Skip to main content
NCBI home page
British Heart Journal logoLink to British Heart Journal
. 1987 Dec;58(6):613–616. doi: 10.1136/hrt.58.6.613

Randomised crossover trial of rate responsive Activitrax and conventional fixed rate ventricular pacing.

D P Lipkin 1, N Buller 1, M Frenneaux 1, L Ludgate 1, T Lowe 1, S C Webb 1, D M Krikler 1
PMCID: PMC1277313  PMID: 3322351

Abstract

Atrial tracking pacemakers may improve exercise capacity and symptoms because they maintain atrioventricular synchrony and preserve the physiological response of heart rate to exercise. A rate responsive pacemaker which reacts to physical activity may be effective in patients with sinus node disease who are unsuitable for VDD pacing. At least three months after implant a double blind randomised short and long term crossover study was performed in ten patients with complete heart block: block was present at rest and during exercise on a modified Bruce protocol. Symptoms were assessed on a visual analogue scale and exercise capacity (maximal oxygen consumption and anaerobic threshold) was measured during rate responsive (peak rate 125/min) and conventional fixed rate (VVI) pacing (70/min). One month after randomisation treadmill exercise was performed. The mode was then changed to the other pacing mode and exercise was repeated three hours later. After another month the process was repeated but in the reverse order. During long term assessment there was subjective improvement in the sensation of breathlessness with rate responsive pacing. During short term assessment maximal oxygen consumption increased and the benefit was maintained during long term rate responsive compared with long term VVI pacing; oxygen consumption at the anaerobic threshold was similarly improved. Activity detecting rate responsive pacing is better than fixed rate ventricular pacing in patients with complete atrioventricular block.

Full text

PDF
613

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Ausubel K., Steingart R. M., Shimshi M., Klementowicz P., Furman S. Maintenance of exercise stroke volume during ventricular versus atrial synchronous pacing: role of contractility. Circulation. 1985 Nov;72(5):1037–1043. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.72.5.1037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Benditt D. G., Mianulli M., Fetter J., Benson D. W., Jr, Dunnigan A., Molina E., Gornick C. C., Almquist A. Single-chamber cardiac pacing with activity-initiated chronotropic response: evaluation by cardiopulmonary exercise testing. Circulation. 1987 Jan;75(1):184–191. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.75.1.184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Donaldson R. M., Fox K., Rickards A. F. Initial experience with a physiological, rate responsive pacemaker. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1983 Feb 26;286(6366):667–671. doi: 10.1136/bmj.286.6366.667. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Humen D. P., Kostuk W. J., Klein G. J. Activity-sensing, rate-responsive pacing: improvement in myocardial performance with exercise. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1985 Jan;8(1):52–59. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1985.tb05723.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Karlöf I. Haemodynamic effect of atrail triggered versus fixed rate pacing at rest and during exercise in complete heart block. Acta Med Scand. 1975 Mar;197(3):195–206. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kristensson B. E., Arnman K., Smedgård P., Rydén L. Physiological versus single-rate ventricular pacing: a double-blind cross-over study. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1985 Jan;8(1):73–84. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1985.tb05726.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Lipkin D. P., Bayliss J., Poole-Wilson P. A. The ability of a submaximal exercise test to predict maximal exercise capacity in patients with heart failure. Eur Heart J. 1985 Oct;6(10):829–833. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a061768. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Lipkin D. P., Perrins J., Poole-Wilson P. A. Respiratory gas exchange in the assessment of patients with impaired ventricular function. Br Heart J. 1985 Sep;54(3):321–328. doi: 10.1136/hrt.54.3.321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Maron B. J. Myocardial disorganisation in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Another point of view. Br Heart J. 1983 Jul;50(1):1–3. doi: 10.1136/hrt.50.1.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Rossi P., Plicchi G., Canducci G., Rognoni G., Aina F. Respiration as a reliable physiological sensor for controlling cardiac pacing rate. Br Heart J. 1984 Jan;51(1):7–14. doi: 10.1136/hrt.51.1.7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. SAMET P., BERNSTEIN W., LEVINE S. SIGNIFICANCE OF THE ATRIAL CONTRIBUTION TO VENTRICULAR FILLING. Am J Cardiol. 1965 Feb;15:195–202. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(65)90454-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Wirtzfeld A., Heinze R., Stanzl K., Hoekstein K., Alt E., Liess H. D. Regulation of pacing rate by variations of mixed venous oxygen saturation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1984 Nov;7(6 Pt 2):1257–1262. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1984.tb05692.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Heart Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES