Skip to main content
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy logoLink to Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
. 2002 Sep;46(9):3054–3056. doi: 10.1128/AAC.46.9.3054-3056.2002

Clinical Isolates of Staphylococcus aureus with Ribosomal Mutations Conferring Resistance to Macrolides

Anne-Laure Prunier 1, Brigitte Malbruny 1, Didier Tandé 2, Bertrand Picard 2, Roland Leclercq 1,*
PMCID: PMC127407  PMID: 12183270

Abstract

Six strains of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from cystic fibrosis patients after treatment with azithromycin were cross-resistant to azithromycin and erythromycin. None of the isolates contained erm or msr(A) genes, but they all carried either A2058G/U or A2059G mutations within the rrl genes, with a majority of the rRNA copies bearing the mutation. One strain displayed an additional mutation in the rplV gene, encoding the L22 ribosomal protein.


Emergence of resistance to macrolides in staphylococci shortly after the therapeutic use of erythromycin has been reported (3). In most cases, macrolide resistance in clinical isolates of staphylococci has been linked to target site alteration due to methylation of adenosine 2058 (A2058) of 23S rRNA within the large ribosomal subunit (8). These ribosomal methylases are encoded by erm genes. In some cases, ABC transporters encoded by plasmid-borne msr(A) genes cause active efflux of 14-member-ring (erythromycin, clarithromycin, roxithromycin, and dirithromycin) or 15-member-ring (azithromycin) macrolides (14). Rare staphylococcal strains have been reported to produce a macrolide phosphotransferase which inactivates some of these antimicrobials (12, 20). Overall, in several survey studies, drug efflux and ribosomal methylation have been found to be responsible for macrolide resistance in all of the strains studied (10, 15).

The use of macrolides for the treatment of staphylococcal infections is generally limited to uncomplicated soft tissue infections. Recently, it has been inferred from anti-inflammatory and antiadhesion effects of macrolides observed in vitro that these antimicrobials may have a favorable action at low concentrations for treatment of Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections (7). These indirect effects might be helpful in the case of cystic fibrosis, where the major cause of morbidity and mortality remains respiratory disease, with P. aeruginosa as the most frequently organism isolated, followed by Staphylococcus aureus (5). We report on six strains of erythromycin-resistant S. aureus, isolated from patients suffering from cystic fibrosis, with unusual mutations of the ribosomal target of macrolides.

Bacterial strains and antimicrobial susceptibility testing.

Among 12 S. aureus strains resistant to erythromycin and isolated from cystic fibrosis patients, 6 did not contain erm or msr(A) genes as determined by PCR (1). These strains, S. aureus UCN13, UCN14, UCN15, UCN16, UCN17, and UCN18, were isolated at the hospitals of Brest and Caen, France, from the sputa of five patients (S. aureus UCN13 and UCN14 were isolated from the same patient) suffering from cystic fibrosis who were treated with azithromycin (10 mg/kg/day) for a minimum of 3 months and a maximum of 1 year. The strains were considered to be genetically unrelated since the patterns of SmaI-restricted DNA differed by more than three fragments after pulsed-field gel electrophoresis analysis (data not shown) (18). All isolates were resistant to erythromycin as determined by the disk diffusion technique. Macrolide-susceptible S. aureus ATCC 29213 was included as a control. MICs of antibiotics were determined by the agar dilution method with Mueller-Hinton medium. Dalfopristin (RP54476), erythromycin, quinupristin (RP57669), quinupristin-dalfopristin, pristinamycin, and spiramycin were from Aventis Pharma (Romainville, France), and lincomycin was from Pharmacia-Upjohn (Kalamazoo, Mich.).

PCR and DNA sequence analysis.

As mentioned above, no rRNA methylase genes [erm(A), erm(B), and erm(C)] or efflux gene [msr(A)] could be detected by PCR with specific primers (1). Since mutations in genes coding for L4 or L22 ribosomal proteins or in domains II and V of 23S rRNA have been reported to be responsible for macrolide resistance in a variety of bacterial species, we hypothesized that similar mutations might account for resistance in the strains studied (2, 16, 19). Portions of rrl genes for domains II and V of 23S rRNA and the genes for ribosomal proteins L4 and L22 were amplified by PCR from total genomic DNA with the oligonucleotides shown in Table 1. The amplification primers were designed after analysis of the sequence of S. aureus COL obtained from The Institute for Genomic Research website (http://www.tigr.org). Mutations were screened for by PCR-SSCP, as described previously (2). After heat denaturation, the single-stranded PCR products were separated by nondenaturing polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Fragments with mobilities different from those of susceptible controls were sequenced.

TABLE 1.

Oligodeoxynucleotides used for the amplification of fragments of the 23S rRNA gene and of ribosomal protein genes

Gene Primer designation Primer sequence (5′ to 3′)a Position Product size (bp)
rrl (23S rRNA)
    Domain II II U1 +CGGAAGGGGAGTGAAATAGAAC 486b 478
II L1 −CCTTATCACCCATGTTCTGAC 963b
II U2 +GCCTCAAGTGATGATTATTGG 837b 508
II L2 −ACTAACCCAGAGCGGACGAGC 1344b
    Domain V V U1 +GAAAGGCGTAATGATTTGGG 1968b 437
V L1 −GGAACCACCGGATCACTAAG 2404b
V U3 +GTATAAGGGAGCTTGACTG 2331b 439
V L3 −GGGTTTCACACTTAGATG 2769b
V LA −TGTGAAAAAGACTGGATGACAG 2161c 2,251
V LB −CGTTGACATATTGTCATTCAG 1145c 1,235
V LC −CATACTTAGACAATCGAAAGTG 1319c 1,409
V LD −CTAGGCCGGCAATATGTAAG 1138c 1,228
V LE −CAGGTGCATTGAGAGAATTTG 1438c 1,528
V LF −TCCACAGGTAGGACTCGAAC 1087c 1,177
V U2 +CTGTCTCAACGAGAGACTC 1990b 144
V L2 −CTTAGACTCCTACCTATCC 2133b
rplD (L4) RPL 4 a +AATAATAAGAAGTGAAAGGAGG −31d 414
RPL 4 a′ −GCGTCAACTACAGTTAAGCC 383d
RPL 4 b +CTCAGCATTATCTTTCAAAGC 335d 411
RPL 4 b′ −GCCATTTTTACTTGTGTTTTG 745d
rplV (L22) RPL 22 a +CAAAGGACACGTTGCAGACGACAAGAAA −68d 456
RPL 22 b −ATTTTTTGACCCACAGTATTCCCTCCTT 388d
a

+, sense primer; −, antisense primer.

b

E. coli numbering.

c

Base relative to adenine 2058 on each copy.

d

Base relative to ATG.

We also determined the copy numbers of the rrl genes carrying 23S rRNA mutations. A strategy was developed to amplify the different copies of rrl domain V individually. Sequence analysis of S. aureus COL showed that the strain carried six copies of the rrl gene. We used primers complementary to unique sequences downstream from each rrl gene (V LA to V LF in Table 1) and a primer common to the six alleles and complementary to a region upstream from the peptidyl transferase region in domain V (V U1). Internal primers (V U2 and V L2) were then used to amplify a 144-bp fragment encompassing the domain V region, which was subsequently sequenced.

Susceptibility to antimicrobials.

The six isolates were highly resistant to erythromycin and azithromycin (MIC of >128 μg/ml) (Table 2). Five strains were also resistant to the 16-member-ring macrolide spiramycin, whereas the spiramycin MIC for strain UCN16 was lower (8 μg/ml). MICs of quinupristin, a streptogramin B, and clindamycin were more widely distributed. MICs of dalfopristin, a streptogramin A, were similar to those for susceptible strains (9). All strains except strain UCN15 were susceptible to quinupristin-dalfopristin and pristinamycin.

TABLE 2.

MICs of macrolides, lincosamides, and streptogramins

S. aureus strain Ribosomal mutation(s) (gene) MIC (μg/ml)a of:
ERY AZI SPI CLI QUI DAL QUI-DAL PRI
ATCC 29213 None 0.25 0.5 4 0.06 4 2 1 0.12
UCN13 A2058G (rrl) >128 >128 >128 16 64 2 1 0.5
UCN14 A2058T (rrl) >128 >128 128 1 32 0.5 0.25 0.12
UCN15 A2058G (rrl), deletion (rplV) >128 >128 128 2 32 4 4 1
UCN16 A2058G (rrl) >128 >128 8 0.5 8 0.25 0.25 0.12
UCN17 A2058G (rrl) >128 >128 128 16 16 4 0.5 0.25
UCN18 A2059G (rrl) >128 >128 128 1 2 2 0.25 0.12
a

Abbreviations: AZI, azithromycin; CLI, clindamycin; DAL, dalfopristin; ERY, erythromycin; PRI, pristinamycin; QUI, quinupristin; QUI-DAL, quinupristin-dalfopristin; SPI, spiramycin.

Identification of ribosomal mutations.

Sequencing showed that SSCP mobilities of fragments different from those of the controls amplified from S. aureus ATCC 29213 were associated with point mutations or a deletion. Four strains, S. aureus UCN13, UCN15, UCN16, and UCN17, carried an A2058G (E. coli numbering) transition; S. aureus UCN14 contained an A2058T transversion; and S. aureus UCN18 had an A2059G transition. No mutation was detected in domain II of 23S rRNA or in the rplD gene (encoding the L4 protein). In strain UCN15, a deletion of nine nucleotides which would result in the deletion of three amino acids at position 101 of the deduced amino acid sequence of protein L22 was associated with the A2058G mutation. Mutations at positions A2058 and A2059 were associated with macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B and macrolide-lincosamide phenotypes, respectively, similar to those already reported for other organisms (19). Relative to other rRNA mutations, A2058G gives the highest level of resistance to 14-member-ring macrolides and confers macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B resistance, defined as high resistance to all of the antimicrobials in this group. However, MICs of clindamycin and quinupristin were lower than expected for strains UCN14, UCN15, UCN16, and UCN18. This might be due to the fact that these staphylococci grew slowly on agar, as has been reported for most S. aureus strains isolated from cystic fibrosis patients, which frequently yield small-colony variants (6). The A-to-U or A-to-G substitutions gave a similar level of resistance. The A2059 mutation gave the macrolide-lincosamide phenotype, with moderate resistance to clindamycin and no resistance to streptogramins B, as previously reported for Helicobacter pylori and Streptococcus pneumoniae (17, 19).

Resistance by mutation in 23S rRNA has generally been reported for bacteria with few copies of rrn operons, such as H. pylori, Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Mycobacterium intracellulare, and Mycobacterium avium. However, mutations in 23S rRNA have been reported for S. pneumoniae, which contains four rrn operons (2, 4, 16). In PCR experiments carried out to determine the copy numbers of mutated rrl genes, one copy, named B, could not be amplified from five of our strains (Table 3). In silico analysis of strain N315 DNA, available at the National Center for Biotechnology Information website (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov), revealed that it also contained only five rrl copies and that the copy at a position similar to that of the B copy was missing. In every erythromycin-resistant strain, three or four copies were mutated, confirming that mutation in a majority of rrl operons was associated with significant resistance, as reported for S. pneumoniae (Table 3).

TABLE 3.

Mutations of the rrl genes

S. aureus strain Mutation in rrl Nucleotide in rrl copya
No. of wild-type copies/no. of mutated copies
A (533061) B (576663) C (581841) D (1977965) E (2113031) F (2229521)
UCN13 A2058G G b A G G G 1 (A)/4 (G)
UCN14 A2058T A T T T T 1 (A)/4 (T)
UCN15 A2058G A G G G G 1 (A)/4 (G)
UCN16 A2058G A G G G G 1 (A)/4 (G)
UCN17 A2058G G G G G A A 2 (A)/4 (G)
UCN18 A2059G G A G A G 2 (A)/3 (G)
a

Numbers in parentheses indicate the position of A2058 in S. aureus COL.

b

—, copy B could not be amplified.

Resistance to streptogramins was observed in strain UCN15, which combined a rplV mutation with an A2058G mutation. Recently, resistance to quinupristin-dalfopristin in staphylococcal strains selected under treatment with this antibiotic has been explained by similar mutations in the conserved 3′ end of the rplV gene (11)).

Isolation of staphylococci with resistance to macrolides conferred by ribosomal mutations is unusual. It may be related to the specific context of cystic fibrosis. Half of 12 erythromycin-resistant strains of S. aureus isolated from cystic fibrosis patients in our institutions were mutants. Indeed, patients suffering from this genetic disorder receive multiple courses of antibiotics. In addition, administration of macrolides at low doses aimed at preventing Pseudomonas infections might favor the emergence of mutants, although no definitive relationship could be proven in this study. Finally, colonization of cystic fibrosis patients by hypermutable strains of P. aeruginosa has been reported (13). A similar possibility for the staphylococcal isolates is currently under investigation.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported in part by a grant from the association Vaincre la Mucoviscidose.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Angot, P., M. Vergnaud, M. Auzou, R. Leclercq, and Observatoire de Normandie du Pneumocoque. 2000. Macrolide resistance phenotypes and genotypes in French clinical isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 19:755-758. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Canu, A., B. Malbruny, M. Coquemont, T. A. Davies, P. C. Appelbaum, and R. Leclercq. 2002. Diversity of ribosomal mutations conferring resistance to macrolides, clindamycin, streptogramin, and telithromycin in Streptococcus pneumoniae. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 46:125-131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Chabbert, Y. 1956. Antagonisme in vitro entre l'érythromycine et la spiramycine. Ann. Inst. Pasteur (Paris) 90:787-790. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Depardieu, F., and P. Courvalin. 2001. Mutation in 23S rRNA responsible for resistance to 16-membered macrolides and streptogramins in Streptococcus pneumoniae. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 45:319-323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Govan, J. R., and J. W. Nelson. 1992. Microbiology of lung infection in cystic fibrosis. Br. Med. Bull. 48:912-930. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kahl, B., M. Herrmann, A. S. Everding, H. G. Koch, K. Becker, E. Harms, R. A. Proctor, and G. Peters. 1998. Persistent infection with small colony variant strains of Staphylococcus aureus in patients with cystic fibrosis. J. Infect. Dis. 177:1023-1029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kobayashi, H. 1995. Biofilm disease: its clinical manifestation and therapeutic possibilities of macrolides. Am. J. Med. 99:26S-30S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Leclercq, R., and P. Courvalin. 1991. Bacterial resistance to macrolide, lincosamide, and streptogramin antibiotics by target modification. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 35:1265-1272. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Leclercq, R., L. Nantas, C. J. Soussy, and J. Duval. 1992. Activity of RP 59500, a new parenteral semisynthetic streptogramin, against staphylococci with various mechanisms of resistance to macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin antibiotics. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 30(Suppl. A):67-75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Lina, G., A. Quaglia, M. E. Reverdy, R. Leclercq, F. Vandenesch, and J. Etienne. 1999. Distribution of genes encoding resistance to macrolides, lincosamides, and streptogramins among staphylococci. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 43:1062-1066. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Malbruny, B., A. Canu, B. Bozdogan, V. Zarrouk, B. Fantin, and R. Leclercq. 2002. Resistance to quinupristin-dalfopristin due to mutation of L22 ribosomal protein in Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 46:2200-2207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Matsuoka, M., K. Endou, H. Kobayashi, M. Inoue, and Y. Nakajima. 1998. A plasmid that encodes three genes for resistance to macrolide antibiotics in Staphylococcus aureus. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 167:221-227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Oliver, A., R. Canton, P. Campo, F. Baquero, and J. Blazquez. 2000. High frequency of hypermutable Pseudomonas aeruginosa in cystic fibrosis lung infection. Science 288:1251-1253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ross, J. I., E. A. Eady, J. H. Cove, W. J. Cunliffe, S. Baumberg, and J. C. Wootton. 1990. Inducible erythromycin resistance in staphylococci is encoded by a member of the ATP-binding transport super-gene family. Mol. Microbiol. 4:1207-1214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Schmitz, F. J., R. Sadurski, A. Kray, M. Boos, R. Geisel, K. Kohrer, J. Verhoef, and A. C. Fluit. 2000. Prevalence of macrolide-resistance genes in Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus faecium isolates from 24 European university hospitals. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 45:891-894. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Tait-Kamradt, A., T. Davies, M. Cronan, M. R. Jacobs, P. C. Appelbaum, and J. Sutcliffe. 2000. Mutations in 23S rRNA and ribosomal protein L4 account for resistance in pneumococcal strains selected in vitro by macrolide passage. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 44:2118-2125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Tait-Kamradt, A., T. Davies, P. C. Appelbaum, F. Depardieu, P. Courvalin, J. Petitpas, L. Wondrack, A. Walker, M. R. Jacobs, and J. Sutcliffe. 2000. Two new mechanisms of macrolide resistance in clinical strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae from Eastern Europe and North America. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 44:3395-3401. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Tenover, F. C., R. D. Arbeit, R. V. Goering, P. A. Mickelsen, B. E. Murray, D. H. Persing, and B. Swaminathan. 1995. Interpreting chromosomal DNA restriction patterns produced by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis: criteria for bacterial strain typing. J. Clin. Microbiol. 33:2233-2239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Vester, B., and S. Douthwaite. 2001. Macrolide resistance conferred by base substitutions in 23S rRNA. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 45:1-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Wondrack, L., M. Massa, B. V. Yang, and J. Sutcliffe. 1996. Clinical strain of Staphylococcus aureus inactivates and causes efflux of macrolides. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 40:992-998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES