Skip to main content
Springer logoLink to Springer
. 2025 Aug 27;33(2):1091–1092. doi: 10.1245/s10434-025-18274-w

ASO Author Reflections: Impact of Social Vulnerability and Allostatic Load on Postoperative Outcomes

Mujtaba Khalil 1, Timothy M Pawlik 2,✉
PMCID: PMC12765728  PMID: 40866639

Past

Hepatopancreatobiliary (HPB) cancers remain among the most complex malignancies to treat surgically, with high postoperative morbidity and mortality.1 For patients living in socially vulnerable neighborhoods, the challenges extend beyond the operating room.2,3 Chronic exposure to socioeconomic stressors such as financial hardship, limited healthcare access, and unstable living conditions can alter the body’s regulatory systems, a process captured by the concept of allostatic load (AL).4 AL reflects cumulative physiologic wear and tear across cardiovascular, metabolic, renal, and immune systems.4 While prior work has linked AL to poor outcomes in chronic medical conditions, its influence on patients undergoing high-risk HPB surgery has been ill-defined.4,5

Present

Among 34,253 individuals, the mean patient age was 71 years (interquartile range 63–78), approximately half of the patients were male (n = 18,045, 52.7%), and 29,246 (85.4%) patients had a high Charlson Comorbidity Index score (CCI >2). The most common cancer site was the pancreas (n = 21,402, 62.5%), followed by the liver (n = 8451, 24.7%) and biliary tract (n = 4400, 12.8%). Overall, 13.8% (n = 4717) of patients had high AL. On multivariable analysis, the risk of allostasis increased stepwise with higher social vulnerability (reference: low; medium: odds ratio [OR] 1.11, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04–1.19; high: OR 1.17, 95% CI 1.11–1.17). Moreover, high AL was associated with a 44% increased risk of Clavien–Dindo grade IV complications (OR 1.44, 95% CI 1.36–1.54) and an 85% increased risk of failure to rescue (OR 1.85, 95% CI 1.60–2.13). In addition, the risk of 30-day mortality was approximately twofold higher with elevated AL (OR 1.92, 95% CI 1.70–2.19).

Future

The current study highlights the need to recognize and address biologic consequences of long-term social disadvantage in patients with cancer.5 AL, derived from routinely collected clinical data, could be integrated into preoperative workflows to identify patients who may benefit from targeted interventions ranging from prehabilitation and metabolic optimization to enhanced perioperative surveillance and tailored discharge planning.4 Future studies should explore whether modifying AL before surgery can improve recovery and survival, and how combining patient-level physiologic data with hospital-level quality measures might further reduce disparities in HPB cancer care.4,5

Funding

No sources of funding were used to assist in the preparation of this study.

Disclosures

Mujtaba Khalil and Timothy M. Pawlik have no conflicts of interest to declare that may be relevant to the contents of this study.

Footnotes

This article refers to: Khalil M, Woldesenbet S, King J, et al. Impact of Social Vulnerability and Allostatic Load on Postoperative Outcomes. Ann Surg Oncol. Epub 20 Aug 2025. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-025-18144-5.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Kneuertz PJ, Pitt HA, Bilimoria KY, et al. Risk of morbidity and mortality following hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery. J Gastrointest Surg. 2012;16(9):1727–35. 10.1007/s11605-012-1938-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Khalil M, Munir MM, Woldesenbet S, et al. Association between historical redlining and access to high-volume hospitals among patients undergoing complex cancer surgery in California. Ann Surg Oncol. 2024;31(3):1477–87. 10.1245/s10434-023-14679-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Zindani S, Khalil M, Rashid Z, Altaf A, Woldesenbet S, Pawlik TM. Association of socio-environmental burden and inequality with cancer screening and mortality. J Surg Oncol. 2025;131(6):1110–7. 10.1002/jso.28039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Khalil M, Woldesenbet S, Rashid Z, et al. The hidden burden: impact of allostatic load on colorectal cancer surgery outcomes. Ann Surg Oncol. Epub 21 June 2025. 10.1245/s10434-025-17711-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 5.Khalil M, Woldesenbet S, King J, et al. Impact of social vulnerability and allostatic load on postoperative outcomes. Ann Surg Oncol. Epub 20 Aug 2025. 10.1245/s10434-025-18144-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Articles from Annals of Surgical Oncology are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES