Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2026 Jan 7.
Published in final edited form as: Curr Opin HIV AIDS. 2025 Oct 14;21(1):46–51. doi: 10.1097/COH.0000000000000986

The female microbiome in HIV prevention, pathogenesis, and treatment

Brandilyn A Peters 1, Mykhaylo Usyk 2,3, Robert D Burk 1,2,3,4
PMCID: PMC12772430  NIHMSID: NIHMS2129190  PMID: 41091637

Abstract

Purpose of review:

To summarize the relationship of vaginal and gut microbiomes with HIV transmission, pathogenesis, and treatment, focusing on women’s health.

Recent findings:

Bacterial vaginosis (i.e., vaginal microbiome dysbiosis) is a well-established risk factor for HIV acquisition, and recent research focused on molecular mechanisms and biomarkers for HIV acquisition related to vaginal microbiota. Recent clinical trials reported on probiotics to treat bacterial vaginosis with the goal of HIV prevention; however, durability of treatment response remains sub-optimal. The vaginal microbiome may impact efficacy of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) and antiretroviral therapy (ART) in vaginal tissue, with recent literature examining vaginal microbiota and long-acting PrEP vaginal rings. Some research also suggests effects of PrEP or ART initiation on the vaginal microbiome. Regarding the gut microbiome, associations with HIV status may differ more by sexual practices than biological sex, and sex-specific roles of gut microbiota in HIV pathogenesis and treatment are unknown. Interactions of the gut microbiome with estrogens could underlie a role of gut microbiota in health of women with HIV.

Summary:

The vaginal microbiome remains an important factor in HIV acquisition, prevention, and treatment in women. The gut microbiome has roles in HIV pathogenesis and treatment, but women-specific effects are unclear.

Keywords: HIV, microbiome, prevention, treatment, women

INTRODUCTION

Sex differences in HIV infection, including HIV acquisition, pathogenesis, and treatment response, can be attributed to a variety of factors spanning anatomy, genetics, immunity, and hormones [1]. For example, vaginal inflammation increases risk of HIV acquisition [2, 3], which may contribute to higher rates of HIV infection from heterosexual intercourse in women vs. men [4]; while the role of estrogen in HIV latency may lead to sex differences in HIV pathogenesis and cure strategies [5]. The human microbiome may also play important roles in sex differences in HIV. Spanning many anatomical sites, human-resident microbial communities differ by sex [6, 7], and contribute to host metabolism, immunity, and inflammation, underlying their role in disease susceptibility and sex differences therein. In this review, with focus on women’s health, we summarize the relationship of vaginal and gut microbiomes with HIV transmission, pathogenesis, and treatment, paying particular attention to recent insights from female populations.

VAGINAL MICROBIOME IN HIV ACQUISITION

A healthy vaginal microbiome in reproductive age women is characterized by low diversity and dominance of Lactobacillus, which maintain an acidic environment aiding in protection from pathogens [8]. In contrast, a diverse vaginal microbiome depleted in Lactobacillus and enriched in other anaerobes (e.g., Gardnerella, Prevotella), a condition termed bacterial vaginosis (BV), is associated with increased vaginal pH, inflammation, and risk of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) [9]. BV, affecting 25% of women globally with greatest burden in resource-limited settings [9], has been consistently associated with increased risk of HIV acquisition [10]. Over the last decade, research has strongly supported the notion that microbiome dysbiosis in the female reproductive tract promotes local inflammation [11, 12], which increases risk of acquiring HIV [2, 3, 1319].

To address the vaginal microbiome as an important risk factor for HIV acquisition, recent studies focused on further clarifying underlying mechanisms. Smoorenburg et al. (2025) reported that Prevotella timonensis, a BV-associated bacterium, increased HIV uptake in dendritic cells present in vaginal tissue, and enhanced HIV transmission to target cells [20]. This new data, taken together with other recent data showing P. timonensis induces HIV uptake and transmission in vaginal Langerhans cells [21], and increases HIV uptake and production in vaginal CD4+ T cells [22], suggests that P. timonensis may underlie BV-related HIV susceptibility, though further research is needed to isolate molecular mechanisms by which P. timonensis enhances viral uptake and transmission [2022].

Recent observational studies provided new insights into vaginal microbiome biomarkers of HIV risk. In a nested case-control study among 586 African women, Srinivasan et al. (2024) found that 14 bacterial taxa in vaginal swabs were associated with greater HIV acquisition risk, while Lactobacillus crispatus was associated with reduced risk [23]. The 14 risk-associated taxa (not typical BV-associated bacteria) were correlated with higher vaginal proinflammatory cytokines IL-1α and IL-1β, and served together with immune biomarkers to classify risk of HIV [23]. Meanwhile, a point-of-care cytokine biomarker lateral flow test for STI and BV screening, the Genital InFlammation Test (GIFT) [24], has been developed based on research showing vaginal cytokines IL-1α, IL-1β, and IP-10 performed well in classification of asymptomatic STIs and vaginal microbiome dysbiosis [25]. Ramboarina et al. (2024) reported that the GIFT device is being prospectively evaluated to determine its performance, acceptability, and cost-effectiveness as a routine care strategy to identify women at high risk of HIV in resource limited countries [24].

MODIFICATION OF VAGINAL MICROBIOME FOR HIV PREVENTION

Given the well-known association of BV with HIV incidence, modification of the vaginal microbiome for HIV prevention in women is of utmost importance; however there are limited effective treatments for BV [14]. Standard-of-care antibiotic treatment (i.e., metronidazole) for BV often fails or is followed by recurrence [26, 27], with no improvement by addition of vaginal probiotics based on current strategies [28]. Standard BV treatment may lead to complex outcomes regarding HIV susceptibility, with one study showing reduced HIV entry into cervical CD4+ T cells but increased chemokine levels associated with HIV acquisition, the latter related to Lactobacillus iners colonization [29]. Further, metronidazole was shown to reduce genital inflammation through reductions in BV-associated bacteria rather than increases in Lactobacillus [30], and may increase vaginal fungi with unclear implications [31]. Given limitations and complexities with standard BV treatment, novel treatments are needed to move the HIV prevention field forward.

Recent clinical trials tested new treatments for improving the vaginal microbiome in women with high HIV risk. Gill et al. (2025) reported on a phase 1 clinical trial of intravaginal estradiol and/or vaginal or oral Lactobacillus probiotics for 30 days, among 50 African, Caribbean and Black women in Canada [32], the rationale based on estrogen supporting glycogen production in the vaginal mucosa, which should promote Lactobacillus and is typically prescribed for genitourinary symptoms in menopausal women [8, 33]. While the trial demonstrated success in safety and tolerability, future publications will investigate secondary outcomes including vaginal Lactobacillus, inflammation, and HIV target cells [32]. Hemmerling et al. (2025) conducted a phase 2 randomized, placebo-controlled trial of a vaginal live therapeutic, LACTIN-V (Lactobacillus crispatus CTV-05) among women at high HIV risk in South Africa [34]. Forty-five women with BV completed metronidazole treatment and were randomized 2:1 to LACTIN-V or placebo for 4 weeks. LACTIN-V increased vaginal L. crispatus after 4 weeks, though the effect was minimized at 8 weeks [34]. These results were consistent with a prior larger trial of LACTIN-V in the U.S. with similar design for 11 weeks, in which LACTIN-V significantly increased L. crispatus and lowered incidence of BV recurrence at 12 weeks [35]. Additionally in the South African trial, endocervical CD4+ HIV target cells increased in the placebo but not LACTIN-V group at 4 weeks, suggesting that treatment with LACTIN-V after metronidazole has potential to reduce risk of HIV acquisition [34], though further strategies are needed to support durability past the treatment period. Finally, Zulaika et al. (2024) reported a protocol for a single-arm trial of menstrual cups to reduce BV and HIV/STI incidence among women in Kenya [36], which is ongoing.

VAGINAL MICROBIOME IN PRE-EXPOSURE PROPHYLAXIS (PrEP)

Treatment with PrEP has reduced HIV transmission in high-risk populations, however early PrEP trials showed high variability of efficacy in women [3739]. Almost a decade ago, Klatt et al. demonstrated that the vaginal microbiome modifies efficacy of topically-applied vaginal tenofovir gel in protection against HIV [40], which was a breakthrough in understanding variable efficacy of PrEP in women. Specifically, tenofovir gel significantly reduced incidence of HIV in women with Lactobacillus-dominated vaginal microbiomes, but not in women dominated by Gardnerella or other BV-associated bacteria, since these bacteria can rapidly metabolize and deplete tenofovir in vaginal mucosa [40, 41]. Further, Lactobacillus-dominant women in the trial faced greater HIV risk if using injectable depot medroxyprogesterone acetate [42]. On the other hand, oral PrEP efficacy may not be influenced by the vaginal microbiome [4345].

With great interest in long-acting PrEP to overcome daily adherence issues, recent research examined tenofovir vaginal rings and whether vaginal microbiota may influence drug release. In a phase 1 randomized trial of a 90-day tenofovir vaginal ring, Thurman et al. (2022) found that women with non-Lactobacillus-dominated vaginal microbiomes had higher release rates of tenofovir from vaginal rings and lower tenofovir concentration in vaginal tissue, which may be due to higher vaginal pH promoted by non-Lactobacillus-dominated microbiota [46]. However, this did not impact in vitro HIV inhibition in vaginal fluid, which was increased in all women [46]. More recently, Liu et al. (2024) reported that vaginal microbiota were unrelated to residual tenofovir in returned rings in a phase 1 randomized trial of a 90-day tenofovir vaginal ring [47]. To target BV and HIV prevention simultaneously, a combination vaginal ring of metronidazole and PrEP is also under development [48].

Initiation of PrEP may also impact the vaginal microbiota. In a study of 255 pregnant women with or without HIV in Malawi, Saidi et al. (2025) observed that oral PrEP initiation in women without HIV increased vaginal microbiome diversity, decreased L. iners, and increased Gardnerella, a shift associated with higher risk of pre-term birth [49]. However, Mazibuko-Motau et al. (2022) did not observe an impact of oral PrEP initiation on longitudinal shifts in vaginal microbiota among South African women [50].

VAGINAL MICROBIOME IN WOMEN WITH HIV

Given the role BV plays in susceptibility to HIV, it is difficult to disentangle whether HIV infection also contributes to BV development [45], though research suggests that HIV is associated with BV persistence (but not incidence), particularly in immunocompromised women with HIV [51]. BV is associated with obstetric complications including pre-term birth and spontaneous abortion [9], and increased vaginal HIV shedding which impacts transmission [17, 52], highlighting importance of BV treatment among women with HIV. Research is mixed on how antiretroviral therapy (ART) and/or hormonal contraception impact the vaginal microbiota and vaginal HIV shedding among women with HIV, with some research suggesting no impact of ART initiation on the vaginal microbiome in women with HIV [53]. However, in the study of pregnant women with or without HIV in Malawi, ART initiation decreased vaginal microbiome diversity and increased abundance of Prevotella, Gardnerella, and Peptostreptococcus among women with HIV [49]. In a clinical trial of an ethinyl estradiol/etonogestrel vaginal ring among 74 women with HIV, Tobin et al. (2024) reported that vaginal ring use increased prevalence of Lactobacillus-dominated vaginal microbiomes, which were associated with lower risk of vaginal HIV shedding [54].

Some research suggests that the vaginal microbiome may also modulate ART efficacy in the female genital tract in women with HIV [55], similar to its modulation of PrEP efficacy in women without HIV, reviewed above. Lantz et al. (2023) found that ART drug concentrations were positively correlated with anaerobic bacteria in cervicovaginal fluid, which differed by ART regimen, among 73 women with HIV in Malawi [56]. Other reports by that group noted positive correlations of Lactobacillus with lamivudine triphosphate concentration in cervicovaginal fluid among 50 women with HIV in Uganda receiving tenofovir/lamivudine-based ART [57, 58].

GUT MICROBIOME IN WOMEN WITH HIV

Gut microbiota carry out many critical functions including metabolism of exogenous and endogenous compounds, and modulation of immunity and inflammation. Therefore, the impact of HIV on the gut microbiome, and role of gut microbiota in HIV pathogenesis and treatment, has been a focus of HIV research over the past two decades. It is generally recognized that HIV infection leads to gut microbiome dysbiosis, in the form of reduced diversity and altered composition, though altered taxa may vary across studies [5961]; while ART in part may reverse gut microbiome dysbiosis [62]. Microbial translocation due to impaired gut barrier is a suspected cause of immune activation and inflammation in HIV [63]. Gut microbiome alterations in HIV may contribute to non-communicable diseases [64], and gut microbiome-targeted therapies (e.g., fecal microbiome transplant, probiotics) have been investigated to reduce inflammation and morbidity in people with HIV, though progress is ongoing [65, 66].

While these topics have been reviewed extensively [59, 62, 6466], here we focus on the gut microbiome in women with HIV specifically. There has been limited research on whether the gut microbiome is associated with HIV acquisition risk in women, likely because (1) the vaginal microbiome is more relevant for HIV acquisition in women given risk of vaginal transmission, and (2) the gut or rectal microbiome is more relevant to risk of HIV in men who have sex with men (MSM) given risk of rectal transmission [6769].

Whether there are sex differences in the association of HIV with the gut microbiome is currently unknown, though there is sexual dimorphism of the gut microbiome [7072]. MSM sexual practices, which are related to Prevotella-rich gut microbiome composition, have confounded associations of HIV status with the gut microbiome [73] and pose difficulties in disentangling effects of sex, sexual practices, and HIV on gut microbiota. In a meta-analysis, HIV was associated with decreased gut microbiome diversity among women and men who have sex with women, but not MSM [60], supporting heterogeneity by sexual practices, but not biological sex, in the relationship of HIV and the gut microbiome. A number of studies reported comparisons of the gut microbiome in women with vs. without HIV [7477], but without comparable men to determine sex-specific effects. Our group has uncovered relationships of the gut microbiome with various outcomes in women with and without HIV, including diabetes [78], subclinical atherosclerosis [79, 80], sleep [81], and cognitive function [82], but without comparable men to examine sex specificity. However, in a recent large analysis of aging and the gut microbiome, we found similar associations of age with gut microbiota across sex and HIV strata [83].

Research by our group has also focused on relationships of hormonal factors (menopause, sex hormones) with the gut microbiome in women with and without HIV. The gut microbiome is hypothesized to “recycle” estrogens and other sex hormones via deconjugation reactions which facilitate hormone reabsorption from the gut [6] – this relationship may underlie associations of the gut microbiome with hormonal factors, which may be particularly important in women with HIV who have lower estrogen levels [84, 85], and possible earlier menopause with more severe symptoms [8691]. In a cross-sectional study of 446 women with and without HIV in the U.S., we observed compositional differences in the gut microbiome for post- vs. pre-menopausal women with HIV, including depletion of Faecalibacterium prausnitzii and abundance of the β-glucuronidase gene, involved in estrogen deconjugation; while these differences were not observed among women without HIV [92]. The menopause-related gut microbiome profile in women with HIV was associated with adverse metabolomic and proteomic profiles and elevated waist-to-hip ratio, suggesting contribution to cardiometabolic risk [92]. Further, in cross-sectional analysis of 197 post-menopausal women with and without HIV, we found positive associations of serum estrogens with gut microbiome diversity, Alistipes and Collinsella species, and the β-glucuronidase gene; while estrone-related gut microbiota were associated with reduced odds of carotid artery plaque [85], though sample size was limited for HIV-stratified analysis. This research highlights that via interactions with sex hormones, the gut microbiome may play a unique role in women’s health, particularly for women with HIV. It is also possible that via estrogen recycling, the gut microbiome could positively influence the vaginal microbiome [8] to reduce BV and HIV risk, though this has never been studied.

CONCLUSIONS

Vaginal microbiome dysbiosis (i.e., BV) has become a well-established risk factor for HIV acquisition. Molecular mechanisms of vaginal microbiota contributing to acquisition are still being uncovered, as are vaginal microbiome-related biomarkers of HIV risk. Current probiotic therapies to resolve BV for HIV prevention show promise but limited durability; more research is needed to identify effective, durable BV treatments. Additionally, the vaginal microbiome may alter PrEP and ART efficacy in vaginal tissue through drug metabolism, particularly for topical PrEP. Evidence for effects of PrEP or ART initiation on vaginal microbiota remains limited. The effect of HIV on the gut microbiome may differ more by sexual practices than biological sex, while interactions of menopause and estrogens with the gut microbiome may have implications for cardiometabolic health in women with HIV. Future research can explore whether gut microbiota have a sex-specific role in health of women with HIV.

KEY POINTS.

  • Dysbiosis of the vaginal microbiome, often called bacterial vaginosis, is a well-established risk factor for HIV acquisition.

  • More research is needed to identify effective and durable treatments for bacterial vaginosis to promote HIV prevention in women.

  • The vaginal microbiome may alter PrEP and ART efficacy through drug metabolism.

  • Sex-specific effects of the gut microbiome in HIV pathogenesis and treatment are unclear.

Funding

BAP was supported by funding from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) under award numbers K01HL160146 and R03HL182350.

Footnotes

Conflict of Interest: Brandilyn A. Peters, Mykhaylo Usyk, and Robert D. Burk declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent: This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Scully EP. Sex Differences in HIV Infection. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2018;15(2):136–46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Arnold KB, Burgener A, Birse K, et al. Increased levels of inflammatory cytokines in the female reproductive tract are associated with altered expression of proteases, mucosal barrier proteins, and an influx of HIV-susceptible target cells. Mucosal Immunol. 2016;9(1):194–205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Masson L, Passmore JA, Liebenberg LJ, et al. Genital inflammation and the risk of HIV acquisition in women. Clin Infect Dis. 2015;61(2):260–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Patel P, Borkowf CB, Brooks JT, et al. Estimating per-act HIV transmission risk: a systematic review. AIDS. 2014;28(10):1509–19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Das B, Dobrowolski C, Luttge B, et al. Estrogen receptor-1 is a key regulator of HIV-1 latency that imparts gender-specific restrictions on the latent reservoir. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018;115(33):E7795. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Peters BA, Santoro N, Kaplan RC, Qi Q. Spotlight on the Gut Microbiome in Menopause: Current Insights. Int J Womens Health. 2022;14:1059–72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ma ZS, Li W. How and Why Men and Women Differ in Their Microbiomes: Medical Ecology and Network Analyses of the Microgenderome. Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany). 2019;6(23):1902054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Łaniewski P, Herbst-Kralovetz MM. Connecting microbiome and menopause for healthy ageing. Nature Microbiology. 2022;7(3):354–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Bradshaw CS, Plummer EL, Muzny CA, et al. Bacterial vaginosis. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2025;11(1):43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Atashili J, Poole C, Ndumbe PM, et al. Bacterial vaginosis and HIV acquisition: a meta-analysis of published studies. AIDS. 2008;22(12):1493–501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Anahtar MN, Byrne EH, Doherty KE, et al. Cervicovaginal bacteria are a major modulator of host inflammatory responses in the female genital tract. Immunity. 2015;42(5):965–76. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Lennard K, Dabee S, Barnabas Shaun L, et al. Microbial Composition Predicts Genital Tract Inflammation and Persistent Bacterial Vaginosis in South African Adolescent Females. Infect Immun. 2017;86(1): 10.1128/iai.00410-17. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Gosmann C, Anahtar MN, Handley SA, et al. Lactobacillus-Deficient Cervicovaginal Bacterial Communities Are Associated with Increased HIV Acquisition in Young South African Women. Immunity. 2017;46(1):29–37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Cherenack EM, Broedlow CA, Klatt NR. The vaginal microbiome and HIV transmission dynamics. Curr Opin HIV AIDS. 2024;19(5). [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Waltmann A, Thomas C, Duncan JA. The role of the genital microbiota in the acquisition and pathogenesis of sexually transmitted infections. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2023;36(1):35–48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.McKinnon LR, Achilles SL, Bradshaw CS, et al. The Evolving Facets of Bacterial Vaginosis: Implications for HIV Transmission. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2019;35(3):219–28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Borgdorff H, Tsivtsivadze E, Verhelst R, et al. Lactobacillus-dominated cervicovaginal microbiota associated with reduced HIV/STI prevalence and genital HIV viral load in African women. The ISME journal. 2014;8(9):1781–93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Wang Y, Noël-Romas L, Perner M, et al. Non-Lactobacillus-Dominant and Polymicrobial Vaginal Microbiomes Are More Common in Younger South African Women and Predictive of Increased Risk of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Acquisition. Clin Infect Dis. 2023;76(8):1372–81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.McClelland RS, Lingappa JR, Srinivasan S, et al. Evaluation of the association between the concentrations of key vaginal bacteria and the increased risk of HIV acquisition in African women from five cohorts: a nested case-control study. The Lancet Infectious Diseases. 2018;18(5):554–64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.van Smoorenburg MY, Remmerswaal EBM, Segui-Perez C, et al. Vaginal Prevotella timonensis Bacteria Enhance HIV-1 Uptake and Differentially Affect Transmission by Distinct Primary Dendritic Cell Subsets. Eur J Immunol. 2025;55(3):e202451192. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; * This in vitro experiment showed that Prevotella timonensis may enhance HIV viral uptake in dendritic cells from vaginal tissue.
  • 21.van Teijlingen NH, Helgers LC, Sarrami-Forooshani R, et al. Vaginal bacterium Prevotella timonensis turns protective Langerhans cells into HIV-1 reservoirs for virus dissemination. EMBO J. 2022;41(19):e110629. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.van Teijlingen NH, van Smoorenburg MY, Sarrami-Forooshani R, et al. Prevotella timonensis Bacteria Associated With Vaginal Dysbiosis Enhance Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Susceptibility Of Vaginal CD4+ T Cells. The Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2024;230(1):e43–e7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Srinivasan S, Richardson BA, Wallis JM, et al. Vaginal Bacteria and Proinflammatory Host Immune Mediators as Biomarkers of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Acquisition Risk Among African Women. J Infect Dis. 2024;230(6):1444–55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; * In a large prospective analysis of African women, this study found fourteen bacterial taxa that are not typical of bacterial vaginosis were associated with greater risk of HIV acquisition.
  • 24.Ramboarina S, Crucitti T, Gill K, et al. Novel point-of-care cytokine biomarker lateral flow test for the screening for sexually transmitted infections and bacterial vaginosis: study protocol of a multicentre multidisciplinary prospective observational clinical study to evaluate the performance and feasibility of the Genital InFlammation Test (GIFT). BMJ Open. 2024;14(5):e084918. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Masson L, Barnabas S, Deese J, et al. Inflammatory cytokine biomarkers of asymptomatic sexually transmitted infections and vaginal dysbiosis: a multicentre validation study. Sex Transm Infect. 2019;95(1):5–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Bradshaw CS, Sobel JD. Current Treatment of Bacterial Vaginosis-Limitations and Need for Innovation. J Infect Dis. 2016;214 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S14–20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Joseph RJ, Ser HL, Kuai YH, et al. Finding a Balance in the Vaginal Microbiome: How Do We Treat and Prevent the Occurrence of Bacterial Vaginosis? Antibiotics (Basel). 2021;10(6). [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Tan H, Fu Y, Yang C, Ma J. Effects of metronidazole combined probiotics over metronidazole alone for the treatment of bacterial vaginosis: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017;295(6):1331–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Joag V, Obila O, Gajer P, et al. Impact of Standard Bacterial Vaginosis Treatment on the Genital Microbiota, Immune Milieu, and Ex Vivo Human Immunodeficiency Virus Susceptibility. Clin Infect Dis. 2019;68(10):1675–83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Armstrong E, Hemmerling A, Miller S, et al. Metronidazole treatment rapidly reduces genital inflammation through effects on bacterial vaginosis–associated bacteria rather than lactobacilli. The Journal of Clinical Investigation. 2022;132(6). [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Armstrong E, Hemmerling A, Miller S, et al. Vaginal fungi are associated with treatment-induced shifts in the vaginal microbiota and with a distinct genital immune profile. Microbiol Spectr. 2024;12(8):e0350123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Gill B, Wessels JM, Hayes CL, et al. Feasibility, safety and tolerability of estrogen and/or probiotics for improving vaginal health in Canadian African, Caribbean, and Black women: A pilot phase 1 clinical trial. PLoS One. 2025;20(1):e0315576. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Afshin A, Sur PJ, Fay KA, et al. Health effects of dietary risks in 195 countries, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. The Lancet. 2019;393(10184):1958–72. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Hemmerling A, Mitchell CM, Demby S, et al. Effect of the vaginal live biotherapeutic LACTIN-V (Lactobacillus crispatus CTV-05) on vaginal microbiota and genital tract inflammation among women at high risk of HIV acquisition in South Africa: a phase 2, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Microbe. 2025;6(6):101037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; ** This was the first trial to show that vaginal colonization with a live L. crispatus biotherapeutic strain was possible in an African setting.
  • 35.Cohen CR, Wierzbicki MR, French AL, et al. Randomized Trial of Lactin-V to Prevent Recurrence of Bacterial Vaginosis. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(20):1906–15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Zulaika G, Otieno FO, Mason L, et al. Menstrual cups to reduce bacterial vaginosis and STIs through reduced harmful sexual and menstrual practices among economically vulnerable women: protocol of a single arm trial in western Kenya. BMC Public Health. 2024;24(1):3089. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Karim SS, Kashuba AD, Werner L, Karim QA. Drug concentrations after topical and oral antiretroviral pre-exposure prophylaxis: implications for HIV prevention in women. Lancet. 2011;378(9787):279–81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Cottrell ML, Yang KH, Prince HM, et al. A Translational Pharmacology Approach to Predicting Outcomes of Preexposure Prophylaxis Against HIV in Men and Women Using Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate With or Without Emtricitabine. J Infect Dis. 2016;214(1):55–64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Nicol MR, Olsem CM. Hormones, microbes, and PrEP drugs in the female genital tract. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2025;21(5):525–34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Klatt NR, Cheu R, Birse K, et al. Vaginal bacteria modify HIV tenofovir microbicide efficacy in African women. Science. 2017;356(6341):938–45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Cheu RK, Gustin AT, Lee C, et al. Impact of vaginal microbiome communities on HIV antiretroviral-based pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) drug metabolism. PLoS Pathog. 2020;16(12):e1009024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Noël-Romas L, Perner M, Molatlhegi R, et al. Vaginal microbiome-hormonal contraceptive interactions associate with the mucosal proteome and HIV acquisition. PLoS Pathog. 2020;16(12):e1009097. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Heffron R, McClelland RS, Balkus JE, et al. Efficacy of oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV among women with abnormal vaginal microbiota: a post-hoc analysis of the randomised, placebo-controlled Partners PrEP Study. Lancet HIV. 2017;4(10):e449–e56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Morris S, Cottrell M, Rawlings SA, et al. Genital Inflammation Is Not Associated With Decreased Vaginal Tenofovir Concentrations in Women Taking Oral PrEP. JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes. 2022;89(4):390–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Swanson EC, Basting CM, Klatt NR. The role of pharmacomicrobiomics in HIV prevention, treatment, and women’s health. Microbiome. 2024;12(1):254. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Thurman AR, Ravel J, Gajer P, et al. Vaginal Microbiota and Mucosal Pharmacokinetics of Tenofovir in Healthy Women Using a 90-Day Tenofovir/Levonorgestrel Vaginal Ring. Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology. 2022;12:799501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Liu AY, Gundacker H, Richardson B, et al. Phase 1 randomized pharmacokinetic and safety study of a 90-day tenofovir vaginal ring in the United States. J Int AIDS Soc. 2024;27(3):e26223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; ** The vaginal microbiota were not associated with residual tenofovir in a 90-day trial of a tenofovir vaginal ring, suggesting that the vaginal microbiome did not impact its pharmacokinetics.
  • 48.Zhao X, Boyd P, Bashi YD, et al. Two into one does go: Formulation development of a multipurpose combination vaginal ring releasing dapivirine and metronidazole for prevention of HIV infection and treatment of bacterial vaginosis. Int J Pharm. 2023;648:123572. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Saidi F, Graybill LA, Tang JH, et al. Effect of initiation of antiretroviral drugs for HIV prevention or treatment on the vaginal microbiome of pregnant women in Malawi. NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes. 2025;11(1):67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; * This study provided the first evidence that oral PrEP initiation could adversely impact the vaginal microbiome.
  • 50.Mazibuko-Motau N, Sobia P, Xu J, et al. Vaginal microbial shifts are unaffected by oral pre-exposure prophylaxis in South African women. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):16187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Jamieson DJ, Duerr A, Klein RS, et al. Longitudinal Analysis of Bacterial Vaginosis: Findings From the HIV Epidemiology Research Study. Obstet Gynecol. 2001;98(4). [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Cu-Uvin S, Hogan JW, Caliendo AM, et al. Association between Bacterial Vaginosis and Expression of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 RNA in the Female Genital Tract. Clin Infect Dis. 2001;33(6):894–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Liu CM, Packman ZR, Abraham AG, et al. The Effect of Antiretroviral Therapy Initiation on the Vaginal Microbiome in HIV-Infected Women. Open Forum Infectious Diseases. 2019;6(9):ofz328. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Tobin NH, Brooker SL, Li F, et al. Use of an Ethinyl Estradiol/Etonogestrel Vaginal Ring Alters Vaginal Microbial Communities in Women With HIV. J Infect Dis. 2025;231(3):583–94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; ** This study provided evidence that hormonal contraception with a vaginal ring may benefit the vaginal microbiome and reduce HIV shedding among women with HIV.
  • 55.Taneva E, Sinclair S, Mesquita PM, et al. Vaginal microbiome modulates topical antiretroviral drug pharmacokinetics. JCI Insight. 2018;3(13). [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Lantz AM, Cottrell ML, Corbett AH, et al. Vaginal microbiome, antiretroviral concentrations, and HIV genital shedding in the setting of hormonal contraception initiation in Malawi. AIDS. 2023;37(14):2185–90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Lantz AM, Kiweewa Matovu F, Johnson R, et al. Female Genital Tract Host Factors and Tenofovir and Lamivudine Active Metabolites. J Infect Dis. 2024;230(6):1434–43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Nicol MR, Eneh P, Nakalega R, et al. Depot Medroxyprogesterone Acetate and the Vaginal Microbiome as Modifiers of Tenofovir Diphosphate and Lamivudine Triphosphate Concentrations in the Female Genital Tract of Ugandan Women: Implications for Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate/Lamivudine in Preexposure Prophylaxis. Clin Infect Dis. 2020;70(8):1717–24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Vujkovic-Cvijin I, Somsouk M. HIV and the Gut Microbiota: Composition, Consequences, and Avenues for Amelioration. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2019;16(3):204–13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Tuddenham SA, Koay WLA, Zhao N, et al. The Impact of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection on Gut Microbiota alpha-Diversity: An Individual-level Meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis. 2020;70(4):615–27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Zhou J, Zhang Y, Cui P, et al. Gut Microbiome Changes Associated With HIV Infection and Sexual Orientation. Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology. 2020;10:434. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Gáspár Z, Nagavci B, Szabó BG, Lakatos B. Gut Microbiome Alteration in HIV/AIDS and the Role of Antiretroviral Therapy-A Scoping Review. Microorganisms. 2024;12(11). [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Brenchley JM, Douek DC. Microbial Translocation Across the GI Tract. Annu Rev Immunol. 2012;30(1):149–73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Mac Cann R, Newman E, Devane D, et al. HIV, the gut microbiome and clinical outcomes, a systematic review. PLoS One. 2024;19(12):e0308859. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Bulnes R, Utay NS. Therapeutic microbiome modulation: new frontiers in HIV treatment. Curr Opin HIV AIDS. 2024;19(5):268–75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Brenchley JM, Serrano-Villar S. From dysbiosis to defense: harnessing the gut microbiome in HIV/SIV therapy. Microbiome. 2024;12(1):113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Abdool Karim SS, Baxter C, Passmore JS, et al. The genital tract and rectal microbiomes: their role in HIV susceptibility and prevention in women. J Int AIDS Soc. 2019;22(5):e25300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Chen Y, Lin H, Cole M, et al. Signature changes in gut microbiome are associated with increased susceptibility to HIV-1 infection in MSM. Microbiome. 2021;9(1):237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Coleman SL, Neff CP, Li SX, et al. Can gut microbiota of men who have sex with men influence HIV transmission? Gut microbes. 2020;11(3):610–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Yatsunenko T, Rey FE, Manary MJ, et al. Human gut microbiome viewed across age and geography. Nature. 2012;486(7402):222–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Markle JG, Frank DN, Mortin-Toth S, et al. Sex differences in the gut microbiome drive hormone-dependent regulation of autoimmunity. Science. 2013;339(6123):1084–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Yurkovetskiy L, Burrows M, Khan AA, et al. Gender bias in autoimmunity is influenced by microbiota. Immunity. 2013;39(2):400–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Armstrong AJS, Shaffer M, Nusbacher NM, et al. An exploration of Prevotella-rich microbiomes in HIV and men who have sex with men. Microbiome. 2018;6(1):198-. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Chandiwana P, Munjoma PT, Mazhandu AJ, et al. Antenatal gut microbiome profiles and effect on pregnancy outcome in HIV infected and HIV uninfected women in a resource limited setting. BMC Microbiol. 2023;23(1):4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Munjoma PT, Chandiwana P, Wyss J, et al. Immune activation and inflammation in lactating women on combination antiretroviral therapy: role of gut dysfunction and gut microbiota imbalance. Front Immunol. 2023;14:1280262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Wang Z, Usyk M, Sollecito CC, et al. Altered Gut Microbiota and Host Metabolite Profiles in HIV-infected Women. Clin Infect Dis. 2019. [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Williams B, Weber K, Chlipala G, et al. HIV Status Does Not Affect Rectal Microbiome Composition, Diversity, or Stability over Time: A Chicago Women’s Interagency HIV Study. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2019;35(3):260–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Luo K, Peters BA, Moon JY, et al. Metabolic and inflammatory perturbation of diabetes associated gut dysbiosis in people living with and without HIV infection. Genome Med. 2024;16(1):59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Luo K, Wang Z, Peters BA, et al. Tryptophan metabolism, gut microbiota, and carotid artery plaque in women with and without HIV infection. AIDS. 2023. [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Wang Z, Peters BA, Bryant M, et al. Gut microbiota, circulating inflammatory markers and metabolites, and carotid artery atherosclerosis in HIV infection. Microbiome. 2023;11(1):119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Zhang Y, Lin CL, Weber KM, et al. Association of gut microbiota with objective sleep measures in women with and without HIV infection: the IDOze study. J Infect Dis. 2023. [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Hua S, Peters BA, Lee S, et al. Gut Microbiota and Cognitive Function Among Women Living with HIV. J Alzheimers Dis. 2023;95(3):1147–61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Peters BA, Xue X, Hanna DB, et al. Healthy Aging and the Gut Microbiome in People With and Without HIV. J Infect Dis. 2025. [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Karim R, Mack WJ, Kono N, et al. Gonadotropin and sex steroid levels in HIV-infected premenopausal women and their association with subclinical atherosclerosis in HIV-infected and -uninfected women in the women’s interagency HIV study (WIHS). The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. 2013;98(4):E610–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Peters BA, Hanna DB, Wang Y, et al. Sex hormones, the stool microbiome, and subclinical atherosclerosis in women with and without HIV. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2023. [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Schoenbaum EE, Hartel D, Lo Y, et al. HIV infection, drug use, and onset of natural menopause. Clin Infect Dis. 2005;41(10):1517–24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Scherzer R, Greenblatt RM, Merhi ZO, et al. Use of antimüllerian hormone to predict the menopausal transition in HIV-infected women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;216(1):46.e1–.e11. [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Cejtin HE, Evans CT, Greenblatt R, et al. Prolonged Amenorrhea and Resumption of Menses in Women with HIV. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2018;27(12):1441–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Andany N, Kennedy VL, Aden M, Loutfy M. Perspectives on menopause and women with HIV. International journal of women’s health. 2016;8:1–22. [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Tariq S, Delpech V, Anderson J. The impact of the menopause transition on the health and wellbeing of women living with HIV: A narrative review. Maturitas. 2016;88:76–83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Looby SED. Menopause-associated metabolic manifestations and symptomatology in HIV infection: a brief review with research implications. The Journal of the Association of Nurses in AIDS Care : JANAC. 2012;23(3):195–203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Wang Y, Sharma A, Weber KM, et al. The menopause-related gut microbiome: associations with metabolomics, inflammatory protein markers, and cardiometabolic health in women with HIV. Menopause. 2024;31(1). [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES