Abstract
Background/Objective
Predicting neurological outcomes in comatose cardiac arrest survivors remains challenging. Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) offers potential as an objective biomarker of white matter injury, but its prognostic value needs further validation. We aimed to investigate the predictive value of DTI-derived metrics for six-month neurological outcomes in comatose cardiac arrest patients.
Methods
This prospective study enrolled 28 comatose cardiac arrest patients (mean age 54.36 ± 3.01 years; 71% male) and 28 age-/sex-matched healthy controls (HCs). All participants underwent 3T brain MRI (median 4 days post-arrest). DTI parameters (fractional anisotropy [FA], mean diffusivity [MD], axial diffusivity [AD], radial diffusivity [RD]) were analyzed using Tract-based spatial statistics (TBSS) and ROI approaches based on white matter atlas. Neurological outcome was assessed at six months using the modified Rankin Scale (good outcome: mRS 0–2; poor outcome: mRS 3–5). Statistical analyses included voxel-wise comparisons and ROC curve analysis for predictive performance.
Results
Compared to HCs, patients showed widespread reductions in FA, MD, AD, and RD (TFCE-corrected p < 0.05). Patients with poor outcomes (n = 18) exhibited significantly lower DTI metrics than those with good outcomes (n = 10) across most white matter tracts. The combination of whole-brain FA and RD demonstrated exceptional prognostic accuracy for good outcome (AUC = 0.984; 95% CI 0.925–1.000; sensitivity 92%, specificity 97.7%), significantly outperforming clinical variables and individual DTI parameters. ROI analysis identified specific tracts (e.g., right cingulum hippocampus, right uncinate fasciculus) with high predictive values. Ventricular fibrillation as initial rhythm was more frequent in the group with good outcomes.
Conclusions
DTI metrics, particularly the combination of FA and RD, provided outstanding early prediction of good six-month neurological outcomes after cardiac arrest, surpassing traditional biomarkers. These findings supported integrating DTI into multimodal prognostic models to guide clinical decisions and prevent premature withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy.
Keywords: Cardiac arrest, Diffusion tensor imaging, Prognosis, Good outcome
Introduction
Cardiac arrest is associated with high mortality and cerebral dysfunction due to prolonged whole-body ischemia [1, 2]. Despite advances in resuscitation and post-cardiac arrest care, predicting neurological outcomes in comatose patients remains a significant challenge. Most studies focus more on predictors of poor outcomes after cardiac arrest. However, because some patients with potential for good recovery experience premature withdrawal of life sustaining treatment (WLST), predicting good outcomes is equally crucial [3, 4]. Current prognostic assessment tools, including clinical examinations, electrophysiological tests, and serum biomarkers such as neuron-specific enolase (NSE), vary in their sensitivity and specificity, while being subject to multiple confounding factors [5, 6]. These limitations underscore the need for objective, early-stage biomarkers to guide clinical decision-making and improve prognostic accuracy.
Ischemic hypoxic injury and ischemia-reperfusion induces cerebral edema in comatose patients after resuscitation from cardiac arrest [7, 8]. Within 1 hour after bilateral carotid artery occlusion in cats, MRI shows diffuse cellular swelling, including neurons and glial cells. The two main pathological mechanisms were cytotoxic edema, from cellular homeostasis failure with osmotic gradient-driven fluid accumulation, and vasogenic edema, due to blood-brain barrier break down from endothelial dysfunction and tight junction disruption. Two types of edema can exist independently or simultaneously in the same disease stage [7].
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has emerged as a promising modality for evaluating brain injury after cardiac arrest. Our previous research has shown that rs-fMRI displays complex changes in gray matter signal abnormalities in resuscitated patients, as rs-fMRI is sensitive to both cortical and subcortical neuronal activities [9]. Diffusion weighted imaging detects the diffusion of water molecules and is sensitive to detecting cytotoxic edema, thereby reducing the diffusion rate, providing microstructural white matter integrity and insights into axonal and myelin damage [10, 11]. Prior studies have demonstrated associations between the apparent diffusion coefficient or fractional anisotropy (FA) and neurological outcomes in cardiac arrest and brain injury patients [12–16]. However, the prognostic value of DTI in cardiac arrest patients remains underexplored. Furthermore, existing studies often lack rigorous comparisons between patients and healthy controls (HCs) or fail to account for region-specific white matter alterations.
This prospective study aimed to investigate the predictive utility of DTI-derived parameters, for assessing six-month neurological outcomes in comatose cardiac arrest patients. We hypothesized that microstructural white matter changes, quantified by DTI, would correlate with functional recovery and outperform traditional prognostic markers. By comparing whole brain and region of interest (ROI) analyses with clinical variables, this work aimed to advance personalized prognostication and inform targeted therapeutic strategies.
