Abstract
Prolactin (PRL) is secreted by various cells in the anterior pituitary gland, mammary glands, placenta, uterus, ovaries, testes, skin, adipose tissue, endothelial cells, immune system, and central nervous system. The expression and secretion of PRL are influenced by several factors such as suckling, thyrotropin‐releasing hormone (TRH), cytokines, dopamine, estrogen, and vasoactive intestinal polypeptide. It operates through a complex receptor, which is expressed in mammary gland cells, pancreatic beta cells, adipocytes, and immune cells. PRL is essential for various physiological functions, in particular milk production, breast development, metabolism, and immune regulation. Serum PRL levels fluctuate daily and can be affected by exercise, diet, and stress. Hyperprolactinemia is linked to autoimmune diseases and viral infections. In viral infections such as HIV, HCMV, HCV, and COVID‐19, PRL levels are often increased, which may influence the immune responses. PRL can modulate the activity of various immune cells, including T cells, B cells, natural killer cells, and macrophages, mounting an effective immune response against viral infections. Moreover, PRL influences the production of cytokines that mediate and regulate immunity and inflammation. PRL stimulates B cells to produce antivirus antibodies that are essential for neutralizing viruses and preventing their spread within the body. PRL levels, varying by sex and life stage, may affect immune responses and susceptibility to viral infections. Moreover, overexpression of PRL was indicated in various autoimmune diseases. Overall, PRL is a complex hormone with significant implications for endocrine function, immune regulation, and immune responses to viral infections, highlighting the need for further research into its diverse roles in health and disease. This review summarizes current knowledge of the immunomodulatory effects of PRL in human viral infections and possibly its contribution to the development of autoimmune diseases.
Keywords: autoimmune diseases, immune response, prolactin, viral infections
1. Introduction
1.1. Overview of Prolactin (PRL) and Its Biological Functions
PRL is an endocrine protein hormone primarily secreted by lactotroph cells in the anterior pituitary gland. These secretagogues enhance PRL release through mechanisms involving calcium‐dependent exocytosis and transcriptional regulation [1]. Unlike other hormones of the anterior pituitary, PRL is not activated by hypothalamic‐releasing factors; instead, its secretion is inhibited by dopamine and a primary physiological PRL inhibitory factor (PIF) released from the hypothalamus. Additionally, triiodothyronine (T3) negatively impacts the human PRL gene promoter to influence PRL levels. In contrast, T3‐releasing hormone (TRH) acts as a PRL‐releasing factor (PRF), facilitating PRL release. Moreover, PRL exerts negative feedback on its secretion by activating tuberoinfundibular dopamine (TIDA) neurons through its interaction with the PRL receptor (PRLR) on these cells [2]. In addition to the pituitary gland, PRL can also be produced in various other tissues, including the mammary glands, placenta, uterus, ovaries, testes, skin, adipose tissue, endothelial cells, immune system, and central nervous system [3, 4]. The expression and secretion of PRL are influenced by several factors such as suckling, TRH, cytokines, estrogen, and vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP) [5–7]. The expression of PRL in the pituitary gland is primarily governed by a balance of inhibitory and stimulatory molecules, including hormones, cytokines, and other factors that orchestrate a series of intracellular signaling events (Figure 1). Key signaling pathways involved in this process include cAMP/protein kinase A (PKA), phosphatidylinositol/Ca++/protein kinase C (PKC), and mitogen‐activated protein kinase (MAPK), which play significant roles in modulating PRL expression dynamics [8].
Figure 1.

Sources of PRL secretion. The anterior pituitary gland is the primary source of prolactin, produced by lactotroph cells, with its secretion regulated by inhibitory factors such as dopamine, T3, and PIF and stimulated by factors including VIP, estrogen, TRH, and suckling. Secondary sources of prolactin include the placenta, adipose tissue, mammary glands, skin, testes, uterus, ovaries, endothelial cells, immune cells (e.g., lymphocytes), and the central nervous system. Abbreviations: PRL: prolactin; VIP: vasoactive intestinal peptide; TRH: thyrotropin‐releasing hormone; T3: triiodothyronine; PIF: prolactin inhibitory factor.
Serum PRL levels vary with the time of day and can be increased by exercise, a high‐protein diet, emotional stress, slumber, orgasm, prolactinoma, primary hypothyroidism, and adrenal insufficiency. The highest levels of PRL are observed during sleep and early in the morning, whereas the lowest levels occur during the day [9, 10]. The physiological concentration of fasting PRL is up to 25 ng/mL in females and up to 20 ng/mL in males [5].
PRL exerts endocrine, paracrine, and autocrine activities through binding to a complex receptor system, specifically PRLRs [5]. The PRLR belongs to the Type 1 cytokine receptor superfamily and is associated with biological processes such as cell differentiation, reproduction, and immune responses [4, 11]. It lacks an intrinsic kinase domain but has a region that associates with Janus kinase 2 (JAK2). This receptor family also includes receptors for leptin, erythropoietin, colony‐stimulating factor, and interleukin‐6 (IL‐6). PRLRs are found in various endocrine tissues and target organs, including the brain (with the highest concentration in the choroid plexus), liver, epithelial cells of the breast gland, prostate, placenta, seminal vesicles, and different kinds of immune cells [12].
The PRLR gene is located on Chromosome 5 and contains 11 exons [13]. Due to conserved homology, PRLRs can also function as receptors for human growth hormone (GH) and placental lactogen [5, 14]. Different PRLR isoforms can activate various signaling pathways, leading to alterations in cell survival, proliferation, and differentiation. PRL influences cell function, guides cell fate, regulates physiological homeostasis, and affects the tissue microenvironment [7, 15].
PRL plays an essential role in various biological functions [5]. PRL, also known as lactotropin, is responsible for milk production and breast development in females [5]. Additionally, it influences the regulation of sexual desire and maternal behavior [10]. PRL also affects metabolic homeostasis by maintaining the abundance of insulin‐producing cells (islets), regulating the hypothalamic energy center, promoting lipogenesis, balancing adipose tissue expansion, modulating insulin response in adipocytes, and affecting liver metabolism [16]. PRL also possesses regenerative properties for various tissues and cell types, including chondrocytes, oligodendrocyte precursor cells, and neural stem/progenitor cells [17].
Structural analyses of PRL and its receptors have established their connection to the cytokine/hematopoietic family. PRL is a hormone primarily known for its role in lactation, but it also has powerful impacts on the immune system. Moreover, PRL plays a role in both proinflammatory and anti‐inflammatory functions [5]. As a cytokine derived from leukocytes, PRL plays a significant role in the immune system and is modulated by various cytokines through both autocrine and paracrine signaling mechanisms. In T lymphocytes, the expression of PRL mRNA is decreased by IL‐2, IL‐1β, and IL‐4, whereas IL‐10 and interferon‐γ (IFN‐γ) do not influence its expression [18]. Within the immune system, PRLR is expressed by various cells such as monocytes, macrophages, T lymphocytes, and B lymphocytes [12], indicating that PRL influences both innate and adaptive immune responses. This review provides an overview of the current understanding of PRL’s immunomodulatory role in human viral infections and possibly its contribution to the development of autoimmune diseases (Figures 2 and 3).
Figure 2.

Immunomodulatory effects of prolactin on various immune cells. Prolactin modulates immune responses by enhancing B‐cell differentiation and antibody production, promoting CD4+ and CD8+ T‐cell proliferation and cytokine production, boosting NK cell activity, inducing dendritic cell maturation and cytokine release, and stimulating macrophage proinflammatory functions (green arrows indicate upregulation; red arrows indicate downregulation).
Figure 3.

Role of prolactin in autoimmunity. Hyperprolactinemia, defined as prolactin levels above 20 ng/mL in males and 25 ng/mL in females, disrupts immune tolerance by impairing B‐cell receptor editing, deletion, and energy, leading to increased autoantibody production and apoptosis. It also activates T cells, shifts the Th1/Th2 cytokine balance, and reduces regulatory T‐cell (Treg) function. This immune dysregulation contributes to the development and activity of various autoimmune diseases—such as celiac disease, autoimmune thyroid disease, multiple sclerosis, neuromyelitis optica, psoriasis, systemic sclerosis, systemic lupus erythematosus, and rheumatoid arthritis—with a higher prevalence in women.
1.2. Significance of Immunoregulation in Viral Infections
Immunoregulation is a sophisticated mechanism that helps the immune system effectively combat viral infections while preventing potentially harmful inflammatory responses. During viral infections, the immune system must strike a delicate balance between eliminating the pathogen and protecting host tissues from damage [19, 20] (Table 1).
Table 1.
Prolactin isoforms, sources, and regulatory factors.
| Source/tissue | Isoform(s) | Molecular weight/characteristics | Biological activity | Stimulatory factors | Inhibitory factors |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anterior pituitary gland (lactotroph cells) | Full‐length PRL, glycosylated PRL | Full length: 23 kDa, 199 aa; glycosylated: ∼25 kDa, glycosylated | Full length: lactogenic, immunomodulatory; glycosylated: reduced receptor binding | Suckling, TRH [2], cytokines [8], estrogen [5–7], VIP [21] | Dopamine, PIF, T3 [2] |
| Mammary glands | Not specified (likely full‐length PRL) | — | — | Suckling and estrogen [5–7] | Dopamine [2] |
| Placenta | 16‐kDa PRL, glycosylated PRL | 16 kDa: 16 kDa, cleaved fragment; glycosylated: ∼25 kDa, glycosylated | 16 kDa: antiangiogenic; glycosylated: reduced receptor binding | Cytokines and estrogen [5–7] | — |
| Uterus, ovaries, testes | Not specified | — | — | Estrogen [5–7] | — |
| Skin, adipose tissue, endothelial cells | Not specified | — | — | Cytokines [5–7] | — |
| Immune system (T/B cells, macrophages) | Full‐length PRL, delta‐PRL | Full length: 23 kDa, 199 aa; delta‐PRL: variable, truncated | Full length: immunomodulatory; delta‐PRL: immunomodulatory (context‐specific) [5, 22] | cAMP [23, 24], retinoic acid [25, 26], calcitriol [25] | IL‐2 [18], IL‐1β [18], IL‐4 [18], dexamethasone [1] |
Note: Physiological PRL levels: up to 25 ng/mL (females) and 20 ng/mL (males). PIF, primary physiological PRL inhibitory factor; T3, triiodothyronine; TIDA, tuberoinfundibular dopamine.
Abbreviations: TRH, thyrotropin‐releasing hormone; VIP, vasoactive intestinal polypeptide.
2. PRL: Structure and Mechanism of Action
2.1. Molecular Structure of PRL
PRL has three isoforms produced by alternative splicing that can be distinguished chromatographically [10]. (i) Large (PRLR‐L), also known as big–big PRL or macroPRL, constitutes up to 1% of circulating PRL [10]. In humans, PRLR‐L is predominantly found in the placenta, adrenal gland, pituitary gland, and hippocampus [27]. (ii) Intermediate (PRLR‐I), also referred to as big PRL (with a molecular weight of 45–60 kDa), is primarily expressed in the placenta, adrenal gland, small intestine, and kidneys [10, 27]. (iii) Small (PRLR‐S), the most biologically active isoform, is monomeric and free, with a molecular weight of 23 kDa. This isoform constitutes up to 95% of serum PRL [10]. The expression of PRLR‐S has been documented in various organs, including the prostate, liver, and uterus [27]. The modified cytoplasmic domains of PRL are distinct, whereas the extracellular domains of the PRLRs are identical [27] (Table 1).
2.2. Regulation of PRL Expression in the Immune System
PRL is synthesized by various immune cells, including T and B lymphocytes, macrophages, thymocytes, mononuclear cells, and natural killer (NK) cells. In peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), the production of PRL is predominantly linked to T lymphocytes [28, 29]. Unlike PRL expression in the pituitary gland, which is influenced by classical regulators such as Pit‐1, progesterone, estrogen, TRH, dihydrotestosterone, and insulin, lymphocyte‐derived PRL utilizes an alternative promoter that renders its expression independent of these factors [18, 29]. Instead, the expression of PRL in T lymphocytes is promoted by agents such as cAMP [23, 24], retinoic acid, and calcitriol [25, 26]. Conversely, this expression can be suppressed by dexamethasone and certain interleukins [1] (Table 1).
2.3. PRLR Expression
The expression of PRLR has been extensively studied across various immune cell types, including splenocytes, thymocytes, bone marrow cells, and PBMCs [30]. Within the immune system, PRL is primarily produced by T and B cells and macrophages [31, 32]. Notably, both PRL and its receptors are constitutively expressed in resting T cells, indicating a baseline level of readiness for immune modulation [4].
Beyond pituitary and immune sources, PRL can also be produced ectopically by several nonpituitary tumors. Early biochemical evidence demonstrated autonomous synthesis and secretion of PRL by human breast carcinoma and other neoplastic tissues independent of hypothalamic or pituitary control [33]. This ectopic PRL behaves similarly to pituitary PRL and may exert local autocrine and paracrine immunomodulatory effects within the tumor microenvironment, contributing to cellular proliferation and immune escape. Recognition of such nonpituitary sources therefore broadens the concept of PRL’s systemic and tissue‐specific immunoregulatory roles.
3. PRL and the Immune System
PRL plays a significant role in regulating the immune system through various mechanisms [22, 34]. PRL functions as a cytokine that enhances the growth and activity of various immune cells through both paracrine and autocrine mechanisms [35]. Additionally, PRL exhibits cytokine‐like activity in human mononuclear and polymorphonuclear leukocytes [36]. PRL influences both innate and adaptive immunity [35]. Although immune responses do not rely exclusively on PRL, this hormone can influence the phenotype and functions of cells in both the innate and adaptive branches of the immune system [17]. A balance between the two arms of the cellular immune response is crucial for the proper functioning of the immune system.
3.1. PRL Impacts on Innate Immunity
Innate immunity primarily relies on interferons (IFNs) and NK cell (NKC) activity in antiviral defense [37–39]. Upon PRLR engagement, PRL activates the canonical JAK2–STAT1/interferon regulatory factor‐1 (IRF‐1) axis, thereby enhancing IFN‐γ and IL‐2 transcription and promoting T cell [40, 41].
PRL also augments NK cell cytotoxicity by upregulating activating receptors and stimulating IFN‐γ production [42–45]. In vivo, these effects have been associated with reduced lymphocyte apoptosis in Chagas disease models [46] (Table 2).
Table 2.
PRLR expression across immune cells.
| Immune cell type | PRLR expression | Functional impact of PRL binding |
|---|---|---|
| T lymphocytes (CD4+ and CD8+) | Constitutive | Enhances IL‐2 [47], IFN‐γ production [5, 46, 48–50], proliferation [41, 51, 52] |
| B lymphocytes | Constitutive | Stimulates antibody production [4, 27, 53, 54] reduces apoptosis [46, 55, 56] |
| NK cells | Constitutive | Boosts activity [5, 42–44, 50, 51], IFN‐γ secretion [45], receptor expression [51] |
| Macrophages | Constitutive | Increases cytokine/chemokine secretion [57–59], phagocytosis [36] |
| Monocytes | Constitutive | Enhances inflammatory responses [51, 60, 61] |
| Splenocytes and thymocytes | Detected | Supports immune cell development [46] |
| PBMCs | Detected | Modulates T‐cell activity [4, 35] |
Abbreviations: NK, natural killer; PBMC, peripheral blood mononuclear cells.
3.2. PRL Impacts on Adaptive Immunity
The adaptive immune response mainly involves B cells, which generate antivirus antibodies, as well as T cells, including CD4+ T cells that deliver helper signals to other immune cells and CD8+ cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) that eliminate virus‐infected cells [62–64]. PRL promotes B‐cell activation and differentiation, enhancing antibody production and survival through antiapoptotic and activation‐promoting mechanisms [53, 55, 56, 65].
During Chagas disease, PRL further enhances adaptive responses by increasing the proportion of splenic CD4+ T cells capable of producing IFN‐γ [46]. PRL acts as a mitogen, enhancing cellular survival in T cells [66] by promoting their longevity and increasing the production of key cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor‐alpha (TNF‐α), IFN‐γ, and IL‐2 in CD8+ T cells when treated with phorbol myristate acetate [47]. It should be noted that the cellular and humoral responses are initiated by Type 1 (Th1) and Type 2 (Th2) T‐helper cells, respectively [63, 67]. PRL plays a significant role in maintaining this balance between Th1 and Th2 responses. Additionally, PRL diminishes the suppressive functions of regulatory T cells (Treg) [68], thereby potentially enhancing immune responses [27].
Furthermore, PRLRs are also expressed on CD8+ CTLs [22]. Therefore, PRL can boost the cytotoxic capabilities of CD8+ CTLs, allowing them to more effectively kill virus‐infected cells [69]. However, it was reported that the physiological levels of PRL (12–25 ng/mL) boost CTL activity, whereas excessively high levels (200 ng/mL) can inhibit this response [69] (Table 2).
3.3. PRL Influence on Proinflammatory and Anti‐Inflammatory Cytokines
PRL engages classical cytokine signaling through the JAK2–STAT1/3/5 axis, which integrates upstream cues from immune and endocrine mediators [70–77]. This pathway balances pro‐ and anti‐inflammatory outputs: STAT1 activation favors IFN‐γ gene expression, whereas STAT3 mediates interleukin‐10 (IL‐10)‐driven anti‐inflammatory effects in macrophages [73–77]. Beyond signaling, PRL modulates cytokine secretion across multiple immune compartments. It promotes the release of IFN‐γ, interleukin‐12 (IL‐12), and IL‐10 in peripheral blood cells [78] and enhances macrophage chemokine production including macrophage inflammatory protein‐1α (MIP‐1α), monocyte chemoattractant protein‐1 (MCP‐1), IFN‐γ‐inducible protein 10 (IP‐10), and C–C motif chemokine ligand 5 (CCL5) that coordinate leukocyte recruitment [57]. PRL also elevates reactive oxygen species (ROS) and boosts phagocytic and cytotoxic capacity in tumor‐associated macrophages [58, 59]. In granulocytes, PRL upregulates inducible nitric oxide (NO) synthase (iNOS) and IRF‐1 expression, supporting antimicrobial activity [36].
Collectively, PRL exerts dual immunoregulatory roles by simultaneously amplifying protective inflammatory pathways while activating counter‐regulatory signals that prevent excessive tissue injury (Table 2).
3.4. PRL‐Related Modulatory Impacts on the Circadian System, Sleep–Wake Cycle, and Immune Function
Research indicates that the composition and levels of immune system cellular components fluctuate according to circadian rhythms. Notable examples include IgE‐dependent activation by mast cells [79], expression of cell‐adhesion molecules, activation of NKCs [80], and worsening of clinical symptoms related to rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in the morning, correlating with the daily rhythm of the proinflammatory cytokine IL‐6 [81]. The immune function is significantly affected by the various changes that occur during sleep. Notably, sleep leads to a marked increase in the production of IL‐12 by myeloid dendritic cell precursors, suggesting a promotion of Th1 immune responses. Conversely, sleep results in a reduction in both plasmacytoid dendritic cells and T‐cell populations, although it does not impact the production of IFN‐α. Additionally, sleep substantially decreases certain monocyte subpopulations, specifically CD14+ and CD16+ cells, likely due to their margination associated with a decrease in catecholamine levels during sleep [82]. The levels of undifferentiated naive T cells and the production of proinflammatory cytokines reach their highest levels during the initial hours of sleep.
In contrast, the circulatory immune cells with immediate effect or functions, along with the activity of anti‐inflammatory cytokines, peak during periods of wakefulness. Sleep also promotes the movement of T cells from the bloodstream into tissues and their subsequent redistribution to lymph nodes. Overall, sleep enhances the production of certain cytokines, such as IL‐12, which facilitate interactions between antigen‐presenting cells (APCs) and T‐helper cells [83].
Nonrapid eye movement (NREM) sleep is thought to play a crucial role in the transfer of antigenic information from APCs to antigen‐specific Th cells. This process may enhance immunological memory following vaccination [84], as evidenced by observations that sleep postvaccination boosts immune responses. The daily pattern of circulating PRL, which peaks during rest periods in mammals, suggests that PRL might contribute to the improved immune response associated with sleep [1].
4. PRL and Autoimmunity
Altered levels of PRL, which may favor either Th1 or Th2 dominance, are often linked to autoimmune diseases [67]. The impact of hyperprolactinemia on the immune system varies based on its duration. Acute exposure to elevated PRL levels can increase inflammation during stress, whereas chronic hyperprolactinemia tends to have an immunosuppressive effect [85]. The effects of PRL on the immune response are dual and primarily depend on its concentration. Higher levels of PRL tend to suppress the immune system, whereas lower levels promote immune stimulation [86, 87]. Hyperprolactinemia, characterized by elevated PRL levels, is primarily viewed as a pathological condition, particularly when excluding physiological instances such as pregnancy. This condition has been linked to various autoimmune diseases, including systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) [88], multiple sclerosis (MS) [89], and RA [90], with a notable prevalence among women, especially during pregnancy [91]. Research indicates that women typically have higher baseline PRL levels compared to men, which may contribute to the increased incidence of these autoimmune disorders in females [91]. Therapeutically, bromocriptine—a dopamine agonist that reduces PRL levels—has shown promise in managing these autoimmune conditions. By lowering PRL concentrations, bromocriptine may help suppress the autoimmune processes linked to hyperprolactinemia [91]. It is noteworthy that immunostimulatory PRL can display an immunosuppressive response at relatively high doses under specific conditions [91]. PRL has been demonstrated to have a significant role in inhibiting apoptosis in lymphocytes [92]. In BALB/c mice that carry a transgene for the heavy chain of a pathogenic anti‐DNA antibody [93], inducing moderate hyperprolactinemia (resulting in a twofold increase in serum PRL levels) enhances the population of autoreactive B cells exhibiting a follicular phenotype. This increase in B cells leads to their activation, which subsequently triggers the production of anti‐DNA antibodies and IgG deposition in the kidneys [55]. The induction of hyperprolactinemia enhances autoreactivity by disrupting B‐cell tolerance. This occurs through three primary mechanisms that govern the induction of B‐cell tolerance: receptor‐mediated deletion, receptor editing, and anergy [55]. Although there is evidence suggesting that PRL plays an immunomodulatory role, studies have demonstrated that the development of the immune system remains unchanged in both PRL knockout and PRLR knockout mice [94].
4.1. PRL and Some Immunologic Disorders
4.1.1. PRL and Systemic Sclerosis
Systemic sclerosis is a complex systemic autoimmune disease characterized by progressive fibrosis, microvascular damage, and immune system dysregulation, resulting in excessive collagen and extracellular matrix accumulation within the skin and multiple internal organs [95]. Elevated PRL levels have been documented in a range of 13%–59% of patients diagnosed with systemic sclerosis, suggesting a potential hormonal involvement or endocrine dysregulation in this complex autoimmune connective tissue disorder [96]. A robust statistical relationship was discovered linking hormonal concentrations directly to the progression and intensity of skin hardening (sclerosis), pulmonary complications, and cardiovascular system manifestations ([97]{La Montagna, 2001 #313, [98]). The pathogenesis of PRL elevation in this disease is attributed to multiple mechanisms, including augmented lymphocyte secretory activity, heightened central dopaminergic tone, and pharmacological induction primarily through antidepressant and prokinetic medications [99]. Pregnancy does not inherently worsen the underlying disease, although isolated cases have been documented involving women experiencing organ dysfunction, particularly pulmonary hypertension and extensive skin fibrosis ([100]{Tincani, 2016 #317). In conclusion, the research demonstrated a statistically significant correlation between PRL levels and the progression and intensity of the underlying disease pathology (Table 3).
Table 3.
PRL in autoimmune diseases.
| Autoimmune disease | PRL level change | Key effects | Therapeutic insight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Systemic sclerosis | Elevated (13%–59%) [96, 99] | Correlates with skin sclerosis, pulmonary issues [97, 98, 100] | — |
| Multiple sclerosis (MS) | Elevated (mild–moderate) [89, 101, 102] | Increases B‐cell autoreactivity [103], varies by gender [104] | — |
| Celiac disease | Elevated (untreated) [105–107] | Correlates with mucosal atrophy [107, 108], reduced by GFD (125) | Gluten‐free diet reduces PRL [105–107] |
| Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) | Variable (elevated in some) [109, 110] | Enhances NK activation and autoantibody production [54, 111] | Bromocriptine may suppress [91] |
| Autoimmune thyroid disease | Elevated (20% and 90% in HT) [112] | Linked to hypothyroidism, low cortisol [112] | Dopamine agonists under study [112] |
| Neuromyelitis optica (NMO) | Elevated during attacks [113] | Suggests an immunomodulatory role [113] | — |
| Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) | Elevated in synovial tissue [90] | Increases in TNF‐α correlate with disease activity [61, 114, 115] | High‐dose PRL protective in models [116] |
| Psoriasis | Elevated (debated) [117, 118] | Promotes keratinocyte proliferation [48, 119], IFN‐γ [48, 120] | Treatment reduces PRL levels [117, 118] |
| Idiopathic granulomatous mastitis (IGM) | Elevated in hyperprolactinemic states [121, 122] | Stimulates macrophage and lymphocyte activation, promoting granuloma formation | Dopamine agonists normalize PRL and prevent recurrence [121, 122] |
Abbreviations: GFD, gluten‐free diet; HT, Hashimoto’s thyroiditis; TNF‐α, tumor necrosis factor‐alpha.
4.1.2. PRL and MS
MS is a complex autoimmune disease affecting the central nervous system, characterized by an intricate interplay of immune dysregulation, where inflammatory processes lead to demyelination and neuronal damage through the activation of various immune cells in the brain and peripheral blood [123]. The PRL gene is situated on the short arm of chromosome 6p, positioned near the HLA‐DRB1 region and the TNF‐α gene, both of which play significant roles in modulating PRL gene expression [124]. The relationship between PRL levels in MS is complex, with potential dual roles involving both neuroprotective mechanisms and proinflammatory effects that could impact disease progression [125]. A comparative research investigation demonstrated that MS patients of Asian descent exhibit significantly higher serum PRL levels compared to their Western counterparts [101]. A research investigation revealed that female patients with relapsing‐remitting MS (RRMS) exhibited heightened PRL concentrations in both serum and cerebrospinal fluid, whereas male patients demonstrated standard PRL levels [104]. The studies demonstrate significant racial and gender influences on PRL secretion and its implications in MS pathogenesis. In MS, PRL triggers increased CD40 surface expression on B cells, which subsequently amplifies their autoreactive characteristics [103]. Elevated PRL concentrations have been observed in MS patients [89, 102]. Increased PRL production has been associated with the corticospinal MS variant, which is characteristic of Asian populations [101]. Emerging evidence proposes that hyperprolactinemia may play a contributory role in the underlying pathogenetic mechanisms of autoimmune demyelinating neurological disorders affecting the central nervous system. Researchers have discovered elevated PRL levels in neuromyelitis optica (NMO) and clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) patients, indicating that altered PRL production is not unique to MS but may be a broader characteristic of autoimmune demyelinating disorders [113]. Research indicates that MS patients experienced mild‐to‐moderate hyperprolactinemia, compared to healthy subjects [89, 102, 126]. Some studies have not found a significant association between PRL levels, oligoclonal band status, and disease duration [104, 127–129]. Kira et al. discovered that among eight patients with hyperprolactinemia, four were found to have diencephalon–hypothalamic lesions, leading them to hypothesize that MS‐related lesions in the hypothalamus might disrupt dopamine release, the PIF [102] (Table 3).
4.1.3. PRL and Celiac
Celiac disease represents an immune‐driven disorder characterized by an inflammatory small intestinal condition that triggers a permanent adverse reaction to gluten‐containing proteins derived from wheat and related cereal grains, resulting in chronic digestive and systemic complications [130–132]. Scientific investigations have elucidated the complex mechanisms by which PRL influences adaptive hyperplastic and hyperfunctional processes within intestinal mucosal tissue ([108]{Mainoya, 1978 #341). The presence of PRLRs in the human small intestine challenges previous reports suggesting that PRL is not trophic to the small intestine, indicating potential physiological interactions and signaling mechanisms that warrant further investigation [133]. Elevated serum PRL levels observed in untreated celiac disease patients may potentially indicate a primary immunological mechanism that triggers intestinal mucosal damage and subsequent clinical manifestations. Intestinal mucosal injury can potentially modulate the expression and functionality of PRLRs within the human gastrointestinal epithelial lining [133]. Compared to children with celiac disease following a gluten‐free diet, those who continue to consume gluten demonstrate markedly elevated PRL levels [105, 106, 134]. PRL serum levels demonstrated a positive correlation with three key parameters: the extent of disease activity, the severity of mucosal atrophy, and the concentration of antiendomysial antibodies in the serum [107]. A gluten‐free diet appears to directly influence hormone levels, as demonstrated by the concurrent reduction in PRL and antitransglutaminase antibodies, indicating a potential metabolic interrelationship [107] (Table 3).
4.1.4. PRL and SLE
SLE is a chronic autoimmune disease in which the body’s immune system mistakenly attacks its tissues, causing widespread inflammation and potential damage across multiple organ systems [135]. SLE patients exhibit variable plasma/serum PRL levels across different geographical regions, with some populations demonstrating consistently elevated concentrations compared to healthy controls [109]. In SLE, there is a significant increase in NKCs expressing PD1 and T‐cell‐induced negative regulator TIM‐3, which correlates positively with elevated inflammatory markers (erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C‐reactive protein [CRP]) and anti‐dsDNA autoantibody levels, indicating a direct relationship with disease activity and severity [136]. Elevated PRL levels stimulate NKC activation, thereby promoting inflammatory processes and potentially exacerbating SLE, which underscores the critical role of PRL in disrupting NKC development and potentially contributing to autoimmune pathogenesis [111]. PRL stimulates transcriptional regulation through IRF‐1 activation in monocytes, which substantially enhances the expression of multiple genes central to the SLE interferon signature, thereby reinforcing PRL’s critical role in SLE pathogenesis [60]. Alemán‐García et al. discovered that PRL enhanced both the quantity and functional activation of IL‐21‐producing OX40‐positive T follicular helper cells, which subsequently disrupted immune tolerance mechanisms by stimulating germinal center formation, promoting the development of autoreactive plasma cells, and ultimately triggering autoantibody production [54]. In patients with SLE, an elevated proportion of CD4+ OX40+ T cells serves as a potential biomarker correlating with heightened disease activity [137]. Although a definitive causal link between PRL secretion and neutrophil dysfunction in SLE remains unestablished, research indicates that PRL can modulate neutrophil function by significantly influencing their phagocytic capabilities and intracellular pathogen elimination mechanisms [138]. Neutrophil migration appears compromised or impaired in patients experiencing hyperprolactinemia [139]. Al‐Bayyoumy and colleagues observed no statistically significant variation in PRL concentrations between patients with active and inactive disease states before initiating treatment [140]. Pacilio et al. demonstrated a direct correlation between elevated PRL levels (hyperprolactinemia) and neurological manifestations involving the central nervous system [141]. The intricate pathophysiological relationship between elevated PRL levels and increased IL‐6 concentrations in neuropsychiatric lupus patients provides compelling evidence for a bidirectional communication mechanism between the neuroendocrine and immune regulatory networks [110] (Table 3).
4.1.5. PRL and Autoimmune Thyroid Disease (AITD)
AITDs primarily encompass two clinical presentations: Graves’ disease and Hashimoto’s thyroiditis, both characterized by immune‐mediated attacks on the thyroid gland [142]. A comprehensive analysis revealed that hyperprolactinemia occurred in 20% of patients with AITD, with a notably higher prevalence (double the frequency) among those with hypothyroidism. Furthermore, approximately 90% of Hashimoto’s thyroiditis patients exhibited significantly elevated PRL levels, which were concurrently associated with reduced cortisol concentrations [112]. The potential therapeutic role of dopamine agonists in managing AITD remains an area of ongoing research and scientific investigation (Table 3).
4.1.6. PRL and NMO
NMO is a rare autoimmune disease that targets the central nervous system, causing inflammation and damage specifically to the optic nerves and spinal cord [143]. Elevated PRL levels during MS and NMO attacks, particularly the more pronounced elevations observed during myelitis episodes, suggest a potential immunomodulatory role for PRL in the pathogenesis of autoimmune demyelinating diseases [113] (Table 3).
4.1.7. PRL and RA
RA distinguishes itself among autoimmune diseases through its persistent inflammatory process, which not only targets joint structures but also impacts multiple systemic bodily systems [144]. Patients with active inflammatory arthritis, particularly RA, exhibit elevated PRL expression within their synovial tissue compared to healthy controls [90]. Monocytes derived from RA patients demonstrate an increased release of TNF‐α when exposed to PRL [61]. In a rodent model of inflammatory arthritis triggered by intra‐articular cytokine injection, both high‐dose PRL and the dopaminergic antagonist haloperidol demonstrated comparable protective effects, mitigating joint damage by suppressing chondrocyte programmed cell death [116]. The authors argue that PRL primarily functions as a catalytic mechanism in the pathogenesis of autoimmune disorders, suggesting its role as an initial inflammatory instigator ([114]{Ewerman, 2020 #378). Although some researchers argue that the mechanism primarily sustains inflammatory processes, others contend that it plays a more complex role in inflammatory activity [145]. In RA, compromised hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis function coupled with sympathetic nervous system dysregulation can exacerbate stress‐related inflammatory disease progression [146]. During pregnancy, placental steroid hormones that induce hyperprolactinemia play a significant role in modulating RA remission mechanisms [147, 148]. The study revealed a positive correlation between varying PRL concentrations and increased clinical manifestations, including fatigue, morning stiffness, elevated disease activity scores, and glycemic irregularities in RA patients [115] (Table 3).
4.1.8. PRL and Psoriasis
Psoriasis is a chronic autoimmune skin disorder primarily mediated by T cells, where environmental factors, potentially including viral antigens, trigger T‐cell activation and cytokine production. These cytokines subsequently promote keratinocyte proliferation and the expression of adhesion molecules in dermal blood vessels. Among the various mediators influencing keratinocyte behavior, PRL has been identified as having significant effects on epithelial cells, lymphocytes, and keratinocytes [117]. PRL appears to be implicated in the development of psoriasis and may serve as a biological marker for the disease’s activity. This hormone could be involved in both the causative mechanisms and the consequences of psoriasis pathology [117]. Keen and Hassan demonstrated that serum PRL levels were significantly elevated in patients compared to the control group [117]. PRL promotes the proliferation of cultured human keratinocytes and increases the production of VEGF in vitro [119, 149]. PRL may play a significant role in the development of psoriasis by promoting several key processes. It stimulates the proliferation of keratinocytes, enhances the production of IFN‐γ by T lymphocytes, and fosters angiogenesis [48, 49], all of which are crucial in the pathogenesis of this chronic inflammatory skin disease. Additionally, PRL’s inhibition of T‐suppressor cell functions could further facilitate the formation of psoriatic plaques [150]. Moreover, PRL amplifies the transcription and secretion of critical chemokines such as CXCL9, CXCL10, and CXCL11 in response to IFN‐γ, which encourages the infiltration of Th1 T‐helper cells into psoriatic lesions [120]. Studies on serum PRL levels in psoriasis have yielded inconsistent findings. Some research indicates that psoriatic patients exhibit significantly elevated serum PRL levels compared to healthy controls, with evidence suggesting local production of PRL in lesional skin that may contribute to the disease’s pathology [117, 118]. However, other studies have found no significant difference in serum PRL concentrations between psoriatic patients and healthy individuals, indicating that the role of PRL in psoriasis requires further investigation [151, 152]. PRL, often referred to as a stress hormone, can see elevated levels during times of psychological stress. This increase may worsen psoriasis symptoms. Notably, this phenomenon is especially pronounced during the postpartum period, when physiological hyperprolactinemia occurs. [153]. Psoriasis treatment seems to have an impact on serum PRL levels. Various therapeutic approaches, including both topical and systemic treatments, have been associated with a notable decrease in serum PRL levels among patients undergoing psoriasis treatment. Some studies indicate that after treatment, there is a significant reduction in serum PRL levels, suggesting a correlation between treatment effectiveness and hormone regulation in psoriatic patients [117, 118].
In conclusion, the connection between PRL and psoriasis is intricate and somewhat debated. Some studies indicate that elevated PRL levels may be present in patients with psoriasis and could contribute to worsening the condition. However, other research contradicts these findings. To better understand the role of PRL in the development of psoriasis, as well as its potential as a therapeutic target or biomarker for disease activity, further investigation is essential (Table 3).
4.1.9. PRL and Idiopathic Granulomatous Mastitis (IGM)
IGM represents one of the most relevant tissue‐specific inflammatory disorders associated with hyperprolactinemia. Recent clinical observations describe strong associations between elevated serum PRL states including postpartum and lactational periods, prolactinomas, and antipsychotic‐induced hyperprolactinemia and the onset or recurrence of IGM [121]. PRL appears to contribute to IGM through its cytokine‐like actions on macrophages and lymphocytes, promoting proinflammatory cytokine release and granuloma formation within breast lobules. The condition often resolves following normalization of PRL levels with dopamine agonists such as bromocriptine, underscoring a causal endocrine–immune link. A large retrospective cohort confirmed that the difference between pre‐ and post‐treatment PRL values was an independent risk factor for recurrence in IGM patients, emphasizing the clinical importance of monitoring PRL during and after treatment [122]. Altogether, IGM illustrates how PRL‐mediated immune dysregulation can manifest as localized granulomatous inflammation in hormone‐responsive tissues.
5. Viral Infections in Endocrinology
Viruses are small obligatory intracellular parasites that possess either single‐ or double‐stranded RNA or DNA genomes [154]. They cannot replicate independently and must enter host cells, such as those of bacteria, algae, fungi, plants, insects, and vertebrates, to initiate viral replication. This entry process begins with the recognition of specific receptors on the host cell surface. Once inside, numerous structural and functional changes occur in the infected cell to facilitate viral replication [155]. The antiviral immune system plays a crucial role in defending the host organism against viruses. However, this immune response can also lead to inflammation and damage to nearby uninfected cells [156, 157]. The endocrine system is a sophisticated network of hormone‐producing cells and organs that is essential for maintaining homeostasis and regulating the immune response to infections. Numerous epidemiological and clinical studies have identified various endocrine and metabolic dysfunctions that can occur following viral infections, including those caused by human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV‐1) [158], coxsackieviruses B (CVB) [159], and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronaviruses (SARS‐CoV) [154, 160].
5.1. PRL in Viral Infections
5.1.1. Changes in the PRL Levels During Viral Infections
The role of PRL in the pathophysiology of viral infections involves its participation in viral entry and replication processes, as well as the stimulation of PRL secretion through inflammatory signaling pathways. This mechanism accounts for the elevated serum levels of PRL observed in various viral diseases. Notably, PRL possesses anti‐inflammatory properties, suggesting that the increase in serum PRL levels during viral infections may serve as a compensatory response to counteract inflammation and restore homeostasis [4]. PRL and its receptors are crucial in modulating both innate and adaptive immune responses, particularly influencing the growth and activation of T lymphocytes. This regulatory role has been observed during the COVID‐19 pandemic and in other severe acute viral infections [156]. Research indicates that certain viruses may exploit PRLR as entry points into host cells, revealing a complex evolutionary interplay between hormones and viral pathogens. This phenomenon suggests that the evolution of PRL and its receptors is not solely for endocrine functions but may also be shaped by viral interactions [161]. Beyond its function in boosting immune responses, PRL has exhibited antiviral properties in specific contexts. For example, research indicates that PRL can influence the clearance of avian leukosis virus (ALV‐J) viremia in animal models. This finding suggests that PRL may not only inhibit certain viral infections directly but also aid in their resolution [162].
In summary, PRL significantly influences immune responses during viral infections. It not only modulates these responses but may also serve as a receptor for certain viruses. PRL exhibits a dual role, possessing both proinflammatory and anti‐inflammatory properties, which positions it as a crucial factor in the pathophysiology of viral diseases.
5.1.1.1. Correlation Between PRL Levels and Disease Severity
Acute viral infections trigger an increase in PRL levels through the stimulation of specific cytokines. Inflammatory cytokines such as IL‐1, IL‐2, and IL‐6 play a crucial role in promoting PRL production during viral infections [51]. Viral infections such as HIV can directly diminish dopaminergic tone, consequently leading to elevated PRL levels [163]. PRLRs are expressed on macrophages, monocytes, lymphocytes, and NKCs, enabling PRL to engage these immune cells through receptor binding, which subsequently triggers intracellular signaling cascades that promote immune cell proliferation, differentiation, and enhanced cellular survival [51]. PRL counteracts the immunosuppressive mechanisms of TNF‐α and TGF‐β, thereby enhancing immune system responsiveness [85].
In summary, elevated PRL levels serve as an immunomodulatory agent during acute infectious processes, dynamically influencing immune system responses and inflammatory mechanisms. PRL has a complex relationship with viral disease severity, showing both proinflammatory and anti‐inflammatory effects across different viral infections (Figure 4).
Figure 4.

The role of prolactin in immune response to viral infections. PRL activates immune cells to fight viral infections via innate and adaptive immunity. In innate immunity, it boosts NK cells, macrophages, and granulocytes, increasing ROS production, macrophage cytotoxicity, and cytokine release (IFN‐γ, MIP‐1α, and IP‐10). In adaptive immunity, PRL enhances B‐cell differentiation for antibody production, T‐cell activation, and secretion of IL‐2, IFN‐γ, and TNF‐α, while promoting CTL cytotoxicity, Th1/Th2 balance, and B‐cell apoptosis. These actions target viruses such as influenza, RSV, HBV, HCV, HCMV, SARS‐CoV‐2, and HIV.
In this section, we deal with it by classifying diseases.
5.1.1.2. Immunomodulatory Effects of PRL in HIV Infection
The pituitary gland is influenced by various stages of HIV infection. Research indicates that the mean basal serum levels of GH, PRL, and testosterone are comparable between HIV‐positive individuals (regardless of AIDS status) and healthy controls. However, those with AIDS exhibit elevated basal serum concentrations of thyroid‐stimulating hormone (TSH), luteinizing hormone (LH), adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH), and cortisol. Furthermore, poststimulation peak levels of GH, PRL, TSH, and ACTH are also significantly higher in this group, suggesting increased pituitary gland activity [164]. PRL levels are elevated in individuals diagnosed with HIV, or hyper‐PRL emia, and have been associated with HIV infection. Elevated PRL levels enhance the activity of immune cells, and it is hypothesized that PRL levels may influence prognosis and pave the way for innovative therapeutic approaches [165]. Hyper‐PRL emia is frequently observed in patients with HIV, affecting approximately 20% of male individuals who are in a stable clinical condition. This elevation in PRL levels is not correlated with factors such as antiretroviral therapy (ART), metabolic disturbances, liver disease, or viral load [166]. Studies indicate that serum PRL levels in AIDS patients are significantly elevated compared to those of seronegative homosexual men and healthy controls. This increase in PRL is noteworthy because it is associated with lymphocyte activation and lymphoproliferation, processes crucial for immune response [52]. Research indicates that hyper‐PRL emia is prevalent among HIV‐infected individuals, particularly during the onset of secondary infections, but it does not correlate with metabolic disorders, liver dysfunction, viral load, or the use of ART [4, 5]. A prospective study involving 192 men diagnosed with HIV infection revealed that hyper‐PRL emia occurs in 21.4% of these patients. Notably, this condition is correlated with higher CD4+ counts, indicating a potential relationship between PRL levels and immune function in HIV‐infected individuals [166]. High levels of PRL have been proposed as a potential cause of hypogonadism in HIV patients, primarily due to PRL’s inhibitory effect on the release of gonadotropin‐releasing hormone from the hypothalamus. However, contrasting evidence suggests that hypogonadism associated with hyperprolactinemia in these patients may not significantly correlate with the suppression of gonadotropin release [167] (Table 4).
Table 4.
PRL levels and effects on viral infections.
| Viral infection | PRL level change | Immunomodulatory effects | Disease severity correlation |
|---|---|---|---|
| HIV | Elevated [163, 165] (20%–21.4% of males) [166] | Enhances lymphocyte activation [52, 156] and increases CD4+ counts [166] | Higher severity of secondary infections [52, 166] |
| HCMV | Elevated [168] | Increases PRLR expression [168–170], promotes inflammation [168] | Notable in immunocompromised states [161, 168, 171] |
| HCV | Elevated (males > females) [61, 172] | Induces PREB [172, 173], disrupts B‐cell tolerance [174, 175], causes thrombocytopenia [175, 176] | Linked to HCC and liver dysfunction [177–179] |
| HBV | Elevated [180–182] | Activates NK cells [183], correlates with cirrhosis severity [181, 184] | Predicts mortality (> 50 ng/mL in hepatic encephalopathy) [184, 185] |
| RSV | Elevated in severe cases [186–189] | Modulates CD4+ T cells [190, 191], reduces Treg suppression [191] | Higher levels in ICU‐admitted infants [186–189] |
| SARS‐CoV‐2 (COVID‐19) | Elevated [4, 51, 192–197] | Dual role: pro‐ and anti‐inflammatory cytokine effects [4, 50, 193] | Correlates with CRP levels, severe cases [50] |
| Influenza (H1N1) | Downregulated (mammary) [198, 199] | Potential antiviral metabolite [199] | Limited data on severity |
Note: HCMV: human cytomegalovirus; HCV: hepatitis C virus; HBV: hepatitis B virus; CRP: C‐reactive protein; PREB: PRL regulatory element binding.
Abbreviations: HE, hepatic encephalopathy; RSV, respiratory syncytial virus.
5.1.1.3. Immunomodulatory Effects of PRL in Human Cytomegalovirus (HCMV) Infection
HCMV is a prevalent DNA herpesvirus that affects approximately 60%–90% of adults globally. Its prevalence is notably higher among individuals from non‐Caucasian backgrounds and those with lower socioeconomic status [171]. HCMV is a common virus that can lead to significant health issues, particularly in immunocompromised individuals. An intriguing link exists between HCMV and PRL, particularly through the involvement of cyclophilin A (CypA) and cyclosporine, an immunosuppressive medication commonly used in transplant patients. Research has highlighted a functional interaction between CypA and the PRLR, demonstrating that CypA can modulate the activity of this receptor [169, 170]. Furthermore, HCMV infection promotes the expression of PRLRs in ovarian cancer by activating inflammatory signaling pathways such as nuclear factor kappa‐light‐chain‐enhancer of activated B cells (NF‐κB) and MAPK. This activation leads to the suppression of anti‐inflammatory pathways, which further enhances viral replication and exacerbates inflammatory responses. Both HCMV and PRL may utilize similar immunological pathways, contributing to an inflammatory environment that supports viral activity and impacts cancer progression [168]. Wallis demonstrated that PRLRs can function as both a receptor and an entry point for viral communication between CMV and host cells, as well as for other viruses such as Rubella [161].
In summary, the interaction between HCMV and PRL reveals a complex mechanism that may affect immune responses and tumor behavior. This intriguing relationship calls for further investigation in the fields of virology and oncology (Table 4).
5.1.1.4. Immunomodulatory Effects of PRL in Hepatitis C Infection
Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is classified as a single‐stranded, positive‐sense RNA virus belonging to the Flaviviridae family [200]. Studies conducted both in vitro and in vivo have identified PRL regulatory element binding (PREB) as a novel cofactor in the infection process of HCV. HCV infection induces the expression of PREB, which subsequently facilitates the replication of HCV RNA by contributing to the formation of specific compartments necessary for viral replication [172]. Autoimmunity frequently occurs in individuals infected with HCV. The dysfunction of B cells in these patients may stem from their interaction with HCV, which alters B‐cell functions, leading to polyclonal activation and an increase in CD5+ B cells. Research indicates that hypergammaglobulinemia (HPRL) was observed in 10.1% of patients with HCV, and this condition was found to be independent of the presence of cryoglobulinemia or nonorgan‐specific autoantibodies [174]. A study indicates that HPRL is found in a subset of patients suffering from thrombocytopenia related to HCV infection, suggesting it may play a role in the disease’s pathogenesis. Consequently, treatments targeting PRL could be beneficial for these patients [176]. A prospective study indicated that patients with HCV exhibited elevated serum PRL levels compared to control groups. This increase was attributed to the induction of PRL mRNA in PBMC by HCV [4]. Hyper‐PRL emia is indeed linked to HCV infection; however, this connection does not extend to the extrahepatic manifestations typically associated with HCV, such as autoimmune disorders [201]. The findings indicate that serum PRL levels are elevated in males infected with HCV compared to healthy males. Furthermore, HCV infection appears to stimulate the expression of PRL mRNA in PBMCs, with this effect being more pronounced in males than in females [35]. High levels of PRL serum in HCV infection may lead to immune‐mediated thrombocytopenia by disrupting B‐cell tolerance, which, in turn, induces the production of autoantibodies [175]. Kong et al. conducted an in vitro study revealing that the PREB functions as a novel cofactor in HCV infection. Their findings indicate that HCV induces the expression of PREB, which subsequently enhances the replication of HCV RNA by facilitating the formation of specialized replication compartments within the host cell [173]. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) ranks as the fifth most common cancer globally, with approximately 900,000 new cases diagnosed each year [177]. The incidence of HCC has been observed to double in certain regions, particularly due to infections from HCV and hepatitis B virus (HBV), which are significant risk factors for the disease [178]. Recent studies have identified the PRLR in various human tissues, including the liver. When PRL binds to its receptor, it activates JAK2, a tyrosine kinase that subsequently phosphorylates STAT proteins. This activation plays a crucial role in cell proliferation and differentiation [179]. Research conducted by AbdelGhani et al. has shown that serum levels of PRL are significantly elevated in patients with HCC, suggesting that PRL could serve as a promising and potentially complementary biomarker for diagnosing this type of cancer [177]. A separate investigation into serum PRL levels among individuals infected with HCV revealed that these levels were significantly elevated compared to healthy controls. In particular, HCV‐infected males showed markedly higher PRL levels than their healthy counterparts, whereas the difference in levels among females was less pronounced [35].
In summary, PRL appears to have multifaceted roles in the context of HCV infection, influencing both hematological parameters such as thrombocytopenia and potentially contributing to immune dysregulation. Further research is needed to fully elucidate these relationships and their implications for treatment strategies (Table 4).
5.1.1.5. Immunomodulatory Effects of PRL in Hepatitis B Infection
HBV is an enveloped DNA virus and serves as the prototype for the Hepadnaviridae family, which includes hepatotropic viruses. The viral genome measures approximately 3.2 kb in length and is encapsulated within nucleocapsids that possess an envelope. This structure is essential for the virus’s ability to infect liver cells and replicate efficiently within the host [202]. As noted by Shehata et al., there was a statistically strong significant difference in serum PRL levels between patients and controls. In particular, the serum PRL levels were significantly elevated in patients infected with HBV compared to those of healthy controls [180]. Giri et al. found that serum PRL levels in patients with acute viral hepatitis were similar to those in healthy controls. However, they observed that patients with liver cirrhosis exhibited significantly higher serum PRL levels, even in the absence of hepatic encephalopathy [181]. Ayfer reported that individuals with alcoholic and HBV‐related liver cirrhosis exhibited lower serum testosterone levels alongside elevated estradiol and PRL levels when compared to a control group. Furthermore, the study found a correlation between low testosterone and high PRL levels with the severity of cirrhosis [182]. NKCs play a crucial role in the innate immune response against HCV by utilizing mechanisms such as TRAIL and IFN‐γ. However, their functionality is significantly impaired in patients with chronic HCV infection (HCVp). PRL, an immunomodulatory hormone, has been shown to activate NKCs [183]. According to Medel et al., treatment with levosulpiride/cimetidine resulted in mild hyperprolactinemia, which correlated with enhanced NKC activation and a Th1‐type cytokine profile. Additionally, increases in TRAIL and IL‐2 were associated with reductions in viral load [183]. PRL levels are notably elevated in patients suffering from hepatic encephalopathy, a serious complication associated with liver disease. Research has shown that median PRL levels rise in correlation with the severity of encephalopathy, indicating a direct relationship between PRL concentrations and the deterioration of liver function. [184]. A serum PRL cutoff value of 50 ng/mL has been identified as a predictor of mortality for individuals with liver cirrhosis, particularly those experiencing hepatic encephalopathy. Elevated PRL levels have been linked to increased mortality rates, highlighting its potential role as a prognostic marker in liver disease [184, 185].
In summary, the observed elevation of serum PRL in patients with HBV infection most likely reflects hepatic injury rather than a direct viral effect on PRL synthesis or secretion. Studies have shown that cirrhotic patients whether of viral or alcoholic etiology exhibit a hormonal profile characterized by increased PRL and estradiol with reduced testosterone, similar to the endocrine pattern seen in pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (pitNET). This suggests that hepatic dysfunction per se disrupts dopaminergic regulation and systemic hormone clearance, leading to secondary hyperprolactinemia. Therefore, elevated PRL should be considered an indicator of liver damage severity and neuroendocrine dysregulation, rather than a biomarker of HBV activity [203]. Further mechanistic studies are warranted to clarify how liver pathology contributes to PRL alterations and whether these changes possess prognostic significance for cirrhotic disease progression (Table 4).
5.1.1.6. Immunomodulatory Effects of PRL in Respiratory Syncytial Infection
Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a major cause of lower respiratory tract illness in children [204]. A prospective cohort study involving 32 hospitalized infants diagnosed with RSV disease revealed a significant correlation between severe RSV infection and elevated serum PRL levels, as well as lymphopenia [186]. PRL interacts with its receptor (PRLR) on CD4+ T cells, contributing to altered Th1 polarization, and can modulate Treg by reducing their suppressive capacity [187, 190, 191]. Infants with the most severe disease manifestations show a distinct hormonal pattern of high levels of PRL and GH and reduced leptin correlating with clinical severity and intensive care admission [188, 189, 205–207]. Moreover, RSV‐specific IgA and lactoferrin in breast milk, under PRL influence, may enhance mucosal maturation [206, 207].
In summary, the interplay between PRL and RSV is complex, encompassing both proinflammatory and anti‐inflammatory mechanisms. Elevated levels of PRL during RSV infections may exacerbate the severity of the disease by influencing immune responses. A deeper understanding of this relationship could lead to the development of therapeutic strategies aimed at modulating PRL’s effects on viral infections (Table 4).
5.1.1.7. Immunomodulatory Effects of PRL in SARS‐CoV‐2 Virus Infection
The COVID‐19 pandemic, caused by SARS‐CoV‐2, affects multiple organs, including the endocrine system [204, 208–212]. This diverse range of symptoms is largely attributed to the widespread presence of the angiotensin‐converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptor throughout the human body, which is believed to serve as a critical entry point for SARS‐CoV‐2. The binding of the virus to the ACE2 receptor is a crucial step in its cellular entry mechanism and requires the involvement of transmembrane serine protease 2 (TMPRSS2) for the priming of the viral spike glycoprotein [213]. The stress induced by COVID‐19 may also influence the secretion of PRL and other hormones related to stress responses [192].
Evidence indicates that SARS‐CoV‐2 infection may raise PRL levels [193–195, 214, 215], and moderate increases appear beneficial to immune recovery, whereas excessive levels enhance cytokine‐driven inflammation [91].
PRL interacts with sex hormones and pituitary function. Disruption of gonadal hormones and a significant rise in serum PRL levels have been observed in male patients infected with SARS‐CoV‐2 [215, 216]. Elevated levels of PRL can inhibit the function of the pituitary gland, leading to a decrease in gonadotropin production [217]. Notably, women maintain elevated levels of PRL even after menopause, which does not decrease with age. This persistent elevation in PRL levels among women may contribute to the observed gender bias in COVID‐19 outcomes, suggesting that biological factors beyond hormonal changes could be influencing survival rates during the pandemic [208–212, 218, 219]. An H2 receptor antagonist has been shown to alleviate symptoms in COVID‐19 patients, although the exact mechanism remains unclear [220]. It is noteworthy that, similar to dopamine antagonists, H2 blockers also elevate blood PRL levels [221]. Sharifzak et al. conducted a study that found higher levels of malondialdehyde (MDA) across all time intervals measured, as well as increased NO levels at the first time interval in females compared to males. This research suggests a significant relationship between hyperprolactinemia and elevated lipid peroxidation, alongside increased NO production [210]. In summary, the relationship between PRL levels and COVID‐19 outcomes underscores a dual role where elevated serum PRL can either protect against or worsen the effects of the virus, depending on the infection phase and the patient’s underlying health conditions. A cohort study involving 30 men and 15 women who underwent the Trier Social Stress Test indicated a significant increase in PRL levels in response to stressors [196], potentially linked to the COVID‐19 pandemic [5]. Treg and proinflammatory pathways such as Toll‐like receptor 4 (TLR4) and NF‐κB activation are also modulated by PRL [222]. A study examining men with COVID‐19 found elevated levels of PRL and LH, alongside reduced testosterone and follicle‐stimulating hormone (FSH) levels. These hormonal changes suggest the presence of primary testicular damage occurring during the active phase of the disease [197]. Pregnant women display mild symptoms, possibly benefiting from PRL‐related immune support [223]. Alterations in the endocrine cells of the adenohypophysis have been observed in patients infected with SARS‐CoV. These changes correlate with increased serum levels of PRL, FSH, and LH, alongside decreased serum levels of GH, TSH, and ACTH [224]. Similar hormonal disturbances have been noted in patients infected with SARS‐CoV‐2, particularly concerning LH, PRL, GH, and TSH [194, 225]. Obesity and low PRL levels correlate with worse prognoses [91, 226]. Cigarette smokers exhibit higher PRL after nicotine exposure, which may partly dampen cytokine storms [91, 227, 228]. Another investigation highlighted a moderate positive correlation between PRL and CRP, an inflammation marker, indicating that increased PRL levels may be associated with heightened inflammatory responses in severe COVID‐19 cases [229]. The precise mechanisms by which PRL affects COVID‐19 outcomes are not fully understood. It is suggested that PRL may play a role in enhancing hyperinflammatory responses by promoting the production of proinflammatory cytokines, while simultaneously having anti‐inflammatory effects that could help reduce excessive inflammation [4, 50].
It should be noted that PRL is not the sole determinant of the stronger and more sustained immune responses observed in females. Recent genomic and epigenetic discoveries have revealed additional biological mechanisms underlying this sexual dimorphism. One crucial factor is the escape of the TLR7 gene from X‐chromosome inactivation in females, leading to enhanced Type I interferon responses and contributing both to protection against viral infections and to the higher prevalence of autoimmune diseases among women [230]. Furthermore, dysregulation of XIST, the master X‐inactivation RNA, has been directly implicated in human autoimmunity, promoting overexpression of X‐linked immune genes [231]. Together with hormonal factors such as estrogens and progesterone, these pathways illustrate that immune sexual dimorphism is a multifactorial phenomenon in which PRL acts as one, but not the only, contributing element.
In conclusion, PRL seems to have a crucial role in the immune response to COVID‐19, as higher levels are associated with increased disease severity and inflammatory markers. Nevertheless, additional research is necessary to elucidate its specific functions and mechanisms related to SARS‐CoV‐2 infection, as well as to assess the long‐term effects on endocrine health in patients who have recovered (Table 4).
5.1.1.8. Immunomodulatory Effects of PRL in Influenza Infection
Four types of influenza viruses exist in nature: Influenza A, B, C, and D. Although Influenza A, B, and C can infect humans, only Influenza A and B cause annual seasonal epidemics. Influenza D is primarily found in pigs and cattle and does not currently cause human illness. Among these types, Influenza A viruses are the most significant for human health, responsible for widespread morbidity, mortality, and at least five documented pandemics throughout the twentieth century [232]. Gene regulation analysis in the mammary gland demonstrated downregulation of milk production genes, including PRL, suggesting a potential viral interference mechanism disrupting lactation processes during influenza infection [198]. A novel metabolite originating from PRL, which shares structural similarities with GH, demonstrates potential therapeutic efficacy in combating severe Influenza A virus infections [199]. H1N1 influenza infection leads to a significant downregulation of milk production genes, including PRL [198] (Table 4).
6. Therapeutic Implications of PRL
6.1. Targeting PRL in Viral Infection Treatments
Viral infection treatments may benefit from PRL’s intricate immunological properties, as this hormone demonstrates nuanced potential for modulating immune responses and developing targeted therapeutic interventions. PRL enhances NKC activation, extends T lymphocyte viability, and stimulates IFN‐γ synthesis, thereby modulating critical immune system responses [5, 50]. The compound exhibits a complex immunomodulatory profile, simultaneously triggering proinflammatory cytokine production while also demonstrating the capacity to suppress inflammatory responses, thus presenting a multifaceted and context‐dependent regulatory mechanism [4, 5].
6.2. Potential for PRL Modulators in Clinical Use
PRLR modulators demonstrate promising potential for cancer treatment, particularly in breast and prostate cancers. Research indicates that PRLR signaling plays a critical role in tumor progression, making it an attractive therapeutic target [13, 233]. Emerging scientific evidence indicates that PRL may serve as a nuanced immunomodulatory agent, demonstrating the potential to regulate and potentially attenuate proinflammatory cascades, particularly in complex physiological contexts such as human parturition [234]. Scientists are investigating PRLR modulators as an innovative therapeutic strategy, acknowledging the critical importance of developing alternative interventions to address PRL‐related clinical disorders [235].
6.3. Limitations of PRL as a Disease Biomarker
Recent evidence does not support the use of PRL as a biomarker for viral illness. Large‐scale proteomic datasets from the Human Protein Atlas have shown that elevated circulating PRL levels are primarily associated with pitNET, certain central nervous system neoplasms, and psychiatric disorders secondary to antidopaminergic drug administration. No consistent elevation has been found in common viral infections [203]. Therefore, although PRL may fluctuate in individual viral cases, current population‐based data indicate that PRL cannot serve as a reliable or disease‐specific marker for viral pathology. Its role in immune activation should thus be interpreted strictly as mechanistic rather than diagnostic.
7. Conclusion
PRL serves as a pivotal molecular messenger, intricately linking the endocrine and immune systems through its nuanced and multidimensional biological roles, underscoring the profound complexity of physiological interactions and emphasizing the critical importance of ongoing scientific investigation to elucidate its sophisticated immunomodulatory pathways.
7.1. Future Directions and Research Opportunities
Further rigorous experimental and clinical investigations are imperative to elucidate the multifaceted mechanisms by which PRL interacts with viral pathogenesis, exploring its nuanced potential as a sophisticated diagnostic biomarker and innovative therapeutic intervention strategy across diverse viral disease landscapes.
Nomenclature
- ACE2
Angiotensin‐converting enzyme 2
- ACTH
Adrenocorticotropic hormone
- AITD
Autoimmune thyroid diseases
- ALV‐J
Avian leukosis virus
- APC
Antigen‐presenting cell
- ART
Antiretroviral therapy
- CIS
Clinically isolated syndrome
- CRP
C‐reactive protein
- CVB
Coxsackieviruses B
- CypA
Cyclophilin A
- DDC
Dopamine decarboxylase
- FSH
Follicle‐stimulating hormone
- GH
Growth hormone
- HBV
Hepatitis B virus
- HCC
Hepatocellular carcinoma
- HCMV
Human cytomegalovirus
- HCV
Hepatitis C virus
- HIV
Human immunodeficiency virus
- hPRL
Hypergammaglobulinemia
- IFN
Interferon
- IL
Interleukin
- iNOS
Inducible nitric oxide synthase
- IP‐10
Interferon‐gamma protein 10
- IRF‐1
Interferon regulatory factor‐1
- JAK2
Janus kinase 2
- LH
Luteinizing hormone
- LPS
Lipopolysaccharide
- MAPK
Mitogen‐activated protein kinase
- MCP
Monocyte chemoattractant protein
- MIP
Macrophage inflammatory protein
- MS
Multiple sclerosis
- NF‐κB
Nuclear factor kappa‐light‐chain‐enhancer of activated B cells
- NK
Natural killer
- NKC
Natural killer cell
- NMO
Neuromyelitis optica
- NREM
Nonrapid eye movement
- PBMC
Peripheral blood mononuclear cell
- PIF
Primary physiological prolactin inhibitory factor
- PK
Protein kinase
- PREB
PRL regulatory element binding
- PRF
Prolactin‐releasing factor
- PRL
Prolactin
- PRLR
Prolactin receptor
- PTK
Protein tyrosine kinase
- RA
Rheumatoid arthritis
- ROS
Reactive oxygen species
- RRMS
Relapsing‐remitting multiple sclerosis
- RSV
Respiratory syncytial virus
- SARS‐CoV
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronaviruses
- SLE
Systemic lupus erythematosus
- STAT
Signal transducer and activator of transcription
- T3
Triiodothyronine
- Th
T‐helper
- TIDA
Tuberoinfundibular dopamine
- TLR4
Toll‐like receptor 4
- TMPRSS2
Transmembrane serine protease 2
- TNF‐α
Tumor necrosis factor‐alpha
- Treg
Regulatory T
- TRH
Thyrotropin‐releasing hormone
- TSH
Thyroid‐stimulating hormone
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Funding
This study was funded by Kerman University of Medical Sciences (404000880).
Acknowledgments
This study was supported by Kerman University of Medical Sciences (Grant No. 404000880).
Asadikaram, Mina , Bahrampour, Saeed , Rahimi Naiini, Mahdis , Jafarzadeh, Abdollah , Rosen, Clifford , Asadikaram, Gholamreza , Prolactin: A Key Immunoregulator in Viral Infections and Autoimmune Diseases, International Journal of Endocrinology, 2025, 2312675, 27 pages, 2025. 10.1155/ije/2312675
Academic Editor: Suraiya Saleem
Contributor Information
Mahdis Rahimi Naiini, Email: mahdis.rahimi.68@gmail.com.
Suraiya Saleem, Email: ssaleem@wiley.com.
Data Availability Statement
Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.
