Abstract
Ischemia reperfusion (IR)-induced oxidative stress and inflammation contribute to morbidity and mortality of acute coronary syndrome. Ischemia results in profound hypoxia and tissue dysfunction and subsequent reperfusion further aggravates ischemic cardiac tissue damage. In cardiac IR injury, neutrophils are involved both in causing cardiomyocyte death and in preserving heart tissue homeostasis. We tested the hypothesis that neutrophil subpopulations show distinct functions in the pathogenesis of cardiac IR injury and that their functional heterogeneity can be exploited in subset-specific pharmacological intervention to prevent IR-induced myocardial tissue damage and functional deterioration. Cardiac IR-injury in a mouse model was characterized by the presence of two distinct heart-inflammatory subsets of neutrophils, one that specifically endocytosed albumin nanoparticles (ANPhigh) and one that endocytose few or no ANP (ANPlow). The two subsets had very distinct inflammatory phenotypes. ANPhigh neutrophils expressed significantly greater amounts of inflammatory mediators, such as Il-1b and Ccl3, than ANPlow neutrophils. Targeting the Spleen tyrosine kinase (Syk) specifically in ANPhigh neutrophils post IR reduced cardiac neutrophilic and mononuclear inflammation and drastically decreased infarct size, and prevented the deterioration of cardiac function. Targeting the Syk pathway specifically in a defined subset of neutrophils is a feasible therapy for cardiac IR injury.
Keywords: sterile inflammation, percutaneous coronary interventions, neutrophil heterogeneity, acute myocardial infarction, coronary patency, albumin nanoparticles, piceatannol
Standard treatment for acute myocardial infarction (MI) is timely restoration of blood flow to ischemic tissues using percutaneous coronary intervention and thrombolytic therapies (1–5). Reperfusion of ischemic tissues can exacerbate damage by inducing inflammation, reactive oxygen species production, and microvascular dysfunction (6).
Neutrophils contribute to lethal injury of coronary vascular endothelial cells and cardiomyocytes after reperfusion (7). IR-injury causes emergency myelopoiesis (8, 9). Neutrophil-derived alarmins (S100A8 and S100A9), and danger-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs), signaling through Toll-like receptor 4 and the Nod-like receptor family pyrin domain-containing 3 inflammasome (NLRP3), serve to prime and promote interleukin-1 (IL-1) β secretion (9, 10). IL-1β/MyD88 signaling induces granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) upregulation and consequently the expansion of pluripotent hematopoietic stem cells (11). The ischemic myocardium releases arachidonate and complement-derived chemotactic factors such as leukotriene B4 and C5a, which recruit and activate neutrophils, monocytes and macrophages (12, 13). Activated neutrophils induce NADPH oxidase complex-derived reactive oxygen species (ROS), such as O2·− and H2O2, which further induce formation of OH· and hypochlorous acid (13–16). In patients, targeted PET imaging of chemokine receptor CXCR4 expression demonstrated CXCR4-expressing cell infiltration after cardiac reperfusion (17) suggestive of neutrophil sequestration. In patients with acute coronary syndrome, higher neutrophil counts seen on admission and after revascularization correlated with major adverse cardiovascular disease outcomes (10). Firmly adherent neutrophils, releasing ROS and proteolytic enzymes (16, 18), damage the coronary vascular endothelium and promote the thromboembolization of microvessels, generating no-reflow areas and secondary ischemia (19).
Therefore, removing neutrophils from the systemic or coronary circulation or the prevention of adhesion molecule-dependent interactions with the endothelium to mitigate neutrophil sequestration to the infarcted areas has been attempted experimentally and clinically. However, clinical studies of targeting Mac-1 expressing cells (with recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody to CD18 (Mac1 or LFA-1) or injections of antibodies to all isoforms of CD18) have shown negative results (20–22) and anti-neutrophilic therapeutic strategies have been largely abandoned in the clinic (23). Moreover, experimental depletion of neutrophils before injury-induction impaired cardiac recover (24) suggesting that neutrophils in addition to causing in jury are required for proper myocardial recovery after IR. The rationale for these studies was that cardiac inflammation induced by therapeutic reperfusion is predominantly driven by neutrophils (25–28) but, paradoxically, indiscriminate targeting of neutrophils is ineffective therapeutically (29). Targeting neutrophils specifically based of their distinct functional properties, rather than cell surface marker expression or (as yet unidentified) specific transcriptional programs (30, 31), seemed more feasible. For these reasons, we attempted to identify the specific neutrophil subset involved in cardiac IR injury based on the previously reported propensity of endothelial-adherent neutrophils to endocytose albumin nanoparticles (32–34).
Results
Albumin-based nanoparticles are differentially endocytosed by neutrophils in cardiac IR injury
In ischemia-reperfusion (IR) injury, both in experimental models and human patients, neutrophils are a key cellular component of the inflammatory response (35). We attempted to characterize neutrophils by their ability to endocytose albumin nanoparticles (33). For the synthesis of nanoparticles, we used human serum albumin (HSA), modifying a published method with bovine serum albumin (BSA) (32) (Fig. 1). BSA and HSA are highly homologous (36) but HSA-nanoparticles are more suitable for potential clinical applications (37). For use in flow cytometry, we synthesized nanoparticles loaded with Alexa Fluor® 647 succinimidyl ester (AF647 (50μg) that showed bright and stable fluorescence (Extended data Fig. 1). After the desolvation reaction, the HSA-nanoparticle solutions were washed, and re-suspended in deionized water. These reactions yielded nanoparticles with a hydrodynamic diameter of 149 ± 12 nm and PDI of 0.06, as measured by DLS (Fig. 1a) and scanning electron microscopy revealed a monodisperse size distribution of spherical nanoparticles (Fig. 1b). The nanoparticles solutions proved to be very stable, with a zeta potential of – 29 ± 3 mV (Fig. 1c), measured by Zetasizer nano ZS.
Figure 1. Human serum albumin (HSA)-based nanoparticles used for targeted drug delivery.
Albumin nanoparticles (ANP) were synthesized using a solvent desolvation technique. ANP and piceatannol containing PANP size was characterized by light scatter (a) and scanning electron microscopy (b) and found to be 140–150nm in diameter with a polydispersity value of <0.1 and zeta potential < −40mV (c).
We tested these albumin nanoparticles (ANP) in vivo using a well-established mouse model of IR injury (38). Experimental IR (1h ischemia, followed by 11h reperfusion) elicited an acute inflammatory response (Fig. 2a), with massive cardiac inflammation (CD45+ cells increased from 2% in sham control hearts to 18%) (Fig. 2b). The inflammatory cells were mostly Ly6G+ neutrophils and CD64+ monocytes and macrophages (Fig. 2b). Intravenous injection of ANP after 30’ prior to euthanasia showed that ANP endocytosis was largely restricted to the Ly6G-expressing neutrophils (Fig. 2b). Furthermore, ANP injections showed two distinct subsets of heart inflammatory neutrophils: neutrophils with low or no endocytosis of ANP (ANPlow) and neutrophils that readily endocytosed ANP (ANPhigh) (Fig. 2b).
Figure 2. Myocardial IR injury in mice causes acute innate inflammation characterized by sequestration of distinct subsets of neutrophils.

Flow cytometric analysis of heart cells from sham operated mice or after IR injury. (a) Scheme of IR injury induction and i.v. ANP-injection. Ligation was released 45’ post LAD ligation; cardiac inflammation was analyzed 6h or 12h after LAD ligation or sham operation. ANP were inject 30’ prior to euthanasia. (b) IR injury caused massive inflammation (CD45pos cells increased from 2% in sham control hearts to 18%). ANP endocytosis is mostly restricted for Ly6G-expressing neutrophils; neutrophils with low or no endocytosis of albumin nanoparticles (ANPlow, green), or neutrophils that readily endocytosed albumin nanoparticles (ANPhigh, red). Heart single cell suspensions were prepared, and cells were stained with specific antibodies to Ly6G (neutrophils), CD64 (monocytes and macrophages), CD45 (all leukocytes), and ANP labeled with AF647. Percentages of cell populations are indicated. (c,d) Il-1b or Ccl3 mRNA expression 6h or 12h after sham operation or IR injury induction. RNA for qPCR was prepared from peripheral blood Ly6G-positive ANPlow or ANPhigh, neutrophils. Ly6G-expressing neutrophils were selected (via magnetic beads) from single cell suspensions of peripheral blood or heart and sorted by flow cytometry according to their endocytosis of ANP. Fold change, expression, using Il-1b- or Ccl3-specific primers, relative to Ppia- (6h) or 18S rRNA- (12h) genes, determined by comparative Ct method. Markers represent results from individual mice. ***p< 0.0001, **p< 0.001, *p< 0.01 (unpaired t-test). Representative data from 3 independent experiments are shown.
We next examined whether inflammatory mediators implicated in the pathogenesis cardiac IR injury were differentially expressed in these two neutrophil subsets. We isolated RNA of heart inflammatory ANPlow and ANPhigh neutrophils, and quantified Il-1β expression by qPCR. We found that ANPhigh neutrophils expressed significantly more mRNA for Il-1β than ANPlow neutrophils (Fig. 2c). The chemokine Ccl3 (Mip1α) is associated with the inflammatory response accompanying IR injury (39) and was induced 6h and 12h after the induction of IR injury. Heart ANPhigh neutrophils expressed much greater amounts of Ccl3 than heart ANPlow neutrophils (Fig. 2c). Differential endocytosis of ANP was also evident in peripheral blood neutrophils. Here too, we found that peripheral blood ANPhigh neutrophils expressed significantly more Il-1β and Ccl3 mRNA than ANPlow neutrophils 6h after initiation of IR injury (Fig. 2c). At 12h after IR injury, Il-1β was differentially expressed between the two neutrophil-subsets, whereas induction of Ccl3 expression in neutrophils was no longer apparent at 12h after IR injury (Fig. 2c), suggesting that targeting toxic neutrophils would be most effective within the initial 6h period of reperfusion. We identified two subsets of neutrophils by their selective endocytosis of ANP. In the peripheral blood and in inflamed myocardium, ANPhigh neutrophils expressed inordinate amounts of inflammatory mediators implicated in promoting neutrophil adhesion and transmigration and in the pathogenesis of lethal cardiac reperfusion injury (40).
Selective endocytosis of ANP enables treatment of cardiac IR
We next tested whether selective endocytosis of ANP by neutrophils could be utilized for the reduction of cardiac inflammation post IR. IR injury leads to the release of DAMP-receptors and the activation of downstream signaling molecules such as the spleen tyrosine kinase (Syk) (41). Syk has diverse functions (42) and is essential in CD18 integrin signaling in neutrophils (43, 44), and for the induction of cytokine and chemokine expression (45). Albumin nanoparticles can function as efficient carriers of therapeutics (46–48). We utilized a specific Syk inhibitor, the hydrophobic agent piceatannol, for delivery via ANP to neutrophils. To functionalize ANP with piceatannol, we incubated purified HSA (20 mg/mL) with piceatannol (5mg) prior to the desolvation reaction (Extended data Fig. 1). Drug encapsulation efficiency (measured by LC-MS/MS) was 6.1 ± 0.35% for reactions incubated with 5 mg of piceatannol, which effectively delivered 30.3 ± 1.7 μg/mL piceatannol at the piceatannol-ANP (PANP) formulation concentration of 2 mg/mL. We used these PANP formulations (concentrated solutions in deionized water of 15 mg piceatannol/g albumin, stable at 4°C for more than a month) for all therapeutic experiments.
We induced ischemia via LAD-ligation, released the ligation after 1h, and administered PANP or vehicle loaded ANP i.v. another hour after the release of the LAD-ligation; we euthanized the mice 24h after initiation of IR injury for analysis (scheme in Fig. 3a). We found that PANP treatment drastically reduced myocardial inflammation of Ly6G+ neutrophils and CD64+ monocytes and macrophages (Fig. 3b). The ratios of myocardial Ly6G+ neutrophils to CD64+ monocytes and macrophages were significantly reduced in hearts of PANP-treated mice to the same level as seen in untreated sham controls (Fig. 3c). Reduced cardiac inflammation after PANP-treatment had no effect on the percentage of Ly6G+ neutrophils in the lung (Fig. 3d), correlated with an increased percentage of Ly6G+ neutrophils in the peripheral blood (Fig. 3e) and the liver (Fig. 3f). The spleens from sham-operated or after IR injury treated with ANP or PANP, showed similar percentages of Ly6G+ neutrophils and CD64+ monocytes and macrophages (Fig. 3g). These data demonstrated that piceatannol could be effectively delivered via PANP and that this selective delivery targeting a distinct subset of neutrophils effectively reduced overall myocardial inflammation after IR without causing inflammation elsewhere.
Figure 3. PANP treatment after IR reduces myocardial inflammation.

Flow cytometric analysis of heart single cell suspensions from mice sham operated or after IR injury injected i.v. with ANP (vehicle control) or PANP (piceatannol). (a) Scheme of PANP treatment. Ligation was released 45’ post LAD ligation ANP or PANP were injected i.v. 1h after reperfusion. Innate cardiac inflammation was analyzed 24h after LAD ligation or sham operation. Massive inflammation in hearts of vehicle ANP-treated mice (b). Markedly reduced myocardial inflammation of Ly6G+ neutrophils and CD64+ monocytes and macrophages in hearts of PANP-treated mice (b). PANP-treatment significantly reduced ratio of Ly6G+ neutrophils to CD64+ monocytes and macrophages to level of sham-operated controls (c). Sterile inflammation caused by IR injury was also seen in lungs (d) and PANP treatment correlated with increased percentage of Ly6G+ neutrophils in peripheral blood (e). Percentage of Ly6G+ neutrophils and CD64+ monocytes and macrophages in liver (f) and (g) spleen was similar in all three treatment cohorts. Mice were euthanized for analysis 24h after initiation of IR injury or sham operation. Percentages of cell populations are indicated. Representative data from 3 independent experiments are shown.
Cardiac-derived DAMPs prime and activate of the NOD-like receptor protein 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome (49). NLRP3 inflammasome processes the product of the Il-1β gene and is essential for its release from the cells (50). NLRP3 inflammasome function is dependent on recruitment of the adaptor molecule apoptosis-associated speck-like protein containing a caspase recruitment domain (ASC). ASC activation (ASC phosphorylation, p-ASC formation), is required for caspase-1-dependent processing of pro-IL-1β to mature IL-1β (51). After induction of IR injury, ASC phosphorylation (p-ASC formation), was apparent in inflammatory cells and absent in parenchymal cells (Fig. 4a,b). Moreover, plasma IL-1β concentration increased over controls in mice after IR-injury (Fig. 4c). Treatment of mice with vehicle ANP had no significant effect on inflammasome activation or secretion of mature IL-1β (Fig. 4a–c) but treatment with PANP significantly reduced p-ASC formation and, remarkably, reduced the concentrations of IL-1β in plasma to the levels in naive controls (Fig. 4a–c). These data indicate that the inhibition of Syk, specifically in the subset of ANP-endocytosing neutrophils is sufficient to reduce NLRP3 activity (p-ASC formation) and to reduce the release of mature IL-1β into circulation.
Figure 4. PANP treatment after IR curbs NLP3 inflammasome activation and IL-1b maturation.
(a) Histological sections of hearts from control or MIR-subjected mice injected with PBS, ANP or PANP. The sections were stained with an antibody to p-ASC (red) and DAPI (blue) and imaged by confocal microscopy. Representative confocal microscopy images. (b) Quantification of p-ASC intensity with respect to DAPI per field of view as calculated by ImageJ software. (c) Quantification of IL-1β in plasma collected from control mice and mice after MIR injected with PBS, ANP and PANP as measured by ELISA assay. *p< 0.05; **p< 0.005; ***p< 0.0005 (One-way Anova followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test in GraphPad Prism). Markers represent data from individual mice.
We next investigated whether PANP treatment would also reduce infarct sizes. We induced IR injury and determined the infarcted area (IA) relative to the area at risk (AAR) in hearts excised immediately after euthanasia at 24h after initiation of the initiation of IR injury. IR resulted in massive myocardial necrosis in hearts of ANP-treated control mice (Fig. 5a). When compared to ANP-treated controls, PANP treatment preserved much of the LV myocardium (Fig. 5a) and markedly reduced infarct area: area at risk ratio (IA/AAR) compared to ANP-treated controls (45.6 ± 8.6 vs 9.2 ± 4%) (Fig. 5b). Infarct size in experimental models as in patients can also be assessed by the extent of the release of biomarkers, e.g., the cardiomyocyte-specific troponin I (52, 53). Consistent with our findings in infarct size, Troponin I concentrations were significantly reduced by PANP treatment when compared to saline or ANP-vehicle treated mice. Remarkably, plasma Troponin I concentrations of PANP-treated mice were similar the concentrations found in plasma of naive controls (Fig. 5c). We also evaluated cardiomyocyte death by in situ TUNEL staining (54). Consistent with our findings on infarct size and Troponin I concentrations, we observed a marked reduction in cardiomyocyte death by PANP treatment (Extended data Fig. 2).
Figure 5. PANP treatment post IR reduces myocardial infarct size and cardiomyocyte death.
(a) TTC staining of hearts from ANP control- or PANP-treated mice at 24h after initiation of IR injury. Dotted yellow lines highlight areas of dead myocardium. (b) Quantification of data shows that the infarcted area (IA) relative to area at risk (AAR) was significantly reduced by PANP treatment. Mice were treated with ANP or PANP, and at 24h after MI, hearts were harvested and the area of infarct - area at risk ratio (IA/AAR) was evaluated by dual staining technique. **p< 0.001 (Unpaired t-test). Representative data from 3 independent experiments are shown. (c) Troponin I plasma concentrations were significantly reduced by PANP treatment when compared to saline or ANP-vehicle treated mice and similar to concentrations found in naive control mice. *p< 0.05; **p< 0.005 (One-way Anova followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test in GraphPad Prism). Markers represent data from individual mice.
PANP treatment post IR preserves cardiac function
To ascertain the effects of preventing IR-injury on left ventricular (LV) function, we determined indices of cardiac function, fractional shortening (FS), ejection fraction (EF), stroke volume (SV), and cardiac output (CO). We compared baseline function to function 24h post initiation of IR injury. We found that PANP treatment prevented deterioration of FS, EF, SV and CO (Fig. 6a–e) when compared to baseline cardiac function. We next determined LV fractional shortening before (basal value, 0 time) and 2d and 14d after initiation of IR injury. Injection of vehicle ANP did not prevent the worsening of LV fractional shortening echocardiographically measured 2d after induction of IR injury (Fig. 6f) whereas treating mice with PANP preserved fractional shortening (with values similar to sham-operated controls) (Fig. 6f). The beneficial effects of PANP treatment persisted 2 weeks after surgery (Fig. 6f), suggesting that PANP treatment shown to be beneficial in the early stages of recovery did not induce adverse cardiac remodeling and functional deterioration later. We additionally assessed cardiac myofiber disorganization, indicative of incipient adverse remodeling. Cardiac myofiber disorganization was markedly ameliorated by PANP treatment post IR (Extended data Fig. 3). These results suggest that mitigating IR injury by specific targeting of a neutrophil subset after reperfusion is beneficial in experimental MI (Fig. 7).
Figure 6. PANP treatment post IR preserves cardiac function.

(A) Representative echocardiography imaging of hearts from controls and mice treated with ANP or PANP. We determined (B) ejection fraction, (C) fractional shortening, (D) cardiac output, (E) stroke volume in short axis echo imaging. *p< 0.05; **p< 0.005; ***p<0.0005 (One-way anova followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test in GraphPad Prism). Marker represent data from individual mice. (F) LV fractional shortening was determined before (basal value, 0 time) and 2d and 14d after initiation of IR injury. Mice were treated with ANP or PANP 1h after the release of LAD ligation. Vehicle treated (ANP) mice suffered a marked decrease in shortening at 2d and 14d compared to PANP treated mice or sham controls. Sham (n=5), ANP (n=8) and PANP (n=5). Fractional shortening in ANP treated mice was significantly (*p<0.01 Prism 8) below sham and PANP treated animals at 2 and 14 days. Statistics were determined by 2-way Anova followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test (GraphPad Prism). Representative data from 3 independent experiments are shown.
Figure 7. Graphical summary of findings.
IR injury activates neutrophils, leading to neutropoiesis and functionally diverse inflammation of the myocardium. This study reveals that neutrophils with tissue-toxic potential are main contributors to IR. Therapeutic targeting of the inflammatory Syk pathway specifically in these cells mitigates the myocardial damage caused by IR. Notably, pharmacological Syk inhibition in these cells reduces cardiomyocyte death and preserves cardiac function post IR-injury.
Discussion
Efforts to target neutrophils therapeutically in patients with MI have shown unsatisfactory results in clinical trials (20–22). Since then, a deeper understanding of neutrophil heterogeneity (30, 33, 55, 56) have revived an interest in targeting specific neutrophil subsets to improve therapy of patients with acute coronary syndrome (29). We have shown here that a subset of inflammatory injury-inducing neutrophils can be specifically targeted to dampen the function of these cells and prevent myocardial injury and improve cardiac function post IR. These new results are in contrast to results of earlier experimental studies and clinical trials concentrating on interfering with all neutrophils, irrespective of their distinct functions, and which resulted in harmful outcomes (20–22). Our new results demonstrate the effectiveness of neutrophil subset-targeted therapy. The advantage of the present approach is the targeting of a specific neutrophil population. Non-targeted approaches to inhibit neutrophil function or recruitment have the potential to interfere with the beneficial effects of distinct neutrophil subsets and other inflammatory cells (57–61).
In the healthy individual neutrophils are produced in vast numbers as they are essential defenders protecting the host against a polymicrobial environment. It has become evident that neutrophils function to preserve tissue homeostasis (30), they are also toxic effectors and can cause irreparable harm to host tissues (62). Whether these seemingly paradoxical functions are due the existence of neutrophils as bona fide subsets with distinct functions or divergent responses to distinct micro-environments is still unclear (63, 64). In cardiac IR injury, neutrophils are involved both in causing cardiomyocyte death and in preserving heart tissue homeostasis (7, 16, 65). Indiscriminate inhibition of all neutrophils will affect with both these functions. To obviate this concern, we took advantage of neutrophil heterogeneity to change the toxic subset of neutrophils while preserving the neutrophils essential for tissue-homeostasis. Earlier reports demonstarted a phenotypic and functional profile of tissue-toxic ANPhigh neutrophils that exist side by side with antimicrobial ANPlow neutrophils (33). Neutrophil recruitment in acute inflammation is mediated largely by the β2-integrin family of receptors, with Mac-1 (αMβ2, CD11b/CD18) and LFA-1 (αLβ2, CD11a/CD18) being the chief among them (44). The Syk tyrosine kinase is essential in CD18 integrin signaling in neutrophils (42, 43). Syk functions in both ANPhigh and ANPlow neutrophils. IR injury caused acute inflammation with a substantial portion of ANP-endocytosing (ANPhigh) neutrophils. Inhibition of “outside-in” signals generated by engagement of β2-integrin in the subset of ANPhigh with piceatannol reduced overall myocardial inflammation and rebalanced the ratio of neutrophils to monocytes and macrophages in the myocardium of treated mice. Similarly, piceatannol delivered to infiltrating neutrophils in a mouse model of acute ischemic stroke was associated with decreased stroke size (66, 67). The clinical use of Syk-inhibitors in the course of sterile cardiac inflammation is thus potentially therapeutic when it can be restricted to the tissue toxic neutrophil subsets.
Experimentally, heterogeneous chemokine receptor expression was used to delineate a subset of aged neutrophils (68), and a subset of aged neutrophils in the circulation was detrimental to myocardial tissues after vascular ischemia and reperfusion (69). Cardiac damage, as measured by infarct size, varied diurnally (69), a finding that was attributed to circadian changes in the armamentarium of neutrophils (70). Since the mice in the present study were of the same age and genotype we cannot ascribe differences in neutrophil function to these factors. Protection from myocardial injury could also be achieved by pharmacological targeting of a member of the Src family of protein tyrosine kinases, Fgr, or by using of Fgr gene-deficient mice (71). In the latter study it was claimed that cardiac protection depended on targeting of Fgr specifically in neutrophils (71). It should be noted that Fgr is significantly higher expressed in activated ANPhigh than in ANPlow neutrophils (33), thus we cannot rule out the role of Fgr in the observed protection.
Clinically, cardiomyocyte-protective strategies aimed at preventing cardiomyocyte death have produced mixed results (72, 73). A large randomized clinical study completed a decade ago (the CIRCUS trial) could not confirm earlier findings (74) on the cardioprotective effects of cyclosporine administered to patients with acute myocardial infarction before percutaneous coronary intervention (75). Activation of sphingosine receptors induced cardioprotection both in vitro and in vivo (76), but clinical efficacy of the sphingosine-1-phosphate mimetic drug fingolimod (FTY720) was not demonstrated (76). A clinical study demonstrated that brief cycles of non-lethal ischemia and reperfusion applied to the upper arm down-regulated the expression of kinin B1 and B2 receptors in neutrophils of patients undergoing cardiac surgery (3, 77), possibly reducing cardiac neutrophilic inflammation. Preconditioning, postconditioning, and remote conditioning of the myocardium enhanced the ability of the heart to withstand IR insults (78, 79), but large multicentered randomized studies confirming or refuting these findings on clinical outcomes are still missing (80, 81). Drugs that enhance nitric oxide (NO) release (e.g., statins, calcium antagonists, ACE-inhibitors, dexamethasone), NO, or NO donors had to be administered prior to ischemia to protect the myocardium against IR injury (82, 83), making their clinical use problematic.
The innovation of the nanotherapeutic approach as described is that it preserves the beneficial effects of neutrophils and other innate inflammatory cells in protecting myocardial integrity in the immediate aftermath of MI (Fig. 7). Successful therapies targeting post-ischemia-reperfusion cardiovascular inflammation will require precision and specificity. Our results warrant clinical studies that may identify human neutrophil subsets of similar phenotype and function to those we identified in mice. This study reveals that neutrophils with tissue-toxic potential contribute significantly to cardiac IR injury because targeting the inflammatory Syk pathway specifically in these cells mitigates the myocardial damage caused by IR.
Methods
Preparation of albumin nanoparticles (ANP and PANP).
Human serum albumin (HSA, MW 66,500 Da) was purchased from Akron Biotech and purified by acetone and 0.2μm filter. Glutaraldehyde (25% in water) was bought from Sigma Aldrich. HSA concentration was measured using the Coomassie (Bradford) Protein Assay Kit (Fisher Scientific). ANP were prepared following a desolvation technique, in a modification of an earlier technique (32). Purified HSA was diluted to 20mg/mL with endotoxin free water. The HSA solution (1mL) was transformed into nanoparticles with addition of pure ethanol (3.5mL) over ten minutes while stirring at room temperature and stabilized by the addition of 38μL glutaraldehyde left to stir for a minimum of 4 hours. ANP were collected by centrifugation (15,000 g, 20min, 4°C.) and washed three times by resuspension in endotoxin free water (1mL). After the third wash, the pellet was resuspended in high concentration (~ 20g/mL) and stored at 4°C prior to formulation for experiments. For PANPs piceatannol (5mg) was dissolved in DMSO (50μL) by strong agitation, which was then added to the HSA solution (20mg HSA, 1mL endotoxin free water). The mixture was left stirring to incubate for a minimum of 1 hour, allowing the piceatannol to interact with the solubilized HSA. The mixture remained covered in foil to prevent UV degradation of piceatannol. After 1h, the synthesis continued following the ANP with the addition of ethanol and glutaraldehyde. Loading efficiency was measured via extraction followed by LCMS (Alliance 2795 HPLC, Quattro micro API triple quad (QQQ) mass spectrometer, Waters, Milford, MA, USA.). Extraction was carried with acetonitrile using an internal standard working solution (custom synthesized trans-Piceatannol-d3, 10mg/mL, 20μL). Piceatannol (98%) was purchased from MuseChem and trans-Piceatannol-d3 was custom synthesized by Toronto Research Chemicals Inc. The endotoxin content of prepared nanoparticles was measured using a Genscript ToxinSensor Chromogenic LAL Endotoxin Assay Kit. Endotoxin content was found to be 0.109 Eu/mL for infused nanoparticle formulations at a nanoparticle concentration of 2mg/mL. Alexa-647 (NHS ester), acetone (ACS Grade), ethanol (200 proof), water for injection (WFI), endotoxin free water (HyClone), and phosphate buffered saline (PBS, 1x, without magnesium or calcium) was purchased from Fisher Scientific. Alexa-647 (25μg) was dissolved in DMSO (10μL). Then, the Alexa-647 solution was added to the HSA-piceatannol solution and incubated for one hour. The synthesis then proceeded as before with the addition of ethanol. Any unloaded dye was washed out of the product during the three consecutive washes at the end of the procedure. PANP were characterized by determining size, polydispersity index (PDI), and surface charge as zeta potential. Size and PDI were measured via dynamic light scattering using a Zetasizer (ZS, Malvern Industries, Worcestershire, UK.). First, the sample was diluted with 0.2μm filtered water (1mL). Then, a disposable cuvette was filled with 0.2μm filtered water (1mL). Next, seven drops of sample were added, and the cuvette was shaken lightly to mix. Finally, the cuvette was placed in the Zetasizer and measured. Zeta potential was measured by laser Doppler micro electrophoresis using a Zetasizer. The previous sample was diluted with 0.2μm filtered water (1mL). The sample was then added to a disposable folded capillary cell and measured. Size was verified via nanoparticle tracking analysis using a Nanosight (NS3000, Malvern Industries, Worchestershire, UK.) The sample was first diluted 100,000x with 0.2μm filtered water. Then the sample was injected into the Nanosight via syringe pump and read at 500nm to obtain a video and analyzed to give particle size distribution.
Mice.
We used C57BL/6 male mice, body weight 25 to 28g. Procedures were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of University of Illinois, Chicago. Anesthesia was introduced with 1.5–3% isoflurane inhalation in a closed glass chamber and Etomidate (10 mg/kg body weight IP). Mice were orally intubated with a 18G angiocath sleeve and artificially ventilated with a rodent respirator (tidal volume 0.2–0.3ml (based on body weight), rate 135 strokes/min). Surgical anesthesia was maintained using 1% isoflurane delivered through a vaporizer with air connected in series to rodent ventilator. A dose of buprenorphine sustained release (1.0 mg/kg, s.c.) was administered pre-operatively for long term analgesia.
Flow Cytometry.
Single cell suspensions were prepared as described (84, 85). Cells were stained for 30 min on ice. Dead cells were excluded by F-SC, S-SC. Neutrophils were gated by Ly6Ghi S-SChi. Antibodies as listed ere used. Isotype-matched Abs to irrelevant epitopes were used as negative controls. Isolated Ly6G+ peripheral blood or heart cells were sorted into nanoparticle-endocytosing or -non-endocytosing cells according to their nanoparticle-specific fluorescence using a MoFlo Astrios cell sorter. Reagents used for flow cytometry:
| Ab to | Clone | Source |
|---|---|---|
| CD45 | 30-F11 | Biolegend |
| Ly6G | 1A8 | Biolegend |
| CD31 | 390 | Biolegend |
| CD11b | M1/70 | Invitrogen |
| CD11c | N418 | Biolegend |
| CD16 | 2.4G2 | Biolegend |
| LY6C | HK1.4 | Biolegend |
| CD64 | X54–5/7.1 | Biolegend |
| F4/80 | BM8 | Invitrogen |
| MHC11 | M5/114.15.2 | Biolegend |
| MERTK | 2B10C42 | Biolegend |
| CD206 | C068C2 | Biolegend |
|
Viability dye Zombie Aqua |
Biolegend |
Myocardial infarction and ischemia reperfusion injury (IR injury) and nanoparticle administration.
Fully anesthetized mice were intubated and kept at a controlled temperature of 37°C throughout the experiment. Mice were subjected to 1h occlusion of the left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery followed by reperfusion. Thoracotomy was performed by 1 cm incision 1 mm to the left from a midline between the 2nd and 4th rib in layers. The LAD was ligated with 8 − 0 prolene suture 2 mm below the ostium. The effectiveness of the occlusion was verified by whitening of the ventricle distal of the ligation. The chest cavity was closed with 6 − 0 suture for 45 minutes and then reopened and the arterial ligation was removed. The chest cavity was closed with the 6 − 0 silk sutures. The skin was closed by 6 − 0 Polypropylene monofilament suture. The thorax was drained with PE-10 cannula inserted into incision upon closure. The tube was then removed, and suture completed. Post-operative analgesia was given peri-operatively with one dose of 1.0 mg/kg of buprenorphine sustained release SC. Mice were treated with PANP and ANP vehicle. HSA or BSA nanoparticle preparations were used interchangeably because we observed was no difference in efficacy or safety between preparations. Administration of drug was via tail vein or retroorbital injection at 1 after the removal of the ligation from the LAD with ANP or PANP (20 mg/kg PANP, delivering 0.03 mg/kg piceatannol). Wellbeing of mice was monitored over the course of the experiments.
Evaluation of myocardial function and pathology.
For quantification of infarct size, we re-anaesthetized and re-intubated the mice, and re-occluded the LAD coronary by ligating the suture in the same position as the original infarction. Then, animals were euthanized and 1 ml of 1% Evans Blue dye (Sigma) was infused IV to delineate the area at risk (AAR: myocardium lacking blood flow, that is, negative for blue dye staining). To delineate the infarcted (necrotic) myocardium, slices were incubated in triphenyltetrazolium chloride (TTC, Sigma) at 37°C for 15 min. The slices were then re-photographed, weighed, and regions negative for Evans Blue staining (AAR) and for TTC (infarcted myocardium) were quantified. Percentage values for AAR and infarcted myocardium were corrected to mg independently for each slice. Absolute AAR and infarct size were determined as the mg:mg ratio of AAR:LV and infarcted myocardium:AAR, respectively) (86). Outcome assessment was performed blind to treatment. Troponin I (cTnI) and IL-1β concentrations were measured using commercial ELISA assay kits according to the manufacturers’ instructions.
Echocardiography.
Animals are placed on a heated platform and kept at a controlled temperature of 37°C throughout monitoring (VisualSonics, Inc.) where ECG (lead II), heart rate, respiratory waveform and respiratory rate are monitored and displayed on the ultrasound’s CPU display. Nair depilatory cream was used to remove the hair in the vicinity of the chest. Prewarmed (37° C) acoustic coupling gel was then applied to the chest and the ultrasound probe used to obtain recordings. We measured cardiac function before 24h post occlusion. Mice were anesthetized by 3.5% isoflurane and placed a heated platform (VisualSonics, Inc.). Three views were recorded with the sample volume in the proper modes (B-mode, M-mode, pulsed Doppler or tissue Doppler): 1. The parasternal long axis [B-mode and/or M-mode]; 2. The parasternal short axis [M-mode was taken at the papillary level followed by tissue Doppler of the myocardium]; and 3. Apical view [pulsed Doppler of the mitral flow]. Pressure-Volume Loop analyses of Left Ventricle: under the same anesthetic regiment as for the MI procedure, a 1.4 French pressure-conductance catheter (SPR-839, Millar Instruments, Houston TX) was inserted into the right carotid artery to measure baseline arterial pressure, then advanced retrograde into the LV to record baseline hemodynamics in the closed chest configuration with the ARIA Pressure Volume Conductance System (Millar Instruments, Houston, TX). All data were analyzed with the PVAN 3.4 software package from Millar Instruments (Houston, TX).
Histological analysis.
For histological analysis of Hearts from control mice and MIRI mice treated with PBS, ANP and PANP were fixed using 10% buffered formaldehyde and processed for paraffin section. The histological sectioning and staining for Hematoxylin & Eosin, Trichome staining and Tunel staining were done with the help of Research Histology Core (RHC), University of Illinois, Chicago. The quantification was done using ImageJ software. Further, the Aperio Image Scope system (Leica) was used to digitize histology slides and quantification.
Statistical analysis.
Data were analyzed for statistical probabilities of differences using Graph Pad Prism 8 software. Continuous variables were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD) after normal distribution approximation was confirmed, and categorical variables as count and percentage. Continuous variables were compared among study groups with student’s t-tests followed by Scheffe’s adjustment for multiple comparisons. ANOVA test was carried out for an omnibus comparison among the four groups followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test in GraphPad Prism. For the comparison of categorical variables, Fisher’s exact test was used. A p value of < 0.05 was regarded as statistically significant.
Supplementary Material
Supplementary Files
This is a list of supplementary files associated with this preprint. Click to download.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors thank Zhigang Hong, Patricia Bucko and Jiwang Chen for technical assistance, Prasad Kanteti and Jalees Rehman for critical discussions.
FUNDING SUPPORT AND AUTHOR DISCLOSURES
Funding from the US National Institutes of Health (T32 HL007829, R41HL118896, R41HL126456, R42HL126456, R01HL149300), and the University of Illinois Chicago (DPI grant). The authors have no other relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.
Funding Statement
Funding from the US National Institutes of Health (T32 HL007829, R41HL118896, R41HL126456, R42HL126456, R01HL149300), and the University of Illinois Chicago (DPI grant). The authors have no other relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.
Footnotes
Additional Declarations: There is NO Competing Interest.
Contributor Information
Abhalaxmi Singh, University of Illinois, Chicago.
Andrew Stuart, University of Illinois, Chicago.
Sreeparna Chakraborty, University of Illinois, Chicago.
Asrar Malik, Cell Biologics.
Kurt Bachmaier, University of Illinois, Chicago.
References
- 1.Anderson JL, and Morrow DA. Acute Myocardial Infarction. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(21):2053–64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Murphy E, and Steenbergen C. Mechanisms underlying acute protection from cardiac ischemia-reperfusion injury. Physiol Rev. 2008;88(2):581–609. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Heusch G. Myocardial ischaemia–reperfusion injury and cardioprotection in perspective. Nature Reviews Cardiology. 2020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Braunwald E. The treatment of acute myocardial infarction: the Past, the Present, and the Future. European Heart Journal: Acute Cardiovascular Care. 2012;1(1):9–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Khan SQ, and Ludman PF. Percutaneous coronary intervention. Medicine. 2022;50(7):437–44. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Algoet M, Janssens S, Himmelreich U, Gsell W, Pusovnik M, Van den Eynde J, et al. Myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury and the influence of inflammation. Trends in Cardiovascular Medicine. 2023;33(6):357–66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Braunwald E, and Kloner RA. Myocardial reperfusion: a double-edged sword? The Journal of clinical investigation. 1985;76(5):1713–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Fuchs A, Monlish DA, Ghosh S, Chang S-W, Bochicchio GV, Schuettpelz LG, et al. Trauma induces emergency hematopoiesis through IL-1/MyD88–dependent production of G-CSF. The Journal of Immunology. 2019;202(10):3020–32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Sreejit G, Nooti SK, Jaggers RM, Athmanathan B, Park KH, Al-Sharea A, et al. Retention of the NLRP3 Inflammasome–Primed Neutrophils in the Bone Marrow Is Essential for Myocardial Infarction–Induced Granulopoiesis. Circulation. 2022;145(1):31–44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Sreejit G, Abdel-Latif A, Athmanathan B, Annabathula R, Dhyani A, Noothi SK, et al. Neutrophil-Derived S100A8/A9 Amplify Granulopoiesis After Myocardial Infarction. Circulation. 2020;141(13):1080–94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Jahandideh B, Derakhshani M, Abbaszadeh H, Movassaghpour AA, Mehdizadeh A, Talebi M, et al. The pro-Inflammatory cytokines effects on mobilization, self-renewal and differentiation of hematopoietic stem cells. Human Immunology. 2020;81(5):206–17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Zuurbier CJ, Abbate A, Cabrera-Fuentes HA, Cohen MV, Collino M, De Kleijn DP, et al. Innate immunity as a target for acute cardioprotection. Cardiovasc Res. 2019;115(7):1131–42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Winterbourn CC, Kettle AJ, and Hampton MB. Reactive oxygen species and neutrophil function. Annual review of biochemistry. 2016;85:765–92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Winterbourn CC. Biological reactivity and biomarkers of the neutrophil oxidant, hypochlorous acid. Toxicology. 2002;181:223–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Werns SW, and Lucchesi BR. Myocardial ischemia and reperfusion: the role of oxygen radicals in tissue injury. Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy. 1989;2(6):761–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Vinten-Johansen J. Involvement of neutrophils in the pathogenesis of lethal myocardial reperfusion injury. Cardiovasc Res. 2004;61(3):481–97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Thackeray James T, Derlin T, Haghikia A, Napp LC, Wang Y, Ross Tobias L, et al. Molecular Imaging of the Chemokine Receptor CXCR4 After Acute Myocardial Infarction. JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging. 2015;8(12):1417–26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Daseke MJ, Valerio FM, Kalusche WJ, Ma Y, DeLeon-Pennell KY, and Lindsey ML. Neutrophil proteome shifts over the myocardial infarction time continuum. Basic research in cardiology. 2019;114:1–13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Rezkalla SH, and Kloner RA. No-Reflow Phenomenon. Circulation. 2002;105(5):656–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Harlan JM, and Winn RK. Leukocyte-endothelial interactions: clinical trials of anti-adhesion therapy. Critical care medicine. 2002;30(5):S214–S9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Baran KW, Nguyen M, McKendall GR, Lambrew CT, Dykstra G, Palmeri ST, et al. Double-blind, randomized trial of an anti-CD18 antibody in conjunction with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator for acute myocardial infarction: limitation of myocardial infarction following thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction (LIMIT AMI) study. Circulation. 2001;104(23):2778–83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Faxon DP, Gibbons RJ, Chronos NA, Gurbel PA, Sheehan F, and Investigators H-M. The effect of blockade of the CD11/CD18 integrin receptor on infarct size in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with direct angioplasty: the results of the HALT-MI study. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2002;40(7):1199–204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Andreadou I, Cabrera-Fuentes HA, Devaux Y, Frangogiannis NG, Frantz S, Guzik T, et al. Immune cells as targets for cardioprotection: new players and novel therapeutic opportunities. Cardiovasc Res. 2019;115(7):1117–30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Horckmans M, Ring L, Duchene J, Santovito D, Schloss MJ, Drechsler M, et al. Neutrophils orchestrate post-myocardial infarction healing by polarizing macrophages towards a reparative phenotype. Eur Heart J. 2017;38(3):187–97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Ma Y. Role of Neutrophils in Cardiac Injury and Repair Following Myocardial Infarction. Cells. 2021;10(7). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Sreejit G, Johnson J, Jaggers RM, Dahdah A, Murphy AJ, Hanssen NMJ, et al. Neutrophils in cardiovascular disease: warmongers, peacemakers, or both? Cardiovasc Res. 2022;118(12):2596–609. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Zhang N, Aiyasiding X, Li W-j, Liao H-h, and Tang Q-z. Neutrophil degranulation and myocardial infarction. Cell Communication and Signaling. 2022;20(1):50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Puhl S-L, and Steffens S. Neutrophils in Post-myocardial Infarction Inflammation: Damage vs. Resolution? Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine. 2019;6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Zang X, Zhou J, Zhang X, Han Y, and Chen X. Ischemia Reperfusion Injury: Opportunities for Nanoparticles. ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering. 2020;6(12):6528–39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Palomino-Segura M, Sicilia J, Ballesteros I, and Hidalgo A. Strategies of neutrophil diversification. Nature Immunology. 2023;24(4):575–84. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Khoyratty TE, Ai Z, Ballesteros I, Eames HL, Mathie S, Martín-Salamanca S, et al. Distinct transcription factor networks control neutrophil-driven inflammation. Nature Immunology. 2021;22(9):1093–106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Wang Z, Li J, Cho J, and Malik AB. Prevention of vascular inflammation by nanoparticle targeting of adherent neutrophils. Nat Nano. 2014;9(3):204–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Bachmaier K, Stuart A, Singh A, Mukhopadhyay A, Chakraborty S, Hong Z, et al. Albumin Nanoparticle Endocytosing Subset of Neutrophils for Precision Therapeutic Targeting of Inflammatory Tissue Injury. ACS Nano. 2022;16(3):4084–101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Maishan M, Stuart A, Bachmaier K, Matsumoto S, Taenaka H, Singh A, et al. Engineered Albumin Nanoparticles Targeting Inflammatory Neutrophils in Human Lungs Mitigate Endotoxemia-Induced Lung Injury. ACS Applied Nano Materials. 2024;7(1):92–101. [Google Scholar]
- 35.Hansen PR. Role of Neutrophils in Myocardial Ischemia and Reperfusion. Circulation. 1995;91(6):1872–85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Kong F, Mehwish N, and Lee BH. Emerging albumin hydrogels as personalized biomaterials. Acta Biomaterialia. 2023;157:67–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Desai N. Challenges in Development of Nanoparticle-Based Therapeutics. The AAPS journal. 2012;14:282–95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Lindsey ML, Bolli R, Canty JM Jr., Du XJ, Frangogiannis NG, Frantz S, et al. Guidelines for experimental models of myocardial ischemia and infarction. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2018;314(4):H812–h38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Ma Y, Yabluchanskiy A, Iyer RP, Cannon PL, Flynn ER, Jung M, et al. Temporal neutrophil polarization following myocardial infarction. Cardiovasc Res. 2016;110(1):51–61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Reichel CA, Rehberg M, Lerchenberger M, Berberich N, Bihari P, Khandoga AG, et al. Ccl2 and Ccl3 mediate neutrophil recruitment via induction of protein synthesis and generation of lipid mediators. Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology. 2009;29(11):1787–93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Mócsai A, Ruland J, and Tybulewicz VL. The SYK tyrosine kinase: a crucial player in diverse biological functions. Nat Rev Immunol. 2010;10(6):387–402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Mócsai A, Ruland J, and Tybulewicz VLJ. The SYK tyrosine kinase: a crucial player in diverse biological functions. Nature Reviews Immunology. 2010;10(6):387–402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Mocsai A, Zhou MJ, Meng FY, Tybulewicz VL, and Lowell CA. Syk is required for integrin signaling in neutrophils. Immunity. 2002;16(4):547–58. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Legate KR, Wickström SA, and Fässler R. Genetic and cell biological analysis of integrin outside-in signaling. Genes & development. 2009;23(4):397–418. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Callaway JB, Smith SA, McKinnon KP, de Silva AM, Crowe JE Jr., and Ting JP. Spleen Tyrosine Kinase (Syk) Mediates IL-1β Induction by Primary Human Monocytes during Antibody-enhanced Dengue Virus Infection. J Biol Chem. 2015;290(28):17306–20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Hoogenboezem EN, and Duvall CL. Harnessing albumin as a carrier for cancer therapies. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2018;130:73–89. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Bunschoten A, Buckle T, Kuil J, Luker GD, Luker KE, Nieweg OE, et al. Targeted non-covalent self-assembled nanoparticles based on human serum albumin. Biomaterials. 2012;33(3):867–75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Yang F, Zhang Y, and Liang H. Interactive association of drugs binding to human serum albumin. Int J Mol Sci. 2014;15(3):3580–95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Toldo S, Mauro AG, Cutter Z, and Abbate A. Inflammasome, pyroptosis, and cytokines in myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2018;315(6):H1553–h68. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Swanson KV, Deng M, and Ting JP-Y. The NLRP3 inflammasome: molecular activation and regulation to therapeutics. Nature Reviews Immunology. 2019;19(8):477–89. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Brough D, and Rothwell NJ. Caspase-1-dependent processing of pro-interleukin-1β is cytosolic and precedes cell death. J Cell Sci. 2007;120(5):772–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Bøtker HE, Hausenloy D, Andreadou I, Antonucci S, Boengler K, Davidson SM, et al. Practical guidelines for rigor and reproducibility in preclinical and clinical studies on cardioprotection. Basic research in cardiology. 2018;113:1–73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Bachmaier K, Mair J, Offner F, Pummerer C, and Neu N. Serum Cardiac Troponin-T and Creatine Kinase-Mb Elevations in Murine Autoimmune Myocarditis. Circulation. 1995;92(7):1927–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Scarabelli TM, Knight RA, Rayment NB, Cooper TJ, Stephanou A, Brar BK, et al. Quantitative assessment of cardiac myocyte apoptosis in tissue sections using the fluorescence-based tunel technique enhanced with counterstains. J Immunol Methods. 1999;228(1–2):23–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Kolaczkowska E, and Kubes P. Neutrophil recruitment and function in health and inflammation. Nature Reviews Immunology. 2013;13(3):159–75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Evrard M, Kwok IWH, Chong SZ, Teng KWW, Becht E, Chen J, et al. Developmental Analysis of Bone Marrow Neutrophils Reveals Populations Specialized in Expansion, Trafficking, and Effector Functions. Immunity. 2018;48(2):364–79.e8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Braunersreuther V, Pellieux C, Pelli G, Burger F, Steffens S, Montessuit C, et al. Chemokine CCL5/RANTES inhibition reduces myocardial reperfusion injury in atherosclerotic mice. Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology. 2010;48(4):789–98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Montecucco F, Braunersreuther V, Lenglet S, Delattre BMA, Pelli G, Buatois V, et al. CC chemokine CCL5 plays a central role impacting infarct size and post-infarction heart failure in mice. European Heart Journal. 2012;33(15):1964–74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Hausenloy DJ, and Yellon DM. Myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury: a neglected therapeutic target. The Journal of Clinical Investigation. 2013;123(1):92–100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Heywood SE, Richart AL, Henstridge DC, Alt K, Kiriazis H, Zammit C, et al. High-density lipoprotein delivered after myocardial infarction increases cardiac glucose uptake and function in mice. Science Translational Medicine. 2017;9(411):eaam6084. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Richart AL, Reddy M, Khalaji M, Natoli AL, Heywood SE, Siebel AL, et al. Apo AI Nanoparticles Delivered Post Myocardial Infarction Moderate Inflammation. Circ Res. 2020;127(11):1422–36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.de Oliveira S, Rosowski EE, and Huttenlocher A. Neutrophil migration in infection and wound repair: going forward in reverse. Nat Rev Immunol. 2016;16(6):378–91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Maas RR, Soukup K, Fournier N, Massara M, Galland S, Kornete M, et al. The local microenvironment drives activation of neutrophils in human brain tumors. Cell. 2023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.He WF, Yan LF, Hu DX, Hao JL, Liou YC, and Luo GX. Neutrophil heterogeneity and plasticity: unveiling the multifaceted roles in health and disease. Medcomm. 2025;6(2). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Ma Y. Role of neutrophils in cardiac injury and repair following myocardial infarction. Cells. 2021;10(7):1676. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Tang C, Wang C, Zhang Y, Xue L, Li Y, Ju C, et al. Recognition, Intervention, and Monitoring of Neutrophils in Acute Ischemic Stroke. Nano Letters. 2019;19(7):4470–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Zhang CY, Dong X, Gao J, Lin W, Liu Z, and Wang Z. Nanoparticle-induced neutrophil apoptosis increases survival in sepsis and alleviates neurological damage in stroke. Science Advances. 2019;5(11):eaax7964. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Zhang D, Chen G, Manwani D, Mortha A, Xu C, Faith JJ, et al. Neutrophil ageing is regulated by the microbiome. Nature. 2015;525(7570):528–32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Adrover JM, del Fresno C, Crainiciuc G, Cuartero MI, Casanova-Acebes M, Weiss LA, et al. A Neutrophil Timer Coordinates Immune Defense and Vascular Protection. Immunity. 2019;50(2):390–402.e10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Adrover JM, Aroca-Crevillén A, Crainiciuc G, Ostos F, Rojas-Vega Y, Rubio-Ponce A, et al. Programmed ‘disarming’ of the neutrophil proteome reduces the magnitude of inflammation. Nature Immunology. 2020;21(2):135–44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Crainiciuc G, Palomino-Segura M, Molina-Moreno M, Sicilia J, Aragones DG, Li JLY, et al. Behavioural immune landscapes of inflammation. Nature. 2022;601(7893):415–21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Singhal NS, Sun C-H, Lee EM, and Ma DK. Resilience to Injury: A New Approach to Neuroprotection? Neurotherapeutics. 2020;17(2):457–74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Pang A, Cheng N, Cui Y, Bai Y, Hong Z, Delaney MK, et al. High-loading Gα13-binding EXE peptide nanoparticles prevent thrombosis and protect mice from cardiac ischemia/reperfusion injury. Science Translational Medicine. 2020;12(552):eaaz7287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Piot C, Croisille P, Staat P, Thibault H, Rioufol G, Mewton N, et al. Effect of Cyclosporine on Reperfusion Injury in Acute Myocardial Infarction. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(5):473–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Cung T-T, Morel O, Cayla G, Rioufol G, Garcia-Dorado D, Angoulvant D, et al. Cyclosporine before PCI in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(11):1021–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Cartier A, and Hla T. Sphingosine 1-phosphate: Lipid signaling in pathology and therapy. Science. 2019;366(6463):eaar5551. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Saxena P, Aggarwal S, Misso NL, Passage J, Newman MA, Thompson PJ, et al. Remote ischaemic preconditioning down-regulates kinin receptor expression in neutrophils of patients undergoing heart surgery. Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery. 2013;17(4):653–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Ibáñez B, Heusch G, Ovize M, and Van de Werf F. Evolving Therapies for Myocardial Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2015;65(14):1454–71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Zhao T, Wu W, Sui L, Huang Q, Nan Y, Liu J, et al. Reactive oxygen species-based nanomaterials for the treatment of myocardial ischemia reperfusion injuries. Bioactive Materials. 2022;7:47–72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Hausenloy DJ, and Yellon DM. Preconditioning and postconditioning: underlying mechanisms and clinical application. Atherosclerosis. 2009;204(2):334–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Buske M, Desch S, Heusch G, Rassaf T, Eitel I, Thiele H, et al. Reperfusion Injury: How Can We Reduce It by Pre-, Per-, and Postconditioning. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2024;13(1). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Stühlinger MC, Conci E, Haubner BJ, Stocker EM, Schwaighofer J, Cooke JP, et al. Asymmetric dimethyl L-arginine (ADMA) is a critical regulator of myocardial reperfusion injury. Cardiovasc Res. 2007;75(2):417–25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Lefer AM, and Lefer DJ. The role of nitric oxide and cell adhesion molecules on the microcirculation in ischaemia-reperfusion. Cardiovasc Res. 1996;32(4):743–51. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Bachmaier K, Toya S, Gao XP, Triantafillou T, Garrean S, Park GY, et al. E3 ubiquitin ligase Cblb regulates the acute inflammatory response underlying lung injury. Nature Medicine. 2007;13(8):920–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Bachmaier K, Neu N, de la Maza LM, Pal S, Hessel A, and Penninger JM. Chlamydia infections and heart disease linked through antigenic mimicry. Science. 1999;283(5406):1335–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Redfors B, Shao Y, and Omerovic E. Myocardial infarct size and area at risk assessment in mice. Exp Clin Cardiol. 2012;17(4):268–72. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]




