Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2025 Nov 29;16:542. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-29917-z

Histological prognostic factors in canine appendicular osteosarcoma: 57 cases (2014–2022)

Hiroshi Miyagi 1, Sheryl Coutermarsh-Ott 2, Laura E Selmic 3, Sara Campuzano 1, Maci Raybuck 1, Brittany Ciepluch 1, Joanne Tuohy 1,✉
PMCID: PMC12775486  PMID: 41318771

Abstract

Appendicular osteosarcoma is the most common primary malignant bone neoplasia in dogs, with a generally guarded prognosis. Multiple clinicopathological factors have been suggested to be associated with a negative prognosis in dogs with osteosarcoma. The objective of this study was to identify histopathological prognostic factors in canine appendicular osteosarcoma. We hypothesize that the presence of microvascular invasion and certain histological subtypes will negatively impact prognosis. Dogs with surgically resected primary appendicular osteosarcoma were enrolled. The following histopathological results were recorded: subtype of osteosarcoma (chondroblastic, osteoblastic, fibroblastic, giant cell, telangiectatic, poorly differentiated, combined), presence of microvascular invasion, lymphatic invasion, and completeness of surgical margin. Survival analysis was performed to evaluate disease outcome associations with histopathological data. Fifty-seven dogs were included. The majority (43) of dogs had osteoblastic osteosarcoma. Only two dogs had chondroblastic osteosarcoma, one dog had giant cell osteosarcoma, and no dog had fibroblastic or poorly differentiated osteosarcoma. Microvascular invasion was evident in 5 dogs. There was no significant difference in progression-free interval (PFS) or overall survival time (OST) between tumor subtypes. There was also no difference in PFS and OST with tumoral microvascular invasion (median 271 days and 168 days, respectively) or without microvascular invasion (median 209 days and 262 days, respectively). Neither microvascular invasion nor histologic subtype were significantly associated with outcome in dogs with appendicular osteosarcoma. Further evaluation of subtype as a prognostic indicator is warranted, given the predominance of a single subtype in this study. The clinical significance of osteosarcoma subtypes as a prognosticator needs further evaluation based on this study given the predominance of a single subtype.

Keywords: Appendicular osteosarcoma, Histopathology, Subtype, Microvascular invasion

Subject terms: Cancer, Diseases, Medical research, Oncology

Introduction

Osteosarcoma is the most common primary malignant bone neoplasia in dogs and in children and adolescents, affecting mainly the appendicular skeleton1–3. Certain breeds, such as Rottweilers and Great Danes, and body weight > 40 kg are factors associated with the occurrence of osteosarcoma that have been identified previously3,4.

Prognosis is generally guarded for both humans and dogs with osteosarcoma due to its aggressive biological behavior. The 5-year event-free survival (EFS) for humans is reported to be 27.4% with metastatic lung disease detected at the time of diagnosis5,6. The median survival times in dogs with surgery alone and with adjuvant chemotherapy are reported to be on average five months and 10–14 months, respectively7–11. In one study, 21% of dogs were alive at two years after diagnosis, compared to only 2% in an older study; this difference likely reflects the use of multimodal therapy in the more recent cohort versus surgery alone in the earlier study10,12.

Negative prognostic indicators have been assessed and identified in many studies, but not necessarily replicable, including younger or older age (< 5 years old or > 10 years old)10, higher body weight (> 40 kg)11, and the presence of regional lymph node metastasis13. Studies focusing on histopathological characteristics also did not reach a consensus14–18. In studies including only canine appendicular osteosarcomas, the fibroblastic subtype was shown to have longer survival compared to osteoblastic or chondroblastic osteosarcomas14. Another smaller study of canine osteosarcoma did not find a correlation between histological subtypes and prognosis15. In a meta-analysis study on negative clinicopathological prognostic factors, only elevated serum alkaline phosphatase (ALP) levels and proximal humeral location reached statistical significance1.

