Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2026 May 28.
Published in final edited form as: Talanta. 2025 Dec 16;300:129261. doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2025.129261

Calibration-Free Ion-Selective Electrodes: A Critical Review of Design Strategies, Materials, and Applications in Sensing

Pavel Sengupta 1, Dipankar Koley 1,*
PMCID: PMC12765629  NIHMSID: NIHMS2132513  PMID: 41422798

Abstract

Ion-selective electrodes (ISEs) are powerful analytical tools for potentiometric ion sensing, yet their widespread application, particularly in decentralized and real-time monitoring, has been perennially constrained by the need for frequent and technically demanding calibration. This procedural bottleneck undermines their utility for portable, wearable, and in situ deployments. The development of calibration-free ISEs (CF-ISEs) represents a paradigm shift that aims to decouple the ion concentration measurements from the prerequisite of on-site calibration. In this review, we critically examine the foundational principles and core requirements that define this emerging class of sensors. We explore the diverse and innovative mechanisms enabling calibration-free operation, categorizing them as ion-to-electron transduction modes, structural and material innovations, and electrochemical conditioning techniques. A specific case study on screen-printed ISEs for Na+ and Ca2+ analysis is presented to illustrate the practical realization and performance of these systems. Furthermore, we explore the significant benefits and expanding applications of CF-ISEs across environmental, biomedical, and industrial sectors. Finally, we address persistent challenges, including long-term stability, complex matrix effects, and material limitations, and outline the key future research directions poised to propel CF-ISEs from laboratory curiosities to robust, commercially viable analytical platforms.

Keywords: Ion-Selective Electrode, Calibration-Free, Potentiometry, Solid Contact, Electrochemical Sensors, Point-of-Care Testing

1. Introduction

Calibration-free ion-selective electrodes (CF-ISEs) represent a significant advancement in electrochemical sensing that aims to eliminate the need for frequent calibration, a major limitation of traditional ISEs.[1–5] These sensors are designed to provide accurate ion concentration measurements without requiring on-site calibration, making them highly suitable for decentralized, portable, and real-time monitoring applications.[3,5–7] For an ISE to be considered “calibration free,” it must possess a known stable intercept, along with a reproducible Nernstian or near-Nernstian response. This means that after an initial calibration (or even without it in an “ideal” scenario), the ISE should not require further calibration in fresh solution to correct for drift in the intercept of its linear calibration curve.[1–3,7–9] The term calibration free can be understood in two ways: broadly, applied to analytical tools needing only an initial calibration after fabrication, or more restrictively, applied to sensors capable of directly providing analyte concentration without any calibration at all.[1,2,5,6,10–18]

The primary purpose of developing CF-ISEs is to move measurements from laboratory settings to the actual site of interest, overcoming the limitations of traditional ISEs, which often require technically demanding on-site calibration.[3,6] This innovation enhances accessibility and affordability for electrolyte measurements, especially for at-home, wearable, transdermal, and implantable sensors (Figure 1).[19–21]

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Design strategies, material synthesis, and sensing applications toward fabricating calibration-free ion-selective electrodes.

Advantages of CF-ISEs include operational simplicity and convenience, as they eliminate the time-consuming and cumbersome process of performing calibration curves before each experiment. Their design facilitates portability and miniaturization, making them suitable for portable, scalable, and single-use analytical devices.[1,3,12,14] They are generally simpler and cheaper to develop and operate than other techniques, offering significant cost-effectiveness. CF-ISEs demonstrate enhanced applicability across diverse environments, including remote water sample analysis, complex matrices such as biological fluids (e.g., undiluted human serum, blood, artificial sweat), and industrial wastewater, while remaining insensitive to sample color, viscosity, or suspended solids. They enable real-time and long-term monitoring through in situ analysis with minimal or no maintenance, which is crucial for continuous monitoring in environmental, clinical, and industrial applications. Finally, they aim for and often achieve high accuracy and reproducibility, with strong sensor-to-sensor consistency, stable standard potentials, and precise measurements.[1,3,7,11,22–34]

2. Underlying Mechanisms and Strategies for Calibration-Free Operation

The realization of CF-ISEs hinges on a range of sophisticated strategies designed to address the fundamental challenge that necessitates recalibration: the inherent instability of the interfacial potential (Figure 2). In conventional solid-contact ISEs, the buried interface between the ion-selective membrane (ISM) and the electron-conducting substrate is often ill-defined and susceptible to the formation of a parasitic aqueous layer that leads to unpredictable and drifting potentials.[1–4,7,15,23,35] The mechanisms to overcome these issues are not singular but represent a convergence of innovations (Figure 1) in materials science, electrochemical control, and sensor architecture, each providing a unique pathway to achieving a stable and reproducible analytical signal.[1–3,6,7,9–12,18,25,28,35–45]

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Underlying mechanisms and strategies undertaken for designing calibration-free ion-selective electrodes (ISEs). (A) Colloid-imprinted mesoporous carbon with a redox couple solid contact-based K+-ISE offered an innovative material design solution toward maintaining a fixed phase boundary potential, thereby achieving a reproducible standard potential E°.[16] (B) Electrochemical treatment of solid contact to maintain a precisely controlled potential was achieved through short-circuiting and current pulsing of the ISE versus an Ag/AgCl reference electrode, thereby “programming” the E° and ISE intercept reproducibly, as given by the K+-ISE responses.[8] (C) Innovative architectural ISE design for fabricating a “self-calibrated ISE” that connected the working and reference electrodes to establish a stable internal potential. The bridge acted as a one-point calibration for enhanced sensing reproducibility.[12] (D) Experimental schematic and Nernstian calibration curves for coulometric calibration-free K+ ISE versus TBA+-ISE provided the direct potentiometric measurement of concentration rather than activity. This approach also completely bypassed ionic strength limitations of traditional ISE measurements while providing a unique paper-based platform.[53]

A primary strategy focuses on fundamentally stabilizing the phase boundary potential at its source. This stability is achieved through the rational design of the solid-contact transducer material. For instance, colloid-imprinted mesoporous carbon offers a compelling solution.[1,7,16,35,46] Its engineered structure provides an intrinsically hydrophobic, high-capacitance interface that physically resists the formation of a water layer, while the low density of its redox-active surface functional groups minimizes parasitic electrochemical reactions. This passive stability can be transformed into active potential control by incorporating a hydrophobic redox buffer, such as a well-defined Co(II)/Co(III) complex, into the sensing membrane (Figure 2A).[1,4,16,35] This redox couple acts as an internal potential poise, effectively “pinning” the phase boundary potential at a fixed value. This approach is remarkably effective and capable of reducing the standard deviation of the standard potential (E°) among replicate electrodes to an unprecedented 0.7 mV or as low as 0.3 mV, a level of reproducibility that makes calibration-free operation a tangible reality.[35,47] In the latter examples, K+ and H+ ions were detected respectively with outstanding ISE potential drifts of 20 μV/h for K+ (measured over 100 h) and 7 μV/h for H+ (measured over 260 h) in standard solutions.

Building upon this, another powerful approach involves the direct electrochemical manipulation of the standard potential. This is particularly effective for solid contacts based on conducting polymers such as PEDOT.[42] By applying a minute, constant current (in the pA to nA range) or a fixed potential, the redox state of the polymer can be precisely controlled and maintained (Figure 2B). This active treatment effectively fixes the back-contact potential and, consequently, the intercept of the sensor’s calibration curve.[2,8,9] A brilliantly simplified, instrument-free version of this technique involves short-circuiting the solid-contact ISE with a conventional Ag/AgCl reference electrode while it is immersed in a solution of the primary ion.[9] This action induces a spontaneous current flow that drives the redox state of the conducting polymer until its potential equilibrates with that of the reference electrode, thereby “programming” the E° to a known, reproducible value without compromising the Nernstian slope (Figure 2B).[9] The concentration of the primary ions in the short-circuiting solution determined the equilibrium potential.[2,9]

Beyond manipulating the electrode material itself, innovative architectural designs provide system-level solutions.[12,43,44,48] The concept of a self-calibrating ISE exemplifies this approach. Here, a built-in ionic conductor connects the indicator and reference electrodes, establishing a stable internal electromotive force (EMF) baseline.[12] This internal bridge acts as a dynamic one-point calibration that actively corrects for variabilities in absolute potential among identically fabricated sensors (Figure 2C). Ion measurements are subsequently based on the EMF change relative to this stable internal baseline, rather than an absolute potential reading. This design elegantly circumvents the issue of drift and dramatically improves sensor-to-sensor consistency, reducing relative EMF variability to less than 2.0 mV.[12] Similarly, perfectly symmetric measuring systems, which use optimized membrane technologies and reference electrodes, achieve exceptional stability by balancing the electrochemical potentials across the entire cell assembly.[10,12,43]

Perhaps the most innovative strategy abandons the Nernstian potentiometric measurement paradigm altogether in favor of a coulometric approach. This method leverages Faraday’s law of electrolysis for an absolute, calibration-free determination of ion concentration.[5,6,10,11,17] A thin-layer sample of precisely known volume is confined against an ultrathin ISM, which is in contact with an ion-to-electron transducer, such as the conducting polymer poly(3-octylthiophene).[1,5,11,18,45] The sample layer thickness not exceeding that of the diffusion layer (usually <100 μm) can reduce detection time.[6] Thin layer coulometric detection depends on a precisely known sample volume (usually <100 μL) which is maintained through a custom-designed microfluidic electrochemical cell.[5,10,17,45,49] A nitrite-ISE based on these principles was able to achieve a low 10 μM detection limit in undiluted urine and tap water along with a workable range of 20–100 μM in different matrices.[49] In another case, with a specially designed microfluidic cell to precisely control the sample thickness (<100 μm) and low sample volumes (50 μL), a calibration-free detection of K+ was achieved having the working range 1–37.5 μM detected with 5 μL sample volumes and an average coulometry efficiency of 96%.[17] An applied cathodic potential sweep alters the polymer’s oxidation state, triggering the quantitative transport and accumulation of the target cation from the sample into the ISM. Further, the potential sweep technique provides a unique platform for multianalyte sensing.[5,18,45,50,51] The total charge transferred during this exhaustive depletion process is measured and, through Faraday’s law, is directly converted to the molar amount of the analyte, providing a direct concentration readout and completely obviating the need for calibration standards.[5,6,10,17] This technique has been successfully validated for K+ detection in real-world samples, demonstrating remarkable accuracy and temperature independence.[17,18] Further, a linear detection range of 10−5 to 10−2 M for Ca2+ with a Nernstian slope and a repeatability relative standard deviation of <2% (10 days) have been reported.[5] In a later work, the group reported a Ca2+ coulometric CF-ISE potentiometric working range of 0.25−0.75 mM (3% precision) and coulometric working range of 0.02−0.12 mM (2% precision).[52] Interestingly, the potentiometric measurement uncouples the excitation and the detector sources in comparison to coulometry.[52] Different electrochemical techniques such as chronoamperometry, linear sweep and cyclic voltammetry were used for multi-cation detection.[5,18,45,50] Simplified cell designs based on graphite-ink-printed and Ag/AgCl paste-printed electrodes to detect TEA+ and K+ respectively have also been reported.[51] This opens the possibility of mass production using the screen-printing technique although precision of measurement was improved using a designed electrolysis cell.[51] Coulometric approach has been remarkably successful in ion-selective detection in undiluted human fluids and environmental samples.[49,50] and serves as a promising field of research towards CF-ISEs.

Finally, clever chemical strategies are being used to address matrix effects, such as variations in ionic strength, which can confound potentiometric measurements by altering ion activities.[53] One such design uses a tetrabutylammonium (TBA+)-selective membrane as a reference electrode. Because the activity coefficients for many target cations (e.g., K+) and TBA+ change in a parallel fashion with varying ionic strength, the differential measurement between the sensing and reference electrodes effectively cancels out this influence, allowing for the direct potentiometric measurement of concentration rather than activity (Figure 2D).[53] As a result, an extremely low potential change of <1 mV between the K+ ISE and TBA+ ISE were reported while individual ISEs had similar changes of ~ 4 mV versus a commercial reference electrode, further cementing the prospect of this approach.[53]

Collectively, these diverse and creative mechanisms, from advanced materials such as single-walled carbon nanotubes and novel polymeric back contacts to active electrochemical control, intelligent system architectures, and fundamentally new measurement principles, are altering the landscape of electrochemical sensing. They demonstrate a sophisticated and multifaceted effort to engineer robust, reliable, and user-friendly ISEs that are truly liberated from the constraints of calibration.

3. Performance Characteristics

The advanced mechanisms underpinning CF-ISEs translate directly into exceptional analytical performance, validating their potential for robust, real-world deployment. A main characteristic of these devices is their consistent exhibition of near-Nernstian responses, a critical indicator of theoretical ideality (Figure 3). For instance, systems that use advanced PEDOT:PEDOT-S (S=sulfonated) back contacts achieve remarkable precision, with slopes of 57.2 ± 0.2 mV/decade for K+ and 28.5 ± 0.3 mV/decade for Ca2+ (Figure 3A).[2] This was achieved by a mechanically and electrochemically stable polymeric back contact (PEDOT:PEDOT-S) combined with an applied low constant current (few nA) charging and pulsing treatment, in a relevant primary analyte solution. This resulted in fixing the background potential at a desired fixed intercept value across different ionophores (K+, Ca2+). (Figure 3A). This has been highlighted by multiple overlapping calibration curves for the two cations reported (Figure 3A).[2] This high degree of accuracy is complemented by impressive sensitivity, with detection limits pushing into the low and even sub-micromolar range, including reported values of 1.68 μM for K+ and an outstanding 0.45 μM for Ca2+.[2] Furthermore, novel methods such as coulometry-based detection have proven highly effective for K+ analysis within the physiologically relevant 5–40 μM range.[11] Development of CF-ISEs should be aimed at extending the detection limits without compromising sensor performance, reproducibility of intercept and prolonged operation in complex analyte matrices.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Performance criteria for calibration-free ISEs demonstrated with multiple overlapping calibration curves in fresh solutions. (A) Structure of PEDOT:PEDOT-S and schematic of PEDOT:PEDOT-S based calibration-free Ca2+ and K+ ISE design on standard gold electrodes. Mechanically and electrochemically stable PEDOT:PEDOT-S back contact and electrochemical treatment combined to fix the intercept and provide multiple overlapping ISE calibration curves across batches for mono and divalent cations.[2] (B) PEDOT:PEDOT-S back contact-based screen-printed ISEs with similar electrochemical treatment provided multiple overlapping ISE calibration curves and remarkable reproducibility of the calibration intercept across 7 days as reported in the calibration plots.[3] (C) Exceptional calibration stability of 6 months offered by pH-ISEs with poly(decyl methacrylate)-based sensing membranes covalently attached to an inert polymer substrate and a conductive carbon contact.[47]Fabrication of theses CF-ISEs have been highlighted in the schematic with corresponding image of the pH-ISE.

Crucially, these sensors demonstrate the extraordinary stability required for calibration-free operation.[2,3] The high reproducibility of multiple overlapping calibration curves (intercepts) is consistently maintained across different manufacturing batches and over operational periods spanning from 12 hours to 7 days (Figure 3B).[3,35] As a case study, these CF-ISEs on a screen-printed electrode design presented a suitable leap from laboratory to field-deployable solid ISEs while maintaining near-Nernstian response and favorable selectivity.[3] As noted before, an applied low constant current (few nA) charging and pulsing treatment, in a relevant primary analyte solution, allowed fixing the background potential at a desired fixed intercept value across different ionophores (K+, Ca2+) (Figure 3B) demonstrating the effectiveness of this treatment technique.[3] A measured 7-day intercept drift of around 4 mV for both Na+ and Ca2+ CF-ISEs (N=6) were observed. This work demonstrated the practical realization of lab-to-field deployment of CF-ISEs, which is the end goal.[3] Multiple overlapping ISE calibration curves within and across batches were also reported for both Na+ and Ca2+ (Figure 3B). In a remarkable display of robustness, these electrodes can be stored dry for prolonged durations and deployed without reconditioning, a significant operational advantage over their conventional counterparts.

This stability is quantitatively striking and has further been achieved by a standard potential (E°) benchmark approach with advanced colloid-imprinted mesoporous carbon-based ISEs exhibiting exceptionally low potential drifts along with stable and reproducible E° values. [16,35,47] For example, a K+ ISE was reported with a 59.5 mV/decade response and an internal reference redox couple to fix the E° of the ISM.[16] This produced remarkable E° control with ~0.7 mV standard deviation and low drift (1.3 μV/h) measured over 70 h. Another version of K+ ISE fabricated with cobalt redox buffer functionalized in colloid-imprinted mesoporous carbon reported an exceptionally stable E° with standard deviation of ~0.3 mV and potential drift of 20 μV/h measured over 100 h.[35] A different approach without redox buffers in the ISM employed the use of covalently attaching the ionophore to a poly(decyl methacrylate) sensing membrane to produce calibration-free pH-ISEs (Figure 3C).[47] The best in class stability and reproducibility of E° (0.2 mV standard deviation) with long-term potential drift as low as 7 μV/h over 260 h were reported. This highlights the important influence of ISM mechanical integrity on performance towards calibration-free nature, particularly storage and operational stability over long-term (6 months) (Figure 3C).[47] The stability and reproducibility of E° towards calibration-free ISEs has been studied and implemented for the past few decades; and have been summarized elsewhere.[1] Notably, these performance gains of CF-ISEs are achieved without compromising the inherent selectivity of the ionophore-based membranes, which continue to effectively discriminate against major interfering ions. These characteristics collectively affirm that CF-ISEs are a mature technology capable of delivering high-fidelity analytical data.

4. Advantages and Applications

The liberation of ISEs from the constraints of frequent calibration represents a paradigm shift in analytical chemistry, fundamentally altering not only how measurements are performed, but also where they can be deployed. This innovation unlocks a cascade of advantages that collectively transition potentiometry from predominantly a laboratory-bound technique to a versatile, field-forward analytical powerhouse.[3,6] The most immediate benefit is a profound enhancement in operational simplicity. By obviating the need for cumbersome, multipoint calibrations with freshly prepared standards, these sensors democratize chemical analysis, making sophisticated measurements accessible to non-specialist users and enabling robust, autonomous operation in remote or resource-limited settings. On a sensor design level, with the development of autonomous ISE fabrication technologies, electrode performance reproducibility can be ensured, provided that it is cost-effective.[37,39] This simplification drastically reduces the time, labor, and reagent costs associated with traditional potentiometric analysis, thereby increasing both throughput and economic feasibility.

Such operational freedom in design and usage is the critical enabler for radical miniaturization and the development of entirely new sensing modalities. Without the requirement for external calibration solutions and associated fluidics, ISEs can be seamlessly integrated into compact, self-contained devices. This development has catalyzed an explosion of innovation in healthcare, paving the way for wearable sensors that continuously monitor electrolytes such as sodium and potassium in sweat, providing real-time insights into a user’s hydration and metabolic state.[14,54,55] The potential extends to transdermal and implantable biosensors for the long-term management of chronic conditions such as heart, renal, and parathyroid diseases, where continuous monitoring can provide critical, actionable data. In the realm of point-of-care diagnostics, CF-ISEs are poised to revolutionize rapid testing, delivering laboratory-grade accuracy in the analysis of complex biological matrices such as undiluted human blood serum, with a precision that meets stringent clinical requirements across both normal and pathological ranges.[14,21,54,55]

The impact of this technology extends far beyond the biomedical sphere. In environmental science, CF-ISEs enable unprecedented capabilities for in situ, long-term monitoring. Deployable sensor networks can provide continuous, real-time data on nutrient levels in agricultural hydroponics solutions, assess soil health for precision agriculture, or track pollutants and essential mineral content in natural water bodies and industrial effluents.[3,31,33] Their intrinsic insensitivity to sample turbidity, color, and viscosity makes them exceptionally well-suited for direct analysis in these challenging environments.[30,31,33]

Furthermore, industrial applications are rapidly emerging. In the burgeoning field of energy storage, these sensors offer a powerful tool for monitoring real-time state of health and battery charge by tracking ionic species within the electrolyte.[56] They are also being integrated into industrial process control streams for continuous quality assurance and optimization, as well as for the analysis of raw materials such as ores and agricultural feedstuffs.[24,31,33] In essence, the advent of CF-ISEs is not merely an incremental improvement, but a transformative leap, enabling robust, accurate, and autonomous chemical sensing at the point of need across a vast and expanding scientific and technological landscape.

5. Challenges and Limitations

Despite the transformative potential of CF-ISEs, their transition from controlled laboratory prototypes to universally deployed analytical tools is impeded by a series of formidable challenges. These hurdles, rooted in fundamental materials science, interfacial electrochemistry, and the complexities of real-world sample matrices, represent the active frontiers of research in the field. Addressing them is paramount to realizing the full promise of this technology (Figure 4).

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Overcoming challenges and limitations of calibration-free ion-selective electrodes (ISEs) can be seen from different lenses such as potential stability and reproducibility, materials design, application-specific ease of use, and overcoming operational challenges through intelligent design and standardization. (A) Illustration of a wearable solid-contact Ca2+ sensor embedded inside a microfluidic device for perspiration analysis and recorded data for Ca2+ concentrations in iontophoresis sweat samples.[21] (B) Electron micrographs of different conducting carbon solid contacts for both solid-state ISE and reference electrode designs can be beneficial toward the fabrication of calibration-free sensors and systems. Sustained material research into this field is paramount for providing the generational leap of calibration-free operation.[7] (C) Voltammetry-based coulometric ISEs in thin-layer samples in a microfluidic cell offer an alternative calibration-free approach to bypass ionic strength limitations in diluted real water samples by providing the K+ concentration directly.[17]

5.1. Stability and Reproducibility Issues

The central challenge in realizing truly autonomous ISEs lies in conquering the inherent instabilities that necessitate calibration in the first place. The Achilles’ heel of many all-solid-state designs remains the buried interface between the ISM and the solid-contact transducer. This junction is often electrochemically ill-defined, giving rise to drifting potential that undermines long-term analytical reliability. A primary antagonist in this scenario is the formation of an aqueous layer at the interface.[1,2,8,35] This parasitic water film, even if nanoscopic, acts as a dynamic reservoir for both primary and interfering ions, creating an uncontrolled mixed potential, degrading detection limits, and introducing an unwelcome sensitivity to sample osmolality. Over time, it can also lead to mechanical delamination and catastrophic sensor failure.

This interfacial instability is compounded by electrode-to-electrode irreproducibility. Even with nominally identical fabrication protocols, microscopic heterogeneities in materials and interfacial morphology can lead to significant variations in the absolute EMF between individual sensors. Although strategies and systems such as self-calibrating architectures can mitigate this, the root variability persists.[12,38] Consequently, even advanced calibration-free designs can exhibit residual signal drift. For instance, a reported potential drift of 300 μV/h in a calcium ISE, while small, can accumulate to a significant error over extended monitoring periods.[2] Achieving the long-term, unattended stability required for multiday or multiweek deployments, particularly under fluctuating environmental conditions, remains a formidable research frontier. Mitigating the root causes for ISE instability and irreproducibility can offer a faster response and more accurate concentration determination particularly in real complex matrices (Figure 4A).[21,54,57]

5.2. Material and Design-Specific Limitations

The very materials and architectural strategies that enable calibration-free operation also introduces their own unique sets of limitations. Conducting polymers, for example, are prized for their high redox capacitance and ion-to-electron transduction capabilities, yet they often exhibit insufficient long-term potential stability.[7,42] Their continuum of redox states, which can be influenced by subtle variations in crystallinity, conformation, and fabrication conditions, makes it exceptionally challenging to precisely fix the standard potential (E°) with the sub-millivolt reproducibility required for the most demanding applications. Similarly, although carbon-based materials offer cost-effectiveness, they can suffer from lower double-layer capacitance and undefined surface redox chemistry, which can compromise potential stability. Sustained material research into this field is paramount for providing the generational leap of calibration-free operation and future system architectures which translates to both structurally stable and functionally capable solid-contact CF-ISEs (Figure 4B).[7]

Furthermore, the sensor system is not isolated, as it is in constant dialogue with its environment. Many advanced transducer layers remain susceptible to interference from ambient gases such as O2 and CO2 and even light, which can introduce parasitic redox reactions and perturb the measured potential. Even the inclusion of sophisticated redox buffers is not a cure-all solution: over long operational lifetimes, the ionophores within the sensing membrane can facilitate the gradual leaching of these essential, potential-poising species from the membrane into the sample. Although scientifically elegant, these approaches often lack the scalability and cost-effectiveness required for mass production, highlighting a persistent tension between peak performance and manufacturability.

5.3. Application-Specific Challenges

Deploying a sensor in a real-world sample matrix, be it blood, soil extract, or industrial wastewater, introduces a new dimension of complexity far removed from the idealized conditions of a laboratory beaker. Complex matrices are rife with potential interferences (ions, proteins, and organic ligands) that can directly compete with the target analyte at the membrane surface or alter its activity. In some cases, sample pretreatment is required, a step that compromises the very on-site and user-friendly ethos of calibration-free sensing.

A more persistent challenge, particularly for long-term deployments, is biofouling.[54,58] The accumulation of biological films and other matrix components on the sensor surface can passivate the membrane, induce signal drift, and render the sensor’s response unrepresentative of the bulk sample, ultimately necessitating cleaning and recalibration. The solution to mitigate biofouling to make CF-ISEs is not a trivial one.[59] For example, a micrometer-sized pH-ISE was reported to provide a real-time response in the presence of complex dental biofilms.[60] A correction was reported based on the ISE response to H+ ions over the signal resulting from adsorption of multispecies biofilm (dental plaque) and protein or other biomacromolecules which could be mitigated (within reported time of 10 days) with a PTFE-AF (Teflon) coating on ISE. However, the pH-ISE was not calibration-free.[60] Simultaneously, the fundamental principle that ISEs measure ion activity, not concentration, becomes a critical issue in samples with variable or unknown ionic strength. Although clever designs that use dual-analyte referencing or coulometric ISE designs to bypass ionic strength considerations (Figure 4C) are promising and can mitigate this issue, it remains a significant hurdle.[43,53] Furthermore, the development of stable, miniaturized, solid-state reference electrodes continues to be a major bottleneck for the entire field. Although this field has seen some growth, further development in mechanically and electrochemically stable solid-state reference electrodes is crucial to unlock the future of calibration-free sensors.[7,36,61,62] The lack of a truly robust and universally applicable solid-state reference electrode often forces a compromise that limits the overall performance and operational lifetime of the entire sensing system.

5.4. Operational and Commercialization Hurdles

The final gauntlet for CF-ISEs is the transition from academic discovery to a commercially viable product. The complexity of many cutting-edge designs and their reliance on advanced materials developed in foundational research, often on expensive substrates such as gold or glassy carbon, creates significant barriers to cost-effective mass production.[2,47] There is a pressing need to translate these high-performance concepts into economical and scalable platforms, such as screen printing on carbon substrates, without compromising analytical fidelity.[3,7] For voltammetric ISEs with coulometric detection, a confined volume (such as 5.0 μL) and sample thickness of less than 100 μm necessitates a microfluidic cell designed for precise measurement and control.[17] For this system, a K+ concentration range of 1–37.5 μM was achieved in the sample.[17] This is made possible when the sample volume has been precisely defined and the analyte is taken to have an approximately 100% conversion and transport (the average coulometric efficiency reported was 96%).[17]

Practical implementation is further hindered by operational nuances. Many potentiometric sensors, despite advances, still require an initial conditioning step to ensure a stable response, a procedure that complicates their use in single-use or rapid-deployment scenarios. Perhaps most fundamentally, the very term calibration free lacks a universally accepted, standardized definition within the scientific community. This ambiguity can make it difficult to compare performance across different studies and platforms, creating a need for clearer reporting standards. Ultimately, the commercial success of these promising technologies hinges on solving these practical challenges to deliver sensors that are not only scientifically sound, but also demonstrably reliable, user friendly, and economically compelling for their target applications.

6. Future Directions

The trajectory of CF-ISEs is one of remarkable progress, yet the field is poised at the threshold of even greater innovation. The journey from laboratory curiosities to ubiquitous, autonomous analytical tools requires a concerted research effort focused on surmounting the remaining fundamental and practical challenges. The future of this technology will be defined by advancements across several key frontiers, from the molecular design of sensor materials to their seamless integration into intelligent, real-world systems.

6.1. Fundamental Mechanistic Understanding and Standardization

Underpinning all these applied goals is the need for a deeper, more fundamental understanding of the intricate electrochemical processes at the heart of the sensor. Advanced in situ and operando characterization techniques are required to probe the buried solid-contact/membrane interface, providing unprecedented insight into the mechanisms of ion-to-electron transduction and the origins of potential drift.[1] Systematic investigations into the long-term effects of environmental variables such as temperature and humidity are also crucial for developing robust compensation models. Finally, as the field matures, it must move toward standardization. Establishing clear, community-wide definitions for terms such as calibration free, and developing standardized protocols for performance evaluation, will be essential for ensuring the reliability and comparability of data, a prerequisite for regulatory approval and building ultimate user confidence in this transformative analytical technology.

6.2. Enhancing Stability and Reproducibility

The cornerstone of all future development remains the quest for absolute stability and perfect electrode-to-electrode reproducibility. This necessitates a continued and intensified exploration of novel solid-contact materials. The next generation of transducers must not only exhibit exceptional potential stability but must also be amenable to scalable and cost-effective manufacturing processes, moving beyond precious-metal substrates. A critical avenue of research involves the molecular engineering of redox buffers in order to design highly lipophilic couples with immense buffering capacity that are virtually immune to leaching over months or even years of continuous operation (Figure 4B).[7,35,46,47,58] Furthermore, the development of methodologies for the precise electrochemical “setting” of the standard potential (E°) to a universally defined value would enable the mass production of interchangeable sensors with sub-millivolt consistency (Figure 2B).[1,8,9] This goal is intrinsically linked to refining automated manufacturing protocols, which are essential to bridge the gap between bespoke laboratory fabrication and the production of highly consistent commercial sensors.

6.3. Expanding Scope and Versatility

With the foundations of stability becoming more established, the next grand challenge is to dramatically expand the analytical reach of CF-ISEs. Research must extend beyond canonical physiological electrolytes to a much wider array of target ions that are critical in environmental science, industrial processing, and clinical diagnostics (Figure 4A). This expansion involves not only the discovery and synthesis of new, highly selective ionophores, but also the adaptation of existing calibration-free strategies, such as coulometry, for a broader suite of analytes (Figure 2D, 4C).[6,10,11,18,44] A particularly vital area of focus is the design of sensors that are inherently robust to the rigors of complex sample matrices.[58] This requires the development of advanced membrane compositions and surface modifications that actively resist biofouling in biological fluids and fouling from natural organic matter in environmental samples.[58] Several lines of thought have been to fabricate ISEs with surface modifications containing anti-biofouling or anti-fouling materials.[63,64] or have specific pre-treatment (such as ionic strength adjustment in complex matrices) and ISE operation strategies have been employed for mitigation.[65,66] Design of hydrophobic ISM based ISEs have also been successful.[1,7] Use of Nafion or a charged membrane and a dialysis membrane on ISEs as a physical barrier from fouling have also been reported.[67–69] Careful choice of materials, techniques and strategies for fabricating anti-biofouling CF-ISEs are application dependent as well.[69] Proper attention is necessary to study the effect of biofouling conditions on CF-ISE characteristics which are presently yet to be reported. Deviations from standard ISE measurement conditions add another layer of complexity to this. Concurrently, the evolution from single-analyte sensors to integrated, multi-ion sensing arrays is paramount for applications such as physiological or environmental monitoring, where the interplay between different ions is critically important for further insights.[18,44,45]

6.4. Enhancing Performance Characteristics

The pursuit of enhanced analytical performance is relentless. Future research will drive toward ever-lower detection limits, pushing from the micromolar into the nanomolar and even picomolar regimes, which is essential for applications such as heavy metal monitoring in environmental waters.[70] This pursuit will demand novel ionophore-membrane systems engineered to minimize ion leakage from the sensor into the sample, which is often the limiting factor for trace-level analysis. Furthermore, as sensors are deployed in increasingly complex environments, the role of sophisticated data processing becomes crucial.[38,71] The integration of machine learning and advanced chemometric algorithms will be essential for creating intelligent sensors that can actively correct for interferences from competing ions and fluctuations in background matrix properties such as pH and ionic strength in real time, thereby ensuring high accuracy and precision.[38] We have already seen the advent of intelligent sensing methods and corresponding systems such as multi-ion detection using ISE arrays that can be valuable to mitigate signal error and recalibration needs in complex real-sample matrices of variable ionic strength.[71] New types of ISM membrane research for specific materials [72], design strategies, applications along with underlying mechanistic exploration of ISEs and CF-ISEs can all benefit from artificial intelligence and machine learning.[71–74] Attempts to dive deeper can lead to the understanding of ISE fabrication parameters, characteristics and performance specifically under complex matrices, biofouling mitigation routes and structure-function relationships for CF-ISEs.[73] This can pave the way for efficiency of ISE development by creating different solutions and provide future autonomous CF-ISE measurement systems.[71–75]

6.5. Integration and Miniaturization for Practical Applications

The ultimate measure of success for this technology will be its seamless integration into devices that solve real-world problems (Figure 2C, 2D, 3B, 4A–C). A critical enabling technology for this transition is the development of a truly stable, miniaturized, and mass-producible solid-state reference electrode; its absence remains one of the most significant bottlenecks hindering the widespread deployment of portable potentiometric systems. With this piece in place, the vision of integrating CF-ISEs into flexible, wearable platforms for monitoring health through sweat or interstitial fluid can be fully realized.[54] This integration will require concurrent advances in biocompatible materials, power management, and wireless data transmission. The future will see these sensors incorporated into smart battery management systems for electric vehicles, embedded within industrial pipelines for process control, on-body healthcare devices, and forming the core of multimodal “lab-on-a-chip” diagnostic platforms.

Highlights.

  • Novel mechanisms for calibration-free operation of ISEs for decentralized monitoring

  • Critical performance characteristics reviewed with focus on operational stability and reproducibility

  • Materials science innovations enable fixed interfacial potentials without calibration requirements

  • Expanding applications across biomedical, environmental, and industrial sensing platforms

  • Future directions identified toward commercialization and deployment in complex real-world matrices

Acknowledgement

We greatly acknowledge the National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (Grant # 2R01DE027999-06A1 and 1R21DE034919-01) for their financial support for this research.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

Declaration of interests

The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests:

Dipankar Koley reports financial support was provided by National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research. If there are other authors, they declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

  • [1].Rousseau Celeste R., Bühlmann Philippe, Calibration-free potentiometric sensing with solid-contact ion-selective electrodes, Trends Anal. Chem 140 (2021) 116277. 10.1016/J.TRAC.2021.116277. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [2].Bahro C, Goswami S, Gernhart S, Koley D, Calibration-free Solid-State Ion-Selective Electrode Based on a Polarized PEDOT/PEDOT-S-Doped Copolymer as Back Contact, Anal. Chem 94 (2022) 8302–8308. 10.1021/acs.analchem.2c00748. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [3].Sengupta P, Ramsperger C, Koley D, Development of reusable screen-printed ion-selective electrodes with calibration-free operation, Sens. Actuators Rep 10 (2025) 100367. 10.1016/j.snr.2025.100367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [4].Zou XU, Zhen XV, Cheong JH, Bühlmann P, Calibration-Free Ionophore-Based Ion-Selective Electrodes With a Co(II)/Co(III) Redox Couple-Based Solid Contact, Anal. Chem 86 (2014) 8687–8692. 10.1021/ac501625z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [5].Grygolowicz-Pawlak E, Bakker E, Thin Layer Coulometry with Ionophore Based Ion-Selective Membranes, Anal. Chem 82 (2010) 4537–4542. 10.1021/ac100524z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [6].Bakker E, Can Calibration-Free Sensors Be Realized?, ACS Sens. 1 (2016) 838–841. 10.1021/acssensors.6b00247. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [7].Hu J, Stein A, Bühlmann P, Rational design of all-solid-state ion-selective electrodes and reference electrodes, TrAC Trends Anal. Chem 76 (2016) 102–114. 10.1016/j.trac.2015.11.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [8].Vanamo U, Bobacka J, Electrochemical control of the standard potential of solid-contact ion-selective electrodes having a conducting polymer as ion-to-electron transducer, Electrochim. Acta 122 (2014) 316–321. 10.1016/j.electacta.2013.10.134. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [9].Vanamo U, Bobacka J, Instrument-Free Control of the Standard Potential of Potentiometric Solid-Contact Ion-Selective Electrodes by Short-Circuiting with a Conventional Reference Electrode, Anal. Chem 86 (2014) 10540–10545. 10.1021/ac501464s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [10].Bhakthavatsalam Vishnupriya, Shvarev Alexey, Bakker Eric, Selective coulometric release of ions from ion selective polymeric membranes for calibration-free titrations, Analyst 131 (2006) 895–900. 10.1039/B602906J. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [11].Liu Yujie, Crespo Gastón A., Cuartero María, Approaching to Calibration-Free Ion Detection Based on Thin Layer Coulometry with Ultrathin Ion-Selective Membranes, ACS Meas. Au (2024). 10.1021/acsmeasuresciau.4c00069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [12].Adil N, Wang R, Wang X, Self-Calibrated Ion-Selective Electrodes, Anal. Chem 95 (2023) 11149–11156. 10.1021/acs.analchem.3c02135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [13].Gao L, Tian Y, Gao W, Xu G, Recent Developments and Challenges in Solid-Contact Ion-Selective Electrodes, Sensors 24 (2024) 4289. 10.3390/s24134289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [14].Rostampour M, Lawrence DJ Jr, Hamid Z, Darensbourg J, Calvo-Marzal P, Chumbimuni-Torres KY, Highly Reproducible Flexible Ion-selective Electrodes for the Detection of Sodium and Potassium in Artificial Sweat, Electroanalysis 35 (2023) e202200121. 10.1002/elan.202200121. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [15].Wang Xuewei, (Invited) Calibration-Free Ion-Selective Electrodes and Optodes for Decentralized Electrolyte Monitoring, Meet. Abstr (2023). 10.1149/ma2023-02632965mtgabs. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [16].Hu J, Zou XU, Stein A, Bühlmann P, Ion-Selective Electrodes with Colloid-Imprinted Mesoporous Carbon as Solid Contact, Anal. Chem 86 (2014) 7111–7118. 10.1021/ac501633r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [17].Liu Y, Crespo GA, Cuartero M, Voltammetric Ion-Selective Electrodes in Thin-Layer Samples: Absolute Detection of Ions Using Ultrathin Membranes, Anal. Chem 96 (2024) 1147–1155. 10.1021/acs.analchem.3c04224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [18].Cuartero M, Crespo GA, Bakker E, Ionophore-Based Voltammetric Ion Activity Sensing with Thin Layer Membranes, Anal. Chem 88 (2016) 1654–1660. 10.1021/acs.analchem.5b03611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [19].Yang M, Sun N, Lai X, Li Y, Zhao X, Wu J, Zhou W, Screen-Printed Wearable Sweat Sensor for Cost-Effective Assessment of Human Hydration Status through Potassium and Sodium Ion Detection, Micromachines 14 (2023) 1497. 10.3390/mi14081497. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [20].Wang S, Wu Y, Gu Y, Li T, Luo H, Li L-H, Bai Y, Li L, Liu L, Cao Y, Ding H, Zhang T, Wearable Sweatband Sensor Platform Based on Gold Nanodendrite Array as Efficient Solid Contact of Ion-Selective Electrode, Anal. Chem 89 (2017) 10224–10231. 10.1021/acs.analchem.7b01560. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [21].Guo Yang, Wang Chaoqi, Han Ge, Nyein Hnin Yin Yin, Wearable ion-selective sensors with rapid conditioning and extended stability achieved through modulation of water and ion transport, Biosens. Bioelectron. X 19 (2024) 100509–100509. 10.1016/j.biosx.2024.100509. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [22].Rezapour M, Monitoring Cerium Concentration in Waste Water Samples using a Novel All-Solid-State Electrode, Anal. Bioanal. Electrochem 15 (2023) 767–777. 10.22034/abec.2023.708106. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [23].Schwarz J, Trommer K, Gerlach F, Mertig M, All-Solid-State Screen-Printed Sensors for Potentiometric Calcium(II) Determinations in Environmental Samples, Am. J. Anal. Chem 09 (2018) 113–123. 10.4236/ajac.2018.93010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [24].Wang Liang, Cheng Ying, Lamb Dane, Megharaj Mallavarapu, Naidu Ravendra, Application of Ion Selective Electrode array to simultaneously determinate multi-free ions in solution, Environ. Technol. Innov 15 (2019) 100424. 10.1016/J.ETI.2019.100424. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [25].Plaxco K, CURRAS NA, Calibration free in-vivo measurement of analytes using electrochemical sensors, WO2019089465A1, 2019. https://patents.google.com/patent/WO2019089465A1/en (accessed November 28, 2025).
  • [26].Schwarz J, Trommer K, Gerlach F, Mertig M, All-Solid-State Screen-Printed Sensors for Potentiometric Calcium(II) Determinations in Environmental Samples, Am. J. Anal. Chem 09 (2018) 113–123. 10.4236/ajac.2018.93010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [27].Craggs A, Moody GJ, Thomas JDR, Calcium ion-selective electrode measurements in the presence of complexing ligands, Analyst 104 (1979) 961–972. 10.1039/AN9790400961. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [28].Rumpf G, Spichiger-Keller Ursula E., Bühler H, Simon Wilhelm, Calibration-Free Measurement of Sodium and Potassium in Undiluted Human Serum with an Electrically Symmetric Measuring System, Anal. Sci 8 (1992) 553–559. 10.2116/ANALSCI.8.553. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [29].Fayose Tolulope, Thomas Ellen, Radu Tanja, Dillingham Peter W., Ullah Sami, Radu Aleksandar, Concurrent measurement of nitrate and ammonium in water and soil samples using ion-selective electrodes: Tackling sensitivity and precision issues, 2 (2021) 279–288. 10.1002/ANSA.202000124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [30].Ivan Sekerka J Lechner, Ion selective electrode for determination of chloride ion in biological materials, food products, soils and waste water., J. - Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem 61 (1978) 1493–1495. 10.1093/JAOAC/61.6.1493. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [31].De Marco R, Clarke G, Pejcic B, Ion-Selective Electrode Potentiometry in Environmental Analysis, Electroanalysis 19 (2007) 1987–2001. 10.1002/elan.200703916. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [32].Forster Robert J., Keyes Tia E., Ion-Selective Electrodes in Environmental Analysis, (2000). 10.1002/9780470027318.A0837. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [33].Crespo GA, Recent Advances in Ion-selective membrane electrodes for in situ environmental water analysis, Electrochimica Acta 245 (2017) 1023–1034. 10.1016/j.electacta.2017.05.159. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [34].De Marco R, Clarke G, Pejcic B, Ion-Selective Electrode Potentiometry in Environmental Analysis, Electroanalysis 19 (2007) 1987–2001. 10.1002/elan.200703916. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [35].Kim M, Dong XIN, Spindler BD, Bühlmann P, Stein A, Functionalizing Carbon Substrates with a Covalently Attached Cobalt Redox Buffer for Calibration-Free Solid-Contact Ion-Selective Electrodes, Anal. Chem 96 (2024) 7558–7565. 10.1021/acs.analchem.4c00373. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [36].Zuliani C, Matzeu G, Diamond D, A liquid-junction-free reference electrode based on a PEDOT solid-contact and ionogel capping membrane, Talanta 125 (2014) 58–64. 10.1016/j.talanta.2014.02.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [37].Rojas D, Torricelli D, Cuartero M, Crespo GA, 3D-Printed Transducers for Solid Contact Potentiometric Ion Sensors: Improving Reproducibility by Fabrication Automation, Anal. Chem 96 (2024) 15572–15580. 10.1021/acs.analchem.4c02098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [38].Zhao Xueliang, Chen Ying, Xu Chongxuan, Wei Guanghua, Yuan Aijun, Calibration-free pH long-time measurement method based on electrode potential drift dynamic compensation-applying self-adaptive dynamic optimization exponential smoothing method, Meas. Sci. Technol 34 (2022) 025103–025103. 10.1088/1361-6501/ac94eb. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [39].Zhai J, Luo B, Liu T, Wang X, Zhao C, A Method for Automated Manufacturing of Ion-Selective Electrodes, IEEE Sens. Lett 9 (2025) 1–4. 10.1109/LSENS.2024.3503720. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [40].Kang A, Ryu J, Lee J, Kim S, Lee CY, Yun WS, Calibration curve-free electrochemical quantitation by micro-nano multi-scale gap devices, Microchim. Acta 188 (2021) 200. 10.1007/s00604-021-04861-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [41].Bartoszewicz B, Dąbrowska S, Lewenstam A, Migdalski J, Calibration free solid contact electrodes with two PVC based membranes, Sens. Actuators B Chem 274 (2018) 268–273. 10.1016/j.snb.2018.07.111. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [42].Bobacka J, Conducting Polymer-Based Solid-State Ion-Selective Electrodes, Electroanalysis 18 (2006) 7–18. 10.1002/elan.200503384. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [43].Ishige Y, Klink S, Schuhmann W, Intercalation Compounds as Inner Reference Electrodes for Reproducible and Robust Solid-Contact Ion-Selective Electrodes, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 55 (2016) 4831–4835. 10.1002/anie.201600111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [44].Zdrachek E, Bakker E, Electrochemically Switchable Polymeric Membrane Ion-Selective Electrodes, Anal. Chem 90 (2018) 7591–7599. 10.1021/acs.analchem.8b01282. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [45].Crespo GA, Cuartero M, Bakker E, Thin Layer Ionophore-Based Membrane for Multianalyte Ion Activity Detection, Anal. Chem 87 (2015) 7729–7737. 10.1021/acs.analchem.5b01459. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [46].Zhen XV, Rousseau CR, Bühlmann P, Redox Buffer Capacity of Ion-Selective Electrode Solid Contacts Doped with Organometallic Complexes, Anal. Chem 90 (2018) 11000–11007. 10.1021/acs.analchem.8b02595. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [47].Choi KR, Troudt BK, Bühlmann P, Ion-Selective Electrodes With Sensing Membranes Covalently Attached to Both the Inert Polymer Substrate and Conductive Carbon Contact, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 62 (2023) e202304674. 10.1002/anie.202304674. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [48].Tsou K-L, Cheng Y-T, Miniaturized inkjet-printed flexible ion-selective sensing electrodes with the addition of graphene in PVC layer for fast response real-time monitoring applications, Talanta 275 (2024) 126107. 10.1016/j.talanta.2024.126107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [49].Afshar MG, Crespo GA, Dorokhin D, Néel B, Bakker E, Thin Layer Coulometry of Nitrite with Ion-Selective Membranes, Electroanalysis 27 (2015) 609–615. 10.1002/elan.201400522. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [50].Cuartero M, Crespo GA, Bakker E, Ionophore-Based Voltammetric Ion Activity Sensing with Thin Layer Membranes, Anal. Chem 88 (2016) 1654–1660. 10.1021/acs.analchem.5b03611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [51].Tatsumi S, Omatsu T, Maeda K, Mousavi MPS, Whitesides GM, Yoshida Y, An all-solid-state thin-layer laminated cell for calibration-free coulometric determination of K+, Electrochimica Acta 408 (2022) 139946. 10.1016/j.electacta.2022.139946. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [52].Ghahraman Afshar M, Crespo GA, Bakker E, Coulometric Calcium Pump for Thin Layer Sample Titrations, Anal. Chem 87 (2015) 10125–10130. 10.1021/acs.analchem.5b02856. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [53].Soda Yoshiki, Bakker Eric, Ionic strength-independent potentiometric cation concentration sensing on paper using a tetrabutylammonium-based reference electrode, Sens. Actuators B-Chem 346 (2021) 130527. 10.1016/J.SNB.2021.130527. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [54].Lee J, Kim MC, Soltis I, Lee SH, Yeo W, Advances in Electrochemical Sensors for Detecting Analytes in Biofluids, Adv. Sens. Res 2 (2023) 2200088. 10.1002/adsr.202200088. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [55].Li Hui, Dauphin-Ducharme Philippe, Ortega Gabriel, Plaxco Kevin W., Calibration-Free Electrochemical Biosensors Supporting Accurate Molecular Measurements Directly in Undiluted Whole Blood., J. Am. Chem. Soc 139 (2017) 11207–11213. 10.1021/JACS.7B05412. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [56].Lyu Y, Zhang Y, Xu L, Zhong L, Sun Z, Ma Y, Bao Y, Gan S, Niu L, Solid-Contact Ion Sensing Without Using an Ion-Selective Membrane through Classic Li-Ion Battery Materials, Anal. Chem 93 (2021) 7588–7595. 10.1021/acs.analchem.0c05422. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [57].Harris AR, Zhang J, Bond AM, Applications of voltammetric ion selective electrodes to complex matrices, Anal. Methods 5 (2013) 3840–3852. 10.1039/C3AY40769A. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [58].Buhlmann P, Zhen XV, Hu J, (Invited) Ionophore-Doped Ion-Selective Electrode Membranes, ECS Meet. Abstr. MA2016–01 (2016) 2173. 10.1149/MA2016-01/45/2173. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [59].Bandodkar AJ, Wang J, Non-invasive wearable electrochemical sensors: a review, Trends Biotechnol. 32 (2014) 363–371. 10.1016/j.tibtech.2014.04.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [60].Nguyen AT, Goswami S, Ferracane J, Koley D, Real-time monitoring of the pH microenvironment at the interface of multispecies biofilm and dental composites, Anal. Chim. Acta 1201 (2022) 339589. 10.1016/j.aca.2022.339589. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [61].Sarbapalli D, Mishra A, Rodríguez-López J, Pt/Polypyrrole Quasi-References Revisited: Robustness and Application in Electrochemical Energy Storage Research, Anal. Chem 93 (2021) 14048–14052. 10.1021/acs.analchem.1c03552. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [62].Bahro C, Sengupta P, Koley D, PEDOT/PEDOT-S Copolymer-Based Nonaqueous Solid-State Reference Electrode with High Electrochemical and Mechanical Stability, Anal. Chem 97 (2025) 5454–5462. 10.1021/acs.analchem.4c04108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [63].Qi L, Jiang T, Liang R, Qin W, Polymeric membrane ion-selective electrodes with anti-biofouling properties by surface modification of silver nanoparticles, Sens. Actuators B Chem 328 (2021) 129014. 10.1016/j.snb.2020.129014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [64].Liu T, Liang R, Qin W, Anti-fouling TiO2-Coated Polymeric Membrane Ion-Selective Electrodes with Photocatalytic Self-Cleaning Properties, Anal. Chem 95 (2023) 6577–6585. 10.1021/acs.analchem.2c05514. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [65].Qi L, Liang R, Jiang T, Qin W, Anti-fouling polymeric membrane ion-selective electrodes, TrAC Trends Anal. Chem 150 (2022) 116572. 10.1016/j.trac.2022.116572. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [66].Harris AR, Zhang J, Cattrall RW, Bond AM, Applications of voltammetric ion selective electrodes to complex matrices, Anal. Methods 5 (2013) 3840–3852. 10.1039/C3AY40769A. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [67].Fish SJ, Brassard P, Dialysis membrane to prevent cadmium ion specific electrode fouling, Talanta 44 (1997) 939–945. 10.1016/S0039-9140(96)02144-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [68].Lu H, Yin T, Luan F, Li Y, Qin W, Tailoring the surface of a polymeric membrane with a thin-layer Nafion membrane: Construction of an anti-surfactant solid-contact ion-selective electrode, J. Electroanal. Chem 977 (2025) 118830. 10.1016/j.jelechem.2024.118830. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [69].Razmjou A, Asadnia M, Hosseini E, Habibnejad Korayem A, Chen V, Design principles of ion selective nanostructured membranes for the extraction of lithium ions, Nat. Commun 10 (2019) 5793. 10.1038/s41467-019-13648-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [70].Ceresa A, Radu A, Peper S, Bakker E, Pretsch E, Rational Design of Potentiometric Trace Level Ion Sensors. A Ag+ -Selective Electrode with a 100 ppt Detection Limit, Anal. Chem 74 (2002) 4027–4036. 10.1021/ac025548y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [71].Jarosińska E, Wojnowska J, Durka M, Podrażka M, Witkowska Nery E, Low-cost, syringe based ion-selective electrodes for the evaluation of potassium in food products and pharmaceuticals, Electrochimica Acta 508 (2024) 145209. 10.1016/j.electacta.2024.145209. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [72].Maleki R, Shams SM, Chellehbari YM, Rezvantalab S, Jahromi AM, Asadnia M, Abbassi R, Aminabhavi T, Razmjou A, Materials discovery of ion-selective membranes using artificial intelligence, Commun. Chem 5 (2022) 132. 10.1038/s42004-022-00744-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [73].Huang Y, Zhong S, Gan L, Chen Y, Development of Machine Learning Models for Ion-Selective Electrode Cation Sensor Design, ACS EST Eng. 4 (2024) 1702–1711. 10.1021/acsestengg.4c00087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [74].Zhai J, Duan S, Luo B, Jin X, Dong H, Wang X, Classification techniques of ion selective electrode arrays in agriculture: a review, Anal. Methods 16 (2024) 8068–8079. 10.1039/D4AY01346H. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [75].Hanitra IN, Criscuolo F, Carrara S, De Micheli G, Multi-Ion-Sensing Emulator and Multivariate Calibration Optimization by Machine Learning Models, IEEE Access 9 (2021) 46821–46836. 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3065754. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES