Abstract
In order to correctly evaluate a test, at least four attributes should be measured: namely, sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and precision. Sensitivity is the proportion of diseased animals which are correctly identified, whereas specificity is the proportion of healthy animals which are correctly identified. These two attributes are important, not only because of the reasons implied by their definition but because they influence both the apparent prevalence of disease and proportion of test-positive animals which are actually diseased. The ability of a test to give a true measurement of the substance being measured, its accuracy, and its ability to give consistent results on the same sample, its precision, are good measures of quality control. Both these attributes influence the sensitivity and specificity of the test. Inaccuracies and inconsistencies arise from the test itself, the technician and the nature of the sample being tested.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Davies G. The Rose Bengal test. Vet Rec. 1971 Apr 24;88(17):447–449. doi: 10.1136/vr.88.17.447. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Katz M. A. A probability graph describing the predictive value of a highly sensitive diagnostic test. N Engl J Med. 1974 Nov 21;291(21):1115–1116. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197411212912106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- May D. Error rates in cervical cytological screening tests. Br J Cancer. 1974 Feb;29(2):106–113. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1974.46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Morgan W. J., Richards R. A. The diagnosis, control and eradication of bovine brucellosis in Great Britain. Vet Rec. 1974 Jun 1;94(22):510–517. doi: 10.1136/vr.94.22.510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nicoletti P. Further evaluations of serologic test procedures used to diagnose brucellosis. Am J Vet Res. 1969 Oct;30(10):1811–1816. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Reif J. S., Rhodes W. H., Cohen D. Canine pulmonary disease and the urban environment. I. The validity of radiographic examination for estimating the prevalence of pulmonary disease. Arch Environ Health. 1970 Jun;20(6):676–683. doi: 10.1080/00039896.1970.10665643. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stewart G. T. Letter: Predictive value of laboratory tests. Lancet. 1974 Oct 26;2(7887):1010–1010. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(74)92099-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vecchio T. J. Predictive value of a single diagnostic test in unselected populations. N Engl J Med. 1966 May 26;274(21):1171–1173. doi: 10.1056/NEJM196605262742104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]