Skip to main content

This is a preprint.

It has not yet been peer reviewed by a journal.

The National Library of Medicine is running a pilot to include preprints that result from research funded by NIH in PMC and PubMed.

bioRxiv logoLink to bioRxiv
[Preprint]. 2025 Dec 23:2025.12.04.691931. [Version 2] doi: 10.64898/2025.12.04.691931

Gut microbial interaction networks control autoimmunity to neuroretina

Amy Zhang 1,#, Reiko Horai 1,#,*, Yingyos Jittayasothorn 1, Jonathan H Badger 2, Zhichao Wu 3, Akriti Gupta 1, Samyuktha Arunkumar 1, Caitlin E Murphy 1, Guangpu Shi 1, Vijayaraj Nagarajan 1, John A McCulloch 2, Shilpa Kodati 1, H Nida Sen 1, Jung Wha Lee 1, Jonathan P Jacobs 4, Xiaoyan Xu 1, Mary J Mattapallil 1, Zixuan Peng 1, Biying Xu 1, Robert J Palmer 5, Nadim Majdalani 6, Kenya Honda 7, Colm O’hUigin 2, Rachel R Caspi 1,*
PMCID: PMC12776170  PMID: 41509494

Abstract

The gut microbiome influences the development of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases. One such condition is autoimmune uveitis, a sight-threatening ocular inflammation driven by retina-specific T cells1. Using a model of spontaneous experimental autoimmune uveitis (sEAU) we showed that gut commensals provide innate and adaptive immune stimuli that trigger the disease2. Here we report that uveitis-promoting microbes are present in human gut flora and that colonization of germ-free (GF) mice with commensal flora from healthy human donors was sufficient to provoke disease. Severity of sEAU correlated with expansion of Akkermansia and contraction of short-chain fatty acid (SCFA)–producing Firmicutes, as well as decreased SCFA levels and a dominant gut Th1 effector response. Mechanistic gain-of-function experiments, enriching GF sEAU mice with Akkermansia, reproduced these microbiome, metabolite and immune phenotype shifts, and exacerbated disease. We propose that Akkermansia promotes autoimmunity by outcompeting SCFA-producers and enhancing Th1-type responses. Notably, an inverse correlation between Akkermansia (Verrucomicrobia) and Firmicutes was also present in fecal microbiome of patients with uveitis, multiple sclerosis and Crohn’s disease. These findings reveal a stereotypic gut microbial interaction network that regulates systemic immune balance, and may represent an ecologically conserved mechanism through which the gut microbiome modulates autoimmune and inflammatory diseases.

Keywords: autoimmune uveitis, T cell receptor transgenic mice, humanized gnotobiotics, fecal microbiota reconstitution, microbial interaction, short chain fatty acids

INTRODUCTION

Immune-privileged tissues are increasingly recognized as sites where host–microbiota interactions influence immunological balance in autoimmune and inflammatory diseases3,4. Multiple mechanisms have been proposed that explain the central role of microbiota in driving inflammation in the central nervous system (CNS), including innate and adaptive effects such as molecular mimicry2,5, bystander activation6, epitope spreading7,8 and dual T cell receptors (TCRs)9. Neuroretina of the eye is part of the CNS that represents a quintessential immune-privileged tissue, making it a valuable model to study gut microbiota and autoimmunity in the CNS.

Autoimmune uveitis is a T cell-driven intraocular inflammation of unknown etiology that targets the neuroretina and can lead to blindness1. It is represented by the models of experimental autoimmune uveitis (EAU) in animals. EAU is induced in wild type mice by immunization with the retinal antigen IRBP1, or can develop spontaneously (sEAU) in mice expressing a transgenic IRBP-specific TCR cloned from the immunization induced model (line R161H)10. Our previous studies highlight the critical role of gut microbiome in triggering sEAU by providing antigenic stimuli that activate retina-specific T cells2. Subsequent research reported inhibitory effects of microbiome depletion also in induced EAU11, where the antigen is provided, emphasizing the antigen-independent (innate?) effects of gut microbes on EAU. Interestingly, gut microbiome studies in uveitis patients have revealed differences in gut flora between patients and healthy controls1216, but mechanistic information could not be resolved.

Because inductive events and causal relationships cannot be studied in patients, we employed the model of sEAU in R161H TCR transgenic mice10, which may provide a more physiologically relevant system to study triggers delivered by the microbiota. To gain mechanistic insights into how human gut microbiota might affect the development of autoimmune uveitis, we created gnotobiotic breeding colonies of R161H mice harboring healthy human gut flora by reconstituting GF parental mice with fecal material from three healthy human donors. The rationale for focusing on healthy donors is that (i) every uveitis patient was once a healthy person, so by definition, uveitis-relevant microbes should be present in the healthy person’s gut flora, and (ii) the composition of patient flora could have been altered by their disease or by their treatment, confounding data interpretation.

Using a multiomic strategy that integrates microbial, metabolomic and immune profiling of human flora (HuFl)-reconstituted R161H mice, combined with analyses of human autoimmune disease datasets, we identified a microbial interaction network comprising an “Akkermansia/Verrucomicrobia—Firmicutes axis” that appears to regulate autoimmunity. Our data points to an underexplored but fundamental mechanism, where interactive relationships in the microbial community play a central role in regulation of autoimmune disease pathogenesis by microbiota17.

RESULTS

1. Human gut commensals support development of spontaneous experimental autoimmune uveitis (sEAU)

R161H mice harboring mouse microbiota (specific-pathogen-free, SPF) typically develop moderate to severe uveitis with high penetrance (100% incidence by two months of age)10. To first assess whether human gut microbiota affect uveitis development, we developed “humanized gnotobiotic” R161H mouse lines as our pre-clinical model, by reconstituting breeding pairs of GF R161H mice with gut microbiota from three healthy human subjects—U, V, and W. Each line was maintained in separate isolators through successive generations, so that the offspring acquired the human flora naturally from their respective parents (Fig. 1a).

Fig. 1 |. Human gut commensals support development of spontaneous experimental autoimmune uveitis (sEAU).

Fig. 1 |

a, Schematic representation of human fecal microbiota transfer experiments and data collection. b, Beta diversity based on Bray–Curtis dissimilarity showing differences in fecal microbiome composition between recipient groups U (n = 50), V (n = 59), W (n = 64). Encircled with dashed lines are the respective human donor (original) fecal samples. c, Disease scores (histology) of age-matched R161H mice (4–5 months old) from human flora (U, V, W, n = 28, 38, 18), SPF (n = 22) and GF (n = 10) groups (Kruskal–Wallis test between mouse recipient groups, p = 0.0002). d, Immunological clusters of CD4 T cells from colon lamina propria (LP) by the microbiome groups. PCA analysis performed on immune signature matrix by frequencies of CD4 T cells expressing each cell surface or intracellular marker (see Extended Data Fig. 1e). eg, Frequencies of memory (CD44highCD62Llow, e), IFN-γ- or IL-17A-producing (f), and regulatory (Foxp3-positive or IL-10-producing, g) CD4 T cells in colon LP of HuFl, SPF and GF R161H mice. dg, Compiled data from 12 experiments, n = 15, 19, 11, 11, 27 for GF, U, V, W and SPF, respectively. Kruskal–Wallis tests show p < 0.0001 (eg). P-values adjusted for post hoc multiple comparisons are displayed as asterisks. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001, and bar plots showing mean values ± SEMs (c, eg).

Microbiome sequencing results showed successful engraftment of human flora in gnotobiotic R161H mice. The succession of gut microbiota through generations of breeding in gnotobiotic isolators did not appear to diminish the differences between individual cohorts, and each U, V, or W mouse recipient cohort preserved the microbial signatures of its original donor (Fig. 1b).

Human commensal microbes supported uveitis development in R161H mice. Although HuFl mice displayed a broad spectrum of disease severity scores, the scores were on average lower than those of SPF mice that harbor normal mouse flora (Fig. 1c & Extended Data Fig. 1a). We did not observe obvious sex differences with respect to disease severity in HuFl mice (Extended Data Fig. 1b). Immune phenotype of colonic CD4+ T cells, based on a range of cell surface and intracellular markers, clearly distinguished HuFl mice from GF and SPF mice (Fig 1d & Extended Data Fig. 1c-e). The HuFl mice showed a spectrum of disease scores and memory marker expression between GF (low) and SPF (high) mice (Fig. 1e), had fewer IFN-γ-producing Th1 and IL-17A-producing Th17 effector cells and more regulatory T cells (Tregs) expressing Foxp3 and IL-10 than did SPF mice (Fig. 1f-g). This immune phenotype was consistent with other activation markers and Th1/Th17 signature molecules (Extended Data Fig. 1e). This phenotype may explain the lower disease scores that they developed.

2. Human flora sEAU tracks with a dominant Th1 phenotype and abundance of Akkermansia (Verrucomicrobia)

Since both Th1 and Th17 effector phenotypes can drive autoimmune uveitis1820, we set out to define the immune signatures that associate with disease in the HuFl model. We categorized histological scores into high (score ≥ 1.5), mid (0.75 < score < 1.5), and low (score ≤ 0.75) to facilitate statistical analysis. Interestingly, IFN-γ/T-bet expressing CD4 T cells, rather than IL-17A/RORγt expressing cells, in the gut (and other tissues) associated strongly with severe disease phenotype (Fig. 2a-d). This suggests that uveitis development in HuFl mice is more dependent on Th1 than Th17.

Fig. 2 |. Human flora (HuFl) sEAU tracks with a dominant Th1 phenotype and abundance of Akkermansia (Verrucomicrobia).

Fig. 2 |

a, Mean relative frequency of colon LP CD4 T cells of each cell surface or intracellular marker arranged in a circular plot, colored by histology category: high (score ≥ 1.5, n = 10), mid (0.75 < score < 1.5, n = 8), low (score ≤ 0.75, n = 17). b, Correlational heatmap of histology scores with relative frequencies of each cell surface or intracellular marker in CD4 T cells across six tissue sites. LP, lamina propria; LN, lymph nodes; Sm Int, small intestine; Mes, mesenteric; Subm, submandibular; Periph, peripheral. 0.05 < P < 0.08, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, modeled by simple linear regression. cd, Representative trend lines with 95% confidence interval (shaded area) show that disease scores of HuFl mice are positively associated with IFN-γ-producing, but not IL-17A-producing, CD4 T cells, in colon LP (c) and small intestine LP (d). Data in ad are aggregated from 8 experiments (UVW combined, sample sizes ranged from n = 27 to 39 across tissues following quality filtering). e, Correlational heatmap showing major fecal bacterial taxa (out of top 20 most abundant families) that correlate with disease scores in adult HuFl R161H (UVW combined, n = 105). P-values assessed after FDR (false discovery rate) correction following Pearson correlation. *P < 0.05. fg, More Verrucomicrobia (f), and fewer Firmicutes (g) are present in the gut of HuFl mice with high disease scores. Sample sizes are n = 36 and 43 for high and low histology categories, respectively. Data in bar plots are presented as mean values ± SEMs, and P-values from Mann-Whitney U tests are shown in plots.

Microbiome analysis of parental and offspring HuFl mice showed that colonized mice adopted only a subset of the original donor taxa (Extended Data Fig. 2a-b). This could be a result from loss during human stool sample preservation and transfer processes, and/or from inefficient engraftment of some non-native microbes to the gut environment of a different host species. However, in terms of the overall microbial composition, each mouse cohort remained closer to their original donor, preserving a distinct microbial footprint (Fig. 1b & Extended Data Fig. 2c-d). Differences between female vs. male HuFl mice in terms of microbial abundance and composition were minimal, if any, compared to the differences based on human donors (Extended Data Fig. 2e-f). This is compatible with the apparent lack of sex differences in disease severity of HuFl mice (Extended Data Fig. 1b).

We then explored how gut microbiome associates with severity of uveitis. Correlational heat map of major bacterial taxa at the family level revealed strong links between several taxa and histology scores (Fig. 2e). Among them, Akkermansia (the only representative of Verrucomicrobia in HuFl mice) correlated with high disease scores (Pearson r = 0.5, FDR <0.05), whereas certain members of the Firmicutes phylum were correlated with low disease scores (Pearson r = −0.3, FDR <0.05). Differential abundance analysis between high and low histology categories consistently showed that Akkermansia was enriched in mice with high disease, whereas Firmicutes (especially Clostridia) were enriched in mice with low disease (Fig. 2f-g & Extended Data Fig. 2g).

3. SCFA signatures are enriched in low disease HuFl mice or healthy subjects

SCFAs are metabolites of commensal gut microbes, especially Firmicutes, resulting from fermentation of dietary fiber, and have anti-inflammatory properties in a range of pathological conditions21. Some SCFAs, e.g. butyrate and propionate, may have therapeutic potential in induced EAU22,23. In the current study, a key observation from differential abundance analyses of mice with low and high disease scores was that SCFA-producing Firmicutes were associated with lower sEAU scores (Fig. 2e). Therefore, it appeared plausible that SCFAs may also have the potential to modulate sEAU.

To address this, we mined functional gene signatures from shotgun metagenomic sequences of HuFl mice. Genes known to be involved in SCFAs synthesis and metabolism were mapped to the simplified pathways shown in Fig. 3a. Consistent with the observed differences in microbial abundance (Fig. 2e), the genes involved in main SCFA pathways were enriched in mice with low disease scores and reduced in mice with high disease scores (Fig. 3b). In agreement with the pathway analysis, metabolomic quantification of SCFAs in the gut and serum of the mice confirmed that higher disease scores were associated with lower SCFA concentrations both locally and systemically (Fig. 3c).

Fig. 3 |. SCFA signatures are enriched in low disease HuFl mice or healthy subjects.

Fig. 3 |

a, A simplified pathway map highlighting functional genes involved in the main SCFA synthesis and metabolism. Dashed arrows indicate hidden intermediate steps. Abbreviations of enzyme symbols: pta, Phosphotransacetylase; ackA, Acetate kinase; acs, Acetyl-CoA synthetase; but, Butyryl-CoA:acetate CoA-transferase; ptb, Phosphate butyryltransferase; buk, Butyrate kinase; crt, Crotonase; bcd, Butyryl-CoA dehydrogenase. b, Enzymes in SCFA pathways (annotated with InterPro and Gene Ontology databases) are enriched in HuFl mouse gut with low histology scores (UVW combined, weanling and adult samples included). PPM, parts per million, a measure of relative abundance based on normalized base count for each feature in a metagenomic sample. c, Spearman correlation (visualized with a linear trend line) showing higher disease scores associated with lower SCFA concentrations both locally (in gut content) and systemically (in serum) in representative cohort U mice (n = 9). d, Enzymes in SCFA pathways (annotated with Gene Ontology and Pfam databases) are enriched in fecal samples from healthy humans compared to those from treatment-naïve uveitis patients, from a cohort of autoimmune uveitis (ocular-restricted, including idiopathic uveitis, VKH/SO and BCR). Sex, age, race and diet are comparably represented in patient and control groups. Normalized gene abundance is reported in PPM. e, SCFA levels from uveitis patients and healthy controls (same cohort as in d, but n = 6 available from the patient group). For b, d & e, Data are presented as mean values ± SEMs. Statistical significance was determined by Mann-Whitney U test.

We next examined whether this signature was present in a cohort of uveitis patients seen at the NEI clinic, compared to healthy controls. Because uveitis is a heterogenous disease, we focused on a subset of patients whose disease was restricted to the eye (idiopathic uveitis, sympathetic ophthalmia, birdshot chorioretinopathy, and Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada disease with ocular manifestations), as modeled by EAU. Similarly to the HuFl R161H mice, enzymes involved in acetate, butyrate and propionate pathways (Fig. 3d) and their corresponding SCFAs (Fig. 3e), were reduced in uveitis patients compared to healthy controls. This supports a role for SCFAs in regulation of human uveitis.

4. Akkermansia negatively correlates with Firmicutes in both sEAU and clinical uveitis

Among all taxa in HuFl mice, Akkermansia abundance was shown to be a prominent correlate of severe uveitis and IFN-γ-producing CD4+ T cells in the gut (Fig. 2e-f, Extended Data Fig. 3ab), whereas SCFA-producing Firmicutes were reduced in the same animals (Fig. 2e, g). We therefore analyzed their relative abundance and potential interdependence to determine whether competitive interactions between these taxa might contribute to autoimmune uveitis.

We first quantified abundance of Akkermansia and Firmicutes, and found them to be inversely correlated (Fig. 4a). An in-depth computational analysis of the bacterial association network confirmed the negative correlation between Akkermansia and multiple families of SCFA-producing Firmicutes (Fig. 4b, Extended Data Fig. 3c). Levels of major SCFAs in feces also exhibited an inverse correlation with Akkermansia abundance (Fig. 4c). Taken together, this supports an interpretation of a negative interaction between Akkermansia and a range of SCFA-producing microbes.

Fig. 4 |. Akkermansia negatively correlates with Firmicutes in both sEAU and clinical uveitis.

Fig. 4 |

a, Simple linear regression showing a negative correlation of microbial relative abundance between Akkermansia (equivalent to Verrucomicrobia in this dataset) and Firmicutes in HuFl R161H mice (n = 234, UVW combined, weanling and adult samples included). b, Fecal bacterial association network exemplified in HuFl cohort V (n = 79, weanling and adult samples included). Network constructed at the taxonomic level of the bacterial family. Correlations with a threshold of Pearson r > 0.5 were transformed into dissimilarities via the “unsigned” distance metric, on which edge weights (strength of correlations) are based. Blue edges correspond to positive associations and orange edges to negative ones. Yellow and purple nodes represent taxa enriched in high vs. low disease categories, with Firmicutes labeled as bolded taxon names. Bigger nodes are more influential in the network (higher eigenvector centrality). c, Spearman correlation (visualized with a linear trend line) showing a negative association between relative Akkermansia abundance and SCFA concentrations in R161H gut (n = 35, UVW and SPF combined). Akkermansia was selected following multivariable association between SCFA concentrations and microbial features using MaAsLin2. d, Class level association networks in treatment-naïve uveitis patients (left, n = 8) and healthy controls (right, n = 12) from the same cohort of autoimmune uveitis. Correlations with a threshold of Pearson r > 0.3 are shown. Node and edge color schemes same as in b. Shaded ellipse in the patient network highlights the negative correlation between Verrucomicrobiae (Akkermansia) and Clostridia (Firmicutes), and this relationship is absent from the healthy human gut.

Similarly, gut microbiome interaction networks of uveitis patients displayed a negative relationship between Verrucomicrobia (primarily Akkermansia) and SCFA-producing Firmicutes (Clostridia, class level), but this relationship was not evident in healthy subjects (Fig. 4d). This supports the relevance of the sEAU model to clinical disease.

5. Akkermansia promotes uveitis by outcompeting SCFA producers and decreasing circulating SCFA levels

To validate the proposed microbiome interaction network in vivo, we used a gain-of-function approach, where GF R161H mice received Akkermansia alone or Akkermansia mixed with HuFl mouse donor fecal flora. In the first paradigm, we associated GF mice de novo with cultured Akkermansia muciniphila (the type species of Akkermansia) or with sterile PBS as control, and maintained them in static microisolators using facility-standard “sterile handling” techniques, designed to minimize environmental microbial exposure (Extended Data Fig. 4a). This approach resulted in a minimal gut microbial population of very low diversity (≤10 total detectable taxa/mouse), dominated by Verrucomicrobia (Akkermansia) and Firmicutes (Extended Data Fig. 4b-d).

First paradigm: A single oral gavage led to successful and sustained engraftment of Akkermansia, and resulted in higher uveitis scores (Extended Data Fig. 4e-f). Akkermansia was nearly undetectable in the PBS control group, whose gut microbiota became dominated by Firmicutes (Extended Data Fig. 4g). As such, the relative abundances of Akkermansia and Firmicutes showed a near-perfect inverse relationship (r-squared > 0.99, p < 0.0001) (Extended Data Fig. 4h). Other bacterial phyla that are prominent in normal mouse or human gut flora were low or on the borderline of detectability (Extended Data Fig. 4i). Thus, this model reflects a minimal-diversity gut ecosystem dominated by the two taxa that we hypothesize to display competitive dynamics that control expression of disease.

Second paradigm: To examine this hypothesis under more physiological conditions, where Akkermansia is not given a major “head start”, we associated GF R161H mice with flora from HuFl mice (selected for low disease and low abundance of Akkermansia) “spiked”, or not, with cultured A. muciniphila (Fig. 5a). Fecal microbiome profiling confirmed successful microbial engraftment and stability of Akkermansia-high or Akk-low status (Fig. 5b & Extended Data Fig. 5a). Akkermansia “spiked” flora induced more severe uveitis than base HuFl alone (Fig. 5c) and the relative abundances of Akkermansia and Firmicutes were consistently inversely correlated (Fig. 5d). Notably, among the major bacterial phyla, Firmicutes was the only phylum whose abundance was decreased in Akk-enriched mice (Fig. 5b & Extended Data Fig. 5b), particularly those taxa considered “professional” SCFA producers such as Clostridia24 (Extended Data Fig. 5c). To confirm that the effects described above were indeed Akkermansia-specific, we associated GF R161H mice with the same HuFl “spiked” with E. coli. The disease-promoting phenotype and the reduction in Firmicutes abundance were not recapitulated, supporting the notion that the observed effects were specific to Akkermansia (Extended Data Fig. 5d-f). Together, these results reinforce a dynamic balance between Akkermansia and Firmicutes that modulates autoimmune uveitis in a physiologically relevant setting.

