Pharmacologic therapy for lipid disorders is now dominated by hydroxymethyl-glutaryl-coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors (statins). They have been conclusively proved to prevent coronary events and save lives in a wide variety of situations and are acceptably safe.
Alternatives to statins include resins (eg, cholestyramine), fibric acid derivatives (eg, gemfibrozil), and nicotinic acid (table 1, see p 400). They all have a place in lipid management but should be considered second-line agents.
STATINS (HMG-COA REDUCTASE INHIBITORS)
Competitively inhibit HMG-CoA reductase, which catalyzes the rate-limiting step in cholesterol synthesis, leading to greater uptake of low-density-lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) in hepatocytes
Decrease LDL-C levels by a greater amount (30%-60%) and have shown a clearer reduction in overall mortality (as many as 3.3 lives saved per 100 patients over 5 years) than the other lipid-lowering agents
Better tolerated than the other 3 major classes1
Roughly 1% of patients who take statin drugs have reversible, asymptomatic, dose-dependent elevations in aminotransferase levels to more than 3 times normal
Myopathy, defined as creatine kinase elevations to more than 10 times normal, occurs in less than 0.2% of patients. Combination therapy with niacin or gemfibrozil increases the risk
Coronary outcomes have been studied in 5 major randomized placebo-controlled trials (table 2, see p 401)
Table 2.
Summary of major trials of statin drugs
| Study name | Type of prevention | Baseline LDL-C (avg), mg/dL* | Active treatment | Effect on LDL-C% | Mortality | CHD events† | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RRR, % | ARR, % | RRR, % | ARR, % | |||||
| 4S |
Secondary |
188 |
Simvastatin |
-38 |
30 |
3.2 |
34 |
8.2 |
| LIPID |
Secondary |
150 |
Pravastatin |
-25 |
22 |
3.1 |
24 |
3.6 |
| CARE |
Secondary |
139 |
Pravastatin |
-28 |
20 |
0.8 |
24 |
3.0 |
| WOSCOP |
Primary |
192 |
Pravastatin |
-26 |
28 |
0.9 |
31 |
2.4 |
| AFCAPS |
Primary |
150 |
Lovastatin |
25 |
NS |
NS |
40 |
2.3 |
| NS=not significant. | ||||||||
To convert to SI units (mmol/L), multiply by 0.02586.
CHD events = CHD deaths plus nonfatal MIs
SCANDINAVIAN SIMVASTATIN SURVIVAL STUDY (4S)2
Statins are thought to stabilize coronary plaques by mechanisms other than lowering LDL-C levels alone: depletion of the plaques' lipid core, strengthening of the fibrous cap, normalization of the endothelium, anti-inflammatory effects, and inhibition of thrombus formation.
In patients with known coronary artery disease (CAD) and high LDL-C levels (mean, 4.91 mmol/L [190 mg/dL]), simvastatin lowered LDL-C levels by 38% and increased high-density-lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels by 8%
For every 100 patients treated for 5 years, simvastatin saved 3.3 lives overall (the greatest benefit ever reported for cholesterol treatment). Coronary events decreased by 42%
LONG-TERM INTERVENTION WITH PRAVASTATIN IN ISCHAEMIC DISEASE (LIPID) STUDY3
• In patients with known CAD and moderately elevated LDL-C levels (mean, 3.88 mmol/L [150 mg/dL]), pravastatin prevented about 2 coronary deaths and 4 coronary events for every 100 patients treated for 6 years
CHOLESTEROL AND RECURRENT EVENTS (CARE) STUDY4
• In patients with a history of myocardial infarction (MI) and normal LDL-C levels (mean, 3.59 mmol/L [139 mg/dL]), pravastatin prevented about 1 coronary death, 2 nonfatal MIs, 1 stroke, and 4 revascularization procedures for every 100 men treated for 5 years
WEST OF SCOTLAND CORONARY PREVENTION STUDY (WOSCOPS)5
In mostly healthy men with high LDL levels, pravastatin lowered LDL-C levels by 26%
For every 100 men treated for 5 years, pravastatin prevented 2 nonfatal MIs, 3 revascularizations, and 0.5 coronary death
AIR FORCE/TEXAS CORONARY ATHEROSCLEROSIS PREVENTION STUDY (AFCAPS/TEXCAPS)6
In healthy patients with average total cholesterol levels (mean, 572 mmol/L [221 mg/dL]) and below-average HDL-C levels (mean, 0.93 mmol/L [36 mg/dL]), the use of lovastatin, 20 to 40 mg per day, was associated with a 37% reduction in the incidence of first acute major coronary events over 5 years
All-cause mortality was not affected
SUMMARY OF CLINICAL EVIDENCE OF STATINS
Statin trials demonstrate an important axiom of clinical epidemiology: the same RRR may produce markedly different ARRs across different patient populations. For example, pravastatin's 25% RRR in subjects with heart disease (LIPID) saved more than 2 lives per 100 treated, but its equal 24% RRR in healthy subjects (WOSCOPS) saved less than 1 life per 100.
Many trials across a broad spectrum of risk demonstrate that aggressive treatment of cholesterol can prevent adverse coronary events and save lives
The statin drugs have the most impressive effect on mortality of any lipid-lowering agents
Although sample sizes were smaller for women in the statin trials, they appeared to have similar benefits to those for men
The relative risk reduction (RRR) in coronary events is consistently about 25% to 35%, regardless of the baseline cholesterol level or type of statin. The absolute risk reduction (ARR) varies with the subjects
The greatest absolute benefits are seen in patients with the highest baseline risk (with CAD and high LDL-C levels). Absolute risk reductions in overall mortality range from 0% to 3% over 5 years, depending on the baseline risk
A meta-analysis of 28 trials concluded that statin drugs reduce the incidence of stroke; diet, fibrates, and resins do not7
NICOTINIC ACID (NIACIN)
Decreases LDL-C levels 10% to 25% and decreases triglyceride levels 20% to 50%
Increases HDL-C levels 15% to 35%
Limited by patients' ability to tolerate the bothersome side effect of cutaneous flushing. The administration of aspirin 30 minutes before niacin can reduce flushing
Nicotinic acid can cause asymptomatic increases in aminotransferase levels, especially at doses about 3 g per day. These levels should be monitored every 6 to 12 weeks in the first year, then every 6 months thereafter
Niacin may also cause glucose intolerance, hyperuricemia, and exacerbation of peptic ulcer
In the Coronary Drug Project, a secondary prevention study, niacin prevented about 4 coronary events per 100 men over 6 years.8 Coronary mortality was not affected
The best-tolerated nicotinic acid preparations are once-per-day agents that may be taken at bedtime. In a randomized trial to assess side effects, a once-per-day preparation of 2 g taken at bedtime decreased LDL-C levels by 16% and triglyceride levels by 35% and increased HDL-C levels by 26%9
BILE ACID SEQUESTRANTS (RESINS)
Resins should be administered before the evening meal, when bile acid secretion is greatest. Preprandial dosing also decreases the major adverse side effects, which include bloating, abdominal pain, and distension. Little additional benefit is gained with more than 4 scoops (16 g) per day.
Decrease LDL-C levels 15% to 30% and increase HDL-C levels 3% to 5%
May increase triglyceride levels. Contraindicated when triglyceride level is greater than 5.65 mmol/L (500 mg/dL)
Block enterohepatic recirculation of bile acids by binding them in the gut. They do not act systemically
Can interfere with absorption; other medications should be taken 1 hour before or 3 to 4 hours after the resin
May be started with 1 or 2 scoops (4-8 g) dissolved in juice 30 minutes before supper, and may be increased as tolerated
In healthy men with high LDL-C levels, cholestyramine resin prevented 2 CAD events for every 100 patients treated for 7 years. There was no effect on overall mortality10
FIBRATES (GEMFIBROZIL, FENOFIBRATE, CLOFIBRATE)
Increase HDL-C levels 10% to 15% and decrease triglyceride levels 20% to 50%
Have only a modest effect on LDL-C levels
Are generally used in patients with low HDL-C levels or high triglyceride levels
Their use is contraindicated in patients with active peptic ulcer or cholelithiasis
Should be carefully monitored if used in combination with statin drugs due to the risk of myopathy and rhabdomyolysis
In the Helsinki Heart Study, gemfibrozil prevented 1.5 coronary events in 100 patients over 5 years (RRR=34%) in healthy men with high total cholesterol levels.11 The greatest reduction in the incidence of coronary events was in patients with the highest triglyceride and lowest HDL-C levels. Total mortality was higher in the gemfibrozil group, mostly due to excess cancer deaths
In a more recent trial, treatment with gemfibrozil prevented 3 nonfatal MIs and 2 coronary deaths over a 5-year period for every 100 men with CAD (average baseline HDL-C and LDL-C levels, 0.83 and 2.90 mmol/L [32 and 112 mg/dL], respectively). There was no effect on cancer mortality.12 Interestingly, gemfibrozil's effect on HDL-C levels (increased 10%) was no better than that achieved by simvastatin at a dose of 40 mg per day (table 3, see p 401)
Table 3.
Lipid-lowering effects (%) of selected statin drugs*
| Agent (dose in mg) | Total cholesterol, mg/dL | LDL-C, mg/dL | HDL-C, mg/dL | Triglycerides, mg/dL |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Atorvastatin calcium (80) |
-42 |
-54 |
+0 |
-25 |
| Atorvastatin calcium (40) |
-40 |
-51 |
+5 |
-32 |
| Simvastatin (80)† |
-35 |
-47 |
+8 |
-23 |
| Simvastatin (40) |
-30 |
-41 |
+10 |
-15 |
| Pravastatin (40) |
-24 |
-34 |
+6 |
-10 |
| Lovastatin (40) |
-23 |
-31 |
+5 |
-2 |
| Fluvastatin (40) | -19 | -23 | -3 | -13 |
Adapted from Jones P, Kafonek S, Laurora I, Humminghake D. Comparative dose efficacy study of atorvastatin, simvastatin, pravastatin, lovastatin, and fluvastatin in patients with hypercholesterolemia (the CURVES Study). Am J Cardiol 1998;81;582-587. This study was funded by the makers of atorvastatin calcium.
The 80-mg dose was not studied in the CURVES study. The 80-mg figures were taken from Davidson MH, Stein EA, Dujovne CA, et al. The efficacy and six-week tolerability of simvastatin 80 and 160 mg/day. Am J Cardiol 1997;79:38-42. This study was funded by the makers of simvastatin.
COMBINATION REGIMENS
A small randomized crossover trial comparing 3 regimens (nicotinic acid [NIC] at 400 mg 3 times a day, lovastatin [LOV] at 20 mg a day, or both) showed the following effects compared with no treatment, with TC representing total cholesterol level:
| TC, % | LDL, % | HDL | |
|---|---|---|---|
| NIC |
-6 |
-11 |
— |
| LOV |
-17 |
-25 |
— |
| NIC + LOV | -27 | -37 | — |
Two or even 3 drugs may be used together
In patients with hypercholesterolemia on a maximal-dose statin regimen, niacin or a bile acid sequestrant drug may be added
In patients with hypertriglyceridemia receiving a fibrate, niacin or a statin drug may be added
The risk of hepatitis, statin-induced myopathy, and rhabdomyolysis is increased when niacin and, especially, gemfibrozil are added. Patients taking combinations must be monitored closely
ESTROGEN
No adverse events were reported in this small trial. Vacek JL, Dittmeier G, Chiarelli T, White J, Bell HH. Comparison of lovastatin (20 mg) and nicotinic acid (1.2 g) with either drug alone for type II hyperlipoproteinemia. Am J Cardiol1995;76:182-184.
Decreases LDL-C levels 15% and increases HDL-C levels 20% to 30%
Can increase triglyceride levels; they should be monitored if initially high
Case-control studies suggest a 40% to 50% reduction in cardiovascular events
In postmenopausal women with a history of CAD, however, treatment with a combination of estrogen and progesterone (Pempro) did not lower the overall rates of MI or death from CAD over an average follow-up of 4.1 years.13 This occurred despite 10% lowering of LDL-C levels and 11% raising of HDL-C levels in the estrogen group compared with the placebo group
OTHER DYSLIPIDEMIAS
Hypertriglyceridemia
Associated risk factors
The role of triglycerides as an independent risk factor for coronary artery disease remains unclear14
Triglyceride levels higher than 5.65 mmol/L (500 mg/dL) are associated with acute pancreatitis
Gemfibrozil, nicotinic acid, and statins are the most effective agents at decreasing triglyceride levels
ATP III Classification of serum triglyceride levels (mmol/L [mg/dL])
Triglyceride conversion factor: 1 mmol/L=88.6 mg/dL
The effect of statins on triglyceride levels is roughly proportional to the effect on LDL-C levels (see table 3).
<1.70 (<150): normal
1.70-2.25 (150-199): borderline high
2.26-5.64 (200-499): high
≥5.65 (≥500): very high
Treatment of Hypertriglyceridemia
Non-HDL cholesterol = total cholesterol — HDL
If triglyceride levels are higher than 5.65 mmol/L (>500 mg/dL), the level should first be lowered to prevent pancreatitis. This should be done with a triglyceride-lowering drug (fibrate or niacin) and weight loss through a very-low-fat diet and exercise
When triglyceride levels are below 5.65 mmol/L (<500 mg/dL), LDL-C level-lowering therapy becomes the priority
In patients with triglyceride levels higher than 2.26 mmol/L (>200 mg/dL) after the LDL-C goal is reached, the sum of LDL plus very-low-density-lipoprotein (VLDL) cholesterol (a non-HDL cholesterol) is a secondary target. A goal of a level of non-HDL cholesterol 30 mg/dL higher than the LDL-C goal should be sought
Non-HDL cholesterol targets for patients with triglyceride levels higher than 2.26 mmol/L (>200 mg/dL) after attaining LDL-C goal
| LDL-C Goal, mg/dL | Non-HDL-C Goal | |
|---|---|---|
| CAD or equivalent | <100 | <130 |
| ≥2 risk factors | <130 | <160 |
| 0 or 1 risk factor | <100 | <130 |
Low HDL-C Level (<1.03 mmol/L [<40 mg/dL])
Associated risk factors
Independently associated with coronary events. Low HDL-C level increases risk even when total cholesterol level is less than 2.26 mmol/L (<200 mg/dL)
Every 1 mg/dL decrease in HDL-C levels is associated with a 2% to 3% increased risk of coronary events
Levels are decreased by cigarette smoking, sedentary lifestyle, obesity, and use of β-blockers and anabolic steroids
Levels are increased by moderate alcohol use, exercise, and weight reduction
Statins, fibric acid derivatives, and niacin all increase HDL-C levels, with the greatest effects (20%-30% increase) produced by niacin
Treatment
First reach LDL-C goal
Weight loss through diet and exercise
If triglyceride levels are 2.26 to 5.64 mmol/L (200-499 mg/dL), achieve non-HDL-C goal
If triglyceride levels are below 2.26 mmol/L (<200 mg/dL) (isolated low HDL-C level) in a patient with CAD or equivalent, consider administering nicotinic acid or a fibrate
Table 1.
Agents for treating hyperlipidemia
| Drug (trade name)* | Dosage form | Dosage range |
|---|---|---|
| Statins† | ||
| Atorvastatin calcium (Lipitor) | 10, 20, 40 mg | 10-40 mg PO per day (any time of day) |
| Lovastatin (Mevacor) | 10, 20, 40 mg | 10-80 mg PO each evening |
| Fluvastatin (Lescol) | 20, 40 mg | 20-40 mg PO each evening |
| Pravastatin (Pravachol) | 10, 20, 40 mg | 10-40 mg PO each evening |
| Simvastatin (Zocor) |
5, 10, 20, 40, 80 mg |
5-80 mg PO each evening |
| Fibrates | ||
| Gemfibrozil (Lopid) | 600 mg | 600 mg PO twice a day before meals |
| Fenofibrate (Tricor) | 67 mg | 201 mg per day |
| Colestipol hydrochloride (Colestid) |
1 packet = 5 g |
5 mg PO per day-15 mg twice a day |
| Bile acid sequestrants | ||
| Cholestyramine resin (Questran) |
4-g packets |
4-12 g in 8 oz of water PO twice a day |
| Niacin | ||
| Niacin (nicotinic acid) |
500 mg |
1-2 PO 3 times a day with food |
| Female hormones | ||
| Conjugated estrogens (Premarin) |
0.625 mg |
0.625 mg PO per day |
| PO = by mouth. | ||
The trade name is given for information purposes only and should not be interpreted as endorsement by either the authors of this article or wjm's editors.
Cerivastatin sodium (Baycol) was taken off the market because of its association with an excessive incidence of fatal rhabdomyolis.
This article is part of the series of extracts from The Bellevue Guide to Outpatient Medicine—An Evidence-Based Guide to Primary Care, published in 2001 by BMJ Publishing Group.
