Skip to main content
Future Oncology logoLink to Future Oncology
. 2025 Nov 28;21(30):3845–3858. doi: 10.1080/14796694.2025.2592722

A plain language summary of the EORTC 1333/PEACE-3 study of enzalutamide alone vs enzalutamide plus radium-223 in patients with metastatic castrationresistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) and bone metastases

Bertrand Tombal a, Fred Saad b, Enrique Gallardo c, Andrey Soares d, Yohann Loriot e, Ray McDermott f, Erik Briers g, Mikael Lagström h, Corneel Coens i, Coralie Poncet i, Beatrice Fournier i, Silke Gillessen j
PMCID: PMC12758334  PMID: 41313045

Plain Language Summary

What is this summary about?

Enzalutamide and radium-223 are two different types of medicines normally used separately to treat prostate cancer that has spread to other parts of the body (metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer; mCRPC). Both medicines are usually given with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Radium-223 is only used in people with mCRPC whose cancer has spread to their bones (called bone metastases). When the study began, enzalutamide was only used to treat patients with castration-resistant disease; nowadays, it is also used to treat earlier stages of prostate cancer that are hormone-sensitive.

This summary describes the early results of a study called EORTC 1333, or ‘PEACE-3’. The researchers compared enzalutamide plus ADT treatment alone against enzalutamide plus ADT combined with radium-223 in people with mCRPC with bone metastases who had not been treated for mCRPC. Patients, however, may have been treated for earlier stages of prostate cancer. They wanted to see if there was any difference in how long patients lived before their cancer got worse based on medical scans (radiological progression-free survival). They also looked for any difference in how long patients lived and the side effects of combining the two therapies.

What were the results of the study?

In people with mCRPC, combined treatment with enzalutamide plus ADT and radium-223 showed a trend towards an increased time that patients lived without their cancer getting worse compared with enzalutamide plus ADT alone. The combined treatment was also found to improve how long they lived. More people had broken bones (fractures) in the combination group, but the use of medication to keep bones strong partway through the study helped reduce the risk of fractures in both treatment groups. Most side effects were moderate and manageable.

What do the results mean?

In people not treated for mCRPC before, combining enzalutamide plus ADT with radium-223 treatment can slow down their cancer compared with taking enzalutamide plus ADT alone. The results suggest that people live longer if they have this combined treatment. Therefore, combining enzalutamide and radium-223 could be a new option for doctors to treat people with mCRPC with bone metastases. However, it should be given with medication to keep bones strong.

It is worth noting that, when this study began, enzalutamide was mainly used to treat patients who had castration-resistant prostate cancer. Today, enzalutamide is used to treat earlier stages of prostate cancer. This means that treatments received for earlier stages of prostate cancer may differ between patients enrolled in PEACE-3 and those who are being treated in routine clinical practice today.

Clinical trial number: NCT02194842

KEYWORDS: HER-2, stomach cancer, gastroesophageal junction cancer, oncology, HER-2 Positive

Infographic

Infographic:

Infographic:

A PDF version of this infographic is available as supplemental material.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank all the study participants and their families and caregivers, and all the investigators and collaborating groups who participated in the PEACE-3 trial. They would also like to thank Zahra Anita Trippe for her support liaising with patient organizations and patient advocacy groups.

Supplementary Material

Infographic
IFON_A_2592722_SM4036.pdf (690.8KB, pdf)

This is an abstract of the Plain Language Summary of Publication article.

View the full Plain Language Summary PDF of this article to read the full-text

Link to original article here

Supplementary material

Supplemental data for this article can be accessed here.

Disclosure statement

The following authors have reported consulting fees or payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speaker’s bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events. Bertrand Tombal: Accord, Amgen, Astellas, Bayer, Myovant, MSD, Ferring, Pfizer. Fred Saad: Janssen, Merck, Pfizer, BMS, Novartis, Sanofi, AstraZeneca. Enrique Gallardo: Advanced Accelerator Applications, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Bayer, BMS, Ipsen, Johnson & Johnson, Merck, MSD, Pfizer, Recordati, Roche. Andrey Soares: Novartis, AstraZeneca, Janssen, MSD, Pfizer, Bayer. Yohann Loriot: Amgen, Sanofi, Astellas, Pfizer, Merck KGaA, Janssen, Exelexis, BMS, Roche, MSD, Tahio, Orion, Incyte, Gilead, Tyra, Lilly, AstraZeneca. Ray McDermott: Astellas, Bristol Myers Squibb, MSD, Ipsen, Novartis, Pfizer, Bayer. Silke Gillessen: Amgen, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo, Innomedica, Ipsen, Macrogenics, MSD, Novartis. The authors have no other relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript apart from those disclosed.

Medical writing support was provided by Bioscript Group, Macclesfield, UK, funded by Bayer HealthCare.

Patient reviewers on this PLSP have received honorarium from Future Oncology for their review work but have no other relevant financial relationships to disclose.

Peer reviewers on this manuscript have no relevant financial or other relationships to disclose.

Funding

The PEACE-3 study was funded by an investigator driven clinical trial agreement from Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals (funding and supply of radium-223; IIR ISCS 17739), and Astellas Pharma Europe (funding and supply of enzalutamide; grant number: ISR004823/BE-72-RG-13).

This manuscript was funded by Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals were provided the opportunity to review the manuscript during development, but all decisions on content were made by the authors.

Ethical disclosure

A local institutional review board or independent ethics committee approved the trial. The trial was conducted according to the requirements of each country’s regulatory authorities and by the Declaration of Helsinki and the good clinical practice guidelines of the International Council for Harmonisation. All patients provided written informed consent.

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Infographic
IFON_A_2592722_SM4036.pdf (690.8KB, pdf)

Articles from Future Oncology are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES