Abstract
The rheological behavior of high-viscosity heavy oil is crucial for its efficient development. CO2-assisted thermal recovery serves as an effective method to enhance heavy oil mobility. However, existing studies still lack sufficient quantitative characterization of the coupling effect of thermal and CO2 interactions on improving heavy oil flow capacity. To address this issue, this study thoroughly investigates the synergistic viscosity reduction mechanism and the evolution of rheological properties during heavy oil extraction under combined CO2 and thermal effects. Through systematic rheological testing and theoretical modeling, a modified Arrhenius model incorporating a shear correction factor was developed, enabling accurate prediction of the viscosity–temperature relationship under different shear rates. Dual hysteresis loop analysis was employed to quantify the effects of thermal and shear history, confirming that the thixotropic recovery capability of heavy oil is governed by both thermal and shear history and revealing an exponential decay pattern of thixotropic strength with increasing temperature and shear rate. A temperature-dependent Bingham constitutive equation was established, achieving precise prediction of rheological behavior across the full temperature range from the non-Newtonian to the Newtonian regime. This study elucidates the spatiotemporal evolution of heavy oil rheological behavior throughout the entire CO2-thermal synergistic extraction process, providing a key theoretical tool for accurate prediction of development performance and dynamic regulation of production parameters.


1. Introduction
The global geological reserves of heavy oil and oil sands exceed 8 trillion barrels, − far surpassing those of conventional crude oil, making them a crucial strategic alternative resource for future energy supply. As a typical non-Newtonian fluid, improving the rheological properties of heavy oil is the core objective of enhancing its recovery.
At present, thermal recovery remains the primary method for heavy oil development. By injecting thermal fluids such as steam into the reservoir to increase formation temperature, the viscosity of heavy oil is reduced, thereby improving its flowability. − As early as 1966, Trintopec conducted the first thermal recovery experiment on heavy oil, carrying out a small-scale cyclic project test in the Palo Seco field, which demonstrated the significant role of thermal effects in enhancing heavy oil flowability. Kumar P. conducted rheological experiments in the temperature range of 35–65 °C using oscillatory tests (OSC), universal control rate (CR), and controlled stress (CS) modes, confirming that heavy oil exhibits non-Newtonian fluid characteristics at low temperatures, which diminish as temperature increases. Ilyin S.O. investigated the effects of temperature and shear on the rheological properties of heavy oil, showing that the complex molecular structure of heavy oil is responsible for its high viscosity and yield stress. High temperature and high shear can reduce the viscosity of heavy oil, while the addition of light hydrocarbon solvents can suppress its yield stress. Mario R. proposed a viscosity calculation model based on the Arrhenius equation for heavy oil and light oil binary mixtures, applicable for viscosity prediction across a wide temperature range. Although extensive research has been conducted on the impact of thermal effects on the rheological properties of heavy oil, most heavy oil reservoirs worldwide have now entered the late stages of steam injection, − facing challenges such as low thermal efficiency, significant heat loss, and high development costs. These limitations are particularly pronounced in ultradeep heavy oil reservoirs. , Therefore, there is a need to introduce auxiliary methods to enhance heavy oil flowability and improve recovery. In recent years, CO2-assisted thermal recovery technology has garnered widespread attention due to its unique technical advantages. , CO2 exhibits good solubility in heavy oil and can significantly improve its flowability through multiple mechanisms. − Compared to traditional steam injection processes, CO2-assisted steam processes require much less thermal energy, reducing the temperature of the injected fluid. , Srivastava R.K. evaluated the applicability and effectiveness of CO2 for heavy oil recovery, showing that dissolved CO2 causes crude oil to swell, reduces oil phase density, and significantly decreases crude oil viscosity. Simultaneously, CO2 can extract light components from crude oil, improving oil phase composition and effectively enhancing heavy oil flowability. Geng H.Z. tested the influence of CO2 on heavy oil viscosity, confirming that the viscosity of the oil-gas mixture decreases with increasing pressure until the bubble point pressure is reached. Lu N. systematically explored the mechanisms of enhanced oil recovery in heavy oil through microscopic visualization experiments and molecular dynamics simulations in a mixed CO2 thermal system. The results indicated strong van der Waals forces between CO2 and heavy oil molecules, and the addition of CO2 effectively promotes the decomposition and swelling of heavy oil. CO2 can significantly reduce interactions between heavy oil and rock surfaces as well as within the heavy oil itself. Hu R.E. systematically studied the influence patterns on heavy oil rheological capacity, proposing that the viscosity-temperature relationship of the mixed fluid still follows an exponential decline pattern, and that CO2-dissolved heavy oil still exhibits non-Newtonian fluid characteristics. Zhang Y. explored the nucleation and growth patterns of CO2 bubbles in CO2-heavy oil systems, demonstrating that the structure of asphaltenes in heavy oil promotes the formation of CO2 cavities, thereby enhancing the flowability of the mixed fluid. Most importantly, the synergistic effect between CO2 and thermal energy can significantly enhance viscosity reduction. Field tests have shown that CO2-assisted steam flooding can substantially improve recovery rates, demonstrating promising application prospects.
However, current understanding of the rheological behavior of heavy oil under the synergistic action of CO2 and heat remains significantly inadequate. Particularly under the multifield coupling conditions of temperature, shear, and CO2 dissolution, the evolution patterns of the microscopic structure and the macroscopic rheological response characteristics of heavy oil are still unclear. Traditional Arrhenius models only consider the influence of temperature on viscosity and fail to account for the effect of shear rate, leading to deviations between predicted results and actual data. Furthermore, the impact of thermal history experienced by heavy oil during thermal recovery on its rheological properties lacks systematic study. These knowledge gaps severely constrain the precise design and optimization of CO2-assisted thermal recovery technologies.
In response to the aforementioned challenges, this study employs a combined approach of systematic experimentation and theoretical modeling to thoroughly investigate the influence mechanism of CO2 dissolution on the rheological behavior of heavy oil. The research focuses on the coupling effects of temperature, shear, and CO2 dissolution, utilizing rheometric testing methods to reveal the evolution of rheological properties of heavy oil under the synergistic action of CO2 and heat. The phase transition critical conditions for the rheological behavior of heavy oil were determined, a viscosity-temperature prediction model considering shear effects was established, the viscosity reduction mechanism of the CO2-thermal synergistic effect was clarified, and a temperature-dependent constitutive equation was constructed to accurately characterize the rheological behavior of heavy oil across the entire temperature range. This study provides deeper insights into the rheological behavior of heavy oil under CO2-thermal synergy and establishes a viscosity prediction method under multifield coupling conditions. The findings are expected to advance the innovation of CO2-assisted thermal recovery technology, with significant practical implications for enhancing heavy oil development efficiency and economic returns.
2. Experimental Section
2.1. Experimental Samples
The experimental oil samples were obtained from Block J230 in the Xinjiang Oilfield. The crude oil underwent dehydration and degassing treatment, and its basic physical properties are shown in Table . The main components of this crude oil are saturates (51.7%), while the content of resins and asphaltenes exceeds 20%, classifying it as a typical high-viscosity heavy oil. To eliminate the ″memory effect″ of historical thermal and shear actions on the colloidal structure, all samples were maintained at a constant temperature of 90 °C for 60 min and then quenched to the initial experimental temperature. Additionally, to ensure experimental accuracy, the crude oil was subjected to pretreatment operations such as filtration and impurity removal to eliminate interference from other factors. The gas used in the experiments was CO2 with a purity ≥ 99.99%.
1. SARA Components and Basic Properties of Heavy Crude Oils.
| SARA
components(wt.%) |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oil type | Density (g·mL–1, 20 °C) | Viscosity (mPa·s, 50 °C) | Saturate | Aromatic | Resin | Asphaltene |
| Heavy oil | 0.927 | 2847.64 | 51.7 | 18.11 | 16.98 | 5.28 |
2.2. Viscosity-Temperature Characteristics of Heavy Oil
The viscosity measurements were conducted following the Chinese National Standard GB/T 28910–2012, which employs a rotational viscometer to determine the apparent viscosity of crude oil through controlled shear rate testing under precisely regulated temperature conditions. The rheological measurements were performed using an MCR 302 rheometer (Anton Paar, Austria), with an operable temperature range of 90–300 °C and a maximum pressure tolerance of 15 MPa. The temperature test range was set from 25 to 95 °C with a heating rate of 0.5 °C/min. Shear rates were set at 7.34, 20, 50, 75, and 100 s–1 respectively to investigate the viscosity variation under different shear conditions. The testing procedure consisted of heating the sample from 25 to 90 °C at a fixed heating rate of 0.5 °C/min, followed by immediate cooling from 90 °C back to 25 °C at the same rate. All tests were performed in triplicate and average values were calculated to ensure experimental accuracy.
2.3. Thixotropy of Heavy Oil
The sample to be tested was placed in the high-temperature high-pressure rheometer. The target pressure was set, and the system was preheated to the target temperature and held for 1 h to ensure sufficient thermal equilibrium. The shear rate range was set from 0 to 120 s–1. The testing procedure involved linearly increasing the shear rate from 0 s–1 to 120 s–1 over 20 min, followed by immediately decreasing it back to 0 s–1 over another 20 min at a uniform rate. All tests were performed in triplicate, and average values were calculated to ensure experimental accuracy.
2.4. Impact of CO2 on Crude Oil Rheology
2.4.1. Experiment on the Solubility of CO2
The pretreated J230 heavy oil sample (50.0 ± 0.1 g) was injected into a high-pressure cylinder using a high-pressure saturation device. After vacuum degassing, CO2 was injected into the system. The mixture was presaturated for 24 h under target pressure and temperature to ensure gas–liquid phase equilibrium. This was followed by a constant-volume depletion test, during which the volume of liberated gas was measured using a wet gas flow meter to calculate the dissolved gas-oil ratio. Throughout the process, the pressure was controlled with an accuracy of ± 0.05 MPa, the temperature fluctuation was within ± 0.1 °C, and the volume measurement error did not exceed ± 0.5%. Triplicate parallel experiments were conducted to ensure reproducibility.
2.4.2. The Rheological Properties of Heavy Oil after Dissolving CO2
During the development of heavy oil utilizing CO2-thermal synergistic effects, the process is subject to the combined influence of thermal effects and formation shear. To clarify the impact patterns of thermal history and shear history on the overall development process of heavy oil under different working conditions, characteristic temperature and pressure points were selected based on solubility experimental results for rheological testing of CO2-saturated heavy oil. A high-pressure rheometer was employed to conduct viscosity-temperature, thixotropic hysteresis loop, and dynamic strain tests, following the procedures described in Sections and . The study focused on quantifying thermal history effects (assessing irreversible damage through heating–cooling cycles) and shear history effects (structural reconstruction of heavy oil due to stepwise shear), simulating the scenarios of injection-production disturbance and thermal recovery. All experiments were performed in triplicate under each condition, with key parameters controlled within specified coefficients of variation to ensure data repeatability.
3. Result and Discussion
3.1. Modified Arrhenius Model and Viscosity Chart for Heavy Oil
3.1.1. Viscosity-Temperature Characteristics of Heavy Oil
Viscosity is a key parameter characterizing the flow capacity of heavy oil. The high viscosity of heavy oil leads to significant flow resistance, severely restricting its flowability within the reservoir. Therefore, reducing viscosity constitutes a core challenge in heavy oil development. , This complexity originates from the three-dimensional network structure formed by asphaltenes and resins, whose topological properties are highly sensitive to the temperature field. When temperature increases, molecular thermal motion disrupts the connecting points within the colloidal network, resulting in structural disaggregation and a sharp decline in viscosity. , Traditionally, this temperature dependence is commonly described by the Arrhenius equation, − as shown in Equation .
| 1a |
| 1b |
where η is the viscosity in mPa·s, E a is the activation energy in J/mol, A is the pre-exponential factor, R is the universal gas constant equal to 8.314 J/(mol·K), and T is the absolute temperature in K.
However, the Arrhenius model is only applicable for predicting the viscosity of heavy oil at high temperature. At low temperature, the viscosity of heavy oil is no longer a single function of temperature. When the temperature falls below a certain threshold, the spatial structure of heavy oil undergoes significant alterations: resin aggregates increase substantially, structural complexity rises abruptly, and a three-segment linear pattern emerges in logarithmic coordinates. Distinct temperature transition points exist. Above these points, heavy oil gradually transitions from non-Darcy flow to Darcy flow, and its temperature sensitivity progressively weakens, resulting in a flatter viscosity-temperature curve in logarithmic coordinates. As the temperature continues to increase, the spatial structure of resin aggregates in heavy oil is further disrupted. Beyond a specific threshold, the flow behavior shifts entirely to Darcy flow, becoming solely a function of temperature. In Figure , these three regions are defined as the non-Newtonian flow zone, the quasi-Darcy flow zone, and the Darcy flow zone, respectively.
1.
Viscosity-temperature relationship of heavy oil. (a) Viscosity (η) as a function of temperature (T) in semilogarithmic coordinates. (b) The relationship between lnη and temperature (T –1) in linear coordinates.
The three distinct regions were individually fitted according to the Arrhenius equation, yielding the respective formulas for each zone as shown in eq . In the low-temperature region (T < 339.35 K), the activation energy is the highest (79.13 kJ/mol), indicating that the resin aggregate structure remains intact and molecular motion must overcome a high energy barrier. When the temperature rises into the transition region (339.35 K ≤ T ≤ 357.35 K), the activation energy decreases to 66.4 kJ/mol. The reduction in slope reflects the onset of resin aggregate disaggregation, leading to a transition from non-Darcy to Darcy flow. In the high-temperature region (T > 357.35 K), the activation energy drops sharply to 34.84 kJ/mol. At this stage, resin aggregates are thoroughly disrupted, and the system transitions into a Newtonian fluid. It is worth noting that the pre-exponential factor A continuously increases with rising temperature, reflecting enhanced molecular transport frequency and effective collision probability. Together with the decrease in activation energy, this trend reveals the fundamental mechanism by which thermal agitation reduces the flow barrier by weakening intermolecular forces. The two characteristic temperature inflection points correspond to critical transition thresholds in the rheological behavior of the heavy oil.
| 2 |
3.1.2. The Modified Arrhenius Equation for Heavy Oil
As evidenced by the preceding analysis, a significant deviation exists between the measured viscosity of heavy oil and the viscosity predicted by the Arrhenius equation, primarily stemming from the high sensitivity of its internal structure to temperature. To elucidate the true viscosity-temperature response of heavy oil under reservoir conditions, this study systematically conducted viscosity-temperature tests at five different shear rates (γ̇). Figure presents the viscosity-temperature curves of the heavy oil under these varying shear rates.
2.
Viscosity-temperature relationship prediction model. (a) Form of η -T, (b) Form of lnη - T.
It can be observed that at high shear rates, the apparent viscosity of the heavy oil further decreases, while still exhibiting a three-stage linear pattern in logarithmic coordinates. This reflects a structural transformation in the rheological behavior of heavy oil under the coupled effect of temperature and shear. These results indicate that the structure of heavy oil is dually influenced by both shear and temperature, with viscosity being significantly affected by shear rate in the non-Newtonian flow region at low temperatures. The traditional Arrhenius model, which assumes a linear relationship between lnη and T–1, does not account for the effect of shear, leading to insufficient predictive accuracy. Specifically, in the low-temperature region, shear forces have a strong disruptive effect on the heavy oil’s structure, resulting in dramatic viscosity changes. In contrast, in the high-temperature region, where thermal agitation dominates the weakening of intermolecular forces, the influence of shear is relatively reduced. This leads to a distinct segmented linear characteristic in the viscosity-temperature relationship across different shear rates when plotted in logarithmic coordinates.
Both the activation energy E a and the pre-exponential factor A exhibit functional relationships with the shear rate γ̇. Based on this, the Arrhenius equation model was applied to fit the viscosity-temperature data obtained at different shear rates, resulting in fitted models (eq ) for each shear rate condition.
| 3 |
To further quantify the influence of shear rate (γ̇) on the viscosity-temperature relationship of heavy oil, secondary fitting was performed on the Arrhenius fitting parametersspecifically the pre-exponential factor A and the activation energy E aobtained at different shear rates (Figure ). The results indicate that A increases exponentially with γ̇ (as shown in eq ), while E a decreases linearly (eq ). The goodness-of-fit for both relationships exceed 0.98, further validating the significant regulatory effect of shear on the rheological behavior of heavy oil. This observed pattern demonstrates that an increase in shear rate not only promotes the disentanglement of molecular chains but also enhances the dynamic intermolecular response, collectively leading to a nonlinear reduction in the viscosity of heavy oil
| 4 |
| 5 |
3.

(a) Pre-exponential factor, (b) pseudoactivation energy.
Based on the above analysis, the equations describing the relationships between the pre-exponential factor A (eq ) and activation energy E a (eq ) with shear rate were incorporated into the Arrhenius equation (eq ), ultimately establishing a viscosity prediction model for heavy oil that simultaneously accounts for both temperature and shear rate effects (eq ). This model overcomes the limitation of the traditional Arrhenius equation, which considers only the temperature effect, and achieves for the first time an accurate characterization of heavy oil viscosity under the coupled influence of temperature and shear rate. To intuitively illustrate the variation of viscosity with temperature and shear rate, a three-dimensional viscosity distribution plot was further developed (Figure ). This plot enables rapid determination of the heavy oil viscosity value for any temperature–shear rate combination, providing an important theoretical basis and engineering guidance for the optimization of thermal recovery processes parameters in oilfields.
| 6 |
4.

Viscosity of heavy oil at different temperature and shear rates.
3.2. The Thixotropy of Heavy Oil
The previous sections systematically examined the variation of heavy oil viscosity with temperature and shear rate, demonstrating that thermal treatment is a key viscosity-reduction technique in heavy oil development. However, under actual reservoir conditions, crude oil undergoes a complete temperature cycle from heating to cooling. Studying only the heating phase is insufficient for a comprehensive evaluation of thermal recovery performance. It is therefore necessary to conduct a systematic assessment of the entire heating and cooling processes experienced by heavy oil during production, in order to reveal the impact of thermal cycling on its rheological behavior and the underlying structural response mechanisms. Heavy oil exhibits a viscosity-temperature hysteresis phenomenon during heating–cooling cycles, which fundamentally arises from the alteration of the asphaltene-resin supramolecular network by thermal history. , When the temperature crosses a critical transition threshold, thermal agitation overcomes the energy barriers of van der Waals forces and hydrogen bonds, leading to the dissociation of the three-dimensional network. This causes asphaltene layers to melt into discrete units and resin molecules to desorb from asphaltene surfaces. During the subsequent cooling processes, structural reorganization is dominated by kinetic nonequilibrium recombination. The dispersed asphaltenes act as nucleation sites triggering disordered stacking, while resins cannot fully restore their original coverage due to irreversible loss of adsorption sites. The synergistic effect of these processes results in a new, loose and porous structure, in which steric hindrance significantly inhibits the reformation of a dense network.
This structural transformation causes the viscosity during cooling to be systematically lower than that during heating at the same temperature. To quantify the degree of structural alteration, the hysteresis loop area HT is introduced as a key indicator. It is defined as the enclosed area between the apparent viscosity (η) versus temperature (T) curves during the heating and cooling cycles, as given by the formula:
| 7 |
where HT is the viscosity-temperature hysteresis area (mPa·s·°C), η is the viscosity (mPa·s), and T is the temperature (°C). The value of HT quantitatively represents the structural recovery capability of heavy oil before and after thermal treatment.
Figure illustrates the effects of thermal treatment on heavy oil under different shear rates. Figure (b) shows the variation of hysteresis area with temperature. Experimental results confirm that the hysteresis area systematically decreases as temperature increases, indicating that high-temperature conditions weaken the self-repair capacity of the heavy oil network. Furthermore, the hysteresis area also decreases with increasing shear rate, demonstrating that shear similarly influences the structure. At high shear rates, the effect of temperature on the hysteresis behavior is reduced. To visually represent the relationship between hysteresis area and shear rate, Figure (c) is provided. The hysteresis area serves as a key criterion for optimizing thermal recovery processes. A larger hysteresis area suggests difficult recombination of the asphaltene-resin network, necessitating significantly extended shut-in time to ensure production capacity recovery. This parameter also guides the dynamic adjustment of steam injection rates to compensate for viscosity loss due to structural damage. Combined with the previously established viscosity prediction model, it enables accurate prediction of load fluctuations in lifting equipment under variable-speed conditions. This method establishes a bridge between molecular-scale structural characteristics and reservoir engineering decisions through rheological parameters, providing a theoretical tool for the efficient development of heavy oil.
5.
Influence of heat treatment on the viscosity of heavy oil at different shear rates. (a) Viscosity–temperature relationship, (b) Hysteresis loop area, (c) Form of HT - γ̇.
As demonstrated in the preceding sections, the rheological behavior of heavy oil is influenced not only by thermal effects but also significantly by shear, exhibiting a pronounced shear-thinning phenomenon where the apparent viscosity decreases with increasing shear rate. The microscopic origin of this behavior lies in the three-dimensional network structure formed by resin and asphaltene molecules through intermolecular forces such as van der Waals interactions and hydrogen bonding. , When external shear is applied, weak bonds between molecules are selectively broken, resin chains disentangle to reduce flow resistance, sheet-like asphaltenes align along the flow direction to minimize turbulent dissipation, and aggregate breakdown leads to a notable reduction in micelle size. This series of structural changes results in a characteristic power-law decay in viscosity. While the breakdown of the network occurs over short time scales, structural reorganization requires a much longer relaxation time ranging from minutes to hours. This significant difference in time scales forms the kinetic basis for the observed thixotropic behavior.
To quantitatively analyze the influence of shear history on the thixotropic behavior of heavy oil, this study defines two key rheological parameters: the hysteresis area of shear viscosity Ha and the hysteresis area of shear force Hb (eq ).
| 8a |
| 8b |
where Ha represents the irreversible loss of viscosity during the shear rate ascending/descending cycle (mPa), and Hb denotes the net energy consumption of structural destruction (Pa·s–1). Here, η is the viscosity (mPa·s), τ is the shear stress (Pa), and γ̇ is the shear rate (s–1).
Together, these two parameters reveal the essential mechanism of thixotropy in heavy oil. During the shear rate ascending phase, heavy oil exhibits significant viscosity attenuation. Shear forces destroy the resin-asphaltene network, leading to structural dissociation and a reduction in macromolecular entanglement density, which causes a pronounced decrease in viscosity. In the descending phase, however, due to the fact that the reorganization relaxation time is much longer than the destruction time scale, the reorganization kinetics are delayed, preventing the viscosity from recovering to its initial value and resulting in the formation of a characteristic hysteresis loop. As temperature increases, both Ha and Hb show systematic attenuation (Figure , the unit of temperature is °C). When the temperature crosses the anomalous transition threshold, the hysteresis area decreases sharply, indicating a loss of self-repair capacity in the three-dimensional network.
6.
Influence of share treatment on the viscosity of heavy oil at different temperature. (a) Form of η - γ̇, (b) Form of τ - γ̇.
Figure reveals that the hysteresis area of shear viscosity Ha and the hysteresis area of shear force Hb evolve in three distinct stages as temperature increases. In the low-temperature region (T < 80 °C), both Ha and Hb remain at high levels, indicating significant thixotropic behavior. When the temperature crosses the anomalous transition threshold, the hysteresis areas decrease sharply, marking a sudden loss of self-repair capacity in the resin-asphaltene network. In the high-temperature region, Ha and Hb approach zero, confirming the transition of heavy oil to Newtonian fluid behavior under high-temperature conditions. This phenomenon demonstrates the dual regulatory effect of temperature on shear-thinning behavior: at low temperature, it enhances the hysteresis of structural reorganization, while at high temperature, network dissociation leads to the disappearance of thixotropy. This method can serve as an objective criterion for identifying rheological anomaly points, as Ha quantitatively reflects the energy consumption of structural destruction, and Hb characterizes the intensity of reorganization kinetic hysteresis. This phenomenon holds significant engineering guidance value. During the steam injection phase, the temperature should exceed the critical transition point to achieve sufficient dissociation of the resin-asphaltene network structure. When designing the production strategy, the shut-in time should be scientifically determined based on the exponential decay law of thixotropic strength to balance productivity recovery and production efficiency. For production performance prediction, the degree of structural damage should be incorporated into constitutive equations and numerical models to enhance the accuracy of production forecasts. This understanding not only clarifies the rheological control mechanism of the CO2-thermal synergistic effect but also provides direct theoretical support for optimizing injection-production parameters and predicting development performance in field applications, effectively bridging fundamental research and engineering practice.
7.
Shear treatment loop area as a function of temperature. (a) Form of Ha - T, (b) Form of Hb - T.
3.3. The Influence of CO2 on the Viscosity of Heavy Oil
The solubility of CO2 in heavy oil (S, m3/m3) exhibits a significant temperature–pressure coupling effect. Figure illustrates the variation of CO2 solubility under different temperature and pressure conditions. Driven by pressure, CO2 molecules diffuse into the interstitial spaces of the resin-asphaltene network, expanding the free volume of the system and increasing the molecular spacing. Simultaneously, CO2 forms weak bonding structures with alkane chains through van der Waals forces, an interaction that attenuates with increasing temperature, leading to reduced solubility. − The synergistic effect of temperature and pressure shows a linear response, while temperature rise weakens the van der Waals forces between CO2 and alkane chains, promoting desorption. This negative temperature effect causes S to decrease with increasing temperature; however, more intense molecular motion at elevated temperature shortens the time required to achieve diffusion equilibrium.
8.

Solubility of CO2 at different temperature and pressures.
