Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Biophysical Journal logoLink to Biophysical Journal
. 1994 Apr;66(4):996–1010. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(94)80881-1

Gating of Shaker K+ channels: I. Ionic and gating currents.

E Stefani 1, L Toro 1, E Perozo 1, F Bezanilla 1
PMCID: PMC1275807  PMID: 8038403

Abstract

Ionic and gating currents from noninactivating Shaker B K+ channels were studied with the cut-open oocyte voltage clamp technique and compared with the macropatch clamp technique. The performance of the cut-open oocyte voltage clamp technique was evaluated from the electrical properties of the clamped upper domus membrane, K+ tail current measurements, and the time course of K+ currents after partial blockade. It was concluded that membrane currents less than 20 microA were spatially clamped with a time resolution of at least 50 microseconds. Subtracted, unsubtracted gating currents with the cut-open oocyte voltage clamp technique and gating currents recorded in cell attached macropatches had similar properties and time course, and the charge movement properties directly obtained from capacity measurements agreed with measurements of charge movement from subtracted records. An accurate estimate of the normalized open probability Po(V) was obtained from tail current measurements as a function of the prepulse V in high external K+. The Po(V) was zero at potentials more negative than -40 mV and increased sharply at this potential, then increased continuously until -20 mV, and finally slowly increased with voltages more positive than 0 mV. Deactivation tail currents decayed with two time constants and external potassium slowed down the faster component without affecting the slower component that is probably associated with the return between two of the closed states near the open state. In correlating gating currents and channel opening, Cole-Moore type experiments showed that charge moving in the negative region of voltage (-100 to -40 mV) is involved in the delay of the conductance activation but not in channel opening. The charge moving in the more positive voltage range (-40 to -10 mV) has a similar voltage dependence to the open probability of the channel, but it does not show the gradual increase with voltage seen in the Po(V).

Full text

PDF
996

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Armstrong C. M., Bezanilla F. Currents related to movement of the gating particles of the sodium channels. Nature. 1973 Apr 13;242(5398):459–461. doi: 10.1038/242459a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Barish M. E. A transient calcium-dependent chloride current in the immature Xenopus oocyte. J Physiol. 1983 Sep;342:309–325. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1983.sp014852. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bezanilla F., Armstrong C. M. Inactivation of the sodium channel. I. Sodium current experiments. J Gen Physiol. 1977 Nov;70(5):549–566. doi: 10.1085/jgp.70.5.549. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bezanilla F. Gating of sodium and potassium channels. J Membr Biol. 1985;88(2):97–111. doi: 10.1007/BF01868424. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bezanilla F., Perozo E., Papazian D. M., Stefani E. Molecular basis of gating charge immobilization in Shaker potassium channels. Science. 1991 Nov 1;254(5032):679–683. doi: 10.1126/science.1948047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bezanilla F., Perozo E., Stefani E. Gating of Shaker K+ channels: II. The components of gating currents and a model of channel activation. Biophys J. 1994 Apr;66(4):1011–1021. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(94)80882-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Fu L. N., Ye R. Q., Browder L. W., Johnston R. N. Translational potentiation of messenger RNA with secondary structure in Xenopus. Science. 1991 Feb 15;251(4995):807–810. doi: 10.1126/science.1990443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Goldman L. Gating current kinetics in Myxicola giant axons. Order of the back transition rate constants. Biophys J. 1991 Mar;59(3):574–589. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(91)82273-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. HODGKIN A. L., HUXLEY A. F., KATZ B. Measurement of current-voltage relations in the membrane of the giant axon of Loligo. J Physiol. 1952 Apr;116(4):424–448. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1952.sp004716. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hoshi T., Zagotta W. N., Aldrich R. W. Biophysical and molecular mechanisms of Shaker potassium channel inactivation. Science. 1990 Oct 26;250(4980):533–538. doi: 10.1126/science.2122519. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kamb A., Tseng-Crank J., Tanouye M. A. Multiple products of the Drosophila Shaker gene may contribute to potassium channel diversity. Neuron. 1988 Jul;1(5):421–430. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(88)90192-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. MacKinnon R., Yellen G. Mutations affecting TEA blockade and ion permeation in voltage-activated K+ channels. Science. 1990 Oct 12;250(4978):276–279. doi: 10.1126/science.2218530. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Methfessel C., Witzemann V., Takahashi T., Mishina M., Numa S., Sakmann B. Patch clamp measurements on Xenopus laevis oocytes: currents through endogenous channels and implanted acetylcholine receptor and sodium channels. Pflugers Arch. 1986 Dec;407(6):577–588. doi: 10.1007/BF00582635. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Miledi R. A calcium-dependent transient outward current in Xenopus laevis oocytes. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1982 Jul 22;215(1201):491–497. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1982.0056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Perozo E., MacKinnon R., Bezanilla F., Stefani E. Gating currents from a nonconducting mutant reveal open-closed conformations in Shaker K+ channels. Neuron. 1993 Aug;11(2):353–358. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(93)90190-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Perozo E., Papazian D. M., Stefani E., Bezanilla F. Gating currents in Shaker K+ channels. Implications for activation and inactivation models. Biophys J. 1992 Apr;62(1):160–171. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(92)81802-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Rakowski R. F. Charge movement by the Na/K pump in Xenopus oocytes. J Gen Physiol. 1993 Jan;101(1):117–144. doi: 10.1085/jgp.101.1.117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Schneider M. F., Chandler W. K. Voltage dependent charge movement of skeletal muscle: a possible step in excitation-contraction coupling. Nature. 1973 Mar 23;242(5395):244–246. doi: 10.1038/242244a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Schoppa N. E., McCormack K., Tanouye M. A., Sigworth F. J. The size of gating charge in wild-type and mutant Shaker potassium channels. Science. 1992 Mar 27;255(5052):1712–1715. doi: 10.1126/science.1553560. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Spires S., Begenisich T. Pharmacological and kinetic analysis of K channel gating currents. J Gen Physiol. 1989 Feb;93(2):263–283. doi: 10.1085/jgp.93.2.263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Stühmer W., Conti F., Stocker M., Pongs O., Heinemann S. H. Gating currents of inactivating and non-inactivating potassium channels expressed in Xenopus oocytes. Pflugers Arch. 1991 May;418(4):423–429. doi: 10.1007/BF00550881. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Swenson R. P., Jr, Armstrong C. M. K+ channels close more slowly in the presence of external K+ and Rb+. Nature. 1981 Jun 4;291(5814):427–429. doi: 10.1038/291427a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. TAYLOR R. E., MOORE J. W., COLE K. S. Analysis of certain errors in squid axon voltage clamp measurements. Biophys J. 1960 Nov;1:161–202. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3495(60)86882-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. TAYLOR R. E., MOORE J. W., COLE K. S. Analysis of certain errors in squid axon voltage clamp measurements. Biophys J. 1960 Nov;1:161–202. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3495(60)86882-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Taglialatela M., Stefani E. Gating currents of the cloned delayed-rectifier K+ channel DRK1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 May 15;90(10):4758–4762. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.10.4758. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Taglialatela M., Toro L., Stefani E. Novel voltage clamp to record small, fast currents from ion channels expressed in Xenopus oocytes. Biophys J. 1992 Jan;61(1):78–82. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(92)81817-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Taylor R. E., Bezanilla F. Sodium and gating current time shifts resulting from changes in initial conditions. J Gen Physiol. 1983 Jun;81(6):773–784. doi: 10.1085/jgp.81.6.773. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Tempel B. L., Papazian D. M., Schwarz T. L., Jan Y. N., Jan L. Y. Sequence of a probable potassium channel component encoded at Shaker locus of Drosophila. Science. 1987 Aug 14;237(4816):770–775. doi: 10.1126/science.2441471. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. White M. M., Bezanilla F. Activation of squid axon K+ channels. Ionic and gating current studies. J Gen Physiol. 1985 Apr;85(4):539–554. doi: 10.1085/jgp.85.4.539. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Biophysical Journal are provided here courtesy of The Biophysical Society

RESOURCES