu F., Chang W., Chen M., Xu F., Ma J., Zhong F. Tailoring Physicochemical Properties of Chitosan Films and Their Protective Effects on Meat by Varying Drying Temperature. Carbohydr. Polym. 2019;212:150–159. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.02.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 252.Bordenave N., Grelier S., Pichavant F., Coma V. Water and Moisture Susceptibility of Chitosan and Paper-Based Materials: Structure–Property Relationships. J. Agric Food Chem. 2007;55:9479–9488. doi: 10.1021/jf070595i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 253.Patil D.A., Tated S., Mhaske S.T. Plasticized Kafirin-Based Films: Analysis of Thermal, Barrier and Mechanical Properties. Polym. Bull. 2021;78:1721–1733. doi: 10.1007/s00289-020-03179-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 254.Arruda T.R., de Oliveira Machado G., Marques C.S., de Souza A.L., Pelissari F.M., de Oliveira T.V., Silva R.R.A. An Overview of Starch-Based Materials for Sustainable Food Packaging: Recent Advances, Limitations, and Perspectives. Macromolecules. 2025;5:19. doi: 10.3390/macromol5020019. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 255.Khanal B.P., Imoro Y., Chen Y.H., Straube J., Knoche M. Surface Moisture Increases Microcracking and Water Vapour Permeance of Apple Fruit Skin. Plant Biol. 2021;23:74–82. doi: 10.1111/plb.13178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 256.Liu Y., Xu H., Chen Z., Xie Z., Wen H., Chang X., Li G. Development of Lily Starch Films Reinforced with Chitosan–Honeysuckle Essential Oil Hybrid Particles and Cellulose Nanofibers for Enhanced Properties. Foods. 2025;14:589. doi: 10.3390/foods14040589. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 257.Daza L.D., Parra D.O., Rosselló C., Arango W.M., Eim V.S., Váquiro H.A. Influence of Ulluco Starch Modified by Annealing on the Physicochemical Properties of Biodegradable Films. Polymers. 2022;14:4251. doi: 10.3390/polym14204251. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 258.Daza L.D., Montealegre M.Á., Sandoval Aldana A., Obando M., Váquiro H.A., Eim V.S., Simal S. Effect of Essential Oils from Lemongrass and Tahiti Lime Residues on the Physicochemical Properties of Chitosan-Based Biodegradable Films. Foods. 2023;12:1824. doi: 10.3390/foods12091824. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 259.Sosa A.M., Cottet C., Berin B.E., Martínez L.M., Peltzer M.A., Prieto M.J., Martinez C.S. Development of Films for Wound Healing Based on Gelatin and Oil/Water Emulsions as Carriers of Bioactive Compounds. Pharmaceutics. 2025;17:357. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics17030357. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 260.Kim J.M., Lee M.H., Ko J.A., Kang D.H., Bae H., Park H.J. Influence of Food with High Moisture Content on Oxygen Barrier Property of Polyvinyl Alcohol (PVA)/Vermiculite Nanocomposite Coated Multilayer Packaging Film. J. Food Sci. 2018;83:349–357. doi: 10.1111/1750-3841.14012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 261.Argel-Pérez S., Velásquez-Cock J., Zuluaga R., Gómez-Hoyos C. Improving Hydrophobicity and Water Vapor Barrier Properties in Paper Using Cellulose Nanofiber-Stabilized Cocoa Butter and PLA Emulsions. Coatings. 2024;14:1310. doi: 10.3390/coatings14101310. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 262.Teoh R.W., Ting A.S.Y., Thoo Y.Y. Characterization and Modeling of Diffusion Kinetics of Rosemary Oleoresin Extract from Gellan Gum-Based Film. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2023;60:2978–2989. doi: 10.1007/s13197-023-05826-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 263.Olewnik-Kruszkowska E., Vishwakarma A., Wrona M., Bertella A., Rudawska A., Gierszewska M., Schmidt B. Comparative Study of Crucial Properties of Packaging Based on Polylactide and Selected Essential Oils. Foods. 2025;14:204. doi: 10.3390/foods14020204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 264.Sharma C., Kundu S., Singh S., Saxena J., Gautam S., Kumar A., Pathak P. From Concept to Shelf: Engineering Biopolymer-Based Food Packaging for Sustainability. RSC Sustain. 2025;3:4992–5026. doi: 10.1039/D5SU00483G. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 265.Attallah O.A., Mojicevic M., Garcia E.L., Azeem M., Chen Y., Asmawi S., Fournet M.B. Macro and Micro Routes to High Performance Bioplastics: Bioplastic Biodegradability and Mechanical and Barrier Properties. Polymers. 2021;13:2155. doi: 10.3390/polym13132155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 266.Mccurdy C., Dixion D., Archer E., Dooher T., Edwards I. A Comparison of the Sealing, Forming and Moisture Vapour Transmission Properties of Polylactic Acid (PLA), Polyethene (PE) and Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) Coated Boards for Packaging Applications. J. Packag. Technol. Res. 2022;6:91–100. doi: 10.1007/s41783-022-00131-w. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 267.American Society for Testing and Materials . Standard Test Methods for Gravimetric Determination of Water Vapor Transmission Rate of Materials. ASTM International; West Conshohocken, PA, USA: 2024. [Google Scholar]
- 268.Murugan G., Benjakul S., Prodpran T., Rajasekaran B., Baboonsundaram A., Nagarajan M. Enhancement of Barrier Properties of Fish Skin Gelatin Based Film Layered with PLA and PBAT. J. Polym. Environ. 2023;31:5416–5431. doi: 10.1007/s10924-023-02948-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 269.Piñeros-Guerrero N., Collazo-Bigliardi S., Ortega-Toro R. Mechanical and Barrier Properties of Thermoplastic Starch Based Composites by the Incorporation of Montmorillonite Clays. Investig. Desarro. Cienc. Tecnol. Aliment. 2020;5:558–562. [Google Scholar]
- 270.Kalita P., Bhattacharjee B., Goswami A., Pachuau L., Roy S. Development of Zein-Based Functional Packaging in Food Preservation: A Comprehensive Review. J. Food Meas. Charact. 2025;19:6239–6263. doi: 10.1007/s11694-025-03422-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 271.Alvarado S., Sandoval G., Palos I., Tellez S., Aguirre-Loredo Y., Velazquez G. The Effect of Relative Humidity on Tensile Strength and Water Vapor Permeability in Chitosan, Fish Gelatin and Transglutaminase Edible Films. Food Sci. Technol. 2015;35:690–695. doi: 10.1590/1678-457X.6797. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 272.Zehra A., Wani S.M., Jan N., Bhat T.A., Rather S.A., Malik A.R., Hussain S.Z. Development of Chitosan-Based Biodegradable Films Enriched with Thyme Essential Oil and Additives for Potential Applications in Packaging of Fresh Collard Greens. Sci. Rep. 2022;12:16923. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-20751-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 273.Azlin T.N., Lyn F.H., Hanani Z.A.N. Active Food Packaging Development: Rambutan (Nephelium Lappaceum L.) Peel Extract Incorporated into Starch-Protein Blend Films. Sustain. Food Technol. 2025;3:2032–2040. doi: 10.1039/D5FB00343A. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 274.Hasanin M.S., Hassan Y.R., Youssef A.M. Active Packaging Films Based on the Nanoform of Chitin, Alginate, and Layered Double Hydroxides: Characterization, Mechanical Properties, Permeability, and Bioactive Properties. RSC Adv. 2024;14:37380–37391. doi: 10.1039/D4RA06306F. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 275.Koppolu R., Lahti J., Abitbol T., Aulin C., Kuusipalo J., Toivakka M. Tailoring the Performance of Nanocellulose-Based Multilayer-Barrier Paperboard Using Biodegradable-Thermoplastics, Pigments, and Plasticizers. Cellulose. 2023;30:6945–6958. doi: 10.1007/s10570-023-05281-x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 276.American Society for Testing and Materials . Test Method for Tensile Properties of Thin Plastic Sheeting. ASTM International; West Conshohocken, PA, USA: 2018. [Google Scholar]
- 277.Morel S., Mura G., Gallarate M., Sapino S. Cosmetic Packaging: European Regulatory Aspects and Sustainability. Cosmetics. 2024;11:110. doi: 10.3390/cosmetics11040110. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 278.Omira A., Grira S., Mourad A.H.I., Alkhedher M. The New Generation of Cosmetics Packaging: A Paradigm Shift. Glob. Transit. 2025;7:223–246. doi: 10.1016/j.glt.2025.04.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 279.Blanco I., Siracusa V. The Use of Thermal Techniques in the Characterization of Bio-Sourced Polymers. Materials. 2021;14:1686. doi: 10.3390/ma14071686. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 280.Lynch J.M., Corniuk R.N., Brignac K.C., Jung M.R., Sellona K., Marchiani J., Weatherford W. Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC): An Important Tool for Polymer Identification and Characterization of Plastic Marine Debris. Environ. Pollut. 2024;346:123607. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2024.123607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 281.Makowskaya K., Jargieło P., Worzakowska M., Rogulska M. Thermal Properties and the Decomposition Path of Novel UV Polymers of Terpene-Based Monomer: Citronellyl Methacrylate. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2023;148:13349–13362. doi: 10.1007/s10973-023-12655-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 282.Zolghadr A., Foroozandehfar A., Kulas D.G., Shonnard D. Study of the Viscosity and Thermal Characteristics of Polyolefins/Solvent Mixtures: Applications for Plastic Pyrolysis. ACS Omega. 2021;6:32832–32840. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.1c04809. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 283.Browne J., Gough J. Application Note SEC/GPC, DSC, and TGA Analysis of Low Molecular Weight Poly-L-Lactic Acid. Waters Corporation; Milford, CT, USA: 2021. [Google Scholar]
- 284.Gill P., Moghadam T.T., Ranjbar B. Differential Scanning Calorimetry Techniques: Applications in Biology and Nanoscience. J. Biomol. Tech. 2010;21:167. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 285.Righetti M.C. Crystallization of Polymers Investigated by Temperature-Modulated DSC. Materials. 2017;10:442. doi: 10.3390/ma10040442. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 286.Thomas L.C. Modulated DSC ® Paper #1 Why Modulated DSC ®?; An Overview and Summary of Advantages and Disadvantages Relative to Traditional DSC. TA Instruments; New Castle, DE, USA: 2005. [Google Scholar]
- 287.Wesolowski M., Leyk E., Wesolowski M., Leyk E. Coupled and Simultaneous Thermal Analysis Techniques in the Study of Pharmaceuticals. Pharmaceutics. 2023;15:1596. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15061596. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 288.Archer W.R., Schulz M.D. Isothermal Titration Calorimetry: Practical Approaches and Current Applications in Soft Matter. Soft Matter. 2020;16:8760–8774. doi: 10.1039/D0SM01345E. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 289.Nuvoli L., Conte P., Fadda C., Reglero Ruiz J.A., García J.M., Baldino S., Mannu A. Structural, Thermal, and Mechanical Properties of Gelatin-Based Films Integrated with Tara Gum. Polymer. 2021;214:123244. doi: 10.1016/j.polymer.2020.123244. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 290.Li Y., Yang J., Sun L., Liu B., Li H., Peng L. Crosslinked Fish Scale Gelatin/Alginate Dialdehyde Functional Films Incorporated with Carbon Dots Derived from Pomelo Peel Waste for Active Food Packaging. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023;253:127290. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.127290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 291.Xu H., Chai Y., Zhang G. Synergistic Effect of Oleic Acid and Glycerol on Zein Film Plasticization. J. Agric Food Chem. 2012;60:10075–10081. doi: 10.1021/jf302940j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 292.Da Silva L.S., Taylor J.R.N. Physical, Mechanical, and Barrier Properties of Kafirin Films from Red and White Sorghum Milling Fractions. Cereal Chem. 2005;82:9–14. doi: 10.1094/CC-82-0009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 293.Nordin N., Othman S.H., Basha K., Rashid A. Mechanical and Thermal Properties of Starch Films Reinforced with Microcellulose Fibres. Food Res. 2018;2:555–563. doi: 10.26656/fr.2017.2(6).110. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 294.Wu H., Lei Y., Lu J., Zhu R., Xiao D., Jiao C., Xia R., Zhang Z., Shen G., Liu Y., et al. Effect of Citric Acid Induced Crosslinking on the Structure and Properties of Potato Starch/Chitosan Composite Films. Food Hydrocoll. 2019;97:105208. doi: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2019.105208. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 295.International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use . ICH Topic Q 1 A (R2) Stability Testing of New Drug Substances and Products. European Medicines Agency; London, UK: 2003. [Google Scholar]
- 296.Lee C.M., Jin S.P., Doh E.J., Lee D.H., Chung J.H. Regional Variation of Human Skin Surface Temperature. Ann. Dermatol. 2019;31:349–352. doi: 10.5021/ad.2019.31.3.349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 297.Zhang Q., Murawsky M., LaCount T., Hao J., Kasting G.B., Newman B., Ghosh P., Raney S.G., Li S.K. Characterization of Temperature Profiles in Skin and Transdermal Delivery System When Exposed to Temperature Gradients In Vivo and In Vitro. Pharm. Res. 2017;34:1491–1504. doi: 10.1007/s11095-017-2171-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 298.Zemitis J., Borodinecs A., Frolova M. Measurements of Moisture Production Caused by Various Sources. Energy Build. 2016;127:884–891. doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.06.045. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 299.Singh S., Habib M., Rao E.S., Kumar Y., Bashir K., Jan S., Jan K. A Comprehensive Overview of Biodegradable Packaging Films: Part I—Sources, Additives, and Preparation Methods. Discov. Food. 2025;5:41. doi: 10.1007/s44187-025-00303-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 300.Sharma S., Mulrey L., Byrne M., Jaiswal A.K., Jaiswal S. Encapsulation of Essential Oils in Nanocarriers for Active Food Packaging. Foods. 2022;11:2337. doi: 10.3390/foods11152337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 301.Wicochea-Rodríguez J.D., Chalier P., Ruiz T., Gastaldi E. Active Food Packaging Based on Biopolymers and Aroma Compounds: How to Design and Control the Release. Front Chem. 2019;7:452563. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2019.00398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 302.Brandelli A. Nanocomposites and Their Application in Antimicrobial Packaging. Front Chem. 2024;12:1356304. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2024.1356304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 303.Reis C.A., Gomes A., do Amaral Sobral P.J. Films Based on Biopolymers Incorporated with Active Compounds Encapsulated in Emulsions: Properties and Potential Applications—A Review. Foods. 2023;12:3602. doi: 10.3390/foods12193602. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 304.Nogueira G.F., de Oliveira R.A., Velasco J.I., Fakhouri F.M. Methods of Incorporating Plant-Derived Bioactive Compounds into Films Made with Agro-Based Polymers for Application as Food Packaging: A Brief Review. Polymers. 2020;12:2518. doi: 10.3390/polym12112518. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 305.Zema L., Sangalli M.E., Maroni A., Foppoli A., Bettero A., Gazzaniga A. Active Packaging for Topical Cosmetic/Drug Products: A Hot-Melt Extruded Preservative Delivery Device. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2010;75:291–296. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2010.03.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 306.Peng Y., Wu Y., Li Y. Development of Tea Extracts and Chitosan Composite Films for Active Packaging Materials. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2013;59:282–289. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2013.04.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 307.Zhang Y., Liu G., Ren F., Liu N., Tong Y., Li Y., Liu A., Wu L., Wang P. Delivery of Curcumin Using Zein-Gum Arabic-Tannic Acid Composite Particles: Fabrication, Characterization, and in Vitro Release Properties. Front. Nutr. 2022;9:842850. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.842850. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 308.Cadinoiu A.N., Rata D.M., Daraba O.M., Ichim D.L., Popescu I., Solcan C., Solcan G. Silver Nanoparticles Biocomposite Films with Antimicrobial Activity: In Vitro and In Vivo Tests. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022;23:10671. doi: 10.3390/ijms231810671. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 309.Ferreira R.R., Souza A.G., Quispe Y.M., Rosa D.S. Essential Oils Loaded-Chitosan Nanocapsules Incorporation in Biodegradable Starch Films: A Strategy to Improve Fruits Shelf Life. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021;188:628–638. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.08.046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 310.Zhang W., Rhim J.W. Functional Edible Films/Coatings Integrated with Lactoperoxidase and Lysozyme and Their Application in Food Preservation. Food Control. 2022;133:108670. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2021.108670. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 311.Benaissa S., Benmansour K., Zenagui C., Bouchenak Khelladi M., Belyagoubi L. Development of Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Chitosan Nanocomposite Films Incorporating with Eco-Friendly Silver Nanoparticles Synthesized with Arabic Gum. Polym. Bull. 2025;82:9275–9301. doi: 10.1007/s00289-025-05898-x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 312.Shehabeldine A.M., Salem S.S., Ali O.M., Abd-Elsalam K.A., Elkady F.M., Hashem A.H. Multifunctional Silver Nanoparticles Based on Chitosan: Antibacterial, Antibiofilm, Antifungal, Antioxidant, and Wound-Healing Activities. J. Fungi. 2022;8:612. doi: 10.3390/jof8060612. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 313.Theerthavathy B.S., Arakhanum S., Ravi Kumar B.S., Ravi Kiran S. Anti-Oxidant and Anti-Microbial Activities of Silver Nanoparticles of Essential Oil Extracts from Leaves of Zanthoxylum Ovalifolium. Eur. J. Med. Plants. 2019;29:1–11. doi: 10.9734/ejmp/2019/v29i330157. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 314.Mussin J., Giusiano G. Synergistic Antimicrobial Activity of Biogenic Silver Nanoparticles and Acanthospermum Australe Essential Oil against Skin Infection Pathogens. Antibiotics. 2024;13:674. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics13070674. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 315.Singh B.K., Maurya A. Plant Essential Oils: From Traditional to Modern-Day Application. Springer; Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany: 2024. Antioxidant Activity of Essential Oils: A Mechanistic Approach; pp. 59–76. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 316.Sheng Y., Sun Y., Tang Y., Yu Y., Wang J., Zheng F., Li Y., Sun Y. Catechins: Protective Mechanism of Antioxidant Stress in Atherosclerosis. Front. Pharmacol. 2023;14:1144878. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1144878. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 317.Tit D.M., Bungau S.G. Antioxidant Activity of Essential Oils. Antioxidants. 2023;12:383. doi: 10.3390/antiox12020383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 318.Kuai L., Liu F., Chiou B.S., Avena-Bustillos R.J., McHugh T.H., Zhong F. Controlled Release of Antioxidants from Active Food Packaging: A Review. Food Hydrocoll. 2021;120:106992. doi: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2021.106992. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 319.Vidal O.L., Barros Santos M.C., Batista A.P., Andrigo F.F., Baréa B., Lecomte J., Figueroa-Espinoza M.C., Gontard N., Villeneuve P., Guillard V., et al. Active Packaging Films Containing Antioxidant Extracts from Green Coffee Oil By-Products to Prevent Lipid Oxidation. J. Food Eng. 2022;312:110744. doi: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2021.110744. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 320.Singh A., Gu Y., Castellarin S.D., Kitts D.D., Pratap-Singh A. Development and Characterization of the Edible Packaging Films Incorporated with Blueberry Pomace. Foods. 2020;9:1599. doi: 10.3390/foods9111599. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 321.Akhter R., Masoodi F.A., Wani T.A., Rather S.A. Functional Characterization of Biopolymer Based Composite Film: Incorporation of Natural Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Agents. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019;137:1245–1255. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.06.214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 322.Wang I.-C., Jiang Y.-R., Wang Y.-W., Li C.-Y., Wang I.-C., Jiang Y.-R., Wang Y.-W., Li C.-Y. Exploring the Multisensory Attractiveness of Cosmetic Packaging: A Study of Visual and Tactile Design Elements and Attractiveness Factors. Sustainability. 2024;16:5716. doi: 10.3390/su16135716. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 323.Quanjiao L., Jianfeng L., Shun L., Shaotong J., Lin L. Effect of Sodium Alginate on Physicochemical Properties of Fish Skin Gelatin Films. Food Sci. 2019;40:81. doi: 10.7506/SPKX1002-6630-20170830-358. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 324.Pena-Serna C., Lopes Filho J.F. Biodegradable Zein-Based Blend Films: Structural, Mechanical and Barrier Properties. Food Technol. Biotechnol. 2015;53:348–353. doi: 10.17113/ftb.53.03.15.3725. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 325.Gao C., Taylor J., Wellner N., Byaruhanga Y.B., Parker M.L., Mills E.N.C., Belton P.S. Effect of Preparation Conditions on Protein Secondary Structure and Biofilm Formation of Kafirin. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2004;53:306–312. doi: 10.1021/jf0492666. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 326.Busato S., Kremer D., Perevedentsev A. Imaging-Based Metrics Drawn from Visual Perception of Haze and Clarity of Materials. I. Method, Analysis, and Distance-Dependent Transparency. Macromol. Mater. Eng. 2021;306:2100045. doi: 10.1002/mame.202100045. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 327.Jain A., Mason B., Brooks M.S.-L. Development of Tailored Composite Biopolymer Film Formulations Using Minimally Refined Chitosan from American Lobster (Homarus americanus) Shell Waste for Different Food Packaging Applications. Polymers. 2025;17:3132. doi: 10.3390/polym17233132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 328.Chabni A., Bañares C., Sanchez-Rey I., Torres C.F. Active Biodegradable Packaging Films Based on the Revalorization of Food-Grade Olive Oil Mill By-Products. Appl. Sci. 2024;15:312. doi: 10.3390/app15010312. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 329.Stable Micro Systems Measure Stickiness/Adhesiveness. [(accessed on 24 November 2025)]. Available online: https://www.stablemicrosystems.com/properties/stickiness-adhesiveness/
- 330.Romruen O., Kaewprachu P., Sai-Ut S., Kingwascharapong P., Karbowiak T., Zhang W., Rawdkuen S. Impact of Environmental Storage Conditions on Properties and Stability of a Smart Bilayer Film. Sci. Rep. 2024;14:23038. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-74004-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 331.Holm V.K., Ndoni S., Risbo J. The Stability of Poly(Lactic Acid) Packaging Films as Influenced by Humidity and Temperature. J. Food Sci. 2006;71:E40–E44. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2621.2006.tb08895.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 332.Jiang C., Cui H., Tan P., Huang Q., Liu Q., Dong J., Tang Y. Chitosan Membrane Tailored for Topical Acne Treatment by Incorporating Pickering Encapsulated Tea Tree Oil Based on Organosilane-Modified Palygorskite. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2025;321:146317. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2025.146317. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 333.Wang Z., Zhang M., Liang S., Li Y. Enhanced Antioxidant and Antibacterial Activities of Chitosan/Zein Nanoparticle Pickering Emulsion-Incorporated Chitosan Coatings in the Presence of Cinnamaldehyde and Tea Polyphenol. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024;266:131181. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.131181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 334.Subramani G., Manian R. Bioactive Chitosan Films: Integrating Antibacterial, Antioxidant, and Antifungal Properties in Food Packaging. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024;278:134596. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.134596. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 335.Dong J., Wang S., Li M., Liu J., Sun Z., Mandlaa, Chen Z. Application of a Chitosan-Based Active Packaging Film Prepared with Cell-Free Supernatant of Lacticaseibacillus Paracasei ALAC-4 in Mongolian Cheese Preservation. J. Food Prot. 2023;86:100158. doi: 10.1016/j.jfp.2023.100158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 336.Wang F., Xie C., Ye R., Tang H., Jiang L., Liu Y. Development of Active Packaging with Chitosan, Guar Gum and Watermelon Rind Extract: Characterization, Application and Performance Improvement Mechanism. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023;227:711–725. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.12.210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 337.Xie C., Wang F., He Z., Tang H., Li H., Hou J., Liu Y., Jiang L. Development and Characterization of Active Packaging Based on Chitosan/Chitin Nanofibers Incorporated with Scallion Flower Extract and Its Preservation in Fresh-Cut Bananas. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023;242:125045. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.125045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 338.Yadav S., Mehrotra G.K., Dutta P.K. Chitosan Based ZnO Nanoparticles Loaded Gallic-Acid Films for Active Food Packaging. Food Chem. 2021;334:127605. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.127605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 339.Qin Z., Fang W., Jiang Q., Li J., Zhang H. The Urchin-like Gold Nanoparticles/Poly(ε-Caprolactone)/Chitosan Electrospun Nanofibers for Antibacterial Active Packaging. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024;274:133287. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.133287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 340.Alirezalu K., Pirouzi S., Yaghoubi M., Karimi-Dehkordi M., Jafarzadeh S., Mousavi Khaneghah A. Packaging of Beef Fillet with Active Chitosan Film Incorporated with Ɛ-Polylysine: An Assessment of Quality Indices and Shelf Life. Meat Sci. 2021;176:108475. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2021.108475. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 341.Basumatary I.B., Mukherjee A., Kumar S. Chitosan-Based Composite Films Containing Eugenol Nanoemulsion, ZnO Nanoparticles and Aloe Vera Gel for Active Food Packaging. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023;242:124826. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.124826. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 342.Bi F., Qin Y., Chen D., Kan J., Liu J. Development of Active Packaging Films Based on Chitosan and Nano-Encapsulated Luteolin. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021;182:545–553. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.04.063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 343.Salem A., Jridi M., Abdelhedi O., Fakhfakh N., Nasri M., Debeaufort F., Zouari N. Development and Characterization of Fish Gelatin-Based Biodegradable Film Enriched with Lepidium Sativum Extract as Active Packaging for Cheese Preservation. Heliyon. 2021;7:e08099. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08099. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 344.Hanani Z.A.N., Yee F.C., Nor-Khaizura M.A.R. Effect of Pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) Peel Powder on the Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Properties of Fish Gelatin Films as Active Packaging. Food Hydrocoll. 2019;89:253–259. doi: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2018.10.007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 345.Liu Y., Wang J., Zhang A., Xu L., Li X., Hu T., Shi X. Characterization of Fish Gelatin-Artemisia Sphaerocephala Krasch Gum Films Prepared by Adding Bamboo Leaf Flavonoids as an Active Substrate: Application in Chilled Pork Preservation. LWT. 2025;231:118367. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2025.118367. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 346.Ponnusamy A., Khan A., Prodpran T., Kim J.T., Benjakul S., Rhim J.W. Active Packaging Film Based on Chitosan/Gelatin Blend Incorporated with Mango Peel Carbon Dots: Properties and Shelf Life Extension of Minced Pork. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2025;288:138692. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.138692. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 347.Zheng H., Chen X., Li L., Qi D., Wang J., Lou J., Wang W. Development of Gelatin-Based Active Packaging and Its Application in Bread Preservation. J. Renew. Mater. 2023;11:3693–3709. doi: 10.32604/jrm.2023.027748. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 348.Fathihatunnisa R., Sedayu B.B., Nurimala M., Purwaningsih S., Hakim A.R., Fauzi A. Performance of Fish Gelatin Coating Incorporated with Liquid Smoke in Tilapia Fillet Preservation. Food Packag. Shelf Life. 2025;49:101485. doi: 10.1016/j.fpsl.2025.101485. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 349.Nilsuwan K., Rajagukguk Y.V., Patil U., Prodpran T., Benjakul S. Fish Gelatin-Based Film Containing Maillard Reaction Products: Properties and Its Use as Bag for Packing Chicken Skin Oil. J. Renew Mater. 2024;12:1125–1143. doi: 10.32604/jrm.2024.051361. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 350.Stephen Inbaraj B., Sridhar K., Sharma M., Giannakas A., Rizqy Fauzan H., Ningrum A., Supriyadi S. Evaluation of a Fish Gelatin-Based Edible Film Incorporated with Ficus Carica L. Leaf Extract as Active Packaging. Gels. 2023;9:918. doi: 10.3390/gels9110918. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 351.Li Y., Shan P., Yu F., Li H., Peng L. Fabrication and Characterization of Waste Fish Scale-Derived Gelatin/Sodium Alginate/Carvacrol Loaded ZIF-8 Nanoparticles Composite Films with Sustained Antibacterial Activity for Active Food Packaging. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023;230:123192. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.123192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 352.Ali M.S., Haq M., Roy V.C., Ho T.C., Park J.S., Han J.M., Chun B.S. Development of Fish Gelatin/Carrageenan/Zein Bio-Nanocomposite Active-Films Incorporated with Turmeric Essential Oil and Their Application in Chicken Meat Preservation. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces. 2023;226:113320. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2023.113320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 353.Wu J., Song G., Huang R., Yan Y., Li Q., Guo X., Shi X., Tian Y., Wang J., Wang S. Fish Gelatin Films Incorporated with Cinnamaldehyde and Its Sulfobutyl Ether-β-Cyclodextrin Inclusion Complex and Their Application in Fish Preservation. Food Chem. 2023;418:135871. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2023.135871. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 354.Nurdiani R., Ma’rifah R.D.A., Busyro I.K., Jaziri A.A., Prihanto A.A., Firdaus M., Talib R.A., Huda N. Physical and Functional Properties of Fish Gelatin-Based Film Incorporated with Mangrove Extracts. PeerJ. 2022;10:13062. doi: 10.7717/peerj.13062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 355.Tavana F., Hematian Sourki A., Golmakani M.T. Enhancing the Accuracy, Speed, and Efficiency of Kafirin-PEO Electrospun Bio-Nanocomposite PH Indicators with Red Beetroot Extract Using Image Processing. Food Sci. Nutr. 2024;12:2874–2885. doi: 10.1002/fsn3.3968. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 356.Huang T., Lin J., Fang Z., Yu W., Li Z., Xu D., Yang W., Zhang J. Preparation and Characterization of Irradiated Kafirin-Quercetin Film for Packaging Cod (Gadus morhua) during Cold Storage at 4 °C. Food Bioproc. Tech. 2020;13:522–532. doi: 10.1007/s11947-020-02409-w. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 357.Xiao J., Shi C., Zheng H., Shi Z., Jiang D., Li Y., Huang Q. Kafirin Protein Based Electrospun Fibers with Tunable Mechanical Property, Wettability, and Release Profile. J. Agric Food Chem. 2016;64:3226–3233. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.6b00388. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 358.Wang W., Xiao J., Chen X., Luo M., Liu H., Shao P. Fabrication and Characterization of Multilayered Kafirin/Gelatin Film with One-Way Water Barrier Property. Food Hydrocoll. 2018;81:159–168. doi: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2018.02.044. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 359.Jin C., Zhu L., Zhang H., Zhang H. Electrospun Wheat Gluten/Zein Nanofibers Co-Loaded with Ferulic Acid and TiO2 as Potential Food Active Packaging. Food Res. Int. 2025;221:117285. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2025.117285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 360.Wang J., Shan H., Qin Y., Qin D., Zhao W., Yang Z., Kong L., Li S. Electrospinning Zein with Theaflavin: Production, Characterization, and Application in Active Packaging for Cold-Fresh Pork. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2025;287:138594. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.138594. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 361.Cheng K., Du J., Xu F., Wang Z., Zhang L., Bai M., Wang X., Liu J. Preparation and Characterization of Zein-Based Active Packaging Films Integrated with TiO2 Nanotube Arrays. Food Packag. Shelf Life. 2024;45:101348. doi: 10.1016/j.fpsl.2024.101348. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 362.Shahbazi Y., Shavisi N., Daraei P. Characterization of Zein Nanofiber Mats Encapsulated with Foeniculum Vulgare and Carum Carvi Essential Oils as Active Packaging Materials. LWT. 2024;206:116615. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2024.116615. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 363.Xia L., Li L., Xiao Y., Xiao F., Ji W., Pang M., Wang H. Hydrophobic Electrospun Membrane of Peppermint Oil Loaded Zein with Coating of Methyltriethoxysilane for Active Packaging. Food Hydrocoll. 2023;144:109031. doi: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2023.109031. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 364.Altan A., Aytac Z., Uyar T. Carvacrol Loaded Electrospun Fibrous Films from Zein and Poly(Lactic Acid) for Active Food Packaging. Food Hydrocoll. 2018;81:48–59. doi: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2018.02.028. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 365.Perdana M.I., Ruamcharoen J., Panphon S., Leelakriangsak M. Antimicrobial Activity and Physical Properties of Starch/Chitosan Film Incorporated with Lemongrass Essential Oil and Its Application. LWT. 2021;141:110934. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2021.110934. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 366.Chawla R., Sivakumar S., Kaur H., Mishra S.K. Effect of Starch Based Edible Antimicrobial Films and Modified Atmospheric Packaging (MAP) on Extended Life of Composite Sweetmeat. Carbohydr. Polym. Technol. Appl. 2021;2:100055. doi: 10.1016/j.carpta.2021.100055. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
No new data were created in this study and therefore, data sharing is not applicable to this article.





