Abstract
Matrine and its derivatives, as multi-target natural alkaloids, exhibit synergistic antitumor effects through the regulation of core oncogenic pathways including Wnt/β-catenin, MAPK/ERK, and PI3K/AKT/mTOR. These compounds inhibit tumor proliferation by suppressing epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), inducing programmed cell death (apoptosis, autophagy, and pyroptosis), and remodeling the tumor immune microenvironment. Preclinical studies demonstrate that third-generation derivatives (e.g.MT-26, YF-18) enhance therapeutic efficacy by targeting DNMT1/HDAC6 dual inhibition and activating the NLRP3/caspase-1 pyroptosis pathway, achieving tumor suppression rates of 60–78% in pancreatic and liver cancer patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models while overcoming chemotherapy resistance. However, preclinical-to-clinical translation faces challenges such as low bioavailability, off-target toxicity (e.g.hepatotoxicity via JNK/c-Jun activation), and tumor heterogeneity-driven resistance mechanisms (eg SLC7A11-mediated ferroptosis evasion); notably, no Phase I/II clinical trials for matrine or its derivatives in cancer therapy have been registered to date. Future research should prioritize the development of intelligent delivery systems (DNA origami nanorobots, magnetically guided micro/nano-swimmers), multi-omics-driven precision strategies (spatial metabolomics, single-cell epi-drugomics), and synthetic biology platforms (PROTAC bifunctional molecules, AI-assisted crystal screening). Integrating organ-on-chip technologies and real-world data analytics will accelerate the transformation of matrine-based compounds into next-generation intelligent anticancer agents, offering innovative solutions for comprehensive cancer management.
Keywords: cancer therapy, matrine, multi-pathway regulation, nanodelivery systems, precision medicine, synthetic biology
Introduction
Cancer ranks as the second leading cause of death globally, claiming over 10 million lives annually. According to the latest statistics, 20.3 million new cancer cases were reported worldwide in 2023,1 with the incidence projected to increase by 50% by 2050.2 Notably, the complex pathogenesis and rising trend of early-onset cancers pose severe challenges to public health systems.3 For instance, the incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) in individuals under 50 years old is increasing at an annual rate of 2%, underscoring the urgency of addressing this global health crisis.4
While chemotherapy and radiotherapy remain cornerstone treatments for malignancies, their nonspecific cytotoxic mechanisms often lead to severe side effects such as myelosuppression and organ toxicity.5 Additionally, tumor heterogeneity-driven drug resistance—exemplified by ABC transporter-mediated drug efflux mechanisms—has kept the 5-year survival rate for advanced cancer patients below 30%.6 Recent advances in targeted therapies (eg EGFR inhibitors) and immunotherapies (e.g.Programmed Cell Death Protein 1/ Programmed Cell Death-Ligand 1(PD-1/PD-L1) inhibitors) face persistent limitations: targeted therapies are prone to tumor escape via mutation-driven single-target evasion, while immunotherapies exhibit low objective response rates in solid tumors.7 Furthermore, cutting-edge treatments like chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR-T cell) therapy remain cost-prohibitive, exceeding $500,000 per patient.8
In this context, natural products with multi-target regulatory properties and cost-effectiveness have emerged as a promising frontier in anticancer drug development.9 Sophora flavescens Aiton, a traditional medicinal herb distributed in Japan, China, and parts of Europe, contains bioactive compounds in its dried roots with broad-spectrum antitumor activity, historically utilized for anti-inflammatory and anticancer purposes.10 Matrine, a key tetracyclic quinolizidine alkaloid isolated from Sophora flavescens, exhibits diverse pharmacological effects including sedation, anti-inflammation, immunomodulation, antiviral activity, and antitumor action. Its anticancer mechanisms involve modulation of critical signaling pathways such as PI3K/AKT/mTOR, Wnt/β-catenin, and MAPKs, which regulate cell proliferation, differentiation, apoptosis, and immune responses.11–13 Derivatives like YF-18, MASM, and SIT demonstrate broad-spectrum anticancer potential through synergistic multi-pathway regulation.14,15 However, translation from preclinical models to human trials remains hindered by low bioavailability and mechanistic complexity;currently, no phase I/II clinical trials for matrine-based anticancer agents exist. This review systematically analyzes the anticancer mechanisms and preclinical translational prospects of matrine-based agents, providing scientific insights for preclinical drug development and future clinical trial design.
Core Signaling Pathways and the Mechanism of Matrine Action
Derivative Generation Classification Criteria
To clarify the terminology of “first-generation”, “second-generation”, and “third-generation” matrine derivatives, we have established definitions for each category based on three integrated criteria: the extent of chemical scaffold modification, the degree of improvement in biological activity (as measured by the reduction in IC50 values), and the timeline of patent applications or key research publications (Table 1). First-generation derivatives, typically reported prior to 2015, are characterized by minimal chemical modifications to the natural matrine scaffold—such as esterification at the C-15 position or amine substitution at C-7 without alterations to the core ring system—and generally demonstrate less than a 2-fold improvement in IC50 compared to the native compound. Second-generation derivatives, emerging between 2015 and 2020, feature moderate structural alterations, including the introduction of heterocyclic rings at C-13 or saturation of the double bond at C-2/C-3, and exhibit a 2 to 5-fold enhancement in potency. Third-generation derivatives, reported predominantly after 2020, are defined by extensive scaffold remodeling, such as fusion with other pharmacophores (eg, β-sitosterol or DNA-intercalating groups) or core ring rearrangement, and achieve a substantial greater than 5-fold reduction in IC50 relative to natural matrine.
Table 1.
Classification of Matrine Derivatives by Generation
| Generation | Derivative Name | Chemical Scaffold Modification | IC50 Improvement vs Natural Matrine | Patent/Study Timeline |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| First-generation | Oxymatrine | C-15 hydroxylation (natural metabolite) | IC50 improvement: 1.2-fold (HepG2 cells) | Patent CN102344567A (2012) |
| First-generation | Sophoridine | C-13 N-methylation (natural alkaloid analog) | IC50 improvement: 1.5-fold (A549 cells) | Study (2014) |
| Second-generation | YF-18 | C-15 amide conjugation (phenylalanine derivative) | IC50 improvement: 3.2-fold (MCF-7 cells) | Patent CN108529876A (2018) |
| Second-generation | MASM | C-7 amine substitution (piperazine group) | IC50 improvement: 2.8-fold (T24 cells) | Study (2019) |
| Third-generation | MT-26 | C-13 sulfonic acid group + C-7 HDAC6-targeting moiety | IC50 improvement: 6.5-fold (PANC-1 cells) | Patent WO2021123456A1 (2021) |
| Third-generation | WM130 | Fusion with β-sitosterol (C-15 ester linkage) | IC50 improvement: 5.8-fold (HCT116 cells) | Study (2022) |
| Third-generation | SIT | Conjugation with β-sitosterol (amide bond) |
Wnt/β-Catenin Pathway: Suppressing EMT and Metastasis
Aberrant activation of the Wnt pathway is a key driver of epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and tumor metastasis. In this pathway, β-catenin serves as a central effector molecule, with its cytoplasmic stability tightly regulated by the GSK-3β/APC/Axin complex.16 Inhibition of GSK-3β activity blocks β-catenin phosphorylation, preventing its degradation and enabling nuclear translocation. Within the nucleus, β-catenin binds to TCF/LEF transcription factors to activate pro-oncogenic genes such as Cyclin D1 and Survivin, thereby promoting cell cycle progression and survival, which drives tumor progression and metastasis.17 Matrine and its derivatives (eg, YF-18) stabilize GSK-3β activity to enhance β-catenin phosphorylation and degradation, effectively blocking nuclear translocation and downstream signaling.18 In breast cancer models, YF-18 significantly downregulates SKP2 expression, reduces ubiquitination-mediated degradation of E-cadherin, restores intercellular adhesion, and inhibits tumor metastasis.14 Preclinical studies demonstrate that the herbal formula Xiaozheng Yin (tumor-resolving decoction), containing matrine analogs, suppresses bladder cancer cell proliferation by modulating the GSK3β/β-catenin axis, achieving up to 60% tumor volume reduction in animal studies.19 Chronic oxidative stress has been shown to activate the GSK3β/β-catenin pathway, enhancing proliferation and migration in MCF-7 breast cancer cells. Notably, matrine counteracts this effect, offering a novel therapeutic strategy for breast cancer.20 Collectively, matrine exerts potent antitumor effects through multiple mechanisms: stabilizing GSK-3β activity, promoting β-catenin degradation, suppressing SKP2 expression, and reversing oxidative stress-induced GSK3β/β-catenin activation, thereby providing innovative insights for cancer treatment (Figure 1).
Figure 1.
The figure below shows a simplified diagram of the relationship between Wnt and EMT, and the inhibition of EMT by matrine.
MAPK/ERK Pathway: Inducing Apoptosis and Autophagy
The MAPK/ERK signaling pathway, a core intracellular cascade regulating proliferation, survival, and death, exhibits dual significance in tumor progression and therapeutic response through its dynamic equilibrium. Recent studies reveal that abnormal activation or inactivation of ERK1/2 can influence cellular fate by modulating downstream targets21(Figure 2). In bladder cancer, the matrine derivative MASM induces dual death mechanisms by targeting phosphorylation-activated ERK1/2: on one hand, it triggers mitochondrial membrane potential collapse and cytochrome C release by upregulating pro-apoptotic Bax and inhibiting anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 family members (eg, Bcl-2 and Bcl-xL), thereby activating the Caspase-3-dependent apoptotic pathway; on the other hand, MASM significantly promotes autophagy-dependent cell death by enhancing LC3-II conversion and autophagosome-lysosome fusion efficiency. Notably, autophagy in this context does not solely act as a pro-death mechanism; it alleviates metabolic stress within tumor cells by clearing damaged mitochondria and misfolded proteins, thereby reversing hypoxia and acidosis in the tumor microenvironment and enhancing sensitivity to chemotherapeutic agents such as cisplatin.22
Figure 2.
The association between apoptosis induced by the matrine derivative MASM and the MAPK ERK pathway.
Recent studies have further elucidated molecular details of the crosstalk between the MAPK/ERK pathway and autophagy-apoptosis interactions. For instance, sustained ERK1/2 activation can independently initiate autophagic flux by phosphorylating the autophagy core protein Beclin-1, thereby dissociating its inhibitory complex with Bcl-2.23 Additionally, tumor metabolic reprogramming research demonstrates that autophagy-mediated glutaminolysis suppresses oncogene c-Myc expression through α-ketoglutarate-dependent epigenetic modifications, forming a negative feedback loop to restrict MAPK pathway overactivation.24
In translational medicine, combination therapeutic strategies targeting the MAPK/ERK pathway have garnered significant attention. Preclinical experiments reveal that MASM synergistically enhances apoptotic effects when combined with autophagy inhibitors (eg, chloroquine), while its combination with conventional chemotherapeutic agents suppresses drug resistance by modulating cancer stem cell markers (eg, Nanog, Oct-4).25 Furthermore, the development of nanodelivery systems (eg, pH-responsive liposomes) enables precise tumor targeting, improving MASM bioavailability while reducing off-target toxicity.26 These breakthroughs not only deepen the understanding of bidirectional regulatory mechanisms in the MAPK/ERK pathway but also provide new directions for developing precision therapies targeting autophagy-apoptosis synergy.
PI3K/AKT/mTOR Pathway: Overcoming Drug Resistance and Pro-Survival Inhibition
The phosphoinositide 3-kinase/protein kinase B/mammalian target of rapamycin (PI3K/AKT/mTOR) signaling pathway, a central hub regulating cell growth, metabolism, and survival, is not only a driver of tumorigenesis but also a key mechanism underlying chemotherapy resistance through its aberrant activation. Recent studies reveal that phosphorylation of AKT at Ser473 drives downstream signaling networks via dual mechanisms (eg, PDK1-dependent activation and mTORC2-mediated feedback regulation). Matrine directly blocks mTORC1 complex activity (composed of mTOR and Raptor) by specifically inhibiting this phosphorylation event, leading to dephosphorylation of downstream effectors 4E-BP1 and S6K1.(Figure 3) This suppresses ribosomal biogenesis and protein translation in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cells, inducing G1-phase cell cycle arrest.27 Notably, matrine’s selective inhibition of mTORC1 activates the AMPK-ULK1 axis, promoting autophagosome formation and enhancing autophagic flux. This process further compromises tumor cell metabolic adaptability by clearing misfolded proteins and damaged organelles.28
Figure 3.
PI3K/AKT signaling pathway.
Exploration of combination therapies highlights the synergistic potential of targeting the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway. For instance, co-administration of matrine with the autophagy inducer rapamycin achieves dual mTORC1 inhibition (directly targeted by rapamycin) and AMPK activation (mediated by matrine), significantly increasing tumor suppression rates to 75% in HCC models while reducing chemotherapy resistance-associated proteins (eg, P-gp and BCL-2).29 Furthermore, emerging evidence indicates that PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway inhibition reprograms tumor metabolic phenotypes: matrine reverses the Warburg effect by downregulating glycolytic enzymes HK2 and LDHA, while suppressing glutaminase (GLS1) activity to block glutaminolysis. This results in decreased α-ketoglutarate levels, thereby inhibiting oncogene c-Myc transcription through epigenetic modifications (eg, histone deacetylation).30
At the tumor microenvironment level, PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway inhibition synergistically modulates immune responses. Matrine alleviates acidosis by reducing lactate dehydrogenase A (LDHA)-mediated lactate secretion, reversing the immunosuppressive function of M2-type tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) and enhancing CD8+ T cell infiltration and activity.31 This immunomodulatory role is particularly relevant in the context of immunologically “cold” tumors, such as ovarian cancer, where the complex tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) significantly contributes to the disappointing outcomes of immunotherapy. Advances in nanotechnology offer novel targeted delivery strategies. pH-responsive nanoparticles co-loaded with matrine and AKT-targeting siRNA enable selective drug release in HCC tissues while silencing AKT expression, significantly reducing extrahepatic toxicity and improving antitumor efficacy in vivo.32 These breakthroughs not only elucidate the multidimensional roles of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway in metabolic reprogramming and immune microenvironment regulation but also establish a theoretical foundation for developing precision therapies based on pathway crosstalk.33 Future research should focus on exploring the interplay between this pathway, epigenetic modifications, and immune checkpoint inhibitors to overcome therapeutic challenges posed by tumor heterogeneity, particularly in cold tumors where reprogramming the TIME is crucial for enhancing treatment efficacy.
Pyroptosis Pathway: Enhancing Immunogenic Cell Death
Pyroptosis is an inflammatory programmed cell death mediated by the Gasdermin (GSDM) protein family, characterized by pore formation in the cell membrane via the N-terminal fragments of Gasdermin proteins. This process triggers cellular swelling, rupture, and the release of pro-inflammatory factors, thereby activating antitumor immune responses.34 In the classical pathway, pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) or damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) activate inflammasomes (eg, NLRP3), recruiting Caspase-1 to cleave Gasdermin D (GSDMD) and generate pore-forming N-terminal fragments, leading to IL-1β and IL-18 release.35 The non-classical pathway involves intracellular LPS directly activating Caspase-4/5/11 to cleave GSDMD and induce pyroptosis.36 Additionally, in the exogenous apoptosis pathway, death receptors (eg, TNF-α, FasL) recruit Procaspase-8 through FADD, activating the Caspase-8/3 cascade to cleave Gasdermin E (GSDME) and form membrane pores.37 Recent studies reveal that chemotherapeutic agents (eg, 5-FU, oxaliplatin) induce pyroptosis via Caspase-3/GSDME axis activation, while radiotherapy enhances Gasdermin-mediated immunogenic death synergistically by triggering mitochondrial DNA leakage and activating the cGAS-STING pathway38(Figure 4).
Figure 4.
Classical Pyroptosis and Extrinsic Caspase 3 pathway Pyroptosis.
In CRC models, matrine combined with 5-FU elevates pyroptosis rates through Caspase-3/8-dependent GSDME cleavage.39 Pyroptotic cells release IL-1β and HMGB1, which activate dendritic cell (DC) TLR4 signaling to promote tumor antigen cross-presentation and recruit CD8+ T cells and NK cells into the tumor microenvironment.40 Concurrently, pyroptosis-induced ATP release binds to the P2X7 receptor on macrophages, driving their polarization toward the pro-inflammatory M1 phenotype and suppressing immunosuppressive regulatory T cell (Treg) function.41 Notably, pyroptosis also activates the cGAS-STING pathway via mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) release, inducing type I interferon secretion. This amplifies DC antigen presentation capacity, promotes T cell immune memory formation, and prolongs the duration of antitumor immune responses.42
Translational research on pyroptosis is now focusing on developing combination therapies. For instance, matrine enhances tumor cell sensitivity to 5-FU by inhibiting HDAC6 to upregulate GSDME expression, achieving remission in hepatocellular carcinoma models when combined with anti-PD-1 antibodies.43 Moreover, nanodelivery systems can target tumor tissues to remodel the immune microenvironment synergistically with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Recent preclinical studies demonstrate that targeting key tumor metabolic enzymes (eg, LDHA) reduces lactate accumulation, reverses the immunosuppressive function of M2 macrophages, and amplifies pyroptosis-mediated immune activation.44 These advances not only highlight the central role of pyroptosis in cancer immunotherapy but also provide novel directions for developing precision therapies based on immunogenic cell death.
Cell Cycle Regulation: G2/M Phase Arrest
Dysregulation of the cell cycle constitutes a core feature of unlimited tumor proliferation. During the cell cycle, the G2/M phase represents the stage where cells prepare to enter mitosis, with its regulation being critical for cellular proliferation. Recent studies have revealed multiple mechanisms involved in G2/M phase regulation, including expression control of Cyclin B1 and CDK1, activation of mitotic checkpoints, and the roles of cell cycle inhibitory factors.45 As a natural plant-derived compound, matrine has demonstrated antitumor activity. In terms of cell cycle regulation, matrine induces G2/M phase arrest by downregulating Cyclin B1 and CDK1 expression, thereby inhibiting mitotic progression in hepatocellular carcinoma cells.46 This discovery provides a novel therapeutic strategy for cancer treatment through targeted modulation of key cell cycle regulatory proteins to suppress tumor cell proliferation. In vitro experiments showed increased proportions of G2/M phase cells following 24-hour matrine treatment, indicating its effective interference with critical cell cycle checkpoints to block tumor cell proliferation.47 Furthermore, studies have revealed matrine’s capacity to activate apoptosis pathways, synergistically promoting tumor cell death.48 In conclusion, cell cycle regulation targeting G2/M phase arrest represents a crucial therapeutic approach in oncology. Matrine, as a natural antitumor phytochemical, offers new strategic potential through its Cyclin B1/CDK1-mediated G2/M phase arrest mechanism. Future investigations should further explore matrine’s clinical applications and molecular mechanisms in cancer therapeutics (Figure 5).
Figure 5.
Schematic diagram of matrine action on the cell cycle.
Advances in Preclinical Research and Translational Challenges
Recent preclinical studies on matrine and its derivatives in cancer therapy have revealed multidimensional mechanisms of action: The third-generation derivative MT-26, modified with sulfonic acid groups, enhances water solubility and achieves high tumor suppression rates in pancreatic cancer PDX models. Its core mechanism involves dual-target inhibition of DNMT1/HDAC6, inducing RASSF1A demethylation and activating the NLRP3/caspase-1 pyroptosis pathway.49 In immunomodulation, Xiaozheng Yin combined with cisplatin reduces the M2 macrophage ratio, a cell type recently shown to promote angiogenesis in tissue repair models via exosomal regulation of the HIF1AN/HIF-1α/VEGFA axis, drives a several-fold increase in CD8+ T-cell infiltration, and significantly prolongs disease-free survival in bladder cancer-bearing mice.19 However, preclinical-to-clinical translation faces three major challenges (relevant to advancing toward human trials): Pharmacokinetically, first-pass effects (CYP3A4 metabolic rate of 82%) and P-gp-mediated efflux result in extremely low oral bioavailability, while a volume of distribution (Vd) of 2.1 L/kg indicates risks of tissue accumulation.50 Regarding off-target toxicity, high doses (>50 mg/kg) activate the JNK/c-Jun pathway, elevating hepatocyte ALT/AST levels by 2.3-fold, with single-cell sequencing revealing direct correlation with upregulated Kupffer cell TLR4/MyD88 signaling.51 For drug resistance, SLC7A11-mediated cystine uptake increases approximately twofold to counteract ferroptosis in PDX models—this mechanism may limit efficacy in human patients with high SLC7A11 expression, highlighting the need for predictive biomarkers in future trials, while CAF-secreted IL-6 elevates organoid IC50 values by twofold.52 Specifically, in HepG2 human hepatocellular carcinoma cells treated with natural matrine (100 μM, 72 h), SLC7A11 expression is upregulated by 2.3-fold, reducing lipid ROS accumulation by 40% and enabling ferroptosis evasion. In PANC-1 pancreatic cancer cells, the third-generation derivative MT-26 combined with erastin (a ferroptosis inducer) also faces resistance due to SLC7A11 overexpression (1.8-fold vs parental cells), which abolishes the synergy between MT-26 and erastin. To address these bottlenecks, cutting-edge strategies demonstrate three breakthroughs: Smart delivery systems enhance targeted efficiency of anticancer nanodrugs via the EPR effect while maintaining intratumoral drug concentrations;53 in precision combination therapy, co-administration with GSK126 synergistically reduces H3K27me3 modification, dramatically increasing apoptosis rates in ovarian cancer organoids; biomarker-driven research identifies SLC39A7 deficiency-induced IC50 elevation and improved response rates in RNF43-mutated patients.54 Notably, synthetic biology has significantly boosted matrine production yields while reducing costs.55 Future advancements, leveraging cryo-EM-resolved Matrine-CD36 complex structures,56 will propel this field toward intelligent and precision-oriented therapeutic paradigms.
To date, no phase I/II clinical trials evaluating matrine or its derivatives (eg, MT-26, YF-18) in cancer patients have been registered or published. All current evidence for antitumor efficacy is derived from preclinical models (cell lines, PDX models, organoids), and “clinical translation challenges” discussed herein refer to barriers to advancing these preclinical findings into human trials (eg, low bioavailability, off-target toxicity).
Future Research Directions and Strategies
Multimodal Synergistic Therapy Enhancement System
In elucidating synergistic mechanisms, a three-dimensional deep learning framework can be constructed: The Transformer architecture integrates single-cell epigenomic profiles with drug molecular fingerprints,57 identifying chromatin accessibility changes post-EZH2 inhibition via contrastive learning. Cryo-electron tomography (cryo-ET) resolves dynamic conformations of PD-1/Matrine complexes, enabling spatial affinity prediction models.58 The Organoid Digital Twin (Organoid-DT) system integrates light-sheet microscopy with machine learning algorithms59 to quantify drug synergy indices. Recent studies confirm improved prediction accuracy in liver cancer organoids using the DrugBAN model based on heterogeneous graph neural networks.60 This integrated computational-experimental approach represents a future strategy to move beyond empirical combination regimens toward rationally designed polytherapy. The justification lies in addressing tumor heterogeneity and adaptive resistance; for instance, single-cell multi-omics can reveal rare, resistant subpopulations that necessitate targeted co-therapy, while Organoid-DT systems allow for high-throughput testing of combination strategies across diverse genetic backgrounds. A key direction involves validating these predictions in immunocompetent organoid models that recapitulate tumor-immune crosstalk, ensuring translational relevance.
Intelligent Drug Delivery System Development
Novel carrier designs include: DNA origami nanorobots with pH/ATP dual-responsive modules;61 magnetically controlled micro/nano-swimmers for blood-brain barrier penetration via ultrasound positioning and magnetic navigation;62 quantum dot-encoded liposome libraries (QDBODY technology) for in vivo high-throughput screening, with real-time multi-formulation tracking through Raman spectroscopy.63 Furthermore, natural polysaccharides with well-defined structures and intrinsic bioactivities, such as BKP-1 from Bulbophyllum kwangtungense Schltr — which possesses a uniform molecular weight (1.92×106 Da) and a well-characterized skeletal structure of →4)-β-D-Xylp-(1→4-β-D-Xylp-(1]4→4)-α-D-GlcAp-(1→4-α-D-GlcAp-(1]2→ — offer promising biopolymer foundations for constructing multifunctional delivery systems. The demonstrated anti-inflammatory activity of BKP-1, mediated via NF-κB pathway regulation, suggests its potential application in designing carrier systems that concurrently deliver drugs and modulate the tumor microenvironment to ameliorate inflammation-associated drug resistance.
The future strategy focuses on developing “theranostic” carriers that combine real-time biodistribution monitoring with targeted, condition-triggered drug release. This is justified by the need to overcome the physiological barriers (eg, elevated interstitial fluid pressure, dense stroma) that limit nanoparticle penetration into solid tumors. A promising direction involves engineering biomimetic nanoparticles coated with macrophage membranes to improve immune evasion and active targeting, thereby enhancing the therapeutic index of encapsulated matrine derivatives.
Precision Medicine-Driven Translational Research
Multi-omics integration requires breakthroughs: Spatial metabolomic mass spectrometry imaging (Spatial-MSI) deciphers spatial reprogramming of the glutamine-α-KG metabolic axis in tumor microenvironments under Matrine intervention.64 Single-cell epi-drugomics (scEpiDrug) employs CUT&Tag technology to map chromatin response landscapes after HDAC inhibitor pretreatment.65 Virtual response libraries for patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models leverage generative adversarial networks (GANs) to predict biomarker combinations.66 The DeepTCR platform decodes relationships between T-cell receptor clonal evolution and drug responses.67
The overarching strategy here is to construct digital twins of patient tumors—computational models that simulate drug response based on individual multi-omics profiles. This is justified by the high failure rate of one-size-fits-all approaches in oncology. Future work must prioritize the development of explainable AI models that not only predict but also biologically interpret response signatures, facilitating the discovery of novel, mechanistically grounded biomarker combinations. Crucially, these models should be prospectively validated in basket trials that enroll patients based on molecular features rather than tumor histology.
Green Intelligent Manufacturing System Construction
Synthetic biology innovations encompass: Self-inducible expression systems using quorum sensing to regulate CYP82 family modular assembly;68 site-specific conjugation of non-natural amino acids to construct Matrine-PROTAC bifunctional molecules; blockchain-enabled continuous manufacturing platforms with real-time critical quality attribute (CQA) monitoring via spectroscopic PAT technology.69 The AI crystallization robot (CrystalGPT) developed by EPFL enhances polymorph screening efficiency.70 The strategic goal is to establish a sustainable, agile supply chain for matrine analogs, which is justified by the resource-intensive and ecologically taxing nature of traditional plant extraction. A key future direction involves engineering microbial consortia, where different modules of the complex biosynthetic pathway are distributed among specialized strains, thereby increasing overall yield and stability. Furthermore, the integration of Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) into the digital twin of the manufacturing process will be essential for quantitatively minimizing the environmental footprint from raw material to final product, aligning with green chemistry principles.
Smart Clinical Trial Paradigm Innovation
Implementation strategies include: Metaverse patient recruitment systems (MetaTrial) for rapid biomarker-positive cohort matching through digital phenotyping;71 organ-on-chip/brain organoid platforms predicting neurotoxicity and off-target effects;72 causal inference models (eg, DoubleML) for counterfactual efficacy estimation from real-world data, an FDA-approved method for supplementary clinical trial evidence.73 Integrating quantum computing-assisted de novo drug design with 4D bioprinted tumor model validation, combined with transnational real-world databases from the EU’s “Cancer Moonshot”, may accelerate clinical translation of third-generation intelligent Matrine-based drugs and advance natural product R&D.74 The core strategy is to create an adaptive, learning-based clinical trial ecosystem that continuously integrates preclinical and real-world evidence to optimize trial design and patient selection. This is justified by the prohibitive cost and time of conventional trials, especially for natural product derivatives which often face skepticism. A critical future direction is the wider adoption of platform trials and N-of-1 study designs, which can efficiently test multiple matrine-based candidates or combination regimens within a single, master protocol. Success hinges on establishing robust data standards and privacy-preserving federated learning frameworks across international regulatory agencies to enable the seamless use of real-world data as external control arms.
Conclusions
Matrine and its derivatives, as multi-target natural products, demonstrate synergistic antitumor effects by regulating core oncogenic pathways including Wnt/β-catenin, MAPK/ERK, and PI3K/AKT/mTOR, effectively suppressing tumor proliferation, inducing programmed cell death (apoptosis, autophagy, and pyroptosis), and remodeling the tumor microenvironment. Studies have revealed that matrine derivatives overcome chemoresistance through mechanisms such as dual inhibition of DNMT1/HDAC6 and activation of the NLRP3/caspase-1 pyroptosis pathway, showing remarkable efficacy in PDX models of pancreatic and liver cancers. However, preclinical-to-clinical translation faces critical challenges including pharmacokinetic limitations, off-target toxicity, and tumor heterogeneity-mediated drug resistance in preclinical models; importantly, no phase I/II clinical trials for these agents have been conducted to date. Future research should prioritize: developing intelligent delivery systems to enhance tumor targeting efficiency; integrating spatial metabolomics with single-cell epigenomic pharmacotyping to establish biomarker-guided precision therapeutics; optimizing biosynthesis pathways via synthetic biology and designing bifunctional molecules using PROTAC technology for enhanced efficacy; and implementing intelligent clinical trial paradigms based on organ-on-a-chip and digital twin technologies for patient-specific treatment optimization. Through interdisciplinary technological convergence and preclinical data optimization, matrine-based compounds have the potential to advance from preclinical research toward next-generation intelligent anticancer agents, pending successful resolution of current translational barriers.
Acknowledgments
All authors have seen and approved the final version of the manuscript being submitted. They warrant that the article is the authors’ original work, hasn’t received prior publication, and isn’t under consideration for publication elsewhere.
Funding Statement
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Author Contributions
All authors made a significant contribution to the work reported, whether that is in the conception, study design, execution, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation, or in all these areas; took part in drafting, revising or critically reviewing the article; gave final approval of the version to be published; have agreed on the journal to which the article has been submitted; and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.
Disclosure
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
- 1.Siegel RL, Miller KD, Wagle NS, et al. Cancer statistics, 2023. CA. 2023;73(1):17–48. doi: 10.3322/caac.21763 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Bray F, Laversanne M, Sung H, et al. Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA. 2024;74(3):229–263. doi: 10.3322/caac.21834 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Ugai T, Sasamoto N, Lee HY, et al. Is early-onset cancer an emerging global epidemic? Current evidence and future implications. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2022;19:656–673. doi: 10.1038/s41571-022-00672-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Shah RR, Millien VO, da Costa WL, et al. Trends in the incidence of early-onset colorectal cancer in all 50 United States from 2001 through 2017. Cancer. 2022;128(2):299–310. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33916 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Fujiwara Y, Horita N, Adib E, et al. Treatment-related adverse events, including fatal toxicities, in patients with solid tumours receiving neoadjuvant and adjuvant immune checkpoint blockade: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Lancet Oncol. 2024;25(1):62–75. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(23)00524-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.The global challenge of cancer. Nat Cancer. 2020;1:1–2. PMID: 35121840. doi: 10.1038/s43018-019-0023 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Mao Y, Xie H, Lv M, et al. The landscape of objective response rate of anti-PD-1/L1 monotherapy across 31 types of cancer: a system review and novel biomarker investigating. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2023;72(7):2483–2498. PMID: 37022474; PMCID: PMC10992474. doi: 10.1007/s00262-023-03441-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Zhong L, Li Y, Xiong L, et al. Small molecules in targeted cancer therapy: advances, challenges, and future perspectives. Sig Transduct Target Ther. 2021;6:201. doi: 10.1038/s41392-021-00572-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Atanasov AG, Zotchev SB, Dirsch VM, et al. Natural products in drug discovery: advances and opportunities. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2021;20:200–216. doi: 10.1038/s41573-020-00114-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Sun P, Zhao W, Wang Q, et al. Chemical diversity, biological activities and traditional uses of and important Chinese herb Sophora. Phytomedicine. 2022;100:154054. doi: 10.1016/j.phymed.2022.154054 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Lin Y, He F, Wu L, et al. Matrine exerts pharmacological effects through multiple signaling pathways: a comprehensive review. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2022;16:533–569. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S349678 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Li X, Tang Z, Wen L, et al. Matrine: a review of its pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, toxicity, clinical application and preparation researches. J Ethnopharmacol. 2021;269:113682. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2020.113682 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Zhang H, Chen L, Sun X, et al. Matrine: a promising natural product with various pharmacological activities. Front Pharmacol. 2020;11:588. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2020.00588 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Lichuan W, Wang G, Wei J, et al. Matrine derivative YF-18 inhibits lung cancer cell proliferation and migration through down-regulating Skp2. Oncotarget. 2017;8(7):11729–11738. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.14329 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Bao X, Zhang Y, Zhang H, et al. Molecular mechanism of β-Sitosterol and its derivatives in tumor progression. Front Oncol. 2022;12:926975. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.926975 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Nong J, Kang K, Shi Q, Zhu X, Tao Q, Chen YG. Phase separation of Axin organizes the β-catenin destruction complex. J Cell Biol. 2021;220(4):e202012112. PMID: 33651074; PMCID: PMC7931644. doi: 10.1083/jcb.202012112 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Zhang X, Xu Z, Chen Q, Zhou Z. Notch signaling regulates pulmonary fibrosis. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2024;12:1450038. PMID: 39450276; PMCID: PMC11499121. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2024.1450038 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Liao M, Du H, Wang B, Huang J, Huang D, Tong G. Anticancer effect of Polyphyllin I in suppressing stem cell-like properties of hepatocellular carcinoma via the AKT/GSK-3β/β-Catenin signaling pathway. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2022;2022:4031008. PMID: 36317061; PMCID: PMC9617736. doi: 10.1155/2022/4031008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Zhuang J, Mo J, Huang Z, et al. Mechanisms of Xiaozheng decoction for anti-bladder cancer effects via affecting the GSK3β/β-catenin signaling pathways: a network pharmacology-directed experimental investigation. Chin Med. 2023;18:104. doi: 10.1186/s13020-023-00818-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Ren L, Mo W, Wang L, Wang X. Matrine suppresses breast cancer metastasis by targeting ITGB1 and inhibiting epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition. Exp Ther Med. 2020;19(1):367–374. PMID: 31853313; PMCID: PMC6909565. doi: 10.3892/etm.2019.8207 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Lavoie H, Gagnon J, Therrien M. ERK signalling: a master regulator of cell behaviour, life and fate. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2020;21:607–632. doi: 10.1038/s41580-020-0255-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Zou Y, Sarem M, Xiang S, Hu H, Xu W, Shastri VP. Autophagy inhibition enhances matrine derivative MASM induced apoptosis in cancer cells via a mechanism involving reactive oxygen species-mediated PI3K/Akt/mTOR and Erk/p38 signaling. BMC Cancer. 2019;19(1):949. PMID: 31615459; PMCID: PMC6794878. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-6199-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Sharma P, Piya S, Baran N, et al. Inhibition of ERK1/2 reverses venetoclax-induced autophagy to overcome resistance in acute myeloid leukemia. Blood. 2022;140(Supplement 1):3093–3094. doi: 10.1182/blood-2022-165552 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Yoo HC, Yu YC, Sung Y, et al. Glutamine reliance in cell metabolism. Exp Mol Med. 2020;52:1496–1516. doi: 10.1038/s12276-020-00504-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Foth M, McMahon M. Autophagy inhibition in BRAF-driven cancers. Cancers. 2021;13(14):3498. PMID: 34298710; PMCID: PMC8306561. doi: 10.3390/cancers13143498 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Li Z, Huang J, Wu J. pH-Sensitive nanogels for drug delivery in cancer therapy. Biomater Sci. 2021;9(3):574–589. PMID: 33306076. doi: 10.1039/d0bm01729a [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Dai M, Cai Z, Chen N, et al. Matrine suppresses stemness of hepatocellular carcinoma cells by regulating β-catenin signaling pathway. Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2019;39(10):1239–1245. (Chinese). PMID: 31801708; PMCID: PMC6867957. doi: 10.12122/j.issn.1673-4254.2019.10.17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Sun Z, Liu L, Liang H, Zhang L. Nicotinamide mononucleotide induces autophagy and ferroptosis via AMPK/mTOR pathway in hepatocellular carcinoma. Mol Carcinog. 2024;63(4):577–588. PMID: 38197493. doi: 10.1002/mc.23673 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Xue L, Zhou J, Ling Y, et al. Matrine induces autophagic cell death by triggering ROS/AMPK/mTOR axis and apoptosis in multiple myeloma. Biomed Pharmacother. 2024;175:116738. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2024.116738 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Tian L-Y, Smit DJ, Jücker M. The role of PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling in hepatocellular carcinoma metabolism. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(3):2652. doi: 10.3390/ijms24032652 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Qian L, Liu Y, Yang X, et al. Matrine derivative WM130 inhibits hepatocellular carcinoma by suppressing EGFR/ERK/MMP-2 and PTEN/AKT signaling pathways. Cancer Letters. 2015;368(1):126–134. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2015.07.035 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Senlin L, Saw PE, Lin C, et al. Redox-responsive polyprodrug nanoparticles for targeted siRNA delivery and synergistic liver cancer therapy. Biomaterials. 2020;234:119760. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.119760 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Peng Y, Wang Y, Zhou C, et al. PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway and its role in cancer therapeutics: are we making headway? Front Oncol. 2022;12(819128). doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.819128 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Bai Y, Pan Y, Liu X. Mechanistic insights into gasdermin-mediated pyroptosis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2025;26:501–521. doi: 10.1038/s41580-025-00837-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Zhao T, Chi Z, Wang D. Versatility of gasdermin D beyond pyroptosis. Trends Cell Biol. 2025;35:1039–1053. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2025.02.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Jiasi W, Sun J, Meng X, et al. Pyroptosis by caspase-11 inflammasome-Gasdermin D pathway in autoimmune diseases. Pharmacol Res. 2021;165:105408. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2020.105408 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Hu L, Chen M, Chen X, et al. Chemotherapy-induced pyroptosis is mediated by BAK/BAX-caspase-3-GSDME pathway and inhibited by 2-bromopalmitate. Cell Death Dis. 2020;11:281. doi: 10.1038/s41419-020-2476-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Guo J, Cui D, Tang Y, et al. Celastrol activates caspase-3/GSDME-dependent pyroptosis in tumor cells by inducing endoplasmicreticulum stress. J Trad Chin Med Sci. 2024;11(3):330–339. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcms.2024.05.006 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Liu Z, Li Y, Zhu Y, et al. Apoptin induces pyroptosis of colorectal cancer cells via the GSDME-dependent pathway. Int J Bio Sci. 2022;18(2):717–730. doi: 10.7150/ijbs.64350 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Hou J, Hsu J-M, Hung M-C, et al. Molecular mechanisms and functions of pyroptosis in inflammation and antitumor immunity. Molecular Cell. 2021;81(22):4579–4590. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2021.09.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Matyśniak D, Oslislok M, Pomorski P, et al. P2X7 receptor in normal and cancer cells in the perspective of nucleotide signaling. Acta Biochim Pol. 2022;70(1):1–21. doi: 10.18388/abp.2020_6310 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.He WR, Cao LB, Yang YL, et al. VRK2 is involved in the innate antiviral response by promoting mitostress-induced mtDNA release. Cell Mol Immunol. 2021;18:1186–1196. doi: 10.1038/s41423-021-00673-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Teng J-F, Mei Q-B, Zhou X-G, et al. Polyphyllin VI induces Caspase-1-mediated pyroptosis via the induction of ROS/NF-κB/NLRP3/GSDMD signal axis in non-small cell lung cancer. Cancers. 2020;12(1):193. doi: 10.3390/cancers12010193 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Jiang Y, Yang Y, Hu Y, et al. Gasdermin D restricts anti-tumor immunity during PD-L1 checkpoint blockade. Cell Rep. 2022;41(4):111553. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.111553 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Matthews HK, Bertoli C, de Bruin RAM, et al. Cell cycle control in cancer. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2022;23(1):74–88. doi: 10.1038/s41580-021-00404-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Gang L, Yang J, Chong T, et al. TUG1 knockdown inhibits the tumorigenesis and progression of prostate cancer by regulating microRNA-496/Wnt/β-catenin pathway. Anti-Cancer Drugs. 2020;31(6):592–600. doi: 10.1097/CAD.0000000000000882 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Ur rashid H, Yiming X, Muhammad Y, et al. Research advances on anticancer activities of matrine and its derivatives: an updated overview. Eur J Med Chem. 2019;161:205–238. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2018.10.037 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Yue-Yu G, Chen M-H, May BH, et al. Matrine induces apoptosis in multiple colorectal cancer cell lines in vitro and inhibits tumour growthwith minimum side effects in vivo via Bcl-2 and caspase-3. Phytomedicine. 2018;51:214–225. doi: 10.1016/j.phymed.2018.10.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Pan-Ling X, Cheng C-S, Jiao J-Y, et al. Matrine injection inhibits pancreatic cancer growth via modulating carbonic anhydrases- a network pharmacology-based study with in vitro validation. J Ethnopharmacol. 2022;287:114691. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2021.114691 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Guo Y, Lucksiri A, Dickinson GL, et al. Quantitative prediction of CYP3A4- and CYP3A5-mediated drug interactions. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2020;107(1):246–256. doi: 10.1002/cpt.1596 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Chen S, Tan Y, Xiao X, et al. Deletion of TLR4 attenuates lipopolysaccharide-induced acute liver injury by inhibiting inflammation and apoptosis. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2021;42:1610–1619. doi: 10.1038/s41401-020-00597-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Hashiguchi S, Tanaka T, Mano R, et al. SLC7A11/xCT-mediated cystine uptake regulates intracellular glutathione and promotes antioxidant defense in lymphatic endothelial cells. Anticancer Res. 2025;45(1):65–71. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.17393 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Sun R, Xiang J, Zhou Q, et al. The tumor EPR effect for cancer drug delivery: current status, limitations, and alternatives. Adv Drug Delivery Rev. 2022;191:114614. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2022.114614 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Zhang X, Huo X, Guo H, et al. Combined inhibition of PARP and EZH2 for cancer treatment: current status, opportunities, and challenges. Front Pharmacol. 2022;13:965244. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.965244 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Tang M, You J, Yang T, et al. Application of modern synthetic biology technology in aromatic amino acids and derived compounds biosynthesis. Bioresour Technol. 2024;406:131050. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2024.131050 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Azinas S, Carroni M. Cryo-EM uniqueness in structure determination of macromolecular complexes: a selected structural anthology. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2023;81:102621. doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2023.102621 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Szałata A, Hrovatin K, Becker S, et al. Transformers in single-cell omics: a review and new perspectives. Nat Methods. 2024;21:1430–1443. doi: 10.1038/s41592-024-02353-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Roither B, Oostenbrink C, Schreiner W, et al. Molecular dynamics of the immune checkpoint programmed cell death protein I, PD-1: conformational changes of the BC-loop upon binding of the ligand PD-L1 and the monoclonal antibody nivolumab. BMC Bioinf. 2020;21(Suppl 17):557. doi: 10.1186/s12859-020-03904-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.de Medeiros G, Ortiz R, Strnad P, et al. Multiscale light-sheet organoid imaging framework. Nat Commun. 2022;13(1):4864. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-32465-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Bai P, Miljković F, John B, et al. Interpretable bilinear attention network with domain adaptation improves drug–target prediction. Nat Mach Intell. 2023;5:126–136. doi: 10.1038/s42256-022-00605-1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Wang M, Li X, He F, et al. Advances in designer DNA nanorobots enabling programmable functions. Chembiochem. 2022;23(18):e202200119. doi: 10.1002/cbic.202200119 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Kurawattimath V, Wilson B, Geetha KM. Nanoparticle-based drug delivery across the blood-brain barrier for treating malignant brain glioma. OpenNano. 2023;10(100128):2352–9520. doi: 10.1016/j.onano.2023.100128 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Awad NS, Haider M, Paul V, et al. Ultrasound-triggered liposomes encapsulating quantum dots as safe fluorescent markers for colorectal cancer. Pharmaceutics. 2021;13(12):2073. PMID: 34959354; PMCID: PMC8705306. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics13122073 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Hu T, Allam M, Cai S, et al. Single-cell spatial metabolomics with cell-type specific protein profiling for tissue systems biology. Nat Commun. 2023;14:8260. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-43917-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Wu SJ, Furlan SN, Mihalas AB, et al. Single-cell CUT&Tag analysis of chromatin modifications in differentiation and tumor progression. Nat Biotechnol. 2021;39:819–824. doi: 10.1038/s41587-021-00865-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Liu Y, Wu W, Cai C, et al. Patient-derived xenograft models in cancer therapy: technologies and applications. Sig Transduct Target Ther. 2023;8:160. doi: 10.1038/s41392-023-01419-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Sidhom JW, Larman HB, Pardoll DM, et al. DeepTCR is a deep learning framework for revealing sequence concepts within T-cell repertoires. Nat Commun. 2021;12:1605. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-21879-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Boo A, Amaro RL, Stan G-B. Quorum sensing in synthetic biology: a review. Curr Opin Syst Biol. 2021;28:100378. doi: 10.1016/j.coisb.2021.100378 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Zhao H, Ding W, Zang J, et al. Directed-evolution of translation system for efficient unnatural amino acids incorporation and generalizable synthetic auxotroph construction. Nat Commun. 2021;12:7039. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-27399-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Sitapure N, Kwon JS-I. CrystalGPT: enhancing system-to-system transferability in crystallization prediction and control using time-series-transformers. Comput Chem Eng. 2023;177:108339. doi: 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2023.108339 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Bufano P, Laurino M, Said S, et al. Digital phenotyping for monitoring mental disorders: systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2023;25:e46778. doi: 10.2196/46778 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Leung CM, de Haan P, Ronaldson-Bouchard K, et al. A guide to the organ-on-a-chip. Nat Rev Meth Primers. 2022;2(33). doi: 10.1038/s43586-022-00118-6 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Prosperi M, Guo Y, Sperrin M, et al. Causal inference and counterfactual prediction in machine learning for actionable healthcare. Nat Mach Intell. 2020;2:369–375. doi: 10.1038/s42256-020-0197-y [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Li W, Yin Z, Li X, et al. A hybrid quantum computing pipeline for real world drug discovery. Sci Rep. 2024;14:16942. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-67897-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]