Competing interests: None declared
References
- 1.Andrade SE, Walker AM, Gottlieb LK, et al. Discontinuation of antihyperlipidemic drugs: do rates reported in clinical trials reflect rates in primary care settings? N Engl J Med1995;332: 1125-1131. In this retrospective, health maintenance organization-based cohort study, rates of discontinuation at 1 year were 46% for niacin, 41% for bile acid sequestrants, 37% for gemfibrozil, and 15% for lovastatin. Discontinuation rates were higher than those reported in randomized trials. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study Group. Randomised trial of cholesterol lowering in 4444 patients with coronary heart disease: the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S). Lancet1994;344: 1383-1389. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Prevention of cardiovascular events and death with pravastatin in patients with coronary heart disease and a broad range of initial cholesterol levels. The Long-Term Intervention with Pravastatin in Ischaemic Disease (LIPID) Study Group. N Engl J Med1998;339: 1349-1357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Sacks FM, Pfeffer MA, Moye LA, et al. The effect of pravastatin on coronary events after myocardial infarction in patients with average cholesterol levels. N Engl J Med1996;335: 1001-1009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Shepherd J, Cobbe SM, Ford I, et al for the West of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study Group. Prevention of coronary heart disease with pravastatin in men with hypercholesterolemia. N Engl J Med1995;333: 1301-1307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Downs JR, Clearfield M, Weis S. Primary prevention of acute coronary events with lovastatin in men and women with average cholesterol level: results of AFCAPS/TexCAPS. JAMA1998;279: 1615-1622. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Bucher HC, Griffith LE, Guyatt GH. Effect of HMG CoA reductase inhibitors on stroke: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ann Intern Med1998;128: 89-95. The RRR for stroke was 24% (95% confidence interval, 8%-38%). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.The Coronary Drug Project Research Group. Clofibrate and niacin in coronary heart disease. JAMA1975;231: 360-381. This was the first of 5 trials of niacin to show statistically significant reductions in coronary events. None of the 5 studies was sufficiently powered to demonstrate mortality reductions.1088963 [Google Scholar]
- 9.Goldberg A. Clinical trial experience with extended-release niacin (Niaspan): dose-escalation study. Am J Cardiol1998;82: 35U-38U. In 87 subjects, there were no cases of aminotransferase elevations of more than 3 times normal. Nonetheless, 47% of patients receiving niacin dropped out compared with 22% of patients receiving placebo. Flushing was noted by 85% but tended to disappear over time. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Lipid Research Clinics Program: The Lipid Research Clinics Coronary Primary Prevention Trial results, I: reduction in incidence of coronary heart disease. II: the relationship of reduction in incidence of coronary heart disease due to cholesterol lowering. JAMA1984;251: 351-374. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Manninen V, Tenkanen L, Koskinen P, et al. Joint effects of serum triglyceride and LDL cholesterol and HDL cholesterol concentrations on coronary heart disease risk in the Helsinki Heart Study. Circulation1992;85: 37-45. This was not the only study to demonstrate increased mortality with a fibrate. In the WHO Clofibrate Study, clofibrate increased total mortality by 20% in a trial of 10,000 men. See Committee of Principle Investigators. A cooperative trial in the primary prevention of ischaemic heart disease using clofibrate. Br Heart J 1978;40:1069-1118.1728471 [Google Scholar]
- 12.Rubins HB, Robins SJ, Collins D, et al. Gemfibrozil for the secondary prevention of coronary heart disease in men with low levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. N Engl J Med1999;341: 410-418. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Hulley S, Grady D, Bush T, et al. Randomized trial of estrogen plus progestin for secondary prevention of coronary heart disease in postmenopausal women. JAMA1998;280: 605-613. HERS was the first substantial randomized trial of estrogen replacement therapy for the prevention of heart disease. Previous cohort and case-control studies (ie, observational studies) had shown 35% to 85% reductions in the risk of coronary events in women taking estrogen replacement. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Jeppesen J, Hein HO, Suadicani P, Gyntelberg F. Triglyceride concentration and ischemic heart disease: an eight-year follow-up in the Copenhagen Male Study. Circulation1998;97: 1029-1036. After adjusting for confounders, this cohort study found a relative risk of 2.2 for men in the highest tertile of triglyceride levels (>1.60 mmol/L[>142 mg/dL]) compared with the lowest tertile (<1.10 mmol/L[<97 mg/dL]). However, when triglyceride levels were analyzed as continuous data in a conventional multivariate analysis, there was no increase in risk. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