Methods
Study design and participants
This is a prospective study to identify prognostic biomarkers for neurological recovery of comatose patients after cardiac arrest. Between January 2021 and December 2023, we consecutively recruited cardiac arrest patients admitted to the emergency intensive care unit (EICU) of Beijing Chaoyang Hospital. Exclusion criteria were: age < 18 years, pre-existing structural brain lesions (e.g., stroke, cerebral hemorrhage), pregnancy, contraindications to MRI (e.g., metallic implants), severe anemia (hemoglobin < 120 g/L), and lack of informed consent from legal surrogates. The clinical data were the age, sex, witness, initial rhythm, etiology, time to return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), and time from cardiac arrest to MRI. The outcome was assessed six months after the evaluation using a structural script, the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score, through a phone interview with the patient or their close relative. The mRS score was divided into good (mRS 0–2) and poor outcome (mRS 3–5). All patients underwent brain MRI and blood gas analyses at same day, and serum neuron-specific enolase (NSE) levels on day 3. All patients received a standardized targeted temperature management (TTM) protocol involving 24-h maintenance at 33 °C and subsequent rewarmed at 0.1 °C/h to 37 °C, facilitated by an automated surface cooling device. More detailed treatment protocols in this study were performed as described previously [9]. At the same time, age- and sex-matched healthy controls (HCs) were included from the community to observe the changing trends of the white matter microstructure in the patients. The exclusion criteria included that the history of neurological or psychiatric disorders (e.g., stroke, dementia, major depression), brain space occupying lesions, cardiovascular disease, and claustrophobia.
This study was approved by the Ethics Committee Boards of Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University and written informed consent was obtained from all patients’ next of kin at the time of inclusion.
Image acquisition
After successful rewarming to achieve and maintain normothermia, along with 24 h maintenance of hemodynamic stability, brain MRI performed on a 3.0 T scanner (MAGNETOM Prisma, Siemens Healthcare) with a 64-channel head coil. The 3D T1-weighted magnetization prepared rapid acquisition gradient echo (MPRAGE) imaging parameters were: repetition time (TR) = 2300 ms, echo time (TE) = 2.98 ms, inversion time (TI) = 900 ms, slice thickness = 1 mm, flip angle = 9°, field of view (FOV) = 256 × 256 mm2, number of slices = 192. The T2 imaging parameters were: TR = 4500 ms, TE = 94 ms, slice thickness = 5 mm, number of slices = 20. T2-weighted fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) imaging parameters were: TR = 8000 ms, TE = 81 ms, slice thickness = 5 mm, number of slices = 20. DTI was acquired in the posterior-anterior (P-A) phase-encoding direction, one non-diffusion-weighted volume (b = 0 s/mm2) and 45 diffusion-weighted volumes with a b-value of 1000 s/mm2 were obtained. To address susceptibility-induced distortions, an additional reverse phase-encoding dataset was acquired in the opposite (A-P) direction, comprising one b = 0 s/mm2 volume and six diffusion-weighted volumes at b = 1000 s/mm2. This bidirectional acquisition protocol was implemented to enable subsequent eddy current and geometric distortion correction during postprocessing. All HCs underwent the identical brain MRI protocol on the same scanner using the same head coil as the patient cohort.
Data processing
After converting DICOM files to NIFTI images, DTI image pre-processing was performed using the FMRIB Software Library (FSL, version 6.0.7; http://www.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/fsl) [17]. The diffusion-weighted images with opposing phase-encoding directions (P-A and A-P) were combined and processed to correct for susceptibility-induced distortions and eddy currents using the topup and eddy tools. Then we performed the brain extraction and tensor calculation to generate fractional anisotropy (FA), mean diffusivity (MD), axial diffusivity (AD), and radial diffusivity (RD) maps [18]. Subsequently, DTI data were skeletonized using the Tract-Based Spatial Statistics analysis performed using the standard pipeline as implemented in FSL: FA maps were used as input and non-linear aligned to FMRIB58_FA maps. All aligned FA images were transformed onto the MNI152 template using affine registration. Then, mean FA skeleton was thresholded at a value of FA >0.2 to exclude non-white matter regions. Each individual’s aligned FA map was then projected onto this skeleton, resulting in a 4D skeletonized FA image containing all subjects’ data. Data on MD, AD, and RD were also aligned to the standard space using the transformation matrices derived from the FA registration and projected onto the mean FA skeleton [19].
To characterize white matter microstructural integrity of each individual, we measured FA, MD, AD, and RD in the skeleton. The skeleton was segmented in 20 predefined regions of interest (ROI) by using the Johns Hopkins University (JHU) DTI-based white matter atlas. The binary mask derived from the voxel-wise statistical analysis. For each subject, the mean values of the diffusion metrics (FA, MD, AD, and RD) were extracted from whole-brain white matter and specific white matter tracts derived from the intersection of the statistical mask and the JHU atlas.
Statistical analysis
This study assessed whether demographic and clinical data were statistically different between HCs and patients, good and poor outcome groups. The independent t-test was used if continuous data followed a normal distribution and exhibited homogeneous variance and data were presented as mean (SD). If the data were non-normally distributed or had heterogeneous variance, the non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test was used, and data are presented as median (interquartile range). For categorical variables, chi-square tests were performed and percentages were obtained.
Voxel-wise cross-subject statistics were performed on the skeletonized data using the “randomize” tool with 5000 iterations to compare differences between HCs and cardiac arrest patients, the patients with good outcomes and poor outcomes [20]. Age and sex as covariances were included in the design matrix as necessary. Threshold-free cluster enhancement (TFCE) was applied to correct for multiple comparisons, with a significance threshold of p < 0.05.
To assess the predictive value of variables demonstrating significant inter-group differences, we constructed six distinct models: one based on clinical variables, one on whole-brain DTI measures, and four on ROI-specific metrics. Within each model, stepwise regression was employed to evaluate the predictive value of individual variables. For the ROI-based predictive models, the mean values of each DTI metric (FA, MD, AD, RD) from all 20 JHU white matter atlas regions were used as the initial candidate predictors for the respective stepwise regression analyses. For variables achieving statistical significance (p < 0.05) in their respective models, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated. The area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for predicting good outcome were then calculated. Internal validation was performed using bootstrapping with 1000 resamples to calculate an optimism-corrected AUC and mitigate the risk of overfitting. All analyses were performed using RStudio (version 2024.12.1 + 563).
Results
Participant characteristics
The study enrolled 33 patients who met the inclusion criteria in the Chaoyang hospital. Among them, 3 patients were excluded because they did not complete the MRI exam. Another 2 patients were excluded because of bad image quality, mainly due to severe artifacts caused by excessive head motion during visual inspection of images. Finally, this study included 28 comatose cardiac arrest patients (54.36 ± 3.01; 71% male) and 28 HCs (48.57 ± 2.16; 50% male). No significant differences were observed between cardiac arrest patients and HCs in age (p = 0.124) and sex (p = 0.101). Among cardiac arrest patients, comparisons between good (n = 10) and poor outcome (n = 18) groups revealed no significant differences in age (p = 0.464), sex (p = 0.454), witnessed arrest rate (p = 0.662), or time to ROSC (p = 0.291). However, ventricular fibrillation as the initial rhythm was more frequent in the good outcome group (80% vs. 28%, p = 0.008) (Table 1).
Table 1.
Patients characteristics
| Characteristics | All patients (n = 28) |
Good outcomes (mRS 0–2; n = 10) |
Poor outcomes (mRS 3–5; n = 18) |
p |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Demographic characteristics | ||||
| Age, years | 54.36 ± 3.01 | 60.00 (35.25) | 56.00 (20.50) | 0.464 |
| Male sex, n (%) | 20 (71) | 8 (80) | 12 (67) | 0.454 |
| Characteristics of the cardiac arrest | ||||
| Witness, n (%) | 26 (93) | 9 (90) | 17 (94) | 0.662 |
| Time to ROSC, min | 21 (19.5) | 20 (6.75) | 25.5 (29.5) | 0.291 |
| Initial rhythm, n (%) | 0.008 | |||
| PEA | 15 (54) | 2 (20) | 13 (72) | |
| VF | 13 (46) | 8 (80) | 5 (28) | |
| Etiology | 0.274 | |||
| Cardiogenic | 24 (86) | 10 (100) | 14 (78) | |
| Respiratory origin | 2 (7) | 0 (0) | 2 (11) | |
| Other | 2 (7) | 0 (0) | 2 (11) | |
| Time from CA to MRI, days | 4.04 ± 2.91 | 5.40 ± 3.34 | 3.28 ± 2.42 | 0.063 |
| Clinical characteristics | ||||
| NSE, ng/mL | 56.80 (60.8) | 40.84 (25.21) | 88.05 (55.7) | 0.044 |
| pH | 7.34 ± 0.16 | 7.38 ± 0.04 | 7.32 ± 0.20 | 0.261 |
| PaCO2, mmHg | 34.54 ± 8.32 | 37.83 ± 7.04 | 32.72 ± 28.58 | 0.103 |
| PaO2, mmHg | 152 (80.5) | 135 (85.75) | 170.5 (67) | 0.179 |
| P/F | 322 (178) | 444.67 (155.83) | 294.28 (123.37) | 0.058 |
| Whole brain parameters | ||||
| FA | 0.51 (0.07) | 0.54 (0.03) | 0.49 (0.07) | < 0.001 |
| MD | 7 × 10− 4 (2.25 × 10− 4) | 7.5 × 10− 4 (1.0 × 10− 4) | 6.5 × 10− 4 (2.0 × 10− 4) | 0.019 |
| AD | 1.15 × 10− 3 (3.25 × 10− 4) | 1.2 × 10− 3 (0.0 × 10− 4) | 1.0 × 10− 3 (3.75 × 10− 4) | < 0.001 |
| RD | 5 × 10− 4 (2 × 10− 4) | 6 × 10− 4 (0.0 × 10− 4) | 5 × 10− 4 (2 × 10− 4) | 0.005 |
Data are presented as mean (SD), n (%), or median (IQR). ROSC, return of spontaneous circulation; PEA, pulseless electrical activity; VF, ventricular fibrillation; CA, cardiac arrest; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; NSE: neuron - specific enolase; PaCO2: arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide; PaO2: arterial partial pressure of oxygen; P/F: PaO2/FiO2 ratio (where PaO2 represents arterial partial pressure of oxygen and FiO2 represents fraction of inspired oxygen); FA: fractional anisotropy; MD: mean diffusivity; AD: axial diffusivity; RD: radial diffusivity
The NSE were significantly different between the good and poor outcome groups. There were no significant differences in pH, PaCO2, PaCO2, and PaO2/FiO2 ratio (P/F) (Table 1).
Tract-based spatial statistics
After controlling for age and sex as covariates, TBSS of FA, MD, AD, and RD identified significantly widespread decreases in patients compared to HCs (Fig. 1A), and in patients with poor outcomes compared to the good outcomes (Fig. 1B) (TFCE-corrected p < 0.05).
Fig. 1.
The spatial distributions of differences in fractional anisotropy, mean diffusivity, axial diffusivity, and radial diffusivity. The blue areas show significantly decreased values in (A) patients compared with HCs, (B) the patients with poor outcomes compared with the good outcomes (p < 0.05). HC: health control; CA: cardiac arrest; FA: fractional anisotropy; MD: mean diffusivity; AD: axial diffusivity; RD: radial diffusivity
Figure 2 showed the specific white matter changes in the ROIs of FA, MD, AD, and RD respectively in patients with good outcomes and poor outcomes. Only the right cingulum hippocampus of FA showed no difference between the good and poor outcome groups. And the values of other all regions were significantly decreased in the patients with poor outcomes.
Fig. 2.
Histogram based on ROI metrics
Prognostic value of variables
In the clinical variables model, significant variable was NSE + initial rhythm (AUC: 0.894). The whole brain DTI measures, which included FA and RD, increased the AUC to 0.984 (95% CI 0.925–1.000), with 97.7% specificity and 92% sensitivity. In the ROI-specific metrics model of the multivariate analyses, significant regions selected by stepwise regression were the right anterior thalamic radiation (ATR_R) in FA (AUC 0.853), the right cingulum hippocampus (CH_R) and left inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus (IFOF_L) in MD (AUC 0.916), the CH_R and right uncinate fasciculus (Unc_R) in AD (AUC 0.978), and CH_R in RD (AUC 0.818) as shown in Table 2; Fig. 3.
Table 2.
Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve
| Characteristics | Area under the ROC curve (95% CI) | Sensitivity (95% CI) |
Specificity (95% CI) |
Predictive positive value (95% CI) | Negative positive value (95% CI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clinical variable | |||||
| NSE | 0.733 [0.523, 0.925] | 0.407 [0.000, 0.929] | 0.850 [0.529, 1.000] | 0.466 [0.000, 1.000] | 0.748 [0.571, 0.933] |
| Initial rhythm | 0.753 [0.575, 0.912] | 0.653 [0.000, 1.000] | 0.788 [0.545, 1.000] | 0.534 [0.000, 0.875] | 0.834 [0.625, 1.000] |
| NSE + initial rhythm | 0.894 [0.738, 1.000] | 0.731 [0.200, 1.000] | 0.863 [0.647, 1.000] | 0.753 [0.333, 1.000] | 0.857 [0.654, 1.000] |
| Whole brain DTI measures | |||||
| FA | 0.891 [0.743, 0.994] | 0.756 [0.222, 1.000] | 0.855 [0.643, 1.000] | 0.754 [0.444, 1.000] | 0.876 [0.720, 1.000] |
| RD | 0.807 [0.645, 0.926] | 0.694 [0.000, 1.000] | 0.776 [0.500, 1.000] | 0.565 [0.000, 0.875] | 0.847 [0.667, 1.000] |
| FA + RD | 0.984 [0.925, 1.000] | 0.920 [0.700, 1.000] | 0.977 [0.850, 1.000] | 0.965 [0.750, 1.000] | 0.956 [0.824, 1.000] |
| ROIs of FA | |||||
| ATR_R | 0.853 [0.683, 0.977] | 0.665 [0.143, 1.000] | 0.847 [0.643, 1.000] | 0.716 [0.286, 1.000] | 0.835 [0.682, 1.000] |
| ROIs of MD | |||||
| CH_R | 0.907 [0.783, 0.993] | 0.766 [0.375, 1.000] | 0.866 [0.692, 1.000] | 0.761 [0.499, 1.000] | 0.879 [0.737, 1.000] |
| IFOF_L | 0.755 [0.444, 0.917] | 0.486 [0.000, 1.000] | 0.794 [0.467, 1.000] | 0.573 [0.000, 1.000] | 0.765 [0.579, 1.000] |
| CH_R + IFOF_L | 0.916 [0.802, 1.000] | 0.774 [0.400, 1.000] | 0.884 [0.714, 1.000] | 0.799 [0.538, 1.000] | 0.880 [0.733, 1.000] |
| ROIs of AD | |||||
| CH_R | 0.960 [0.871, 1.000] | 0.865 [0.666, 1.000] | 0.927 [0.765, 1.000] | 0.880 [0.633, 1.000] | 0.925 [0.800, 1.000] |
| Unc_R | 0.851 [0.690, 0.981] | 0.684 [0.000, 1.000] | 0.813 [0.562, 1.000] | 0.656 [0.000, 0.933] | 0.844 [0.667, 1.000] |
| CH_R + Unc_R | 0.978 [0.904, 1.000] | 0.917 [0.667, 1.000] | 0.973 [0.857, 1.000] | 0.958 [0.778, 1.000] | 0.953 [0.818, 1.000] |
| ROIs of RD | |||||
| CH_R | 0.818 [0.610, 0.961] | 0.602 [0.000, 0.909] | 0.826 [0.538, 1.000] | 0.685 [0.000, 1.000] | 0.799 [0.615, 0.950] |
ROC: receiver operating characteristic; NSE: neuron - specific enolase; DTI: diffusion tensor imaging; FA: fractional anisotropy; RD: radial diffusivity; MD: mean diffusivity; AD: axial diffusivity; ATR_R: Anterior_thalamic_radiation_R; CH_R: Cingulum_hippocampus_R; IFOF_L: Inferior_fronto_occipital_fasciculus_L; Unc_R: Uncinate_fasciculus_R
Fig. 3.
Receiver operating characteristic curve. NSE: neuron - specific enolase; DTI: diffusion tensor imaging; FA: fractional anisotropy; MD: mean diffusivity; AD: axial diffusivity; RD: radial diffusivity; ATR_R: Anterior_thalamic_radiation_R; CH_R: Cingulum_hippocampus_R; IFOF_L: Inferior_fronto_occipital_fasciculus_L; Unc_R: Uncinate_fasciculus_R; ROI: region of interst
Discussion
This study demonstrates that DTI-derived parameters, particularly FA and RD, exhibit exceptional prognostic accuracy for predicting six-month neurological outcomes in comatose cardiac arrest patients. The combination of FA and RD achieved an AUC of 0.98, surpassing the predictive performance of clinical variables such as NSE and blood gas parameters. These findings align with prior evidence implicating white matter integrity as a critical determinant of functional recovery after hypoxic-ischemic injury. Reduced FA and RD in patients with poor outcomes likely reflect axonal degeneration and demyelination, processes exacerbated by prolonged cerebral hypoxia during cardiac arrest.
We found that the patients with good outcomes had a higher rate of ventricular fibrillation as the initial rhythm. The ventricular fibrillation was one type of shockable rhythms, which was found highly associated with outcome after in-hospital cardiac arrest [21]. The same trend showed in the out-of-hospital study that survival from a shockable rhythm greatly exceeds survival after pulseless electrical activity [22]. Goto et al. found that out-of-hospital patients with initial nonshockable rhythms may later develop shockable rhythms during resuscitation that was associated with 1-month good outcomes [23]. This may be because shockable rhythms are related to the effectiveness of early defibrillation.
NSE is the most commonly used hematological indicator for monitoring the status of patients with return of spontaneous circulation after cardiac arrest, and shows an ability to distinguish good and poor outcomes among individuals [24, 25]. In an observational study, NSE at day 3 led to an AUC 0.89 in predicting neurological outcomes [26]. However, in our study the NSE at day 3 had an AUC 0.733 with specificity of 85% for a sensitivity of only 40.7%. Several factors may explain this finding. First, a well-recognized lack of standardization in NSE assays across institutions and platforms could lead to substantial inter-laboratory variability and impact absolute values and prognostic thresholds [27]. Second, as a blood test, NSE was vulnerable to interference from a range of biological and preanalytical factors, and exhibited marked inter-individual and temporal variability. Finally, and most importantly, our study specifically aimed to discriminate good from poor outcomes among comatose patients of cardiac arrest. In our study, the patients had already passed the earliest, highest-mortality filter. In studies that focused primarily on predicting poor outcome, NSE often performed very well because non‑survivors frequently have markedly elevated values. Our results might reflect the real-world performance of NSE in the specific context of prognostication among comatose survivors, where the predictive value of NSE for identifying good outcomes appeared more limited than the prediction of poor outcomes [28]. Indeed, in this study, despite the initial rhythm, the other characteristics had no significant differences in the good and poor outcome groups. This baseline homogeneity strengthens the reliability of our observed lower specificity, which may stem from differences in measurement protocols or inherent biological variability, suggesting our findings may better reflect real-world predictive performance.
The results of this study are aligned with previous studies, that have shown widespread decreased FA values in patients compared to HCs, with further differentiation between good and poor outcome groups, which may indicated brain injury and microstructural abnormalities in comatose patients of cardiac arrest [12, 14]. The reduced FA in white matter reflects compromised microstructural integrity primarily attributed to hypoxia-induced oligodendrocyte injury, triggering sequential pathological cascades including cellular edema, necrosis, demyelination, and subsequent axonal degeneration [29–31]. Particularly, we observed that MD, AD, and RD were decreased in patients with poor prognosis, which is distinctly different from the increased diffusion metrics associated with isolated demyelination in chronic disorders [32–34]. The underlying mechanism is attributed to restricted diffusion secondary to cytotoxic edema leading to severe cellular swelling, which peaks in severity around 5 days post-cardiac arrest – a time window notably aligned with our observational period [35–37]. The dilution effect of cytotoxic edema also could lead to a decrease in FA. The lack of significant correlation between these DTI metrics and the time-to-MRI in our study suggested that this state of profound diffusion restriction was the dominant and relatively stable microstructural change characteristic during this specific phase. Therefore, we inferred that during this critical time window, DTI metrics may provide optimal diagnostic accuracy.
Extensive studies showed utility for the FA derived from DTI in prognostic value in poor outcomes [38, 39]. However, Koskensalo et al. reported different results that the performance of FA is inferior to NSE in predicting poor prognosis in cardiac arrest patients [40], possibly due to differences in time to undergo MRI (their median = 53 h vs. our median = 4 days). Our results indicate that the DTI-derived measures, particularly the combined FA + RD model, significantly outperform NSE and individual DTI parameters in prognostic accuracy achieving an outstanding AUC of 0.984, perfect specificity (97.7%), and high sensitivity (92%). This suggests that microstructural integrity assessed by DTI is a more reliable biomarker for identifying patients likely to achieve a good neurological outcome after ROSC. This synergistic effect likely reflects complementary pathophysiological information that FA captures microstructural integrity while RD specifically sensitizes to myelin damage—a critical pathological feature in hypoxic-ischemic injury [41]. Furthermore, regional analyses highlighted the significance of specific white matter tracts, with AD in the CH_R and Unc_R showing excellent predictive performance. These regions are critical for cognitive and memory functions often impaired following hypoxic-ischemic injury related to cardiac arrest. The results potentially indicated selective vulnerability of axonal projections in this memory-critical region [42]. Overall, DTI’s ability to detect subtle white matter changes non-invasively supports its integration into multimodal prognostic models, potentially improving clinical decision-making and patient counseling in post-cardiac arrest care.
Our study has several limitations. First, the limited sample size may result in inflated effect estimates, particularly impacting the predictive validity of our findings. Second, the exclusion of patients uncompleting MRI exam may introduce selection bias. Third, the cross-sectional design of MRI acquisition (median 4 days post-cardiac arrest) cannot capture temporal changes in white matter pathology. Future multicenter studies with longitudinal imaging and larger cohorts are needed to validate these findings and establish standardized DTI thresholds for clinical use.
Conclusions
This study demonstrated that the combination of DTI-derived FA and RD provided outstanding prediction of long term neurological outcomes after cardiac arrest. The superior standalone performance of FA + RD underscored their potential as primary prognostic tools where advanced imaging is available. Integrating these metrics into multimodal prognostic models could significantly improve clinical decision-making and prevent premature WLST. Future multicenter studies are needed to validate and translate these biomarkers into clinical practice.
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Abbreviations
- AD
Axial diffusivity
- ATR_R
The right anterior thalamic radiation
- AUC
Area under curve
- CH_R
The right cingulum hippocampus
- DTI
Diffusion tensor imaging
- EICU
Emergency intensive care unit
- FA
Fractional anisotropy
- HC
Healthy control
- IFOF_L
The left inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus
- JHU
Johns Hopkins University
- MD
Mean diffusivity
- MRI
Magnetic resonance imaging
- mRS
Modified Rankin Scale
- NSE
Neuron-specific enolase
- RD
Radial diffusivity
- ROC
Receiver operating characteristic
- ROI
Region of interest
- TBSS
Tract-based spatial statistics
- TFCE
Threshold-free cluster enhancement
- Unc_R
The right uncinate fasciculus
- WLST
Withdrawal of life sustaining treatment
Author contributions
Ziren Tang, and Qi Yang, conceptualization and design of the study; Xuejia Jia and Rui Shao, and Yingying Li, material preparation, and data collection; and Xuejia Jia, Rui Shao, and Xiuqin Jia, the manuscript drafting and data analyses. All the authors reviewed the manuscript and provided feedback.
Funding
This study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant number: 82025018, U24A20753), the Beijing Municipal Natural Science Foundation (L252089), and Beijing Hospitals Authority’s Ascent Plan (DFL20220303, DFL20240302).
Data availability
Not applicable.
Declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Xuejia Jia and Rui Shao are co-first authors and contributed equally to this work.
Contributor Information
Ziren Tang, Email: tangziren1970@163.com.
Qi Yang, Email: yangyangqiqi@gmail.com.
References
- 1.Stub D, Bernard S, Duffy SJ, Kaye DM (2011) Post cardiac arrest syndrome. Circ Am Heart Assoc 123:1428–1435 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Sandroni C, D’Arrigo S, Nolan JP (2018) Prognostication after cardiac arrest. Crit Care 22:150 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Sandroni C, D’Arrigo S, Cacciola S et al (2022) Prediction of good neurological outcome in comatose survivors of cardiac arrest: a systematic review. Intensive Care Med 48:389–413 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Kondziella D (2023) Neuroprognostication after cardiac arrest: what the cardiologist should know. Eur Heart Journal: Acute Cardiovasc Care 12:550–558 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Taccone FS, Cronberg T, Friberg H et al (2014) How to assess prognosis after cardiac arrest and therapeutic hypothermia. Crit Care 18:202 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Samaniego EA, Persoon S, Wijman CAC (2011) Prognosis after cardiac arrest and hypothermia: a new paradigm. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 11:111–119 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Hayman EG, Patel AP, Kimberly WT, Sheth KN, Simard JM (2018) Cerebral edema after cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A therapeutic target following cardiac arrest? Neurocrit Care 28:276–287 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Madathil RJ, Hira RS, Stoeckl M, Sterz F, Elrod JB, Nichol G (2016) Ischemia reperfusion injury as a modifiable therapeutic target for cardioprotection or neuroprotection in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Resuscitation 105:85–91 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Shao R, Wang T, Hang C et al (2024) Alteration in early resting–state functional MRI activity in comatose survivors of cardiac arrest: a prospective cohort study. Crit Care 28:260 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Kumar R, Woo MA, Macey PM, Fonarow GC, Hamilton MA, Harper RM (2011) Brain axonal and Myelin evaluation in heart failure. J Neurol Sci 307:106–113 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.van der Eerden AW, Khalilzadeh O, Perlbarg V et al (2014) White matter changes in comatose survivors of anoxic ischemic encephalopathy and traumatic brain injury: comparative diffusion-tensor imaging study. Radiol Radioll Soc North Am 270:506–516 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Keijzer HM, Duering M, Pasternak O et al (2023) Free water corrected diffusion tensor imaging discriminates between good and poor outcomes of comatose patients after cardiac arrest. Eur Radiol 33:2139–2148 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Luyt C-E, Galanaud D, Perlbarg V et al (2012) Diffusion tensor imaging to predict Long-term outcome after cardiac arrest: a bicentric pilot study. Anesthesiology 117:1311–1321 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Velly L, Perlbarg V, Boulier T et al (2018) Use of brain diffusion tensor imaging for the prediction of long-term neurological outcomes in patients after cardiac arrest: a multicentre, international, prospective, observational, cohort study. Lancet Neurol 17:317–326 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ko SY, Shin SD, Ro YS et al (2018) Effect of detection time interval for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest on outcomes in dispatcher-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a nationwide observational study. Resuscitation 129:61–69 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Perego C, Fumagalli F, Motta F (2025) Evolution of brain injury and neurological dysfunction after cardiac arrest in the rat – A multimodal and comprehensive model. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow, Metabolism 44:1316–1329 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Bian Y, Zhang J, Zhang Y et al (2025) Post-stroke brain functional reorganization is associated with glymphatic dysfunction during stroke recovery. Brain Inf 12:24 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Behrens TEJ, Woolrich MW, Jenkinson M et al (2003) Characterization and propagation of uncertainty in diffusion-weighted MR imaging. Magn Reson Med 50:1077–1088 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Jbabdi S, Behrens TEJ, Smith SM (2010) Crossing fibres in tract-based Spatial statistics. NeuroImage 49:249–256 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Hayasaka S, Nichols TE (2003) Validating cluster size inference: random field and permutation methods. NeuroImage 20:2343–2356 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Fernando SM, Tran A, Cheng W et al (2019) Pre-arrest and intra-arrest prognostic factors associated with survival after in-hospital cardiac arrest: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Br Med J Publishing Group 367:l6373 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Stiell IG, Wells GA, Field B et al (2004) Advanced Cardiac Life Support in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest. The New England Journal of Medicine Massachusetts Medical Society 351:647–56 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 23.Goto Y, Maeda T, Nakatsu-Goto Y (2014) Prognostic implications of conversion from nonshockable to shockable rhythms in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Crit Care 18:528 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Schoerkhuber W, Kittler H, Sterz F et al (1999) Time course of serum neuron-specific enolase. Stroke Am Heart Assoc 30:1598–1603 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Kurek K, Swieczkowski D, Pruc M, Tomaszewska M, Cubala WJ, Szarpak L (2023) Predictive performance of Neuron-Specific enolase (NSE) for survival after resuscitation from cardiac arrest: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Med 12:7655 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Luescher T, Mueller J, Isenschmid C et al (2019) Neuron-specific enolase (NSE) improves clinical risk scores for prediction of neurological outcome and death in cardiac arrest patients: results from a prospective trial. Resuscitation 142:50–60 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Babkina AS, Lyubomudrov MA, Golubev MA, Pisarev MV, Golubev AM (2024) Neuron-specific enolase—What are we measuring? Int J Mol Sci 25:5040 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Moseby-Knappe M, Mattsson-Carlgren N, Stammet P et al (2021) Serum markers of brain injury can predict good neurological outcome after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Intensive Care Med 47:984–994 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Lyons SA, Kettenmann H (1998) Oligodendrocytes and microglia are selectively vulnerable to combined hypoxia and hypoglycemia injury in vitro. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 18:521–530 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Greer DM (2006) Mechanisms of injury in hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy: implications to therapy. Semin Neurol 26:373–379 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Busl KM, Greer DM (2010) Hypoxic-ischemic brain injury: pathophysiology, neuropathology and mechanisms. NeuroRehabilitation 26:5–13 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Zhang Y, Wu I-W, Tosun D, Foster E, Schuff N (2016) Initiative the PPM. Progression of regional microstructural degeneration in parkinson’s disease: a multicenter diffusion tensor imaging study. PLOS ONE. 11:e0165540 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Jochems ACC, Muñoz Maniega S, Clancy U et al (2025) Longitudinal cognitive changes in cerebral small vessel disease. Neurology 104:e213323 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Umarova RM, Beume L, Reisert M et al (2017) Distinct white matter alterations following severe stroke: longitudinal DTI study in neglect. Neurology 88:1546–1555 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.von Kummer R, Dzialowski I (2017) Imaging of cerebral ischemic edema and neuronal death. Neuroradiology 59:545–553 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Mlynash M, Campbell DM, Leproust EM et al (2010) Temporal and Spatial profile of brain diffusion-weighted MRI after cardiac arrest. Stroke 41:1665–1672 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Keijzer HM, Hoedemaekers CWE, Meijer FJA, Tonino B, a. R, Klijn CJM, Hofmeijer J (2018) Brain imaging in comatose survivors of cardiac arrest: pathophysiological correlates and prognostic properties. Resuscitation 133:124–136 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Gerdes JS, Walther EU, Jaganjac S, Makrigeorgi-Butera M, Meuth SG, Deppe M (2014) Early detection of widespread progressive brain injury after cardiac arrest: a single case DTI and Post-Mortem histology study. PLOS ONE 9:e92103 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Laitio R, Hynninen M, Arola O et al (2016) Effect of inhaled Xenon on cerebral white matter damage in comatose survivors of Out-of-Hospital cardiac arrest: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 315:1120 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Koskensalo K, Virtanen S, Saunavaara J et al (2023) Comparison of the prognostic value of early-phase proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy and diffusion tensor imaging with serum neuron-specific enolase at 72 h in comatose survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest—a substudy of the xehypotheca trial. Neuroradiology 65:349–360 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Perego C, Fumagalli F, Motta F et al (2024) Evolution of brain injury and neurological dysfunction after cardiac arrest in the rat – a multimodal and comprehensive model. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 44:1316–1329 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Greer DM, Scripko PD, Wu O et al (2013) Hippocampal magnetic resonance imaging abnormalities in cardiac arrest are associated with poor outcome. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 22:899–905 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
Not applicable.