References
- 1. Díaz L., Muñoz M. D., González L., Lira-Albarrán S., Larrea F., and Méndez I., Prolactin in the Immune System, Prolactin. (2013) . [Google Scholar]
- 2. Pernasetti F., Caccavelli L., Van de Weerdt C., Martial J. A., and Muller M., Thyroid Hormone Inhibits the Human Prolactin Gene Promoter by Interfering With Activating Protein-1 and Estrogen Stimulations, Molecular Endocrinology. (1997) 11, no. 7, 986–996, 10.1210/mend.11.7.9945, 2-s2.0-0030908289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Freeman M. E., Kanyicska B., Lerant A., and Nagy G., Prolactin: Structure, Function, and Regulation of Secretion, Physiological Reviews. (2000) 80, no. 4, 1523–1631, 10.1152/physrev.2000.80.4.1523, 2-s2.0-0033771336. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Rasmi Y., Jalali L., Khalid S. et al., The Effects of Prolactin on the Immune System, Its Relationship With the Severity of COVID-19, and Its Potential Immunomodulatory Therapeutic Effect, Cytokine. (2023) 169, 10.1016/j.cyto.2023.156253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Al-Kuraishy H. M., Al-Gareeb A. I., Butnariu M., and Batiha G. E.-S., The Crucial Role of Prolactin-Lactogenic Hormone in COVID-19, Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry. (2022) 477, no. 5, 1381–1392, 10.1007/s11010-022-04381-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Al-Nami M. S., Al-Kuraishy H. M., Al-Gareeb A. I., and Al-Mamoori F., Metabolic Profile and Prolactin Serum Levels in Men With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Old-New Rubric, International Journal of Critical Illness and Injury Science. (2019) 9, no. 3, 120–126, 10.4103/ijciis.ijciis_40_19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Ghoreshi Z.-S., Akbari H., Sharif-Zak M., Arefinia N., Abbasi-Jorjandi M., and Asadikaram G., Recent Findings on Hyperprolactinemia and Its Pathological Implications: A Literature Review, Journal of Investigative Medicine. (2022) 70, no. 7, 1443–1451, 10.1136/jim-2022-002351. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Featherstone K., White M., and Davis J., The Prolactin Gene: A Paradigm of Tissue‐Specific Gene Regulation With Complex Temporal Transcription Dynamics, Journal of Neuroendocrinology. (2012) 24, no. 7, 977–990, 10.1111/j.1365-2826.2012.02310.x, 2-s2.0-84862679184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Saleem M., Martin H., and Coates P., Prolactin Biology and Laboratory Measurement: An Update on Physiology and Current Analytical Issues, Clinical Biochemist Reviews. (2018) 39, no. 1, 3–16. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Jakubaszek M. P., The Significance of Prolactin in Systemic Connective Tissue Diseases, Reumatologia. (2023) 61, no. 4, 264–270, 10.5114/reum/170319. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Aamodt A. H., Høgestøl E. A., Popperud T. H. et al., Blood Neurofilament Light Concentration at Admittance: A Potential Prognostic Marker in COVID-19, Journal of Neurology. (2021) 268, 1–10, 10.1007/s00415-021-10517-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Gorvin C. M., The Prolactin Receptor: Diverse and Emerging Roles in Pathophysiology, Journal of Clinical & Translational Endocrinology. (2015) 2, no. 3, 85–91, 10.1016/j.jcte.2015.05.001, 2-s2.0-84937038150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Standing D., Dandawate P., and Anant S., Prolactin Receptor Signaling: A Novel Target for Cancer Treatment-Exploring Anti-PRLR Signaling Strategies, Frontiers in Endocrinology. (2023) 13, 10.3389/fendo.2022.1112987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Liu Y., Jiang J., Lepik B., Zhang Y., Zinn K. R., and Frank S. J., Subdomain 2, Not the Transmembrane Domain, Determines the Dimerization Partner of Growth Hormone Receptor and Prolactin Receptor, Endocrinology. (2017) 158, no. 10, 3235–3248, 10.1210/en.2017-00469, 2-s2.0-85030652315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Atıcı ÖK., Govindrajan N., Lopetegui-González I., and Shemanko C. S., Prolactin: A Hormone with Diverse Functions From Mammary Gland Development to Cancer Metastasis, Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology. (2021) Elsevier. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Wu T., Duan Y., Jiang J., Gu T., Zhang P., and Bi Y., A Century of Prolactin: Emerging Perspectives as a Metabolic Regulator, Diabetes. (2024) 40, no. 6, 10.1002/dmrr.3836. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Costanza M., Binart N., Steinman L., and Pedotti R., Prolactin: A Versatile Regulator of Inflammation and Autoimmune Pathology, Autoimmunity Reviews. (2015) 14, no. 3, 223–230, 10.1016/j.autrev.2014.11.005, 2-s2.0-84920964589. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Gerlo S., Verdood P., Hooghe-Peters E. L., and Kooijman R., Modulation of Prolactin Expression in Human T Lymphocytes by Cytokines, Journal of Neuroimmunology. (2005) 162, no. 1-2, 190–193, 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2005.02.008, 2-s2.0-17044365802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Thangaraj A., Tyagi R., Suri D., and Gupta S., Infections in Disorders of Immune Regulation, Pathogens. (2024) 13, no. 3, 10.3390/pathogens13030259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Mulik S., Berber E., Sehrawat S., and Rouse B. T., Controlling Viral Inflammatory Lesions by Rebalancing Immune Response Patterns, Frontiers in Immunology. (2023) 14, 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1257192. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Abe H., Engler D., Molitch M. E., Bollingergruber J., and Reichlin S., Vasoactive Intestinal Peptide is a Physiological Mediator of Prolactin Release in the Rat, Endocrinology. (1985) 116, no. 4, 1383–1390, 10.1210/endo-116-4-1383, 2-s2.0-0021884918. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Yu-Lee L.-Y., Molecular Actions of Prolactin in the Immune System, PSEBM. (1997) 215, no. 1, 35–52, 10.3181/00379727-215-44111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Gerlo S., Verdood P., Hooghe-Peters E., and Kooijman R., Multiple cAMP-Induced Signaling Cascades Regulate Prolactin Expression in T Cells, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences. (2006) 63, no. 1, 92–99, 10.1007/s00018-005-5433-4, 2-s2.0-30744449954. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Gerlo S., Verdood P., Hooghe-Peters E. L., and Multiple K. R., PKA-Dependent and PKA-Independent, Signals are Involved in cAMP-Induced PRL Expression in the Eosinophilic Cell Line Eol-1, Cellular Signalling. (2005) 17, no. 7, 901–909, 10.1016/j.cellsig.2004.11.010, 2-s2.0-14844362559. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Díaz L., Martínez-Reza I., García-Becerra R., González L., Larrea F., and Méndez I., Calcitriol Stimulates Prolactin Expression in Non-Activated Human Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells: Breaking Paradigms, Cytokine. (2011) 55, no. 2, 188–194, 10.1016/j.cyto.2011.04.013, 2-s2.0-79959557190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Gerlo S., Verdood P., and Kooijman R., Tumor Necrosis Factor-α Activates the Extrapituitary PRL Promoter in Myeloid Leukemic Cells, Journal of Neuroimmunology. (2006) 172, no. 1-2, 206–210, 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2005.10.011, 2-s2.0-33244475806. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Ramos-Martinez E., Ramos-Martínez I., Molina-Salinas G., Zepeda-Ruiz W. A., and Cerbon M., The Role of Prolactin in Central Nervous System Inflammation, Reviews in the Neurosciences. (2021) 32, no. 3, 323–340, 10.1515/revneuro-2020-0082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Ben-Jonathan N., Mershon J. L., Allen D. L., and Steinmetz R. W., Extrapituitary Prolactin: Distribution, Regulation, Functions, and Clinical Aspects, Endocrine Reviews. (1996) 17, no. 6, 639–669, 10.1210/edrv-17-6-639. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Montgomery D., Prolactin Production by Immune Cells, Lupus. (2001) 10, no. 10, 665–675, 10.1191/096120301717164895, 2-s2.0-0034766202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Bole-Feysot C., Goffin V., Edery M., Binart N., and Kelly P. A., Prolactin (PRL) and Its Receptor: Actions, Signal Transduction Pathways and Phenotypes Observed in PRL Receptor Knockout Mice, Endocrine Reviews. (1998) 19, no. 3, 225–268, 10.1210/er.19.3.225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Pellegrini I., Lebrun J., Ali S., and Kelly P., Expression of Prolactin and Its Receptor in Human Lymphoid Cells, Molecular Endocrinology. (1992) 6, no. 7, 1023–1031, 10.1210/mend.6.7.1508218, 2-s2.0-0026750040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Gingras M.-C. and Margolin J. F., Differential Expression of Multiple Unexpected Genes During U937 Cell and Macrophage Differentiation Detected by Suppressive Subtractive Hybridization, Experimental Hematology. (2000) 28, no. 1, 65–76, 10.1016/s0301-472x(00)00149-1, 2-s2.0-0034145987. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Turkington R. W., Ectopic Production of Prolactin, New England Journal of Medicine. (1971) 285, no. 26, 1455–1458, 10.1056/nejm197112232852604, 2-s2.0-0015237880. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Smith P. E., The Effect of Hypophysectomy Upon the Involution of the Thymus in the Rat, The Anatomical Record. (1930) 47, no. 1, 119–129, 10.1002/ar.1090470110, 2-s2.0-0001034336. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Ishii R., Saito T., Shao L. et al., Serum Prolactin Levels and Prolactin M RNA Expression in Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells in Hepatitis C Virus Infection, Journal of Medical Virology. (2013) 85, no. 7, 1199–1205, 10.1002/jmv.23599, 2-s2.0-84878246789. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Dogusan Z., Hooghe R., Verdood P., and Hooghe-Peters E., Cytokine-Like Effects of Prolactin in Human Mononuclear and Polymorphonuclear Leukocytes, Journal of Neuroimmunology. (2001) 120, no. 1-2, 58–66, 10.1016/s0165-5728(01)00420-9, 2-s2.0-0034752337. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Jafarzadeh A., Nemati M., Saha B., Bansode Y. D., and Jafarzadeh S., Protective Potentials of Type III Interferons in COVID-19 Patients: Lessons From Differential Properties of Type I- and III Interferons, Viral Immunology. (2021) 34, no. 5, 307–320, 10.1089/vim.2020.0076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Mariuzza R. A., Singh P., Karade S. S., Shahid S., and Sharma V. K., Recognition of Self and Viral Ligands by NK Cell Receptors, Immunological Reviews. (2025) 329, no. 1, 10.1111/imr.13435. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Jafarzadeh A., Naseri A., Shojaie L. et al., MicroRNA-155 and Antiviral Immune Responses, International Immunopharmacology. (2021) 101, 10.1016/j.intimp.2021.108188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Matera L., Cutufia M., Geuna M. et al., Prolactin is an Autocrine Growth Factor for the Jurkat Human T-leukemic Cell Line, Journal of Neuroimmunology. (1997) 79, no. 1, 12–21, 10.1016/s0165-5728(97)00096-9, 2-s2.0-0030659717. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Yu-Lee L.-Y., Prolactin Modulation of Immune and Inflammatory Responses, Recent Progress in Hormone Research. (2002) 57, no. 1, 435–456, 10.1210/rp.57.1.435, 2-s2.0-0036374389. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Leite-de-Moraes M., Touraine P., Kelly P., Kuttenn F., and Dardenne M., Prolactin Receptor Expression in Lymphocytes From Patients With Hyperprolactinemia or Acromegaly, Journal of Endocrinology. (1995) 147, no. 2, 353–359, 10.1677/joe.0.1470353, 2-s2.0-0028832779. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Mavoungou E., Bouyou-Akotet M. K., and Kremsner P. G., Effects of Prolactin and Cortisol on Natural Killer (NK) Cell Surface Expression and Function of Human Natural Cytotoxicity Receptors (NKp46, NKp44 and NKp30), Clinical and Experimental Immunology. (2005) 139, no. 2, 287–296, 10.1111/j.1365-2249.2004.02686.x, 2-s2.0-13544251376. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Godoy-Pacheco A., García-Chagollán M., Ramírez-De-Arellano A. et al., Differential Modulation of Natural Killer Cell Cytotoxicity by 17β-Estradiol and Prolactin Through the NKG2D/NKG2DL Axis in Cervical Cancer Cells, Oncology Letters. (2022) 24, no. 2, 10.3892/ol.2022.13408. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Sun R., Li A. L., Wei H. M., and Tian Z. G., Expression of Prolactin Receptor and Response to Prolactin Stimulation of Human NK Cell Lines, Cell Research. (2004) 14, no. 1, 67–73, 10.1038/sj.cr.7290204, 2-s2.0-12344297552. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Filipin M. D. V., Brazao V., Santello F. H. et al., Does Prolactin Treatment Trigger Imunoendocrine Alterations During Experimental T. Cruzi Infection?, Cytokine. (2019) 121, 10.1016/j.cyto.2019.154736, 2-s2.0-85066306748. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Dimitrov S., Lange T., Fehm H., and Born J., A Regulatory Role of Prolactin, Growth Hormone, and Corticosteroids for Human T-Cell Production of Cytokines, Brain, Behavior, and Immunity. (2004) 18, no. 4, 368–374, 10.1016/j.bbi.2003.09.014, 2-s2.0-2442449023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. De Bellis A., Bizzarro A., Pivonello R., Lombardi G., and Bellastella A., Prolactin and Autoimmunity, Pituitary. (2005) 8, no. 1, 25–30, 10.1007/s11102-005-5082-5, 2-s2.0-33644850060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Biswas R., Roy T., and Chattopadhyay U., Prolactin Induced Reversal of Glucocorticoid Mediated Apoptosis of Immature Cortical Thymocytes is Abrogated by Induction of Tumor, Journal of Neuroimmunology. (2006) 171, no. 1-2, 120–134, 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2005.09.014, 2-s2.0-29244448018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Polyzou E., Schinas G., Bountouris P. et al., Prolactin Role in COVID-19 and Its Association With the Underlying Inflammatory Response, International Journal of Molecular Sciences. (2024) 25, no. 22, 10.3390/ijms252211905. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Borba V. V., Zandman-Goddard G., and Shoenfeld Y., Prolactin and Autoimmunity, Frontiers in Immunology. (2018) 9, 10.3389/fimmu.2018.00073, 2-s2.0-85041892840. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Graef A. S., Gonzalez S. S., Baca V. R. et al., High Serum Prolactin Levels in Asymptomatic HIV-Infected Patients and in Patients With Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome, Clinical Immunology and Immunopathology. (1994) 72, no. 3, 390–393, 10.1006/clin.1994.1157, 2-s2.0-0028086216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Santana-Sánchez P., Vaquero-García R., Legorreta-Haquet M. V., Chávez-Sánchez L., and Chávez-Rueda A. K., Hormones and B-Cell Development in Health and Autoimmunity, Frontiers in Immunology. (2024) 15, 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1385501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Alemán-García Y. P., Vaquero-García R. M., Flores-Fernández R. et al., Prolactin Increases the Frequency of Follicular T Helper Cells With Enhanced IL21 Secretion and OX40 Expression in Lupus‐Prone MRL/lpr Mice, Journal of Immunology Research. (2021) 2021, no. 1, 10.1155/2021/6630715. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Saha S., Gonzalez J., Rosenfeld G., Keiser H., and Peeva E., Prolactin Alters the Mechanisms of B Cell Tolerance Induction, Arthritis & Rheumatism: Official Journal of the American College of Rheumatology. (2009) 60, no. 6, 1743–1752, 10.1002/art.24500, 2-s2.0-66449129213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Richards S. M., Garman R. D., Keyes L., Kavanagh B., and McPherson J. M., Prolactin is an Antagonist of TGF-β Activity and Promotes Proliferation of Murine B Cell Hybridomas, Cellular Immunology. (1998) 184, no. 2, 85–91, 10.1006/cimm.1998.1275, 2-s2.0-0032520608. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Sodhi A. and Tripathi A., Prolactin and Growth Hormone Induce Differential Cytokine and Chemokine Profile in Murine Peritoneal Macrophages In Vitro: Involvement of p-38 MAP Kinase, STAT3 and NF-κB, Cytokine. (2008) 41, no. 2, 162–173, 10.1016/j.cyto.2007.11.007, 2-s2.0-38949207497. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Malaguarnera L., Musumeci M., Licata F., Di Rosa M., Messina A., and Musumeci S., Prolactin Induces Chitotriosidase Gene Expression in Human Monocyte-Derived Macrophages, Immunology Letters. (2004) 94, no. 1-2, 57–63, 10.1016/j.imlet.2004.03.009, 2-s2.0-3242689560. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Majumder B., Biswas R., and Chattopadhyay U., Prolactin Regulates Antitumor Immune Response Through Induction of Tumoricidal Macrophages and Release of IL‐12, International Journal of Cancer. (2002) 97, no. 4, 493–500, 10.1002/ijc.1624, 2-s2.0-0036466861. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Leung Y. T., Maurer K., Song L., Convissar J., and Sullivan K. E., Prolactin Activates IRF1 and Leads to Altered Balance of Histone Acetylation: Implications for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, Modern Rheumatology. (2020) 30, no. 3, 532–543, 10.1080/14397595.2019.1620999, 2-s2.0-85067544067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Tang C., Li Y., Lin X. et al., Prolactin Increases Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha Expression in Peripheral CD14 Monocytes of Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis, Cellular Immunology. (2014) 290, no. 1, 164–168, 10.1016/j.cellimm.2014.06.005, 2-s2.0-84903795097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Abassifard M., Khorramdelazad H., Rezaee S., and Jafarzadeh A., Higher Circulating Concentration of Interleukin-38 in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis: Its Association With Disease Severity, Iranian Journal of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology. (2021) 20, no. 1, 114–119, 10.18502/ijaai.v20i1.5418. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Jafarzadeh A. and Shokri F., The Antibody Response to HBs Antigen is Regulated by Coordinated Th1 and Th2 Cytokine Production in Healthy Neonates, Clinical and Experimental Immunology. (2003) 131, no. 3, 451–456, 10.1046/j.1365-2249.2003.02093.x, 2-s2.0-0037342284. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Gambadauro A., Galletta F., Li Pomi A., Manti S., and Piedimonte G., Immune Response to Respiratory Viral Infections, International Journal of Molecular Sciences. (2024) 25, no. 11, 10.3390/ijms25116178. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Lahat N., Miller A., Shtiller R., and Touby E., Differential Effects of Proclatic Upon Activation and Differentiation of Human B Lymphocytes, Journal of Neuroimmunology. (1993) 47, no. 1, 35–40, 10.1016/0165-5728(93)90282-4, 2-s2.0-0027200731. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Bauernhofer T., Kuss I., Friebe-Hoffmann U. et al., Role of Prolactin Receptor and CD25 in Protection of Circulating T Lymphocytes From Apoptosis in Patients With Breast Cancer, British Journal of Cancer. (2003) 88, no. 8, 1301–1309, 10.1038/sj.bjc.6600860, 2-s2.0-0038147039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Orbach H. and Shoenfeld Y., Hyperprolactinemia and Autoimmune Diseases, Autoimmunity Reviews. (2007) 6, no. 8, 537–542, 10.1016/j.autrev.2006.10.005, 2-s2.0-34548483876. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Wu W., Sun M., Zhang H.-P. et al., Prolactin Mediates Psychological Stress-Induced Dysfunction of Regulatory T Cells to Facilitate Intestinal Inflammation, Gut. (2014) 63, no. 12, 1883–1892, 10.1136/gutjnl-2013-306083, 2-s2.0-84893908765. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Matera L., Beltramo E., Martinuzzi E., and Buttiglieri S., Effect of Prolactin on Carcinoembryonic Antigen-Specific Cytotoxic T Lymphocyte Response Induced by Dendritic Cells, Clinical and Experimental Immunology. (2004) 137, no. 2, 320–328, 10.1111/j.1365-2249.2004.02533.x, 2-s2.0-3543034678. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Rui H., Djeu J., Evans G., Kelly P. A., and Farrar W., Prolactin Receptor Triggering. Evidence for Rapid Tyrosine Kinase Activation, Journal of Biological Chemistry. (1992) 267, no. 33, 24076–24081, 10.1016/s0021-9258(18)35948-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Poehlmann T. G., Busch S., Mussil B. et al., The Possible Role of the Jak/STAT Pathway in Lymphocytes at the Fetomaternal Interface, Immunology of Pregnancy. (2005) 89, 26–35, 10.1159/000087907. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Rawlings J. S., Rosler K. M., and Harrison D. A., The JAK/STAT Signaling Pathway, Journal of Cell Science. (2004) 117, no. 8, 1281–1283, 10.1242/jcs.00963, 2-s2.0-2342445635. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73. Takeda K. and Akira S., STAT Family of Transcription Factors in Cytokine-Mediated Biological Responses, Cytokine & Growth Factor Reviews. (2000) 11, no. 3, 199–207, 10.1016/s1359-6101(00)00005-8, 2-s2.0-0034046605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74. DaSilva L., Rui H., Erwin R. A. et al., Prolactin Recruits STAT1, STAT3 and STAT5 Independent of Conserved Receptor Tyrosines TYR402, TYR479, TYR515 and TYR580, Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology. (1996) 117, no. 2, 131–140, 10.1016/0303-7207(95)03738-1, 2-s2.0-0030000424. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75. David M., Petricoin E., Igarashi K., Feldman G. M., Finbloom D. S., and Larner A. C., Prolactin Activates the Interferon-Regulated p91 Transcription Factor and the Jak2 Kinase by Tyrosine Phosphorylation, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. (1994) 91, no. 15, 7174–7178, 10.1073/pnas.91.15.7174, 2-s2.0-0028338714. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76. Takeda K., Clausen B. E., Kaisho T. et al., Enhanced Th1 Activity and Development of Chronic Enterocolitis in Mice Devoid of Stat3 in Macrophages and Neutrophils, Immunity. (1999) 10, no. 1, 39–49, 10.1016/s1074-7613(00)80005-9, 2-s2.0-0033034365. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77. Williams L. M., Sarma U., Willets K., Smallie T., Brennan F., and Foxwell B. M., Expression of Constitutively Active STAT3 Can Replicate the Cytokine-Suppressive Activity of Interleukin-10 in Human Primary Macrophages, Journal of Biological Chemistry. (2007) 282, no. 10, 6965–6975, 10.1074/jbc.m609101200, 2-s2.0-34147095832. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78. Matalka K. Z., Prolactin Enhances Production of Interferon-γ, Interleukin-12, and Interleukin-10, But Not of Tumor Necrosis Factor-α, in a Stimulus-Specific Manner, Cytokine. (2003) 21, no. 4, 187–194, 10.1016/s1043-4666(02)00496-9, 2-s2.0-0037604670. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79. Wang X., Reece S. P., Van Scott M. R., and Brown J. M., A Circadian Clock in Murine Bone Marrow-Derived Mast Cells Modulates IgE-Dependent Activation In Vitro, Brain, Behavior, and Immunity. (2011) 25, no. 1, 127–134, 10.1016/j.bbi.2010.09.007, 2-s2.0-78649318163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80. Masera R., Carignola R., Sartori M., Staurenghi A., and Angeli A., Circadian Abnormalities of Natural Killer Cell Activity in Rheumatoid Arthritis, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. (1999) 876, no. 1, 88–90, 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1999.tb07626.x, 2-s2.0-0032774276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81. Sierakowski S. and Cutolo M., Morning Symptoms in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Defining Characteristic and Marker of Active Disease, Scandinavian Journal of Rheumatology. (2011) 40, no. 125, 1–5, 10.3109/03009742.2011.566433, 2-s2.0-79955615918. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82. Dimitrov S., Lange T., Nohroudi K., and Born J., Number and Function of Circulating Human Antigen Presenting Cells Regulated by Sleep, Sleep. (2007) 30, no. 4, 401–411, 10.1093/sleep/30.4.401, 2-s2.0-34247567766. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83. Besedovsky L., Lange T., and Born J., Sleep and Immune Function, Pfluegers Archiv European Journal of Physiology. (2012) 463, no. 1, 121–137, 10.1007/s00424-011-1044-0, 2-s2.0-84856756884. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84. Lange T., Dimitrov S., Bollinger T., Diekelmann S., and Born J., Sleep After Vaccination Boosts Immunological Memory, The Journal of Immunology. (2011) 187, no. 1, 283–290, 10.4049/jimmunol.1100015, 2-s2.0-79960416742. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85. Ochoa-Amaya J. E., Malucelli B. E., Cruz-Casallas P. E., Nasello A. G., Felicio L. F., and Carvalho-Freitas M. I. R., Acute and Chronic Stress and the Inflammatory Response in Hyperprolactinemic Rats, Neuroimmunomodulation. (2010) 17, no. 6, 386–395, 10.1159/000292063, 2-s2.0-77952814181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86. Spangelo B. L., Hall N. R., Ross P. C., and Goldstein A. L., Stimulation of in Vivo Antibody Production and Concanavalin-A-Induced Mouse Spleen Cell Mitogenesis by Prolactin, Immunopharmacology. (1987) 14, no. 1, 11–20, 10.1016/0162-3109(87)90004-x, 2-s2.0-0023259284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87. Matera L., Cesano A., Bellone G., and Oberholtzer E., Modulatory Effect of Prolactin on the Resting and Mitogen-Induced Activity of T, B, and NK Lymphocytes, Brain, Behavior, and Immunity. (1992) 6, no. 4, 409–417, 10.1016/0889-1591(92)90039-q, 2-s2.0-0027053654. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88. Jara L. J., Gomez-Sanchez C., Silveira L. H., Martinez-Osuna P., Vasey F. B., and Espinoza L. R., Hyperprolactinemia in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Association With Disease Activity, The American Journal of the Medical Sciences. (1992) 303, no. 4, 222–226, 10.1097/00000441-199204000-00003, 2-s2.0-0026598274. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89. Azar S. T. and Yamout B., Prolactin Secretion is Increased in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis, Endocrine Research. (1999) 25, no. 2, 207–214, 10.1080/07435809909066142, 2-s2.0-0033001858. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90. Tang M. W., Garcia S., Gerlag D. M., Tak P. P., and Reedquist K. A., Insight Into the Endocrine System and the Immune System: A Review of the Inflammatory Role of Prolactin in Rheumatoid Arthritis and Psoriatic Arthritis, Frontiers in Immunology. (2017) 8, 10.3389/fimmu.2017.00720, 2-s2.0-85021204075. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91. Sen A., Repurposing Prolactin as a Promising Immunomodulator for the Treatment of COVID-19: Are Common Antiemetics the Wonder Drug to Fight Coronavirus?, Medical Hypotheses. (2020) 144, 10.1016/j.mehy.2020.110208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92. Krishnan N., Thellin O., Buckley D. J., Horseman N. D., and Buckley A. R., Prolactin Suppresses Glucocorticoid-Induced Thymocyte Apoptosis In Vivo, Endocrinology. (2003) 144, no. 5, 2102–2110, 10.1210/en.2003-0053, 2-s2.0-0038408966. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93. Peeva E., Michael D., Cleary J., Rice J., Chen X., and Diamond B., Prolactin Modulates the Naive B Cell Repertoire, The Journal of Clinical Investigation. (2003) 111, no. 2, 275–283, 10.1172/jci16530. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94. Dorshkind K. and Horseman N. D., The Roles of Prolactin, Growth Hormone, Insulin-Like Growth Factor-I, and Thyroid Hormones in Lymphocyte Development and Function: Insights From Genetic Models of Hormone and Hormone Receptor Deficiency, Endocrine Reviews. (2000) 21, no. 3, 292–312, 10.1210/er.21.3.292, 2-s2.0-0034454903. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95. Elhai M., Avouac J., Kahan A., and Allanore Y., Systemic Sclerosis: Recent Insights, Joint Bone Spine. (2015) 82, no. 3, 148–153, 10.1016/j.jbspin.2014.10.010, 2-s2.0-84929276164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96. Jara L. J., Medina G., Saavedra M. A., Vera-Lastra O., and Navarro C., Prolactin and Autoimmunity, Clinical Reviews in Allergy and Immunology. (2011) 40, no. 1, 50–59, 10.1007/s12016-009-8185-3, 2-s2.0-79951671779. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97. Straub R., Zeuner M., Lock G., Schölmerich J., and Lang B., High Prolactin and Low Dehydroepiandrosterone Sulphate Serum Levels in Patients With Severe Systemic Sclerosis, British Journal of Rheumatology. (1997) 36, no. 4, 426–432, 10.1093/rheumatology/36.4.426. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98. Shahin A. A., Abdoh S., and Abdelrazik M., Prolactin and Thyroid Hormones in Patients With Systemic Sclerosis: Correlations With Disease Manifestations and Activity, Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie. (2002) 61, no. 6, 703–709, 10.1007/s00393-002-0413-7, 2-s2.0-0036961206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99. Vera-Lastra O., Jara L. J., Medina G. et al., Functional Hyperprolactinemia and Hypophyseal Microadenoma in Systemic Sclerosis, Journal of Rheumatology. (2006) 33, no. 6, 1108–1112. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100. de León Aguirre A. R., Calvo J. A. R., and Reyna T. S. R., Comprehensive Approach to Systemic Sclerosis Patients During Pregnancy, Reumatología Clínica. (2015) 11, no. 2, 99–107, 10.1016/j.reumae.2014.06.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101. Yamasaki K., Horiuchi I., Minohara M. et al., Hyperprolactinemia in Optico-Spinal Multiple Sclerosis, Internal Medicine. (2000) 39, no. 4, 296–299, 10.2169/internalmedicine.39.296, 2-s2.0-0034166955. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102. Kira J.-I., Harada M., Yamaguchi Y., Shida N., and Goto I., Hyperprolactinemia in Multiple Sclerosis, Journal of the Neurological Sciences. (1991) 102, no. 1, 61–66, 10.1016/0022-510x(91)90094-n, 2-s2.0-0025973243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103. De Giglio L., Marinelli F., Prosperini L. et al., Relationship Between Prolactin Plasma Levels and White Matter Volume in Women With Multiple Sclerosis, Mediators of Inflammation. (2015) 2015, no. 1, 10.1155/2015/732539, 2-s2.0-84937775635. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104. Markianos M., Koutsis G., Evangelopoulos M., Mandellos D., and Sfagos C., Serum and Cerebrospinal Fluid Prolactin Levels in Male and Female Patients With Clinically‐Isolated Syndrome or Relapsing‐Remitting Multiple Sclerosis, Journal of Neuroendocrinology. (2010) 22, no. 6, 503–508, 10.1111/j.1365-2826.2010.01972.x, 2-s2.0-77954092215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105. Reifen R., Buskila D., Maislos M., Press J., and Lerner A., Serum Prolactin in Coeliac Disease: A Marker for Disease Activity, Archives of Disease in Childhood. (1997) 77, no. 2, 155–157, 10.1136/adc.77.2.155, 2-s2.0-0030961038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106. Gocyła U., Szczepański Z., Kalita B., Sikora A., and Slimok M., Serum Prolactin Concentration in Children With Celiac Disease, Pediatria Polska. (1996) 71, no. 9, 797–800. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107. Delvecchio M., Faienza M. F., Lonero A., Rutigliano V., Francavilla R., and Cavallo L., Prolactin May Be Increased in Newly Diagnosed Celiac Children and Adolescents and Decreases After 6 Months of Gluten-Free Diet, Hormone Research in Paediatrícs. (2014) 81, no. 5, 309–313, 10.1159/000357064, 2-s2.0-84902543629. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108. Stevens F. and Craig A., Prolactin and Coeliac Disease, Irish Journal of Medical Science. (1981) 150, no. 1, 329–331, 10.1007/bf02938268, 2-s2.0-0019801442. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109. Wang P., Lv T.-T., Guan S.-Y. et al., Increased Plasma/Serum Levels of Prolactin in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis, Postgraduate Medicine. (2017) 129, no. 1, 126–132, 10.1080/00325481.2017.1241130, 2-s2.0-84990185739. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110. Jara L., Vera-Lastra O., Miranda J., Alcala M., and Alvarez-Nemegyci J., Prolactin in Human Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, Lupus. (2001) 10, no. 10, 748–756, 10.1191/096120301717164994, 2-s2.0-0034753976. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111. Legorreta-Haquet M. V., Santana-Sánchez P., Chávez-Sánchez L., and Chávez-Rueda A. K., The Effect of Prolactin on Immune Cell Subsets Involved in SLE Pathogenesis, Frontiers in Immunology. (2022) 13, 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1016427. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112. Yamamoto M., Iguchi G., Takeno R. et al., Adult Combined GH, Prolactin, and TSH Deficiency Associated With Circulating PIT-1 Antibody in Humans, The Journal of Clinical Investigation. (2011) 121, no. 1, 113–119, 10.1172/jci44073, 2-s2.0-78650950728. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113. Türkoğlu R., Gencer M., Akcan U., Örçen A., and Orcen A., Serum Prolactin Levels in Multiple Sclerosis, Neuromyelitis Optica, and Clinically Isolated Syndrome Patients, Nöro Psikiyatri Arşivi. (2016) 53, no. 4, 353–356, 10.5152/npa.2016.16979, 2-s2.0-85006380204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114. Ignacak A., Kasztelnik M., Sliwa T., Korbut R., Rajda K., and Guzik T. J., Prolactin–Not Only Lactotrophin. A “New” View of the “Old” Hormone, Journal of Physiology & Pharmacology. (2012) 63, no. 5, 435–443. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115. Santana L. B., Lima T. A. S., Costa A. R. et al., Exploring the Association of Serum Prolactin With Serum Glucose Levels and Clinical Findings in a Cohort of Patients With Early Rheumatoid Arthritis, Advances in Rheumatology. (2024) 64, no. 1, 10.1186/s42358-024-00394-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116. Adán N., Guzmán-Morales J., Ledesma-Colunga M. G. et al., Prolactin Promotes Cartilage Survival and Attenuates Inflammation in Inflammatory Arthritis, The Journal of Clinical Investigation. (2013) 123, no. 9, 3902–3913, 10.1172/jci69485, 2-s2.0-84883492086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117. Keen M. A. and Hassan I., Serum Prolactin Levels in Psoriasis and Its Association With Disease Activity: A Case-Control Study, Indian Journal of Dermatology. (2014) 59, no. 6, 562–566, 10.4103/0019-5154.143512, 2-s2.0-84908480328. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118. Maryam G., Zahra H., and Shaban Ali N., Serum Prolactin Level in Psoriasis: Is It Really Higher Than in Healthy Individuals?, Iranian Journal of Dermatology. (2015) 18, no. 1, 6–9. [Google Scholar]
- 119. Girolomoni G., Phillips J. T., and Bergstresser P. R., Prolactin Stimulates Proliferation of Cultured Human Keratinocytes, Journal of Investigative Dermatology. (1993) 101, no. 3, 275–279, 10.1111/1523-1747.ep12365203, 2-s2.0-0027295353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120. Kanda N. and Watanabe S., Prolactin Enhances Interferon-γ-Induced Production of CXC Ligand 9 (CXCL9), CXCL10, and CXCL11 in Human Keratinocytes, Endocrinology. (2007) 148, no. 5, 2317–2325, 10.1210/en.2006-1639, 2-s2.0-34249795191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121. Alkaissi H., Kim E. J., Salahi N., and McFarlane S. I., Granulomatous Mastitis: An Initial Presentation of Undiagnosed Prolactinoma, Cureus. (2024) 16, no. 7, 10.7759/cureus.65639. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122. Huang Y. and Wu H., A Retrospective Analysis of Recurrence Risk Factors for Granulomatous Lobular Mastitis in 130 Patients: More Attention Should Be Paied to Prolactin Level, Annals of Palliative Medicine. (2021) 10, no. 3, 2824–2831, 10.21037/apm-20-1972. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123. Jara L. J., Lavalle C., Fraga A. et al., Prolactin, Immunoregulation, and Autoimmune Diseases. Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism, 1991, Elsevier. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124. Friedrichsen S., Harper C. V., Semprini S. et al., Tumor Necrosis Factor-α Activates the Human Prolactin Gene Promoter Via Nuclear Factor-κB Signaling, Endocrinology. (2006) 147, no. 2, 773–781, 10.1210/en.2005-0967, 2-s2.0-30944465703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125. Wei W., Liu L., Cheng Z.-L., and Hu B., Increased Plasma/Serum Levels of Prolactin in Multiple Sclerosis: A Meta-Analysis, Postgraduate Medicine. (2017) 129, no. 6, 605–610, 10.1080/00325481.2017.1282297, 2-s2.0-85010676985. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126. Moshirzadeh S., Ghareghozli K., Harandi A. A., and Pakdaman H., Serum Prolactin Level in Patients With Relapsing–Remitting Multiple Sclerosis During Relapse, Journal of Clinical Neuroscience. (2012) 19, no. 4, 622–623, 10.1016/j.jocn.2011.07.032, 2-s2.0-84857785051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127. Sandyk R. and Awerbuch G. I., Relationship of Nocturnal Melatonin Levels to Duration and Course of Multiple Sclerosis, International Journal of Neuroscience. (1994) 75, no. 3-4, 229–237, 10.3109/00207459408986306, 2-s2.0-0028410563. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128. Harirchian M. H., Sahraian M. A., and Shirani A., Serum Prolactin Level in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis: A Case Control Study, Medical Science Monitor: International Medical Journal of Experimental and Clinical Research. (2006) 12, no. 4, CR177–CR180. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129. Heesen C., Gold S. M., Bruhn M., Mönch A., and Schulz K.-H., Prolactin Stimulation in Multiple Sclerosis–An Indicator of Disease Subtypes and Activity?, Endocrine Research. (2002) 28, no. 1-2, 9–18, 10.1081/erc-120004533, 2-s2.0-0036287690. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130. Brandtzaeg P., Halstensen T., Kett K. et al., Immunobiology and Immunopathology of Human Gut Mucosa: Humoral Immunity and Intraepithelial Lymphocytes, Gastroenterology. (1989) 97, no. 6, 1562–1584, 10.1016/0016-5085(89)90406-x, 2-s2.0-0024389095. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131. Halstensen T. S., Scott H., and Brandtzaeg P., Human CD8+ Intraepithelial T Lymphocytes are Mainly CD45RA− RB+ and Show Increased Co‐Expression of CD45R0 in Celiac Disease, European Journal of Immunology. (1990) 20, no. 8, 1825–1830, 10.1002/eji.1830200829, 2-s2.0-0025182903. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132. Bardella M., Molteni N., Prampolini L. et al., Need for Follow Up in Coeliac Disease, Archives of Disease in Childhood. (1994) 70, no. 3, 211–213, 10.1136/adc.70.3.211, 2-s2.0-0028331155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133. Garcia-Caballero T., Morel G., Gallego R. et al., Cellular Distribution of Prolactin Receptors in Human Digestive Tissues, Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism. (1996) 81, no. 5, 1861–1866, 10.1210/jcem.81.5.8626848. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134. Várkonyi M. B., Endreffy E., Németh I., and TimÁr E., Coeliac Disease: Always Something to Discover, Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology. (1998) 33, no. 228, 122–129, 10.1080/003655298750026651. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135. Arnaud L., Chasset F., and Martin T., Immunopathogenesis of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: An Update, Autoimmunity Reviews. (2024) 23, no. 10, 10.1016/j.autrev.2024.103648. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136. Luo Q., Kong Y., Fu B. et al., Increased TIM-3+ PD-1+ NK Cells are Associated With the Disease Activity and Severity of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, Clinical and Experimental Medicine. (2022) 22, no. 1, 47–56, 10.1007/s10238-021-00726-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137. Farres M. N., Al-Zifzaf D. S., Aly A. A., and Abd Raboh N. M., OX40/OX40L in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Association With Disease Activity and Lupus Nephritis, Annals of Saudi Medicine. (2011) 31, no. 1, 29–34, 10.4103/0256-4947.75775, 2-s2.0-79251612617. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138. Thorat S., Thatte U., Pai N., and Dahanukar S., Effect of Prolactin on Neutrophils and Monocytes, Acta Haematologica. (1993) 89, no. 4, 219–220, 10.1159/000204572, 2-s2.0-0027443338. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139. Fornari M. C., Palacios M. F., Diez R. A., and Intebi A. D., Decreased Chemotaxis of Neutrophils in Acromegaly and Hyperprolactinemia, European Journal of Endocrinology. (1994) 130, no. 5, 463–468, 10.1530/eje.0.1300463, 2-s2.0-0028305564. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140. Al-Bayyoumy S. A., Kadry Y. A., Mohammad M. A., and Ismaiel H. M., Relation of Serum Prolactin Level to Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity: The Effect of Immunosuppressive Medications, Egyptian Rheumatology and Rehabilitation. (2007) 34. [Google Scholar]
- 141. Pacilio M., Migliaresi S., Meli R., Ambrosone L., Bigliardo B., and Di Carlo R., Elevated Bioactive Prolactin Levels in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus--Association With Disease Activity, Journal of Rheumatology. (2001) 28, no. 10, 2216–2221. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142. Dong Y. and Fu D., Autoimmune Thyroid Disease: Mechanism, Genetics and Current Knowledge, European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences. (2014) 18, no. 23, 3611–3618. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143. Shahmohammadi S., Doosti R., Shahmohammadi A. et al., Autoimmune Diseases Associated With Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorders: A Literature Review, Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders. (2019) 27, 350–363, 10.1016/j.msard.2018.11.008, 2-s2.0-85056928746. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144. Finckh A., Gilbert B., Hodkinson B. et al., Global Epidemiology of Rheumatoid Arthritis, Nature Reviews Rheumatology. (2022) 18, no. 10, 591–602, 10.1038/s41584-022-00827-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145. Fojtíková M., Cerna M., and Pavelka K., A Review of the Effects of Prolactin Hormone and Cytokine on the Development and Pathogenesis of Autoimmune Diseases, Vnitrní Lékarství. (2010) 56, no. 5, 402–413. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146. Straub R. H., Dhabhar F. S., Bijlsma J. W., and Cutolo M., How Psychological Stress Via Hormones and Nerve Fibers May Exacerbate Rheumatoid Arthritis, Arthritis & Rheumatism: Official Journal of the American College of Rheumatology. (2005) 52, no. 1, 16–26, 10.1002/art.20747, 2-s2.0-12344279826. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147. Vieira Borba V. and Shoenfeld Y., Prolactin, Autoimmunity, and Motherhood: When Should Women Avoid Breastfeeding?, Clinical Rheumatology. (2019) 38, no. 5, 1263–1270, 10.1007/s10067-018-04415-y, 2-s2.0-85059906850. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148. Clapp C., Ortiz G., García-Rodrigo J. F. et al., Dual Roles of Prolactin and Vasoinhibin in Inflammatory Arthritis, Frontiers in Endocrinology. (2022) 13, 10.3389/fendo.2022.905756. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149. la Torre N. G., Turner H., and Wass J., Angiogenesis in Prolactinomas: Regulation and Relationship With Tumour Behaviour, Pituitary. (2005) 8, no. 1, 17–23, 10.1007/s11102-005-5081-6, 2-s2.0-33644872936. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 150. Lowes M. A., Bowcock A. M., and Krueger J. G., Pathogenesis and Therapy of Psoriasis, Nature. (2007) 445, no. 7130, 866–873, 10.1038/nature05663, 2-s2.0-33847279025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 151. Handjani F., Saki N., Ahrari I., Ebrahimi M., Khorrami M. M., and Nematollahi P., Serum Prolactin Levels in Psoriasis Vulgaris, International Scholarly Research Notices. (2014) 2014, no. 1, 10.1155/2014/586049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 152. Robati R. M., Toossi P., Rahmati-Roodsari M. et al., Association of Psoriasis Severity With Serum Prolactin, Thyroid Hormones, and Cortisol Before and After Treatment, The Scientific World Journal. (2013) 2013, no. 1, 10.1155/2013/921819, 2-s2.0-84888862104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 153. Azizzadeh M., Malek M., Amiri M., and Ghorbani R., Does Prolactin Indicate Severity of Psoriasis?, 2009.
- 154. Nekoua M. P., Debuysschere C., Vergez I. et al., Viruses and Endocrine Diseases, Microorganisms. (2023) 11, no. 2, 10.3390/microorganisms11020361. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 155. Kino T. and Chrousos G. P., Virus-Mediated Modulation of the Host Endocrine Signaling Systems: Clinical Implications, Trends in Endocrinology and Metabolism. (2007) 18, no. 4, 159–166, 10.1016/j.tem.2007.03.003, 2-s2.0-34247178645. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 156. Ivanov S. M., Tarasova O. A., and Poroikov V. V., Transcriptome-Based Analysis of Human Peripheral Blood Reveals Regulators of Immune Response in Different Viral Infections, Frontiers in Immunology. (2023) 14, 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1199482. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 157. Magloire P. N., Debuysschere C., Vergez I. et al., Viruses and Endocrine Diseases, Microorganisms. (2023) 11, no. 2, 10.3390/microorganisms11020361. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 158. Mirza F. S., Luthra P., and Chirch L., Endocrinological Aspects of HIV Infection, Journal of Endocrinological Investigation. (2018) 41, no. 8, 881–899, 10.1007/s40618-017-0812-x, 2-s2.0-85050092698. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 159. Nekoua M. P., Alidjinou E. K., and Hober D., Persistent Coxsackievirus B Infection and Pathogenesis of Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus, Nature Reviews Endocrinology. (2022) 18, no. 8, 503–516, 10.1038/s41574-022-00688-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 160. Clarke S. A., Abbara A., and Dhillo W. S., Impact of COVID-19 on the Endocrine System: A Mini-Review, Endocrinology. (2021) 163, no. 1, 10.1210/endocr/bqab203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 161. Wallis M., Do Some Viruses Use Growth Hormone, Prolactin and Their Receptors to Facilitate Entry Into Cells? Episodic Evolution of Hormones and Receptors Suggests Host‐Virus Arms Races; Related Placental Lactogens May Provide Protective Viral Decoys, BioEssays. (2021) 43, no. 4, 10.1002/bies.202000268. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 162. Mo G., Hu B., Wang G. et al., Prolactin Affects the Disappearance of ALV-J Viremia In Vivo and Inhibits Viral Infection, Veterinary Microbiology. (2021) 261, 10.1016/j.vetmic.2021.109205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 163. Parra A., Ramírez‐Peredo J., Larrea F. et al., Decreased Dopaminergic Tone and Increased Basal Bioactive Prolactin in Men With Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection, Clinical Endocrinology. (2001) 54, no. 6, 731–738, 10.1046/j.1365-2265.2001.01262.x, 2-s2.0-0035723491. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 164. Wilson L., Truong M., Barber A., and Aoki T., Anterior Pituitary and Pituitary-Dependent Target Organ Function in Men Infected With the Human Immunodeficiency Virus, Metabolism. (1996) 45, no. 6, 738–746, 10.1016/s0026-0495(96)90140-7, 2-s2.0-0030160897. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 165. Youssef J., Sadera R., Mital D., and Ahmed M. H., HIV and the Pituitary Gland: Clinical and Biochemical Presentations, Journal of Laboratory Physicians. (2021) 13, no. 01, 084–090, 10.1055/s-0041-1723055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 166. Collazos J., Ibarra S., Martínez E., and Mayo J., Serum Prolactin Concentrations in Patients Infected With Human Immunodeficiency Virus, HIV Clinical Trials. (2002) 3, no. 2, 133–138, 10.1310/qaqq-xtcj-8al4-6f5p, 2-s2.0-0036097148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 167. Collazos J. and Esteban M., Has Prolactin a Role in the Hypogonadal Status of HIV-Infected Patients?, Journal of the International Association of Physicians in AIDS Care. (2009) 8, no. 1, 43–46, 10.1177/1545109708330908, 2-s2.0-67649383530. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 168. Rahbar A., AlKharusi A., Costa H. et al., Human Cytomegalovirus Infection Induces High Expression of Prolactin and Prolactin Receptors in Ovarian Cancer, Biology. (2020) 9, no. 3, 10.3390/biology9030044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 169. A Abdullah A., Abdullah R., A Nazariah Z. et al., Cyclophilin A as a Target in the Treatment of Cytomegalovirus Infections, Antiviral Chemistry and Chemotherapy. (2018) 26, 10.1177/2040206618811413, 2-s2.0-85056591273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 170. Syed F., Rycyzyn M. A., Westgate L., and Clevenger C. V., A Novel and Functional Interaction Between Cyclophilin A and Prolactin Receptor, Endocrine. (2003) 20, no. 1-2, 83–89, 10.1385/endo:20:1-2:83, 2-s2.0-0037322838. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 171. Lawrence S. M., Goshia T., Sinha M., Fraley S. I., and Williams M., Decoding Human Cytomegalovirus for the Development of Innovative Diagnostics to Detect Congenital Infection, Pediatric Research. (2024) 95, no. 2, 532–542, 10.1038/s41390-023-02957-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 172. Kiciak S., Fota-Markowska H., Borowicz I., Modrzewska R., and Przybyła A., Prolactin Concentration in the Serum of Male Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C, Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Sklodowska Sectio D Medicina. (2002) . [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 173. Kong L., Fujimoto A., Nakamura M. et al., Prolactin Regulatory Element Binding Protein is Involved in Hepatitis C Virus Replication by Interaction With NS4B, Journal of Virology. (2016) 90, no. 6, 3093–3111, 10.1128/jvi.01540-15, 2-s2.0-84961150043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 174. Sousa G. M., Oliveira R. C., Pereira M. M., Paraná R., Sousa-Atta M. L. B., and Atta A. M., Autoimmunity in Hepatitis C Virus Carriers: Involvement of Ferritin and Prolactin, Autoimmunity Reviews. (2011) 10, no. 4, 210–213, 10.1016/j.autrev.2010.10.003, 2-s2.0-79951856918. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 175. Shahin D., Thrombocytopenia and Leukocytosis are Independent Predictors of Hyperprolactinemia in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Patients, The Egyptian Rheumatologist. (2011) 33, no. 2, 77–83, 10.1016/j.ejr.2011.03.001, 2-s2.0-84880395939. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 176. Abdelsala A. E., Glal A. Z., Abdelhafez M. A. et al., Prolactin Contributes to the Pathogenesis of Thrombocytopenia in Patients With Hepatitis C Virus, Menoufia Medical Journal. (2017) 30, no. 1, 162–167, 10.4103/mmj.mmj_15_15. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 177. AbdelGhani A. E., AbdElatty E. A., Elshayeb E. I., Abouhabal M. A., and El Ghobashy Y. A., Evaluation of Serum Prolactin as a Potential Tumor Marker in Hepatocellular Carcinoma, Menoufia Medical Journal. (2017) 30, no. 3, 700–705. [Google Scholar]
- 178. Yu M.-W., Chang H.-C., Chang S.-C. et al., Role of Reproductive Factors in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Impact on Hepatitis B–and C–Related Risk, Hepatology. (2003) 38, no. 6, 1393–1400, 10.1016/j.hep.2003.09.041, 2-s2.0-84984593075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 179. Behera R., Kumar V., Lohite K., Karnik S., and Kundu G. C., Activation of JAK2/STAT3 Signaling by Osteopontin Promotes Tumor Growth in Human Breast Cancer Cells, Carcinogenesis. (2010) 31, no. 2, 192–200, 10.1093/carcin/bgp289, 2-s2.0-77649207043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 180. Shehata R. R., Abdel H. K. M., Fawzi E., Kamal E. E., Hassany S., and Zakaria M., Impact of Hepatitis B on Male Reproductive Hormones, Journal of Current Medical Research and Practice. (2016) 1, no. 2, 28–30, 10.4103/2357-0121.192542. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 181. Giri R., Pandey S., and Kushwaha J., Assessment of Serum Prolactin Level in Hepatic Encephalopathy Patient, International Journal of Advances in Medicine. (2021) 8, no. 6, 793–799, 10.18203/2349-3933.ijam20212101. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 182. Ayfer S., Changes of Some Hormones Levels in Patients With Hepatitis B Virus-Related Chronic Liver Disease/Ayfer Serina, Mesut Akarsub, Hale Akpinarb, Ilkay Simsekb, Gastroenterology Research. (2013) 6, no. 4, 134–138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 183. Medel M. L., Reyes G. G., Porras L. M. et al., Prolactin Induces IL-2 Associated TRAIL Expression on Natural Killer Cells From Chronic Hepatitis C Patients In Vivo and In Vitro, Endocrine, Metabolic & Immune Disorders-Drug Targets. (2019) 19, no. 7, 975–984, 10.2174/1871530319666181206125545, 2-s2.0-85073673343. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 184. Srinivasa S. and Vemanamanda S., Correlation of Relation of Serum Prolactin Level to Child-Pugh Score in Cirrhosis of Liver in Assessing Disease Severity, 2024.
- 185. Jha S. K. and Kannan S., Serum Prolactin in Patients With Liver Disease in Comparison With Healthy Adults: A Preliminary Cross-Sectional Study, International Journal of Applied and Basic Medical Research. (2016) 6, no. 1, 8–10, 10.4103/2229-516x.173984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 186. Tasker R. C., Roe M. F., Bloxham D. M., White D. K., Ross-Russell R. I., and O’Donnell D. R., The Neuroendocrine Stress Response and Severity of Acute Respiratory Syncytial Virus Bronchiolitis in Infancy, Intensive Care Medicine. (2004) 30, no. 12, 2257–2262, 10.1007/s00134-004-2470-7, 2-s2.0-12944319847. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 187. Mariani T. J., Qiu X., Chu C. et al., Association of Dynamic Changes in the CD4 T-Cell Transcriptome With Disease Severity During Primary Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infection in Young Infants, The Journal of Infectious Diseases. (2017) 216, no. 8, 1027–1037, 10.1093/infdis/jix400, 2-s2.0-85038238869. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 188. Eisenhut M., Extrapulmonary Manifestations of Severe Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infection–A Systematic Review, Critical Care. (2006) 10, no. 4, 1–6, 10.1186/cc4984, 2-s2.0-34247551015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 189. Gkentzi D., Dimitriou G., and Karatza A., Non-Pulmonary Manifestations of Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infection, Journal of Thoracic Disease. (2018) 10, no. 33, S3815–S3818, 10.21037/jtd.2018.10.38, 2-s2.0-85057372907. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 190. Tomio A., Schust D. J., Kawana K. et al., Prolactin Can Modulate CD4+ T‐Cell Response Through Receptor‐Mediated Alterations in the Expression of T‐Bet, Immunology & Cell Biology. (2008) 86, no. 7, 616–621, 10.1038/icb.2008.29, 2-s2.0-53249117357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 191. Legorreta-Haquet M. V., Flores-Fernández R., Blanco-Favela F. et al., Prolactin Levels Correlate With Abnormal B Cell Maturation in MRL and MRL/Lpr Mouse Models of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus‐Like Disease, Journal of Immunology Research. (2013) 2013, no. 1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 192. Jara L. J., Lopez-Zamora B., Ordonez-Gonzalez I. et al., The Immune-Neuroendocrine System in COVID-19, Advanced Age and Rheumatic Diseases, Autoimmunity Reviews. (2021) 20, no. 11, 10.1016/j.autrev.2021.102946. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 193. Żak K., Starek E., Korga-Plewko A. et al., Assessment of the Impact of SARS-CoV-2 Infection on the Sexual Function of Women, Levels of Oxytocin and Prolactin: A Prospective Cohort Study, Journal of Clinical Medicine. (2024) 13, no. 8, 10.3390/jcm13082230. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 194. Kadihasanoglu M., Aktas S., Yardimci E., Aral H., and Kadioglu A., SARS-CoV-2 Pneumonia Affects Male Reproductive Hormone Levels: A Prospective, Cohort Study, The Journal of Sexual Medicine. (2021) 18, no. 2, 256–264, 10.1016/j.jsxm.2020.11.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 195. Bao J., Guo Z., He J. et al., Semen Parameters and Sex Hormones as Affected by SARS-CoV-2 Infection: A Systematic Review, Progrès en Urologie. (2022) 32, no. 16, 1431–1439, 10.1016/j.purol.2022.09.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 196. Lennartsson A.-K. and Jonsdottir I. H., Prolactin in Response to Acute Psychosocial Stress in Healthy Men and Women, Psychoneuroendocrinology. (2011) 36, no. 10, 1530–1539, 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2011.04.007, 2-s2.0-80555136108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 197. Ma L., Xie W., Li D. et al., Effect of SARS-CoV-2 Infection Upon Male Gonadal Function: A Single Center-Based Study, medRxiv. (2020) . [Google Scholar]
- 198. Paquette S. G., Banner D., Huang S. S. et al., Influenza Transmission in the Mother-Infant Dyad Leads to Severe Disease, Mammary Gland Infection, and Pathogenesis by Regulating Host Responses, PLoS Pathogens. (2015) 11, no. 10, 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005173, 2-s2.0-84946058447. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 199. Harpur C. M., West A. C., Le Page M. A. et al., Naturally Derived Cytokine Peptides Limit Virus Replication and Severe Disease During Influenza A Virus Infection, Clinical & Translational Immunology. (2023) 12, no. 3, 10.1002/cti2.1443. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 200. Stroffolini T. and Stroffolini G., Prevalence and Modes of Transmission of Hepatitis C Virus Infection: A Historical Worldwide Review, Viruses. (2024) 16, no. 7, 10.3390/v16071115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 201. Al-Ghamdi A. S. and Aljohani N., Graves’ Thyrotoxicosis-Induced Reversible Cardiomyopathy: a Case Report, Clinical Medicine Insights: Case Reports. (2013) 6, 10.4137/ccrep.s10534, 2-s2.0-84875680298. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 202. Zoulim F., Chen P.-J., Dandri M., Kennedy P. T., and Seeger C., Hepatitis B Virus DNA Integration: Implications for Diagnostics, Therapy, and Outcome, Journal of Hepatology. (2024) 81, no. 6, 1087–1099, 10.1016/j.jhep.2024.06.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 203. Atlas H. P., PRL (ENSG00000172179) Protein Expression in Blood–The Human Protein Atlas: The Human Protein Atlas Project, 2025, Science for Life Laboratory, https://www.proteinatlas.org/ENSG00000172179%E2%80%91PRL/blood. [Google Scholar]
- 204. Szczerbiński Ł., Okruszko M. A., Szabłowski M. et al., Long-Term Effects of COVID-19 on the Endocrine System–A Pilot Case-Control Study, Frontiers in Endocrinology. (2023) 14, 10.3389/fendo.2023.1192174. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 205. Russell C. D., Unger S. A., Walton M., and Schwarze J., The Human Immune Response to Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infection, Clinical Microbiology Reviews. (2017) 30, no. 2, 481–502, 10.1128/cmr.00090-16, 2-s2.0-85012113486. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 206. Sommer C., Resch B., and Simões E. A., Suppl 2: Risk Factors for Severe Respiratory Syncytial Virus Lower Respiratory Tract Infection, The Open Microbiology Journal. (2011) 5, 144–154, 10.2174/1874285801105010144, 2-s2.0-84855755161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 207. Baraldi E., Checcucci Lisi G., Costantino C. et al., RSV Disease in Infants and Young Children: Can We See a Brighter Future?, Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics. (2022) 18, no. 4, 10.1080/21645515.2022.2079322. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 208. Sharif-Zak M., Abbasi-Jorjandi M., Asadikaram G. et al., CCR2 and DPP9 Expression in the Peripheral Blood of COVID-19 Patients: Influences of the Disease Severity and Gender, Immunobiology. (2022) 227, no. 2, 10.1016/j.imbio.2022.152184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 209. Sharif-Zak M., Abbasi-Jorjandi M., Asadikaram G., Ghoreshi Z.-a-S., Rezazadeh-Jabalbarzi M., and Rashidinejad H., Influence of Disease Severity and Gender on HLA-C Methylation in COVID-19 Patients, Iranian Journal of Science and Technology Transaction A-Science. (2022) 46, no. 5, 1309–1316, 10.1007/s40995-022-01334-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 210. Sharifzak M., Abbasi-Jorjandi M., Asadikaram G., Abolhassani M., and Rosen C., Post-COVID-19: Hematological Factors Changes in Patients at Three--Time Intervals, Current Medicinal Chemistry. (2024) 32, no. 18, 3670–3692, 10.2174/0109298673299246240625084103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 211. Ghoreshi Z.-A.-S., Abbasi-Jorjandi M., Asadikaram G. et al., Paraoxonase 1 rs662 Polymorphism, Its Related Variables, and COVID-19 Intensity: Considering Gender and Post-COVID Complications, Experimental Biology and Medicine. (2023) 248, no. 23, 2351–2362, 10.1177/15353702221128563. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 212. Abbasi-Jorjandi M., Asadikaram G., Sharif-Zak M. et al., Time Course of Biochemical and Metabolic Parameters During and After COVID-19, Current Medicinal Chemistry. (2024) . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 213. Esmaeilzadeh A., Elahi R., Siahmansouri A., Maleki A. J., and Moradi A., Endocrine and Metabolic Complications of COVID-19: Lessons Learned and Future Prospects, Journal of Molecular Endocrinology. (2022) 69, no. 3, R125–R150, 10.1530/jme-22-0036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 214. Petrulli J., Kalish B., Nabulsi N., Huang Y., Hannestad J., and Morris E., Systemic Inflammation Enhances Stimulant-Induced Striatal Dopamine Elevation, Translational Psychiatry. (2017) 7, no. 3, e1076–e, 10.1038/tp.2017.18, 2-s2.0-85031099874. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 215. Ma L., Xie W., Li D. et al., Evaluation of Sex‐Related Hormones and Semen Characteristics in Reproductive‐Aged Male COVID‐19 Patients, Journal of Medical Virology. (2021) 93, no. 1, 456–462, 10.1002/jmv.26259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 216. Vilar L., Abucham J., Albuquerque J. L. et al., Controversial Issues in the Management of Hyperprolactinemia and Prolactinomas–An Overview by the Neuroendocrinology Department of the Brazilian Society of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Archives of Endocrinology and Metabolism. (2018) 62, no. 2, 236–263, 10.20945/2359-3997000000032, 2-s2.0-85047264462. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 217. Brown R. S., Khant Aung Z., Phillipps H. R. et al., Acute Suppression of LH Secretion by Prolactin in Female Mice is Mediated by Kisspeptin Neurons in the Arcuate Nucleus, Endocrinology. (2019) 160, no. 5, 1323–1332, 10.1210/en.2019-00038, 2-s2.0-85067266954. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 218. Sawin C. T., Carlson H. E., Geller A., Castelli W. P., and Bacharach P., Serum Prolactin and Aging: Basal Values and Changes With Estrogen Use and Hypothyroidism, Journal of Gerontology. (1989) 44, no. 4, M131–M135, 10.1093/geronj/44.4.m131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 219. Asadikaram G. and Arababadi M. K., Why is Hormone Therapy Successful Strategy Against Coronavirus-19?, VirusDisease. (2021) 32, no. 3, 388–389, 10.1007/s13337-021-00711-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 220. Freedberg D. E., Conigliaro J., Wang T. C. et al., Famotidine Use is Associated With Improved Clinical Outcomes in Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients: A Propensity Score Matched Retrospective Cohort Study, Gastroenterology. (2020) 159, no. 3, 1129–1131.e3, 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.05.053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 221. Torre D. L. and Falorni A., Pharmacological Causes of Hyperprolactinemia, Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management. (2007) 3, no. 5, 929–951. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 222. Semenyna H., Fartushok T., Perfun A., and Saliuk A., Features of the Course of COVID-19 in Women With Hyperprolactinemia, Grail of Science. (2022) no. 21, 230–235, 10.36074/grail-of-science.28.10.2022.043. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 223. Liu D., Li L., Wu X. et al., Pregnancy and Perinatal Outcomes of Women With Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Pneumonia: A Preliminary Analysis, American Journal of Roentgenology. (2020) 215, no. 1, 127–132, 10.2214/ajr.20.23072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 224. Wei L., Sun S., Zhang J. et al., Endocrine Cells of the Adenohypophysis in Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS), Biochemistry and Cell Biology. (2010) 88, no. 4, 723–730, 10.1139/o10-022, 2-s2.0-77954922980. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 225. Li T., Wang L., Wang H. et al., Characteristics of Laboratory Indexes in COVID-19 Patients With Non-Severe Symptoms in Hefei City, China: Diagnostic Value in Organ Injuries, European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases. (2020) 39, no. 12, 2447–2455, 10.1007/s10096-020-03967-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 226. Kopelman P., Physiopathology of Prolactin Secretion in Obesity, International Journal of Obesity. (2000) 24, no. 2, S104–S108, 10.1038/sj.ijo.0801291, 2-s2.0-0033928131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 227. Gonzalez-Rubio J., Navarro-Lopez C., Lopez-Najera E. et al., What is Happening With Smokers and COVID-19? A Systematic Review and a Meta-Analysis, 2020.
- 228. Wilkins J., Carlson H., Van Vunakis H., Hill M., Gritz E., and Jarvik M., Nicotine from Cigarette Smoking Increases Circulating Levels of Cortisol, Growth Hormone, and Prolactin in Male Chronic Smokers, Psychopharmacology. (1982) 78, no. 4, 305–308, 10.1007/bf00433730, 2-s2.0-0020429243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 229. Nur A. A., Osman A. L., Kandakurti P. K. et al., The Association of Prolactin and CRP Biomarkers With the Severity of COVID-19 in Thumbay Hospital, Ajman, UAE, International Journal of Biomedicine. (2023) 13, no. 4, 286–295. [Google Scholar]
- 230. van der Made C. I., Simons A., Schuurs-Hoeijmakers J. et al., Presence of Genetic Variants Among Young Men With Severe COVID-19, JAMA. (2020) 324, no. 7, 663–673, 10.1001/jama.2020.13719. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 231. Dou D. R., Zhao Y., Belk J. A. et al., Xist Ribonucleoproteins Promote Female Sex-Biased Autoimmunity, Cell. (2024) 187, no. 3, 10.1016/j.cell.2023.12.037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 232. Bi Y., Yang J., Wang L., Ran L., and Gao G. F., Ecology and Evolution of Avian Influenza Viruses, Current Biology. (2024) 34, no. 15, R716–R721, 10.1016/j.cub.2024.05.053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 233. Agarwal N., Machiels J.-P., Suárez C. et al., Phase I Study of the Prolactin Receptor Antagonist LFA102 in Metastatic Breast and Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer, The Oncologist. (2016) 21, no. 5, 10.1634/theoncologist.2015-0502, 2-s2.0-84966454846. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 234. Zaga-Clavellina V., Parra-Covarrubias A., Ramirez-Peredo J., Vega-Sanchez R., and Vadillo-Ortega F., The Potential Role of Prolactin as a Modulator of the Secretion of Proinflammatory Mediators in Chorioamniotic Membranes in Term Human Gestation, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. (2014) 211, no. 1, 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.01.039, 2-s2.0-84903397762. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 235. Petersenn S., Fleseriu M., Casanueva F. F. et al., Diagnosis and Management of Prolactin-Secreting Pituitary Adenomas: A Pituitary Society International Consensus Statement, Nature Reviews Endocrinology. (2023) 19, no. 12, 722–740, 10.1038/s41574-023-00886-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.