Fig. 5 |. Akkermansia promotes uveitis by outcompeting SCFA producers and decreasing circulating SCFA levels.

Fig. 5 |

a, Study design of microbe reconstitution experiments. Previously GF R161H mice gavaged with a baseline human gut microbiota suspension (HuFl) plus A. muciniphila culture (AKK, 108 CFU) or sterile PBS. b, Relative abundance of Akkermansia and Firmicutes in feces from one representative of 3 experiments (n = 7 and 6 for Akk-rich and control, respectively). c, Left: Fundoscopy score increments from starting disease scores, combined from three experiments. Right: Histology scores and example images from 2 out of 3 experiments (n = 11 and 7 for Akk-rich and control, respectively). Mean values ± SEM. P-value determined by Welch-corrected t test. d, A negative correlation of relative abundance between Akkermansia and Firmicutes (n = 52, AKK and PBS groups combined, multiple time points included) by simple linear regression. e, Serum concentrations of main SCFAs are significantly lower in Akk-rich (n = 13) mice than in PBS controls (n = 10). Serum harvested 3 – 4 weeks post gavage, three experiments combined. f, Correlational heatmap of SCFA levels with cytokine concentrations in serum of engrafted mice. *P < 0.05, modeled by simple linear regression as well as Pearson correlation. g, Spearman correlation (visualized with a linear trend line) showing Akkermansia relative abundance associated positively, and serum acetic acid associated negatively, with the frequency of IFN-γ-producing CD4 T cells in colonic LP. h, Akk-enriched (n = 18) mice had higher serum IFN-γ concentrations compared to PBS control mice (n = 14), five experiments combined, of which two experiments used the minimal flora model. i, Representative trend lines show that main SCFA concentrations are negatively associated with IFN-γ levels in serum. Data in g, i are from 2 experiments (n = 12) using the minimal flora model.

To mechanistically link Akkermansia–Firmicutes dynamics with circulating SCFA levels available to regulate uveitis-relevant immune responses, we measured serum SCFAs and host immune parameters. All three major SCFAs – acetic, butyric and propionic acids – were reduced in Akk-high mice compared with Akk-low mice (Fig. 5e), consistent with the negative relationship between Akkermansia and Firmicutes. This reduction was not observed in the E.coli control group (Extended Data Fig. 5g). Given the known immunomodulatory role of SCFAs21, we examined whether this metabolomic shift was associated with an altered systemic effector response. In both the Akk-associated minimal flora model and the Akk-enriched HuFl model, reduced serum SCFAs were tightly coupled with elevated serum and/or gut IFN-g responses (Fig. 5f-i). These results imply that SCFAs may regulate disease by dampening the Th1 effector response.

The final mechanistic question was whether Akkermansia can provide surrogate antigenic stimuli to trigger activation of the R161H TCR-expressing cells in the gut2. To address this, we used an in vitro activation assay, where naïve R161H CD4 T cells and antigen-presenting cells were cultured with Akk-rich HuFl gut content extracts, or with heat-killed Akkermansia. Unlike SPF gut flora extracts or the cognate peptide antigen2,10, neither Akkermansia preparation activated the retina-specific T cells, as measured by expression of CD69 and Nur77 (Extended Data Fig. 6a-b), indicating that Akkermansia was not acting as an antigen mimic.

Single cell RNA-seq analysis of colonic CD4 T cells, of which an average of 15% expressed the R161H TCR, revealed that both R161H TCR-expressing and non-R161H (endogenous) T cells had a Th1, rather than a Th17, signature, that positively correlated with abundance of Akkermansia (Extended Data Fig. 6c-d). Thus, Akkermansia appears to skew the T cell response phenotype independently of the T cell antigen specificity, which for non-R161H cells could be other gut microbes or food antigens. VDJ analysis did not reveal evidence for a 2nd TCR among R161H TCR+ cells. In addition, in silico analysis did not reveal shared sequence(s) between Akkermansia and IRBP161–180, which is the cognate R161H TCR epitope. We interpret this to mean that Akkermansia regulates disease through innate, adjuvant-like mechanisms that shape the T-cell effector response phenotype, as well as indirectly by modulating SCFA-producing Firmicutes. This working model is depicted in Figure 6a.

Fig. 6. The inverse relationship between Verrucomicrobia and Firmicutes extends to clinical uveitis, multiple sclerosis (MS) and Crohn’s disease.

Fig. 6.

a, Graphical summary of the working model. b, A positive correlation between V/F (Verrucomicrobia/Firmicutes) ratios and histology scores of HuFl mice by simple linear regression, and V/F ratios compared between high and low disease of HuFl mice. c, V/F and F/B (Firmicutes/ Bacteroidetes) ratios compared between patients from uveitis, MS and IBD and their respective healthy controls. Analyzed datasets of MS and IBD (Crohn’s disease and UC) and healthy controls were from public sources. Uveitis and MS cohorts included those established on treatment. For F/B ratio in the IBD cohort, samples with <0.1% relative abundance of either Bacteroidetes or Firmicutes were removed from the analysis. Data are presented as mean values ± SEM. Statistical significance was determined by Mann-Whitney U test (one-tailed analysis was applied for uveitis and MS) and Kruskal–Wallis test with P-values adjusted for post hoc multiple comparisons (for IBD).

6. The inverse relationship between Verrucomicrobia and Firmicutes extends to clinical uveitis, multiple sclerosis and Crohn’s disease

Because effector Th1 skewing in the Akk-rich gut environment was independent of antigenic specificity, we hypothesized that it could be associated with human inflammatory conditions, such as uveitis, multiple sclerosis (MS) and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). To establish a common metric for comparing healthy to diseased state, we used the phylum-level ratio of Verrucomicrobia / Firmicutes (V/F ratio) which consistently tracked with disease severity in HuFl mice (Fig. 6b). Application of this metric to the entire cohort of our clinical uveitis samples (so as to minimize any selection bias), revealed higher V/F ratios in uveitis patients compared to healthy subjects (Fig. 6c). We next examined publicly available MS25 and IBD26 datasets, the latter comprising patients with Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis (UC). Compared to healthy controls, the V/F ratio in MS, and in Crohn’s disease patients––a condition predominantly driven by Th1-mediated inflammation––but not in UC patients27,28, was markedly elevated (Fig. 6c). Notably, the ratio of Firmicutes / Bacteroidetes (F/B ratio), commonly used as a broad indicator of “dysbiosis” 38, has not consistently distinguished patients from healthy controls across disease settings (Fig. 6c). Taken together, the gut microbial interaction networks indicated a negative correlation of Verrucomicrobia (Akkermansia) with Firmicutes not only in R161H mice, but also in uveitis, MS and Crohn’s disease patients, supporting the generality of this relationship.

DISCUSSION

In this study, we report a gut microbial interaction network that regulates autoimmune and inflammatory processes along the “gut–eye axis”. By integrating data-driven analyses and in vivo microbial perturbation, we provide compelling evidence for a negative relationship between Akkermansia and Firmicutes and link it to disease severity. Specifically, Akkermansia appears to promote sEAU in HuFl R161H mice by outcompeting SCFA-producing Firmicutes in the gut, resulting in diminished SCFA levels and enhanced Th1 responses both locally and systemically (Fig. 6a). Our findings provide a mechanistic basis for how the gut microbiome controls ocular autoimmunity, dissect the complex interacting stimuli that underpin this process, and highlight its broadly generalizable nature.

Our network-based perspective contrasts with previous studies, which have mostly focused on how individual gut microbial taxa influence disease and host immunity4. A. muciniphila has been studied across a spectrum of inflammatory and autoimmune diseases, and different reports have described inconsistent functional effects29. As an example, although Akkermansia promoted Th1 polarization of human PBMCs30 and positively correlated with disease activity in MS patients25,3032, in vivo Th1-polarizing activity was not observed in Akk-monocolonized mice30 and in the context of a diverse gut microbiome (SPF mice), Akkermansia-specific T cells differentiated into a mixture of effector phenotypes33. Our finding that Akkermansia affects sEAU through interactions that modulate the gut microbial network explains and reconciles these contradictions by demonstrating that the immunological impact of Akkermansia—and probably of any single microbe in general—is a product of its interactions with the broader gut microbial community.

The R161H sEAU model provides a platform to dissect these contextual effects. When the model was first established, we identified signaling by a (microbiota-dependent) mimic antigen in the SPF flora of R161H mice as an important, but possibly not the only, disease trigger2. In the “humanized” sEAU mice, Akkermansia does not appear to act as a surrogate antigen, suggesting that other HuFl members may provide this function. However, we did not attempt to identify the HuFl microbial mimic, as identifying it would lack translational relevance. The R161 TCR recognizes a mouse class II (I-Ar)-restricted epitope of IRBP. Human MHC class II molecules would almost certainly present a different epitope(s) from any given antigen than does mouse I-Ar, plus the epitope(s) would differ between individuals, given the heterogeneity of human MHC haplotypes. Moreover, whereas IRBP is a dominant retinal autoantigen in mice, human uveitis more commonly involves recall responses to arrestin1. Therefore, although the HuFl R161H sEAU model cannot reveal specific antigenic targets involved in human uveitis, it can reveal conserved mechanisms shared across species, such as the microbial interaction network identified in this study.

A key feature of this microbial network is the negative relationship between Akkermansia and Firmicutes, which links gut microbial composition to systemic inflammation. This antagonism likely arises from multiple, non-mutually exclusive mechanisms. Both taxa are dominant colonizers of the colon and may engage in direct niche competition and indirect interactions. Akkermansia promotes mucus degradation during gut inflammation34,35. The compromised mucus barrier would exacerbate inflammation and oxidative stress36, creating inhospitable conditions for obligate anaerobes like Firmicutes. Finally, while Akk antagonizes SCFA-producing Firmicutes, their SCFAs can in turn act to suppress Akkermansia growth and mucolytic activity37.

All those interactions are reflected in the V/F ratio, which may serve as an indicator of inflammatory state and immune polarization across species, supporting its translational value. A similar “legacy” metric F/B ratio has been used to indicate overall shifts in gut microbiome composition, but is now being phased out due to its inconsistent disease associations38,39. We propose that the V/F ratio is more specifically informative in autoimmune and inflammatory settings. Of note, numerous studies report an association between uveitic diseases and gut inflammation. Uveitis is associated with an increased risk of Crohn’s (but not of UC)40, and Crohn’s patients are more likely than UC patients to develop uveitis41. The findings are compatible with the notion that the V/F ratio increases under conditions where gut inflammation co-occurs with extraintestinal autoimmunity. The V/F ratio may also rise under Th1-dominant inflammatory conditions, as observed in our data. Our analyses reveal elevated V/F ratios not only in our patients with uveitis, but also in published datasets from patients with MS25 and IBD26. Within IBD, increases in V/F were evident in Crohn’s disease (Th1-dominant4244), but not in UC (Th2-like4547).

Limitations of the study:

The complexity of the Akkermansia–Firmicutes axis poses a major challenge to resolving microbial relationships at species and strain levels. Emerging approaches such as bacterial spatial transcriptomics48 are not yet sufficiently developed to define the precise mechanisms by which Akkermansia antagonizes SCFA-producing Firmicutes. In addition, the finite capacity of our GF R161H colony constrains the scale and breadth of gnotobiotic experiments. Consequently, several mechanistic studies, including administering individual SCFAs to HuFl mice for functional validation, could not be completed within a feasible time frame.

In conclusion, our findings show that a complex microbial interaction network—rather than individual taxa—plays a central role in shaping the gut–eye axis. The Akkermansia–Firmicutes relationship, captured in a simple translational metric (the V/F ratio) that tracks inflammatory state and immune polarization, likely reflects a generalizable ecological principle in which microbial competition influences systemic immune balance and susceptibility to autoimmunity and inflammation, and which extends across species. Future studies aimed at defining the mechanisms by which Akkermansia gains an advantage over SCFA-producing Firmicutes, may guide the development of microbiome-based interventions for autoimmune and inflammatory diseases that intersect with gut dysregulation.

METHODS

Mice.

R161H mice on the B10.RIII background10 were bred in-house and maintained under SPF conditions and fed standard facility chow ad libitum. GF and HuFl R161H mice were maintained in the gnotobiotic isolators. The animal study protocol (NEI-688) was approved by the NEI Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.

Generation of gnotobiotic mice with human stool samples.

Human stool samples of healthy volunteers were collected at Keio University according to the study protocol49 approved by the Institutional Review Boards (approval number 20150075) and informed consent was obtained from each subject. Stool samples were suspended in 20% glycerol in PBS, snap frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80°C. The U, V, and W stocks were thawed and gavaged into GF R161H mice and individual cohort lines were established in separate germ-free isolators.

Evaluation of uveitis phenotype.

Development of uveitis was monitored by fundoscopic observation via a binocular microscope of anesthetized mice at the indicated age. For histopathology, eyes were enucleated and fixed in 4% glutaraldehyde for 1 h and transferred to 10% formaldehyde for additional 24 h, embedded in methacrylate, and processed for H&E staining. Disease scores of fundoscopy and histology were assigned by a masked observer on a scale of 0–4, according to the criteria for EAU scoring described in detail elsewhere which are based on the number, size and type of lesions50.

HuFl R161H fecal suspension preparation.

Cecal and colonic contents from HuFl mice of varying disease severity were collected under sterile conditions and immediately transferred on ice to an anaerobic chamber (Coy Laboratory Products). Contents were filtered three times through a 70 μm cell strainer in 20% glycerol–PBS, and aliquoted to prevent repeated freeze–thaw cycles. Each sample was prepared from either individual mice or pools of mice with the same disease severity. The baseline HuFl suspension for reconstitution experiments was prepared from two mice with low uveitis scores and validated by 16S sequencing to contain ~1% Akkermansia (ranges 1–8% in tested samples).

In vivo microbial enrichment by gnotobiotic reconstitution.

A. muciniphila or E. coli were cultured in mucin-BHI media inside the anaerobic chamber or in LB media in the aerobic incubator, respectively. Microbial monoculture was prepared in advance and the first passage timed to reach the exponential growth phase immediately prior to oral gavage. On the day of gavage, GF R161H were transferred from the gnotobiotic isolators to sterile and static microisolator cages with a Reemay filter top. Using sterile techniques, these mice were examined by fundoscopy and assigned to experimental or control groups based on initial uveitis disease scores, age and sex. While mice were recovering from anesthesia, gavage material was prepared inside the anaerobic chamber for A. muciniphila or in the aerobic bacterial hood for E. coli, or sterile PBS, which in the “HuFl base model” was combined with the selected HuFl fecal suspension, so each mouse in the experimental group would receive an additional ~108 CFU of the microbe of interest in 200uL HuFl fecal suspension via oral gavage. Fecal sampling and fundoscopy scoring were performed on a weekly basis, and mice were handled under sterile protocols, with cages opened only inside a biosafety cabinet.

Fecal DNA extraction and quantification of microbes.

Fecal pellets were collected from individual mice, immediately frozen on dry ice and stored at −80°C until bacterial DNA extraction in house as previously described51 or by the NCI Genetics and Microbiome Core. Absolute abundance of bacteria in each fecal sample was assessed by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) using Akkermansia or E. coli standard curves with Fast SYBR Green Supermix (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA) and run on a QuantStudio™ 7 Pro Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems). Specific primers for Akkermansia were Akk.mu3.Fwd (5’-GCGTAGGCTGTTTCGTAAGTCGTGTGTGAAAG-3’) and Akk.mu3.Rvs (5’-GAGTGTTCCCGATATCTACGCATTTCA-3’)52, and for E. coli were Uni515F (5’-GTGCCAGCMGCCGCGGTAA-3’) and Ent826R (5’-GCCTCAAGGGCACAACCTCCAAG-3’)53. Five ng of fecal DNA was amplified per 10 μL reaction with the following cycling conditions: initial denaturation at 95 °C for 20 sec, followed by 40 cycles of 95 °C for 3 sec and 63 °C for 30 sec. A melt-curve analysis was included at the end of each run to confirm amplification specificity. Bacterial counts (CFU) per 5 ng of DNA were extrapolated from fitted standard curves correlating Cq values with bacterial quantity.

16S rRNA gene sequencing and analyses.

Fecal samples were processed at the NCI Genetics and Microbiome Core for 16S rRNA gene sequencing as detailed in prior work51. 16S amplicon sequence variants (ASV) were inferred with YAMS16 v1.7 (https://github.com/jhbadger/YAMS16), a pipeline running DADA254, and taxonomically classified using the SILVA reference database (release 138.1)55. Microbial diversity, differential abundance and multivariable association analyses were performed with phyloseq v1.42.056, MaAsLin2 v1.12.057, microViz v0.12.358, and custom scripts in R. Microbial association networks were analyzed with NetCoMi59. (NCBI SRA submission in progress)

Shotgun metagenomic sequencing and analyses.

Selected DNA samples were submitted to CosmosID, Inc. (Germantown, MD, USA) for shallow shotgun sequencing (3 million reads per sample). Specifically, DNA libraries were generated using the Nextera XT DNA Library Preparation Kit (Illumina, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) and IDT Unique Dual Indexes, with total input of 1 ng DNA. Genomic DNA was enzymatically fragmented according to the manufacturer’s guidelines, after which unique dual indexes were added to each sample and libraries were amplified through 12 PCR cycles. The products were purified with AMpure magnetic Beads (Beckman Coulter, Inc., Brea, CA, USA) and eluted in EB buffer (QIAGEN). Library concentrations were determined using a Qubit 4 fluorometer with a Qubit dsDNA HS Assay Kit, and final libraries were sequenced in paired-end mode (2×150 bp) on the Element AVITI platform. JAMS v1.9.960 and HUMAnN v3.961 were used for taxonomic and functional profiling, and genes involved in metabolic pathways of the main SCFAs (acetate, butyrate and propionate) were identified based on InterPro, Gene Ontology and Pfam annotations, and those present in the uveitis datasets were compared between diseased and healthy groups. (NCBI SRA submission in progress)

Targeted metabolomics and cytokine quantification.

Cecal and colonic contents (collectively referred to as “fecal contents”), eyes, and serum were collected from age-matched mice at harvest. Eyes were fixed for histological analysis as described above. Fecal and serum samples were snap-frozen on dry ice and stored at −80 °C. For metabolite profiling, at least 100 mg of fecal contents and 150 μL of serum per mouse were transferred to designated tubes and shipped on dry ice to Metabolon, Inc. (Morrisville, NC, USA) for absolute quantification of eight short-chain fatty acids (acetic, propionic, butyric, isobutyric, 2-methylbutyric, valeric, isovaleric, and hexanoic acids). Serum cytokine concentrations were measured using the Mouse Inflammation Panel (13-plex, LEGENDplex, BioLegend, San Diego, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Data were acquired on a CytoFlex LX flow cytometer (Beckman coulter) and analyzed with LEGENDplex Data Analysis Software (BioLegend) to quantify cytokine levels based on standard curves.

Tissue harvesting and flow cytometry analyses.

Peripheral lymphoid tissues (submandibular lymph nodes, spleen, peripheral lymph nodes, mesenteric lymph nodes), and gut lamina propria from small intestine and colon were collected and prepared for single cell suspensions as described elsewhere2. Cells were stained with fluorochrome-conjugated antibodies from BD Biosciences, BioLegend or Thermo Fisher Scientific, and viability dyes from Beckman Coulter. Fluorescence-activated cell sorting analyses were done using CytoFlex LX (Beckman coulter). FlowJo v10 (BD Biosciences) was used for data analyses.

In vitro activation assay on retina-specific T cells.

IRBP-specific T cells were harvested from spleen and peripheral lymph nodes of Tcra−/− Nr4a1EGFP (Nur77GFP) R161H mice and were enriched for naïve CD4+ cells by negative selection (EasySep, StemCell Technologies). CD11c+ dendritic cells were purified from spleen WT B10.RIII mice (Miltenyi Biotec) as antigen-presenting cells. T cells and dendritic cells were co-cultured at a 4:1 ratio in the presence of heat-killed A. muciniphila, heat-killed E. coli, or bacteria-rich extracts. T cell activation was assessed after 22 h by flow cytometric analysis of CD69 and Nur77 expression.

5’ single cell RNAseq sample processing.

Colon LP cells were labeled with anti-mouse TotalSeqC-HashTags and cell surface antibodies, and sorted for live CD45+ and CD4+ populations using FACSAria III/Fusion sorters (BD Biosciences). Post-sort viability exceeded 80%, and hash-tagged samples were pooled at equal ratios within each experimental group, combining CD45+ and CD4+ fractions at 1:1 ratio to enrich for CD4+ T cells. Pooled cells were resuspended in PBS with 0.04% BSA and loaded onto a 10x Genomics Chromium X instrument at 700–1200 cells/μL for single cell 5’ gene expression and TCR profiling. Libraries were prepared using the Chromium Next GEM Single Cell 5’ Reagent Kits v2 (Dual Index) following the manufacturer’s protocol, and sequenced on NovaSeq 6000 platform (Illumina, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA).

Single cell RNAseq data analyses.

Sequencing data were processed with Cell Ranger v9.0.1 (10x Genomics) for demultiplexing and alignment to the Mus musculus reference (GRCm39, Genome Reference Consortium, 2024). Cell doublets were detected and removed using Scrublet v0.2.362. Cells exhibiting high mitochondrial transcript content (≥ 5%) or abnormal gene counts (< 500 or > 8000) were excluded. Expression data were log-normalized and scaled using the Scanpy v1.11.063 in Python v3.10. Dimensionality reduction was performed using Principal Component Analysis (PCA) followed by Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection (UMAP), and cell clusters were identified with the Leiden algorithm64. Cell type annotation was based on computational classification using SingleR v2.8.065 with mouse immune reference data from celldex::ImmGenData v1.16.0 in R v4.4, as well as the expression of canonical cell type marker genes, and validated by cell lineage–specific surface antibody. The expression of both Trav16 and Trbv5 in a CD4 T cell was the standard used to identify IRBP-specific T cells10. (NCBI SRA and GEO submission in progress)

NEI clinical samples and public human data.

Stool samples were obtained from patients with autoimmune uveitis and healthy controls enrolled in a clinical cohort at the National Eye Institute (NEI), National Institutes of Health (NIH). All participants provided written informed consent under the protocol approved by the Institutional Review Board (Protocol 13-EI-0072). A stratified cohort of treatment-naïve autoimmune uveitis was selected for in-depth gut microbial network analysis, representing primarily posterior- and pan-uveitis cases and ocular-restricted phenotypes such as idiopathic uveitis, sympathetic ophthalmia and birdshot chorioretinopathy. 16S rRNA gene and shotgun metagenomic sequencing of human fecal samples were performed by the Microbiome Cores at the NCI and the Goodman-Luskin Microbiome Center (Los Angeles, CA, USA). Public microbiome data of IBD patients’ stool are from PRJNA119891126, and that of MS patient stool from the International MS Microbiome Study (iMSMS)25.

Statistical analyses.

Statistical analyses were conducted with R v4.4, Python v3.10, and GraphPad Prism v10.5.0. Non-parametric tests such as Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used for most comparisons between two or more groups. Group differences in multivariate community structure were evaluated by Permutational Multivariate Analysis of Variance (PERMANOVA). Pearson’s or Spearman’s rank correlation, as well as multivariable association (MaAsLin2 and equivalent methods) were used to assess associations between microbial features and disease or immune phenotypes. P-values were adjusted for multiple comparisons using the false discovery rate (FDR) where applicable, and statistical significance was indicated as follows: * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, and **** P < 0.0001. Data in bar plots are presented as mean values ± SEMs.

Supplementary Material

Supplement 1
media-1.pdf (3MB, pdf)

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to NEI and NHLBI Flow Cytometry Cores, NEI Histology and Genetic Engineering Cores, Ms. Wuxing Yuan, Dr. Shah Rashed and members of NCI Microbiome Core, UCLA Goodman-Luskin Microbiome Center Microbiome Core, and all members of the Caspi Lab for their invaluable experimental assistance. We extend special thanks to Dr. Katsuko Sudo (Tokyo Medical University, Japan), Mr. Hirofumi Kobayashi and staff at Sankyo Labo Service Corporation, Inc. (Japan), as well as the gnotobiotic management team from NEI Veterinary Research and Resources Section for their expert support and guidance in GF and gnotobiotic colony maintenance. We also thank Dr. Eduard Ansaldo (NIAID) for sharing protocols for Akkermansia culture, Dr. Kikuji Itoh (Japan SLC, Inc.), Dr. Koji Atarashi and members of the Honda Lab for providing experimental advice. Finally, we acknowledge Dr. Geoffrey A. Mueller and staff at NIEHS Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Group for their generous assistance with metabolomics, and Drs. Kelsey Wheeler, Daniel Sellers, and Reuben Allen (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) for their insightful discussions and critical feedback. This study was supported by NIH/NEI Intramural funding, Project Number EY000184.

Funding:

NIH/NEI Intramural funding, Project Number EY000184

Footnotes

Commercial Disclosures: None

REFERENCES

  • 1.Caspi R. R. A look at autoimmunity and inflammation in the eye. J Clin Invest 120, 3073–3083 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Horai R. et al. Microbiota-Dependent Activation of an Autoreactive T Cell Receptor Provokes Autoimmunity in an Immunologically Privileged Site. Immunity 43, 343–353 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Horai R. & Caspi R. R. Microbiome and Autoimmune Uveitis. Front Immunol 10, 232 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Salvador R., Zhang A., Horai R. & Caspi R. R. Microbiota as Drivers and as Therapeutic Targets in Ocular and Tissue Specific Autoimmunity. Front Cell Dev Biol 8, 606751 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • 5.White Z. et al. Gut inflammation promotes microbiota-specific CD4 T cell-mediated neuroinflammation. Nature 643, 509–518 (2025). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Lee H. G. et al. Pathogenic function of bystander-activated memory-like CD4(+) T cells in autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Nat Commun 10, 709 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Miller S. D. et al. Persistent infection with Theiler’s virus leads to CNS autoimmunity via epitope spreading. Nat Med 3, 1133–1136 (1997). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Deeg C. A., Amann B., Raith A. J. & Kaspers B. Inter- and intramolecular epitope spreading in equine recurrent uveitis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 47, 652–656 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ji Q., Perchellet A. & Goverman J. M. Viral infection triggers central nervous system autoimmunity via activation of CD8+ T cells expressing dual TCRs. Nat Immunol 11, 628–634 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Horai R. et al. Breakdown of immune privilege and spontaneous autoimmunity in mice expressing a transgenic T cell receptor specific for a retinal autoantigen. J Autoimmun 44, 21–33 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Nakamura Y. K. et al. Gut Microbial Alterations Associated With Protection From Autoimmune Uveitis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 57, 3747–3758 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Shimizu J. et al. Bifidobacteria Abundance-Featured Gut Microbiota Compositional Change in Patients with Behcet’s Disease. PLoS One 11, e0153746 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Huang X. et al. Gut Microbiota Composition and Fecal Metabolic Phenotype in Patients With Acute Anterior Uveitis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 59, 1523–1531 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kalyana Chakravarthy S. et al. Dysbiosis in the Gut Bacterial Microbiome of Patients with Uveitis, an Inflammatory Disease of the Eye. Indian J Microbiol 58, 457–469 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ye Z. et al. A metagenomic study of the gut microbiome in Behcet’s disease. Microbiome 6, 135 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ye Z. et al. Altered gut microbiome composition in patients with Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada disease. Gut Microbes 11, 539–555 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Steimle A. et al. Gut microbial factors predict disease severity in a mouse model of multiple sclerosis. Nat Microbiol 9, 2244–2261 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Luger D. et al. Either a Th17 or a Th1 effector response can drive autoimmunity: conditions of disease induction affect dominant effector category. J Exp Med 205, 799–810 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Damsker J. M., Hansen A. M. & Caspi R. R. Th1 and Th17 cells: adversaries and collaborators. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1183, 211–221 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Horai R. & Caspi R. R. Cytokines in autoimmune uveitis. J Interferon Cytokine Res 31, 733–744 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Mann E. R., Lam Y. K. & Uhlig H. H. Short-chain fatty acids: linking diet, the microbiome and immunity. Nat Rev Immunol 24, 577–595 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Nakamura Y. K. et al. Short chain fatty acids ameliorate immune-mediated uveitis partially by altering migration of lymphocytes from the intestine. Sci Rep 7, 11745 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Chen X. et al. Sodium butyrate regulates Th17/Treg cell balance to ameliorate uveitis via the Nrf2/HO-1 pathway. Biochem Pharmacol 142, 111–119 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Louis P. & Flint H. J. Formation of propionate and butyrate by the human colonic microbiota. Environ Microbiol 19, 29–41 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.iMSMS Consortium. Gut microbiome of multiple sclerosis patients and paired household healthy controls reveal associations with disease risk and course. Cell 185, 3467–3486 e3416 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Orejudo M. et al. Exploration of fecal microbiota in newly diagnosed patients with inflammatory bowel disease using shotgun metagenomics. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 15, 1595884 (2025). [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Strober W., Fuss I. & Mannon P. The fundamental basis of inflammatory bowel disease. J Clin Invest 117, 514–521 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Guan Q. A Comprehensive Review and Update on the Pathogenesis of Inflammatory Bowel Disease. J Immunol Res 2019, 7247238 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Cani P. D., Depommier C., Derrien M., Everard A. & de Vos W. M. Akkermansia muciniphila: paradigm for next-generation beneficial microorganisms. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 19, 625–637 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Cekanaviciute E. et al. Gut bacteria from multiple sclerosis patients modulate human T cells and exacerbate symptoms in mouse models. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 114, 10713–10718 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Berer K. et al. Gut microbiota from multiple sclerosis patients enables spontaneous autoimmune encephalomyelitis in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 114, 10719–10724 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Jangi S. et al. Alterations of the human gut microbiome in multiple sclerosis. Nat Commun 7, 12015 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Ansaldo E. et al. Akkermansia muciniphila induces intestinal adaptive immune responses during homeostasis. Science 364, 1179–1184 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Desai M. S. et al. A Dietary Fiber-Deprived Gut Microbiota Degrades the Colonic Mucus Barrier and Enhances Pathogen Susceptibility. Cell 167, 1339–1353 e1321 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Tingler A. M. & Engevik M. A. Breaking down barriers: is intestinal mucus degradation by Akkermansia muciniphila beneficial or harmful? Infect Immun 93, e0050324 (2025). [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Sugihara K. et al. Mucolytic bacteria license pathobionts to acquire host-derived nutrients during dietary nutrient restriction. Cell Rep 40, 111093 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Schwabkey Z. I. et al. Diet-derived metabolites and mucus link the gut microbiome to fever after cytotoxic cancer treatment. Sci Transl Med 14, eabo3445 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Magne F. et al. The Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes Ratio: A Relevant Marker of Gut Dysbiosis in Obese Patients? Nutrients 12 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Walters W. A., Xu Z. & Knight R. Meta-analyses of human gut microbes associated with obesity and IBD. FEBS Lett 588, 4223–4233 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Lo T. C., Chen Y. Y. & Chen H. H. Risk of inflammatory bowel disease in uveitis patients: a population-based cohort study. Eye (Lond) 36, 1288–1293 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Lin H. et al. Differences in the prevalence of uveitis between Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Ophthalmol 102, e485–e492 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Bouma G. & Strober W. The immunological and genetic basis of inflammatory bowel disease. Nat Rev Immunol 3, 521–533 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Fuss I. J. et al. Disparate CD4+ lamina propria (LP) lymphokine secretion profiles in inflammatory bowel disease. Crohn’s disease LP cells manifest increased secretion of IFN-gamma, whereas ulcerative colitis LP cells manifest increased secretion of IL-5. J Immunol 157, 1261–1270 (1996). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Parronchi P. et al. Type 1 T-helper cell predominance and interleukin-12 expression in the gut of patients with Crohn’s disease. Am J Pathol 150, 823–832 (1997). [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Fuss I. J. et al. Nonclassical CD1d-restricted NK T cells that produce IL-13 characterize an atypical Th2 response in ulcerative colitis. J Clin Invest 113, 1490–1497 (2004). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Heller F. et al. Interleukin-13 is the key effector Th2 cytokine in ulcerative colitis that affects epithelial tight junctions, apoptosis, and cell restitution. Gastroenterology 129, 550–564 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Strober W. & Fuss I. J. Proinflammatory cytokines in the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel diseases. Gastroenterology 140, 1756–1767 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Sarfatis A., Wang Y., Twumasi-Ankrah N. & Moffitt J. R. Highly multiplexed spatial transcriptomics in bacteria. Science 387, eadr0932 (2025). [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Tanoue T. et al. A defined commensal consortium elicits CD8 T cells and anti-cancer immunity. Nature 565, 600–605 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Horai R. & Caspi R. R. in Animal Models for Retinal Diseases. Neuromethods. Vol. 46 207–225 (SpringerLink, 2010). [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Salvador R. et al. Too Much of a Good Thing: Extended Duration of Gut Microbiota Depletion Reverses Protection From Experimental Autoimmune Uveitis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 64, 43 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Goux H. J., Chavan D., Crum M., Kourentzi K. & Willson R. C. Akkermansia muciniphila as a Model Case for the Development of an Improved Quantitative RPA Microbiome Assay. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 8, 237 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Barman M. et al. Enteric salmonellosis disrupts the microbial ecology of the murine gastrointestinal tract. Infect Immun 76, 907–915 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Callahan B. J. et al. DADA2: High-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat Methods 13, 581–583 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Quast C. et al. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res 41, D590–596 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.McMurdie P. J. & Holmes S. phyloseq: an R package for reproducible interactive analysis and graphics of microbiome census data. PLoS One 8, e61217 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Mallick H. et al. Multivariable association discovery in population-scale meta-omics studies. PLoS Comput Biol 17, e1009442 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Barnett D. J. M., Arts I. C. W. & Penders J. microViz: an R package for microbiome data visualization and statistics. J Open Source Software 6 3201 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Peschel S., Muller C. L., von Mutius E., Boulesteix A. L. & Depner M. NetCoMi: network construction and comparison for microbiome data in R. Brief Bioinform 22 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  • 60.McCulloch J. A. et al. JAMS - A framework for the taxonomic and functional exploration of microbiological genomic data. bioRxiv (2023). [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Beghini F. et al. Integrating taxonomic, functional, and strain-level profiling of diverse microbial communities with bioBakery 3. Elife 10 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Wolock S. L., Lopez R. & Klein A. M. Scrublet: Computational Identification of Cell Doublets in Single-Cell Transcriptomic Data. Cell Syst 8, 281–291 e289 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Wolf F. A., Angerer P. & Theis F. J. SCANPY: large-scale single-cell gene expression data analysis. Genome Biol 19, 15 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Traag V. A., Waltman L. & van Eck N. J. From Louvain to Leiden: guaranteeing well-connected communities. Sci Rep 9, 5233 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Aran D. et al. Reference-based analysis of lung single-cell sequencing reveals a transitional profibrotic macrophage. Nat Immunol 20, 163–172 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplement 1
media-1.pdf (3MB, pdf)

Articles from bioRxiv are provided here courtesy of Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Preprints

RESOURCES