In humans, microvascular invasion has been studied in recent years as a potential prognosticator in osteosarcoma19,20. In pediatric patients who had received chemotherapy prior to surgical resection, the presence of peritumoral microvascular invasion was associated with a lower two-year event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival time (OST)19. Microvascular invasion was again shown to be associated with lower overall survival and higher recurrence or metastasis, especially in those with poor response to pre-operative chemotherapy in another human osteosarcoma study20. In dogs, approximately 70% of osteosarcoma samples were found to have microvascular invasion16,21. In one of these studies, microvascular invasion in canine osteosarcoma was found to have a significantly higher hazard of death (hazard ratio: 8.3)16.

Given the scarcity of studies investigating the prognostic significance of microvascular invasion in canine osteosarcoma and the lack of consensus as to whether histological subtypes have prognostic significance in osteosarcoma, the goal of this study was to identify histopathological prognostic factors in canine appendicular osteosarcoma. We hypothesize that the presence of microvascular invasion is associated with negative prognoses for disease-free progression and survival and that histological subtypes can provide prognostic data.

Materials and methods

Case selection

Electronic medical records from the Virginia Tech Animal Cancer Care and Research Center (VT-ACCRC) and from the Virginia Tech Veterinary Teaching Hospital (VT-VTH) were retrospectively reviewed for client-owned dogs with appendicular osteosarcoma from May 15, 2014, to March 9, 2022. Informed consent was obtained from all pet owners. All procedures were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. Dogs were included in the study if they had received thoracic radiographs or CT scan for staging prior to limb amputation surgery (partial or full), had a histopathological diagnosis of primary osteosarcoma arising from the appendicular bones. Dogs that received adjuvant treatment with chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy after amputation were included. Dogs were excluded if they did not receive surgical tumor resection, had non-appendicular osteosarcoma, had presence of metastasis at initial diagnosis via thoracic radiograph or CT scan, or lack of complete follow-up information.

Medical record review

Historical data at the time of diagnosis was obtained from the electronic medical records and included age, sex, neuter status, breed, body weight, serum ALP levels, anatomic location of primary tumor, date of osteosarcoma diagnosis, tumor histopathological evaluation, the presence of regional or distant metastases as determined via CT scans or thoracic radiographs, and abdominal ultrasound, the presence of ulcerated tumor or pathological fracture. Patient follow-up information after surgical treatment was acquired from medical records from recheck visits at the VT-ACCRC, VT-VTH and/or referring veterinarians, and from phone calls to owners requesting information about their pets. Follow-up information obtained included the presence of surgical site infection, the use of adjuvant therapy (chemotherapy, radiation therapy, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs [NSAIDs]), development of local recurrence or distant metastases, anatomic location of metastases, date of last follow-up if the patient was alive, or date and cause of euthanasia or death.

Histopathological review

All primary tumor specimens were reviewed by a single boarded pathologist (SCO), who was blinded to original histopathological results and clinical outcomes. Subtypes of osteosarcoma (chondroblastic, osteoblastic, fibroblastic, giant cell, telangiectatic, and poorly differentiated) were assigned based on the World Health Organization classification of tumors of soft tissue and bone22. The authors categorized tumors with distinct histologic features of two or more of the existing subtypes as a combined subtype, when there is no one subtype that predominates more than the other in the examined section. The following histopathological results were recorded in addition to tumor subtype: presence of microvascular invasion, mitotic counts performed in an area of 2.37 mm2 in 10 contiguous fields at 400× magnification avoiding areas of the tumor that are cell-poor from hemorrhage, edema, necrosis, cysts, presence of lymphatic invasion, and status of histologically tumor-free margin (HTFM). Lymphovascular invasion was defined by neoplastic cells within a space lined by lymphatic or blood vascular endothelium on H&E staining. HTFMs were determined on microscopic examination to be negative if no tumor cells contacted the surgical edges of the resection, and positive if tumor cells contacted the surgical edges of the resection. For patients who had lymph node extirpation performed at the time of primary tumor removal, the presence of nodal metastasis was evaluated.

Outcome definitions

Local recurrence was defined as tumor regrowth at or near surgical sites of tumor resection, as determined by the attending clinician based on physical examination, radiographic or CT findings, and/or confirmation via histopathology. The presence of distant metastases was defined as presumptive metastatic lesions noted on radiographic/CT or ultrasonographic findings and/or confirmed metastatic lesions obtained via cytology or histopathology. The date of osteosarcoma diagnosis was defined as the date of surgical resection. Progression-free survival time (PFS) was defined as the median time from the date of osteosarcoma diagnosis to the date of documented local recurrence or distant metastases. Overall survival time (OST) was defined as the median survival time from the date of diagnosis to the date of last follow-up if patient was still alive or the date of death due to disease. Death was attributed to disease if local tumor recurrence or metastasis was determined to be the cause. Unknown causes of death were attributed to death due to disease.

Statistical analysis

Dogs were censored in the PFS analysis if they had no documented local recurrence or distant metastasis or were alive or lost to follow up at the time of study completion. Dogs were censored in the OST analysis if they had documented death of causes other than osteosarcoma or were alive or lost to follow up at time of study completion. Kaplan-Meier survival function was used to calculate PFS and OST with 95% confidence intervals. Cox proportional hazard model was used to evaluate clinicopathological (serum ALP, primary tumor location) and histological data (subtype and the presence of microvascular invasion) and outcome measures (PFS and OST) using statistical software SAS version 9.4.

Results

Fifty-seven dogs met inclusion criteria during the study period. There were 23 spayed females, 1 intact female, 28 castrated males, and 5 intact males. The median age at the time of osteosarcoma diagnosis was 8.5 years (range: 1.3–12.1 years) and the median weight was 34.8 kg (range: 4.2–66.5 kg). Twenty-three breeds were represented. The most common were mixed-breed dogs (n = 18) and Labrador Retriever (n = 6). Other breeds included Golden Retriever (n = 4), Greyhound (n = 4), German Shepherd Dog (n = 3), Great Pyrenees (n = 2), Bulldog (n = 2), Doberman Pinscher (n = 2), and Great Dane (n = 2), and 1 each of Akita, Alaskan Malamute, Australian Shepherd, beagle, Borzoi, boxer, Chihuahua, Newfoundland, German Shorthaired Pointer, Chesapeake Bay Retriever, Saint Bernard, English Springer Spaniel, Russell Terrier, and Scottish Terrier.

Out of 57 dogs, 16 dogs (28.1%) were documented to have elevated serum ALP. The median elevation above the reference range was 204 U/L (range: 113–1737). The primary tumor locations included femur (n = 16), tibia (n = 13), radius (n = 13), humerus (n = 10), scapula (n = 2), metatarsus/tarsus (n = 1), ulna (n = 1), and fibula (n = 1). Full limb amputations were performed for surgical tumor resections in 56 dogs and a partial limb amputation was performed for one dog. Regional lymph node extirpation was performed in 43 out of 57 (75.4%) dogs who underwent surgical tumor resection. Ulcerated tumor and pathological fracture at time of diagnosis were present in 2/57 (3.5%) and 8/57 (14%) dogs, respectively. No dogs received palliative radiation therapy pre-operatively. Superficial surgical site infection was present in 5/57 (8.8%) dogs. NSAIDs were administered in 56/57 (98.2%) dogs post-operatively. No post-operative chemotherapy information was available in 4 dogs. Of the remaining 53 dogs, 41 (77.3%) dogs received chemotherapy post-operatively. Chemotherapy protocols utilized included single-agent carboplatin for 4 to 6 doses (n = 40) and single-agent lomustine daily for three weeks (n = 1). Toceranib phosphate, pamidronate, and rapamycin was administered in 5 of 40 (12.5%), 1 of 40 (2.5%), and 2 of 40 (5%) dogs that received carboplatin, respectively. One dog had rapamycin only and another dog had toceranib phosphate only.

All 57 tumor resections achieved negative HTFMs. Microvascular invasion was evident in 5/57 (8.8%) dogs (Fig. 1), and none had lymphatic invasion. Of the histological subtypes in the microvascular invasion group, there was one (20%) chondroblasts, two (40%) osteoblastic, and two (40%) telangiectatic (Table 1). Histopathological assessment of the regional lymph node was performed in all 43 dogs where the lymph nodes were extirpated at time of surgery. 1 of 43 (2.3%) had evidence of metastasis. Of the histological subtypes, there were 43/57 (75.4%) osteoblastic, 5/57 (8.8%) combined subtype, 6/57 (10.5%) telangiectatic, 2/57 (3.5%) chondroblastic, and 1/57 (1.8%) giant cell. There were no fibroblastic or poorly differentiated subtypes. The median mitotic count was 12 per 2.37 mm2 (range: 0–84). The median mitotic count with and without microvascular invasion was 20 and 11.5 per 2.37 mm2, respectively. Serum ALP elevation did not demonstrate a significant association with PFS (p = 0.16) or OST (p = 0.21). Similarly, the anatomic location of the primary tumor was not significantly associated with PFS (p = 0.40) or OST (p = 0.67).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Microvascular invasion with viable tumor cells. Muscularis layer of arteriole is outlined with arrows. Osteoid (asterisks) is shown within a vascular space. Hematoxylin and eosin stain, 200x magnification.

Table 1.

Progression-free survival time and overall survival time in 57 dogs with appendicular osteosarcoma.

Subtype (n) Progression-free survival
time (days)
Overall survival time (days)
Chondroblastic (2) N/A (range: N/A) N/A
Osteoblastic (43) 200 (range: 140–383) 262 (range: 168–498)
Giant Cell (1) N/A N/A
Telangiectatic (6) 59 (range: 59 to UC) 271 (range: N/A)
Combined (5) 119 (range: N/A) 122 days (range: N/A)

N/A: not application; UC: unable to calculate range.

One dog in this population had ulnar osteosarcoma, received partial radioulnar amputation, and developed local recurrence at mid-radius 76 days post-operatively. 34/57 (59.6%) dogs developed known or suspected distant metastasis, in which 6/34(17.6%) were diagnosed via histopathology or necropsy, 1/34 (2.9%) was diagnosed via cytology, and 27/34 (79.4%) were diagnosed based on CT or thoracic radiograph. The median PFS was 209 days (range: 141–323 days). PFS for each histological subtype is summarized in Table 1. There was no significant difference in PFS between histological subtypes (p = 0.68). As depicted in Fig. 2, there was no significant difference in PFS in dogs with tumoral microvascular invasion (median 271 days; range: N/A) or without microvascular invasion (median 209 days; range: 140–383 days) (p = 0.81).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Kaplan-Meier curves for overall survival (A) and progression free survival (B) in dogs with or without histologic osteosarcoma vascular invasion.

Of the 57 dogs, 19 (33.3%) were censored in the OST analysis, with 4/57 (7%) dogs still alive at the time of study completion (median follow-up time 650 days; range: 356–726). Median OST was 241 days (range: 168–498). OSTs for each histological subtype are summarized in Table 1. There was no significant difference in OST between subtypes (p = 0.28). The presence of microvascular invasion was not significantly associated with OST, with a median of 168 days (range: N/A) for dogs with tumoral microvascular invasion and 262 days (range: 189–517) without tumoral microvascular invasion (p = 0.78) (Fig. 2). One of 5 dogs with microvascular invasion had chondroblastic subtype and was alive at time of study completion at 726 days with no evidence of disease progression. Four of 5 dogs with microvascular invasion (2 osteoblastic and 2 telangiectatic) died from the disease. Clinical data are summarized in Table 2.

Table 2.

Clinical data, histological features, treatment received, and outcome for 5 dogs with osteosarcoma microvascular invasion.

Case 1 2 3 4 5
Breed Mixed breed Borzoi

Labrador

Retriever

Great Dane

Golden

Retriever

Age 9 y 8 y 9 y 3 mo 2 y 7 mo 9 y 7 mo

Body weight

(kg)

22.3 43.4 39.6 60.7 40.2

Gender/

Neuter

status

FS MI MC MI MI
ALP (U/L) 79 102 62 84 24

Primary OSA

location

Femur Tibia Tibia Scapula Humerus

Histopathology

subtypes

Chondroblastic Osteoblastic Osteoblastic Telangiectatic Telangiectatic

Mitotic count

(2.37 mm2)

25 84 14 20 8
Chemotherapy

Carboplatin

(300 mg/m2),

4 does

Carboplatin

(300 mg/m2),

4 doses

Carboplatin

(300 mg/m2),

4 doses

None

Carboplatin

(300 mg/m2),

4 doses

Radiation

therapy

None None None None None
NSAID

Carprofen

2.2 mg/kg

Carprofen

2.2 mg/kg

Carprofen

2.2 mg/kg

Carprofen

2.2 mg/kg

Carprofen

2.2 mg/kg

Local

recurrence

None None None None None

Metastasis

post-op

None Lung Lung, liver, brain None Liver

Progression

free interval

(days)

726 55 167 124 271

Survival time

(days)

726 135 168 124 305

Y: years, Mo: months; FS: female/spayed; MN: male/neutered; MI: Male/intact; ALP: serum alkaline phosphatase.

Discussion

The presence of microvascular invasion and histological subtype were not associated with PFS or OST in this population of dogs.

Since microvascular invasion can provide a route for metastases and 90% of canine osteosarcoma have undetectable micrometastases at time of diagnosis, identifying the presence of microvascular invasion can be crucial as anti-angiogenesis target therapies may be beneficial, which is currently being explored in human medicine23–25. Only 5/57 (8.8%) tumors in this study had microvascular invasion, so its prevalence in various subtypes could not be determined. No difference was detected in PFS and OST in dogs with or without microvascular invasion. It is possible that this finding is a result of type 2 error due to the low number of tumors with microvascular invasion resulting in the study being underpowered to reveal the association between microvascular invasion and survival. The prevalence of microvascular invasion in this study was 8.8%, which is lower compared to a larger study where microvascular invasion was noted in 117 out of 152 (70.5%) appendicular and axial tumors16. It was shown to be associated with shorter OST but not PFS16. The percentage of appendicular tumors with microvascular invasion was not specified, which could contribute to the difference in prevalence reported. Additionally, the lack of standardization of tissue processing and sectioning may have resulted in discrepancies compared to the current study findings. In Coomber et al., increased microvascular density was significantly higher in canine primary osteosarcoma with pulmonary metastasis at time of diagnosis23. The significance of microvascular invasion in human osteosarcoma is still being investigated, with studies demonstrating decreased survival and poorer response to treatment19,20,26,27.

The majority of osteosarcomas in this population were of the osteoblastic subtype (75.4%), similar to the proportions reported in two recent studies of appendicular osteosarcoma, which found osteoblastic subtypes in 49% of 87 tumors and 56.9% of 153 tumors, respectively14,15. No significant difference in survival could be detected among histological subtypes in this study. However, only the osteoblastic subtype included an adequate number of cases for 95% confidence intervals to be calculated for both PFS and OST. Due to the low number of cases, there was only one giant cell subtype (alive at time of study completion at 356 days) with no fibroblastic or poorly differentiated subtype present. Given the small number of cases in most osteosarcoma subtypes, the authors postulated that the study was underpowered for any statistical significance to be detected. Therefore, interpretation must be made carefully with the current results. To this date, there is no consensus on the impact of histological subtype on survival in canine appendicular osteosarcoma. One study with 87 tumors showed longer survival in dogs with fibroblastic subtype; however, the comparison was only made between osteoblastic, chondroblastic, and fibroblastic subtypes14. Another study that included 22 tumors in the survival analysis did not find histological subtypes (osteoblastic, telangiectatic, chondroblastic, fibroblastic, poorly differentiated, giant cell-rich) to have an influence on survival outcome15. In osteosarcoma of the flat/irregular bones, telangiectatic subtype had the highest prevalence of metastases28 and had an increased hazard of progression29. Meanwhile, histological subtype did not impact survival in other osteosarcoma studies30,31.

Limitations of this study included rarity of disease resulting in a small cohort of dogs with low numbers of some histological subtypes. Additionally, post-mortem examination to confirm the cause of death and incidence of metastasis was also not available in all cases. The retrospective design of the study led to variability in treatment protocols and follow-up imaging schedules. While most dogs received postoperative chemotherapy, there was substantial variation in the chemotherapy protocols, thereby limiting the ability to robustly evaluate chemotherapy as a prognostic factor. Neither microvascular invasion nor histopathologic subtype were significant prognostic indicators in this population. However, median OST was shorter in dogs with microvascular invasion compared to those without. This finding suggests that the prognostic impact of microvascular invasion may have been missed due to type II error. Exclusion of dogs with metastasis at diagnosis may also have resulted in exclusion of that subset dogs with vascular involvement. However, dogs with metastasis at diagnosis have a different survival prognosis, and this dataset did not have a sufficient number of dogs with metastasis at presentation to conduct meaningful statistical analysis. Similarly, the small number of cases within most histological subtypes restricted clinically relevant comparisons. Although neither microvascular invasion nor histopathologic subtype were prognostic in this study population, identification of prognostic indicators in osteosarcoma is important for guidance toward future development of differential treatment strategies32–35.

This study has provided valuable information on the prevalence of microvascular invasion and histopathologic subtypes for planning future prospective studies. Prospective studies or evaluation of available datasets from the Comparative Oncology Trials Consortium control group can provide additional data to evaluate the prognostic significance of microvascular invasion and histological subtypes in canine appendicular osteosarcoma, with standardization of procedures such as pre-operative and post-operative imaging, use of adjuvant therapy, and routine lymph node extirpation.

Conclusion

Based on the results of this study, microvascular invasion is not significantly associated with decreased survival in dogs with appendicular osteosarcoma potentially due to type II error. Histological subtype does not provide additional prognostic data.

Acknowledgements

Thanks to the Virginia-Maryland College of Veterinary Medicine Pathology department for their contributions to the study.

Abbreviations

PFS

Progression-free survival time

OST

Overall survival time

HTFM

Histologically tumor-free margin

Author contributions

H. Miyagi: conceptualization, data collection, interpretation of the data, and preparation of the manuscript. S. Coutermarsh-Ott: laboratory data analysis support, data management, and preparation of the manuscript. L. Selmic: data management, data analysis, and preparation of the manuscript. S. Campuzano: preparation of the survey, data collection, and data management. M. Raybuck: preparation of the survey, data collection, and data management. B. Ciepluch: conceptualization, coordination, and preparation of the manuscript. J. Tuohy: conceptualization, coordination, study design, interpretation of the data, and preparation of the manuscript.

Data availability

Joanne Tuohy can be contacted for datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Cell line validation statement: Cell lines were not used in this study and so no validation was necessary. As this was a retrospective study, approval through a regulatory agency was not necessary.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Boerman, I., Selvarajah, G. T., Nielen, M. & Kirpensteijn, J. Prognostic factors in canine appendicular osteosarcoma - a meta-analysis. BMC Vet. Res.8, 56. 10.1186/1746-6148-8-56 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Belayneh, R., Fourman, M. S., Bhogal, S. & Weiss, K. R. Update on osteosarcoma. Curr. Oncol. Rep.23, 71. 10.1007/s11912-021-01053-7 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Cavalcanti, J. N., Amstalden, E. M. I., Guerra, J. L. & Magna, L. C. Osteosarcoma in dogs: clinical-morphological study and prognostic correlation. Braz J. Vet. Res. Anim. Sci.41, 299–305. 10.1590/S1413-95962004000500002 (2004). [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Edmunds, G. L. et al. Dog breeds and body conformations with predisposition to osteosarcoma in the UK: a case-control study. Canine Med. Genet.8, 2. 10.1186/s40575-021-00100-7 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Bacci, G. et al. High grade osteosarcoma of the extremities with lung metastases at presentation: treatment with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and simultaneous resection of primary and metastatic lesions. J. Surg. Oncol.98, 415–420. 10.1002/jso.21140 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Beird, H. C. et al. Osteosarcoma. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers8, 77. doi:10.1038/s41572-022-00409-y (2022). [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 7.Marconato, L. et al. Timing of adjuvant chemotherapy after limb amputation and effect on outcome in dogs with appendicular osteosarcoma without distant metastases. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc.259, 749–756. 10.2460/javma.259.7.749 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Thompson, J. P. & Fugent, M. J. Evaluation of survival times after limb amputation, with and without subsequent administration of cisplatin, for treatment of appendicular osteosarcoma in dogs: 30 cases (1979–1990). J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc.200, 531–533 (1992). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Berg, J., Weinstein, M. J., Schelling, S. H. & Rand, W. M. Treatment of dogs with osteosarcoma by administration of cisplatin after amputation or limb-sparing surgery: 22 cases (1987–1990). J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc.200, 2005–2008 (1992). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Spodnick, G. J. et al. Prognosis for dogs with appendicular osteosarcoma treated by amputation alone: 162 cases (1978–1988). J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc.200, 995–999 (1992). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Bergman, P. J. et al. Amputation and carboplatin for treatment of dogs with osteosarcoma: 48 cases (1991 to 1993). J. Vet. Intern. Med.10, 76–81. 10.1111/j.1939-1676.1996.tb02031.x (1996). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Culp, W. T. N. et al. Evaluation of outcome and prognostic factors for dogs living greater than one year after diagnosis of osteosarcoma: 90 cases (1997–2008). J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc.245, 1141–1146. 10.2460/javma.245.10.1141 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Hillers, K. R., Dernell, W. S., Lafferty, M. H., Withrow, S. J. & Lana, S. E. Incidence and prognostic importance of lymph node metastases in dogs with appendicular osteosarcoma: 228 cases (1986–2003). J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc.226, 1364–1367. 10.2460/javma.2005.226.1364 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Al-Khan, A. A. et al. Fibroblastic subtype has a favourable prognosis in appendicular osteosarcoma of dogs. J. Comp. Pathol.176, 133–144. 10.1016/j.jcpa.2020.02.011 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Guim, T. N. et al. Relationship between clinicopathological features and prognosis in appendicular osteosarcoma in dogs. J. Comp. Pathol.180, 91–99. 10.1016/j.jcpa.2020.09.003 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kirpensteijn, J., Kik, M., Rutteman, G. R. & Teske, E. Prognostic significance of a new histologic grading system for canine osteosarcoma. Vet. Pathol.39, 240–246. 10.1354/vp.39-2-240 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Schott, C. R., Tatiersky, L. J., Foster, R. A. & Wood, G. A. Histologic grade does not predict outcome in dogs with appendicular osteosarcoma receiving the standard of care. Vet. Pathol.55, 202–211. 10.1177/0300985817747329 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Loukopoulos, P. & Robinson, W. F. Clinicopathological relevance of tumour grading in canine osteosarcoma. J. Comp. Pathol.136, 65–73. 10.1016/j.jcpa.2006.11.005 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Benezech, S. et al. Prognostic value of vascular invasion in pediatric osteosarcomas. Pathol. Oncol. Res.22, 847–852. 10.1007/s12253-016-0074-5 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Tsuda, Y. et al. Is microscopic vascular invasion in tumor specimens associated with worse prognosis in patients with high-grade localized osteosarcoma? Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res.478, 1190–1198. 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001079 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Misdorp, W. & Hart, A. A. Some prognostic and epidemiologic factors in canine osteosarcoma. J. Natl. Cancer Inst.62, 537–545. 10.1093/jnci/62.3.537 (1979). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Fletcher, C. D. M. & World Health Organization. In WHO Classification of Tumours of Soft Tissue and Bone 4th edn (IARC Press, 2013).
  • 23.Sorensen, F. B. et al. Immunohistochemical estimates of angiogenesis, proliferative activity, p53 expression, and multiple drug resistance have no prognostic impact in osteosarcoma: a comparative clinicopathological investigation. Sarcoma2008, 874075. 10.1155/2008/874075 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Hammer, A. S., Weeren, F. R., Weisbrode, S. E. & Padgett, S. L. Prognostic factors in dogs with osteosarcomas of the flat or irregular bones. J. Am. Anim. Hosp. Assoc.31, 321–326. 10.5326/15473317-31-4-321 (1995). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Selmic, L. E. et al. Outcome and prognostic factors for osteosarcoma of the maxilla, mandible, or calvarium in dogs: 183 cases (1986–2012). J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc.245, 930–938. 10.2460/javma.245.8.930 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Nagamine, E. et al. Diversity of histologic patterns and expression of cytoskeletal proteins in canine skeletal osteosarcoma. Vet. Pathol.52, 977–984. 10.1177/0300985815574006 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Kruse, M. A. et al. Evaluation of clinical and histopathologic prognostic factors for survival in canine osteosarcoma of the extracranial flat and irregular bones. Vet. Pathol.50, 704–708. 10.1177/0300985812471542 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Bicanova, L., Kreilmeier-Berger, T., Reifinger, M., Holzmann, K. & Kleiter, M. Prevalence and potentially prognostic value of C-circles associated with alternative lengthening of telomeres in canine appendicular osteosarcoma. Vet. Comp. Oncol.19, 222–231. 10.1111/vco.12665 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Matsuyama, A., Wood, G. A., Speare, R., Schott, C. R. & Mutsaers, A. J. Prognostic significance of the urokinase plasminogen activator system in tissue and serum of dogs with appendicular osteosarcoma. PLOS One. 17, e0273811. 10.1371/journal.pone.0273811 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Yang, R. et al. Over-expression of parathyroid hormone type 1 receptor confers an aggressive phenotype in osteosarcoma. Int. J. Cancer. 121, 943–954. 10.1002/ijc.22749 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Al-Khan, A. A. et al. Parathyroid hormone receptor 1 (PTHR1) is a prognostic indicator in canine osteosarcoma. Sci. Rep.10, 1564. 10.1038/s41598-020-58524-3 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Coomber, B. L., Denton, J., Sylvestre, A. & Kruth, S. Blood vessel density in canine osteosarcoma. Can. J. Vet. Res.62, 199–204 (1998). [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Szewczyk, M., Lechowski, R. & Zabielska, K. What do we know about canine osteosarcoma treatment? Review. Vet. Res. Commun.39, 61–67. 10.1007/s11259-014-9623-0 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Assi, T. et al. Targeting the VEGF pathway in osteosarcoma. Cells10, 1240. 10.3390/cells10051240 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Broadhead, M. L., Clark, J. C. M., Myers, D. E., Dass, C. R. & Choong, P. F. M. The molecular pathogenesis of osteosarcoma: a review. Sarcoma2011, 959248. 10.1155/2011/959248 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Joanne Tuohy can be contacted for datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study.


Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES