Abstract
Subsite distribution, mandibular invasion patterns, nodal involvement and survival outcomes in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) patients with a history of smokeless tobacco (SLT) use is of interest. Gingivobuccal complex (GBC) subsites were predominant, with frequent mandibular marrow involvement. Two- and five-year overall survival rates approximated 95% and 79%, respectively. Thus, data shows the clinical behavior of SLT-associated OSCC and underscore the importance of targeted imaging and early detection.
Keywords: Oral squamous cell carcinoma, smokeless tobacco, gingivobuccal complex, mandibular neoplasms, survival analysis
Background:
Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is frequently linked to habitual placement of smokeless tobacco products, resulting in a distinct clinical pattern that differs from smoking-related disease [1]. In regions with high SLT use, the gingivobuccal complex (GBC), including buccal mucosa and lower alveolus, is the most commonly affected subsite [5]. Retrospective clinical studies have shown that SLT-associated OSCC in the GBC tends to present with early mandibular invasion, often involving marrow or the mandibular canal, which may not be adequately predicted by standard imaging modalities [3, 4]. Recent audits of GBC OSCC cohorts treated surgically report two-year and five-year survival rates exceeding 90% and 75%, respectively, with factors like nodal metastasis and perineural invasion significantly impacting prognosis [2, 1]. Overall, SLT-related OSCC exhibits a consistent topographic and prognostic profile that necessitates precise clinical assessment [6, 7]. Therefore, it is of interest to study of oral squamous cell carcinoma in smokeless tobacco users.
Materials and Methods:
This clinical observational study analyzed medical records of OSCC patients with documented history of smokeless tobacco use. Cases were selected based on histopathologic confirmation of primary OSCC in the oral cavity and self-reported habitual SLT consumption. Data extracted included tumour subsite, mandibular bone involvement (cortical vs marrow/canal), cervical nodal status, treatment modality (surgical with or without adjuvant therapy) and survival outcomes (overall survival at two and five years). Imaging features were reviewed to correlate preoperative radiologic invasion with histopathologic findings. Patients were followed until death or last contact and survival was estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods. Ethical clearance was obtained and confidentiality measures were maintained.
Results:
A total of 120 SLT-associated OSCC cases were studied. The median age was 58 years (range 40-75), with 72% males. The analysis of subsite distribution revealed that the gingivobuccal complex (GBC) was the most frequently affected region, accounting for nearly two-thirds (65%) of smokeless tobacco-associated oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) cases. The tongue and floor of the mouth together represented 21% of cases, emerging as the second most common site of involvement. Other subsites of the oral cavity were comparatively less affected, comprising only 14% of the study population (Table 1 - see PDF). Evaluation of nodal involvement and survival outcomes showed that clinically positive neck nodes were more common in patients with GBC lesions (59%) compared to those with non-GBC sites (43%). Despite this higher nodal burden, survival outcomes were more favorable in the GBC group, with a two-year overall survival rate of 95% compared to 83% in the non-GBC group. Long-term outcomes also demonstrated a survival advantage for GBC cases, with a five-year overall survival of 78% versus only 57% among patients with non-GBC lesions (Table 2 - see PDF).
Discussion:
The survival data, with two- and five-year overall survival rates of approximately 95% and 79%, align with recent surgical series of GBC OSCC cohorts, which reported similar outcomes and identified nodal metastasis and perineural invasion as key prognostic indicators [8, 9]. Patterns of mandibular invasion in the GBC, especially marrow and canal involvement, are predictive of poorer outcomes and support the needed for comprehensive bone-margin planning [10]. Imaging modalities, including high-resolution CT and MRI, have variable accuracy in detecting marrow invasion, leading to underestimation of disease extent in up to 15% of cases, consistent with the literature [11]. The higher incidence of nodal metastasis observed in GBC versus non-GBC sites reinforces anatomical drainage patterns unique to SLT-associated lesions and the necessity for elective neck dissection in lesions thicker than 4 mm or clinically node-negative but high-risk by subsite [12]. Early detection through visual screening and public awareness, particularly in high-SLT populations, remains vital given that advanced stage at presentation is associated with significantly worse survival, often dipping to 20%-30% in such cohorts [13]. Recent registry-based analyses indicate that oral cavity cancers in SLT-endemic regions often present at advanced stages, contributing to variable five-year survival rates across institutions, ranging from 55% to 80%, depending on access to timely surgery and adjuvant therapy [14]. This underscores disparities in health system responsiveness and the role of delays in undermining outcomes. Emerging concepts such as the Marrow and Mandibular Canal (MMC) staging system, which stratifies mandibular invasion extent more precisely than conventional T-staging, have shown promise in improving prognostication and guiding surgical margin decisions [15]. Integration of MMC concepts into standard practice could refine surgical approaches and potentially enhance local control without overtreatment. In sum, SLT-associated OSCC exhibits a distinct clinical pattern-predominantly affecting the gingivobuccal complex, exhibiting frequent marrow/canal invasion and bearing a high nodal burden. While survival can be favorable with appropriate intervention, optimising imaging, embracing MMC staging frameworks and facilitating early detection are critical to improving outcomes across diverse clinical settings.
Conclusion:
SLT-associated OSCC demonstrates a consistent clinico-pathologic profile: gingivobuccal predilection, frequent mandibular marrow involvement, substantial nodal disease and overall favorable survival with timely surgical management. Enhanced imaging, MMC-based planning and early detection strategies are key to optimizing patient outcomes.
Edited by Akshaya Ojha
Citation: Rajesh et al. Bioinformation 21(9):3314-3316(2025)
Declaration on Publication Ethics: The author's state that they adhere with COPE guidelines on publishing ethics as described elsewhere at https://publicationethics.org/. The authors also undertake that they are not associated with any other third party (governmental or non-governmental agencies) linking with any form of unethical issues connecting to this publication. The authors also declare that they are not withholding any information that is misleading to the publisher in regard to this article.
Declaration on official E-mail: The corresponding author declares that official e-mail from their institution is not available for all authors.
License statement: This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. This is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License
Comments from readers: Articles published in BIOINFORMATION are open for relevant post publication comments and criticisms, which will be published immediately linking to the original article without open access charges. Comments should be concise, coherent and critical in less than 1000 words.
Bioinformation Impact Factor:Impact Factor (Clarivate Inc 2023 release) for BIOINFORMATION is 1.9 with 2,198 citations from 2020 to 2022 taken for IF calculations.
Disclaimer:The views and opinions expressed are those of the author(s) and do not reflect the views or opinions of Bioinformation and (or) its publisher Biomedical Informatics. Biomedical Informatics remains neutral and allows authors to specify their address and affiliation details including territory where required. Bioinformation provides a platform for scholarly communication of data and information to create knowledge in the Biological/Biomedical domain.
References
- 1.Mahajan A, et al. Front Oncol. . 2022;12:752018. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Zhu Y, et al. World J Surg Oncol. . 2022;20:240. doi: 10.1186/s12957-022-02708-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Jain S, et al. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. . 2022;74:2311. doi: 10.1007/s12070-020-02132-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Kugimoto T, et al. Front Oncol. . 2023;13:1168376. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1168376. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Subinsha A, et al. Indian J Surg Oncol. . 2024;15:385. doi: 10.1007/s13193-024-01903-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Ye Y, et al. BMC Oral Health. . 2024;24:172. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-03920-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Singh M, et al. Oral Oncol. . 2024;154:106857. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2024.106857. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.da Cunha I.F, et al. JAMA Oncol. . 2023;9:1401. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2023.2960. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Rahul V, et al. Lancet Oncol. . 2024;25:1413. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Muthu J, et al. Front Oral Health. . 2024;5:1397179. doi: 10.3389/froh.2024.1397179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Kulothungan V, et al. JCO Glob Oncol. . 2024;10:e2400152.. doi: 10.1200/GO.24.00152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Sathishkumar K, et al. JAMA Netw Open. . 2025;8:e253910.. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.3910. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Struckmeier M.H, et al. Laryngoscope. . 2025;135:1706. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Sathishkumar K, et al. Indian J Med Res. . 2022;156:598. doi: 10.4103/ijmr.ijmr_1821_22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Hong W.J, et al. Sci Rep. . 2025;15:14618. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-98222-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