Under simulated target reservoir pressure conditions MPa), systematic measurements of the viscosity reduction rate (θ, defined as the percentage decrease in crude oil viscosity, %) of CO2-saturated heavy oil were conducted at different shear rates (7.34, 20, 50, 75, and 100 s–1) and temperature (40, 50, 70, and 90 °C) (Figure ). The results reveal a significant shear-temperature coupling effect on the viscosity-reduction efficiency of CO2. As the shear rate increases, the viscosity reduction rate systematically rises. In the high-shear region (γ̇ = 100 s–1), the viscosity loss reaches 65.1%, which is 3.3% higher than that at the low shear rate (γ̇ = 7.34 s–1) of 61.8%. In contrast, at a constant shear rate, the viscosity reduction rate follows an exponential decay with increasing temperature, decreasing by 2.8% across the temperature range from 40 to 90 °C. This phenomenon originates from the microscopic interaction mechanisms within the CO2-heavy oil system. Dissolved CO2 expands the free volume and increases molecular spacing, thereby weakening van der Waals forces. However, elevated temperature intensifies molecular thermal motion, leading to the attenuation of weak bonding interactions between CO2 and alkane chains, as well as a decrease in solubility. Simultaneously, high shear rates disrupt swelling stability, induce local degassing and phase separation, and reduce the effective dissolved concentration. The regulatory effect of temperature on the state of the resin-asphaltene network further amplifies this behavior: in the low-temperature region, the resin aggregate structure remains intact, enhancing CO2 disruptive effect on the heavy oil structure; in the high-temperature region, although the network disaggregates, thermal disturbance dominates viscosity reduction, causing the marginal contribution of CO2 to diminish sharply. In summary, the synergistic effect of temperature and shear collectively influences the viscosity-reduction performance of CO2 in heavy oil. These findings suggest that near-wellbore regions require steam coinjection to compensate for heat loss or a reduction in gas injection rate. The critical inflection point predicted by the exponential decay model can be used to optimize shut-in time. For shallow low-temperature reservoirs, a ″CO2-thermal″ hybrid system is recommended, employing high-rate injection to enhance the viscosity-reduction effect. This study provides molecular-scale mechanistic support and engineering optimization pathways for multithermal fluid displacement technologies.
9.

Variation of the viscosity reduction rate of CO2 at different temperature and shear rates.
To further quantify the impact of thermal treatment on CO2-saturated heavy oil, shear tests were conducted at different shear rates, as shown in Figure . Thermal treatment influences the CO2-dissolved heavy oil in a manner similar to its effect on deaerated heavy oil, but the absolute value of the thixotropic hysteresis loop area is significantly reduced (Figure c). The hysteresis loop area exhibits an exponential decay with increasing shear rate.
10.
Influence of shear treatment on the viscosity of heavy oil saturated with CO2 at different shear rates. (a) Viscosity–temperature relationship, (b) Hysteresis loop area, (c) Form of Hc - γ̇.
Through systematic testing of the rheological behavior of thermally treated CO2-saturated heavy oil under different shear rates (7.34, 20, 50, 75, and 100 s–1) (Figure ), it was observed that thermal treatment significantly reduces the hysteresis loop area Hc of the CO2-saturated oil (Figure c). Taking the shear rate of 7.34 s–1 as an example, the Hc value decreased from 69,060.896 for the original heavy oil to 21,120.96 for the CO2-saturated oil after thermal treatment, representing a reduction of 69.42%.
Furthermore, Hc follows an exponential decay trend as the shear rate increases. This phenomenon stems from the synergistic damaging effects of thermal treatment and CO2 dissolution. High temperature promote the desorption of resins from asphaltene surfaces, forming discrete units and a loose porous structure. After CO2 dissolution, the kinetic energy of the heavy oil surpasses the recombination activation energy, weakening the recombination capability of heavy oil macromolecules, inhibiting the reassociation of resins and asphaltenes, and leading to more thorough molecular disentanglement, thereby reducing the hysteresis effect. This effect indicates that although thermal treatment can reduce thixotropic energy consumption, the viscosity of the heavy oil remains relatively high after structural recovery, which may still cause near-wellbore clogging. It is necessary to dynamically adjust the shut-in time based on the decay model to fully leverage the synergistic effects of CO2 and heat in enhancing the fluidity of heavy oil. This study reveals that thermal treatment weakens thixotropy through structural modification, but the shear dependence of the recombination energy barrier necessitates a process design that synergistically incorporates ″thermal-rheological-chemical″ multifield effects.
3.4. Viscoelasticity of Saturated CO2 Heavy Oil and Constitutive Equation
To investigate the temperature–shear coupling effects of CO2 dissolution on the rheological behavior of heavy oil, systematic shear tests were conducted within the temperature range of 40–90 °C on CO2-saturated heavy oil (Figure ). This study reveals a profound restructuring mechanism induced by CO2 dissolution: both the viscosity hysteresis area (Ha) and the shear stress hysteresis area (Hb) decreased sharply compared to those of the original heavy oil, indicating that CO2 penetration disrupts hydrogen bonding and π-π stacking within the resin layered structure, significantly impairing the recovery capacity of the resin-asphaltene network. − The synergistic temperature–thixotropy evolution (Figure ) further demonstrates that at temperature above 70 °C, the values of Ha and Hb correspond to effects equivalent to those observed in non-CO2-solubilized systems above 80 °Ceffectively reducing the threshold temperature by 10 °C. This phenomenon results from intensified CO2 diffusion at elevated temperature, where CO2 molecules penetrate micellar interstices, weakening van der Waals forces and polar interactions, and disentangling the macromolecular system from a highly entangled state to a low-entanglement regime. Concurrently, CO2 extracts light components and reduces interfacial tension, synergizing with thermal motion to diminish network strength. As a result, the heavy oil exhibits near-Newtonian behavior at 70 °C, representing a significant efficiency improvement over thermal treatment alone. This mechanism effectively lowers the operational temperature threshold for extraction to 70 °C and reduces steam injection volume by 15–20%. It demonstrates that in low-temperature regions, the synergistic action of CO2 and heat can enhance the flowability of heavy oil, providing a molecular-scale design basis for multithermal fluid stimulation technologies.
11.
Influence of share treatment on the viscosity of heavy oil saturated with CO2 at different temperature. (a) Form of η - γ̇, (b) Form of τ - γ̇.
12.
Shear treatment loop area as a function of temperature. (a) Form of Ha - T, (b) Form of Hb - T.
The shear stress versus shear rate curve during the heating processes in Figure (b) was fitted and found to conform to the Bingham model (eq ).
| 9 |
In the equation, τ is the shear stress, Pa; τ0 is the yield stress, Pa; γ̇ is the shear rate, s–1, and K is the consistency coefficient, Pa·s.
The fitting results are summarized in Table . Even after CO2 dissolution, the heavy oil continues to exhibit yield characteristics dominated by the resin-asphaltene network skeleton, retaining a measurable yield stress. The fitted line does not pass through the origin, confirming that the rheological behavior follows the Bingham model. This indicates that flow initiation requires overcoming the yield stress to break the resin-asphaltene network structure. , As the temperature increases from 40 to 90 °C, the yield stress τ0 decreases exponentially from 8.07 to 0.03 Pa (a reduction of 99.6%). Concurrently, the rheological curves shift systematically toward the horizontal axis with a decreasing slope, reflecting a continuous weakening of non-Newtonian behavior. In the low-temperature region (<60 °C), an increase in shear rate of 50 s–1 can reduce the apparent viscosity by up to 70%, whereas in the high-temperature region (>80 °C), a similar change in shear rate results in less than 5% viscosity variation. This evolution can be accurately described by the constructed temperature-shear universal constitutive equation.
2. Rheological Curve Constitutive Equation and Yield Stress.
| Crude Oil | T/(°C) | T/(Pa) | R2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Heavy oil | 40 | τ = 1.71γ̇ + 8.07 | 99.96 |
| 50 | τ = 0.74γ̇ + 2.68 | 99.97 | |
| 60 | τ = 0.32γ̇ + 0.51 | 99.96 | |
| 70 | τ = 0.15γ̇ + 0.21 | 99.99 | |
| 80 | τ = 0.08γ̇ + 0.07 | 99.99 | |
| 90 | τ = 0.05γ̇ + 0.03 | 99.99 |
The consistency coefficient K and the yield stress τ0 from the constitutive equation in Table were fitted against temperature, and their variations with temperature are shown in Figure . Both the consistency coefficient K and the yield stress τ0 in the constitutive equation of heavy oil exhibit a power-law exponential decay with increasing temperature. This behavior originates from the significant weakening of the resin-asphaltene network skeleton strength and the reduction in intermolecular viscous resistance caused by rising temperature. By substituting the fitted formulas into the Bingham model (eq ), a temperature-dependent universal constitutive equation for heavy oil was established (eq ). This equation couples the synergistic effects of temperature and shear rate on flow behavior, quantitatively characterizing the systematic evolution of rheological properties with temperature. It enables accurate prediction of the rheological properties of heavy oil across the entire temperature range.
| 10 |
13.

(a) Consistency coefficient factor, (b) Yield stress.
Based on Equation , a three-dimensional stress response surface for CO2-saturated heavy oil was plotted (Figure ), visually revealing the evolution of shear stress (τ) under varying temperature and shear rate (γ̇) conditions. The stress exhibits an exponential decay with increasing temperature, while the influence of shear rate weakens significantly as temperature rises. In the low-temperature region, the surface shows a steep inclination, where a slight increase in γ̇ leads to a sharp decrease in stress, highlighting the strong shear-thinning behavior of the resin-asphaltene network. In contrast, the surface becomes nearly flat in the high-temperature region, where changes in γ̇ cause only minor stress adjustments, reflecting the near-Newtonian fluid behavior after the collapse of the colloidal network. This surface further identifies a sensitive transition zone between 50–60 °C where rheological properties change markedly, and an engineering safe zone above 70 °C where stress is dominated by viscous resistance, allowing for simplified operational design. The model provides a visual theoretical tool for optimizing production parameters in heavy oil extraction.
14.

Shear stress of heavy oil at different temperature and shear rates.
4. Conclusion
This study establishes a novel methodology for quantifying thermal-shear history effects through hysteresis area analysis and develops a comprehensive temperature-dependent constitutive model that accurately predicts heavy oil rheological behavior across the full temperature range. These innovations provide both theoretical advances in understanding CO2-thermal synergistic mechanisms and practical tools for optimizing heavy oil recovery processes. The specific conclusions are as follows:
-
(1)
The phase transition critical conditions for the rheological behavior of heavy oil were identified. At temperature below 339.35 K, heavy oil exhibits non-Darcy flow characteristics with a high flow activation energy (79.13 kJ/mol). In the temperature range of 339.35–357.35 K, the activation energy decreases to 66.4 kJ/mol, the flow behavior transitions to Darcy flow. When the temperature exceeds 357.35 K, the activation energy further drops to 34.84 kJ/mol, resin aggregates completely disintegrate, and the system transitions to a Newtonian fluid.
-
(2)
The traditional viscosity-temperature prediction model for heavy oil was modified, and a new viscosity prediction model that simultaneously considers both temperature and shear rate was established. This model accurately characterizes the coupling effect of shear and temperature fields under reservoir conditions, significantly improving prediction accuracy.
-
(3)
The viscosity reduction efficiency of CO2 exhibits a notable temperature-shear coupling effect: the viscosity reduction rate increases with higher shear rates, reaching 65.1% at γ̇ = 100 s–1, which is 3.3% higher than at γ̇ = 7.34 s–1. At the same shear rate, the viscosity reduction rate decays exponentially with increasing temperature, decreasing by 2.8% over the 40–90 °C range.
-
(4)
The hysteresis area was introduced as a key indicator to quantify the impact of thermal-shear history on heavy oil structure. It was found that the hysteresis area decays exponentially with increasing shear rate and temperature. This parameter can serve as an important criterion for optimizing thermal recovery processes and, combined with the viscosity prediction model, accurately predict the load fluctuations of lifting equipment under variable-speed conditions.
-
(5)
The constitutive behavior of CO2-saturated heavy oil was determined to conform to the Bingham model, with both the consistency coefficient K and yield stress τ0 following power-law decay with increasing temperature. Accordingly, a temperature-dependent universal constitutive equation was constructed. This model couples temperature and shear effects, enabling precise characterization of the rheological behavior of heavy oil across the entire temperature range, providing a theoretical basis for numerical simulation of oil reservoirs and the design of production processes.
This study provides a reliable theoretical basis and process optimization methods for the CO2-thermal synergistic development of conventional heavy oil. Extra-heavy and ultraheavy oils possess more complex spatial topological structures, leading to more intricate rheological response mechanisms under thermal-shear coupling fields. Therefore, future research could explore the structural evolution patterns of these types of heavy oils under CO2-thermal-shear multifield coupling conditions, to further improve the theoretical system of heavy oil development and expand the adaptability boundaries of process technologies.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank National Key Research and Development Program (2024YFF0506503), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. U23b6003), and the Postdoctoral Fellowship Program (Grade B) of China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (GZB20250681) for the support of this work.
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
References
- Dong X. H., Liu H. Q., Chen Z. X., Wu K. L., Lu N., Zhang Q. C.. Enhanced oil recovery techniques for heavy oil and oilsands reservoirs after steam injection. Applied Energy. 2019;239:1190–1211. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.01.244. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Santos R. G., Loh W., Bannwart A. C., Trevisan O. V.. An Overview of Heavy Oil Properties and Its Recovery and Transportation Methods. Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering. 2014;31:571–590. doi: 10.1590/0104-6632.20140313s00001853. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Meyer, R. F. ; Attanasi, E. D. ; Freeman, P. A. . Heavy oil and natural bitumen resources in geological basins of the world. Open File-Report 2007–1084; U.S. Geological Survey; 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Speight, James G. Enhanced recovery methods for heavy oil and tar sands; Gulf: Publishing Company; 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Zhou L. B., Qin B., Li W., Wang Z.. Development and Application of Heavy Oil Viscosity Reduction Technology at Home and Abroad. Oilfield Chem. 2020;37:557–563. [Google Scholar]
- Chai M., Nourozieh H., Chen Z., Yang M.. A semi-compositional approach to model asphaltene precipitation and deposition in solvent-based bitumen recovery processes. Appl. Energy. 2022;328:120197. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.120197. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Dong X., Liu H., Wang Q., Pang Z., Wang C.. Non-Newtonian flow characterization of heavy crude oil in porous media. J. Pet. Explor. Prod. Technol. 2013;3(1):43–53. doi: 10.1007/s13202-012-0043-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Khan, J. ; Parag, D. . Twenty-five years of oil recovery by steam injection. Paper presented at the SPE/DOE Enhanced Oil Recovery Symposium; SPE: Tulsa, OK, April 1992. [Google Scholar]
- Kumar P., Kumar S., Singh J.. Effect of Natural Surfactant on the Rheological Characteristics of Heavy Crude Oil. Materials Today: Proceedings. 2018;5(11):23881–23887. doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2018.10.180. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Ilyin S. O., Arinina M. P., Polyakova M. Yu., Kulichikhin V. G., Malkin A. Ya.. Rheological comparison of light and heavy crude oils. Fuel. 2016;186:157–167. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2016.08.072. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Mario R., Edgar C., Humberto A., Bernardo C.. A new correlation to calculate the viscosity of binary mixtures of heavy or extra-heavy crude oil and light hydrocarbons using the Arrhenius-Lederer equation. Fuel. 2023;344:128095. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2023.128095. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Johnson D. O., Sugianto R., Mock P. H., Jones C. H.. Identification of steam-break-through intervals with DTS technology. SPE Production & Facilities. 2004;19(1):41–8. doi: 10.2118/87631-PA. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Chai M. J., Chai L. W., Nourozieh H., Chen Z. X., Yang M.. A technical, economic, and environmental assessment on dimethyl ether (DME) as a renewable solvent from carbon dioxide utilization (CCU) for heavy oil recovery: A real field in Surmont, Canada as case study. Chemical Engineering Journal. 2024;482:148936. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2024.148936. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Alvarez J. M., Han S.. Current overview of cyclic steam injection process. J. Pet. Sci. Res. 2013;2(3):116–27. [Google Scholar]
- Chen X., Trivedi J., Liu J., Zhu J., Patel V., Li Y., Liu Z., Liu S.. Evolution law and control method of invasion front surface during the immiscible displacement in porous media: Expanding the swept volume. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2025;343:103586. doi: 10.1016/j.cis.2025.103586. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Masse P. J., Gosney T. C., Long D. L.. Use of pulsed-neutron capture logs to identify steam breakthrough-case Study: South Belridge Middle Expansion Steam flood Project. SPE Form. Eval. 1991;6(3):319–26. doi: 10.2118/20252-PA. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Wang X. Z., Wang J. Z., Qiao M. Q.. Horizontal well, nitrogen and viscosity reducer assisted steam huff and puff technology: Taking super heavy oil in shallow and thin beds, Chunfeng Oilfield, Junggar Basin, NW China, as an example. Petroleum Exploration and Development. 2013;40(1):104–10. doi: 10.1016/S1876-3804(13)60010-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Sun, Y. T. ; Zhao, L. C. ; Lin, T. ; Zhong, L. G. ; Yu, D. ; Lin, H. . Enhance offshore heavy oil recovery by cyclic steam–gas-chemical co-stimulation. Paper SPE 149831 Presented at the SPE heavy oil conference and exhibition; SPE: Kuwait City, Kuwait, December,2011. [Google Scholar]
- Nasr T. N., Pierce G. E.. Steam-CO2 recovery processes for bottom water oil reservoirs. J. Can. Pet. Technol. 1995;34(7):42–9. doi: 10.2118/95-07-04. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Gümrah F., Baǧcı S.. Steam-CO2 drive experiments using horizontal and vertical wells. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering. 1997;18:113–29. doi: 10.1016/S0920-4105(97)00003-X. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Rostami B., Pourafshary P., Fathollahi A., Yassin M. R., Hassani K., Khosravi M., Mohammadifard M., Dangkooban A.. A new approach to characterize the performance of heavy oil recovery due to various gas injections. Int. J. Multiphase Flow. 2018;99:273–283. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2017.10.014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Stone T., Malcolm J. D.. Simulation of a large steam–CO2 co-injection experiment. J. Can. Pet. Technol. 1985;24(6):51. doi: 10.2118/85-06-04. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Dong X., Liu H., Hou J., Zhang Z., Chen Z.. Multi-thermal fluid assisted gravity drainage process: a new improved-oil-recovery technique for thick heavy oil reservoir. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 2015;133:1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.petrol.2015.05.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Liu J., Xie L. Z., He B., Gan Q., Zhao P.. Influence of Anisotropic and Heterogeneous Permeability Coupled with In-Situ Stress on CO2 Sequestration with Simultaneous Enhanced Gas Recovery in Shale: Quantitative Modeling and Case Study. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control. 2021;104:103208. doi: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2020.103208. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Srivastava R. K., Huang S., Dong M.. Comparative effectiveness of CO2 produced gas, and flue gas for enhanced heavy-oil recovery. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering. 1999;2(3):238–47. doi: 10.2118/56857-PA. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Geng H. Z., Chen J. W., Sun R. Y., Li D. X.. Effect of dissolved carbon dioxide on the viscosity of crude oil. J. Univ. Pet. China. 2004;28(04):78–80. [Google Scholar]
- Lu N., Dong X. H., Wang H. T., Liu H. Q., Chen Z. X., Li Y., Zeng D. H.. Hybrid CO2 thermal system for post-steam heavy oil recovery: Insights from microscopic visualization experiments and molecular dynamics simulations. Energy Geoscience. 2025;6(2):100394. doi: 10.1016/j.engeos.2025.100394. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Hu R., Crawshaw J. P., Trusler J. P. M., Boek E. S.. Rheology of diluted heavy crude oil saturated with carbon Dioxide. Energy Fuels. 2014;29(5):2785–2789. doi: 10.1021/ef5020378. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang Y., Yuan L., Liu S. Z., Zhang J. R., Yang M. J., Song Y. C.. Molecular dynamics simulation of bubble nucleation and growth during CO2 Huff-n-Puff process in a CO2-heavy oil system. Geoenergy Science and Engineering. 2023;227:211852. doi: 10.1016/j.geoen.2023.211852. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Ren Y. B., Yang S. L., Andersen K. H., Yang Q., Wang Y.. Thixotropy of soft clay: A review. Engineering Geology. 2021;287:106097. doi: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2021.106097. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Sochi T.. Non-Newtonian flow in porous media. Polymer. 2010;51(22):5007–5023. doi: 10.1016/j.polymer.2010.07.047. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Mu, L. ; Wu, X. ; Huang, Z. . Development Theory and Technology of High Pour Point Oil Reservoir; Petroleum Industry Press: Beijing, China, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Nategh M., Mahdiyar H., Malayeri M. R., Unz S., Beckmann M.. Impact of Liquid Composition and Asphaltene Properties on Asphaltene Aggregation Using Interaction Energies. Chem. Eng. Technol. 2021;44(8):1488–1495. doi: 10.1002/ceat.201900455. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang J., Zhu B., Yuan H., Peng H., Zhong J., Yan Y., Li Z.. Nonlinear relationship between heavy oil viscosity and asphaltene dispersion: A molecular dynamics simulation study. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2024;295:120173. doi: 10.1016/j.ces.2024.120173. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Nentwig T., Kondratiev A., Yazhenskikh E., Hack K., Müller M.. Viscosity model for oxide melts relevant to coal ash slags based on the associate species thermodynamic model. Energy Fuels. 2013;27(11):6469–6476. doi: 10.1021/ef401306d. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Zhou L. J., Wang W. L.. Application of non-Arrhenius models to the viscosity of mold flux. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B. 2016;47(3):1548–1552. doi: 10.1007/s11663-016-0651-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Cui J. D., Cao X., Wang P. P., Shi L., Zhong Z., Zhao F., Gao Q., Li J. W.. Full temperature range fitting of glass viscosity-temperature curve. Mater. Rep. 2020;34(Z2):128–131. [Google Scholar]
- Yadykova A. Y., Ilyin S. O.. Compatibility and rheology of bio-oil blends with light and heavy crude oils. Fuel. 2022;314:122761. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2021.122761. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Guo L. P., Wang Y., Shi S., Yu X. Y., Chen X.. Study on thixotropic properties of waxy crude oil based on hysteresis loop area. Engineering. 2015;07(7):469–476. doi: 10.4236/eng.2015.77043. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Tang X., Li Y., Hu Z., Xiao C., Liu Z., Lv X.. Rheological behavior of high-pour-point oil: Insights into viscosity–temperature prediction and viscoelastic-yielding transition. Phys. Fluids. 2024;36:033124. doi: 10.1063/5.0201385. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Hu R., Crawshaw J. P., Trusler J. P. M., Boek E. S.. Rheology and Phase Behavior of Carbon Dioxide and Crude Oil Mixtures. Energy Fuels. 2017;31(6):5776–5784. doi: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.6b01858. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Hénaut, I. ; Barré, L. ; Argillier, J. F. ; Brucy, F. ; Bouchard, R. . Rheological and Structural Properties of Heavy Crude Oils in Relation with their Asphaltenes Content. Paper presented at the SPE International Symposium on Oilfield Chemistry; SPE: Houston, TX, February 2001. [Google Scholar]
- Su H. X., Wang H. T., Li D. Y., Zhang D. F.. Diffusion and Dissolution Behaviors of CO2, CH4, and N2 in Heavy Oil under High-Temperature and -Pressure Conditions: Insights into Heavy Oil Production via Multithermal Fluid Stimulation. Energy Fuels. 2023;37:15753–15767. doi: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.3c02749. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Davarpanah A., Mirshekari B.. Experimental study of CO2 solubility on the oil recovery enhancement of heavy oil reservoirs. J. Thermal Anal. Calorim. 2020;139:1161–1169. doi: 10.1007/s10973-019-08498-w. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Wang Q. X., Zhang W., Wang C., Han X. D., Wang H. Y., Zhang H.. Microstructure of Heavy Oil Components and Mechanism of Influence on Viscosity of Heavy Oil. ACS Omega. 2023;8(12):10980–10990. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.2c07713. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chen X., Patel V., Liu J., Liu S., Trivedi J.. Surfactant synergy on rheological properties, injectivity, and enhanced oil recovery of viscoelastic polymers. Phys. Fluids. 2025;37(2):023107. doi: 10.1063/5.0252754. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Chen X., Li Y., Trivedi J., Liu Z., Sui M., Tang Y., Liu J., Liu S.. Pulse injection to suppress invasion front fingering: a clean technology to improve oil recovery from oilfields. J. Clean. Prod. 2025;525:146573. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.146573. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Sun Y. X., Zhang W. J., Tian J. L., Meng Y. Z., Zhang L. P.. Research Progress on Displacement Mechanism of Supercritical CO2 in Low-Permeability Heavy Oil Reservoir and Improvement Mechanism of Displacement Agents. Molecules. 2023;28(16):6154. doi: 10.3390/molecules28166154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Su X., Yue X. A.. Mechanism study of the relation between the performance of CO2 immiscible flooding and rock permeability. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 2020;195:107891. doi: 10.1016/j.petrol.2020.107891. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Arinina M., Zuev K., Kulichikhin V., Malkin A.. Superposition of temperature and diluent concentration for the viscosity reduction of heavy crude oil. J. Dispersion Sci. Technol. 2021;42(2):270–277. doi: 10.1080/01932691.2019.1679167. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Jin F., Jiang T., Yuan C., Varfolomeev M. A., Wan F., Zheng Y., Li X.. An improved viscosity prediction model of extra heavy oil for high temperature and high pressure. Fuel. 2022;319:123852. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2022.123852. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Chen X., Zhang Q., Trivedi J., Li Y., Liu J., Liu Z., Liu S.. Investigation on enhanced oil recovery and CO2 storage efficiency of temperature-resistant CO2 foam flooding. Fuel. 2024;364:130870. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2024.130870. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang J., Chen X. p., Zhang D., Xu J. y.. Rheological behavior and viscosity reduction of heavy crude oil and its blends from the Sui-zhong oilfield in China. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 2017;15:563–574. doi: 10.1016/j.petrol.2017.06.038. [DOI] [Google Scholar]








